Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
composed his work entit led a/-Zij al-Kamil jr-I-Ttflitrm in honour of the
Caliph Abu ~ Abd Allah Muqammad al-Na~ir (who reigned from 11991213). All we know of Ibn aJ -Ha'im's life is that he came frolll Sev ille and
that he appears to have worked in North Africa.
Ibn al-Ha' im 's 21) is included in the MS Oxford Bodleian 285 (Marsh
618) . It is qui le a long text, with an introduction and seven books
(maqdld/). Each book is divided imo several chapters, of which there are
eighty altogether. The text can be considered as a 'i.E} on the basis of its
structure and its contenlS, although it does not include astronomical tables;
This paper is part of the complete study of the I II of Ibn al-Ha'im which we
started in Barcelona some years ago as pan of a research program entitled
"Astronomical Theory and Tables in al-AndaJus and the Maghrib between the 12th
and 14th Centuries", sponsored by the Direcci6n General de Investigaci6n
Cientifica y Tecnica of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture, Emilia
Calvo ( 1998) has recently published a paper on the astronomical theories related
to the Sun in the same vland Merce Comes is preparig a paper on Ibn al-Ha 'im's
trepidation model.
72
R. Puig
it may in fact have had some tables in its origina l version 2, The text offers
ca lculati ng procedures and g ives geometrical proofs for the rules proposed .
Ibn al-I-Hi'im describes the astronomy practised in al-Andalus and the
Maghrib al the beginning of the Ihinecmh century and informs us of the
activities of the Andalusian astronomer Ibn al-Za rqalluh (died 11(0) and
the ToJedan astronomers (al:Jamtla al-!ulay!iiliyya) who worked under the
patronage of qaqI ~at id in the eleventh century.
In this paper I shall deal with the theory of the Moon in the zij, which
is of considerable hislOrical interest. The ZI} deals with two aspects of the
theory of the Moon: the computation of its longitude, and the compUlalion
of its latitude It does nOt contain specific chapters on eclipses, the visibility
of the new moon or the parallax, which are typ ical of sim ilar z!)es. The
Arabic text of the chapters that I will comment on appears as Appendix I
at the end of the paper .
Determination of the Moon's Longitude
73
of the distance between the Moon and the corrected solar apogee3 by
0 ;0,2404.
[3J Then add this produclto the mean longitude if the Moon is between the
solar apogee and the solar perigee, or subtract it from the mean longitude
if the Moon is between the solar perigee and the apogee.
[4J Subtract the mean longitude of the Sun from this corrected mean
longitude of the Moon in order to obtain the elongation (1]) and hence the
double elongation (211). Then, enter with the double elongation as
argument in the Lunar Equation Tables.
[5]-[8] The rest of the steps are standard and the only point of interest is
the terminology used by Ibn al-Ha 'im: the equat ion of the cent re is ca ll ed
i"~iraf al-qli(' (A lmagesf C3 : Equarion f or Mean to Tru e Apogee); the
interpolation function corresponds to the daqa'iq al-nisba (Aim. C6 :
Sixtieths); the tcfdfl a/-bucd a/-aqrab is the difference between the epicyclic
equation at the perigee and at the apogee (AIm. Cs: Increment in Epicyclic
Equation); the equation of anomaly at the apogee is the ta Cdz1 al-~i~~a (Aim.
C4 : Epicyclic Equation). The final result (equat ion of anomaly for a
particular double elongation and true anomaly) is called al-Iacdil almurakkab . We must add it to or subtract it from the mean lunar longitude
10 obtain the sidereal longitude.
74
R. Puig
[9] In order to obtain the tropical long itude, we must add or subtract the
amount of precession calculated with the trepidation tables .
T he most interesting thing in this chapte r is the correction of [2] and [3],
which will modify the Moon's initial mean longitude obtained with the
tabl es and consequently the double elongation as argument . We find Ibn alHii ' im's justification in chapter!)6:
Ibn al-Ha ' im begins ([10]-[23]) by explaining the computation of the
lunar equation of the centre using Ptolemy's model. For that purpose, he
begins by explaining the computation procedure ([IOH17]) and then adds
a geometrical justification (tilla) of the fannula employed ([18]-[23]).
There is nothing new in Ihis part of the text , but o ne should note that Ibn
al~ H a' im is not copy ing the Almagest (V, 9). As in the rest of the book , he
is providing a clear explanation of the methods used to calculate tables of
equations: something which is implicit in Ptolemy 's work , and which our
author wishes 10 develop.
