"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws" Meyer Rothschild

The Rothschilds, descendants of my great great great grandfather, Meyer Amschel Rothschild, and
their agents planned three world wars, and executed two world wars.

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none." --Gutle Schnapper, Mayer Amschel
Rothschild's wife

They can be tied to the planning of WWIII as well, which was to begin at the end of 1998 and reach
its conclusion by January 1, 2000. (1998 equals three times 666 - a key number for satanists.)

Albert Pike and Three World Wars

Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated
August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as
necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has
predicted events that have already taken place.

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm

After Mazzini's death on March 11, 1872, Pike appointed Adriano Lemmi (1822-1896, 33rd
degree Mason), a banker from Florence, Italy, to run their subversive activities in Europe.
Lemmi was a supporter of patriot and revolutionary Giuseppe Garibaldi, and may have been
active in the Luciferian Society founded by Pike. Lemmi, in turn, was succeeded by Lenin and
Trotsky, then by Stalin. The revolutionary activities of all these men were financed by British,
French, German, and American international bankers; all of them dominated by the House of
Rothschild.

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm

General Albert Pike and World War III

SNIP

Pike's plan was ingeniously simple. The inherent antagonism between different ideologies was
to be stirred up and made to explode in three world wars and three revolutions. The first world
war was to destroy the three European empires, at that time being the last remaining bulwarks
against Illuminism. One of these (Russia) Was to be made a centre of atheist totalitarianism
(Communism). The second world war was to erupt from heightened tensions
between the Jewish race (and its spiteful Zionism) and extreme European
nationalism (Nazism and Fascism). This war would weaken Europe
economically and politically and Communism would expand and become as
strong as all Christendom, but not stronger, until the time was up for the
final destruction of society. A third reason the second world war was to
create a Jewish state in Palestine. Gradually it would be possible to thereby heighten
the tensions between Judaism and Islam until they broke out in a war which would bring in all
of the world powers. The three revolutions, which would aid this carefully planned dissolution
of all human civilisation...

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1068

Section 4 Page 1
Most people did not realize that the Rothschild were Satanic. They have hidden behind the mask of
Jewishness. Understanding the concept of a false person hiding behind a true mask is essential to
understanding the condition of the world today. Using the wolf in sheep’s clothing analogy to fool
the masses is very much a strategy of war.

This is a Biblical reference to the Rothschilds:

Re 2:9 -I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the
blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of
Satan.

The Rothschilds have a history of hiding their bloodline under other names, and using their relatives
in their plots.
Conspiracy Too Monstrous To Conceive

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot

believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover

http://www.savethemales.ca/000166.html

The Rothschilds planned the French Revolution and three world wars using agents like Weishaupt,
Lenin, Marx, Stalin and Hitler. Both Stalin and Hitler were Rothschild descendants. In their
planned wars Rothschilds almost always controlled both sides of the conflict so they could
manipulate the outcome. The plan for world domination was passed on from generation to
generation.

“Adolph Hitler was born in 1889 on the German-Austrian border in the Austrian border town
of Brannau-on-the-Inn. Brannau is situated on the Inn River midway between Munich and
Linz. A key border crossing between Germany and Austria, Brannau is the gateway for travel
between Munich and Vienna. Travel from Frankfurt to Vienna through Munich couriers would
enter Austria at the Brannau crossing.

Why was Adolph Hitler born in Brannau? At the time of his birth, his father, Alois, was the
chief customs official at the Brannau border crossing. This fact is quite curious as there is
strong evidence that Hitler's father was the illegitimate son of Baron Salomon Mayer
Rothschild, head of the Rothschild family's Vienna branch.”

http://www.geocities.com/cliff_shack/TheSignificanceOfHitlersBirthplace.html

Was Stalin a Rothschild?

SNIP

“So which Rothschild may have fathered Stalin?

Edmond de Rothschild of the Paris branch of the Rothschild bank is,IMHO, the most
plausible candidate.

Edmond, the youngest son of James (Yakov) de Rothschild was the go to guy when it came to
globetrotting. He did much of the legwork for the French Rothschilds who ran the family's
oil business. Edmond travelled the sea in style in the latest ocean-going yacht of his day.”

Section 4 Page 2
 http://www.geocities.com/cliff_shack/stalinrothschild.html

(German Chancellor Angela Merkel is also a Rothschild. She is Hitler’s daughter.)

Meet the Real Adolf Hitler!! Hitler was a Rothschild!!

http://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler.html

Daughter Of Adolph Hitler Vows To Complete European Union

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

It is with troubling concern that we report today that the Western Nations have announced this
week that the ancient German city of Meerholz, Germany has now become the ‘Heart’ of the
European Union with the inclusion of the former Soviet block nations of Bulgaria and Romania.

The symbolism of this ancient citadel, founded in 1170 by the German Emperor Frederick
Barbarossa (who was also crowned the Holy Roman Emperor in 1155, and who has been known
throughout history as Barbarossa) now being the ‘Heart’ of Europe cannot be lost upon our World
of today, particularly when viewed in the light of the German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s vow
today to unite all of Europe under one single constitution, which in effect would wipe out the
National Sovereignty of all the countries in the European Union.

This vow being made by Angela Merkel to unite the European Continent under one flag cannot be
ignored, especially when viewed in the light of still secret, but ‘obtainable’, Soviet KGB archive
files which present a terrifying portrait of the present German Chancellor as being the
daughter of the former German Nazi Leader, Adolf Hitler.

Though said to be born on July 17, 1954 in the former Soviet controlled German Democratic
Republic (East Germany), Angela Merkel’s Stasi GDR file (currently still held in the Soviet KGB
archives) states that she was instead born on April 20, 1954, the birth date of her ‘true’ father,
Adolph Hitler who was born on April 20, 1889.

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index973.htm

World War I

The Rothschilds manipulated the outcome of WWI, and in doing so murdered 66 million - mainly
Christians - in Russia as sacrifices to Satan.

“The largest number of victims, Solzhenitsyn reports, were Christian believers, understandable
since the revolutionary Jews despised and hated Jesus and His Chosen People, the Christians.
All-in-all, about 66 million innocent people were kidnapped and eventually died a hideous death
at the hands of the Jewish "Ivan the Terrible" corps.”

http://www.conspiracyworld.com/index0091.htm

Human sacrifice is still very much part of the agenda. The sacrifices are not limited to “Satanic
Holy Days,”but are committed every day of the year around the world. Most of the serial killings
and mass murders are Illuminati Satanic sacrifices using Illuminati mind control.

Section 4 Page 3
 The House of Rothschild

The Satanic vision for the New World Order could never have been realized had it not been for
the immense wealth of the Rothschild Family.

---

Satan's Altar is highly significant. Human sacrifice is required on this altar, as are abominations
against God of every conceivable stripe.

Satanic Sabbaths (Eight Holy Days per year, each of which requires human sacrifice)

http://www.cuttingedge.org/pages/seminar2/SEAL8.htm

3. People must die as human sacrifices, especially children, since Lord Satan looks upon a
younger human sacrifice as his most desirable

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienciareal/cienciareal20.htm

Last century alone they were responsible for the deaths of over one hundred million people through
Communism, an invention of Rothschild agent, Karl Marx.

DEMOCIDE: MURDER BY GOVERNMENT

Governments have murdered hundreds of millions of their citizens and those under their control.

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/MURDER.HTM

...the new world total: old total 1900-1999 = 174,000,000. New World total = 174,000,000 +
38,000,000 (new for China) + 50,000,000 (new for Colonies) = 262,000,000.

Just to give perspective on this incredible murder by government, if all these bodies were laid head
to toe, with the average height being 5', then they would circle the earth ten times.

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM

They are of the belief that they gain satanic power by offering blood sacrifices to Satan. When they
are feeling a loss of power, they step up the bloodshed. (Americans are naive to believe their
government does not participate in these satanic sacrifices or democide, and it is time for all
Americans to awaken to the reality of what America has become.)

The Rothschild motive for World War II was to recreate Israel for their own Satanic purposes -
world domination.

Rothschild
The Israeli Supreme Court Building

And The New World Order

http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/rothschild__the_israeli_supreme.htm

Israel Supreme Court & Illuminati. P.1

Section 4 Page 4
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17CRVGojwic

Rothschild-Israeli Connection

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/roth-israel.html

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WORLD WAR II

'Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off,
and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened." -- Winston Churchill

The true story behind the world wars is a web of intrigue laced with incest, adultery, illegitimacy,
homosexuality jealousy, treason, pedophilia, hatred, rage, insanity and mass murder. Unfortunately
some nobodies have tried to interject themselves into this saga due to the inferiority, insanity, and
sado-masochism of the latter self-centered spoiled generation Rothschilds who cannot comprehend
that they cannot have everything they so desire. The world has been told World War II is over, but
yet it is not a fait accompli.

Germany Still In Juridicial Limbo

By Christopher Bollyn
12-15-5

POTSDAM, Germany - The Allied occupation of Germany began 58 years ago this month and in the
eyes of many Germans has not yet ended. Foreign armies are still based on German soil and
Europe's largest and most prosperous "democracy" still lacks a constitution and a peace treaty
putting a formal end to the Second World War.

The reunified German nation, considered a modern European democracy, has no constitution other than
the temporary Basic Law (Grundgesetz) originally written in 1948, under the guidance of the U.S.
military occupation forces and originally meant only to apply to the western parts of Germany under
U.S. control.

http://www.rense.com/general69/germany.htm

Hitler did not commit suicide after World War II, but escaped.

The World was Lied to about Hitler's Death

'Identity Theft' must be carried out before an impostor can use the name of another person to
commit fraud

As the Third Reich collapsed in the spring of 1945, the Russians were the first to enter Berlin and
capture Adolf Hitler's bunker. Then, the Soviet Union made a series of contradictory statements or
lies concerning Hitler's death. Stalin announced to Truman during lunch in Potsdam
on July 17, that Hitler did not commit suicide but had probably escaped. After
that, the Russians released photographs of what they claimed to be Hitler's corpse on a dingy
floor.

http://www.blackraiser.com/nredoubt/identity.htm

HITLER ESCAPED!
Section 4 Page 5
 I remember hearing, in the 1950s, rumors that Hitler had escaped to a secret Nazi base at the
South Pole. In 1952, Dwight D. Eisenhower said: "We have been unable to
unearth one bit of tangible evidence of Hitler's death. Many people believe
that Hitler escaped from Berlin." When President Truman asked Joseph Stalin
at the Potsdam conference in 1945 whether or not Hitler was dead, Stalin
replied bluntly, 'No.'

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/omegafile18.htm

According to letters The Kennedy-Khrushchev Letters, edited by Thomas Fensch, U.S.S.R.

Chairman Nikita Khrushchev and United States President John F. Kennedy, the exchanged
correspondence which revealed that they wanted to bring a finality to WWII. This, in essence, was
admitting there had been no solution to the Nazi aggression. In relation to world peace, Kennedy
placed great emphasis is placed on "a special responsibility at this time rests upon the Soviet Union
and the United States."

Khrushchev to Kennedy:

•"...the question of Germany should be solved in such a way that the prestige of any of our
countries was not hurt" (pg. 89)

•"The Soviet Union proceeds from the necessity to find such a solution which would not cause
damage to either side; we must solve this whole problem amicably and, having solved it, not
collide with each other in the future. In short, it is necessary to untie knots which create frictions
between our states." 3/10/62 (pp. 219-220)

•"The policies which the Western powers continue to stick to might somehow have been
understood in the times when it was originated. That is a policy of diktat, a policy 'from the
position of strength'. The late Dulles did not make bones about it. But one wants to conduct this
policy even now ignoring the enormous changes that have taken place in the world." Undated (pg.
151)

•"And of course, Mr. President, I am again reminding you of the necessity to solve the German
question because the next crisis, possibly of no lesser danger, can be caused by the German
question." 10/30/62 (pg. 351)

•"The signing of a German peace treaty would help to liquidate the state of 'cold war," ...11/9/61
(pg. 90)

•"The peace treaty should fix the situation which really exists, should not allow to upset the
established balance and should secure stable peace and tranquility in Europe and not only in
Europe." 3/10/62 (pg. 220)

•"I would not like to leave anything unclear - one way or another we will sign a German peace
treaty." 3/10/62 (pg. 223)

•"The Soviet Union intends to conclude a German peace treaty." 3/10/62 (pg. 224)

•"The Hitlerite Germany lost the war with all the ensuing consequences. Its plans to expand
"Lebensraum" at the expense of other states ended in failure. This should be recognized once and
for all. In fact, that is what the United States, Britain, France, the Soviet Union and other

Section 4 Page 6
 countries fought for against the Hitlerite Germany. Why then should you and we now reckon with
the revanchist strivings of the FRG and even encourage them delaying indefinitely the conclusion
of a German peace treaty and preserving the present indefinite situation, fraught with danger? After
all it is the absence of a peace treaty that feeds the hopes of aggressive revanchist circles in West
Germany for a possibility to revise the results of World War II." 9/28/62 (pg. 284)

•"fate of mankind is at stake, we as statesmen must use all opportunities to justify the great trust
placed upon us." (pg. 229-230)

Why would these two world leaders be speaking about signing a final peace negotiation if a final
conclusion had been reached? The reason World War II is not over in terms of treaties, is because
Hitler won - NOT England. The Mountbattens and Hitler’s masochistic egomaniac Rothschild
cousins did not want to accept defeat. I realize that on the surface, it appears that England and the
Allies won the war, and Hitler and the Germany lost the war, but that is because the public does not
know what was at the root of the war. The public was fed propaganda for the reasons they went to
war, and the world was fed propaganda for how the war ended. No final papers for World War II
have been drawn up because the reasons that were given to the public were false ones. If England
had truly been victorious in their own eyes, they would have rushed to finalize the treaties of World
War II. They have not because they planned to keep the war going until they were satisfied - which
will never happen.

As you can see, important facts were left out of WWII history. World War II was a family feud,
and the crown of the United Kingdom was a central issue. There are other subplots not commonly
known to the public, and then there are many elements of the reality of the events leading up to
World War II which have been purged from public accounts. The truth was documented in the
fiction piece, 1984:

At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in
alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers
had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only
four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was
merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not
satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at
war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the
moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with
him was impossible.
.

The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew
that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did
that knowledge exist? Only in his own consciousness, which in any case must soon be
annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -if all records told the same
tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past,' ran the Party
slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.' And yet the past, though
of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting
to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over
your own memory. 'Reality control', they called it: in Newspeak, 'doublethink'
1984 by George Orwell; pp. 23-24

When all facts - not the myths - are accurately presented, Hitler’s actions were much more
reasonable, and the “interpretation” of what transpired during the Holocaust takes on a new
dimension.

