Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
1 Methods of determination
2 Estimation by empirical approach
2.1 Estimation from grain size
2.2 Pedotransfer function
3 Determination by experimental approach
3.1 Laboratory methods
3.1.1 Constant-head method
3.1.2 Falling-head method
3.2 In-situ (eld) methods
3.2.1 Augerhole method
4 Related magnitudes
4.1 Transmissivity
4.2 Resistance
5 Anisotropy
6 Relative properties
7 Ranges of values for natural materials
8 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity by Soil Texture
9 See also
10 References
11 External links
Methods of determination
There are two broad categories of determining hydraulic conductivity:
Empirical approach by which the hydraulic conductivity is correlated to soil properties like
pore size and particle size (grain size) distributions, and soil texture
1 di 8
Experimental approach by
which the hydraulic conductivity
is determined from hydraulic
experiments using Darcy's law
The experimental approach is
broadly classied into:
Laboratory tests using soil
samples subjected to hydraulic
experiments
Field tests (on site, in situ) that
are dierentiated into:
where
Hazen's empirical coeicient, which takes a value between 0.0 and 1.5 (depending on
literatures), with an average value of 1.0. A.F. Salarashayeri & M. Siosemarde give C as
usually taken between 1.0 and 1.5, with D in mm and K in cm/s.
is the diameter of the 10 percentile grain size of the material
Pedotransfer function
A pedotransfer function (PTF) is a specialized empirical estimation method, used primarily in
the soil sciences, however has increasing use in hydrogeology.[1] There are many dierent PTF
methods, however, they all attempt to determine soil properties, such as hydraulic conductivity,
given several measured soil properties, such as soil particle size, and bulk density.
2 di 8
Laboratory methods
Constant-head method
The constant-head method (http://www.geotechdata.info/geotest/constant-head-permeabilitytest.html) is typically used on granular soil. This procedure allows water to move through the
soil under a steady state head condition while the quantity (volume) of water owing through
the soil specimen is measured over a period of time. By knowing the quantity
of water
measured, length of specimen, cross-sectional area
of the specimen, time required for the
quantity of water
to be discharged, and head , the hydraulic conductivity can be calculated:
where
where
as:
Solving for
, yields:
gives:
Falling-head method
The falling-head method (http://www.geotechdata.info/geotest/falling-head-permeability-test) is
totally dierent from the constant head methods in its initial setup; however, the advantage to
the falling-head method is that it can be used for both ne-grained and coarse-grained soils. The
soil sample is rst saturated under a specic head condition. The water is then allowed to ow
through the soil without maintaining a constant pressure head.[2]
3 di 8
There are also in-situ methods for measuring the hydraulic conductivity in the eld.
When the water table is shallow, the augerhole method, a slug test, can be used for determining
the hydraulic conductivity below the water table.
The method was developed by Hooghoudt (1934) [3] in The Netherlands and introduced in the
US by Van Bavel en Kirkham (1948).[4]
The method uses the following steps:
1. an augerhole is perforated into the soil to below the water table
2. water is bailed out from the augerhole
3. the rate of rise of the water level in the hole is recorded
4. the K-value is calculated from the data as:[5]
K = F (Ho-Ht) / t
where: K = horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity (m/day), H
= depth of the waterlevel in the hole relative to the water table in
the soil (cm), Ht = H at time t, Ho = H at time t = 0, t = time (in
seconds) since the rst measurement of H as Ho, and F is a factor
depending on the geometry of the hole:
F = 4000 /
Cumulative frequency
distribution (lognormal) of
hydraulic conductivity
(X-data)
Related magnitudes
Transmissivity
The transmissivity is a measure of how much water can be transmitted horizontally, such as to a
pumping well.
Transmissivity should not be confused with the similar word transmittance used in optics, meaning the fraction
of incident light that passes through a sample.
4 di 8
soil
where
where
, with
Resistance
The resistance to vertical ow (Ri) of the
vertical hydraulic conductivity Kvi is:
Ri =
and
/ Kvi
/ Kvi
, with = 1, 2, 3, . . .
The resistance plays a role in aquifers where a sequence of layers occurs with varying horizontal
permeability so that horizontal ow is found mainly in the layers with high horizontal
permeability while the layers with low horizontal permeability transmit the water mainly in a
vertical sense.
Anisotropy
When the horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity (Khi and Kvi) of the
5 di 8
soil layer
dier considerably, the layer is said to be anisotropic with respect to hydraulic conductivity.
When the apparent horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity (KhA and KvA) dier
considerably, the aquifer is said to be anisotropic with respect to hydraulic conductivity.
An aquifer is called semi-conned when a saturated layer with a relatively small horizontal
hydraulic conductivity (the semi-conning layer or aquitard) overlies a layer with a relatively
high horizontal hydraulic conductivity so that the ow of groundwater in the rst layer is mainly
vertical and in the second layer mainly horizontal.
The resistance of a semi-conning top layer of an aquifer can be determined from pumping
tests.[7]
When calculating ow to drains [8] or to a well eld [9] in an aquifer with the aim to control the
water table, the anisotropy is to be taken into account, otherwise the result may be erroneous.
