This article was downloaded by: [University of Birmingham]

On: 20 March 2015, At: 05:52

Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

International Journal of Food Properties

Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ljfp20

Click for updates

Comparative Pharmacognostic Evaluation and HPTLC

Analysis of Petals of Spiny and Non-Spiny Safflower
Cultivars
a

Sajeli Begum Ahil , Senthi Mahibalan , Shaik Ameer Basha , Ramesh Babu & Katragadda
c

Suresh Babu
a

Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani Hyderabad

Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, India
b

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Achraya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Palem,
Mahabub Nagar District, Telangana, India
c

Natural Product Laboratory, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Uppal Road,
Hyderabad, India
Accepted author version posted online: 09 Mar 2015.

To cite this article: Sajeli Begum Ahil, Senthi Mahibalan, Shaik Ameer Basha, Ramesh Babu & Katragadda Suresh Babu
(2015): Comparative Pharmacognostic Evaluation and HPTLC Analysis of Petals of Spiny and Non-Spiny Safflower Cultivars,
International Journal of Food Properties, DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2014.988722
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.988722

Disclaimer: This is a version of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service
to authors and researchers we are providing this version of the accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting,
typesetting, and review of the resulting proof will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of
the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the
content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to this version also.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

cr
ip

COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTIC
EVALUATION AND HPTLC ANALYSIS OF
PETALS OF SPINY AND NON-SPINY
SAFFLOWER CULTIVARS

Sajeli Begum Ahil1, Senthi Mahibalan1, Shaik Ameer Basha2, Ramesh Babu3 and Katragadda
Suresh Babu3
1

us

Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani Hyderabad

Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, India
2

M
an

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Achraya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Palem,
Mahabub Nagar District, Telangana, India
3

Natural Product Laboratory, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Uppal Road,
Hyderabad, India

ABSTRACT

ed

Address correspondence to Sajeli Begum Ahil, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of

Technology and Science - Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga
Reddy District-500078, Telangana, India. E-mail: sajeli@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in

cultivars (APRR3, TSF-1, NARI-NH-01 and NARI-06) were analyzed for various

ce

spiny

pt

To establish the identity and quality of safflower petals used as herbal tea, four spiny and non-

pharmacognostic characters, toxic metals (As, Pb, Hg, Cr, Cd by atomic absorption
spectroscopy), pesticide residue (GC-ECD/PFPD) and flavonoid constituents like quercetin,

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

Short title: PHARMACOGNOSTIC AND HPTLC STUDIES ON SAFFLOWER PETALS

quercetin-3-O-rutinoside and kaempferol by HPTLC.. Arsenic and lead were found to be absent

in the decoction of all varieties. Although mercury and chromium were detected in standard
acceptable levels, cadmium was exceeding the limit except in APRR3(0.3 mg/kg). While none of

the samples contained pesticide residue and saponins, presence of tannins (19 - 25%), bitterness

principle (1257 2200 units/g), mucilaginous substances (0.93 2.83 ml/g) and volatile matter
(4 16%) were observed and estimated in all varieties. Microscopic examination of NARI-06
and APRR3 petals explored similar features having slightly thick cylindrical style with dense

spikes and corolla tube with five slightly thick ridges possessing ribbon like outgrowths. HPTLC

cr
ip

analysis revealed APRR3 to possess higher amount of quercetin (116.6 ng/g), quercetin-3-O-

us

encompassing anti-oxidative flavonoids and complying heavy metals test, was identified as a
safe variety for human consumption.

NH-01, NARI-06.

ed

INTRODUCTION

M
an

Keywords: Carthamus tinctorius, Heavy metals, HPTLC, Flavonoids, APRR3, TSF-1, NARI-

Selectivity of a medicinal plant material is very crucial to attain the prescribed ethno-medicinal

pt

uses. Consumption of medicinal herbs in the form of tea is becoming a common practice in many

ce

countries, however much importance is not given to the selectivity of particular species or
variety and their chemical constituents. Identity of crude herbal drugs can be well established
through their pharmacognostical and phytochemical characterization. This in turn helps in

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

rutinoside (189.7 ng/g) and kaempferol (185.07 ng/g). Thus, the spiny APRR3 safflower petals

ensuring the purity and quality of crude drug sample. Several herbs are in general use without
any surefire assertion for quality and identity, raising ambiguity on recommended medical cure.
One such drug recognized for the study was Carthamus tinctorius (Family: Asteraceae),
commonly known as Safflower.

