Sei sulla pagina 1di 623

AR 2079 EQ RESISTANT ARCHITECTURE

UNIT I
Fundamental of EQ

UNIT II
Site planning, Performance of Ground & Building

UNIT III
Seismic Design Codes and building Configuration

UNIT IV
Various Types of Construction Details

UNIT V
Urban planning and design
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

1/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

3/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

4/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

5/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

6/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

7/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

8/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

9/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

10/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

11/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

12/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

13/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

14/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

15/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

16/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

17/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

18/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

19/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

20/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

21/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

22/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

23/29

Long time ago, a large


collection of material
masses coalesced to
form the Earth. A large
amount of heat was
generated by this
fusion, and slowly as
the
Earth
cooled
down, the heavier and
denser materials sank
to the center and the
lighter ones rose to
the top.

The differentiated Earth consists of the Inner Core


(radius ~1290km), the Outer Core (thickness
~2200km), the Mantle (thickness ~2900km) and the
Crust (thickness ~5 to 40km).
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

25/23

Convection currents
develop in the
viscous Mantle due to
prevailing high
temperatures and
pressure gradients
between the Crust
and the Core

These convection currents


result in a circulation of the
earths
mass;
the
temperature
difference
causes interlayer movement.
The hot molten lava rises and
the cold rock mass sinks into
the Earth.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

26/23

The convective flow of Mantle material cause the Crust and some portion of the
Mantle, to slide on the hot molten outer core. This sliding of Earths mass takes
place in pieces called Tectonic Plates.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

27/23

Many such local circulations are taking place at different regions underneath the Earths
surface, leading to different portions of the Earth undergoing different directions of
movements along the surface.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

28/23

The Himalayas are formed due to conveyance of Indo-Australian plate


The relative movement of these plate boundaries varies across
the Earth; on average, it is of the order of a couple to tens of
centimeters per year.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

29/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

30/23

after the earthquake is over, the process of strain build-up at this modified interface
between the rocks starts all over again. This is Stage AB
This is know as
Elastic Rebound
Theory

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

31/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

32/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

33/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

34/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

35/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

36/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

37/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

38/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

39/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

40/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

41/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

42/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

43/23

Seismic Zones of India


The varying geology at different locations in the country implies
that the likelihood of damaging earthquakes taking place at
different locations is different.

Thus, a seismic zone map is required so that buildings and


other structures located in different regions can be designed to
withstand different level of ground shaking.
The seismic zone map of 1984 subdivided India into five zones
I, II, III, IV and V.

Parts of Himalayan boundary in the north and northeast, and


the Kachchh area in the west were classified as zone V.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

44/29

The seismic zone maps are revised from time to time as more
understanding is gained on the geology, the seismotectonics and
the seismic activity in the country. For instance,
Koyna earthquake of 1967 occurred in an area classified in
zone I as per map of 1966. The 1970 version of code upgraded
the area around Koyna to zone IV.
Killari (Latur) earthquake of 1993 occurred in zone I. The current
Indian seismic zone map places this area in zone III.
The zone map now has only four seismic zones II, III, IV and V.
The areas falling in seismic zone I in the 1984 map were merged
with those of seismic zone II.
Chennai now comes under seismic zone III as against zone II in
1984 map.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

45/29

The national Seismic Zone Map presents a large-scale


view of the seismic zones in the country.
Local variations in soil type and geology cannot be
represented at that scale.
Therefore, for important projects, such as a major dam
or a nuclear power plant, the seismic hazard is
evaluated specifically for that site.
Also, for the purposes of urban planning, metropolitan
areas are microzoned. Seismic microzonation accounts
for local variations in geology, local soil profile, etc.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

46/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

47/23

Measuring Instruments
The instrument that measures earthquake shaking, a
seismograph, has three components
Sensor
Recorder
Timer.
The principle: A pen attached at the tip of an oscillating
simple pendulum marks on a chart paper that is held on
a drum rotating at a constant speed.
A magnet around the string provides required damping
to control the amplitude of oscillations.
The pendulum mass, string, magnet and support
together constitute the sensor; the drum, pen and chart
paper constitute the recorder; and the motor that rotates
the drum at constant speed forms the timer.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