The computatio n of the equation of the centre appears as follows:
[IO~II] He calcu lates Sin 211 (al-jayb al-awwal, the first sine) and Cos 211
(al-jayb al~tMn{, [he second sine)
[ 12] He then determines:
dJ = 10; 191' x Sin 21/160 (al~qif a/~awwal,t h e first side)
f ~ 2 x 10; 19' x Cos 2~ / 60 (a/{ad/a, difference)
[13~ 14] d z = V(49;4 12 d/) + !(alqif a/~IJuj"r, the second side)
b = v(49;4 12 ~ d,z) + f/2 (bifd al~markaz al-mar'f the distance
between the centre of the lunar epicycle and the centre of the ecl iptic)
[1 5J He next gives an alternative approx imate procedure to calculate b. He
enters the table of the interpolation function (daqtJ'iq lIisbat al-khiirij afmarkaz) with the value for the double elongation, obtains a value m, and
establishes a proportion :
x / 20;38 ~ m / 60 where x ~ 60 - b
- fo r 211 = 0 , then m = 0, x = 0 and b = 60
- for 21/ = 180, then m = 60, x = 20;38 and b = 39;22 = R - e , e
t
A description and delai led analysis of this chapter is in R. Puig (1992), slill
unpublished. See a fi rsl approximation 10 the subjecl in J.Sams6 (1992), pp. 218219.
7S
Figure 1
I (200:)
76
R. Puig
between < HBS (mean anomaly) and < MBS (true anomaly).
[211 < HBM (equation of the centre) is known. From points E and T he
[22) EZB is a right ang led triangle, < Z being the right angle. EZ and EB
(deferent radius = 49 ;41 P) are known, as is side BZ . This imp lies that he
is using Pythagoras' theorem , and we have :
BZ ~ v{49;41' -EZ') (as in [13])
and BL is also known , for
BL = BZ + ZL (wh ich should be identified with dz)
BD = BZ + ZLI2 (b ll' d al-markaz al-mar'f) (as in [1 4]) .
G. Saliba has pointed out to me that there is a . tradition for the terms
mustadraka. istidrdk, etc. to mean "objections to Ptolemy and his discovery of
77
In order to make clearer the relationshIp between figure t and figure 2, I have
rotated figure 2 and put letters in brackets which correspond with telters in
fig. I.
78
R. Puig
correspond to the mean distance between the centre of the epicycle of the
Moon and the solar apogee obtained from the tables.
B_,
DO'
Figure 2
[32] Angle ZBE will be the maximum difference, which reaches about
0;24 for this position of B.
[From this max imum value we will find a partial value which will
correspond to any possible posit ion of the centre of the epicycle]:
[33] T is now the cenlre of the epicycle. Ibn al-Ha'imjoins T and Z, T and
E with lines ZT and ET . In this case, as before, angle AET corresponds
to the mean observed distance between the centre of the lunar epicycle and
the solar apogee, while angle AZT is (he mean distance obtained from the
tables. The end of the paragraph (almost two lines) is difficult to
reconstruct due to the blanks in the manuscript.
[34]-[35] He drops perpendicular EQ from E to the prolongation of ZT.
Angles Band T, being small enough , are considered by Ibn al-Ha' im as
equivalent [0 segments EZ and EQ subtended by these two angles (01khu{u! al-mustaqfma a/-muwouora bihd).
SoWoyl 1 (2000)
The
79
[36] He solves right angled triangle EQZ in which Q is the right angle, EZ
is approximately equivalent to the 24' of the max imum variat ion and Z
equals ang le AZT , the mean lunar longitude measured from the solar
apogee as obtained from the tables.
Then,
<T =
QE
EZ/60 x Sin
< Z = 0;24'/60 x
Sin
< AZT
Therefore , the final fo rmula (see above [2] and [3]) to correct the mean
longitude obtained with the tables is :
is the distance between the mean position of the Moon obtai ned with
the tables and the corrected solar apogee.
We find the same correction in zljes of later Andalusian and Maghribf
astronomers such as:
Al-Zij al-Muqrabas by Ibn al-Kammad (fl . Cordova 12th century)9. His
procedu re fo r calculating the longitude of the Moon is Ptolemaic, and he
uses the correction in the case of the calcu latio n of eclipses. In fact, the
canons of Ibn al-Kammad state the following rule: ~ Quod sf volueris locum
Lune vemm pro eclipsi minue augem Solis a cemro et quod remanseritJac
illud cordam er multipliea eam in duobus quintis lmillS minuri et duo quinri
unius min uti sum 24 secunda et divide quod i!lde colligetur per 60". Ibn alKamrnad 's words deserve some comments . First, the use of the term corda
for the sine, following al-BattanL This use is confirmed in chapter 17 of
the canons in which he explains how to use the table of cords, cords of the
complement (= cosine), and sagiuae (versed sines). Second: there seems
to be an error in his formulation for , accord ing to him, the correction is:
I have used the Latin manuscript 10023 of Biblioteca Nacional de Madrid , Chapter
