Older Womens Clothing

Fit and Style Concerns and

Their Attitudes Toward the
Use of 3D Body Scanning

Clothing and Textiles

Research Journal
30(2) 102-118
The Author(s) 2012
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X11429741
http://ctrj.sagepub.com

Young-A Lee1, Mary Lynn Damhorst1, Min-Sun Lee1,

Joy M. Kozar2, and Peter Martin1

Abstract
The research explores older womens clothing fit and style concerns and their attitudes toward 3D
body scanning. A film of the 3D body scanning process was developed as an information source and
shown to groups of older women prior to collecting survey and focus group data in 10 different
community centers and living facilities in four Midwestern U.S. states. Clothing fit was the most
important consideration to participants in making apparel purchasing decisions. Participants
addressed the difficulty in finding clothing that fits their body shapes and styles that are
appropriate for the aging body. Participants preferences for using 3D body scanning in the future
were also examined. Focus group participants expressed greatest willingness to use 3D body
scanning for pattern development services. Future research needs to address older consumer
acceptance of emerging technology applications for clothing customization and selection.
Keywords
3D body scanning, clothing, older women, fit
In 2010, older persons 65 and over in the United States constituted approximately 13% of the total
population (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010). Projections for the older population in 2050 are more
than double, as the older population is expected to grow from 40.2 to 88.5 million and will make up
nearly 20.2% of the total U.S. population (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010). As of 2011, the first
wave of the 76 million baby boomers, the generation born between 1946 and 1964, will turn 65 (U.S.
Bureau of the Census, 2005).
The apparel industry tends to design clothing for younger consumers and overlook consumers who
are over 65 years old (Alexander, Connell, & Presley, 2005; Thomas & Peters, 2009). Because the
older segment of the population is increasing proportionately at a greater rate than other segments

1
2

Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA

Corresponding Author:
Young-A Lee, Department of Apparel, Educational Studies, and Hospitality Management, 1073 LeBaron Hall, College of
Human Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Email: ylee@iastate.edu

Lee et al.

103

of the population, attention to their clothing needs and preferences makes sense from both marketing
and human issues perspective. The older segment of the population controls a major portion of the
nations wealth and has a large disposable income (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011), making them
a viable market as they age. In previous research, older consumers complained about their dissatisfaction with apparel fit and style offerings in the market (Howarton & Lee, 2010; Twigg, 2007). The present study provides a check on whether older consumers still have fit and style complaints and whether
they are interested in new technologies that could help satisfy their apparel needs more adequately.
Although most clothing designers are aware that there is a growing segment of older consumers in
current society, a need still exists within the industry to fully understand the physical, social, and
psychological changes inherent in the aging process. Older consumers, particularly women, have for
several decades reported complaints about the difficulty of finding well-fitting, comfortable clothing
in stores (e.g., Ashdown & Na, 2008; Birtwistle & Tsim, 2005; Howarton & Lee, 2010; Joung &
Miller, 2006; Lee, 2005; Twigg, 2007). Salusso, Borkoski, Reich, and Goldsberry (2006) stated that
this age group was not well represented in the U.S. sizing system database from the 1940s or in any
contemporary studies. Ready-to-wear fit problems in the areas of the shoulders, back, waist, bust,
arms, and abdomen have been commonly noted by older women (Shim & Bickle, 1993). Changes
in body shape during the aging process, such as changes in height and proportion, are common
(Campbell & Horne, 2001; Salusso, Borkoski, Reich, & Goldsberry, 2006). Campbell and Horne
(2001) described that shorter stature, thickened waist, protruding abdomen, flattened buttocks, and
a forward tilt of the head and shoulders (p. 196) are common characteristics of the figure shape of
older women. Good clothing fit is vital to an individuals psychological and social well-being
(Ashdown & OConnell, 2006; Chun, 2007; Lee, 2005; Lee & Sontag, 2010; Twigg, 2007), but finding well-fitting clothing can still be challenging for older women.
Because the U.S. clothing sizing system was based on a study from the 1940s which does not
accommodate the diversity of human shapes that currently exist in the United States, many fit problems have been increasing among consumers (Ashdown & Dunne, 2006; Simmons, Istook, &
Devarajan, 2004). Limited research has been conducted on factors associated with older individuals
changes in body shape, apparel fit, and comfort. In 1994, the release of the American society for
testing and materials D5586 standard tables of body measurements for women aged 55 and over (all
figure types) marked the first step toward solving apparel fit problems for older women; however,
few researchers and industry professionals have experimented with incorporating the measurements
into garments for women in the older age group (Schofield, Ashdown, Hethorn, LaBat, & Salusso,
2006). Some firms are incorporating information from more recent national body scan studies, but
dimensions of the older consumer are not usually incorporated purposefully into new sizing systems.
Previous research and design experts have used traditional measuring equipment (i.e., tape
measures) to assess apparel fit. Current technology, particularly the three-dimensional (3D) body
scanner, has the ability to obtain 3D data of the surface of the human body, providing valuable information to improve garment fit (Apeagyei & Otieno, 2007; Ashdown & Dunne, 2006; Ashdown &
Na, 2008; Connell et al., 2003; Daanen & Hong, 2008; Loker, Ashdown, & Schoenfelder, 2005;
Petrova & Ashdown, 2008; Simmons et al., 2004).
Full body 3D scanning captures 3D data in about 1215 s, creating a computer image in less than
1.5 min (Ashdown, Loker, Schoenfelder, & Lyman-Clarke, 2004; Ashdown, Slocum, & Lee, 2005;
Bye & Labat, 2005). Body scanning technology is beginning to have many significant uses in the
apparel industry that will benefit consumers, such as developing custom fit apparel, selecting the
best-fitting brand and size of ready-to-wear clothing, and providing virtual try-on of garments sold
over the Internet (Cho, 2007; Fiore, 2008; Kim, 2009; Kim & Forsythe, 2008; Senanayake & Little,
2010; Wang, Lu, Chen, Geng, & Deng, 2011).
The SizeUSA and Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource
(CAESAR) studies using 3D body scanning technology were the first major undertakings to gather

