Sei sulla pagina 1di 574

STAT,

"VRT

A COURSE IN

BY

EDOUARD GOURSAT
PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICS

IN

THE UNIVERSITY OF PARIS

TRANSLATED BY

EARLE RAYMOND HEDRICK


PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI

VOL.

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS


EXPANSION IN SERIES

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

APPLICATIONS TO GEOMETRY

GINN AND COMPANY


BOSTON

ATLANTA

NEW YORK
DALLAS

CHICAGO
LONDON
SAN FKANCISCO

COLUMBUS

STAT.

LIBRARY

ENTERED AT STATIONERS HALL


1

COPYRIGHT,

1904,

BY

EARLE RAYMOND HEDRICK


ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
426.6

jgregg

GINN AND COMPANY


PRIETORS BOSTON

PRO
U.S.A.

AUTHOR S PREFACE
This book contains, with slight variations, the material given in

my

course at the University of Paris.

have modified somewhat

the order followed in the lectures for the sake of uniting in a single

volume

that has to do with functions of real variables, except

all

the theory of differential equations.

being treated in the

"

The

differential notation not

Classe de Mathematiques

treated this notation from the beginning,

speciales,"

* I

have

and have presupposed only

a knowledge of the formal rules for calculating derivatives.


Since mathematical analysis

tinuum,

it

logically,

is

essentially the science of the con

would seem that every course

in analysis should begin,

with the study of irrational numbers.

however, that the student

is

theory of incommensurable

well-known works f that


a discussion.

As

basis of analysis,

double integral,

have supposed,

already familiar with that subject.

numbers

is

have thought

for the other

treated in so
it useless to

many

The

excellent

enter upon such

fundamental notions which

lie at

the

such as the upper limit, the definite integral, the


etc.,

have endeavored to treat them with

all

desirable rigor, seeking to retain the elementary character of the

work, and to avoid generalizations which would be superfluous in a


book intended for purposes of instruction.
Certain paragraphs which are printed in smaller type than the
body of the book contain either problems solved in detail or else

*An

interesting account of French

methods of instruction in mathematics

will

be found in an article by Pierpont, Bulletin Amer. Math. Society, Vol. VI, 2d series

TRANS.
Such books are not common in English. The reader is referred to Pierpont,
Theory of Functions of Real Variables, Ginn & Company, Boston, 1905; Tannery,
Lemons d arithiiietique, 1900, and other foreign works on arithmetic and on real
(1900), p. 225.
t

functions.
iii

7814G2

AUTHOR S PREFACE

iv

supplementary matter which the reader


ing without inconvenience.

may omit

Each chapter

is

at the first read

followed by a

list

of

examples which are directly illustrative of the methods treated in


the chapter.
Most of these examples have been set in examina
tions.
Certain others, which are designated by an asterisk, are

somewhat more

difficult.

The

latter are taken, for the

most

part,

from original memoirs to which references are made.

Two

of

my

and M. Jean

old students at the Ecole Normale,

I take this occasion to tender

JANUARY

M. Emile Cotton

Clairin, have kindly assisted in the correction of proofs

them

my

hearty thanks.
E.

27, 1902

GOURSAT

TRANSLATOR
The

PREFACE

was undertaken at the suggestion

translation of this Course

whose review of the original appeared


of Professor W.
in the July number of the Bulletin of the American Mathematical
The lack of standard texts on mathematical sub
Society in 1903.
F. Osgood,

too well

known

jects in the

English language

I earnestly

hope that this book will help to

felt

is

fill

to require insistence.

the need so generally

throughout the American mathematical world.

conveniently in our
in calculus,

It

may

be used

system of instruction as a text for a second course

and as a book of reference

it

will be

found valuable

an American student throughout his work.


Few alterations have been made from the French

text.

to

Slight

changes of notation have been introduced occasionally for conven


ience,

and several changes and .additions have been made at the sug

gestion of Professor Goursat,

work

in the

of translation.

who

has very kindly interested himself

To him

is

due

all

the additional matter

not to be found in the French text, except the footnotes which are
signed,

and even

edited by him.

these,

though not of his

initiative,

I take this opportunity to express

were always

my

gratitude to

the author for the permission to translate the work and for the

sympathetic attitude which he has consistently assumed. I am also


indebted to Professor Osgood for counsel as the work progressed
and for aid in doubtful matters pertaining to the translation.

The

make

publishers, Messrs.

Ginn

the typography excellent.

& Company, have spared

no pains to

Their spirit has been far from com

mercial in the whole enterprise, and

it

is

their hope, as

it is

mine,

that the publication of this book will contribute to the advance of

mathematics

in

AUGUST, 1904

America.

E R HEDRICK

CONTENTS
PAGE

CHAPTER
I.

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

Functions of a Single Variable


Functions of Several Variables

11

The

19

I.

II.

III.

II.

Differential Notation

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS. FUNCTIONAL DETERMINANTS.

I.

II.

III.

Implicit Functions

II.

Functional Determinants

52
61

Taylor

Series with a Remainder.

Singular Points.

II.

Taylor

Maxima and Minima

DEFINITE INTEGRALS
I. Special Methods of Quadrature
III.

Series

Definite Integrals. Allied Geometrical Concepts


Change of Variable. Integration by Parts
.

Integrals.

Line Integrals

V. INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

III.

VI.

Integration of Rational Functions

Double

.110

Methods

of

Evaluation.

Green

III.

Change

192

208

208
226

.236
250

250

Area of a Surface
Double Integrals. Improper

of Variables.

Generalizations of

175

.196

Theorem
II.

140

.166

........

Integrals.

134

.134

.....
....

and Hyperelliptic Integrals


Integration of Transcendental Functions
Elliptic

DOUBLE INTEGRALS
I.

89

89

Improper

V. Functions defined by Definite Integrals


VI. Approximate Evaluation of Definite Integrals

II.

......
....

IV. Generalizations of the Idea of an Integral.

I.

35

35

Transformations

TAYLOR S SERIES. ELEMENTARY APPLICATIONS. MAXIMA


AND MINIMA
I.

IV.

CHANGE

........
....
.........
........
........

OF VARIABLE

III.

Surface Integrals

.......

IV. Analytical and Geometrical Applications

264

Integrals.

277
284

CONTENTS

viii

PAGE

CHAPTER
VII.

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS.

INTEGRATION OF TOTAL DIFFER


296

ENTIALS
I.

II.

VIII.

of Variables

Multiple Integrals. Change


Integration of Total Differentials

INFINITE SERIES
I. Series
of Real Constant Terms.

296

.313
327

General Properties.

327

Tests for Convergence


II.

Series of

III. Series of

IX.

POWER
I.

II.

Complex Terms. Multiple Series


Variable Terms. Uniform Convergence

SERIES.

Power
Power

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

Series of a Single Variable


Series in Several Variables

350

360

....

375

.....
.

Analytic Curves and Surfaces


IV. Trigonometric Series. Miscellaneous Series

III.

Implicit Functions.

375

S94
399

.411
426

X. PLANE CURVES
I.

II.

III.

XI.

Envelopes
Curvature

426

Contact of Plane Curves

443

SKEW CURVES
I.

II.

433

........
....
........

Osculating Plane
Envelopes of Surfaces

Curvature and Torsion of Skew Curves


IV. Contact between Skew Curves. Contact between Curves

III.

and Surfaces
XII.

II.

III.

Curvature of Curves drawn on a Surface


Asymptotic Lines. Conjugate Lines

459
468
486

....

Lines of Curvature

497

.514

506

526

IV. Families of Straight Lines

INDEX

453

497

SURFACES
I.

453

541

CHAPTER

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

FUNCTIONS OF A SINGLE VARIABLE

I.

1.

Limits.

When

the successive values of a variable x approach

nearer and nearer a constant quantity a, in such a way that the


a finally becomes and remains
absolute value of the difference x
less

than any preassigned number, the constant a is called the


This definition furnishes a criterion for

limit of the variable x.

determining whether a
sary and

is

the limit of the variable

sufficient condition that it

should

x.

The neces

is

be,
that, given any
no matter how small, the absolute value of x
a
should remain less than e for all values which the variable x can

positive

number

e,

assume, after a certain instant.

Numerous examples

of limits are to be found in Geometry


For example, the limit of the variable quantity
x = (a 2
m 2 ) / (a m), as m approaches a, is 2 a for x 2 a will
a is taken less than e. Likewise, the
be less than e whenever m
variable x = a
where
n is a positive integer, approaches the
1/n,
limit a when n increases indefinitely
for a
x is less than e when

and Algebra.

ever n

It is apparent from these examples that


greater than 1/e.
the successive values of the variable x, as it approaches its limit, may
is

form a continuous or a discontinuous sequence.


It is in general very difficult to determine the limit of a variable
quantity. The following proposition, which we will assume as selfevident, enables us, in

many

cases, to establish the existence of a limit.

variable quantity which never decreases, and which ahvays


less than a constant quantity L, approaches a limit I, which

Any

remains
is less

than or at most equal

to L.

Similarly, any variable quantity which never increases, and which


always remains greater than a constant quantity L approaches a
,

limit

which

is

greater than or else equal


1

to

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

2.

For example,

[I,

each of an infinite series of positive terms is


than the corresponding term of another infinite
series of positive terms which is known to converge, then the first
series converges also
for the sum 2 n of the first n terms evidently
increases with n, and this sum is constantly less than the total sum
if

less, respectively,

5 of the second

series.

2. Functions. When two variable


quantities are so related that
the value of one of them depends upon the value of the other,
they
are said to be functions of each other.
If one of them be sup

posed to vary arbitrarily, it is called the independent variable. Let


this variable be denoted by x, and let us
suppose, for example,
that it can assume all values between two given numbers a and b

Let y be another variable, such that to each value of x


b).
(a
between a and b, and also for the values a and b themselves, there
corresponds one definitely determined value of y. Then y is called
a function of x, defined in the interval (a, b) and this dependence
<

indicated by writing the equation y =/(z). For instance, it


may
happen that y is the result of certain arithmetical operations per
formed upon x. Such is the case for the very simplest functions
studied in elementary mathematics, e.g. polynomials, rational func
is

tions, radicals, etc.

A function may also be defined graphically. Let two coordinate


axes Ox, Oy be taken in a plane and let us join any two
points A
and B of this plane by a curvilinear arc .4 CB, of any shape, which
;

not cut in more than one point by any parallel to the axis
Oy.
Then the ordinate of a point of this curve will be a function of the
abscissa.
The arc A CB may be composed of several distinct por
is

tions

which belong

to different curves, such as

segments of straight

lines, arcs of circles, etc.

In short, any absolutely arbitrary law


may be assumed for finding
the value of y from that of x.
The word function, in its most gen
eral sense, means nothing more nor
x corresponds a value of y.

less

than this

to every value of

3. Continuity.
The definition of functions to which the infini
tesimal calculus applies does not admit of such broad
generality.
Let y =f(x) be a function defined in a certain interval
and
(a,

b),

let

x and x

ence f(x

-f

h be two values of x

in that interval.

If the differ

f(xo) approaches zero as the absolute value of h


approaches zero, the function f(x} is said to be continuous for the
value x
From the very definition of a limit we may also say that
.

-f A)

I,

FUNCTIONS OF A SINGLE VARIABLE

3]

a function f(x)

x if, corresponding to every


continuous for x
no matter how small, we can find a positive num

is

positive number
ber 77, such that

e,

|/(*o

A)-/(*o)|<

We

shall say that


for every value of h less than rj in absolute value.*
a function f(x) is continuous in an interval (a, b) if it is continuous
for every value of x lying in that interval, and if the differences

each approach zero when

h,

which

approaches zero.
In elementary text-books

is

it

now

is

usually

rational functions, the exponential

to be taken only positive,

shown

that polynomials,

and the logarithmic function,

the trigonometric functions, and the inverse trigonometric functions


are continuous functions, except for certain particular values of
It follows directly from the definition of continuity
the variable.
or the product of any number of continuous functions
and this holds for the quotient of
itself a continuous function

that the
is

sum

two continuous functions also, except


for which the denominator vanishes.

for the values of the variable

seems superfluous to explain here the reasons which lead us to


assume that functions which are defined by physical conditions are,
It

at least in general, continuous.

the properties of continuous functions we shall now state


only the two following, which one might be tempted to think were
self-evident, but which really amount to actual theorems, of which

Among

rigorous demonstrations will be given later, f

If the function yf(x) is continuous in the interval (a, b), and


a number between f (a) andf(b), then the equation f(x) =
has at least one root between a and b.
II. There exists at least one value of x belonging to the interval
I.

if

N is

(a, b ), inclusive

of

its

end points, for which y takes on a value

greater than, or at least equal to, the value of the function at


any other point in the interval. Likewise, there exists a value of x
for which y takes on a value m, than which the function assumes no

which

is

smaller value in the interval.

The numbers

M and m are called the maximum and the minimum

values of f(x), respectively, in the interval


*

The notation

See Chapter IV.

(a,

b*).

denotes the absolute value of

It is clear that

a.

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

[I,

the value of x for which /(ce) assumes its maximum value M, or the
value of x corresponding to the minimum m, may be at one of the

end points, a or
that

N is a

if

at least one root


4.

Examples

from the two theorems above,

It follows at once

b.

number between
which

lies

M and m, the equation /() = N has

between a and

of discontinuities.

b.

The functions which we

shall study

will be in general continuous, but they may cease to be so for


certain exceptional values of the variable.
proceed to give

We

several examples of the kinds of discontinuity

which occur most

frequently.
The function y

= 1 / (x a) is continuous for every value x of


x except a. The operation necessary to determine the value of y
from that of x ceases to have a meaning when x is assigned the
value a but we note that when x is very near to a the absolute
;

value of y is very large, and y is positive or negative with x


a.
As the difference x
a diminishes, the absolute value of y increases
indefinitely, so as eventually to become and remain greater than any

preassigned number.

y becomes

infinite

This phenomenon

when x

a.

is described by saying that


Discontinuity of this kind is of

great importance in Analysis.


Let us consider next the function y
sin 1/z.
As x approaches
zero, I/a; increases indefinitely, and y does not approach any limit

it remains between + 1 and


1.
The equation
where A
1, has an infinite number of solutions
which lie between
and e, no matter how small e be taken. What
ever value be assigned to y when x
0, the function under con

whatever, although

sin l/a;

= ,4,

<

sideration cannot be

An example

made continuous

of a still different

for x

0.

kind of discontinuity

is

given by

the convergent infinite series

When

x approaches

S (x~) approaches the

limit 1, although
every term of the series is zero, and
hence 5 (0) = 0. But if x be given a value different from zero, a
geometric progression is obtained, of which the ratio is 1/(1 + a; 2 ).

5 (0)

0.

For,

zero,

when x

Hence

0,

FUNCTIONS OF A SINGLE VARIABLE

5]

I,

and the limit of S(x)

is

seen to be

Thus, in this example, the

1.

function approaches a definite limit as x approaches zero, but that


0.
limit is different from the value of the function for x

Derivatives.

5.

