Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chapter 1
Brewing microbiology
Feb 2009
Micro-organisms
During production of beer, several micro-organisms are likely to grow
because of nutrient-rich environment (sugar, amino acid, phosphate,
sulphate, oxygen, vitamins, minerals) and suitable conditions
(temperature, time, pH)
However, characteristics of beer alcohol, CO2, SO2, pH reduce the
range of organisms. Examples:
Lactobacillus (L.brevis, L.lindneri, L.brevisimilis, L.frigidus, L.coryniformis,
L.Casei)
Pectinatus cerevisiiphilus
Feb 2009
Bacterium
Enterobacter
- Aerogenes
- Klepsiella
Wort, Fermentation
DMS, H2S
Flavobacterium
- (Obesum)
Wort
Celery
Aerobacter
Escherichia
Fermentation
Megasphera
Wort, Fermentation
Pectinatus
Cerevisiiphilus
Wort, Beer
Zymomonas
Beer
Vinegar
Acetobacter
Wort, Beer
Diacetyl, Sour
Pediococcus
Lactobacillus
Clostridium
Adjuncts, Wort
Apple, Vinegar
Acetomonas /
Gluconobacter
Beer
Phenolic, Smoke
wild yeast
Anise
wild yeast
Feb 2009
O2
_
or trace of oxygen is
required
_
_
Process stage
Wort, Fermentation
Wort, Fermentation
4
Feb 2009
Feb 2009
Micro-organism type
With requirement of Oxygen
Group
Aerobic Env
Anaerobic Env
O2 effect
Obligate Aerobe
Growth
No growth
Microaerophil
Growth if O2
level not to
high
No growth
Obligate anaerobe
No growth
Growth
O2 is a toxic substance
Facultative aerobe /
anaerobe
Growth
Growth
Aerotolerant anaerobe
Growth
Growth
Organism grows from 1 108 times in less than 9 hours when circumstances
are ideal
Feb 2009
: 0 300C
Mesophiles (medium)
: 20 500C
Thermophiles (hot)
: 40 700C
Feb 2009
Prevention of infection
Sanitary mindset of personel
Good housekeeping
Hygiene design of equipment
Hygiene maintenance
Feb 2009
Chapter 2
Source:
IWW Water Center, Mulheim an der Ruhr, Duisburg Essen University
Markus Timke, Analysis of Biofilm communities in Breweries, Biologies/Chemie der Universitat Osnabruck
Feb 2009
10
Feb 2009
11
Feb 2009
12
Feb 2009
13
Feb 2009
14
Feb 2009
15
Feb 2009
16
Feb 2009
17
Feb 2009
18
Feb 2009
19
Feb 2009
20
Feb 2009
21
Feb 2009
22
Feb 2009
23
24
Feb 2009
25
Feb 2009
26
Feb 2009
27
Chapter 3
Source:
HeiQ
Paul Wood APB Microbiology Workshop
Stijn Van Liefferinge, C&D Sopura SA
DiverseyLever, Basic principle of CIP& Application
John David Cluett, Cleanability of Stainless steel surface, Rank Afrikaans University, USA
Feb 2009
28
Cleaning principles
Feb 2009
29
30
31
Cleaning soil
Function: cleaning of soil is achieved by one / combination of energies:
Mechanical
Liquid rinsing flow (hl/h respective with designed flow Re)
Pressure flow impact (bar)
Brushing (kg/cm2, frequency time/s), stirring (rpm)
Thermal: only effective when it goes with time and limited by machine
component and economy reasons (0C)
Chemical
Removal of soil without leaving residues
Concentration, frequency and contact time (economy use)
Environmental impact
Affection on material being cleaned (machine component, pipe)
32
Feb 2009
33
Cleaning products
Surfactants: makes a link between organic matter and water
Anionic
Cationic
Non-ionic
Amphoteric
34
Cleaning products
Dissolving / Reaction agent
Acids:
H2SO4
H3PO4
HNO3
Sulphamic acid
Organic acid like acetic acid
Alkaline:
Strong alkaline: caustic soda
Alkaline salts:
Metalisicates,
Na3PO4
Na2CO3
Oxidization agent
Feb 2009
35
Feb 2009
Wetting
and low
surface
tension
No wetting
and high
surface
tension
No wetting
and high
surface
tension
36
Surfactants
Feb 2009
37
Sequestrant
Feb 2009
38
Feb 2009
39
Composition of soil
Composition of soil and removal method
Organic: containing carbon element in molecule