104

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

information on womens body dimensions since the 1940s (Ashdown, Loker, & Schoenfelder,
2005). New sizing systems for mass customization and tools for analyzing body scanning data have
been developed on the premise that customization must start from a garment pattern that is correctly
shaped for each customer (Loker, 2007). Several apparel companies, such as Brooks Brothers and
Lori Coulter, have produced custom-made garments using measurements taken from 3D body scanners and have begun to realize the value of visual analysis of 3D scans in analysis of body types and
sizing systems. Companies such as Jockey International, JCPenney, and Sears partnered with [TC]2
on the SizeUSA project, an anthropometric study. These companies have worked with data from 3D
body scans to improve the fit of their products (Chensvold, 2007; Davis & Munro, 2008; [TC]2,
2006). Body scan data of target customers can help companies to visualize their customers body
proportions and body shapes more clearly and give valuable information for revising their sizing
systems. However, little effort has been given to incorporate these data for an older consumer market, except to a limited extent in active wear, intimates, plus-size garments, and menswear (Brock,
Ulrich, & Connell, 2010; Bye & Hakala, 2005; Connell et al., 2008; Shin & Istook, 2007).
Body scanning technology also could be used to assist consumers during style selection. When
body scan data can be entered into codesign and virtual try-on systems, the consumer will be able
to see how a garment fits the body proportionately and, to some degree, how the style looks on his or
her own body (Kim, 2009; Loker, Ashdown, Cowie, & Schoenfelder, 2004a). In previous research,
older consumers were dissatisfied with ready-to-wear apparel fit and were concerned that various
components of styles were too youthful (Ashdown & Na, 2008; Howarton & Lee, 2010; Salusso
et al., 2006).
An understanding of older individuals willingness to try 3D body scanning is necessary before
the apparel industry will be willing to adopt this new technology for the older consumer market. Several studies have been conducted on interest in 3D body scanning but focused primarily on convenience samples of consumers younger than 60 (Fiore, Lee, & Kunz, 2003; Lee, Kunz, Fiore, &
Campbell, 2002; McKinnon & Istook, 1999). Loker, Cowie, Ashdown, and Lewis (2004b) found
that 88% of 203 women between ages 35 and 54 expressed comfort with the body scanning process
and were interested in being scanned again. However, 45% of the participants expressed less comfort
with viewing their scans on a computer screen, and 62% were not comfortable showing their scan to
family and friends.

Research Objectives
The purpose of this study is (a) to identify clothing fit and style concerns among women aged 60 and
over and (b) to examine their willingness to use the 3D body scanning technology as an approach to
improve clothing fit, to improve success in style selection, and for other potential commercial applications of this technology. The research questions that frame this exploratory study are
 What are the major clothing fit issues and general clothing concerns among older women?
 Are older women willing to participate in the body scanning process? If so, how much time and
money are they willing to invest in the body scan process?
 In what types of 3D body scan applications are older women more interested?
This study is exploratory and inductive, examining attitudes about a new technology in a population
group that may have limited knowledge about a technological advancement pertinent to the apparel
industry. Previous research and theoretical frameworks guided inclusion of wide-ranging concepts
and perspectives during interpretation of data. Lamb and Kallals (1992) conceptual framework for
apparel design was utilized when analyzing older womens clothing concerns in considering the
functional (i.e., fit, mobility, comfort, and protection), expressive (i.e., values, roles, status, and

Lee et al.

105

self-esteem), and aesthetic (i.e., art elements, design principles, and body/garment relationships)
needs and motives for dress that may form the basis for older womens attitudes toward 3D body
scanning. This framework can be adopted and used to interpret individuals design preference criteria across various age groups.
Moschis (1996) market segmentation model of older consumers was also utilized in considering
personal and lifestyle characteristics that may shape attitudes toward use of technology for consumer
activities. Moschis found that health status and socializing (outgoing vs. reclusive) behaviors were
key determinants of consumer behavior among older population segments. The technology acceptance
model by Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw (1989) indicated a further array of variables to consider, such as
previous experience with, perceived ease of use of, and perceived usefulness of computer technology.
These frameworks were not employed for a priori hypothesis testing among variables. Our approach is
inductive, using previous research findings and existing theoretical concepts and models to assist in
interpretation of patterns that emerged in the data (Corbin & Strauss, 2008).
For this study, we have the challenge of studying individuals from at least three generations who
have widely varied experience with, perceived need for, and overall limited understanding of an
emergent technology that may soon impact the retail industry and consumer access to goods and
services. We take an exploratory mixed methods approach that is designed to uncover variables and
concepts that will help shape further research as body scanning technology and its applications
advance tremendously and as a new generation explodes in numbers in the older consumer age range
we are studying.

Method
A combination of quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative (focus group interview) approaches
was applied as part of this mixed-methods study. The triangulation of data facilitated the exploratory
approach. Small groups of participants were first instructed to view a 3-min video-clip explaining
the body scanning process and potential use of this technology before administering the survey questionnaire. Each scenario of 3D body scanning applications was presented and clearly explained
before initiating the focus group interview. Interview moderators also provided some possible examples of each scenario application verbally. After completing a questionnaire measuring participants
attitudes and feelings about body scanning, a focus group discussion about the potential uses of body
scans ensued.

