Globalization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Globalization (or globalisation) describes an ongoing process by which regional economies,

societies, and cultures have become integrated through a globe-spanning network of
communication and trade. The term is sometimes used to refer specifically to economic
globalization: the integration of national economies into the international economy through trade,
foreign direct investment, capital flows, migration, and the spread of technology.[1] However,
globalization is usually recognised as being driven by a combination of economic, technological,
sociocultural, political, and biological factors.[2] The term can also refer to the transnational
circulation of ideas, languages, or popular culture through acculturation.

Contents
[hide]

• 1 Definitions
• 2 History
• 3 Modern globalization
• 4 Measuring globalization
• 5 Effects of globalization
o 5.1 Cultural effects
o 5.2 Negative effects
 5.2.1 Effect on disease
 5.2.2 Brain drain
 5.2.3 Economic liberalization
 5.2.4 Effect on Income disparity
 5.2.5 Effect on environmental degradation
 5.2.6 Food security
 5.2.7 Drug and illicit goods trade
 5.2.8 Sweatshops
• 6 Pro-globalization (globalism)
• 7 Anti-globalization
o 7.1 International Social Forums
• 8 See also
• 9 References
• 10 Further reading
• 11 External links

o 11.1 Multimedia
 [edit] Definitions
An early description of globalization was penned by the American entrepreneur-turned-minister
Charles Taze Russell who coined the term 'corporate giants' in 1897.[3] However, it was not until
the 1960s that the term began to be widely used by economists and other social scientists. It had
achieved widespread use in the mainstream press by the later half of the 1980s. Since its
inception, the concept of globalisation has inspired numerous competing definitions and
interpretations.[4]

The United Nations Building

The United Nations ESCWA has written that globalization "is a widely-used term that can be
defined in a number of different ways. When used in an economic context, it refers to the
reduction and removal of barriers between national borders in order to facilitate the flow of
goods, capital, services and labour... although considerable barriers remain to the flow of
labour... Globalization is not a new phenomenon. It began in the late nineteenth century, but it
slowed down during the period from the start of the First World War until the third quarter of the
twentieth century. This slowdown can be attributed to the inwardlooking policies pursued by a
number of countries in order to protect their respective industries... however, the pace of
globalization picked up rapidly during the fourth quarter of the twentieth century..."[5]

Saskia Sassen writes that "a good part of globalization consists of an enormous variety of micro-
processes that begin to denationalize what had been constructed as national — whether policies,
capital, political subjectivities, urban spaces, temporal frames, or any other of a variety of
dynamics and domains."[6]

Tom G. Palmer of the Cato Institute defines globalization as "the diminution or elimination of
state-enforced restrictions on exchanges across borders and the increasingly integrated and
complex global system of production and exchange that has emerged as a result."[7]

Thomas L. Friedman has examined the impact of the "flattening" of the world, and argues that
globalized trade, outsourcing, supply-chaining, and political forces have changed the world
permanently, for both better and worse. He also argues that the pace of globalization is
quickening and will continue to have a growing impact on business organization and practice.[8]

HSBC is the largest bank in the world and operates across the globe.[9][10]

Noam Chomsky argues that the word globalization is also used, in a doctrinal sense, to describe
the neoliberal form of economic globalization.[11]

Herman E. Daly argues that sometimes the terms internationalization and globalization are used
interchangeably but there is a significant formal difference. The term "internationalization" (or
internationalisation) refers to the importance of international trade, relations, treaties etc. owing
to the (hypothetical) immobility of labor and capital between or among nations.[citation needed]

Finally, Takis Fotopoulos argues that globalisation is the result of systemic trends manifesting
the market economy’s grow-or-die dynamic, following the rapid expansion of transnational
corporations. Because these trends have not been offset effectively by counter-tendencies that
could have emanated from trade-union action and other forms of political activity, the outcome
has been globalisation. This is a multi-faceted and irreversible phenomenon within the system of
the market economy and it is expressed as: economic globalisation, namely, the opening and
deregulation of commodity, capital and labour markets which led to the present form of
neoliberal globalisation; political globalisation, i.e., the emergence of a transnational elite and the
phasing out of the all powerful-nation state of the statist period; cultural globalisation, i.e., the
worldwide homogenisation of culture; ideological globalisation; technological globalisation;
social globalisation.[12]

[edit] History
The historical origins of globalization are the subject of on-going debate. Though some scholars
situate the origins of globalization in the modern era, others regard it as a phenomenon with a
long history.

Perhaps the most extreme proponent of a deep historical origin for globalization was Andre
Gunder Frank, an economist associated with dependency theory. Frank argued that a form of
globalization has been in existence since the rise of trade links between Sumer and the Indus
Valley Civilization in the third millennium B.C.[13] Critics of this idea point out that it rests upon
an overly-broad definition of globalization.

Extent of the Silk Road

An early form of globalized economics and culture existed during the Hellenistic Age, when
commercialized urban centers were focused around the axis of Greek culture over a wide range
that stretched from India to Spain, with such cities as Alexandria, Athens, and Antioch at its
center. Trade was widespread during that period, and it is the first time the idea of a
cosmopolitan culture (from Greek "Cosmopolis", meaning "world city") emerged.

Others have perceived an early form of globalization in the trade links between the Roman
Empire, the Parthian Empire, and the Han Dynasty. The increasing articulation of commercial
links between these powers inspired the development of the Silk Road, which started in western
China, reached the boundaries of the Parthian empire, and continued onwards towards Rome.[14]

The Islamic Golden Age was also an important early stage of globalization, when Jewish and
Muslim traders and explorers established a sustained economy across the Old World resulting in
a globalization of crops, trade, knowledge and technology. Globally significant crops such as
sugar and cotton became widely cultivated across the Muslim world in this period, while the
necessity of learning Arabic and completing the Hajj created a cosmopolitan culture.[15]

The advent of the Mongol Empire, though destabilizing to the commercial centers of the Middle
East and China, greatly facilitated travel along the Silk Road. This permitted travelers and
missionaries such as Marco Polo to journey successfully (and profitably) from one end of
Eurasia to the other. The so-called Pax Mongolica of the thirteenth century had several other
notable globalizing effects. It witnessed the creation of the first international postal service, as
well as the rapid transmission of epidemic diseases such as bubonic plague across the newly
unified regions of Central Asia.[16] These pre-modern phases of global or hemispheric exchange
are sometimes known as archaic globalization. Up to the sixteenth century, however, even the
largest systems of international exchange were limited to the Old World.

The Age of Discovery brought a broad change in globalization, being the first period in which
Eurasia and Africa engaged in substantial cultural, material and biologic exchange with the New
World.[17] It began in the late 15th century, when the two Kingdoms of the Iberian Peninsula -
Portugal and Castile - sent the first exploratory voyages[18] around the Horn of Africa and to the
Americas, "discovered" in 1492 by Christopher Columbus. Shortly before the turn of the 16th
century, Portuguese started establishing trading posts (factories) from Africa to Asia and Brazil,
to deal with the trade of local products like gold, spices and timber, introducing an international
business center under a royal monopoly, the House of India.[19] Global integration continued with
the European colonization of the Americas initiating the Columbian Exchange,[20] the enormous
widespread exchange of plants, animals, foods, human populations (including slaves),
communicable diseases, and culture between the Eastern and Western hemispheres. It was one of
the most significant global events concerning ecology, agriculture, and culture in history.

Colonial empires in 1800 (animated map, 1492 to present)

This phase is sometimes known as proto-globalization. It was characterized by the rise of

maritime European empires, in the 16th and 17th centuries, first the Portuguese and Spanish
Empires, and later the Dutch and British Empires. In the 17th century, globalization became also
a private business phenomenon when chartered companies like British East India Company
(founded in 1600), often described as the first multinational corporation, as well as the Dutch
East India Company (founded in 1602) were established. Because of the large investment and
financing needs and high risks involved in international trade, the British East India Company
became the first company in the world to share risk and enable joint ownership of companies
through the issuance of shares of stock: an important driver for globalization.[citation needed]

Great Britain grew rich in the 19th century as the first global economic superpower, because of
its superior manufacturing technology and improved global communications such as steamships
and railroads.

