Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Biomaterials
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biomaterials
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 10 September 2014
Accepted 20 December 2014
Available online
Physical topographic cues from various substrata have been shown to exert profound effects on the
growth and differentiation of stem cells due to their niche-mimicking features. However, the biological
function of different topographic materials utilized as bio-scaffolds in vivo have not been rigorously
characterized. This study investigated the divergent differentiation pathways of mesenchymal stem cells
(MSCs) and neo-tissue formation trigged by aligned and randomly-oriented brous scaffolds, both
in vitro and in vivo. The aligned group was observed to form more mature tendon-like tissue in the
Achilles tendon injury model, as evidenced by histological scoring and collagen I immunohistochemical
staining data. In contrast, the randomly-oriented group exhibited much chondrogenesis and subsequent
bone tissue formation through ossication. Additionally, X-ray imaging and osteocalcin immunohistochemical staining also demonstrated that osteogenesis in vivo is driven by randomly oriented topography. Furthermore, MSCs on the aligned substrate exhibited tenocyte-like morphology and enhanced
tenogenic differentiation compared to cells grown on randomly-oriented scaffold. qRT-PCR analysis of
osteogenic marker genes and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining demonstrated that MSCs cultured on
randomly-oriented ber scaffolds displayed enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with cells
cultured on aligned ber scaffolds. Finally, it was demonstrated that cytoskeletal tension release abrogated the divergent differentiation pathways on different substrate topography. Collectively, these
ndings illustrate the relationship between topographic cues of the scaffold and their inductive role in
tissue regeneration; thus providing an insight into future development of smart functionalized bioscaffold design and its application in tissue engineering.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Bio-scaffold topography
Tissue engineering
Tendon regeneration
Bone formation
Mesenchymal stem cells
1. Introduction
by
* Corresponding author. Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, School of
Medicine, Zhejiang University, 866 Yu Hang Tang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Tel./fax: 86 571 88208262.
E-mail address: hwoy@zju.edu.cn (H.-W. Ouyang).
1
These authors contribute equally to this work.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.027
0142-9612/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
174
The scaffold samples were sputter-coated with gold, and then their structure
was observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S3000N) at an
accelerating voltage of 15 kV. After the micrographs were obtained, image analysis
software (Image-Pro Plus) was used to measure the average diameter of the nanobers (n 3). For each sample, an average of 50 bers were counted.
175
3. Results
3.1. Fabrication and morphological characterization of scaffolds
Electrospinning is used to fabricate aligned brous scaffolds, as
well as randomly-oriented brous membranes with similar ber
diameters, which served as controls. The surface topography of
both aligned and randomly-oriented brous scaffolds was examined using SEM (Fig. 1A and B). Majority of the bers in the aligned
scaffolds were parallel to each other and formed angles from 0 to
10 with respect to the horizontal axis, while the randomlyoriented nanober scaffold exhibited nearly equal distributions at
all angles.
3.2. The effects of aligned and randomly-oriented scaffolds on neotissue formation
3.2.1. Histology of repaired tendons
After 2 weeks post-surgery, histological analysis showed that
there was a greater number of cells exhibiting spindle-shaped
morphology on the aligned scaffolds (Fig. 1C). While, the cell
morphology in the randomly-oriented groups displayed relatively
round shapes (Fig. 1D). Masson trichrome staining showed that the
tissue matrix was denser in the aligned versus randomly-oriented
scaffold group, which means that more collagen bers have been
deposited compared to the control group (Fig. 1 E and F). Collagen I
immunohistochemical staining showed organized collagen deposition on the aligned bers (Fig. 1 G and H), while the randomlyoriented scaffolds were lled with loose, disarranged matrix.
At 4 weeks post-surgery, the histological results showed that the
aligned scaffold-induced spindle-shaped cells and tendon-like tissue formation in vivo, as evidenced by the Masson trichrome
staining. In addition, the aligned scaffold implantation showed
improved tendon repair quality was compared to the histology of
blank group without scaffold implantation, which displayed limited
tissue regeneration (Supplementary Fig.S1). The collagen I immunohistochemical staining reveals enhanced collagen I matrix production and arrangement in the aligned scaffold group (Fig. 2A).