48/29

One such instrument is required in each of the


two orthogonal horizontal directions. Of course,
for measuring vertical oscillations, the string
pendulum is replaced with a spring pendulum
oscillating about a fulcrum.
Some instruments do not have a timer device
(i.e., the drum holding the chart paper does not
rotate). Such instruments provide only the
maximum extent (or scope) of motion during the
earthquake; for this reason they are called
seismoscopes or scratch plate accelerometers.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

49/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

50/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

51/23

The point on the fault where slip starts is the Focus


The point vertically above this on the surface of the
Earth is the Epicenter
The distance from the epicenter to any point of
interest is called epicentral distance
The depth of focus from the epicenter, called the Focal
Depth, is an important parameter in determining the
damaging potential of an earthquake.
Most damaging earthquakes have a shallow focus with
focal depths less than about 70km..
After & Before shocks More numbers

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

52/29

MedvedevSponheuerKarnik scale (USSR-Germany-Czechslovakia)

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

53/23

Intensity is a qualitative measure of the actual shaking


at a location during an earthquake, and is assigned as
Roman Capital Numerals.
Two commonly used ones are the Modified Mercalli
Intensity (MMI) Scale and the MSK Scale. Both scales
are quite similar
and range from I (least perceptive) to
.
XII (most severe).
The intensity scales are based on three features of
shaking perception by people and animals,
performance of buildings, and changes to natural
surroundings

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

54/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

55/23

Magnitude of an earthquake is a measure of its size. For


instance, one can measure the size of an earthquake by the
amount of strain energy released by the fault rupture. This
means that the magnitude of the earthquake is a single value for
a given earthquake.

Intensity is an indicator of the severity of shaking


generated at a given location. Clearly, the severity of shaking is
much higher near the epicenter than farther away. Thus, during
the same earthquake of a certain magnitude, different locations
experience different levels of intensity

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

56/29

The peak ground acceleration (PGA), i.e.,


maximum acceleration experienced by the ground
during shaking, is one way of quantifying the
severity of the ground shaking. Approximate
empirical correlations are available between the
MM intensities and the PGA that may be
experienced.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

57/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

58/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

59/23

These waves are of two types - body waves and surface waves
Body waves consist of Primary Waves (P-waves) and Secondary Waves (Swaves)
Surface waves consist of Love waves and Rayleigh waves.
Under P-waves, material particles undergo extensional and compressional
strains along direction of energy transmission.
Under S-waves, oscillate at right angles to it P Waves . S-waves are the
primary cause of damage to buildings.
Love waves cause surface motions similar to that by S-waves, but with no
vertical component.
Rayleigh wave makes a material particle oscillate in an elliptic path in the
vertical plane (with horizontal motion along direction of energy transmission).

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

60/29

P-waves are fastest, followed in sequence by S-, Love and


Rayleigh waves.
For example,
in granites,
P- and S-waves have speeds ~4.8 km/sec and ~3.0km/sec,
respectively.
S-waves do not travel through liquids.
S-waves in association with effects of Love waves cause
maximum damage to structures by their racking motion on the
surface in both vertical and horizontal direction

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

61/29

Random motion in earthquake shaking occurs in all directions; therefore buildings and
structures designed to resist earthquake shaking must have strength to withstand
shaking from any direction.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 2: Plate Tectonics & Seismic Waves

62/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

64/23

Fault
A fracture in the earth along which the opposite
sides have been relatively displaced parallel to the
plane of movement. The Earths crust breaks along
surfaces known as faults which are weak areas in
the crust along which opposite sides have been
displaced relative to each other. Faults occur when
stresses within the Earth build to a point that the
elastic properties of the rock are exceeded causing
irreversible strain or fracturing of the rock. Fault
lengths may range from a few centimeters to
hundreds of kilometers.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