(pona) 13. See a general commemary on the tables of this;,O in J. ChabAs and
B. R. Goldste in (1994) .
80
R. Puig
The zfj of Ibn Ist)aq al-Tunisi (fl. Tunis and Marrakesh ca. 1193- 1222),
as preserved in the Hyderabad manuscript Andra Pradesh State Library
298 1 and the Al-Minhtij al-{tJlib fi tifdrl al-kawttkib, by Ibn al- Banna' al-
Marrakushi (1256-\321 )11. They add 10 their procedure fo r calcul ati ng the
long itude of the Moon another correction which appeared in Eastern
Islamic astronomy in the ninth cent ury: as Ihey obtain the longitude of the
Moon on its orbital plane, they must ~ reduce" it to the ecl iptic by means
of a table ca lled Jadwa/ ((fdrt al-falak a/-mti'iI by Ibn I s ~ aq and Jadwa/
tcfdfl falak al -qamar al-ml1'U by Ibn al -Banna'. The manuscript of Ibn
Isl.laq comains (Wo versions of (he same table ll which we also find in the
zt) of Ibn al-Banna '(MS Escoria l 909, fol. 25v) beside the lunar latitude
(able , with a maximum ofY. In both authors, (he arguments are comprised
between 00 and 1800 with a maximum of 0;6,39" fo r argument 45. We can
find the same table in (he ast ronomical handbook known as Mum/a~all ilJ
(MS Escoria t Arabic 927 , fols. 20v-23r) , in the C, of the lunar equation
table of Yal.l ya ibn Abi Man~ Or (fl. ca. 830) calcul ated for a max imum
10
11
11
l owe this information to Angel Meslres who is preparing the edition of this zrj.
To date, he has published a delailed survey of the contents of Ihe manuscript in
Mcstres (1996).
The canons oflhis zl} were ediled by 1. Vernet ( 1952). Chapters on the Moon are
on pp. 3 1-32 (Arabic lex!) ~nd 8789 (Spanish translalion). On the computation
of planetary longirudes in the V}, including the Moon, see a recent paper by J.
Sams6 and E. Millas (1998).
See Mestres (1996), p. 415 .
~~I
] (2000)
81
inclination of the lunar orbit of 4;46013 , The "red uction to the ecl iptic" as
a correction to the Ptolemai c longi mde is pointed ou t by Pedersen l4 who
has calculated a maximum correction of about 0;70 fo r a longitude of 45; 3
and for a maximum latitude of SO.
In addition to this adj ust ment, both Ibn IsJ:taq and Ibn al-Banna'
recommend using the correction explained by Ibn al-Ha'im when a high
degree of accuracy is needed , i.e. for the calculat ion of eclipses and new
moon . Ibn al-Banna' also incl udes lhe computed values of the second
correct ion in a table called Table o/rhe ~arf~.
AI-il] al-ShtimilJr whdhfb al-Kamif by Ibn al- Raqqam (1245-13 15). He
follows Ibn al-Ha'im word for word but he does not include the
geometrica l j ust ifications; nor does he mention Ibn al-Zarqalluh I6 .
Finall y, the recent publication by Mancha 17 of a Provencal version of
the tables for eclipses of Levi ben Gerson (1288- 1344) shows a possible
introduct ion of the Za rqalJi an correction in the work of the Jewish
astronomer: Lev i says that in lunar conjunctions and oppositions one fi nds
a correction (divercitat) in the lunar equation (the computat ion of luna r
longitude ?) which could reach an amount of up to 29 minutes . I wonder
whether these 29 minutes are the result of a copy ing error and they
correspond (0 the 24 minutes of Ibn al-Zarqalluh or whether Levi ben
Gerson made a new est imation of the maximum vallie of the ZarqlHlian
correct ion .
I)
It
See H. Salam and E.S. Kennedy (1967), reprinted in E.S. Kennedy (1983), pp.
109-113.
See O. Pedersen (1974). p. 200.
IS
The table of $aif(MS Escorial909. fo!. 25v) is only described. not edited, in a
footnote by 1. Vernet (1952). p. 88, note 177.
16
I have used the MS Istanbul Kandilli 249, fo l. l4r (Chapter 28) and foJ. lSv
(Chapter 33), as well as the partial edition of this vJ presented by Mu~ammad
"Abel a l - Ra~man as a doctoral dissertation (l996b).
11
82
R . Puig
50r~50v .
the seventh book (fols. 84 r-84v, pp . 165- 166). tn chapter 2 of the fourth
book, ent itled On Determining the Lunar Lmirude 10 the South and North
of the Ecliptic, rlie Argument of Latitude (~i ~~a l al_Car~) and its
Verification. we have Ibn aJ -Ha'im 's instructions for us ing a Table of {h e
Differences of the Arguments of Latitude (JadwaJ tara~ul ~i ~a~ carc.!
al-qamar) which does nOI appear in the standard layout of the Ptolemaic
lunar tables . In chapter 6 of the seventh book, entitled 011 Determining rhe
Inclinations a/the Degrees o/the Lunar Orbit (muyUl ajza ' falak alqamar)
from the EcliptiC and the Differences of the Argumems of Latitude, we find
the general formula for the computat ion of a table of latitude and another
one for the aforementioned differences.