Section 4 Page 7
HOLOCAUST DENIAL WORKS TWO WAYS

The issue of the Holocaust immediately brings up an emotional response. As the Nazis learned,
people who are whipped up into emotions, fail to use their reasoning. There is science to support
this concept. The brain is divided into two halves. The right brain contains emotions. The left brain
contains logic. It is possible to shut down the ability to reason if a crowd is whipped into an
emotional frenzy.

War is ugly, but it is ugly on all sides. Torture, human experimentation occurred on both sides. If
anyone has doubts about this, research what America is doing today to its prisoners.

Hitler “murdered” six million Jews. Churchill and Eisenhower starved to death 7-8 million
surrendered Germans in peace time. If Hitler is the “devil” because he murdered six million Jews,
why are not the British and Americans devils for murdering 7-8 surrendered Germans in peace
time? Why are they not shunned?

Mass Starvation of Germans, 1945-1950

Crimes and Mercies cover In 1997 James Bacque published his Crimes and Mercies, which showed that
more than nine million Germans (mostly civilians) died as a result of Allied starvation and expulsion
policies in the first five years after World War II. These deaths were not accidental, but were the result
of deliberately genocidal policies instituted by Dwight Eisenhower and Henry Morgenthau. They
began planning for this in 1944, before the extent of the atrocities of the death camps became known.
(That more Germans did not starve to death or die of illness in the post-war years was due to the
humanity of Herbert Hoover and others.) Awareness of this act of genocide has been suppressed for
fifty years not only by the Allied governments but also by the German government.

http://www.serendipity.li/hr.html#c&m

Why is FDR not reviled for allowing 3,000 Americans to be slain at Pearl Harbor just so that he
could enter a war, he had promised Americans he would not enter?

Yes, there were concentration camps and ovens. Were the ovens used to cremate masses of dead
bodies who died from starvation? Did the Germans torture people? Yes. Americans and British
torture people today. The CIA tortures people today. Why are they not viewed in the same light?
Is torture justified by some, but not by others? In Hitler’s day, there was no Geneva Convention or
Nuremberg Code. What is the excuse for violating those international standards? In comparison,
Hitler had no such restrictions. Today the restrictions exist, but are ignored. Who then, is the worse
war criminal: Hitler or Bush?

Why is the life of a Jew who leeched off of Germany, then declared war on it with the intent to
starve the nation, more important than a German who defended his country against an enemy
within? The Jews had publicly stated their intention to starve the Germans to death. They were
parasites in the nation of Germany.

To begin with, the Jews were not totally innocent as they have always been presented. In 1933, they
declared an war on Germany, a nation that had been more than hospitable to them.

Documents Relating to the Holocaust

JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY
Jews Of All The World Unite In Action

Section 4 Page 8
 BOYCOTT OF GERMAN GOODS

http://www.historiography-project.org/documents/19330324dailyexpress.html

http://americandefenseleague.com/judea_declares_war_on_germany.htm

Jewish Defector warns America.

"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a
sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender.
We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them
because they are dependent upon their export business."

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only
be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not
export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food
for more than one third of the population.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

Germany imported 2/3 of its food. The successful economic boycott led to the starvation of
Germans which was the stated goal of the Rothschild controlled Jews.

A Jewish Defector Warns America:

“ Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and from
1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out
of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very
nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted
Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

After helping the Jews, Germany was betrayed by them. Hitler was left with Jews who had declared
war on Germany, in ghetto prisons when he was unable to deport them. He did not have enough
food to feed his own law-abiding citizens for whom he was responsible. When Germany received
food rations, the food went to his law-abiding citizens, not to the revolutionary Jews who had
openly stated their intent to starve the Germans.

Jewish Defector warns America.

"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a
sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender.
We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them
because they are dependent upon their export business."

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only
be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not
export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food
for more than one third of the population.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

Section 4 Page 9
There is an orchestrated effort to silence anyone who questions the official Holocaust story. Why?
If, in fact, atrocities happened exactly as the public has been told, why is there a need to suppress
looking at the evidence a little closer?

Why are people who question the official story, like David Irving and Zundel, incarcerated? Is
Charlie Manson censored? Was Ted Bundy censored? David Irving is a respected historian. Did
he not have the right to publish the facts as he saw them? More importantly, why are these people
who question the official version of the Holocaust put in prison? If they are lying or wrong, they
should not be a threat to anyone. There are books on the assassination of John F. Kennedy
ranging from the big conspiracy angle to Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. Should one version of
that tragedy be censored so that only one side of the story is heard?

If the Jews had some fault, is it just to lay ALL the blame at the feet of Hitler when he repeatedly
tried to offer other solutions in spite of his well-known vitriolic rhetoric?

Most people are unaware that Hitler was a Rothschild and participated as an “actor” on the world
stage in the Rothschild plan for a New World Order. It was not an accident that he had a Charlie
Chaplin moustache. Charlie Chaplain was used to give Hitler coded messages as to the program he
should follow in the planned war, but he had a different vision than his Rothschild cousins whose
plan is being carried out now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcvjoWOwnn4&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJOuoyoMhj8&NR=1

In the following video, Hitler is speaking to the youth. In Rothschild code, he was speaking to the
“children” which is code for RothsCHILD. To understand the Rothschild world, one must
understand that it is all conducted in a secret code spoken by all. Every speech Hitler gave was full
of secret messages to his cousins. He preached an Aryan race but he was not Aryan. He was
saying to the Rothschilds: the children were all pure, but you are not pure. You are half-breeds, but
I am leading them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_440uVJ6aA&NR=1

Get bone of my bone video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCBXcnndhJU

Explain age difference. Hitler was calling for unity amoung his cousins.

The public’s view of him is skewed because he was the victim of a propaganda campaign waged
against him by his Rothschild cousins due to the fact he also was “winner take all” in a gamble
with his cousins over the Rothschild fortune. The Rothschilds used the principle of the BIG LIE
against him.

Principles of the BIG LIE:

...never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may
be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on
one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie
sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe
Section 4 Page 10
 it.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

He justified his fight for the German people and against Jews by using godly and Biblical
reasoning. Indeed, one of his most revealing statements makes this quite clear: His beliefs stem
from the writings of well respected Christian, Martin Luther.

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by
defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."

http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the
man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they
were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer
but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which
tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple
the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison.
To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever
before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I
have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and
justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the
distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf
Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm

(Hitler was an actor. Hitler spoken in a coded language. Not all that he said should be taken
literally.)

What were Hitler’s options as Chancellor?

As you know, Hitler was dramatic and used theatrics to advance his cause. What you may not be
aware of is that the Rothschilds communicate with one another and have for centuries, through the
media. They do not call each other on the phone. They kill people and send coded messages in
blood to each other using a symbol language.

When Hitler made statements about “JEWS”, he was speaking directly to his Rothschild cousins
who loved being threatened and frightened. This Satanic game Rothschilds have played for
centuries.

Most statements about killing Jews meant Hitler’s desire to kill his cousins - something he should
have done, but did not do, with the exception of a woman named Elizabeth Rothschild who
symbolized Elizabeth Windsor. In the Rothschild world innocent people are killed to “pay” for
the sins of the guilty. The deaths are messages that reflect, “This is what I’d like to do to you.”

Hitler was working on his part of the Rothschild plan. He was funded by them and aided by them.

'Mein Kampf' - Hitler Used Rothschild Banker's Typewriter

Section 4 Page 11
 Emil Georg von Stauss, the president of Germany's largest bank, the Deutsche Bank, lent Hitler a
portable Remington so he could write his infamous anti-Jewish banker manifesto "Mein Kampf."

Von Stauss, a principal Nazi Party fund raiser, also was a longtime business associate of the
Rothschilds.

http://www.rense.com/general77/meinl.htm

The Rothschilds wanted him to complete his role, so they could lay the blame of the atrocities on
him, discredit him, and just throw him away. They, then, wanted to steal what he had attained.
What a person sees does not always reflect the reality of the situation. The Rothschilds are masters
at tweaking the doors of perception.

What happens when we can no longer believe our own eyes?

25 Tactics for Truth Suppression

http://alaskafreepress.com/msgboard/disinfo/index.html

One successful technique used in mind control or brainwashing is to shock someone then alter the
person’s perspective of what happened. The photos of many dead Jews would shock anyone. The
Rothschilds provided the explanation for how the photographs came to be: Hitler the evil one,
intentionally killed the Jews. The Rothschilds failed to mention how Germany did not have enough
food to feed its citizens, let alone its prisoners of war. The Jews were kept alive by Prisoner of
War food rations provided by the Rothschild controlled Red Cross, and other agencies. The Allies,
who had conspired to deliver Palestine, a nation they did not own, to the Rothschilds to be used as
the new Israel, intentionally bombed the roads on which the Prisoner of War food rations were
delivered thereby creating the conditions under which many, if not most of the Jews died. The
photographs of most of the dead Jews in World War II photos clearly show the people died of
starvation. The questions is, “Who is to blame for that?”

Historians failed to state that the Rothschilds made sure the Red Cross Prisoner of War food was
cut off, and ordered the Allies to bomb the roads on which the food supplies were delivered in order
to ensure the high Jewish death count. Hitler got all the blame, but he was not entirely responsible
for what occurred.

The Rothschilds failed to allow the public to know they planned the state of Israel well before there
ever was a Holocaust, but used the Holocaust as an excuse to start the state up again in 1948. The
Rothschild plan to start Israel dated back to 1917 - long before Hitler ever came to power. The
Holocaust is always used as the reason the Jews must have a homeland, but why then were the
plans agreed upon by England and the Rothschilds in 1917?

THE BALFOUR DECLARATION

Foreign Office

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

Section 4 Page 12
 I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following
declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and
approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home
for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this
object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status
enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/balfour.htm

In order to have an excuse to re-create the nation of Israel, they needed to have a reason and created
that reason by creating the conditions under which so many Jews were starved to death. The
Rothschilds failed to balance the picture of all the dead Jews with evidence that Hitler tried to avoid
that war.

Hitler Didn't Want World War

Hitler didn't want a world war, and had no stomach for fighting England, according to Pulitzer
Prize winning journalist Louis Kilzer, author of Churchill's Deception (Simon & Schuster, 1994).

Hitler believed the future of Western civilization depended on the cooperation of Germany and her
Aryan cousins: England and the United States. His territorial demands were limited to Communist
Russia, which he regarded as a proxy for Jewish world ambitions. He was determined to avoid
fighting a war on two fronts.

The "miracle at Dunkirk" was in fact an extraordinary peace overture to England. We don't
normally associate Hitler with such magnanimity.

In May 1940, the British were on the verge of defeat. The English army was trapped at Dunkirk.
Rather than take them prisoner, Hitler halted his generals for three days allowing
330,000 [British] men to escape. [He did so, because he was their KING. It
was a gesture of love towards his people.]

"The blood of every single Englishman is too valuable to shed," Hitler said.
"Our two people belong together racially and traditionally. That is and always
has been my aim, even if our generals can't grasp it." (Kilzer, p.213)

http://www.savethemales.ca/000369.html

There was a motive for the Rothschilds wanting to smear Hitler until he could never again appear in
public. They had personal motive for smearing him beyond redemption. To meet their goals, the
Rothschilds needed to victimize Jews, and to create a high Jewish death count to meet that goal.
The French and English Rothschilds threatened any country who would accept Hitler’s Jewish
prisoners as deportees with financial ruin. They had a track record of being able to deliver upon
that threat. Their basic message was, “You take the Jews, we will destroy you.”

Besides the propaganda campaign against Hitler’s popular memory in order to stop him from
claiming his throne ,- something that cannot be legitimately stolen as it is a title and authority
bestowed by God and God, alone, his evil relatives who funded both Naziism and Communism,
launched a campaign to imprison the entire planet in total slavery of mankind. They are not in

Section 4 Page 13
control of man; God is. The quest for Satan or his henchmen was a losing proposition from its
inception. Satan was a created being who delusionally believed he could overtake his Creator, and
nothing anyone could say would stop him from trying. Elizabeth Mountbatten, her insane son, and
others in this sorry story are followers of Lucifer and strive to be the “god of this world”.

CHARLES PROCLAIMED "SAVIOR OF THE WORLD" AND A STATUE IS PLANNED

FOR HIM! Part 2 In Antichrist Series

http://www.cuttingedge.org/NEWS/n1678.cfm

The attitude of Lucifer is consistent with their beliefs:

Isaiah 14 11 Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is
spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.

12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the
ground, which didst weaken the nations!

13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the
stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

Hitler’s evil cousins were far worse than Hitler ever was, even if everything that has been said about
him is true. To accurately analyze any situation, a person must have ALL the facts.

Are there other factors to consider?

The Rothschilds failed to tell people that in spite of Hitler’s dramatic rhetoric, he tried to deport the
Jews rather than kill them. Hitler’s threat to kill the “Jews” was for the most part theatre. This is
not to say he was not willing to sacrifice people or kill them. He was a Rothschild, and that is what
they have done and still do. If you study Hitler’s rhetoric and then look at his actions, the portrayal
of him as a killer of innocent Jews does not stand the test of truth. His threats were to commit
genocide against Jews who had declared their intent to commit genocide against Germans, but his
actions told a different story. His actions did not support the widely accepted belief that he planned
to murder millions of Jews. It is fact that he threatened to kill them, but it is also fact that his
preference was to DEPORT them.

As Chancellor his duty was to protect his people from enemies foreign and domestic. The Jews
Section 4 Page 14
openly identified themselves as enemies of Germany, and it is time that the myth be destroyed that
the poor little Jews were picked on by big bad Hitler for no good reason. They openly plotted
genocide against Germans and published their intentions in the newspapers.

"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every
conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the
assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and
material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a
great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish
interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..." (Valadimir Jabotinsky, in
Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/archive/index.php?t-770098.html

Hitler’s basic message, although delivered with dramatic emotion was, “Get these traitorous,
ungrateful Jews (who worked for the French/English Rothschilds) out of Germany, OR I will kill
them.” Deportation of Jews was his first choice: .

The 'Final Solution' of Adolf Hitler retained a single meaning right through
WW2, central to the program of 'National socialism,' and signified the
deportation of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and Russia[

International Jewish organisations twice declared war on Germany, in 1933 then again in 1939[27].
As the 'final solution' policy[28] was thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places of hard
labour; then under the impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages of disease and famine took place.

http://www.rense.com/general81/chamber.htm

IF the Jews were not deported, then he would kill them. The fact that so many of them died of
starvation, as evidenced by the photos, is proof that he did not intentionally kill them. Only if he
had enough food to feed them and refused to do so, could one lay all the blame at his feet.

