Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Paper
Authors:
Dr.
Andreas
Eisenbltter,
Rafa
Pisz
and
Szymon
Stefaski
Executive Summary
The
report
Energy-saving
solutions
helping
mobile
operators
meet
commercial
and
sustainability
goals
worldwide
(Ericsson,
2008)
and
the
article
Why
the
Telecom
Sector
Should
Take
Renewables
Seriously
(Greentechmedia,
2013)
both
state
that
energy
costs
account
for
as
much
as
half
of
a
mobile
operators
operating
expenses
these
days.
Radio
network
solutions
that
improve
energy-efficiency
are
not
only
good
for
the
environment;
they
also
make
commercial
sense
for
operators
and
support
sustainable,
profitable
business
on
mature
market.
The
last
statement
is
becoming
even
more
important
in
the
context
of
forecasts
such
as
Ericssons
Energy
and
Carbon
Report
(Ericsson,
2013),
which
predicts
the
total
electricity
consumption
of
mobile
networks,
including
future
wireless
access
points,
to
triple
by
2020
in
comparison
to
2007.
The
challenge
has
been
recognised
by
the
industry.
Researchers,
standard
organisations
and
hardware
vendors
are
successfully
working
on
improved
solutions
such
as
better
or
smarter
hardware,
better
software
or
communication
protocols.
All
of
this
will
contribute
to
saving
energy
in
the
future
once
introduced
into
the
market
at
large
scale.
The
GreenNets
approach,
in
contract,
is
different.
The
GreenNets
project
has
looked
into
what
can
be
done
to
save
energy
NOW.
With
the
aim
of
cutting
the
energy
consumption
of
GSM,
UMTS
and
LTE
radio
access
networks
at
least
10%,
the
project
consortium
focused
on
vendor
agnostic
approaches
optimizing
network
operation.
This
strategy
is
based
on
two
main
observations:
Current
networks
are
typically
designed
and
operated
to
secure
coverage
and
capacity
resources
needed
to
deliver
services
in
peak
hours
Energy
consumption
hasnt
been
considered
so
far
as
radio
access
network
optimization
criterion.
Switching-off
temporarily
unnecessary
(pieces
of)
equipment
(e.g.
GSM
TRXs
or
UMTS
cells),
matching
capacity
to
demand
while
keeping
coverage
in
a
multi-RAT
environment
and
not
influencing
the
network
topology.
Thinning
out
and
optimizing
topology
of
a
single-RAT
network
by
reconfiguration
of
antennas
tilts,
profiting
from
the
same
fact
as
described
above.
The
underlying
idea
of
the
proposed
methods
is
to
exploit
coverage
redundancies
in
order
to
adapt
the
network
configuration
to
better
match
the
actual
service
demands
of
the
network.
In
such
deployments
there
are
usually
in
use
technologies
of
different
generations
(2G,
3G,
4G)
and
different
hierarchical
levels
(macro-,
micro-,
pico-,
femto
cells)
with
overlapping
coverage.
If
the
service
demands
can
be
fulfilled
by
different
subsets
of
network
elements
the
energy
savings
can
be
significant
when
configuring
the
network
to
having
only
one
of
those
subsets
of
network
elements
active.
GreenNets
solutions
have
been
tested
on
the
real
network
data.
Implementing
the
first
method
in
a
single-RAT
setting,
just
switching
off
redundant
capacity,
energy
savings
of
up
to
7.1%
were
uncovered.
Moreover,
such
savings
can
be
achieved
within
the
current
hardware
and
software
landscape
of
mobile
network
operator.
Designed
as
a
functional
extension
of
current
planning
tools
and
OSSs,
the
GreenNets
software
components
can
be
easily
fused
with
the
planning,
maintenance
or
optimisation
processes
as
they
use
easily
available
performance
and
configuration
data
and
are
capable
of
automated
implementation
of
changes
in
the
network
configuration
(centralised
SON)
communicating
with
standard
OSS
interfaces.