C. tinctorius is a branching and flowering herbaceous annual plant possessing numerous spines
on leaves and bracts. It produces several flowering heads commonly called capitula. Each
capitulum has several flowers ranging from 20-250 interspersed with hairs or bristles. These

flowers are enclosed by bracts in circular order, attached to a flat or convex receptacle. Each

cr
ip

flower is composed of petals that are attached to a corolla tube which in turn is attached at its

[1]

Safflower is a common adulterant for Saffron, detection of which in

us

style and stigma.

commercial saffron is an important aspect of quality assessment. [2]

M
an

Safflower is mainly grown as an oilseed crop with their flowers used medicinally and dye
sources as well. Besides its coloring properties, safflower petals are used for curing various
chronic diseases like hypertension, coronary heart ailments, rheumatism and fertility problems. [3,
4]

In few countries like China, safflower is grown solely for its flowers, which are used in

ed

treatment of many illnesses in the form of tea.

[5]

Recent pharmacological studies have proved

the excitation effects on smooth muscles, contraction effect on blood vessels

[7]

, analgesic [8], anti-inflammatory [9], and antidiabetic effects

pt

cholesterol levels

[10]

[6]

, lowering

exhibited by

ce

safflower flowers. Some of the chemical constituents reported from the flowers of C. tinctorius
include carthamine, carthamidine, quercetin, kaempferol, safflower yellow, safflamin A,
safflomin A, carthamosides, flavonoid glycosides, dye, etc. [11]

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

base to an inferior ovary. The corolla tube is attached with five fused anthers and surrounded the

The bright yellowish orange petals of safflower are popularly used as herbal tea for the treatment
of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and gynaecological diseases.

[12]

Different varieties and

hybrids of C. tinctorius (Family: Asteraceae) are cultivated throughout the world

[5]

and are

presumed to be same by public, although they differ definitely in quality and chemical
constituents. Our attempts to corroborate the physico-chemical, histological and secondary
metabolic variation among four spiny and non-spiny Indian cultivars through various

quantitative determinations are discussed in this paper. The extent of three bio-active flavonoids

cr
ip

quercetin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside and kaempferol present in the florets of four different

us

(HPTLC).

M
an

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material

Safflower petals of two spiny varieties [TSF-1 and Sagaramutyalu (APRR3)], a non-spiny hybrid

ed

[NARI-NH-01] and a non-spiny variety [NARI-06] were collected from farmers cultivation land

work.

pt

near Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, India and preserved at 4C till the completion of

ce

Chemicals and reagents

The solvents used were of HPLC grade and other reagents were of AR grade. Saponin R was

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

cultivars had also been determined using High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography

procured from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. All standard pesticides were procured
from PC Cell and Dr. Ehrensortfer GmbH (Augsburg, Germany). Until unless specified, all the
chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore,

India. High purity water was obtained from Milli-Q water system (Millipore, Billerica, MA,
USA) and the resistivity was 18.2 M at 25C.

cr
ip

Instruments and conditions

Arsenic and heavy metals analysis was done using Perkin Elmer-AA Analyst 700 Atomic

us

was determined using Shimadzu GC-2010 Capillary Gas Chromatograph with electron capture
detector (ECD) and phosphorus mode flame photometric detector (PFPD). HPTLC analysis was

M
an

performed using CAMAG, TLC Scanner III system operated by WIN CATS software (V 143
CAMAG).

Quantitative pharmacognostic studies

ed

Determination of ash value, extractable matter, loss on drying, volatile oils, bitterness value,
hemolytic activity, tannins content, swelling index, foaming index were carried out by following
[13]

pt

WHO guidelines.