Then

Let/(x) be a continuous function.

the

two

terms of the quotient

k
approach zero simultaneously, as the absolute value of h approaches
If this quotient approaches a limit,
zero, while x remains fixed.
derivative
of the function /(#), and is denoted
is
called
the
this limit
the notation due to Lagrange.
An important geometrical concept is associated with this analytic
Let us consider, in a plane XOY, the curve
notion of derivative.

by y

or

by /

(x), in

A MB, which

represents the function y =/(#), which


in the interval (a, b).
Let
and
continuous
to be

on this curve, in the interval

(a, b),

and

let

we

shall

assume

be two points
their abscissas be x and

MM

The

is then
slope of the straight line
A, respectively.
h
above.
Now
as
the
zero
the
approaches
quotient
point
precisely
approaches the point M] and, if the function has a derivative,

the slope of the line

MM

MM

approaches the limit y

The

straight line

therefore, approaches a limiting position, which is called the


tangent to the curve. It follows that the equation of the tangent is
,

Y-y = y
where

To

and

(X-x),

are the running coordinates.


generalize, let us consider any curve in space,

and

let

be the coordinates of a point on the curve, expressed as functions of


be two points of the curve
Let
and
a variable parameter t.

corresponding to

two values,

equations of the chord

MM

x-f(t)

and

h, of

the parameter.

The

are then

f(t + h)
If

we

divide each denominator by h and then let h approach zero,

MM

evidently approaches a limiting position, which


given by the equations

the chord

X -f(f)
f(t)

Y4, ft)

is

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

[i,

provided, of course, that each of the three functions f(t),


(t), \J/ (t)
The determination of the tangent to a curve
possesses a derivative.
thus reduces, analytically, to the calculation of derivatives.
<f>

Every function which possesses a derivative is necessarily con


It is easy to give examples
tinuous, but the converse is not true.
of continuous functions which do not possess derivatives for
par
ticular values of the variable.
The function y
for

= xsinl/x,
=
=

a perfectly continuous function of x, for x


0,* and y
approaches zero as x approaches zero. But the ratio y /x
sinl/cc
does not approach any limit whatever, as we have already seen.

example,

is

Let us next consider the function y = x*. Here y is continuous


= when x = 0. But the ratio y /x = x~*
a;; and y
increases indefinitely as x approaches zero.
For abbreviation the
derivative is said to be infinite for x =
the curve which repre
for every value of

sents the function

tangent to the axis of y at the origin.


Finally, the function
is

is

continuous at x

limits according as
it is

approaching

0,* but the ratio

zero.

is

y /x approaches two different


always positive or always negative while
When x is positive and small, e l/x is posi

and very large, and the ratio y /x approaches 1. But if x


is negative and very small in absolute value, e l/x is
very small, and
the ratio y / x approaches zero.
There exist then two values of the
derivative according to the manner in which x approaches zero the
curve which represents this function has a corner at the origin.
It is clear from these examples that there exist continuous func
tions which do not possess derivatives for particular values of the
variable.
But the discoverers of the infinitesimal calculus confi
tive

dently believed that a continuous function had a derivative in gen


eral.
Attempts at proof were even made, but these were, of course,
Finally, Weierstrass succeeded in settling the question
conclusively by giving examples of continuous functions which do not
But
possess derivatives for any values of the variable whatever.!
fallacious.

as these functions have not as yet been

employed

in

any applications,

* After the value zero has been


0.
TRANSLATOR.
assigned to y for x
t Note read at the Academy of Sciences of Berlin, July 18, 1872.
Other examples
are to be found in the memoir by Darboux on discontinuous functions (Annales de

Ecole Normale Superieure, Vol. IV, 2d series).


given later (Chapter IX).

One

of Weierstrass s examples

is

FUNCTIONS OF A SINGLE VARIABLE

6]

I,

them here. In the future, when we say that


in the interval (a, b), we shall mean
a
derivative
has
a function f(x)
for every value of x between
derivative
an
it
has
that
unique finite

we

shall not consider

and also f or x = a (h being positive) and f or x = b (h being


is made to the contrary.
negative), unless an explicit statement
a and

6.

The

Successive derivatives.

derivative of a function f(x) is in


If f (x) in turn has a deriva
(x).

general another function of x,f


the new function is called the second derivative of /(x), and is
In the same way the third deriva
or by f"(x).
represented by
the derivative of the second, and
to
be
or / "(#), is defined
tive y
n)
derivative
In general, the rath
so on.
7/ , or f
(x), is the deriva
tive,

y"

",

tive of the derivative of order (n

1).

If, in thus

forming the

never obtain a function which has no

we
we may imagine the process carried on indefinitely. In
this way we obtain an unlimited sequence of derivatives of the func
Such is the case for all functions
tion /(cc) with which we started.
successive derivatives,

derivative,

which have found any considerable application up to the present


time.

The above notation

Dn f(x),

due to Cauchy,

wth derivative.
7.

is

Leibniz

due to Lagrange. The notation Dn y, or


also used occasionally to represent the

is

notation will be given presently.

The use of derivatives in the study of equa


upon the following proposition, which is known as
Theorem :

Rolle s theorem.

tions depends

Roue

Let a and

0.
b be two roots of the equation f (x)
If the function
in
interval (a, b~),
a
derivative
the
and
continuous
possesses
f(x)
has at least one root which lies between a and b.
the equation / (#)

is

For the function f(x) vanishes, by hypothesis, for x

= a and x =

b.

vanishes at every point of the interval (a, b), its derivative also
vanishes at every point of the interval, and the theorem is evidently
If

it

fulfilled.

val, it

will

If the function f(x) does not vanish throughout the inter


assume either positive or negative values at some points.

Suppose, for instance, that it has positive values. Then it will have
a maximum value
for some value of x, say x lf which lies between

a and

b (

3,

Theorem

II).

The

ratio

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

[I,

where h is taken positive, is necessarily negative or else


Hence the limit of this ratio, i.e. f (x^), cannot be positive
f ( x i) = 0- But if we consider f (x\) as the limit of the ratio

zero.
;

i.e.

>

h
where h

From

is

positive, it follows in the

these two results

same manner that f\x\) ^

evident that/

it is

^) =

0,

0.

8. Law of the mean.


It is now easy to deduce from the above
theorem the important law of the mean *
:

Let f(x) be a continuous function which has a derivative in the


interval (a,

Then

b).

m-f(a) = (b-a)f(c-),

(1)

where

c is

a number between a and

b.

In order to prove this formula, let (x) be another function which


has the same properties as/(x), i.e. it is continuous and possesses a
derivative in the interval (a, b).
Let us determine three constants,
A, B, C, such that the auxiliary function
<

vanishes for x

a and for x

The necessary and

b.

sufficient

conditions for this are

A /(a)

+B

<()+

and these are

satisfied if

A =

(b),

<l>(a)-4>

The new function


in the interval (a,
fore vanishes for

replacing

we

C=

B<l>(b)+

0;

set

B =/(&) -/(a),
\J/(x)

thus defined

b).

The

is

It is merely necessary to take


which was to be proved. It is
<

if/

which

their values,

(a;)

=/()

(*)-/(&) * (a).

continuous and has a derivative

derivative

some value

A and B by

Af(b)

0,

we

=x

(x)

lies

= A f (x) + B

<

between a and

(z) there
b,

find a relation of the

whence
form

in order to obtain the


equality

to be noticed that this

demonstration
does not presuppose the continuity of the
derivative/ ^).
des accroissements finis."
as a synonym.
Other English

"Formule

moyenne"

and

"

Mean value

theorem."

TRANS.

The French
synonyms are

also use

Formule de la
value theorem

"

"

"Average

FUNCTIONS OF A SINGLE VARIABLE

8]

I,

From

the theorem just proven it follows that if the derivative


zero at each point of the interval (a, b), the function f(x)
has the same value at every point of the interval for the applica

f (x)

is

x z belonging to the interval


Hence, if two functions have the same
(a, b), gives f(xi)=f(x.2 ).
derivative, their difference is a constant and the converse is evi
If a function F(x) be given whose derivative is
dently true also.
which have the same derivative are found by
f(oc), all other functions
adding to F(x) an arbitrary constant*
tion of the formula to

two values

Xi,

The geometrical interpretation of the equation (1) is very simple,


Let us draw the curve A MB which represents the function y = f(x)
Then the ratio [/(&) /()]/ (b a) is the
in the interval (a, b).

slope of the chord AB, while


() is the slope of the tangent at a
whose
abscissa
is c.
Hence the equation (1)
point C of the curve

expresses the fact that there exists a point C on the curve A MB,
between A and B, where the tangent is parallel to the chord AB.
If the derivative

/ (a;)

is

continuous, and

if

we

let

a and

approach

according to any law whatever, the number c,


lies between a and b, also approaches x 0} and the equation (1)
that the limit of the ratio

the same limit x

which
shows

f (xo). The geometrical interpretation is as follows. Let us


whose abscissa is x
consider upon the curve y=f(x) a point
and two points A and B whose abscissa are a and b, respectively.
is

is equal to the slope of the chord


The ratio [/(&) /()] / (b
)
AB, while / (x ) is the slope of the tangent at M. Hence, when
the two points A and B approach the point
according to any law

whatever, the secant AB approaches, as


tangent at the point M.

limiting position, the

its

* This theorem

is sometimes applied without due regard to the conditions imposed in


Let/(x) and 0(^), f r example, be two continuous functions which have
=
If the relation / (z) <t>(x)f(x)
derivatives / (a;),
(x)
(x) in an interval (a, 6).
is satisfied by these four functions, it is sometimes accepted as proved that the deriva
- f(x) (z)] / 2 is zero, and that accordingly
tive of the function//
or [/ (a;)
(cc)

its

statement.

4>

</)

<

<f>,

f/<t>

is

constant in the interval

unless the function

(a, b).

But

$ (a;) does not vanish

this conclusion is not absolutely rigorous

in the interval (a, b).

Suppose, for instance,

A function/(x) equal
and
(x) both vanish for a value c between a and 6.
to
between c and b, where Cj and C2 are dif
between a and c, and to
ferent constants, is continuous and has a derivative in the interval (a, b), and we have

that

(a;)

<j>

C%<f)(x)

Ci<f>(x)

(x)<t>(x)

f(x)<p

interpretation

is

(x)

apparent.

for every value of x in the interval.

The geometrical

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

10

[I,

This does not hold in general, however, if the derivative is not


For instance, if two points be taken on the curve
=
on
x*,
y
opposite sides of the y axis, it is evident from a figure
that the direction of the secant joining them can be made to approach
continuous.

any arbitrarily assigned limiting value by causing the two points to


approach the origin according to a suitably chosen law.
The equation (! ) is sometimes called the generalized law of the
mean. From it de 1 Hospital s theorem on indeterminate forms fol
lows at once.

x in
by
*

where
ratio
/"(#)

9.

of the

For, suppose f(a)

we

(j>

and
<f>

(a)

0.

Replacing

find
\

between a and

x.
This equation shows that if the
(x) approaches a limit as x approaches a, the ratic
and (a)
0.
approaches the same limit, if f(a)

a^ lies

f
/

(!
).
\ /

(x)/(j>

(a;)

<f>

Generalizations of the law of the mean.

Various generalizations of the law

mean have been

de la Socie te

The following one is due to Stieltjes (Bulletin


suggested.
Mathtmatique, Vol. XVI, p. 100). For the sake of defmiteness con

sider three functions, /(x), g(x), h(x), each of which has derivatives of the first
and second orders. Let a, 6, c be three particular values of the variable (a b c).
<

Let

and

let

be an auxiliary function.

c, its

derivative

Since this function vanishes

must vanish
/(a)
/(&)

/
If b

of x

<

be a number defined by the equation

for

when x

some value f between

g(a)

h(a)

g(b)

h(b)

-A

c.

and when
Hence

a2

b2

2f

(f)

and

be replaced by x in the left-hand side of this equation, we obtain a function


which vanishes when x = a and when x = b. Its derivative therefore van

ishes for

some value

of

equation thus obtained

x between a and

6,

which we

shall call

The new

is

(a)

(f)

g (a)

(a)

=
1

0.

2f

Finally, replacing f by x in the left-hand side of this equation, we obtain a func


tion of x which vanishes when x =
and when x
Its derivative vanishes
f

FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES

10]

I,

and f and therefore between a and

some value ij, which lies between


Hence A must have the value

for

J_

(a)

11

c.

h (a)

(a)

1.2

where

lies

between a and

and

6,

17

lies

between a and

c.

This proof does not presuppose the continuity of the second derivatives
If these derivatives are continuous, and if the values a, 6, c
f"(x), g"(x), h"(x).
approach the same limit XQ, we have, in the limit,

(x

(x

f (x

(xo)

f"(x

0"(xo)

h
h

(x

(x

h"(x

Q)

Analogous expressions exist for n functions and the proof follows the same
If only two functions /(x) and g (x) are taken, the formula? reduce to the
law of the mean if we set g (x) = 1.
An analogous generalization has been given by Schwarz (Annali di Mathematica, 2d series, Vol. X).
lines.

II.

FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES

10. Introduction. A variable


quantity w whose value depends on
the values of several other variables, x, y, z,
-, t, which are in

dependent of each other,


ent variables x, y,

w =f(x, y,z,---,
is

z,

t).

a function of the

t;

is called a function
of the independ
and this relation is denoted by writing

For definiteness,

let

us suppose that w

two independent variables x and

y.

If

= f(x, y)
we think

of x and y as the Cartesian coordinates of a point in the


plane,
each pair of values (x, y) determines a point of the plane, and con
If to each point of a certain region A in the xy
versely.
plane,

bounded by one or more contours of any form whatever, there


corresponds a value of
in the region A.

w,

the function f(x, y)

is

said to be defined

Let (x y ) be the coordinates of a point


lying in this region.
The function f(x, y) is said to be continuous for the pair of values
,

x oi

any preassigned positive number


such that

yo) if, corresponding to

positive

number

77

exists

|/C*o

+ h,

+ k)-f(x

2/ )

<

c,

another

whenever \h
and \k\<rj.
rj
This definition of continuity
<

may be interpreted as follows. Let


us suppose constructed in the xy plane a square of side
2^ about
as center, with its sides
to
the
The
axes.
parallel
,
point

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

12

[I,

11

whose coordinates are x + h, y + k, will lie inside this square, if


To say that the function is continuous for the
and k
h
rj
pair of values (x T/ O ) amounts to saying that by taking this square
sufficiently small we can make the difference between the value of
and its value at any other point of the square less
the function at
<

<

rj.

than

in absolute value.

we may

It is evident that

as center.

replace the square by a circle about


the above condition is satisfied for all

if

For,
(x y )
points inside a square, it will evidently be satisfied for all points
inside the inscribed circle.
And, conversely, if the condition is
,

satisfied for all points inside a circle, it will also be satisfied for all

We might then
points inside the square inscribed in that circle.
define continuity by saying that an rj exists for every c, such that
whenever V/i 2

+k
I

The

<

/(<>

17

we

also have

h y
>

k)

-f(x

definition of continuity for a function of 3, 4,

pendent variables
It is clear that

variables x

and y

taken separately.
11.

is

n inde

similar to the above.

any continuous function of the two independent


is

a continuous function of each of the variables

However, the converse does not always hold.*

Partial derivatives.

