Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ANALYSIS
Some important concepts and
considerations
RUTH WODAK
DISTINGUISHED PROFESSOR
OF DISCOURSE STUDIES
LANCASTER UNIVERSITY
http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/Ruth-Wodak/
WHY DISCOURSE
ANALYSIS?
Qualitative Methods and/or Discourse
Analysis
y
in the Social Sciences
Developments
l
and
d synergies
i
An interest in the properties of naturally occurring
language
g g use by
y real language
g g users (instead
(
of a study
y
of abstract language systems and invented examples)
A focus on larger units than isolated words and
sentences, and hence, new basic units of analysis: texts,
discourses, conversations, speech acts, or communicative
events.
t
The extension of linguistics beyond sentence grammar
towards a study of action and interaction.
interaction
(Wodak 2008, van Dijk 2007)
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT - CDA
Course 2010
CHALLENGES II
The Text
as Representation
R
t ti
off F
Features
t
off th
the
Situations Investigated
((2.2.))
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT - CDA
Course 2010
DEFINING DISCOURSE?
Discourse, Genre, Text, Context
FOR EXAMPLE.
A SPECIFIC DISCOURSE (Racist, Sexist, national,
liberal, conservative, historical,)
(Discourse of the EU,, Discourse of
DISCOURSE OF (
an organisation, of men or women, of Hillary
Clinton, .)
X + DISCOURSE (security discourse,
globalisation
l b li ti
discourse)
di
)
DISCOURSE ABOUT (unemployment, racism,
enlargement)
MODE + DISCOURSE (visual
( is al discourse,
disco se written
itten
discourse, spoken discourse)
DISCOURSE as lieu de mmoire, as building, as
language as image.
language,
image
Different language-specific meanings (spoken
language, structures of knowledge)
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT - CDA
Course 2010
Pragmatism
Pragmatismus
(Dewey)
(Dewey)
Georg
GeorgSimmel
Simmel
SSymbolischer
Symbolic
b li
Interactionism
Interaktionismus
(Mead,
(Mead,Blumer)
Blumer)
Social
SocialAnthropology
Anthropology
(Radcliffe-Brown,
(Radcliffe-Brown,EvansEvansPritchard,
Pritchard,Malinowski)
Malinowski)
Cultural
CulturalAnthropology
Anthropology
(Boas,
(Boas,Benedict)
Benedict)
Grounded
GroundedTheory
Theory
(Glaser
(Glaser//Strauss)
Strauss)
Russian
Russischer
Formalism
Formalismus
(Todorov,
(Todorov,Propp)
Propp)
Prague
Prager School
Schule of
der
Structural
Linguistics
strukturalen
Linguistik
(Jakobson)
(Jakobson)
Phenomenology
Phnomenologie
(Husserl)
(Husserl)
Conversation
analysis
Konversationsanalyse
(Sacks,
Schegloff,
(Sacks, Schegloff,
Jefferson)
Jefferson)
Technological
Technologisches
Communication
KommunikationsModel
modell
(Shannon/Weaver)
(Shannon/Weaver)
Theory
Theorieofd.