Wherever required, decoction or aqueous extract of safflower petals was

ce

used. It was prepared by boiling safflower petals (500 g) with water (3x600 mL) for 30 min and
the decoction was filtered through muslin cloth. The filtrate was collected and evaporated under
reduced pressure to yield dry residue.

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) with flame and mercury hydride system. Pesticide residue

Determination of arsenic and heavy metals using AAS

The procedure for sample preparation as recommended in WHO guidelines [13] was followed for

determining arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury. Standard instrumental parameters

for each metal were set in AAS during the analysis. Calculations were done by standard addition
methods using reference solutions of each metal.

cr
ip

Determination of pesticide residue

The sample for pesticide analysis was also prepared according to WHO guidelines.

[13]

The

us

nitrogen flow rate of 1 mL min-1 in a constant flow mode, using an oven temperature program for
95 min from 150 to 280 C at a rate of 10 C min-1. The injection inlet was set at 260 C, ECD at

M
an

330 C and makeup at 50 mL min-1. Injection volume of 1 L was used with split ratio of 5.0.
Standard work solutions were prepared at a concentration of 0.1 g mL-1. The standard mixture
and all concentrated sample fraction were injected into GC-ECD/PFPD to determine the peak

ed

area recovered in each fraction.

pt

Microscopic Study

Fresh safflower petals removed from the plant were fixed in FAA (Formalin (5 ml) + Acetic acid

ce

(5 ml) + 70 % ethyl alcohol (90 ml). After 24 h of fixing, the specimen was dehydrated with
graded series of tertiary butyl alcohol as per established procedure

[14]

by Sass 1940. Infiltration

of the specimens was carried by gradual addition of paraffin wax (m.p. 58-60 C) until tertiary

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

separation was performed on HP-5 quartz capillary column (30 m x 0.25 mm, I.D. 0.25 m) at a

butyl alcohol solution attained super saturation. The specimens were cast into paraffin blocks.
The paraffin embedded specimens were sectioned with the help of Rotary Microtome. The
thickness of the sections was 10-12 prn. De-waxing of the sections was by customary
procedure. The sections were stained with Toluidine blue as per the method published by

O'Brien et al.

[15]

Microscopic descriptions of tissues are supplemented with micrographs

wherever necessary. Photographs of different magnifications were taken with Nikon Labphoto 2
microscopic Unit. For normal observations bright field was used. Magnifications of the figures

us

HPTLC was carried out on 1010 cm HPTLC plates pre-coated with silica gel 60 F 254 (Merck,
Darmstadt, Germany) and the plates were washed using methanol before use. The sample and

M
an

standard solutions were applied as bands of 6 mm wide and 10 mm apart using Automatic TLC
Sampler 4 applicator (Muttenz, Switzerland) fitted with a 25 L Hamilton syringe supplied with
Nitrogen flow. A constant application of 6 L s-1 was used. A saturated mixture of toluene: ethyl
acetate: methanol: formic acid (3:1:1:0.1 v/v/v/v) was used as mobile phase and chromatography

ed

was performed using 10 ml of mobile phase in a 10 10 cm twin trough glass chamber by linear

pt

ascending development with a chromatographic run length of 8.5 cm. The optimized chamber
saturation time for mobile phase was 20 min at room temperature.

Subsequent to the

ce

development, the plates were dried in a current of air with the help of a dryer in wooden chamber
with adequate ventilation. Densitometric scanning was done with Camag TLC scanner III in the
absorbance-reflectance mode at 350 nm with a slit dimension of 5.0 mm x 0.45 mm and a

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

HPTLC quantification of flavonoids

cr
ip

are indicated by the scale-bars.

scanning speed of 20 mm/sec. The instrument was operated by WIN CATS software (V 143
CAMAG) resident in the system. The source of radiation utilized was deuterium lamp emitting a
continuous UV spectrum between 200 and 400 nm and the concentrations of the compound
chromatographed were determined from the intensity of diffusely reflected light.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Safflower, NARI-NH-01 released in 2001 was the first non-spiny hybrid in the world, which

cr
ip

yields red colored florets. NARI-06 is high oil yielding spineless variety, producing dark red
colored florets. These two non-spiny cultivars analyzed for total sugar, proteins, amino acids,