The 19th century witnessed the advent of globalization approaching its modern form.
Industrialization allowed cheap production of household items using economies of scale, while
rapid population growth created sustained demand for commodities. Globalization in this period
was decisively shaped by nineteenth-century imperialism. After the Opium Wars and the
completion of British conquest of India, vast populations of these regions became ready
consumers of European exports. It was in this period that areas of sub-Saharan Africa and the
Pacific islands were incorporated into the world system. Meanwhile, the conquest of new parts of
the globe, notably sub-Saharan Africa, by Europeans yielded valuable natural resources such as
rubber, diamonds and coal and helped fuel trade and investment between the European imperial
powers, their colonies, and the United States.[citation needed] Said John Maynard Keynes,[21]
 The inhabitant of London could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea, the
“ various products of the whole earth, and reasonably expect their early delivery upon
his doorstep. Militarism and imperialism of racial and cultural rivalries were little
more than the amusements of his daily newspaper. What an extraordinary episode in
the economic progress of man was that age which came to an end in August 1914. ”
The first phase of "modern globalization" began to break down at the beginning of the 20th
century, with the first world war. The novelist VM Yeates criticised the financial forces of
globalisation as a factor in creating World War I.[22] The final death knell for this phase came
during the gold standard crisis and Great Depression in the late 1920s and early 1930s.[citation needed]

In the middle decades of the twentieth century globalization was largely driven by the global
expansion of multinational corporations based in the United States and Europe, and worldwide
exchange of new developments in science, technology and products, with most significant
inventions of this time having their origins in the Western world according to Encyclopedia
Britannica.[23] Worldwide export of western culture went through the new mass media: film,
radio and television and recorded music. Development and growth of international transport and
telecommunication played a decisive role in modern globalization.

In late 2000s, much of the industrialized world entered into a deep recession.[24] Some analysts
say the world is going through a period of deglobalization after years of increasing economic
integration.[25][26] Up to 45% of global wealth had been destroyed by the global financial crisis in
little less than a year and a half.[27] China has recently become the world’s largest exporter
surpassing Germany.[28]

[edit] Modern globalization

Globalization, since World War II, is largely the result of planning by politicians to break down
borders hampering trade to increase prosperity and interdependence thereby decreasing the
chance of future war[citation needed]. Their work led to the Bretton Woods conference, an agreement
by the world's leading politicians to lay down the framework for international commerce and
finance, and the founding of several international institutions intended to oversee the processes
of globalization.

These institutions include the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the
World Bank), and the International Monetary Fund. Globalization has been facilitated by
advances in technology which have reduced the costs of trade, and trade negotiation rounds,
originally under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which led
to a series of agreements to remove restrictions on free trade.

Since World War II, barriers to international trade have been considerably lowered through
international agreements — GATT. Particular initiatives carried out as a result of GATT and the
World Trade Organization (WTO), for which GATT is the foundation, have included:

• Promotion of free trade:

 o elimination of tariffs; creation of free trade zones with small or no tariffs
o Reduced transportation costs, especially resulting from development of
containerization for ocean shipping.
o Reduction or elimination of capital controls
o Reduction, elimination, or harmonization of subsidies for local businesses
o Creation of subsidies for global corporations
o Harmonization of intellectual property laws across the majority of states, with
more restrictions
o Supranational recognition of intellectual property restrictions (e.g. patents granted
by China would be recognized in the United States)

Cultural globalization, driven by communication technology and the worldwide marketing of

Western cultural industries, was understood at first as a process of homogenization, as the global
domination of American culture at the expense of traditional diversity. However, a contrasting
trend soon became evident in the emergence of movements protesting against globalization and
giving new momentum to the defense of local uniqueness, individuality, and identity, but largely
without success.[29]

The Uruguay Round (1986 to 1994)[30] led to a treaty to create the WTO to mediate trade disputes
and set up a uniform platform of trading. Other bilateral and multilateral trade agreements,
including sections of Europe's Maastricht Treaty and the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) have also been signed in pursuit of the goal of reducing tariffs and barriers to trade.

World exports rose from 8.5% in 1970, to 16.2% of total gross world product in 2001.[31]

[edit] Measuring globalization

Looking specifically at economic globalization, demonstrates that it can be measured in different
ways. These center around the four main economic flows that characterize globalization:

• Goods and services, e.g., exports plus imports as a proportion of national income or per
capita of population
• Labor/people, e.g., net migration rates; inward or outward migration flows, weighted by
population
• Capital, e.g., inward or outward direct investment as a proportion of national income or
per head of population
• Technology, e.g., international research & development flows; proportion of populations
(and rates of change thereof) using particular inventions (especially 'factor-neutral'
technological advances such as the telephone, motorcar, broadband)

As globalization is not only an economic phenomenon, a multivariate approach to measuring

globalization is the recent index calculated by the Swiss think tank KOF. The index measures the
three main dimensions of globalization: economic, social, and political. In addition to three
indices measuring these dimensions, an overall index of globalization and sub-indices referring
to actual economic flows, economic restrictions, data on personal contact, data on information
flows, and data on cultural proximity is calculated. Data is available on a yearly basis for 122
countries, as detailed in Dreher, Gaston and Martens (2008).[32] According to the index, the
world's most globalized country is Belgium, followed by Austria, Sweden, the United Kingdom
and the Netherlands. The least globalized countries according to the KOF-index are Haiti,
Myanmar, the Central African Republic and Burundi.[33]

A.T. Kearney and Foreign Policy Magazine jointly publish another Globalization Index.
According to the 2006 index, Singapore, Ireland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Canada and
Denmark are the most globalized, while Indonesia, India and Iran are the least globalized among
countries listed.

[edit] Effects of globalization

Globalization has various aspects which affect the world in several different ways such as:

• Industrial - emergence of worldwide production markets and broader access to a range of

foreign products for consumers and companies. Particularly movement of material and
goods between and within national boundaries. International trade in manufactured goods
increased more than 100 times (from $95 billion to $12 trillion) in the 50 years since
1955.[34] China’s trade with Africa rose sevenfold during 2000-07 alone.[35][36]
• Financial - emergence of worldwide financial markets and better access to external
financing for borrowers. By the early part of the 21st century more than $1.5 trillion in
national currencies were traded daily to support the expanded levels of trade and
investment.[37] As these worldwide structures grew more quickly than any transnational
regulatory regime, the instability of the global financial infrastructure dramatically
increased, as evidenced by the Financial crisis of 2007–2010.[38]

As of 2005–2007, the Port of Shanghai holds the title as the World's busiest port.[39][40][41]

• Economic - realization of a global common market, based on the freedom of exchange of

goods and capital.[42] The interconnectedness of these markets, however meant that an
economic collapse in any one given country could not be contained.[citation needed]
 India is right now home of almost every well known I.T company around the globe. Four
Indians were among the world's top 10 richest in 2008, worth a combined $160 billion.[43]
In 2007, China had 415,000 millionaires and India 123,000.[44]

• Health Policy - On the global scale, health becomes a commodity. In developing nations
under the demands of Structural Adjustment Programs, health systems are fragmented
and privatized. Global health policy makers have shifted during the 1990s from United
Nations players to financial institutions. The result of this power transition is an increase
in privatization in the health sector. This privatization fragments health policy by
crowding it with many players with many private interests. These fragmented policy
players emphasize partnerships, specific interventions to combat specific problems (as
opposed to comprehensive health strategies). Influenced by global trade and global
economy, health policy is directed by technological advances and innovative medical
trade. Global priorities, in this situation, are sometimes at odds with national priorities
where increased health infrastructure and basic primary care are of more value to the
public than privatized care for the wealthy.[45]

Britain is a country of rich diversity. As of 2008, 40% of London's total population was
from an ethnic minority group. The latest official figures show that in 2008, 590,000
people arrived to live in the UK whilst 427,000 left, meaning that net inward migration
was 163,000.[46]

• Political - some use "globalization" to mean the creation of a world government which
regulates the relationships among governments and guarantees the rights arising from
social and economic globalization.[47] Politically, the United States has enjoyed a position
 of power among the world powers, in part because of its strong and wealthy economy.
With the influence of globalization and with the help of The United States’ own
economy, the People's Republic of China has experienced some tremendous growth
within the past decade. If China continues to grow at the rate projected by the trends, then
it is very likely that in the next twenty years, there will be a major reallocation of power
among the world leaders. China will have enough wealth, industry, and technology to
rival the United States for the position of leading world power.[48]
• Informational - increase in information flows between geographically remote locations.
Arguably this is a technological change with the advent of fibre optic communications,
satellites, and increased availability of telephone and Internet.
• Language - the most popular language is Mandarin (845 million speakers) followed by
Spanish (329 million speakers) and English (328 million speakers).[49]
o About 35% of the world's mail, telexes, and cables are in English.
o Approximately 40% of the world's radio programs are in English.
o About 50% of all Internet traffic uses English.[50]
• Competition - Survival in the new global business market calls for improved productivity
and increased competition. Due to the market becoming worldwide, companies in various
industries have to upgrade their products and use technology skillfully in order to face
increased competition.[51]
• Ecological - the advent of global environmental challenges that might be solved with
international cooperation, such as climate change, cross-boundary water and air pollution,
over-fishing of the ocean, and the spread of invasive species. Since many factories are
built in developing countries with less environmental regulation, globalism and free trade
may increase pollution. On the other hand, economic development historically required a
"dirty" industrial stage, and it is argued that developing countries should not, via
regulation, be prohibited from increasing their standard of living.

