Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Pharmacovigilance: A Review
Avani Patel*1, D.Giles1, Vidhya Thomas1, Gurubasavarajaswamy PM1, Riddhi Patel2
1
Acharya & B.M. Reddy College of Pharmacy, Dept of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bangalore-560090, Karnataka,
India
2
S. S.College of Pharmacy, Hadala, Gujarat, India
o
o
o
o
o
ADVERSE EVENT:
An adverse event is not having any casual
relationship with patient treatment but its one of
the medical incidence with patient. So an adverse
event (AE) can be any critical or
Unintentionalindication of disease which is
temporally related with the use of a medication
[5,6]
(Fig 1).
Life Threatening
of
Serious AEs
Permanent incapacity/disabilities
Birth Defect
PHARMACOVIGILANCE PROGRAMME IN
INDIA:
The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization
(CDSCO) under the aegis of Ministry of Health &
Family Welfare, Government of India in
collaboration with Department of Pharmacology,
All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS),
New Delhi has initiated a nation-wide
pharmacovigilance programme for protecting the
health of the patients by assuring drug safety
which will include data for drugs, biological,
vaccines, diagnostics and medical devices from
public and private sector. The comprehensive
national programme is coordinated by the
Department of Pharmacology at AIIMS as a
national coordinating centre [15].
FRAMEWORK
FOR
PHARMACOVIGILANCE IN INDIA:
The National Pharmacovigilance Program
established in January 2005, New Delhi and the
performance of various Zonal, Regional and
Peripheral Centers will be supervise by the
National Pharmacovigilance Advisory Committee
(NPAC) and will perform the functions of
Review Committee for this program. A countrywide Pharmacovigilance programmed is initiating
by the Central Drugs Standard Control
Organization (CDSCO) under the guidance of
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare and
Government
of
India.
The
National
Pharmacovigilance Centre shall coordinate the
program at CDSCO. The National Centre will
operate under the supervision of the National
Pharmacovigilance Advisory Committee to
recommend procedures and guidelines for
regulatory services [16] (Fig 2).
Fig 2: illustrates the constant pharmacovigilance system describing the people, functions, structures of a
pharmacovigilance and medicine system. Medicine-related problems, morbidity and mortality should be decreased as a
result of pharmacovigilance system.
PEOPLE
Reporters
Doctors,
Pharmacists
Nurses other
health care
workers
Evaluators
Medical
Specialists,
Clinical
Pharmacologist,
Pharmacists
FUNCTION
Reporting (Detection and Generation)
Report side effects and adverse events
STRUCTURES
Manufactures
Pharmacovigilance centre
Safety advisory
committee
Regulatory
authority
industry
health
services
1573
2010, IJPBA. All Rights Reserved.
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS:
To record and report adverse effects of drugs in
different country patients is the main principal
basis for the WHO International Drug Monitoring
Program, through which over 90 member
countries had send their reports to the Uppsala
Monitoring Centre where they are processed,
evaluated and entered into the WHO International
Database[15].
The Uppsala Monitoring Centre (the UMC),
located in Uppsala, Sweden, is the field name for
the World Health Organization Collaborating
Centre for International Drug Monitoring. The
UMC works by collecting, assessing and
communicating information from member
countries national pharmacovigilance programs in
regards to the benefits, harm, effectiveness and
risks of drugs.
EUROPE:
The national competent authorities (NCAs)
coordinate and conduct the European Medicines
Agency (EMA). The pharmacovigilance database
of human and animals consisting of all suspected
serious adverse reactions are maintained and
developed by the EMA in the European
Community and the system is called
EudraVigilance.
JAPAN:
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
(PMDA) and Ministry of Health, Labour and
Welfare (MHLW) regulate the pharmacovigilance
in Japan.
UNITED STATES:
Three primary branches of pharmacovigilance in
the U.S. include the FDA, the pharmaceutical
manufacturers, and the academic/non-profit
organizations.
SERBIAN:
To achieve the optimum number of 2000
spontaneous reports/year, regular contact with
healthcare professionals, and finally Good
Pharmacovigilance Practice is the final goal of the
Serbian Pharmacovigilance System [17].
REFERENCE:
1. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. February
2008; 40(1):1-31
2. The Uppsala monitoring system, WHO
Collaborating Centre for International
Drug
Monitoring
World
Health
Organization.2002; 28-34
a
component
of
pharmacovigilance,
Environmental Health July, 2007.
10. Surendra S, Dang A, Rataboli P.
Pharmacovigilance
and
Pharmaco
epidemiology, Indian J Pharm Sci.July
2010.
11. RaviShankarP, SubishP, Mishra P,
DubeyAK. Teaching Pharmacovigilance to
Medical students and doctors, Educational
Forum.July2010.
12. Ronaldd
M,
Elizabethb
A.
nd
Pharmacovigilance, 2 Edition.
13. WHO guidelines on safety monitoring of
herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance
systems, World Health Organization,
Geneva. 2004.
14. Rahman SZ & Singhal KC, Problems in
pharmacovigilance of medicinal products
of herbal origin and means to minimize
them,
Uppsala
Reports,
WHO
Collaborating Center for ADR monitoring,
Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Sweden.
January 2002; 17: 1-4
15. Rahman, SZ; Khan, RA. Environmental
pharmacology: A new discipline. Indian J
Pharmacology. December 2006; 38 (4):
229230.
16. World
Health
Organization.
Pharmacovigilance: Ensuring the safe use
of medicines. October, 2004.
17. Indicator-Based
Pharmacovigilance
Assessment Tool: Manual for Conducting
Assessments in Developing Countries,
USAID December 2009:1-10.
1574