[16]

us

Sagaramutyalu (APRR3) is a rust resistance spiny safflower variety, yielding yellow colored
florets. TSF-1 is a wilt resistance spiny variety yielding red florets which are difficult to collect

M
an

from fields. [17] These four major cultivars cultivated throughout India are commercially exported
and sold as herbal tea by small scale industries. Although little preliminary studies related to
nutritive value of safflower were found in the literature, there is no systematic report on the

ed

quantitative determinations pertaining to physico-chemical properties and flavonoid content. [16]

Quantitative pharmacognostical evaluation

pt

Whole safflower petals of all four varieties can be classified as coarse powder as they pass

ce

through No. 2000 sieve. A relative report on different physicochemical parameters analyzed on
safflower petals are presented in Table 1. The total ash and water soluble ash yielded by APRR3
was found to be high (171.45 mg/g and 103.42 mg/g, respectively) compared to other varieties.

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

and minerals like K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Na, Mn, Zn, Cu, etc., are reported to be highly nutritive.

The extractive value was assessed by two different methods viz., cold maceration and hot
extraction. The spiny variety, APPR3 yielded higher extractive value of 116.25 mg/g and 99.38
mg/g through cold maceration and hot extraction method, respectively. Testing of loss on drying
indicated the hybrid NARI-NH-01 to possess more moisture i.e. 77.5 mg/g.

The presence of mucilage, pectin and hemicelluloses can be recognized through swelling index,
which was considerably more (2.83 ml/g) in non-spiny NARI-NH-01 petals. No sizeable
difference was shown between spiny and non-spiny varieties towards presence of tannins. While

a maximum of 26.25% was found to be present in TSF-1, 19.99 % was determined in APRR3.

cr
ip

The foaming ability indicating the level of saponin was measured in terms of foaming index and

us

safflower petals. This observation was further supported by testing hemolytic activity, a specific
test for saponins which cause changes in erythrocyte membrane when mixed with blood

M
an

suspension, making haemoglobin to diffuse into surrounding medium. The hemolytic activity of
a preparation containing saponins was determined by comparing with that of a reference
material, saponin R, which has a hemolytic activity of 1000 units/g (Table 1). Safflower petal
extracts showed no hemolysis upto 3mg mL-1.

ed

Bitterness value was determined by comparing the threshold bitter concentration of aqueous

pt

extract of safflower petals with that of a dilute solution of quinine hydrochloride R. The
bitterness value is expressed in unit equivalent to the bitterness of a solution containing 1g of

ce

quinine hydrochloride R in 2000 mL and it was found to be 1257 units g-1. Medicinal plants
exhibiting strong bitter taste are therapeutically used as appetizing agent and no general limit has
been prescribed by WHO for bitterness value. Spiny petals (APRR3 2200 units/g) were found to

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

it was found to be less than 100 in all the cases, specifying low level or absence of saponins in

be bitterer than non-spiny variety. On the other hand, more volatile matter was found to be
present in non-spiny variety, a maximum of 16% by NARI-06. The amount of volatile oil shown
by the same sample was found to be higher (1.4 ml/g) compared to others.

Microscopic study
The microscopic characters of corolla and style of spiny (APRR3) and non-spiny (NARI-06)

safflower flowers were examined and were found to be indistinguishable. The important features

cr
ip

are illustrated in Figure 1. In cross sectional view, the corolla tube appeared circular with five

were slightly rectangular or squarish with thick walls and were 10 m thick. The ridges of the

us

corolla tube were slightly thicker and consisted of three or four cells. In the median position of

M
an

the petal and in between two ridges, prominent forked ribbon like outgrowths were seen. The
outgrowths were uniseriate and fork into two lobes from the middle part. The cells were
transversely rectangular and thick walled. They were 110-150 m long and 40 m thick (Figure
1C). In the cross sectional view, the style exhibited thick walled, compact parenchymatous

ed

ground tissue and two xylem strands arranged radially and alternating with each other (Figure
1B). The surface of the style had prominent dense spikes or short projecting outgrowths. The

pt

upper part of the style was thick and cylindrical having dense spines all over. The spines were

ce

unicellular, unbranched, pointed at the tip and were 50 m long (Figure 1D).