The construction of continental hotels is a major consequence of globalization process in

affiliation with tourism and travel industry, Dariush Grand Hotel, Kish, Iran

• Cultural - growth of cross-cultural contacts; advent of new categories of consciousness

and identities which embodies cultural diffusion, the desire to increase one's standard of
living and enjoy foreign products and ideas, adopt new technology and practices, and
participate in a "world culture". Some bemoan the resulting consumerism and loss of
languages. Also see Transformation of culture.
o Spreading of multiculturalism, and better individual access to cultural diversity
(e.g. through the export of Hollywood and, to a lesser extent, Bollywood movies).
Some consider such "imported" culture a danger, since it may supplant the local
culture, causing reduction in diversity or even assimilation. Others consider
 multiculturalism to promote peace and understanding between peoples. A third
position gaining popuilarity is the notion that multiculturalism to a new form of
monoculture in which no distinctions exist and everyone just shift between
various lifestyles in terms of music, cloth and other aspects once more firmly
attached to a single culture. Thusly not mere cultural assimilation as mentioned
above but the obliteration of culture as we know it today.[52][53]
o Greater international travel and tourism. WHO estimates that up to 500,000
people are on planes at any one time.[54] In 2008, there were over 922 million
international tourist arrivals, with a growth of 1.9% as compared to 2007.[55]
o Greater immigration,[56] including illegal immigration.[57] The IOM estimates there
are more than 200 million migrants around the world today.[58] Newly available
data show that remittance flows to developing countries reached $328 billion in
2008.[59]
o Spread of local consumer products (e.g., food) to other countries (often adapted to
their culture).
o Worldwide fads and pop culture such as Pokémon, Sudoku, Numa Numa,
Origami, Idol series, YouTube, Orkut, Facebook, and MySpace. Accessible to
those who have Internet or Television, leaving out a substantial segment of the
Earth's population.
o Worldwide sporting events such as FIFA World Cup and the Olympic Games.
o Incorporation of multinational corporations in to new media. As the sponsors of
the All-Blacks rugby team, Adidas had created a parallel website with a
downloadable interactive rugby game for its fans to play and compete.[60]
• Social - development of the system of non-governmental organisations as main agents of
global public policy, including humanitarian aid and developmental efforts.[61]
• Technical
o Development of a Global Information System, global telecommunications
infrastructure and greater transborder data flow, using such technologies as the
Internet, communication satellites, submarine fiber optic cable, and wireless
telephones
o Increase in the number of standards applied globally; e.g., copyright laws, patents
and world trade agreements.
• Legal/Ethical
o The creation of the international criminal court and international justice
movements.
o Crime importation and raising awareness of global crime-fighting efforts and
cooperation.
o The emergence of Global administrative law.
• Religious
o The spread and increased interrelations of various religious groups, ideas, and
practices and their ideas of the meanings and values of particular spaces.[62]

[edit] Cultural effects

Globalization has had an impact on different cultures around the world.

Japanese McDonald's fast food as an evidence of corporate globalization and the integration of
the same into different cultures.

Culture is defined as patterns of human activity and the symbols that give these activities
significance. Culture is what people eat, how they dress, beliefs they hold, and activities they
practice. Globalization has joined different cultures and made it into something different. As Erla
Zwingle, from the National Geographic article titled “Globalization” states, “When cultures
receive outside influences, they ignore some and adopt others, and then almost immediately start
to transform them.”[63]

One classic culture aspect is food. Someone in America can be eating Japanese noodles for lunch
while someone in Sydney, Australia is eating classic Italian meatballs. India is known for its
curry and exotic spices. France is known for its cheeses. America is known for its burgers and
fries. McDonalds is an American company which is now a global enterprise with 31,000
locations worldwide. This company is just one example of food causing cultural influence on the
global scale.

Another common practice brought about by globalization is the usage of Chinese symbol in
tattoos. These tattoos are popular with today’s youth despite the lack of social acceptance of
tattoos in China.[64] Also, there is a lack of comprehension in the meaning of Chinese characters
that people get,[65] making this an example of cultural appropriation.

The internet breaks down cultural boundaries across the world by enabling easy, near-
instantaneous communication between people anywhere in a variety of digital forms and media.
The Internet is associated with the process of cultural globalization because it allows interaction
and communication between people with very different lifestyles and from very different
cultures. Photo sharing websites allow interaction even where language would otherwise be a
barrier.

[edit] Negative effects

See also: Alter-globalization, Participatory economics, and Global Justice Movement

Globalization has been one of the most hotly debated topics in international economics over the
past few years. Globalization has also generated significant international opposition over
concerns that it has increased inequality and environmental degradation.[66] In the Midwestern
United States, globalization has eaten away at its competitive edge in industry and agriculture,
lowering the quality of life in locations that have not adapted to the change.[67]

[edit] Effect on disease

Globalization, the flow of information, goods, capital and people across political and geographic
boundaries, has also helped to spread some of the deadliest infectious diseases known to humans.
[68]
Modern modes of transportation allow more people and products to travel around the world at
a faster pace, they also open the airways to the transcontinental movement of infectious disease
vectors.[69] One example of this occurring is AIDS/HIV.[70]

[edit] Brain drain

Opportunities in richer countries drives talent away, leading to brain drains. Brain drain has cost
the African continent over $4 billion in the employment of 150,000 expatriate professionals
annually.[71] Indian students going abroad for their higher studies costs India a foreign exchange
outflow of $10 billion annually.[72]

[edit] Economic liberalization

Further information: Neoliberalism

The World today is so interconnected that the collapse of the subprime mortgage market in the
U.S. has led to a global financial crisis and recession on a scale not seen since the Great
Depression.[73] Government deregulation and failed regulation of Wall Street's investment banks
were important contributors to the subprime mortgage crisis.[74][75]

A flood of consumer goods such as televisions, radios, bicycles, and textiles into the United
States, Europe, and Japan has helped fuel the economic expansion of Asian tiger economies in
recent decades.[76] However, Chinese textile and clothing exports have recently encountered
criticism from Europe, the United States and some African countries.[77][78] In South Africa, some
300,000 textile workers have lost their jobs due to the influx of Chinese goods.[79] A total of 3.2
million – one in six U.S. factory jobs – have disappeared since the start of 2000.[80]

[edit] Effect on Income disparity

A study by the World Institute for Development Economics Research at United Nations
University reports that the richest 1% of adults alone owned 40% of global assets in the year
2000. The three richest people possess more financial assets than the poorest 10% of the world's
population, combined [5][citation needed]. The combined wealth of the 10 million millionaires grew to
nearly $41 trillion in 2008.[81] In 2001, 46.4% of people in sub-Saharan Africa were living in
extreme poverty.[82] Nearly half of all Indian children are undernourished.[83]

[edit] Effect on environmental degradation

Burning forest in Brazil. The removal of forest to make way for cattle ranching was the leading
cause of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon from the mid 1960s. Recently, soybeans have
become one of the most important contributors to deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.[84]

The Worldwatch Institute said the booming economies of China and India are planetary powers
that are shaping the global biosphere. In 2007, China has overtaken the United States as the
world's biggest producer of CO2.[85] At present rates, tropical rainforests in Indonesia would be
logged out in 10 years, Papua New Guinea in 13 to 16 years.[86] A major source of deforestation
is the logging industry, driven spectacularly by China and Japan.[87] Thriving economies such as
China and India are quickly becoming large oil consumers.[88][89] China has seen oil consumption
grow by 8% yearly since 2002, doubling from 1996–2006.[90] Crude oil prices in the last several
years have steadily risen from about $25 a barrel in August 2003 to over $140 a barrel in July
2008.[91] State of the World 2006 report said the two countries' high economic growth hid a
reality of severe pollution. The report states:

The world's ecological capacity is simply insufficient to satisfy the ambitions of China,
India, Japan, Europe and the United States as well as the aspirations of the rest of the
world in a sustainable way[92]

Without more recycling, zinc could be used up by 2037, both indium and hafnium could run out
by 2017, and terbium could be gone before 2012.[93] It said that if China and India were to
consume as much resources per capita as United States or Japan in 2030 together they would
require a full planet Earth to meet their needs.[94] In the longterm these effects can lead to
increased conflict over dwindling resources[95] and in the worst case a Malthusian catastrophe.