Introduction
During
the
past
three
years
there
are
clear
trends
that
energy
consumption
reduction
became
a
strategic
goal
for
mobile
network
operators
(MNO)
around
the
globe.
Different
sources
name
a
different
numbers
of
potential
financial
losses,
waste
of
energy
or
CO2
footprint.
But
all
of
the
sources
prove
the
critical
need
of
improvements
in
the
area
of
mobile
network
energy
consumption
optimisation.
According
to
press
information
report
Energy-saving
solutions
helping
mobile
operators
meet
commercial
and
sustainability
goals
worldwide
(Ericsson,
2008)
and
the
article
Why
the
Telecom
Sector
Should
Take
Renewables
Seriously
(Greentechmedia,
2013)
energy
costs
account
for
as
much
as
half
of
a
mobile
operators
operating
expenses.
Additionally
Ericssons
Energy
and
Carbon
Report
(Ericsson,
2013)
forecasts
the
total
electricity
consumption
of
the
ICT
sector
to
increase
by
almost
60%
from
2007
to
2020
owing
to
the
increasing
number
of
devices
and
network
expansion.
As
for
the
electricity
consumption
of
mobile
networks,
including
future
wireless
access
points,
is
expected
to
not
more
than
triple
by
2020.
Thus
radio
network
solutions
that
improve
energy-efficiency
are
not
only
good
for
the
environment;
they
also
make
commercial
sense
for
operators
and
support
sustainable,
profitable
business.
There
is
a
clear
trend
that
functionality
of
mobile
phones
increases
dramatically
over
the
past
two
decades,
transforming
the
mobile
phone
to
a
device
capable
of
far
more
than
simple
voice
calls.
Market
demands
are
expected
to
increase
the
bandwidth
of
the
digital
cellular
network
up
to
eight
times
over
the
next
years.
That
is
possible
by
installing
additional
equipment
(e.g.
3G
and
LTE
layers
as
capacity
over
existing
2G
or
3G
as
coverage
layers)
or
adding
more
sites
with
reduced
heights
and
cell
sizes,
which
will
lead
to
even
higher
total
energy
consumption.
The
reports
highlight
the
MNO
focus
on
OPEX
optimisation
as
well.
Improvements
must
be
achieved
by
complex
solutions
combining
new
generation
of
radio
equipment
amended
with
additional
control
solutions.
Another
report
published
by
Capgemini
(2009)
analyses
cost
reduction
strategies
for
MNOs.
Network
operating
expenditure
is
identified
as
one
of
the
key
areas
for
improvement,
since
operating
costs
take
from
50%
up
to
75%
of
MNO
revenue.
The
network
operation
expenses
make
up
23.7%
of
the
overall
OPEX
and
electricity
costs
make
up
15%
of
the
network
OPEX.
The
findings
in
the
Capgemini
report
are
confirmed
by
the
latest
resources
as
well
as,
for
example,
the
article
Saving
Operating
Expenses
in
the
Mobile
Backhaul
(Juniper,
2013).
This
report
states
that
the
network
operating
costs
are
even
higher
and
reach
30%,
since
the
expansion
of
the
4G/LTE
services
requires
a
substantial
increase
in
the
network
bandwidth
in
terms
of
extra
equipment
and
power
consumption.
Leading
network
equipment
providers
(NEP),
supplying
MNOs
around
the
globe,
are
proactively
tackling
the
reduction
of
energy
consumption
too.
They
are
running
their
own
economy
studies
and
technology
development,
announcing
the
corporate
commitment
for
the
energy
and
CO2
footprint
reduction
and
developing
modern
energy
effective
offerings.
Numerous
initiatives
and
solutions
have
been
emerging
over
the
last
12-24
months,
and
there
is
no
unified
trend
how
to
address
the
problem
at
the
moment.
The
GreenNets
approach
is
different.
The
consortium
decided
to
look
for
solutions,
which
allow
saving
energy
and
reducing
CO2
emission
in
short
term
without
depending
on
changes
to
the
hardware
infrastructure.