Determination of arsenic and heavy metals

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

slightly thick ridges. The ridges represented the union of five petal lobes (Figure 1A). The cells

Arsenic and its derivatives are described to be carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic in
nature. [18] Heavy metals like cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury in certain quantities, can be
carcinogenic, cause adverse reproductive effects, unfavorably impact nutrition, and even displace
more biologically useful metals such as calcium and zinc. [19] Such toxic metals get accumulated

10

in the soil due to the usage of arsenical pesticides, fertilizers, irrigation and oxidation of volatile
arsine in air, dust from the burning of fossils fuels as well as disposal of industrial, municipal and
animal wastes. Hence quantitative analysis of arsenic and other heavy metals in safflower petals

extract is essential. Arsenic and lead were found to be below the detectable level in all four

cr
ip

varieties. Trace amount of mercury was found in all samples, however it was observed to be

us

APRR3 and NARI-NH-01 were detected with no chromium, TSF-1 and NARI-06 showed 0.67
and 0.95 mg of chromium/100g of extract. Hence dose limited consumption of TSF-1 and NARI-

M
an

06 petals is advised considering the safety. With respect to cadmium, although APRR3 (0.3
mg/kg) complied the acceptable limit of WHO standard, other varieties did not (Table 2). As per
WHO, the maximum permissible limit for cadmium is 0.3 mg/kg of dried plant material. [3]
Hence, consumption of safflower could cause cadmium toxicity leading to reproductive hazards,

ed

cancer, heart disease, zinc-deficiency, etc. [21]

pt

Determination of pesticide residues

ce

Medicinal plant materials are liable to contain pesticide residues which accumulate from
agricultural practices of using pesticide to improve productivity. Pesticide residues in food are
found to be a serious cancer hazard according to the existing body of the literature. [22] Tests for

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

within the limit of 0.02 mg/day according to NSF International Drafts Standard. [20] While

the pesticides that have both long and short residual actions were carried out. Capillary Gas
chromatography (GC) with electron capture detector (ECD) and Phosphorus mode Flame
photometric detector (PFPD) were used for determining the pesticide residues in safflower
extract. The list of organo-chlorines, synthetic pyrethroids and organo-phosphates tested were

11

given in Table 4. Results displayed no significant ECD, PFPD detectable pesticide residues
were found in the tested sample.

cr
ip

HPTLC analysis of flavonoids

Several analytical methods correlating chemical constituents with bio-activity of various species

us

materials. Recently, Santana et al., had correlated total phenolic and flavonoid contents of
Brazilian honeys with colour and antioxidant capacity.

[23]

HPLC fingerprint analysis of Flos

M
an

carthami from China for the presence of yellow pigment safflower A had been reported in
literature, however analytical study using HPTLC for flavonoids are not explored.
tinctorius flowers have been reported as good antioxidants.

[25]

[24]

C.

The free radical scavenging

property could be accounted by estimating the amount of flavonoids present in the sample.

ed

Presence of three bioactive flavonoids, quercetin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside and kaempferol was

identified through co-TLC studies between aqueous extracts of different safflower petals and

pt

authentic samples. Estimation of flavonoids using HPTLC has been identified as a reliable

ce

method as it can provide chromatographic fingerprint which can be visualized and stored as
electronic images.

[26]

HPTLC analytical conditions such as, mobile phase composition,

wavelength of detection, scan speed and scan mode were optimized. Mobile phase consisting of

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

belonging to same genus are available in the literature for measuring the quality of herbal

toluene: ethyl acetate: methanol: formic acid (3: 1: 1: 0.1 v/v/v/v) offered the best separations
with well resolved zones. Chamber saturation for 20 min with the mobile phase facilitated the
best chromatographic behaviour. Densitometric measurement was carried out simultaneously for
all standards at 350 nm. Baseline separation was obtained between all three standard compounds