[edit] Food security

The head of the International Food Policy Research Institute, stated in 2008 that the gradual
change in diet among newly prosperous populations is the most important factor underpinning
the rise in global food prices.[96] From 1950 to 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed
agriculture around the world, grain production increased by over 250%.[97] The world population
has grown by about 4 billion since the beginning of the Green Revolution and most believe that,
without the Revolution, there would be greater famine and malnutrition than the UN presently
documents (approximately 850 million people suffering from chronic malnutrition in 2005).[98][99]
It is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain food security in a world beset by a confluence of
"peak" phenomena, namely peak oil, peak water, peak phosphorus, peak grain and peak fish.
Growing populations, falling energy sources and food shortages will create the "perfect storm"
by 2030, according to the UK government chief scientist. He said food reserves are at a 50-year
low but the world requires 50% more energy, food and water by 2030.[100][101] The world will
have to produce 70% more food by 2050 to feed a projected extra 2.3 billion people and as
incomes rise, the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) warned.[102]

The journal Science published a four-year study in November 2006, which predicted that, at
prevailing trends, the world would run out of wild-caught seafood in 2048.[103]

[edit] Drug and illicit goods trade

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) issued a report that the global drug
trade generates more than $320 billion a year in revenues.[104] Worldwide, the UN estimates there
are more than 50 million regular users of heroin, cocaine and synthetic drugs.[105] The
international trade of endangered species is second only to drug trafficking.[106] Traditional
Chinese medicine often incorporates ingredients from all parts of plants, the leaf, stem, flower,
root, and also ingredients from animals and minerals. The use of parts of endangered species
(such as seahorses, rhinoceros horns, saiga antelope horns, and tiger bones and claws) has
created controversy and resulted in a black market of poachers who hunt restricted animals.[107]
[108]
In 2003, 29% of open sea fisheries were in a state of collapse.[109]

[edit] Sweatshops

A maquila in Mexico

It can be said that globalization is the door that opens up an otherwise resource-poor country to
the international market. Where a country has little material or physical product harvested or
mined from its own soil, large corporations see an opportunity to take advantage of the “export
poverty” of such a nation. Where the majority of the earliest occurrences of economic
globalization are recorded as being the expansion of businesses and corporate growth, in many
poorer nations globalization is actually the result of the foreign businesses investing in the
country to take advantage of the lower wage rate: even though investing, by increasing the
Capital Stock of the country, increases their wage rate.

One example used by anti-globalization protestors is the use of sweatshops by manufacturers.

According to Global Exchange these “Sweat Shops” are widely used by sports shoe
manufacturers and mentions one company in particular – Nike.[110] There are factories set up in
the poor countries where employees agree to work for low wages. Then if labour laws alter in
those countries and stricter rules govern the manufacturing process the factories are closed down
and relocated to other nations with more conservative, laissez-faire economic policies.[citation needed]

There are several agencies that have been set up worldwide specifically designed to focus on
anti-sweatshop campaigns and education of such. In the USA, the National Labor Committee has
proposed a number of bills as part of the The Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition
Act, which have thus far failed in Congress. The legislation would legally require companies to
respect human and worker rights by prohibiting the import, sale, or export of sweatshop goods.
[111]

Specifically, these core standards include no child labor, no forced labor, freedom of association,
right to organize and bargain collectively, as well as the right to decent working conditions.[112]

Tiziana Terranova has stated that globalization has brought a culture of "free labour". In a digital
sense, it is where the individuals (contributing capital) exploits and eventually "exhausts the
means through which labour can sustain itself". For example, in the area of digital media
(animations, hosting chat rooms, designing games), where it is often less glamourous than it may
sound. In the gaming industry, a Chinese Gold Market has been established.[113]

[edit] Pro-globalization (globalism)

Supporters of free trade claim that it increases economic prosperity as well as opportunity,
especially among developing nations, enhances civil liberties and leads to a more efficient
allocation of resources. Economic theories of comparative advantage suggest that free trade leads
to a more efficient allocation of resources, with all countries involved in the trade benefiting. In
general, this leads to lower prices, more employment, higher output and a higher standard of
living for those in developing countries.[114][115]

Dr. Francesco Stipo, Director of the USA Club of Rome suggests that “the world government
should reflect the political and economic balances of world nations. A world confederation
would not supersede the authority of the State governments but rather complement it, as both the
States and the world authority would have power within their sphere of competence".[116]

Proponents of laissez-faire capitalism, and some libertarians, say that higher degrees of political
and economic freedom in the form of democracy and capitalism in the developed world are ends
in themselves and also produce higher levels of material wealth. They see globalization as the
beneficial spread of liberty and capitalism.[114]

Supporters of democratic globalization are sometimes called pro-globalists. They believe that the
first phase of globalization, which was market-oriented, should be followed by a phase of
building global political institutions representing the will of world citizens. The difference from
other globalists is that they do not define in advance any ideology to orient this will, but would
leave it to the free choice of those citizens via a democratic process.[citation needed]
Some, such as former Canadian Senator Douglas Roche, O.C., simply view globalization as
inevitable and advocate creating institutions such as a directly-elected United Nations
Parliamentary Assembly to exercise oversight over unelected international bodies.

[edit] Anti-globalization
Main article: Anti-globalization movement
See also: Alter-globalization, Participatory economics, and Global Justice Movement

The "anti-globalization movement" is a term used to describe the political group who oppose the
neoliberal version of globalization, while criticisms of globalization are some of the reasons used
to justify this group's stance.

"Anti-globalization" may also involve the process or actions taken by a state or its people in
order to demonstrate its sovereignty and practice democratic decision-making. Anti-globalization
may occur in order to maintain barriers to the international transfer of people, goods and beliefs,
particularly free market deregulation, encouraged by organizations such as the International
Monetary Fund or the World Trade Organization. Moreover, as Naomi Klein argues in her book
No Logo, anti-globalism can denote either a single social movement or an umbrella term that
encompasses a number of separate social movements[117] such as nationalists and socialists. In
either case, participants stand in opposition to the unregulated political power of large, multi-
national corporations, as the corporations exercise power through leveraging trade agreements
which in some instances damage the democratic rights of citizens[citation needed], the environment
particularly air quality index and rain forests[citation needed], as well as national government's
sovereignty to determine labor rights,[citation needed] including the right to form a union, and health
and safety legislation, or laws as they may otherwise infringe on cultural practices and traditions
of developing countries.[citation needed]

Some people who are labeled "anti-globalist" or "sceptics" (Hirst and Thompson)[118] consider the
term to be too vague and inaccurate.[119][120] Podobnik states that "the vast majority of groups that
participate in these protests draw on international networks of support, and they generally call for
forms of globalization that enhance democratic representation, human rights, and
egalitarianism."

Joseph Stiglitz and Andrew Charlton write:[121]

The anti-globalization movement developed in opposition to the perceived negative

“ aspects of globalization. The term 'anti-globalization' is in many ways a misnomer,
since the group represents a wide range of interests and issues and many of the
people involved in the anti-globalization movement do support closer ties between
the various peoples and cultures of the world through, for example, aid, assistance for
refugees, and global environmental issues. ”
Some members aligned with this viewpoint prefer instead to describe themselves as the "Global
Justice Movement", the "Anti-Corporate-Globalization Movement", the "Movement of
Movements" (a popular term in Italy), the "Alter-globalization" movement (popular in France),
the "Counter-Globalization" movement, and a number of other terms.

Critiques of the current wave of economic globalization typically look at both the damage to the
planet, in terms of the perceived unsustainable harm done to the biosphere, as well as the
perceived human costs, such as poverty, inequality, miscegenation, injustice and the erosion of
traditional culture which, the critics contend, all occur as a result of the economic
transformations related to globalization. They challenge directly the metrics, such as GDP, used
to measure progress promulgated by institutions such as the World Bank, and look to other
measures, such as the Happy Planet Index,[122] created by the New Economics Foundation.[123]
They point to a "multitude of interconnected fatal consequences–social disintegration, a
breakdown of democracy, more rapid and extensive deterioration of the environment, the spread
of new diseases, increasing poverty and alienation"[124] which they claim are the unintended but
very real consequences of globalization.

