Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ENERGY
PERCAMON
Renewable
c3
AND c4
POTENTIAL
IMPACT
ON ENVIRONMENT
SOURCES
AND THEIR
AND CLIMATE
DR. N. EL BASSAM
Institute of Crop Science
Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL)
Bundesallee 50, 38 I I6 Braunschweig. German)
Tel: +49 531 596605: Fax. +49 53 I 596365
Email: EIBassan@pf.fal.de
ABSTRACT
Careful selection of crop species. amoung other aspects, is very helpful in enhancing energy production b>
\<a! of increased biomass yields from agricultural land. A wide range of Cj and Cd plant species has been
tntroduced and investigated for their environmental and climatic impact. The results indicate already that
some perennial Cd crop species posses high yield potential, lower erosion-index, better CO* reduction rates
and need less fertilizer. water and chemicals. !:, 1998 Published by Elsevler Science Ltd. All rights reserved
KEYWORDS
Energy balance: photosynthetic pathways; biofuels
INTRODUCTION
Nearly all of the energy which we use today has been collected and stored by the process of photosynthesis.
The amount of carbon fixed each year by autotrophic plants. in the form of biomass, is roughly 200 billion
rons or approximately ten times the energy equivalent used yearly in the world. Of these 200 billion tons.
800 million are used to feed the human population, i.e. 0.4%.
The fundamental process of biomass accumulation within the context of energy is based on photosynthesis.
The green plant is the only organism able to absorb solar energy with the help of the green pigment
chlorophyll. With the aid of carbon dioxide and water, solar energy is converted into the chemical energy
of organic compounds (Fig. I). In addition to C. H. and 0, plants also incorporate N and S into organic
matter by means of light reactions.
The photosynthetic process also requires other adequate nutrients for optimum functioning. and an
adequate temperature in which to take place. The efficiency of photosynthesis, expressed as the ratio
between chemical energy fixed by plants and the energy contained in light rays falling on plants. is less
than 1%. A small increase in this efficiency would have spectacular effects in view of the scale of the
process involved. However. what has been defined as photosynthesis efficiency is actually the sum of the
individual effectivenesses of a large number of complex and related processes taking place both within the
plants and in their environment.
0960-1481/98/$-see
front matter C
PII: SO960-l481(98)00157-8
reserved
WREC
206
199X
If we summarize the solar energy which hits every hectare globally it averages out to be the amount found
at 40 latitude where every hectare receives 1.47 x lOI calories for total energy radiation (TER). If this
energy is completely converted into the chemical energq of carbohydrates we would expect a yield of more
than 2000 tons per hectare. But the photosynthetically acti\,e radiation (PAR) amounts to 43% of the total
solar radiation on the earths surface.
Solar
Radiation
Energy
602-tCaHuOa'=-6CO2t 6 H20t
carbon dioxide
water aIII~~~I
oygen
ENERGYt
ASH
glucose t
Heat
WREC
1998
207
PHOTOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYS
The two major pathways of photosynthesis are the C; pathway and the CJ pathway. A third. less common
pathway, is the CAM pathway. In the CJ pathway, the first product of photosynthesis is a j-carbon organic
acid (3-phosphoglyceric acid) while in the Ca the first products are 4-carbon organic acids (malate and
aspartate). In general the C3 assimilation pathway is adapted to operate at optimal rates under conditions of
low temperature (15-20C). The C3 species have at a given radiation level relatively lower rates of CO?
exchange than Cq species which are adapted to operate at optimal rates under conditions of higher
temperature (30-35C) and have comparatively higher rates of CO* exchange. Furthermore, CJ species
habe maximum rates of photosynthesis in the range of 70-100 mg COxidmVh with light saturation at 1.O1.J cal/cm2/min total radiation. while C3 species have maximum rates of photosynthesis in the range 1j-30
mg COz/dm2/h with light saturation at 0.2-0.6 cal/cmVmin.
WREC
208
1998
The Cl, Cd and CAM crops can be roughly classified into five groups (Table 1). based on the differences
between crop species in their photosynthetic pathways and the response of photosynthesis to radiation and
temperature.
CJ plant species tend to be more efficient in Mater utilization because they do not have to open their
stomata so much for inward diffusion of CO>. Thus transpiration is reduced. The corollary is that Ci
species are usually more efficient net photosynthesizers at lower temperatures than Cd species. Both
metabolic groups are capable of substantial climatic adaptation (Clayton and Renovize. 1986). ~4L~canthu.s
spp. and Spartina spp. are both CJ species and more efficient photosynthesizers than a wide variety of C;
grasses. This reflects the fact that there are possibilities for genetic selection of Cd plants with improved
cold tolerance. The Cd species may utilize nitrogen with greater efficiency.
intensity
C1
C;
C,
C4
0.2 - 0.6
0.3 - 0.8
I .o - I .4
20 - 30
40 - 50
70
I.O-
I.4
CAM
0.6 - 1.4
;;;;;.Ph?!::~
- Max.
net rate of
CO? exchange at
light saturation
(mg dm h)
100
70 - 100
20
- 50
- Temperature
respon. of photosyn
optimum temp.
operative temp.
- :trq$Y
yzyY;
- Water use
efficiency
(g/g)
- Crop species
15 - 20C
5 - 30C
25 - 30C
IO - 35OC
30 - 35C
15 -45C
20 - 30C
IO - 35T
25 - 35C
IO-45C
20 - 30 g
30 - 40 g
30 - 60 g
40 - 60 g
20 - 30 g
400 - 800
300
150-300
150-350
50 - 200
field mustard,
potato, oat.
flax, rape,
sugarbeet.
rye, wheat,
topinambur,
olive. barley,
lentil, linseed,
broom. poplar,
- 700
millet, maize.
groundnut. rice.
japanese
soybean. castor,
barnyard millet.
sweet sorghum.
sesame, tobacco,
grain sorghum.
fiber sorghum,
willow, bananas, maize, sugarcane.
aieman grass
Miscanthus spp.,
sunflower. kenaf.
switchgrass,
safflower,
Andropogen
Spartina spp.
sweet potato.
ischaeIIll,m
bamboo. cotton.
coconuI. cassava.