The
products
developed
by
the
GreenNets
Consortium
are
able
to
recognize
when
and
which
resources
are
in
excess
due
to
(temporarily)
network
over-dimensioning,
and
then
propose
a
new
configuration
for
network
parameters
adequate
to
the
actual
demand
on
services.
As
energy-efficient
network
configuration
settings
depend
on
variable
network
states,
they
need
to
be
applied
and
adapted
dynamically.
This
dynamic
approach
allows
the
GreenNets
products
to
adjust
network
capacity
to
users
demand
on
services
and
to
save
resources.
Switching-off
temporarily
unnecessary
(pieces
of)
equipment
(e.g.
GSM
TRXs
or
UMTS
cells),
matching
capacity
to
demand
while
keeping
coverage
in
a
multi-RAT
environment
and
not
influencing
the
network
topology.
Thinning
out
and
optimizing
topology
of
a
single-RAT
network
by
reconfiguration
of
antennas
tilts,
profiting
from
the
same
fact
as
described
above.
The
underlying
idea
of
the
proposed
methods
is
to
exploit
coverage
redundancies
in
order
to
adapt
the
network
configuration
to
better
match
the
actual
service
demands
of
the
network.
In
such
deployments
there
are
usually
in
use
technologies
of
different
generations
(2G,
3G,
4G)
and
different
hierarchical
levels
(macro-,
micro-,
pico-,
femto
cells)
with
overlapping
coverage.
If
the
service
demands
can
be
fulfilled
by
different
subsets
of
network
elements
the
energy
savings
can
be
significant
when
configuring
the
network
to
having
only
one
of
those
subsets
of
network
elements
active.
This
White
Paper
is
focused
on
the
first
method,
since
every
mobile
network
operator
could
integrate
the
GreenNets
software
solution
implementing
the
approach
Energy
Efficiency
Optimiser
within
few
weeks.
This
paper
is
organized
as
follows:
The
first
section
provides
the
business
context
of
energy
saving
in
mobile
networks
an
analysis
of
potential
savings
for
two
different
networks
is
made
The
second
section
presents
the
Energy
Efficiency
Optimizer
(EEO)
a
tool
developed
by
the
GreenNets
Consortium
and
sketches
how
it
is
forecasting
traffic
and
optimizing
network
configuration
to
save
energy
The
last
part
includes
an
analysis
of
potential
savings
achieved
by
using
EEO
in
a
real
network
Business potentials
The
GreenNets
Consortium
has
performed
an
analysis
of
business
potentials
in
terms
of
saving
energy
in
mobile
communication
environment
and
determined
the
most
promising
domains.
The
analysis
was
done
based
on
performance
and
configuration
data
from
two
different
networks
in
two
different
countries,
at
different
stages
of
development
and
composed
of
legacy
devices
as
well
as
latest
technologies.
The
Consortium
conducted
the
analysis
using
the
Business
Case
Demonstrator
(BCD)
a
tool
developed
by
the
Consortium
that
is
capable
of
digesting
data
on
an
operators
network
configuration,
the
equipment
in
use,
traffic
profiles
per
cell,
as
well
as
power
contracts
(per
site).
The
network
infrastructure
of
Mobile
operator
1
in
Country
1
(M1)
is
based
on
traditional
solutions:
one
core
network
and
separate
RANs
for
2G
and
3G.
Mobile
operator
2
in
Country
2
(M2)
operates
a
significantly
smaller
network
built
on
more
modern
technologies
like
Software
Defined
Radio
Base
Stations
(SDR
BTS).
These
different
mobile
network
realizations
allowed
us
to
perform
analysis
from
different
perspectives.
First
analysis
was
focused
on
network
elements
and
energy
consumption
domains.
The
results
show
that
beside
the
different
absolute
values
in
both
networks,
the
base
station
sites
are
the
main
power
consumers
and
cover
almost
99%
of
network
power
consumption.
In
the
next
stage,
power
consumption
of
different
types
of
base
stations
was
investigated
and
a
simple
model
of
energy
consumption
was
built.