If

any constant value whatever be substi

tuted for y, for example, in a continuous function f(x, y), there


results a continuous function of the single variable x.
The deriva
tive of this function of x, if it exists, is denoted by fx (x, y) or by x
<a

Likewise the symbol u v or fy (x, y), is used to denote the derivative


of the function f(x, y} when x is regarded as constant and y as the
,

independent variable. The functions x (x, y) and y (x, y) are called


the partial derivatives of the function f(x,
They are themselves,
y).
in general, functions of the two variables x and y.
If we form their

partial derivatives in turn,

we

get the partial derivatives of the sec


Thus there are four partial
y).

ond order of the given function f(x,

derivatives of the second order, fa (x, y),fx


(x, y),fyx (x, y),f+(x, y\
The partial derivatives of the third, fourth, and higher orders are
*
2
Consider, for instance, the f unction /(x, y), which is equal to 2 xy / (x 2
y ) when
the two variables x and y are not both zero, and which is zero when x
0.
It is
y
evident that this is a continuous function of x when y is constant, and vice versa.

+
=

Nevertheless it is not a continuous function of the two independent variables x and y


for the pair of values x = 0, y = 0. For, if the point (a-, y) approaches the origin upon
the line x = y. the f unction/ (x, y) approaches the limit 1, and not zero. Such functions

have been studied by Baire

in his thesis.

FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES

11]

I,

13

In general, given a function w


defined similarly.
-, f)
/(x, y, z,
of any number of independent variables, a partial derivative of the
nth order is the result of n successive differentiations of the function
/, in

in /.

a certain order, with respect to any of the variables which occur


will now show that the result does not depend upon the

We

order in which the differentiations are carried out.

Let us

f =f

tjx ,

Ax, y

+ Ay) -f(x,

-f(x +

Ay)

Ax, y)

+ /(x,

y}

where we suppose that x, y, Ax, A?/ have


Let us introduce the auxiliary function

00 =f( x

<

where v

is

+ Ax,

U = Ay
replacing

<j>

by

(y

<

its

regarding u

-/(x,

we

<(w),

where

<

<

Ax, y

mean

0Ay)

U = Ax Ay/^ (x +

Ax, y

of the expression

0|

we

Ax, y

fy (u,

<

in x, y, Ax, Ay,

<

0Ay),

we

1.

see that

y,

+ ^ Ay),

0, and 0[ are again positive constants less than unity.


these
two values of U and dividing by Ax Ay, we have
ing

where

Ax, y

find

+ 0Ay),

interchanging x and

U = Ay Aaj/q, (x +

0[

-f (x, y + 0Ay)].

to the function

as the independent variable,

fxy (x +

value,

the law of the

From the symmetry


we would also have,

v),

to the function

+ 0Ay),

U = Ay [/(* +
we now apply

u)

Then we may write

an auxiliary variable.

Applying the law of the mean

If

different forms,

definite values.

or,

Then

this let us first write the expression

U =f(x +
two

y) be a function of the two variables x and y.


provided that these two derivatives are continuous.

To prove

in

prove the following lemma

= f (x,

Let w
xij

first

+ ^Ay) =f,,x (x +

Ax, y

Equat

0Ay).

(x, y) and fvx (x, y) are supposed continuous,


of the above equation approach fxy (x, y) and

Since the derivatives /,.


the two

fyx (x,

members

as Ax and Ay approach
we wished to prove.

y), respectively,

the theorem which

zero,

and we obtain

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

14

[I,

above demonstration that no hypothesis

It is to be noticed in the

made concerning the other derivatives of the second order,


The proof applies also to the case where the function
f^ and fy
f(x, y) depends upon any number of other independent variables
whatever

is

t.

besides x and y, since these other variables would merely have to


be regarded as constants in the preceding developments.

now

Let us

consider a function of any

number of independent

variables,
=/(>

and

let

y>

*)j

*>>

be a partial derivative of order n of this function.

Any

permutation in the order of the differentiations which leads to fi


can be effected by a series of interchanges between two successive
differentiations

tion considered.
is

and, since these interchanges do not alter the


just seen, the same will be true of the permuta

we have

result, as

have a notation which

It follows that in order to

not ambiguous for the partial derivatives of the nth order,

it is

number

of differentiations performed with


respect to each of the independent variables. For instance, any nth
derivative of a function of three variables, to =/(x, y, z), will be
sufficient to indicate the

represented by one or the other of the notations

where p

-f-

+ r = n*

result of differentiating

Either of these notations represents the


/ successively p times with respect to x,

q times with respect to ?/, and r times with respect to 2, these oper
ations being carried out in any order whatever.
There are three
distinct derivatives of the first order, x
six of the second
z

f f f
,

order, fa,

fa fa /

3 v

fa fxz

In general, a function of

and so

on.

p independent variables

has just as

many

n as there are distinct terms in a homo


of
n in p independent variables that is,
order
geneous polynomial
distinct derivatives of order

as

is

shown

in the theory of combinations.

Practical rules.
certain number of practical rules for the cal
culation of derivatives are usually derived in elementary books on
*

The notation /a Pyq (x, y, z) is used instead of the notation fxfyn z r (x, y, z) for
Thus the notation fxy (x, y), used in place of fx y (x, y), is simpler and
TRANS.
equally clear.

simplicity.

..r

I,

FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES

11]

the Calculus.
its

table of such rules is appended, the function


same line

derivative being placed on the

ax

ax log

a,

where the symbol log denotes the natural logarithm

= log x,

=
y=
y

->

cos x,

= arc tan x,

arc sin x,

JL

y = uv,

The

u
f

=/(),

last

sin x,

and

y
y

16

-\-

= u v 4- uv
^ u v uv

2/*=/>K;

two rules enable us to find the derivative of a function


and that of a composite function if fu ,fv ,fw are con

of a function
tinuous.

Hence we can

find the successive derivatives of the func

tions studied in elementary mathematics,


and irrational functions, exponential and

polynomials, rational

logarithmic functions,
trigonometric functions and their inverses, and the functions deriv
able from all of these by combination.

For functions of several variables there exist certain formulae


analogous to the law of the mean. Let us consider, for definiteness, a function f(x, y) of the
The difference f(x
h, y 4- K)

f(x

+ h,y +

to each part of
thus find

f(x

h,y

where 6 and

k)

-f(x,

y)

two independent variables x and y.


f(x, y) may be written in the form

= [/(* + h,

k)

-f(x, y

+ &)]

which we may apply the law of the mean.

k}-f(x,
each

y)

= hfx (x +

6h,

We

+ k}+ kf (x, y + O K),


v

between zero and unity.


This formula holds whether the derivatives fx and / are continu

ous or not.

lie

If these derivatives are continuous, another formula,

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

16

[1,512

similar to the above, but involving only one undetermined number


In order to derive this second formula, con
6, may be employed.*

= f(x + ht, y + kfy, where x, y, h,


sider the auxiliary function
and k have determinate values and t denotes an auxiliary variable.
Applying the law of the mean to this function, we find
<f>()

Now

is
<(>")

equal to

a composite function of

hfx (x

ceding formula

12.

ht,

-f-

may

Tangent plane

and

t,

derivative

its

(t)

4>

y + kf) + kfy (x + ht,

-f-

kt)

is

hence the pre

be written in the form

We

to a surface.

have seen that the derivative

of a function of a single variable gives the tangent to a plane curve.


Similarly, the partial derivatives of a function of two variables occur
in the determination of the tangent plane to a surface.
z

(2)

. F(x,

Let

y)

be the equation of a surface S, and suppose that the function F(x,


?/),
together with its first partial derivatives, is continuous at a point
Let z be the corresponding value of z,
(^o? yo) of the xy plane.
and AT (cr 7/0
the
corresponding point on the surface S. If
)
,

>

the equations

*=/(*),

(3)

z/

*
<KO>

^(9

the
represent a curve C on the surface S through the point
three functions f(f),
which we shall suppose continuous
<j>(t),

and

differentiable,

must reduce to x y
t.
The tangent

of the parameter

value

given by the equations

is

x
Since the curve

must hold

C lies on the surface


t;

z , respectively, for some


to this curve at the point

5)

for all values of

"A(0>

that

S,

is,

the equation \j/(t)=F[f(t~),

this relation

must be an identity

* Another formula
may be obtained which involves only one undetermined number 0,
and which holds even when the derivatives/^, and/, are discontinuous. For the
applica
tion of the law of the mean to the auxiliary function
=f(x + ht,y + k) +f(x, y + kt)
<j>(t)

gives
<(!)

-0(0)

or

f(x

+ h,y +

k)

-f(x,

y)

= (0),
= hfx (x +

0<0<1.

6h,

k)

+ kfy (x,

6k),

0<0<1.

The operations performed, and hence the final formula, all hold provided the deriva
tives fx and fy merely exist at the points (x + ht, y + k),
TRANS.
(x,y + kt),0^t^\.

FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES

13]

I,

in

17

Taking the derivative of the second member by the rule for


t = t
we have

t.

the derivative of a composite function, and setting


(5)

(t

<j,

We

can

and

(5),

now

eliminate

and the

f (t

<

~),

i//(

)>

)FVa

(t

<t>

between the equations

(4)

result of this elimination is

Z-z = (X-

(6)

)FXo +

)=fi(t

ar

F +
Xg

(Y

-y)

F^.

is the equation of a plane which is the locus of the tangents to


It is called the tan
curves on the surface through the point

This

all

gent plane

to the surface.

We

13. Passage from increments to derivatives.

have defined the successive


from

derivatives in terms of each other, the derivatives of order n being derived


It is natural to inquire whether we
those of order (n
1), and so forth.

may

not define a derivative of any order as the limit of a certain ratio directly, with
We have already done some
out the intervention of derivatives of lower order.
thing of this kind for fxy
is the limit of the ratio

f(x

as

+ Ax,

11); for the

+ Ay) -/(x +

Ax and Ay both approach

second derivative

/"

zero.

demonstration given above shows that/rj,

Ax, y)-f(x, y
Ax Ay

It

Ay)

+ /(x,

y)

can be shown in like manner that the

of a function f(x) of a single variable is the limit of the

ratio

/(x

hi

h*)

-f(x +

hi)

-f(x

^1^2
as hi

and h 2 both approach

zero.

For, let us set

/i(x)=/(z
and then write the above

ratio in the

Ai)

form

h\

>

(x

+
hi

The

limit of

derivative

is

this ratio

is

therefore the second derivative

/",

provided that

continuous.

Passing now to the general case, let us consider, for definiteness, a function of
Let us set
three independent variables, w =f(x, y, 2).

AW =/(x + h, y,
AW =/(x, y + k,
A^w =/(x,

z)

-/(x,

2)

-/(x,

y, 2),

y, 2 -f 1)

-/(x,

y, z),

y, 2),

w.
If we consider ^, k, I as given
functions of x, y, 2,
themselves
are
increments
first
then
these
three
constants,
and we may form the relative increments of these functions corresponding to

where A* w, A* w, A z u are the^irsi increments of


l

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

18

13

[I,

increments

This gives us the second increments,


hi, ki, ^ of the variables.
A* 1 A* w A* A w
Tnis process can be continued indefinitely an increment
v
of order n would be defined as a first increment of an increment of order
(n
1).
Since we may invert the order of any two of these
it will be suffi
1

>

operations,
cient to indicate the successive increments
given to each of the variables. An
increment of order n would be indicated by some such notation as the
following
:

where p

AX

A<->

AX

A*p A*

A^/(z,

and where the increments

y, z),

be either equal or
This increment may be expressed in terms of a
unequal.
partial derivative of
order n, being equal to the product
hihy

hpki

n,

may

lr

kgl\

h, k,

+ d,,hp y + eiki +
+ Oq kq z + ffi li +
+ Kir),
where every 6 lies between and 1. This formula has already been proved for
first and for second increments.
In order to prove it in general, let us assume
that it holds for an increment of order (n
1), and let
x

fx p*z

(x

*i Ai

(X, y, 2)

AX

Ah/ Ajt

A**

f.

Then, by hypothesis,
$(x,y,z)

h z ---hp ki-- -k q li--

fxp-i

Ir

if, i

r(x + 0sh2 +

----\-6
---P hp, y-\

,H----

).

But the nth increment considered is equal to 0(x + hi, y, z)


y, z); and if we
apply the law of the mean to this increment, we finally obtain the formula sought.
<f>(x,

Conversely, the partial derivative fxT^ zr

AX

hp ki k 2

hi h?

as all the increments h, k,


It is interesting to

the usual definition.

function of x and y,

no

first

approach

kg

---

A/-/
lr

li

zero.

notice that this definition

sometimes more general than


+ ^(y) is a
Then u also has

is

Suppose, for example, that w =/(x, y)


where neither
nor ^ has a derivative.
<f>

<f>(x)

and consequently second derivatives are out

derivative,

the ordinary sense.


Nevertheless,
tive fxy is the limit of the fraction
in

/(x

the limit of the ratio

is

.-AX-.. -AX

h,

-/(x +

k)

if

we adopt

h, y)

the

-/(x, y

of the question,

new definition,
k)

+/(x,

the deriva

y)

hk
which

is

equal to
h)

t( V

k)

<t>(x

h)

hk

But the numerator of this ratio is identically


zero as a limit, and we find/xy = 0.*
*

similar

zero.

Hence the

remark may be made regarding functions of a


= xs cosl/x has the derivative

ratio

approaches

single variable.

example, the f unction /(K)

f
and f

(x)

(x)

has no derivative for x

3 x 2 cos -

0.

But the

xsin-i
ratio

/(2ar)-2/(tt)+/(0)
o"

or 8

a cos (I/ 2 a)

2 a cos (I/

or),

has the limit zero

when a approaches

zero.

For

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

)14 ]

19

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

III.

which has been in use longer than any


it is by no means indispensable,
Although
other,*
it possesses certain advantages of symmetry and of generality which

The

differential notation,
is

due to Leibniz.

are convenient, especially in the study of functions of several varia


This notation is founded upon the use of infinitesimals.
bles.

which approaches zero as


small
a limit is called an infinitely
quantity, or simply an infinitesi
the
that
The condition
mal.
quantity be variable is essential, for
not
an infinitesimal unless it is zero.
is
a constant, however small,

Any

14. Differentials.

variable quantity

which approach zero


Ordinarily several quantities are considered
standard of compari
as
the
is
chosen
them
of
One
simultaneously.
Let
called the principal infinitesimal.
Then
infinitesimal.
another
infinitesimal, and ft
son,

and

be the principal
said to be an

is

is

infinitesimal of higher order with respect to a, if the ratio ft/a


On the other hand, ft is called an infini
zero with a.

approaches
of

tesimal

the

order with respect to a,

first

approaches a limit
this case

different

^
where

=K+

ft=a(K + c)= Ka

if

a.

Hence

+ at,

Ka

The complementary term


is called the principal part of ft.
an infinitesimal of higher order with respect to a. In general,
such that ft
we can find a positive power of a, say

and
at

the ratio ft/a


In
zero.

e,

another infinitesimal with respect to

c is

if

from zero as a approaches

is

a",

zero,

ft

is

/a"

from zero as a approaches


Then
called an infinitesimal of order n with respect to a.

approaches a

finite

limit

different

we have

=K+
4
a
;

e,

or
ft

The term

an (K

-f e)

= Ka* +

".

again called the principal part of ft.


these
definitions, let us consider a continuous func
Having given
Let Aa; be an
tion y=f(x), which possesses a derivative
(x).
Ka"

is

With the

possible exception of

Newton

notation.

TRANS.