Population and Sample

Older women 60 years of age were recruited from a convenience sample of 10 different community
centers and independent and assisted living facilities in four Midwestern U.S. states. The facilities
were located in a large urban area, mid-sized cities, and small towns. Women who were younger
than 60 years of age or living in an institutional setting such as a nursing home were not included
in this study. A total of 84 older women participated in this study. Participants ages ranged from
62 to 97 with a mean of 81.4 years. The largest percentage of participants was aged 85 and older
(38.1%), followed by 7584 (36.9%) and less than 75 (22.6%). European Americans comprised
86.9% of participants. Asian American and Hispanic or Latino American made up 2.4% and
3.6% of participants, respectively. The remaining 7% of participants did not indicate their ethnicity.
African Americans were not represented in the sample but were not intentionally excluded. The education level of the sample was relatively high; 38% had college degrees, 34.5% were high school
graduates, and over 25% had graduate degrees. The overrepresentation of higher education achievement may reflect that half of the facilities in which data were collected were in cities where large

106

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

state universities are located. Thus, the findings of this study are limited because the sample is not
representative of the U.S. older population.

Informative 3D Body Scanning Film

A 3-min film about the 3D body scanning process was developed with the assistance of information
technology services. The film was designed to provide basic information about 3D body scanning
technology. Three older women with different body shapes and ethnicities (i.e., European American,
African American, and Asian American) were recruited to volunteer as body scan models. The
participants were filmed separately during the scanning process using a [TC]2 NX-16 white-light
3D body scanner. Each model wore a close fitting Lycra scan suit in the film. The entire body
scanning process was videotaped and explained in the film via professional narration.

Quantitative Instrument
Four items assessing comfort with the 3D body scanning process were adopted from Loker et al.
(2004b): (a) how comfortable are you to be scanned, (b) how comfortable is it for you to view your
scan on the computer screen, (c) how comfortable are you showing your scanned image to family or
friends, and (d) are you comfortable to attend the scanning process in the future if available. These
items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 as Very Uncomfortable, 3 as
Neutral, to 5 as Very Comfortable.
Items measuring personal investment of time and money were also adopted and modified from
Loker et al. (2004b). Participants were asked about (a) the amount they were willing to pay for one
body scan, (b) the extra amount they were willing to pay for custom fitted garments on the basis of
scan data, (c) the time participants were willing to travel to be scanned, and (d) the time they were
willing to wait for a garment customized via scan data. Items measuring demographics as well as
self-reported height and weight were adopted and modified from Lee (2005) and Kim (2008).

Data Collection Procedure

The researchers worked with 11 supervisors/activity directors to set up visitation announcements,
dates, times, and meeting areas. Data were collected at 10 facilities because of a cancellation at one
facility. The focus groups ranged in size from 5 to 17 participants.
Each focus group session was audio-recorded. After the completion of each focus group interview, $10 was offered to each participant as a thank-you gift. The entire process took an average
of 90 min, ranging from 60 to 120 min, depending on the number of participants in each facility and
the time individuals took to complete the questionnaire.
After viewing the film as a group, participants completed the questionnaire individually. Participants were then asked to discuss as a group questions asked by the focus group moderator about
major concerns when purchasing clothing, specific fit problems when shopping for clothing, and
alterations done to their clothing.
Finally, scenarios about potential applications of body scanning were presented to participants
who, in open group format, discussed their interest in and willingness to make use of the varied
applications. The scenarios were developed by Loker, Ashdown, Cowie, and Schoenfelder
(2004a) to describe seven different potential commercial applications of 3D body scan data: virtual
try on, size prediction, custom fit, personal shopper, codesign, pattern development, and research.
For this study, the focus group moderator presented, one at a time, PowerPoint descriptions of
possible usages of 3D body scan data with full verbal explanation of each scenario. The moderator
then engaged the participants in discussion and asked them to express their interest in the

Lee et al.

107

application. Rather than obtaining quantitative measures of the level of their interest, the qualitative
approach was taken to assure that participants understood the scenarios which related to use of scan
information for seven potential commercial applications.

Data Analysis
Quantitative analysis. The statistical package for the social sciences 17.0 was used to examine
frequency distributions, means, and correlations. The 4 items of comfort with the 3D body scanning
process were factor analyzed using principle component factor analysis with varimax rotation.
One factor resulted, explaining 64% of the variance. Cronbachs a was .84. Body mass index (BMI)
scores based on each participants height and weight were also calculated to examine correlations
with the 4 items of 3D body scan comfort level.
Qualitative analysis. Major themes across responses from focus group interviews were identified
through constant comparison analysis (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). The data were examined line by
line. Each time a passage of text was coded, it was also compared with all passages which were
already coded into the same theme. After establishing a coding guide, two trained judges independently coded the interview data, and a third researcher audited the findings. All of the interview transcripts were coded by each judge, and differences in coding were negotiated by the two judges.
Intercoder reliability of 94.5% was achieved.

Results and Discussion

Findings are organized by research objectives. Quotes are identified by facility ([F1], [F2], etc.) rather
than by individuals, because which individual was talking is not always clear on the audio tapes.

Research Objective 1: Clothing Fit and General Concerns

What are your major concerns when you purchase your own clothing?. Participants were concerned
about how clothing fits on the body, whether the clothing is easy to care for, and whether the price
is too high. Clothing fit, a functional, expressive, and aesthetic aspect of clothing (cf. Lamb & Kallal,
1992), was the most important consideration noted by participants in making apparel purchasing
decisions. As found previously (Ashdown & Na, 2008; Lee, 2005; Schofield et al., 2006; Shim &
Bickle, 1993), participants expressed that it is difficult to find the right size of clothing.
In addition to fit problems, participants were concerned about their appearance and wanted to
hide or minimize some signs of aging. Many women expressed that they would like to cover their
arms and neck to hide wrinkles. They were more likely to wear long and three fourth length sleeves
and were more likely to avoid low-cut necklines. For example:
I like 3\4 -length sleeves because my arms are no longer beautiful. And I hate to wear long sleeves all the
time. And, the short sleeves dont do me any favors. So, something thats kind of cupped and youthful
looking yet covers your arms. T-shirts that kind of come down on the elbow [F10].
Low necks . . . I dont. Im kind of boney. I cant have low necks [F2].