12

and the R2 value of quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin and kaempferol was found to be 0.9985,
0.9997 and 0.9995 respectively. The linear regression equation of three standard compounds
were found to be y=-221.540+5.211*x, y=-933.336+13.765*x and y=-1105.408+13.316*x,

where y is the spot area and x in ng/spot. Based on the identity of retention factor (R f ) of samples

cr
ip

with that of standards, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (0.04 0.03), quercetin (0.48 0.03) and

us

presented in Table 4 and Figure 2. The amount of quercetin-3-O-rutinoside in APRR3, TSF-1,

NARI-NH-01 and NARI-06 was found to be 189.7, 87.85, 72.97 and 77.24 ng/gm of extract,

M
an

respectively. Significant variation was not observed among the four varieties with respect to
quercetin content, which was found to be 116.6, 115.7, 112.36 and 101.6 ng/gm of APRR3, TSF1, NARI-NH-01 and NARI-06 extracts, respectively. While 185.07 ng/gm of kaempferol was
found in spiny APRR3 variety, only 169.69 ng/gm was present in TSF-1 variety. The spineless

ed

NARI-NH-01 and NARI-06 possessed 177.20 and 107.80 ng of kaempferol/gm of aqueous

extract, respectively. Kaempferol was found to be predominantly present in all varieties except

pt

APRR3, which has quercetin-3-O-rutinoside as major flavonoid. In a nutshell, the study revealed

ce

the presence of higher amount of bioactive flavonoids in spiny safflower petals of sagaramutyalu
(APRR3) variety. The method validated for linearity, specificity, precision (interday and
intraday), accuracy and robustness can be used for the quality control of safflower petals.

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

kaempferol (0.58 0.02), identification of flavonoids was done. Results of HPTLC analysis are

CONCLUSIONS
Various quantitative determinations on four different Indian cultivars revealed APRR3 variety to
be safe for human consumption as herbal tea. The study also, highlighted the presence of non-

13

permissible amount of toxic cadmium in TSF-1, NARI-NH-01 and NARI-06. Further, the
HPTLC analysis explored the possession of higher quantity of quercetin-3-O-rutinoside,
quercetin and kaempferol in APRR3. Thus the observed variation in tested safflower petals

mandates the selectivity of specific variety with elaborative safety and quality specifications

cr
ip

before taken for internal administration.

us

This work was financially supported by University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

M
an

through Major Research Grant Scheme (F. No. 39-171/2010(SR)). Also, authors thankfully
acknowledge Ms. A. Ramya (Project Fellow) and Quality Control Laboratory, ANGRAU,
Hyderabad, for helping in pesticide and heavy metals analysis.

1.

ed

REFERENCES

Singh, V.; Nimbkar, N. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). In Genetic resources,

pt

chromosome engineering and crop improvement: Oilseed crops; Singh, J., Eds.; Boca Raton: FL,

2.

ce

2006; 167-194.

Heidarbeigi, K.; Mohtasebi, S.S.; Foroughirad, A.; Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M.; Rafiee,

S.; Rezaei, K. Detection of adulteration in saffron samples using electronic nose. International

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Journal of Food Properties. DOI 10.1080/10942912.2014.915850.

3.

Asgarpanah, J.; Kazemivash, N. Phytochemistry, pharmacology and medicinal properties

of Carthamus tinctorius L. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2013, 19, 153-159.

14

Wang, G.; Li, Y. Clinical application of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Zhejiang

4.

Journal of Traditional Chinese medicine. 1985, 20, 42-43.

Dajue, L.; Mndel. Safflower. Carthamus tinctorius L. Promoting the conservation and

5.

cr
ip

use of underutilized and neglected crops. 7. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research,
Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, 1996; 8 pp.

Liu, F.; Yang, X.Z.; Li, F.G.; Hu, J.; Cheng, R.F. Hypotensive effects of safflower yellow

level. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 1992, 27, 785-787.

Wenxuan, Q.; Yunxia, Z.; Daowu, W.; Yanying, Z.; Jianying, Y. Effects of safflower

M
an

7.

us

in spontaneously hypertensive rats and influence on plasma renin activity and angiotensin II

yellow pigment on the blood fat and liver function of rabbits. Journal of Lanzhou College of
Medical Science. 1987, 3, 7-60.