Alkali dissolvable organic matters like caustic soda in environment of non-CO2
gas
Acid dissolvable organic matter like phosphoric acid
Feb 2009
40
Feb 2009
41
Feb 2009
42
Feb 2009
43
Feb 2009
44
Feb 2009
45
Feb 2009
46
Feb 2009
47
Feb 2009
48
Feb 2009
49
Nature of surface
Surface roughness is evaluated via parameter Ra (m) peak-tovalley height. The less the better. Stainless steel fermentation tank: Ra
0.8 m
Other parameters: max Ra, waviness Wt, total depth Pt, spacing Nr
Feb 2009
50
: laminar flow
: transition flow
Re > 3,000
: turbulent flow
Feb 2009
51
52
Feb 2009
53
As experiment, at Re > 3000 and Ra = 0.8 stainless steel tank, the flow
speed on internal tank surface is about 0.022 0.025 m/s
Feb 2009
54
Feb 2009
55
: 1 2.5 bars
: 5 8 bars
Too little pressure: tank wall is not reached, less flow pressure impact
to remove sticky/solidified soil, not enough rinsing flow for tank
Too high pressure: reduces effectiveness of rinsing flow
Feb 2009
56
Feb 2009
57
Disinfection principles
Feb 2009
58
Feb 2009
59
Source of micro-infection
Source of contamination:
Production process
Apparatus having dead ends
Chinks, fittings, couplings
Surface, material, system cavities
CIP process
Contaminated final rinse water
Bio-film
Others
Man: flora from hand, breath, skin, clothes, production tools
Insects, dust
Feb 2009
60
Disinfection
An effectiveness of disinfection depends on:
Type of micro-infection, i.e. micro-organism species
Level of micro-infection, i.e. number of micro-organisms
Type of disinfection method, e.g. disinfectants
Concentration of disinfection dose
Feb 2009
61
Disinfectants
Selection of disinfectant is a consideration of:
Broad spectrum and biodegradability, especially spore forming
Minimum influence of at application conditions: pH, low temperature, presence
of protein
Neutralization by CO2
Composition should not changed or reduced by carrier (ex water hardness)
Food and health safety: no smell, taste / colour or harmful to man
No influence on material / surface (ex: corrosion)
Easily rinse-able by water (ex residue after cleaning)
Environment friendly and local legal compliance
62
Disinfectants (cont)
Common disinfectants:
Chlorine (NaOCl and ClO2)
Iodophores
Halogenated acetic acid ester
Halogen carbon acid
Peroxydes
Gluteralhehyde
Quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC)
Amphoterics
Salicylates
Feb 2009
63
Chapter 4
Source:
HeiQ
Stijn Van Liefferinge Sopura SA
Feb 2009
64
TPM 1st priority: Regular CIP program is set up and controlled for a
standard soil load and micro-infection level and routes. It is effective
when
Soil type and load level (thickness) is controlled (what and how much)
Soil deposited location is controlled (where)
CIP program conditions are controlled
TPM 2nd priority: Less soil load is on surface and system, less
cleaning activities (procedure) is required, i.e. lower cost, higher
productivity
Feb 2009
65
Feb 2009
66
Feb 2009
67
68
InFlow
Steps
Group 2
Steps
Object
Fermenter (Vertical)
Fresh
Caustic pulses
Recup
Water rinse
Recup
Acid circulation
Recup
Water rinse
Recup
Disinfectant circulation
Foam catcher
Fresh
Water rinse
Feb 2009
OutFlow/Recup. Parameters
T
Strength
Duration
Rest
Pulses
to drain
Ambient
1% w/v
1 min
10 min
to drain
Ambient
1 min
2 min
3 min
1 min
1 min
2 min
3 min
1 min
1 min
2 min
Ambient
69
70
Circle count: pre-rinsing volume and total volume of all circles; Or: pre-rinsing time /
circle and total time of all circles
Circle ends: Empty signal if applicable (LAL)
Number of circles
Spray ball: pulse and pause duration
CIP return pump: run / stop duration
