The Human Design

An Introduction to the Design in Nature

Marcus David Morgan

Dedicated to my wonderful mother, Patricia (1928-2015)

Last Re-edited 2nd May 2015

Copyright M. D. Morgan 2011-2015
National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication
Author: Morgan, Marcus David, 1960Title: The human design an introduction to the design in
nature.
ISBN: 9780646559605 (pbk.)
Subjects: Human evolution.
Human beings--Origin.
Dewey Number: 128 or 576.82
1st Edition 2011, 2nd Edition 2012, 3rd Edition 2013, 4th
Edition 2014, 5th Edition 2015
Published & Distributed by the Author. Free PDF download at
http://thehumandesign.net subject to terms

Contents

Contents

1. Introduction

1
2
3
4

General Readership
Humans in the Universe
Design of our Anatomy
Predetermined Anatomy

2. Environmental Adaptation

12
13

DNA & Chemicals

Chemical Affinities

16

3. A Biosphere for Life

16
17
18
20
21
23
23
24
24
25

Quite Regular Planets

Quite Regular Anatomies
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Active Chemicals
Passive Chemicals
Levity & Gravity
Space & Time
Cause & Effect
Gravity & Levity Arcs
Environmental Layers & Currents

27

5. The Design

30

Forms Delineate Substances

iii

Contents

iv

34

6. The Scheme of Existence

34
35
36
53

Definitions in Science
Discreteness & Continuity
Continual Physics
Continual Biology

63

7. Modern Scientific Context

63
64
65
66

Isaac Newton
Immanuel Kant
Charles Darwin
Albert Einstein

68

8. Organ Substructure

68
84
87
89
90
91
91
92

Blocks & Fields

Involuntary & Voluntary Moves
Thought Merely as Integration of Feelings
Sexuality, Growth, & Awareness
Cause, Effect, & Awareness
Space, Time
Complete Inversion as Sides of a Soup Spoon
Twist in Block Merger & Twist in Field Accretion

93

9. Appendage Superstructure

101
103
107

Extra Levers & Springs to Keep Templates Intact

Appendages Matching Organs
Site Impetus favored across Levels

108

10. Facility of Neurons

115

Accretion for the Experience

Contents
117
118
122
126
128

Referral of Awareness by Brain to Sites

Language as Syntax & Semantics
Fidelity in a Cycle Shaped by a World
From Recognition to Anticipation
Plasticity in Site Processing by a Brain

133 11. Awareness in the World

133
135
136
136
138
140
140

Free Will, a Pure Idea

Words in a World
Maintaining Anticipation to favor a World
Automatism & Health
Freedom, Copying, & Niches
Cause-Effect in a Niche
Realities of Containment & Reasoning

147 12. The Design in Physics

147
162
165
160
170
171
172
173

Particles & Fields as Strings & Loops

Spin as Rotation & Vibration in Physics & Anatomy
Particle Distribution
Field Distribution
Distribution with Interaction
Particle Interaction
Field Interaction
Constants & Variables

174 13. The Design in a Void

174
178
181
183
188

Right Handed Gravitons & Both Handed Photons

Pure Isotropy
Distorted Discrete Spaces & Times
Dimensionality & Periodicity
Strings & Loops, and Sexuality

Contents
192 14. Heat Loss in Physics & Biology
194
197

Heat & Homeostasis

Concurrent & Recurrent Heat Loss

198 15. Ancient & Modern Ideas

198
201

Ancient & Modern Approaches

Absolutely Continual & Relatively Discrete

203 16. Ideological Implications

203
204
205

Design & Designer

Individual Human Value
Consequences of Predetermination

208 17. Conclusion

vi

The Human Design

1. Introduction

I am a lawyer from Melbourne, Australia and I have been

interested in human evolution since high school in the 1970s,
but only casually and not professionally. However, I have kept
notes over four decades and compiled them gradually into this
book explaining humans within nature. Hopefully, it will be of
value to you, as it is completely new and original, and worth
considering for its breadth and meaning. I avoid any jargon,
and I present my ideas in plain language and very simply. I
use geometrical diagrams rather than math equations.
I deconstruct human existence within nature to its essential
aspects, and combine all of them into a completely new theory,
including a model for awareness, equated to consciousness.
We are aware of ourselves by our thoughts and feelings, and
aware of events in the world. I explain how humans may have
evolved and may function under a Design, with awareness
from a relation of our organs and appendages, and our brain. I
consider the Design to be a reconciliation of the laws of nature,
and that it does not need a designer. It would be a pattern to
the laws of nature, and it does not include a designer as one
of its features. Matter may not be created or destroyed, and
the laws of nature are our starting point. The laws are selfconsistent and were not created.
General Readership
The style I use is personal and methodical. I use the first
person throughout to explain my new theory, which is creative
and requires working and reworking to emphasize and
reinforce new ideas. You will understand the basic structure
and message of my book, which is necessarily repetitive for
full coverage. I may condense to 60 pages of my principles
in future, but this book also deals with current theory to give

The Human Design

a complete assessment. I use only one Design to compare

physics, chemistry, biology, and psychology. An aspect of
the Design used for each of those four rigors for comparison,
is action-reaction. I cover the work of Isaac Newton,
Immanuel Kant, Charles Darwin, and Albert Einstein. If you
are not familiar with basic facts or theories discussed here,
any science encyclopedia will assist you.
Non-technical words with regular meanings are used to
explain technical issues, and a regular dictionary would also
be useful. Technical words with specialized meanings have a
capital letter, and are used as references in non-technical
explanations. Words in inverted commas have a particular
usage in a given context. I do not provide references in the
style of an academic paper, and only rely on facts and
theories that are very simple and well established. One can
always misstate a fact or theory in error. Confirmation is easily
found in encyclopedias, including Wikipedia.
Humans in the Universe
I explain human existence within the workings of nature in
an unbroken thread. I consider the workings of nature by
examining the particle forces of physics. Forces may be
directly comparable to the human anatomy in h o w they are
structured under the directions of the same Design. An
identical match between the Design as a blueprint for our
biological anatomies and the Design as an equation
unifying physical particle forces may allow each of us to
be aware of nature, including oneself within it, with great
accuracy. Our Design enables us to measure and understand
a world and our anatomical functions within it in the most
appropriate ways for the world and oneself to be measured
and understood. One knows oneself always in interface with a
world, as an entity within the world, by experiences provided
by our own moves while we use them to collect experiences
provided by the world.

The Human Design

Human-types in a Biosphere are a Microcosm or mini universe,

comparable to a universe as a Macrocosm, consistent with
ancient philosophies. Human type anatomies with awareness
may be central to evolution in the universe generally, and my
work is Anthropocentric, meaning human-types would be
clearly predetermined. I track an unbroken arrow of causation
by action-reaction across all of nature for human evolution.
Design of our Anatomy
Neuroscientists probe the brain to determine which regions of
it are responsible for states of awareness. My approach is to
explain it by organ and appendage functions facilitated by a
brain. The brain would not have evolved its neural networks
alone by trial and error as to which connections between
neurons are most beneficial for survival. Instead, our anatomy
may have evolved an aligned anatomy with specific functions
under the Design with neurons to function. Awareness is the
peak product of organ and appendage functions using neurons
as their facility for it.
I define the specific features of our anatomy for relevance to
producing awareness for the first time. I present the Design as
a blueprint for our anatomy. The Design is simple, but it is
not a standard anatomical chart with the usual labels for
features. It is a new way of understanding all organ and
appendage functions, according to their structure contributing
to awareness. The Design in application to both the human
anatomy and to the particle forces of physics is a Rosetta
Stone, which provided a basis for the translation of Ancient
Egyptian hieroglyphs using Ancient Greek. The Design may
define both their constituents, and by doing so across the
extreme breadth of physics with chemistry, and biology with
psychology, those constituents are explained in comparisons.
Be persuaded rather than dissuaded by the incredible
simplicity of my concepts and language compared to science
in general. This is from invention & distillation, for your benefit.

The Human Design

Predetermined Anatomy
I explain how the Design may apply to the universe generally
within an overall Scheme for existence. If the Design applies
to all of nature, then our anatomy may be the final product
of evolution in the universe. Nature may evolve according to
the Design across physics and then across biology.
Evolutions are by heat loss after an explosion at a Big Bang,
explained later, for atoms and compounds by more heat loss.
A universe drives to economy after a Big Bang.
In physics, the universe is in uniform expansion and evolves
according to fundamental capacities of mass prescribed and
reconciled by the Design. Particles and their fields would
reconcile their capacities by the creation of a gravitationally
neutralized universe in which they evolve cosmological
structures to the extent of solar systems and Earth-type
planetary surfaces for human-type evolution. Evolution of the
entire universe, from a state of containment before a Big
Bang event of expansion, may be led by the Design to
inevitably evolve Earth-type planetary surfaces. In evolution
of forces, the synthesis of the range of atoms on Earth is
essential. Then anatomies evolve by biology in environmental
landscapes of chemicals under an epicycle of Earth orbiting
the Sun, and the Moon orbiting Earth, to shape landscapes.
In biology, evolution by adaptation to an environment is
necessary, but evolution may not be undirected. Structured
layering of the chemical capacities of Earths surface may
predetermine the structures of anatomies. It may be inevitable
that anatomies will literally resemble their landscapes if DNA
constructs them using the chemicals of the landscape. In my
theory, DNA is not a selfish replicator. It is a replicator
serving an environment that shapes it. Our landscape has a
specific arrangement of layered compounds under an
epicycle, from given affinities between atoms to bond into
those compounds under the epicycle. Those affinities also

The Human Design

allow atoms to bond into DNA and its mechanisms, to

construct anatomies according to that layering. DNA has a
formal digital sequence and accompanying mechanisms to
construct phenotypes by proximate environmental chemicals.
We are literal embodiments of our landscape.
Some people speculate about Intelligent Design, as there
appears to be more complexity to our anatomy than might
be expected of undirected evolution. The complex structure
of our anatomy suggests to some that an intelligent creator
may have designed it. However, I say nature provides these
features, and that there is no need for a designer. Around the
first billion years after the formation of our planet four and a
half billion years ago, DNA formed, and could replicate while
enclosed within a membrane. DNA has basic mechanisms
to replicate and express genes as phenotypes uniquely
suited to environmental circumstances as they change,
perhaps even within hours. Nature provides those capacities,
together with environmental chemicals needed for DNA to
construct the features of our anatomy. Missing pieces are
inevitable but the process shows itself without them. We only
need to structure knowledge properly, and add a few insights.
Replication enables DNA to create new cells by encoding the
formation of proteins using chemical segments that are
sequenced for new cells. The proteins react with proximate
chemicals to flexibly build the constituents of a cell. DNA may
be encoded to knit together different expressions of proteins
from the same fixed sequence of DNA, splicing DNA
sequences to suit environmental circumstances as they
change, for greater flexibility. We may re-sequence DNA by
Epigenetics to flexibly suit environments. RNA may play an
important part in the flexibility of DNA expressions, and
perhaps also its mutations. Chemical bonding is by affinities
that are not well understood, and mutations may be primed by
Epigenetics rather than being random, later. The proximate
chemicals used by DNA and its proteins to construct new

The Human Design

cells are those of the environment. DNA may use chemicals

in the most economical possible way when constructing cells.
Our anatomy may correspond to exact layering of chemicals in
the environment, suggesting a purpose of Earth-type planets
to evolve our type of anatomy.
Charles Darwins Natural Selection is not scientific to the
extent of being predictive, which is a weakness. In it,
mutations are supposedly random, and novelties that survive
will do so with novelty, even if we have a record of
forms that survived in the past. It does not have a handle on
the mutations or the environment for prediction. However,
changing the idea of adaptation to direct use of chemical
capacities for embodiments of landscapes makes it
predictable. Embodiments may be functional, if mutations are
prolific and economical enough to form them over time.
There is an area of science that purports to deal with the
Evolvability of life. DNA has mechanisms to replicate and
express genes by affecting chemicals in its vicinity, including
RNA and enzymes. Variety is enabled by those mechanisms,
extending into Recombination in sexed species explained later.
Scientists miss the point entirely. DNA and its mechanisms use
non-living chemical capacities of an environment to construct
anatomies. Evolvability depends upon what functional cells in
an environment DNA can build using environmental chemicals
in the first place. Mutational variety is extremely useful, but it is
not the point at all. The ignorance of science in this area is
astounding, with endless labels for anatomy.
We have loose environmental narratives as to why it is so,
simply because there are mechanisms for random sorting for
variety based on random mutations for our DNA sequence. That
is a weak basis for evolution, given that we have layered
capacities ready to be engineered by DNA for anatomies in the
first place. Later, on page 206, I note there are many
Convergent species types. Dogs, cats, bears and other types

The Human Design

evolve separately despite the supposed sequential randomness

of mutation. Biologists non-answer for abundant coincidences
is nature prefers certain types. Math by Population Genetics is
irrelevant to whether a specific random mutation happens,
even based on workable success. Selection is irrelevant, as it is
just success at a workable level of life that got there randomly
for a specific sequence, to perhaps go further randomly to
humans.
In the next chapter, I explain our embodiment of landscapes
in more detail. My inspiration was from a locally made picture
book I got when I was a child. The layering of chemical
elements under an epicycle used by DNA to build anatomies is
straightforward. You will grasp it by the time our anatomy is
detailed in chapters 8 & 9, but if you turn to diagrams briefly,
you can see the simplicity to our anatomy. Science has not
seen what you can simply see here, and that continues through
physics, chemistry, psychology, and methodology to an equal
degree to their supposed pillars. Just as I have identified and
will shortly explain the ignorance of biology around its supposed
pillar, I do so to the pillars of the remaining fundamental rigors in
this compendium. I would be briefer, but my ideas are new and
original, and the same basic principles apply in different ways
for comparison and contrast throughout. I also have to deal with
science as you currently know it, which is misguided.

The Human Design

2. Environmental Adaptation

I will now draw a line to separate our anatomy and the world
around us. On one side of the line may be a landscape of
rivers, lakes, hills, and valleys. Our anatomy has evolved
from a single microscopic cell within a landscape. We have
evolved over several billion years by adaptation. This means
all our systems, senses, and appendages need to be suited
to our environment and maintained by our environment.
Usually, adaptation is understood by looking at what has
already survived. We can find correlations to environmental
conditions to which it may have adapted. However, I consider
preexisting chemical layers and construct creatures based
upon how they may be used to construct anatomies. Never
spout narratives that a species has its features because it is
environmentally Selected, working with what looks successful
to the narrator. That is the work of an inventive artist, not a
scientist. You start at lower levels of chemistry and physics,
not up to a Selection filter by a mantra if it works, that is why it
evolved. That is so shallow, it is ridiculous to rely on it.
Population Genetics is shallow math from random mutation or
duplication, for random shuffling. As with most of science
explored here, it is so inadequate as an explanation as to be a
sad joke. In fact, DNA engineers chemicals to be anatomies in
environments. Chemicals stand between DNA and Selection.
They are in pre-existing layers as constituents for engineering
by DNA. I do not simply put endlessly labeled anatomical parts
on a savannah to explain them by narratives around a 100%
blind, purely accidental, mutation of our three billion sequence.
Our anatomies are constructed using the chemicals of our
environment, and this has been overlooked by science to date.
I will show our anatomy may be a perfect embodiment of
chemicals at Earths surface. My removal of biologys pillar is
probably the most obvious original idea ever presented, sadly.

The Human Design

Diagram 1, Head & Body Structures (from above)

Left
Mineral Loose
Tongue

Gas Lifting
Lungs

Liquid Flowing
Heart

Solid Light
Nose

Back

Front

Spine
Mineral Tightening

Eye
Gas Pocket

Ear
Liquid Well

Gut
Solid Heavy
Right

Merged across both sides

Adjoined on each side

We literally resemble the environment, with chemicals formed

by DNA into anatomies, as previewed in Diagram 1, in a view
of our head and body from above. As a child I had a picture
book of landscapes of people, with hills for bodies, lakes and
clouds for heads, or rivers for arms. More entertaining than
Darwins finches. Diagram 1 has its own reference points as
chemical constituents engineered for functions by DNA.
Consider pre-existing chemicals for DNA to shape into
anatomies, then DNA shaping of chemical functions, and then
Selection narratives about their continuation. Narratives are
just so stories. 100% blind mutation is proposed with no long
term specific observation, as the theory itself is very recent.

The Human Design

10

Diagram 2, Layered Chemicals on Earths Surface

External
Mineral Loose
Tongue

Gas Lifting
Lungs

Liquid Flowing
Heart

Solid Light
Nose

Horizon

Spine
Mineral Tightening

Eye
Gas Pocket

Ear
Liquid Well

Gut
Solid Heavy
Internal

Anatomists' reductive constituents ignore basic non-living

chemical structures. In chapter 8, I place biology on a secure
footing and show anatomy is nothing more than pure economy
eked out by particles and fields across split seconds continually
over eons. Evolution is not an easy task. We evolved as part of
an environment that loses heat. Nature builds up to wind down
after a Big Bang, and Earth has life within environments to wind
down by storing heat in plants from the Sun, and releasing it in
mammals and birds that have their own warm chemical activity
under a Sun, more than a plant. Evolution drives to economize
compounds into stable lower energy orbitals in overall heat loss
by an environment in which life is completely immersed.

The Human Design

11

DNA has preexisting layers with which to construct anatomies

once DNA has mutated. A functional anatomical form that
economically accords to layers of chemicals on a planetary
surface may be inevitable, given time. Non-living chemical
capacities are from integration of chemicals on Earths
surface with four planetary conditions by Earths epicycle. The
epicycle is the overlap between the orbits of the Moon around
Earth, and Earth around the Sun. The conditions are Earths
gravity attracting towards its center, Earths spin creating
electromagnetic effects, the Moons drag upon the surface,
and sunshine. Surface chemicals interact with the epicycle to
shape the features of the landscape.
DNA & Chemicals
Evolution is based fundamentally on the capacities of DNA,
which is found in the nucleus of cells. DNA is a strand of
chemicals with a digital form. DNA is a macromolecule in a
strand with a sequential binary form. DNA has contact with
chemicals in its immediate proximity. Interacting with those
chemicals, it constructs our cells using its mechanisms for
replication and gene expression. DNA constructs according to
the directions of its sequential code for the assembly of amino
acids to build our cells. The chemicals of an environment
used by DNA for the construction of anatomies are directed
and fashioned by DNA using its encoded proteins. Chemicals
are specifically selected for exact functions when formed into
the cells and other constituents of our anatomies according to
the directions of the DNA code. DNA encodes to construct an
anatomy that reproduces, as well as constructing one that is
adaptive to the environment.
Given that an individual survives and reproduces, DNA can
be passed on, complete with variations. Another generation of
individuals then grows to manipulate specific proximate
chemicals into an exact anatomy. Coding for its own
perpetuation by growing anatomies that can reproduce,

The Human Design

12

individuals mutate gradually over generations to build new

types of cells. DNA formed with sufficient coding capacity to
maintain a single microscopic cell. It then grew and changed
by extending its coding by replication with mutation via
reproduction. Proximity of chemicals in environments to
permeate the cell membrane to follow directions of DNA is
essential. DNA mutations are shaped by environmental
chemical availabilities around a cell in my model.
Chemical Affinities
Feedback from the environment creating mutations is
controversial. The traditional view known as the Central
Dogma, is that DNA mutates and its encoded proteins build
using available chemicals, rather than those chemicals building
proteins that become encoded in DNA as mutations.
Biological mutations supposedly go from DNA to functions,
rather than from functions to DNA. However, underpinning
that view, there are chemical affinities that favor the formation
of every specific compound of atoms. The affinities are as
given by nature and capacities of atoms set out in the Periodic
Table of Elements, which are not fully understood. There are
huge gaps in knowledge about chemicals and their potentials.
Chemistry cannot predict how the same protons, electrons,
and neutrons combine in so many ways. A whole is exactly the
sum of its parts unseparated, but Emergence Theories say
wholes have parts that can be analyzed or compared. By
definition, they cannot. This is a basic self-contradiction, which
applies also to Godels First Incompleteness Theorem and
Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. I obviate them on pages
142-144 using proper logic. In fact, the same particles change
markedly as different atoms, and are only known in retrospect
by a compendium from observations as they play out on Earth.
Science knows little about chemistry. It is all preset potential to
neutrons decaying in a void at Escape Velocity at a Big Bang.
It ekes out its preset potential by evolution, and nothing ever

The Human Design

13

Emerges, which is an ass of a concept. Everything maximizes

economy by a preset potential, as will be explained. Just track
back and see the facts unfold to logical patterns.
My model is based on clear affinities between atoms to allow
them to bond into every compound that exists. Affinities are
non-random by definition. Mutation is as subject to affinities
as DNA itself or any compound. The explanation is tied to
heat loss by organism and environment in Homeostasis
all the way to replications, and increasing that continually by
mutation. Plants are immobile and use heat from the Sun
(and Earth) to bond as cells into more economical and stable
atomic orbitals. Animals are mobile, and humans have high
temperature with more heat loss by bonding, with less direct
usage. Mutation for economical convection is unlikely to be
random, but I do not separate organism and environment,
as this is overall heat loss, storing it in plants and releasing it
in animals as one system. Heat is lost at a Big Bang to then
store as atoms by supernovae, to then store and release on
Earth organically all across its surface, creeping, crawling.
Mutations build effectively upon successful previous mutations,
and even if entirely random, they work by predetermined
chemical layers and we still have the most comprehensive
structure on Earth. However, there is no clear work on all the
mutations to make humans from amoeba, randomly upon
success. Fred Hoyles Assembly of a 747 airplane in a
Whirlwind remains very real, even though he goes straight to it
rather than meandering. Hoyle applies even though mutations
are Selected in individuals, meandering over eons. The point
is random sequencing. A whirlwind also builds piece on piece
randomly sequentially, and an airplane is workable before
completion. The gap of humans to precursors is as great.
Despite disdain for narcissism, human awareness is so far
above other species, apes just taxi on runways. Science
ignores the unlikelihood of random sequential change and
uses foolish reasons like Selection to reject Hoyle.

The Human Design

14

There are three billion DNA Base Pair nucleotides specifically,

but flexibly, sequenced to make a human. We may mutate
changes to as few as 30 to 100 Base Pairs in a lifetime,
supposedly randomly along the three billion sequence. Base
Pair Mutations are accompanied by deletions and insertions
of accumulated sections of DNA. 70% of mutations are
deleterious and most of the rest are neutral. Nature builds a
high mutation barrier, with a low estimate of several per billion
beneficial. Supposedly we accumulated a specific three billion
DNA beneficial sequence by chance from such mutations,
albeit in three billion years not a whirlwind. I note an amoeba
has more Base Pairs than a human, and if we evolved from
such cells, deletions would be a fundamental process. Biology
has not done the math on the likelihood of random sequencing
to make humans, or for Convergent types generally. They
prefer random Population Genetics as a circular sidetrack.
The first but by no means the last step to solve this issue is in
Epigenetics by environmentally induced flexibility to expression
of fixed sequences in individuals extending into generations.
They might settle as a n actual mutation to the DNA, or at
least enable a mutated individual in a population with the
same changes in temporary form to stay within it to pass on a
mutation. Epigenetics shows that DNA expression in
individuals may be flexible enough to adapt without the DNA
mutating. Populations might be primed to spread mutations if
they arise, and cells may work at a threshold of arising. This
would mean Fred Hoyle fades, as each stage of success is
primed in various directions and not blind, later in chapter 14.
Over-simplification of evolution and mutation by Darwin stifles
progress in science. Later, I also explain errors by Einstein,
Newton, and Kant. Complexities of affinities may result from
all atoms being created to a specific pattern in nature.
Chemical affinities may have a predetermined purpose of our
type of evolution on Earth-type planets. Next, I explore basics
for the inevitability of earth type planets and human types.

The Human Design

15

3. A Biosphere for Life

We have comprehensive awareness, and if it happens to be
from an embodiment of specifically layered gasses, liquids,
minerals, and solids of our landscape, there may be a
conspiracy at work. In this case, there may be a conspiracy in
the laws of nature. The conspiracy in nature may extend
beyond our planet. It is possible, if not likely, that the laws of
nature conspire to evolve Earth-type planets for human-type
anatomies to evolve. In that process, the creation of a
Biosphere of chemical elements and their combination into the
layered chemical compounds of our landscape are essential.
Earth is in a solar system that has abundances of chemical
elements in the approximate proportions in which they are
found in our galaxy and the universe generally. However,
within our regular solar system, Earth has its own specific
proportions, which might be considered regular if such inner
planets laden with heavier elements can be expected to be of
that composition. I will consider the combined role of atoms on
Earth's surface and the epicycle around them to the shaping
of our landscapes for the evolution of life. As noted, they
would combine as one system. The Sun, Moon, attraction
of Earth, and spin of Earth are essential to shaping atoms into
layered compounds of gasses, liquids, minerals, and solids.
The combination of atoms and epicycle are perfectly
harmonious, adding to likelihood of predetermination if DNA
and supporting chemicals become harbored by a membrane.
A planetary surface with a range of elements in approximate
proportions created in supernovae, as in Earths mantle,
provides DNA with chemicals to build human types. It supports
DNA by enveloping. It works continually around DNA by
microseconds across eons to rigid laws cycling chemicals on
that landscape. It shapes DNA in tiny bursts across one huge

The Human Design

16

burst of evolution for any life that winds, creeps, or crawls

across it. Three billion years helps, but that is a natural
cosmological time scale. The human type is on a scale
midway between an atom and a solar system, and both huge
and tiny cosmological time scales apply to gradual mutation of
DNA for the evolution of a completed embodiment.
Quite Regular Planets
Upon Earths surface, there will be variations in abundances
as chemicals accumulate as a Biosphere with a structured
landscape for evolution. The most abundant elements by total
mass in the universe, our galaxy, and our solar system, are
found in stars, which comprise 74 % hydrogen and 24%
helium. Our solar system has 1% oxygen and 0.5% carbon,
but in Earths total composition, oxygen is 30%, hydrogen is
0.03%, helium is rare and carbon is 0.07%. Oxygen rates are
aided by photosynthesis on earth.
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis nearly fourteen billion years ago
ensured abundant hydrogen and helium. Stars could not
have formed the remaining elements of nature without their
abundances. Likewise, our planet of heavy elements would
not have evolved without a solar system of different overall
composition from our planet, with the Sun having 99.8% of
mass. Supernovae make heavier elements of nature and
explode to disperse them as rotating clouds. In Wikipedia
under Chemical Elements, Abundance of elements in Earth's
crust differs from those in the universe, but the composition of
Earth's mantle, which has more magnesium and iron in place
of aluminum, more closely mirrors that of the universe, save
for the noted loss of volatile elements, as a result of solar
heating in the early formation of the solar system.
We are 65% oxygen and 0.5% iron, and Earths abundance of
oxygen is 30% and iron is 32%. We are 18% carbon and
10% hydrogen, while Earth has 0.07% and 0.03% in total.

The Human Design

17

Helium is in traces in anatomy, and on Earth. Variation across

Earths entire structure allows specific elements to
concentrate in a Biosphere to support life mostly between
500 meters below the oceans surface and six kilometers
above it. The atoms o f the Periodic Table of Elements
combine as compounds to provide the features of our
landscape and our anatomy.
Quite Regular Anatomies
Chemicals do not have a one-to-one correspondence between
the universe and humans. T hey lay different foundations of
abundances as they refine to the combination found in our
Biosphere, and they have continuing relevance to it as an
epicycle. It might seem costly to have a sun with us as its
purpose. However, many stars would exist to no great
purpose with no life around them. The purposes of the Sun,
Earth's spin and attraction, and the orbit of the Moon, may be
our type of evolution and continuation. I am not concerned
that we have not reproduced the conditions for a sliver of DNA
enclosed in a membrane with supporting chemicals to form
from a chemical soup, to replicate. Look next to where Earths
mantle breaks its crust, given failure so far in labs. Missing
pieces are a reality, but reality presents itself in their absence.
Easily overlooked features of our Biosphere contributing to the
layering of the chemical elements are gravitational and
electromagnetic arcs created by Earth-Moon and Sun-Earth
rotations respectively. Our distance from the Sun, and a large
influential Moon, are features in the formation of arcs that
produce a temperate environment. The charge from Earths
surface by spin resolves as a surface with temperate radiation.
Our surface is calm by a specific balance of electromagnetic
and gravitational arcs within an epicycle. In the next chapter, I
will set out the influences of the epicycle across our surface for
annual, monthly, and daily cycles of chemical activity
continually shaping other chemical activity, to release heat.

The Human Design

18

Later, the simple driver of evolution is pure economy of

energy, evident in heat loss. After a Big Bang with heat
loss, heat is stored as bigger atoms created in supernovae,
but there is heat loss in that process. Then the atoms
compound dynamically in stars for heat loss, and also as
planets, far less dynamically, when atoms compound and
lose heat. Earths surface has heat from the Sun, and also
from below. On Earth, atoms compound under a Sun to
both store heat driving plant cell creation, and release it in
mammals, birds, and other life with mechanical motion. I
use the word Homeostasis for heat balance of cells and
environment, trying not to separate life and environment. It
is all heat loss on Earth by storage and release using cells,
in an overall drive to build heat in supernovae in order to
lose it gradually via living cells on planetary surfaces as
atoms bind into stable lower energy orbitals, compounding.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Considering the effort of refining evolution down to its
ultimate expression on Earth-type planets, our evolution in the
universe may b e costly, but our anatomy and its awareness
from cosmological and biological evolution of basic chemicals
is a considerable beneficial outcome. There may be millions
of evolutions of human types. The universe is gigantic, if you
think that is interesting. Our planet is interesting and diverse in
landscapes and life, which are failing. There is in fact genuine
purpose here, and gigantic lifeless events that dominate the
universe by size can be seen for what they are. They are just
blobs compared to life in landscapes. Disparate oxygen
thieves dominate the media, including speculative cosmology
with zero relevance to human affairs. But, there is no need for
something to design what has always existed. Particle forces
under the Design may have always existed with capacities to
change from a contracted state at the Big Bang to an
evolving universe. We can turn to nature and the chemical
constituents of nature for our evolution and our awareness.

The Human Design

19

4. Layered Chemicals

I will now begin to construct the Design for the human

anatomy and explain it by the gradual introduction of new
concepts. First, I will introduce various capacities that may
make up the structure of our anatomy from chemicals of our
landscape. I will define the capacities more fully in the
following chapter.
Active Chemicals
For our materials to construct the Design, I will use eight
categories of chemicals layered on Earths surface
mentioned earlier. I will begin with four categories of the
chemicals in active states showing their energies. External
at the surface are gasses warmly lifting and liquids tidally
flowing, and internal at the surface are minerals tightly
shifting and solids heavily compacting. The chemicals are
compounds of elements, and they are clearly recognizable on
Earth's surface. We sometimes study these four active
categories in junior school. Shortly, I will discuss the relevance
of the epicycle of the combined orbit of Earth around the Sun
with the Moon around Earth, and how it determines the
layering of chemicals on Earths surface.
Diagram 3 includes a preview of the organs that are the basis
for the systems of our bodies. Our anatomy is cellular and
two-thirds water. We have bones supporting our structure,
muscles manipulating the bones, and skin upon muscles all
across our anatomy, but our organs and appendages are
chemically diverse across those shared features. Later, I will
distinguish between our organ substructure from gross
chemicals, and appendage superstructure from chemical
traces across gross aggregates.

The Human Design

20

Diagram 3, Active Chemicals

External
(Left)
Gas Lifting
(Lungs)
Liquid Flowing
(Heart)
(Back)

Horizon

(Front)

(Spine)
Mineral Tightening
(Gut)
Solid Heavy
(Right)
Internal

Passive Chemicals
I will double the number of categories. There is also a
resting state, for their passive sensitivities. External to the
surface are minerals loosened in pools, and solids settling
as dust; and internal to the surface are gasses contained in
pockets, and liquids sunken in drains. Passive chemicals
would not move as they do in their active states. In
passive states, they also have alternative positions in the
landscape, higher or lower than active positions. Later, I
explain our anatomy is formed by gas bubbles (eye & alveoli)
and liquid canals (cochlea & heart) stretching; solid piles (nose
& gut) and mineral seams (spine & tongue) stacking. I include
all muscles to stretch and all receptors-effectors to stack, later.

The Human Design

21

Diagram 4, Passive Chemicals

External
(Left)
Mineral Floating
(Tongue)
Solid Light
(Nose)
(Back)

Horizon

(Front)
(Eye)
Gas Pocket

(Ear)
Liquid Well
(Right)
Internal

Minerals may spread like salt in water rather than tightly

polarizing; lighter solids as dust may drift rather than
compacting heavily in the ground; gasses may be contained
in pressurized pockets rather than rising lightly; and liquids
may settle when sinking rather than flowing. I propose a
relation that allows passive suspension, for floating minerals
suspended in liquids, drifting solids suspended in gasses,
contained gasses suspended in solid pockets, and sinking
liquids suspended in minerals. Head is suspended above
body. Later, I explain this as Electrostatics across a head,
between mixed levity conductors and gravity insulators. It
houses an Electrostatic brain of neurons, comprised of equal
nerve conduction and hormone insulation. A body is
Electrodynamic by pure chemicals to move by neurons at a
spine and gut in particular.

The Human Design

22

Levity & Gravity

Two chemicals aggregate with more electromagnetic charge
and may tend to rise with levity from agitation and heat, as
do gasses and minerals. Two chemicals aggregate with more
gravitational mass and may tend to fall with gravity from
weight, as do liquids and solids. Rising levity capacities would
position chemicals higher than falling gravity capacities,
whether the chemicals have an external or internal position in
the landscape. Gasses and minerals share charge and tend
to rise with levity against gravity. Liquids and solids tend to
fall evenly by weight from gravity without levity. This is a
comparative statement, as electromagnetism and gravitation
combine universally.
Space & Time
Two chemicals make temporal waves with compressing
peaks and decompressing troughs, as in the gravitational
waves of liquids and the electromagnetic waves of
minerals. A temporal wave shows rhythm in its peaks (up)
and troughs (down). I will explain shortly chemicals in the
Design peak as tightening minerals and flowing liquids, and
trough as loose minerals and liquid sinks.
Two chemicals have spatial capacities that expand and
contract under gravitational and electromagnetic forces, as
solids and gasses respectively. They may contract (in), and
expand (out). I will explain chemicals in the Design expand as
lifting gasses and heavy solids, and contract as contained
gasses and light solids. A wider definition of a wave may
combine temporal and spatial aspects. A wave can have a
high temporal peak and low trough, with a spatially
expanding wave front and contracting wave crest. Later, in
Diagram 13, our anatomy may resemble a water wave, with
watery cells in general locomotion as a wave. It will be
obvious from that diagram that we have a peak above a front

The Human Design

23

and behind a trough with a crest above it, in structure and

movement. In physics, particles move in periodic waves and
spatial pathways, and are also described as having
coexisting aspects.
Cause & Effect
I will adjust my terms by replacing the words internal and
external with cause and effect, respectively, to recognize
chemicals as Earth-based and cause, or celestial and effect,
for gravity or levity. Internal chemicals have Earth-based
influences, and may be causal on Earths surface, while
external chemicals may take the effects of the celestial Moon
and Sun. The intact levity or gravity groupings of chemicals are
grouped or divided into internal consistencies and external
consistencies.
Gravity & Levity Arcs
An epicycle of two orbits is from an Earth type planet orbiting
a star like the Sun, and a Moon like ours orbiting the planet.
The orbits are created by gravitational attraction, but Earths
orbit of the Sun has levity, and the Moons orbit of Earth has
gravity. Meanwhile, chemicals compound by electromagnetic
attraction on Earth under that epicycle, but, like gravitational
orbits, this equally provides for levity & gravity chemistry
compounding. Distinguishing gravitation for arcs and
electromagnetism for compounds is important. It is explained
later as nature mutually partitioned by the two forces.
Each arc is external (celestial) & internal (Earth-based).
External are the Suns warmth and the Moons drag. Internal
are Earths spin and attraction. Internal chemicals are Earthbased, and causally securely rise by levity or fall by gravity
below a horizon. Effected chemicals are exposed above to the
Suns radiation downwards to rise above as levity, or a
Moons pull upwards to fall from above as gravity.

The Human Design

24

Diagram 5, Orbits and Arcs

(1) Electromagnetic Arc

Sunshine

Arc

Earths Spin
(2) Gravitational Arc
Moons Drag

Arc

Earths Pull

The arcs stretch and stack levity or gravity compounds, by

forces below & above. Later, levity & gravity organs are
embedded at locations. Causal are secure below, and
effected exposed above. Eight organs rise or fall, and each
moves asymmetrically up & down across levels and left &
right across sides. Keep each organ dangling up by levity or
down by gravity in Diagram 6. Now rotate the Design to be flat
above a surface in Diagram 1, merged left & right, but keep
organs up & down from Diagram 6, delicately, like hanging
mobiles from a star shaped grid, made in any junior school.

The Human Design

25

Diagram 6, Arcs (as Triangles) on Earths Surface

Celestial Effects
Sunshine
Mineral Loose

Gas Lift

Tongue

Lungs
Moons Drag

Liquid Flow

Solid Light

Heart

Nose
Horizon

Spine

Eye

Mineral Tight

Gas Pocket
Earths Spin

Ear

Gut

Liquid Well

Solid Heavy
Earths Pull

Earth-Based Causes

Environmental Layers & Currents

Chemicals lift, lighten, compact, contain, sink, tighten, flow,
and loosen, with the cycles of the Moon around Earth and
Earth around the Sun, in daily, monthly, and yearly cycles.
Atoms have neutral charge, but as chemical compounds in
gravitational layers, they would have electromagnetic current
running through them in their movements. As noted, these

The Human Design

26

descriptions reflect anatomical features. Gravitational layers

and their electromagnetic currents are concentrated, for every
cell of our anatomy. All cells are in turn facilitated by neuron
cells among them, in layered neural channels with extreme
current accreting to settle hormones, for precisely layered site
functions. Humans are embodiments of landscapes. Neuron
cells are an intact facility to enable diverse anatomical cells to
function with an intact comprehensive awareness, later.
An epicycle has gravitational concentrations at surfaces of
masses around neutrality at centers, for arcs. Atoms have
electromagnetically charged neutrality at surfaces around
concentration at centers, for compounds. A massive sphere in
a void has a concentrated surface around a neutral center. A
neutron in a void has concentrated charge within a neutral
surface. I explain later, we are compounds under arcs, and we
reconcile those forces in physics. We reconcile them as a final
product, by equal contributions of those forces, by a human
anatomy that is on a scale exactly between an atom and a
solar system. We are also an intact representation, because
basic compounds under arcs rely on basic principles of forces,
to the extent they shape a basic representation. A surface
above the horizon concentrates mass and neutralizes charge,
and a center below concentrates charge and neutralizes mass.
Gravitation is mass, and electromagnetism is charge. In my
model, all mass is made of graviton strings, and this includes
photons. Charge has mass, as it is made of mass, and it gets
momentum from it. However, a photon is a limit to a graviton.
Gravitons interact with photons proportionally as masses, but
photons also have electromagnetic interactions, and gravitons
also have gravitational interactions. Photons may have been
created by graviton compression in extreme gravitation at a
Big Bang explosion. Gravitation surrounds electromagnetism
proportionally and allows for it completely. Electromagnetism
reduces to angles to gravitational momentum, as Angular
Momentum. I refer to the Big Bang as an explosion, shortly.

The Human Design

27

5. The Design

This chapter presents the Design in a reconciliation of the

chemical capacities of gasses, liquids, minerals, and solids.
Terms for capacities so far should be reasonably familiar, but
in their reconciliation I use concepts of substance and form
in a strict geometrical Design. Diagram 7 shows the capacities
of the eight states of the four chemicals in their layers on
Earths surface. They are arranged naturally into layers as
active or passive, levity or gravity, space or time, and cause or
effect. Thanks to the strictness of every line in the Design
delineating relations, explained throughout, there can be no
smudges, and no magic at all, just distinct rules.