The Jewish community is well aware of Hitler’s desire to deport the Jews rather than kill them.

Ten questions to the Zionists

by Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl ZT"L
Dean of Nitra Yeshiva and author of min hametzar
(Published by the author in 1948 and reprinted many times)

1. IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews
transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on
condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain;
with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the
family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily.

2. IS IT TRUE that the Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear
understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an
agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.

Section 4 Page 15
 3. IS IT TRUE that the answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations,
in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war.
c) No ransom will be paid

http://www.nkusa.org/Historical_Documents/tenquestions.cfm

Here is another view of the facts leading to World War II that are conveniently left out of the
history people are taught. The history people are taught, by the way, in highly controlled way by the
same people who perpetrated the wars. They controlled the information fed to the masses.

Hitler did state in his writings that he was aware that every Jew was not aware of his role in
advancing the Rothschild agenda, but Hitler’s belief was that if he did not stop the advancement of
the Jewish money machine, Germans and Germany would be destroyed.

(Supposedly 19 hijackers attacked America on 9-11, but war has been declared on Muslims around
the world. Iraq had no role in 911, but over 80,000 civilians have been killed, and no one seems to
flinch an eye over it. “We don’t do body counts.” General Tommy Franks. Why is it that
America can take this stance, but Hitler was scorned, especially when did not want war and tried to
prevent it. He simply did not want the Jews controlling his nation, and tried to deport them.

Neither Saddam Hussein nor Iraq attacked America, but Americans are over in Iraq destroying that
nation and its people while Americans blindly trust their moronic “leader” - cocaine addicted
alcoholic who never went through rehabilitation, and never succeeded at anything he attempted
except to execute more prisoners than other governors. Bush is a man who openly has served in a
Satanic cult, and Americans have continued to march in lock step to his every idiotic whim because
they are too lazy to perform their duties as citizens. America with its trillion dollar budget daily
fails the American people who continue to open their wallets and pay for an incompetent non-
responsive, ineffectual government which in fact works AGAINST the foundation of this country.)

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORLD WAR II?

Rothschild, Windsor, and Churchill, to name a few. Churchill was a short-sighted opportunist.

Obsessed not only with defeating Hitler, but with destroying Germany, Churchill was oblivious to
the danger of a Soviet inundation of Europe until it was far too late.

SNIP

But while Winston had no principles, there was one constant in his life: the love of war.

SNIP

He attended Sandhurst, the military academy, instead of the universities, and "from the moment
that Churchill left Sandhurst . . . he did his utmost to get into a fight, wherever a war was going
on." All his life he was most excited on the evidence, only really excited by war. He loved war as
few modern men ever have he even "loved the bangs," as he called them, and he was very brave
under fire.

In 1925, Churchill wrote: "The story of the human race is war."

Section 4 Page 16
 http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/raico-churchill1.html

Churchill, after 1945, promoted Hitler's doctrine

"I said that frankly, as I had listened to him inveigh so violently against the threat of Soviet
domination and the spread of Communism in Europe, and disclose such a lack of confidence in the
professions of good faith in Soviet leadership. I had wondered whether he (Churchill), the Prime
Minister, was now willing to declare to the world that he and Britain had made a mistake in not
supporting Hitler, for as I understood him, he was now expressing the doctrine which Hitler and
Goebbels had been proclaiming and reitering for the past for years ... Exactly the same conditions
which he described and the same deductions were drawn from them as he now appeared to assert."
(Foreign Relations of the United States - The Conference of Berlin - The Potsdam Conference -
Vol. I, p. 73)

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/history/whowasah.htm

One of his famous sentences after the WWII: "I think we have slaughtered the wrong pig".

One can infer from that quote since England went to war against Germany, he acknowledged that
he made a mistake.

There is published evidence to support the above statement that Hitler did not want to go to war with
England - his OWN country. Others, too, saw the need to curb Communism, and agreed with
Hitler. World War II did not have to be so destructive.

"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in
Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian
colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German
People did not want war. But we, {England}, declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in
accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the
'Americans'{Jews} around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into
war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of
Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I
feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued
now, only under a different label."

(Ashamed and Humiliated The British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at
Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP)).

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/archive/index.php?t-770098.html

The Bible speaks of a return to a God-worshipping Israel, but man is on earth with free will, and if
he chooses evil over good, then the outcome of the story is different than originally planned. The
Jews need to take responsibility for what Israel has become. Did they let money become their God
instead of the God of the Old Testament?

One of the Rothschild tactics is to take God’s plan and then twist it to fit their personal agenda. In
order to create a motivation for the creation of Israel, a Holocaust was PLANNED well before
WWII ever began.

The Rothschilds, through their intelligence and monetary networks controlled many groups of
people, especially Jews whom they funded and whose financial operations they coordinated in an
Section 4 Page 17
effort to consolidate power in the hands of the money changers.

WHAT’S WORLD DOMINATION WITHOUT A THRONE - AN ETERNAL THRONE?

The Rothschilds fomented the French Revolution in order to destroy the French monarchy.

“On Sept. 9, 1785, Joseph Utzschneider, a lawyer, and two other defectors revealed the
Illuminati goals before a Court of Inquiry in Bavaria: Abolition of the Monarchy and
all ordered government; Abolition of private property (which the Illuminati will
assume); Abolition of Patriotism (nations); Family, (through the abolition of Marriage,
Morality, and by government providing "Education" for children) and finally, Abolition of all
Religion, particularly Christianity.”

http://www.savethemales.ca/001260.html

Their goal, which they subsequently obtained, was to gain title to the British throne, and place a
Rothschild as monarch. The Rothschilds were responsible for legally removing the Windsors from
the British throne. Although the objective to legally remove the Windsors was met, the spoiled
scion of Meyer Amschel Rothschild worked against their founding father because of jealousy that
they were not the “Chosen One” which is why Elizabeth Mountbatten, a fraud, is known to the
world as “Queen.” In reality she is not one.

During the years, 1649-1660, England did not have a reigning monarch. During the years 1936
until the time I reclaimed the throne - sometime in 2004 - England had pretenders sitting on the
throne- people who were not fit to rule, and people who were not legitimate. People who destroyed
the nation, destroyed the kingdom. I saved my country from a World War with no help. Can they
deny that I am the King prophecied to appear at the end time - especially when the Satanists were
told by Satan, himself, that I was to be that King. They kept the information from me, but did that
stop God’s power?

Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Jer 23:5 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch,
and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.

Ps 99:4 The king’s strength also loveth judgment; thou dost establish equity, thou executest
judgment and righteousness in Jacob.

Pr 25:5 Take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in
righteousness.

Isa 32:1 Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment.

The public only can learn from the knowledge base available to it, and usually believes what the
media tells it. The public does not see the world from a spiritual perspective. The people do not
know the future. They do not know who the wolves are in sheep’s clothing. God knows the truth.
He is never fooled. By His foreknowledge, He knew what England would need. Hitler respected
the British, and showed his loyalty to his people. He was not out to make them speak German. He
was there to work with King Edward VIII to the benefit of the British.

Hitler gained legal title to the throne of the United Kingdom after a breach was made in a contract
Section 4 Page 18
between Hitler and King Edward VIII.

Nuremberg Rally and Parade

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilXVkgmJk2E

The Rothschilds originally had five branches in five major European cities. Being a member of the
royal family was not sufficient to the 20th century Rothschild power brokers. Family feuds erupted
and Rothschild spilled the blood of Rothschild trying to gain the crown from Hitler There were
some Rothschilds who would stop at nothing in an effort to become “God’s Elect.” Guy de
Rothschild and his cousin, Elie de Rothschild were the two worst family members. (They were
both murdered in the summer of 2007.) They believed they owed no loyalty to Meyer Amschel’s
mission, and they could change the plan at their whim. Needless to say, they did not follow the
family motto as stated below:

“Lord Rothschild in his book The Shadow of a Great Man quotes a letter sent from Davidson on
June 24, 1814 to Nathan Rothschild, “As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work
together with your brothers, not a house in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause
you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any
house in the world."(1) The closeness of the Rothschild brothers is seen in a letter from Saloman
(Salmon) Rothschild to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, "We are like the mechanism
of a watch: each part is essential.”

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_rothschild_bloodline.htm

The French and British branches planned to eliminate the other branches, and claim the British
throne for themselves. There was also bad blood between the two remaining houses: French
Rothschild vs. British Rothschild. Of the two families, the most evil of the pit of vipers resided in
the French House of Rothschild. The Bible states that in the last days children would be
disobedient to parents. Satan did not fare any better than God did in this arena. Total rebellion
means just that. Satan’s children also rebelled against their chosen leader, Meyer Amschel
Rothschild, which spelled defeat for their plans. In other words the modern Rothschilds decided to
usurp the Rothschild plan for personal glory rather than institute the plan as designed.

Hitler descended from the Austrian line from which the other Rothschilds received the royal title of
“Baron”.

Meet the Real Adolf Hitler!!

Hitler was a Rothschild!!

http://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler.html

Adolf Hitler who was one of the “hidden” Rothschilds who was selected to play a part in the plan
for the one world government. Hitler’s ascension to Chancellor of Germany was manipulated by
an older generation of Rothschild. Hitler’s younger cousins believed they could use him for their
own gain, and then destroy him. He ended up battling his cousins. World War II was an outward
expression of that family feud. When Hitler spoke about the “JEWS” he was directly speaking
about his cousins who had controlled the imprisoned Jews by the Rothschild intricate
financial/banking empire they manipulated.

The French house of Rothschild produced Hitler’s enemy cousins: Guy de Rothschild and Elie de
Rothschild. Hitler’s cousins were simply jealous of Hitler’s accomplishments, and attempted to
Section 4 Page 19
denigrate him, treating him as if he was “poor relations” because Hitler’s father was the
illegitimate son of Baron Salomon Rothschild of Vienna. Hitler, knowing the true conditions of the
births of both Guy and Elie, believed himself not to be inferior, but superior to his cousins. Guy
and Elie’s mothers were not married to their father - Baron Maurice de Rothschild, but to other
men. Hitler’s parents were married to each other.

In the Hitler youth videos he can be heard saying that the youth are bone of his bone and flesh of
his flesh. In code, he was saying to his young cousins (the children), “There is illegitimacy on both
sides. You are not any different then I am.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIyF3B1_0bk&feature=related

Hitler knew the truth of the conditions of Guy and Elie’s birth. He knew both Rothschilds were
products of adulterous relationships their mothers had. Baron Édouard de Rothschild was not
Guy’s biological father, and Baron Robert Philippe de Rothschild was not Elie de Rothschild’s
biological father. It is quite possible that Guy and Elie were, in fact, half-brothers both being the
sons of Baron Édouard and Baron Robert’s other cousin, Baron Maurice de Rothschild. (It is
possible that Elie’s father was not Maurice, but an outsider, but he stuck by the story that Maurice
was his father.)

The trauma and rejection both Guy and Elie suffered from being illegitimate drove them to extremes
to attempt to legitimize themselves. Gaining the crown was what they believed would do just that.
Both Guy and Elie were relentless in their hatred for Hitler who was no less proud than they.

Baron Guy de Rothschild married Baroness Alix Hermine Jeanette Schey de Koromla in 1937. At
the end of 1942, his wife gave birth to a son, David. Baron David’s father was Guy’s British
cousin, Lord Victor Rothschild’s son, not Guy’s. Guy was away at war fighting for his country
against his cousin, the Chancellor of Germany. So David was born under similar circumstances to
Guy, illegitimate, but still Rothschild. This made him half-brother with the Rothschild he and his
father would eventually have murdered: Amschel Rothschild, Victor’s legitimate son. Amschel was
half- brother of British Lord Victor’s other legitimate son, Jacob Rothschild of England.

Illegitimacy then became a major factor in this epic drama. In some ways the root of this war to
seize the crown by illegal piracy, was a quest to legitimize illegitimacy for many of the players.
The incest became “irrelevant,” so to speak, because of the practice of royalty intermarrying blood
relations. Rothschilds were under orders to intermarry by the founding father, Meyer Amschel
Rothschild, in his will.

MAYER AMSCHEL'S WILL

When he died on September 19, 1812, the founder of the House of Rothschild left a will that was
just days old. In it, he laid down specific laws by which the House that bore his name would
operate in future year.

The laws were as follows:

(1) All key positions in the House of Rothschild were to be held by members
of the family, and not by hired hands. Only male members of the family were allowed to
participate in the business.

The eldest son of the eldest son was to be the head of the family unless the majority of the rest of
the family agreed otherwise. It was for this exceptional reason that Nathan, who was particularly

Section 4 Page 20
 brilliant, was appointed head of the House of Rothschild in 1812.

(2) The family was to intermarry with their own first and second cousins, thus
preserving the vast fortune. This rule was strictly adhered to early on but later, when other rich
Jewish banking houses came on the scene, it was relaxed to allow some of the Rothschilds to
marry selected members of the new elite.

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm

The management problems arose when Guy refused to follow the family rules in order to try to heal
his broken ego. The Rothschilds always work through agents or hired hands which is perfectly
acceptable as a condition of Mayer Amschel’s will, but the 20th century generation of treacherous
Rothschilds failed to adhere to the tenets of his mandates.

(1) All key positions in the House of Rothschild were to be held by members
of the family, and not by hired hands. Only male members of the family were
allowed to participate in the business.

Guy, the unofficial leader of the family had some personal issues which he allowed to fog his
thinking. He and Elie, not only let hired hands in the inner circle, he allowed Elizabeth Mountbatten,
a female, to participate in our family business. They cannot then claim that I have no right to
participate in family business as a female, especially since I inherited control and ownership of the
City of London. The problem lies in how the “hired hands” were handled.

Hermann Goering was a hired hand who was fired by Hitler and then turned over to trial by his
handlers. His conviction should have sent the message that Goering’s treason and betrayal of
Hitler was not going to be rewarded. Goering’s surviving his suicide is another story, but he did
survive and lived in San Diego, California as the 1st Toyota dealer in America: John A. Rose. His
illegitimate son is Alan Douglas Bersin, who was assigned to carry out his father’s NAZI agenda.
Just before Bersin took his office as Superintendent of San Diego Unified School District, he
vacationed in a little town near Visalia, Calfornia, where John A. Rose owned property. Bersin was
born on 10/14/46. Goering was scheduled to die at Nuremburg on 10/15/46. Goering was “born
again” in bersin/prison. (“b’s” and “p’s” are used interchangably like “6’s” and “9’s” - that
is, if you are a benighted one.)

