86%(7)Il 86% ha trovato utile questo documento (7 voti)
8K visualizzazioni2 pagine
Bentham believed in act utilitarianism, evaluating each act based on the utility it produces. Mill believed in rule utilitarianism, where general rules are followed to maximize utility. Bentham used a hedonic calculus to quantify pleasure, while Mill argued for considering the quality of pleasures and distinguishing between higher and lower pleasures. For gang rape, Bentham would say it produces the greatest good for the perpetrators based on quantity, while Mill would argue it does not produce true happiness and is always wrong. Overall, Bentham's theory was more situation-dependent while Mill's theory remained more consistent.
Descrizione originale:
utilitarianism essay. received around 16/25 from a very harsh marker. good for revision craming
Titolo originale
Explain the Main Differences Between the Utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham and That of John Stuart Mill
Bentham believed in act utilitarianism, evaluating each act based on the utility it produces. Mill believed in rule utilitarianism, where general rules are followed to maximize utility. Bentham used a hedonic calculus to quantify pleasure, while Mill argued for considering the quality of pleasures and distinguishing between higher and lower pleasures. For gang rape, Bentham would say it produces the greatest good for the perpetrators based on quantity, while Mill would argue it does not produce true happiness and is always wrong. Overall, Bentham's theory was more situation-dependent while Mill's theory remained more consistent.
Bentham believed in act utilitarianism, evaluating each act based on the utility it produces. Mill believed in rule utilitarianism, where general rules are followed to maximize utility. Bentham used a hedonic calculus to quantify pleasure, while Mill argued for considering the quality of pleasures and distinguishing between higher and lower pleasures. For gang rape, Bentham would say it produces the greatest good for the perpetrators based on quantity, while Mill would argue it does not produce true happiness and is always wrong. Overall, Bentham's theory was more situation-dependent while Mill's theory remained more consistent.
Explain the main differences between the utilitarianism of Jeremy
Bentham and that of John Stuart Mill.
Bentham and mill shared and believed in the idea of utilitarianism. Mill believed in rule utilitarianism, this is the general rule that everybody should follow to bring about the greatest good for that community. Moreover, we should vote on the best possible results for the whole community, which produces the most happiness and that should become a rule for society to live by. On the other hand, Bentham believed in act utilitarianism this maintains that whenever possible the principle of utility should be directly applied for each individual circumstance. For example, if lying to someone will produce the greatest pleasure / happiness then they should lie. The theory of the hedonic calculus plays a large part in both mill AND Bentham theory of utilitarianism. Bentham believed that the hedonic calculus was needed as a quantity assessment of a situation, which looks at the quantity of pleasure it produces. The hedonic calculus measures the different factors of pleasures in a situation. Intensity Duration Certainty Propinquity Frequency Purity Extent Mill, however, rejected the theory of the hedonic calculus and instead introduced the idea that as Bentham quotes the greatest good for the greatest number is purely quantity, what would stop one person from being destroyed by the majority? Therefore distinguishing between higher and lower pleasures. Mill explains that higher pleasures are qualitatively better and more important that lower pleasures. Mill quotes that a happiness which does not include a higher pleasure was not a considered a pleasure by human beings higher pleasures should be considered better even if we find ourselves unhappy because we have forgone quantity. If both mill and Bentham were presented with the situation of gang rape, Bentham would use the rule of the greatest good for the greatest number of which is based on quantity therefore Bentham would say that gang rape produces a greater good for the perpetrators, as there is a higher quantity of pleasures. However, Mill would act against this in favour of quality over quantity and argue that the happiness of a gang rape victim is so low that it overrules the happiness of the perpetrators and is therefore not considered a higher pleasure and as a result is not
considered happiness by a human being. This leads to the absolute theory
that gang rape is always wrong. However it must be considered that Bentham and mill produced these ideas eras ago and that arguments have changed in time. Several differences between mills and Benthams theory of utilitarianism arise as Jeremy Bentham believed that the act that produces the most happiness is the most moral, for example abortion may lead to the happiness of one person, but for another to believe that this act is wrong. This is the idea of the utility principle the rightness or wrongness of an action is judged by its utility or usefulness to produce pleasure. Mill disagreed with Benthams opinion and claimed Human beings have more than animal desires and, once we know that, we do not regard anything as true happiness that includes satisfaction of those desires. Mill also spoke about the idea of it being better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. [Pleasures of the mind are higher than those of the body, for example, bodily pleasures such as food, drink, and sex are those that do not have a higher pleasure than those that are intellectually demanding. Throughout Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mills theorys of utilitarianism it is clear that both have contradicting and challenging views against one another, however the final difference between one anothers theory is that Benthams theory is constantly changing, adapting to certain situations and may even be affected by emotions. However It is very clear that Mills theorys stay consistent and do not contradict each other.