Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
6
Syllogism
Exam
Importance
Exam
Importance
CAT
Very Important
IBPS/Bank PO
Very Important
XAT
Very Important
BANK Clerk
Very Important
IIFT
Very Important
SSC
Very Important
SNAP
Very Important
CSAT
Very Important
NMAT
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Introduction
Syllogism is one of the very important chapters for any aptitude test exam. In these types of questions premise
has generally two statements on the basis of which a deduction has to be made for conclusion. And then that
conclusion we have to select from the given options
We may have a case where from the given premise no conclusion can be drawn
There are two methods to solve these types of questions:(i)
Venn Diagram
Now we will see how to derive conclusion from the given premise from these two methods but before that lets have
a look at the different components of the premise and for that take two example of premise
(i)
The premises normally start with qualifiers or quantifiers, e.g. the word All, No, some and Some Not. The
word All has its synonyms as Every, Any, Each, whereas the word Some can also be replaced by Many,
Few, A little, Most of, Much of, More, etc.
(ii) A premise consists of a subject and a predicate wherein the first term [e.g. Rats in statement (i)] is the
subject and the second term [e.g. Hats in statement (i)] the predicate. Similarly, in statement (ii), Hats is
called the subject and Pats is the predicate.
(iii) The word that occurs in both the premises is known as the middle term (in this example since Hats is in
both the premise hence it is called middle term).
(iv) The conclusion of the premise middle term should not appear and conclusion should consist of the other two
words (Rats and Pats in the above example) and the.
(A) Universal statements [ if the qualifier used in the premise is All, Every, Any, Each]
(B) Particular statements [if the qualifier used in the premise is Some, Many, Few, A little, Most of,
Much of, More, etc]
(B) Negative statements [If premise has a negative term like not or no]
The combination of the two different categories of classifications leads to four different premises as given in Table
below.
Universal/ Particular
Affirmative/ Negative
Universal
Affirmative
No , Not None
Universal
Negative
Some, Many
Particular
Affirmative
Particular
Negative
The subject or the predicate can be either distributed or not distributed in the given premise.
The subject and the predicate are either distributed (indicated as yes) or not distributed (indicated as no) depending
on what kind of a statement it is. Table below shows the distribution pattern of the subject and the predicate.
Universal affirmative
Universal negative
Example
Subject
Predicate
Yes
No
No , Not None
Yes
Yes
Some, Many
No
No
No
Yes
Particular affirmative
Particular negative
Please note that:
(i)
Every deduction should contain three and only three distinct terms.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Now lets take few examples to understand thisExample 1) Find the conclusion of
(i)
Here the first statement starts with All which is Universal affirmative hence it is a universal affirmative
statement, and the subject (Rats) is distributed but the predicate (Pats) is not distributed.
(ii) The second statement is also Universal affirmative, the subject Pats is distributed and the predicate Cats is
not distributed.
(iii) Here the middle term is Pats as it occurs in both the premises.
(iv) Middle term is Pats is distributed once in the premises (In this example Premise ii) hence it satisfies Rule [2]
hence we can find a conclusion.
(v) Conclusion will have two terms and these terms are Rats and Cats
(vi) As Rats is distributed in the 1st premises and Cats is not distributed,
(vii) In final conclusion Rats is distributed but Cats is not distributed.
Conclusion: All Rats are Cats
Note of Caution: The conclusion cannot be All Cats are Rats as in this case we have distributed the
Venn diagram approach:(i)
Pats
Rats
Cats
Overall conclusion is:
Cats
Pats
Rats
Hence final conclusion is all rats are cats.
Example 2) Find the conclusion of
(i) All Rats are Pats (ii) Some Rats are Cats
Solution: Now look at the minute details of each premise(i)
Here the first statement starts with All which is Universal affirmative hence it is a universal affirmative
statement, and the subject (Rats) is distributed but the predicate (Pats) is not distributed.
(ii) Here the 2ndstatement starts with Some which is Particular affirmative hence it is a Particular affirmative
statement, and the subject (Rats) is not distributed and the predicate (Pats) is not distributed.
(iii) Here the middle term is Rats as it occurs in both the premises.
(iv) Middle term is Rats is distributed once in the premises (In this example Premise i) hence it satisfies Rule [2]
hence we can find a conclusion.
(v) Conclusion will have two terms and these terms are Pats and Cats
(vi) In premise neither Pats nor Cats are distributed; so in conclusion they should not be distributed.
Conclusion: Some Pats are Cats or some Cats are Pats
Rats
Rats
Cats
Pats
Rats
Cats
Or
Hence final conclusion is Some Pats are Cats or some Cats are Pats.
Example 3) Find the conclusion of
(i) All Rats are Pats (ii) No Pats are Cats
Solution: Now look at the minute details of each premise(i)
Here the first statement starts with All which is Universal affirmative hence it is a universal affirmative
statement, and the subject (Rats) is distributed but the predicate (Pats) is not distributed.
(ii) Here the 2ndstatement starts with No which is Universal negative hence both subject (Rats) and the
predicate (Pats) is distributed.
(iii) Here the middle term is Pats as it occurs in both the premises.
(iv) Middle term is Pats is distributed once in the premises (In this example Premise ii) hence it satisfies Rule [2]
hence we can find a conclusion.
(v) Conclusion will have two terms and these terms are Rats and Cats
(vi) Since one of the premises is negative hence conclusion must be negative.
(vii) In premise both Rats and Cats is distributed, so in final conclusion they should be distributed.
Conclusion: No Rats are cats or No Cats are Rats