Diagram 7, All Chemicals Capacities

Effect
Mineral Loose
Passive, Levity

Gas Lift
Active, Levity

Liquid Flow
Active, Gravity

Solid Light
Passive, Gravity

Time

Space

Mineral Tight
Active, Levity

Gas Contained
Passive, Levity

Liquid Sink
Passive, Gravity

Solid Heavy
Active, Gravity
Cause

The Human Design

28

Diagram 8, The Design

Effect (You)
(Decompression To You)

(Compression From You)

Time
(When)

Space
(Where)
(Compression To Me)

(Decompression From Me)

Cause (Me)

Electromagnetism . Gravitation
(To)
(From)

Rest Mass
(Stop)

Energy
(Go)

The Human Design

29

Diagram 8 has arrows for levity rising or gravity falling at set

locations. Chemicals are compressed or decompressed
around a horizontal center line, intact as levity or gravity.
Organ rises or falls by arrows embed them at set locations
above or below the horizon in relation to each other. Dealing
with the single arrows in Diagrams 6 & 8 for now, they also
indicate whether a relevant decompression or compression
capacity is spatially or temporally decompressing or
compressing. Chemicals compress as a temporal peak or a
spatial contraction, and decompress as a temporal trough or a
spatial expansion. Spatial solids and gasses compress in
contraction as contained gasses and light solids, and
decompress in expansion as lifting gasses and heavy solids.
Temporal minerals and liquids compress in peaking as
tightening minerals and flowing liquids, and decompress as
troughs of loosening minerals and sinking liquids.
Axes in the Design divide formal space, time, cause, and
effect capacities. In the Design, the properties are in regions
either side of each axis that divides them. Within their regions,
they compress and decompress as space or time, and as
cause or effect. Levity, gravity, active, and passive capacities
are divided into enclosed substantive triangles. There are two
chemicals at the base and two chemicals at the point of each
triangle, and they decompress or compress. They are
delineated by formal regions of the axes, as decompressing or
compressing in space, time, cause or effect. The Design also
applies to forces. Active, passive, levity, & gravity capacities
are energetic, resting, electromagnetic, & gravitational masses
respectively. In chapters 12 & 13, the Design reconciles
particles with measurable substantive capacities within a
framework of space, time, cause, and effect units.
In chapters 8 & 9, our anatomy uses axes and triangles of the
Design as a substantive rest, energy, gravity & levity
anatomy formally delineated by space, time, cause, and effect
capacities. The layout of our organs and their chemical

The Human Design

30

capacities will be quite evident then. We have comprehensive

anatomical structure, to know the world and ourselves within it.
In chapters 10 & 11, I explain how neurons are a facility for
our formally delineated substantive anatomy to be aware of its
functional interfaces with a world, fully preserved in processing
by a brain after neural capture of vision, sound, touch, and so
on, for fidelity to interfaces. A brain does nothing but preserve
functional site interfaces by diverse intricate cell functions, to
integrate and finalize them for one awareness, as thoughts
about feelings.
We rely on capacities of organs and appendages, processed
by neurons as a faithful facility, for essential concepts of
space, time, cause and effect. They frame existence itself,
across its most essential facts. Neurons finalize inputs to the
brain from all sites of function for the experience to arise. It
would not be by an independent little man Homunculus in a
brain. Our diverse neural inputs from site are processed in a
brain for experience of hormonal feelings of sites, with vision,
for example, preserved as diverse hormonal components of
line, shade, color, and so on by receptors. Neurons integrate
components by shared network commonalities (commons), for
nervous thoughts. Anatomy and its neurons are equally
hormonal mass & nervous charge. I simplify terms to feelings
by hormone preserves, and thoughts by nerve networks, for
thoughts about feelings. Hormones are integrated by nerves
for networked thoughts about preserved feelings, which
neurons integrate for an experience combining them.
Forms Delineate Substances
Note that space, time, cause, and effect are states of form
delineating active, passive, levity, and gravity substance.
Space & time discretely delineate distributive active &
passive capacities. Cause & effect discr et ely delineate
interactive levity & gravity capacities. Disregard ideas from
ancient philosophy you may have about substances, forms,

The Human Design

31

and essences. Consider substance & form afresh in my book.

All of nature, living or not, is comprised of substances
delineated by their forms. Space & time delineate substantive
active, a large space in a short time, and passive, a small
space in a long time, motions. Compression is smaller space
& shorter time. Decompression is larger space & longer time.
Active & passive states have motions & positions that are
measurable in space & time units. As particles, the motions
& positions of resting protons & energetic electrons are
measurable in space & time units, as is the momentum of
their field exchanges in relation to those particle, using a void.
They are pivots & orbits as atoms using fields, which
compound into pivots & orbits as solar systems using fields. In
anatomy, active & passive are spatial & temporal, for innate
awareness of motions and positions by a head & body and
their appendage exchanges in relation to them, using a world.
Electrons & protons use a void for their intact distributions and
interactions, and a human head and body use a world likewise.
Cause & effect delineate interactions by exchanges of
electromagnetism, by taking as cause, and giving as effect.
Gravitation gives as cause, and takes as effect. Exchange is
by compressions to take, and decompressions to give, for
both particles & anatomies. The Design provides both these
capacities for resting & energetic parties to an interaction, for
exchanges of fields between them. Effects follow causes. In
the Design, charge orients to compress causally, and mass to
decompress causally. Electromagnetism causes compressions
to make atoms, and gravitation causes decompressions to
make solar systems. Each party to an interaction would be
both cause & effect around the equal & opposite relation of an
action & reaction by charge or mass. Resting protons &
energetic electrons are both electromagnetic and gravitational,
and they have equal & opposite exchanges of electromagnetic
fields for atoms. Each is a l s o cause & effect as intact
atoms bound by gr avitat ion as int act solar systems.

The Human Design

32

They are also equal & opposite capacities for interaction

between a passive head & active body that both have levity &
gravity, and they exchange levity & gravity appendage
movements. Mass obeys its rules, and charge goes its way
with its rules, but they are mutual, shortly. This stretches the
rules for mass to alternative extremes, for angles to mass
intact as atoms by rules for both but tending to charged
angles, within angles to mass intact as solar systems by rules
for both but tending to massive momentum.
Decaying neutrons evolve into every intact atom using a void.
This is beyond prediction from the neutron, so science
invents obfuscations like Emergence to cover their ignorance.
A human head & body are likewise intact, and they use
appendages in a world to function while combining with other
humans. A world is interposed in anatomical functions to the
same extent as a void is to atoms. A proton & electron using
their fields are the equal of a human head & body using
appendages. At root, photons and gravitons create
neutrons to decay into protons & electrons. Later, a photon
has potential to create neutrons, protons, and electrons using
graviton compression, and then a full Periodic Table.
Distribution & interaction are inverted, meaning more of one
has less of the other. I use compression to stand for the
inverted relation of interactive pressure increase while
distributive extension lessens. I use decompression for less
pressure and more extension. In chapter 8, I use compression
& decompression to explain organs as cones, building upon
Diagram 6. Rising levity or falling gravity are in a cone shape
at a set location, but each moves first as compression action
by a ring move, then compression action by a link move, then
decompression reaction by a link move, then decompression
reaction by a ring move. The link transition is to integrate
diverse compressions using a brain before they decompress,
to coordinated action-reaction by separate organs. Ring
interface and link embedding makes a central accretion of

The Human Design

33

neurons around a brain for a brain to represent all sites that

have neurons Psychology is within biology to represent it, with
consistent ring & link biology, later.
I note cause is the past in time and the space we have back
behind us, while effect is the future in time and space we have
ahead in front of us. The Design across Earths horizon or our
anatomical center line between right and left is for time and
space to apply equally across cause and effect, but that does
not mean in the same way. A contracted or expanded period
of time, as two discrete uses of time, always has a present
moment between a past and future within it, and the Design
allows for that by cause being strictly the past and effect the
future side of any moment. Causes determine effects in
different ways, by charge or mass, but always as a past cause
with a future effect across a present moment of action-reaction
by momentum. This is not magic, just clear your mind of muck
and look for a logical frame. It is locked into capacities in the
Design, with momentum across present moments between
causal drives behind effects. This is exactly true also for
anatomy, which has effect organs and appendages at front or
above, driven by cause at back or below across every present
moment, to literally frame experiences of awareness.
Cause is me, and effect is you. I cause you to be effected
and you cause me to be effected. We have a cause-effect
anatomy by back-front, but also hemispherical differences for
right side (left hemisphere) to favor cause, and left side (right
hemisphere) effect, talking across sides to tend to favor cause
or effect overall in thoughts, while locked into favoring it frontback in structure. Deductive thought is secure in the past as
cause, as the future cannot literally be seen and only foreseen
by induction about future effects of past causes, and insecure.
We induce to extend the past to include the future. Science
has the wrong levels of analysis and fails at logic, because it is
obsessed with cobbling industrial rubbish like stooges. Strict
principles apply to anatomies & physics, next.

The Human Design

34

6. The Scheme of Existence

I have proposed that the Design delineates substances by

forms in a fundamental way for both physics and biology.
However, the Design fits within an overall Scheme for
existence that is not immediately apparent from the way the
Design delineates substances using forms. We need to allow
for the fact that the discrete substances and forms might have
a continual existence with those capacities.
Definitions in Science
Substance is a mechanism and form is a framework for it, and
they are the fundamental properties of things in existence. The
ways they integrate establishes a basis for all scientific
measurement, prescribed by the Design in a Scheme for
existence explained in this chapter. Existence has measurable
properties, with logical definitional underpinnings to physical
and biological measurement of the properties. Science must
include the study of its own measurements, as metaphysics,
as original cause, and beyond physics. It extends to all of
science, but physics reductively. Epistemology (knowledge) is
merely methodology (reasoning) building partially to a whole
theory. Ontology (existence) is merely a whole metaphysics
(theory) of falsifiable & un-falsifiable parts, as a theory.
Philosophy reduces to a methodical task of reasoning to greater
satisfaction that hypothetical beliefs are secure knowledge, for a
metaphysical Scheme as a basis for measurement but not
measurable in itself. My methodology makes subjective use of
reasoning a secure objective exercise, beyond the inductivedeductive Scientific Method. My metaphysical Scheme is the
foundation for all science, and very simple. My book has no
strange math models, or strange psychology for humans to lack
Free Will. The universe merely ekes towards economy.

The Human Design

35

Diagram 9, T h e Scheme of Existence

Inherent

Discrete

Complement

Forces

Life

Substance
& its Form

Form & its

Substance

Design
as Product

Design
as Product

Continuous

Form

Substance

Discreteness & Continuity

The delineation of substances by forms in the Design is
discrete in the rigors of physics and biology, meaning it is in
many bits, pieces, or parts. However, in both physics and
biology, discrete delineations may interface complementing
continuous states that are completely uniform. Particles and
anatomies may be discrete in delineation, but they would have
a uniform setting provided by continuous states. Although
particles and anatomies are discrete in their delineations, they
would also have aspects of continuity by complementing the
continuous states. They cannot be continuous because they
are in bits and pieces, but they are continual in their
discreteness, as they continually interface complementing
continuous states. The Design within its Scheme shows itself
fundamentally in the complementing relation of discreteness

The Human Design

36

and continuity. Form and substance are inseparable in the

Design as discrete delineations. Discreteness and continuity
are inseparable as complementing states in the Scheme.
The relation of discreteness & continuity is as fundamental as
substance & form. In Diagram 9, they fit in a Scheme of
discrete substances and their forms complementing
continuous forms in physics, and discrete forms and their
substances complement continuous substances in biology. In
Diagram 10, uniform formal axes of space, time, cause and
effect for physical particles, and uniform substantive triangles
of passive, active, levity, and gravity for biological anatomies
are complementing continuous states. Complementarity is a
simple idea, and it should be grasped easily, as it is probably
how most people understood nature before General Relativity
Theory, which is discussed in detail in later chapters.
Continual Physics
In physics, discrete particles and fields with resting & energetic
mass would be defined by their space & time forms in the
discrete Design, which applies universally and collectively to
all particles and fields in prescribing their capacities. Particles
with their own discrete space & time forms have rotations as
atoms and solar systems, by exchanging fields delineated by
their own discrete space & time forms. In addition, space &
time may comprise a continuum of infinite space & time.
Continuous space & time would complement all discrete
particles and fields, and allow them to express their own
discrete space & time forms. They have their own forms
despite sharing a void. Given that particles and fields have
those forms, science assumes they are the only forms in
existence, and denies that a void exists. A void does not even
reveal motion to a particle. It assumes rest by a field exchange
at constant light speed despite particle motion. I explain later
that void keeps you honest about momentum, rather than
losing it by magical events like math curvature with force.

The Human Design

37

Diagram 10, Continuous Form & Substance

(1) Cont. Form (Physics)

Effect

Time

Space

Cause

(2) Cont. Substance (Biology)

Ionic
Levity

Covalent
Gravity

Positive
Rest

Negative
Energy

The Human Design

38

Open continuity is represented by a void of infinite space and

infinite time divided by the vertical axis of Diagram 10 ( 1).
Space & time together make one open continuum, but divided
by the vertical axis in the diagram to represent distinct
aspects of that open continuum, or void. The discrete Design,
shown earlier in Diagram 8 on page 28, defines capacities of
individual particles and fields, and a collective of individual
particles and fields as an entire universe with those
capacities. It would be a feature of the universality of
repeated examples of particles and fields, that when they
integrate as one collective, the Design continues to
represent them as a collective. Their forces are consistent, and
they can be wound back to before and after a Big Bang event.
The collective of all particles and fields may have had a
precise balance to their substantive capacities for resting
and energetic compression to, and decompression from, the
horizontal axis of the discrete Design. The void simply
provides a setting for the decompressions and compressions,
as a complementing continuum of space and time for resting
and energetic particle capacities. It would complement any
active or passive states of mass, or their combinations. It is a
an honest setting to show particle & field distributions, with rest
& energy being mutable within that continuum, meaning they
can change from one to the other in equilibrium between
compression and decompression in the discrete Design.
A particle has capacities for rest and energy in an absolute
setting of space and time. Its capacities can also be
considered absolute, being set in nothing. However, all
measurements are in fact made relative to a particle, and a
particle cannot know its own absolute state of coasting motion
in a void unless it changes, as the void only offers a frame in
which it assumes itself to be at rest. The void does not reveal
its coasting motion to it, and if moved by a constant field
force, that motion is also undetectable. Fields have constant
light speed, and they couple to particles as if particles have

The Human Design

39

rest frames. I will discuss these issues later in considerable

detail as I must refute Einsteins General Relativity. He is a
much loved icon whose perspective dominates physics, as
an unfortunate byproduct to some okay, tendentious, work.
Particles and fields also have mutual mass & charge with
proportional interactions for mutable rest & energy capacities.
Mutuality usefully frames a universe by mass & charge. I
explain mutuality as mass pushing momentum in a void, and
charge pulling momentum in a void. Momentum has a
relation of rest & energy by a Lorentz Transformation that was
extrapolated by Einstein into a familiar formula. Mutability &
mutuality are from charge & mass as basic alternative
examples of strings with loops, shortly. Gravitons are smooth
loops along angled string building compressions by loops
shearing each other in a void between alternative sources.
The sources explode linearly around their own loops when
their string reaches an explosive limit to density. A photon is
complete as a smooth string with no angle that decays into
angled photon loops to exchange between a proton & electron.
A smooth complete photon decays into two angled loops
exchanged by momentum across matching angles on smooth
proton & electron string surfaces. Photons are stable, to pull
towards balanced graviton explosions in nature, but a Big
Bang was an original massive reservoir on edge with potential
to explode extremely compressed strings.
Particles exchange fields that unify rest & energy as atoms
and as solar systems. Interactions are by equal & opposite
proportional exchange of fields as cause and effect between
the resting and energetic particles, but interactive continuity
also applies uniformly to particles & fields. They are mutual
in their alternative examples of cause & effect, by collectively
complementing a continuum for all discrete interactions. The
continuum arose when particles, which are neutral by equal
attraction & repulsion in their photon exchanges, had their
attraction from graviton exchanges neutralized at a Big Bang.

The Human Design

40

There may have been an equal and opposite expansion from

contraction, as a one-off change around continuity between
one action and reaction they share, at the dividing horizontal
axis in Diagram 10 (1), as a closed Point-Instant coordinate.
Action-reaction is a continuum between cause & effect,
alternatively by electromagnetism or by gravitation, as a PointInstant without spatial or temporal extent because it is merely
equal opposition at a change to both forces tending inward
and tending outward. In the Design, a horizon with compressed
action inward and decompressed reaction outward is neutral to
electromagnetism or gravitation, working alternative ways using
that Point-Instant. Past-to-future as cause-to-effect before a Big
Bang is on the edge in compression as an original state with a
slip tendency by both, and it slip released for both, continuing
as cause-to-effect, past-to-future, now as decompression from
that compression. Before and after a Big Bang, electromagnetic
and gravitational cause precedes effect to literally drive effects
by mechanisms that push as mass and pull as charge in a void,
explained shortly. But electromagnetic cause is favored by the
original compressed state in mutuality between the forces,
while each continually drives as cause preceding effect.
A gravitational potential to explode is retained by mechanisms
of cause driving effect, which maintain compression. But the
original compression can slip into favoring gravitation as cause,
to release a given potential that is dormant because gravitation
not only attracts as cause to compress as effect as an original
state. It explodes equally from compression by decompressing
a center in an explosion directly against its own linearity. Cause
drives effect for gravitation to compress a surface, but its
potential includes equal decompression from its neutral center
to release compression. It is a slip release in mutuality to
compromise charge just as mass was compromised before it.
The product is neutrons by mass merged around a complete
photon, and charge answers by using freedom in a void to
decay stably by charge, to retain electrons & protons as atoms.

The Human Design

41

At root, electromagnetism and gravitation each have their own

slip tendencies by compression. They also have slip releases
to equalize the tendencies by decompression. Compressions
appear in the Design inwards as charge by cause, and as
mass by effect, mutually. The decompressions are outwards
by charge as effect, and by mass as cause, mutually. Each is
a mutual slip, where charge and mass combine to compress
and to decompress, and they use the difference between their
treatments of centers and surfaces to do it. Electromagnetism
concentrates centers within neutral surfaces, while gravitation
concentrates surfaces around neutral centers. Each force is a
complete opposite in how it makes wholes using centers &
surfaces. The centers and surfaces of each force have their
own relations delimiting each force, while the two forces also
have mutual relations between those alternative uses. These
four mutual moves in & out across action-reaction underpin all
natural processes, enabling nature to be easily understood by
gravitation pushing and electromagnetism pulling momentum.
Electromagnetism compresses as cause, and decompresses
as effect, and its slip tendency in a void is to contain the slip
release opening of a neutron by its decay into a proton and an
electron. A neutron with charge concentrated between positive
and negative has that concentration changed by decay into a
positive proton and a negative electron. A neutrino is also
produced. The charge separates using gravitational energy
from a state with a concentrated center within a void as all or
nothing, to having a separated center by neutralizing the intact
relation of opposite charges. Its identity changes by a slip into
decay, but center and surface relations stay consistent. A
neutron has a concentrated center and its surface is its edge in
a void. A surface exists exactly between a concentration and
nothing. A void is a fact by definition here. To be concentrated
is in comparison to de-concentrated nothingness of a void. A
neutron in a void is in a deductive, black & white, relation of
concentration against nothing outside its surface. The surface
only has a void beyond it, and neutral compared to its center.

The Human Design

42

Decay changes a concentration into two equal parts in a void.

The logic of a concentrated center in a void is consistent with
the stretched product, stretched by intervention of a void
between the two parts. It is now two concentrations that still
seek to get as close as possible in lowest energy orbitals like
they were before decay, and they still seek to have a neutral
surface in the void as contained neutral atoms with no force in
the void outside themselves, except by exchanging photons
when compounding with each other. The logic before and after
decay is the same, but the product gets stretched by the decay
momentum of gravitation separating the two parts. It is a
stretched relation, but not broken, logically or mechanically,
because the products can now follow that logic in a dynamic
relation in a void with other atoms. They form compounds after
both forces create a mutual field accretion to compress and
decompress as a supernova and leave a neutron star behind
with extreme Angular Momentum due to its concentration.
Containing concentrations ever inwards to lowest orbitals while
compounding with others, makes a range of neutral surfaces in
a void, as compounds. That is causal orientation back to a
neutron in a void after potential for more dynamic relations is
realized by decay using mutual gravitation. Charge cannot
resist the minor gravitational explosion of decay in mutuality, as
gravitation diverges causally by decompression from a state of
compression, automatically in the Design. That decompression
is matched by charge, which has matching products with
preserved relations to attract to the extent they repel their own
kind, to sort neutrally to contain as atoms. The two centers
reduce the void between them attracting to the extent they
increase it repelling their own kind. Electromagnetic cause is a
black & white ideal in a void, as concentrated charge with a
neutral surface. Its effect is grey, as neutral sorting when the
parts separate and begin to emit photons to attract or repel.
Photons are absorbed as cause in the Design, to determine,
black & white, whether to attract or repel, depending on
whether the particle that emitted grey as effect was a like or

The Human Design

43

unlike particle. Emission is to an equally inductive hypothesis of

attraction or repulsion, and causal absorption determines
deductively whether it will attract or repel, by taking it in.
A void frames concentration and neutrality. Gravitation
concentrates a surface around a neutral center by the inverse
square law of gravitation, applied to a spherical mass in a void.
Once again, the state itself has an intact relation of its neutral
center and concentrated surface. To aid my argument for
gravitation, which in General Relativity can somehow exist
intact without a void, a sphere has no coordinate center.
General Relativity relies on pure geometry, and a sphere
creates an incalculable neutral center. A neutral center is by
definition without force. It is also therefore a void coordinate of
unknown extent inwards and devoid of force to the same extent
as the void is, extending outwards from it. The void and the
coordinate provide a perfect frame for gravitation.
The area of a circle or sphere is defined by Pi, and impossible
to center. Its diameter passes through its center, but drawing its
diameter divides its circumference in half, with each half
measuring Pi multiplied by the radius, impossible to nail.
Drawing chords with lines perpendicular to midpoints to
intersect at a center applies secure straight lines to a circle.
Any points of contact of the chord lines with the circle to make
the calculation cannot be nailed down to more than an
approximation. A center can be known by straight lines, but not
if applied to a circle. The difference between straight line and
curved circle geometry restricts absolute certainty to finding a
circles center. It is a basic fact that is not applied by science.
Gravitation also has a basic deductive and inductive frame in
the Design. Neutrons attract others to the same extent as they
are attracted, all being equal, and at a Big Bang they are
spread in a void at Escape Velocity. The Big Bang neutralized
gravitation for neutrons to decay at Escape Velocity, which
simply means there was an equal and opposite expansion from

The Human Design

44

contraction by the collective, for equal freedom at specific

temperatures in decay. They attract as cause gravitationally,
and are attracted as effect, in the Design. However, they
literally explode away from their own capacity to attract others
when others get too close, as an equal and opposite causal
expansion from effected contraction. It is causal independence
away from their own compression capacities, just as gravitation
provides inevitably for neutron decay away from compression.
In terms of strings & loops, by deductive and inductive stages
in the Design, emission of graviton field loops along string is
the first deductive step, after which there is inductive absorption
and compression in the direction of emission. Receipt takes the
recipient on a ride to a deductive source unknown to it, as it is a
separate source effecting it. Induction is grey, because the
recipient has its own causal independence in the void at a Big
Bang, and they reach a grey compromise. Deduction is black
& white, by emission attracting and then repelling, after the
grey build up has concentrated too much and the center
expands outwards in a linear explosion from center to surface.
Minimum force at center has maximum force at surface, for a
smooth explosion in all directions building from nothing to
maximum using increasing gravitational energy from center to
surface. The surface is neutralized to explode in a void, and
this is by various mutual accretions in nature, but a Big Bang
was a non-rotating compression with huge potential. In their
double decompression, a slip inward by charge and mass
before a Big Bang became a slip outward, but preset angles of
electron and proton for intact atoms on decay to exchange
photons compare to all angles at a Big Bang, as a puffball
against intact linear density to its structure.
Photons are angled loops of smooth string, while gravitons are
smooth loops of angled string. A Big Bang had one smooth
photon string as a pilot light near center of a dense graviton
string lattice poised to explode. It is a compete photon that
has angled loops if broken by decay. Gravitons are cold, and

The Human Design

45

photons heat when smooth graviton loops along angled string

shear with photons in a void. A complete photon within cold
dense strings sheared inwards to bounce cross-ways at a
center line, as its tendency, until evenly around a center point
to detonate dense string. Energy is available from zero at a
center to maximum at a surface, by the universal inverse
square law of gravitation, by loops along string to keep
density linear. It is released for motion from density by angled
graviton string detonation around the photon, to wind around it
to make a neutron that has a direction of spin with poles,
which is the basis for a complex mathematical model, Spin
in Quantum Mechanics. Particles & fields rotate with magnetic
& electrical lines. They have north or south poles by rotating
left or right. Particle & field lines align in different ways for
intact systems. Particles can only exchange fields at their
poles in my model. A proton has a surface loop making a well,
and an electron has a hill, but only at one pole, not both poles.
They are aligned to each other from having been together as
one intact smooth photon loop in a neutron before it decayed.
I will refer to left & right poles for different alignments by
particles & fields, or to left & right spin for poles.
The basic polar alignments are set out in Diagram 11 (1), and
easy to understand. The important thing is to remember the
alternative alignments make an intact system, whether their
poles align one way or another, particularly when an entire
alternative system of alignments may be possible by antiparticles. A photon of intact smooth string has two loops
together aligned in one direction to merge a neutron around it
by mass upon detonation at a Big Bang. It rotates to make
poles, with only one operative pole for field exchange, but we
can distinguish a graviton that only rotates right handed, and
a photon that can rotate either right handed to make particles
or left to make anti-particles. A photon has only one pole for
two equal (neutral) masses, electron or proton, to exchange.
However, gravitons rotate only one direction as one mass, but
geomagnetism has two equal (neutral) poles, north & south.

The Human Design

46

Diagram 11, Relation of Field Loops & Block Strings

(1) Electron & Proton Set Poles, But Neutral to Spin
Complete Photon
Proton Well at One Pole (Head)
Complete Photon
Right Spin Down View from Above
Loops Overlap Without Touching
Backward Rotation
Slip to Decay Inside a Neutron
Low End High End
Decay to Proton

Light Speed

Low Ends

Front

High Ends

Peeled Apart to Show Opposites

Front

Front

Light Speed
Left Spin Up
High End Low End

Decay to Electron
View From Below Backward Rotation
Electron Hill at One Pole (Body)
(2) Standard Right Spin of Gravitons Counter-Shearing
Sets a Right Spin, But Neutral to Poles
.
Resting String Reels
Right Hand Spin
(Spine)

(Hearts)
(Spine)
Left Shear Points
to Widen & Densify

Smaller Scale than Photon

Right Hand Spin

Resting String Reels

The Human Design

47

Fixed right spin by gravitons without polar preference makes a

neutron to contain a detonating pulse at a Big Bang as causal
containment in compression, earlier. That decays equally by
a slip to decompression to release an electron by a charged
Weak Force while retaining the bulk of the neutron as a
proton with a pivotal massive Strong Force, shortly. A
compressed pulse & depth becomes a decompressed pulse &
depth in the Design. You can track decompression from
compression by the charged triangle in Diagram 8, to change
from a neutron to realize a potential that should be released
unless a neutron is intact in nuclei across a Periodic Table.
The neutron slips to decay by decompressing its pulse &
depth, rather than retaining them together by compressing. In
Diagram 11 (1) a particle gets correctly spun right, which is
all that matters to gravitons. However, the neutron has two
fixed poles by its loops, not changeable poles by mass like on
Earth, which reverse north & south neutrally, spontaneously.
Those fixed poles of a neutron create one pole for each of its
decayed particle, aligning to face each other when they slip
away to decay from their shared rotation, for angled loop
exchange at those poles. Massive orbital alignments are
shared by particles, with exchanges to maintain them by polar
alignments. In anatomy, there is a crucial difference between
a direct massive vestibular at a head like a pivotal proton, and
a twisted charged medulla at a body to decay an electron. A
vestibular keeps both head & body in shared rotation without
a medulla twist to a brain to function. A medulla keeps a head
& body intact by recognizing equal integrity of each pole to
exchange with the other, and therefore inevitably spin in
different directions when facing each other, as basic polarity
applied to decayed parts that align one pole with the other.
Spin differentiates particles & anti-particles at a Big Bang to
create particle systems. As noted, spin to a neutron right
handed is preferred by graviton spin at a Big Bang, creating a
particle rather than anti-particle preference. However, both

The Human Design

48

spin & anti-spin apply to each as intact systems. At a Big

Bang, photon string can spin either way, and it retains that
inherent capacity even after a preference is set by right-hand
gravitons. Strings & loops have an intact relation as charge in
particle systems, and unstable but intact anti-particle systems.
My model simplifies Quantum Mechanics to intact right & left
polar alignments of surviving particles using fields. That
relation is across a uniform massive preference for right spin,
also retained in the universe, for charged particle right & left
poles with intact exchanges once two equal particles are
created. A massive right hand spin is equal to north & south
poles by charge setting its poles for its equal particles. Charge
makes either end into a north or a south pole on Earth by
spontaneously changing in geomagnetism. By massive poles,
we cannot say if gravitons always spin right, as photon fields
can tilt either way neutrally. However, the poles of particles
are fixed by an original spin driven by right from causal past to
left effected future, and there is an inevitable intact twist rightleft or left-right between them when they exchange loops from
their equal but opposite faces within that shared rotation. The
massive proton keeps the original graviton right spin by its
pole, while the electron keeps a matching left spin by its pole.
Angled photon loops realign particle poles of atoms to north or
south in geomagnetism. Loops also do it within atoms to
compound between them, as particles seal their intact neutral
relation by workable alignments of poles to exchange. Within
and across atoms, right spin or left spin is possible due to the
spin option & alignments of the two particle poles. Alignments
are studied in Quantum Mechanics, and beyond a simple
hydrogen atom, they accommodate other electron orbitals and
other protons & neutrons in atomic nuclei. The math and the
angles become complex when particles with alternative spin
to poles for loops align one pole towards or away for
exchange, to give and make way for other particles in bigger
atoms or when compounding. Root bases are set out here.
.

The Human Design

49

Diagram 12, Accretion Disc Spring-Shift (Piston Line across Cog Line)

One Contour
Cog Line
Zoom View
Higher
Piston Line

Lower

(Adapted from Wikipedia)

Without a void, General Relativity has expanding Spacetime for

compression, not particle & field mechanisms. A Big Bang has
mysterious status in literally nothing. I simplify mass to smooth
loops pushing with forward rotation at light speed in a void.
Charge is string that breaks apart by decay into angled loops
pulling with backward rotation in a void, for lines of least
resistance to momentum. Each interacts with their own, and
also directly by shearing in a void. We can get a view of them.
The two forces have double compression in rotation from their
decompression as a puffball at a Big Bang, for supernova
accretion until decompression by a minor explosion. Accretion
uses atoms with straight electrical lines, and right angled
magnetic lines in massive field rotation. Atoms with neutral
surfaces around concentrated centers pull centers together
into lower energy orbitals while mass is pushed outwards to
concentrate a surface around a neutral center by massive
Angular Momentum. They can accrete after string merges for
neutrons, to decay for accretion. Gravitational contours form,
and atoms use their photons to sling Angular Momentum to a
surface and atoms to a center. Interiors of contours compress
and reduce momentum, and exteriors increase momentum by
magnetic spring tension at right angles by a basic spring-shift.

The Human Design

50

You will not read much about accretion as a runaway process

essential for supernova creation of a full Periodic Table. You
will read a lot of piecemeal Quantum Mechanics fashioned by
and for industry. Electrical lines are along, and magnetic lines
are across protons & electrons that seek closer orbitals, but
lose a photon to cross to it. Electrical lines seek economy
between two concentrations as a line tending inward, and a
magnetic line facilitates across it, to shift a line outward to
move inward. When massive rotations accrete, the process
also slings entire atoms across, by dividing contours to lower
& higher lines for both forces, crossed by magnetism to sling
for both lines. Being across its own electrical line, it is both a
vibrational and rotational adjuster, enabling it to serve a catchall graviton field that creates the contours. The electrical takes
its own line along contour lines. Magnetism slings for more
Angular Momentum at a surface, to concentrate, while the
inner line drops atoms to less momentum around them to
concentrate. The Design has eight parts, but graviton strings
merge angles around smooth photon string, then photon field
loops accrete angles across smooth massive contours.
Surface compression by gravitation is an effect in the Design,
by a source extending attractive gravitons as cause by forward
rotating loops pushing into each other from any directions, to
expand their loops by shearing. Their angled string sections
are drawn by larger loops to move particle sources. They exist
in the void as a Dark Mass fluid. Sources extend loops along
resting string at light speed to shear others for momentum in
the void. Graviton loops move along their own resting string
that moves as loops widen by shearing to build Isometric
counter-tension, anchored to sources to attract them in a void
by reeling string. Photons are loops detached to move at light
speed in a void. They hinge at particle surfaces to attract or
repel depending on the surface. A graviton rotates forwards. A
photon rotates backwards, to attract by hinging its backward
rotation to a particle surface and pulling back in the direction it
came. It can also repel by direct drive on like surface.

The Human Design

51

Gravitation is only known as weight relative to other mass,

and never relative to a void, which gives nothing to measure
against. Everything we experience or measure is by relative
action-reaction impacts, and neurons in particular. No-one can
know, and nothing can measure, beyond an impact surface,
including photons to & from a void that has gravitons, but only
known at impact to say there is a tree, over there after
shearing with gravitons, as a product. Nor do we measure
momentum itself in passage, only impact each side, with a gap
closed to a wavelength, later. A photon and relative weight
are both in an unknown absolute field, including Redshifts &
Blueshifts. We know products, and not the absolute itself.
Physics speculates, exploiting this fact. It enjoys blind spots in
knowledge, to protect its nonsense from exposure. It does not
identify its own limits to knowing. It is shut up and calculate,
or speculate, and little in between.
There is no theory of gravitation in physics other than General
Relativity as curved Spacetime geometry, not mechanisms. To
fill an obvious gap, a Higgs Field is proposed and was perhaps
made in a lab by repeated collisions to make a specific
product, which a lab might do eventually, aimed at products. If
curved Spacetime compresses weight, the issue is whether it
has weight or not. Higgs retains Relativity and gives weight by
a Field. Everything has it by relative compressions, like on
Earth, in water, or on the Moon. Relativity is retained so
curved Spacetime stays responsible for relative compression
for the weight of a neutron provided now by Higgs. This
belated gap filler, which can provide fluid and background
as a field, and General Relativity itself, can be replaced by a
graviton loop along string in a void as one mechanism.
I note Weak & Strong Force are safe counterforces and not
anti-states. They are safely encompassed in states to make a
Periodic Table. Strong Force is by graviton compression
retained in a reservoir consistent with a neutral center with a
concentrated surface, to keep particles in close orbit against

The Human Design

42

charged repulsion. It holds compression for massive nuclei

beyond iron, and releases if broken. The Strong retains mass
to equally explode it when nuclei break apart, consistent with
a Big Bang as an original reservoir that explodes equally from
its own given mass. Weak Force has counter momentum by a
neutrino to explode against attraction. Weak decays charged
compression at angles for orbitals. Weak decay repulsion
momentum is equal to attractive containment by neutrons as
reserves, to equally attract & repel after decay to sort towards
atoms. Causally, mass attracts and equally explodes from a
past by built reserves. Using the reserves, charge contains
and equally decays, to sort equally back to containment, but
as a full Periodic Table in future, due to decay. See Diagram 8
for terms for the Design, with charge to and mass from.
Later, I reject a popular Accelerating Universe theory overthrow
of cosmology. A graviton has uniform height & distorted depth
as a flat spatial plane of string, with uniform width by a loop
extending by a distorted pulse along it as a wave. Width &
height have linear motion as resting string by loops countershearing uniform heights to planes for more width. When
energy is invested, a pulse gets dense with less depth as a
distortion that slows the loop rotation around the string while
keeping light speed for loops along it, for a linear relation of
width & height around a density distortion. However, note that
linear density at a spherical Big Bang is not subject to distortion
in motion & density because it works the other way, by density
for motion. But it must feedback motion to density as a constant
reduction in a linear expansion rate, so distance recedes more
slowly whilst linear, for a closed edge with the void. Regions do
not overtake, but close without ever closing. Redshifts by
distant objects do not show them as having accelerated far
away to have low Redshifts despite distance. They show the
recession marginally slower than expected, for less Redshift.
Later, our anatomy is directly comparable, as suggested by a
massive vestibular aligning head & body while a medulla twists
between them, earlier. They inform each other directly.

The Human Design

53

Continual Biology
In biology, form and substance as an anatomy are cellular, by
pure discrete binary form of DNA in Diagram 9, with its own
substantive nucleotides & chromosomes interfacing open and
closed substantive continuities. It is comprised of substance to
interface, but with pure form. DNA encodes a use for those
interfaces by coding for growth from sexual reproduction. DNA
is intact as chromosomes lined with nucleotides. It uses
continuities and adapts sequences to make best use of them
by coding to grow from a single cell under nurturing of parents
encoded with sex. That is complete use of interface, as
seamless in creating cells as use of continuities in physics.
DNA is a formal strand of four substantive nucleotides of
adenine, cytosine, g uanine, and thymine to initiate bonding for
cell growth. All nucleotides have exactly two open protons, and
two open electrons, as hydrogen bonds interfacing a chemical
continuum. Open continuity is represented in Diagram 10 (2)
by resting proton & energetic electron as equal triangles, with
continuity to their open bonding into chemical compounds for
all cells, initiated by DNA through mechanisms and proteins.
Open charges of hydrogen bonds interface other atoms,
tending continually to lower energy orbital bonding, for DNAs
mechanisms to extend bonding continually from the digital
strand itself. It is substantive continuity used for continual DNA
purposes. All atoms beyond the strand are subject to pure
formal coding by DNA, including its mechanisms, proteins, and
those from the landscape permeating a cell membrane.
Biology has a closed continuum, with restriction to the freedom
of bonding. DNA has substantive chromosomes, to use a
chemical continuum for blending compounds between ionic
and covalent limits. Ionic bonds conduct electromagnetic
charge, while covalent bonds do not. Ionic compounds rise
with levity, and covalent fall by gravity. Chromosomes carry
genes for DNA to encode reproductive blending between

The Human Design

54

males and females. Blending is as simple as bonding. They

combine as one continuous mechanism, just as there is one
continuous framework for particles. DNA interfaces the closed
continuum as two sets of chromosomes that separate in each
sex cell, and blend at fertilization between sex cells. Ionic levity
is male, and covalent gravity is female. Closed continuity is
ionic levity and covalent gravity compounds as equal
triangles in Diagram 10 (2), with blending in cells for DNA.
Our cells have 46 chromosomes made up of two sets of 23,
so we have two set of genes to help determine our features,
and the sets share dominance across features. The 46
become 23 in male and female sex cells. Each set of 23 has
a male Y or female X chromosome. One X needs to
combine with one Y on fertilization for a male, or two Xs for
a female, in characteristics they determine. Each individual is
a product of two sets of chromosomes that share dominance
and recession in coding for gene expression, and the
presence of a Y dominates for male features. In sex cell
formation, the two sets separate, and they combine when sex
cells blend at fertilization. Males may be ionic, with levity, and
females may be covalent, with gravity.
Male reproductive organs rely on levity to a penis, which
ejaculates multiple excited sperm, and a female relies on
gravity of one falling egg, which is massive. Other male and
female features of rise or fall, and sharpness or curvature, may
be consistent with that difference. Synchronization with our
epicycle may exist by levity daily to yearly cycles for male
arousal and gravity daily to monthly cycles for female
ovulation. We have continual sex and growth influencing
shared human cognition. We are all encoded with features for
discrete continual growth and breeding and also discrete
features we share in the Design. Global discreteness has sex
& growth using continuities, to be continual, just as mass is
discretely continual in its global Big Bang frame. Sex is a
global arc around copulation, not limited to a grinding action.