The terms globalization and anti-globalization are used in various ways. Noam Chomsky
believes that[125][126]

The term "globalization" has been appropriated by the powerful to refer to a specific
“ form of international economic integration, one based on investor rights, with the
interests of people incidental. That is why the business press, in its more honest
moments, refers to the "free trade agreements" as "free investment agreements"
(Wall St. Journal). Accordingly, advocates of other forms of globalization are
described as "anti-globalization"; and some, unfortunately, even accept this term,
though it is a term of propaganda that should be dismissed with ridicule. No sane
person is opposed to globalization, that is, international integration. Surely not the
left and the workers movements, which were founded on the principle of
international solidarity — that is, globalization in a form that attends to the rights of
people, not private power systems. ”
The dominant propaganda systems have appropriated the term "globalization" to
“ refer to the specific version of international economic integration that they favor,
which privileges the rights of investors and lenders, those of people being incidental.
In accord with this usage, those who favor a different form of international
integration, which privileges the rights of human beings, become "anti-globalist."
This is simply vulgar propaganda, like the term "anti-Soviet" used by the most
disgusting commissars to refer to dissidents. It is not only vulgar, but idiotic. Take
the World Social Forum, called "anti-globalization" in the propaganda system –
which happens to include the media, the educated classes, etc., with rare exceptions.
The WSF is a paradigm example of globalization. It is a gathering of huge numbers
of people from all over the world, from just about every corner of life one can think
of, apart from the extremely narrow highly privileged elites who meet at the
competing World Economic Forum, and are called "pro-globalization" by the
propaganda system. An observer watching this farce from Mars would collapse in
hysterical laughter at the antics of the educated classes. ”
Critics argue that:

• Poorer countries suffering disadvantages: While it is true that globalization encourages

free trade among countries, there are also negative consequences because some countries
try to save their national markets. The main export of poorer countries is usually
agricultural goods. Larger countries often subsidise their farmers (like the EU Common
Agricultural Policy), which lowers the market price for the poor farmer's crops compared
to what it would be under free trade.[127]
• Exploitation of foreign impoverished workers: The deterioration of protections for
weaker nations by stronger industrialized powers has resulted in the exploitation of the
people in those nations to become cheap labor. Due to the lack of protections, companies
from powerful industrialized nations are able to offer workers enough salary to entice
them to endure extremely long hours and unsafe working conditions, though economists
question if consenting workers in a competitive employers' market can be decried as
"exploited". It is true that the workers are free to leave their jobs, but in many poorer
countries, this would mean starvation for the worker, and possible even his/her family if
their previous jobs were unavailable.[128]
• The shift to outsourcing: The low cost of offshore workers have enticed corporations to
buy goods and services from foreign countries. The laid off manufacturing sector workers
are forced into the service sector where wages and benefits are low, but turnover is high .
[citation needed]
This has contributed to the deterioration of the middle class[citation needed] which is
a major factor in the increasing economic inequality in the United States .[citation needed]
Families that were once part of the middle class are forced into lower positions by
massive layoffs and outsourcing to another country. This also means that people in the
lower class have a much harder time climbing out of poverty because of the absence of
the middle class as a stepping stone.[129]
• Weak labor unions: The surplus in cheap labor coupled with an ever growing number of
companies in transition has caused a weakening of labor unions in the United States.
Unions lose their effectiveness when their membership begins to decline. As a result
unions hold less power over corporations that are able to easily replace workers, often for
lower wages, and have the option to not offer unionized jobs anymore.[127]
• Increase exploitation of child labor: for example, a country that experiencing increases
in labor demand because of globalization and an increase the demand for goods produced
by children, will experience greater a demand for child labor. This can be "hazardous" or
“exploitive”, e.g., quarrying, salvage, cash cropping but also includes the trafficking of
children, children in bondage or forced labor, prostitution, pornography and other illicit
activities.[130]

In December 2007, World Bank economist Branko Milanovic has called much previous
empirical research on global poverty and inequality into question because, according to him,
improved estimates of purchasing power parity indicate that developing countries are worse off
than previously believed. Milanovic remarks that "literally hundreds of scholarly papers on
convergence or divergence of countries’ incomes have been published in the last decade based
on what we know now were faulty numbers." With the new data, possibly economists will revise
calculations, and he also believed that there are considerable implications estimates of global
inequality and poverty levels. Global inequality was estimated at around 65 Gini points, whereas
the new numbers indicate global inequality to be at 70 on the Gini scale.[131]

The critics of globalization typically emphasize that globalization is a process that is mediated
according to corporate interests, and typically raise the possibility of alternative global
institutions and policies, which they believe address the moral claims of poor and working
classes throughout the globe, as well as environmental concerns in a more equitable way.[132]

The movement is very broad[citation needed], including church groups, national liberation factions,
peasant unionists, intellectuals, artists, protectionists, anarchists, those in support of
relocalization and others. Some are reformist, (arguing for a more moderate form of capitalism)
while others are more revolutionary (arguing for what they believe is a more humane system
than capitalism) and others are reactionary, believing globalization destroys national industry and
jobs.

One of the key points made by critics of recent economic globalization is that income inequality,
both between and within nations, is increasing as a result of these processes. One article from
2001 found that significantly, in 7 out of 8 metrics, income inequality has increased in the twenty
years ending 2001. Also, "incomes in the lower deciles of world income distribution have
probably fallen absolutely since the 1980s". Furthermore, the World Bank's figures on absolute
poverty were challenged. The article was skeptical of the World Bank's claim that the number of
people living on less than $1 a day has held steady at 1.2 billion from 1987 to 1998, because of
biased methodology.[133]

A chart that gave the inequality a very visible and comprehensible form, the so-called
'champagne glass' effect,[134] was contained in the 1992 United Nations Development Program
Report, which showed the distribution of global income to be very uneven, with the richest 20%
of the world's population controlling 82.7% of the world's income.[135]

Distribution of world GDP, 1989

Quintile of Population Income
Richest 20% 82.7%
Second 20% 11.7%
Third 20% 2.3%
Fourth 20% 2.4%
Poorest 20% 0.2%

Source: United Nations Development Program. 1992 Human Development Report[136]

Economic arguments by fair trade theorists claim that unrestricted free trade benefits those with
more financial leverage (i.e. the rich) at the expense of the poor.[137]

Americanization related to a period of high political American clout and of significant growth of
America's shops, markets and object being brought into other countries. So globalization, a much
more diversified phenomenon, relates to a multilateral political world and to the increase of
objects, markets and so on into each others countries.
Critics of globalization talk of Westernization. A 2005 UNESCO report[138] showed that cultural
exchange is becoming more frequent from Eastern Asia but . In 2002, China was the third largest
exporter of cultural goods, after the UK and US. Between 1994 and 2002, both North America's
and the European Union's shares of cultural exports declined, while Asia's cultural exports grew
to surpass North America. Related factors are the fact that Asia's population and area are several
times that of North America.

Some opponents of globalization see the phenomenon as the promotion of corporatist interests.
[139]
They also claim that the increasing autonomy and strength of corporate entities shapes the
political policy of countries.[140][141]

[edit] International Social Forums

See main articles: European Social Forum, the Asian Social Forum,(Africa Social Forum),
World Social Forum (WSF).

The first WSF in 2001 was an initiative of the administration of Porto Alegre in Brazil. The
slogan of the World Social Forum was "Another World Is Possible". It was here that the WSF's
Charter of Principles was adopted to provide a framework for the forums.

The WSF became a periodic meeting: in 2002 and 2003 it was held again in Porto Alegre and
became a rallying point for worldwide protest against the American invasion of Iraq. In 2004 it
was moved to Mumbai (formerly known as Bombay, in India), to make it more accessible to the
populations of Asia and Africa. This last appointment saw the participation of 75,000 delegates.

In the meantime, regional forums took place following the example of the WSF, adopting its
Charter of Principles. The first European Social Forum (ESF) was held in November 2002 in
Florence. The slogan was "Against the war, against racism and against neo-liberalism". It saw
the participation of 60,000 delegates and ended with a huge demonstration against the war
(1,000,000 people according to the organizers). The other two ESFs took place in Paris and
London, in 2003 and 2004 respectively.