George Herbert Walker Bush was another hired hand. Bill and Hillary Clinton were hired hands.
Guy and Elie allowed them all to get out of control and out of hand thereby leading the hired hands
to think they could just do anything they wanted including trying to steal my crown. Guy and Elie
never intended for them to have the crown, but allowed them to joust with them to try to take it.
Should they have been “successful”, Guy and Elie would have just killed them. The root of this
management problem was the fact that Guy and Elie were sado-masochists and needed someone to
“beat on them” when they were in a masochistic mood. This was done more psychologically than
physically. Hermann Goering and Bill Clinton, because of their megalomanic psychosis, were
unable to just work as hired hands. They internalised their quest to become royal and convinced
themselves that each was really the “Chosen Ones” for whom the crown was really meant. They
were unable to distinguish fantasy from fact.

They were not the only fools who believed this. Idiots like Donald Rumsfeld, Bob Gates, and
others also believed they were destined to be King of the United Kingdom. Bersin actually believed
he REALLY was the Prince of Wales, and that Princess Diana (whom he helped murder) was really
his wife! No, I am not making this up. This information can be decoded in many sources because
the psuedo illumined ones left a diary of everything they thought and did in secret code hiding out
Section 4 Page 21
in the open, and I broke the code. (Along with my fortunes, titles I inherited, I was given a
prophetic gift which assisted me in breaking the code.)

ROTHSCHILD VENDETTA

Both Guy and Elie de Rothschild, sado-masochists, personally fought against their cousin. Both
desired leadership, but proved time and time again they were not fit for the “top job.” A leader
must learn to stand alone - something neither one could do. They felt most comfortable in a group
taking orders from others.

Mickey Rooney - Treat Me Rough

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7Xb4qgj-TA&feature=related

Apparently, Guy didn’t like being treated too roughly though. While Guy served in the French
military, and Hitler was being honored as a great leader, Hitler had Guy’s ship torpedoed The
scene was reminiscent of the scene in “Jaws” in which shipwrecked survivors were routinely
picked off by hungry great white sharks.

“He narrowly escaped death when his ship was torpedoed and sunk. Rescued, he celebrated his safe
arrival with an 1895 bottle of Château Lafite from the family vineyards.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/business/worldbusiness/14rothschild.html?_r=2&pagewanted
=2&oref=slogin

Two years later, with the outbreak of World War II, he was called up to serve as a young cavalry
officer. Rothschild fought well in the first days of the war, winning a Croix de Guerre in northern
France before he joined the British retreat from Dunkirk. After being evacuated to England,
Rothschild returned immediately to France and was demobilized following the French defeat. He
then took charge of the family’s office at La Bourbale, near Clermont-Ferrand.

Under the Fascist Vichy government, Rothschild’s father and uncles were stripped of their French
nationality, removed from the register of the Légion d'honneur, and the family was forced to sell its
possessions. Rothschild managed to persuade the buyers to grant options under which he would
later be able to buy the family's interests back. Rothschild and his wife left France in 1941 for New
York, where Rothschild’s parents had already relocated, and Baron Guy joined General Charles de
Gaulle’s Free French forces. A year later, the couple’s first son, David, was born.

As part of the Free French Forces, Rothschild boarded the cargo ship, Pacific Grove, to travel back
to Europe. His ship was torpedoed and sunk in March 1943, and he was rescued
after spending 12 hours in the Atlantic.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/GuyRothschild.html

This is something Guy never forgave Hitler for, and he would exact his revenge on Hitler and
Hitler’s relatives. Hitler was born in 1889. The 1895 bottle of Château Lafite was a warning to
Hitler. Guy and the other Rothschilds, because of their close personal ties to Satan, knew Hitler
would one day have a descendent known as “6” born on a 666 day. 1889 plus 6 is 1895. The
message being, I will get even with you through your children and grandchildren. (I was born on
6/6/51. 5 + 1 adding up to six.) As they indicated, they would do, they exacted their revenge on
Hitler by planning World War III with me as the centerpiece. Guy’s desire for revenge guided his
life.
Section 4 Page 22
Besides torpedoing Guy’s ship, Hitler also imprisoned Guy’s French cousin, Elie de Rothschild:
World War II service

[Elie} and his brother served as officers in a cavalry regiment - the Anciens 11èmes Cuirassiers -
when Nazi Germany invaded France in 1940. Both were captured by the Germans close to the
Belgian border during World War II. Élie was taken to a prisoner of war camp at Nienberg near
Hamburg. After being discovered planning to escape, he was taken to Colditz Castle, then to
Lübeck, one of the toughest POW camps. There, he was reunited with his brother. As persons of
Jewish descent, both were fortunate in being treated as captured officers, thus avoiding the
extermination camps.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elie_de_Rothschild

With the outbreak of the Second World War, Alain and Elie rode off to the front with their cavalry
regiment, the Anciens 11èmes Cuirassiers - "like Pancho Villa," Elie said, "with a horse and a
sabre". After German forces invaded France in May 1940 the brothers were captured (Alain was in
hospital, recovering from wounds) near the Belgian frontier.Elie was sent to a German PoW camp
near Nienburg from which, after an unsuccessful escape attempt, he was sent to Colditz.
Subsequently he was moved again, to a camp at Lübeck, where he was reunited with Alain. In the
immediate postwar years, in Paris, Elie and Alain and their wives shared 23 avenue de Marigny.
During the war the house had been occupied as Luftwaffe headquarters and had been frequented by
Hermann Goering; it was then taken over by their English cousin Victor, Lt-Col Lord
Rothschild, who had become a wartime specialist in counter-sabotage (bomb disposal).

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/07/db0702.xml

Guy and Elie would stop at nothing to try to steal Hitler’s legal acquisition, the crown of many
nations, and the bulk of the Rothschild fortune to go with that crown. In actuality, there were two
crowns available besides the crown of the sovereign state, City of London.

HOW DID HITLER GAIN THE CROWNS?

Hitler was on excellent terms with Edward, Prince of Wales, soon to be King Edward VIII. Prince
Edward highly respected the new Chancellor of Germany and knew of his royal Merovingian blood
line. He was well-pleased to be able to negotiate an agreement with Hitler and Germany as he was a
devout Germanophile. He spoke high German better than he spoke English. Edward, Prince of
Wales fully intended to become king and remain king. He never considered that he would one day
have to abdicate his throne when he made this agreement with Hitler. He had no legitimate children
and was not sure he would have legitimate children. As future King Edward VIII, he was
responsible for making sure his nieces, heirs to the throne, were well married. He knew Hitler knew
the real conditions of the birth of his nieces, and he knew Hitler’s past as well. It was in the best
interest of both parties to attempt to “legitimize” the “illegitimacies” in their respective families by
keeping them secret. King James I was also illegitmate, being gthe son of Mary Queen of Scots
Secretary Rizzio, but this exception was also made. There was no exception made for Keppel’s
bastards. They were not part of the Hitler King Edward agreement - no matter how they would
have liked to have been. Cold-hearted ambition, insatiable greed and ungovernable lust are not
conditions for attaining royalty. Liz was precontrated in marriage to my father - not to a relative of
hers.

Liz rejected her legal right to sit on the throne. When she refused to honor the contract with my
father, she lost her royal status. Even Herman Goering who believed himself to be God could not

Section 4 Page 23
give her what she wanted. The coded evidence of this is also voluminous. She has also admitted
that she believes that I - not she is the Queen of the United Kingdom. (As has her son, dummy
Charlie.)

It was obvious in June 1483, however that this particular horse was not going to run, and
necessary therefore that Edward V's unfitness to wear a crown be established by other means.
Shortly after the fiasco of Shaa's sermon, Gloucester had it put about that Edward IV's marriage
to Elizabeth Wydville was invalid because he had at the time been contracted to
another lady, and that their children were bastards and incapable of inheriting
the throne. It was this that was the eventual basis of Gloucester's claim to sovereignty. The
Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir (pg. 117)

Her children are bastards.

A precontract, in that period, was a promise before witnesss to marry followed by sexual
intercourse. Many couples lived together on the strength of this and did not have their unions
blessed in church. A precontract was as binding as a marriage and could only be dissolved by the
ecclesiastical authroities. by 1330 the law recognized that an isisting precontract with one
partner was a bar to marriage with another and sufficient to bastardise any
children of a subsequent marriage. The Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir (pg. 119)

It is the tradition of royals to have their spouses chosen for them to benefit the realm. Prince
Edward/King Edward VIII had every right to negotiate a marriage for his niece - which he did do.
In the agreement, England and Germany would form an alliance, Hitler would become a King of
Germany and King Edward VIII would remain King of the United Kingdom. They agreed to keep
the conditions of the births of Elizabeth and Margaret secret, and the conditions of the birth of
Hitler’s son, my father, would also remain secret. The Windsors and Hitler agreed not to take
illegitimacy into account because Princess Elizabeth was the biological product of an incestuous
union of her father and her aunt, Princess Royal Mary. There are other very shocking conditions
related to her birth which I will expose at some future time.

(Can you spell h-e-r-m-a-p-h-r-o-d-i-t-e?)

The true conditions of her birth were covered up and reported only in the inner circles as “artificial
insemination”:

The Queen [Queen Mum] had demonstrated stout resolve in facing other obstacles in the past;
the most pressing was her inability to get pregnant during the months after her wedding. The
fertility problem stemmed from the 'nervousness' that afflicted her husband, producing his
debilitating stutter, distracting twitches, rickety legs, and bleeding ulcers. Most disturbing to the
new bride was his inability to impregnate her. This was a disorder he shared with his older
brother. When the Duchess of Windsor was asked why she had no children with her husband,
she joked about the disability: The Duke is not heir-conditioned."

"Neither was his brother. For two barren years the Duchess of York was unable to conceive.
She consulted several gynecologists and obstetricians about the problem. Finally, on the advice
of her doctor, Lane Phillips, she and her husband submitted to the unorthodox
science of artificial insemination. The arduous procedure of mechanically injecting his
sperm into her uterus finally enabled her to get pregnant. Only because of this manual
fertilization was she able to produce her first child, Elizabeth, in 1926, and her second, Margaret
Rose, in 1930." The Royals by Kitty Kelley (pg. 23).

Section 4 Page 24
Elizabeth’s biological mother was her aunt - her father’s sister, The Princess Mary, Princess Royal
and Countess of Harewood. Prince George, Duke of York, and his sister, Princess Mary had
previously had a long lasting incestuous relationship from childhood.

In 1926, she became the commandant-in-chief of the British Red Cross Detachments. (Elizabeth was born
in 1926. Harewood is symbol for “the rabbit died”)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary%2C_Princess_Royal_and_Countess_of_Harewood

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was not Elizabeth’s biological mother.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Bowes-Lyon

King Edward VIII apparently also did have an illegitimate son by one of his married mistresses, and
there were rumors of a daughter as well.

“Evidently, Elizabeth had been born in England in June of 1934. Her true parents were later to
be known as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.”

http://we3.org/

Hitler also had an illegitimate son. Princess Elizabeth was promised to marry Hitler’s son - my
father. My father would become a Prince, and by agreement with Elizabeth’s parents, would marry
Elizabeth, setting her up to become Queen of Germany (which is why her preferred crown has the
German iron cross symbol). Princess Elizabeth had an arranged marriage to my father and was not
free to break it on a whim.

...the subject of some of them - by carefully primed preachers - was the assertion that Edward V,
his brother and his sisters were not the legitimate children of the late King: Edward IV had
been 'pre-contracted' to another woman when he married Elizabeth Woodville, so
that their marriage was illegal and their children were ineligible for the crown.
Similarly the Duke of Clarence's children could not inherit it, since their late father was a convicted
traitor. Royal Murders by Dulcie M. Ashdown, (pg. 53)

God provided a way for then Princess Elizabeth to become Queen, but she refused it, thereby
removing herself from royalty and titles. She is not a person who believes in God, as she believes
herself to be “God”.

A monarch is placed by God and it should be no surprise that she was removed by God, even if her
removal was accompanied by a perceived insult, but God was sending her and her debauched family
a message.

In the event that King Edward VIII had legitimate children which was expected of him in 1933,
Princess Elizabeth would never have been Queen of England. By this agreement, Princess Elizabeth
was ensured a throne - either England or Germany or both. This is ample consideration for a valid
contract. Remember, it was believed that Edward, Prince of Wales, a single man, would one day
marry a respectable woman to serve as Queen and have children of his own. In 1933, no one knew
that he would fail in his duties and marry a low class twice divorced American also of questionable
sexuality. When she failed to keep the agreement, her family lost all rights to the throne, all royal
titles and privileges, and my family gained it. She has no rights over me in any way, but because of
her defective DNA she has an inability to comprehend the change intellectually. Emotionally, she
knows, but intellectually, she cannot grasp this. Besides being autistic, obsessive compulsive,
Section 4 Page 25
suffering from Asperger Syndrome and psychosis, she has the genetic flaws carried in the defunct
once royal bloodline God was so anxious to replace.

The reason they planned World War III around me as the centerpiece is some of the evidence they
believed me to be the heir to the throne. When they murdered my older brother, I became Queen,
and it took me several years of speaking with them on a daily basis before I understood what
exactly it was these “high-powered” people wanted from me. I knew they must have wanted
something they did not possess, but I could not figure out what that could possibly be, until no
other answer was possible.

Hitler became the King of the United Kingdom and of Germany which was not part of the United
Kingdom. These are the “two crowns” that Guy and Elie had in mind for themselves. Germany
was a separate kingdom which would only fall under the banner of the United Kingdom in the event
the marriage between Hitler’s son and Princess Elizabeth took place.

Ordinarily, an illegitimate offspring could not claim royal blood.

In 1830, when Victoria was eleven, the death of “uncle King” brought the Princess even closer to
the throne. The new King, her sixty-five-year uncle William, had sired ten children, all
illegitimate; Victoria, accordingly, was Heir to the British Crown. Dreadnought: Britain,
Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 4)

Besides King James I, the one exception for persons of questionable birth taking the throne was
made in the contract with Hitler and King Edward VIII because there was illegitimacy on both
sides.

First, King James I of England was a devout believer in the "divine right of kings," a philosophy
ingrained in him by his mother, Mary Stuart. Mary Stuart may have been having an
affair with her Italian secretary, David Rizzio, at the time she conceived
James. There is a better than even chance that James was the product of adultery. Apparently,
enough evidence of such conduct on the part of Mary Stuart and David Rizzio existed to cause
various Scot nobles, including Mary's own husband, King Henry, to drag David Rizzio from
Mary's supper table and execute him. The Scot nobles hacked and slashed at the screaming Rizzio
with knives and swords, and then threw him off a balcony to the courtyard below where he landed
with a sickening smack. In the phrase of that day, he had been scotched.