The Human Design

55

Differences between charged levity and massive gravity may

extend to males functioning as an edge to a world to ideal
ends of a home, often with violence. Females tend to hold
from real origins of a home, often with ignorance of the world,
discussed later. Sexes are ends of a blending continuum, and
blending for an individual to grow is the point, not division. Life
as individuals evolved without sex, but sex no doubt enriches
reproduction. There is a continuum of features, and we must
accept people who respect the other sex by evidently thinking
and feeling as would the other around a continuum that only
divides to reproduce. Homosexuality is around new growth,
not in opposition to it. Individual behavior within species
behavior is a global sex arc, not just a local grinding action.
Some simply fertilize, but most have great activities around it
of many kinds. Some never fertilize. A normal range applies.
Reproduction is a slip release of levity and gravity for growth
from fertilization. A fertilized cell is itself a state of neutralized
decay, neutral between ionic male and covalent female while
having a membrane to import and export across its surface
membrane. Action-reaction applies to biological cell chemistry
as gravity action inwards around a membrane, for levity
bonding inwards within a membrane, for heat loss outwards
around the membrane and, in my model, mutation outwards
within it. Neutralized merger has a full set of 46 chromosomes
together within one cell membrane to use stored nutrition in
the egg and begin to divide. It continues by permeating
membranes in cooperation with other cells. Explosive actionreaction applies to chemistry for that merger in cell biology.
Layered chemicals and heat have action inward at the surface
of a cell membrane, tending to compress to lower orbital stable
electromagnetic bonding within the membrane, to grow cells
on a warm, layered chemical surface. Compatibility in growth
by double compression on Earths surface is precise under the
Design on pages 24-27, for our anatomy to function on Earth
in chapters 8 & 9. It is achieved by mutual action-reaction at a

The Human Design

56

Big Bang to a Periodic Table, continuing double compressions

and decompressions. Decompressions are heat loss decay
outwards around a cell membrane by bonding within it, and
explosive mutation in leaps outwards within a membrane from
compression inwards around it. The frame to remove 100 per
cent blind mutation is convective action-reaction chemistry.
Mutations, which are gene expressions when they take hold,
are leaps from available chemicals around a membrane to
bond within it by environmental Homeostasis, ongoing.
A merged fertilized egg cell has a membrane as a surface for
levity and gravity to import and export crossways and around
it. Cells grow explosively with others, and are encoded
together, using membrane surfaces for compression imports
and decompression exports suitable for functions. Distance is
covered by neuron cells, with excitable gravity hormone
gateways for ionic levity current to shift hormone sediment
along networks. Internal charge extends considerable length,
embedded at all sites as input receptors and output effectors,
to gateways to others at ends crossed by gravity hormone
neurotransmitters to enhance or inhibit levity current. Accretion
by action-reaction applies to neurons, like neutrons in physics,
within explosive, merging and dividing, action-reaction biology.
I use accretion between levity and gravity in broad structure to
explain neural action-reaction within a chemical explosion by
action-reaction to grow cells biologically. Psychology is within
biology as its facility for awareness & enablement by combined
roles of neurons. Return to the basic operation of levity and
gravity at page 49 for physics in mutuality, accreting around a
central rotation, which is a rotational neural cycle here.
Hormones in pivotal synaptic gravity bulbs, and nerves in
lateral network lines of levity current, merge in neurons they
comprise. Later, economical electrical lines share a massive
hormone rotation around anatomy to alternative center-surface
orientations of charge & mass. A magnetic line across it sorts
it, but also serves the gravity orientation when sorting. Merged

The Human Design

57

levity & gravity neurons within anatomy are serviced entirely

by biological cells around them, to build and drive them, to be
facilitated by neurons for enablement & awareness. Actionreaction biology extends shortly into a completely consistent
arrangement by organs, by DNA encoding for our explosive
cell functions to accrete as neurons. Organ causal centers &
effected surfaces accrete for a central brain & surface sites
rotation, by dividing organs into link & ring moves to do so.
Neuron inputs are actions of hormone mass pushing pressure
inwards & levity nerve current also pulling it by lines of least
resistance. Outputs are reactions by gravity sediment pushing
pressure outwards & levity current also pulling it by lines of
least resistance. They are gravity layered site channels for
ions, with momentum in one direction to ends, but they use
openings on their membranes for import and export to those
ends along it, and across it at right angles. Endogenous
neurotransmitters are neuron cell hormones. The gateway is
crossed from a reservoir as a bulb at ends for insulating
hormones to block or allow the current crossing the gateway to
other neurons. Electric current flows along, while magnetic has
polarities to go across, to use as necessary, under insulation.
In nature, events are by action inward to realize an inevitable
outward potential from action inwards. All moves are motor
reactions to a world's actions cycling with self-stimulation by
an intact chemical unit level in a world, to collect stimulation
from a world to be comfortable, continually. Life is open to a
world while self-contained, and we evolved to resolve inputs
interfacing a world by processing inputs from our own moves.
Motor moves lead to sensory inputs in a self-contained cycle
begun by action of a world interfacing a cell for sensory
action inwards to react by motor reactions outward. Sensing
a world in which we are entirely immersed is more important
than self-stimulation, to grow from one cell, after a world
provides essential actions upon cells by chemicals and heat
for evolution from a single cell amoeba.

The Human Design

58

Awareness is neural sensory identification. Motor moves

cannot be known until return by inputs, but we use memory to
anticipate. Identification encompasses anticipation. We identify
using memory and we identify past anticipations by using
memory. It is less secure identification of future possibility. It is
present flow across past flow retained in stronger extended
neurons. It always includes anticipation of future moves. Close
control of future moves using memory relies on networking
between input action and output reaction to have confidence
that our anticipations can be accurate and smooth, which they
can. We evolved automatic, matching, outputs from inputs to
move all the time, but we can learn about them and extend
them, by continual intricate moves using memory to identify
what worked and how we anticipated it, to condition oneself.
Present flow across past flow in the moment is I, as a pure
point of reference for experiences after delay for processing
makes them recognizable now. They are only recognized by
further tracking across its past base to inform it by secure
memory. It is a continual, ready, nervous edge tracking its own
hormonal base by patterns to enable I to know who I am by
tracking in the present across the past, open to conditioning.
I note awareness is extended present moments, for sensory
framed by motor with impetus between past & future, or cause
& effect, in continual action-reaction events in a brain. We
have a psychological present by a biological anatomy divided
into causal functional sites behind & below driving effected
functional sites at front & above. Forward momentum is literally
cause-to-effect as past-to-future, represented faithfully by
neurons. We have a common neural frame between motor and
sensory to cycle frames read by sensory from past interfaces,
but representing past-to-future because motor moves are
framed for sites that are past-to-future, to be read. Psychology
is consistently serviced by biology, to represent biology, but to
its rules of neural action-reaction correlating to site moves.
Neural action-reaction in a brain is the point of it all, as actionreaction is defined as a Point-Instant, not events either side.

The Human Design

59

Awareness is experienced as thoughts about feelings, but

thoughts are no more than hormonal feelings networked for
commonalities to their preserved components, as well-shaped
feelings. They arise after diverse delineations from sites as
components are split for commons to finalize for experiences.
A table in thought has components of line, shade, depth,
height, level, and so on that are integrated by their commons
across other sites, for components of feelings shared with my
legs for line, gut for height, or brow for shade, and so on.
There are key structural hormonal components of each site
function, and they are shared by analogy across our Design,
which relies as much on overlap as it does to separation. We
are set for analogy by commons about shared components.
Nerve networks shape feelings into an experience of thoughts
about feelings that accompany them, seeing or hearing and
thinking about what we see or hear, seamlessly together. We
are automatons until self-stimulation & world stimulus are both
processed. And when the experience arises, it is of thoughts
seamlessly combined with feelings of self-stimulation & world.
I suspect many species have glimmers of thought, which are
merely shaped feelings, if it networks common concepts to
components in a brain. Hormones only contribute feelings, and
nerves only contribute the conceptual shaping of feelings.
Thoughts are self-stimulated attenuated feelings to collect
stimulus from a world and settle in one experience of oneself
within the world. I explain later we attenuate or lessen feelings
from our own self-stimulation, to be chemically level with a
world without feedback to our own moves, to level at goals in a
world. Each species has its own attenuated levels to collect
un-attenuated goals, and thoughts would be attenuated by
modulation, to create our own scenes or sounds as thoughts.
We are aware of one interface of oneself and a world for one
experience of it. Light out there is changed by receptors for
our own captured experience of vision. We speculate about
what is out there. We are subjects, and we explore ourselves

The Human Design

60

as purported objects. Sites only know they exist because

they have the experience after delay to process their inputs in
a brain. Descartes said I think, therefore I am, but this is only
true because we have an experience and therefore assume, in
the experience, that we exist. This is due to brief delay for
processing awareness of self-stimulation and world stimulus
for one experience of both. We use the experience itself to
work out our separateness from a world, but we move
between different objects in a world by dependency from a
zygote. Attributing interface to oneself or to world is difficult.
Mutuality shapes atoms as solar systems from a Big Bang, for
a cloud from a supernova, for layered compounds within an
epicycle, for human types on a scale exactly between an atom
and a solar system. We are an embodiment of a landscape of
reconciled levity and gravity, and a testament to reconciliation
of atoms as solar systems, by forms we embody to principles
easily repeated by compounds. In DNA explosive cell biology,
organs have compression at a broad end, and decompression
at a narrow end in Diagram 6, but not as a conduit. Levity
organs compress a center and decompress a surface. Gravity
compress a surface and decompress a center. For example, a
spine with nerve effectors-receptors, and a gut for endogenous
hormone supply, are centrally causal. A heart with muscular
sites, and lungs for oxygenation, are an effected surface.
Apply logic from Diagram 8, for charge moving to, and mass
moving from, and a mechanism for charge to pull
momentum by laying lines of least resistance at angles, and
mass to push momentum pivotally by building reserves. To
& from are heart & gut as hormone supply compressing from
sites and decompressing from a brain by building reserves;
and spine & lungs as oxygenated nerves compressing to a
brain and decompressing to sites by laying lines. Push & pull
are compression pushing from sites & decompression pushing
from a brain by reserves; and nerve compression pulling to a
brain & oxygen decompression pulling to sites by laying lines.

The Human Design

61

This broad biology can be extended. Each organ in Diagram 6

has four moves, asymmetrically up & down and left & right, for
each organ. Later, I separate them into ring moves that have
world interfaces, and link moves embedded in organs closer
to a brain to link rings into ring-a-rosy, by each organ linking to
one other organ or to a brain. It is shockingly simple. Causal
organs tend to centers and effected tend to surfaces, but
center-surface logic can be applied two ways. The sequence
of ring & link moves for cause & effect organs is the same, as
a ring compression action, then a link compression action,
then a link decompression reaction, then a ring decompression
reaction. However, causal organ rings interface at their center
and embed their surface. Effected organ rings interface at their
surface and embed their center. Rings interface a world, at
the accretion surface, and links are embedded closer to a
brain at the accretion center to adjust ring transitions
between action & reaction, using the cause-effect organ setup.
Accretion has embedding as its center and interfacing as its
surface, across causal centers & effected surfaces
interfacing, and across causal surfaces & effected centers
embedding. It is a crossover use of center-surface definitions.
Action-reaction is directly relevant to center-surface accretion,
as the flow by neurons of sites around a brain serviced by our
eight organs is by input action inwards and output reaction
outwards between sites & brain. The purpose of accretion is
action-reaction events of continual Point-Instant experiences in
a brain. The purpose of inputs & outputs is their transition, as
action-reaction is defined as no more than a Point Instant, and
in this case, continual. This is explained in detail later. I note
action-reaction in the universe as a whole has mutuality of
mass & charge by causation, but I correlate across rigors.
Physics is a Big Bang explosion for particles, and chemistry is
a supernova accretion for fields to build heat as a Periodic
Table, for planetary landscapes to use it. The relation is direct
by neutrons to a full Periodic Table, but known by correlation
after it plays out. Cells explode within biology, for accretions by

The Human Design

62

neurons in cellular biology that only correlates to subjective

experiences despite direct relation. Potential of the neutron
includes a chemical mind, impossible to know. An experience
is a product that cannot access its own prior process to know
itself, as it is a logical impossibility. Explosive physics founds
accretion chemistry, to found explosive biology, to found
accretion psychology, known by correlation after they play out.
I noted that one Big Bang has many concurrent supernovae in
tending to epicycles with landscapes of atoms, but always by
ongoing neutralized decay. Our recurrent reproductive slip
release also provides a context for a shared species anatomy
with sexual differences for a recurrent spread of genes. We do
not personally regenerate, and neither does a Big Bang. The
divide of male and female for merger & division as cells, by
repeated replication of the DNA code after fertilization, means
we have evolved to stand as sexes beside a threshold for new
life. A Big Bang is poised between expansion and contraction
by matched forces, and it released at a threshold, to exist
beside that threshold, in ongoing evolution. Individuals show
ongoing origins by perfect division as male or female, not
perfect diffusion on neutralization at a Big Bang. Precision in a
Big Bang never compressing back speaks for replacement by
reproduction in Australia, which does not quite happen.
Sexes stand beside a threshold precariously to reproduce or
not. We are locked in by origins, and taken by hormones to
slip from beside a threshold to at it globally across local
individuals. Globally, DNA encodes for bonding by cell
division, and blending by sex division. Male sex organs are
concentrated centers within neutral surfaces, and female are
neutral centers within concentrated surfaces, for actionreaction shearing to fertilize. Later, I compare Strong and
Weak Force atom creation to female Strong linguistics and
male Weak logistics, to mutually partner and parent on the
chance of replacing oneself by reproduction, which is equal in
Australia. Populations need to be more limited in future.

The Human Design

63

7. Modern Scientific Context

I will now briefly mention some issues of relevance to my

work theorized by the four most significant modern scientists
and philosophers. This may help you to see the context of
the Design within current science. I will not provide a
comprehensive analysis of their work in this chapter,
although later I will discuss them further. They are useful
case studies in the methods of science, including
assumptions underlying theories.
Isaac Newton
First, Isaac Newton (1642-1727), in his Three Laws of
Motion, shows our environment is made up of space and time
motions, around equal and opposite actions and reactions,
in a setting of continuous space and time. His view was of
fixed capacities of mass in a void, and it is a view with which
I agree in my model detailed later, subject to the condition that
any actual measurement is always relative to the measurer.
Newtons masses moved and interacted in a complementing
void of infinite space from which to view them, and time.
Time is simultaneous for all, as past becomes future at every
present moment at the same time, everywhere in space.
Everything also has an absolute direction interacting in space
at all times, ahead to a future and behind in the past, even
though always measured relatively. Newton is very limited
about mass itself, being unaware of fields at light speed. He
said gravitation acts across space and time instantaneously,
and he should have seen that combustion might counter
gravitation in action-reaction at a Big Bang. Later, ideas about
fields led Albert Einstein to measure masses relative to their
assumed states of rest, extrapolate the rest and energy
relation in masses, and put a new theory of gravitation.

The Human Design

64

Newtons action-reaction underpins discrete interactions by

cause and effect by masses. He also had a basic void for
gravitational distributions. He could not have grasped particlefield relations for resting frames of moving particles, nor the
stark reality of subjective confinement to a relative view. Later
discoveries made those restrictions clear for Einstein, but I
model relative measurement in a void, reconciling Newton and
Einstein. I will use Newtons Gods Eye in a void to literally
view gravitational interfaces of masses. Infinite space is not
measurable, being only a frame in dimensions. Simultaneous
time passing equably for all is likewise a continuous reality
enabling measurement rather than being measureable in itself.
Later, I explain Relativity theory is equivocal. Events are
simultaneous for all observers, even though their observations
will not coincide due to delay in receiving light and gravitation
from it. It is basic, and not deep.
Immanuel Kant
Next in time, and immediately following Newton, is Immanuel
Kant (1724-1804), who created his Categories for Awareness.
He proposed that our awareness is the product of a mental
framework that should include capacities for awareness of
space, time, cause and effect. That was accurate, and he
made the important simple union of oneself and the world in
one contained experience of awareness, but without a basis
in permanent interface. Kant was born after Newton defined
nature by using concepts of space, time, cause, and effect.
He established the concept that humans may formally order
experiences into categories of space, time, cause, and
effect, but with other categories, and without delineated levity,
gravity, active, and passive substances. He also left behind a
Homunculus brain with its own will like a soul, by failing to
see a rapid automatic facility for manual organ and appendage
sites to be aware of their interfaces with a world, at manual
rates of function and awareness. A brain is not independent at
all, but it is sensitive, and it can be diseased or disabled.

The Human Design

65

Kant took the bold step of saying that we cannot know if those
forms exist in the world. We have them unified under a soul
to work with what we can sense from the world. We impose
ordered forms upon sense datum for an experience of entity
in relation to sense datum as objects perceived by a soul. The
experience is not from finalized neural activity, known today but
not to Kant, it is from a soul perceiving entity and a world as
objects in one experience. He unified entity & world necessarily
in the experience but not clearly by interface of self-stimulation
with a world of stimulation for capture of both by neurons in a
contained neural representation of entity within a world.
Neural activity for both entity and world equate to the word I.
I am a subjective experience of a representation of both, by
the interactive capacities of I to cause effects on others or be
effected by cause of others. I use the word I here, but I could
use oneself as equally causal and effected in Diagram 8.
We have experiences representing an interactive interface, and
using the experience at all times, we consider its objective
reality. I think, therefore, I assume I am an object thinking about
its interfaces after delay, by Descartes. A subjective experience
is just that, and it assumes things are out there, as necessary,
in the locked-in experience itself. We only experience after
delay for processing. We are always immersed in a world of
objects, from one cell, and never separate. We assume things
are out there, including entity as an object, as entity in world,
in what appear in experiences to be objects in interface. I is a
pure point of reference in experiences. The world is mine, but
it owns me in reality. I explore interfaces with my world to
differentiate them as objects, to attain my goals in my world.
Charles Darwin
Next in time, immediately following Kant, is Charles Darwin
(1809-1882). He said in his theory of Natural Selection that
life evolves by absolutes of growth and reproduction, and by
adaptation to the environment. Viewing from universal

The Human Design

66

absolutes, he did not consider a final product species, but he

did not realize an environment has specific chemical layers
corresponding to the structure of our anatomy, preferring our
form of adaptation. Nor did he know about cellular chemical
activity serving overall heat loss on a planetary surface.
Darwin realized there is an absolute continuous mechanism
for growth and reproduction. Division into two sexes and
reproduction between them provides for growth and gradual
mutation of growing anatomies over time. Adaptation has that
context, but in discrete subjective form, we are embodiments
of a landscape, for a much, much, deeper view of adaptation,
for humans with comprehensive subjective awareness.
Albert Einstein
Next in time, and immediately following Darwin, is Albert
Einstein (1879-1955). In Special Relativity, he confined
observers to their own subjective frames of reference, just
as Kant did for our anatomical frame. Discrete particles have
their own discrete space and time forms as a framework
relative to which they measure the world. It is a theory
about how one mass measures another by using fields,
theorized from the fact that the motion of light is constant
whatever the motion of its atomic source. Particles use
photons for measurements in a void that otherwise provides no
indication of their motions. Special Relativity Theory entirely
confined particles to their own frames, and used parsimony to
deny a void. That denial extended to the General Theory.
To me, Special Relativity reconciles particle measurements,
required as constant photon exchanges automatically create
a rest frame for particles. I will explain later that regardless of
particle motions, fields extend to and from them by coupling
at a constant speed by their own mechanism, creating rest
frames by doing so. This does not mean there is no underlying
reality to the reconciliation, beyond being an adjustment

The Human Design

67

because particles in motion have rest frames created by a field

mechanism for constant speed. This is consistent with two
facts. Rest mass can convert to energy by the speed of light
squared, and back again, so they can convert from one form
to the other. Moreover, when rest mass is given energy, its
motion does not increase in direct proportion. Invested with
high energy, its momentum increases more than its motion,
suggesting but not concluding that it cannot reach light speed.
These facts are consistent with lab tests of particle and field
properties, explained later. The Special from photon transfers
at light speed, was developed into a General for relative
motion under gravitation. Relativity says curved Spacetime
geometry gives gravitational attraction, not interfaces creating
each relative view. It prevents views of mechanical interfaces
using a void. Pure Spacetime, with no mass, supposedly
expands with mass just as fast as it needs to escape at a Big
Bang. It denies a void, but particles can be as fast as needed
under ad hoc and quite bizarre Inflation from non-existence,
matched by rapid expansion of Spacetime geometry with nonexistence around it. It has blunt geometry preventing use of a
void to explore mechanical interfaces, a Singularity of infinite
compression before a Big Bang, and pure linear Isotropy for all
observers, which are all impossible. Mass has supposed
Symmetry Breaking, ignoring Spacetime expanding linearly,
which is how particles exploding in a void expand anyway.
Homogeneity, or sameness, depends on what is said to be the
same. Pure linear Isotropy about all observers requires models
so far from human reasoning as to be impossible. To the
extent we have pure Isotropy around Earth, then we are near
the center of a puffball, or else expanding Spacetime creates a
Hologram in which we live. A void can contain Einsteins
Spacetime, which does not extend beyond three spatial
dimensions, but that puts an impossible Hologram in a void. I
choose the puffball, but I reserve my opinion on limits to
motion & density relations, later, relying on Escape Velocity.

The Human Design

68

8. Organ Substructure

I will now explain the discrete capacities of our anatomy under

the Design. In this chapter, I explain moves of levity and gravity
organs, in & out, up & down, front & back, and left & right. In the
next chapter, appendages conform to all organ moves in this
chapter, graphically. Organs are blocks because they stand
alone, as gross chemicals. Appendages are fields across the
organ blocks, as trace chemicals. Organs are a substructure
with distributive spatial and temporal organs around equal and
opposite causal and effected organs merged at our center line.
Appendages conform in a standard template at each organ
sector, by location, composition, and function, and more
obviously at a head than a body. They also have their own
features as eight fields at each of eight organ sectors.
Diagram 13 is a view of our organ anatomy from above, and
Diagram 14 transforms that view into a watery wave-like
structure upright on Earth rather than from above. Arrows in
Diagram 13 are compressions and decompressions of space,
time, cause, and effect across active, passive, levity and
gravity examples. Diagram 13 shows causal organs tending
behind (or below) in the past driving effected organs at front
(or above). Upright in Diagram 14, organs are set as cause,
effect, levity, and gravity by cone shapes, at logical locations.
Each organ moves between levels up & down, and sides left &
right, by interfacing ring and embedded link moves. Each link
is to another organ or the brain, for literal ring-a-rosy. In turn, a
ring compresses, a link compresses, a link decompresses, and
a ring decompresses. Rings interface a world & links interface
a brain, for accretion to represent both, most likely by their
roles as world-stimulation & self-stimulation. Cause embeds
links around rings, and effect embeds links within rings, for
ring-a-rosy around a central brain accretion, to represent all
sites peripherally by Point-Instants of action-reaction in a brain.

The Human Design

69

Diagram 13, Organ Design (Anatomy from above)

Effect Left
Mineral Loose
Gas Lift
8 Tongue
1 Lungs

Liquid Flow
Heart 7

Solid Light
2 Nose

Time
Back

Space
Front

Spine 6
Mineral Tight

3 Eye
Gas Contained

5 Ear
4 Gut
Liquid Well
Solid Heavy
Cause Right
Merged across both sides

Adjoined on each side

In Diagram 6, each organ mobile favors the compression or

decompression end as cause or effect, but they all have the
other end as well, as cones. I keep root moves from Diagram 6
in Diagram 15, by a legend in Diagram 16, which has apparent
symmetry, but root asymmetries from Diagram 6. We favor
the compression or decompression end as cause or effect, as
a root ring move. The other end of the cone is a root link move
upon transition. Symmetry in Diagram 16, is a generality from
balanced mass slicing in & splaying out, and stable charge
mirroring left & right. It has two root moves to make four moves.

The Human Design

70

Diagram 14, Organ Substructure as a Water Wave

Two Arrows, With
Two Levels & Two Sides

Head, looking up to left

Narrow Crest

2 Nose
Upright Levity Organ

3 Eye

Right

Front
Back

Left
8 Tongue

5 Ear

Upright Gravity Organ

Broad Trough

Body, leaning down to left

Narrow Peak
Appendage
Templates
7 Heart
6 Spine

Back
Right

Left
Front

4 Gut

Broad Front

1 Lungs

The Human Design

71

Diagram 15, Organ Rings & Links in Four Layers

(1) Logistical Cycle of Sites & Supply Cycle of Sites
Spine Cycles in Nervous Brain Heart Cycles around Hormonal Brain
Pulse Up to Down Back
Stretch In to Out Front
N Cloth=Link Junction
Circle of Willis, Spine, & All Sites
Flat Equal Table Cloth
Muscular Activity Pumping
Full Cone
Half Cycle
Sensory Motor Motor Sensory
Aorta
4 Pulm. Lungs
2
Wind
Unwind
3
1 SVC
Fixed
Wind
C Link Slices
Mirrors Across Center Line
SA
Atrium High
Fixed
IVC Atrium
Out Left
Gut
Out In 3
In
Cord 1
Half Cycle
2
AV
Stacks
4
Low Right
M Link Left
Ventricles Slice
Levers Along Center Point
Receptors & Effectors
Gut Half Cycle Cooperates
Lungs Half Cycle Oscillates
Stack Low to High Back
Stretch Deep to Shallow Front
Lever & Stall Across Center Point
Mirror & Bounce
Splay
Liver Wind 2
Splay
Along Center Line
H Link
Right Bile
1 Stomach
Tidal Air
Wind
Bronchi
Portal
Free
Free
Small Int
Duod.
4
Unwind
3
Chest Ring
Full Cone
Full Cone
Heart
Out
In In
Out
3 Alveoli Rip Gap
Large Int
Unwind
Settled Air
D Link Left
Free
Free
1
Diaphragm
(Appendix) (Bladder) 4
Bounce
(Bowel)
Splay
2
Splay

The Human Design

72

(2) Balanced Circle of Sites & Circle of Linguistics of Sites

Eye Half-Circle Oscillates
Nose Half-Circle Cooperates
(One Eye Side View)
(One Nostril Side View)
Open Pupil Close Olfactory
1 Seek X
2 Use
4 Snort Plane
Two Sacs Down
Light
Wind
Cone Up
Cone Up X
Y
1 Sniff Plane
Fovea Ball Saccades
Level
Optic
3 Sniff Olfac
One Sac Up
X
Cone Down
3 Edge Y
4 Get X
Unwind
2 Snort Olfac
Depth Link Up & Survey Down
Height Link Down & Survey Up
Bounce Shallow to Deep Back
Stack High to Low Front
Slice by Stretched Turn
Slice by Levering a Plane
Mirror Along Center Line
Stall Across Center Point
Oscillating
Cooperative
Vestibular
Vestibular
High
Lens
X
X
Crosses
X
Shallow
Y
Deep
Low
X
Ear Circles Head Around
Tongue Circles in Head
(One Ear, Right Rear View)
Helix
(Tongue, Right Rear View)
Stretch Out to In Back
Pulse Down to Up Front
Helix Winds
Splay
Mirrors Across Center Line
Vestib. 2 M Link
Unwind
Dish by Edges
Wind
1
Stack Intrinsic Surface
Waves Wind Stack by Gutter
Face Down Coch @
Drum
In
3
4
(Listening for Tone)
Palate
Free Free
Stall & Lever Along Center Point
Splay
Edges Above
Coch.Unwinds Vestib.
1
Intrinsic Level
3 M Link
C Link Below
4 Coch @
Unwind
2 Tolerant Level
Free
Waves Out
Splay
Face Up Waves Out
Drum
Epiglottis
Extrinsic Level
(Speaking with Tone)
Flat Equal Napkin
N Cords=Link Junction
Stalls to Circle Width by Stretch Tilt & Turn + Stack Bob & Nod Cooperating
Vestibulocochlear
Wind & Unwind

The Human Design

73

Diagram 16, Down Causal & Up Effected Rings (Links Counter)

Head Symmetry

Solid

Root Tilts for Head Symmetry

Eye
Compress
Nose
Up

Fovea

Tilt Down

Olfact

Slice
Gas

Down

Optic

Sandwich Rings, Spread Links

Mineral

Ear

Up

Vestib.

Tilt Up

Vomer.

Decompress Tongue
Tilt Up

Edges

Splay
Liquid

Down

Coch. Tilt Down Gutter

N Cords
Periphery Middle
Body Symmetry
N Cloth
Liquid

Middle Periphery

Root Bulges for Body Symmetry

Spine
Compress
Heart
Up

Med .

Bulge Down

Atrium

Slice
Mineral

Down

Cord

Spread Rings, Sandwich Links

Gas

Gut

Up

Liver

Bulge Up
Decompress

Ventr.
Lungs

Bulge Up

Chest

Splay
Solid

Down

Bowel Bulge Down Diaph.

Horizontal: Convex & Concave with Spread & Sandwiched Rings & Links

Splay
Gut

Nose
Slice

Lung

Splay
Slice

Heart
Splay Tongue

Spine

Slice

Ear Splay

Slice
Eye

The Human Design

74

Diagram 17, Survey & Occupy by Head

Solids & Gasses
Focus Up
Convergent
Blind Optic Link
Light
Overlap Liquids & Minerals
Unset Surveys
Less
Olfact
Helix Apex
Dust Level
Optic
Vision
Sun Level
More
Snort Plane
Link Up
Sniff Plane
Ring
Cochlea
Drum Down
Sacc. Down
Sea Level
for Waves
Fovea Ring
Set
from Below
Snort Olfact Link
Ring Divergent
Ring Down
Blitz Olfact
Harmony
Tongue Surface
Palate Nods
Surf Level Set
Gutter
Neck Rotates
Link
Epiglottis
Extrinsic
Waves
N Cords

The correct side for links is seen in Diagram 13, as eight relative
positions that are also absolute from a landscapes using color
by numbers. A correct level for rings is also absolute, by causal
rings below their links, and effected rings above their links for
cause and effect in a landscape. Those levels have correct
relative positions, but you will see in Diagrams 16 & 17, upper
organs have almost complete overlap of ring & link levels of two
organs together, slicing. Lower organs have almost complete
distancing of ring & link levels of two organs apart, splaying.
Upper organs slice inwards by links from ring compression to
decompression. Lower organs splay outward by their links from
ring compression to decompression. Links slice or splay at
transition, but rings conform by fixing for a slice or freeing for a
splay, so slice or splay is by both links & rings. Links counter to
rings are like twists between action & reaction of inertial rings,

The Human Design

75

which change their inertia by links, and this may apply also in
general to physics, including collisions for anti-state formation.
Respectively, slice or splay are concave or convex, upper or
lower. Concave-convex have opposite depths back-front. Slice &
splay have opposite widths in-out. Upper & lower have opposite
heights up-down. A present moment of pulse mirrors left-right
sides. Gas has depth, liquid has width, solid has height, and
mineral has pulse. Two charged axes of depth & pulse seen
from above flat on the surface for forward traction, combine with
two pivots by width using height seen from the side to wind a
mound around axes for circular momentum for that traction.
Charge unifies flat, by axes to four sides laterally. Mass unifies
pivotally around the axes, as width extending to or from height
for momentum around crossways charged axes that are flat on
the surface for forward traction by momentum. This enables
charge to be causal back & effected front for traction, while
mass can be causal down & effect up for momentum cycles.
There is complete inversion of slice versus splay on each side,
and unity between both sides by two axes and two pivots. All
moves match between two organs in each of four layers, to
provide perfect traction to momentum across an entire system.
The lines for rings and dashed lines for links in Diagrams 15 &
16 each have moves by arrows. Moves of each organ match for
both in layers. Time flows or ebbs by waves, and space
converges or diverges by planes. The moves are achieved by
tilts at a head or bulges at a body by rings & links from set
positions, in a legend at right in Diagram 16, as root moves.
Upper organs overlap by compression in shared layers by
waves or planes. Lower organs disperse by decompression. The
legend of root moves underlies the apparent symmetrical
moves in the diagram, which are moves from Diagram 15.
Liquid flows down from up at an atrium and up from down at a
ventricle in overlap to make a flow direct from sites to an atrium
that can be modulated by a ventricle at transition to pump back

The Human Design

76

to sites. Liquid ebbs down from down at a cochlea and up from

up at a vestibular in dispersal to make an ebb by collected
external waves for sites that can be modulated by a vestibular
for sites to balance at transitions for collection. Mineral flows up
from down at a spine and down from up at a medulla in overlap
to flow from sites with crossover impetus to a brain for a
medulla to take a flow back for site reactions after processing.
Mineral ebbs up from up at edges and down from down at a
gutter in dispersal to make an ebb of sounds for sites by a
tongue using edges for impetus in a muscular wave to vocal
cords, to collect and then project back by crossover at a gutter.
Solid converges up from down at a vomeronasal plane and
down from up at an olfactory in overlap to make a terrace of
tilting planes by a lift to sniff across the lowest to settle and
then gather by dipping the highest to snort and settle again.
Solid diverges up from up a liver and down from down at a
bowel in dispersal as a catchment of high planes to collect and
then stall by a liver to move nutrients up and let waste go down.
Gas converges down from up at a fovea and up from down at
an optic in overlapping planes by tilting an eye down to take
light from depth at upper fovea, then to depth up for brighter
light at lower optic nerve to edge objects from above. Gas
diverges up from up at a chest and down from down at a
diaphragm in dispersal as one extended plane to collect air and
stretch it to a flat base by depth for saturation and then exhale.
At a head, rings sandwich and links spread. Rings at eye &
nose sandwich together as planes, and rings at ear & tongue
sandwich apart as waves. There is overlap between rings of
receptors downward by an olfactory nerve plane directly above
fovea receptors upward by an optic nerve plane, to overlap in
sandwich using a border. There is dispersal between rings at
tongue edges and a cochlea to find harmony in sandwich. By
tilting, nose and eye survey space at any level, while ear and
tongue occupy an actual level of timing. Conversely, at a body,
rings spread and links sandwich. There is a spread of spinal
and heart flow in overlap across sites, and a sandwich at an N

The Human Design

77

Cloth between medulla and sinoatrial to modulate. There is a

spread of chest and bowel in their dispersals, and a sandwich
of diaphragm and liver using a border. By bulging, upper body
surveys time at any level, and lower occupies an actual level
of space. Use the view at foot of Diagram 16 as a guide.
As a complete layer of rings & links across left & right, each
eye stretches along its center line for a cone, by a ring fovea
for a light cone along a line of depth set by an optic nerve link
with one Point of Vision for both eyes. Each lung stretches
along its center line for a cone, by ring chest heaves pulling a
lung for its air cone along a line of depth set by one linked
diaphragm arch to mirror both lungs. A spine stacks across its
center line for a cone on each side with sensory actions to spit
out mirrored motor reactions, across a line for pulses set by a
linked medulla to a brain, with cross talk working to one pulse
axis left & right. A tongue stacks across a ring tongue edge on
each side as a cone shaping waves across a line for a
mirrored pulses set by a linked gutter to one set of vocal folds
talking for both hemispheres.
Gravity organs at ears wind by stretching along each ring
cochlea spiral, levering each helix as a cone to collect waves
around it using a linked vestibular nerve for one point balance
for both, with a middle ear to adjust. At a heart, ring atria for
vessels make a cone stretching along each ventricle linked by
nodes to one brain for supply of blood to spinal logistics at
sites in one full beat for both sides. A gut stacks by cones
across each side, for one central blood supply at a liver to and
from a heart. A nose stacks mucus across each nostril cone
down to a ring plane, by levering it around one bridged
olfactory nerve linking for both sides. Gas has bubbles at an
eyeball and lung alveoli, liquid has canals at heart and ear,
mineral has seams at spine and tongue, and solid has piles at
nose and gut. Gasses and liquids stretch. Minerals and solids
stack. I suspect an eye & ear may stretch by causal density,
by etching into matting, to sketch.

The Human Design

78

At a compressed upper body, overlapping heart and spine

make clear cones with links counter to rings in cones. A spine
links to a brains neurons, via a medulla oblongata, and a
hearts sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes also link to a brain
for blood flow to sites to supply to spinal logistics at sites. We
are two thirds water in locomotion as a wave. Like an ear has
its own integrity to hear hormonally, a heart has integrity by
rubbery walls as a pump for sites with muscles working to
keep a flow. It can half cycle with a gut and half cycle with
lungs by taking links from them to extend their capacities
across sites. Liquids and minerals are waves flowing across all
sites by vessels and nerves to and from heart and spine. All
sites are therefore wavelike by liquids and minerals at all sites,
but head sites also have sound waves used by ears and
tongue in its circular chamber for sound production. We are
walking compasses & talking clocks by neurons representing
sites, rather than by abstruse neural magic, and our frame is
comprehensive across fundamentals in Diagram 8.
At the spine, the first ring move is sensory action in & up
before motor reaction out & down, using a crossover C Link
medulla to a brains neurons in a flat refolded table cloth of
neurons, N Cloth. The links send sensory from in & up to go
out & up to resolve as motor at the N Cloth and go in & down
to a spine to flow out & down as responses. A first ring move
in & up is sensory flow, and it has reflexes for sensory to react
by motor at a spine, but it can adjust sensory via an N Cloth
before motor outputs. In chapter 10 on neurons, sensory
inputs compress in a brain until a threshold of intensity to
experience awareness, and then it decompresses as motor
outputs for reactive moves, consistent with the compressiondecompression crossover vectors in Diagram 15 (1).
A heart supplies oxygen from lungs and nutrients from a gut to
all sites, as supply to spine logistics. Its first ring flow is in &
down to a heart and then out & up, which is automatic by rings
using rubbery walls of a heart itself. A heart has a modulating

The Human Design

79

M Link, its nodes to the N Cloth. It uses a gut link in the right
atrium cooperating with spinal logistics via the sinoatrial to
favor a gut & spinal logistics before flow to lungs, coordinating
atrioventricular nodes to modulate ventricle flow for both gut
and lungs. The rings are Full Cones above and right at a heart,
and I prioritize the ventricles to slice, but using a sinoatrial to
settle atria for a gut & spinal logistics. The nodes adjust ring
flow for supply of oxygen and nutrients by blood at sites for
logistics. Modulation controls filling out & down and beating in
& up to get the blood out, as counter cycles extending a ring to
sites. Its location at left sets locations for other body organ
links. A full cone is right & above, and links tend left & below.
Muscles at sites are integral as the effected periphery driving
regularly to enable a heart to compress blood flow back to it.
A first spinal ring move is at front of back in & up. A first link is
at back of back out & up in a deep brain with sensory at back
in Diagram 26, later. A second link for motor moves is front of
front in & down in a brain, slicing back to front. A second ring
move is back of front out & down to move, behind to forward.
A medulla braces a brain deeper back and front than a spine.
To match a spine, a heart sends a blood flow from SVC & IVC
blasted front of front by atria in & down, then a ventricle stops
it to fill back of front out & down, then it flows front of back by
slicing in & up from that fill, to then flow back of back out & up
behind the SVC & IVC by an aorta or pulmonary. Later, an arm
& hand throw objects using the same sequence. All moves of
two organs sharing each layer are synchronized for front,
back, left, right, in, out, up, and down moves. This extends
clearly to appendages they share in Diagram 21, later. Each
organ has a different starting move by ring compression from
its layer partner, but all moves are matched, despite starting
and finishing differently in a shared cycle.
At lower body, a liver links rings of a gut to a heart to extend
beyond its stomach & large intestine, for nutrition to sites by
blood vessels. Link moves are counter to ring, using a portal to

The Human Design

80

send blood to a liver from a small intestine stripping nutrients.