The expressive aspect of clothing was also important to the women participating in the study. They
described attempts to choose age-appropriate clothes and the desire to look younger.
I have a hard time finding clothes that are appropriate for the mature woman. I dont want to look like an
old lady [F7].

108

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

The women also expressed a desire for clothing to fit their lifestyles. They emphasized difficulty in
finding clothing for mature women like themselves in most clothing stores. They addressed industry
stereotypes about older womens design preferences:
. . . they always think that anybody who is over 50 loves huge flashy prints and these insane colors, and I
said I dont want to look like a rock-star but then again, I dont want to look like Eleanor Roosevelt, you
know. And there currently isnt anything in between [F10].

Aesthetic components of clothing were also important to the participants when purchasing clothing.
Participants held a general interest in appearing attractive, for example:
No matter how old we are, we still want to look attractive [F6].

To summarize, older women would like to purchase clothing that is attractive as well as functional in
terms of fit, yet balanced between perceived age appropriateness and current fashion trends. Functional, expressive, and aesthetic concerns were all mentioned by the women, reflecting the Lamb and
Kallal (1992) framework.
What specific fit problems do you often have when shopping for clothing?. Two major fit concerns were
(a) lack of a standardized sizing system in the current apparel industry (i.e., inconsistency of clothing
sizes across and within different brands) and (b) lack of attention by industry to body shape changes
during the aging process. The majority of participants discussed difficulty in finding well-fitting garments because each company does not use a consistent standardized sizing system. For example:
For the same brand you have to try it even if its the same size [F2].

Another fit concern among participants was related to the proportion of body shape change during
the aging process. Participants pointed out their specific clothing needs due to changes in body
shape, particularly changes in height and proportion. Participants expressed that retailers/apparel
manufacturers are not attending to their aging body proportions, for example:
If I get it to fit my lower portion, then the shoulders would be too broad [F8].
If you fit in the hip, you do not fit in the waist. If you fit in the waist, you do not fit in the hip [F1].

A majority of the respondents in this study addressed fit concerns related to aging body shape
changes, specifically pant and sleeve length. Other examples include
My waist. It doesnt fit the way it used to [F7].
. . . the amount between the bust and the hips shortened. Nothing fits afterwards [F1].
Ive noticed on my mother-in-law. Shes shrinking a little, so when she buys a jacket now it looks like it
hangs longer and longer down her legs, you know. The jacket used to be styled right below her rear end,
but now it looks like it hangs almost to her knees because shes shorter . . . [F5].

Do you ever get alterations done to your clothing?. Consistent with Howarton and Lees (2010)
results, participants often reported that they alter purchased garments to compensate for changes
in body shape:
I cant make sure I am getting the right thing. I usually buy bigger and I tailor myself . . . I make everything . . . it is difficult to buy the right size [F10].

Lee et al.

109

The most frequent alterations occurred in the area of hem, hip, waist, and bust.
I shorten pants all the time, and I used to be considered very tall. Of course, I have lost some height, but it
feels like I cant find a pair of slacks that is right for me [F7].

Garment alterations were linked with changes in body appearance, including increasing wrinkles, thickened waist, enlarged hips, drooping bustline, and decreasing height. Many participants preferred elastic
waistbands so that they do not need to be concerned about fit at the waist level.

Research Objective 2: Interest and Comfort With the Scanning Process

In the questionnaire, participants were asked to answer 4 items about their perceptions of the process. Approximately 64% of participants were comfortable or very comfortable to be scanned
(M 3.83). More than 63% of the women felt comfortable or very comfortable in viewing their
scans on a computer screen (M 3.79); whereas only about 38% felt comfortable or very comfortable in showing their scanned image to their family or friends (M 3.13). The majority of participants (60%) felt comfortable or very comfortable in participating in the 3D body scanning
process in the future (M 3.66).
Characteristics of willing 3D body scan participants. The women who were interested in 3D body
scanning had personal characteristics different from characteristics of the women who were not willing to participate in 3D body scanning. Approximately 74% of participants less than 75 years old
were comfortable to very comfortable with the 3D body scanning process, while only 50% of the
women aged 75 years and over were comfortable with the 3D body scanning process. With increasing age, womens comfort in participating in 3D body scanning decreased. A number of the oldest
participants suggested during focus groups that they might not be alive or would be too old to make
use of it when body scanning became more commercially available.
Correlation analyses were conducted among demographic variables and the four perceptions
of 3D body scanning items related to the level of comfort with (a) being scanned, (b) viewing
the scanned image on the computer screen, (c) showing the scanned image to family or friends,
and (d) attending the scanning process in the future. Despite the frequency distributions and
qualitative comments indicating age differences in comfort with body scanning, no significant
correlations were found between age and any of the four 3D scan-related items. However, BMI
was negatively correlated with participants comfort to share their scan image with family or
friends, r .287, p < .05. This indicates that the women who proportionately weigh more
were more uncomfortable about letting others see their scan images. No significant correlations
were found between education level and any of the four 3D scan items.
All of the 4 items about comfort with the 3D body scanning process were significantly intercorrelated. Participants more comfortable with the scanning process were also more comfortable (a) in
viewing their scan images on the computer screen, (b) in showing their scan image to family or
friends, and (c) in attending the scanning process in the future, r .766, p < .01, .524, p < .01. and
709, p < .01, respectively.
Time and money issues. Approximately 31% of participants were willing to pay more than $21 dollars for one scan (see Table 1). When asked to estimate how much extra they would be willing to
spend for a $50 garment that was customized using scan data, approximately 42% of participants
indicated a willingness to pay up to $15 or less. When asked about a garment that was normally
priced at $150, 33.4% of participants were willing to pay up to $15, whereas 38.2% were willing

110

Table 1.