Mary did have affairs with other men, such as the Earl of Bothwell. She later tried to execute her
husband in a gunpowder explosion that shook all of Edinburgh. King Henry survived the
explosion only to be suffocated later that same night. The murderers were never discovered. Mary
was eventually beheaded at the order of her cousin, Elizabeth I of England.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=123096

This exception to the rule, did not eliminate royal standards. The monarchy is divine providence,
and man does not control it. God wanted a new royal bloodline for good reason. To make an
exception in the particular case with Hitler and Prince Edward was not a change in the general rule
that illegitimate heirs were not considered royal. Hitler’s parents were married. The entire
circumstances of this change in house from House of Windsor to House of Rothschild was both
for the good of both the United Kingdom and Germany, and for the fate of the future of mankind.
God, alone, knew what He was thinking and what He was doing. In retrospect, God’s decision to
change royal houses was clearly the right decision.

Section 4 Page 26
Any illegitimacy exception involved in the King Edward VII-Hitler agreement was not transferable
posthumously or retroactively to parties who were not party to the original contract. It was not a
contract in which some outside party could intervene just because he or she wanted to be a monarch
and felt that God did not know what He was doing or had a right to make any change He desired.
God made any exception, in order to choose the best available person and his bloodline to
accomplish His will. He also wanted to send a message to the formerly royal bloodline about
WHY they lost it.

It is God perrogative as to who reigned in His kingdoms, and it was God who wanted the change in
royal houses. Hitler had talent from which the United Kingdom would have benefited. Look at
them today! They have lost everything they ever symbolized.

"In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he (‘the former corporal and house-painter’) has
succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he
restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of
the Great War ... the vanquished are in process of becoming the victors and the victors the
vanquished ... whatever else may be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the
most remarkable in the whole history of the world.

"... and the achievement by which the tables have been turned upon the complacent, feckless and
purblind victors deserves to be reckoned a prodigy in the history of the world and a prodigy which
is inseparable from the personal exertions of life of a single man .... Those who have met Hitler
face to face in public, business, or on social terms, have found a highly competent, cool, well-
informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a discerning smile, and few have been unaffected
by a subtle personal magnetism. Nor is this impression merely the dazzle of power. He exerted it
on his companions at every stage in his struggle, even when his fortunes were in the lowest
depths .... One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our
country were defeated I hope we should find a champion as admirable to restore our courage and
lead us back to our place among the nations.

"There must not be lacking in our leadership something of that spirit of the Austrian corporal
who, when all had fallen into ruins about him, and when Germany seemed to have fallen forever
into chaos, did not hesitate to march forth against the vast array of victorious nations and has
already turned the tables so decisively upon them."
(Churchill, quoted by E. Hughes, "Churchill - British Bulldog - his career in War and Peace", p.
140, 141, 144, 167)

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/history/whowasah.htm

GOD CREATES A MONARCH; NOT MAN

Daniel 2:20 Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and
might are his:

21 And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up
kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:

22 He revealeth the deep and secret things: he knoweth what is in the darkness, and the light
dwelleth with him.

----

Section 4 Page 27
 William’s reign was filled with references to his own preminence. “There is only one ruler in the
Reich and I am he. I tolerate no other, “ he said in 1891. The sovereign, he told a military banquet
in 1897, bears a “terrible responsibility to the Creator alone, from which no man, no minister, no
parliament, no nation, can free him.” Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great
War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 105)

The Rothschilds are of royal blood from the Merovingian line. The Rothschilds, although Satanic,
inadvertently, were doing God’s will by installing a person with strong national loyalty as monarch:
Adolf Hitler, a well respected and proven leader of people.

Hitler created a happy nation, David Lloyd George revealed!

"Yes, Heil Hitler. I, too, say that because he is truly a great man." (1)

"I spoke with Hitler ... In Nürnberg he, Hitler, declared it rightly, that his political movement has
created a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade after the war, prostrated,
despondent and bowed down in grief and impotence. It is now filled with hope and trust, filled
with a new sense of significance and determination to lead its own life without the interference of
foreign influences.

For the first time since the war, a general feeling of security and peace prevail. The people are
happier. Throughout the land is evident an attitude of universal joy and delight. It is a much
happier Germany. I could see that everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my journey, who
knew Germany well, were equally much impressed with the great change. That wonderful
phenomenon was accomplished by one man ...

This is the fame of mind of the young Germans. With nearly a religious fervor they believe in
their movement and in their leader.

This impressed me more than anything else that I experienced during my short visit in that new
Germany. A refreshing new atmosphere of an awakening, so uncommonly effective in the unity of
that nation.

Catholics and Protestants, Prussians and Bavarians, employer and worker, rich and poor have been
united into one nation. Confessions of faith, clans - or class rule and class-extraction can no
longer cleave that nation. There is a passion, a sacred fire, a striving for unity, born out of hard
necessity." (2)

(1) Said Lloyd George, K. Hierl, "In the Service for Germany", p. 163
(2) Wrote Lloyd George in an article, published in the "Daily Express", 17 September 1936).
Lloyd George (British Prime Minister 1916-1922) was a hardliner against Germany in WWI

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/history/whowasah.htm

There are many examples in the Bible of God using evil to destroy His enemies.

Ps 34:21 -
Evil shall slay the wicked: and they that hate the righteous shall be desolate.

By foreknowledge, God knew he would have his choice of a righteous Christian monarch through
Hitler’s future descendants. Being omniscient, He also knew that the Windsor’s DNA was totally
polluted, degenerated, and had no future.
Section 4 Page 28
 From King David to Baron David: The genealogical connections between Baron Guy de Rothschild
and Baroness Alix de Rothschild

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0961057831/loebfamilytree

A monarch has a unique position in the world: peerless and answerable to God, and God, alone.
God selects a monarch and a royal line and He changes it when He sees fit. There is a spiritual
component to the office that God, and God alone, ordains the rightful monarch - not man. God
must weed through all the details, and select the monarch of his choosing based on character.
Queen Victoria’s family practices of human sacrifice, incest, pedophilia, and many other atrocities
was evidence that this royal line did not even answer to God, and God had His right to bring that
royal line to a close. Many males suffered from fatal haemophilia and severe mental disorders. The
Windsor royal line was finished. With the help of the Rothschilds, God decided to change the
royal line. Hitler was a good choice with his wealth of talent and leadership skills.

A rightful monarch is preordained. During the selection for King Saul’s replacement, a prophet
was sent to the House of Jesse to choose a king. David was not man’s choice, but God’s.

1 Samuel; 16

1 And the LORD said unto Samuel, How long wilt thou mourn for Saul, seeing I have rejected
him from reigning over Israel? fill thine horn with oil, and go, I will send thee to Jesse the
Bethlehemite: for I have provided me a king among his sons.

2 And Samuel said, How can I go? if Saul hear it, he will kill me. And the LORD said, Take an
heifer with thee, and say, I am come to sacrifice to the LORD.

3 And call Jesse to the sacrifice, and I will shew thee what thou shalt do: and thou shalt anoint unto
me him whom I name unto thee.

4 And Samuel did that which the LORD spake, and came to Bethlehem. And the elders of the town
trembled at his coming, and said, Comest thou peaceably?

5 And he said, Peaceably: I am come to sacrifice unto the LORD: sanctify yourselves, and come
with me to the sacrifice. And he sanctified Jesse and his sons, and called them to the sacrifice.

6 And it came to pass, when they were come, that he looked on Eliab, and said, Surely the
LORD'S anointed is before him.

7 But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature;
because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward
appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.

8 Then Jesse called Abinadab, and made him pass before Samuel. And he said, Neither hath the
LORD chosen this.

9 Then Jesse made Shammah to pass by. And he said, Neither hath the LORD chosen this.

10 Again, Jesse made seven of his sons to pass before Samuel. And Samuel said unto Jesse, The
LORD hath not chosen these.

Section 4 Page 29
 11 And Samuel said unto Jesse, Are here all thy children? And he said, There
remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said
unto Jesse, Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither.

12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a
beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint
him: for this is he.

13 Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit
of the LORD came upon David from that day forward. So Samuel rose up, and went to Ramah.

14 But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled
him.

King Saul, a handsome tall man was man’s choice to be king, and he turned out to be a mistake.
After serving as King, God rejected him, and replaced him with an unlikely person - young David.
In a Christian theocracy, man is not free to throw out God’s choice.

The House of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha and the Windsors hid their sin from the world, but God was
very well aware of them. It is not an accident that the Windsors/Mountbattens are and have been
intellectually and anatomically sexually challenged as the result of a curse from God. It was a sign
from God.

2 Chronicles 10: 6 And king Rehoboam took counsel with the old men that had stood before
Solomon his father while he yet lived, saying, What counsel give ye me to return answer to this
people?

7 And they spake unto him, saying, If thou be kind to this people, and please them, and speak
good words to them, they will be thy servants for ever.

8 But he forsook the counsel which the old men gave him, and took counsel with the young men
that were brought up with him, that stood before him.

9 And he said unto them, What advice give ye that we may return answer to this people, which
have spoken to me, saying, Ease somewhat the yoke that thy father did put upon us?

10 And the young men that were brought up with him spake unto him, saying, Thus shalt thou
answer the people that spake unto thee, saying, Thy father made our yoke heavy, but make thou
it somewhat lighter for us; thus shalt thou say unto them, My little finger shall be
thicker than my father's loins.

Jeremiah 22: 24 As I live, saith the LORD, though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah
were the signet upon my right hand, yet would I pluck thee thence;

25 And I will give thee into the hand of them that seek thy life, and into the hand of them whose
face thou fearest, even into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, and into the hand of the
Chaldeans.

26 And I will cast thee out, and thy mother that bare thee, into another country, where ye were
not born; and there shall ye die. [King Edward VIII - the sins of the fathers are visited
on the children or “generational sin”. Queen Victoria was also sin ladened and
mentally ill.]
Section 4 Page 30
 27 But to the land whereunto they desire to return, thither shall they not return.

28 Is this man Coniah a despised broken idol? is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are
they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not?

29 O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the LORD.

30 Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper
in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of
David, and ruling any more in Judah.

“My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins,” accurately describes the immature sexual
organs of many Windsors, especially Charles Mountbatten which is one of the sources of his many
murderous rampages.

The plan to remove the crown from the House of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha (Hanover) was in place well
before Hitler was born, and the Rothschilds legally and spiritually accomplished that goal. The
family did not stick to its original plan because certain family members and certain Rothschild
houses were simply too greedy. No matter how wealthy and celebrated they were, it was “never
enough.”

GOD CANNOT TOLERATE SIN FOREVER

God did not alter His decision because of the rebelliousness of man. His decision stood, and I am
now the Queen of the United Kingdom and Germany, as well as other nations, like Israel. No man
can alter a divine appointment. No man is to interfere in the work of a righteous king, but the
Houses of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha and Windsor are dead, and the world must adjust to the change.
There was good reason to eliminate the Windsors. They too, practice human sacrifice, cannibalism,
pedophilia, and other unspeakable acts.

The old has been cast off into outer darkness - never to return, never to revive - no matter how
ambitious anyone with that bloodline is. This is true of all other British royal lines, like the
Stewarts. They are finished.

The House of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha/Windsor was unrighteous, and suffered the appropriate

consequences.

Ge 6:3 -
And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man,

King Edward VII was not fit to be king, and Queen Victoria was negligent in her duties not to pass
him over. Known as the “Prince of Pleasure,”King Edward VII, was an abomination to God with
his heinous sins and defilement of all that was royal. His relationship with Keppel, was just one of
his insults to the God who placed him on the throne, but the Keppel story was enough to remove
him. He was intellectually and spiritually inferior, but it was his own character that was his
ruination. Keppel did not have the power to remove him. He removed himself.

Prime Minster Gladstone: ‘To speak in rude and general terms, ‘ he confided, with rare
succinctness, to a colleague, ‘the Queen is invisible, and the Prince of Wales is not
respected.’ The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice
Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 3)

Section 4 Page 31
During their eldest son’s boyhood, Victoria and Albert, all aglow with good Coburg intentions,
had decreed that Bertie - as he was known in the family - ‘ought to be accustomed early to work
with [them], to have great confidence shown him, that he should be early instructed into the
affairs of state.’ Their admirable resolve had been short-lived. In spite of - or rather, because of -
a system of educational force-feeding, Bertie had never matched up to their exacting standards.
He had emerged from those years of intensive study as an amiable but far from intellectual young
man. Of Prince Albert’s earnestness, industriousness and highmindedness, he showed no trace.
He lived the disapproving Queen would point out, purely for pleasure. The
King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others
by Theo Aronson 1988, (pp. 4-5)

Not only did she consider her son to be lacking in intellect but she found him
irresponsible, immature, and indiscreet. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses:
Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 5)

Albert Edward, Prince of Wales, was a hedonist from the crown of his already balding
head to the soles of his elegantly shod feet. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie
Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 7)

The pace of his life was frenetic. Easily bored, averse to reading, wary of intellectual talk,
lacking in application, hating desk-work, unappreciative of serious music or anything other than
the most blandly representational painting, he flung himself into a ceaseless round of
amusements. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice
Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 8)

... he would indulge in one activity which he preferred above all others. For more than racing,
shooting, yachting, gambling or eating, the Prince of Wales enjoyed making love. The King in
Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo
Aronson 1988, (pg. 9)

It was in this happy hunting ground that the Prince of Wales was able to assuage his appetites.
The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and
others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 17)

How much did Alexandra know about her husband’s unfaithfulness? ‘I often think her lot is no
easy one, ‘ wrote Queen Victoria as early as 1864, when the couple had been married for less than
two years, but she is very fond of Bertie, though not blind. The Princess would have noticed
what others noticed: how her husband was paying too much attention to a certain ‘Madame von
B’ at Sandringham, or how he was spooning with Lady Filmer’ at Ascot. She would have heard
of his involvement with various Russian beauties when he was in St Petersburg in 1866 and of
his suppers with ‘female Paris notorieties’ when he visited France The King in Love: Edward
VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson
1988, (pg. 17)

Bertie was not quite fourteen when his dawning interest in the opposite sex first became apparent.
In 1855 Queen Victoria – accompanied by Prince Albert and their two eldest children the Princess
Royal and the Prince of Wales – paid a state visit to Paris. At the brilliant court of the Second
Empire, presided over by the worldly Napoleon III and the beautiful Empress Eugenie, the young
Prince first experienced a way of life which he would one day make his own. In the person of the
Emperor of the French, Bertie discovered an adult who accepted him for what he was. Her was
someone who seemed to take an unashamed delight in the thing in which he delighted; who loved

Section 4 Page 32
show and colour and movement; who lived, quite naturally and openly, for the pleasure. To the
youngster, whose life had always been narrow, repressed and dedicated to self-improvement,
Napoleon III’s tolerance and sense of enjoyment were a revelation. This, surely, was how life
was meant to be lived. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy
Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 10)

… the young man had shown precious little sigh of developing into the sort of enlightened sage
of his father’s fond aspirations. In fact, in that tug-o-war between Coburg and Hanover for
control of the boy’s character, his Hanoverian ancestry was winning hands down. Every year thee
regrettable characteristics were becoming more pronounced. The King in Love: Edward VII’s
Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg.
13)

There was only one possible remedy. An early marriage decided the Prince Consort’s great dream
of fashioning the perfect, unsullied heir had been shattered. Not only was the Prince of
Wales proving himself sadly lacking intellectually, but he was about to go
the way of Queen Victoria’s unspeakable uncles. The King in Love: Edward VII’s
Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988,
(pg. 13)

SNIP

…if he married a nice wife that he likes, she will deep him straight and as he is too weak to keep
from sin for virtue’s sake, he will only keep out of it from other motives, and surely a wife will
be the strongest? The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick,
Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 13)

‘All the world and glory of it, whatever is most seductive, has always been offered to the Prince
of Wales of his day…’ wrote that great analyst of British Constitution, Alter Bagehot. This had
been true for the previous Prince of Wales, that celebrated debauchee who became first Prince
Regent and then King George IV, and it was to be true for the future Prince of Wales, the
capricious young man who was to become King Edward VIII, and then Duke of Windsor. But
neither of these princes availed themselves of the world’s glories and seductions with quite as
much uninhibited zest as did Queen Victoria’s heir. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses:
Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 15)

Nor was Alexandra clever, or at least sharp, enough to satisfy him. She had
very little brain. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy
Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 15)

But none of this can explain the Prince of Wale’s tireless extramarital activity. The King in
Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo
Aronson 1988, (pg. 16)

Another factor was that he was granted every opportunity for infidelity.