65/29

Elastic rebound theory


The strain along the fault exceeds the limit of the
rocks at that point to store any additional strain. The
fault then ruptures--that is, it suddenly moves a
comparatively large distance in a comparatively
short amount of time. The rocky masses which form
the two sides of the fault then "snap" back into a new
position. This snapping back into position, upon the
release of strain, is the "elastic rebound.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

66/29

The initial rupture point of an earthquake, where strain energy is first converted to
elastic wave energy; the point within the Earth which is the center of an earthquake.
The point on the fault where slip starts is the Focus or Hypocenter

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

67/23

That point on the Earth's surface vertically above the hypocenter of an earthquake is
the Epicenter

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

68/23

earthquake depth range of 0 - 700


shallow, intermediate, and deep.

km is divided into three zones:

The depth of focus from the epicenter, called as Focal Depth

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

69/23

Distance from epicenter to any point of interest is called epicentral distance

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

70/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

71/23

Main shock believed to be the result of minor readjustments of stress at places in the
fault zone results in After shocks

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

72/23

Dip Slip Faults


There are three primary types of fault motion (1) normal, (2) reverse, and (3)
strike slip. A normal (or gravity) fault is one in which one plate slips downward
along the plane relative to the other. The angle of dip is generally 45 to 90. A
reverse fault is one in which one plate slips upward along the plane relative to
the other. The angle of dip is generally 45 or more. Along the Himalayas,
reverse faulting is occurring.
Strike Slip Faults
A strike-slip fault is one in which the movement is predominantly horizontal
and approximately parallel to the strike of the fault. Strike-slip faults can be
classified as right lateral or left lateral depending if the fault block opposite the
viewer moved right or left, respectively. The San Andreas fault in California and
the north Anatolian fault in Turkey are examples of predominant strike-slip
faults.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

73/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

74/23

Earthquake Ground Shaking


The motion of the ground can be described in terms of displacement,
velocity or acceleration. The variation of ground acceleration with time
recorded at a point on ground during an earthquake is called an
accelerogram.
They carry distinct information regarding ground shaking; peak amplitude,
duration of strong shaking, frequency content (e.g., amplitude of shaking
associated with each frequency) and energy content (i.e., energy carried by
ground shaking at each frequency) are often used to distinguish them.
Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA) is physically intuitive. For instance, a
horizontal PGA value of 0.6g (= 0.6 times the acceleration due to gravity)
suggests that the movement of the ground can cause a maximum horizontal
force on a rigid structure equal to 60% of its weight. In a rigid structure, all
points in it move with the ground by the same amount, and hence experience
the same maximum acceleration of PGA.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

75/29

Generally, the maximum amplitudes of horizontal motions in the two orthogonal


directions are about the same.

However, the maximum amplitude in the vertical direction is usually less than
that in the horizontal direction.
In design codes, the vertical design acceleration is taken as a half to two-thirds
of the horizontal design acceleration.
In contrast, the maximum horizontal and vertical ground accelerations in the
vicinity of the fault rupture do not seem to have such a correlation.

Buildings have proved capable of withstanding vertical accelerations with the


exception of horizontal cantilevers .
It is the horizontal accelerations that cause damage to buildings, and these
must be designed for.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

76/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

77/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

78/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

79/23

Liquefaction
Quick sand condition in soils is a very well known
phenomenon. An upward flow of water through a sand leads to
this effect. Soil liquefaction is also known as quick-sand
condition.
If saturated cohesionless soils, like sands are subjected to
earthquake ground motions, the resultant tendency to compact
is accompanied by an increase in the pore water pressure in soil
and a resulting movement of water from the voids.
Being lighter than soil, water is caused to flow upward to the
ground surface, where it emerges and manifests in the form of
mud spouts or sand boils. The development of high pore water
pressure due to ground vibration and the resulting upward flow
of water turns the soil into a liquefied condition. Under this Fluid
conditions, heavier buildings sink, lighter buildings rise, and
unsymmetric building tilt
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

80/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

81/23

Jelly on a plate

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

82/23

Rupture of gas lines, overturning of


stoves and heaters, and short
circuiting of electrical wires

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

83/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

84/23

Tsunamis are giant ocean waves.