Relative properties
Because of their high porosity and permeability, sand and gravel aquifers have higher hydraulic
conductivity than clay or unfractured granite aquifers. Sand or gravel aquifers would thus be
easier to extract water from (e.g., using a pumping well) because of their high transmissivity,
compared to clay or unfractured bedrock aquifers.
Hydraulic conductivity has units with dimensions of length per time (e.g., m/s, ft/day and
(gal/day)/ft ); transmissivity then has units with dimensions of length squared per time. The
following table gives some typical ranges (illustrating the many orders of magnitude which are
likely) for K values.
Hydraulic conductivity (K) is one of the most complex and important of the properties of
aquifers in hydrogeology as the values found in nature:
range over many orders of magnitude (the distribution is often considered to be lognormal),
vary a large amount through space (sometimes considered to be randomly spatially
distributed, or stochastic in nature),
are directional (in general K is a symmetric second-rank tensor; e.g., vertical K values can
be several orders of magnitude smaller than horizontal K values),
are scale dependent (testing a m of aquifer will generally produce dierent results than a
similar test on only a cm sample of the same aquifer),
must be determined indirectly through eld pumping tests, laboratory column ow tests or
inverse computer simulation, (sometimes also from grain size analyses), and
are very dependent (in a non-linear way) on the water content, which makes solving the
unsaturated ow equation diicult. In fact, the variably saturated K for a single material
varies over a wider range than the saturated K values for all types of materials (see chart
below for an illustrative range of the latter).
6 di 8
K (cm/s)
10 101
K (ft/day)
Relative
Permeability
Pervious
Aquifer
0.1
Well
Sorted
Gravel
None
Peat
Highly Fractured Rocks
Impervious
Poor
Unconsolidated
Clay & Organic
Semi-Pervious
Good
Unconsolidated
Sand & Gravel
Consolidated
Rocks
Layered Clay
Oil Reservoir
Rocks
Fresh
Sandstone
Fresh
Granite
References
1. Wsten, J.H.M., Pachepsky, Y.A., and Rawls, W.J. (2001). "Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap
between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics". Journal of Hydrology
251 (3-4): 123150. Bibcode:2001JHyd..251..123W (http://adsabs.harvard.edu
/abs/2001JHyd..251..123W). doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00464-4 (https://dx.doi.org
/10.1016%2FS0022-1694%2801%2900464-4).
2. Liu, Cheng "Soils and Foundations." Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2001 ISBN
0-13-025517-3
3. S.B.Hooghoudt, 1934, in Dutch. Bijdrage tot de kennis van enige natuurkundige grootheden van de
grond. Verslagen Landbouwkundig Onderzoek No. 40 B, p. 215-345.
4. C.H.M. van Bavel and D. Kirkham, 1948. Field measurement of soil permeability using auger holes.
Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. Proc 13:90-96.
5. Determination of the Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Chapter 12 in: H.P.Ritzema (ed., 1994)
Drainage Principles and Applications, ILRI Publication 16, p.435-476. International Institute for Land
Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen (ILRI), The Netherlands. ISBN 90-70754-33-9. Free
download from: [1] (http://www.waterlog.info/articles.htm) , under nr. 6, or directly as PDF : [2]
(http://www.waterlog.info/pdf/chap12.pdf)
6. Drainage research in farmers' elds: analysis of data. Contribution to the project Liquid Gold of the
International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Free download from : [3] (http://www.waterlog.info/articles.htm) , under nr. 2, or directly as PDF : [4]
7 di 8
(http://www.waterlog.info/pdf/analysis.pdf)
7. J.Boonstra and R.A.L.Kselik, SATEM 2002: Software for aquifer test evaluation, 2001. Publ. 57,
International Institute for Land reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
ISBN 90-70754-54-1 On line : [5] (http://content.alterra.wur.nl/Internet/webdocs/ilri-publicaties
/publicaties/Pub57/Pub57.pdf)
8. The energy balance of groundwater ow applied to subsurface drainage in anisotropic soils by pipes
or ditches with entrance resistance. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement,
Wageningen, The Netherlands. On line : [6] (http://www.waterlog.info/pdf/enerart.pdf) . Paper based
on: R.J. Oosterbaan, J. Boonstra and K.V.G.K. Rao, 1996, The energy balance of groundwater ow.
Published in V.P.Singh and B.Kumar (eds.), Subsurface-Water Hydrology, p. 153-160, Vol.2 of
Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydrology and Water Resources, New Delhi, India,
1993. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. ISBN 978-0-7923-3651-8 . On line :
[7] (http://www.waterlog.info/pdf/enerbal.pdf). The corresponding free EnDrain program can be
downloaded from: [8] (http://www.waterlog.info/endrain.htm)
9. Subsurface drainage by (tube)wells, 9 pp. Explanation of equations used in the WellDrain model.
International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
On line: [9] (http://www.waterlog.info/pdf/wellspac.pdf) . The corresponding free WellDrain program
can be downloaded from : [10] (http://www.waterlog.info/weldrain.htm)
10. Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-65675-6.
External links
Hydraulic conductivity calculator (http://www.fxsolver.com/solve/share
/jZLNM1J9bHMGTCqIglfgmQ==/)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hydraulic_conductivity&
oldid=658761209"
Categories: Hydrology Hydraulic engineering Soil mechanics Soil physics
This page was last modied on 22 April 2015, at 23:29.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional
terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-prot
organization.
8 di 8