In Chapter 2 of the fourth book, the instructions to calculate the latitude
are as follows:
[37] Take (he distance between the Moon's true position (mawtfl alqamar
almllqawwam) and the neare r of the two nodes. Call it the first argument
(al-lJi~~a al-Ula) or the difference (al jaqla).
[38J Emer with it in the Table of the Differences of the Argumellis of
Latitude, tabulated in minutes and seconds, and always add them to the
first argument in order to obtain the true argument of latitude Vli~~at alCarq a/-~/Qqfqiyya). [As the argument used is true argument o f latitude,
these tables must be calculated from 0" to 9O"J.
[39] Enter with it in the Lunar Latitude Tab/e to obtain the latitude.
[40] and (41) We must take into account four possible positions of the
Moon with respect to both the ascending and descending nodes according
to the distance obtained in [37] , in order to determine if the latitude is
northern or southern and if the Moon is ascendi ng or descending on its
orbit.
[42] Ibn al-Ha ' im gives a figure (fig . 3) to just ify all this : Circle AG O is
the lunar o rbit (aljalak a/-nul 'if) and circle ABO is the parecliptic (a/ja/ok
al-muwafiq) . A is the ascending node and 0 the descending one. G and Z
Somayl I (2IXKl)
Th~
Theory
of(h~
Moon in
(h~
83
are , respectively, the northern and southern positions of the Moon on its
orbital plane.
A
Figure 3
[43J We drop perpendiculars ZL and GS on the plane of the ecliptic: Sand
L will be the positions of the Moon in longitude.
[44] Sand L being right angles. arcs AZ and AG, on the orbital plane , are
longer than the corresponding arcs AL and AB , on the ecliptic. This
produces a difference, which. according to [bn al -Ha ' im , will reach a
maximum of about 0 ;7. He then explains that the value of the latitude in
the tables is given as a funct ion of the argument of latitude measured on the
Moon's orbit. Thus , latitude ZL corresponds to arc AZ . But, if we enter
the latirude table with the arc AL of the ecliptic as argument instead of arc
AZ, the latitude corresponding to AL will be approximate.
[451 At the limits of ec lipses Ibn al-Ha' im gives a difference between both
Suhayl I (2lKXl)
84
R. Puig
AG - AB
(50) Ibn al-Ha'im gives a figure (fig. 4) saying that AG is the true
argument of latitude, measured on the lunar orbit, and AS the argument of
longitude, measured on the ecliptic. SG is the latitude of point G.
II
This figu re is correct according to the Ptolemaic values of 5" for the maximum
inclination and 15:12~ for a lunar eclipse limit (Almagest VI, 5, see GJ . Toomer
(1984) , p. 287 and O. Pedersen (1974), p. 230).
Suha)'l I (lOX)
85
Figure 4
[5 1] In the figure he justifies the formula explained in [48], applying the
sine law to spherical triangle ABG :
sin BG I sin
< GAB
= sin AG I sin
9<r
[52J And the formu la of the differences using the so-called theo rem of Ja:bir
ibn Af1a~ (Geber)19:
sin AG I s in AB = cos BG I cos
< GAB
19 Both the sine law and 1libir's theorem appear in the Kitdb Majh,ulJt qisi al-kura
of Ibn Mu"adh al-Jayyani (d . 1093) and in Jiibir b. Ana~'s J~la~ al.Majis![. I
do not know which source is used by Ibn al-Ha'im. See J. Sams6 (1980) , p.
64 , nOte 44 , reprinted in J. Sams6 (1994) item VIII . On llibir 's trigonometry
see R. Lorch (1975), reprinted in R. Lorch (I995a), item VI, and R. Lorch
( 1995a) item VIII.
86
R. Puig
The conclusion we may draw from Ibn al*Hii ' im's treatment of lunar
latitude is that it contains important informat ion about his determination of
the lunar longitude. It seems clear that he interprets his corrected lunar
position (maw4l: al-qamar al-11Iuqawwam) as corresponding to a lunar
longilUde measured on the ecliptic (AB in fig . 4) and not on its own orbit
(AG) , in spite of the fact that the instructions given by the amhor to
calcuJate longitudes do not include any reference to the "reduction to the
ecliptic " and that the Zarqiillian co rrection , which is a function of the mean
lunar longitude and of the longitude of the solar apogee, has nOlhing to do
with Ihis . As the argument for lunar latitude is not AB but AG, Ibn a1Hii'im uses his table of differences in order to obtain an amoum d, and [hen
AS + d = AG, which he uses to obtain the lunar latitude. The procedure
is related to, although to some extent in conn ict with , the tradition of the
Mllmta~lOli ilj, preserved by Ibn l s~aq and Ibn al-BaIIDa': there , Ya~ya ibn
AbT Ma~ijr considers that, when he calculates the lunar longirude using his
lunar equation tables derived from the Halldy Tables, he obtains AG which
he uses directly in order to obtain the lunar latitude. On the other hand , to
compute the longitude correctly, he must obtain AB and, for that purpose,
he uses his own table of differences mentioned above . Since his table is
calculated for arguments between 1 and 1800, the correction can be
positive or negative.
