Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
www.actamat-journals.com
Abstract
We present three-dimensional simulations of the microstructure and mechanical response of shape memory alloys undergoing cubic to
tetragonal transitions, using FePd as an example. The simulations are based on a nonlinear elastic free-energy in terms of the appropriate
strain elds. The dynamics is simulated by force balance equations for the displacement elds with a damping term derived from a dissipation function. Stressstrain properties in the pseudoelastic as well as the shape memory regime are investigated using strain loading.
We also study the eects of defect-induced heterogeneous nucleation and motion of twin boundaries during deformation. Thus, we probe
the inuence of the microstructure on the mechanical response and investigate how the stressstrain behavior changes as a function of
strain rate.
2006 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Shape memory alloys; Martensitic phase transformation; Microstructure; Modelling; Nucleation
1. Introduction
Shape memory alloys exhibit interesting mechanical
properties due to a diusionless structural phase transformation from a high temperature austenite phase (e.g.,
cubic) to a low temperature martensite phase that is often
tetragonal, orthorhombic or monoclinic in structure. This
transition is usually rst order and is accompanied by a
spontaneous strain. The martensitic transition is also
responsible for the shape memory eect, which refers to
the recovery by heating of an apparently permanent deformation undergone below a critical temperature [1]. This
property makes shape memory materials suitable for a
large number of technological applications [2]. Another
important property of shape memory materials is the socalled pseudoelastic behavior which arises due to a reversible stress/strain-induced martensitic transformation at a
temperature that is higher than the austenite nish temperature of the material. In pseudoelastic deformation, a high
temperature cubic austenite phase typically transforms to
*
1359-6454/$30.00 2006 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.040
2110
fgradient
The quantities Abulk and Ashear are the bulk and shear moduli, respectively, that can be expressed in terms of the linear
12
elastic constants. In particular, Abulk C11 2C
and
3
Ashear = 4C44. Notice that the above form ensures that
the transformation described by the deviatoric strains results in non-zero e1 in equilibrium. Thus, the free energy
also incorporates volume changes associated with the
transformation. The volume change depends on the parameter E0 that can be determined from the transformation
strains obtained from the lattice parameter data.
We rst rescale the free energy by introducing strain
variables
i ei =e0 ;
2111
10
f0 e1 0:47,
E
where
e01 xx pyy3 zz .
The
values
eO
10
2
A0 = 1.97 10 N/m , Abulk = 19.23 1010 N/m2, Ashear
= 28 1010 N/m2, T0 = 295 K and Tc = 270 K are taken
from temperature-dependent elastic constant data [13].
We then calculate the stressstrain curves for a uniaxial
tensile loading (xx = applied) by minimizing the energy
fhomo with respect to yy and zz, where
e bulk
A
f0 2 2 2
1 E
2
3
2
Fig. 2, we show the stressstrain curves in the shape memory regime. These curves correspond to the situation where
at zero load the material is initially in the austenite state
and the martensite is either a local or global minima. Thus,
upon unloading, these curves exhibit a residual strain.
Notice that the residual strain increases as the temperature
is decreased. We have also calculated the stressstrain
curves by applying an external stress. In this case, an
external stress contribution, rxxxx is added to the energy
and the free energy is minimized to calculate the strains
13
as the shear strains xy, xz, yz are zero. The strains min
yy and
min
represent
the
stress-free
transverse
strains
if
an
external
zz
xx is applied. These stress-free strains are obtained by
numerically solving _ yy dfdhomo
, _ zz dfdhomo
so that the
yy
zz
system may be driven to the free energy minima. At convergence, the stress rxx = ofhomo/oxx is calculated at
xx = applied, which is varied from 0 to 0.03. Fig. 1 shows
the calculated stressstrain curves in the pseudoelastic
regime for three dierent temperatures. It is clear that the
stressstrain curves for T = 305 and 300 K exhibit regions
of negative slope corresponding to mechanically unstable
regions. It is also observed that the stress required for the
transition increases as the temperature increases. In
2112
$
q~
u r r r r0 .