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

Personal Investment of Money to Use Three-Dimensional (3D) Body Scanning Technology

Characteristics
Specific amount willing to pay for one scan
Less than $10
$11$20
$21$35
$36 or more
Specific amount willing to pay for $50 garment
Less than 10% of garment (less than $5)
1020% of garment ($6$10)
2130% of garment ($11$15)
3150% of garment ($16$25)
51% or more of garment ($26 or more)
Specific amount willing to pay for $150 garment
Less than 10% of garment (less than $15)
1020% of garment ($16$30)
2130% of garment ($31$45)
3150% of garment ($46$75)
51% or more of garment ($76 or more)

Frequency (n 84)

Percent (%)

21
27
10
16

25
32.10
11.90
19

17
13
5
21
9

20.30
15.50
6
32.20
10.80

28
15
3
10
4

33.40
17.90
3.60
14.30
2.40

Note. Due to missing data, the totals across ns do not equal 84.

to pay $16 and more. In terms of the travel time to obtain 3D body scanning, it was found that the
preferable travel time was less than 30 min.
Correlations were examined between demographic variables and the time and money items. The
amount that participants were willing to pay for one scan had positive correlation (r .316, p < .01)
with age and a negative correlation (r .287, p < .05) with increased education level. Participants
with a high school education were willing to pay more for a body scan than those with a college
education or higher. Older and less-educated women were willing to pay more for scans, possibly
because of less knowledge about scanning and the assumption that the process would be expensive.
More-educated individuals may know that technology applications tend to reduce in price over time,
and therefore may not be willing to leap ahead and pay high prices. Further research is needed to
understand these low but significant correlations.
Education had a positive correlation with travel time, indicating greater willingness to travel farther
for shopping in general (r .245, p < .05). In addition, younger women in the sample were willing to
wait longer for delivery of a garment made using 3D scan information (r .324, p < .01).

Research Objective 3: Commercial Applications of 3D Body Scanning for Older Women

Preference for using 3D body scan data in the future was examined for seven different scenarios of
commercial application. Comments about the applications are presented in the order of importance
to interview participants.
Custom pattern development. Participants were most enthusiastic about use of 3D body scans for
pattern alterations, particularly among the women who sewed. The participants were interested that
clothing fit could be improved by developing custom patterns using 3D body scan measurements.
Sewers had high interest to resolve issues of clothing fit. Many participants were familiar with sewing and recognized the potential for home-sewn garments to fit better if altered with scan data.

Lee et al.

111

I did take a class in adult education on designing my own slack pattern, and I used it for several years, and
they fit. Using this service [body scan], . . . you can just lay the pattern out, cut them out, sew them
together, put them on, and they will fit [F6].

Participants responded that a pattern development option is a great way to customize clothing fit
to body shape. The women who sewed recommended that it would be good to provide this
service at local fabric stores. They recognized the value of effort and time savings and made
statements such as:
The price wouldnt matter so much then if you knew it was going to fit. [F8]
It would save an enormous amount of time. [F7]

Participants did not state much concern about the cost of pattern development services, possibly
because they realized that this service would save time.
Size prediction. Size prediction is an online service that identifies the specific brand and size within
the brand that should fit each individual best. Such a service could steer consumers to brands that
might give greatest satisfaction with fit. Participants expressed that size prediction might be one
of the more useful commercial options for 3D body scan information. Most participants presented
a positive attitude about size prediction, even though they thought that younger people might be
more interested in this service; participants thought that computer technology usage is more common among the young. For example:
If I were 20 or 30 years younger, I might seriously look at body scanning, but at my age right now and the
lifestyle that I live, I dont see that for me it would be all that useful. [F6]

Size prediction was more interesting to the women who had most difficulty finding garments that fit.
Some of the women stated that they would not need to go to a store and try things on because they
expected that often in stores today retail sales personnel are not very helpful in finding a size that fits.
. . . rather than having to go in the store and try on three or four different sizes to figure out which one,
you could go and just tell them or just go in and pull off the rack. [F5]

However, most women addressed concerns about the cost of this service, apparently not realizing
that the store or brand will very likely pay for the service.
Codesign mass customization. Codesign is an online service that allows customers to be involved in
the process of designing their own unique garments. On a codesign website customers use their body
scan information to see how a set of options such as style, fit, color, and fabric features would look
on their own body; then the codesign customers are able to choose and order the features they prefer
to develop a unique garment.
Participants expressed a positive attitude toward codesign. One participant recalled her past
experience which was similar to the codesign process but without the possibility of seeing the
garment on the self before ordering or making it:
Well, I grew up, my mother made my clothes. . . . and I always loved to pick patterns, pickthe fabrics,
. . . . [F2]

Some participants also elaborated that the codesign option would make their shopping much easier:
It would make shopping much easier instead of going from a store to a store. [F4]

112

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

Some women mentioned that they were experiencing physical difficulties during the bricks-andmortar format of shopping; it is difficult for some older consumers to shop in a big mall because
of issues of fatigue and physical stamina (Moschis, 1996). The codesign option may be particularly
useful for these individuals.
The women who were most interested in this service assumed that they would use it for purchasing special clothes:
I would have it maybe on a special occasion but not for a run of the mill outfit. [F10]

The tempered interest in codesign may be due to the expectation that making several design
decisions would take much work and cognitive demand; Lee, Damhorst, Campbell, Loker, and Parsons (2011) found this trend among younger adults who had actual experience with a codesign site.
Although consumers in the Lee et al. study were highly interested in a more complex codesign site,
they were more likely to return to a simpler site that required fewer design choices. One participant
in our focus groups reflected:
. . . sounds like a lot of work and sounds fun . . . but its not easy. [F7]

Virtual try-on. A virtual try-on service allows the consumer to dress the personal 3D scanned image
on a computer screen to see how a style looks on ones body. Because an individual is using his or
her own body scan data, the image is formed from personal measurements to give a more accurate
representation of how clothes appear on ones body. Some participants were interested in the
possibility of using this service:
Absolutely! . . . because you can see it from all angles and that would help . . . . [F7]