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

20
increment of

From

x,

and

let A?/

14

[I,

denote the corresponding increment of

the very definition of a derivative,

y.

we have

approaches zero with Ace. If Ax be taken as the principal


infinitesimal, AT/ is itself an infinitesimal whose principal part is
f (x) Ax.* This principal part is called the differential of y and is

where

denoted by dy.

dy=f(x)&x.

When /(x)

reduces to x

itself, the above formula becomes dx


and hence we shall write, for symmetry,

= Ax

where the increment dx of the independent variable x is to be given


the same fixed value, which is otherwise
arbitrary and of course
variable, for all of the several

functions of x which

may

dependent

be under consid

eration at the same time.

Let us take a curve C whose equation is


y = f(x), and consider two points on it,
and
whose abscissae are x and x -f dx,
In the triangle MTN we have
respectively.

NT = MN tan Z TMN = dxf (x).


Hence NT represents the differential

while

Ay

is

equal to

NM

It

is

evident from the figure that

dy,

MT

an infinitesimal of higher order, in general, with


respect to NT,
is parallel to the x axis.
approaches M, unless
Successive differentials may be defined, as were successive deriv
atives, each in terms of the preceding.
Thus we call the differ
is

as

MT

ential of the differential of the first order the


differential of the
second order, where dx is given the same value in both
cases, as
2
above.
It is denoted
by d

y:

d*y

= d (dy) =

[/"(x)

Similarly, the third differential

d*y

dx] dx

f"(x)

= d(d*y) = [_f(x)dx*]dx

=f"(x)(dx)*,

*
Strictly speaking, we should here exclude the case
ever, convenient to retain the same definition of dy

even though

it is

(dx}*.

is

not the principal part of Ay.

where f

=f

TRANS.

(x)

= 0.

It is,

(x)&x in this case

how
also.

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

14]

I,

and so
(n

1)

The

21

In general, the differential of the differential of order

on.
is

/ (or),

derivatives

/"(a),

-,

(n

...

\x),

the other hand, in terms of differentials, and


tion for the derivatives

can be expressed, on
a new nota

we have

~ dy

_
~

,,

dx

dx

To each of the

<Py

t>

rules for the calculation of a derivative


corresponds

a rule for the calculation of a differential.

= mx m dx
d log x =
d xm

dn y
~dtf

For example, we have

da x =

dx,

d sin x

a x log a dx
cos

x dx

SC
,

aarcsmcc

dx

Vl -

darctanx

>

a;

=-

dx

+x

Let us consider for a moment the case of a function of a function.

=/(), where u

is

a function of the independent variable

x.

whence, multiplying both sides by dx, we get

yx dx =/(M) X ux dx;
that

is,

dy =f(u)du.

The formula

for dy is therefore the same as if u were the inde


variable.
This is one of the advantages of the differential
pendent
notation. In the derivative notation there are two distinct
formulae,

yx=f(u)uxy

&=/(*)>

y with respect to cc, according as y is


given directly as a function of x or is given as a function of x by
means of an auxiliary function u. In the differential notation the
to represent the derivative of

same formula applies in each case.*


If y = f(u, v, w) is a composite function, we have
Vx
at least

if

fu ,f ,fw
v

= U xfu + Vx f + Wx fn
v

are continuous, or, multiplying

yx dx =

u x dxfu

v x dxfv

+ wx dxfw

by dx,

* This
particular advantage is slight, however for the last formula ahove
well a general one and covers both the cases mentioned.
TRANS.
;

is

equally

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

22
that

[I,

15

is,

dll

Thus we have,

= f du + f dv +fw dw.
u

for example,

V du,

The same

rules enable us to calculate the successive differentials.


Let us seek to calculate the successive differentials of a function

= /(u),

We

for instance.

have already

dy=f (u}du.
In order to calculate d?y, it must be noted that du cannot be
regarded
as fixed, since u is not the independent variable.
We must then
calculate the differential of the composite function
f du, where u
(u)

We

and du are the auxiliary functions.

To

thus find

calculate d*y, we must consider d*y as a


composite function, with
d2 u as auxiliary functions, which leads to the

u, du,

expression

d*y

and so

=f

"(u)du

+f (u)d*u

3f"(u)dud*u

It should be noticed that these formulae for


d*y, d*y,
etc., are not the same as if u were the independent variable, on
account of the terms d*u, d z u, etc.*

on.

similar notation

is

of several variables.

f(x,
is

y, s),

which

is

used for the partial derivatives of a function

Thus the

xf>flzr

n of

in our previous notation,

represented by

____

in the differential notation.f

in

partial derivative of order

represented by

This notation is purely symbolic, and


no sense represents a quotient, as it does in the case of functions

of a single variable.

Let w =f(x,

15. Total differentials.

three independent variables x,


o

du
* This
disadvantage

dx
^ex

y,

z)

be a function of the

The expression

y, z.

^ dy + dz
-^ dz
dy
-

would seem completely

to offset the

advantage mentioned

TRANS.
Strictly speaking, we should distinguish between d^y and d?uy, etc.
t This use of the letter d to denote the partial derivatives of a function of several
variables is due to Jacob!
Before his time the same letter d was used as is used for

above.

the derivatives of a function of a single variable.

I,

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

15]

23

where dx, dy, dz are three fixed


called the total differential of
otherwise
which
are
arbitrary, assigned to the three
increments,
is

o>,

independent variables

The three products

x, y, z.

8f
TT-

df j
~
dz

df j
dy,

dx.

ex

cz

dy

are called partial differentials.


The total differential of the second order
ential of

the"

dx, dy, dz remaining the

d2 u

same

d*<a

the total differ

is

order, the increments

first

as

we pass from one

dx

-f -^

differential to

Hence

the next higher.

or,

the

total differential of

d(dta)

ddia

cdw

ddia

Ox

oy

dy

+ -=cz

dz

expanding,
ex cz

dx oy

ex*

Oy Oz

Ox oy

If cPf be replaced by
becomes the square of

We may

dxdy
df

2
,

dxdz

ox cz

2 =
dy dz.
Oy Oz

the right-hand side of this equation

then write, symbolically,

0x

cy

oz

2
being agreed that df* is to be replaced by 8 f after expansion.
of
the total differential
In general, if we call the total differential
order
the total differential of
of order
n, and denote it by

it

(n

1)

dn (a, we may write,

in the

same symbolism,

*.-(***
\0x

where df n

is to

Oy

+*)",
Oz
/

be replaced by d nf after expansion

ordinary notation,

that

is,

in our

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

[I,

15

where
n

A pqr
is

p\q\r\

the coefficient of the term ap &

in the

development of

(a.

+ b + c)

n
.

We

n
will show that it then
For, suppose this formula holds for d w.
and this will prove it in general, since we have
holds for dn+l
<o;

for

it

already proved

From

2.

the definition,

we

find

dn+l w=d(dn (o)

zn+if

whence, replacing

en + 1

d n+l f

/by cf

+ l the
right-hand side becomes
,

(
1

dx

7T-

dy

-f 7f-

^V

C7

rf

<7

or

cz

cy

\ox

Hence, using the same symbolism,

cy

we may
-

cz

cy
Note.

Let us suppose that the expression for dw, obtained in any

way whatever,

is

= P dx

dw

(7)

where P,

write

Q,

-f-

Q dy

are any functions x,


rfw

d<a

^dx

<c

+ R dz,
Since by definition

y, z.

8<a

ay
cy

d<a

^cz

dz,

we must have

where dx, dy, dz are any constants.

/\
(o)

S<a

"5~

^X

The

.r,

go)

^~

Hence
n
y,

8<a

-ft.

"5~~

KB

single equation (7) is therefore equivalent to the three separate


and it determines all three partial derivatives at once.
equations
(8)

I,

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

16]

In general,

if

25

the nth total differential be obtained in any

whatever,

= 2 Cpqr

d"

dx"
dy"

dz

way

r
;

Cyqr

then the coefficients

are respectively equal to the corresponding


nth derivatives multiplied by certain numerical factors. Thus all

these derivatives are determined at once.

We

shall

have occasion

to use these facts presently.

written

down

as follows

dia_dFdii

dFdv

dFdw

du dx

dv dx

dw dx

_d_F_d_u
du dy

d_F_d_v_

___

dy

dv dy

dw dy

dz

du dz

do dz

dw

dw

dF du

dF dv

dF dw

du

dv dt

dw

dx
d>

Let w
F(u, v, w~)
being themselves functions of the
The partial derivatives may then be

16. Successive differentials of composite functions.

be a composite function, u, v,
independent variables x, y, z, t.

d_F_d_v

dt

dt

dz

dt

If these four equations be multiplied by dx, dy, dz, dt, respectively,


and added, the left-hand side becomes
d(

3- dx
dx

that

is, do*

and the

<?

-r-

dy

dy

^<

-^-

dz

dz

J.
+,^-^
dt,
d

coefficients of

0F

d]F
do

d_F

du

dw

on the right-hand side are du, dv, dw, respectively.


do)

(9)

Hence

= ^dF du + dF dv + ^dF dw,


-r

cu

dv

cw

and we

see that the expression of the total differential of the first


order of a composite function is the same as if the auxiliary functions
were the independent variables. This is one of the main advantages

The equation (9) does not depend, in


form, either upon the number or upon the choice of the independent
variables
and it is equivalent to as many separate equations as
there are independent variables.
of the differential notation.

To

calculate

that the second


u, v,

d2 w,

let

us apply the rule just found for dta, noting


of (9) involves the six auxiliary functions

member

w, du, dv, dw.

We

thus find

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

26

-i^-

4-

dudv

4-

-z

cucu

Ctr
4-

du dv
d

d2

du 2

^
cv 2

+ ^gw du dw

4- o

du dv

du dw +
+ cucw

dv 2

dv

dw

[I,

dF

lu

dz u

-^-

en

dvdw + ^
ff
cw
cv

cu

d2
TT-^1

-f

t?w

Cw

^y^M>

dF
^
cw

simplifying and using the same symbolism as above,

or,

d2 w

= [7^- du+
7

Vc/w

^
dv
^^y

^
+

dw\

CM;

+^

TT-

cu

c?

Co

w 4- ^

cw

This formula is somewhat complicated on account of the terms in


d 2 u, d z v, dz w, which drop out when u, v, w are the independent
This limitation of the differential notation should be
variables.
2
borne in mind, and the distinction between d w in the two cases
s
To determine d w, we would apply the same rule
carefully noted.
to

2
<2

o>,

2
noting that d w depends upon the nine auxiliary functions

w, du, dv, dw, d u, d v,d w; and so forth. The general expres


sions for these differentials become more and more complicated
u, v,

dn w

an integral function of du, dv, dw, d 2 u,


the terms containing dn u, dn v, dn w are
is

dF
cu
If, in

dF

dn u

the expression for

4-

d"

dF

dn v

cv

w, u, v,

4-

cw

dn u, d n v, dn w, and

d n w.

w, du, dv, dw,

be replaced by

n
their values in terms of the independent variables, d t becomes an
coefficients
are equal
in
whose
dx, dy, dz,
integral polynomial

(cf.

by

Note,
15) to the partial derivatives of w of order n, multiplied
thus obtain all these derivatives
certain numerical factors.

We

at once.

Suppose, for example, that we wished to calculate the first and


second derivatives of a composite function <a=f(ii), where w is a

If we calculate
function of two independent variables u
(x, y).
these derivatives separately, we find for the two partial derivatives
of the first order
<f>

1ft

8w

dx

8w du

du dx

8u)

dy

du>

du

du dy

Again, taking the derivatives of these two equations with respect


to x, and then with respect to y, we find only the three following
distinct equations, which give the second derivatives
:

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

27

du\*

<i>

(11)

du

ex

dx*

dx dy

U CU

du* Cx dy

d*

<a

du dx dy

&u

d-

22

da

dy

,2*

The second

of these equations is obtained by differentiating the


of equations (10) with respect to y, or the second of them with
In the differential notation these five relations (10)
respect to x.

first

and (11) may be written

in the

form

en
(12)

cu
If

du and d*u

in these formulae be replaced

du

and

dy

TT-

-^ a

by

dx dy

in the first give the first


respectively, the coefficients of dx and dy
z
of dx , 2 dx dy, and
coefficients
while
the
of
o,
partial derivatives

dy

in the second give the second partial derivatives of w.

The formula for the total differential


n of a composite function becomes considerably simpler
in certain special cases which often arise in practical applications.
Thus, let us seek the differential of order n of the product of two
= uv. For the first values of n we have
functions
17. Differentials of a product.

of order

o>

dw

v dti

and, in general,
d"

it is

d"

dv,

d* a)

= v d* u +

2 du dv -f ud* v,

evident from the law of formation that

4- r,

dr d n ~^u

+ Cd*v d

~2

-f

It might be shown by alge


where C lt C 2
are positive integers.
braic induction that these coefficients are equal to those of the
,

but the same end may be reached by the


expansion of (a +
following method, which is much more elegant, and which applies
do not depend
to many similar problems. Observing that C l C 2
&)"

upon the particular functions n and v employed,

let

us take the

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

28

[I,

17

u = e*, v = &, where x and y are the two inde


pendent variables, and determine the coefficients for this case. We
special functions

thus find

e x+y ,

dw

e x+y

(dx

+ dy),

du =

e*dx,

dv

e v dy,

dn

-,

<*

d u = ex dx*,
d*v = e dy

x
e +y

(dx

+ dy)n

and the general formula, after division by ex+ J becomes


,

(dx

+ di/} n =

dx*

C^dydx*-

Since dx and dy are arbitrary,

r
Cl

_n
~l

n(n-l)

C t dy 2 dx n - 2

[-dp.

-\

follows that

it

~ n(n -1)

"

1.2

(n

- p + 1)

1.2-..p

and consequently the general formula may be written


n
(13) d (uv)

= vd u+^dud
1
n

n-

^
4

d 2 vdn

~2

-\

\-ud*v.

This formula applies for any number of independent variables.

u and v are functions of a single variable x, we


n
by dx the expression for the nth derivative of
the product of two functions of a single variable.
It is easy to prove in a similar manner formulae analogous to
(13) for a product of any number of functions.
Another special case in which the general formula reduces to a
simpler form is that in which u, v, w are integral linear functions
In particular,

if

have, after division

of the independent variables x, y,

where the
have

u=

ax

v =
w=

a"x

coefficients a,

a x

z.

+ cz+f,
+ b y + c z +/
+
+
by

-f

c"z

+/",

b"y

=
dv =
dw =
du

a",

b,

a dx

a dx

-f-

a"dx

are constants.

b
b

+
dy +
+
dy

b"dy

c dz,
c

dz,

c"dz,

the differentials of higher order d u, dn v, dn iv, where n>l,


vanish.
Hence the formula for dn is the same as if u, v, w were

and

For then we

all

<j>

the independent variables

that

is,

I,

THE DIFFERENTIAL NOTATION

18]

dn w

We proceed

8F
= (dF
-5- du + -T- dv

homogeneous

of degree m,
<(w,

is

4- 5

dw

V">

to apply this remark.

Homogeneous functions.

18.

