Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The acquisition of immunity to a disease that a patient has already encountered has been
documented for many centuries. Arguably some of the earliest work in the field that has now become
known as immunology was performed in the period around 1714-1717. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu,
Emanuel Timoni and James Pylarini pioneered a smallpox inoculation, a course of action
unparalleled in medical advance up to that point. Variolation, as it was known, used live smallpox
virus in the liquid taken from a smallpox blister in a mild case of the disease and carried in a nutshell
(1). In 1798 the first smallpox vaccination was more notably demonstrated by Edward Jenner. This
was performed by inoculating a boy with the fluid from a cowpox pustule giving him immunity to the
very similar but much more serious disease smallpox (2, 3).
The earliest reference to antibodies came from Emil von Behring and Shibasabura Kitasato in 1890.
In a landmark publication they showed that the transfer of serum from animals immunised against
diptheria to animals suffering from it could cure the infected animals (4). The potential for treatment
in humans was immediately apparent and Behring was later awarded the Nobel Prize for this work in
1901.
In 1900 Paul Ehrlich, who is regarded as one of the fathers of modern immunology, proposed the
side-chain theory, where he hypothesised that side chain receptors on cells bind to a given
pathogen. He was the first to propose a model for an antibody molecule in which the antibody was
branched and consisted of multiple sites for binding to foreign material, known as antigen, and for
the activation of the complement pathway (5). This model agreed with the lock and key hypothesis
for enzymes proposed by Emil Fischer (6, 7) and still in general terms holds true today.
Astrid Fagraeus in 1948 described that plasma B cells are specifically involved in antibody
generation and by 1957 Frank Burnet and David Talmage had developed the clonal selection theory
(8). This stated that a lymphocyte makes a single specific antibody molecule that is determined
before it encounters an antigen, which was in contrast to the instructive theory developed by Linus
Pauling in 1940 where the antigen acted as a template for the antibody (9).
By 1959 Gerald Edelman and Rodney Porter independently published the molecular structure of
antibodies (10, 11), for which they were later jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in 1972. The first
atomic resolution structure of an antibody fragment was published in 1973 (12) and this was quickly
followed by the invention of monoclonal antibodies in 1975 by Georges Khler and Csar Milstein
(13) signalling the start of the modern era of antibody research and discovery.
Antibody structure >>
<< Antibody overview
References
1.
Case, C.L., and Chung, K.T. (1997). Montagu and Jenner: The Campaign Against Smallpox.
SIM News 47, 5860.
2.
Jenner, E. An Inquiry Into the Causes and Effects of the Variol Vaccin, Or Cow-Pox.
3.
Riedel, S. (2005). Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Proc (Bayl
Univ Med Cent) 18, 2125.
4.
Behring, E., and Kitasato, S. (1890). Uber das Zustandekommen Der Diphtherie- Immunitat
Und der Tetanus-Immunitat Bei Thieren. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 49, 11131114.
5.
Davies, D.R., and Chacko, S. (1993). Antibody structure. Acc. Chem. Res. 26, 421427.
6.
Fischer, E. (1894). Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme. Berichte Der
Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 27, 29852993.
7.
Lemieux, R.U., and Spohr, U. (1994). How Emil Fischer was led to the lock and key concept
for enzyme specificity. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 50, 120.
8.
Edelman, G.M. (1959). Dissociation of -globulin. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 31553156.
9.
Burnet, F.M. (1957). A modification of Jernes theory of antibody production using the
concept of clonal selection. The Australian Journal of Science 20, 6769.
10.
Pauling, L. (1940). A Theory of the Structure and Process of Formation of Antibodies. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 62, 26432657.
11.
Porter, R.R. (1959). The hydrolysis of rabbit y-globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain.
Biochem. J. 73, 119126.
12.
Inbar, D., Hochman, J., and Givol, D. (1972). Localization of antibody-combining sites within
the variable portions of heavy and light chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 26592662.
13.
Khler, G., and Milstein, C. (1975). Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of
predefined specificity. Nature 256, 495497.
Akuisisi kekebalan terhadap penyakit yang pasien telah mengalami telah didokumentasikan selama
berabad-abad. Boleh dibilang beberapa pekerjaan awal di bidang yang sekarang telah menjadi
dikenal sebagai imunologi dilakukan pada periode 1714-1717 sekitar. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu,
Emanuel Timoni dan James Pylarini memelopori inokulasi cacar, suatu tindakan yang tak tertandingi
di muka medis sampai saat itu. Variolation, seperti yang diketahui, digunakan virus cacar hidup
dalam cairan yang diambil dari blister cacar dalam kasus ringan penyakit dan dibawa dalam
Singkatnya (1). Pada tahun 1798 vaksinasi cacar pertama lebih terutama ditunjukkan oleh Edward
Jenner. Hal ini dilakukan dengan menginokulasikan anak dengan cairan dari bintil cacar sapi
memberinya kekebalan terhadap sangat mirip tapi jauh lebih serius penyakit cacar (2, 3).