Recently there has been some discussion behind the movement about the role of the social
forums. Some see them as a "popular university", an occasion to make many people aware of the
problems of globalization. Others would prefer that delegates concentrate their efforts on the
coordination and organization of the movement and on the planning of new campaigns. However
it has often been argued that in the dominated countries (most of the world) the WSF is little
more than an 'NGO fair' driven by Northern NGOs and donors most of which are hostile to
popular movements of the poor.[142]

[edit] See also

• Alter-globalization
• American Imperialism
• Archaic globalization
• Civilizing mission
 • Columbian Exchange
• Cultural assimilation
• Deglobalization
• Development criticism
• Globalism
• Global information system
• Globality
• Great Transition
• Interdependence
• New world order (politics)
• Postmodernism
• Impact of globalization on women in China
• Transnational cinema
• Vermeer's Hat: The Seventeenth Century and the Dawn of the Global World

[edit] References
1. ^ Bhagwati, Jagdish (2004). In Defense of Globalization. Oxford, New York: Oxford
University Press.
2. ^ Sheila L. Croucher. Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity in a
Changing World. Rowman & Littlefield. (2004). p.10
3. ^ The Battle of Armageddon, October, 1897 pages 365–370
4. ^ A.G. Hopkins, ed. "Globalization in World History". Norton. (2004). p. 4
5. ^ Summary of the Annual Review of Developments in Globalization and Regional
Integration in the Countries of the ESCWA Region by the United Nations Economic and
Social Commission for Western Asia
6. ^ [|Sassen, Saskia] (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global
Assemblages. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691095388.
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8159.html.
7. ^ Globalization Is Grrrreat! by Tom G. Palmer, Senior Fellow, Cato Institute
8. ^ Friedman,Thomas L. "The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention". Emergin: A Reader.
Ed. Barclay Barrios. Boston: Bedford, St. Martins, 2008. 49
9. ^ "Special Report - The Global 2000," Forbes, April 2, 2008.
10. ^ "HSBC tops Forbes 2000 list of world's largest companies," HSBC website, 4 April
2008
11. ^ ZNet, Corporate Globalization, Korea and International Affairs, Noam Chomsky
interviewed by Sun Woo Lee, Monthly JoongAng, 22 February 2006
12. ^ “Globalisation, the reformist Left and the Anti-Globalisation ‘Movement’”, Takis
Fotopoulos, DEMOCRACY & NATURE: The International Journal of INCLUSIVE
DEMOCRACY, Vol.7, No.2, (July 2001),
13. ^ Andre Gunder Frank, "Reorient: Global economy in the Asian age" U.C. Berkeley
Press, 1998.
14. ^ Ancient Silk Road Travellers
15. ^ John M. Hobson (2004), The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, p. 29-30,
Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-54724-5.
16. ^ Jack Weatherford, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, Crown, 2004
17. ^ "The Age of Exploration", Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2009. Archived
2009-10-31.
18. ^ "Portuguese Empire", Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2009. Archived 2009-
10-31.
19. ^ House of India, Encyclopedia Britannica.
20. ^ Crosby, Alfred W., "The Columbian exchange: biological and cultural consequences of
1492", Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0275980731
21. ^ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/tr_show01.html
22. ^ VM Yeates. Winged Victory. Jonathan Cape. London. 1962 pp 54–55
23. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica's Great Inventions", Encyclopædia Britannica
24. ^ Nouriel Roubini (January 15, 2009). "A Global Breakdown Of The Recession In
2009". http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/14/global-recession-2009-oped-
cx_nr_0115roubini.html.
25. ^ A Global Retreat As Economies Dry Up. The Washington Post. March 5, 2009.
26. ^ Economic Crisis Poses Threat To Global Stability. NPR. February 18, 2009.
27. ^ 45 percent of world's wealth destroyed: Blackstone CEO. Reuters. March 10, 2009.
28. ^ "In Recession, China Solidifies Its Lead in Global Trade". The New York Times.
October 13, 2009.
29. ^ Jurgen Osterhammel and Niels P.Petersson. Globalization: a short history. (2005) P.8
30. ^ WTO.org,(2009)
31. ^ "World Exports as Percentage of Gross World Product". Global Policy Forum.
Archived from the original on 12 July 2008.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080712023541/http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/trade/
tables/exports2.htm. Retrieved 11 November 2009.
32. ^ Axel Dreher, Noel Gaston, Pim Martens, Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its
Consequences, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-74067-6.
33. ^ KOF Index of Globalization
34. ^ "Globalisation shakes the world". BBC News. January 21, 2007.
35. ^ "China and Africa: Stronger Economic Ties Mean More Migration". By Malia Politzer,
Migration Information Source. August 2008.
36. ^ "Africa, China's new frontier". Times Online. February 10, 2008.
37. ^ "Globalization". Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2009. Archived 2009-10-31.
38. ^ "Globalization (Page 3 of 5)". Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2009. Archived
2009-10-31.
39. ^ "World Port Rankings 2005". American Association of Port Authorities. 2005.
http://www.infoplease.com/business/world-port-ranking-2005.html. Retrieved 2009-09-
15.
40. ^ "World Port Rankings 2006". American Association of Port Authorities. 2006.
http://www.infoplease.com/business/world-port-ranking.html. Retrieved 2009-09-15.
41. ^ "World Port Rankings 2007". American Association of Port Authorities. 2007.
http://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/Statistics/WORLDPORTRANKINGS2007.xls. Retrieved
2009-09-15.
42. ^ http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,465007-3,00.html The birth of
China's "special economic zones"
43. ^ "4 Indians in Forbes’ top 10 billionaires list". The Hindu Business Line. March 6, 2008.
44. ^ "India sees fastest growth of millionaires". NewsX. September 26, 2008.
45. ^ Ollila, E. (2005). Global health priorities – priorities of the wealthy? Globalization and
Health, vol. 1(6)
46. ^ "Emigration reaches record high in 2008". Office for National Statistics. 26 November
2009. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/mignr1109.pdf. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
47. ^ Francesco Stipo. World Federalist Manifesto. Guide to Political Globalization, ISBN
978-0-9794679-2-9, http://www.worldfederalistmanifesto.com
48. ^ Hurst E. Charles. Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and consequences, 6th ed. P.91
49. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8311000/8311069.stm
50. ^ http://anthro.palomar.edu/language/language_1.htm
51. ^ http://workinfonet.bc.ca/lmisi/Making/CHAPTER2/TANDG1.HTM
52. ^ http://www.corrupt.org/articles/politics/markus_nordman/de_facto_monoculture
53. ^ http://bss.sfsu.edu/fischer/IR%20305/Readings/global.htm
54. ^ Swine flu prompts EU warning on travel to US. The Guardian. April 28, 2009.
55. ^ "UNWTO World Tourism Barometer June 2009". UNWTO World Tourism Barometer
(World Tourism Organization) 7 (2). June 2009.
http://unwto.org/facts/eng/pdf/barometer/UNWTO_Barom09_2_en_excerpt.pdf.
Retrieved 3 August 2009.
56. ^ "Migration in the Asia-Pacific Region". Stephen Castles, University of Oxford. Mark J.
Miller, University of Delaware. July 2009.
57. ^ "Guinea: Unstoppable exodus", BBC News, May 18, 2004.
58. ^ "Rich world needs more foreign workers: report". FOXNews.com, December 02, 2008
59. ^ "Migration and Remittances". The World Bank.
60. ^ Scherer, J. (2007). "Globalization, promotional culture and the production/consumption
of online games: Engaging Adidas's “Beat Rugby” campaign". New Media & Society 9:
475–496. doi:10.1177/1461444807076978. [1]
61. ^ Pawel Zaleski Global Non-governmental Administrative System: Geosociology of the
Third Sector, [in:] Gawin, Dariusz & Glinski, Piotr [ed.]: "Civil Society in the Making",