8F

29

<f>(x,

w)=

v,

when we

identically satisfied

function

tx,

is

y, z)

said to be

the equation

if

$(x,

y, z)

set

w=

= ty,

tz.

equate the differentials of order n of the two sides of this


with
respect to t, noting that u, v, w are linear in t, and that
equation

Let

xis

du

The remark

ihi

If

+
set

"

>==

*^)
#

z dt.

shovvs that
(

y fo

dw =

= y dt,

dv

dt,

made

just

we now

m(m ~ 1}

1, w, v,

the development of the

first

"

(m

reduce to

"

#,

?/,

+1 )
2,

a;

<m

""*(

y*)-

and any term of

member,

becomes
d"<>

whence we may

which reduces,

write, symbolically,

for

= 1,

to the well-known formula

We

have then, altogether, three systems of nota


Various notations.
tion for the partial derivatives of a function of several variables,
Each of
that of Leibniz, that of Lagrange, and that of Cauchy.
these

is

somewhat inconveniently long, especially in a complicated


For this reason various shorter notations have been
Among these one first used by Monge for the first and

calculation.

devised.

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

30

[I,

19

second derivatives of a function of two variables is now in common


use.
If z be the function of the two variables x and y, we set

P
and the

ex 2

dy
total differentials dz

and d

ex 8y
2

z are given

= p dx + q dy,
d z = r dx
2 s dx dy +

o if

by the formulae

dz
2

-f-

dy~.

is now coming into


general use is the
Let z be a function of any number of independent vari
following.
x n then the notation
ables x 1} x z x 3)

Another notation which

ex
is

ex.

where some of the indices a lt

used,

ox

a.2)

a n may be

zeros.

19. Applications. Let y


f(x) be the equation of a plane curve C with
The equation of the tangent at a point
respect to a set of rectangular axes.

M(x,

is

y)

Y-y = y
The

slope of the normal,

tangency,

l/y

is

which

(X-x).

perpendicular to the tangent at the point of


and the equation of the normal is, therefore,
is

Let
be the foot of the ordinate of the point Jlf, and let T and
be the
points of intersection of the x axis with the tangent and the normal, respectively.
The distance
is called the subnormal

PN

the subtangent; MN, the normal; and


T, the tangent.
From the equation of the normal the ab

FT,

scissa of the point

subnormal

is

If

we

yy

whence the

agree to call the


the subnormal, and to attach the
length
sign + or the sign
according as the direc
tion
is positive or negative, the subnormal
is

yy

PN

PN

will

C.

The

lengths

Various problems
a.

MN and M T are given by the triangles MPN and MPT:

may

instance, all the curves for

number

always be yy for any position of the curve


Likewise the subtangent is
y /y

be given regarding these lines. Let us find, for


is constant and equal to a
given

which the subnormal

This amounts to finding

the equation yy

a.

The left-hand

all

the functions

side

is

y=f(x) which

the derivative of

2
2/

satisfy

/2, while the

I,

EXERCISES

EXS.]

These functions can therefore

right-hand side is the derivative of ax.


only by a constant whence
;

= 2ax +

31
differ

C,

the equation of a parabola along the x axis.


Again, if we seek the
curves for which the subtangent is constant, we are led to write down the equa

which

is

y /y

tion

= l/;

whence
log2/

which

is

tote.

To

+ logC,

or

Ce?,

the equation of a transcendental curve to which the x axis is an asymp


find the curves for which the normal is constant, we have the equation

or

/a2

The

first

member

is

the derivative of

(x

which

C)

y*

- Vo^-

a2

2
;

hence

the equation of a circle of radius a, whose center lies on the x axis.


curves for which the tangent is constant are transcendental curves, which

is

The

we

shall

later.

study

= f(x)

and let
and
F(x) be the equations of two curves C and
In order that
be the two points which correspond to the same value of x.
the two subnormals should have equal lengths it is necessary and sufficient that
Let y

M,

C",

YY
that

is,

that

directed in like

=yy

y + C, where the double sign admits of the normals being


This relation is satisfied by the cirfves
or in opposite senses.
2

and also by the curves

which gives an easy construction for the normal

to the ellipse

and

to the hyperbola.

EXERCISES
1.

= f(6) be the equation of a plane curve in polar coordinates. Through

Let p

the pole O draw a line perpendicular to the radius


be the points where this
vector OM, and let T and

line cuts the tangent

and the normal.

sions for the distances

OT, ON,

MN,

Find expres

and

MT

in

terms of /(0) and /


Find the curves for which each of these distances,
(<?).

in turn,
2.

is

constant.

Let y

skew curve

= f(x),
T,

i.e.

z<t>(x)

be the equations of a
Let

of a general space curve.

FIG. 3

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

32

be the point where the normal plane at a point


meets the z axis and
tangent at

lar to the

M to

PN and JOT,
3.

the z axis.

in turn, is constant.

These curves

[Note.

that

let

Exs.

is, the plane perpendicu


be the foot of the perpen
Find the curves for which each of the distances

.M",

dicular from

Af,

[I,

lie

on paraboloids of revolution or on spheres.]

Determine an integral polynomial /(z) of the seventh degree in x, given


+ 1 is divisible by (x - I) 4 and f(x) - 1 by (x+1)*. Generalize the

that f(x)

problem.
4.

Show

that

if

the two integral polynomials

Vl -p-t

= Q Vl -

P and
x

satisfy the relation

2
,

then

dP

ndx
Vl - x2

Vl - p*
where n

a positive integer.

is

From

[Note.

the relation

l-P2 = Q2(l-x)

(a)
it

follows that

- 2 PP = Q [2 Q (l - x*) -

(b)

The equation
by Q-]
and

where R\

Show

where

let

(t) is

shows that

A;

is

prime to

and

(b)

shows that

divisible

all dif

a polynomial of the fourth degree and P / Q is a rational function.


U/ satisfies a relation of the form

dx

kdt

VR(X)

Vfl!()

[JACOBI.]

Each root of the equation R(U/ V) = 0, since


must cause
VU and hence also dx/dt,

UV

Show

is

a constant.

is

to vanish,

be a polynomial of the fourth degree whose roots are


= U / be a rational function of t, such that

that the function

[Note.

6*.

E (x)

Let

5*.

ferent,

(a)

2 Qx].

it

cannot cause

(x)

to vanish.]

that the nth derivative of a function y = $


(u), where
may be written in the form

is

a func

tion of the independent variable x,

where

~
ctx

1.2

(*=1,

2,

[First notice that the nth derivative


coefficients

AI, A*,

-,

An

may be written in the form (a), where the


are independent of the form of the function
<j>(u).

I,

EXERCISES

EXS.]

To

find their values, set

Show

7*.

A^,

it

An

2
)

(>(x

n(n

the form

and

solve the

(b).]

X )n- 2P 0("-P)(x2 )

ju

is

is

(2
1

successively,

result

-V--( n -*P+V

n (n

(x

<f>

dx n

The

that the nth derivative of

"

un

equal to w,

(M)

resulting equations for

33

where p varies from zero to the last positive integer not greater than n/2, and
where 0(0 (x2 ) denotes the ith derivative with respect to x.

Apply

this result to the functions er 3?, arc sin x, arc tan x.

8*.

If

show that

cos u,

d-i(l

-x 2

)">-*

dx m ~ l

m ~i 1.3.5-

-(2m-

l)

1)

sin

mu.

[OLINDE RODRIGUES.]
9.

Show that Legendre

polynomial,

2
satisfies

dx"

the differential equation

ax

ax-

Hence deduce the


10.

Show

coefficients of the polynomial.

that the four functions

yt

y2

=
=

sin (n arc sin x),

2/3

cos (n arc sin x),

2/4

= sin (n arc cos x),


= cos (n arc cos x),

satisfy the differential equation


(1

x2 )

Hence deduce the developments

y"

xy

ri*y

Q.

when they reduce

of these functions

to poly

nomials.
11*. Prove the formula
i

dn

=
_(x-iei)
dx
V

G*
-

(-!)"

x+!
[HALPHEN.]

12.

Every function

of the

form
rx

The function

+
^.

= x0(x +

y)

<f>

and

whatever be the functions


13.

and

\f/.

ty*

+ y^(x + y)
-2s+t=

whatever be the functions

x$(y/x) + $ (y/x)

2 sxy

satisfies the

0,

satisfies
0,

the equation

equation

DERIVATIVES AND DIFFERENTIALS

34
14.

The function

=f[x +

satisfies the

</>(y)]

equation ps

[I,

qr,

Exs

whatever

be the functions / and 0.


15.

The function

rx 2

and

<j>

Show
y

where fa

2 sxy

whatever be the functions


16.

x<j>(y/x)

y~ n ^(y/x)

ty

+ px +

satisfies the

qy

equation

n 2 z,

\f/.

that the function

ai 0! (x)
|

a z fa (x)
\

an

n (x),

(x),
(x),
together with their derivatives, 0i (x),
(x),
0n(x), are continuous functions of x, has a derivative which is discontinuous
for x = a\ Oz
an

fa

n (x),

17. Find a relation between the first and second derivatives of the function
=/(&! M), where M = 0(x2 x 3 ); x t x2 x 3 being three independent variables,
and /and two arbitrary functions.
,

18.

Let/"(x)

be the derivative of an arbitrary


1 d*u,

u dx 2
where u
19*.

may

[/ (x)]-i and

The nth

=/(x) [/

#2

dx 2

f unction

/(x).

Show

that

(x)]-*.

derivative of a function of a function

u-<p(y),

where y

= ^ (x),

be written in the form

^1.2,

where the sign of summation extends over all the positive integral solutions of
the equation i + 2 j + 3 h
+ Ik = n, and where p = i + j +
+ k.
-\

[FA A DE BRUNO, Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Vol.

I, p.

359.]

CHAPTER

II

FUNCTIONAL DETERMINANTS
CHANGE OF VARIABLE

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

I.

20.

We

particular case.

frequently have to study functions for

which no explicit expressions are known, but which are given by


means of unsolved equations. Let us consider, for instance, an
equation between the three variables x, y, z,
F(x,

(1)

y, z)

= 0.

This equation defines, under certain conditions which we are about


to investigate, a function of the two independent variables x and y.

We

shall prove the following

Let x

=x

=.

theorem

z b&

set

of values which satisfy the equa

us suppose that the function F, together with its first


in the neighborhood of this set of values*
is
continuous
derivatives,
z
vanish for x = x y
there
F
does
not
derivative
the
y z
z
If

and

tion (1),

let

and only one continuous function of the independent variables


x and y which satisfies the equation (1), and which assumes the value z
when x and y assume the values x and y respectively.
exists one

=z

x y
The derivative Fz not being zero for x
y z
Since
is
that
it
F, Fx
positive.
suppose, for defmiteness,
I

sets of values x, y, z
(2)

and

let

Fv F
,

us
are

us choose a positive
are
continuous for all
functions
four
so small that these

supposed continuous in the neighborhood,

number

\x-x

which

satisfy the relations

\y-y

\<l,

\*-z

\<l,

that, for these sets of values of x, y,

*Iu a recent

let

(x,y,z}

>

<l,

z,

P,

Mathematique de France, Vol. XXXI,


Goursat has shown, by a method of successive approximations, that
it is not necessary to make any assumption whatever regarding
x and F even as to
His general
their existence. His proof makes no use of the existence of Fx and Fy
TRANS.
theorem and a sketch of his proof are given in a footnote to 25.
35
article (Bulletin de la Societe

190. ?, pp. 184-192)

t/

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

36

[II,

20

P is some positive number. Let Q be another positive num


ber greater than the absolute values of the other two derivatives
Fx Fy in the same region.
where

x, y, z

Giving

down

write

- F(*o,

V, *)

(*>

values which satisfy the relations

the following identity


7/0,

= F(x, y, z} - F(x

(2),

we may then

-F(x

T/o,

z)

y, z)

+F(x

F(x y,
F(x

z)

z)

7/0j

7/0,

applying the law of the mean to each of these differences, and


= 0,
observing that F(x y
)
or,

F(x>y>*)

*o)-F a r[o

(*

+ - yo) Fv [*.,
+ (z - ) F
2

Hence

-F(cc,

(3)

T/,

F^

2) is of

the form

^=

A (x y
+B(x, y,

>

>

[>o,

8(x

2/o
?/o,

ff(y

C (x,

where the absolute values of the functions A(x,


C(x,

y, z)

y,

*]
]

),

0"0

^ (x ~ xd
- )+
z) (y
T/O

o),

-y
*o +

)].

y, z) (z
y, z),

-*

B(x,

),

y, z),

satisfy the inequalities


M|<Q,

\B\<Q,

\C\>P

which satisfy (2). Now let c be a


number
less
than
and
the smaller of the two numbers
positive
Z,
rj
I and
x
that
and
Pe/2Q. Suppose
y in the equation (1) are given
definite values which satisfy the conditions
for all sets of values of x, y, z

and that we seek the number of roots of that


equation, z being
regarded as the unknown, which lie between z
e and z + c.
In
the expression (3), for F(x, y,
z} the sum of the first two terms is
always less than 2Qrj in absolute value, while the absolute value of
the third term is greater than Pe when z is
e.
From
replaced by z
the manner in which 77 was chosen it is evident that this last term
determines the sign of F.

and F(x, y, z + e )
which lies between z
>

since the derivative

and

only one

X Q and

?/

It

follows, therefore, that F(x, y, z


e)
hence the equation (1) has at least one root
<

is

and

e.

Moreover this root

is

unique,

positive for all values of z between z

It is therefore clear that the


equation (1) has one and
root, and that this root approaches ZQ as x and y approach
e.

respectively.

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

20]

II,

37

Let us investigate for just what values of the variables x and y


Let h be
the root whose existence we have just proved is denned.
the
foregoing reason
the smaller of the two numbers I and PI/2Q;
x
and
of the variables
y satisfy the
ing shows that if the values
one
h, the equation (1) will have
inequalities \x

<

x^\

and only one root which

between

lies

and z
y ), with

about the point M (x

-f

Let

I-

be a

sides parallel
,
square of side 2 h,
this square,
inside
lies
As long as the point (x, y)
to the axes.
x
and
of
function
a
determines
y, which
the

equation (1) uniquely


I and z
remains between z
the above, at the point

This function

I.

its

is

continuous, by
any other

this is likewise true for

and

by the hypotheses made regarding the func


tion F and its derivatives, the derivative Ft (x lf y l} i) will be posi
z i~ z
x
since \x l
tive at the point
lt
ya\<l,
\y\
as at
the
same
is
then
The condition of things at
l
exactly
point

of

R;

for,

<l,

o\<l-

consideration will be continuous for

and hence the root under

defined only in the interior of the


function.
region R, we have thus far only an element of an implicit
out
In order to define this function

Since the root considered

is

we proceed by successive
Let L be a con
follows.

side of R,
steps, as

tinuous path starting at the point


(x y and ending at a point (X, F)
Let us suppose that
outside of R.
,

~)

the variables x and y vary simul


taneously in such a way that the
point
If

we

of

(x, y)

describes the path L.

start at (x
z,

we have

Fm

with the value

a definite value of this root as long as we remain


Let 1 (x l y^ be a point of the path inside R,

inside the region R.

and

z t the corresponding value of

=x

y=y

The

z.