Histology scoring also conrmed the histological results that the
quality of repaired tendons in the aligned scaffold group were
signicantly better than the control group (p < 0.05, Fig. 2E),
particularly in ber structure, ber arrangement and nuclei shape
aspects. The ultrastructural morphology based on TEM imaging
from transection revealed larger bril formation within the aligned
scaffold, as compared to the thin brils observed within the
randomly-oriented scaffold (Fig. 2B). The average diameter of
collagen brils in the aligned group was 52.88 nm (373 bers),
which was 121.4% of the random group (43.57 nm, 266 bers) at 4
weeks post-implantation (Fig. 2D). Analysis of the distribution of
bril diameters within the two groups (Fig. 2C) revealed that the
ATs in the aligned scaffold treatment group formed signicantly
larger brils compared to ATs in the random group at 4 weeks postimplantation. The collagen content assay demonstrated that the
aligned group had signicantly more collagen deposition,
compared to the random group (0.281 0.039 mg/mg vs.
0.198 0.072 mg/mg, p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig.S2).
We also utilized polarized light microscopy to compare the
collagen ber maturation levels within the two groups. The aligned
scaffold group exhibited more continuous collagen bers at the
repair site (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the expression of tendon-specic
marker scleraxis (Scx) was signicantly higher in the aligned versus
randomly-oriented group at 2 weeks and 8 weeks post-surgery
(Fig. 3A). The other teno-lineage marker gene tenomodulin
(Tnmd) also displayed signicantly higher levels in the aligned
scaffold group, thus indicating that aligned topographic cues have
176
Fig. 1. (A) and (B) SEM micrographs (1000 ) of electrospun PLLA with aligned (A) and randomly-oriented (B) brous scaffold surface topography. Scale bars, 50 mm. Histological
results of repaired rat Achilles tendon in section of aligned group (upper panel) and randomly-oriented group (lower panel) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (C) and (D) are typical
hematoxylin and eosin staining, (E) and (F) are Masson trichrome staining, (G) and (H) are immunohistochemical staining of collagen type I, respectively. Arrows indicated the
remaining brous scaffolds. Scale bars, 50 mm, 100 mm (inset).
Fig. 2. Repaired rat Achilles tendon at 4 weeks post-surgery. (A) Typical hematoxylin and eosin staining, Masson trichrome staining, immunohistochemical staining of collagen type
I in repaired zones within sections of aligned group (upper panel) and randomly-oriented group (lower panel). (B) Transmission Electron Microscopy images show ultrastructure of
repaired tendons after 4 weeks post-surgery. (C) Histogram and distribution of collagen bril diameters of aligned group (upper panel) and randomly-oriented group (lower panel).
(D) Collagen bril diameters. Data are mean SD, n 3. (E) The overall histology score is the sum of six parameters (ber structure, ber arrangement, rounding of nuclei,
inammation, vascularity, cell population). Statistically signicant at *p < 0.05. Scale bars, 100 mm (HE and Masson stained images), 200 mm (immunohistochemical staining of
collagen type I, left images), 50 mm (immunohistochemical staining of collagen type I, right images).
177
Fig. 3. (A) Gene expression levels of tendon-related markers assessed by quantitative PCR at 2, 4 and 8 months post-surgery. (B) Polarized microscopy images of aligned group
(upper panel) and randomly-oriented group (lower panel) at 2, 4 and 8 months post-surgery. Statistically signicant at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars, 100 mm.
178
Fig. 4. (A) Safranin O staining images of aligned group (upper panel) and randomly-oriented group (lower panel) at 4 and 8 months post-surgery. (B) Gene expression levels of
chondrogenic (aggrecan, Sox9, collagen type II) and osteogenic markers (Bmp4, Ocn, Runx2) assessed by quantitative PCR at 2, 4 and 8 months post-surgery. Statistically signicant at
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars, 200 mm (100X), 100 mm (200X).
179
Fig. 5. (A) X-ray images of repaired tendons of mice at 8 weeks post-transplantation and evaluation of the extent of ossication (n 5). (B) The distribution and medians of area,
max density, sum density and integrated optical density of ectopic bone in aligned group (dot) and randomly-oriented group (square). Arrows depict exactly the locations of the
ectopic bone formation. Statistically signicant at *p < 0.05.
