Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 2 June 2014
Received in revised form
23 September 2014
Accepted 26 September 2014
Available online xxx
We compared the postabdominal architecture of Mastigini with extremely long (Stenomastigus) or short
(Palaeostigus) aedeagus. A novel mode of copulation was discovered: males of Stenomastigus insert a
paramere between the female's abdomen and elytra, and the intromission is stabilized by several
structures in both sexes. The intrinsic aedeagal mechanism is indicated as responsible for inating the
endophallus, and the long agellum does not penetrate the ductus spermathecae during copulation. The
structure of the agellum suggests that it is primarily responsible for the sperm transfer. Asymmetrical
postabdominal rotators of the aedeagus were only found in Stenomastigus; they presumably facilitate the
withdrawal of the genitalia. Their origin as bunches separated from larger muscles is postulated. We
discuss a scenario in which the evolution of elongated genitalia was facilitated by the lack of structural
constraints and existing preadaptations. Benets of stabilizing the copulation and intromission are
indicated as the driving force for the evolution of extremely long aedeagi, while the short aedeagi might
have the advantage of freedom of movements facilitating the initiation of copulation by males. Disruptive
selection is suggested as a working hypothesis to further investigate mechanisms that have played a role
in the evolution of genital structures of Mastigini.
2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords:
Histology
3D reconstruction
Anatomy
Aedeagus
Mastigini
Copulation
1. Introduction
The phenomenon of the 'hyper elongation' of insect genitalia is
usually discussed in the context of specic intromittent structures
of the male reproductive system, e.g., the agellum in various
beetle families (e.g., Gack and Peschke, 2005; Matsumura et al.,
2013), the distiphallus in Tephritidae ies (Eberhard, 2005), the
processus gonopori in Lygaeidae bugs (Gschwentner and Tadler,
2000), the virga of earwigs (Kamimura, 2000, 2005), the agellum or elongated tube of Zoraptera (Mashimo et al., 2013;
Matsumura et al., 2014), and others (summarized by Matsumura
and Yoshizawa, 2012). Such elongated sclerotized structures have
various functions, from sperm transfer to removal of a rival sperm
from the female reproductive tract, and may play a role in cryptic
female choice (e.g., Rodriguez, 1995; Gschwentner and Tadler,
2000; Kamimura, 2000; S. Naomi, pers. comm). Sexual selection
* Corresponding author. Museum of Natural History, Wrocaw University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocaw, Poland.
ski).
E-mail address: scydmaenus@yahoo.com (P. Jaoszyn
mechanisms are broadly accepted to explain the genital diversication, and the evolution of enlarged and often complex intromittent organs can be attributed to post-insemination selection
processes (e.g., Eberhard, 1985; Hosken and Stockley, 2004). A
growing body of evidence shows correlations between the
observed variation in male genital morphology and insemination/
fertilization success (e.g., House and Simmons, 2003; Hotzy and
Arnqvist, 2009; Polak and Rashed, 2010). Most of the published
studies deal with behavioral and anatomical specializations associated with the elongated genitalia. Recently questions related to
storing the large genitalia in a limited space of abdomen and precise manipulations during the copulation (i.e., insertion and withdrawal) without tangling or breakage were discussed (e.g., Gack
and Peschke, 2005; Matsumura et al., 2014). Anatomical constraints may have a profound effect on the available character
change scenarios, and therefore preadaptations to evolve hyper
elongated genitalia must play an important role in the diversication of genital traits.