IFiS Publishers, Warszawa 2006
62. ^ McAlister, Elizabeth. 2005. “Globalization and the Religious Production of Space.”
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 44, No 3, September 2005, 249-255.
63. ^ http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/2000/culture/global/section1.html
64. ^ http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/news/blogs/2009-06-
26/200906261246030870437.html
65. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2008/aug/18/bodyartblunders
66. ^ http://www1.worldbank.org/economicpolicy/globalization/index.html
67. ^ Longworth, Richard, C. Caught in the Middle: America's Heartland in the Age of
Globalism. New York: Bloomsbury, 2007.
68. ^ Dr. Daulaire. Globalization and Health. Retrieved October 11, 2006 from
http://www.globalhealth.org/assets/html/drmed3.html
69. ^ The Impact of Globalization on Infectious Disease Emergence and Control: Exploring
the Consequences and Opportunities, Workshop Summary - Forum on Microbial Threats
70. ^ "The virus from Africa reached the U.S. by way of Haiti, a genetic study shows". Los
Angelese Times. October 30, 2007.
71. ^ "Brain drain in Africa"
72. ^ "Students’ exodus costs India forex outflow of $10 bn: Assocham". Thaindian News.
January 26, 2009.
73. ^ "Economic Crisis in a Globalized World". Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
November 21, 2008
74. ^ "The fruit of hypocrisy". The Guardian. September 16, 2008
75. ^ "Banks Taking Same Risks That Led to Crisis: ECB's Noyer". CNBC.com. October 26,
2009.
76. ^ Vogel, Ezra F. 1991. The Four Little Dragons: The Spread of Industrialization in East
Asia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
77. ^ "SOUTH AFRICA: Fallout as China sews up textile market". IRIN Africa. June 29,
2005.
78. ^ Growth of China's textile industry slows". Chinadaily.com.cn. March 21, 2007.
79. ^ "Asia strips Africa's textile industry". Asia Times. April 26, 2005.
80. ^ "Factory jobs: 3 million lost since 2000". USATODAY.com. April 20, 2007.
81. ^ "Growth of millionaires in India fastest in world ". Thaindian News. June 25, 2008.
82. ^ "Birth rates 'must be curbed to win war on global poverty'". The Independent. January
31, 2007.
83. ^ "Half of India's children malnourished, says NGO report". Calcutta News. October 15,
2009.
84. ^ "Brazil Amazon deforestation soars". BBC News. January 24, 2008.
85. ^ "China overtakes US as world's biggest CO2 emitter". Guardian.co.uk. June 19, 2007.
86. ^ "China is black hole of Asia's deforestation." Asia News. March 24, 2008.
87. ^ "Japan depletes Borneo's rainforests; China remains largest log importer"
88. ^ Oil price 'may hit $200 a barrel', BBC News
89. ^ "Running Out of Planet to Exploit". The New York Times. April 21, 2008.
90. ^ "International Petroleum (Oil) Consumption Data". U.S. Energy Information
Administration. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/oilconsumption.html.
Retrieved 2007-12-20.
91. ^ http://tfc-charts.com/chart/QM/W
92. ^ "Booming nations 'threaten Earth'". BBC News. January 12, 2006.
93. ^ "Earth's natural wealth: an audit". New Scientist. May 23, 2007.
94. ^ "State of the World 2006: China and India Hold World in Balance". Worldwatch
Institute. 11 January 2006.
95. ^ "Effects of Over-Consumption and Increasing Populations". 26 September 2001.
Retrieved on 19 June 2007
96. ^ von Braun, "High and Rising Food Prices", 2008, p 5, slide 14
97. ^ Kindall, Henery W & Pimentel, David (May 1994). "Constraints on the Expansion of
the Global Food Supply". Ambio. 23 (3). http://dieoff.org/page36.htm.
98. ^ "The limits of a Green Revolution?". BBC News. March 29, 2007.
99. ^ "Feed the world? We are fighting a losing battle, UN admits". The Guardian. February
26, 2008.
100. ^ "World faces 'perfect storm' of problems by 2030, chief scientist to warn". The
Guardian. March 18, 2009.
101. ^ "Global crisis 'to strike by 2030'". BBC News. March 19, 2009.
102. ^ "Global food production will have to increase 70% for additional 2.3 billion
people by 2050". Finfacts.com. September 24, 2009.
103. ^ Juliet Eilperin (2 November 2006). ""Seafood Population Depleted by 2048,
Study Finds"". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/11/02/AR2006110200913.html.
104. ^ http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/gashc3947.doc.htm
105. ^ "Drug Trade". BBC News.
106. ^ "Will traditional Chinese medicine mean the end of the wild tiger?". San
Francisco Chronicle. November 11, 2007.
107. ^ "India says Chinese medicine fuels tiger poaching". Reuters. September 17,
2009.
108. ^ "Rhino rescue plan decimates Asian antelopes". New Scientist. February 12,
2003.
109. ^ "'Only 50 years left' for sea fish", BBC News. 2 November 2006.
110. ^ http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/nike/faq.html
111. ^ GovTrack, S. 3485
112. ^ http://www.educatingforjustice.org/stopnikesweatshops.htm
113. ^ Terry Flew. Ten Key Contemparary New Media Theorist.2008.P 78
114. ^ a b Sachs, Jeffrey (2005). The End of Poverty. New York, New York: The
Penguin Press. ISBN 1-59420-045-9.
115. ^ "World Bank, Poverty Rates, 1981–2002" (PDF).
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/table2-7.pdf.
Retrieved 2007-06-04.
116. ^ http://www.usacor.org/archive/index.html
117. ^ No Logo: No Space, No Choice, No Jobs, Naomi Klein.
118. ^ Hirst and Thompson "The Future of Globalisation" Published: Cooperation and
Conflict, Vol. 37, No. 3, 247-265 (2002)DOI: 10.1177/0010836702037003671
http://cac.sagepub.com/cgi/content/short/37/3/247
119. ^ Morris, Douglas "Globalization and Media Democracy: The Case of
Indymedia", Shaping the Network Society, MIT Press 2003. Courtesy link to(pre-publication
version) [2]
120. ^ [3] Podobnik, Bruce, Resistance to Globalization: Cycles and Evolutions in the
Globalization Protest Movement, p. 2.
121. ^ Stiglitz, Joseph & Charlton Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote
Development. 2005 p. 54 n. 23
122. ^ The Happy Planet Index
123. ^ The New Economics Foundation
124. ^ Capra, Fritjof (2002). The Hidden Connections. New York, New York: Random
House. ISBN 0-385-49471-8.
125. ^ Noam Chomsky Znet 07 May 2002 / The Croatian Feral Tribune 27 April 2002
[4]
126. ^ Interview by Sniježana Matejčić, June 2005 en 2.htm
127. ^ a b Hurst E. Charles. Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and consequences, 6th
ed. P.41
128. ^ Chossudovsky, Michel. The globalization of poverty and the new world order /
by Michel Chossudovsky. Edition 2nd ed. Imprint Shanty Bay, Ont. : Global Outlook,
c2003.
129. ^ The Declining Middle Class: A Further Analysis, Journal article by Patrick J.
Mcmahon, John H. Tschetter; Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 109, 1986
 130. ^ Pavcnik, Nina (September 2005). "Child Labor in the Global Economy".
Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 199–220. doi:10.1257/0895330053147895.
131. ^ Developing Countries Worse Off Than Once Thought - Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace
132. ^ Fórum Social Mundial
133. ^ Wade, Robert Hunter. 'The Rising Inequality of World Income Distribution',
Finance & Development, Vol 38, No 4 December 2001
134. ^ Xabier Gorostiaga,"World has become a 'champagne glass' globalization will
fill it fuller for a wealthy few' National Catholic Reporter, Jan 27, 1995 '
135. ^ United Nations Development Program. 1992 Human Development Report,
1992 (New York, Oxford University Press)
136. ^ "Human Development Report 1992".
http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/1992/en/. Retrieved 2007-07-08.
137. ^ NAFTA at 10, Jeff Faux, Economic Policy Institute, D.C.
138. ^ 2005 UNESCO report
139. ^ Lee, Laurence (17 May 2007). "WTO blamed for India grain suicides". Al
Jazeera. http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2ED53A8B-1058-49CF-B9FF-
3D96639456D1.htm. Retrieved 2007-05-17.
140. ^ Bakan, Joel (2004). The Corporation. New York, New York: Simon &
Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-4744-2.
141. ^ Perkins, John (2004). Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. San Francisco,
California: Berrett-Koehler. ISBN 1-57675-301-8.
142. ^ Pambazuka News