180
Fig. 6. Immunohistochemical staining of collagen type X and osteocalcin in repaired zones within sections of aligned group and randomly-oriented group after 4 weeks and 8
weeks post-surgery. Scale bars, 100 mm (200X), 50 mm (400X).
4. Discussion
This study is based on our previous report on alignmentinduced tenogenesis of tendon stem cells, as well as osteogenesis being enhanced by randomly-aligned ber scaffolds [7].
181
Fig. 8. (A) and (B) show MSCs cultured on the aligned and randomly-oriented nanobrous scaffolds respectively. Scale bars, 100 mm. Quantitative data of cell size (C) and radius ratio
(D) on different substrates. Statistically signicant at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
182
Fig. 9. (A) Immunouorescence staining of vinculin and F-actin in MSCs cultured on the aligned and randomly-oriented nanobrous scaffolds with or without Y-27632 for 3 days,
with the right column being the merged images with DAPI staining. Scale bars, 20 mm. (B) F-actin staining in MSCs cultured on the aligned and randomly-oriented nanobrous
scaffolds, with or without exposure to cyto D for 48 h, with the right column being the merged images with DAPI staining. Scale bars, 20 mm. Quantitative PCR analysis of tenogenic
(C) and osteogenic-specic gene (D) expression of MSCs seeded on different scaffolds with or without Y-27632 and cyto D on day 3. Gene expression levels are normalized to the
housekeeping gene, Gapdh. n 5. Statistically signicant at *p < 0.05.
183
Fig. 10. Immunouorescence staining of SCX and F-actin in MSCs cultured on the aligned and randomly-oriented nanobrous scaffolds with or without exposure to Y-27632 for 3
days, with the right column being the merged images with DAPI staining. Scale bars, 20 mm.
between nanometer scale and micrometer scale architecture inuence cell behavior signicantly in terms of proliferation and
differentiation [27e29]. The diameters of around 700 nm and
1000 nm bers used in this study are belongs to similar micro-scale
and would not cause signicant effect on cell activities. Further
comparison studies of topography need to be carried out on
nanometer scale bers if they can be manufactured with sophisticate control of diameters and alignment. Based on the aforementioned studies, elongated morphology and alignment orientation is
always associated with tenogenic differentiation, whereas spread
cell shape and random orientation is associated with osteogenesis
[6]. Since the cytoskeleton is known to play important roles in
maintaining cell morphology, this study demonstrated that cyto D
and Y-27632 treatment caused signicant cell morphological
changes followed by loss of lineage commitment. Divergent patterns of MSC adhesion on different substrate topography reected
varying cytoskeletal tension, as focal adhesions form the anchor
points of the cytoskeleton [30]. The ber topography altered the
pattern of cellesubstrate interaction and such changes in cytoskeletal rearrangements will in turn lead to changes in intracellular
mechanotransductive pathways, such as demonstrated by changes
in the Rho A-ROCK pathway of stem cells in response to material
184
Fig. 11. ALP staining of MSCs cultured on the aligned and randomly-oriented nanobrous scaffolds with or without exposure to Y-27632 for 7 days, respectively. The middle column
shows MSC nuclei being stained with DAPI to quantify the cell number. The right columns are merged images of the left and middle images. Scale bars, 100 mm.
5. Conclusion
This study contributes to understanding of the biological effects
of physical cues from aligned and randomly-oriented nanobrous
scaffolds, not only on the aspect of cellular behavior, but also on
tissue formation in vivo. The aligned brous scaffold displays
promising results in tendon-like tissue regeneration at early repair
stage, while in the randomly-oriented brous scaffold group, we
observed the development of bone formation at the injury site. The
two topographically-different scaffolds not only support MSC
adhesion and spreading, but also induced tenogenesis and osteogenesis respectively, both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, we found
that this topography-induced lineage commitment is dependent on
cytoskeleton-mediated mechanotransduction. These ndings thus
provide vital information for the development of the nextgeneration of stem cell and bio-scaffold interfaces in future tissue
engineering applications.
(LR14H060001).