The
investigation
shows
a
correlation
between
the
type
of
equipment
used
by
an
operator
(old
vs.
modern)
and
the
energy
consumption
level,
as
the
base
stations
deployed
by
M2
network
consume
40
%
less
energy.
The
analysis
of
the
GreenNets
Consortium
focused
on
traffic
profiles.
The
pattern
of
daily
voice
traffic
for
two
separate
geographical
areas
with
200
base
stations
each
is
presented
in
Figure
1.
Analyzing
daily
traffic
profiles
reveals
a
possibility
of
saving
energy
by
efficient
management
of
free
capacity
and
adjusting
network
resources
automatically
as
traffic
increases
or
decreases
during
the
day.
The
operators
could
switch
off
some
segments
of
the
site
or
capacity
oriented
network
elements,
as
each
cell
in
a
traditional
mobile
network
is
designed
with
a
maximum
capacity
to
carry
at
least
100%
of
the
peak
traffic.
During
off-peak
times,
almost
all
base
stations
operate
at
low
load
and
with
relatively
low
output
powers,
where
the
efficiency
of
the
PA
(power
amplifier)
and
the
base
stations
is
very
poor.
In
that
sense,
spare
capacity
should
be
avoided
and
the
capacity
should
be
adapted
to
the
demand
over
time.
Switching
OFF
excessive
capacity
network
elements
when
traffic
is
low
is
the
main
method
of
saving
energy
in
mobile
communication
networks
developed
within
the
GreenNets
project
To
check
the
efficiency
of
the
approach,
a
calculation
of
energy
consumed
by
both
M1
and
M2
networks
have
been
performed.
For
the
purposes
of
the
analysis
it
was
assumed
that
all
redundant
radio
units,
i.e.
radio
units
without
any
impact
on
the
current
network
quality,
are
switched
off
(Switch-off
abundant
capacity
method
developed
by
the
GreenNets
Consortium).
The
following
assumptions
were
made
for
the
calculation
of
possible
energy
savings
and
the
economic
impact:
1. Average
power
consumption
per
site
2833W
for
M1,
and
1682W
for
M2
2. Network
size
1450
(M1),
865
(M2)
of
GSM
and
UMTS
sites
Figure
2
and
Figure
3
show
the
average
load
for
each
RAT
in
both
networks
and
the
total
power
consumption
calculated
for
the
reference
case
and
after
the
application
of
Switch-off
method.
It
should
be
noted
that
the
working
day/weekend
distinction
is
not
the
only
factor
influencing
the
load
pattern.
Differences
between
areas
of
network
deployment
urban,
suburban
or
rural
are
also
taken
into
consideration.
Figure
2
Modeled
Load
and
Power
Consumption
profile
for
M1,
generated
by
BCD
Figure
3
Modeled
Load
and
Power
Consumption
profile
for
M2,
generated
by
BCD
The
difference
between
the
total
power
consumption
profiles
in
the
reference
case
and
the
switch-off
cases
indicates
potential
energy
savings
over
the
time.
It
is
evident
that
most
savings
can
be
achieved
at
night
time
when
users
activity
is
lower.
Table
1
and
Table
2
present
total
energy
consumption
by
different
time
periods
for
M1
and
M2,
working
in
normal
operation
mode
(Normal
Operation)
and
after
application
of
GreenNets
approach
(Switch-Off).
The
difference
is
about
10%
in
both
cases.
Normal
operation
Backhaul/
Site
management
Switch-Off
Savings
Normal
operation
Backhaul/
Site
management
Switch-Off
Savings
prediction
and
statistics
like
quintile
estimations
for
packet
data
traffic.
In
case
of
voice
traffic,
its
pattern
is
predicted;
while
for
data
traffic,
the
upper
end
of
a
confidence
interval
is
estimated.