The most common causes are sudden rupture or faulting of sea


bed or submarine earthquakes that shift a significant area of sea
floor upwards or downwards, displacing millions of cubic tonnes of
water.
The sudden introduction of a large amount of material into the
ocean by an erupting submarine volcano, or sudden slide down
slope of ocean-floor sediments, or a landslide into water from a
cliff or collapsing volcano, has a similar effect.

Tsunamis are relatively common in earthquake-prone regions


around Japan and along the rim of the Pacific Plate, and the word
tsunami is Japanese for port wave or harbour wave.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

85/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

86/23

Tendency to continue to remain in the previous position is known as inertia

From Newtons First Law of Motion, even though the base of the building moves with the
ground, the roof has a tendency to stay in its original position.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

87/23

Consider a building whose roof is supported on columns.


Yourself on the bus: when the bus suddenly starts, you are thrown backwards as if
someone has applied a force on the upper body.
Similarly, when the ground moves, even the building is thrown backwards, and the
roof experiences a force, called inertia force.

If the roof has a mass M and experiences an acceleration a, then from Newtons
Second Law of Motion,
Inertia force FI = M times acceleration a,
Direction is opposite to that of the acceleration.
Clearly, more mass means higher inertia force. Therefore, lighter buildings sustain
the earthquake shaking better.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

88/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

89/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

90/23

Horizontal and Vertical Shaking


Earthquakes shake the ground in all three directions along the two horizontal
directions (X and Y, say), and the vertical direction (Z, say) Also, during the
earthquake, the ground shakes randomly back and forth (- and +)

All structures are primarily designed to carry the gravity loads, The downward force
Mg is called the gravity load. The vertical acceleration during ground shaking either
adds to or subtracts from the acceleration due to gravity. Since factors of safety are
used in the design of structures to resist the gravity loads, usually most structures
tend to be adequate against vertical shaking.
However, horizontal shaking along X and Y directions (both + and directions of
each) can collapse buildings. Hence, it is necessary to ensure adequacy of the
structures against horizontal earthquake effects. Thus the strength of structure to
resist internal forces referred to as stiffness forces, in the vertical elements like
columns/walls, becomes critical in achieving the safety of the building.
Provided a building is provided with sufficient strength in each of the X and Y
directions it will cope with shaking in any direction. Therefore architects must
ensure that each building has a suitable structural system that can resist X and
Y direction horizontal loads.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

91/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

92/23

Flow of Inertia Forces to Foundations


Under horizontal shaking of the ground, horizontal inertia

forces are generated at level of the mass of the structure


(usually situated at the floor levels).
These lateral inertia forces are transferred by the floor slab to
the walls or columns, to the foundations, and finally to the soil
system underneath.

So, each of these structural elements (floor slabs, walls,


columns, and foundations) and the connections between them
must be designed to safely transfer these inertia forces through
them.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

93/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 3: Basic Terminology &


Consequences of EQ

94/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

96/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

97/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

98/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

99/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

100/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

101/23

Fundamental natural period T is an inherent property of a building. Any alterations


made to the building will change its T

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

102/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

103/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

104/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

105/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

106/23

Damping is a very important dynamic characteristic of a


building. It critically controls, i.e. reduces, the response of the
structure. Damping is a property of the building material and
the way it is combined to construct the building. Hence, the
choice of the building material is a crucial indicator of damping.
Reinforced concrete structures possess more damping than
steel structures. Damping also increases with increasing
response and damage during earthquakes.
Damping reduces the build-up of earthquake inertial forces
and reduces resonance.
We experience damping in cars which are fitted with
shock-absorbers that quickly dampen out vertical vibrations
caused when a car travels over a bump. The damping in
buildings has the same effect but is smaller in its intensity.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

