Last week, I briefly highlighted both the E-12 and the Higher Education Omnibus bills. As Chair of Higher Education and Workforce Development, I would like to elaborate on the bill that we put together, which was heard and passed in our committee and the full Finance committee this week. A few weeks ago, we learned that the Senate had given the Higher Education Division a target of $205 million from the $2 billion surplus. As you may recall the Governor had proposed $288 million and while we did not quite come up to his level, I believe our target represents a healthy investment into our postsecondary systems. In working through this target, our committee chose to approach with parity across the three buckets of Higher Education: the University of Minnesota, the MnSCU system and the State Grant Program. The University of Minnesota received approximately $85 million in increases. This money is divided up with $25 million going to the University Medical School and the remaining $60 million going to keep costs down for students. The Medical School appropriation is the result of work done over the interim by the Blue Ribbon Commission, a working group put together by the Governor to come up with strategies to get the School back to its elevated status. Before we presented the Omnibus bill on Tuesday, we had four esteemed doctors from the University come in to provide information on the critical and life-saving work they are doing. These doctors are working on curing not just treating some of the most difficult health challenges of our day.
This includes, but is not limited to, HIV/AIDS, Cancer
and Urology. The committee was awe-struck with the brilliance of the doctors and humbled by the fact that out of all the institutions in the world, they choose to practice at the University of Minnesota. In addition, associated with this investment is language consistent with the recommendations of the AAHRPP and the OLA report regarding human subject research. This language provides strong oversight and asks for specific reform details to accompany this proposed appropriation. You can find that language in Article 12 of the Higher Education Omnibus bill. I renew my pledge to demand the University take responsibility for past transgressions that have occurred within the Department of Psychiatry and will stay vigilant regarding the implementation of their response to this crisis. The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system also received approximately $85 million as an increase to their base budget. We structured this increase by appropriating $25 million to the initiative many of you may have read about free technical college for qualifying Minnesota students. This provision had been introduced in a broader concept (free two-year community and technical college for all students), but as the Chief Author worked through the policy, it was decided that we needed to be more targeted with our dollars. I am particularly fond of the mandated mentoring program that each participating student will be required to take part in. This is now a need-based approach that goes a long way in making postsecondary technical education possible for those who previously could not afford to go even with our generous State Grant Program.
The third traditional bucket of Minnesotas Higher
Education budget is the State Grant Program. When I took over as Chair in 2013, we made significant changes to the policy that allowed students to access more dollars. As we entered the 2015 Legislative Session, the Office of Higher Education notified us that within the account there was $75 million in unspent funds. This money was trapped as a result of the caps and limits that are placed on the funding formula. This Session, we took the approach of freeing this money by adjusting that formula so that these funds could be made available to all students. On top of this, we invested an additional $19 million into the program. Aside from these three pillars, the bill contains important provisions such as sexual assault policy on college campuses, student debt counseling, mandated disclosure to students of institutional outcomes prior to their enrollment, investments in Spinal Cord and Alzheimers research and also holds the policy and funding for my Earn While You Learn program. This bill passed out of our committee with a unanimous bipartisan vote on Tuesday and passed through Finance on Friday. Next week, the bill will be on the Senate floor for a full vote and then sent to conference committee, where we will do our best to find compromise with the House. I am optimistic about conference committee as I know and respect the House Chair, Representative Bud Nornes. However, I do want to let you know that we are significantly far apart in our budgets. To start, the House gave the University of Minnesota $0 and decided that the unspent $75 million in the State Grant Program should be raided to pay for a MnSCU increase essentially taking money from students to attend the College or University of their choice in order to pay for the operations and management of one system.
Omnibus Liquor Bill Sunday Sales Debate:
On Thursday, the Senate took up the Omnibus Liquor bill. In recent years, the debate over selling liquor on Sundays has come to the forefront of the discussion. I have heard from numerous constituents on both sides of this issue. While the Sunday Sales provision was not included in the bill as it entered the floor, it was offered by Senator Susan Kent as an amendment. This led to nearly an hour of debate amongst members, but was ultimately defeated. I am a strong proponent of allowing Sunday Sales and spoke on the Senate floor providing rationale.
Capitol Update Survey:
I have provided an attachment for you in the e-mail that gives an overview of the three different budget approaches taken by the Senate, House and Governor. In this weeks survey, I am asking your preference. Which direction do you support? If you do not agree with any, let me know why and what you would do differently in the comments section of the survey . In addition, the DFL Senate Media Team put together a fun tool that allows you to make some hypothetical budget decisions to see which approach you align with. You can do this for fun here.