Its alternate, lungs, uses rings of a ribcage to inhale and
exhale, with a diaphragm as a link to draw directly from
bronchi to alveoli down to the gut level, below a ribcage level,
to bounce inhale to exhale. A diaphragm acts on lungs down
the middle to pull air, and it is counter to a ribcage in each lung
to draw oxygen to transport to sites and brain by a heart. Their
splay has a shared harmony with gut splay, for a lung level to
invade down, and a gut level to invade it up. Downwards
Peristalsis is not used in a gut beyond the duodenum. Small
and large intestines have weight for gravity across their bulk
served by regular muscle contractions. They decompress in
broad biology. Gut rings open down center of a body as causal
gravity. Rib rings open a surface ribcage as effected levity.
Chest ring moves pull lungs out & down front, then drive them
in & up back, with links between. Air moves deep at front of
front, out & down as the first ring move for both lungs, to draw
fresh air at back of front linking in & down to settle from
bronchi to alveoli, using the draw of a central diaphragm for
both lungs. Then air moves out & up, at front of back linking to
remove stale air at alveoli back to bronchi, as a diaphragm
closes by a secondary ring move and a chest drives lungs
back in & up to exhale. Lungs stretch depth to extend air to
sites by linking to a heart. Lungs decompress as a surface.
At a gut, a liver serves digestion to transfer nutrients to blood
from the entire tract, placed above a stomach. A bladder is
supplied by kidneys, not in the diagram but placed each side
of a liver for blood purification. A gut has as about as many
neurons as a spine. While it accompanies lungs in sequences
matching up or down bulges by their rings and links, it begins
at back and then rounds to front, rather than at front and then
at back like lungs. First, we fill a stomach out & up at front of
back to begin a flow of digested nutrients for blood supply to a
liver back of back. We use bile storage at a pancreas in & up
to a duodenum bend, to mix with food moving out & down to

The Human Design

81

small intestines as the process moves to front of front.

Nutrients gradually digest in the small intestine for flow up to a
liver by an opened portal, and continue back of front for large
intestines to compact in & down. Gut and lungs alternate rings
and links front & back, with ribs as a ring surface front & back
around a gut ring centering front & back, to both decompress.
At upper head, an olfactory nerve links a ring vomeronasal
plane for settled odor, to a vestibular for central balance up &
down. A solid nostril and concha in a cone shape take gas with
odor along narrowing passages to settle below an olfactory
above a lower plane, for a full stack of odor. The gas angle
inhaling by a throat through a nose is along the lower plane for
gas cones made by a low passage, but it can blitz an
olfactory by tilting down to odor to sniff up the hypotenuse
angle. That blitz is not a smell, due to intensity, but it can settle
from the blitz, down to the plane, for an extended stack from
higher up. An olfactory connects direct to brain cortices for its
vestibular link to balance a plane up & down to gather & stack.
A nose settles dust onto its own terraced landscape in a high
cathedral as a recreated environment. A vomeronasal plane is
a level in animals for pheromone reception of familiar odor,
with a Flehman Response in dogs & cats. It may still be for
familiarity in humans, as the lowest ring stack down from up.
In Diagram 15 (2), a nose sequences from its plane tilted
above level, to move in & down inhaling at the plane draining
back in the throat, to level it out. It can stay above level by
lifting to snort the plane out & up, or it can link to move below
level to exhale gently nuzzling with the olfactory lowered out &
down, and then inhaling in & up down to be blitzed by a sniff,
then moving above level to snort out & up. We settle to a flavor
plane, with an organ in snakes.
An eye likewise settles from a blind spot near bright objects
to a fovea below, for reflected sharp edges. An optic nerve
links to a vestibular for central balance tilt to gather light for a

The Human Design

82

central & shallow below fovea from a deep & wide arc of light
above, to etch. A solid eyeball shudder tends downwards in
pressure, as saccades tend to read down a page and not up,
in all languages except a few ancient religious ones. This
sends light cones in an eyeball upwards as a levity cone to a
fovea. It benefits from a half link oscillating centrally to a
vestibular from the optic nerve, but an eye has a blind spot at
the optic nerve when light comes from bright sources above.
The blind spot gives range to find bright edges for a fovea with
less harm, and the link extends eye function to balance a
whole head for it. An eye can voluntarily move on its own, and
also oscillate into a vestibular for static balance. An optic nerve
enables a mirror between eyes for width & depth, to level at a
fovea more centrally focused, by etching over its tight images
below using arcs of light from above & sides.
An eye has a pure light cone captured in its ball as a recreated
environment for light to excite gasses in pressurized solid
pockets. In Diagram 15 (2,) a cone is made by a lens from a
saccade tending down from X, in & up to compress dim light to a
fovea, which is not preferred. Saccades move all ways, but tend
down. This literally drains light from the eye out & up as a link, to
then seek light at the upper edge of X, towards Y, to saccade an
edge to X using light above it. The pupil closes from edging at Y,
to return to X and open for a clear view of the object revealed by
edging, taking in light by opening for dim light. In my current
model, edging reveals objects for ring examination in a relation
of pupil moves for light levels, and saccade moves for edges that
excite from above but favor cooler objects below in doing so.
Saccades are our fastest anatomical moves, and at lower
head we use our smallest anatomical muscle to reflex by an
ossicles pedal at a middle ear. The cone of an ear is set from
auricle out with helix as an apex, down a canal to a drum
angled down, and then down to a cochlea. Ossicles intercede
that cone to amplify waves at the drum and to speak using a
reflexive sensitivity. The drum is a cone angled down to the

The Human Design

83

helix and cochlea cone, and the middle ear link creates a
leveraged reflex, so that waves externally tighten to increase
hearing. A cochlea is liquid in a well with mineral hairs, to
detect sound waves, below added canals for vestibular
balance. Ossicles are between the cochlea and drum and
below the vestibular. A cochlea uses a vestibular to reflex
balance, for turns to hear from the leverage of ossicles with a
helix as an apex. Cochlea reception of internal waves from
vocal folds can loosen by a Vocalization-Induced Stapedius
Reflex. We can favor external over the internal. A bird uses it
to sing, and a bat blocks its cry to hear its echo.
A heart is subject to sinoatrial logistics for supply to sites, while
a tongue and its use of vocal cords is subject to a high level of
supply by ears to replicate by tones. An ear helix stop waves
out & up as a reservoir to canal down to a drum angled for an
M Link to go in & up by pressure from ossicles to an oval
window at a cochlea to intensify drum waves. A helix tilts for
any waves in any direction. With a face lowered, ears go up at
back for the helix to be an apex for favored waves from below,
to go down a canal to the drum. However, ossicles can release
the pressure pedal out & down as a reflex for internal waves,
to favor the external and continue in & down to a cochlea,
which swings to relate external & internal. In Diagram 15 (2)
the swing up to speak to unfix ossicles is tolerance to still go in
& down to a cochlea. It compares to a gut as a lower gravity
organ by collection wide to channel down, then up by link and
down by link, and then down with nothing left to digest or hear.
A tongue can move on its own like an eye, in tilts up and down
alternating to hear and speak. Its link is also muscular, and it
also goes to vocal folds, by a gutter crossing over ring tongue
edges to shape waves blown from vocal folds. The ring edges
make a mineral cone level, barely above its own gutter as a
counter cone tending back and down relative to ring up and
front. The gutter collects waves to blow and cross over in a
mouth chamber, in wave formation. It wets continually, and its

The Human Design

84

link to vocal folds for waves benefits from balance of an ear at

a vestibular. However, it sets its own level, like surf over a sea
level set by an ear, with a mere margin for tongue rings to be
above the tilt of a helix ring with face down, to harmonize. It
can substitute for a damaged vestibular in providing general
balance. It is loose to circle for all sites like a spine, but unlike
heart supply to spine logistics, there is tongue linguistics to ear
supply, favoring an ear to veto & tone speech to fit in
hormonally externally. Receptors are in triangles with a gutter,
and muscles run deep to move its intrinsic surface.
Crossover of a tongue linking with N Cords vocal folds is from
a lower link gutter cutting across upper tongue edges in
Diagram 15 (2). The out & down move is the first ring tilt down
by its edges to anticipate specific waves to shape. Then it links
with N Cords to bounce a wave using the tongues gutter in &
down for blown waves. The gutter opens to blow out & up, to
shape by upper tongue edges in & up, as readily collected in
anticipation. N Cords are tiny flaps hung out there to dry by the
N Cloth, so to speak. We adjust tone at N Cord muscles until
tuned to ears using modulation. Pacing and edging waves
from N Cords for linguistics may edge basic ideas into complex
ones with tone for tunes. A tongue is mineral acting on air to
shape waves, using a gutter for solids or gasses, contained by
edges for liquids in particular when drinking upwards.
Involuntary & Voluntary Moves
We have voluntary moves by a medulla bracing nerves across
stable hemispheres by unifying pulses across the left & right
axis, for a unified structure sharing two axes and two pivots.
They provide ideal confinements to goals in the world, along &
across an intact cerebrum. We have involuntary moves as
continual corrections in extensive balance from a pivotal
vestibular, for static reflex using a pivotal cerebellum. As
noted, electromagnetism & gravitation, in mutuality by actionreaction, partition all of nature. Levity current by nerve &

The Human Design

85

gravity sediment by hormone combine in neurons. They have

partitioned flows for current & hormone that are pivotal at a
rounded intact cerebellum to maintain extended reflexive
levels in a world by all organs and appendages, and laterally
divided at a cerebrum to confine the maintenance of levels in a
world for moves aimed at goals in a world by conditioning.
Maintenance is adjusted for smooth levelling in this chapter
and the next, for anatomy to maintain an intact state that is
level in relation to a world, continually adjusting to see objects
without saccades being mistimed as jerky vision, for example.
All levels, including for appendages, are structural by gravity to
maintain diverse cellular chemical levels in relation to a world.
Organs and appendages are immersed in a world, and their
chemically delimited moves reflex naturally in interface with a
chemical world in this chapter and the next. Structural reflexive
moves condition voluntarily by nerves confining hormonal sites
preemptively to goals, and levels are settled around them. The
nerve cycle tied to a medulla for voluntary confinement as
levity is lateral to a pivotal hormone cycle tied to a vestibular
for involuntary maintenance of level interfaces. Nerve is rapid
and hormone lasts longer, but pivotal & lateral extends to both
nerve & hormone. Loops & string with lateral angles & smooth
momentum also combine in photons & gravitons, earlier.
Given that we have automatic chemical levelling by anatomy,
unknown until now, we can clarify Cortical Discharge to backcheck to attenuate reflex to our moves, for levelling at goals in
a world. In my model, there is no working backwards to
prevent reflexing sequentially, to suppress feeling every little
move we make when we detect interface with a world. As the
self-stimulated and contained aspect of a cycle that is also
crucially open to collect everything from a world, we control it
by hormonal regulation and send attenuated moves to be felt
as attenuated moves. Continual back-checks are a processing
burden, if the brain can deal with burdens. If not, it may more
efficiently stall for the output, by an extant hormone distribution

The Human Design

86

in a brain that sent it. My model simplifies to attenuation by

self-stimulation for levels, including self-stimulation for
sequential level experiences of thought. Levels condition to
un-attenuated goals in a world, to attenuate our levels to
them for greater ease within a niche. Moves for levels & goals,
by each different species with its own chemical levels, are
coordinated using a central brain that only needs to tend to
favor moves, and tendencies become conditioned.
We can favor our moves in comfortable cycling, more distant
from suitable levels in a world, or be more immersed in it. The
experience is always of oneself in the world as interface. We
generate warmth and we have our own gravity, but if we move
in a cold ocean we experience our warmth & gravity and an
oceans, not a beachs. Proprioception gives intactness as we
move to adjust levels by conditioning. It does not give feelings
of pressure distributed in and around anatomy by receptors
capturing impact with a world, including weight and warmth, to
retain as our experience of one impact at interface. We are
attenuated in our intactness to favor goals in a world, but that
does not sort which part is due to us, and which part the world.
It just confirms the primacy of the world. It confirms that our
moves are reactions to actions of a world in interface, in our
experience and in reality. We need experience in a world to
condition our impacts and avoid clumsiness from attenuation.
In Diagram 15 (2), black dots are direct to cortices bypassing
the medulla to have vestibular access. Static reflex is also at
eye and tongue direct to reflex by nerves to the cerebellum.
Static reflex is from Electrostatics by insulating gravity and
electrical levity organs combining for a head. Electrodynamics
for energy would apply at a body, but each system completely
overlaps, by centers & surfaces for inputs to a brain, and
outputs from it. In Diagram 26, cortical structure conforms to
broad biology by charged axes & massive pivots partitioning
brain cortices appropriately across the board, for actionreaction present moments with impetus as past-to-future sites.

The Human Design

87

In chapter 13, I explain linguistics at vocal folds is based on a

vestibular at ears serving head & body. Logistics by a spine is
based on a medulla for head & body served by a heart. Vocal
folds and a medulla are both in the neck between body and
head, but nerves favor a spinal body, and linguistic balance
favors a vestibular head. A relation to Strong & Weak Nuclear
Forces in physics arises from an offset of counter & regular
force. Vestibular balance for static reflex to keep levels are
regular at a head, as neutral centers for concentrated surfaces
at ear & nose, countered by concentrated centers & neutral
surfaces at an eye & tongue. Involuntary reflexes encompass
voluntary moves at a head. At a body, voluntary spine & lung
logistics have a concentrated center & neutral surface to
encompass involuntary energy decay by gut & heart as a
neutral center and concentrated surface. This applies to sway
males to logistics to ideal ends of a home, edging. Females
sway to linguistics from real origins of a home, pivoting.
Thought Merely as Integration of Feelings
All moves during thought may contribute to it, and so regularly
they simply go together. Sites are represented by neurons on
finalization of inputs in continual Point-Instant experiences.
Complexity to awareness is mostly an obfuscation. In almost
all of neuroscience, a brain is a silly intact little person,
Homunculus, with its own will, and not an automatic facility to
represent site interfaces. Thoughts are diverse feelings that
are integrated & modulated when inputs of site receptor
components are networked for commons pivotally & laterally in
a brain. It is an experience of thoughts about feelings, but it
is hormonally modulated and nervously confined feelings in
itself, as settled across all sites by networking their commons.
It is the ethereal or conceptual reality of networking feelings
to create a state that is actually experienced ethereally or
conceptually about feelings that remain preserved. But
feelings can be intricate by their components, at an eye or ear
for example, and concepts about them match intricately.

The Human Design

88

Feelings that are unrecognized by obvious thought at any

moment are subtle, supporting the more obvious, rather
than merely unrecognizable. The subtle accompanies the
obvious, which is a peak. I do not use subconscious, as low
level conscious events. The only events below the continual
combination of subtle & obvious experiences are preconscious
processes, of which we are never conscious. Thoughts use
preconscious delay for components of line, shade, and color
for vision, for example, to split for vision and thought about it
by commons, involving all sites. We do not experience the
assembly of diverse specifics for one vision as they happen
before our eyes. Thoughts attend feelings when they arise.
By plasticity, various active sites instigate thoughts involving
past & potential patterns across many inactive sites during that
moment by integration in a brain using plasticity. Some will
instigate and be more obvious, and other subtly support. An
automatic flow continually spits out motor moves as reaction to
sensory actions, as inputs build to outputs. Each site will join
that flow by its inputs with variable timing to finalize their
processing, faster for hearing at 30 milliseconds and slower for
touch, at 150, for example. Some build enough, and others do
not. Sites literally carry each other across activities from subtle
to obvious to subtle. Flow can fill partly in cortices, ready to
feel or move by synchronized patterns.
We construct an intact representation of oneself in the world
with fidelity to all site interfaces. Awareness is a sensory
experience continually refreshed by fresh interfaces with a
world, cycling as memory. I equate sensory with memory, from
the process of continual refreshment and adjustment to an
accumulating sensory flow. Our gravity & levity cause-to-effect
sites use automatic motor outputs from sensory inputs to spit
out moves continually, some of which we know and control.
They provide for their forward momentum by replenishing sites
and neural networks to know our evolved and stored reaction
potential from actual actions to the extent they can before

The Human Design

89

reactions. Anticipation is for improved sensory satisfaction. We

collect stimulation from a world and condition moves that
differentiate us from it, to explore and not return to the same
sensory inputs for satisfaction with a world. This enables us to
extend beyond niches to condition the appearance of Free Will
from comprehensive capacities. We are always subjective, but
we can try to be objective by motor control of sensory inputs.
Awareness satisfactorily matches reality for humans, but it
is a construct using neurons, and only experienced when site
inputs synchronize to finalize in a brain. It is a representation
because sites do not experience events at sites immediately
by awareness. The event is evidenced by feelings of sites and
conceptual thoughts about them, but it is an intact actionreaction event in the brain, with variable processing times for
sites joining the flow after receptor stimulation. We are
automata in a world until processed, but the delay is brief, we
have reflexes to ameliorate, and we have conditioned
expectations. But we are always inevitably open to being
interrupted by the world necessarily during automatism, as that
interface is vital. A brain is automatic in representing site
interfaces with fidelity, but we are dependent on its intact
capacities. We can correlate neural activity to sites and
subjective experiences by chemistry, not merely brain scans.
To date, Embodied Mind in psychology & neuroscience has
been pushed aside to preserve other academic reputations.
Sexuality, Growth & Awareness
Levity at edges and gravity as bases applies to sex organs, and
also to appendages in the next chapter. Male testes and penis
are at the edge of anatomy with levity. They aim multiple levity
sperm at a massive gravity egg that falls down into a massive
womb. A vagina extends down from a womb to hold and insulate
friction of a risen and rising penis head until fertilization. A womb
expands for an embryo till a baby falls down. Levity daily across
yearly cycles are for male arousal. Gravity daily across monthly

The Human Design

90

cycles are for female ovulation. Human females exactly match

our lunar cycles duration, which is as precise as any features
matching landscapes. Gravity concentrates a vaginal surface
around a neutral center womb for an egg. Levity concentrates a
center at testes building sperm for a shaft, with a neutral surface
penis head to decay when a concentrated shaft penetrates a
concentrated vaginal surface for neutral head to meet womb.
In chapters 12 & 13, I apply gravity Strong Force linguistics by
females mutual to levity Weak Force logistics by males. Sex is
by direct action-reaction shearing by sex organs in mutuality.
We have a welcoming base with edged border, as a home
for a child. A mother extends herself into the world to hold
from the causal origin of a home, but too often in ignorance
of a world. A father contains himself as an edged border to
sort the world to the causal ideal of a home, but too often with
violence in the world. Society can substitute for family in an
extension of altruism, or to extend its ignorance and violence.
Cause, Effect & Awareness
We have causal organs tending back and below in the past
driving effected at front and above in the future. Future is also
effect by induction in right brain hemisphere and past is cause
by deduction in left hemisphere, talking across sides. Cause is
me affecting the other, effect is the other affecting me, and
both aspects comprise the entity, I, or oneself. We are an
entity that is entirely interactive to progress from a zygote, and
we regulate interactivity by dividing functions between causal
security and effected exposure. Political systems conform, to
right wing for initiatives of self, and left wing for others.
Organs infiltrate across both sides by merger, but may tend to
favor one side or other in cross talk. Cause is from the ground
up for my consistent outlook that you can note, and effect is
from top down for you to cause me to have insight about
you. Cause is known by assured steps from the past, and
effect is to future knowledge by insights in need of secure

The Human Design

91

relations to causes. Deductive knowledge is secured by your

past while inductive belief based upon it is open to refutation in
your future. Reasoning does not conform to a shaky past, as
your past and your future, whether your time is used for either.
Space & Time
There are spatial dimensions and temporal periods. Later, I
discuss this to allow for temporal width, but any discrete
space or time has reducing or increasing spatial sizes or
temporal periods. Upper head has less size and lower body
more size. Upper body has shorter periods, and lower head
longer periods. Spatial sizes and temporal periods can be
used discretely, alternatively, and together for active and
passive motions. We extend from a causal past with space
behind us to an effected future with space ahead, with upper &
lower as complete inversions.
Complete Inversion as Sides of a Soup Spoon
A flat mirror distorts a charged pulse left-right & depth frontback-front, but massive height up & down and width in & out
remain uniform and undistorted as a frame for pulse & depth
distortion. I will discuss the uniformity of gravitons as mass and
distortion by photons as charge in physics later, with charge as
a product of a density distortions to graviton pulses & depths.
Add concave & convex depth by curvature of mass up & down,
in & out, and it completely inverts the distortion if you look
into a round soup spoon each way completely inverted from
each other. Each soup spoon eye lens on each side has an
image made at a fovea automatically completely de-inverted
by neurons. It will apply more generally to neurons to reconcile
upper & lower layers each side to mirror between, to represent
an actual inverted structure. The next chapter shows some
geometrical potential, with spoons as appendage templates
each side aligning to mirror two concave spoons slicing at
upper levels, or two convex spoons splaying at lower levels.

The Human Design

92

Twist in Block Merger & Twist in Field Accretion

As noted in my general physics coverage, there is merger by
blocks and accretion by fields. Using Diagrams 11 (1) & (2) for
anatomy, it simplifies to a twist at a medulla by a charged body
in relation to a massive vestibular head with brain encased.
The head keeps an original rotation, and a body must twist in
relation to it when mass merges around intact charge to spin it
in a particle direction sympathetic to mass, with right causal
past driving left effected future. Merger requires a twisted
relation as it spins to create a necessarily twisted reconciliation
of body & head in Diagram 11 (1). A vestibular primary works
at a head direct to brain cortices, and a medulla at a body by
crossover, although they overlap by appendages in particular,
which follow both regimes. A head stays pivotal by mass like
a proton, with massive Strong Force linguistics at a vestibular,
and a body is laterally orbital to it by Weak Force logistics at a
medulla. It is a relation of charge & mass across rest & energy
to mutually keep rest & energy balanced & stable, with a twist
for intact rest & energy in shared rotation.
Consistently, field appendages also twist when blocks decay
to release them for exchange, as a relation between mass &
charge across rest & energy. There is a necessary twist to the
relation for accretion in physics in Diagram 12, and also for
anatomy, to create a piston line across a cog line. I noted in
physics that a proton actually decompresses to twist away
from a compressed electron pulse, as mass twisting for charge
for decay, but in appendages, charge twists away from mass.
Blocks are intact as an atom of head & body organs with flat
traction by charge served by cycles of massive momentum.
Atoms compound flat on a surface in Diagram 6 and also
conform to massive epicycle field momentum. The epicycle is
for appendage momentum. Flat charged traction & massive
momentum cycles with a twist for organs, become flat charged
springs that twist for massive levers around those organs. The
Design applies complementing logic for field capacities, next.

The Human Design

93

9. Appendage Superstructure

Organs are gross chemicals and appendages are traces.

Appendages are in templates of joints & lengths as slanted
coils, adapting the Design in Diagram 18. They do not merge
to adjoin like organs. Appendages uncoil from compression to
decompress and coil again compressing. Appendages serve by
conforming to organs in location, composition, and function.
The flat charged grid on a surface for compounds as organs is
a smooth intact relation of rest & energy with traction as causeeffect, back-front. The grid is filled in by massive pivots around
it with epicycle momentum as cause-effect, down-up. Merger
for the grid to dangle organs resolves as a diagonal between
cause back & below and effect front & above, and this shows
graphically in conforming brain cortices for organs in Diagram
26 later. A diagonal division enables organ mass up-down, inout to support traction to that momentum front-back, left-right.
Appendages also use a diagonal, across a common template,
shortly. Momentum is provided up-down, in-out, with traction to
it front-back, left-right, as a standard template that pivots mass
smoothly and angles charge at extremities. Charge has flat
traction by rolls across angles, using massive cyclical leverage.
A template levers a pivot up & down, in & out for momentum,
and flattens a spring front-back, left-right for traction, by shared
pistons at upper or cogs at lower. Pivotal cycles of mass
have lateral springs at extremities to flatten at impact for
levered traction. Charged axes for springs provide forward
angles for momentum. Upper templates infiltrate across sides
as pistons with traction to momentum out & back. Lower
undulate across sides as cogs with traction to momentum
round & round. Cogs & pistons accrete as one system that
follows accretion in physics from Diagram 12 exactly, shown in
Diagram 22 shortly.

The Human Design

94

Diagram 18, Design for Slanted Template Upright in an Epicycle

Effect
Mineral Loose
Joint
8

Gas Lift
Length
1

Liquid Flow
7 Length

Solid Light
2 Joint

Time

(Horizon)

Space

6 Length
Mineral Tight

3 Joint
Gas Contained
5
Joint
Liquid Sink

Edges

4
Length
Solid Heavy
Cause

Bases

Diagram 19, Fields Always Relative, but Absolute in a World

Relative View

View in World by Results

In

Relative View
Out

Organ 6

Organ 4
Out

In

The Human Design

95

Diagram 20, Arrowed Pulls of Coils to Lever Open & Closed

(Concave Space, Back-Front)
(Concave Time, Back-Front)
Right Upper Head (Sliced Front Views) Right Upper Body
(Palm over mouth)
Slice
Slice
7 brow
1 thumb Out
Fix
In
3 wrist In
8 palm
1 upper lid
Out
Fix
6 fingers
5 temple

3 orbit 8 duct
In
Slice

2 sinus

7 lower arm

6 lower lid
Fix
Out

5 shoulder

In
2 elbow

Out Fix
4 cheek

4 upper arm
Slice

Upper and Lower Templates

Complete Inversions
(Convex Space, Front-Back)
(Convex Time, Front-Back)
Right Lower Body (Splayed Front Views) Right Lower Head
Splay
4 thigh

2 knee
In
Free

Out

Splay
4 palate

5 hip

Out

6 upper teeth Free

In

7 calf
2 lips
6 toes

Free

In
8 sole
3 ankle
Out
Free
1 big toe
Splay

8 gums 3 hinge
Splay
Out
In
1 lower teeth
7 chin

5 arch

The Human Design

96

Diagram 21, Coils with a Diagonal Compromise Level to Lever

Upper Template, Right Front Slice (Applies to Head or Body)
Front & Back, Left & Right for Lateral Infiltration to Twist
7
Pivotal Momentum Out & Back as Piston
Old Horizon
Effect Rings
1
C
B
Up
Front
5

Lever

Slice In

Down

Back
D
A
Cause Rings
(From the Front, Slice Follows Diagram 15)

6
4

Lower Template, Right Front Splay (Applies to Head or Body)

Front & Back, Left & Right for Lateral Undulation to Ride
4
Pivotal Momentum Out & Back as Cog
Old Horizon
Effect Rings
6
A
D
Front
Up
2

Splay Out

Lever

Back

1
7

Down
B
C
Cause Rings
(From the Front, Splay Follows Diagram 15)

Levering Matches Organ Rings & Links

Stage
Move

A
Out & Down

B
In & Down

C
Out & Up

D
In & Up

Match to Numbered Moves 1 4 in Organ Diagram 14 (& 15)

Upper: Gravity Sequ. 1D, 2C, 3B, 4A; Levity Sequ. 1B, 2A, 3D, 4C
Lower: Gravity Sequ. 1C, 2D, 3A, 4B; Levity Sequ. 1A, 2B, 3C, 4D

The Human Design

97

Gate Slice & Splay from Above, Inversion Each Side to Mirror Between
Right Front Spatial Gates
Right Back Temporal Gates
Center
Center
Splay
Hip
Wrist
Orbit
Slice Splay Arch
Slice
Slice
Slice
Sinus

Gape
Splay

Sole
Splay

Elbow

Diagram 22 Accretion in Anatomy & Physics

(1) Piston & Cog, with Cycling & Traction, Right Front Head or Body
Traction Ahead (Front)
Bright Leaf
Cycle Down
Twist Back
Traction Ahead (Front)
High Grass
Twist Out
Cycle Up

Cycle Down
Ride Out
Dark Branch
Ride Back
Cycle Up

Traction Ahead (Back)

Low Root

Traction Ahead (Back)

(2) Accretion Disc Spring-Shift (Piston Line across Cog Line)
Zoom View
High
Piston Line

Low

One Contour
Cog Line
(Adapted from Wikipedia)

The Human Design

98

Mass provides momentum by levering in Diagram 21. An intact

template is comprised of equal resting joints and energetic
lengths as a spring lever by both tilting & bulging. It levers with
causal appendage rings behind & below their links and
effected in front & above their links, by setting a compromise
leverage level. As noted, organ mass cuts through charged
axes to dangle angles up & down by merger. Organs are not
neat by angled dangling internally, but we have hemispheres
that crosstalk to settle asymmetry. In templates, a vestibular
tends to aid mass pivotally around organs, and a cerebrum
tends to aid charge laterally at extremities. But, in levering flat
with charge at extremities, we have a smooth level pivot for all
templates around organs in Diagrams 20 & 21. Charge angles
its springs less neatly at extremities, dangling. Charge is free
to angle for traction, not anchor to a trunk smoothly pivotally.
Organs have smooth charge mirroring for crosstalk, and mass
dangles angles by pivotal balance at a vestibular. Templates
have springs at extremities that now dangle angles, like
angled mass does in organs, with mass smoothly pivoting.
Appendages loosen, lift, lighten, contain, weight, sink, tighten,
& flow, consistently across each template, using the same
words from comparable organ functions. They make one coil
of sharp sorting edges and massive explosive bases. A coil
has contraction on the inside of coils to compress, and outside
to decompress in Diagrams 20 & 21, for in and out moves
of edges and bases. Muscles pull by nerves and push by
hormones to explode to set conditioned levels to a world. A
line of common contraction on one side uses relaxation on
the other to pull open or pull closed. They sort by edges that
pull equally both ways as a cup, free at extremities to snap
both ways, sorting. It extends to hold & explode by bases
pushing one way around as an Isometric hook to build
pressure with bulk muscles on both sides as if holding others in
check. Cups have confined intensity, rolling across flat, when
sorting, and electrical and magnetic lines cross each other, but
the massive bases have one line to cycle to build pressure.

The Human Design

99

In Diagrams 20 & 21, electrical gas lines contain using massive

liquid & solid extensions on the same line. Magnetic lines
sharing electrical containment sort across the electrical line, to
contain and also sling for extension, with mass as a catch-all
in mutuality by shared rotation. The Design has eight distinct
capacities, but block merger & field accretion across it arise
after a Big Bang, as mutuality across distinct opposites.
Depth & pulse make a spring-shift mutually with base cycles.
At a hand, a cup contracts on the outside of a palm and then
a thumb to open, and inside of a wrist and then fingers to
close. By that alignment the cup can roll across flat to open
and close each appendage in turn because thumb & wrist are
crossed by palm & fingers. We can fully roll a closed cup
around an opening, to lever to or from, rolling across flat to
scoop and then drink by levering away as it tips a stream into
a mouth. Levering rolls across flat, also at feet, eyes, or teeth.
Conversely, bases lever to pivot rather than roll flat, to carry
edges at extremities to find paths of least resistance to hooks
holding tension in one line of pulls in by lower arm & elbow
while it eases out by upper arm & shoulder. It can compress
or make way by decompression with tension both ways in
Isometric holds in check around a head & body, like graviton
loops fully counter-shearing to hold as one between sources.
Cups & hooks serve an intact relation of head & body. Cups sort
laterally, and hooks hold tension pivotally for longer in extended
function using a vestibular, with adjustable give & take to one line
of tension. Edges sort for an intact head & body as an atom by
sorting one way or the other by rolls, while bases hold to keep a
head & body intact with a shared interlocked tension as an atom
within a wider species rotation shared by human atoms.
By appendages, we move objects around us by charge to keep
a head & body intact, as atoms by accretion. We also move
ourselves entirely as atoms by massive fields in accretion, to
be intact around others. Field loops in mutual accretion across
merged blocks create a human atom as a member of a species

The Human Design

100

intact by accretion applied to be intact itself and in a species

dance. Wrists, ankles, eye orbits & jaw hinges all saccade to
contain by switching between moving something around us, or
moving ourselves around something. Blocks merge across sides
to provide a block foundation for sufficient crosstalk & vestibular
balance to direct the lateral and pivotal appendages.
Diagram 22 (1) conforms directly to Diagram 22 (2), as a basis
for entire templates to piston across cog lines that adjust for
lower & higher tension using pistons. An economical electrical
gas line of depth with massive solid inertial height is set lower
at lower body, and higher at upper head. Mineral & liquid at an
upper body piston stably across lower head balance, to adjust
wave tempo, and also gas & solid piston & cog lines higher &
lower. Two cog lines alternate in Diagram 22 (2) equally high &
low by pistons & cogs adjusting tighter & looser tensions.
Upper & lower reconcile by changes of tempo & line, but each
template has its edges opening and closing in turn to one line
one way, and then the opposite way by reversing the line of
pull, to snap either way. Each is also a massive contour by
bases in one line of pivotal Isometric tension. Adjustments are
managed within templates by loosening & tightening tension to
suit changes to higher & lower. I explain basic moves shortly.
Accretion has a twist of charge around the vertical axis, borne
as a 180 turn to face mass, comparing Diagrams 18 & 20,
just as mass bears a 180 turn for charge at a medulla. For
organs, merger by mass to spin around the horizontal axis
creates labels left & right, by direction of spin to right. On
decay from particles with that aligned spin, charged fields twist
across the vertical axis to economically follow a massive
contour by electrical line, while a magnetic line slings across it
to both massive & charged purposes as mutuality between
charge & mass. Then, Diagram 20 & 21 simply leans a horizon
in Diagram 18 for template levels. The diagonal lean is a perfect
compromise for flat charge and upright mass to both be causeeffect across the horizon. The level accretes diagonally, like a

The Human Design

101

diagonal relation of organs seen in brain cortices in Diagram 26.

Accretion uses momentum on pages 103-107, so do not be
concerned about the inverted positions of lower templates, as
their momentum is correct in Diagram 21. In Diagram 21, upper
templates swing on pivots inward as a slicing flat gate. Mass and
charge combine for an overall levered springing template with
specific moves levering as mass and springing as charge within
it. Appendages move in & out, but as entire templates they favor
slice at upper with out moves fixed to slice; and splay at lower
with in moves free to splay. As noted, upper & lower each side
are complete inversions to mirror across.
I note blocks have absolute directions to momentum. Fields
have momentum in directions relative to blocks to keep them
intact. In anatomy, fields use a world just as a void is used in
physics. Momentum cannot be measured, as it exists in
passage, later. We do not know fields separately from their
relation to blocks. Appendages are sent and taken relatively
to organs in Diagram 19, but with intact purpose in the world.
They move in & out of each block, but coordinate in between
in a world that carries their impacts. This applies to physics,
later. Fields are measured relative to particles exchanging
them and not in passage, which is impossible.
I note anatomy is intact by logic as organs & appendages, but
also intact by examples of field loop & block string in an exact
biological replica of physics. Biological & psychological drivers of
our organs & appendages also drive sex. We are subject to sex
organs, with block & field intact in fact, as a photon loop upon a
string surface for males, and graviton loops along string for
females, for mutual shearing as a factual microcosm of physics.
At root, all is gravitons dealing with a photon by merger and then
accretion. Sex organs evidence that level in a hormonal anatomy
of organs & appendages generally, and also specifically by sex
when taken over by Strong & Weak Forces. Strong & Weak
are reconstructive in anatomy as female linguistics & male
logistics. A microcosm exists as intact sex organs, to influence

The Human Design

102

intact organs & appendages hormonally to linguistics or logistics,

consistently across biology & psychology. General anatomy
apart from sex has intact logic keeping atoms intact, while sex
extends beyond intact, wholly reconstructing. DNA encodes
discretely for global features along with local, for continuation by
factual biological replicas discretely at the chemical lynchpin.
Lots of strange species have still got recognizable sex gear.
Extra Levers & Springs to keep Templates Intact
Edges and bases use a gravity lever and a levity spring for each
entire template above & below in shared momentum. Levers &
springs stack or stretch for cause or effect moves of organs.
Upper body has pectoral muscles primarily to hold as a lever
stretching for gravity bases across sides, related to muscular
heart stretch. A levity spring at each shoulder blade angles
edges at extremities for stacked vertebrae. Lower body has a
stacked lever at buttocks to hold bases for a pelvis to stack a
gut. A stretched spring at groins edges heels across sides for a
stretched diaphragm. They are for entire templates, and rely on
bulk or extremity to attract a vestibular into balance.
However, upper head barely moves in itself for vestibular
interest, so it has unique nerves direct to cortices that go further,
to make clear connections for concentration & balance, as
levers and springs. Sites have full cross-over to brain cortices,
except nose and eye, divided at eye to spring a mirror across
right & left divided fields of vision, and strutted at nose to lever.
A template springs and levers across sides for eyes & nose
using opposite cortices, uniquely. A lower head has a mandible
with muscular stretchy bands at the jaws, and it springs at throat
cartilage. A mandible with bands are a weight for undulation of a
lower head to balance or speak, extending down from ear
bones. A throat and its stacked cartilage are more directly
related to a tongue retracting in and out of it, and it springs for a
tongue. Jaws lever while a throat springs epiglottis cartilage to
swallow alternating with breathing, and to speak.

The Human Design

103

Appendages Matching Organs

Matching appendages to Diagram 20, upper body has an arm
inward with palm near mouth, or to cradle an infant, or to arm
wrestle properly, or like The Thinker statue by Rodin. A hand
more easily opens a twisted closed wrist, keeping elbow in. An
elbow more easily opens from body to side to leave a hand
closed in. But arm and hand can work as a metronome to twist
open and closed together, or settle. They slice, bearing stress
at our centerline in a twisting rhythm, but never fully invert.
Hands have rings below level, with links above, like a spine.
Arms have rings above level, with links below, like a heart.
Range to hands may need neural bulk as the spines traveler.
Moves in one side balance with moves out the other side.
A thumb is a diaphragm as an arched spur. Under your gaze,
turn palms to chest slicing in correctly as in Diagram 20, and
make two fists against each other, as a spine with the two final
thumb joints as a diaphragm arch to lift way from the index
finger to open a hand to inhale, but with diaphragm above
rather than below spine, upside down. That relation is upside
down at a hand but normal at a foot, in Diagram 20. Now sit
to rotate feet in against splay out, incorrectly with soles against
each other and fists by toes, spraining ankles. Hands and
feet match. When splayed, big toe & toes have diaphragm
below spine, correctly. Consider wrist and palm (or ankle and
sole) and how the wrist swivels the palm around to sort, just as
an eye swivels to direct a tongue to what we see. Wrists and
ankles saccade to move in relation to objects or vice versa.
Sequencing back from stage D in Diagram 21, a hand at hip is
below level for closed wrist & finger grip below a stick in & up
first, for a spine to swing an arm with a bent elbow in & up and
a hand is twisted down by a stick front of back. Then a hand
goes above level and opens at stage C, levering up to send a
hand around a neck out & up to back of back using a swing of
the arm from middle to side and pulled back with palm at back

The Human Design

104

of head at a sensory brain, to brace at back of back upward to

throw a stick. The hand and eye are both sighting a target as
they swing from D to C. Then at B, a hand closes in again by
fingers & wrist with palm at front of front over brow and arm
swings down at front to throw at front of front. Then below
level, a hand and arm go out & down to back of front at A as a
follow through. Up and down moves are reversals in a twisting
metronome. To favour arms & heart, we start at B. This is an
alignment to lift & pick in Diagram 22, or throw a paper plane.
A boomerang is a rigid branch in the shape of a leaf, so in the
old olden days, you denude low branches for boomerangs and
make gardens, animals gather in the shade, and you know the
rest. This piston cycle has flows tracking each other to move
out & back by the same line in cooperation, whereas legs &
feet move round & round by alternating apart to cooperate.
At lower body, feet chew into a path and legs gulp it back. Levity
rings close around openings to contain them to front ahead, and
again to front from behind after two link moves, using heels to
undulate. Gravity pivots open around closures to extend them to
back from front, and then from front to back after two link
moves, using a pelvis to undulate. Moves behind are first as a
ring to stack by a buttock lever for a stomach, and ahead is
down for excretion. Legs hover above to link for rings below. A
foot ahead to drop down splays a groin for inhale by diaphragm
stretch, and back is up for exhale. Feet hover below by pressure
to bounce up as a link, for lungs to stretch inhale to exhale.
Ankle and hip in Diagram 20 drop into slots between torso and
thigh, or saccade by an achilles tendon upon ankle closure.
Sequencing forward from stage A to favor levity, a move above
level goes out & down for a big toe and sole open by a closed
instep to drop a heel ideally at level, using thigh and hip out &
down extended upside down from the last step. Then at B
below level, an instep opens for a foot to lever down as an ankle
and toes close, to grip land and lower a knee and calf in & down
at the same time as we move land behind and drive down

The Human Design

105

below level to bounce, even if land does not give way. Then still
below level at C, a foot angles to open the instep for a big toe
open out & up using hip and thigh extended again to support
and lever us forward. Then at D, above level ankle and toes
close and instep opens again in & up to for a next step, using
knee and calf closure upright in & up behind to swing ahead.
Feet open and close ahead and behind to complete a sequence
of inhale to exhale. Leg pivots have an alternative sequence of
eat to excrete, starting at C to eat at a stomach.
At lower head, sequencing forward from stage A to favor levity
(C starts gravity), a mouth is above level, but lowers its lower
teeth & gums to open out & down to be level, gaping with a
palate & arches hovering open as a sound dish. Then at B,
upper teeth & hinge close by biting to make a mouth lever down
below level in & down, with a chin & lips hovering with them, in
& down, to bite and cradle solids, to pack by a tongue. Then at
C, palate & arches open out & up from packing solids by tongue
edges & gutter, with lower teeth and gums hovering open out &
up by a swallow moving to level. Then, moving from level to
above it again at D, chin and lips close in & up to use edges &
gutter, with upper teeth & hinge hovering in & up to open up.
Gas waves are collected below like solids and projected above
like liquids in speech. These moves harmonize for collection of
waves at N Cords, begun by a ring opening above level for a
tongue to drop out & down to speak, continuing to a stage of
listening in & down for an opportunity, to readiness to speak out
& up, to projecting outwards in & up. A mineral tongue may
have solidity below and liquidity above for gas shaping as it
nods with pauses between speaking and listening using the
ears vestibular for balanced nodding. That nodding can be very
subtle across a level of harmony shared with ears, like surf on
an undulating sea level gathering tones to utter. It would go
round & round like surf over undertow rolling back as surf.
Balance is maintained by a vestibular, while a tongue also
reflexes at a cerebellum for pulses over waves rolling forward.