14
2
~
o~x
o~y
o~z
ot
o2 ~uy o~
rxy o~
ryy o~
ryz
2
o~x
o~y
o~z
o~t
18
o2 ~uz o~
rxz o~
ryz o~
rzz
o~x
o~y
o~z
o~t2
where ~x; ~y ; ~z are rescaled space variables given by x d~x,
y d~
y
and z d~z. The rescaled time variable ~t is written as
q
t ~t qd2 =A0 . The total (elastic + dissipative) rescaled
stress elds can be determined from the elastic free energy
and the dissipation functional using
G1
G2 G3
~xx p p p ;
r
3
6
2
G1 G2 G3
~yy p p p ;
r
3
6
2
G1 2G3
~zz p p ;
r
3
6
~yz G4 ;
r
~xz G5 ;
r
~xy G6 ;
r
19
where
e bulk 1 E
e 0 2 2 cm o1 ;
G1 A
2
3
o~t
2
2
G2 2s2 122 3 42 2 3
e
e bulk 1 E
e 0 2 A
e 0 2 2 G r~2 2 cm o2 ;
2E
2
3
o~t
d2
2
2
2
2
G3 2s3 63 2 43 2 3
e
e bulk 1 E
e 0 3 A
e 0 2 2 G r~2 3 cm o3 ;
2E
2
3
o~t
d2
o
e shear 4 cm 4 ;
G4 A
o~t
e shear 5 cm o5 ;
G5 A
o~t
o
e shear 6 cm 6
G6 A
o~t
20
q
and the rescaled damping constant cm g=A0 A0 =qd2 .
The above set of equations of motion can be used to simulate the microstructural evolution in shape memory alloys.
In the following section, we simulate the microstructure
associated with the cubic to tetragonal transformation as
a function of temperature using these equations of motion.
5. Temperature-induced transformation
We apply the present theory to obtain the microstructures for temperature-induced cubic to tetragonal transformation in FePd shape memory alloys which have attracted
attention due to interesting magnetoelastic properties [19].
To completely specify the FePd system, we need experimental values for e0, E0, A0, Abulk and Ashear used in
Section 3. To specify the spatial length scales, we use the
value G = 3.15 108 N from microstructural data
obtained by transmission electron microscopy for FePd
using 30 per cent Pd [20]. The value is chosen such that
the length scales of the simulated microstucture match
experiment. With this choice, the smallest length scale
being simulated becomes d 4 nm based on a simulation
box size of 64 64 64. Phonon dispersion data provide
a value [13,21] of G = 3.38 1010 N, corresponding to
d 0.3 nm. The system size would then be too small and
therefore we choose G from microstructural data. To solve
the full dynamic equations we need an estimate of the
damping constant g that can be obtained from measurements of ultrasonic attenuation as a function of frequency
[22,23], x. The attenuation varies as gx2/vs, where vs is the
sound velocity and thus this phonon viscosity model provides an estimate for g. In the absence of ultrasonic measurements for FePd, we use the estimate g 0.015 N s/m2
for V3S as it also undergoes a very similar cubic to tetragonal transformation [22].qAs
the rescaled time ~t is related to
2
the real time t by t ~t qd =A0 , we use the estimate for
density q 104 kg m3 to obtain t=~t 2:8 1012 s.
The form of the damping used in the simulation is a generalization of the result for a body with nite velocity
undergoing internal friction to continuous elastic bodies
[24]. The damping coecient corresponds to a domain wall
mobility of 104 m3/N s at the transformation temperature
[22,23]. The damping is 103 104 larger than theoretically
calculated room temperature values for several metals, so
that the attenuation measured is not directly due to merely
phonon viscosity. Dislocation drag, thermoelastic eect,
phonon scattering, electronic damping would all make
some contribution. Ultrasonic measurements [23] indicate
rapid but continuous increase in attenuation below the
structural transformation. However, there are limitations
in the interpretation of attenuation data. As the damping
term helps to drive the system to the free energy minima,
we do not expect the damping to aect the transformation
strains. However, anharmonicities in the dissipational
function may inuence the dynamics and transients.