107/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

108/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

109/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

110/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

111/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

112/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

113/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

114/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

115/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 4: Factors Affecting EQ Loads

116/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

118/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

119/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

120/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

121/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

122/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

123/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

124/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

125/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

126/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

127/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

128/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

129/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

130/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

131/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 5: Earthquake Load on Simple


Buildings

132/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

134/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

135/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

136/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

137/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

138/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

139/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

140/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

141/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

142/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

143/15

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002


IS 1893 is the main code that provides the seismic zone map (Figure 3) and
specifies the seismic design force. This force depends on the mass and
seismic coefficient of the structure; the latter in turn depends on properties like
seismic zone in which structure lies, importance of the structure, its stiffness,
the soil on which it rests, and its ductility. For example, a building in Bhuj will
have 2.25 times the seismic design force of an identical building in Bombay.
Similarly, the seismic coefficient for a single-storey building may be 2.5 times
that of a 15-storey building.
The revised 2002 edition, Part 1 of IS1893, contains provisions that are
general in nature and those applicable for buildings. The other four parts of IS
1893 will cover: Liquid-Retaining Tanks, both elevated and ground supported
(Part 2); Bridges and Retaining Walls (Part 3); Industrial Structures including
Stack-Like Structures (Part 4); and Dams and Embankments (Part 5). These
four documents are under preparation. In contrast, the 1984 edition of IS1893
had provisions for all the above structures in a single document.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

144/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

145/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

146/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

147/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 6: Seismic Design Philosophy & Code
Requirement

148/15

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

150/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

151/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

152/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

153/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

154/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

155/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

156/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

157/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

158/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

159/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

160/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

161/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

162/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

163/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 7:Calculation of Design EQ Loads

164/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

165/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

166/13

Two points to note


1. 80% of the mass of a
building is in its floor
slabs, floor live loads,
and
the
beams,
earthquake loads are
applied at the roof and
floor levels
2. In the case of wind
loads. However, in reality
all earthquake loads act
within the building.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

167/13

Effect of the Earthquake


Loads

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

168/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

169/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

170/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

171/13

Strength
After calculating the earthquake loads, the structural engineer analyses
the structure, usually with the help of computer software. The shear forces,
bending moments and axial loads in each member are determined, and the
required strength is provided in them.
In the case of a RC structure, members must possess enough
longitudinal and transverse reinforcing steel to resist the shear force and
bending moments due to both gravity and earthquake loads.
The strength of the building will be developed at a given amount of
sideways deflection or drift. After reaching its maximum strength members of
a ductile building will begin to yield in a ductile manner and the building will
drift with no significant gain or loss of strength.
The maximum building strength is greater than the Design strength. This
is because reinforcing steel and (hopefully) the concrete is stronger than that
specified.
2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

172/29

Columns had no ductile detailing.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

173/13

Poorly designed buildings may not collapse, but may be irreparably damaged

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

174/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

175/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

176/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 8: Vertical Distribution of Base Shear

177/13

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

179/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

180/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

181/23

Consider a well configured building comprising flat slab construction and shear walls.
Gravity loads are resisted by the slabs and columns, while horizontal loads in both the
X and Y direction, are resisted by shear walls. The flat slab-column system will not
resist any significant horizontal forces because it is much more flexible than the stiff
shear walls

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

182/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

183/23

frames to perform well during strong shaking columns must be stronger than
beams. As a rule-of-thumb, columns must be at least as deep as the beams.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

184/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

185/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

186/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

187/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

188/23

The first requirement is that the wall must be continuous from foundation to roof.
Secondly, a strong foundation system is required to resist overturning moments

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

189/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

190/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

191/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

192/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

193/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

194/23

Shear walls in
Y-direction

Y
Frame in
X-direction
X

Plan
Frame in
X and Y-directions

Plan

Figure 19

Examples of Structural System per Direction

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

195/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

196/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 9: Overview of EQ resistant Structural