=z

conditions of the theorem

there exists another region


lt
v
l}
being
R l} about the point MI, inside which the root which reduces to z l for
satisfied for

= Xi,

= yi

is

This

uniquely determined.

new

region #! will

Taking then such a point t


but outside R, we may repeat the same con

have, in general, points outside of R.

on the path L, inside R


struction and determine a new region

R2

inside of

which the solu

this process could be


defined;
(1)
find
as
as
we
did
not
a set of values of
repeated indefinitely,
long
z
F
which
for the present
for
0.
shall
content
ourselves
x, y,
z

tion of the equation

is

We

and

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

38

[II,

21

with these statements; we shall find occasion in later chapters to


treat certain analogous

problems in

detail.

Let us return

Derivatives of implicit functions.

21.

R, and to the solution z

=
<f>(x,

to the region

y) of the equation (1),

which

is

continuous function of the two variables x and y in this region.


This function possesses derivatives of the first order. For, keeping
y fixed, let us give x an increment Ax. Then z will have an incre

ment

Az, and

we

find,

by the formula derived

As, y,z

+ A) -

F(x,

= Az Fx (x +

0Az, y,e

+ Az)

F(x

in

20,

z)

ij,

-f

Aa

z
(x, y,

Az)

= 0.

Hence

and when A# approaches zero, As does also, since z is a continuous


The right-hand side therefore approaches a limit,
a;.
and z has a derivative with respect to x

function of

In a similar manner

we

find

If the equation F =
functions of the variables x and

is

y,

of degree

in

z,

it

defines

and the partial derivatives cz/cx,

values of the variables


3z/dy also have m values for each set of
x and y. The preceding formulas give these derivatives without
ambiguity, if the variable z in the second member be replaced by
the value of that function whose derivative is sought.

For example, the equation

defines the

two continuous functions

+ Vl
for values of

The

x2

y*

Vl

and

x2

x and y which satisfy the inequality x-

first partial

derivatives of the

first

are

-y

2
<

1.

II,

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

2]

and the

39

the second are found by merely chang


partial derivatives of
The same results would be obtained by using the

ing the signs.


formulae

dz

Cz

cy

dx
replacing z by

its

y
z

two values, successively.


If

Applications to surfaces.

22.

we

interpret x, y, z as the Cartesian

coordinates of a point in space, any equation of the form

F(x,y,

(4)

z)=0

represents a surface S. Let (cc y z^) be the coordinates of a point


A of this surface. If the function F, together with its first deriva
tives, is continuous in the neighborhood of the set of values x yw z
,

three of these derivatives do not vanish simultaneously


at the point A, the surface S has a tangent plane at A.
Suppose,

and

if all

for instance, that

is

not zero for x

=x

=y

Accord

ing to the general theorem we may think of the equation solved


for z near the point A, and we may write the equation of the surface
in the form
z
4(x, y},

(x, y)

is

a continuous function

tangent plane

at

where
<f>

and the equation of the

is

Replacing dz /dx and dz /dy by the values found above, the equation
of the tangent plane becomes

If

F =
z

0,

but

Fx

pendent variables and

0, at
a;

we would

consider y and z as inde

as a function of them.

We

would then

same equation (5) for the tangent plane, which


dent a priori from the symmetry of the left-hand side.
find the

the tangent to a plane curve F(x, y)

0,

at a point (x

is

also evi

Likewise

~),

is

If the three first derivatives vanish simultaneously at the point A.

dF

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

40

[II,

23

We

shall see later


the preceding reasoning is no longer applicable.
to the various curves which lie on
that
the
tangents
(Chapter III)

the surface and which pass through


not a plane.

form, in general, a cone and

In the demonstration of the general theorem on implicit functions


Our geometrical
that the derivative F^ did not vanish.

we assumed

intuition explains the necessity of this condition in general.


For,
is parallel to the % axis,
the
if
but
3=
tangent
plane
0,
F^
F^

line parallel to the z axis and near the line x = x w y = y


meets the surface, in general, in two points near the point of
Hence, in general, the equation (4) would have two
tangency.
roots which both approach z when x and y approach x and y

and a

respectively.
If the sphere

y = 0,
with

23.

x
;

=1+

a;

+y

-+-

we

find

they are real

if c

c,

1 = 0, for instance, be cut by the line


two values of z, which both approach zero
is negative, and imaginary if c is positive.
2

Successive derivatives.

In the formulae for the

3z
= _Fx
dx~
F,

=
cy~
dz_

first

derivatives,

_FJL
F,

consider the second members as composite functions, z being


an auxiliary function. We might then calculate the successive deriv
The
atives, one after another, by the rules for composite functions.
existence of these partial derivatives depends, of course, upon the

we may

existence of the successive partial derivatives of F(x, y, K).


The following proposition leads to a simpler method of determin
ing these derivatives.

If several functions of an independent variable satisfy a relation

F=

obtained by equating to
0, their derivatives satisfy the equation
zero the derivative of the left-hand side formed by the rule for differ
vanishes
For it is clear that if
entiating composite functions.

when the

variables which occur are replaced by func


identically
tions of the independent variable, then the derivative will also van
ish identically.

which

The same theorem holds even when

satisfy the relation

F=

the functions

depend upon several independent

variables.

Now suppose that we wished to calculate the successive derivatives


of an implicit function y of a single independent variable x defined
by the relation

II,

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

23]

We

41

find successively

dF~
T~
ox

+2
^

dxdy

v
y

d2

SF~

cy

+^

dF
y

v"

dy

-dy

=0

ox dy

dx*

ox dy*

dxdy

dy
32

from which we could calculate successively y

7,1

y",

Example. Given a function y =/(x), we may, inversely, consider y as the


independent variable and x as an implicit function of y defined by the equation
y=f(x). If the derivative / (x) does not vanish for the value XQ, where
2/o =/(zo)i there exists, by the general theorem proved above, one and only one
function of y which satisfies the relation y

= f(x)

and which takes on the value

XQ for y = 2/0- This function is called the inverse of the f unction /(x). To cal
of this function, we need merely
culate the successive derivatives x y x y t, ay,
differentiate, regarding y as the independent variable, and we get
,

= /
=

(x)

=/"

(x) (x y )*

xy

/"(x)

(X,)

+ / (x) ay,
+ 3f"(x)x y x? +/

(x)x

3,

2/

whence
1

_8[/"(x)]-

f"(z)

~[7w

~7^)

[/

It

should be noticed that these formulae are not altered

(x), Xy2

the

and /"(x),

Xj,s

and

/"

(x),

for

it is

if

we exchange

x v and

evident that the relation between

= /(x) and x = (y) is a reciprocal one.


application of these formulae, let us determine all those functions
which satisfy the equation

two functions y

As an

y=f(x)

"

yy

3y"*

0.

Taking y as the independent variable and x as the function,


becomes

this equation

0.

Xj/>

But the only functions whose third derivatives are zero are polynomials of
most the second deree. Hence x must be of the form

at

C2 , C3 are three arbitrary constants. Solving this equation for y,


see that the only functions y = /(x) which satisfy the given equation are
of the form
where Ci,

we

V bx + c,

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

42
where a, 6,
whose axis

c
is

two

variables,

Let us now consider an implicit function

denned by the equation

= 0.

F(x,y,z)

(6)

The

24

This equation represents a parabola

are three arbitrary constants.


parallel to the x axis.

24. Partial derivatives.

of

[II,

first order are given, as


partial derivatives of the

we have

seen,

by the equations

9F.9F9*
p 7T-

(7)

?l

u,

9* 0z

0x

-^

dFdz_
;p

fl

u.

0#

</*

<?y

partial derivatives of the second order we need


two equations (7) again with respect to x and
the
differentiate
only
with respect to y. This gives, however, only three new equations,

To determine the

for the derivative of the first of the equations (7) with respect to y
is identical with the derivative of the second with respect to x.

The new equations

are the following:

dx 2
d

.OJL.? +
dxdzdx
d2

d*F dz ^

d_z_

""

~F +

d2

d2

dz

"

fe dy

ftr

d2

dz

dz

\dx]
dz dz

<P_F

r\

dx

/!?)%-

dz 2

r\

dx dy
2

(dz\
(dy)

dx 2

d*z
d_F
O
O O
c~

dF

+^

=o
_

^J

d2 z
:

dy

third and higher derivatives may be found in a similar manner.


By the use of total differentials we can find all the partial deriva

The

tives of a given order at the

following theorem

z,

the relation

This depends upon the

w,
of any number of independent vari
0, the total differentials satisfy
satisfy a relation F
total differential
0, which is obtained by forming the

If several functions
ables x, y,

same time.

u, v,

dF=

of F as if all the variables which occur in

F ivere independent variables.

be the given relation between


In order to prove this let F(u, v, w)
the three functions u, v, iv of the independent variables x, y, z, t. The
first partial derivatives of M, v, w satisfy the four equations

dFdu
__

__

du dx
d_Fd_u

du dy

dv dx

dw dx

dv dy

dw dy

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

II,24J

dFdv
~

dFdu
~
o

d_F_d-w_

~o

CM

tf

dFdu

a?

CZ
=

a^

a<

st

Multiplying these equations by dx, dy, dz,

we

adding,

^)

~a

^^! =

d_Fd_

&

aw

o
OW

tfS

43

dt,

respectively, and

find
d
= dF=0.
+ -/-dw
+ ^-dv
-^du
dv
OW
du

This shows again the advantage of the differential notation, for the
preceding equation

is

independent of the choice and of the number


To find a relation between the second

of independent variables.

we need merely apply the general theorem to the


considered
as an equation between u, v, w, du,
0,
equation
of higher order than the
The
differentials
forth.
and
so
dv, dw,
first of those variables which are chosen for independent variables
total differentials,

dF =

must, of course, be replaced by zeros.


Let us apply this theorem to calculate the successive total differ
entials of the implicit function defined by the equation (6), where
x and y are regarded as the independent variables. We find
*

Fi

dx

ox

dF

T- dx
dx

dF

+ -z-

dy

F
^
+
7

cy

8F

dy

3F j
^
=
+ 7cz dz

j
a;/

+ -rdz

dz

2
>

+
,

dF n

<P*

cz

0,

= 0,

two of these equations may be used instead of the five


equations (7) and (8) from the expression for dz we may find the
two first derivatives, from that for d^z the three of the second order,
and the

first

etc.

Consider for example, the equation

Ax 2
which

gives, after

two

y*

A"z*

l,

differentiations,

Ax dx + A ydy + A dz =
2
A dx + A dy 2 + A
+ A zd*z =
"z

0,

"

"dz

whence
dg

-- Axdx + A

0,

ydy,

TTi

A"z

and, introducing this value of dz in the second equation,

(A x*

+A

2
"z

dx*

+ 2AA xy dx dy + A

(A y*

we

+A

find
2

"z

dy*

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

44
Using Monge

s notation,

A(Ax*

24

we have then

Ax

p=

[II,

~IV
AA

_~

A"z*)

A y

~IV

xy

"**

evidently general, whatever be the number of the


derivatives which
independent variables or the order of the partial
it is desired to calculate.

This method

is

Example. Let z = /(x, y) be a function of x and y. Let us try to calculate


2
the differentials of the first and second orders dx and d x, regarding y and z as
the independent variables, and x as an implicit function of them.

First of

all,

we have
dz

dx

dy.

dx

Since y and z are

now

the independent variables,

d*y

and consequently a second

dy

dxdy

dy*

Monge s notation, using p, q, r, s,


equations may be written in the form

=
we

find
,

dx=

q dy,

dx2

dz

for the derivatives of /(x, y), these

p dx +

dz

first

0,

^dx + 2 ^- dxdy + ?^-dy* + ^d?x.


dx
x

In

the

set

differentiation gives

From

d2 z

we must

2 s dx

dy

tdy*

+ p d2 x.

dy

-,

and, substituting this value of dx in the second equation,


<Px=

The
z,

first

rdz*

and second

+ 2(ps-qr)dydz + (q*r -2pqs


partial derivatives of x, regarded as a function of

therefore, have the following values

dx
dz

d*x
dz 2

As an
which

dz x

dy dz

8x

dy

_qr

ps

p
d2 x

dy

_ 2pqs

application of these formulae, let us find

satisfy the equation

y and

pH

q*r

ps
all

those functions /(x, y)

2pqs.

=/(x, y), x be considered as a function of the two inde


pendent variables y and z, the given equation reduces to Xyt = 0. This means
If, in the

equation z

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

25]

II,

that x v

is

function of

independent of y
z.

which shows that x

and hence xv

This, in turn,

may

is
<f>(z)

45

where

0(z),

is
<f>(z)

an arbitrary

be written in the form

independent of

Hence we may write

y.

It is clear, therefore, that all the


is another arbitrary function of z.
functions z =/(x, y) which satisfy the given equation, except those for which fx
This equation represents
vanishes, are found by solving this last equation for z.

where ^ (z)

a surface generated by a straight line which

The general theorem.

25.

is

always parallel to the xy plane.

Let us consider a system of n equations


}

xpi u

"
l>

**ll

(E)
*

(x

w)

un x l} x y
between the n-\-p variables u i} u 3
,
that these equations are satisfied for the values x v
,

wj,

un

= un

that the functions

first partial derivatives

this system

=
,

xp

Suppose

xp = xp
are continuous and possess
x\,

which are continuous, in the neighborhood of

of values; and, finally, that the determinant

du

does not vanish for

uk

x,-

Under these conditions there

<f>i(xi,

for

x,

= x\,

=
p

and only one system of con


x2
xp
un
n (x
x^),
un
and which reduce to u\, u\,

exists one

x2
tinuous functions u^
which satisfy the equations (E)
x* *
x

<}>

1,

~)

his paper quoted above (ftn., p. 35) Goursat proves that the same conclusion
be reached without making any hypotheses whatever regarding the derivatives
remain
cFi/dXj of the functions { with regard to the x s. Otherwise the hypotheses
exactly as stated above. It is to be noticed that the later theorems regarding the
would not follow, however, without
existence of the derivatives of the functions
some assumptions regarding dFf /dXj. The proof given is based on the following

*In

may

4>

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

46

The determinant A
ables u l}

is

called the Jacobian,* or the Functional Deter

n functions

minant, of the
it?,

un

Fu F

2,

Fn

-,

with respect to the n vari


by the notation

It is represented

D(F F2
lf

We

26

[II,

...,F,,)

by proving the theorem in the special case of a


two equations in three independent variables x, y, z and
two unknowns u and v.
will begin

system of

= 0,
Fi(x,y,z,u,v) = Q.
y, z, u, v)

Fi(x,

(9)

(10)

=x

These equations are satisfied, by hypothesis, for x


u = u v = v and the determinant
,

,y

= y ,z = z

dF\ dFj
du cv

dF\ dFt
dv cu

does not vanish for this set of values.

It follows that at least

one

of the derivatives dF^/dv, dF2 /dv does not vanish for these same
values.
Suppose, for definiteness, that oFl /8u does not vanish.
According to the theorem proved above for a single equation, the
relation (9) defines a function v of the variables x, y,

which reduces

to v

in the equation (10)


x, y, z,

and

=f( x

=x

y,

by

this function,

*>

y=y

for

z, u,

)>

we

= zw

Replacing v

obtain an equation between

u,

$(,

y, z, u}

=F

[x, y, z, u,

f(x,

y, z,

)]

0,

lemma: Let f\(x\,3kt,---,v p MI, u 2


u n ) be n
,u n ),
,/(!, x?, ,x p MI, u 2
functions of the n + p variables X{ and u^, which, together with the n 2 partial deriva
tives cfi/GUfr, are continuous near Xi
x p = 0, HI = 0,
u n = 0. If
0, x z = 0,
the n functions f{ and the n 2 derivatives dfi/^Uf. all vanish for this system of values,
then the n equations
,

i=/i.