Eucalyprus spp.,
I
I,
sisal,
pineapple
WREC 1998
209
An estimate of the upper threshold for converting incident solar energy into biomass production for C; and
Cd species was made by Hall e/ al. (1993).
For C~plants:
??
energy efficiency
of converting
the effectively
0.60 = The about 60% energy stored in photosynthesis remaining after 40% is
consumed during dark respiration to sustain plant metabolic processes.
The 6.7% applies to Ca plants (plants where the first stable products of photosynthesis
compounds).
are 4-carbon
FOI- Cj plants. 2 additional losses occur: Cj plants lose about 30% of the already fixed CO2 during
photorespiration. and Cj plants become light-saturated at lower light intensities than Cd plants. so that Cj
plants are unable to utilize perhaps 30% of the light absorbed by photosynthetically active compounds.
For Cl plants: 6.7% x 0.70 x 0.70 = 3.3%
These figures can be now used to calculate the potential dry matter yield for each biomass crop. However.
the following information is also required:
-
The final biomass accumulation is then determined by the genetic structure of the genotype and population.
Plants with the Cd photosynthetic pathway have a maximum possible potential in temperate climates of 55
tonnes per hectare per year as compared to 33 tonnes per hectare per year for temperate C, crops (Bassham.
1980). The potentials could be much higher for warmer and more humid climates. Samson and Chen
(1995) estimated the maximum photosynthetic efficiency of the biomass plantation studied in Canada
would be 64.8 ODTlha for switchgrass (Cd) and 33.6 ODT/ha for Willow (Cj). ODT being oven dried tonne.
1he growth and productivity of crops depends on their genetic potential. The degree of the realization of
this potential is closely related to the environmental factors dominating in the region and the external
inputs. Yields achieved in field experiments do not represent the physiological limits of the present
cultivars, but only demonstrate that portion of the genetic potential which is realized by optimal utilization
of present means of cultivation and levels of inputs (Dambroth and El Bassam, 1990). Yield and response
of cultivars to environmental conditions and inputs is under genetic control and therefore an improved
response is accessible via screening, selection and breeding.
Climate and local soil properties are the most important constraints influencing the biomass productivity
within a specific region. Temperature, precipitation and global radiation are the few classical climatic
factors which influence, to a great extent, the regional distribution of various plant species. Breeding and
selection. through both natural and human activities, has changed the temperature response of
photosynthesis in some Cs and Cd species. Consequently, there are C3 species whose optimum temperature
is in a medium to high range (25-30C). and there are Cd species (e.g. maize. sorghum) where. for
temperate and tropical highland cuhivars, the optimum temperature is in the range (20-30C).
WREC 1998
210
IMPACT
The criteria for an ideal fuel crop can be summarized as:
??
??
??
??
??
??
??
??
Efficient conversion of solar radiation to biomass. with a yield close to the theoretical maximum. 55 t
DM/ha for C4 crops and 35 t DM/ha for C3 crops. or crops with high oil contents or high fermentable
constituents (sugar, starch, etc.).
High dry matter content (%).
Efficient use of minerals and water.
Convenient energy balance (output. input).
IIigh energy density (MJ/kg).
Enable sustainable production systems.
Good disease resistance.
Consistent to the environment and climate.
[f all these aspects would be considered, the best fuel crop would be characterized as a high productive
perennial plant species. They can be high productive perennial Cj plant species such as Arundo donux or
CAplant species such as Miscanrhus sinensis.
The reasons are:
I
2.
3.
1
>_
6.
7.
8.
9.
IO.
These crops are basically lignocellulosic plant species. The biomass can be converted to a wide variety of
biofules.
REFERENCES
Bassham, J.A. (1980) Energy crops (energy farming). In: Biochemical und Phofosynfhefic Aspects of
Energy Producfion 6. Academic Press, New York. pp. 147-173.
Clayton. W.D. and S.A. Renovize (1986) Genera Graminum, Grasses of fhe World. Kew Bulletin
Additional Series XIII.
Dambroth, M. and N. El Bassam (1990) Genotypic variation in plant productivity and consequences for
breeding of low-input cultivars. Generic Aspecfs of Plant Minerul Nufrifion, Developmenfs in
Plant and Soil Sciences, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1-7.
El Bassam, N. (1990) Requirements for biomass production with higher plants under artificial ecosystems.
Workshop Artificial ecological systems. Marseille. pp. 59-65.
El Bassam, N. (1995) Auswirkungen einer Klimaverlnderung auf den Anbau von C4-Pflanzenarten zur
Erzeugung von Energietrlgem. Miff. Ges. Pfunzenbuuwiss. 8: 169- 172.
FAO (1980) Report on the agro-ecological zones project, Vol. 1. FAO, Rome. pp. 24-48.
Hall. D.O.. F. Rosillo-Calle, R.W. Williams and J. Woods (1993) Biomass for energy: supply prospects.
In: T.B. Johannsson et al., (eds). Renewable Energy: Sources of Fuels and Elecfricify. Island Press,
Washington, D.C. pp. 593-651.
Samson, R. and Y. Chen (1995) Short-rotation forestry and water problem. Canadian Energy Plantation
Workshop. pp. 43-49.