Despite the enormous diversity of male genital structures
(especially, in the context of this study, the aedeagi in beetles), the
function and basic mechanisms of insertion and withdrawal remain
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2014.09.006
1467-8039/ 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
extremely long agellum (Fig. 1AeC). External structures of Stenomastigus, Mastigus and Palaeostigus, three components of the
Mastigini lineage, are extremely similar and in recent phylogenetic
ski (2012d) relationships between these
reconstructions of Jaoszyn
genera remained unresolved. Only Stenomastigus and Palaeostigus
are well-dened and certainly monophyletic genera; Mastigus
shows some intermediary characters (also in the aedeagus), which
is problematic due to a large variability of the external and genital
structures, and this genus requires a comprehensive revision (dis ski, 2012a,c). Stenomastigus and Palaeostigus
cussed in Jaoszyn
differ externally only in the shape of the mesoventral intercoxal
process, the general body shape (Stenomastigus more slender and
with longer appendages) and the dorsal microsculpture (Stenomastigus with distinct microgranulation), but their aedeagi are
strikingly different. In Stenomastigus (Fig. 1A) the aedeagus is
extremely elongated and slender, with one paramere rudimentary
or missing, and the apex of the membranous inatable endophallus
located near the median region of the rigid long paramere. The
entire aedeagus is as long or even longer than the abdomen and
pterothorax together. Consequently, in some species the apical
portion of the long paramere is permanently projecting outside
from the male abdomen even in repose (Fig. 2A, arrow), while the
aedeagal base rests near the anterior margin of the mesothorax
ski, 2012a,b). In Palaeostigus (Fig. 1C), the
(Leleup, 1968; Jaoszyn
aedeagus is short and entirely contained within the abdomen
posterior to segment VIII, the short paramere is always distinct, and
the apex of endophallus is located near the apex of the long paramere or distinctly protrudes distally beyond the paramere (Leleup,
1968; Bordoni and Castellini, 1973). The signicant difference in the
length of the entire copulatory organ and the position of the
permanently everted endophallus in relation to the rigid and
immovable long paramere must have a profound effect on the
mating and copulation. However, while studying these beetles in
their natural environment and in photographs taken by participants of the 2013 South African expedition of the University of
Wrocaw, the rst author surprisingly observed that the mating
position in Palaeostigus and Stenomastigus appears identical, and
the extremely long aedeagus of the latter genus during copulation
seemed nearly entirely (except for a short basal portion) inserted
into the female abdomen (Fig. 2B). Moreover, when collecting
Stenomastigus using a beating net, males just uncoupled from females were observed with the entire aedeagus projecting from the
abdomen (Fig. 2C). These observations prompted the present study.
To understand the evolution of enlarged or variously armed male
genitalia a multidisciplinary approach is required, with morphological, behavioral and genetic studies focused on adaptive functional anatomy, structural and behavioral factors modulating the
reproductive success (male and female strategies to gain control
over the mating process; cryptic female choice; sperm competition
et cet.), the population spacial distribution, sex and genetic structure and phylogenetic reconstructions (e.g., Hosken and Stockley,
2004; Soulier-Perkins, 2002; Hotzy and Arnqvist, 2009; Richmond et al., 2012; Hotzy et al., 2012). The present study deals with
the rst of these aspects, the functional morphology of the short
(Palaeostigus) and long (Stenomastigus) aedeagus in the context of
the intromission, postabdominal architecture and endophallus
mechanics in Mastigini. To our best knowledge, no other such
closely related and morphologically similar genera so profoundly
differing in the length of the entire aedeagus (and not only in its
internal structures, as in some Chrysomelidae (Matsumura and
Yoshizawa, 2010, 2012; Matsumura et al., 2013) or Zoraptera
(Matsumura et al., 2014)) exist in the Coleoptera.
Mastigini offer a unique opportunity of a deeper insight into the
evolution of short vs. long male genitalia and closely associated
problems of the internal architecture of the abdomen as a whole
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
ski, 2012d). Above trees exemplars aedeagi in abparameral view are shown
Fig. 1. Two alternative and equally supported hypotheses of the phylogeny of Mastigitae (after Jaoszyn
ski (A), Mastigus spinicornis (Fabricius) (B), Palaeostigus micans Leleup (C); Papusus macer Casey (D); Leptomastax sp. (E),
for each genus: Stenomastigus berlinafricanus Jaoszyn
ski, Hlavac & Nomura (G); and Leptochromus agilis (Sharp) (H). Abbreviations: cp, copulatory piece; eph, permanently
Ablepton treforti Frivaldszky (F); Clidicus aliquantulus Jaoszyn
everted distal portion of endophallus; fg, agellum; pm, paramere.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Fig. 2. Stenomastigus longicornis. A, male with permanently projecting tip of paramere (indicated by arrow); B, mating couple; C, male shortly after copulation in the process of
retracting aedeagus.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Fig. 3. Palaeostigus palpalis (A, B) and Stenomastigus longicornis (CeF). Male in dorsal view (A, C); female in dorsal (B, D) and lateral (F) view; and elytra of female in posterior view
(E). Arrows showing anterior elytral impressions, posterior gap, raised elytral suture and roof-like shape of elytra. Scale bars 1 mm.
