Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
com
Abstract
Since the 1980s, the titanium alloys show attractive properties for biomedical applications where the most important factors are, firstly, biocompatibility, corrosion and mechanical resistances, low modulus of elasticity, very good strength to weight ratio, reasonable formability and
osseointegration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different heat treatments; furnace cooling and water quenching, on
the general electrochemical corrosion resistance of Ti35 wt%Nb alloy samples immersed in a 0.9% NaCl (0.15 mol L1 ) solution at 25 C and
neutral pH range. The samples were obtained using a non-consumable tungsten electrode furnace with a water-cooled copper hearth under argon
atmosphere. The microstructural pattern was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). In order to
evaluate the electrochemical corrosion behavior of such TiNb alloy samples, corrosion tests were performed by using electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy (EIS) and potentiodynamic polarization curves. Analyses of an equivalent circuit have also been used to provide quantitative support
for the discussions and understanding of the corrosion behavior. It was found that water quenching provides a microstructural pattern consisting of
an alpha-martensite acicular phase which decreases the material electrochemical performance due to the stress-induced martensitic transformation.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: TiNb alloys; Biomaterials; Corrosion resistance; Microstructure; EIS diagrams
1. Introduction
Since the commercial introduction of Ti alloys in the early
1950s, these materials have in a relatively short time become
one of the backbone materials for aerospace, energy, chemical
industries, nuclear power plants and medical prostheses [1,2].
Since the 1980s, the titanium alloys are intensively applied
in the manufacturing of biomedical devices where the most
important factors are, firstly, biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, mechanical behavior and osseointegration (facility to
bone ingrowths or fixes in the metal implant with the patients
bone structure) [17]. The Ti6Al4V alloy was the first Ti alloy
registered as implant material in ASTM standards [8] and has
dominated wrought industry production. It has become a benchmark alloy against which others are compared. Its studies in vitro
Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 19 3521 3320; fax: +55 19 3289 3722.
E-mail address: wislei@fem.unicamp.br (W.R. Osorio).
0013-4686/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.011
4868
Ba
0.001
Br
0.01
K
0.005
Ca
0.005
PO4
5 ppm
Other
<2 ppm
4869
Fig. 2. Typical Ti35 wt%Nb alloy sample in: (a) furnace cooled and (b) water quenched conditions (magnification 200; etchant: Krolls).
4870
Fig. 3. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and (b) EDAX results for furnace cooled and water quenched conditions.
Fig. 4. Typical experimental data and simulated curves by using the ZView software: (a) and (b) for the furnace cooled (FC) and (c) and (d) for the water quenched
(WQ) Ti35 wt%Nb alloy samples and (e) equivalent circuit for modeling impedance data performed after 1h in a 0.9% NaCl solution.
4871
Table 2
Impedance parameters for furnace cooled and water quenched Ti35 wt%Nb alloy samples after 1 h of immersion and polarized in a 0.9% NaCl test solution
Parameters
FC
WQ
FC (polarized)
WQ (polarized)
Rel ()
ZCPE(1) (F cm2 )
ZCPE(2) (F cm2 )
n1
n2
R1 () (porous)
R2 () (barrier)
2
279.5
10.98 (0.7)
7.48 (0.4)
0.92
0.84
2.30 106
1.43 106
16 104
279.8
14.11 (0.8)
6.46 (0.3)
0.88
0.74
1.16 106
0.55 106
11 104
276.2
3.70(0.3)
1.09 (0.1)
0.94
0.78
0.73 106
3.11 106
38 104
279.4
3.45 (0.3)
1.65 (0.1)
0.92
0.69
0.98 106
2.97 106
33 104
4872
Fig. 5. Typical SEM images after polarization in a 0.9% NaCl solution and EDAX patterns.
2nd polarization cycles, as shown in Fig. 6(a) and (b). For the
WC sample the potential is slightly displaced toward less noble
values and the current density is higher when compared to the
corresponding values of the FC sample, i.e., for the FC and WQ
samples the current densities and potentials are 0.044 A/cm2
and 363 mV; and 0.050 A/cm2 and 488 mV, respectively.
A partial stabilization on the current density is observed
at about 2 108 A cm2 for both potentials of FC and WQ
Fig. 6. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of furnace cooled (FC) and water quenched (WQ) Ti35 wt%Nb alloy samples after: (a) first and (b) second polarization
cycle in a 0.9% NaCl solution.
4873
(1) Both water quenching (WQ) and furnace cooling (FC) heat
treatments of Ti35 wt%Nb alloy samples have provided a
passive film formation during corrosion tests in a 0.9% NaCl
solution, which has been observed by the very low experimental current densities. After a second polarization cycle,
the corrosion potentials for both (FC) and (WQ) samples
were displaced toward less noble conditions while the corrosion rates have decreased due to a thicker Ti oxide film
formation.
(2) The experimental EIS diagrams, potentiodynamic polarization curves and the equivalent circuit parameters have shown
that the WQ Ti35Nb alloy sample had the electrochemical
corrosion resistance decreased compared to that of the FC
sample due to stress-induced martensitic transformation.
(3) The EIS results and the equivalent circuit analysis have indicate that the protective passive films formed on both FC and
WQ Ti35Nb alloy samples are composed of a dual-layered
oxide consisting of an inner barrier layer associated to high
impedance and responsible for corrosion protection, and an
outer porous layer, of lower impedance, which apparently
facilitates the osseointegration.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support provided by
FAPESP (The Scientific Research Foundation of the State of Sao
Paulo, Brazil), FAEPEX-UNICAMP and CNPq (The Brazilian
Research Council).