The Human Design

106

At an upper head, a nose levers bases to open around pinched

closure to extend mucus stacks. This arc may enable levity
edges to contain around openings for light. Like an upper body,
there is a slice across center by one side balancing the other
automatically out and in on each side. Levity and gravity may
make alternative spatial arcs for survey, which can open and
close together, despite sequencing differently. Nose and eyes
may track a concave infinity sign or mask. Sequencing back
from stage B, for bases, a vomeronasal sniffs above level
upside down, in & down, with inhale using sinus and eyebrow.
Then at A, it levers below to snort out & down by open temple
and cheek to stack and seek new odor. Then still below level at
stage D, a nose with a pinched sinus and eye brow moves in &
up, sniffing to an olfactory. Then at C, the nose lever moves
above level to snort again to stack by open temple and cheek,
out & up above level. Bases of an upper head make one huge
sinus around a nose, but my diagrams use one sinus location.
To alternate with a nose, eyes may stretch for peripheral light,
levering edges by pinched closure of orbit and lower lid around
openings at upper lid and duct. Sequencing back from stage D,
a nose is above level, and an eye fixed in space at level
saccades down as a ring when a nose sniffs up, using a
pinched orbit and lower lid to control light from below level.
Then at C, moving a nose below level, an eye saccades up to
stay at level with open upper lid and duct out & up to control
light from above. Then at B with a nose still below level, an orbit
and lower lid pinch closes in & down for saccades up into an
eye for light from above. Then at A, returning above level, an
upper lid and duct open again out & down for more light for
saccades up from darkness below. Edges may frame images.
I note we favor impression surveyed in a world by upper organs
and expression levelled at a world by lower organs. We have an
impression of a future coming in braced by our past, and we
express by going out to a future braced by our past. Upper
organs have the impression that this is our, me as cause, and

The Human Design

107

as effected by you, time and place; and lower organs give

expression to it. Impression and expression might also overlay
as racial genetics from migration, on page 206.
Site Impetus Favored across Levels
Awareness represents levity or gravity impetus, even though
time locked as an input in the past with an output in the future.
They each serve past-to-future site moves. Moves are known
from continually refreshed neural frames that capture site
moments. The sensory reads motor frames and their collections
in the world, which are frames that represent anatomy. Sites
function in forward momentum and are represented as such by
past-to-future in every present moment of rapid, sequential,
action-reaction processing. Rapid neural action-reaction frames
represent impetus across site moments. Our cause-to-effect
biology frames its own forward momentum by motor moves,
and this is represented in the experience using inputs to read
what is framed by outputs for collections in the world. Actionreaction is not cause-effect, by definition. Given that cause is
past and effect is future, action-reaction is primarily an instant
within a full biological state of impetus around a contained cycle
for action-reaction. It is a full state that will cycle motor back to
be felt continually for present moments by which the unit can
know it exists. A present moment favors neither past nor future.
Neurons are contained within cause-to-effect biology to cycle
continually as self-stimulation to collect stimulation from a world
to keep impetus. Action as past inputs and reaction as future
outputs are in a contained cycle within a full state of impetus
shared between charge & mass at all times. A Big Bang also
lurches a relation between a full state of charge & mass across
a moment of action-reaction. The issue is merely containment
of an action-reaction neural cycle entirely within intact past
cause-to-future effect biological anatomies. We prioritize a
world to continue biological impetus to maintain a neural cycle
by self-stimulation for present moments in all awareness.

The Human Design

108

10. Facility of Neurons

In this chapter, I discuss awareness by organs & appendages

using neurons as a facility. I will self-evidently show neurons
are an automatic facility for manual organs & appendages to
be aware of their functional interfaces with the world, by an
intact representation finalized in a brain by rapid neurons. The
means of enablement is by impulses for functions, to move
them to feel as levity ion current through gravity layered sites
with hormonal sediment in neurons appropriate for sites.
Layered sediment in neurons has reservoirs at round bulbs at
ends of lines of ionic current. Neurons themselves have ionic
current and hormonal insulation, with mutual Electrostatic roles
in my model, for the experience to arise by a relation between
them, perhaps related to friction or shearing. Nerve current
draws network lines of least resistance to pressure. Hormone
insulators collect in bulb reserves, made endogenously to
insulate allowances of current between neurons, to build &
release pressure along networks. Neurotransmitters are
neural hormones, used to represent hormonal sites.
Diagram 23 is m y contained model. Feelings are by a cycle
of neural activity from hormonal & nervous interface captured
by receptors, to integrate for an experience of integrated
feelings representing site interfaces with a world. It includes
self-stimulation from moves when collecting from the world,
including self-stimulation for thoughts. Neurons change, but
contain capture. The cycle is intact, with cross-over, brain to
body, right to left sides. In chapter 8, straight vectors have
cross-talk by hemispheres to close the loop left and right, with a
stable brace by crossover below it, for talk with a medulla, but
retaining some tide direct to cortices using a vestibular. We
have one full heartbeat of two flows, and one neural finalization
across two brain hemispheres around a vestibular.

The Human Design

109

Diagram 23, One-Way Accretion Cycle for Experiences

World
Stimulating

Functioning

Retain

Release
Manual
- Automatism -

Delineation

Delineation

Input

Output
Awareness
- Automatic -

Sensory

Motor
Identifying

Anticipating
Brain

Awareness represent sites by neurons as sites facility.

Functions include neurons within them, and biological
functions have psychology in my model, with neurons as their
facility for it. Each site has its own distance from a brain and
processing time to finalize experiences. They enter & exit the
flow by receptors & effectors variably to contribute. Hearing is
the fastest, perhaps related to linguistics and nurturing. Sites
interrupt each other, and timing is set variably below an overall
full state of neural activity that is ready to adjust for
awareness across the variation in processing times of sites.
I will explain how neurons may comprise levity as nerve and
gravity as hormone in equal proportions but to opposite
systems and scales of function. Nerve & hormone together
retain a line-network structure of a nerve, to contain hormones
in bulb-reserves at their ends, adapted to hold transmitters of
hormonal sediment to cross a gap between a synapse of one
neuron & dendrite of another to continue the current, or not.

The Human Design

110

Diagram 24, Gravity & Levity Differ in Scale, but Accrete Together

Synapse

Bulbous

Nerve Point to Join

Nerve Flow
for Hormone Hooks

Hormone Transmitters
Hormone Flow
Hormone Hook-joins
Receptors
Hormone Ends to Join
Dendrite
Nerve Cup-join

The two flows accrete together in one direction, but to their

different preferences in flow. Brain cortices, partitioned to favor
either aspect of the same neurons, might sort their alternative
contribution to the experience of awareness. In physics,
Diagrams 11 (1) & (2), photon & graviton structures compare
by cup-joins for photons, and hook-joins for gravitons.
Neurons are an intact system finalizing in a brain, as evidence
of intactness. We do not have an independent brain thinking
about anatomy. A brain takes inputs by receptors of sites, and
times a finalization of their preconscious processing. Manual
functions at manual rates are automatically facilitated by a
rapid neural cycle, building and subsiding as it facilitates to
patterns. Our subconscious, which is a misnomer, is subtle
awareness of which we less aware than obvious we prioritize
as a peak to subtle, above preconscious processing. Sites
create awareness in each moment, fresh, but using patterns.
There is nothing to fear except poor conditioning of patterns.
.

The Human Design

111

Diagram 25, Neurons, Tend to Nerve Network & Hormone Preserve

Motor Sensory
Front

Back
Cerebrum

Corpus Callosum
Thalamus
Hypothalamus
Network

Hippocampus
Amygdala

Pituitary

Preserve

Cerebellum
Medulla
Neurons

In my model, awareness is input flow of specific hormones with

intense generality when released, and nerves with specific
channels in general networking. Terms like specific and general
can be used for either, so I use network and preserve for their
influences partitioned across a brain. Feelings are from friction
between hormone insulation and nerve current in an
Electrostatic brain in my model, but feelings are confined by
networks and enhanced by hormones. Nerve lateral networks
and hormone pivotal reserves partition across brain regions.
Preservation and networking combine in neurons themselves,
across limbic preservation that is both pivotal & lateral, and a
pivotal cerebellum & lateral cerebrum spreading a network.
Networking is for goals by nerve current bouncing to & from
stalls of hormonal levels in the world to condition them.

The Human Design

112

At a limbic reserve of preserved hormones, pivotal hippocampus

& amygdala at back tend to hormonal sensory memory of levels,
and lower pivotal hypothalamus & pituitary at front tend to motor
release for hormone levels. I note an amygdala can quickly
respond to danger, challenging nerves to preempt regularity, but
conditioning enables it. A limbic has a lateral thalamus & corpus
callosum to send flow into cerebral areas. Inputs tend back, and
outputs tend front in a brain, from a spine at page 78. Flow for
pivotal & lateral preservation of site levels is networked to lateral
cerebrum & pivotal cerebellum, for motor flow to sites supported
by hormonal reserves at a hypothalamus & pituitary. A cerebrum
is lateral along & across for voluntary moves, and a cerebellum
is pivotal for enhanced or inhibited hormone levels for goals.
Hormonal limbic pivotal & lateral cortices connect to network
pivotal & lateral cortices, to overlap their partitioning. Later, I
explain a relation of pivotal facts and lateral logic, using
hormonal & nerve partitioning together for those experiences.
However, as hormone & nerve separately in a brain, hormone
tends to stalls by sediment building. Nerves tend to invasive
current preempting, and it is to the extent of providing thingness for hormonal things. Neurons may tend to hormonal
components with commons confined by current networking the
components, by falling like dominoes any which way. But,
current would be timed in its flow to finalize across a brain,
synchronously connecting diverse regions. Hormonal sites are
layered in neuron as extensions, and layering may be timed
by current for a well-split, but intact, experience to finalize.
I imagine a table by preserved components of line, shade,
brown, and so on, with networked commons of line-ness,
shade-ness, brown-ness, shared in line-ness with legs, and
shade- ness with brow. Awareness is preserved components
split by networking shared with other preserved components,
for moves by outputs supported by hormones from a reserve.
Find preserved components in words for analogies to site
functions by commons. It needs insight into words and

The Human Design

113

anatomy, but words may have that basis for that purpose as
familiar rote cues. Neurons preserve by hormone and network
by nerve, with components networked for rapid exchange of
words in speech by cerebrum & cerebellum to commons.
As noted on pages 82-85 on levels & goals, interface of moves
and world are automatically regulated. Neuroscience is well set
in its view of a literal back-check of our own moves, to avoid
being in a reflexive loop to our own moves when levelling to a
world. In my model, there is no back-check from motor to
sensory, for each sequential levelling move, to continually
attenuate. All species are chemically level, with automatic
adjustment to maintain levels in a flow that is one-way in each
neuron, although it falls like dominoes within overall pivotal &
lateral flow. I value forward momentum, but allow cycling stalls,
as a hormonal stall to edge experiences to and from it by
current. Back-checks are hypothesized in all papers, dealing
with species including birds, insects, fish, and primates.
Although we need to manually differentiate our moves and a
world in one impact at interface, our moves are our own. They
are sent delimited for levelling. Attenuation for automatic levels
means we have goals in a world that are un-attenuated, but we
condition by nerves for comfort, like our own automatic levels
for comfort. In my model, mass stalls, and charge bounces. By
partitioning of influences, hormonal stalls preserve extant
states for attenuated levels felt by inputs, while bounces to &
from stalls preempt to condition levels to goals in a world. A
medulla allows stable talk across hemispheres and a vestibular
is a more tidal pivot, and there might be some tidal aspect to
stalls in processing, while bounces condition around.
I note awareness is a continual present moment that does not
favor past or future. It represents past-to-future sites in chapter
8 equably. Sensory input is action preceding motor output as
reaction, even though cause is past and effect is future, and
even though cause is action by levity and cause is reaction by

The Human Design

114

gravity. It applies at a Big Bang on edge as action before

reaction, by an original massive potential. It is a full state
ready to slip release by a Point-Instant action-reaction, which
is the very definition of action-reaction. An original intact
reservoir stays intact, but as a puffball. Anatomy is also a full
original biological state from which psychology evolves.
We replenish continually, to keep a full state of mass & charge
to process around a cycle for an ongoing present moment, at
Point-Instant action-reaction events in a brain. Given that cause
is past and effect is future, action-reaction is an instant in an
offset of forces. We have a full biological state of cause-toeffect as anatomy around a contained cycle for action-reaction,
to cycle motor back to be felt, with impetus to do so. A slip by
charge & mass around action-to-reaction is a by a sufficiently
full state that improves by better replenishment and activity. An
intact human with a full cycle self-stimulates present moments
to continually seal action-reaction to favor neither cause nor
effect. It is a present moment of awareness by which an entity
knows it exists. Favoring inputs from a world is nevertheless by
an intact unit that constructs its own present moments for that
favoritism. For now, I only say humans are equally sensory &
motor for the purposes of a closed cycle to create present
moments that extend beyond the unit to favor inputs from a
world, for impetus, to keep the fullest state we can.
We experience site forward momentum as cause-to-effect by
inputs-to-outputs-to-inputs-to-outputs and so on, by rapid firing
frames to sustain a present moment. We use future induction
from past deduction by left & right brain cortical crosstalk. It is
time used to improve our sites past or future, as we experience
them equally in present moments. We continually induce from
having deduced, use time equably, applying it freely to improve
our own past or future. Our intact frame of cause-to-effect may
tend to a truer knowledge of its own past to correct for future
plans, or a truer knowledge of its own future using a correct
past, using time in reasoning to either preference by crosstalk.

The Human Design

115

Accretion for the Experience

As noted, we may have an accretion process in a rotational
flow between sites and brain as the very basis for psychology
within biology, from chapter 8. There may be a twist between
action & reaction, like rings & links, or maybe state & anti-state.
At annihilation, there might be momentary continual activity as
the experience itself, derived from preconscious processing but
being something more than the last straw on a stack, as a
regular activity at a purposeful transition of action-reaction.
Within that architecture, there may be direct electrical & right
angled magnetic flows to sort a relation of mass & charge
across pivotal & lateral limbic, and pivotal & lateral network
cortices, and between them. By nerve & hormone, it is I
tracking as nerve to a future, from a past preserve, repeatedly.
My model allows crosstalk between hemispheres to resolve
thoughts about feelings, but thought would not be talking and
hearing or showing and viewing across hemispheres, as such.
An experience would be intact across diverse cortices firing
synchronously by network current, with influences by both
sides resolved in a more integrated frame than strict division,
despite having specific language hubs on the left side and
asymmetry in a brain due to organ asymmetry in any event.
The other side can often substitute or adapt for deficits, and
language hubs can be on the right side for some. It is not a
direct chat between sides, and there are people who are born
with only one hemisphere & a brain stem living quite normally.
We have recognizable events by finalization of diversities using
delay, which gain recognition using that continual recognizable
edge. Feelings accompany thoughts, and the edge and its
gaining of recognition will be enhanced by feelings, but the
issue is to relate those feelings & thoughts to ones experience
of confidently knowing oneself and working through ones
options. This is by the edge merely tracking its own hormonal
base in past patterns to recreate the facts & logic we always
experience, for confident self-knowledge. There is no more to

The Human Design

116

it, but we need to value a relation of current & hormone across

self-stimulated hormonal stalls. The edge lays lines of least
resistance for goals in the world, conditioning hormonal levels.
The experience is I, and it has access to other experiences of
I, from immediate or long past, to know who I am. I
identify by delay, by recognizable experiences in any moment
that are recognized across moments, using access to past
experiences. We stall hormonal preserves for recognition by
self-stimulated contemplation around stalls. We bounce lines
to goals in a world from stalls, for recognizable experiences to
be recognized using hormonal preserves. I tracks to goals with
new levels that are built hormonally around their new tracks for
further impetus from them by new levels. The preserve, as
biology, exists first and then a network tracks from it, to goals
supported by hormones building around tracks. The preserve is
there to inform I as it tracks its own past and the potential it
has for present purposes. Mass & charge operate together in
mutuality by the edge being stalled and the stall being edged.
An edge pulls a base with it as it tracks. A base pushes tracks
along their lines of least resistance for more tracking. Feelings
provide contiguity to experience events of self in world, and
thoughts provide consistency in experiences about any events.
The combination of contiguity & consistency in tracking using
past patterns is sufficient for confident self-knowledge without
more obscure systems or hemispherical interface.
The process is by a recognizable edge continually reinforced by
recognition across its living base, but always open to stimulation
from a world. We have automatism, and are open to the world
during delay to finalize processing. An edge continually tracks
economical lines around a base to pull current to recognizable
but as yet unrecognized news by commons. The base pushes
components to enhance that tracking. The base is open to stall,
for I to know itself in a journey by flow, in a bespoke match
by process for a narrative, rather than using computer models
imposing process. The experience is by pushes of components

The Human Design

117

locking and unlocking enhancing network gates, and pulls of

network lines of economy to keep a recognizable edge directed
to present relevance, while getting stalled and redirected by
gates. The edge knows itself from tracking its base, by drawing
on past edges sufficiently preserved and useful to an edge now.
We recognize a ball, first, because it is recognizable, and then
because we draw from a flow around a base to substantiate it
as recognized. Recognition is just continual reinforcement of the
recognizable edge, and it is dependent on that continual edge to
call it recognition at some point, not a thing. Something could
be anything in potential, but I accepts that it is the thing we
recognize by biological necessity for present purposes. The
process is effective, but an edge cannot guarantee it will stall in
a base, or to what extent, while always open to the world to
interrupt automatism. Recognition is presently available memory
accessed by an edge perfecting its capacity for recognizable
experiences, by applying them to practical circumstances as
recognition. The ideal always accepts practical reality at some
point, and just moves on to suit its logistical requirements.
Referral of Awareness by Brain to Sites
An issue for researchers is they rely on people reporting what
their experience is of stimulation, and where and when they
experience it. Researchers must interpret reports of locked-in
subjective experiences from subjects reports. Awareness is a
subjective experience, even though we attempt to explain it in
objective scientific terms. From a well-tested delay to
awareness by external or self-stimulation, it is assumed that
awareness is an event across cortices of the brain after
processing of inputs. However, I experience touch at my hand
and sight at my eyes, and not in my brain. I also think that I
feel at sites in thoughts. The event in the brain is experienced
as if at sites in feelings, and as if at sites in thoughts, by
thoughts own consistent assumption about feelings. The
experience is referred with preservation of events at sites.

The Human Design

118

The brain is a silent facilitator because the experience it

facilitates represents sites and not itself. We are automatons
until awareness is finalized, but the delay is brief; it meets
regular expectations; and reflexes ameliorate delay as a
primary function of a nervous system. I will be brief about
alternatives, but I keep an open mind. I cannot see input
feedback to sites to finalize after processing, as networked
current back to sites that provided the raw current, as finalized
extensions rapidly collapsing back along the channels in
which they came. Outputs are equally unlikely to feed to sites
to finalize there, as outputs might not carry properties of
finalized awareness to send back to sites. Effectors may be
suited to moving sites rather than to providing the experience.
Languages as Syntax & Semantics
Communication is aided by words with some secure syntax for
ideas. Languages are thoughts about functional interfaces with
a world, securing some conditional experiences of interfaces,
as a personal construct using two hubs in the secure deductive
left hemisphere, Broca & Wernicke. But meanings encompass
more than the rigidity of Broca & Wernicke, which are used
flexibly for words. I can simply say that meaning applies to
the experience of awareness itself. Thoughts & feelings have
meaning as representations of interfaces, whatever their levels
of reality or abstraction. If we experience, it has a meaning,
and thoughts are merely integrated & modulated feelings, and
we retain feelings across that integration. We deconstruct the
experience for its value, but meaning in thoughts & feelings is
from integration of components across commons, and open to
conditioning grounded by action interfacing a world. A related
word, conditional, is for words by thoughts & feelings that are
conditioned for action a world. Words are thoughts & feelings,
but sites acknowledge the conditional state of their words, by
inventing them to stand for interfaces, for conditioned actions.
Conditioned thoughts & feelings invent conditional words, by
choice, as conditional names for interfaces.

The Human Design

119

A word is a rote name or symbol we choose to represent an

interface, which simply amounts to saying thoughts & feelings
name thoughts & feelings. An experience of interfaces at all
times names itself by words, and is conditional with itself in its
choice of words. We invent names for experiences and take
responsibility for them. Words are a conditional state
acknowledged by us when we take responsibility for our use of
rigid hubs to cycle words for conditioned interfaces. Helen
Keller had sensory deprivation preventing naming, and
delayed learning from others about naming. When learned, it
was a revelation for Keller. Words appear to directly represent
interfaces, but they directly represent thoughts & feelings by
representing their conditional interfaces. Feelings accompany
thoughts, and both are conditioned for actions interfacing a
world if we choose to rely on words beyond choosing words to
rely upon. Hormone & nerve must reconcile for transitions of
conditional to conditioned, to conditional and so on.
Being our awareness of a two-sided interface with a world,
languages must encompass purported logic & facts of the
world. Words are conditional on hubs securing a structure for
sites to build around them. All is networking, but intact hubs
are used conditionally by functions driven by hub assurance in
use of words. Noam Chomsky is rigid, but wrong in not valuing
sites as sources. I give rigid hubs a rote secure role within
networks around them for conditional assurance, but entirely
for functional purposes around it. They are used by sites to
provide enough assurance. George Lakoff values flexible
over rigid, but they are equal so far as words are concerned,
although thoughts & feelings are more valuable than their use
of words, by definition. Hubs may be for rigid etching of visual
& verbal rote cues, in particular, for regular rearrangement.
Sites use logistical balance to make, use, and arrange words,
to usefully model interfaces with a world. If useful, it should
mean hubs stand a test of conditioning for conventional
actions. Words, as thoughts, correlate to functional interfaces
with a world in each moment of experience. We can lose

The Human Design

120

language starkly when a hub is damaged, but Broca damage

can leave speech intact. We do not lose thoughts & feelings,
generally. Thoughts & feelings sequentially level themselves
by self-stimulation to goals, including attenuated levels, selfstimulated for words. Hubs may network for word attenuation
levels, or they constitute them, as intact hubs for that selfstimulated purpose.
Visually, written words are lines identified for features of curve,
length, direction, and so on, that are literally assembled into
letters in words. Verbal cues can be likewise deconstructed.
Actual follow through from words as if words were real things
in a world needs conditioning to overcome their conditionality.
That is easy if words have a good match to nature in their
flexibility & rigidity, to progress within it. We react to a world by
framing it using words belonging to functional sites to guide
them. Choice of words is by functions interfacing a world in
moments of thought and sites bow to matching to purported
logic & facts of nature in sites use of words, for those most
useful for living in it. The Design also prescribes the logic &
facts of nature, to close that loop with a tidy ribbon on top.
Words are correlated to functions by networking, apparent in
analogies shared across sites, based on rigidity & flexibility.
Thought is analogy by commons across components apparent
as thingness across things. The word table means line,
level, shade, color, texture, timing, flatness, and many
component things preserved to match across many
functional sites by legs, a stomach, a palm, and other site
things interfacing a world by shared thingness. Deconstruct
each word for functional components that match functional site
interfaces, then value sites contributing to them. Analogy by
commons applies to flexibly unify words. Analogy needs
functions to be broad enough to overlap each other, and this is
provided in the Design, equally differentiating and overlapping
all parts. Our anatomy is made for analogy, and sites have
well defined struts to their functions represented by words.

The Human Design

121

Work in Linguistics refers to Cogs, which are struts, but poorly

defined. They are fundamental components, extending to all
hormonal feelings of functions for thought by commons about
them. Feelings are components, and thoughts are commons
shaping them. You can read work from 2012 by George
Lakoff, Explaining Embodied Cognition Results, free on the
net. The paper says networks follow low-energy pathways,
which corresponds to the low-energy pull of charge, by
definition in the Design. Be wary about categories for Cogs
you might read. Struts are shared by sites by integrated
networking by commons. All experiences by combined thought
& feeling, like logic, fact, abstract & real, are components
by commons, and analogies. They are components integrated
by commons. Networking contributes timed completions to
feelings, to shape feelings. We can strip to component feelings
to unify flexibly by analogy, for the combination of thoughts &
feelings. Networked thoughts & hormonal feelings combine by
a pivotal hormonal vestibular & networked cerebellum for the
experience of fact itself, and a lateral hormonal thalamus &
networked cerebrum for the experience of logic itself, later on
pages 145-146. Thought & feeling combine for each of them.
The process of biology combines stable medulla logistics with
balanced vestibular linguistics. Logic and fact are primary
experiences by feelings & thoughts combined for each, and
their components & commons are processed using continual
balanced logistics. Life evolved to human-types from wordless
life. We use balanced logistics across our human Design to
explore logic & fact in experiences. The product, I, explores
entity in world as objects in an experience, by using it. The
product cannot explore the root creation of an experience by
preceding process, as that is impossible, but analogy is still
evident, and a means of useful deconstruction. An experience
is a product of a process, but it can deconstruct itself in recent
or long retrospect by exploring site analogies apparent in the
experience. Analogies, as conditioned thoughts & feelings, can
be deconstructed by words strutting for them.

The Human Design

122

Conditioned functions and the conditional words they use can

be deconstructed. In my model, the biological process is
primary, and the experiences we have by thoughts & feelings
are secondary, although meaningful in themselves to some
extent, whatever they may be. Balanced logistics, as biology,
can apply itself to explain its product by whatever means it can
find as a logistical enterprise across anatomy in a world, but
without an assumed logical basis to it. Assuming logical
thoughts or feelings is hubris. We have logical potential by the
comprehensive logical layout of the Design, but subject to a
logistical tracking process using hormonal stalls. The process
is never persuaded by the product. It is about process, not
hubristic logic, which I crush on pages 140-142. Feelings
condition by conditionals to improve in my model, but in the
next chapter, hormones can overly rely on words to condition
action to commands. Words are also both given to us and
used inventively by each of us, requiring shared responsibility.
Fidelity in a Cycle Shaped by a World
In a necessarily rapid continual cycle to represent manual
functions in the world by awareness, the cycle automatically
r a p i d l y processes inputs with fidelity to site interfaces. The
capacities added by the brain would be extensions of sites,
evolving to facilitate them with a diagonal line between cause &
effect to match their relation as organs, and as appendages.
Diagram 26 is a standard labelling of brain regions, with a
brace created by a diagonal wrap for eye & ear processing
back & below, and exposed region front & above for tongue &
nose. Gas depth is back, liquid width at sides, tongue central,
and nose height low. Conformity of brain cortices to the Design
is exact by relevant organ axes for links to a brain to process.
Those locations are allowed by a spine at page 78, by links
flowering from middle to extend back of back sensory to front
of front motor. Within that allowance, spinal ring logistics is up
the middle, and sensory-motor as action-reaction can have
Point-Instant events flowering around the apex as a strict line.

The Human Design

123

Diagram 26, Cause-Effect Diagonal, Action-Reaction Vertical

(Spinal Apex)
Front

Back
Motor Sensory
Leg Leg
Trunk Trunk
Arm Arm
Associations Hand Hand
Face Face
Tongue Tongue
Vision
Taste
Effect Exposed
Hearing
Causal Brace
Smell

Medulla
Neurons

I note experience of space, time, cause, and effect, is intact,

and it has a broader frame in Diagram 8 incorporating levity,
gravity, rest, and energy, as me, you, where, when, stop, go,
to, and from. This is a complete frame within which we create
site analogies across shared functions. Linguistics evidences
by use of metaphor, as evident behavioural expressions of
private experiences of analogy. Go to the personal analogies,
but see our shared metaphors. Do not fall into the obfuscation
of over-valuing any aspect of the frame. We do not spatialize
time any more than we temporalize space in awareness, even
though they work together in lock-step. They converge and
diverge, and they are direct analogies of each other. As noted,
the Design overlaps every distinct part in their functions and as
it appears on the page. We are made for analogies.

The Human Design

124

Return to the fact that awareness is a neural representation.

Vision at an eye is a neural representation of spatial slices
after delay for processing. An ear is represented by temporal
sequences. Neither representation is the space or time it
represents, as they are representations by neurons firing, but
we purport that sites provide the experiences using neurons as
their facility. Space and time as we experience them, are
accurate constructs of reality, generally speaking, for humans.
I cannot see time, but it is not merely an analogy of space,
either in an experience or by the event of neurons firing. Time
accompanies space as cause effect, back-front or down-up,
and as cause-effect left-right brain with crosstalk
Languages universally apply our compass, with specialization
included. Aymara people of the Andes coincide with use of a
causal eye looking ahead to a past. Mandarins coincide with
use of an effected nose linking down for a future. English is
written left to right, and Hebrew is right to left, which may
condition consistent past-future gestures. But conventions are
subject to the fixed compass. Reading is passive, and seeing
words or external objects passing truly may not lock us into
imposing our frame of past-future to their moves, which go
either way, even when we track a real logical direction laid by
words. It is a convenience to lay words one way or the other.
By brain crosstalk, seeing words or objects passing truly for
them may not impose our frame of past-future in reading their
directions. They go either way, even when we track a set
direction laid by words. Upper head resolves by unique nerves
direct to cortices, where Aymara & Mandarins have
specializations. We read equably while tending to induction or
deduction overall by crosstalk, but a body has commitment. In
body moves, we are left ahead, driven by right behind, in
sports & stances universally, rarely southpaw. Specialization
or convention will apply by convenience. There is a lot of
shallow speculation by psychologists, building hubris by bits &
pieces of fact, not intact logistical strategies to find them.

The Human Design

125

The cycle has fidelity to a purpose. Life has reactive motor

moves, but sensory may be favored, consistent with impetus
of change being inward to a unit from a world for evolution,
and growth by one fertilized egg. Inward impetus includes
detecting moves when in impact with a world, for inward
sensory flow of combined stimuli. Other species may be more
tied to identifying their last move rather than anticipating their
next move, and more tied to a niche. All species would favor
new stimulus from a world, for continuation, despite the
possibility of favoring past or future moves when collecting. As
noted, interface of oneself and a world is not a fixed line.
Other species might have feelings of niche impact, of their own
past moves interfacing a world to collect new stimulus like a
hand in glove. Humans might control future moves aimed at
goals. We would favor development, but fall into niches. Other
species might favor return to niches, but try to develop. A
reservation is the difference might be simply due to our
capacities under the Design for comprehensive awareness.
Perhaps other animals control what they do, but limited
structures have less comprehension, and the process may
tend to quick repetitions in a limited niche. In any event, all
species would favor the worlds interfaces in their feelings.
I discuss other species in the next chapter, based on a handin-glove cerebellum versus motor for goals at a cerebrum. I
have mentioned attenuating not only our own self-stimulus but
also stimulus from a world, even though it would normally be
un-attenuated. Other species attenuate using species levels,
but I wonder how closely they experience the hand-in-glove,
perhaps by conditioned attenuation or simple suitability to a
niche. The difference between attenuating and not attenuating
might be overcome by a niche if life favors attenuation overall
for natural levels of comfort, rather than jerking to a world. I
suspect it does. Our goals are isolated human worlds within
natural ones, with mostly robotic behavior. Human freedom
from niches does not mean freedom to eradicate niches.

The Human Design

126

From Identification to Anticipation

The motor frames sites, and sensory reads the frames and is
specialized for the frames collections in the world. We may not
need abstruse networking for the cycle. When we think about
future moves, as identification-to-anticipation using past
patterns, we are entitled to have confidence. We cannot know
moves in advance, but a smooth build in motor cortices as
thoughts build to move provides every reason to be confident. A
sensory neuron has a narrow receiving end and multiple giving
ends, a motor neuron has an opposite structure to intensify.
Diagram 27 has a faint line of Old Motor, from a delimited
output sent for return by input. It builds by pivotal & lateral flow
around cortices that only extend one way as neurons, but very
extensively. They are like reset dominoes, falling in many
directions synchronously. The flow is to sensory & motor
apexes within an extensive pivotal & lateral structure. Flow for
New Motor may closely follow New Sensory, paring memory of
available moves while identifying. Activity builds readiness in
motor cortices to experience something less than a real move,
as thoughts about moves in sensory-motor cortices without a
sufficient build up in motor cortices to move.
Shortly, I will explain plasticity, relevant to activity in Diagram
28 building until an input is felt and output is sent. Scans of a
wrist motor cortex before a move by B. Libet & others in 1983
had low activity for thought and high for a move, as in Diagram
28. They found a subtle build imperceptible to a subject before
a random thought to move, and then a move. In my model,
motor cortices are instigated by other cortices for subtly
supportive and obvious moves, for a thought then move. In a
BBC documentary in 2000, Brain Story, activity before thought
inspires wrong ideas, and the show claims we are prey to our
subconscious, and merely invent using fiction after the event
to justify an unknown subconscious. The opposite is correct.
Activity follows sensory inputs to the threshold of outputs.

The Human Design

127

Diagram 27, Development & Timing in Cerebral Apexes

Buildup by Pivotal & Lateral Flows Around, to Settle Between
Output
New Motor Built
Sensory Level Built

S & M Level Experience

Apex Motor
Options

Apex Sensory
Goals
Sensory Builds
Old Motor Level

Input

Diagram 28, Wrist Apex Motor Cortex, Under Instigation

Cortex Activity

Readiness Potential

Milliseconds

350
Thought

470
550
Feeling Move

The chart does not show other sites instigating for a flex. Prior
functions include any subtle poise before a flex. Subtle rise & fall
in support becomes obvious as needed, as the subject will flex
eventually. Scans invade privacy to reveal that we are entitled to
be confident in anticipations, but scans reveal subtleties that are
not important enough to be obvious. We can leave the subtle to
rise and fall. Privacy is always the issue during automatism,
because we are fractionally open to being read by others before
we read ourselves anyway. We feel our self-stimulation and
world stimulus after processing in a brain builds to finalization.

The Human Design

128

We are always open to a world to interrupt, as that interface is

vital. Scans make it possible to read others, but hypnotists and
pathetic advertisers use the open interface to lead you and
read their leading of you, by working you over. Obvious
awareness conditions itself for better undistracted decisions as
a peak, from peak to peak, including satisfaction of hormonal
imperatives. This makes it important to choose that use of your
Free Will, to condition useful interfaces with a world.
In the next chapter, Free Will is the choice to pursue objectivity
using comprehensive sites, despite genetic bias and subjective
conditioning. A claim that humans lack Free Will is abstract
and ignorant, and will never stand up to credible laws. The
errant view has an opening, as awareness just pops on
finalizations from preconscious (no awareness) to conscious
(subtle & obvious awareness). They cannot oversee their own
delayed arrival, which is impossible. Thought is a product of a
process inaccessible to it in moments, by being a product. We
condition self-knowledge.
Thoughts are determinative rather than mere epiphenomenal
by-products. Thoughts remember thoughts, transparent and
crucial. They are not immediate, as we are automatons from
the process. All moves, including for thoughts, cannot actually
be known until processed, but delay is brief and unnoticed
when thinking. We all experience thoughts and know their
value. There is no doubt that thoughts are crucial to build upon,
even if fleeting. If you hold a good fleeting thought, it is a
supposed inspiration, but a fleeting edge is continual, so try to
toss thoughts around with some sensible dexterity.
Plasticity in Site Processing by a Brain
Plasticity extends fidelity into merest relations between sites in
coordination to create assumptions between them, by sites
instigating each other to perform subtly in support. Network
sensory & motor cerebral-apex cortices build to feel sites

The Human Design

129

before they are felt, and build to send moves to site effectors
before they are sent. In Diagram 29, three sensory & motor
cerebral-apex cortices are separated, but they in fact lateralize
in layers by different patterns, rather than by clear borders.
Splitting of components into commons is intricate. In Diagram
29, plastic processing might work with the merest relation of a
thing and thingness. Automatic outputs from inputs, as
reaction from action, using matching apex cortices for motor
and sensory, should always be functionally direct while subject
to intricate continual adjustment to appear controlled. We learn
about our evolved potential for connection of sensory action
and motor reaction by taking them both for workouts.
Variation to a regular flow might be revealed by Phantom
Limbs. Flows backtracking from, or invading across, cerebralapex cortices are theorized. V. S. Ramachandran suggests
invasion into a sensory apex. When a hand is missing and its
cortices are working, touching a cheek is reported by a
subject as if a missing hand is being touched. Instigations
could be by back flow or directly between apexes. Two-way
lines in Diagram 29 are for back or direct flow. In my model, a
cheek instigates to confirm a hand in a conditioned cycle
of cheek & hand, to mistake a touch as by a missing hand.
Perhaps a stump contributes feelings for plastic thoughts
of a hand. Invasion might be limited to creation of pain.
There is a brief delay before the subject starts to feel a missing
hand. There is priming, with a cheek anticipating a relation in
plastic processing. In my model, it is the hand touching the
cheek, and simultaneous. Touch a cheek and a hand is
identified, but insufficiently to align it to the face, which may
only deal in touch in this instigation of a hand relation. A cheek
instigates anticipation of the subjects own hand touching it as
usual, and both feel it. The subject was a smoker with an
intensified relation of hand and cheek. In Diagram 20, a
compressed arm and hand position has a hand to face, ready
for a shoulder, also felt by the subject. They are proximate.

The Human Design

130

Diagram 29, Pivotal Flow Builds in Laterally Divided Cerebrum

Site

Limbic
Cerebral
Apex
Cerebral
Limbic
Accretion
Motor Sensory
Accretion
Front

(Hand)

Site

Back
Fill
Fire

Fill

Cheek

(Hand)

Cheek
Fill
Fire

Fill

Fill
Fire

Fill

Fire

Eye

Eye
Fire

The subjects report suggests the feeling may be supported

by sensory hand cortices, beyond prior instigation in motor
hand cortices for assumed movement, and beyond my view
of cheek and hand relations as integrated thoughts about
feelings of a cheek confused by conditioning. These research
works are discussed in encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia. L.
Moseley & P. Brugger in 2009 sugg est eyes may process
images of hand positions, to instigate thought of a missing
hand move. I suggest we might anticipate and identify a hand
in relation to cheek or eye feelings, rather than a hand alone.
In the eye study the subjects instigated according to diagrams of
impossible hand positions and yet they were constructed in
thoughts. Neurons on the level of plastic assumption construct

The Human Design

131

abstracts easily. We need specific targeting for reconditioning

of sites to accept the non-involvement of the missing part.
Real sites remain responsible, with or without infiltration in
sensory input cortices, as they instigate. A missing part is not
there to use input & output cortices to buck reconditioning.
I note brain lesions interrupt functional regularity and may be
overcome in part by plasticity, perhaps assisted by regularity
imposed upon functions just as in overcoming phantom
feelings. However, rather than inhibiting the re-mapping of
healthy neurons to remove phantoms, healthy neurons may
be extended by re-mapping to avoid use of the area affected
by lesion. Healthy networks may instigate plastic thoughts
across cortices in Blindsight. Plasticity confirms location of
thoughts and feelings at sites, even though it appears to show
a brain ignores site reality. There is intact plasticity for some
experience of a missing site by thought, at least, about its
abstract existence. Alternatively, stop cortical processing if a
site is missing, but we favor use of intact resources of a brain
and try to change them. Instigators can try to recondition to
remove Phantoms using those intact resources.
Phantoms may not always be insurmountable, and instigations
by sites across cortices can overcome brain lesions, showing
primacy of sites. Being within biology, psychology is more
dependent upon biology. Thoughts and feelings fall short of
execution if a site is missing, but support continues. It may
extend to instigate meaning in thoughts, even if abstract as we
cannot use missing sites meaningfully. Neural networks are an
intact resource for sites to instigate for sites benefit, to the
extent any sites can instigate thingness. Meager instigations
may be sufficient to instigate thoughts during Autonomic flow.
Thoughts would not be from direct moves if sites are missing
or paralyzed, and not from specific moves if other moves
instigate. Evidence is clear that that sites recondition the brain
for site and brain deficits. Neurons facilitate as best they can.