=/2,

=/

"

admit one and only one system of solutions of the form

where
all

continuous functions of the p variables Xi, x 2


xp which
1(
2
n a
approach zero as the variables all approach zero. The lemma is proved by means of
m ~l
-1)
>

>

a suite of functions

where

M^

O)

= 0.

limiting function
solution.

u^ =f (x
i

It is

,x z

,x p

u[

w^"

u^

^)

(i

= l,

2,

n),

shown that the suite of functions u\ m) thus denned approaches a


which 1) satisfies the given equations, and 2) constitutes the only

The passage from

the

lemma to

the theorem consists in an easy transforma

tion of the equations (E) into a form similar to that of the


*JACOBI, Crelle s Journal, Vol. XXII.

lemma.

TRANS.

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

25]

II,

which

for

is satisfied

=x
du

and from equation

= zw

47

=u

Now

dv du

8u

(9),

du

ou

ov

whence, replacing df/du by this value in the expression for

WP
we

nhfaun
obtain
d

D(u,

~du

v)

dF^
dv

It is evident that this derivative does not vanish for the values
z
o>

y<

Hence the equation

uo-

<I>

is satisfied

when u

by a certain continuous function u = (x, y, ), which


and, replacing u by
y = y z = z
MO when x = x
<

<

f(x, y,

we obtain

z, ?/),

is

replaced

is

equal to

(x, y, z)

in

continuous function.

for v also a certain

The proposition

is then proved for a system of two equations.


can show, as in
21, that these functions possess partial
derivatives of the first order.
Keeping y and z constant, let us

We

give x an increment Ax, and let AM and Ay be the corresponding


increments of the functions u and v. The equations (9) and (10)

then give us the equations

+
where

e,

e",

rj,

+ A.

+ A.

+ A,

rj

approach zero with

rj"

A,,

."

+ ,- =
Aa-,

A,

0,

It follows

Av.

that
,

^+

\ da;

A;/.

8Fi

^+

/ \ go

A/^

77"

,\

^+

/^i

77

aF2
4-V
II
p t]
/ \ ou

"V

\-

When Ax

V- +

/ \ Ox

V g

f.

approaches zero, AM and Av also approach zero and hence


do so at the same time. The ratio Aw /Ax therefore
e, e
77, 77
approaches a limit that is, u possesses a derivative with respect to x
,

e",

77"

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

48

dF cF2

dF dF2

du

dx

dv

dx

dx

dF dF2

dFi

dFz

du

dv

du

It follows in like

dv
l

dv

manner that the

26

[II,

ratio

Av/Aa; approaches a

finite

limit dv /dx, which is given by an analogous formula.


Practically,
these derivatives may be calculated by means of the two equations

dF dv

dFj du
du dx

8 Ft

dx

dF2

dF^du

"T"

CU
<~\

OX

~r\~

OX

dx

dF^dv
~

==

~^~~

"

OX

CV

and the partial derivatives with respect


a similar manner.
In order to prove the general theorem
that

dv

to

y and z may be found

it

will be sufficient to

in

show

the proposition holds for a system of (n


1) equations, it
will hold also for a system of n equations.
Since, by hypothesis,
the functional determinant A does not vanish for the initial values
if

of the variables, at least one of the first minors


corresponding to the
is different from zero for these same values.

elements of the last row

Suppose, for definiteness, that it is the minor which corresponds to


is not zero.
This minor is precisely

dFn /dun which

D(F F
and, since the theorem

l}

2,

-,F _

D(UI,

2,

...,

we may obtain

equations,
of the equations
(E) in the form

M1

,*; Mn ),

(a? 1 , a;,,

where the functions


<,.

by the functions ^ 1?
a

new equation
ai

>*,;

-,

un _

are continuous.
,<_!

=F

,,-..,

is

<^i5
>

<f>

continuous.

xp

un

-i>

we would

1)

1)

un ),

we

w n _,

obtain

<^

2,

.,

show that the derivative

^0*i, *a,

xp

-,

Then, replacing u^

not vanish for the given set of values x\, x


2
can solve this last equation in the form

fa^fa, x 2

in the last of equations


(E),

(x lt

It only remains for us to

where $

).

solutions of the first (n

for the determination of

un )

_,)

assumed to hold for a system of (n

is

clear that

it is

-,

xp

<;

_,,

MII )

d<b/du n

0.

does

for, if so,

we

*p),

Then, substituting this value of un ir


obtain certain continuous functions foi

II,

25]

HI,

u2

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS
-,

un _ l

49

In order to show that the derivative

also.

in

ques

tion does not vanish, let us consider the equation

The

derivatives

(n

1) equations

d un-i ^ un

dui dun

dun
8<j>

/8un

~7,

7J

d<jj

/du n

"

d* n _i/d

dun

~o

are given by the

V}

(12)
n-1

tj

*Pl

g -^n-l

^yn-1

^-^n-1

r\

and we may consider the equations (11) and (12) as n linear equa
tions for
n -i/du n d/du n) from which we find
n
d<f>!/du

D (MU

cu n

d<f>

,-

t<2,

It follows that the derivative

D (M!,

i)

d/du

?<

2,

wn )

does not vanish for the initial

and hence the general theorem

is proved.
successive derivatives of implicit functions defined by several
equations may be calculated in a manner analogous to that used in

values,

The

When there are several independent


the case of a single equation.
variables it is advantageous to form the total differentials, from
which the

same order may be found.

partial derivatives of the

Consider the case of two functions u and v of the three variables


x, y, z defined

by the two equations


F(x,

The total differentials of the


two equations

3F
-%-

dx

dx

d
-zSec

+
,

0F

^- dy

d$
-^-

cy

..

du

first

SF

dz
^dz

-^- dz

d&
^s

v)=0,

order du and dv are given by the

dy

dx

y, z, u,

+
+
.

8F
-5-

du

d
-r

du

du

du

.dF

-r-

dv

cv
d
-,

-5

c?v

= 0,
= A0.

cv

z
Likewise, the second total differentials d u and d*v are given by the

equations

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

50

dx

-..

dF

2)

dF
G

dF

+ /-d*u+
du

cv dv)
2
>

[II,

d*v

co

26

0,

d&

d&

=
+ ~d*v
CV

?-*d*u
CU

0,

and so forth. In the equations which give dn u and dn v the deter


minant of the coefficients of those differentials is equal for all vahies
of n to the Jacobian D(F,
v), which, by hypothesis, does not
<)/Z>(w,

vanish.
Let MI, 2
u n be n functions of the n independent vari
xn)
n, such that the Jacobian D(UI,
2,
u,,)/D(xi, x 2

26. Inversion.

ables xi, x 2 ,

/i

The n equations

does not vanish identically.


g\

Un

n (X 1(

X2

Xn )

-,

,.

x n as functions of u\, M 2
define, inversely, Xi,
For, taking any
x, for which the Jacobian does not vanish, and
system of values x?, x,
denoting the corresponding values of MI, w2
Un by uj, w!j,
M, there
x2

which

when

according to the general theorem, a system of functions

exists,

satisfy (13),

MI

tions 0i,

wj,
2

-,

and which take on the values


-, x, respectively,
u n = unn
These functions are called the inverses of the func
and the process of actually determining them is called
n
x",

x",

an inversion.
In order to compute the derivatives of these inverse functions
Thus, in the case of two functions

we need merely

apply the general rule.

u=f(x,

y),

=
<f>(x,y)

we

consider u and v as the independent variables and x and y as inverse


functions, we have the two equations
if

du

= 8f,dx +
,

dx

Bf

dv

dy,

,
- dx

30-

d<f>

dx

cy

dy.

cy

whence
^0
,

dx

%f

ait

dy

have then,

,
,

dy

du

dx

a/^0_?/a0

a/ a0

dy dx

dx dy

dx dy

We

c0

-i

av

dy

df
-

dv

dx

^/ ^0
dy dx

finally, the formulae

50

dx
du

dy

dx

8/a0_a/c0

dv

dx dy

dy dx

d_f

dy
d_fdj>_d_fd_$

dx dy

dy dx

II,

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

27]

51
8f

dx

eu

_ cf

df

eB^

d<t>

27. Tangents to skew curves.


sented by the two equations

let

Let us consider a curve C repre

l*i(*,y,)-0,

(14)

and

ey ex

ex ey

ey ex

ex e^

ex

dy

~"

JF,(a5,y,) =
<

T/O ,

be the coordinates of a point

of this curve, such

that at least one of the three Jacobians

dF1 dFt_dF\

dF\dF^ _d_F\d_F\
dy

dz

dz

dx

vz

dy

dx

8F*

8F gF2

dF_i

dz

ex

dij

dy

dF
dx

replaced by x %, z ot respectively.
that
D(Fl} Fj/D(y, z) is one which does
Suppose, for defmiteness,
the equations (14) may be solved
Then
the
not vanish at
n
point

does not vanish

when

x, y, z are

in the form

where $ and

\j/

^(x)

= t( x

)>

are continuous functions of x which reduce to y

The tangent to the curve C


z
respectively,
the two equations
point 3/o is therefore represented by
,

when x

X-x =
1

where the derivatives

<#>

(cc)

F-7/Q
^ (x )
and

and

at the

= Z -g
f (x )
"

i//(ce)

may

be found from the two

equations

In these two equations let us set x = x 0) y = y ,z = 2^, and replace


- )/(X - x ),
* (*) and ^o) by ( F - T/O ) / (X *) and (Z
The equations of the tangent then become
respectively.

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

62

28

[II,

or

xa

^(y,

*)

The geometrical

^>(,

fl(,y

interpretation of this result

is

The

very easy.

two equations (14) represent, respectively, two surfaces Sj and S2 of


which C is the line of intersection. The equations (15) represent
the two tangent planes to these two surfaces at the point 1/
and
,

the tangent to C is the intersection of these two planes.


The formulae become illusory when the three Jacobians above all

vanish at the point

In this case the two equations (15) reduce


and the surfaces Si and S2 are tangent at the
The intersection of the two surfaces will then consist, in
.

to a single equation,

point A/

general, as

point

we

shall see, of several distinct branches through the

II.

FUNCTIONAL DETERMINANTS

We

28. Fundamental property.


have just seen what an important
role functional determinants play in the theory of
implicit functions.

All the above demonstrations expressly presuppose that a certain


Jacobian does not vanish for the assumed set of initial values.

Omitting the case in which the Jacobian vanishes only for certain
particular values of the variables, we shall proceed to examine the
very important case in which the Jacobian vanishes identically.

The following theorem


Let

x \i x ii

HI,
")

a relation

u2
x

n"

w2

fundamental.

un

In

II (M I}

is

>

be n functions of the n independent variables


order that there exist between these n functions
u n) == 0, which does not involve explicitly any
>

of the variables x ly x z
functional determinant

xn

it is

D(UI, M 2

necessary

and

sufficient that the

?y)

should vanish identically.

In

th.3 first

place this condition

is necessary.
For, if such a rela
between the n functions HI, u%,
un
the following n equations, deduced by differentiating with respect to
each of the z s in order, must hold

tion TL(UI, w 2 ,

wn )

exists

II,

FUNCTIONAL DETERMINANTS

28.1

8udu

end Ul
^

7;

jfi

~T~

"^

we cannot

__

"

/-,

Q.

du n dx n

have, at the same time,

=
<7U

^5 =
CU H

would

since the relation considered


it is

du2 dx n

^5 =

identity,

an 8u n

~r

jf2

dui 8xn

and, since

"o

53

in that case reduce to a trivial

clear that the determinant of the coefficients,

which

is

the theorem, must vanish.*

of
precisely the Jacobian
The condition is also sufficient.

To prove

this,

we

shall

make

use of certain facts which follow immediately from the general


theorems.

x,
is

w be three functions of

the three independent variables


functional determinant D(u, v, w)/D(x, y, z)
y, z, such that the
Then no relation of the form
not zero.
1)

Let

u, v,

A du

/u,

dv

+ v dw =

can exist between the total differentials du, dv, dw, except for
= p, = v = 0. For, equating the coefficients of dx, dy, dz in the

three equations for


foregoing equation to zero, there result

which have no other solutions than X


2)

Let

w, u, v,

variables x, y,
is

u, v,

/u,

X,

p.,

= v = 0.

w be four functions of the three independent


such that the determinant D (u, v, w} / D (x, y, s)

We

can then express x, y, z inversely as functions of


we obtain
and substituting these values for x, y, z in

not zero.

z,

o>,

a function
a,

of the three variables u,

= $ (u,

v, ^v.

w)

v,

If by any process ivhatever we can

obtain a relation of the form


(16)

du

= P du +

+ R dw

the
Professor Osgood has pointed out, the reasoning here supposes that
^H / dUn do not all vanish simultaneously
to vanish. This supposition
U (u lf u 2
is solved for one of the variables u t
II
relation
the
when
certainly justified

*As

/,

partial derivatives an / Si/i dU


for any system of values which cause
,

is

Q dv

-,)

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

54

[II,

28

between the total differentials dw, du, dv, dw, taken with respect to the
independent variables x, y, z, then the coefficients P, Q, R are equal,
respectively, to the three first partial derivatives of

d&
P= o

= d$

Cu

**

~o

cv

<

w)

(u, v,

8<b

o
ow

For, by the rule for the total differential of a composite function


(

we have

16),

= d&
du +

<D

du

d&

d<b

dv

-^

-|-

cw

cv

dw

and there cannot exist any other relation of the form (16) between
du, dv, dw, for that would lead to a relation of the form

d<a,

A.

where

X,

/t,

do not

du

p.

do

+ v dw =
We

all vanish.

0,

have just seen that this

is

impossible.
It is clear that these

remarks apply to the general case of any

number

of independent variables.
Let us then consider, for definiteness, a system of four functions
of four independent variables

X=F

(x,y,z,

Y=Fi (x,
Z = F (x,

(17)

T=F

*),

y, z, t),
y, z, t),

(x,y,z,

t),

where the Jacobian

D(F F F3 Fi )/D(x,

zero

and

by hypothesis

l}

let

us suppose,

is
identically
that one of the first

y, z, t)

first,

We may then
minors, say D(F^ F2 Fs )/D(x, y, z), is not zero.
think of the first three of equations (17) as solved for x, y, z as
functions of X, Y, Z, t and, substituting these values for x, y, z in
,

the last of equations (17),


(18)

We

obtain

as a function of

Y, Z, t:

T=*(X,Y,Z,t).

proceed to show that this function $ does not contain the vari
For this purpose
t, that is, that 8$ /dt vanishes identically.
us consider the determinant

able
let

we

FUNCTIONAL DETERMINANTS

II,

55

A=

If, in

this determinant, dX, dY, dZ,

ox

dT

be replaced by their values

Ct

tiy

the determinant be developed in terms of dx, dy, dz, dt, it turns


out that the coefficients of these four differentials are each zero the
first three being determinants with two identical columns, while the

and

if

Hence A

last is precisely the functional determinant.

0.

But

if

we develop this determinant with respect to the elements of the last


column, the coefficient of dTis not zero, and we obtain a relation of
the form

dT = P dX + Q dY + R dZ.
By
side
dt,

the remark

is

equal to

hence d&/dt

made

d<i?/dt.