located near the submedian region of the paramere. Some variability in the shape and length of the entire aedeagus and especially
in the shape of the copulatory piece and paramere were
found within and between several isolated populations of
S. longicornis.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Fig. 4. Palaeostigus palpalis (AeH), and P. micans (IeJ). A, abdominal sternites and posterior portion of metaventrite of male in ventral view; B, metafurca in dorsal view; C,
abdominal segments IXeX with aedeagus in ventral view; D, aedeagus in abparameral view; E, base of copulatory piece; F, permanently erected and folded distal portion of
endophallus in abparameral view; G, details of erected endophallus, abparameral view; H, agellum inside partly dissected median lobe; IeJ, aedeagus in right lateral view with
distal portion of permanently extruded endophallus fully inated (obtained by dissection of a couple preserved in copula). Abbreviations: aed, aedeagus; apo9, tergal apodeme IX;
bm, basal membrane; cop, conical projection of endophallus; cp, copulatory piece; ed, ejaculatory duct; eph, permanently everted distal portion of endophallus; fg, agellum; fgo,
agellar opening; ht9, abdominal hemitergite IX; lmfa, lateral metafurcal arm; ma, membranous area; ml, median lobe of aedeagus; pm, paramere; st3e9, abdominal sternite IIIeIX;
v3; metaventrite. Scale bars: AeD, IeJ 200 mm; EeH 20 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Fig. 5. Stenomastigus longicornis. A, abdominal sternites and posterior portion of metaventrite of male in ventral view; B, pterothorax and abdomen with aedeagus in dorsal view
(aedeagus articially shifted posteriorly during preparation, in intact specimens its base is rested between mesofurcal arms near anterior margin of mesothorax); C, abdominal
segments IXeX with aedeagus in dorsal view; D, distal portion of paramere in ventral view; E, aedeagus in abparameral view; F, aedeagus in left lateral view. Abbreviations: aed,
aedeagus; apo9, tergal apodeme IX; bc, basal capsule of median lobe; bf, basal foramen; cp, copulatory piece; ed, ejaculatory duct; eph, permanently everted distal portion of
endophallus; fg, agellum; fgo, agellar opening; ht9, abdominal hemitergite IX; ms, membranous area; msf, mesofurca; mtf, metafurca; pm, paramere; sat, subapical tooth of
copulatory piece; st3e9, abdominal sternite IIIeIX; t8, 10, abdominal tergite VIII, X; v3, metaventrite. Scale bars 200 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Fig. 6. Stenomastigus longicornis, thoracic and abdominal organs, schematic view (A, B) and 3D-reconstructions (CeG). A, skeletal structures of male postabdomen, horizontal
114
section in dorsal view; B, same, sagittal section in lateral view; C, internal organs and terminal abdominal segments in dorsal view; D, same but with intestine and fat bodies
115
removed; E, internal organs and terminal abdominal segments in lateral view; F, same, sagittal section with fat bodies removed; G, internal organs and terminal abdominal
116
segments in ventral view; H, same but with testis and accessory glands removed. Abbreviations: 3*, M. sinister urotergo-distomembranalis (posterioris); 5*, M. sinister urotergo117
distomembranalis (anterioris); 7*, M. urotergo-distomembranalis (posterioris); 8*, M. urotergo-distomembranalis (submedialis); 9*b, branch b of M. urotergo-distomembranalis
(anterioris); 12*, M. urotergo-distomembranalis (medialis); 14*, M. tergoapodemo-proximomembranalis (posterioris); 15*, M. tergoapodemo-distomembranalis (medialis); 16*,
118
M. tergoapodemo-distomembranalis (posterioris); 27, retractor of distal connecting membrane (not named); 28, M. tergoapodemo-phallobasicus major; acg, accessory glands; aed,
119
aedeagus; apo9, tergal apodeme IX; cns, posterior central nervous system; cp, copulatory piece; dcm, distal connecting membrane; ed, ejaculatory duct; eph, permanently everted
120
distal portion of endophallus; fb, fat body; hg, hindgut; ht9; hemitergite IX; pcm, proximal connecting membrane; pm, paramere; spp, sperm pump; st9; sternite IX; t10, tergite X;
Q2 121
tst, testis; vd, vasa defferens. Scale bar 200 mm.
122
123
124
1*: not named (and not reconstructed). O. ( origin): anterior
through the basal foramen. The ventral nerve cord forms a single
125
region of tergal apodeme VIII; I. ( insertion): anterior region of
undivided ganglionic mass in the pterothorax and abdomen.