Snip

There opportunities were everywhere. Mid-Victorian respectability, so studiously encouraged by

Victoria and Albert, was largely confined to one layer of society – the middle classes. The
aristocracy, as the Queen only too frequently pointed out to her lusty heir, was anything but
respectable. It was quite given over to ‘frivolity, the love of pleasure, self-indulgence and

Section 4 Page 33
 idleness. It was in this happy hunting ground that the Prince of Wales was able to assuage his
appetites. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice
Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pp. 16-17)

On one occasion the Prince was obliged to buy back some letters which he had written to
Madame Giulia Barucci, one of the great courtesans of the Second Empire, who was pleased to
describe herself as ‘the greatest whore in the world’. At the same time he was being asked for
money, in an altogether less menacing fashion, on behalf of Lady Susan Vane Tempest who –
not being the greatest whore in the world – was apparently about to bear his child. The King in
Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo
Aronson 1988, (pg. 18)

This royal line has come to an end. It was time for a change. I am that change.

RIGHTEOUS MONARCHS FOLLOW GOD’S RULES

Magna Carta TranslationA translation of Magna Carta as confirmed by Edward I with his seal in
1297[Preamble] EDWARD by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, and Duke of
Guyan, to all Archbishops, Bishops, etc. We have seen the Great Charter of the Lord HENRY,
sometimes King of England, our father, of the Liberties of England, in these words: Henry by the
grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Guyan, and Earl of Anjou,
to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, Sheriffs, Provosts, Officers, and to
all Bailiffs and other our faithful Subjects , which shall see this present Charter, Greeting. Know
ye that we, unto the honour of Almighty God, and for the salvation of the souls of our
progenitors and successors, Kings of England, to the advancement of holy Church, and
amendment of our Realm, of our meer and free will, have given and granted to all Archbishops,
Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and to all freemen of this our realm, these
liberties following, to be kept in our kingdom of England for ever.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/translation.html

Elizabeth Mountbatten is NOT the Queen of England. Even her actions testify to this fact.

Met Police officers to be 'microchipped' by top brass in Big Brother style

tracking scheme
Last updated at 10:46am on 10th April 2008

Met Chief Sir Ian Blair could be among 31,000 officers to receive the new electronic tracking
device

Every single Metropolitan police officer will be 'microchipped' so top brass can monitor their
movements on a Big Brother style tracking scheme, it can be revealed today.

According to respected industry magazine Police Review, the plan - which affects all 31,000
serving officers in the Met, including Sir Ian Blair - is set to replace the unreliable Airwave radio
system currently used to help monitor officer's movements.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=558597&in_page_id=
1770

Britons 'could be microchipped like dogs in a decade'

by DAN NEWLING - More by this author » Last updated at 00:11am on 30th October 2006

Section 4 Page 34
 Experts predict that humans could soon have ID chips implanted under the skin

Human beings may be forced to be 'microchipped' like pet dogs, a shocking official report into the
rise of the Big Brother state has warned.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=413345&in_page_id=
1770

She is descended from a long line of loons.

The British monarchy, in the years before Victoria’s accession, had come on hard times. Queen
Victoria’s immediate predecessors on the throne - George III, George IV, and William IV - have
been escribed as “an imbecile, a profligate, and a buffon.” Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and
the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie.(pp. 3-4)

She is different than they. She lost her royalty. Add inbreeding and syphilis, and hereditary brain
atrophy to this line, and you get cannibalistic vampiric mass murderers. Elizabeth and her lunatic
son who could be described as a buffon, proliferate, and an imbecile, and still he would not be
adequately described in the negative; he has no positives. Repulsive. He has not one redeeming
quality. He is the kind of person one would enjoy killing. He will only be accomplished when he
dies. He is not even mentally competent to enter into a marriage contract as he cannot even
comprehend what marriage is. He severely lacks cognitive ability to analyze or learn. He is
immersed in lewd, crude and filthy toilet play, feces, bodily eliminations, cheap pornography, and
bloodshed. He is infantile and just plain stupid. His innumerable defects have been hidden from
the public by his handlers. The Illuminati long ago planned to use and eliminate him.

The movie, Charly, starting Cliff Robertson, was written to express the mental deficiencies of
Elizabeth and her son, who inherited her low intelligence.

PC is about his reality.

Politically Correctness - a definition,

"Political Correctness" is a doctrine fostered by a delusional and illogical liberal minority that is
rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is
entirely possible to "pick up a turd by the clean end".

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=97944

God had finally had enough of the Hanover line who have been tormenting the world for centuries
with their lunacy.

The basic principle upon which the Declaration rests is that colonists, as
British citizens, believed they were entitled to the rights and privileges granted
by the Magna Carta, and the British Bill of Rights of 1689. Among other
things, these documents established that the King was not above the law, that
the people, represented in parliament, had a right to endorse or reject taxation, and that citizens were
entitled to a trial by jury of their peers. Additionally, the Declaration relied on precedent: most
British colonies had enjoyed self-rule and had been governed through their own legislative bodies
since their founding. By 1774, most of the colonists that had once protested "no taxation without
representation" found themselves without any representation whatsoever, neither in Parliament nor

Section 4 Page 35
 in any colonial house of representation.

Towards the end of the list of abuses, the Declaration focuses attention on a few specific incidents
that demonstrate the King's disregard for colonial life and liberty, the danger of colonists remaining
divided on the issue of independence, and the preparations being made by Great Britain for an all-out
war.

http://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/declaration/section2.rhtml

Declaration of Independence
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America,

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one humans to dissolve the political
bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to
the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident: all men are created equal, they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

http://www.unique-design.net/library/god/patriot/jefferson.html

In America, God established a nation where freedom of religion was allowed to flourish. He could
not have the state dictate the moving of the Spirit of God. The Church of England rejected its
foundation and its faith to accommodate the sins of its monarch and aristocracy. But He held on to
the monarchy in the United Kingdom because He wanted to have HIS righteous representative on
the throne in the last days. The sinners in the United Kingdom do not want God’s leadership
because the ruling class is out of control and does not want to be reined in. Homosexuals have
taken over the intelligence departments of the United Kingdom because they were the only ones
who would keep the sexual perversions of the Windsors secret. A pagan tree worshipper Satanist
Druid is Archbishop of the Church of England because Elizabeth is not the true Queen.

The British cannot complain about the royal house being turned over to a German. The Hanover
family from which the Windsors descended were German.

Queen Victoria was mostly German. Her father, Edward, Duke of Kent, fourth son of King George
III was a Hanoverian, a descendant of George Louis, Eliector of hanover, brought to England in
1714 and placed on the throne as King George I to ensure the Protestan succession. All of Queen
Victoria's Hanoverian forebears - King George II, his son Frederick, Prince of Wales, and his son
King George III - married German wives, reinforcing the German strain on her father’s side. Queen
Victoria’s mother, Princess Victoria Mary Louisa of Saxe-Coberg, was German. Queen Victoria
herself then redoubled the German fraction in the royal family by marrying her German cousin,
Prince Albert of Saxe-Coberg, the son of her mothers older brother. Dreadnought: Britain,
Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 3)

It was not a huge leap to change one German monarchial family for another. Hitler, too, descended
from the Merovingians, the European royal bloodline.

The Merovingian Kings

Section 4 Page 36
 http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Rulers/merovingian.html

KAISER ADOLF I OF AND GERMANY AND KING HENRY IX OF UNITED THE UNITED
KINGDOM

As kings are ordained by God, this transfer of royalty from the House of Windsor to the House of
Rothschild has been repeatedly confirmed as God’s will, and the English know it beyond a
reasonable doubt. Their pride has stopped them from acknowledging an American Queen because
they always intended to regain America as a colony, and this did not fit in their plan. An American-
born Queen fits in God’s plan, and that is all that is important.

The last legitimate king the United Kingdom had that was accurately reported in the media was
King Edward VIII. Hitler was still working with Duke of Windsor for the vision of a better
England. (Since the frauds took over, England has done nothing but deteriorate.) Here is some
documentation to support his alliance with Edward, former king, and his belief that Hitler would
continue to use him as a leader in England:

During World War II he served as Governor of the Bahamas, where he was plagued by rumours and
accusations that he was pro-Nazi. He reputedly told an acquaintance, "After the war is over and
Hitler will crush the Americans... we'll take over... They [the Commonwealth] don't want
me as their king, but I'll soon be back as their leader."[52] He told a journalist that
"it would be a tragic thing for the world if Hitler was overthrown."[52]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_VIII_abdication_crisis

Prior to the abdication, King Edward VIII was politically astute enough to see that the Communism
espoused by the Jews would eventually destroy the British culture, too. He had a solution to the
threat of certain warfare with Germany. King Edward VIII was a Germanophile, who spoke high
German and spoke German better than he spoke English. He, in his role as king, chose to
enhance the kingdom by bringing Germany into the alliance to ensure a strong future for his
nations. Rather than fear Germany’s rising military power, he wanted to join the United
Kingdom’s power with theirs.

With peabrain pretenders living on royal property masquerading as God’s anointed, England has
lost all its freedoms including those guaranteed by the Magna Carta, and they are too foolish to
know what is good for them because they are blinded by pride.

Royalty is established to provide a vision for the future of the country and preserve the traditions of
the past that are pure and just. God used a family of unconventional but clever people, to say the
least, to orchestrate this change in royal families, but God was in favor of the results of their
unconventional work, to a degree. Besides being leaders and able to implement large long range
plans, The Rothschilds met another need God had because of their financial genius and world
power.

Hag 2:8 - The silver is mine, and the gold is mine, saith the LORD of hosts.

The one world government plan of Satan included the amassing of all the wealth in the hands of one
person. God also planned all along to gather the wealth of the world in His hand. He knew he
would have to use sinners to get it, then He pulled a switch, and had a predestinated Christian,
dedicated to the principles of freedom, righteousness, and high standards, waiting in the wings to be
his final monarch at the end of the history of man.

Section 4 Page 37
 Pr 13:22 - A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children's children: and the wealth of the
sinner is laid up for the just.

Ps 97:2 ...righteousness and judgment are the habitation of his throne.

Pr 16:12 It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by

righteousness.

Pr 25:5 Take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in
righteousness.

Heb 1:8 - But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of
righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

God had plans for His kingdoms, and it is my duty to hold the line against evil for them. I have
done my duty regardless of the opposition I faced - all the major powers of the world against me. It
is mankind which failed in their duties towards me!

Just as natural man would have skipped over David as king, natural man might also try to denigrate
Hitler as king material, but God saw in him a man who would fight his satanic relatives to defend
the right of the Christian church to exist as Hitler’s relatives wanted the communist model for
Europe - the systematic destruction of all belief in God. Hitler was willing to fight the hard battle
and use all means necessary to defend Christian culture against a Godless culture. Even fiction
speaks to this point:

“The Kaiser’ll never bother us,” declared William. So long as he can dress up in splendid uniforms
and parade his soldiers as if he were a child playing with toys, he’ll be absolutely harmless. He
won’t make any trouble.”

“Nonsense,” said Alice. “Grown men who play with real soldeirs under the mistaken idea that
they’re mere toys are a menace to the civilized world.”

“What a glooomy Cassandra you are, Alice!” said William, but his good-humored comment could
not quite hide the note of irriation in his voice. “But I’m afraid I still think there won’t be a war.”

“Churchill thinks there will be!”

“Churchill’s an irresponsible warmonger!”

“I don’t think there’ll be a war - for a while anyway,” I interposed as the conversation threatened to
become too acrimonious. “But if war did break out I’m sure it would only be
because someone flouted all the principles of civilized behavior so
outrageously that we would have no choice except to intervene. After all,
when there’s an open conflict between good and evil - when one’s very
principles are at stake - one simply must defend what one believes to be right.
There’s no better reason for fighting, in my opinion.”

Penmarric by Susan Howatch, 1971, pp, 346

Churchill fought to defend the sins of the Windsors. Hitler fought to defend civilization as it was,
if the truth were known. Hitler was shamanistic in his approach to religion in that he had direct
Section 4 Page 38
contact with the dark side, or Satanic side in order to understand his enemy - his Satanic cousins,
but when push came to shove, he threw his weight in on defending Christianity. He needed to
immerse himself in the dark side to gain information and learn to direct energy for himself instead
of merely relying on others’ views. This can be researched by studying Hitler and his relationship
with Martin Luther’s writings. The world knows that the “Jews” were his enemy. What they did
not realize is that the Jews were COMMUNISTS, and were inadvertently funding the war machine
that would be used to destroy Christian culture.

The fact is that Hitler was the legitimate king, and now I am the Queen of England and Germany
and other nations, including Israel. None of those fools mentioned in this document have any right
or claim to them or to my vast inheritance. The fact that psychotic criminal peons, the likes of Bill
and Hillary Clinton, both George Bushes, Hermann Goering and his bastard son, Alan Bersin, and
Cunt Parker Bowles want what I inherited is a mute point. They didn’t inherit it. I did, and it is
time for the world to fall in line with that truth as it cannot sustain under the false leadership that
the planet is subjected to to this day. (Document update: January 13, 2010)

I have claimed my throne, and I have informed the United Kingdom and my other nations through
the United Nations that I am the last monarch of the United Kingdom as I have no heirs, nor will I
name one. When I am gone, the monarchy will be dead. The country is not fit to have a monarch it
refuses to properly honor and protect. The United Kingdom is wasting precious time by not
acknowledging and honoring me in my rightful place.