On the other hand, some expressed that this service is not appropriate for their current life stage.
Participants thought that younger consumer groups may be more interested in this option. One
woman stated:
That is not so bad. That sounds probably something I might do. But, I cant say that for Sure . . . I think
young people might be excited as a way not to leave the house. [F3]

Some participants also noted that older women might have limited access to use virtual try-on
services that require them to use a computer frequently.
Custom fit. Customers may be interested in custom fit services because the garment is made specifically to their measurements, guaranteeing the best fit of clothing on their body. This possible
application allows a retailer to either mail a garment to the customers or inform them that it is ready
to be picked up at the store after the garment is custom-fit based on scan data. Participants presented
responses similar to their evaluations of the size prediction option. Some of them were interested in
custom fit service for a nice suit, blazer, jackets, sweaters, or dress:
No, not for average t-shirt, but for a nice suit, a nice pantsuit, something like that, but not just for the
regular everyday clothes. [F8]

Other participants were concerned about the price of custom-fit clothing.

Personal shopper services. Using 3D body scan information, a personal shopper service alerts the
client to choices that might be of interest, advises on styles that look good on the individual, and

Lee et al.

113

keeps a record of previous purchases. In general, participants thought that the personal shopper
option was a very useful service. One woman said:
Id love to have someone come up and say this is what you ought to consider. I think that would be nice. [F7]

However, none of the participants expressed high interest in this service compared with other
options. Participants were mostly concerned about the price of this service. Although the women
thought it would be nice if someone brought them clothes that fit well and look good on them, they
were not willing to pay extra for a personal shopper service. Many of the participants daughters
were already assisting them with shopping; therefore, there was not a high need for them to hire
a professional personal shopper.
My daughter will buy for me . . . like personal shopper . . . They always fit and I always like them. [F3]

Research use. Older womens attitudes toward using their 3D scan information for future research
was also explored. No participant expressed any objection toward using their 3D scan data for
research purposes, assuming that the research would help consumers in the future.
In summary, across the different commercial applications of 3D body scan information, pattern
development service was the most desirable among the women who participated in this study. Size
prediction and codesign options were next in preference. Although participants were interested in
various types of applications, they addressed their concerns about the cost of body scanning and the
price of garments that were made or selected using 3D scan data. They also questioned whether it is
easy to find a scanning location, whether this service is currently available in the apparel industry,
how often they would need to rescan their body when their body shape changes, and whether they
need to pay extra each time they rescan.
The technology acceptance model (Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989) explains the impact of
accessibility, ease of use, and cost/resource factors on responses. Many participants agreed that
younger consumers might be more interested in and excited by the commercial applications of
3D scan data, but that this technology would not be useful to them so late in life. Health condition
may influence interest in level of 3D body scanning for any application (Moschis, 1996). For example, one focus group was conducted in a facility oriented to higher levels of assisted living care.
These participants were less convinced of the applicability of body scanning to their needs.

Conclusion and Implications

The results of this study indicate that older women have clothing concerns relating to many
different aspects of their clothingfunctional, expressive, and aesthetic. Participants addressed
that it is difficult to find clothing that fits their aging bodies. Two major concerns related to fit
were (a) no standardized sizing system in the current apparel industry (i.e., inconsistency of
clothing sizes across different and within brands) and (b) lack of industry attention to body
shape changes among older consumers. The majority of participants expressed difficulty in
finding well-fitting garments because each company does not use a consistent standardized sizing system. Other fit concerns related to subjective matters of body shape changes during
aging. Participants felt that retailers and apparel manufacturers are not attending to their
aging/changing body proportions.
Participants interest in using 3D body scanning in the future was examined for seven different scenarios. The focus group participants expressed overall positive attitudes toward 3D
body scanning and expressed some willingness to use 3D body scanning. In particular, pattern
development was the most valuable way of using this technology to women who sewed.

114

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

Potential uses of 3D body scanning for size prediction and codesign options were next of interest. Participants also expressed concerns about costs of a body scan and the need to repeat the
scan as the body changed. A number of the oldest participants expressed that this technology
would not be useful to them so late in life. Individuals with differing levels of physical ability
may have different interest levels in use of 3D body scanning in resolving clothing fit concerns.
Further research on this topic is needed to compare groups of older individuals who are in
higher levels of assisted living care and nursing facilities. Such trends would be consistent with
Moschis (1996) findings that all older consumers do not fit in the same lifestyle and market
segment profiles.
No clear correlation of age and comfort with body scanning was found; however, frequency
distributions and qualitative comments did indicate possible patterns of less comfort and interest
among older individuals. Similarly, education level (i.e., high school, college education, or higher)
was not related to scanning comfort in quantitative correlations but varied across facilities with
different socioeconomic levels among residents. Although a clear measure of socioeconomic
status was not employed (education is a component of status level), in two independent living
facilities with greater concentrations of upper middle-income residents, participants expressed
more enthusiasm for all of the body scanning applications. Qualitative responses may be indicating
relationships that are not significant or are weak in the quantitative analyses. Additional research is
needed to clarify these anomalies. Larger and more representative samples may facilitate more complex analyses to examine differences in quantitative and qualitative findings. Age (both chronological and perceived), generational life experiences, education level, income, and socioeconomic
status all may play a significant role in shaping older consumer responses to emerging technological
applications in shopping technology. Our exploratory, multimethod findings are a clear signal for
future research directions.
Body scan technology application will continue to evolve as costs in scanner technology
decrease. This will make scanners more affordable to manufacturers and retailers and more
familiar to consumers. Older consumers aged 60 and over who are more interested in commercial applications of body scanning will be differentiated by their personal characteristics and
shopping behaviors. Younger women in the focus groups, ranging from approximately 6275
years, tended to be more favorable toward body scanning applications. As they continue to age,
the baby boom generation is likely to have different characteristics from generations that are
older than 67 today, because they are more familiar with computer technologies and online
shopping and are a generation that strongly values product variety, aesthetics, and customization (Weigelt & Boehman, 2009). The technology acceptance model (Davis et al., 1989) predicts that greater computer experience and perceptions that body scanning is useful (for
achieving better fit and aesthetic options) will increase adoption of the new technology.
Further research is recommended using real modules of 3D body scanning applications
rather than examining the preference for using 3D body scanning technology based on hypothetical discussion of scenarios. Likewise, research needs to be conducted on consumer reactions
to commercial applications of 3D body scan data. Consumers from varied populations with different age groups, ethnicities, geographic locations, and cultures need to be studied. However,
greater consumer interface with body scanning and its practical applications is required before
consumer responses can be adequately assessed. The film produced as part of this study was
helpful, but more information resources should be developed. Real participation in the scanning
process, as well as actual experience with applications, might change older womens preferences for various commercial applications of 3D body scan data.
In addition, in-depth examinations of relationships between clothing fit and style concerns and
various commercial applications of 3D scan data are needed. The apparel industry will benefit from
paying attention to these matters when developing product lines. As customization services become