Ibn al- Ha' im's nOll-extant table uses the Ptolemaic 5 for (jmn and
calculates his entr ies for arguments between 1 and 900: as he subtracts the
lunar position from the nearer node (and not from the ascending node as
Ya~ya does) , his corrections are always positive . A table probably similar
to that used by Ibn al- Ha'im is preserved by Ibn al-Raqqam in his SIlilmil
il)-1O, which is also computed for arguments between 1 and 90" and for
(j~x = SO (see Appendix 2) .
Concluding Remarks
Ibn al-Ha'im proposes two corrections to the standard Ptolemaic theory of
the Moon. The first is an attempt to correct the theory of lunar longitude .
HI
1(2000)
87
88
R. Puig
APPENDIX I
The manuscript is badly damaged and the last lines of each page are vcry difficult 10 read . I
have used square brackets to mark th e holes and the words added or reconstructed. In most
oflhe cases, [0 reconstruct the lex!. the vi of Ibn al-Raqqam (d.131S) has been useful since
he follows Ibn al -Ha'im textually in some passages. J have also used brackets 10 indicate the
MS page number as well as sequential paragraph numbers which are not pari of the original
lex!. T his paragraph numbering is referred 10 in my English commentary . A few orthographic
and morphological corrections have been made without comment.
'JSJ
.a..J1
.j)l;.
.
- 1
.,...~
w......."u
,..ru-
W..,....:JI.h..J """"
-- 1
~r"
[4]
~\
u-o
.dJj ..l<...A..::...I J
Suh>yl I (200))
89
Ji' [J-" ~ .:,. .,osi ' ..(.u...J1 ~I w:.lS U>, pi ",.,. [8]
~L.; [J-" ~.:,. "j>i w:.lS ulJ [.,...o..ll] J.u...J1 .L.,JI ~ .,D.,..JI
.a.,. ~ dl~ .a.,. ~ ) ~I WI J.a....JI ~, .h....J U-<o ~ ~I Jo...t.UJ\
J,.uOJ1
4JI J "'-".,JJ 4:.. J-.JI U-ij i..b.;w .:,. [J."JI dl; 0J0:...""; .,.>.11 t-"'.>.:,. J.wl dJ~ [~] ~ J-.JI [-" .:,. [J.wL i.u] L.; L..,..I ""-=- "OJI
,~I ~ [."JI dJ~.:,. ,=,WI J ",;.JI J ,",j.J1 illo ~ ~L.; [J."JI
4:..
'1J:'.l.4cl1J\ 0LS
Suhoyl I (1000)
90
R. Puig
<.,-:. .;:.t.;o JJ-"," .... -..llW-J1 .u.,JL J'"-'u ..:.<..:. ulJ [IS)
l .
-w
..
I
i
~
.
~..::..:.l.SW~,
....u.Ju-" .
~
J .P.- ut~
u-"
...............I~~~
_.
J
.u-" Ll...oi............a.:l..i
-l.S
W
.
'.
I,
-.
U.J\
..!l..t.
~
1'-. - ~.J . ~)t,
.
U
~ U""' ...,...
.....,.......
_
~
J
jS.,..J1 EoWI
- I W '-L;.;,JI
I':"""""
uk
-*'
".,...u
u;:.... ...... 1 .~ [1 7)
is.>"- [.;,.]
II
0LS
"--' y....i
<lo..,u EJ.".!I .!ill jSyo "" ","~I jSyo (J? J;j [.;,.]
w! ~ .lj)
jSYOJ JI.JI ~ -,.k EJ.".!I .!ill jSyo.AJJ ~ uJi ohlJ .4J1 jSyo
'wi
tL-J "Ij .4J JL..... ~~ .Uo ~ .t.... JIJ ~ JL..... Jlo.Uo tL-J ~~
SUhayi I (:!(l()))
91
JS 0 H Wu !$ljJl
~JI)J~..,.h....
L...y......
e:L-J
).u...J\ dJ~ ~i
.)-"uJ1 dI,., [L."i] L.~ olb [01.,] .;oJ"' U;J wL; t)UI
L."i [.bt r]1i [olb 01., t~] <"J I:,; )-"uJ1 d]i, t~ t~ olb 'u~J [23]
.. Uo .. 4 f''l ~Jlj 0~ [ ... J u~ ..Uo .. 4..2iy t,FDI ).lL..J4 4..-..,.h....
u~ wl.4.l1 ~J\jJl <l.,> lSD\ ).lL..J4 4..-..,.h.... ~ ~4 .. L:... ~Jlj ~i
J:'J..LJI <!ill ~ ~-U..;>)tl ~~I ~ u....:....;.Jl ~J ~~ ~ ~L:... _uuY--i
~I ~ ~ ~I <F'J u.- ob. I""" U"y.; .)o-~IJ ",.,.11
..:.L,., c,,) L. d]'J '--.,J... "';)l:.;.~1 ..... '",.,.11
,.,s:.:. L. ~ -oU)I.o.;.~1 ,'-" u-- oL..,;,J1 ~ '-SJ.,:.....JI ',,,jll L.:.iJ [24]
. ~L.:; UJI J.p,., -'-'-!
