Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Job No
Sheet No
Client
EMAAR
Prepared By
Checked By
Section of Project
Date
Date
DX00174
PO Box 52750
Dubai
United Arab Emirates
REFERENCE
15 Apr 15
CONTENTS
OUTPUT
SAFETY MARGIN
CIRIA C660
Tbl A10.2
For reliability analysis, the above equation is re-arranged in the form of the safety margin,
M:
M = crit - kis.ka.ks.fct3/fyk and, at failure, M = 0
BASIC VARIABLES (EC2 & CIRIA C660)
The basic variables are assumed to be normally distributed random variables. Note that
the 3-day tensile strength of concrete is derived overleaf to allow ease of use with
different concrete grades.
Variable
Units
Mean
Std Dev
COV
0.90
0.082
/
0.091
kis
ka
Tbl A10.2
ks
fyk
MPa
1.00
0.136
0.136
0.70
530
0.040
32.1
0.057
0.061
ISO 2394
Table E.3
Sensitivity Factor, i
0.80
0.32
-0.70
-0.28
A variable is a load variable if failure is more likely when it takes values higher than the
mean.
A variable is a resistance variable if failure is more likely when it takes values less than the
mean.
Note that -values are +ve for variables that provide safety and are -ve for variable that
are hazardous.
The procedure is described in ISO 2394 and was used for the probabilistic verification of
the Eurocodes. However, to limit the error in using table E.3, it is usually required that:
0.16 < S/R < 6.6
where S is the dominant load variable
R is the dominant resistance variable
Sheet: Main 04/15/2015 04:39:58
Project Name
Job No
Sheet No
Client
EMAAR
Prepared By
Checked By
Section of Project
Date
Date
DX00174
PO Box 52750
Dubai
United Arab Emirates
REFERENCE
15 Apr 15
CONTENTS
OUTPUT
= C40/50
fck = 40 MPa
fctm = 3.55 MPa
fct3 = 2.12 MPa
E.4.3.A
3-Day Tensile
Strength
fct3 = 2.12 MPa
Units
Mean
Std Dev
COV
/
MPa
2.12
0.39
0.184
pf = 5.0%
-1
= (pf) =
Probability of failure,
ISO 2394
C40/50 Concrete
Reliability Index,
Reliability Index
1.645
ISO 2394 suggests =1.5 for irreversible serviceability limit states, which corresponds to = 1.645 for 5.0%
pf = 6.7%.
probability of failure
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
Check fct3/fyk =
0.39/32.1= 0.012
Notwithstanding the above, a full iterative FORM analysis has been carried out in
accordance with ISO 2394 and this gives similar results to that obtained from this
analysis. Therefore the error using the standardised procedure in this analysis is small.
Using Standardised
ISO 2394 FORM
Procedure is OK
The "design point" values, Z*i, are first calculated in standard normal space and then
transformed to basic variable space.. Note that the variables have a mean, i = 0, and a
standard deviation, i = 1, in standard normal space.
Dominant Load Variable
Dominant Load Variable is fct3 because its COV is highest and all of the load variables vary
linearly with the safety margin, M.
Z*fct3 =
fct3. =
-0.70 x 1.645
= -1.152
= -0.461
= 1.316
= Z*ka = Z*ks
Transforming the design points from standard normal space to basic variable space gives
the following design values:
k*is =
kis - Z*kis.kis =
0.90 + 0.461 x 0.082 =
0.938
k*a =
ka - Z*ka.ka =
1.00 + 0.461 x 0.136 =
1.063
k*s =
ks - Z*ks.ks =
0.70 + 0.461 x 0.040 =
0.718
f*ct3 =
fct3 - Z*fct3.fct3 =
2.12 + 1.152 x 0.390 =
2.57 MPa
f*yk =
fyk - Z*fyk.fyk =
530 - 1.316 x 32.1 =
488 MPa
For Safety Margin, M = 0, Critical Steel Ratio, crit:
crit =
k*is.k*a.k*sf*ct3/f*yk
crit =
0.938x1.063x0.718x2.574/488
= 0.378%
For 5% Failures,
C40/50 Concrete &
500 MPa Steel
crit = 0.378%
PC File Ref: 266706336.xls