Referensi paling awal untuk antibodi berasal dari Emil von Behring dan Kitasato Shibasabura pada
tahun 1890. Dalam publikasi tengara mereka menunjukkan bahwa transfer serum dari hewan
diimunisasi diptheria untuk hewan yang menderita itu bisa menyembuhkan hewan yang terinfeksi
(4). Potensi untuk pengobatan pada manusia adalah segera jelas dan Behring kemudian
dianugerahi Hadiah Nobel untuk pekerjaan ini pada tahun 1901.
Pada tahun 1900 Paul Ehrlich, yang dianggap sebagai salah satu bapak imunologi modern,
mengajukan teori sisi-rantai, di mana ia hipotesis bahwa rantai samping reseptor pada sel mengikat
ke patogen tertentu. Dia adalah orang pertama yang mengusulkan model untuk sebuah molekul
antibodi yang antibodi itu bercabang dan terdiri dari beberapa situs untuk mengikat bahan asing,
yang dikenal sebagai antigen, dan untuk aktivasi jalur komplemen (5). Model ini setuju dengan 'kunci
dan kunci' hipotesis untuk enzim yang diusulkan oleh Emil Fischer (6, 7) dan masih secara umum
berlaku saat ini.
Astrid Fagraeus pada tahun 1948 dijelaskan bahwa sel plasma B secara khusus terlibat dalam
generasi antibodi dan oleh 1957 Frank Burnet dan David Talmage telah mengembangkan teori
seleksi klonal (8). Hal ini menyatakan bahwa limfosit yang membuat molekul antibodi spesifik
tunggal yang ditentukan sebelum bertemu antigen, yang berbeda dengan teori instruktif yang
dikembangkan oleh Linus Pauling pada tahun 1940 di mana antigen bertindak sebagai template
untuk antibodi (9).
Pada tahun 1959 Gerald Edelman dan Rodney Porter independen menerbitkan struktur molekul
antibodi (10, 11), yang mereka kemudian bersama-sama dianugerahi Hadiah Nobel pada tahun
1972. Struktur resolusi pertama atom fragmen antibodi diterbitkan pada tahun 1973 (12) dan ini
segera diikuti oleh penemuan antibodi monoklonal pada tahun 1975 oleh Georges Khler dan Csar
Milstein (13) menandakan dimulainya era modern penelitian antibodi dan penemuan.
Antibody Structure
In simplistic terms antibodies perform two main functions in different regions of their structure. While
one part of the antibody, the antigen binding fragment (Fab), recognises the antigen, the other part
of the antibody, known as the crystallisable fragment (Fc), interacts with other elements of the
immune system, such as phagocytes or components of the complement pathway, to promote
removal of the antigen.
In mammals, antibodies are classified into five main classes or isotypes IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and
IgM. They are classed according to the heavy chain they contain alpha, delta, epsilon, gamma or
mu respectively. These differ in the sequence and number of constant domains, hinge structure and
the valency of the antibody. Antibody light chains fall into two classes in mammals, kappa and
lambda, with kappa light chains being the more common of the two. Although these are relatively
dissimilar in protein sequence they share a similar structure and function.
effector function. In mice the IgG class is divided into five sub-classes (IgG1, IgG2A, IgG2B, IgG2C
and IgG3) and in rat there are four (IgG1, IgG2A, IgG2B, IgG2C). Sub-class nomenclature has
arisen independently for each species and so there is no general relationship between the subclasses from each species.
IgM accounts for 5-10% of the immunoglobulin pool and is the predominant antibody in the primary
immune response (1). Unlike IgG, IgM does not contain a hinge region but does contain an
additional constant domain and an 18 amino acid tailpiece at the carboxy terminus, which contains a
cysteine and is involved in multimerisation of the molecule. It is classically represented as a
pentamer of the basic four chain structure held together by a J chain but can also exist in a
hexameric form without the J chain (2) and as a monomer on the surface of B-cells. Soluble IgM is in
excess of 1 MDa and thus due to its size is largely confined to the intravascular pool.
IgA represents approximately 5-15% of the antibody pool and either exists as a monomer or a dimer
(1). IgA is the predominant antibody in mucous secretions such as saliva, tears, milk and intestinal
juice. Like IgM, the multimeric form of IgA contains a tail piece at the carboxy terminus and is held
together by the J chain. The secretory component is a 75 kDa polypeptide chain synthesised by
epithelial cells of the gut for linkage to the dimeric form of IgA. As the name implies the secretory
component facilitates IgA transport across epithelial cells but is also involved in protecting IgA
secreted into the lumen of the gut from proteolytic digestion.
IgD accounts for less than 1% of the total plasma immunoglobulin but is present in large quantities
on the membrane of B-cells (1). IgD has the same basic structure as IgG but with an extended hinge
region which is very susceptible to proteolytic digestion. The precise function of this class of antibody
is still unknown.