-oL,.,jll ~ ..... J-" I...::.! JI,,.JI ..... '",.,.11 ~I .b...J 'J d]'J [25]
(J.,.ul dli pyo ~ <F' I...::.! <"y.....J1 '-"'J",dli pyo '-S.,.,. 'J ~
~....:..ul ~J uu J jJ4......i1 J r-oJI ~~~IJ":'!JL.:.......ly.1..l....oJL....JJ
-oU.,...sJ1 ..... d], ~IJ -oU)I.o.;.~IJ "".,.1I J J#' ..... ~I -ol$.,.,.
U-- pO 4-'-h. uL.jll U-- u,~ ,.,. (J.,.ul dli ol:,.,.i ~ ...... .,;.s.J1
oI.,F""'~
' . oL..,;Jl~ ~.I,~
I. <:.- . '>1'
. \ ' . k..... oJ c,.>.>.
.,J L._u-'""'"
~
J~
.J.;.> ~I
r:~'C"
f'",
't
c, 't c'
[t,
f .'r.r:
_ . -.,,,
~.~r
,C'
t= 't",
c'
[
"~
l~'~1..
~'
L'
,C'
,C'
~.
' ,t\"
0 ' 1 .c'
t'
:s
'L
.- ,
~,<;" ~
~ Eo i"
- ' t:""" ~
(71
'l,;
'~_~ t'Z'(1-t
ft
..::
E'
,'t:
,'f,
f;
.,.
L'
1..
1~ r;; ~
04, -
l-
C.
..
~,......,.
- "
Ir
",""- I>
~...:..
'r .
L.
t~
~ C
.L ~ '\."
1:0
'
'r
,
<-I...
'
'L.
~ t, c' ~
-'~' 'r ~
- P1
....:..
l-
Ir
b "<'I...
~.
--:
~'
(."I
'r.
I> ,,;.
<...
'&.
t;;
r:-c -.. .
- r.:. 1>'
. II.:::::
,c'~b
'r'h b'f~l(bJ"rf~
<. 1.1 f:'f.~~
-'t':-1
<.
f,
t L ,- <. ,-, c, 'L. <. 'l ~ "- t f,
..,
E""
: c- , '" - -",,- b c: '" 'c' Ir ';'''L 1;- "" - <- -:~ "' -, t:~: _ I> <. c'f:: 't,
't
,f: : '-' t 'I c' 'l,;'l'<i." ~ t -'I 'I ~ r r'l,;'" ' b rt r-<' 1:'i'i.
p ~ ~ (1 t; ~ 'I E ~~. c ~, ~, ~ \ t; t ~
J ~ t'i. ~ E; 1. ~ ,C c
ct, .- ' c ,
'~ ,
1 <..,
~ 't, > ~ ['C;_ 'i' C'K:"
,,
r
t -. 'i' '',
c
l 1. 't,
if
' . "
".'
~ ~,t.,"", , <. <. ,"'1 ~''t, f"' .:. \,;" " <.' f;' <. ~ <.'" :r ' '~.'I f~'
- 1 \' ~_ ~_ _';C'r ' ,<.r: ~<">
f,'' , , __
~
~. ' 't ~
,
~
",
w
N
N f
00
j <. 'w,
_W""'-..<.~;_ ~" <.c'C. ~
_WN ,,;f
l." ~
_0 ..t ' ~
_~ f::<. _f1-_
<.
V\
l.
;f
L'
t r11 t
.(::0.
l)
r"
l}
W. L
C
10
~ "'-.,
1,."
>
1 t
rt
w~.
tv
1..0"
L'
("1
LA
-.l
"
";J'
".
~ i...l..:>.I J .0.:9..10..0 i~ ~ wj
.,t..,...!1
93
V"YJ 4
,,",,~I
~ L:.) ~ ~:L_n ......j)L...:,..)'\ uh tSl.; ~lA 0-> ~i ~lA ......j\.j -u)tJ [35]
i...l..:>.IJ .0.:9..1 ~ 2-jii _)'J
t..:.hl l~! ~LbJ\ ~JI.; V"~ 0-=-:'J
..L...c:..u ~ ~~J ~I 0-=-:' ......j)L...:,..),1 u,.... ~)~ liA uL.$ L.J "'"""~
t-4=)' 4-i 4
Jo'..IL.:a......
"" ul~
4.i.o
U~JL...... ......j\.j ~lAJ 1$\'; ~LA ~ 0-> iJ! ..l..:>.IJ -jS..i [36]
~1.;J1 ~Jlj ~lj......j!.J ~LA c..:.t....., -u-j J .. LbJ1 J ~L,JI ~J\j 0..0.u o';:'.,...Jl
.,i
<.j;J JJ'..,J, .j. [.,.;-JI J.,JoJI ,,.Lh...YIJ [J11 u-.u.J1 4-Co1 .....,t...