Systems

197/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

199/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

201/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

202/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

203/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

204/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

205/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

206/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

207/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

208/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

209/29

Classification of Earthen
Constructions

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

211/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

212/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

214/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

215/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

216/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

217/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

218/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

219/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

220/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

222/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

223/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

224/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

225/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 10: Earthen & Stone Wall Building

226/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

228/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

229/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

230/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

231/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

232/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

233/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

234/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

235/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

236/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

237/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

238/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

239/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

240/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

241/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

242/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

243/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

244/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

245/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

246/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

248/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

249/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

250/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

251/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

252/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

253/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

254/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

255/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

257/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

258/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

259/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

260/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 11: Load Bearing Masonry Buildings

261/35

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

263/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

264/33

Components of Moment-Resisting Frames

It is good practice to make the column cross-section rectangular and deeper


so that it can possess enough bending and shear strength. Note that the frame
is effective in the direction of the plane of the frame only. The frame will not
resist any loads at right angles to its length as its columns are too weak and
there are no beams framing into the columns in that direction.
RC moment-resisting frames require special reinforcement detailing, their
members should not be too small. The minimum size of columns should be 230
mm wide by 400 deep and such small members might even be too small for a
building over two storeys high depending on the seismic zone etc.
Since small structural member sizes are not recommended, the spans of
moment-resisting frames to resist seismic loads as well as gravity loads from
floor slabs, the distance between column centre-lines should typically be in the
range from 5m to 8m. Once the span exceeds 8m the beams become quite
deep and might not allow enough clear inter-storey height.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

265/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

266/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

267/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

268/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

269/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

270/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

271/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

272/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

273/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

274/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

275/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

276/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

277/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

278/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

279/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

280/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

281/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

282/33

The Indian Standard IS:1893 (Part 1) 2002 defines two types of earthquake
load moment-resisting frames.
1. Ordinary RC moment-resisting frames for which a Response Reduction
Factor R=3.0 is specified. Then there are Special RC moment-resisting
frames, or ductile frames with a R=5.0. Special frames require a Capacity
Design Approach and special detailing to achieve the required amount of
ductility. Ordinary frames are not provided with such ductile features but
are designed stronger, in fact by 67%. In spite of their extra strength their
lack of ductility has lead to the Standard allowing their use in Seismic Zone
2 only.
2. Although in theory Special RC moment-resisting frames are ductile, in
practice it is very difficult to achieve the intentions and the requirements of the
Standard both in the design office and on the construction site. For a ductile
frame to have a high level of reliability very high design and construction quality
is necessary. If there is doubt about such quality assurance it is better to
consider using RC shear walls instead to resist seismic loads.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

283/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

284/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

285/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

286/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

287/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

288/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

289/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

290/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

291/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 13: MRF buildings

292/33

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

294/37

An unreinforced masonry structure in a high seismic hazard zone

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

295/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

296/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

297/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

298/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

299/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

300/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

301/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

302/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

303/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

304/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

305/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

306/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

307/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

308/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

309/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

310/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

311/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

312/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

313/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

314/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

315/37

All occupants in this strong-beam weak-column building were killed in the collapse

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

316/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

317/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

318/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

319/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

320/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

321/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

322/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

323/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

324/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 14: Ductility of MRFs

325/37

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

327/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

328/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

329/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

330/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

331/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

332/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

333/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

334/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

335/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

336/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

337/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

338/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

339/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

340/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

341/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

342/22

Especially for one or two-bay


frames, tension piles may
become necessary to prevent a
braced frame from overturning

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 15: Cross-Braced Frames

343/22

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

345/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

346/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

347/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

348/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

349/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

350/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

351/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

352/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

353/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

354/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

355/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

356/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

357/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

358/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

359/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

360/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

361/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

362/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

363/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

364/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

365/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 16: Floor & Roof Diaphragm