Lee et al.

115

more available, consumer demand for improved fit and styles that suit their aging bodies is likely to
expand exponentially.
Generalization of the present findings is limited by the use of a convenience sample of older
women with skewed representation in age and ethnicity categories. Further research is recommended on a random sample from a more representative population of older consumers. Due to the
focus on women in this study, gender differences could not be analyzed. Studies of mens attitudes to
body scanning are certainly warranted.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or
publication of this article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication
of this article from the College of Human Sciences 2008-2009 Seed Grant for Junior Faculty at Iowa
State University.
References
Alexander, M., Connell, L. J., & Presley, A, B. (2005). Clothing fit preferences of young female adult consumers. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 17, 52-64
Apeagyei, P. R., & Otieno, R. (2007). Usability of pattern customizing technology in the achievement and testing of fit for mass customization. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 11, 349-365
Ashdown, S. P., & Dunne, L. (2006). A study of automated custom fit: Readiness of the technology for the
apparel industry. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 24, 121-136
Ashdown, S. P., Loker, S., & Schoenfelder, K. (2005). Size-specific analysis of body scan data to improve apparel fit. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4(3), 1-15. Retrieved May 15, 2011,
from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue3/articles/Loker/Loker_full_136_05.pdf
Ashdown, S. P., Loker, S., Schoenfelder, K., & Lyman-Clarke, L. (2004). Using 3D scans for fit analysis.
Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 4. Retrieved August 3, 2008, from http://
www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue1/articles/loker/loker_full_103_04.pdf
Ashdown, S. P., & Na, H.-S. (2008). Comparison of 3-D body scan data to quantify upper-body postural
variation in older and younger women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 26, 292-307
Ashdown, S. P., & OConnell, E. K. (2006). Comparison of test protocols for judging the fit of mature womens
apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 24, 137-146
Ashdown, S. P., Slocum, A. C., & Lee, Y. A. (2005). The third dimension for apparel designers: Visual assessment of hat designers for sun protection using 3-D body scanning. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
23, 151-164
Birtwistle, G., & Tsim, C. (2005). Consumer purchasing behavior: An investigation of the UK mature womens
clothing market. Journal of Consumer Behavior 4, 453-464
Brock, M. K., Ulrich, P. V., & Connell, L. J. (2010). Exploring the apparel needs and preferences of tween girls
and their mothers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 28, 95-111
Bye, E., & Hakala, L. (2005). Sailing apparel for women: A design development case study. Clothing and
Textiles Research Journal 23, 45-55
Bye, E., & Labat, K. (2005). An analysis of apparel industry fit sessions. Journal of Textile and Apparel
Technology and Management, 4, 1-5. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/
volume4issue3/articles/Bye/Bye_full_129_05.pdf
Campbell, L. D., & Horne, L. (2001). Trousers developed from the ASTM D5586 and the Canada standard
sizing for womens apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 19, 185-193

116

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

Chensvold, C. M. (2007, August 1). Super sizing: J. C. Penney works to perfect fit. Apparel Magazine. Retrieved May
28 2011, from http://apparel.edgl.com/case-studies/Super-SizingJ-CPenney-works-to-Perfect-Fit64312
Cho, H. (2007). Consumer acceptance of online customization for apparel (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Chun, J. (2007). Communication of sizing and fit. In S. P. Ashdown (Ed.), Sizing in clothing. Developing
effective sizing systems for ready-to-wear clothing (pp. 220-245). Cambridge, MA: Woodhead.
Connell, L. J., Ulrich, P. V., Knox, A., Hutton, G., Trent, N., & Bruner, D. (2008). Body scan analysis for fit
models based on body shape and and posture analysis. National Textile Center Annual Report. (NTC
Project: S01-AC27). Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.ntcresearch.org/pdf-rpts/AnRp03/S01AC27-A3.pdf
Connell, L. J., Ulrich, P. V., Simmons, K. P., Chattarman, V., Pascoe, D., & Bruner, D. (2008). Apparel product
development for plus-sized tween and teen boys. National Textile Center Annual Report. (NTC Project: S06AC03). Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.ntcresearch.org/pdf-rpts/Bref0608/S06-AC03-08.pdf
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for
developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Daanen, H., & Hong, S. A. (2008). Made-to-measure pattern development based on 3D whole body scans.
International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 20, 15-25
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison
of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 982-1003
Davis, K., & Munro, K. (2008, February 6). [TC]2 activity-AAFA fit symposium. [TC]2 By-Weekly Technology
Communicator, Retrieved May 25, 2011, from http://www.tc2.com/newsletter/2008/020608.html#tc2
Fiore, A. M. (2008). The digital consumer: Valuable partner for product development and production. Clothing
and Textiles Research Journal 26, 177-190
Fiore, A. M., Lee, S.-E., & Kunz, G. (2003). Psychographic variables affecting willingness to use body-scanning. Journal of Business Management 9, 271-287
Howarton, R., & Lee, B. (2010). Market analysis of fit preferences of female boomers. Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management 14, 219-229
Joung, H.-M., & Miller, N. J. (2006). Factors of dress affecting self-esteem in older females. Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management 10, 46-478
Kim, D. (2009). Apparel fit based on viewing of three-dimensional virtual models and live models (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
Kim, H. (2008). The impact of body image self-discrepancy on body dissatisfaction, fashion involvement,
concerns with fit and size of garments, and loyalty intentions in online apparel shopping (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames.
Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of
Interactive Marketing 22, 45-59
Lamb, J. M., & Kallal, M. J. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles
Research Journal 10, 42-47
Lee, H. H., Damhorst, M. L., Campbell, J. R., Loker, S., & Parsons, J. (2011). Consumer satisfaction with a
mass customized Internet apparel shopping site. International Journal of Consumer Studies 35, 316-329
Lee, S. E., Kunz, G. I., Fiore, A., & Campbell, J. R. (2002). Acceptance of mass customization apparel: Merchandising issues associated with preference for product, process, and place. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 20, 138-146
Lee, Y. A. (2005). Older persons successful aging: Relationships among proximity of clothing to self, age identity, and self-actualization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Lee, Y. A., & Sontag, M. S. (2010). An assessment of the proximity of clothing to self scale for older persons.
International Journal of Consumer Studies 34, 443-448
Loker, S. (2007). Mass customization and sizing. In S. P. Ashdown (Ed.), Sizing in clothing. Developing effective sizing systems for ready-to-wear clothing (pp. 246-263). Cambridge, MA: Woodhead