A monarchy is a theocracy, and leaving God’s will out of the picture is not optional.

SPLENDID ISOLATION

When England was at a crossroads, two different monarchs had two different solutions. King
Edward VII, associate of the Rothschilds, wanted and planned for war. King Edward VIII wanted
peace. Both had severe spiritual deficits which made them unable to lead their countries properly.

Military readiness is an essential quality for any country. No king can rule without spiritual
readiness. God will not deep an incompetent, morally spiritually bankrupt family forever in royal
position forever. There comes a time when He rejects depraved misfits who cannot function above
a reptilian brain.

Quotes below are from Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by
Robert K. Massie.

The story of the Dreadnought served as an allegory to preserve in history the shenanigans of the
God-hating British royal family, and record their descent into contemptible and never ending lust
for personal pleasure. Consider it a private diary for the Illuminati in which their every action - no
matter how ignoble is recorded in code.

The building of the ships lay the groundwork and personally shameful motives for the planned
"Great War" which Bertie did not live to see. The Rothschilds in their Satanic plan (with a Godly
twist) for world domination would require at least three world wars manipulated the war at a higher
level, using Queen Victoria's family as puppets in a much larger show.

Albert Pike, Rothschild agent foretold of future events:

Pike's Amazing Predictions

Of Three World Wars

Section 4 Page 39
 2-1-8

Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August
15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to
bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that
have already taken place.

http://www.rense.com/general80/pike.htm

Conspiratorial History

Conspiratorial history studies that part of history that is a product of man's planning. In
conspiratorial history we are led to believe that events, such as wars and revolutions, are the result
of planned events. While the conspiratorial view is not accurate for weather, volcanoes and
earthquakes, it is a realistic and accurate view of the interrelationship of man and nations. Since
the planning for most of these events was done in secret, we use the term conspiratorial history.
That is; this history is the result of plans constructed in secret, which by definition is a
conspiracy.

Interestingly enough, the Conspiratorial View of History is also the Biblical View of History.
Try Psalms 2 for starters.*

We believe that current world events are not simply circumstantial, but the result of an organized
campaign by an elite group of unseen and widely unknown world leaders. Their goal is to exercise
absolute dictatorial control over the world, to establish a New World Order.

http://www.threeworldwars.com/intro.htm

To drag Britain away from their successful military and defense policy "Splendid Isolation", there
needed to be a motive. In the process of trying to cover up the wretched behavior of the effete
Prince of Wales whose heirs were of extremely low intelligence and mental failings like himself,
the Rothschilds built in a bait and switch component in which the British military would be
infiltrated by a Japanese agent, British Admiral Jackie Fisher.

(John Arbuthnot Fisher - Arbuthnot being code for “we are both not Queen”, in reference to
Bertie’s wife, Queen Alexandra, and his paid companion - the banker’s whore - Alice Keppel.
She was trying to cover both bases in case polygamy would not fly. This plot was not about
narcissist Keppel and her personal desires. This plot was about Rothschild - Balfour means a walk
to home plate or home rule. When pigs fly. The battle was between God and Satan fought
through the Rothschild dynasty. Mrs. Keppel was not a major league player. She was not a little
league player. She was a nonentity. Her services were over when she offered her virgin daughter,
Violet, up for rape in order to pretend to marry Bertie by proxy and pretend to be a virgin, herself.

The story is a Rothschild story and she is trash - a throw-a-way not unlike toilet paper to be used
and flushed down the toilet, and it is not a royal flush - Camilla Toilet Bowl. She was paid upon
Bertie’s death for her services by Ernest Cassel. “Earn us the Castle” was a Rothschild agent.
The Rothschild did not do all this work for Camilla Parker Bowles or for Herman Goering and his
idiot son, Alan Bersin. God did not negotiate with them. NO change in a Royal Family occurs
without God’s consent. The Royal Family is ROTHSCHILD, and I am His Chosen
Representative. God has his reasons.

Section 4 Page 40
 How the Crown Rules the World
by MARK OWEN

How the Crown Rules the World There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen
Elizabeth II.

Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to
deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control
of the English Parliament.

This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the

Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the
677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or
simply 'The City.'

The City is not a part of England, just as Washington, D.C. is not a part of the USA.

The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor
who is appointed annually.

When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at
Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She
then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=52&contentid=1964

Elizabeth Mountbatten, the fraud, is not Queen, and needs to be removed from God’s story and
property. The House of Windsor is dead. No one should be asking why.

No real Queen would give up her sovereignty:

Britain gives up legal sovereignty over European treaty

by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail

Britain yesterday surrendered 1,000 years of legal sovereignty in return for a European extradition
treaty.
Judges and magistrates across the continent will be given the power to demand the arrest and
handover of British citizens simply by naming them as suspects.
The pact sweeps away the right of people in this country to turn to the courts here for defence
against charges abroad.
Also brushed aside will be the historic principle that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and
the habeas corpus protection against unjustified imprisonment.
The treaty, being rushed through as part of the war on terror, covers 32 categories ranging from
fraud and rape to 'xenophobia' and ' corruption' - offences which are currently not recognised in
British law.
Agreement on the European arrest warrant came as the last country standing against it - Italy -
backed down. It is now certain to be approved at a weekend EU summit in Belgium.
Tony Blair and British ministers have pushed enthusiastically for the extradition deal. But human
rights activists and Eurosceptics have condemned an agreement that will abolish the powers of
courts in all EU countries to resist extradition demands for the 32 crimes - beyond checking that
warrants have been correctly issued.
Critics point to Greece - the country that has held 12 British planespotters in jail for more than a

Section 4 Page 41
 month on questionable spying charges - as an example of the legal systems to which the
Government is handing unprecedented powers over Britons. They say the loss of the ability to
challenge extradition in a British court will end the over-riding principle of the court will end the
over-riding principle of the presumption of innocence.
Suspects will in effect face examination by a magistrate or judge to whom they must demonstrate
their innocence under the Napoleonic code favoured in much of Europe.
Another ancient right to be infringed will be habeas corpus, the right to demand the release of
anyone from imprisonment unless a good reason for holding them is demonstrated in court.
Extradited Britons would be at the mercy of the painfully slow legal systems in some countries.
The euro warrant deal was sealed when its last opponent, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi,
backed down.
Italy had wanted the list of crimes cut to six, and was particularly opposed to including financial
crimes. Mr Berlusconi's critics said this was because he feared extradition to Spain to face tax
evasion charges.
Britain and most other EU countries are likely to begin operating the system in 2004, although
legislation to put it into effect will have to be agreed by Parliament. The UK first pressed for a
Euro extradition scheme to get 'Costa del Crime' villains back from Spain. But Spain has now
agreed an extradition treaty and no euro warrant is needed.
Supporters of the agreement say it will stop suspects stretching their fight against extradition over
several years, often at huge cost to taxpayers.
Opponents say the inclusion of crimes like 'swindling' could mean almost anyone involved in any
transaction could find themselves-being summoned. Lawyers also see dangers in the inclusion of
crimes like rape that are notoriously vulnerable to abuse by those making false accusations.
It is even conceivable that Greece could demand the extradition for 'xenophobia' of anyone who
strongly criticises its legal system over cases like that of the planespotters.
Tory spokesman Timothy Kirkhope, MEP for Yorkshire and the Humber, said: 'The warrant will
extend to a very wide range of crimes and cut across national judicial systems in a way that will put
many people in jeopardy and have inadequate safeguards.
'The planespotter case shows there are deep divisions in judicial systems across EU states. We all
support action against terrorism but we are about to introduce a radical shake-up that has not been
thought through.'
Stephen Jakobi of the pressure group Fair Trials Abroad said: 'One problem is that the crimes on
the list are being set by politicians who can move the goalposts at any moment.
'The system will not work unless it is applied across legal systems which work in the same way
and accept the same rules.'
Shadow home secretary Oliver Letwin said: 'While there is a case for a European arrest warrant in
the field of terrorism, the warrant now proposed would have the dreadful effect of enabling a British
citizen to be arrested for a crime which is not a crime in this country.
'It's extraordinary the Government should be sponsoring such a proposal at a time when it is not
prepared to take the power to send Osama Bin Laden to the U.S. for trial if he were captured by
British troops and brought to the UK.'
Former Tory minister John Redwood-said: 'It's a black day for British justice and democracy.
'We were relying on the Italians to throw out this idea. We have known for some time that we
could not rely on our own Government to defend the rights of British citizens.'

The Creator decides the way His story ends, - not man. Man does not interfere in God’s plan
without receiving the penalty of death - spiritual death - if not physical .

Isa 55:9 - For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and
my thoughts than your thoughts.

No hired hands means no hired hands.

Section 4 Page 42
Admiral Fisher worked in collusion with Rothschild prostitute, Mrs. Keppel, who was more than
adequately paid for her services in assisting Japan to destroy British rule, in an attempt to
overthrow God's monarchial rule. She was fortunate to throw many lavious parties, travel, buy a
villa in Italy, buy a home on Grosvenor St, and live at the Ritz Hotel in Paris for an extended period
on her prostitute’s bonus.

Under God’s rule she was not eligible for royal status nor was she authorized to commit adultery
and participate in child rape.
Re 20:14 - And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

Re 21:8 - But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and
brimstone: which is the second death.

Poor management by the Rothschilds does not alter her role or the role of her pig descendants. “It
ain’t you, Babe.” She has been on the stage far too long and it is time for the hook to remove her
permanently. Captain Hook from Peter Pan if need be.

In Rothschild spoof films 'Dracula", Mrs. Keppel is portrayed as an old witch named Queen
Zimba who is not a real Queen but a demented old woman who believed herself to be someone she
was not. She was a zilch, a zero, a naught, a dreaded naught.

...Kay is out in the swamp, talking to a crazy old Gypsy lady who calls herself Queen
Zimba. It would seems the girl has a thing fo the occult, and later events will more than bear this
out that first impression. Zimba's forecast of Kay's future is the sort of thing that would trouble
most people - she says she sees Kay marrying a corpse - but Kay is strangely dismissive of the
seeress' warnings. She also takes it surprisingly well when a huge rubber bat flies into the
Gypsy's shack and apparently frightens the old woman literally to death. All Kay does is look
guiltily and hurry back to Dark Oaks, doing her damndest to make sure no one sees her.

http://www.1000misspenthours.com/reviews/reviewsa-d/sonofdracula.htm

You can see “Mrs. Keppel” as “Queen Zimba from the Rothschild perspective at 1:47 into the
Son of 'Dracula" clip.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=1Ja3vYbyT0c&feature=related

Mrs. Keppel’s role in the death of King Edward VII must also be investigated as her antics after
his death in code belied a foreknowledge of his death. Their relationship was over - contrary to
the myth told by Keppel.

During the afternoon the King suffered a series of heart attacks. But he refused to go to bed.
Section 4 Page 43
‘No, I shall not give in,’ he protested. ‘I shall go on: I shall work to the end.’

It is from this point on that the generally accepted accounts of Edward VII’s last hours are at
variance with what actually happened. Queen Alexandra did not, in a gesture of touching
magnanimity, send for Alice Keppel to take leave of of the King. According to the royal
doctor, Sir Francis Laking, who ws in constant attendance that day, Alice had been in and out
of the palace until the Queen’s arrival home and had since sent Alexandra the letter which the
King had written to her at the time of his appendix operation in 1902: it was the letter in
which he had said that ‘if he were dying, he felt sure that those about him would allow her to
come to him.’ That, combined with the King’s request that Alice be sent for, is what forced
the reluctant Queen into agreeing that Mrs Keppel should be summoned.

There now followed an extraordinary scene. On arrival, the distraught Alice curtseyed to the
Queen and Princes Victoria and was then asked by the king to sit down beside him. Stroking
her hand, he told her not to cry. Calling to Alexandra, who was standing at the window with
her back to this little tableau, the King said, ‘You must kiss her. You must kiss Alice.’
Fighting down, one imagines, her distaste, the Queen presented her cheek to Mrs. Keppel,
although she was afterwards to deny that she had done any such thing. Both women then sat
down beside the King. His mind, says Laking, was by now beginning to wander. He began
fumbling for his false teeth and seemed uneasy at not having them in. Suddenly, quite
forgetting that he was in the company of the Queen, Princess Victoria and Mrs. Keppel, he
said, ‘I want to p___.’

‘What is that he said?’ demanded the deaf Alexandra.

‘He is asking Ma’am for a pencil,’ was Laking’s adroit reply.

Mercifully, at this point, the King slumped into another bout of

unconsciousness. Getting up, Alexandra drew Laking aside and hissed, ‘Get
that woman away.’

This was easier said than done. By now Alice Keppel was hysterical. Nothing would induce
her to leave the side of her dying lover. Only on being told, very firmly, that His Majesty had
asked to be left alone with the Queen, did the demented Alice allow herself to be led out by
Princess Victoria. Shrieking at the top of her voice for ‘all the pages and
footmen in the passage’ to hear, Alice kept repeating, ‘I never did any harm,
there was nothing wrong between us. [Jer 3:3 ... thou hadst a whore’s forehead, thou
refusedst to be ashamed.] What is to become of me?’ All Princess Victoria’s efforts to
soothe her were hopeless; in ‘a wild fit of hysterics’ Alice was carried into Frederick
Ponsomby’s room. She remained there for several hours.

‘Altogether,’ wrote an indignant Lord Esher, ‘it was a painful and rather
theatrical exhibition, and out never to have happened.’ It must also have
been an extremely macabre one.

King Edward VII died just before midnight. He was in his sixty-ninth year.

When it was over Alexandra, ‘in a terrible state of despair’, blurted out her feelings about Mrs
Keppel, and about the King to Sir Francis Laking.

‘I would not have kissed her,’ she said, ‘if he had not bade me. But I would have done
anything he asked of me. Twelve [sic] years ago, when I was so angry about Lady Warwick,
and the King expostulated with me and said I should get him into the divorce court, I told him
Section 4 Page 44
 once for all that he might have all the women he wished, and I would not say a word; and I
have done everything since that he desired me to do about them. He was the whole of my life
and, now he is dead, nothing matters.