[edit] Further reading

• Barbara, Christopher (2008). International legal personality: Panacea or
pandemonium? Theorizing about the individual and the state in the era of
globalization. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller. ISBN 3639115147.
http://www.amazon.com/International-legal-personality-pandemonium-
globalization/dp/3639115147/ref=sr_1_2?
ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1230743211&sr=1-2.
• Barzilai, Gad (2008). Beyond Relativism: Where is Political Power in Legal
Pluralism. The Berkeley Electronic Press. pp. 395–416.
http://www.bepress.com/til/default/vol9/iss2/art4/.
• Bastardas-Boada, Albert (2002), “World Language Policy in the Era of
Globalization: Diversity and Intercommunication from the Perspective of
'Complexity'", Noves SL, Revista de Sociolingüística (Barcelona),
http://www6.gencat.net/llengcat/noves/hm02estiu/metodologia/a_bastardas1_9.htm.
• von Braun, Joachim; Eugenio Diaz-Bonilla (2007). Globalization of Food and
Agriculture and the Poor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195695281.
http://www.ifpri.org/PUBS/otherpubs/globalpoor.asp.
• Peter Berger, Four Faces of Global Culture (The National Interest, Fall 1997).
• Friedman, Thomas L. (2005). The World Is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and
Giroux. ISBN 0-374-29288-4.
• Grinin, Leonid. Globalization and Sovereignty: Why do States Abandon their
Sovereign Prerogatives?. http://old.uchitel-izd.ru/index.php?
option=content&task=view&id=155&Itemid=97.
• Haggblade, Steven; et al. (2007). Transforming the Rural Nonfarm Economy:
Opportunities and Threats in the Developing World. Johns Hopkins University Press.
pp. 512. ISBN 978-0-8018-8663-8. http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/jhu/transformrural.asp.
• Kitching, Gavin (2001). Seeking Social Justice through Globalization. Escaping a
Nationalist Perspective. Penn State Press. ISBN 0271021624.
http://www.gavinkitching.com/africa_3.htm.
• Gernot Kohler and Emilio José Chaves (Editors) “Globalization: Critical
Perspectives” Haupauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers
(http://www.novapublishers.com/) ISBN 1-59033-346-2. With contributions by Samir
Amin, Christopher Chase Dunn, Andre Gunder Frank, Immanuel Wallerstein
• Mander, Jerry; Edward Goldsmith (1996). The case against the global economy :
and for a turn toward the local. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. ISBN 0-87156-
865-9.
• Moore, Karl; David Lewis (2009). Origins of Globalization. New York:
Routledge.
• Murray, Warwick E. (2006). Geographies of Globalization. New York:
Routledge/Taylor and Francis. ISBN 0415317991.
• Osterhammel, Jurgen; Niels P. Petersson (2005). Globalization: A Short History.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12165-6.
http://www.amazon.com/Globalization-Short-History-Jurgen-
Osterhammel/dp/0691121656/ref=sr_1_1?
ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1238939576&sr=1-1.
• Raffaele Feola, La Globalizzazione dell'Arte. L'UTOPIA DEL GLOBALE,
Napoli 2009.
• Reinsdorf, Marshall and Matthew J. Slaughter (2009). International Trade in
Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization. Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226709598.
• Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford, New York: Oxford
University Press. ISBN 019289330.
• Sirkin, Harold L; James W. Hemerling and Arindam K. Bhattacharya (2008).
Globality: Competing with Everyone from Everywhere for Everything. New York:
Business Plus. pp. 292. ISBN 0446178292. http://www.bcg.com/globality.
• Smith, Charles (2007). International Trade and Globalisation, 3rd edition.
Stocksfield: Anforme. ISBN 1905504101.
• Steger, Manfred (2002). Globalism: the new market ideology. Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 0742500721.
• Steger, Manfred (2003). Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, New
York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280359-X.
• Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W.
Norton. ISBN 0-393-32439-7.
• Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2006). Making Globalization Work. New York: W.W. Norton.
ISBN 0-393-06122-1.
 • Tausch, Arno (2008). Multicultural Europe: Effects of the Global Lisbon Process.
Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 978-1-60456-806-6.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=7489.
• Tausch, Arno (2009). Titanic 2010? The European Union and its failed “Lisbon
strategy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 978-1-60741-826-9.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=8314.
• Wolf, Martin (2004). Why Globalization Works. New Haven: Yale University
Press. ISBN 978-0300102529.

[edit] External links

This article's external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please
improve this article by removing excessive and inappropriate external links or by
converting links into references. (June 2009)
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Globalization

Look up globalisation or globalization in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Globalization

• YaleGlobal Online Online Magazine focusing on Globalization

• Latin Business Chronicle, Dec.10, 2008 Latin America More Globalized
• Argentine Center of International Studies
• Arno Tausch (2006), ‘From the “Washington” towards a “Vienna Consensus”? A
quantitative analysis on globalization, development and global governance’. Paper,
prepared for the discussion process leading up to the EU-Latin America and Caribbean
Summit 2006, May 11, 2006 to May 12, 2006, Vienna, Austria. Centro Argentino de
Estudios Internacionales, Buenos Aires
• Arno Tausch (2007), ‘“Destructive Creation”? Some long-term Schumpeterian
reflections on the Lisbon process’ Entelequia e-Books, University of Cadiz/Malaga
(Spain), Munich Personal Repec Archive, Global Development Network, University of
Sussex and University of Connecticut, Ideas/Repec
• Effects of globalization on online freelancers
• Embracing the Challenge of Free Trade: Competing and Prospering in a Global Economy
a speech by Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke
• Globalisation shakes the world BBC News
• Inequality Project from University of Texas
• Institute for Research on World-Systems at UC Riverside
• Resilience, Panarchy, and World-Systems Analysis from the Ecology and Society Journal
• Rethinking Globalisation blog
• OECD Globalization statistics
• Globalization theories
• The Sociology of Globalization
• Mapping Globalization — globalization project with a collection of maps
 • Globalization and Me Views and viewpoints on Globalization
• Globalism/Antiglobalism : a survey and a view
• The Effects of Globalization on the U.S.A.

[edit] Multimedia

• CBC Archives CBC Television reports on the opening of Moscow McDonalds (1990) -
sample of Western business expanding into former communist countries.
• Squeezed: The Cost of Free Trade in the Asia-Pacific 2007 film about the impacts of
globalisation in Thailand and the Philippines.

[show]
v•d•e
International trade

[show]
v•d•e
World government

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization"

Categories: Globalization | Theories of history | Sociocultural evolution | Economic geography |
Cultural geography | World government | Postmodernism
Hidden categories: Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages | All articles with unsourced
statements | Articles with unsourced statements from August 2009 | Articles with unsourced
statements from September 2009 | Articles with unsourced statements from March 2009 |
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2009 | Articles with unsourced statements
from October 2008 | Articles with unsourced statements from February 2007 | Wikipedia
external links cleanup | Wikipedia spam cleanup | Exclude in print
Views

• Article
• Discussion
• Edit this page
• History

Personal tools

• Try Beta
• Log in / create account

Navigation

• Main page
• Contents
• Featured content
• Current events
• Random article

Search

Go Search

Interaction

• About Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Recent changes
• Contact Wikipedia
• Donate to Wikipedia
• Help

Toolbox

• What links here

• Related changes
• Upload file
• Special pages
• Printable version
• Permanent link
• Cite this page

Languages

• Afrikaans
• ‫العربية‬
• Aragonés
• Asturianu
• Azərbaycan
• বাংলা
• Bân-lâm-gú
• Беларуская
• Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
• Bosanski
• Български
• Català
• Česky
• Cymraeg
• Dansk
• Deutsch
• Eesti
• Ελληνικά
• Español
• Esperanto
• Euskara
• ‫فارسی‬
• Français
• Gaeilge
• Galego
• ગુજરાતી
• 한국어
• िहनदी
• Hrvatski
• Bahasa Indonesia
• Íslenska
• Italiano
• ‫עברית‬
• Basa Jawa
• ಕನನಡ
• ქართული
• Қазақша
• Kiswahili
• Latina
• Latviešu
• Lëtzebuergesch
• Lietuvių
• Limburgs
• Magyar
• Македонски
• മലയാളം
• Bahasa Melayu
• Mirandés
• Nederlands
• नेपाल भाषा
• 日本語
• Norsk (bokmål)
• Norsk (nynorsk)
• Piemontèis
• Polski
• Português
• Română
• Русский
• Саха тыла
• Sicilianu
• සිංහල
• Simple English
• Slovenčina
• Slovenščina
• Српски / Srpski
• Srpskohrvatski / Српскохрватски
• Suomi
• Svenska
• Tagalog
• தமிழ்
• Татарча/Tatarça
• తలుగు
• ไทย
• Тоҷикӣ
• Türkçe
• Українська
• ‫اردو‬
• Tiếng Việt
• Võro
• Winaray
• ‫יידיש‬
• 粵語
• Žemaitėška
• 中文

• This page was last modified on 26 January 2010 at 17:56.

• Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.
 Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.
• Contact us
• Privacy policy
• About Wikipedia
• Disclaimers