Mass
MassenCommunication
kommunikation
(Lasswell)
(Lasswell)
Content
analysis
Inhaltsanalyse
Ethnomethodology
Ethnomethodologie
(Garfinkel,
(Garfinkel,Cicourel)
Cicourel)
Functional
FunktionalePragmatics
Pragmatik
(Ehlich
(Ehlich//Rehbein)
Rehbein)
Objective
Objektive
Hermeneutics
Hermeneutik
(Oevermann)
(Oevermann)
Ludwig
Ludwig
Wittgenstein
Wittgenstein
Membership
Membership
Categorization
Categorization
Device
Device(Sacks)
(Sacks)
Ethnography
Ethnographyofof
Communication
Communication
(Hymes)
(Hymes)
Cultural-Structuralism
Kultur-Strukturalismus
(Levi-Strauss,
(Levi-Strauss,Mauss)
Mauss)
Structural
Strukturale
Linguistics
Linguistik
(Saussure)
(Saussure)
Phenomenological
Phnomenologische
Sociology
Soziologie(Schtz,
(Schtz,
Thomas)
Thomas)
Distinction
Diff
Differenztheoretische
thTheory
ti h
Text
Analysis
Textanalyse(Titscher
(Titscher/ /
Meyer)
Meyer)
Organon
model
Organonmodell
ofderLanguage
Sprache
(Bhler)
(Bhler)
Systemic
Systemische
Communication
Theory
Kommunikationstheorie
(Luhmann)
(Luhmann)
Distinction
theoryy
Differenztheorie
(Spencer
Brown)
(Spencer Brown)
Narrative
Narrative
Semiotics
Semiotik
(Greimas)
(Greimas)
SYMLOG
SYMLOG(Bales
(Bales/ /
Cohen)
Cohen)
Field
theory (Lewin)
Feldtheorie
(Lewin)
CDA
F i Fairclough
Fairclough
l h)
CDA(nach
Critical
Theory
Kritische
Theorie
(Adorno,
(Adorno,Habermas,
Habermas,
Horkheimer)
Horkheimer)
Hermeneutics
Hermeneutik
Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalyse
(Dilthey,
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT
- CDA
(Dilthey,
(Freud)
(Freud)
Gadamer)
Gadamer)
Course 2010
Discourse
historical
Diskurshistorische
Method
(Wodak)
Methode
(Wodak)
Michel
MichelFoucault
Foucault
Functional
y
FunctionalSystemic
Systemic
Linguistics
Linguistics(Halliday)
(Halliday)
Cognitive
CognitiveLinguistics
Linguistics
(Shank,
(Shank,Abelson)
Abelson)
CRITICAL DISCOURSE
ANALYSIS
DHA: Beginning,
g
g Domains
of Research
Studying the Waldheim Affair in
Austria Detecting
nationalist/chauvinistic and
/
rhetoric in various
racist/anti-Semitic
public domains
Identity Politics
Organisations: Insiders/Outsiders
Text-Production
Text Production and Comprehension
(Wodak 1986, 1996, Wodak et al. 1990)
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT CDA Course 2010
KEY CONCEPTS
OF DHA
time axis
text x
Discourse B
genre y
genre z
text yz
genre u
text u
topic x1
topic yz1
topic u1
topic x2
topic yz2
topic u2
topic x3
topic yz3
22
US and THEM
The discursive construction of US and
THEM is the foundation of prejudiced and
racist p
perceptions
p
and discourses.
This discursive construction starts with the
labelling of the social actors, proceeds to the
generalization of negative
g
g
attributions and
then elaborates arguments to justify the
exclusion of many and inclusion of some.
The discursive realizations can be more or less
intensified or mitigated, more or less implicit
or explicit, due to historical conventions,
public levels of tolerance,, p
p
political
correctness, context and public sphere.
(Reisigl and Wodak 2001)
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT - CDA
Course 2010
Analyzing
y
gp
positive self- and
negative other presentation
How are persons named and referred to
linguistically?
What traits,
traits characteristics,
characteristics qualities and
features are attributed to them?
By means of what arguments and
argumentation schemes do specific persons
or social groups try to justify and legitimize
the exclusion of others or inclusion of
some?
From what perspective or point of view are
these labels, attributions and arguments
expressed?
d?
Are the respective utterances articulated
overtly,
y are they
y even intensified or are they
y
mitigated?
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT - CDA
Course 2010
Strategy
Objectives
Devices
referential /
nomination
Construction of
in-groups and
out-groups
Membership categorization
metaphors and metonymies
Synecdoches (pars pro toto, totum pro pars)
Predication
g social
Labelling
actors positively
or negatively
Stereotypical,
yp
, evaluative attributions of
negative or positive traits
implicit and explicit predicates
argumentation
Justification of
positive or
negative
attributions
topoi; fallacies
Perspectivation,
Perspectivation
framing or
discourse
representation
Expressing
involvement
Positioning
speaker's point of
view
reporting, description
reporting
description, narration or quotation
of events and utterances
intensification,
mitigation
Modifying the
epistemic status
of a proposition
RECONTEXTUALISATION
CDA - Procedures
Balancing between linguistic expertise
and the needs of q
qualitative research
SUGGESTIONS
DEFINE PROBLEM/OBJECT UNDER
INVESTIGATION
EXPLORE THROUGH ETHNOGRAPHY
DEFINE DISCOURSE RELATED TO
MACRO-TOPIC & CONTEXT
CHARACTERISE RELEVANT GENRES
CHOSE TYPICAL TEXTS
CHOSE ADQUATE TOOLS FOR
ANALYSIS
Ruth Wodak, ACCEPT - CDA
Course 2010
RECURSIVE STEPS