126
tergal apodeme IX; F. ( function): retractor of segment IX.
The postabdomen of Stenomastigus is equipped with a complex
127
2*: not named (and not reconstructed). O.: anterior region of
system of 18 muscles (Figs. 6CeH and 7AeD; summarized in Table 1),
128
tergal apodeme VIII; I.: middle region of tergal apodeme IX; F.:
in and posterior to segment IX and outside of the aedeagus (the
129
retractor of segment IX.
muscularis of internal organs is not treated as separate muscles here):
130
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Fig. 7. Stenomastigus longicornis, 3D-reconstructions of postabdominal skeleton and muscles. A, right lateral view; B, right dorsolateral view; C, dorsal view; D, same but symmetrical dorsal muscles removed. Abbreviations: 3*, M. sinister urotergo-distomembranalis (posterioris); 4*, M. sinister urotergo-distomembranalis (medialis); 5*, M. sinister
urotergo-distomembranalis (anterioris); 7*, M. urotergo-distomembranalis (posterioris); 8*, M. urotergo-distomembranalis (submedialis); 9*a, branch a of M. urotergodistomembranalis (anterioris); 9*b, branch b of M. urotergo-distomembranalis (anterioris); 12*, M. urotergo-distomembranalis (medialis); 14*, M. tergoapodemoproximomembranalis (posterioris); 15*, M. tergoapodemo-distomembranalis (medialis); 16*, M. tergoapodemo-distomembranalis (posterioris); 27, retractor of distal connecting
membrane (not named); 28, M. tergoapodemo-phallobasicus major; apo9, tergal apodeme IX; bf, basal foramen of aedeagus; cp, copulatory piece; dcm, distal connecting
membrane; eph, permanently everted distal portion of endophallus; pcm, proximal connecting membrane; pm, paramere; st9, sternite IX; t10, tergite X. Scale bar 200 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1*
2*
3*
Present
Present
Presenta
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Presenta
Absent
Absent
Presenta
Absent
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
Absent
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Unknownf
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Absent
Presentb
Presentc
Presentb
Presentc
absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Present
Present
Presentd
Presente
Presentd
Presente
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
Present
Absent
Absent
Present
Absent
Absent
Present
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
10
11
12*
13
14*
15*
16*
17*
18* M. phallobaso-endophallicus
(basalis)
21 M. urotergo-sternalis IX
24: M. urotergo-phallicus
(medialis)
27
28 M. tergapodemo-phallobasicus
major
46: M. phallobasophalloapodemalis
51 M. phalloapodemoendophallicus (dorsalis)
62
a
11
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
12
(Fig. 9D). The agellum in its distal portion (in middle of copulatory
piece) is distinctly thicker than in the loops, while the diameter is
smallest near the gonopore (Table 2). The agellum has solid and
smooth cuticular walls (Fig. 11AeB) and is surrounded by a twolayered agellar pouch (Figs. 8AeF, 9AeC, 10BeE, 11A). The
agellar pouch surrounds all loops as one unit (Figs. 8EeF and
9AeC) with a complicated arrangement of its membranes
(Fig. 10B) and, as a narrow tube, extends up to the agellar opening
(in Figs. 8AeF and 9D the reconstruction of distal portion is
omitted). The agellar pouch membrane is continuous with the
cuticle of the endophallus and both are covered with microtrichia
(the endophallus externally, and the agellar pouch internally
along the entire length); the microtrichia inside the agellar pouch
are mostly bent and oriented along the longitudinal axis of the
agellum (Fig. 11AeB). The internal membrane of the agellar
pouch within the agellar loops is continuous with massive and
rigid internal sclerotizations rmly connecting the loops in their
center (Fig. 10B). Two intrinsic aedeagal muscles were found:
Fig. 8. Stenomastigus longicornis, 3D-reconstruction of aedeagal skeleton and musculature. A, parameral view; B, left lateral view; C, parameral view; D, right lateral view; E, basal
capsule in parameral view; F, basal capsule in left lateral view. Abbreviations: 17*, aedeagal membranous area retractor (not named); 18*, M. phallobaso-endophallicus (basalis); bf,
basal foramen of aedeagus; cp, copulatory piece; ed, ejaculatory duct; eph, permanently everted distal portion of endophallus; fg, agellum; fgo, agellar opening; fgp, agellar
pouch; ma, membranous area; pm, paramere; sat, subapical tooth of copulatory piece. Scale bars: AeD 200 mm; EeF 100 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
13
Fig. 9. Stenomastigus longicornis, 3D-reconstruction of agellar loop region (AeC) and distal portion of endophallus (D). A, parameral and slightly lateral view; B, left lateral view; C,
right lateral view; D, left lateral view. Abbreviations: 18*, M. phallobaso-endophallicus (basalis); cp, copulatory piece; ed, ejaculatory duct; eph, permanently everted distal portion
of endophallus; fg, agellum; fgo, agellar opening; fgp, agellar pouch; pm, paramare; sat, subapical tooth of copulatory piece. Scale bars: 100 mm.