).l...Jt..,. L.,.t....... 4.i.o......j!.J ~LA ~ uh r.,.t....... tS1j ~LA ~Y'J W!.J ......jlLll
C;-:')
':flj
.~yJI .L.1.It...,.
~L:.
-;2-;
uM
u;':""'l!lj
~.J..9l...o ~ ~~t..,..0.:9..1uJ~J
o.i'..iA.. ,-;-,.;:ii..,
'
1 cL..oJI 0...):.1
-' L.;, 1....1-'
. "
w'LS W"'I
~y.., ~
\I u<>.,..J1 <.:...,... ~
yUJl U<>.><- u- 4J~ L. :';'J yUJl U<>.><- J~-'e- ..,.; 4, ~L.; [39]
1. 1~
.1 . L.;
'-,','>
[J.,JI .!l..l.; '-.i..b:... 0< yUJl U<>.><- ~ uLS W t "'" L. ..,.k ci'L.;.J1 J
=J
~L.;
Suhayl I (2000)
c l' ~ t 1
ft: 1
f 1, 't
f <. 1
r'l'i.
'::, ~'i..
';; tf 'i
f
I'i..t;n ~'r~, -"'<"i
lA'
L. tl'}:'~~~
t:
d~'i.. ~ h t\ 'i.. b ~ ~ ~r
~: f:: ~ t;, it
~ it, t 't.r.:t.~ 1;' 1'i.. ~ ~ 'i..1' f f <::" \ ' f,,, t Co ~ ~ 'hft ~ 'h l .'I 'i.. ~~ 1'io ~'~ ~ ~ ~b 1-1
"':::: . c, S : '" t ';; ,1, 'I ~
c <. ~ ,'L ~ <.-:- .,. .,--<
~,' -<,L'r[ V"(;: t'i..
'_.
- , ' -I':. -: b r . t 'I;;":
<-
'h1' c.-'l
";t ft ~
'1'
~: ~- "
1- E:;::- .:... c' :[
Ii";"
't
-t
'i.. [ ,
f" - ~ 'r
r1
~
l
E
c'
L,.
'i:.-
b c,
s:'f r;:
[<;
"'
t~ L. 'l.;-,~
C ~ ~ ';-:} ~
~~
'i
~~
\'
'L
"-,
l-
~
l- - [:
,,,
't,
t -"'
\0,.
........
L..
'1:'" ........
........
'f
~.
171e 1heory
0/ /he
95
J"""
u<>~I
J-,,"", c,. ~-= L ~ [J~I dli .J< j:.WI ~I dli J-",", J..o L:.i [47]
~ JyJl o,jlc.! ~y 0Lu. L:.....LA
.dJj
"'J
. [J~I dli.J< ~I ~I
;;: -.:;,.:;,.." 11 ~I ~ '-:-'--,"",,=,U uo'>.r--J1 ~J..OL..;,;.)~WJ) 01-i [49]
[~ W ~j>-ll ~w ~ ~ ~I L "'-:;IJ US -l...J1 ~w ~
~u
u.:-, -
.."
II
'"
MsJl
c,. ~ J r:"" ...:.Ji ~ j:.WI dJ.;J1 c,. ~ ~ .ill, '" LWI J [50]
<J.L. c,. [-""" J [.lOA l] / / ...:.J~ I <J.L. ~ [ ... ] L...:.Ji ~ [J~I dli
",,->, u~ [J~I dli c,. .L,...:.Ji ",,->, ~ iJY"' .L i'+"- ",,->, F'
"'J [J~I dli c,. .LlI <J.L..J< j:.WI c,. F' <J.L. cl-)~ i'+"- .L
,.,-" _.- 'I <J.L. ~ i..J"'
"WI L>-"
.
~ \-"""'"""'
L..;L- ~
-.."
~
'~ ~L,.
<-..;.1..;-A--"
. ,.-.~
'+--'
.L .
r- ~
...:.Ji
U'" Y
~.1
US
"I
V:!-"-'
U'" Y
Suh:lyI I (2(0:))
96
R. Puig
Th~
97
APPENDIX II
,;"' ,+
.t
2;:
15
16
"
19
2U
21
22
23
24
"
2O
So.duyl I (2(0))
;16
;27
;39
;5U
;01
;12
-""
14 5
146
14e
! 4H
! 49
50
;23
;34
1;44
;54
JJ
.+ 1
+:
.+:
+:
'2 +:
;2U + .
;2' .+;
';'0
53
54
"
34 +1
33 + 1
31
29
27
24 (- I)
21 (- I)
IH
(+ I)
IU
)0
'""
UU
+ 1
4> +,
: 7H
179
180
18 1
I H2
183
I H4
H5
i .0
,
..