366/23

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

368/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

369/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

370/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

371/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

372/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

373/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

374/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

375/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

376/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

377/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

378/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Load Paths

379/16

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

381/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

382/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

383/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

384/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

385/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

386/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

387/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

388/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

389/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

390/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

391/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

392/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

393/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

394/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

395/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

396/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

397/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

398/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

399/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

400/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

401/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

402/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

403/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

404/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

405/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

406/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

407/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

408/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

409/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

410/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

411/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

412/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

413/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

414/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

415/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

416/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

417/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 18: Vernacular Structural Systems

418/45

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

420/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

421/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

422/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

423/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

424/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

425/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

426/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

427/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

428/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

429/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

430/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

431/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

432/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

433/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

434/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

435/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

436/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

437/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

438/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

439/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

441/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

442/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

443/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Plan Configuration

444/26

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

446/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

447/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

448/30

This is one of the most common


configuration deficiencies. It leads to
many buildings collapsing in
damaging earthquakes. Such
buildings are commonly known as
Soft-Storey Buildings.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

449/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

450/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

451/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

452/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

453/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

454/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

455/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

456/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

457/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

458/30

The Indian seismic code (IS:1893 (Part1) - 2002) mentions another approach. It states
that the frame should be 2.5 times stronger than usual, or provide a RC shear wall
whose strength is 1.5 times the forces appearing on the ground storey elements

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

459/30

Poor behaviour of short columns is due to the fact that in an earthquake, a tall
column and a short column of same cross-section move horizontally by same
amount .
However, the short column is stiffer as compared to the tall column, and it
attracts larger earthquake force. Stiffness of a column means resistance to
deformation the larger is the stiffness, larger is the force required to deform it.
If a short column is not adequately designed for such a large force, it can suffer
significant damage during an earthquake. This behaviour is called Short
Column Effect. The damage in these short columns is often in the form of Xshaped cracking as a result of brittle shear failure

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

460/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

461/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

462/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

463/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

464/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

465/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

466/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

467/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

468/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

469/30

This question is often asked by architects!


The answer goes like this:
you may have slender columns, but only if you provide another structural
system, such as RC shear walls somewhere else in plan, that will resist all
earthquake loads. This technique then frees up the slender columns to carry
gravity load only in which case they can be slender.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

470/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

471/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

472/30

In plaza type buildings, the usual solution is to separate the podium from the tower.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

473/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 17: Vertical Configuration

474/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

476/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

477/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

478/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

479/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

480/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

482/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

483/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

484/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

485/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

486/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

487/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

488/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

489/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

491/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

492/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

493/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

494/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

495/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

496/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

497/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

498/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

499/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

500/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

501/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

502/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

503/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

504/32

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 21: Masonry Infill Walls

505/32

Infill walls can be a valuable means of bracing for


low-rise buildings (no more than four storeys high,
provided they are continuous up the building, there
a plenty of infills in each principal direction and they
are reasonably symmetrically placed. However, so
often infills cause structural problems that lead to
building collapse.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

508/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

509/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

511/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

512/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

513/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

514/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

515/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

516/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

517/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

518/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

519/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

520/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

521/30

The architect should obtain the inter-storey drifts from the structural engineer and then
ensure the glazing is separated from its frames by sufficient clearances. If the
clearances required are quite large, special seismic mullions which provide
considerable clearance can be used.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

522/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

523/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

524/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

525/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

526/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

527/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

528/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

529/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

530/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

531/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

532/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

533/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

534/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

535/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 22: Non-structural Elements

536/30

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

538/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

539/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

540/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

541/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

542/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

543/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

544/14

At the level of roof of the lower building, maximum drift

= 0.02x15,000
= 300mm

Total gap required

= 2x300mm

= 600mm.
This can be reduced by 50% if floor levels are aligned, and further if the structure
is less flexible than specified by the standard.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

545/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

546/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

547/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

548/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

549/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

550/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 19: Pounding & Seismic Joints