17*: not named (Figs. 8EeF and 10BeC). O.: parameral wall
(internally) of aedeagus; I.: abparameral wall (internally) of
aedeagus: F.: retractor of membranous area.
18*: M. phallobaso-endophallicus (basalis) (Figs. 8EeF, 9AeB,
10A). O.: base (internally) of aedeagus; I.: base of endophallus.
F.: retractor of endophallus.
In Palaeostigus the ne structure of the aedeagus, including the
musculature, does not differ from that of Stenomastigus, except for
the increased length of the agellum (Table 2), with six loops. The
agellum is also distinctly thicker, especially in its distal portion, i.e.
inside the copulatory piece. In specimens of P. micans preserved in
copula it was also possible to examine the extent of the relocation
of the agellar apex in the inated endophallus (Figs. 4IeJ). The
fully inated endophallus projects distally beyond the long paramere, but is only 2e3 times longer compared to the folded position.
The agellum does not extend beyond the apex of the agellar
pouch and uncoiling or a relocation of the loops inside the median
lobe are not recognizable.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
14
Fig. 10. Stenomastigus longicornis, histological cross-sections of aedeagus and associated structures. AeE, aedeagus; F, submedian region of sperm pump; GeH, chart of sections.
Abbreviations: 17*, aedeagal membranous area retractor (not named); 18*, M. phallobaso-endophallicus (basalis); bf, basal foramen of aedeagus; dcm, distal connecting membrane;
ed, ejaculatory duct; eph, permanently everted distal portion of endophallus; fg, agellum; fgp, agellar pouch; pcm, proximal connecting membrane; pm, paramere; rbf, rim of
basal foramen; scl, median sclerotization of agellar loops; spp, sperm pump. Scale bars: 50 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
15
Fig. 11. Stenomastigus longicornis, transmission electron micrographs of cross-sectioned agellar loop. A, agellum in agellar pouch; B, internal wall of agellar pouch with
microtrichia. Abbreviations: fgl, agellar lumen; fgp, agellar pouch; fgw, agellar wall; mtr, microtrichia. Scale bars: 1 mm.
abdomen exed position, with the male grasping the female with
the fore legs between the prothorax and elytra. The aedeagus
(Fig. 13CeE) remains largely visible outside (conrmed by direct
observations of copulating pairs of P. palpalis and in preserved
couples of P. micans, not showing any substantial differences) and
only the permanently everted endophallus is inserted into the female genital opening. The apices of both parameres rest against
tergite VIII of the female and the aedeagus is slightly twisted
around its longitudinal axis. The distal portion of the copulatory
piece with the endophallus is inserted between tergite X and
hemitergite IX. The angle between the copulatory piece and the
parameres is distinctly larger than in repose.
In dissected couples of P. micans the conical projection of the
inated endophallus (with distal gonopore) was found close to (but
not inside) the insertion of the ductus spermathecae, and the agellum was not extended beyond the conical projection, as shown
in Fig. 4IeJ.
4. Discussion
One of many outstanding features of the extremely species rich
Hexapoda is the unparalleled diversity of the genitalia, especially of
males. Investigating evolutionary mechanisms inducing and modulating the megadiverse genital morphology in insects is still a challenging task. Various authors emphasized that these mechanisms
still remain obscure and exceptionally poorly known, and problems
related to the diversication of genitalia are only fragmentarily
claried (e.g., Polak and Rashed, 2010). In the current study we
focused on elucidating the functional morphology of the male terminalia (postabdomen and aedeagus) in Scydmaeninae, a successful
subgroup of the megadiverse rove-beetles, the largest beetle family
(Grebennikov and Newton, 2009). By studying two closely related
genera of Mastigini with striking differences in the length of the
aedeagus, we postulate that a remarkable elongation of the genitalia
can develop by relatively minor morphological transformations and
might have been possible due to preadaptations that removed
structural constraints present in other tribes of Scydmaeninae.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
16
Table 2
Measurements of ductus spermathecae and agellum in S. longicornis and P. palpalis;
N 3 [mm]; in parenthesis % of body length.