The Human Design

132

I note Mirror Neurons are likely rapid responses in a hormonal

state for interaction in a species. We recognize the emotional
states of others, or simply their moves to mimic. Continual
feedback is created between the parties by familiarity with
moves that are usually presented for the purpose of copying,
for shared emotional states in which mimicry is easy. We do
not immediately recognize emotional states of others. We are
primed for them by feedback that can lapse into a loss of selfcontrol in favor of the species, or mob. Familiarity in a species,
or priming by events that prompt emotional species reactions,
may have feedback rapid enough to keep our levels with that
world as if willed by ourselves. It can lead to mob rule. It may
be for easy attenuation to a species to match our attenuated
levels, but within reason. If we condition an attenuation to a
significant object rather than a species, the result is also open
to unreasonable or obsessive ritual, and disregard for species,
as in old brute Musashis Book of Five Rings, free on the net.
In the next chapter, I conclude a brain can be anarchistic in its
plasticity. Reality is biology, and psychology is prone to cryptic
& romantic anarchy. Real logistics & linguistics rein in abstract
psychology. In my model, both sexes are equally biological &
psychological. Biology is intact efficacy of male nerves in
stable logistics, and a species level of female hormones in
balanced linguistics. Male hormones and female nerves tend
abstract. Hormones are enhancers or promoters, and you will
see it across human behavior to differentiate tendencies.
Males by nerve or hormone tend to individuality for personal
traction or personal enhancement respectively, while females
by hormone or nerve tend to species enhancement or traction
respectively. Female hormones work at a species level without
much use for a male past a DNA ratio in one tiny sperm to
grow a complete biological offspring. But offspring still need
fathers, and for his part the male uses nerve to bang out
pathways for growth, to explore beyond a mothers breast. By
nerve, all is technique. It is not about exploding, it is about
dismantling obstacles as quickly as possible.

The Human Design

133

11. Awareness in the World

In this chapter, I continue self-evident modeling, and propose

that comprehensive structure gives us a pivotal position in the
world for the appearance of Free Will in awareness, as we
develop languages to further our knowledge of oneself in the
world using that Free Will. I will also settle the controversy of
other species awareness. There may be a difference in an
experience between collecting from a world and enjoying the
detection of our moves in impact as a hand-in-glove, or
enjoying intricate cycling for goals by anticipation of moves,
rather than feeling them in impact. In each case, the entity fits
its world, but for humans that world is continually shaped for
our wanton goals, not worthwhile goals. I finish the chapter
grounding psychology by biology, using the fundamentals of
cortical partitioning from the last chapter to speculate about
bases for key aspects of an experience.
Free Will, a Pure Idea
A regular and continual appearance of comprehensive options
in feelings and thoughts might condition us to have the pure
idea of choice, which we overlay with bias in reality. We may
have permanent genetic bias by individual genetic features
overlaying neutral species features with that conditioning. We
apply balance in unbalanced personal schemes, strictly
speaking. There may be a set of principles for functional
structures of other species anatomies, repeated for variations
in individual applications of the Design. We also have our own
unique environmental conditioning to our fixed genetic
sequence delimiting our awareness. If the genetics is known in
principle, the environmental can be better understood. The
only impediment to Free Will worth worrying about is the
definition itself, which is reserved for Gods in some theories.

The Human Design

134

Options are presented to us, but our choice is willed by us

upon those options, rather than determined by the options
that happen to be available. It turns us from tinkering with
events that happen to be going on, to fully imposing our
choices, unlocked by reliance on a pure idea applied with
inevitable genetic bias and subjective conditioning. We can
then rely on other ideas being pure and choose to pursue
them, like building to the pure idea of a home. Once we are
conditioned to recognize the pure idea of choice, we can have
the essential impression of behaving freely at will.
We may have predetermined structures resembling different
animal species. We may even securely identify genetic bias,
on page 206. We have inevitable genetic bias by niche and
race, and conditioning by unique immersion in the world, but
we can be objective in cognition by motor control of sensory
satisfaction, to accumulate reliable knowledge about oneself
in the world using facts & logic. Philosophy uses abstracts to
define Free Will. We are subject to deterministic laws, and
bias & conditioning, but we can freely condition greater
objectivity, which is non-abstract Free Will. We are in a world
of fixed laws as an interpreter. We reasonably, freely shape
our world to our choices using its determinism. Legal systems
should never bend to a plea that Humans lack Free Will.
Awareness about all of nature including oneself places our
own view of ourselves in the world in the same terms as we
understand the world, by the lawful terms of nature as set by
its laws and facts, and their logical arrangements and
operations in logical syntax and creative semantics. It would
be a rule that if human understanding of our side of a twosided interface with nature is not subservient to natures laws
and facts, it is abstract and less useful in nature or in
understanding it. Every creature should know its surrounds as
intimately as it knows itself, but we can know ourselves
specifically in forces terms by Design, using rote cues as
words to match facts by valuable logic.

The Human Design

135

Words in a World
Words are thoughts & feelings conditional with themselves,
using rigid hubs for assured construction and perhaps also for
their own attenuated levels by self-stimulation. Thoughts guide
feelings by networking them, to delimit them by commons
across components of feelings. Thoughts & feelings are
conditioned to a world, and words can be deconstructed using
key struts by commons across site components. Settled
languages should use struts effectively for conditioned use in a
world, and site analogies evidence struts by thoughts &
feelings, which deconstruct their own words for their struts.
The issue reduces now to responsibility for words. We are
given words from infancy, and we personally adopt them as
conditional thoughts & feelings. They are conditional on useful
analogy in choice of words, and that depends on whether our
words incorporate the worlds laws, which they generally do by
settled languages. Conditioning of conditionals enables action.
We can reinvent or reshape inadequate settled languages if
their conditioning of conditionals is poor, as judged by the
actions that accompany words. That is the shortcut answer to
the issue, giving personal adoption of words some freedom
from responsibility for settled errors, by invention to remove
them. However, it does not remove the ever-present dynamic
between social and personal reliance on words for action, and
responsibility by relying on them. A measure of responsibility is
reliance beyond conditionality, for felt action in a world in some
measure of conformity with the words we use. That dynamic is
relevant also to animals that are given words by human
conditioning for action, generally. Some species may have
invention to reshape words to suit their personal preferences,
but they might be less conditional by thought and more felt as
hormonal commands for habitual actions. We need to know
hormonal feelings to any conditional words in thought, by
humans & other species. Words may sometimes represent a
conditioned rather than a conditional state, important to know.

The Human Design

136

Words can always be used if they are not for a conditioned

action, and if for conditioned action, assess the action by law.
Conditional words can be used freely without being conditioned.
It is a rule, but you need to know why words are conditional, how
they are conditioned, and where the line is, case by case.
Anticipation to Favor a World
We need to discount our own moves interfacing a world, and
in my model, this is by continual conditioning from infancy to
extend our attenuated comfort with ourselves to attenuated
comfort by conditioned familiarity with levels & goals in the
world. It is comfortable intact attenuation by self-stimulation in
preserved hormonal states as stalls, as a basis for current for
goals from & to those stalls, to favor a world by conditioning for
goals. I tend to see other animals in greater comfort with their
niches and less concerned with diverse goals. Maybe limited
structures retain niche comfort, lost in abstract lifestyles.
We need to condition and resist conditioning for comfort, while
other species only need to resist humans. In future, humans
can apply lower-energy in life, as conditioned comfort with a
world has less clumsy interface. When conditioned, a rough
edge is refined by current for proper goals and levels. We can
try to attenuate our impacts with a world as if they were
impacting oneself, by familiarity, or we favor our attenuated
impact with ourselves apart from a world. When reliance
without interface with a world is off, we experience commands
from a world that actually come from oneself, in Schizophrenia.
Automatism & Health
From statistics, genes might contribute several times more than
environment to mental health issues, and Hybrid Genetic Vigor
reduces issues. A key relation is in delay for processing. We are
in the immediate past due to delay, and open to immediate
stimulation for a world to interrupt our self-stimulation. We are

The Human Design

137

always necessarily open and rolled around by the world in

function and evolution generally. Genes might be more relevant
than environment, but environments are tailored as niches for
genes, and that can be explored to promote better expressions.
As we are automata in a world, if we have poorly conditioned
anticipation, we need exposure to a world to settle us. These are
matters of report and consensus, but confused people can report
a consensus view. Find a reasonable level of interface with an
environment. As noted, resisting conditioning is as important to
humans as conditioning, while other animals might only need to
resist our conditioning, or eradication, of them.
Neural deficits can sometimes be overcome, or not. They can
be genetic or acquired. Neuron cells are subject to disease and
disablement. Identifying what can or cannot be reconditioned by
exposure to environment and in what ways, is essential for
personality and performance. We need to properly settle report
and consensus about interfacing different environments, to
deconstruct a dynamic relation, involving a trusted physician.
Then correlate to neurons and genes. Build a compendium of
opinions as correlated, and avoid exaggeration. This area is full
of pundits like ABC Science brain parrots. Meditation is a huge
stall, if that helps you somehow. Personal progress is by rigor,
by continual peaks with traction. I do not rule out intervention for
degeneration if it is well known and targeted for stimulation, like
Parkinsons. We do not know how they work, but we may know
sufficiently how they do not work in some cases to intervene.
Congratulations as always to Cuba battling away with medicine
in isolation. You can get into this work now if you have the time.
Freedom, Copying, & Niches
A bird is intricate in its embedded interface with its niche, in
concert with a world as a conductor, adjusting to impact
strokes of its baton, but with a low developmental scaffold of
new motor. Other animals have motor control, but are limited
and repetitive. I tend to think other species have a greater

The Human Design

138

appreciation of sensory feelings of their own moves in impact

as a hand-in-glove. They may feel every beat conducted by
nature reinforced by moves felt with fewer rough edges, as
they are do not stray so much. Limited structures fit limited
niches with exactitude. Humans might rely on the capacity to
condition the removal of rough edges, by acceptance and
rejection, in isolated contemplation.
Favoring sensory feelings of last move over motor anticipation
of next move would put a different emphasis on experiences, if
that distinction exists across species. I consider it relevant. In
fish, a developed cerebellum works without any developed
cerebrum, which streamlines it to keep its natural chemical
reflexive levels with a world, but without much conditioning for
goals using a cerebrum. A cerebellum tends to maintain levels
and it may serve sensory experiences of impact of moves and
world that create much interest for the fish, in its subjective
experience. It might be more hand in glove (match), rather
than try something else (mix), by levelling moves in impact.
I do not assume finalizations by single neurons synchronously
across a brain, which equate to the experience itself, are
different in process for other species, even if our advanced
dependence on a cerebrum is likely unique. Fish may feel &
think without our integration & modulation, but experiencing
vision, hearing, smell, touch, and its moves, by synchronous
finalization. Experiences will differ from ours, but thoughts are
integrated feelings using memory, and integration would exist
for many species. I do not even rule out a glimmer of thought
by insects. Be cautious, as advertisers are intimately involved
in campaigns to promote industries that disregard animals. All
species have automatic chemical levelling for interfaces with a
world. That is a subjective experience, whatever the level of
complexity providing the appearance of immediate control.
We need to tighten definitions, to bridge species by terms.
Terms of the Homunculus brain theory are feelings cannot
be felt till we think about them, to be aware that we feel.

The Human Design

139

However, thoughts are integrated feelings, and all feelings are

either too subtle for report, or they are obvious in a subjective
experience. All awareness is experienced fresh from moves,
on single neurons finalizing synchronously, regardless of the
cortical integration and its complexity. Thoughts are merely
intricately coordinated feelings, which other species lack at
our level. They would have feelings of vision, hearing, touch,
moves, and so on as subjective experiences, but with less
capacity to cycle moves intricately using memory fresh in the
moment, for states of contemplation. Thoughts cycle across
moments to constrain our activities reasonably & responsibly.
Glimmers of cortical clogging would arise for fish and many
other species, perhaps even insects.
Cause-Effect in a Niche
Species make causal markings to sketch known territory for a
secure outlook on the world to own it. Parasites have insight
into carriers to ride as an effect of causal provision. A marker
stays within his outlook as loose prey passes. Parasites find
secure carriers. Species make up for each others deficiencies
in lack of fresh exposures or secure bracing by their anatomies.
Human individuals do not have fully intact poise and flow,
despite a species structure for it, and we cooperate to pool
genetic or conditioned security or exposure. The tendencies
also extend to spatial or temporal, and organ or appendage in
my current model across a web of life in niches. This is all
preset potential in an environment for a web of interdependent
life based fundamentally around causal bracing or effected
exposure to anatomy. I will explain later, our species may lend
itself to structural genetics for individual types reflecting other
species, extending the preset patterns to within our species.
Our functions, and awareness about them, are always subject
to a world sustaining us, including every breath. We are
immersed in a world, and awareness is our construct about
interfaces both ways with a world. Life embedded in niches will

The Human Design

140

know them intimately and define themselves, to the extent they

can, in terms of interface recognizing basic consistencies, facts,
or laws about the niche. We make assumptions about ourselves
and the world, but we can recognize interdependence. You
would be foraging without languages or ideas from society, so
be thankful to others that you are not grunting right now.
Importance of society to species, beyond providing for simple
grinding actions of successful copulation, and beyond all the
analyses that follow from the statement that you would be
grunting right now without it, is evident by geometry. I will
explain later how physics is spatial planes of height & depth,
with temporal pulses around string making loops along it at light
speed. Two-dimensional planes align in relative momentum, or
counter-momentum by opposite plane alignments, by freefloating in space (and time) as aligned planes. Their rhythm is
set by pulse with loops running through those aligned planes.
Humans have an advanced cerebrum & cerebellum, and
likewise a horse. A fish has only an advanced cerebellum for
reflexive levelling, but that would be sufficient along with a horse
to set planes between members of a society for them to move
as one to common momentum. That form of alignment would
underlie human societal structures, by simple planar alignments
in aligned or opposed forward momentum by individuals within
it. Copying is a feature of societies.
Realities of Containment & Reasoning
Kant said correctly that our awareness is our own construct,
but he makes a blunt distinction between a constructed world
as one thing and the real world as another thing, saying all
we can know is our construct rather than the real thing. I
would say knowledge is always about the interface of oneself
and the world. Awareness provides reasoning to explore any
objective reality to interfaces, comprehensively to us. It is all
we can hope to do. Kant used a Homunculus soul to impose
forms on sense datum rather than tying awareness to sites.

The Human Design

141

We can use universal laws, as laws of the land, to purport to

reconcile relative views. However, we can go beyond shared
human consistencies, and say that each of us reasonably
knows reality as it is. Our functions are perfectly suited to the
world by evolution. We can all purport to reasonably know
reality as it may be, under the universal prescriptions of
adaptive evolution. We do the same in physics, discussed
later, where we also purport beyond confinement to a relative
view. We can say what others measure, using a universal
set of laws for calculation, and we can take a step further and
purport a void and neutralizing coordinate are also facts of
nature, for an absolute mechanism expanding in a void.
Self-awareness, as awareness that one has awareness, is a
tricky term. One thinking about oneself may not require any
deep ideas about those two parties in awareness. They are
two things that exist in one entity that is aware of change to
its being over time, with its being experienced by an
outlook or insight at any time. More deeply, we realize we can
think quite freely about past thoughts and feelings over time.
We have developed the Scientific Method to evaluate our
regularities and those of the world in detail. However, as
noted, we might tend to favor induction or deduction in our
use of the Scientific Method, viewed objectively.
Analysis of the world needs objective self-analysis of selfstimulation to have an objective view of the world merging
with us. Self-analysis needs objective analysis of stimulation
from the world, for objective analysis of oneself within the
world. We are subjective, but try to be objective. We can go
incrementally from existing theory, or to new paradigms such
as mine. Deductive self-consistency needs to be challenged.
This has implications for extension from existing theory based
upon Bayesian Probability. Bayes builds probabilities based on
given priors that can be challenged, but are assumed, to build
something. But inventive hypotheses do not respect givens or
priors, and they crash by falsifications, continually crashing.

The Human Design

142

Whether the average person always uses bad logic is irrelevant

to our species capacity to learn, and Bayes is not your source
for logic and how to use it. Science & philosophy are a sad
joke, by logic. We learn from our betters to progress. Use
balanced logistics to always return to the old to not only build
the new upon it, but to break the old apart for a new new.
Expand all fronts, and hold until vagaries are removed, by
regular practice. This will not help if you are gutless or lazy.
Reasoning in use of awareness takes us past slow mutational
survival at a broad evolutionary level, although psychology is
part of biology by basic logic that whatever survives is thus
Selected. Stooges love that simplicity, as luck is a factor. This
book may or may not be Selected, but we can reason freely for
traction. We may mutate by migration, but anyone can reason
freely to reconcile freedoms. Distinguishing abstract from real
in subtle & obvious transition from preconscious is essential
for personal sanity and reasoning. Self-fulfillment is an
obsession for some, but most value what the world has given
them. Know facts from the world to have worldviews, and be
custodians of the world rather than gamblers in the world.
Language needs revision to avoid a paradox. Conditional
words are conditioned for actions. A statement like I always
tell lies must account for the fact that particular statement is
also an action inconsistent with the words it uses. That action
and those words cannot both be correct. Logic is not restricted
to specific words, it also assesses a statement as an action or
basis, or fact, which logically contradicts its own words. In logic
it amounts to no more than saying I am lying, but truthfully.
Close your logic around facts, to remove self-contradictions.
There are no paradoxes, just badly framed logic for facts.
Math is a language, and bad axioms persist. Set Theory says
there are sets with members of common status, with subsets
allowed as borders within one border, but I say bordered parts
do not exist within a whole. A whole is one border with parts

The Human Design

143

under one self-consistent logic. There is no value to internal

abstract borders that should be subject only to the border of a
whole. For goofball Logicians who like Bertrand Russell or
Cantor, you have two alternatives that resolve as one, the
relative view from a point, or the absolute view within a border,
and the absolute logically informs us about every isolated
point. The relative view is subject to the absolute, and you
never draw a border around any points within a bigger border.
That is retention of a relative view beyond its point purview,
to a small border that proposes a level of consistency to inform
us around that point, and yet is it within a big border
supposedly doing it inwards. But no, because interposing the
small border suggests that the big one cannot penetrate within
the small to inform us about its points, we stop at its small
border and use its own supposed consistency. Poppycock.
This is deduction to induction to deduction, as cause driving
effect over time. It is logical by definition, and real process, to
ignore a self-consistent border hypothesized in a bigger selfconsistent border, if it withstands deductive trials. Removal of
a lesser border is the point of the process, or it fails and you
do not draw a bigger border. The identities of all points
improve as we draw borders further out directly from them, not
encircled by some abstract consistency that, by definition, can
only restrict application of the whole border logic to a point fact
within its border. Every single atom is a whole of point facts
that dissolves as we wind back to an intact whole for all point
facts at a Big Bang. It is logic & process, not relativistic error.
Mereology is a related field of math dealing with parts, and it
should say a part by definition connects to make something
bigger, and it can only logically extend to a bordered whole
with intact logic untroubled by lesser borders within it, because
part proof is by definition irrelevant separately from a whole
proof. Kurt Godel cannot prove any part of a whole, because
a part is entirely subject to a whole. By failure of Mereology or
Set Theory, Emergence Theory and Godels First Theorem fail

The Human Design

144

to understand logical definition and process. Godel wrote

several volumes to establish that a part proof is impossible
unless you have a whole proof, which is also impossible
because no-one has a crystal ball to make the measurements.
Goofball stuff. Never assume value to limited borders. Always
improve a point fact identity by extending to a full view of it.
To a directly related issue of point facts resolved by extended
logic, note first that oneself & world are an experience by
neurons firing, whether or not they really exist. Truth &
existence are constructs by neurons firing to model. Feelings
secure themselves by their own reasoning. It is a construct
and not simply real. Look to neurons and cortices as a
shortcut in the absence of direct site neural correlations to
experience logic and facts in experiences of combined
thought & feeling. Feelings allow any concepts as a preserve.
Thoughts are just integrated feelings, and my partitioning here
is not by hormone or nerve, it is by pivotal or lateral feelings
and thoughts. They are both pivotal as fact by a vestibular &
cerebellum, and lateral as logic by a thalamus & cerebrum.
Component thing & common thingness apply to anything,
including logic or fact across hormone & nerve, relying on
their pivotal or lateral tracking. Logic is lateral and relates to
itself by self-consistency. Fact is pivotal and relates to itself by
proximate contiguity. Components & commons apply to each
and correspond for both, as logic about facts at all times,
rather than wanton facts with no logical relations or abstract
logic with no reality in fact. Unity by components & commons
combine with unity by logic & fact. A brain has hormone as
mass and nerve as charge, pivotally & laterally. Lateral
hormone & nerve grasp logic, and pivotal grasp fact. Logic
binds across proximities, and fact binds by proximities.
Metaphysics & methodology tend to logic. Physics, chemistry,
biology, and psychology tend to fact. Logic provides frames to
match observable facts, and so we come to a very brief

The Human Design

145

summary of the logic & facts of science. Newton has a void

that is not a measureable fact, but it is a logical frame for
measurement that people might even try to view as a
container for masses. Einsteins measurement relative to
individual particles is consistent, with reciprocity in Light Clock
Experiments across frames, as a subjective relative view used
as a fact for unknowable views of others, by abstract frames
for pure Isotropy. Darwins Selection is not predictive, as his
factual breeding has no universal frame for evolution. Kant
confined awareness to a subjective fact that cannot be
confirmed as a frame despite being personally experienced,
because it is confined to one subject. A subjective experience
cannot frame itself as a frame even though it may be a fact,
as it is on delay and cannot use itself to know itself, logically.
As noted on page 34, Epistemology is merely methodology
and Ontology is merely metaphysics. By use of methodology
for metaphysics, awareness is an experience by cortical
neurons that we need to deconstruct by rules to faithfully
represent biology. It is a representation of oneself & world as
objects we check by logic & fact in the representation itself, to
continually assess the representation for its value to biology,
as we are always locked into it. Existence is a theory by ones
own experience, as a metaphysical scheme. Knowledge is
continual reasoning to adjust a theory by better logic & fact.
Every object is a fact that does something, and a mechanism
when we find it does logical things. You can explore what it
does, by logic, and explain the mechanisms. Seek perfection
on the basis it may be possible, wisely nominated by Gottfried
Leibniz, but popularized by Einstein to find what God would
prescribe. Be a polymath, and also an athlete for real progress.
Philosophy reduces to two rigors, and the test of methodology
is to find metaphysics by logic using consistent conformity to
definition for contiguous facts as mechanisms. People tend to
lateral logic or pivotal fact. Biology tends to female hormones
for vestibular linguistic facts and male nerves for medulla

The Human Design

146

logistical frames. Female nerve is on topic to reflex logistics

by cerebellar romantic linguistics. Male hormones are poetic
to confine linguistics by cryptic thalamic logistics. Romantic &
cryptic abstracts need to be grounded by a vestibular &
medulla. This is bold and general, but they may be fixed
genetic tendencies on a spectrum in the Design, without
favorites. There are only four types, and this may be a reality
to some extent, more useful than harmful. It has nothing to do
with niche or racial types, and avoids usual human prejudices.
A Sophist will manipulate you to your face. An uncooperative
Passive-Aggressive cannot be read for an outlook. They might
tend causal or effected, respectively, by genes. We know it in
politics. I mention these niche, non-racial, genes on page 206,
but left & right politics covers it. It is from a root level of logic &
fact used deductively or inductively. Deduction is black &
white, win & lose. Induction is grey, hypothetical, potentially
either way. You will hear deductive types rave on about strict
dichotomies to behavior, master & servant, all along the way,
by hierarchical win & lose. But ignorant narratives are spouted
by both, with inductive types providing every excuse for
failure. Just take tendentious pundits in the media with a huge
grain of salt if they spout ignorant narratives about humanity.
You can lay it on the line or negotiate the line. By sway today,
capitalists want to be free to apply an outlook and manipulate
us to love it. If a human being rises each morning to the stink
& filth of industry to feed greed, it is time to end the con game
on that basis, and reform our manipulated, win & lose, civil &
criminal law. Seek democratic legal reform, and just cancel
the fake love game that has you crawling over each other for
approval. The sooner the better, but be aware of the logic that
applies from Set Theory. There is intact logic to society
applying equally to everyone, and it supersedes any borders
people like to draw around themselves as a private sector. If
you are poor or uncomfortable with contracts, which define
that sector, do not feel badly. We can change that.

The Human Design

147

12. The Design in Physics

In the remaining third part of my book, I return to the Design

applied to physics. The reversible Scheme for existence
also allows some comparisons between its two main levels of
physics and biology, and physics predetermines human
existence. In Diagram 8, the capacities in the Design read
as the fundamentals of any activity in physics or by anatomy.
Me, you, where, and when apply to formal axes of cause,
effect, space, and time. To, from, stop, and go apply to
electromagnetic, gravitational, rest mass, and energy triangles.
Particles & Fields as Strings & Loops
The Design simply defines rest mass and energy by their
space and time forms, evident as particles and fields. It do
not theorize whether pure energy can exist without rest mass,
and in my current model, they are integrated aspects of one
state of momentum defined by motion and direction. That
momentum has an angle of rotation from exchanges of tension
between charged & massive capacities of rest & energy. My
field definition is not the usual term from physics as
momentum without rest mass, which is illogical. Rest &
energy are by strict definitions, with alternative uses for rest
& energy particles, or rest-energy fields. Their distributions
are defined by position & motion for directional momentum,
differently for particles & fields, but to the same framework to
unify. Their interactions are defined by electromagnetic &
gravitational tension & rotation for angles to their directions.
Distribution & interaction resolve as Angular Momentum
directed to intact structures for atoms as solar systems. Mass
is one mechanism integrating to an intact definitional logic for
atoms as solar systems, and for integration as an intact
collective at the Big Bang.

The Human Design

148

Particles have energy contained in their rest masses by the

square of the speed of light, with varying quantities of energy
as motion converted from rest. They are fixed frames across
the universe, but only detect relative motions of other particles.
They have motion, but fields extend to and from them with
their own adjustments creating the incorrect assumption of rest
to particles in motion in a void. A particle is also unable to
detect its motion under constant acceleration in a uniform field.
A field extends to and from particles by its own mechanism,
with a constant motion at light speed in a void. I will focus on
my strings & loops as they are beyond speculation, they are
likely facts, fundamental, and simple to grasp. Both forces
have a two-step mechanism, but with a complete difference in
application by forwards or backwards rotations.
Gravitons shear with others of their own, linearly or smoothly in
a void. This means they smoothly interface and widen each
others loops by shearing. Their loops all have an anchor at
their back end to stream as continual successive loops along
resting string from vibrating sources in particles. That resting
string moves as loops shear and take up the string slack, to
draw towards any counter-shearing events. Loops make a
compression front between them, to lessen available strings
at back ends. Anchoring is to common momentum of those
successive loops to keep them aligned, but the back end
anchor is angled, not smooth. When loops are sent along
string from a particle source, their front end loop is at light
speed, but the back end anchor angles for particle direction,
while the front end is radial. This creates a changeable radial
stream with a string history of particle directions relative to its
own continual light speed loops as a field around it at all times
as it changes directions. The angle does not need to adjust for
particle motion because it is a particle fixture with whatever
motion a particle may have, but provided by loops shearing for
motion. Shearing sends motion back through string to move
sources, and consistently, when a particle is pushed directly,
its loops will adjust for that motion in a void as it moves.

The Human Design

149

These are fine strings that shear each other for compression
fronts in a void radially around particles for adjustable linear
motion, while particles are anchored to those successive loops
by a back end providing adjustable angled direction. On pages
183-188, this is by a two-dimensional spatial plane as a string
with uniform height and distorted depth, to shear standard
heights to widen loops that are also uniform in their relation to
string by providing direct linear motion by loop widths. Height &
width are uniform relations of mass, and the depth & pulse
along string for a loop are distorted charged relations within a
graviton. A pulse distorts with depth in the direction of motion,
when loops shear to compress string to move it, or when a
particle is pushed to compress string in that direction, as loops
also compress in a void for a particle moved by an explosion.
Although loops will widen linearly with motion, a pulse thickens
& depth shortens to resting string as density inverse to motion
for momentum, summarized by a fundamental graph in
Diagram 30 for energy usage to accelerate motion linearly. A
Lorentz relation is by thickened pulse & less depth slowing the
loop rotation around string. The slower pulse around string
remains along string for widths of loops to be uniform at light
speed with uniform heights despite less depth & denser pulse.
Light speed loops continue to shear linearly for motion, but
thickening takes resting string, compressing it more directly
rather than by loops. And that direct compression is non-linear,
in Diagram 30, as an angled distortion to resting string.
Depth would allow that angling by lessening for it, consistent
with a slower temporal rate to resting string by slowed pulse,
as the well-known Lorentz relation of spatial contraction and
temporal dilation. At root, massive height paired with massive
width are for linear string motion, and they relate to a charged
pulse paired with charged depth as string distortions by a
curve when motion becomes more string by density. Less
depth takes up string to affect motion, but to a distorted curve
along with a thicker pulse to densify, while mass gives motion.

The Human Design

150

Diagram 30, Avoiding the Curve of Density & Motion as Momentum

Line for Linear Motion (Unreal)
Motion

Light Speed

0.8

More Density, Less Motion

0.6

Curve of Linear Momentum Increase (Real)

(Combines Density (Direction) & Motion)

0.4

0.2

Less Density, More Motion

10

Linear Momentum

Diagram 31, String Densifies by Shearing, for Curve of Distortion

Slower, Stack Constant (Pillars) & Long Stretch (Bellows)

Low Density Loops Shear Fast Around at Constant Light Speed Along

Faster, Stack Constant (Pillars) & Short Stretch (Bellows)

High Density Loops Shear Slow Around at Constant Light Speed Along

The Human Design

151

Diagram 31, Photon String Aligned for Mass & Charge

Peeled Apart at Back to Show Opposite Poles Intact by Cross Medulla
& Shared Vestibular Intact to Align Right Spin

Vestibular Cycle Begins at Ear, Right Spin Down all the Way
Cup-join
Lower End
Ear
Upper End
Tongue
Stretch
View from Crown
(Brain Direct)
Stack

Right
Eye

Left

Nose
Front

Medulla Corrects

Left Spin of Body

Front
Gut

Lungs
View from Ground
(Brain Crossover) Stretch

Right

Left

Stack
Heart
Spine
Cup-join
Upper End
Lower End
Medulla Cycle Begins at Spine, Left Spin Up to Cross Half Way

The Human Design

152

Diagram 32, Graviton String Aligned for Mass & Charge

Front Edges of Loops Shear to Widen & Densify
Both Spin Right, but from Opposite Sources

Near

Destinations

Hook-join

Right

Far
Hook-join

Lefts
(Muscles)
Shearing
Hearts

(Nerves)
Spine

(Nerves)
Spine Right

Widen & Densify

(Shear Left Front)
(Turn Right, Spine Behind)
Reels In Behind
as Loop Widens

Far

(Turn Right, Spine Behind)

Reels In behind
as Loop Widens

Sources

Near

The Human Design

153

Loop compressions give density to strings by pushing them

together, by directions to compress rather than decompress,
and it is linear by original conditions at a Big Bang. String
explosion gives motion when loop density is extreme, but loop
density works against it as a reservoir at a Big Bang, rather
than forming around mass by motion in a lab when it is
accelerated. The inversion in Diagram 30 for a laboratory
applies to apportion momentum between density & motion, but
it does not apply at a Big Bang, as a swing across balance for
stability, because linear density is already available for motion.
It works the other way by density to motion, but it must also
feedback motion to density as it expands. In my model,
feedback of motion to density reduces the rate of increasing
motion outwards, but it always increases, so there is no
overtaking. The discrete curve in Diagram 30 sets specific
limits to motion & density, and a Big Bang reservoir avoids the
curve by having an ideal quantity of mass for density to supply
motion to limits, to make an intact linear puffball reducing to an
outer border. It is by limits to density providing motion
linearly, then motion reducing density to limits by feedback. I
use original conditions ideally, as it is always a good start.
The mechanism for photons ties in logically. A photon product
hinges and rotates backward rather than forward. A photon is
emitted with a front end at light speed if given a void, and it is
given a void. It is able to do so by a back end allowing for
particle motion and keeping the front end at light speed.
However, unlike a smooth radial graviton, the front end at light
speed is angled for a void to target an electron or proton, by
photon momentum smoothly at loop surfaces. Smooth
momentum is given to photons to transfer between electron &
proton surfaces, provided by the back end. The back end
keeps the front end at light speed and on absorption by the
opposite particle, the angled front end goes all the way within
a well or around hill surface of the opposite particle. It has a
backward rotation and it hinges, rather than anchors, its back
end, to swing back & angle as an opposite loop to send back.

The Human Design

154

A photon has a smooth angling at a hinge to take the receiving

particles motion and maintain a light speed front end settling
on the surface as an opposite loop. At a hinge, adjustment
sets light speed transfer of specific momentum, with constant
light speed motion for momentum, but also a direction or
angle. There is a specific transfer of momentum at the hinge,
likely at particle poles, for specific orbital energy, but it also
settles on a loop surface. Angling is at light speed, as hinge
adjustment keeps it at light speed, but only because motion
gets directed across a surface rather than directly at the hinge.
Smooth momentum at the pole requires a distribution through
the loop itself to add or remove particle motion by angling it
across the surface. The front end swings back with angles at
light speed, and the back end is smooth at the hinge to stay at
light speed, both emitting & absorbing, with angles directing
momentum across a surface to do so. A line hinging at a pole
is an electrical line for specific quanta, and a line across a
surface between poles is magnetic for vibrational allowances
around the economical line, or to move to a new orbital level.
Received loops resettle on the opposite surface to send back.
Photons may reflex back & forth depending upon angles and
motions of receipt, to attract or repel effectively. Direct
shearing applies to repel like surfaces & photons, with resettling also enabled in cushioned collisions to repel. Loop
structures in Diagrams 32 & 33 are easily modelled using stiff
wire to show how front ends shear in counter-rotation as
gravitons, or hinge onto each other as proton wells or electron
hills, one a surface and the other a photon by angles to match
on a swing back. However, each mechanism has a balancing
or stabilizing mechanism that is blunt. Graviton strings explode
by loop compressions. Photon loops push with a backward
rotation by direct impact, shearing to settle on the surface of a
like particle, to keep stable relations between opposites
attracting as all or nothing in a void. A photon pulls to attract
when it swings on a hinge, but it can also shear directly and
settle, rather than hinge & settle, evident using wire models.

The Human Design

155

Gravitons wind their own thickened pulses & depths to make

smooth bulky photon loops with neutrons around them. Later, I
rely on one original photon for replication, but the possibility of
original creation might be open to gravitons. A thicker pulse &
shorter depth to a graviton is extreme for a photon, and a
standard graviton string of successive anchored loops might
equate to a photon in mass. A photon has one with thirty nine
zeroes more force by bulk & bounce at impact than extended
graviton string. A photon loop does not move smoothly along
angled string, it moves with an angle around smooth intact
string surfaces of proton wells & electron hills. A direct relation
between photons & gravitons by massive momentum is by
compacting graviton pulse & depth within height & width of
loops by contiguous shearing relations to make photons, to
shear by heights for widths of both photons & gravitons.
Momentum builds around photons by shearing for charge, but
always mutual to massive purposes by shearing. Charged
purpose is to hinge to attract within shearing as a massive
purpose. Human sex organ shearing is a direct replica of a Big
Bang, to assist modelling these events in physics.
Mass is always bound by the graviton curve of distortion in
Diagram 30, but it is not relevant when density feeds to
motion, and its relevance feeding back as motion to density
would be to vibrate back & forth as a brake on expansion by
feedback. It may apply a linear brake within overall linear
expansive motion, increasing if further away, for reducing rate
of increase. The curve is a swing of massive balance for
motion feeding density for stable density as photons &
particles in Diagram 30, but in a Big Bang, there is already
density available for stable mass as photons & particles. The
decline in motion within the increase in motion further out
simply makes a definable edge between the massive
expansion and the void around it, as mass closes in proximity
as it extends with increasing motion further out with that
smoothing. At a Big Bang, an explosion is for particles to
compress and remain in density within that decompression.

The Human Design

156

Motion is automatically balanced for density linearly, from

zero to maximum motion outwards by remaining rest mass, as
a product of density decompressed linearly by motion to
enable it. A linear puffball must have a constant rate of more
motion further outwards. However, I have a rate of increasing
speed continually braking at a Big Bang, for an intact edge to
the expansion. This is described by Calculus in math. No
regions overtake, but further out they move away with less
motion & density than expected of a constant increase.
Speed declines to a surface that keeps linear momentum by
slower motion with less density. It keeps a constant motion &
density relation across that braking, as feedback by motion to
density, but reducing to make a linearly extended edge to it.
Original linear string may have been a compressed lattice in a
settled alignment, and settlement in that way would apply also
to a sphere like Earth with a neutral gravitational center and
concentrated surface. That is a linear loop settlement of strings
under gravity, or as an original sphere. Symmetry to formation
is retained if an explosion from it does not follow a distorted
curve, but is instead linear, although I hedge my bets by
allowing some smoothing. The relation of smooth loops and
their angled string has a settled or distorted relation. In
explosions, they combine by loops compressing ahead of
string, explained above when any particle gets an inertial push
rather than being drawn by another source by countershearing loops. Height & width uniformly provide linear motion.
Density in terms of momentum is direction, as density is set
by directing momentum to compress or decompress. It is the
angle of motion that decides compression or decompression,
or states in between. At a Big Bang, neutrality at center to
begin an explosion is not an acceleration in a void from a
source of energy to gain density from it. It is a source of
energy available ahead of an explosion with extant linear
density for motion, rather than extant motion used for density.
It preserves density to use for photons wound as neutrons,

The Human Design

157

compressing then immediately decompressing to neutralize in

state & anti-state continual annihilations at pages 44-45. A
residue of neutrons then decays in a void to complete
decompression. It is compression as charge & mass within a
decompression to decay at Escape Velocity.
Avoiding the curve may also apply to neutron decay in a void
by energy to accelerate an electron mass from zero to one
percent of light speed, but for extant densities as an electron &
proton sharing energy to make and keep orbitals. This is linear
use of density for motion to rest mass on decompression at
low speed for an electron. It is a decompressing pulse from an
intact preserved photon compression that detonated a Big
Bang. An intact pulse in a neutron releases to tend back to
containment after decay. As energy used for motion to rest
mass for electron momentum leaving a proton behind, this is
stable motion & density on decay.
At a Big Bang annihilation, Cosmic Microwave Background is
made, but it is local. Gravity is also local. Events creating the
CMB are frozen, and CMB does not have necessary contiguity
for trajectories across vast regions, except as a uniform cloud
revealing little differentiable inside it locally, but it reflects a Big
Bang. Comparably, the contiguity of gravity is secure across all
distance, but locally, every event is in a freefall by relative
weight that tells us nothing about large scales. The trajectories
we require are by particles evidenced by photons contiguously
shearing gravitons all the way here. The CMB will not show a
global density, so we extrapolate from local examples of it.
But, although we cannot use relative weight on Earth to say if
a universe is neutralized, we can view key particle trajectories.
As noted, the most important current trajectories science is
viewing are bright supernovae. There is a method to estimate
distance or position of a supernova from the arc of its light rays
here, by ancient Greek geometry to calculate distance of the
source. They found that some of most distant ones are too far

The Human Design

158

away to have the Redshift they show by their photons from

trajectories. Whilst a CMB has no contiguity, a photon shearing
gravitons in a void from a source has contiguity, and it
Redshifts for motion & direction (density). A photon is effected
by both its density in relation to gravitational field density, and
its motion in relation to gravitational field motion. When field
density & motion of a source has momentum away from us, its
photons Redshift. Science found far supernovae with too low
Redshift, suggesting they have been accelerated away to
distance, not constantly increasing in their coasting. That has
overturned cosmology, but it clutches at straws. There may be
a braking edge to motion & density that explains why Redshifts
are not as high as they should be for linear expansion. They
are moving more slowly than expected due to that braking.
Dark Mass, Energy, or Matter, is unseen, extrapolated, particle
or field mass in a void. Science does know what it is dealing
with, and I avoid its definitions of energy or matter. Mass in
the universe estimated by recent WMAP telescopes are
quoted as Dark Energy 72.8% (within 1.6%) as non-'particle'
background, and Dark Matter 22.7% (within 1.4%) of nonbaryonic (sub atomic) 'particle' energy, and baryonic particles
(atoms) at only 4.56% (within 0.16%). As noted, resting string
is particulate and can move up to light speed in any Frame.
Loops in resting graviton string or decayed photon string,
move at light speed as a field. Energy is by conversion of rest
to energy by graviton strings exploding by compression. It only
exists combined with rest mass as resting string moved by a
push around a string compression explosion for it, as an
alternative to string moved by counter-shearing loops.
The non-luminous mass proposed by measurements would
primarily be graviton string & loop sections in a void, as fluid
in the void. There is also an energy investment for continual
linear recession to be counted, rather than relying on
expanding Spacetime carrying mass with it, when Spacetime
somehow expands and continues to expand. Definitions for

The Human Design

159

logic & fact need complete revision in physics for progress.