Figure
4
Software
components
of
the
Energy
Efficiency
Optimizer
The
predicted
traffic
is
then
mapped
onto
the
respective
cell
area
and
distributed
among
the
prevailing
land-use
classes
in
this
area,
depending
on
the
day
of
the
week
and
the
time
of
the
day
(e.g.
most
users
stay
at
home
at
night,
whereas
in
the
morning,
most
users
are
on
the
road).
The
temporal
and
spatial
user
and
load
distributions
are
formed
into
a
set
of
Traffic
Intensity
maps,
which
indicate
where
and
when
the
forecasted
demands
for
the
network
and
its
resources
will
exist.
An
example
of
a
traffic
map
is
presented
in
Figure
8.
Optimization Engine
The
Optimization
Engine
performs
an
analysis
of
traffic
intensity
forecasts
and
searches
for
optimal
set
of
changes
to
be
performed
in
the
network
to
save
energy
without
unduly
degrading
the
quality
of
service
experienced
by
users.
Figure
6
Voice
traffic,
observed
in
the
network
and
predicted
with
EEO
10
Figure 8 Packet traffic, observed in the network and predicted with EEO
11
In
terms
of
radio
access
technology
the
Optimisation
Engine
is
looking
for
temporarily
unnecessary
pieces
of
equipment
(e.g.
GSM
TRXs
or
UMTS
cells),
which
could
be
switched
off,
matching
capacity
to
demand
while
keeping
coverage
in
an
multi-RAT
environment
and
not
influencing
the
network
topology.
In
a
mathematical
sense,
the
Optimization
Engine
solves
a
combinatorial
optimization
problem
consisting
of
selecting
the
set
of
network
elements
with
the
smallest
sum
energy
consumption,
constrained
by
the
QoS
requirements
from
users
and
network.
The
underlying
idea
of
the
proposed
methods
is
to
exploit
coverage
redundancies
in
order
to
adapt
the
network
configuration
to
better
match
the
actual
service
demands
of
the
network.
In
such
deployments,
there
is
usually
dedicated
equipment
for
different
generations
(2G,
3G,
4G)
and
different
hierarchical
levels
(macro-,
micro-,
pico-,
femto
cells)
with
overlapping
coverage.
If
the
service
demands
can
be
fulfilled
by
different
subsets
of
network
elements
the
energy
savings
can
be
significant
when
configuring
the
network
to
having
only
one
of
those
subsets
of
network
elements
active.
It
should
be
emphasised
that
changes
of
network
configuration
computed
by
the
Optimization
Engine
could
be
implemented
in
a
short
time,
to
let
profit
even
from
quite
short
periods
of
lower
traffic.
Figure
9
Network
optimization
according
to
the
forecasted
traffic
generated
in
EEO.
Consecutive
pictures
illustrate
traffic
in
the
network
and
optimized
network
configuration
at
different
time
of
the
day.
At
the
time
of
the
low
traffic
(between
1:00
am
and
5:00
am),
a
large
number
of
the
red
points
indicate
network
elements
selected
as
a
subject
for
optimization
(switching-off).
At
daytime
up
to
the
midnight,
network
configuration
is
adapted
to
the
higher
traffic
and
only
very
few
network
elements
could
be
switched
off
Examples
of
different
network
configurations
results
of
computation
done
by
the
Optimization
Engine
are
presented
in
Figure
9.
The
consecutive
pictures
illustrate
traffic
in
a
network
and
the
optimized
network
configuration
at
different
times
of
the
day.
At
the
time
of
low
traffic
(between
1:00
am
and
12
5:00
am),
a
large
number
of
red
points
indicate
NEs
selected
for
optimization
(switching
off).
During
daytime
up
to
midnight,
the
network
configuration
is
adapted
to
the
higher
traffic
and
only
very
few
NEs
could
be
switched
off.
13
2G network
Figure
11
shows
how
many
resources
EEO
operating
on
the
network
could
save,
by
switching
off
one
or
more
TRX,
without
impacting
the
coverage
of
the
GSM
network.