S. longicornis
P. palpalis
750.36e762.97
(15.53e16.58%)
1885.32e1895.12
(36.19e38.21%)
8.08e9.34
5.41e5.78
8.09e8.43
15.10e16.34
9.12e9.97
6.11e6.34
1087.22e1375.23
(24.11e33.14%)
2083.09e2315.44
(46.19e55.79%)
2653.01e2797.12
(55.27e64.15%)
3308.36e3.587.76
(68.92e82.29%)
5.52e6.89
7.23e7.87
4.87e5.11
4.44e6.22
9.65e10.11
6.75e7.02
Fig. 12. Female terminal abdominal segments and associated structures of Palaeostigus palpalis (AeB) and Stenomastigus longicornis (C). A, segments VIIeIX with associated soft
tissues; B, segments VIIIeIX with sclerotized genital structures; C, paraprocts with bursa copulatrix and spermatheca. Abbreviations: ag, accessory gland; bc, bursa copulatrix; ds,
ductus spermathecae; ht9, hemitergite IX; ids, insertion of ductus spermathecae; ovd, oviduct; ovr, ovariole; ppr, paraproct; rec, rectum; sp, spermatheca; st8, sternite VIII; t10,
tergite X; tl, terminal lament; vf, valvifer. Scale bars 200 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
17
Fig. 13. Stenomastigus longicornis (A, F), Palaeostigus palpalis (B), and P. micans (CeE). Male with projected aedeagus in lateral view (A, B); mating couple (C, F) and aedeagus during
copulation (D, E). Arrows showing emarginated protibial apex and angulate protrochanter. Abbreviations: cp, copulatory piece; ht9, hemitergite IX; pm, paramere; st8, sternite VIII;
t10, tergite X; vf, valvifer. Scale bars: AeC, F 1 mm; DeE 0.25 mm.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
18
Table 3
Comparison of the pre-intromission and intromission stabilizing structures of Palaeostigus and Stenomastigus.
Stenomastigus
Function
Structure
Palaeostigus
Females
Anterior elytral impressions
Narrow
Extremely elongated
Parameral tooth
Absent
Females
Elytral impressions
Subapical gap between elytra
Elytra in cross-section
Sternite VIII
Clidicus, also showing the least elongate aedeagi within the genus
ski et al., 2003). Moreover, the emargination is only narrow
(Jaoszyn
and elongated in Stenomastigus, compared to the distinctly shorter
and broader condition in the remaining Mastigitae. It might have
evolved as a mechanism increasing the freedom of movements of
the genitalia, especially to protrude and ex the abdominal segments IXeX with the projected aedeagus and reach into the female
genital opening in strongly convex and elongate beetles. A further
elongation of the male genitalia in the ancestor of Stenomastigus
was consequently facilitated by this preadaptation, i.e., by the
already existing emargination of sternite VIII.
The copulatory piece in Stenomastigus is equipped with a large
subapical tooth (Fig. 6EeF), a structure which is short and inconspicuous in Palaeostigus. It is directed toward the paramere and
during copulation (Fig. 13F) may function as a clasping device that
additionally stabilizes the aedeagus. The female's abdominal
dorsum is clasped between this tooth and the paramere. An additional tooth is present on the paramere in several species of Stenomastigus, usually slightly or distinctly distad the one on the
ski,
copulatory piece (illustrated for seven species in Jaoszyn
2012a,b). This second tooth can provide an additional stabilization. During copulation it is directed downward, presumably
pressing against the female's abdominal tergites. In Palaeostigus,
the asymmetrical parameres are apparently the only stabilizing
structures. They are in close contact with the abdominal tergites of
the female (Fig. 13DeE), but it is also possible that their main
function is sensory and not stabilization.