You can start by seeing these events using a Gods Eye in a
void. That is not denied to you by my work. I rely on it, rather
than math equations to describe momentum shifts by unknown
mechanisms, denied visibility because there is literally no void
from which to view mechanisms interfacing in current science.
Graviton string explosive capacity is by pulse & depth, and it
can be contained as a photon, rather than used by a graviton.
The reduction in depth that thickens a pulse would detonate a
pulse explosion, and that shortened depth is also contained as
a bouncy photon. Photons are bulky resting string of gravitons.
The complete loop is smooth to take angled graviton string
around it as a neutron with intact mechanisms to hold nuclei by
pivotal Strong Force and release for orbitals by lateral Weak
Force. Strong holds gravitational compression for massive
nuclei past iron. Weak decays electromagnetic compression at
angles for orbitals. As momentum, the Strong retains it to
equally explode using it to separate nuclei, consistent with a
Big Bang as an original reservoir that explodes equally from its
own attraction. Weak decay repulsion is equal to attractive
containment by neutrons as massive reserves, to then equally
attract & repel after decay to sort towards atoms.
Graviton string provides momentum for a Big Bang and decay,
and for angled proton wells & electron hills at one pole to give
& take photon loops between surfaces. Levers & springs would
apply, evident in some attempts at illustrating Strong & Weak
in books. Graviton loops along string underpin all of nature,
due to a structure for pulse & depth with height & width in
Diagram 30, for gravitons to make photons, and also make
lever & spring mechanism for particles. A neutron in free space
is a long freeze frame of a delayed moment of action-reaction
for tendency to causal containment to release by effected
decay, for atoms. Neutrinos have some energy at decay, as a
bracing product of rest to energy conversion by gravitons to
preserve two specific rest masses differentiated by energy.

The Human Design

160

Atomic orbitals are a future ideal using emissions as field

decompressions on decay as effects, for hypothetical attraction
or repulsion. It is securely determined on causal absorption
when it actually attracts or repels. Its hypothesis is to an ideal
from potentials that applied to its original state as a neutron in a
binary all or nothing state in a void. Conversely, gravitation
emits from a real origin deductively in the past, and absorption
is an effect hypothesizing about a past origin causing it after
compression at a Big Bang tended to an extrinsic leap at
detonation by a photon at its center. A mutual explosion from
compression at a Big Bang was mediated by a photon inward
for neutron formation around replicated photons. Atoms and
solar systems form together by mutual accretion compressing
to mutual decompression. Particles repel to the extent they
attract, sorting to contain as atoms and compounds.
A neutron uses a void to extend its neutral surface to become
surfaces of protons and electrons sending grey photons to be
sorted black or white on receipt. This is a concentrated
charge with a neutral surface in a void at all times, as a neutron
with binary potential, or as an atom. The terms concentration
and neutrality are defined in relation to the nothing of a void,
but mass can never be measured in relation to a void because
a void provides nothing against which it can be measured. All
measurement is relative to other mass in a void, and not in
relation to a void. I explain in the next chapter graviton loops
along string sections reel and unreel string according to the
widths of loops, as a thoroughly consistent pulley system for
regularly distorted momentum, as measured.
Gravitons are all equal, unlike photons with different momenta.
They are resting string that extends loops along it at light speed
from a causal source that explodes from attractions, black &
white, when overly compressed. Other sources are attracted,
grey, as they have their own inertia to avoid compression, and
in general the system rotates. Supernovae are inevitable after
a Big Bang. Charge leads compression in by mass to its limits

The Human Design

161

until an energy release using neutrinos, to explode for the

dispersal of a rotating cloud with proportions of heavier
elements we find at a mantle for a Biosphere. Atoms rotate by
chasing their own tail in a massive field for rotation. It settles
into energetic planets orbiting a pivotal star. Cloud rotation
increases under contraction as it flattens. Graviton loops
extend between particles to bind in rotation. Neutrinos
energize a supernova explosion. It is only under compression
by initial conditions at a Big Bang that gravitons liberally create
neutrons with photons in them, to annihilate with anti-states.
Particle mass extends from real origins, and attractive fields
extend from them. Particle charge contains to an ideal
destination, and fields sort to contain to that ideal. Those
causes have equal and opposite effects, taking fields as
contracting masses for real integration with past origins, and
giving fields as expanded charges sort ing to all or nothing
ideals of atoms. Causally, mass attracts and equally explodes
from a past by built reserves. By using the reserves, charge
contains and equally decays, to sort equally back to
containment, but as a full Periodic Table. Those mechanisms
lock mass & charge into a logical frame of cause preceding
effect. Opposing directions are mass from a past origin as a
reserve taking from other reserves building to explode from
them and build again, and charge to future ideals known by a
sketch relation of unity able to be filled out in future by decay.
At root, Quantum Mechanics is economical electrical lines of
energy quanta for each coasting orbital upon decay, in its
distortion with magnetism for orbital vibration or adjustment.
Shortly, constant & variable capacities create a simple
framework for bocks & fields, or strings & loops, summarized
in Diagram 39. Blocks coast by absolute momentum in a
void, with constancy & variability, for atoms & solar systems.
Fields have relative momentum in a void, with constancy &
variability, for exchange between blocks particles. Quantum
distortion along & across for orbital lines is within a constant

The Human Design

162

& variable frame for blocks & fields, or strings & loops. This
frames a root relation of electrical & magnetic lines. The
magnetic slings equally to move the economical line in or out
for interactions with other atoms, ultimately for molecular
compounds, not the extremes of physics. Magnetism is also
responsible for vibration around surfaces for orbital rotations,
with either spin or anti-spin options inevitably by smooth or
angled photons tilting with momentum and polarizing to
opposite rotation at poles, positive north and negative south.
An electrical line has economy by quanta for orbitals, while
the magnetic line has variability by slinging both ways across
it, for a new orbital level, or vibrate it around the economical
line, as necessary. Momentum by atoms collectively creates
vibration to their orbitals, as both electrical & magnetic lines
align to any momentum of atoms. A surface vibration is from
excess & shortfall of momentum at a pole, from relative
momentum of particles in proximity. Any variation in relative
momentum will have the effect of orbital magnetic vibration
to resolve economy at pole and vibration across a surface for
momentum excess or shortfall in any photon exchanges.
Spin as Rotation & Vibration in Physics & Anatomy
Underlying these relations there is a fundamental choice of spin
made by a neutron for its proton on decay, and for an electron
to have a spin to match a proton automatically on decay. Antiparticles are no more than particles that spin the opposite way,
with poles reversed so that left-right becomes right-left. This
does not concern an angled photon loop, which already has
options of opposite spin between a proton & electron matching
each others spins. But it concerns the intact photons within a
neutron, as spin one way or the other will decay its two parts,
proton & electron, with opposite poles to align to matching
spins. A proton rotates backward left handed in my model, while
an electron rotates backward right handed, and a graviton
rotates forward right handed. Those simple oppositions and that

The Human Design

163

fixture resolve for spin, and a right-hand spin is non-frictional for

a complete photon merging with gravitons for a neutron. A lefthanded spin by a proton might dissolve it at a Big Bang, as a
complete and permanent failure to detonate.
A complete photon in Diagram 11 (1) decays an electron away
from a proton that spins one way or the other. They both send
backward rotating loops, in matched opposition by right proton
well rotation and left electron hill rotation. Simple mechanics
dictates poles of neutrons tending to proton or electron aligned
in one direction to spin together creates alternative spins of
those two poles at the middle, from their different polar
perspectives. An electron aligns its pole with a proton for an
orbital to exchange photons with a proton in on decay in
Diagram 11 (1), they will be sent with an opposite rotation in
that direction. Electrons spin the same way as protons on decay
and afterwards, noted by physics. But direct alignment for
exchanges means that an opposite pole is aligned to exchange
by spin for its photon hills left handed, from its perspective. The
pole of a proton well stays aligned for hills right-handed, from its
perspective.
This is the twist at a medulla in anatomy, and it means that
proton head & electron body both rotate in common with the
same left & right side. That is maintained by a shared vestibular
at a head for both, while also maintained for both at a body by a
medulla that twists in between their aligned rotations. A brain
extends far above a face in a human, but it starts at a medulla in
between a face and body. The medulla twists left & right to
opposite sides of a brain for it to serve both a body by spinal
logistics as a twist between, and a head at a balanced ear
without a twist, above a medulla. They share appendages that
have medulla & vestibular bases & edges. Appendages fields
knit a basic divide of head & body. Common left & right sides
have pivotal vestibular Strong Force and lateral medulla Weak
Force to keep twist to body & head created across separation.

The Human Design

164

To rotate right to be left forward to future and right back in past,

or southpaw as the opposite, is a simple change in stance, but it
is significant. A mirrored anatomy with appendages mirroring,
and with potential to rotate both ways, only needs to resolve
those stances by crosstalk to make either of them workable.
Quite simply, it resolves as a means for a free floating anatomy
with equal mirrored sides and appendages to favor cause
turning to right or effect turning to left, as simple right or left
handedness. Even though it seems logical to always turn right,
as cause should be behind effect to drive it in that stance, it is a
causal driving stance. The other stance turning left with right
ahead to future is an effected stance absorbing a drive, as an
equal driven stance. They obey internal alignment and share
common directions of spin, but they allow regular momentum
direction & absorption between individuals. In physics, torque
one way produces torque another way in a closed system.
The foundational neutrality of photons that gave them original
spin enables particles to drive with inertia to their own spin, and
be driven by the inertia of others to spin the other way. This is
still strictly divided between cause & effect within their shared
system. Any effect from any cause will be subject to that cause,
which is always as cause by right driving left for particles,
whatever their spin alignments for orbitals by electrical &
magnetic lines. This is not an anti-particle drive, even though it
may spin either way equally as a simple turn. In humans, it is
corrective to drive and to be driven within a species and society,
in alignments of individuals. It is an unavoidable fact of internal
asymmetry to have difference between our turn right or left, but I
noted on page 126 that in perceiving the moves of others to
which we might align, we may respect their turns either way
regardless of their directions in relation to us, by a pivotal head
using a vestibular to reconcile across our own hemispheres to
see truly. We would align to the directions of others, as planes
of height & depth with pulsing loops directing or absorbing
momentum, all sharing a heart at left to future.

The Human Design

165

In the next chapter, gravitons rotate one way, right handed,

while photons rotate either way, and a forced choice for spin
by charge may be right handed to suit a neutron & proton,
not an electron. It is a forced choice for a neutron to rotate
with a graviton upon merger, but it may be the only workable
choice, as frictions may be counter to that direction, and that
might dissolve a photon. I have the same structures for
neurons, comprised of equal charge & mass in Diagram 24.
Scale differs for charge & mass, but multitudes make up the
difference. A charged nerve line, as a neuron, has bulb at
synapse and a cup at dendrite to join ends, with the direction
of flow in the direction of rotation of a photon in Diagram 11
(1), away from the cup-join at a dendrite to continue a flow.
That nerve structure comprises a multitude of hooks flowing
as mass in the same direction by accretion, but to alternative
hormonal purposes across partitioned brain regions. Hooks
build at the giving end of a nerve as a bulb for hormones to
pass, or not, across the gap between synapse and dendrite.
Charge & mass combine in that one structure.
Particle Distribution
At root, charge and mass merge as particles in mutual relations
as strings with directions of magnetic lines from spin. Spin may
be with vibration & rotation. Spin is from a choice of poles. They
share a constant direction as particles, to coast in a void by rest
& energy in varying motions. A constant course coasts at one
rate. The direction is set by the relation of cause and effect, with
cause as past and effect as future. This is represented by
slanted lines in diagrams, for a direction driven by cause, at root.
Our anatomy is illustrated by the Design, but in physics it is a
geometrical reconciliation that almost illustrates particles and
fields, because the real relations are so basic in Diagram 36. A
constant rotation with variable motions is created in Diagram 34,
in either direction for spin using the horizon as an axis. Pivots &
orbits for atoms or solar systems are driven by cause, by the
slant merging charge and mass whatever the direction of spin.

The Human Design

166

Diagram 34, Frame for Particle Motion & Direction

Effect
(Left)

Time
(Back)

Lines of
Alternative Motions

Space
(Front)

(Right)
Cause

Lines of
Constant Directions

Mass and charge are merged in mutuality, to compress and

decompress together, for resting pivots and energetic orbits in
atoms and in solar systems. A block frame applies to particles
with their own absolute direction in a void as its inertia. Mass
angles around charge by set right hand rotation for a preferred
right hand rotation of a neutron (and proton), angling around
charge. Direction of that initial rotation right or left is optional, but
the wrong way may dissolve a photon by friction. In the next
chapter, I explore particle & anti-particle formation & annihilation
further, and propose that anti-particles are intrinsically unstable
gravitationally, and not long-lasting. A complementing field
framework applies for photon and graviton field loops sharing
constant motion rather than varying motions, with alternative

The Human Design

167

directions between particles rather than merged stand-alone for

constant directions coasting. Fields are defined in relation to
absolute particle momentum in void, to unify those absolutes by
relative momentum in a void. Fields serve as a basis for particle
bases to measure relative momentum. Physics has absolute
directions to particle motions as momentum, and relative
directions to field motions as momentum.
The Uncertainty Principle says it is impossible to determine
accurately both the position and the direction and speed of a
particle at the same instant. Obviously, you cannot measure
momentum at one spatial position at one instant, which is a
stationary freeze frame. Direction and motion are defined by
two positions and instants, for motion between them, and
direction between them. Motion is defined by spatial &
temporal positions, plural, between positions & instants, by
definition, not frozen. Direction is likewise defined using two
spatial positions and instants for an angle between. The gap
can be closed to a wavelength, as a smear. No magic exists in
the gap. Physics has a shocking disrespect for definitions.
In the Uncertainty Principle, the definition of momentum is
offended by a silly claim a freeze without motion or direction of
force, as action-reaction impact to measure, has momentum,
whether the measurer has it or not. Any momentum is frozen
out by action-reaction measurement, which is a freeze frame.
Momentum is not falsifiable, in passage. It is not measurable,
by definition. I noted a whole does not have parts that can be
compared with other wholes for Emergent properties, as a
whole is undivided. In his First Theorem, Godel defines a
whole as a complete and consistent theory, but he says a
claim cannot be proven about a part of it, which is obvious. A
proof about a part contradicts the theory being a whole. The
Second Theorem lifts that into practical verification, as if we
have a crystal ball, particularly as momentum is not falsifiable.
Knowledge is by falsifiable parts of a theory comprised of logic
& fact, continually secured but never secure, but science is not

The Human Design

168

merely falsifiable parts. Physics is falsifiable, and metaphysics

is not falsifiable. Progressive theory for a body of reliable
knowledge includes both, to discover root logic & facts.
Field Distribution
Photons have a duality in physics, as spatial path-makers
and temporal wave-makers. In Diagram 35, they integrate rest
and energy equally, by constant motion at light speed and
varying directions between particles. Fields have motion by
straight lines for constant proportions of space and time, and
angled lines for alternative space or time directions. They go
away from one particle while coming in to another. They leave
by energy with more space and at rest with more time, while
they also arrive at rest with less space and by energy with less
time. A passage is measured in the Design at all times relative
to each block, but a loop can be isolated in Diagram 36 (2). In
isolation, we use two separated blocks that give and take that
loop with nothing interposed, other than a void. It is putative,
unmeasurable, momentum in a void. As noted, momentum is
only measured at emission or absorption, so it is putative, like
appendage fields in a world on page 101 and in Diagram 19.
Fields do not have momentum without rest mass. I combine
rest and energy in momentum logically. Fields are extensions
that unify particles as one mechanism. However, in reality,
constant motion as measured by moving particles can only be
maintained by flexible positioning, to distribute momentum and
allow for particle motion by loops settling from and to particle
surfaces. A photon at light speed motion has a smeared
position for motion, by lack of proof from inevitable Uncertainty.
Field loops have back and front ends. If position of a front end
is measured, its motion cannot be known tighter than a smear.
Particles do not exist between states, and mass does not
appear and disappear in the gaps between measurements of
any passage of momentum in a void. If anything, between is
in measuring motion, and it relies on an inverse relation.

The Human Design

169

Diagram 35, Frame for Accretion Field Direction & Motion

Effect
Out
Out
Resting Energetic

Energetic
In

Resting
In

Time

Space

In
Energetic
Lines of
Alternative Direction

In
Resting

Resting
Energetic
Out
Out
Cause

Lines of
Constant Motion

Fields distribute by giving or taking momentum on the surface

by directional change to the extent the particles motion differs
from light speed. Adjusted field motion at constant light speed
for remaining momentum at the front end is measured by the
particle. All loops bend between ends for motion in alternative
directions when sent or taken. Stacking and stretching may be
essentials of strings and loops to maintain consistency,
including the limit to light speed acceleration of particles in labs,
by storing momentum in loops that stack and stretch. In the
next chapter, I will further explore the fundamental nature of
gravitons and their responsibility for Lorentz Transformations at
the unseen roots of nature, to remove all the magical pixies and
so on inhabiting physics.

The Human Design

170

Distribution & Interaction

Diagram 36, Particle & Field Rotation & Tension
(1) Particle:
Varying Tensions &
Constant Axial Rotation

(2) Field:
Varying Rotations &
Constant Screw Tension
Decompress

Decompress
Neat Disc
.

Compress Photon
Compress
Fuzzy Atom

Compress Graviton

Decompress

A photon, as a proton well & electron hill in a neutron, braces a

minor graviton string explosion for a proton & electron to stay
intact by angled photon loops of a proton or electron. A
graviton has smooth loops with linear strings originally, to
explode in neutrons formed around a photon for intact rest &
energy angles. Before a Big Bang all was linear, and angled
afterwards within linearity. Particle poles enable graviton string
to send & receive photons with magnetism directed also
across a surface for vibration across rotations. Diagrams 36 (1)
& (2) purport to illustrate particles and fields in a void.

The Human Design

171

In Diagram 36 (1), tensions are charged or massive. On

decay, orbitals angle at short range, rather than with smooth
momentum for a solar system flattening and speeding up.
Polarization of photon loops as positive wells or negative hills
may initiate neutron decay by graviton string around a photon.
Small angular momentum changes of a planet may initiate
polarization to loops across it for shifty geomagnetism. Field
loops in Diagram 36 (2) look like that in my model, or in
Diagrams 32 & 33, with backward photon rotation in Circular
Polarization animations in Wikipedia, or any physics book with
electrical & magnetic lines made by a loop, but labelled a
probabilistic wave-function as it cannot be seen in passage.
Particle Interaction
Diagram 37, Frame for Particle Tension & Rotation
Effect
(Left)

Time
(Back)

Space
(Front)

Lines of
Alternative Tension

Lines of
Constant Rotation

(Right)
Cause

The Human Design

172

Juxtapose Diagram 34 on Diagram 37. Rest & energy combine

in momentum with rotation by angled lines around a
horizontal axis. Rest & energy combine in momentum in
Diagram 34 that has a const ant rotation along the angled
lines in Diagram 37. They also have constant position with
alternative tension, as compressed pinches or decompressed
bulges along the straight lines in Diagram 34. Charge & mass
merge by straight lines for tension in constant rotation. Merger
as particles would be around a complete photon for a neutron
with Strong Force, and it decays intact by a Weak Force.
Field Interaction
Diagram 38, Frame for Field Rotation & Tension
Effect
Rot. Out Rot. Out

Rot. In

Rot. In

Time

Space

Rot. In

Lines of
Alternative Rotation
Lines of
Constant Tension

Rot. In

Rot. Out
Rot. Out
Cause

The Human Design

173

Juxtapose Diagram 35 on Diagram 38, for photon or graviton

intact loop tension at light speed. Straight lines are rotations
with constant tension by angled lines. Photons and gravitons
rotate as intact loops to for constant tension at constant motion.
Fields compress at the front end by a tension delivered at light
speed, and loosen a back end for directional adjustment for
particle motion when given or taken. Loop tension declines
constantly by the inverse square of distance.
Constants & Variables
Rest & energy in space & time distribution coast constantly in
directions as particles, but by varying motions combining for
those directions, for absolute momentum. Fields have varying
directions relative to particles exchanging them, but by
constant motion to directions, for relative momentum.
Electromagnetism & gravitation by cause & effect interactions
merge to both rotate constantly as particles, but their varying
tensions create atoms or solar systems. Their fields have
constant tension exchanges, but with varying forwards or
backwards rotations for their alternative string tensions.
Diagram 39, Constant and Variable Capacities
Particles

Fields

Motion

Variable

Constant

Direction

Constant

Tension

Variable

Rotation

Constant

Variable

Constant

Variable

The Human Design

174

13. The Design in a Void

The previous chapter placed physics in its proper framework,

but this chapter deals with its presently unseen bases.
Description of momentum shift by math lacks understanding
of what shifts. Without a void, math replaces mechanisms
between particles. A universe becomes a math Hologram we
somehow experience normally. After a Big Bang, math
disperses with galaxies by continual linear appearance,
stretching, and expanding of Spacetime geometry with
literal non-existence around it. I am calling it the Emperors
New Clothes, and physicists are royalty. Likewise, instead of
valuing sites, Kant and modern neuroscience simply impose
construction by thought upon feelings. Homunculus minds
supposedly know and control feelings. Mass and Spacetime
reciprocate by Einstein. Kants guiding principle is a bland
do unto others. Interfaces are neglected by both salesmen.
Right Handed Gravitons & Both Handed Photons
There are two issues about a Big Bang. First, a photon needs to
settle crossways around a center point, and secondly, that must
neutralize graviton string density. Distribution of gravitational
force around mass is linear. It is a smooth distribution of force
radially around a center point, but without rotation at a Big Bang.
It is by flat graviton loops off-setting each other in tension both
ways in a void, relatively between loop sources at ends of strings
that carry loops. Graviton loops from alternative sources hold
tension both ways in a void to build motion & density to sources
by reeling string from widened loops. At symmetrical detonation,
there is a string explosion against the smooth linear distribution
of gravitational energy of loops in the void around vibrating
dense string. Strings would be compressed by loops, exactly at
an explosive limit eternally, in my model. But detonation can
compress to release string tension maintained by loops, and

The Human Design

175

decompress loops linearly for motion by exploding string. String

compresses to wind around the complete photon detonator, for a
neutron to form and annihilate in a massive linear expansion for
formation & annihilation of states & anti-states, leaving a residue.
It is a forced choice that may only work one way.
Even angles to explode the relation between graviton strings
and their loops is provided by a complete smooth photon string
in a contained loop in Diagram 11 (1). The explosion is linear,
but angled string is drawn around the photon to make a neutron,
and then replicate neutrons for only a one-in-ten-billion residue
to decay and remain after state & anti-state annihilation, Photon
string can rotate or vibrate either of two ways, as spin or antispin. They wind one way as a neutron upon detonation, but are
immediately countered the other way. Action-reaction transition,
discretely, is compression for a neutron then an anti-neutron,
then decompression of an anti- neutron then a neutron, creating
more of the same, leaving a residue of neutrons to decay as
photons were forced one way to start it. A forced choice by a
photon has action-reaction by friction around annihilations in a
smooth linear chain reaction of density to motion with an
exponential edge to the void by feedback of motion to density.
I noted mass twists to merge around a compressed pulse; and
charge twists to accrete after a decompressed pulse on decay.
The Design can represent intact relations of charge & mass,
with merger by mass twisting and accretion by charge twisting,
without adding the labels left & right. The Design is charged
pulse & depth compressing to merge mass around it, or
decompressing to accrete with mass around it, as states
neutral to any directions of spin. We add spin in the Design,
with cause at right and effect at left because that is a forced
choice by mutuality. When mass merges around charge it can
only spin one way in my model, to avoid graviton friction, then
it has frictional anti-spin and annihilations. Left & right sides
are an equal choice but not the same. Charge must go to right
as a neutron for its mutuality with set graviton rotation.

The Human Design

176

Pulse & depth compress to twist graviton string away from its
strict position in the Design to merge as a neutron to become a
proton oppositely aligned to an electron. Decay decompresses
for free photon loops to twist to accrete in massive rotations.
String angles by mass create alternative spin around smooth
photons that tilt by graviton momentum, as their fundamental
relation by shearing for momentum. They reverse north &
south spontaneously on Earth in geomagnetism, neutral to any
preferred right hand rotation by gravitons. Gravitons require a
right handed rotation for a residue of particles to be created by
a Big Bang, but in geomagnetism, gravitons create poles and
saying whether they are right or left handed depends entirely
on a charged alignment to differentiate them. Gravitons care
nothing for polar choices, it cares only for a right handed
rotation. For its part, an original photon is neutral to rotation
either way, even though it can only detonate one way, but it
has one matching pole for each particle proton & electron after
neutron decay. How do we know if gravitation only rotates right
handed? It does not differentiate poles, even though it always
spins. Photons spin either way for poles as particles and fields,
but now merged as particles and accreting as their fields.
A proton relates to mass as a pivot, and when a neutron
decays, an electron is made and sent with Angular Momentum
from extant massive density of a neutron. Matched rotations,
whatever their spin, are built into the relation, and seen in
anatomy by a twist at a medulla. The same photons can have
the same spin for anti-spin particles, as angled loops
exchanged with opposite spin from particle exchanges. Antiprotons send the left hand photons that an electron would
send, and anti-electrons send the right hand photons that a
proton would send, by reversing the particle spin. A positive
charge of a proton becomes a negative charge of an antiproton, while a negative charge of an electron becomes a
positive charge of an anti-electron. It is well known that
particles and anti-particles are made in pairs. Even so, facing
equal alternatives, a photon string can be spun either way.

The Human Design

177

A human anatomy is neutral by our mirrored anatomy to turn

either way, but a choice has also been made by setting right
as causal past and left as effected future in a rotation driving
past-to-future one way in anatomy. Within a mirrored anatomy
with apparent neutrality to turns as its foundational state, there
is organ asymmetry retained by brain hemispheres and
resolved by crosstalk for right past & left future sides, and that
directs an apparently neutral frame. We turn left forward to
future and right in past in sports & stances universally, and we
are rarely southpaw. Bias underlies the free turn, and it is
reconciled by neural crosstalk that is asymmetrical in a brain
despite apparent mirrored symmetry. Appendage fields are
likewise mirrored neutrally in anatomy along with the neutrality
of a complete photon, and they will follow the spin direction set
internally by right causal past driving left effected future.
Spin is the basis for an equally mirrored anatomy that chooses
to rotate either way by head or body, alternating as north or
south. A vestibular is pivotal, while a medulla twists around it,
for alternative neural flows in one cycle. A massive vestibular
is quite involuntary in balance, and rotates either way for
charge to align either way, as in geomagnetism. However,
gravitons are right handed and favor a turn to right, rotating
with left exposed around, forward to future braced by cause at
back. A charged medulla is a stable brace that crosses leftright between body & head as an intact charged relation for
Strong & Weak purposes, not spin or anti-spin. The twist of a
medulla can apply to either a left or right handed spin. It is not
necessarily tied to sides, as an intact head & body relation for
Weak Force logistics. Charge turns either way by the stable
interface of a mirror tending right past and left future, and
either way by a massive pivot that is neutral to charged tilts,
once spin direction has been set. Once set, any turns either
way can be resolved by crosstalk between hemispheres.
Appendage fields likewise remain neutral to spin in their
accretion alignments in the Design, and they simply follow by a
choice of overall spin having been made by organs.

The Human Design

178

Pure Isotropy
I noted on page 43, a sphere has no knowable center. Pi used
to find it is endless. Eternality is from the self-consistency of
intactness. It need not change, being stable in rest-energy, but
unbalanced by favoring a compressed form. Balance by
neutralization keeps charged stability for decay to atoms.
Gravitons around Pi cannot center, but may center on the
shape of one photon as a discrete mechanism. All gravitons,
by contiguous shearing, use one photon as a detonator for a
mutual center with initial bounce for a wave, if a photon
vibrates evenly. There is a simple tilt to flatten by the charged
axes in Diagram 6, for merger upon detonation, aligning away
from buffeting by epicycle field loop momentum. A detonator
snuffs out from no energy at the center slot if aligns for antispin friction and the compression is permanent. It is no more
than an even chance to a given compression, as it existed
infinitely with that potential. Be thankful it did not snuff out.
Continual Spacetime expansion in physics has Symmetry
Breaking for particles to bridge separation conveniently as if it
is not happening in our solar system. It requires a relation of
mass and expanding Spacetime, which must relate anyway by
tying ad hoc to an Inflation to disperse particles. Particles keep
original proximities and velocities, and continue as if coasting
in a void, consistent with my model. Einstein uses three
spatial dimensions and time, and we should be able to wind
back and see shape to expansion, but this is not possible in
Relativity, which views from mass and not from a void at
mass. Einsteins Spacetime could be placed entirely within a
void to view it, but an absolute Gods Eye view from a void is
replaced by an absolute analogous to Expanding Rubber with
pure Isotropy. It is two-dimensional rubber that is flat locally,
and flat or curved as one universe. There is only a rubber
surface, with all observers seeing pure Isotropic recession.
This is uses one fact, Earths view of approximate Isotropy,
and more approximate as we try to measure outwards.

The Human Design

179

Expanding Rubber provides pure Isotropy relative to every

observer. Reconciling their views in the rubber analogy can only
be by abstract frame translations referencing two dimensions as
three and saying "they're reconciled". Place objects on a table
and move them apart as if the table top were stretching
everywhere at the same rate and see how every observer sees
linearity around it, faster if further away, with all having pure
Isotropy. Take that concept, and apply it to spherical view
around you and it breaks down completely if every observer has
that view. It is supposedly saved by actually existing in two
dimensions, flat or curved, creating a Hologram that we
experience as three dimensions. Continuous time is added to
any spatial representation, but the Hologram obfuscates time.
In Wikipedia under Metric Expansion of Space: "'space' is a
mathematical concept that stands for the three-dimensional
manifold in which our respective positions are embedded" and
"metric expansion of space is considered by cosmologists to
be an observed feature on the basis that although we cannot
see it directly, scientists have tested the properties of the
universe and observation provides compelling confirmation". In
a puffball, we can exist near a center, assuming we have
measured Isotropy around earth correctly. This is better than a
math model we cannot see directly, which stands for what we
can. The Metric is also applied to explosion in a void from a
central location, but with an impossible twist in Relativity. Our
visible universe becomes a Hologram based on a Geodesic.
Instead, see gravitation as it is on Earth. Karl Popper noted
pure Isotropy using Earths view is not falsifiable. General
Relativity is also used to explain tricky accelerating expansion.
At some point physics might awaken from dogmatic reliance
on math without mechanism. Original compression at a Big
Bang as a non-rotating sphere obeys the universal inverse
square law of gravitation without accretion. My model has
radial and tidal forces from a neutralizing wave that leaves
particles independent in a neutral gravitational field at a Big

The Human Design

180

Bang. The compression is smoothed across the collective by

uniform expansion, and locally every frame is the same, based
on standard particle capacities in the Design. Abstract pure
Isotropy would leave mass to clump into uniform balls.
Mechanisms in a void would not attract by the convenient
curvature of Spacetime. Gravitons push particles together in a
void by being anchored to extended strings from particles to
rotate forward. Photons hinge to protons and electrons to pull
them together by drawing momentum with least resistance in a
void by rotating backwards. A void does nothing. Nature has a
push & pull of momentum in a void to less pressure out into a
void, or into lower energy bonding in a void between particles. I
rely on photon hinges with cup-like contact or graviton anchors
with hook-like contact. Nature is inevitably limited in options for
physics completely unexplained mechanisms for attraction or
attraction & repulsion. In fact, the only options might be
hinging by a cup-join and anchoring by a hook-join, to common
directions of momentum for each, which is a key. The putative
wave-function of Quantum Mechanics is no more than a loop
with variation around an axis in a void, and always known
relative to particles. In a void, it is literally unable to be known
by correct definition of momentum, badly obfuscated by the
Uncertainty Principle. Wake up, a void keeps you honest.
The role of gravitons is completely unattributed in current
physics and in Higgs Field speculations, which rely on General
Relativity as math between masses. Mutuality extends from a
Big Bang, when gravitons served photons, perhaps irresistibly
from shearing, for whatever mass photons need to use their
bounce. In procreation, it means one levity sperm enables a
gravity egg and womb to gestate for a complete new person
around a sperm contribution of specific DNA ratios. As noted, I
leave open the possibility that in fact cold gravitons dominated
before the Big Bang but for one photon to serve as a model for
all others afterwards in a neutralizing chain reaction, as in
biological reproduction.

The Human Design

181

Distorted Discrete Spaces & Times

Each particle is unable to determine its coasting motion in a
void. Ignoring gravitational attraction, any two parties in
inertial motion would have symmetry to their relative views of
motion from their states of assumed rest. We can say they
all have absolute motion from the Big Bang in my model,
but while that sets their overall scheme within an intact
collective in a void, all measurement is relative in a void. Each
particle measures fields at a constant speed at all times,
which has consequences when parties can only measure
motions relative to their state of rest. It means that they will
systematically disagree in their observations of other events
and reciprocally mirror observations of each other.
Photons, as constants in a void, substitute for the void by
providing an absolute when it frames a relative state of
assumed rest as a basis for observation of inertial and
gravitational motions of particles. Being an absolute at light
speed, parties changes within the void of time and space
between light signals will be relevant. Simultaneity and a set
location are essential to measurement in Relativity, and my
model. A single event will have its light start simultaneously
in time from one location in space for all viewing parties. The
absolute void allows specific locations within space, despite
different motions relative to other parties. The void also
allows simultaneous time for all parties, despite different
delays in photon receipt for each party.
Absolute space and time are a setting for a range of absolute
motions of particles, and for the constant motion of fields,
even if measurement is relative. Using light, we see that as
parties approach light speed in particular, their motions
between light signals will give them different measurements
of events. Discrete particles and their extensive fields literally
have discrete spaces and times in my model. This leads
Relativity Theory to say they are the only spaces and times in

The Human Design

182

existence, with magical Spacetime as a field. As particles

move, a distortion arises when we try to reconcile them as two
rest frames using light signals. Light Clock Experiments show
that one party can actually view a Light Clock in the rest frame
of the other party and see it is running at a different rate than
ones own. Light reveals rest frames, and so a moving rest
frame relative to a stationary one will be distorted.
A particle with weight on a mountaintop is stationary, and light
does not read its frame by the simple geometry of relative
motions. Light instead reveals a rest frame consistent w i t h
real relative momentum from the gravitational field affecting
the particle. Photons may interact with gravitons to measure
the field affecting the particle and its inertial state. This might
distort for acceleration, consistent with continual weight to a
particle that is stationary. Gravitation may distort discrete
spaces and times between frames, and photons provide
consistent measurements from their adjustments to gravitons.
Unlike symmetry of two views of inertial particle motion, there
is only one source of gravitation and observers a t o p and at
base of a mountain would have opposite rather than the
same distortions. Particles in weak fields would compress
linearly within limits breached only on extreme compression.
An extreme example of a source is the Sun, which Redshifts
light escaping it, seen from a weak gravitational side, our side.
Photons may be affected by directional change to loop back
ends compacting to gain, or extending to lose, momentum in a
graviton field while keeping light speed at front end. Loop
directional change results in frequency change as Redshift
moving away from the source of graviton loops or Blueshift
moving towards it, and increased if the source is moving
those ways. Directional change is by shearing of backward
rotating photons with forward rotating gravitons in blending by
shearing, unlike photons or gravitons with their own. A
graviton loop can be increased or decreased by inertial
motion of a source. Gravitons resolve a net relative

The Human Design

183

momentum by shearing with their own in the void, for photons

to have paths to Earth from a source when loose after
emission. Photons boost along graviton paths if a source
moves with photons, and drain if against it, by shearing to
affect frequency and curve a passage. Curve remains in
graviton strings in a void as a history balancing out energy
transfer for a frequency change. To leave a curve in gravitons,
photons shear them, and in turn undergo frequency change.
Dimensionality & Periodicity
Time changes along with space in relative momentum. The
periodic frame changes along with the dimensional. Lorentz
Transformations are resting strings that shorten or lengthen
as two-dimensional spatial vectors with temporal third
dimensional widths carrying pulses. Discrete space and time
by strings as particles compare to organs of a human
anatomy, divided between two-dimensional spatial height and
depth extending at our center line, with a temporal width
extending around our center line to carry a pulse along depth.
A void of continuous space & time is conceived by everyone
as space in three dimensions, and time. Discrete space &
time are conceived in Relativity as three dimensions over time
that creates a curved Geodesic or Hologram. More mass
means more curvature, which moves with mass and extends
at light speed around mass. Descriptions of momentum shifts
by math are not definitions. A ratio for a relation of properties,
as the Lorentz relation of spatial contraction and temporal
expansion, is quite secure. From that we can extrapolate the
rest and energy relation of mass, which is quite secure. Other
ratios exist to define the Twenty Physical Constants of
Physics for two forces and their two mutual forces, Strong &
Weak, which appear to be mostly secure. Einsteins attempt at
definitions of space & time in terms of mass, was nonexistent.
It describes by using a Geodesic illustration of how the force
appears to operate, as if the Geodesic is a mechanism.