551/14

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

553/9

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

554/9

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

555/9

Although the design of building foundations is the


responsibility of the structural engineer, who may consult a
geotechnical engineer when designing large buildings and
where difficult soil conditions exist, architects need to
understand the process and arrange sufficient funding from
the client.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

556/9

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

557/9

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

558/9

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

559/9

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 24: Cantilever, Foundation

560/9

Retrofitting is the process of structural


upgrading of an existing building to meet
seismic design standards close to or
equivalent to standards expected of new
buildings.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

562/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

563/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

564/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

565/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

566/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

567/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

568/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

569/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

570/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

571/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

573/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

574/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

575/25

Seismic isolation is a relatively recent and evolving technology. It has been in


increased use since the 1980s, and has been well evaluated and reviewed
internationally.
Base isolation has now been used in numerous buildings in countries like Italy,
Japan, New Zealand, and USA. Base isolation is also useful for retrofitting
important buildings (like hospitals and historic buildings). By now, over 1000
buildings across the world have been equipped with seismic base isolation.
In India, base isolation technique was first demonstrated after the 1993 Killari
(Maharashtra) Earthquake [EERI, 1999].
Two single storey buildings (one school building and another shopping complex
building) in newly relocated Killari town were built with rubber base isolators
resting on hard ground.
Both were brick masonry buildings with concrete roof. After the 2001 Bhuj
(Gujarat) earthquake, the four-storey Bhuj Hospital building was built with the
base isolation technique.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

576/29

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

577/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

578/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

579/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

580/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

581/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

582/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

583/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 25: Retroffiting & Base-Isolation

584/25

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

586/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

587/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

588/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

589/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

590/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

591/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

592/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

593/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

594/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

595/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

596/41

This building was pushed upwards by about 7cm during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

597/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

598/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

599/41

Steeper slopes have greater tendency to


undergo sliding failure under strong earthquake
shaking, particularly if the soil is saturated.
Steep slopes are prone to sliding in
earthquakes

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

600/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

601/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

602/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

603/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

604/41

Single column bridge supports have


been found to be extremely vulnerable
under strong earthquake shaking

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

605/41

When multi-column supports


are used, the orientation of
supports need to carefully
determined. Sudden changes
in the orientation as shown
above are not desirable

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

606/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

607/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

608/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

609/41

Pipelines carry a variety of fluids;


drinking water, sewage, gas, oil etc.
Any disruption to pipelines can have
serious consequences on a
community or even a country.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

610/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

611/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

612/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

613/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

614/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

615/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

616/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

617/41

Architects should inform their clients about the standards of earthquake design
to be adopted and possible earthquake damage scenarios. For example,
clients need to understand that compliance with Indian Code IS 1893 Criteria
for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, will not achieve a earthquake
proof building.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

619/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

620/41

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 27: Urban Planning and Professional
Communication

621/41

The seismic performance of a building will benefit greatly from timely interaction
between architect and structural engineer. A building that is poorly configured will
never perform well in a damaging earthquake. Unfortunately, many architectural
decisions, such as the placement of infill walls, can have a huge and detrimental
affect on a buildings performance. It is crucial that in the early stages of a building
design that engineer and architect discuss issues that will determine largely how
well a building will survive an earthquake.
The architect should consult a structural engineer as soon as the building
massing has been established, and well before detailed space planning is
undertaken. Early consultation will avoid re-work and unduly expensive structural
systems and detailing.
The architect should have a preliminary structural concept in his or her mind
before meeting the engineer so that the structure will be consistent and
compatible, and hopefully reinforce the architectural concept. This preliminary
structural concept will be a good basis from which to discuss structure in more
detail.
The best architectural outcome will occur when there is a high level of
cooperation and collaboration between architect and structural engineer at various
stages of the progress of the project.

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

622/29

THANK YOU

2005 NPEEE Earthquake Design Concept : Lecture 1: Impact of Earthquakes

623/29

Potrebbero piacerti anche