Almeida, R.N.; Navarro, D.S.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M. Plants with central analgesic activity.

ed

8.

Phytomedicine. 2001, 8, 310-322.

Jun, M.S.; Ha, Y.M.; Kim, H.S.; Jang, H.J.; Kim, Y.M.; Lee, Y.S. Antiinflammatory

pt

9.

ce

action of methanol extract of Carthamus tinctorius involves in heme oxygenase-1 induction.

Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2011, 133, 524-530.
10.

Asgary, S.; Rahimi, P.; Mahzouni, P.; Madani, H. Antidiabetic effects of hydroalcoholic

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

6.

extract of Carthamus tinctorius L. in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Journal of Research in

Medical Sciences. 2012, 17, 386-392.
11.

Jinous, A.; Nastaran, K. Phytochemistry, pharmacology and medicinal properties of

Carthamus tinctorius L. Chinese Journal of Integrated Medicine. 2013, 19, 153-159.

15

12.

Kizil, S.; Cakmak, O.; Kirici, S.; Inan, M. A comprehensive study on safflower

(Carthamus tinctorius L.) in semi-arid conditions. Biotechnology and Biotechnological

Equipment. 2008, 22, 947-953.

World Health Organization. Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials, WHO

cr
ip

13.

Press, Geneva, 1998; 8 pp.

1940; 222 pp.

15.

us

Sass, J.E. Elements of botanical microtechnique; McGraw Hill Book Co., New York,

O'Brien, T.P.; Feder, N.; Mc Cull, M.E. Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by

M
an

toluidine blue O. Protoplasma. 1964, 59, 364-373.

http://nariphaltan.org/research/agriculture/safflower/

17.

http://agricoop.nic.in/tmop&m/RVO_DOR010612.pdf

18.

Bencko, V. Carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects of arsenic. Environmental

ed

16.

19.

pt

Health Perspectives. 1997, 19, 179-182.

Waalkes, M.P.; Coogan, T.P.; Barter, R.A. Toxicological principles of metal

ce

carcinogenesis with special emphasis on Cadmium. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 1992, 22,
175-201.

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

14.

20.

NSF International. NSF International standard for dietary supplements-NSF/ANSI 173-

2010, Michigan, USA, 2011; 37 pp.

21.

Linder, M. Nutritional Biochemistry and Metabolism; Elsevier Science Publishing Co.,

New York, 1985; 70 pp.

16

22.

Gold, L.S.; Slone, T.H.; Annes, B.N.; Manley, N.B. Pesticide residue on food and cancer

risk: A critical analysis. In Handbook of Pesticide Technology; San diego: CA, 2001; 799-843.
23.

Santana, L.D.; Ferreira, A.B.B.; Lorensen, M.C.A.; Berbara, R.L.L.; Castro, R.N.

cr
ip

Correlation of total phenolic and flavonoid contents of Brazilian honeys with colour and
antioxidant capacity. International Journal of Food Properties. 2014, 17, 65-76.

Zhang, J.; Ke, Y.; Liu, H.M.; Yang, X. Fingerprint analysis of Flos Carthami and

us

safflower yellow pigments by high performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Letters.

2005, 38, 981-995.

Kruawan, K.; Kangsadalampai, K. Antioxidant activity,phenolic compound contents and

M
an

25.

antimutagenic activity of some water extract of herbs. Thai Journal of Pharmaceutical Science.
2006, 30, 28-35.

Mariswamy, Y.; Gnaraj, W.E.; Antonisamy, J.M. Chromatographic fingerprint analysis

ed

26.

on flavonoids constituents of the medicinally important plant Aerva lanata L. by HPTLC

ce

pt

technique. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2011, 1, S8-S12.

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

24.

17

cr
ip
us
M
an
ed
pt
ce
Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

Figure 1 A and C: Transverse section (TS) of corolla tube of C. tinctorius flower (APPR3), B:
TS of basal part of style, D: Longitudinal section of style (upper part), Co: Corolla tubes, OG:
Out growth, Ri: Ridge, X: Xylem, Ph: Phloem, St: Style, VS: Vascular Strands, Sp: Spines.