Eqs. 1820 are discretized using nite dierences
D~x 1; D~t 0:02 and periodic boundary conditions.
Starting from small amplitude random initial conditions
(corresponding to austenite) for the displacement elds, a
quasi-static cooling process is simulated by varying the
2113
Fig. 3. Simulated microstructures in the martensite phase at T = 260 and 230 K. The columns show the spatial distribution of strains xx, yy and zz. The
variant distorted along x is represented by red/yellow regions in the rst column (xx 6 0), the variant distorted along y is represented by red/yellow
regions in the second column (yy 6 0) and the variant distorted along z is represented by red/yellow regions in the third column (zz 6 0). (For
interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
2114
.
21
applied
ij
2 oxj oxi
This corresponds to a homogeneous strain applied everywhere in the system. In the present simulation, we apply
a uniaxial tensile strain and so applied
applied
applied
yy
zz
xy
applied
applied
0.
The
uniaxial
strain
along
x
is
given
by
yz
xz
c_ t
applied
xx
22
ingunloading simulations reported in this paper correspond to a system that is clamped transverse to the
loading direction. A stressstrain curve can be calculated
for this situation by computing the stress analytically from
the free energy in Eq. (13) using rxx = dF/dxx, subject to
the constraint that yy = zz = 0. This analytical solution
is plotted in Fig. 4. The analytical solution shows that
for strain values in the range 0.006 to 0.017, the austenite is mechanically unstable, as is clear from the negative
slope of the stressstrain curve in that region. The point
C corresponds to where the austenite and martensite have
the same energy and so between C and D, the austenite is
metastable. As the behavior in the metastable and unstable
regions is inuenced by the dynamics associated with
nucleation and growth, a framework that describes the
dynamics is essential.
The strain loading simulations are performed using the
denitions in Eqs. (19) and (20) by solving Eq. (18) as
described in Section 5. We simulate a system in the cubic
austenite phase at T = 313 K. The maximum applied strain
for this case is applied
0:025 and the loading is completed
xx
in t 2.8 ns corresponding to a strain rate of
c_ 8:92 106 =s. Thereafter, the applied strain is decreased
at the same strain rate to simulate the unloading process.
The stressstrain curves are computed by plotting the average stress hddFxx i vs. the average strain xx. Fig. 5 depicts the
microstructural evolution during the loading process. Here,
the red regions in the columns also represent strains with
xx 6 0, yy 6 0 and zz 6 0. At t = 0, the system exists in
the austenite state given by xx = yy = zz = 0. On loading,
the homogeneous austenite phase persists until at
2115
Fig. 5. Microstructural evolution during uniaxial loading along the x direction at T = 313 K for a strain rate c_ 8:92 106 =s. The snapshots A, B and C
correspond to average stresses and strains indicated on the stressstrain curve. Notice that a multi-domain state is formed beyond the mechanical stability
limit corresponding to a stress level equal to the stress at point D in Fig. 4. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
domain walls for this multi-domain state to the low temperature microstructures without an external load that
are depicted in Fig. 3. For example, the angle between
the variant stretched along x and the variant stretched
(not as much) along y, as seen in the top xy plane, is dierent from 45, unlike the low temperature microstructure
shown in Fig. 3. This may be due to the two variants being
unequally distorted as the variant distorted along x is the
2116
oux
applied
seed
xx
xx
ox
23
2117
Fig. 7. Microstructural evolution during uniaxial loading (_c 2:23 106 =s) along the x direction for the case with a defect embedded at the center of the
cubical simulation box. The snapshots A, B, C, D and E show the distribution of the strain xx (along the loading direction) corresponding to the average
stresses and strains indicated on the stressstrain curve. To clearly show the defect region, two mutually intersecting planes through the defect are shown.
Unlike the defect free case, a multi-domain state is created before the limit of mechanical instability due to defect-induced nucleation in the metastable
region. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
the same energy. For strains higher than this critical strain,
the nucleation of martensite can take place as martensite
has lower energy than the austenite. This nucleation
process can be observed by comparing the microstructure
at points B and C. We can see the growth of the martensite
domains (regions shaded red) from a seed defect that is
embedded in the austenite matrix (regions shaded blue).