Lee et al.

117

Loker, S., Ashdown, S., Cowie, L., & Schoenfelder, K. A. (2004a). Consumer interest in commercial
applications of body scan data. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management 4(1),
1-13. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue1/articles/
Loker/Loker_first_100_04.pdf
Loker, S., Ashdown, S., & Schoenfelder, K. (2005). Size-specific analysis of body scan data to improve apparel
fit. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management 4(3), 1-15. Retrieved September 18, 2008,
from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue3/articles/Loker/Loker_full_136_05.pdf
Loker, S., Cowie, L., Ashdown, S., & Lewis, V. D. (2004b). Female consumers reactions to body scanning.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 22, 151-160
McKinnon, L., & Istook, C. L. (1999, November). Psychological issues concerning body scanning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Textile and Apparel Association, Sante Fe, NM
Moschis, G. P. (1996). Gerontographics: Life-stage segmentation for marketing strategy development.
Westport, CT: Quorum Books
Petrova, A., & Ashdown, S. P. (2008). Three-dimensional body scan data analysis: Body size and shape
dependence of ease values for pants fit. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 26, 227-252
Salusso, C. J., Borkoski, J. J., Reich, N., & Goldsberry, E. (2006). An alternative approach to sizing apparel for
women 55 and older. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 24, 96-111
Schofield, N. A., Ashdown, S. P., Hethorn, J., LaBat, K., & Salusso, C. J. (2006). Improving pant fit for
women 55 and older through an exploration of two pant shapes. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 24, 147-160
Senanayake, M. M., & Little, T. J. (2010). Mass customization: Points and extent of apparel customization.
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 14, 282-299
Shim, S., & Bickle, M. C. (1993). Women 55 years and older as catalog shoppers: Satisfaction with apparel fit
and catalog attributes. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 11, 53-64
Shin, S.-J., & Istook, C. L. (2007). The importance of understanding the shape of diverse ethnic female consumers for
developing jeans sizing systems. International Journal of Consumer Studies 31, 135-143
Simmons, K., Istook, C. L., & Deverajan, P. (2004). Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel part I:
Describing female shapes. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4(1), 1-16. Retrieved
July 14, 2008, from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue1/articles/Istook/Istook_full_105_04.pdf
[TC]2. (2006, July 12). The second annual SizeUSA users group meeting. [TC]2 By-Weekly Technology Communicator. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.tc2.com/newsletter/arc/071206.html#two
Thomas, J. B., & Peters, C. L. O. (2009). Exploring the self-concept, lifestyles, and apparel consumption of
women over age 65. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 37, 1018-1040
Twigg, J. (2007). Clothing, age and the body: A critical review. Aging and Society, 27, pp. 285-305.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005). Current population reports, 65 in the United States: 2005 (No. P23209).
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2010). The next four decades, the older population in the United States: 2010 to
2050 (No. P251138). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Consumer Expenditures in 2009. Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxann09.pdf
Wang, J., Lu, G., Chen, L., Geng, Y., & Deng, W. (2011). Customer participating 3D garment design for mass
personalization. Textile Research Journal 81, 187-204
Weigelt, D., & Boehman, J. (2009). Dot boom: Marketing to baby boomers through meaningful online engagement. Great Falls, VA: LINX, Corp.

Bios
Young-A Lee, PhD, is an assistant professor in the department of apparel, educational studies, and hospitality
management at Iowa State University. Her research interests include emerging technology application to design
and product development and social/psychological aspects of clothing focusing on aging population.

118

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2)

Mary Lynn Damhorst, PhD, is a professor in the department of apparel, educational studies, and hospitality
management at Iowa State University. She studies media and family influences on body image, obesity stereotypes, and consumer responses to mass customization of apparel.
Min-Sun Lee is a PhD student in the department of apparel, educational studies, and hospitality management at
Iowa State University. Her general research interests include consumer behavior, consumer-retailer relationships, and consumer satisfaction of his or her body image.
Joy M. Kozar, PhD, is an associate professor of apparel marketing at Kansas State University. Her research
activities encompass an exploration of the aging adult market segment, including consumers perceptions of
advertising media and the relationship between older adults social comparison behavior and self-image.
Peter Martin, PhD, is a professor in the department of human development and family studies and director of
the gerontology program at Iowa State University. His research is on exceptional longevity, adaption, and functioning of very old individuals.