References
[1] J.R. Newman, D. Eylon, J.K. Thorne, Titanium and Titanium Alloys, Metals Handbook, ASM International, Metals Park, OH, USA, 1988, p. 824.
[2] C. Eriksson, K. Ohlson, K. Richter, N. Billerdahl, M. Johansson, H. Nygren,
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 83A (2007) 1062.
[3] E.B. Taddei, V.A.R. Henriques, C.R.M. Silva, C.A.A. Cairo, Mater. Sci.
Eng. 24C (2004) 683.
[4] H.S. Kim, S.H. Lim, I.D. Yeo, W.Y. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng. 449451A (2007)
322.
[5] S.L. Assis, S. Wolynec, I. Costa, Electrochim. Acta 51 (2006) 1815.
[6] Y. Mantani, M. Tajima, Mater. Sci. Eng. 442A (2006) 409.
[7] C.R.M. Afonso, G.T. Aleixo, A.J. Ramirez, R. Caram, Mater. Sci. Eng.
27C (2007) 908913.
[8] T. Akahori, M. Niinomi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 243 (1998) 237.
[9] R.J. S Solar, Corrosion resistance of titanium surgical implant alloys: a
review, in: Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials STP 684,
American Society for Testing of Materials, 1979, p. 259.
[10] R. Karpagavalli, A. Zhou, P. Chellamuthu, K. Nguyen, J. Biomed. Mater.
Res. 83A (2007) 1087.
[11] N. Padilla, A. Bronson, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 81A (2007) 531.
[12] M.A. Khan, R.L. Williams, D.F. Williams, Biomaterials 20 (1999) 631.
[13] L.J. Xu, Y.Y. Chen, Z.G. Liu, F.T. Kong, J. Alloys Compd. 453 (2006)
320324.
[14] A. Choubey, R. Balasubramaniam, B. Basu, J. Alloys Compd. 381 (2004)
288.
[15] Y. Mantani, M. Tajima, Mater. Sci. Eng 43440A (2006) 315.
[16] R.G. Zhang, V.L. Acoff, Mater. Sci. Eng. 463A (2007) 67.
[17] N.J. Petch, J. Iron Steel Inst. 174 (1953) 25.
[18] P. Donelan, Mater. Sci. Technol. 16 (2000) 261269.
[19] P.R. Goulart, J.E. Spinelli, W.R. Osorio, A. Garcia, Mater. Sci. Eng. 421A
(2006) 245.
4874
[20] W.R. Osorio, P.R. Goulart, G.A. Santos, C. Moura Neto, A. Garcia, Metall.
Mater. Trans. 37A (2006) 2525.
[21] C.J. Boehlert, C.J. Cowen, J.P. Quast, T. Akahori, M. Niinomi, Mater. Sci.
Eng. 28 (2008) 323330.
[22] Y.H. Hon, J.Y. Wang, Y.N. Pan, Metall. Mater. Trans. 44 (2003) 2384.
[23] C.M. Lee, C.P. Ju, J.H.C. Lin, J. Oral Rehabil. 29 (2003) 314.
[24] M.F. Lopez, A. Gutierrez, J.A. Jimenez, Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 1359.
[25] Y.F. Zheng, B.L. Wang, J.G. Wang, C. Li, L.C. Zhao, Mater. Sci. Eng. 438A
(2006) 891.
[26] R.M. Bezerra, P.C.R.D. Souza, I. Ramires, M.A. Bottino, A.C. Guastaldi,
Ecl. Quim. 24 (1999) 113.
[27] I. Gurrapa, Mater. Charact. 51 (2003) 131.
[28] M. Anuwar, R. Jayaganthan, V.K. Tewari, N. Arivazhagan, Mater. Lett. 61
(2007) 1483.
[29] S. Tamilselvi, R. Murugaraj, N. Rajendran, Mater. Corrosion 58 (2007)
113.
[30] D.L. Moffat, D.C. Larbalestier, Metall. Trans. 19A (1988) 1687.
[31] W.R. Osorio, J.E. Spinelli, I.L. Ferreira, A. Garcia, Electrochim. Acta 52
(2007) 3265.
[32] J. Pan, D. Thierry, C. Leygraf, Electrochim. Acta 41 (1996) 1143.
[33] S. Gudic, J. Radosevic, M. Kliskic, Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 3009.
[34] W.R. Osorio, J.E. Spinelli, N. Cheung, A. Garcia, Mater. Sci. Eng. 420A
(2006) 179.
[35] W.R. Osorio, N. Cheung, J.E. Spinelli, P.R. Goulart, A. Garcia, J. Solid
State Electrochem. 11 (2007) 1421.
[36] W.R. Osorio, L.R. Garcia, P.R. Goulart, A. Garcia, Mater. Chem. Phys. 106
(2007) 343.
[37] W.R. Osorio, P.R. Goulart, A. Garcia, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) 365.
[38] W.R. Osorio, C.M.A. Freire, A. Garcia, J. Alloys Compd. 379 (2005)
179.
[39] D.Q. Martins, W.R. Osorio, M.E.P. Souza, R. Caram, A. Garcia, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 2809.