18

cr
ip
us
M
an
ed
pt
ce
Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

Figure 2 HPTLC fingerprint of aqueous extract of safflower petals. A: APRR3, B: TSF-1, C:

NARI-NH-01, D: NARI-06. R: Rutin, Q: Quercetin, K: Kaempferol

19

Table 1 Results of pharmacognostical evaluation of safflower petals of different varieties.

TSF-1

NARI-NH-01

NARI-06

63.22 mg/g

107.23 mg/g

Total ash

171.45 mg/g

88.8 mg/g

Acid insoluble ash

7.995 mg/g

4.995 mg/g

Water soluble ash

103.42 mg/g

55.49 mg/g

extraction)

M
an

(Hot

84.3 mg/g

39.99 mg/g

116.25 mg/g

96.875 mg/g

91.25 mg/g

65.3 mg/g

83.75 mg/g

92.5 mg/g

99.38 mg/g

72.39 mg/g

ed

Extractives

9.53 mg/g

Loss on drying

57.48 mg/g

74.16 mg/g

77.5 mg/g

25 mg/g

ce

(maceration)

pt

Extractives

3.33 mg/g

us

APRR3

cr
ip

Parameter

1.1 ml/g

0.93 ml/g

2.83 ml/g

1.0 ml/g

Swelling index

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

S.No.

Tannins

19.99 %

26.25 %

20%

25%

Volatile oil

0.6 ml/g

1.0 ml/g

0.4 ml/g

1.4 ml/g

20

Volatile matter

4%

6%

12 %

16 %

11

Bitterness value

2200 units/g

1467 units/g

1257 units/g

1467 units/g

cr
ip
us
M
an
ed
pt
ce
Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

10

21

Table 2 Amount of Arsenic and Heavy metals (mg/100 g) in different varieties of safflower
petals.
NARI-NH-01

NARI-06

Bdl

Bdl

Bdl

Bdl

Arsenic

Cadmium

0.030

0.150

0.220

Chromium

Bdl

0.670

Bdl

Lead

Bdl

Mercury

0.01 mg/day*

M
an

0.3 mg/kg**

0.950

0.02 mg/day*

Bdl

Bdl

Bdl

10 mg/ kg**

0.00011

0.000048

0.0000022

0.02 mg/day*

ed

0.000015

0.100

us

Acceptable limit

TSF-1

cr
ip

APRR3

as per NSF International Drafts Standard; ** as per WHO; Bdl: Below the detection limit.

ce

pt

Metals

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

S. No.

22

Table 3 Pesticides tested on Safflower extracts for presence of pesticides residue.

Organo Chlorines

Synthetic Pyrethroids

Organo Phosphates

Alpha HCH

Fenitrothion

Dichlorovas

Beta HCH

Lamda Cyhalothrin

Phorate

Gamma HCH

Permethrin 1

Delta HCH

Permethrin 2

Chlorpyrifos Methyl

Heptachlor

Cypermethrin 1

Methyl parathion

Difocol

Heptachlorexo epoxide

cr
ip

us

ed

M
an

Dimethoate

pt

Cypermethrin 2

Fenitrothion

Malathion

Chlorpyrifos

ce

Alpha Cypermethrin

Cypermethrin 4

Alpha Endosulfan

Fluvalinae 1

Quinophos

10

4,4 DDE

Fluvalinate 2

Profenophos

2,4 DDE

23

Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

S. No

2,4 DDD

Fenvalarate 1

Ethion

12

Beta Endosulfan

Fenvalarate 2

Phoslone

13

4,4 DDD

14

2,4 DDT

15

Endo Sulphate

cr
ip
us
M
an
ed

pt
ce
Ac

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

11

24

TSF-1

NARI-NH-01

NARI-06

Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside

189.7

87.85

72.97

Quercetin

116.6

115.70

112.36

101.60

Kaempferol

185.07

169.69

25

77.24

cr
ip

us

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M
an

Marker flavonoids

Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 05:52 20 March 2015

APRR3

Table 4 Amount (ng/g) of quercetin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside and kaempferol in safflower

decoction.

177.20

107.80