And Lord Esher, invited by Alexandra to take a last look at her husband’s body a few days later,
has some interesting observations to make on her attitude to the King’s death. He notes, ‘The
Queen talked for half an hour, just as she always talked to me, with only a slight diminution
of her natural gaiety, but with a tenderness with betrayed all the love in her soul, and oh! so
natural feeling that she had got him there altogether to herself [author’s italics]. In a way she
seemed, and is, I am convinced, happy. It is the womanly happiness of complete possession
of the man who was the love of her youth, and - as I fervently believe - all her life.’

After all, Alexandra is reputed to have said to a friend after Edward VII’s death, ‘he always loved
me the best.’

As for the legend about her saintly gesture towards Alice Keppel: how did that originate?
Now with the Queen. Not even with those devoted members of her entourage who were
always anxious of ‘the beloved lady’ to be presented in the best possible light. It originated
with Alice Keppel.

Once her lover had died, Alice, in an effort to safeguard her future, had
hurried to Marlborough House to sign her name in the book. But the new
monarchs, King George V and Queen Mary, were having none of her: ‘orders
had been given that she should not be allowed to so s o . . . ’ Seeing the way the
wind was blowing, the astute Alice put about the story of how the all-forgiving Queen had
summoned her to the dying King’s bedside, of how Alexandra had ‘fallen upon her neck and
wept with her’, and how she had promised that the royal family would ‘look after her’.

‘Mrs Keppel,’ declared Esher, who had heard that truth from Edward VII’s
secretary, Francis Knollys, ‘has lied about the whole affair.’

The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and
others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pp. 251-3)

DREADNOUGHT

Before World War I, the British Navy ruled the seas.

The supremacy of the British Navy was stamped indelibly on the history of the nineteenth century
... (Introduction)

Both the naval supremacy and the peace endured while warships changed beyond recognition:
wooden hulls were transformed to iron and steel; masts disappeared as sail gave way to steam;
bottle-shaped, muzzle-loading buns were replaced by powerful, turret-mounted naval rifles of far
greater range and accuracy. Something else remained constant as well: through all those years
British seamen exuded a confidence higher than arrogance, an assurance that was bred and passed
along by the seventeen thousand men who served at Trafalgar in Nelson's oak-hulled levianthans.
(pp. xiii-xiv)

Historically, the mission of the British Fleet has been to protect the Home Islands from invasion

Section 4 Page 45
 and to guard the trade routes and colonies of the Empire (pg. xiv)

The USS Brooklyn, an armored cruiser of 9,200 tons was the pride of the United States Navy.

SNIP

The American ship used electricity to hoist shells from magazines to guns and to rotate turrets.
"We are at least seven or eight years behind," lamented the Chronicle. "Her equipment is so
admirable that I blush with shame that only one of our British men of war is fitted with electrical
shell hoists." The United States officers were exceptionally polite, never failing to raise their
white-covered caps in greeting over the water." (pp. xix-xx)

[Referring to ships foreign and domestic visible on England's waters for participation in Queen
Victoria's Diamond Jubilee] Disappointment focussed on the next ship in line, a gray vessel with
two red stripes around her funnel, S.M.S. (Seine Majestat Schiff) Koneg Wilhelm (King William)
of the Imperial German Navy.

SNIP

Rear Admiral Prince Henry of Prussia, who was aboard the King Wilhelm, "I deeply regret that I
have no better ship to place at your disposal whilst other nations shine with their fine vessels.
This is the result of those unpatriotic fellows [William was condemning the Reichstag] who
opposed construction of the most necessary ships." (pg .xx)

The British Empire, guarded by this fleet, was the largest in the history of the world.

All this had been won and was held by sea power. (pp.xx)

A single major defeat had marred the steady progression: between 1776 and 1881 the North
American colonies had successfully revolted and broken away. England bore this shock and moved
forward. (pp.xxi)

The British Empire was a sea empire. (pp.xxi)

If Britain had not ruled the seas, the nation would not have survived. America had not yet reached
its full military strength.

Without the navy, Britain was instantly vulnerable.

SNIP

But with control of the seas, all was reversed. While Britain maintained naval supremacy, no
Continental power, no matter how large or well-trained its army, could touch the British
homeland. With naval supremacy, Britain acquired diplomatic freedom. British statesmen and
diplomats could afford to stand back and regard with detachment the rivalries and hatreds which
consumed the youth and treasuries of Continental powers facing each other across land frontiers.
Few European statesmen or military men understood Great Britain or the British Empire. They
were puzzled when they studied the small island, with its ridiculous army, its aloof, almost
patronizing manner, its pretension to be above the passions and squabbles which dominated their
days. And yet, for all its smallness and seeming fragility, there Britain stood, serene,
unchallengeable, with a range of action which was immense; which had in the past toppled
Continental giants. Foreign military officers were particularly incredulous. With an army which

Section 4 Page 46
 was only an insignificant fraction of their own, Britain ruled a quarter of the globe. To German
officers especially, representing the mightiest army in the world, it seemed absurd that Britain
should claim to rule India's 300 million people with an army of seventy thousand. Yet in India,
Britain continued to rule.

If British naval supremacy had made it possible for the island kingdom to remain outside the web
of Continental rivalries, Britain remained a European state. Political events on the great land mass
across the twenty miles of water that separated dover from Calais were of more importance to
Britons than what happened in Brazil.

By 1897, Europe was divided into two alliance systems: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy
confronted France and Russia. England had taken no position and, under Lord Salisbury, her
Prime Minister, did not intend to do so. This policy of aloofness Lord Salisbury had called
"Splendid Isolation."

England's enemy since the Middle Ages had been France. Through the wars of the Plantagenets,
against Louis XIV, Louis XV, and Napoleon, this had not changed. "France is, and always will
remain, Britain's greatest danger," Lord Salisbury had said in 1867, and he clung to this view
during his three terms as Prime Minister. France posed a multiple threat: to the British Isles
directly across the Channel, and to the imperial lifeline as it passed through the Mediterranean. At
a dozen spots around the globe, French and british colonies rubbed against each other
uncomfortably.

Britain's other traditional enemy was Russia. (pp. xxii-xxiii)

SNIP

...Russian policies seemed threatening. Britain's Director of Military Intelligence warned in 1887,
"The countries with which we are most likely to go to war are France and Russia and the worst
combination which we have any reason to dread is an alliance of France and Russia." In 1894,
precisely such an alliance was signed wand the dreaded became reality. (pg. xxiii)

Having grasped the importance of sea power and seeking to advance Germany’s influence beyond
Europe, WIlliam and his advisors confronted a dilemma: either Germany could accept British
supremacy at sea and work within this framework, or it must challenge British supremacy and
build a fleet powerful enough to wrest the trident away. (pp.xxiv)

Although Britain ruled the seas, it did not have a monopoly on naval build-up.

The German merchant navy, the second-largest in the world, used British harbours and depended on
British naval protection around the globe. Germany naval officers had grown up on British-built
ships, burning British coal, using British techniques and tactics. British and German officers
looked on each other as brothers. One choice, then, was to build on this relationship, reinforce and
solidify it, looking to the day when Germany and Britain might act, in Europe and the world, in
partnership, perhaps even in alliance.

The appointment of Admiral Tirpitz signalled that the opposite choice had been made. (pg. xxiv)

SNIP

At any moment, the British Navy could blockade the German coast, bottle the German Empire
exist on British sufference? Why should German greatness come as a gift from

Section 4 Page 47
 another people? (pp.xxiv)

SNIP

The British were threatened by a planned upgrade of the German Navy by Bertie, Prince of Wales’
main royal competitor, his nephew - the Kaiser .

A German Navy strong enough to protect German merchant shipping in these waters and
guarantee unimpeded passage to the oceans meant, in the last resort, a German fleet able to defeat
the British Navy. This Great Britain would never permit, for it meant also a German fleet strong
enough to screen an invasion of England, to sweep from the seas all British merchant shipping, to
strip Britain of her colonies and empire. Thus, the goal of the German Navy to protect
German commerce on the high seas - was wholly incompatible with the
interest of British security. What one power demanded, the other was
unwilling to concede. (pp.xxiv)

SNIP

...the German reply was that German warships posed little threat to Britain
and that the German Empire had the same right as the British Empire to build
whatever warships it chose. (pp.xxv)

William might proclaim - as he did in Stettin in 1891 - that “our future is on

the water,” (pp. 163)

Kaiser William II’s ambitions for Germany were grand and global and a threat to his British uncle,
the Prince of Wales. As with all modern wars, but unknown to the masses, every confrontation
allegorizes a personal crisis of the world leaders. The question at hand during the end of the
Victorian Age and key issue to the Edwardian Age was the continuation of the Christian principles
as guideposts for morals and behavior and for the monarchy and kingdom.. More specifically,
adultery, pedophelia nd polygamy were the topics on the table. King William II’s positon
represented a defence of traitional values for which Germany was willing to fight to the end.
Edward’s position was to dissolve all restraints to personal pleasure.

William’s ambitions were global. He wanted a fleet to inspire worldwide

respect, to defend German colonies, and to protect German merchant ships on
the high seas; for this purpose a large fleet of cruisers equipped for foreign service seemed more
useful than squadrons of battleships riding at anchor in Kiel and Wilhelmshaven. Hollmann's
strategy was based on coastal defense and commerce raiding: he wanted cruisers. Senden believed
in battleships. He accepted Mahan's thesis that without a battle fleet as the hard core of national
sea power, even swarms of cruisers would eventually be gobbled up by enemy battleships. Knorr
waffled, frustrated that administratively it was Hollmann who decided what ships should be built.
In fact, the real opposition to Hollmann and cruisers, the true intellectual proponent of battleships
and a mighty German battle fleet, was a navy captain serving in the High command. His name
was Alfred Tirpitz.(pp. 164)

On June 6, 1897 [German Navy Minister - Admiral] Tirpitz arrived in Berlin. (pp. 171)

The issue at hand was turpitude. Tipitz was brought in to defend against depravity because
his name represented war with turpitude. Germany would fight to the end to defend
Christian culture.

Section 4 Page 48
June 6 was code for the Anti-Christ, or an attempt to rule the world for Satan. Six is the
number which symbolizes man. The elevation of man is opposite of serving God. God is
the Word. Anti-Christ means being against the Word of God. Satanists knew the Anti-
Christ would be born on June 6. I was born June 6. Old man Bush was born June 12 which
is like three sixes. Clinton’s mother was born June 6. (June 15 has the same numerical value
as 6/6, to these people.) Violet Keppel, Mrs. Keppel’s young daughter was born on June 6.
Edward VII believed he needed her energy to make this bold attempt at becoming the Anti-
Christ who would make the rules for the world (rule the world). He wanted to make
polygamy, pedaphelia rape, and adultery legal. (Not unlike the purpose of gay agenda of
today.)

SNIP

On June 15...[Tirpitz] presented a 2,5000 word “Very Secret” memorandum entitled “General
Considers on the Constitution of Our Fleet According to Ship Classes and Designs.” (pp. 172)

SNIP

Edward VII’s view was a worldwide threat to Western civilization. Edward was backed by the
Rothschilds who had their own agenda and motives for supporting Bertie’s degenderacy. (With the
predestined leader of the family today, the Rothschild agenda has changed. God, too, can play bait
and switch games. God as a Sovereign, does not owe an explanation to man for everything He
does.)

Edward VII’s private actions motivated Germany’s realization that it needed its own strength. The
future war was planned at a higher level than Bertie. To start any war, an enemy must be created.

“For Germany, the most dangerous naval enemy at the present time is England.”
“Our fleet must be constructed so that it can unfold its greatest military potential between
Heliogoland and the Thames.” (pp. 172)

“The military situation against England demands battleships in as great a number as possible.”

“Only the main theatere of war will be decisive.”

All previous German naval strategy was swept away. (pp. 172)

---

The German Empire, ruled by the Queen’s grandson, was assumed to be England’s friend. .(pp.
231)

The personal animosity between Queen Victoria's two descendants grew until it reached a
crescendo, in the last years of Bertie's life, at which point, Bertie had to agree that the Kaiser was
right, but Bertie was being blackmailed by Mrs. Keppel. It was too late to turn the ship of war
around, and it was launched a few years after he died. Being related by blood should have led to
peaceful coexistence from the start, but vainglory masked a dread of being brought to naught by the
revelation of Bertie’s sexual preferences - married women and their little girls.

Royal family ties did not lead to a sense of camaraderie or long standing peaceful coexistence. The
Hanovers had outlived their usefulness to God and His agenda.

Section 4 Page 49
The two men had polar opposite values, which contributed to a lack of trust and fed the prospect of
future military conflict.

SNIP

The international implication of Tirpitz’ memorandum were even more far-reaching. To justify
building battleships a new enemy - England, at that time friendly to Germany -had been
designated. (pp. 172)

William approved Tirpitz’ memorandum and the Navy Secretary moved quickly to draft a new bill.
(pp. 173)

...the reality of Admiral Tirpitz’ determination to build his “Navy Against England” penetrated
English awareness, the British government prepared to alter the foreign policy which had served
England since Trafalgar. The building of the German Fleet ended the century of
Splendid Isolation. (pp. 185)

England had two choices. Form an alliance with Germany which would be beneficial to both
nations, or go to war - a world war. Germany could build the greatest Navy they were capable of
building, and with an alliance, this would have only aided the United Kingdom.

Small-minded hedonist, King Edward VII, was guided by personal revenge and dread of his
predilection towards little girls’ ‘o’s being exposed.

The Prince disliked Germany. Bernhard von Bulow, the German diplomat who later became
Chancellor, knew the Prince well and said that Bertie “could never rid himself of the impression
that the word “German’ was identical with the narrow-minded, moral preaching, drilling, and brute
force. If he found a man to be dull, clumsy and uncouth, he would say of him: ‘He is as tiresome
and tedious as a German professor.’ If a lady seemed to him to lack all grace and elegance, he
compared her with a German Frauchen.” Bertie’s view of Germany was reinforced by his wife,
Princess Alexandra, who hated Germans for wrenching away Schleswig and Holststein from
Denmark, and by his sister Vicy, the German Crown Princess and later Empress, who disliked
almost everything in Berlin and Germany. Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of
the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 18)

War was his solution because he dreaded what would happen to him and his legacy if the
knowledge that the Kaiser had become public.

Kaiser William II knew and disapproved of Edward VII's illicit liaisons with married women and
his debauchery with Mrs. Keppel's daughter, Violet. Bertie did not confine himself with sex with
Mrs. Keppel's daughter, but he was also boinking his granddaughter, Princess Royal Mary whose
confidante and servant was Else, a German woman who had to be sent back to Germany during
World War I.

The Prince of Wales commissioned the building of the Dreadnought battleships in an attempt to
fortify himself against the consequences of his actions which could bring him to naught.

DREAD NAUGHT

naught also nought (nôt) Pronunciation Key

n.

Section 4 Page 50