The elongation of the aedeagus in Stenomastigus required a
development of additional stabilizing devices. When the stability of
mounting and copulating is considered, it seems that none of them
is a true novelty, but they rather evolved as slight modications of
pre-existing structures. The emargination of the male sternite VIII,
presumably ensuring a greater degree of movements and a larger
range of reach of segments IXeX in the rst place, gradually
changed its function to locking the aedeagus in a xed position
along the body axis. The female's impressions on the elytra, initially
increasing the stability of the mounting position, possibly co-
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
19
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
20
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
21
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
Matsumura, Y., Yoshizawa, K., Machida, R., Mashimo, Y., Dallai, R., Gottardo, M.,
Kleinteich, T., Michels, J., Gorb, S., Beutel, R., 2014. Two intromittent organs
in Zorotypus caudelli (Insecta, Zoraptera): a paradox coexistence of an
extremely long tube and a large spermatophore. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 112,
40e54.
Moore, A.J., Gowaty, P.A., Wallin, W.G., Moore, P.J., 2001. Sexual conict and the
evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.
B 268, 517e523.
s-Aguilar, J., Beutel, R.G., 2005. New ndings on the
Navarrete-Heredia, J.L., Corte
enigmatic beetle family Lepiceridae (Coleoptera: Myxophaga). Entomol.
Abhandl. 62, 193e201.
O'Keefe, S.T., 2002. Revision of the Neotropical genus Leptochromus Motschulsky
(Coleoptera: Scydmaenidae). Syst. Entomol. 27, 211e234.
O'Keefe, S.T., 2003. Revision of the Nearctic genus Papusus Casey (Coleoptera,
Scydmaenidae). In: Cuccodoro, G., Leschen, R.A.B. (Eds.), Systematics of Colebl. Mem. Entomol. Int. 17,
optera: Papers Celebrating the Retirement of Ivan Lo
257e310.
O'Keefe, S.T., Monteith, G.B., 2000. Clidicus abbotensis O'Keefe, a new species of
Scydmaenidae (Coleoptera: Staphylinoidea) from Australia with description of
the larva. Mem. Qld. Mus. 46, 211e223.
Pitnick, S., Reagan, J., Holland, B., 2001. Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 1e10.
Polak, M., Rashed, A., 2010. Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of
male intromittent genitalia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277, 1371e1376.
Puthz, V., 1973. On some Neotropical Euaesthetinae (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae).
Stud. Neotrop. Fauna 8, 51e73.
Reynolds, E., 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in
electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208e212.
Rice, W.R., 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental
arrest of female evolution. Nature 361, 232e234.
Richmond, M.P., Johnson, S., Markow, T.A., 2012. Evolution of reproductive
morphology among recently diverged taxa in the Drosophila mojavensis species
cluster. Ecol. Evol. 2, 397e408.
Rodriguez, V., 1995. Copulatory courtship in Chelymorpha alternans Boheman
(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae). Coleopt. Bull. 49, 327e331.
Sharp, D., Muir, F., 1912. The comparative anatomy of the male genitalia tube in
Coleoptera. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1912, 477e642.
Soulier-Perkins, A., 2002. The phylogeny of the Lophopidae and the impact of sexual
selection and coevolutionary sexual conict. Cladistics 17, 56e78.
Suzuki, K., 1988. Comparative Morphology of the Internal Reproductive System of
Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera). In: Jolivet, P., Petitpierre, E., Hsiao, T.H. (Eds.),
Biology of Chrysomelidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston and
London, pp. 317e355.
Verma, K.K., Kumar, D., 1972. The aedeagus, its musculature, and retournement in
Aspidomorpha miliaris F. (Coleoptera, Phytophaga, Chrysomelidae). J. Nat. Hist. 6,
699e719.
Verma, K.K., Kumar, D., 1980. Aedeagal musculature in Phytophaga (Coleoptera).
J. Nat. Hist. 14, 237e270.
Wanat, M., 2007. Alignment and homology of male terminalia in Curculionoidea
and other Coleoptera. Invert. Syst. 21, 147e171.
Yoshizawa, K., Ferreira, R., Kamimura, Y., Lienhard, C., 2014. Female penis, male
vagina, and their correlated evolution in a cave insect. Curr. Biol. 24, 1006e1010.
ski, P., et al., Evolution of a giant intromittent organ in Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae):
Please cite this article in press as: Jaoszyn
Functional morphology of the male postabdomen in Mastigini, Arthropod Structure & Development (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.asd.2014.09.006
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44