Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Always throughout human history there was a current level of development which was
leaded by current at the time most developed countries (clans, tribes, empires,
markets) by using the most advantageous at the time socio-economic tools to compete
one another.
{Examples: Second World War was based on imperialistic ideas at its time when after the
war Colonizing and maintaining Colonies appeared ineffective and were abandoned by
the Great Powers, and then European Union was created which is totally demilitarized;
In case European Union was the possible current level of development thus the
militaristic approach based on an inadequate attitude at the time caused worthless 50
million casualties: the possibilities for different then the militaristic competition were
there even before the war.}
Any country in the world was in individual current level of development in any time of
history, when (as said above) most developed countries (at the time) were always best
adapted to the most recent current level of development. Usually for a country to be most
developed it must include in competition the most of its citizens in response to current
possibilities. But when a new possible current level of development is to occur some
time a most developed country may well experience difficulties to adapt to the new
changing realities and thus loose its most developed status, too.
When a current level of development could be upgraded to a possible current level of
development was always a turbulent time because somehow such changes invoke social
changes of redistribution of wealth;
{Example: Western Europe changed from feudalistic socio-economic structures to the
production based socio-economic structures when fortune changed hands too: new
classes were developed by these new structures.}
See: “Philosophy of the Economy” Part I, II, III some of these historical changes are
explained in better details;
Economy plays vital role when changes of current level of development to a possible
current level of development occurs, because usually by observing the changes of
philosophy of economics and the following developing economic structures objective
conclusions for ongoing developments could be drawn.
{Examples: (pure) Capitalism of the USA and India, (national) Capitalism of Japan,
Social-Capitalism of Western Europe and China, and Communism as it was in Eastern
Block countries, and everyone in between.}
In number of articles an attempt will be made to explain in details the above points of
market economics of Marketism.
Over all even Market philosophy and economics requires personal liability and heavy
regulations it is still based on free entrepreneurship and investing thus it is a most related
to Capitalistic philosophy and economics by protecting freedom and democracy with
liberties for all. Marketism is a system that just responds to the realities of which the
alternative is a progressive bureaucratization leaded by Governments. In the last and still
going recession this alternative appeared clearly and stated to us its powers ;
And, finally, I believe an axiom in economics: “if someone roof is leaking when someone
else is without a job, and someone has the capability to sell the materials for such repair,
and someone has the capabilities to manufacture these materials: then the economy is
there to provide the conditions for happening as far as everyone in the chain is ready to
respond with effort alone these transactions: there should be no excuses for this not
happening”.
© Joshua Konov, 2010