On further loading, the favored variant grows, as can be
observed in the snapshot corresponding to D. Eventually,
a single variant state of the variant stretched along the x
direction is established as can be observed in the snapshot
Fig. 8. Distribution of xx, yy and zz on the surfaces for snapshot C of Fig. 7. It is seen that although all three variants appear to form, tetragonal
distortions along the x direction are larger than those along y and z directions. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the reader
is referred to the web version of this article.)
2118
for the defect free case. It is clear that the slower the rate of
loading, the smaller is the strain at which the stress deviates
from the analytical curve. This is due to the fact that nucleation is not instantaneous and so the time dependence of
the nucleation will inuence the stressstrain response.
For example, if the loading rate is fast enough that there
is little time for the martensite to nucleate, the apparent
stress required to cause the transition will be higher and
the jump at the onset of the transition will be larger. Thus,
the jump in stress becomes less pronounced as the strain
rate becomes smaller. These results show how nucleation
and growth of variants crucially inuence the mechanical
response of shape memory alloys in the pseudoelastic
regime.
To further illustrate the role of defects on the mechanical response, we have performed loading simulations with
three dierent sizes of defects. The stressstrain curves
for defect sizes L0 = 16, 24, 40 nm with the defect free case
at the xed strain rate c_ 2:23 106 =s are shown in
Fig. 10. As expected, nucleation occurs at smaller strains
for larger defect sizes. In fact, for the defect free case, the
martensite is formed only after the applied strain is higher
than the intrinsic limit of mechanical stability. Thus, the
presence of defects inuences the magnitude of the jump
in stress at the onset of the transformation.
We note that the strain rates used in the simulations
(106/s) are relatively higher than those typically observed
in practice. The reason for the high strain rates lies in the
time scales that we are simulating, which are relatively
short (1012 s). The real time is related to the scaled time
via the smallest length (d 0.110 nm). This limits the size
Fig. 10. Simulated stressstrain curves for dierent sizes of the embedded
defect at T = 313 K. The cyan, blue and red curves correspond to defect
sizes L0 = 16, 24, 40 nm, respectively. The green curve is for the defect free
case. The size of the defect determines the magnitude of the jump as the
larger the defect, the easier is nucleation. (For interpretation of the
references to color in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web
version of this article.)
Here we investigate the mechanical response at low temperatures when the material has already transformed to
martensite in the absence of external deformation. Our initial condition is the microstructure in the second row of
Fig. 3, corresponding to T = 230 K. The loading conditions are identical to those in the previous section, although
we load to higher values of the maximum strain to span the
regimes of interest. Fig. 11 shows the simulated loading
and unloading process. The stressstrain curve is calculated
in the same manner as the previous section but the average
stress at applied
0 is subtracted for all points so that the
xx
stress is zero for the rst point. The strain rate used in
the present simulations is c_ 12:5 106 =s. The conguration at the rst point on the stressstrain curve is the as
cooled martensite state of the second row in Fig. 3. As
the strain is applied, there is a short linear elastic regime
during which the microstructure does not change signicantly. This is clear by comparing the microstructure for
the point A in Fig. 11 to that of the second row in
Fig. 3. Beyond the linear elastic region, the twin boundaries
start to move, as can be seen in the microstructure
2119
Fig. 11. Microstructural evolution during uniaxial loading (_c 12:5 106 =s) along x in the shape memory regime for T = 230 K, starting from a twinned
state at T = 230 K depicted in Fig. 3. The snapshots A, B and C correspond to the stresses and strains indicated on the stressstrain curve. Note that after
a transient linear elastic region, the favored variant starts to grow at the expense of the unfavored variants. (For interpretation of the references to color in
this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
2120
Fig. 12. Simulated stressstrain curves for three dierent strain rates at
T = 230 K. The black, red and blue curves correspond to
c_ 12:5 106 =s, c_ 6:25 106 =s and c_ 3:125 106 =s, respectively.
(For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the
reader is referred to the web version of this article.)