IgE is very scarce in the serum but is found on the basophils and mast-cells of all individuals (1). In a
similar manner to IgM, IgE has two additional constant domains in place of the hinge region. This
class may play a role in immunity to parasites but is more commonly associated with type I
immediate hypersensitivity, where an IgE immune response occurs to innocuous environmental
antigens such as pollen and peanuts.
Fc receptors
Fc receptors (FcRs) are key immune regulatory receptors connecting the antibody mediated
(humoral) immune response to cellular effector functions. Receptors for all classes of
immunoglobulins have been identified, including FcR (IgG), FcRI (IgE), FcRI (IgA), FcR (IgM)
and FcR (IgD). There are three classes of receptors for human IgG found on leukocytes: CD64
(FcRI), CD32 (FcRIIa, FcRIIb and FcRIIc) and CD16 (FcRIIIa and FcRIIIb). FcRI is classed
as a high affinity receptor (nanomolar range KD) while FcRII and FcRIII are low to intermediate
affinity (micromolar range KD) (1).
In antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), FcvRs on the surface of effector cells (natural
killer cells, macrophages, monocytes and eosinophils) bind to the Fc region of an IgG which itself is
bound to a target cell. Upon binding a signalling pathway is triggered which results in the secretion of
various substances, such as lytic enzymes, perforin, granzymes and tumour necrosis factor, which
mediate in the destruction of the target cell. The level of ADCC effector function various for human
IgG subtypes. Although this is dependent on the allotype and specific FcvR in simple terms ADCC
effector function is high for human IgG1 and IgG3, and low for IgG2 and IgG4. As shown in the
model below FcRs bind to IgG asymmetrically across the hinge and upper CH2 region. Knowledge
of the binding site has resulted in engineering efforts to modulate IgG effector functions see Fc
engineering section for more detail.
below. FcRn-mediated recycling results in IgG1, 2 and 4 having the longest serum half-life of all
proteins, at approximately 21 days. Although IgG3 binds FcRn recycling of this sub-class is less
efficient due to a single amino acid change at the binding site (7), resulting in a half-life of only 7
days.
Protein A and G
Although not a function of antibodies per se, two bacterial proteins, Protein A and Protein G, bind to
the Fc region of some antibodies. Protein A is a 56 kDa surface protein originally found in the cell
wall of Staphylococcus aureus and Protein G is a 65 kDa protein from Streptococcal bacteria. In a
similar manner to FcRn, protein A and G bind at the interface between the CH2 and CH3 domains,
as depicted in the image below. Although overlapping the three epitopes are distinct and this results
in differential binding of Protein A and G to different isotypes, subtypes and species of
immunoglobulin. A summary table of the binding affinities of these proteins to different antibodies can
be found here. Due to their unique ability to bind pH dependently with high affinity to IgG in
particular, these proteins have become widely used for the purpose of purifying antibodies.
Figure. A model of human IgG1 in complex with both Protein A and Protein A.
The upper images show space-filled models and the lower images are ribbon
representations. The antibody heavy and light chains are shown in blue and green
respectively, glycosylation in orange, a Protein A fragment in purple and a Protein G
fragment in yellow. Model produced from PDB accession numbers 1IGY, 1L6X and 1FCC.
Antibodies as Tools
Due to their high specificity and selectivity antibodies have always had the potential to be of great
use as biochemical tools for a range of applications including selection, identification, purification
and as therapeutics. Broadly speaking antibodies are categorised into two groups (polyclonal or
monoclonal) and are utilised in three main areas (research, diagnostics and therapeutics).
Research
Antibodies are vital tools in many of the laboratory techniques that are used to answer basic
research questions. Due to their outstanding specificity they make exquisite tools that allow
researchers to identify molecules that cannot be seen by the naked eye and thus enable conclusions
to be drawn about the target molecule and pathway of interest. Routine procedures such as western
blot, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry (IHC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and
many others all rely antibodies.
Diagnostics
Antibodies have become a critical component of many diagnostic assays. Uses included but are not
limited to the detection of infections, recognition of allergies and the measurement of hormones and
other biological markers in blood.
Therapeutics
The ability of antibodies to bind an almost unlimited number of target proteins with high specificity
always meant they were destined to be used as therapeutics. As early as 1900 Paul Ehrlich coined
the term magic bullets in reference to antibodies. Following the ground breaking publication on the
production of monoclonal antibodies (1) the early success of the first therapeutic antibody OKT3
(muromonab) as a treatment for transplant rejection was not immediately followed by the wave of
approvals that many anticipated. However, since the mid to late 1990s therapeutic antibodies have
become one of the fastest growing classes of therapeutics in the biological drugs market (2). Some
of the work that led to this breakthrough will be discussed in more detail in the antibody engineering
section.