Figure
10
Unused
resources
in
GSM
network
(real
network
analysis)
3G network
Figure
12
shows
how
many
resources
EEO
could
save,
by
switching
off
one
or
more
carrier,
without
impacting
the
coverage
of
the
UMTS
network.
Energy savings
The
presented
results
show
that
assuming
a
very
conservative
approach,
EEO
could
optimize
energy
consumed
by
88%
of
the
GSM
cells
and
all
UMTS
sectors.
In
all
cases,
at
least
5%
of
the
resources
could
be
saved,
which
means
that
at
least
one
TRX
or
one
carrier
could
be
switched
off
for
ca.
2
hours.
In
case
of
the
analyzed
GSM
network,
approximately
14%
of
the
resources
could
be
saved
(switched
off).
For
the
UMTS,
part
of
the
results
are
even
better
21%.
14
Figure
11
Unused
resources
in
UMTS
network
(real
network
analysis)
Table
3
presents
the
results
expressed
in
kWh
of
saved
energy
-
calculation
has
been
done
using
BCD.
It
shows
that
EEO
running
in
the
most
conservative
mode
could
optimize
energy
consumption
by
5.4%,
for
the
whole
analyzed
network
and
4.13%
and
7.33%
for
UMTS
and
GSM,
respectively.
Energy,Consumption,per,Cell,
Calculated,Using,BCD,Model,
(kWh)
Network
Normal'
Operation
UMTS
GSM
Cells'per'Sector #'Sectors
2
311
3
50
Weighted'Mean
TRX'per'Cell
#'Sectors
2
639
3
115
4
33
Weighted'Mean
Savings'with'
EEO
'''''''3'191,32''''' ''''''''1'137,58'''''
'''''''3'614,72''''' ''''''''1'794,58'''''
'''''''3'249,96''''' ''''''''1'228,58'''''
'''''''2'489,30'''''
'''''''2'698,57'''''
'''''''2'939,47'''''
'''''''2'538,76'''''
Energy,Savings,per,Network,
Per'Technology
Total
73'130,89'kWh
159'162,24'kWh
4,13%
''''''''''479,37''''' 86'031,35'kWH
''''''''''778,67'''''
''''''''1'048,77'''''
7,33%
''''''''''546,98'''''
5,40%
Table
3
Energy
savings
with
EEO
15
Conclusions
As
the
analysis
of
the
real
case
has
shown
the
GreenNets
Consortium
developed
a
solution
that
could
efficiently
reduce
energy
consumed
by
the
present
radio
access
networks.
Designed
as
a
functional
extension
to
current
OSSs,
the
GreenNets
software
components
can
be
easily
fused
with
the
maintenance
or
optimisation
processes.
The
software
components
use
easily
available
performance
and
configuration
data
and
are
capable
of
automated
implementation
of
changes
in
the
network
configuration
(centralised
SON)
communicating
with
standard
OSS
interfaces.
Within
few
weeks
time,
every
mobile
network
operator
could
start
cutting
its
energy
costs
and
positively
influencing
the
environment
-
reducing
the
CO2
emission
and
electro-smog
-
without
investments
in
new
hardware
or
deployment
of
new
technology,
just
implementing
dynamic
approach
to
network
configuration
developed
by
GreenNets.
16
About GreenNets
The
GreenNets
Project
Power
consumption
and
CO2
footprint
reduction
in
mobile
networks
by
advanced
automated
network
management
approaches
is
an
R&D
initiative
of
three
SMEs
and
three
research
institutes
from
Germany,
Poland
and
Lithuania.
The
research
has
received
funding
from
the
European
Union,
Seventh
Framework
Programme
(FP7/2007-2013)
under
Grant
Agreement
n
286822.
The
GreenNets
Partners
are:
atesio
GmbH
BENCO
Baltic
Engineering
Company
UAB
DATAX
Sp.
z
o.o.
Fraunhofer
Institute
for
Telecommunications,
Heinrich
Hertz
Institute,
Berlin
Technical
University
of
Braunschweig,
Institute
for
Communications
Technology
17