, HH
:
"'
3; 16
05
53(+1)
I (+ I)
28
15
02
49
36
23 + 1
IU + 1
)0 + 1
42
, . (+ I)
14 (- I)
98
R. Puig
Bibliography
Abdulrahman, M . (1996a): "Ibn al -Ha'im's Zij did have Numerical Tables - (In
Arabic, with a summary in English). In : J. Casullcras and J. Sams6 (cds.),
From Baghdad 10 Barcelona. Smdies in the Islamic Exact Sciences in Honour
of Prof Juan Vernel, Barcelona , vol. 1, 365-381.
Abdulrahman , M . (1996b) : I-Jisab o(wdl oJ-ktJwdkib ft-l-Zij af-shl1miljrtohdhfb alkamif /i -Ibn al-RaqqlIm, doclOral dissenation, unpublished, University of
Barcelona (September 1996),
Calvo , E. (1998): "Astronomical Theories Related lathe Sun in Ibn al -Ha ' im's 01ZI} al-Kt1milJf-l-Ttfatrm". Zeilschriftfiir Geschichte der Arabisch- Islamischen
Wissellschaften, 12,51 - 111.
Chabas, J. ; Goldstein, B. R. (1994) : "Andalusian Ast ronomy : al-ZIj al-Muqtabis
of Ibn al Kammad -, Archive lor the History 01 Exact Sciences, 48 , 141.
Kennedy , E. S. ( 1983): Smdies in Islamic Exact Sciences, Beirut.
Kennedy. E. S. (1997) : "The Astronomical Tables of Ibn al Raqqam a Scientist of
Granada , ZeilSchriflliir Geschicllle der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften,
11 , 35 72 .
Lorch, R. (1975): "The Astronomy of J:abir ibn An~" , Cellfaurus, 19,85 -107.
Reprinted in Lorch ( 1995a) item VI.
Lorch, R. (1995a): Arabic Mathematical Sciellces, Variorum, Aldershot
Lorch , R. ( 1995b): "1libir ibn An~ and the Establishment of Trigonometry in the
West ". In : R. Lorch, (1995a), item VIII.
Mancha, J. L. (1998): "The Provem;:al Version of Levi ben Gerson 's Tables fo r
Eclipses " , Archives Intemationales d' Histoire des Sciences, 48,269-352.
Mestres, A. ( 1996): "Maghrihi Astronomy in the 13th Century : a Description of
Manuscript Hyderabad Andra Pradesh State Library 298 ". In: J. Casulleras and
J. Sams6 (cds.) , From Baghdad 10 BarcelOlla. Studies ill the Islamic Exact
Scien ces in Honour 01 Prof. Juan Verner, Barcelona, vol. I, 383443 .
Neugebauer, O. (1969) : The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, New York .
Pedersen, O . (1974): A Survey 01 the Almagest , Odense .
Puig, R. (1992): "Le calcul de la longitude de la lune dans Ie zlj d' ibn al -Ha'im,
V Simposio imernacional de HiSloria de La Ciencia Arahe, Granada, 1992,
unpubl ished.
Salam, H.; Kennedy, E.S. (1967) : "Solar and Lunar Tables in Early Islamic
Astronomy " ,Journal olthe American Oriemal Society , 87,492497 . Reprinted
in: E.5 . Kennedy, (1983) 109- 113.
Saliba, G. (1994): "Arabic Planetary Theories after the Eleventh Century AD". In:
Tht Theory
of the Moon
in
t~
99
Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science, vol. I, New York and London,
58-128.
Sal iba, G. (1 999): "Critiques of Ptolemaic Astronomy in Islamic Spain", AI-
Qan!ara, 3-25.
Sams6 , J. (1980): "Notas sobre la trigonometria esferica de Ibn MuC~", Awrdq,
3,60-68. Reprinted in: J. Sams6, (1994) item VIII .
Sams6, J. (1992): Las ciencias de los antiguas en al-Andalus, Madrid.
Sams6, J. (1994): Islamic Astronomy and Medieval Spain , Variorum, Aldershot .
Sams6, J.; Millis, E. (1994): - Ibn al-Banna ', Ibn Js~aq and Ibn al-Zarqal!uh's
Solar Theory-. In : J. Sams6 (1994), item X.
Sams6, J. ; Mi llas, E. (1998): "The Computation ofPlanelary Longitudes in theZlJ
of Ibn al -Banna'\ Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 8,259-286.
Toomer, GJ. (1969): "The Solar Theory of az-Zarqa l: A History of Errors",
Centaurus, 14,306-366.
Toomer, G.J. (1984): Plolemy's Almagest, London 1984.
Toomer. G.1. (1987): "The Solar Theory of az-Zarqal: An Epilogue" . In: D.A .
King and G. Saliba (eds.), From De/erenr to Equanr. A Volume ofSlUdies in the
History of Science in the Ancient and Medieval Near East in Honor of E.S.
Kennedy. New York, 513519.
Verne! , J. ( 1952): Cantribucion al eSlUdio de fa labor astronomica de Ibn al
Bal/nd ', Tetuan .