The Human Design

184

Henrik Lorentz had rigor, like Gottfried Leibniz, and Arthur

Schopenhauer. Mechanisms to his equations concerned him.
Einstein generalized a new view of gravitation consistent
with Lorentz. Geodesics rely on a common view of three
dimensional space with time in Transformations. Geodesics
add only a description consistent with Transformations. It
needs to be defined by a mechanism, to prove that ratio,
rather than relying on consistency with it in geometrical
illustrations of it. Self-consistency and the direct relation of
mass with Spacetime emboldened Einstein to postulate his
theories, meaning thats all there is. That is far too bold. The
difficulty of gravitons arises from their most basic place in
nature, being literally omnipresent. As we move through their
fluid, measurement is relative to concentrations as relative
weight at all times, or a photon product. We cannot know
shared concentration as absolute background. We know flat
action-reaction events relatively in an unknown absolute,
including photon receipt after passage through that medium.
Use a human anatomy as a model, consistent with Diagrams
34-35 & 37-38 in physics. Particles are made of graviton
strings that have two dimensions, massive height with
charged depth, extending as an upright plane. Organs
likewise extend at the left-right center line of anatomy as a
plane with height and depth, along and across that plane in
function, for resolution between them by brain hemispheres in
awareness. We also have circular width and a central pulse
temporally merging with that spatial plane to extend it across
a period extending to or from the present moment of a pulse.
The spatial plane has width merged into it centrally at ears
and peripherally at a heart, for planes around a pulse centrally
at a spine or within a pulse peripherally at a tongue.
The relation of a plane of height & depth as a spatial border
between discrete states, and a width to that plane extending
those borders by temporal sequences within or around pulses,
defines the discrete relation of space and time. Newtons void

The Human Design

185

provides a means to view the mechanical interfaces between

strings with loops that are defined, discretely, by those spatial
and temporal properties of mass. Newtons void is adaptable
as a preconception, to become three dimensions as curved
space, with that space extending over time at light speed in
proportion to masses as they move. Einstein relies on three
dimensional space over time, and nothing more. He supports
the use of that same preconceived frame, but as a Geodesic
that can provide pure Isotropy by giving it a Metric derived
from Lorentz, inserted ad hoc to suit our view of expansion.
Space as three dimensions can be used by Newton and
Einstein to some extent. At the level of proof of discrete
spaces and times, my proposal is that mass is resting string
with extended depth and height as a ribbon, with circular
width accompanying height to make a loop, and a central
pulse driving ahead across depth for a loop, as a vibrating
string. As gravitons, regular vibrations create loops in resting
string, and loops shear with other loops in the void. Motion is
given to string by having less of it, from wider & denser loops,
as a pulley. The relation of resting string motion with loop
width & density is linear, so that more loop from width means
more motion in that direction by string to provide it, but also
denser string. Both width & density are temporal, as density
relates to a pulse through string, densifying and slowing by
counter-shearing other loops as width increases.
Spatial electromagnetic depth changes with a pulse change,
by reducing in its direction. Gravitational width & height of the
string might remain constant because width change is for
wider loops, and they stay constant as momentum is taken by
a denser pulse. Height also remains constant as depth
shortens with a pulse. Pulse & depth distort by confining the
spatial ribbon along depth with height constant, and by
confining the rate of pulse to slow it and keep width constant
as it approaches light speed. Photons confine and gravitons
extend, as opposites whose mutuality is for everything in

The Human Design

186

between compete opposites, which is all of nature. A photon

might partition ultimately for a head & body, suggested in
Diagram 33. I only use a graviton in Diagram 31 because they
can make photons in my model, due to extreme compression
in original conditions. I compare a photon well & hill to a head
& body respectively, because photons provide the basis for
neutrons to form, and then angles for protons & electrons.
Gravitons can replicate the original photon, and both depth &
pulse are capacities of a graviton. Massive width & height as
mass have motion inverse to depth & pulse as charged
resting string that distorts as such, with less space & more
time created by density with extreme momentum, as an
increase in rest mass. A relation of mass & charge may be a
product of that inverted relation in gravitons alone. A pulse
sets present moments, compressing to or decompressing
from them, relevant to a Big Bang and decay. A contained
pulse may detonate for neutrons around its containment at a
Big Bang, and an extended pulse braces decay. Gravitons
may be responsible by way of photons. Accretion by pulses
mediate if economy to electrical neutrality is broken by decay.
A pulse may appear from no pulse, uniquely in these events.
Sharing four factors as height, width, depth, and pulse is the
way to make progress in physics. Three dimensions of a void
of space & time exist, but for two-dimensional discrete spatial
existence side by side as planes, and temporal existence as
width spreading with a pulse that sets a present time. They
complement to the same logic as one void, which merges
them interdependently, so one cannot exist without the other
anyway. As a void, width has space, but relates to time, to
spread equally around an immediate present, continually.
Discretely, a pulse is a present that persists by width to a
future with a past record, if that discrete present moment
arises by a pulse. The true definition of continuity is by
reference to discreteness. It is a void as continuity of discrete
spatial planes, and as continuity of discrete temporal waves.

The Human Design

187

The Twin Paradox in Wikipedia and in all encyclopedias is a

mess. Relativity relies on reciprocity, if parties view each
others Light Clocks, as a Thought Experiment. Each has
space contraction and time dilation in its direction of motion as
viewed by the other. But atomic clocks actually fly around the
world at fractionally slower rates than on the ground. Light
reveals that there is contraction & dilation in the direction of
motion, reciprocally. Contractions & dilations cancel out by
directions, as reciprocity by light to view them, but limited to
mirrored views by light that always lack attribution as to who
is moving. Unattributed reality is a party in motion contracts &
dilates, despite reciprocal views by light. By gravitation there
is always physical change on page 182. Electromagnetic
mirroring needs deconstruction. Relativity is shallow math
from real Lorentz Transformations. Relativity of Simultaneity
is merely absolute simultaneity measured relatively. Einstein
opted to dodge this issue because the answer is his Special
has light signals, and his General has one-way gravity, both in
a void and badly partial. Einstein does not question his work.
For the basics, at least revisit the simple relation of a photon to
an electron, making it orbit by exchange at its pole, or vibrate
by exchange across its surface. All illustrations in physics,
such as Circular Polarization have the shape of a loop. Use
the same inverse square law and light speed, for gravitons as
sectioned loops, but opposite in function. Use a void to
delineate. We can go further in, and further out to a universe in
a void. Every particle has a void allowing free range to strings
to create mechanisms. Omnipresent gravitons are likely cold,
clear, tiny, and experienced by relative weight of flat actionreaction events within their absolute fluid. We never measure
or experience what is out there beyond interfaces, including
photons moving to and from that void, but known at impact to
say there is a tree, over there. We only ever know or
experience relative impacts to neurons and nothing beyond.
You are a free floater by interfaces, and completely locked in.
Unless you are in extreme deprivation, you have Free Will too.

The Human Design

188

Strings & Loops, and Sexuality

In Diagram 32, the two gravitons make a vaginal opening
with clitoris at the counter- rotation point. In Diagram 33, the
two photons tog ether make the com plet e photon loops
in Diagram 11 (1), both as a well one way, and a hill the
other way, intact as a male penis head. Testes and penis are
at the edge of anatomy, levitating to aim multiple tiny sperm to
levitate towards an egg. A vagina extends from one massive
fallen egg in a uterus based inside the anatomy extending as
an embryo grows. Fertilization is by a complete charged
oscillation, as both a well & hill, in insulated gravity for rising
friction until a centered match at fertilization.
The Weak Force is a split between head and body by levity
males to ideal ends of a home, and the Strong Force is
attraction by females at a nurturing distance from the real
origins of a home. We have Testosterone and Estrogen sex
hormones, for males to be excited in springtime and females
tidal monthly. The Weak is a mechanism for charge by neutron
decay, with an opposite process of formation. From decay,
photons can be sent, and they are retained on formation.
Strong Force is attractive at a specific distance for protons or
neutrons to confine in a nucleus, by Binding Energy from
gravitation in high compression for larger atomic nuclei, for
more atoms than helium after a Big Bang.
A Big Bang has particle & anti-particle annihilation and different
types of neutron decay in the first minutes, and then protons
and neutrons compress by gravitation to bind by the Strong
Force while Weak decay continues around new nuclei
formation for atoms beyond helium. In reproduction, those
principles apply to levity and gravity chromosomal blending, but
specific roles of Strong and Weak may be clearer in star and
supernova syntheses. There is neutron formation by massive
compression, hold of protons and neutrons by Strong Force,
and decay by Weak Force to become a new atom.

The Human Design

189

In anatomy, graviton loops hold photon loops as a male

compresses physically and hormonally to make and hold
sperm, while reassured by Strong Force linguistics, and then
decays by Weak Force release of sperm, then resumes intact
template function. Neutrons can form and decay, and disrupt
the intact template function of an atom. Photons are retained,
just as sperm are made by that hormonal use rather than intact
template function, to release on decay. In supernovae,
compression for a new element is by gravitational compression
as the reverse of decay, then Strong capture and Weak decay.
Anatomically, the Weak Force operates at the neck at the
junction between rest and energy, at the logistical link of the
spine to the N Cloth discussed in chapter 8. It enables
coordination of both, but favors logistics, which favors a body in
moves coordinated by head linguistics when commands are
given. For females, linguistics is soothing more than
commanding, in its role of nurturing an infant closely but at a
polite distance for parenting, as a Strong Force. A voice
responds and reassures an infant by tones. It may be counterintuitive to see Weak as N Cloth logistics and Strong as N Cord
linguistics, but small tones and words are important, and
logistics can merely proceed down a line of least resistance.
Polite distance is essential for psychological nurturing of an
infant to be alternately a child and a parent, and for the mother
to know herself also as a partner at equally close distancing.
As noted, Strong & Weak forces are not anti-spin. They are
safely encompassed within spin by extant particles after a Big
Bang. In anatomy, they tend mass by pivotal vestibular and
charge by lateral medulla systems determining site functions
and their awareness by mutuality. Gravitons rotate right
handed, while photons are intact to rotate right and left handed,
but that gets resolved as right handed for a proton and left for
an electron in my model, for a pivotal sympathetic rotation with
gravitons for particle formation at a Big Bang. I note that my
model is open to protons being hills and electrons wells, with

The Human Design

190

protons left handed and electrons right handed, and with

gravitons left handed to match protons,. The important thing is
symmetry between photon rotations and shearing between a
complete photon and gravitons for a neutron, retaining Strong
Force as a proton, and complying with graviton rotations for it.
The Strong is a graviton force in my model, as a mechanism to
retain a reserve of mass from compressions for atom formation
beyond iron, and release a reserve when the nucleus divides
as explosive energy. Mutuality with graviton rotation would be
more relevant to a proton retained from neutron decay, for an
electron to move away from its pivot for stable lateral orbitals.
Linguistics is edged and toned, unlike rough commands of
males with logistics as a sorting edge to a home. In springtime,
a penis rises to soothing linguistics easily distracting the male
head for mating, requiring logistical commitment. Compression
into a neutron is like a male disengaged from atomic template
function by diversion into a void insulated by graviton loops of
a vagina extending on strings from a womb. That diversion
compresses bodily and socially, like gravitation compresses
particles into neutrons to be bound by the Strong and worked
over by Weak decay. There is compression and decay. A male
decays releasing photon sperm on edge between X or Y, with
gene deficiency of Y for males somewhat problematic to male
health. Males also live shorter lives, which must be related.
Females might have a linguistic psychological approach. Males
can recognize this as no means no. Retention by the Strong
Force of females is throughout surrender to male logistics at
the body, in a monthly cycle and a presentation of X or X, as
one base. There is no decay, but there is the explosion, as they
rely on linguistics to attract as a welcoming base to grow an
infant. By linguistic reassurance in closeness with distance, a
male compresses to nurturing used two ways, by female
psychological reconciliation as partner and as mother. She
knows that it is natural and bigger than both of them socially.
Males edge alternately between parenthood and partnering.

The Human Design

191

Females distinguish psychologically between them at a close

distance throughout. This difference is from the equal biological
intimacy of females as partners and child bearers. Hormones
are promoters, and sex may tend gravity females in species,
and levity males as individuals, promoting alternative ways.
With logistical or linguistic bias, male testosterone and female
estrogen flood from hormonal regulation. Sex divides in order
to create a new individual. Blending is the point, not separation,
even though further creation requires that separation in some
people, not all. It is a wide arc around successful copulation,
on pages 54-55, rather than a simple grinding action. It is both
psychological and physical. It extends altruistic drives into
societies for balanced growth within a normal range. Cloth
Mother Experiments with monkeys show the importance of
nurturing to an infant, but in need of reciprocal attention from
the mother, and, often overlooked, a father evident to it banging
out pathways for it to venture beyond the mother.

The Human Design

192

14. Heat Loss in Physics & Biology

In this chapter, the Big Bang is a globally concurrent event of

heat loss, when there is a one-off annihilation of particles &
anti-particles. Our reproduction is a globally recurrent event
involving heat loss, by repeated replication of DNA nucleotides
& anti-nucleotide sheaths. A system develops to draw down to
repeated replications. Each has double compression & double
decompression, and economy drives each of them. Entropy
is an ass of a concept. It is disorder left over when economy of
energy drives to human types by mass & charge in mutuality,
and best completely avoided. Just track the economical drive.
In biology, DNAs open nucleotides for discrete bonding have
anti-nucleotides, but Y and X chromosomes aggregating them
do not. Photons and gravitons, and X and Y chromosomes,
integrate mutually without an offset, which is reserved for
particles or nucleotides with their antis in offset. Comparably,
in physics, there are anti-neutrons and their constituent subatomic particles, but not photon and graviton fields that
aggregate them. A preference to particles or nucleotides is
consistent all the way from an initial preference in my model at
a Big Bang, and from the outset consistently for nucleotides as
only they do the coding, from basic to complex life forms.
Sex cells neutralize by mutual fertilization, for an accumulating
residue to evolve from mutated replications for more stable
bonding, for heat loss as enabled by fertilization. Y and X
mutuality has one Y and three Xs, as Y and X genes with
extra X and X in support. Gravitation is neutralized by mutual
expansion, for remaining residue to evolve from annihilation,
for escaping photons, as enabled by expansion. I generalize a
Big Bang as gravitational rest mass lost as energy to
neutralize the residue, including all energy invested for Cosmic
Microwave Background made by a neutralized annihilation.

The Human Design

193

Diagram 40, Static-Dynamic Enabling of Heat Loss

(1) Cosmology
Effect
Dynamic

Dynamic

Static

Static

Time

Space
Static

Static
Dynamic

Dynamic
Cause

(2) Biology

Dynamic

Dynamic

Static

Static

Static

Static

Dynamic

Ionic
Levity

Covalent
Gravity

Dynamic

Positive
Rest

Negative
Energy

The Human Design

194

First, I will expand from pages 101-102. Sex systems are

biological factual replicas of physics at a junction via chemistry.
This is by the shearing sex organs themselves as loop & string
intact for each, relevant to use of Strong & Weak reconstruction
across an intact human atom when direct shearing happens
within a supernova of species pressure to breed on pages
188-191. But as intact replicas in reconstruction across intact
states, they might not differ from the state they have at the Big
Bang. I also leave open the roles of Strong & Weak, created by
gravitons winding around photons at a Big Bang, inevitably. The
system is fundamentally static-dynamic in physics & biology. On
page 180, I compared them at the level of one photon replicated
by gravitons at a Big Bang. A better fit than reconstruction in a
supernova is the Big Bang event itself, with Strong & Weak
preserved for fuller use later. The irritant photon, like the sperm,
has a striving role, but male & female folk are equal atoms.
Fertilization to an even chance of replacing oneself as a model
is necessity now for humans. Sadly, it has come to that.
Heat loss after a Big Bang continues as atoms store heat
forming in supernovae and lose it making compounds, then
biology mutates dominant genes, with most heat exchange
with environment being from gene expression not replication.
DNA encodes reproduction to replicate repeatedly. In Diagram
40, static and dynamic states complement continuous states
as a totality of discrete mass or DNA across neutralization.
Annihilation or replication releases photons on static-dynamic
neutralization at a Big Bang and reproductive neutralization
in biology by blended fertilization.
Heat & Homeostasis
Concurrent explosion has only an estimated one in ten billion
particles remaining as a residue, so we are talking about one
in billions. In biology, ten per billion bases mutate in DNA
replication, pared 70% for deleterious mutations, making a
few per billion. Nature makes us fight a mutation barrier. More

The Human Design

195

dumb numbers are four forces & four nucleotide bases, and
twenty physical constants for forces & twenty amino acids for
nucleotide bases. Coding strands ride static-dynamic change,
when repeated replications are pulled by more stable bonding
as a functional or non-functional mutation growing. Plants tend
to gain heat for chemical energy, to lose heat from around
them. Warm mammals tend to lose heat to around them.
All cells are in complete immersion in environments, for heat
loss each way as a fundamental exchange. Forget terms
like entropy and track the economy of exchange, to lose heat
to a final human product still immersed in its environment. In
Diagram 41, there is sheathing in sex cells statically for
Recombination before fertilization, then dynamic release for
replication. Cells are a product of drawing down to economical
bonding, with mutation in leaps by momentum.
Diagram 41, Nucleotides of DNA Strand
(1) Static Offset

Code

Sheath

C
G

(2) Dynamic Replication

Code

Sheath

The Human Design

196

Drawing in around a cell challenges the Central Dogma out.

Prior to fertilization, the sex cells of the male and female have
static DNA Recombining. They fertilize for new combinations,
for Recombination again when they mature. After fertilization,
the single zygote cell has chemicals it needs from blending of
sperm and egg to dynamically replicate and divide into new
cells. Genes mutate from replications, and cells grow by
gene expressions from exposed DNA coding. Growth
gathers the chemicals DNA needs to replicate, mutate, and
express genes. DNA point mutations are accompanied by
deletions and insertions of sections, and perhaps duplications
of sections. In Epigenetics, it is currently supposed that DNA
flexibly splices genes based on Homeostasis, which needs to
be broadened as a concept for heat gain and loss within
overall heat loss after a Big Bang.
In my model, DNA, its mechanisms, its internal environment,
and its external environment, are all states of economy to
shape DNA as an adaptable base for more economy. The
outward view of DNA to functions, which I maintain in general
in describing DNA promoting all bonding, even to its own
mechanisms, becomes countered for mutation in the course of
replication. Slippage in splicing to suit environment points to
cracks in the Central Dogma by mechanisms, and mutation
may obviate slippage in an overall drive of environmental
convection drawing down to replications releasing heat by
regular mutations. In growth, there is gravity action inwards
around a membrane, for levity bonding inwards within it, for
levity heat loss outwards around it, and explosive gravity
mutation outwards within it, under the heat of a Sun. Plants,
like supernovae, store heat to lose it eventually, and animals
use that storage to lose heat more quickly than plants rotting.
If spliced changes in populations suit environments, a mutated
individual can remain undistinguished within a population to
breed freely within it and pass on changes. Mutation may be
obviation of splicing. Change may be achieved regularly in the

The Human Design

197

relation of DNAs internal mechanisms and chemical availability

in a setting of environmental heat. Environment may bond for
cells to grow by losing heat and drawing back as mutations for
more heat loss under a Sun, in an overall course of releases for
mutations. We can willfully use functions, but safe mutation
may be by chemicals using their environments suitably, as in
the example given later at the foot of page 206, which will be
achieved unknowingly, unless securely identified. I note if
mutations are entirely random, humans still have the most
comprehensive chemical embodiment on Earth, and the issue
reverts to prolificacy of mutations furthering greatest economy
from convective chemistry. Language in science is lazy about
hubristic paradigms, like 51 percent chances promoted to 100.
Concurrent & Recurrent Heat Loss
In physics, global expansion was a concurrent explosive event
of heat loss by annihilations, with independent photons as
background radiation around a residue of particle trajectories
in a completely gravitationally smoothed universe. In biology,
recurrent reproduction enables repeated replication of DNA for
a residue of mutations, drawing down to stable bonding of a
new coding strand and sheath in a warm environment on
Earth. In physics, concurrent residue remains in dispersal. In
biology, a recurrent residue accumulates in dispersal.
An island is a supernova, using gravitation of an accumulation
of atoms to compress them at its center into containments of
heat, as heavier atoms. There is heat loss, but containment
in heavy atoms. Atoms are assemblages of preserved heat
against the tide of global heat loss, but subject to further heat
loss as they assemble into compounds. In local evolutions as
epicycles, a Sun compounds dynamically to release heat, and
on Earth, lower energy bonding of atoms creates compounds.
Nature winds down to store heat in plants, like supernovae,
and lose it in animals as atoms settle into compounds with
stable lower energy orbitals all across a planetary surface.

The Human Design

198

15. Ancient & Modern Ideas

I would like to provide some ideas about the history of human
thought across ancient and modern science and philosophy,
including methodology. I will begin with the ancient concept of
the Microcosm and the Macrocosm.
Comparisons between our anatomical capacities and the
capacities of the forces of nature may make the evolution of
our anatomies within our environment the realization of the
ancient idea of the Microcosm of our environment
corresponding to the Macrocosm universe. There was no
particular scientific basis for this concept, but the Design
defines both and presents our anatomy as an embodiment of
the environment. I wonder if the mathematicians among
ancients and alchemists could have arrived at the simple
arrangement of chemicals that comprises the Design. We
have valued Four Elements and a possible correspondence
between the Macrocosm and the Microcosm for thousands of
years without making much progress along those lines.
Ancient & Modern Approaches
Material and spiritual empires may have kept us pre-occupied
until after the death of Galileo (1564-1642), and may have
delayed the emergence of a modern world-view. Ancient
speculation about substance, form, forces, and life may have
been followed by more modern universalities and precision in
a division of approaches between a discrete relative view by
Einstein and Kant, and an absolute continuous view by
Newton and Darwin. However, the modern world continued
material and spiritual preoccupations, and has advanced little
beyond those four moderns. We have been in a long industrial
stupor and I do not like our chances at maintaining a healthy
planet at this stage of ignorant development.

The Human Design

199

Progress is by a simple framework. Popper said science is

falsifiable, and falsifications are subject to falsification. This
correctly leaves us on an endless task of making knowledge
more secure. It is never verified in whole or part, from Godel.
Equating falsification with science is wrong. I define science as
reliable knowledge. Falsification secures knowledge, while
reliability is improved by better theories. We can make secure
measurements, or speculate logically about a whole logic or
root fact beyond our grasp, to progress. Physics needs
falsification, but metaphysics does not, including a void, which
is unmeasurable. Momentum is also unmeasurable by actionreaction at one time & place, which is how all measurement is
done. Heisenberg just conforms to the definition of momentum
by ruling out its measurement. I naturally include metaphysics
within science, inextricably bound to physics in the Scheme,
which makes a whole theory possible, to discover root facts.
Deductively, contained awareness leaves us insecure about
the future, including whether the Sun will rise tomorrow, as we
sway to value our past, like David Hume. Inductively exposed
to a future, containment challenges insight into itself because it
is only experienced on the inside, avoiding analysis from the
outside as cause and effect, by outside accessing the inside to
know it. There is no access, merely use of the inside in
rigorous objectivity around itself, but some are more insightful
about their own insides than others.
Ancient philosophers usefully considered: predetermined
existence based on formal standards, by Plato; predetermined
existence based on substantive essences, by Aristotle;
applying universal principles to individual instances in physics,
by Galileo; and applying universal principles to individual
instances for humans, by Socrates. They had a context of
challenges set by others, including: Parmenides view on
rational access to reality; Anaximanders model of reality;
different views about one reality in physics by Copernicus; and
different views about one reality for humans by Protagoras.

The Human Design

200

Diagram 42, Ancient & Modern Perspectives

The Scheme
Forces

Substance
Form

Discrete
Continuous

Life

Continuous
Discrete

Ancients and Moderns

Galileo

Socrates

Aristotle

Einstein

Darwin

Plato

Newton

Kant

Industry backing empire enabled the Greeks to progress from

500 and 300 BC, then Galileo 1,900 years later when Italy had
an empire from bookkeeping, then English & German empires
backed partial efforts. Populations exploded using industry &
spirituality to provide. Industrial & spiritual educators have
failed. Payers overly value the product and resist change by
invested inertia. I am amazed at lack of invention by leaders
and the gullibility of the public, but misery finds company by
leading. A long contagion can end, and our most pioneering
era can begin, but we now have depletion. We have had two
thousand years of sluggish ideas dotted with partial ones, with
the odd effort by others supported by empires, like da Vinci.

The Human Design

201

Absolutely Continual & Relatively Discrete

In physics, Newton tended to an absolute view of rest mass in
motion in continuous space-time and around continual actionsreactions. He did not aggregate his actions-reactions by
gravitation to propose a neutralized universe using
combustion, as an obvious next step. Einstein tended to a
relative view, with all objects having their own discrete space
and time frames by which they measure the world after
discoveries of fields for delays in electromagnetic (and
gravitational) interactions. He could not extend to an adequate
gravitational theory. He relied on parsimony to deny a void.
Maintaining it, he opened a way for math models of pure
Isotropy for expanding Spacetime dispersing with particles,
otherwise particles would have literally nothing to move in.
Newton admits relative measurement, but his ignorance of
particle and field capacities in his absolute Gods Eye view
overlooks the potential of the discrete relative space and time
frames of Einstein in Special Relativity, which I apply in a void.
A discrete event viewed from an absolute continuum must
recognize the view from the discrete state itself more intimately
than Newton imagined, but Einsteins parsimony cannot
remove a void in a view of gravitational events. A void is a way
to a view of a whole universe and interfaces between discrete
states creating their views. We can use universal laws of
gravitation to model in a void and forget abstract pure Isotropy.
I credit Newton for metaphysics, and in Diagram 42 his
contribution to physics is formal, as interfaces can only be
measured using a shared void of space and time. However,
Einstein is credited for discrete substances having those
forms, restricting actual measurement to subjectivity.
Darwin had an absolute view by substantive continuities
applying universally. He failed to provide an adequate scheme
for discrete events like a human anatomy and its mind, with
Selection lacking prediction of species evolution. Newton knew

The Human Design

202

action-at-a-distance was strange, but it meant he could not

advance to a better discrete explanation of reality. Kant used
David Humes skepticism about the relation of mind and world
to confine us to our construct, but it is a discrete process open
to continual stimulation that contains stimulation for contained
awareness. It allows objectivity, despite bias and conditioning.
Anyone can invent a fiction, but Kant had faith in rationality
by ordered forms in discrete applications of logic. We can be
rational and objective, from obvious peak to peak.
I credit Kant for psychology despite errors, but there is no soul
hiding in the instants that comprise the subject, I. It is also
behavioral and continual, in shaping by a world. I spilt into
biology there to credit Darwin despite errors. Science is
metaphysics, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology and
methodology. Chemistry is industry, not biology or psychology,
no credit to anyone. Methodology ties Socrates conformity to
definition and Poppers falsifiability, but combine falsifiable
physics and un-falsifiable metaphysics for a whole theory, with
a spare metaphysical frame. Reality leads invention to lead
discovery of theories about reality, in my own progress. Form
as logic follows function as fact in observation, but form leads
understanding of fact. Aesthetics supposedly discriminates
between form and function across their combinations, by trifles
despite the clear economical drive of the Design. I note billion
dollar Supercollider flotsam, Blue Brain Project jetsam, and
Manned Space Mission joyrides, show ridiculous ignorance.
Newton & Darwin had nave ideas. Einstein & Kant theorized
naked forms clothed with substances so well, naked emperors
appear clothed to onlookers. Nave practicality may be English
from openness to invasion. Claustrophobic relativism may be
German as an enclosed hub. English attempts at empire cut
down villagers in nave practical cultivation across centuries.
German relativism provided our most vicious example of terror
based only on the babblings of a goon. There is no jest here, I
am trying to find a context for fully tendentious perspectives.

The Human Design

203

16. Ideological Implications

There may be ideological implications from knowledge
provided by the Design. Ideological implications shape views
of ourselves in religion, politics, economics, and other stuff.
Design & Designer
I propose only that the laws of the universe are as given, and
are our starting point. The limit to asking why may be
reached if existence shows itself to be logically self-consistent
in creating human awareness capable of understanding
existence itself. A burden of proof is set by existing hypotheses
using parsimony, as economy in reasoning, and it would apply
to ignore Gods if you reasonably tire of refutations.
Belief is not arrogant. It is reasoned, and anyone can only
reject each individual subjective account of Gods one by one
on their own terms, facing difficulties if people claim personal
miracles. Reasoning is by hypotheses defined by more secure
knowledge to extend it, test it, and so on, until you have a selfconsistent whole. I cannot ultimately believe either way about
Gods. I rely on others to define Gods. To date their logic and
evidence is unsatisfactory. Absence of a good argument to
date is no reason for Gods to be absent except in refuted
accounts. Reasoning is not arrogant, so just ignore claims
about Gods if you tire of refutations. That might be reasonable.
A subjective account may follow a trend but that does not
mean it will continue by actual logic and evidence in the next
hypothesis. It is reasonable not to seek better logic and
evidence for Gods, only because parsimony as economy says
not to bother anyway, but that is gambling not reasoning. It is
totalling past reasoning, and its relevance in future is
unknown. There is no crystal ball. Deductive knowledge is

The Human Design

204

secured by our past, but not secure. Inductive belief casts

knowledge to make a satisfactory whole, but not satisfied, as
falsification is ongoing. Reasoning is a process to improved
knowledge using a whole as an aim. A whole theory will
encompass falsifiable and un-falsifiable logic and facts,
continually restructured for more falsifiable ones. We apply
reasoning to analyse past or future events, using our time.
Religions spin out at reconciling a whole. Jesus Christ may
have seen us genetically, with no need for old tribal clusters. A
moral to his claimed parentage may be that wider contributions
are good. Universal human qualities aside, he may have seen
that individuals characteristics repeat anyway across all tribes.
Dealing with people as familiar types might influence them, but
some would baulk at too much familiarity. There may even be
a complete set of principles for individuals to be examples of
different animal species as functional examples of the Design.
Individual Human Value
No person should regard himself or herself as a lesser human,
even if others try to say they are. Intact value can be used to
justify all kinds of personal ignorance, but it remains for
individuals to use awareness as best they can. I would make it
compulsory to vote if 18 or older. These are now pioneering
times for all, and everyone needs to participate. Universal laws
should maintain equality for all. Avoid being told who to love.
We echo now from Alexander the Greats personality, bridged
by militaristic faith that grew in his dread shadow. Democratic
politics can stop industrial razing, and overcome past echoes.
Papers on psychology in economic behavior show when we
are given a choice of a gamble to gain or avoid losing, we tend
to gamble less to gain and more to avoid loss. It can be one
more or less item guaranteed, or a double to nothing gamble.
Organs may reflex wildly. Economies grow slowly and fall fast
by usage on a conditioned level by coasting, for absolute

The Human Design

205

confidence. We also wildly cut off our noses to spite our faces
if we assume equality, and others get better access. Access is
by appendages on a conditioned level of freer momentum,
relative to others in gaining access, for relative confidence. A
binary gamble for usage is a waste, and not grounded by
biology. Equality of access is maintained by grounded biology.
We can recondition to reasonable levels of satisfaction. Social
aims must be restructured to avoid waste, both knowledgably
& openly. Reduce absolute use, and equalize relative access.
On the ground, just stay in trades for goods & services. Always
adequately service at a trade level and be open to the public for
enquiry. Spread a name, trade, extras, waste, and social aim,
as we determine nature now. Advertising creates ideas and
conditions you to them. Avoid being told who, or what, to love.
Here is a tip to avoid binary reflex from overload of bad info and
denial of good. Fill in the gaps yourself. Subjects overloaded
are tested, allowing a guess or tying them in futile analyses to
find an accurate answer so they end up tossing a coin. They
guess a bit more accurately than a toss by subtle trends
otherwise suppressed by futile analysis. Again, we do not know
how it works, but we know how it does not work. We draw
useful pops whose content we regulate to be regular, by
undistracted decisions. Always flatten a plate. Note, the worlds
leading brand is too limited. Hot air. Use Meccano to model.
Consequences of Predetermination
A consequence of predetermination is that we would be the
purpose of nature, and that purpose may have a purpose. Try
to define it. Predetermination refines to individual anatomical
structures regardless of sex, age, or race. We may range in
standard organ & appendage use in landscapes. Species are
Convergent, which challenges random mutation of types.
Australia has evolved marsupial species like cats, dogs, bears,
rats and others, separately from placentals. Hox Genes may
provide standard structures for niches.

The Human Design

206

Distinguish dense or heavy Earthy animals from delicate or

light celestials. Tending causal or affected, we may be horses
or dogs, cats or possums, bears or monkeys, and pigs or birds
(I include birds structurally). That is a valuable clue, but there
can be small causal and large effected, so size is not reliable.
Variations may also tend spatial or temporal, and organ or
appendage, across a set of specific traits. I use bias for
unavoidable genetic traits, and conditioning for avoidable
behavior. Principles for bias may help us understand more
flexible conditioning. They are open to analysis without
favoring niche and racial traits, by a spectrum in the Design.
A clue to race across niche variation is compression as Polar
light and decompression as Equatorial dark, consistent with
impression & survey or expression & occupation, by
adaptation of functions. East is solid & mineral, and West is
gas & liquid, consistent with organs stacking and stretching.
Consistently, we replenish after midnight using a cortisol rush
to rise and sniff fresh air, squat, excrete, sing out a tune, and
eat & drink, facing a morning Sun as a spine stacks. Extend a
rush if obese, but drink & eat. After noon, stretch a stack by
warm air intake and blood flow, urinate, gaze down and tune
ears with balance in darkening. Stacks tend before noon and
stretches after, to stack from stretch then stretch from stack,
with the Sun. Ring large intestine after midnight, ring stomach
before midday, link small intestines after midday, and link liver
before midnight. Balance energy for digestion and from it,
daily. As in physics, ring inertia stacks towards a Suns
approach East, and stretches with its departure West.
We widen or lengthen pursuing the Sun. Chemicals eke an
adaptation East or West over tens of thousands of years to
Equator or Poles from East Africa. One species spreads from
one location. We refine locally by Recombination, drift off & on.
If we mutate by Epigenetics it may build well by homeostasis if
cells move to their paths. You are your chemistries, and race
might be pure Lorentz. That is another amazing consistency.

The Human Design

207

We can speculate about Artificial Intelligence, but we do not

know the neural basis for the subjective experience, which is
how intelligence is accessed. Digitization may order
mechanical calculations if they can be made. Neural
representation of sites may be too intricate and chemically
diverse for calculation and replication. A hypothesis that
anything can be measured and given order is a basis only for
Laplaces Demon in a machine. I note Laplace is used as a
Straw Man to refute determinism, as if we have a crystal ball.
Just track back and see the facts unfold to logical patterns.
We can hope to contact human types on other planets to learn
their ways of life, even if it is only a message in a bottle. It may
fall to one person to write a book like this on other planets if
their mantle has plenty of iron for excessive industry behind
warfare and ravage. That dominates today, extending from the
Greek Academy to English and German empires, as unbroken
wealth to extend knowledge that serves it. A popular single
God then diverts us to the sky while subverted on the ground.
To a notable fawning cryptic court copyist, (life) is a tale told
by an idiot, full of sound & fury, signifying nothing. No, rise &
fall is rise & fall to natural rhythm, not rules set by sheer idiots.
Science is complicit in abject failure of creativity. Both fawn to
industry. Some of its hubris are undirected evolution in biology,
lack of insight into biology by chemistry, lack of a formal
framework for causation to particles and fields in physics and
beyond, and pure Isotropic expansion in cosmology. Then
there is a Homunculus brain of neuroscientists. I removed and
replaced the main pillar of physics to create the main pillar for
chemistry, and extended that to remove and replace the main
pillar of biology to create the main pillar for psychology. I
removed and replaced the main pillar of methodology to create
the main pillar for metaphysics. A fair go. This compendium of
hypotheses is falsifiable to reasonable limits. It has extreme
potential, but it is bold and cautious. It must be taken literally
by cryptic copyists, in its modelling using words and arrows.

The Human Design

208

17. Conclusion
I have shared my ideas about nature in my book, using new
terms for new ideas. The first part presents my theory; the
second details the human anatomy; and the third details
particles for human evolution. I used action-reaction on the
four rigors of physics, chemistry, biology, and psychology, as
intact rigors that build one upon the other. I used the mutuality
of electromagnetism and gravitation around an action-reaction
frame and within a space-time frame for rest mass and energy.
Science attempts to unify the forces of nature to a single
particle or field, when in fact the appropriate level of unification
may be to define the mass that constitutes all particles
according to the fundamental properties of mass reconciled by
the Design within its Scheme. We might simply have a logical
universe, and we may need to use the Design and its Scheme
like a Rosetta Stone. Our anatomy may be predetermined.
This may change many of our values, given that we might now
speculate about the purpose of our existence within nature.
Such speculations may be more useful than spirituality. My
book is literal, unlike confusing spiritual texts I have read.
Metaphysics is difficult, as a void is undetectable. Science
needs broad principles to encompass non-measurable facts
of nature, but science must study substantive and formal
definitional bases for measurement, which include a void as a
frame in my Scheme. I include the study of metaphysics
among the fundamental rigors. I like the classical definition of
science as a body of reliable knowledge, with philosophy
included in it. Science may have six rigors in foundational
order as metaphysics, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology,
and methodology. In reading science, I have found it difficult to
be methodical, as I must always question conformity to
definition, like our old friend Socrates.

The Human Design

209

The six subjects can be paired, and by my reckoning, in order

of certainty, at the top is biology and its rules based on
chemistry, but more certain; then methodology and its logic
based on psychology, but more certain; and then physics and
its laws based on metaphysics, but more certain. It might seem
strange that more certain rigors exist on less certain, but that
should be expected of a universe that evolves through to
significant things from basics whose potential is only evident in
retrospect. Science likes to predict, and so it ignores the most
important questions requiring retrospect to know where we
stand now. Instead, science drives to a future it securely
predicts by industrial processes. A flywheel is very predictable,
as seen by H.G. Wells and Jules Verne, but very destructive.
Pure knowledge from retrospect to know exactly where we
stand today is neglected, and so I have satisfied the need.
I am a lawyer who dislikes jargon with clients and if reading
facts on Sundays. I used color-by-numbers from a landscape,
join-the-dots for anatomy, a slab body & spud head, a hanging
mobile with more mobiles, mix-n-match for awareness of
oneself in a world, and spot-the-difference from physics. Imre
Lakatos said "scientific changes are connected with vast
cataclysmic metaphysical revolutions, and so here we are. My
book is a manifesto, which usually set up feuds by contrary
borders, but mine is universal. You can all feud sensibly now.
We are not rank accidents of nature. The stupor is universal.
Some use far more of our basic comprehension than others.
For four years, academics and media chose to ignore my work
or reject it without any reference at all to its content, with no
hope, initiative, invention, or gratitude. Blogs like Scientia
Salon are Lord of the Flies. My comments are deleted or
trolled by ambitious climbers fawning to authorities. The site
owner said my book is quite simply utter nonsense and shit,
with no facts or logic whatsoever. That sums up his character.
Neurologica & Preposterous Universe are equally bad for
trolls & inertia, with no character at all. Dirty backward clubs.

The Human Design

210

Another is a Psychologist at University of Chicago who edits

journals, who said time is entirely culture specific, left or right,
ignoring left forward to future and right back in past across all
cultures. I'm afraid your emails do not provide any inducement
for me to read your work, although we clearly share interests, I
would not be able to trust your scholarship. Thanks, though,
for your interest. Calm, but ignorant, old bean. I use invention,
not scholarship. Maybe my whirlwind can make some junk into
an airplane, but not his. I refer to past efforts fairly. I read Man
a Machine by de La Mettrie recently, free on the net, but not
everything to check originality. An academic is a scholastic
snipe, not an intellect honed to put up or shut up, except for
industry or by theft. Stats on academic honesty are shocking,
and black holes stall originality, so check if my work is stolen.
The Australian national network, ABC, rejected my ideas as
self-promotion at their site. The producer banned naming my
book, so I wrote to the science host, who invites ideas from
Australians, to scan it for 5 minutes, and his entire reply was I
do not have 5 minutes. Media fawns to academics & spews
out press releases, globally. I have crucial new ideas, and I did
try to promote them, not myself. Our future should be set by
people, not sluggish priestly scientists, but for years everyone
has been a stooge in response to my book. I am not a teacher,
but you are welcome to what I have learned. I will let my book
grow on its own as my efforts were counter-productive. School
students can still read, and if it grows, media do not snoop me.
Extreme evil in the world is also primarily from lack of guts,
corrected by many examples of real guts. This book leads, but
words are not a hard lesson. Corrupt adults & corruptible
children need cast iron chains of idiocy shattered, but the only
person of sufficient touch I have known to do that is my own
mother from Aotearoa, the end of human migration. Even if my
readership grows, without a good driver, you would lapse to
stooging. My book is not poetic, prosaic, or ironic. It is a
pathetic ledger.