Pressure of flow on CIP supply pipe (after pump) or pipe head to spray ball
Flow rate of CIP supply pipe (after pump)
Chemical contamination load after rinse (COD, turbidity, EBC, UVA rate): recovery
system
Feb 2009
71
Feb 2009
72
Feb 2009
73
Chapter 5
Source:
HeiQ
Stijn Van Liefferinge Sopura SA
Paul Wood APB Microbiology workshop
DiverseyLever, Basic principle of CIP& Application
Feb 2009
74
Feb 2009
75
Feb 2009
76
Caustic Purexol:
Based on sequestrants + KOH + 3g chlorine / 100 g product
Alkaline chlorinated detergent for the simultaneous deep cleaning and
sanitation removal sticky and organic scale (solidified) on surface
Normal application frequency: once 12 18 months
Septacid S
Based on sulphuric acid, bromacetic acid and corrosion inhibitors
77
Chapter 6
Spray heads
Source:
DiverseyLever, Basic principle of CIP& Application
Sani-matic spray ball
Toftejorg high pressure impact Rotary Jet Head
Feb 2009
78
Spray ball types: 3600, 1800 upward, 1800 downward, 1800 directional bias shot,
2700 upward, 1200 upward
Tank use
pump specification
Feb 2009
79
1800 upward spray: cleaning top of tank, lower half of tank will be
cleaned from the fluid running down side
1800 down spray: cleaning specific internal instrument or other items
that interfere with cleaning used downstream spraying ball
2700 upward spray: covering more surface and allow direct cleaning
(pressure impact of cleaning product) of more heavily soiled areas,
specially top tank dome, yeast ring.
Bottom center of tank may have outlet valves or other fixtures that do not
require direct exposure to cleaning unit
Feb 2009
80
Feb 2009
81
Feb 2009
82
Feb 2009
83
Feb 2009
84
Choice depends on desired jet impact length and flow rate at desired
pressure
Feb 2009
85
Feb 2009
86
Feb 2009
87
Chapter 7
Source:
Feb 2009
88
What is hygiene?
Hygiene is
Compliance with all conditions
During design & use of process equipment
To achieve the greatest possible suitability of process
For the purpose to guarantee the highest possible safety for customer of
the product
89
Hygiene zone
Zone B: basic level of hygienic design and maintenance for open
areas like outside buildings, walking way, canteen
Zone M: medium level of hygienic design and maintenance to protect
the interior of food processing equipment during closed processes like
fermentation, filtration
Feb 2009
90
Feb 2009
91
ATP bio-luminescence
ATP is a molecule found in living organisms a main immediate
source of usable energy for all activities of cell
Enzymes called Luciferases that emit light and when ATP is brought
into contact with a combination Luciferin Luciferase, a reaction is taken
place, resulting in production of light from release of Luciferase
The higher contamination, the more ATP present and more light is
produced
Feb 2009
92
ATP-free swab
ATP is practically used to evaluate the effective cleaning level instead
of waiting for 3 5 days period where incubation of samples required
How ATP-free swab test works:
ATP swabs are pre-moistened with agents that help to lift soil off surface
After taking sample with the swab, it pushes into tube, is shaken and finally
into illuminometer
Clean sample gives low light level
Dirty level gives high light level. The measure is made in RLU (Relative
Light Unit)
Feb 2009
93
Feb 2009
94
Feb 2009
95
Feb 2009
96
Feb 2009
97
Feb 2009
98
Feb 2009
99
Feb 2009
100
Feb 2009
101
Feb 2009
102
Feb 2009
103
Feb 2009
104
Feb 2009
105
Feb 2009
106
Feb 2009
107
Feb 2009
108
Feb 2009
109
Feb 2009
110
Feb 2009
111
Feb 2009
112
Feb 2009
113
Feb 2009
114
Feb 2009
115
Feb 2009
116
Feb 2009
117