The
National
Key
Scientic
Program
(2012CB966604), the National High Technology Research and
Development
Program
of
China
(863
Program)
(No.2012AA020503). Sponsored by Regenerative Medicine in
Innovative Medical Subjects of Zhejiang Province. Medical and
health science and technology plan of Department of Health of
Zhejiang Province (2013RCA010). The Postdoctoral Foundation of
China (2014M561775, 2014M551759). The Technology Development project (CXZZ20130320172336579) from the Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality. We
are grateful to The Core Facilities of Zhejiang University School of
Medicine for technical assistance.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by NSFC grants (81330041, 81125014,
31271041, 81401781, 81201396, J1103603). The Project Supported
by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
References
[1] Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces
combine and control stem cells. Science 2009;324(5935):1673e7.
185
[20] O'Brien EJ, Frank CB, Shrive NGB, Hallgrimsson, Hart DA. Heterotopic mineralization (ossication or calcication) in tendinopathy or following surgical
tendon trauma. Int J Exp Pathol 2012;93(5):319e31.
[21] Bi Y, Ehirchiou D, Kilts TM, Inkson CA, Embree MC, Sonoyama W, et al.
Identication of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular
matrix in their niche. Nat Med 2007;13(10):1219e27.
[22] Pietschmann MF, Frankewycz B, Schmitz P, Docheva D, Sievers B, Jansson V,
et al. Comparison of tenocytes and mesenchymal stem cells seeded on
biodegradable scaffolds in a full-size tendon defect model. J Mater Sci Mater
Med 2013;24(1):211e20.
[23] Zhu J, Li J, Wang B, Zhang WJ, Zhou G, Cao Y, et al. The regulation of phenotype
of cultured tenocytes by microgrooved surface structure. Biomaterials
2010;31(27):6952e8.
[24] Sharma RI, Snedeker JG. Biochemical and biomechanical gradients for directed
bone marrow stromal cell differentiation toward tendon and bone. Biomaterials 2010;31(30):7695e704.
[25] Yin Z, Chen X, Zhu T, Hu JJ, Song HX, Shen WL, et al. The effect of decellularized matrices on human tendon stem/progenitor cell differentiation and
tendon repair. Acta Biomater 2013;9(12):9317e29.
[26] Tong WY, Shen W, Yeung CW, Zhao Y, Cheng SH, Chu PK, et al. Functional
replication of the tendon tissue microenvironment by a bioimprinted substrate and the support of tenocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.
Biomaterials 2012;33(31):7686e98.
[27] Tong HW, Wang M, Lu WW. Electrospinning and evaluation of PHBV-based
tissue engineering scaffolds with different bre diameters, surface topography
and compositions. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2012;23(6):779e806.
[28] Bashur CA, Shaffer RD, Dahlgren LA, Guelcher SA, Goldstein AS. Effect of ber
diameter and alignment of electrospun polyurethane meshes on mesenchymal progenitor cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15(9):2435e45.
[29] Hodgkinson T, Yuan XF, Bayat A. Electrospun silk broin ber diameter inuences in vitro dermal broblast behavior and promotes healing of ex vivo
wound models. J Tissue Eng 2014;5. 2041731414551661.
[30] McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell
2004;6(4):483e95.
[31] Nikukar H, Reid S, Tsimbouri MP, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Dalby MJ. Osteogenesis
of mesenchymal stem cells by nanoscale mechanotransduction. ACS Nano
2013;7(3):2758e67.
[32] Ker ED, Nain AS, Weiss LE, Wang J, Suhan J, Amon CH, et al. Bioprinting of
growth factors onto aligned sub-micron brous scaffolds for simultaneous
control of cell differentiation and alignment. Biomaterials 2011;32(32):
8097e107.
[33] Wang W, Deng D, Li J, Liu W. Elongated cell morphology and uniaxial mechanical stretch contribute to physical attributes of niche environment for
MSC tenogenic differentiation. Cell Biol Int 2013;37(7):755e60.
[34] Caliari SR, Harley BA. Composite growth factor supplementation strategies to
enhance tenocyte bioactivity in aligned collagen-GAG scaffolds. Tissue Eng
Part A 2013;19(9e10):1100e12.
[35] Cheng X, Tsao C, Sylvia VL, Cornet D, Nicolella DP, Bredbenner TL, et al.
Platelet-derived growth-factor-releasing aligned collagen-nanoparticle bers
promote the proliferation and tenogenic differentiation of adipose-derived
stem cells. Acta Biomater 2014;10(3):1360e9.