Other accessories
Heat exchanger
Pump
Process equipment: spray ball, drive shaft and bearing,
Feb 2009
118
Hygiene audit
After standards available, Hygiene is maintained by schedule Hygiene
Audit by qualified staff
Hygiene Audit is a mandatory requirement of brewery operation
Feb 2009
119
Chapter 8
Disinfection by UV Light
Source:
Feb 2009
UV Wikipedia encyclopedia
American Water Works Association
120
UV Light Application
UV-C 265 nm is germicidal, (1) di-merizes on ADN and inhibits bacteria
to replicate molecule ADN, (2) produces a condense ozone
environment (air)
Germicidal effectiveness is depended type of bacteria and UV dosage
(Ws/m2) at the application point
Feb 2009
121
UV Intensity
In air, UV transmission = 100% at a distance of 1 meter to application
point. The closer the stronger and vice versa (table)
In distilled purifying water, UV transmission = 100% at a distance of 10
mm to application point
UV intensity sensor provides only means of ensuring that adequate
disinfection
Ex: 04 lamps of 66 W/m2 each, reactor: 70 L, water flow: 320 L/min,
T10 = 0.95
Feb 2009
122
Conditions of UV transmission
Water quality factors
Shielding caused by suspension solids
UV light scattering by colloidal solids
UV absorbance by dissolved organics (w
Quartz sleeve foul by inorganic constituents (Ca, Mg, Al, Fe, Mn,
Quartz sleeve transmission ability (colorization of quartz over time)
Water quality (color, air bubble, other factors affecting transmission)
Feb 2009
123
Conditions of UV transmission
Reactor
Internal chamber surface reflecting capability
UV dose delivered is path-dependent
UV sensor
Number of sensors and placing them at optimum positions
Routine check with reference sensor
Factory check to control linearity and drifting
Sensor window cleaning
Feb 2009
124
UV Reactor monitoring
As the minimum
UV intensity by sensor
Water flow rate
Lamp outage
In addition
Water turbidity
Quartz foul
Start-up / out-specification operation / shut-down
Feb 2009
125
Chapter 9
Feb 2009
126
Setting up a QNet
Only setting up a QNet when reoccurrence of micro-infection is high and daily
solution does not give sustainable improvement
Steps to build up QNet and investigation of micro-infection
Identifying process flow and machine boundary (the closed product source of supply)
related to the detection point of product micro-infection normally P&I is used
Identifying all product inflows, outflows to external extents of the machine boundary P&I
and/or site check
Identifying all product internal flows in machine boundary P&I and site check
Identifying, marking all machine components in the boundary and defining their functions
Defining possible soil sources of soil and soil characteristics on each machine component
Feb 2009
127
Feb 2009
128
Internal flow
Function:
CIP to
spray ball
Detection point
Product
inflow
Function:
Product
supply
Product
inflow
Function:
CIP supply
Feb 2009
Product outflow
Function:
product
discharge
Product outflow
Function: overflow
from filling
129
Product
inflow
Function:
Water supply
CIP system
Water
Product
inflow
Function:
CIP supply
Feb 2009
New
detection point
Caustic
Product outflow
Function: CIP
supply to Buffer
tank
Product outflow
Function: overflow
from filling
130
Feb 2009
131
Weekly cleaning
Pre-rinsing
Level making-up
New
generation point
Caustic rinsing
Level making-up
New
detection point
Pre-rinsing
Sterilizing
Cooling (fresh water)
Waiting (time)
Product buffering
Flushing in tank
Filling and supplying
Detection point
Emptying
Weekly cleaning
Feb 2009
132
Feb 2009
133
Feb 2009
134
END
Feb 2009
135