= 0.

above, the coefficient of dt in the right-hand


But this right-hand side does not contain

It follows that the relation (18) is of the

which proves the theorem

form

stated.

It can be shown that there exists no other relation, distinct from


that just found, between the four functions X, Y, Z, T, independent

of x, y, z, t.
For, if one existed, and if we replaced T by $>(X, Y, Z)
in it, we would obtain a relation between X, Y, Z of the form
which is a contradiction of the hypothesis that

U(X,
D(X,

Y,

Z)=0,

Y,

Z)/D(x,

y, z)

does not vanish.

first minors of the


pass to the case in which all the
one of the second
least
at
where
but
Jacobian vanish identically,
the first two of
Then
zero.
not
is
minors, say D(Flt F^)/D(x, y},
of X. Y, z, t,
functions
x
as
and
for
solved
be
y
equations
may

Let us

now

(17)

and the

last

two become

Z = *! (X,

Y, z,

t),

T=

(A

Y, z, t).

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

56

On

we can show,

the other hand

ex

as before, that the determinant

dX
fy

dY

ex
ex

[n,

dZ
dy

vanishes identically and, developing it with respect to the elements


of the last column, we find a relation of the form
;

dZ = FdX + QdY,
whence

it

follows that

In like manner

it

can be shown that

!r=
and there exist in

this case

two

dt

= 0;

distinct relations between the four

functions X, Y, Z, T, of the form

There

exists,

however, no third relation distinct from these two;

there were, we could find a relation between


and Y, which
would be in contradiction with the hypothesis that D(X, Y} D(x, y)

for, if

is

not zero.
Finally, if all the second minors of the Jacobian are zeros, but
all four functions X, Z, Y, T are constants, three of them are

not

The above reasoning is evidently general.


n functions F1} F2
FH of the n independ

functions of the fourth.


If the Jacobian of the

ent variables x ly x 2

x n together with

r
(n
1) -rowed
minors, vanishes identically, but at least one of the (n
r)- rowed
minors is not zero, there exist precisely r distinct relations between

the n functions

all its

and certain r of them can be expressed in terms


of the remaining (n
r), between which there exists no relation.
The proof of the following proposition, which is similar to the
above demonstration, will be left to the reader.
The necessary and
condition
that
n
n
sufficient
functions of
p independent variables be
connected by a relation which does not involve these variables is that
;

every one of the Jacobians of these

n functions, with

respect to

any n

II,

FUNCTIONAL DETERMINANTS

28]

57

In par
of the independent variables, should vanish identically.
and sufficient condition that two functions

ticular, the necessary

Fi(#i

other

xz

CC

and

B)

that the

is

dF2 /dXf should

x z ,---, #) should be functions of each


dF1 /dx i and

(x l ,

corresponding partial derivatives

be proportional.

Fn in the foregoing theorems may


Note. The functions F19 F2
involve certain other variables y 1} y 2)
besides x l , x 2
xn
-, ym
Fn )/D(x l x 2 -, oj n ) is zero, the
If the Jacobian D(Fl} Fz
,

Fn are connected by one or more relations


functions JF\, F2
which do not involve explicitly the variables x 1} x 2
x n but
which may involve the other variables y 1} y 2
ym
,

The funda
Applications. The preceding theorem is of great importance.
mental property of the logarithm, for instance, can be demonstrated by means
of it, without using the arithmetic definition of the logarithm.
For it is proved
at the beginning of the Integral Calculus that there exists a function which is
defined for

positive values of the variable, which is zero


is l/x.
Let/(x) be this function, and let

all

when x

1,

and

whose derivative

u=f(x)+f(y),

xy.

Then

D (u,
D (x,
Hence there

v)

y)

exists a relation of the

y
x

=0.

form

f(x)+f( V ) =
we need only

and to determine
since x

is

set

which gives f(x)

1,

=
<j>

(x).

Hence,

arbitrary,

f(z)+f(y)=f(xy).
It is clear

that the preceding definition might have led to the discovery of


had they not been known before the

the fundamental properties of the logarithm


Integral Calculus.

As another application

let

us consider a system of n equations in n

(MI,

unknowns

(19)
.

where
*i

J/i,

JT2

n are

Xmi which

*2

may

Fn(Ul, W 2

constants or functions of certain other variables


also occur in the functions

If the

.F,-.

Jacobian

un ) vanishes identically, there exist between


2
n )/D(u\,
2i
,
Z)(Fi,
the n functions F, a certain number, say n
fc, of distinct relations of the form
,

>

Ft

F = U n - k (F!,
lt

Fk

).

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

58

In order that the equations (19) be compatible,

t+

Hi (Hn

= U H - t (Hi,

29

evidently necessary that

it is

.,H ),..-,H

[II,

Hk

),

reduce to k distinct equations. We


and, if this be true, the n equations (19)
have then the same cases as in the discussion of a system of linear equations.
29. Another property of the Jacobian. The Jacobian of a system of n
functions of n variables possesses properties analogous to those of
the derivative of a function of a single variable. Thus the preceding

theorem may be regarded as a generalization of the theorem of 8.


The formula for the derivative of a function of a function may be
Fn be a system of n func
extended to Jacobians. Let Flf F2
u n and let us suppose that u^ w 2
tions of the variables M I} u 2
,

-,

>

u a themselves are functions of the n independent variables x lf


x. Then the formula

D(F

D(x

-,

Fn ) D( UI

D(x 1}

lt

follows at once from the rule for the multiplication of determinants


and the formula for the derivative of a composite function. For,
let

us write

down

the

two functional determinants


cj\
ou

dF
in the second

where the rows and the columns


changed.

The

first

dx u

dx n

du

element of the product

dF

cx

have been inter

equal to

is

du,,

that

is,

to

30. Hessians.

?!,

and similarly for the other elements.

Let/(x,

?/,

z)

be a function of the three variables x, y,

the functional determinant of the three

first partial

df/dz,
a2

ax 2
a 2/

ax cy
a2

ex cz

a2

ex 5y
a2

a2

dx az

a2/

dydz

a?/

a 2/

cy oz

a2

cz-

z.

Then

derivatives cf/dx, Sf/cy,

II,

FUNCTIONAL DETERMINA NTS

30]

59

is called the Hessian of f(x, y, z).


The Hessian of a function of n variables is
defined in like manner, and plays a role analogous to that of the second deriva
tive of a function of a single variable.
proceed to prove a remarkable

We

invariant property of this determinant.


Let us suppose the independent vari
ables transformed by the linear substitution

(19

aX+
X+

(X=
y=

where X, F, Z are the transformed

[3Y+ yZ,

Y+

y Z,

and

variables,

or,

0, 7,

7"

are constants

such that the determinant of the substitution,

A=

J8

/3

a"

7
7
7"

/3"

This substitution carries the function /(x, y, z) over into a new


function F(X, Y, Z) of the three variables X, Y, Z.
Let II (X, F, Z) be the
Hessian of this new function. We shall show that we have identically
is

not zero.

II (X, F, Z)

where x, ?/, z are supposed replaced


For we have

fZF

H=

dF
BY

D(X,
and

if

dF^
cZ )

= A 2 /t(x,

their expressions

by

?I\

~\dX aT

aZ/

Y, Z)

D(x,

we consider cf/cx, cf/dy, df/dz,

we may

z),

?/,

in /i(x, y, z)

D(x,

D(X,

y, z)

for a

moment,

cz

By

^, ^, Kl
cx

Y, Z)

as auxiliary variables,

But from the

relation

D(x,

U(X,

y,

Y, Z)

dz /

dy

F(X,

Y, Z) =f(x, y,

dX

ex

dY
3F = a/
+
7
-^
c

cx

we

z),

dF = cf
a
+ a ,cf +

find

,,Bf
a"

dz

cy

dy

a/
cy

+
,

c/
cz

whence

dx

and hence,

d_F

dF

er

ez

dy

dz

a"

=
7

finally,

H=

D(x,

D(X,
It is clear

a a

that this theorem

is

general.

- = A 2 /i-

y, z)

Y, Z)

).

y,

write

D(x,y,z)

from (19

A;

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

60
Let us

now

ox3

3 bx*y

be a given binary cubic form whose coefficients


Then, neglecting a numerical factor,

ax
bx

+
+

and the Hessian

by

bx

cy

cy

ex

dy

is

- &2 )x2 +

(ac

3 cxy 2

dy*

a, b, c,

(ad

30

Let

consider an application of this property of the Hessian.


/(x, y)

[II,

d are any constants.

bc)xy

(bd

c 2 )y 2 ,

seen to be a binary quadratic form. First, discarding the


is a perfect square, we may write it as the product of

case in which the Hessian

two linear factors

(mx

ny) (px

qy).

now, we perform the linear substitution

If,

mx + ny = X,

F(X, Y) = AX* +
whose Hessian

this

the

form

Y,

form,

BX Y+3 CXY + DY
2

8
,

is

2
H(X, Y) = (AC - B

and

px + qy

new

the form/(x, y) goes over into a

If

+ (AD - EC] XY + (BD - C2 F 2


)

must reduce, by the invariant property proved above, to a product of


KXY. Hence the coefficients A, B, C, D must satisfy the relations

one of the two coefficients B,


shall have

be different from zero, the other must be so,

and we

-?
F(X, Y) =

(B*X*

+ 3 B2 CX* Y + 3 BC* XY 2 +

whence F(X, Y), and hence /(x,


particular case,

F(X, Y)

it is

-f-

evident that

will be of the canonical

y), will

we

shall

C*

B
Y =

^+^

)\

be a perfect cube. Discarding this


and the polynomial
have B = C =
;

form

AX* + DY 3

Hence the reduction of the form /(x, y) to its canonical form only involves the
solution of an equation of the second degree, obtained by equating the Hessian
are precisely the two
The canonical variables X,
of the given form to zero.

factors of the Hessian.


It is

AX

easy to see, in like manner, that the form/(x, y) is reducible to the form
When the Hessian van
the Hessian is a perfect square.

+ BX 2 Y when

ishes identically /(x, y)

is

a perfect cube
/(x, y)

(ax

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

31]

TRANSFORMATIONS

III.

It often happens, in

61

many problems which

arise in

Mathematical

we

are led to change the independent variables.


It
Analysis, that
therefore becomes necessary to be able to express the derivatives

with respect to the old variables in terms of the derivatives with


We have already considered a problem
respect to the new variables.

Let us now consider the

of this kind in the case of inversion.

question from a general point of view, and treat those problems


which occur most frequently.
31.

and
x=

be

<().

respect to
respect to

Let

I.
Let y be a function of the independent variable x,
a new independent variable connected luith x by the relation
It is required to express the successive derivatives of y with

Problem

let t

x in terms of

and the

successive derivatives of

y with

t.

be the given function, and F(t) =/[<()] the func


in the given function.
By the
by replacing x by

y=f(x)

tion obtained

<j>(t)

rule for the derivative of a function of a function,

dy

37

at

we

find

dy X ,.
9 m,
ax
.

~r~

whence

dy
dt

To find the derivative of y

This result

may

be stated as follows

with respect

to x,

take the derivative of that function with respect

and divide it by the derivative of x with respect to t.


The second derivative d 2 y/dx* may be found by applying
rule to the expression just found for the first derivative.

Ll =

dx*

_ -y^

We

to t

this

find

-I

w)

(0-y^"(0.
[>

(0]

and another application of the same rule gives the third derivative

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

62

[H,

32

performing the operations indicated,

or,

<*

[>

The remaining

derivatives

may

(OJ
be calculated in succession by

In general, the nth deriva


repeated applications of the same rule.
x
be
to
tive of y with respect
expressed in terms of
may
(),
(n)
the
first n successive derivatives of y with respect to
and
(),
t.
These formulae may be arranged in more symmetrical form.
<}>

<j>"(t),

<

Denoting the successive differentials of x and y with respect to t by


z
dn y, and the successive derivatives of y
-,
dx, dy, d x, d*y,
(n
with respect to x by y
y \ we may write the preceding
d"x,

y",

formulae in the form

y
9

dx

_ dx d

dy 6?

y
dx 3

(20)

~~

x2

- 3 d?y dx d

+ 3dy (d*x)* -

dy d*x dx

The independent variable t, with respect to which the differentials


on the right-hand sides of these formulae are formed, is entirely
arbitrary and we pass from one derivative to the next by the
;

recurrent formula
,

<>=

the second

member being regarded

as the quotient of

two differen

tials.

32.

Applications.

These formulas are used

in the

study of plane

when

the coordinates of a point of the curve are expressed in


curves,
terms of an auxiliary variable t.

=/(*)

* co

in order to study this curve in the neighborhood of one of its points


of y
it is necessary to calculate the successive derivatives y
But the preceding formulas
with respect to x at the given point.
,

?/",

give us precisely these derivatives, expressed in terms of the succes


without the necessity
sive derivatives of the functions f(t) and
(#),
<j>

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

32]

63

of having recourse to the explicit expression of y as a function of x,


Thus the
which it might be very difficult, practically, to obtain.
first

formula

=
dx

y>

f (t)

The value of
occurs in an impor
gives the slope of the tangent.
tant geometrical concept, the radius of curvature, which is given by
y"

the formula

which we shall derive

In order to find the value of R, when

later.

the coordinates x and y are given as functions of a parameter t,


need only replace y and
by the preceding expressions, and
y"

we
we

find

R=

(dx
.

4-

^r~

dy^Y

"

where the second member contains only the


x and y with respect to t.

first

and second deriva

tives of

The following interesting remark is taken from M. Bertrand s Traitt de


Calcul differentiel et integral (Vol. I, p. 170).
Suppose that, in calculating some
geometrical concept allied to a given plane curve whose coordinates x and y are
supposed given

in

terms of a parameter
F(x,

y, dx, dy,

d2 x,

we had obtained

d 2 y,

-,

the expression

d n x, dy),

all the differentials are taken with respect to t.


Since, by hypothesis,
concept has a geometrical significance, its value cannot depend upon the
choice of the independent variable t.
But, if we take x = t, we shall have

where

this

dx

dt,

dz x

d3 x

da x

0,

f(x, y, y

which

is

and the preceding expression becomes


(
,

y",

>

2/

same as the expression we would have obtained by supposing at the


was solved with respect to y in the
case to the case where the inde
this
To
return
from
particular
*().

the

start that the equation of the given curve

form y =
pendent variable
from the formulae

is

arbitrary,

(20).

we need only

Performing

replace y

y",

by their values

this substitution in

with which
we should get back to the expression F(x, y, dx, dy, d 2 x, d 2 y,
we started. If we do not, we can assert that the result obtained is incorrect.
)

For example, the expression

dxd 2 y + dyd2 x

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

64

[II,

33

cannot have any geometrical significance for a plane curve which is independent
of the choice of the independent variable.
For, if we set x = t, this expression
2
reduces to
/(I + y )$ and, replacing y and
by their values from (20), we
do not get back to the preceding expression.
y"

y"

The formulae (20)

33.

differential

determine

are also used frequently in the study of


Suppose, for example, that we wished to

equations.
functions y of the independent variable x,

all the

which

satisfy the equation

(21)

(1

_^*_ e eg +

where n is a constant. Let us introduce a new independent variable


= cos t. Then we have
t, where x

dy

d?y
dx 2

dy

dt

dx

sin

d*y
smt-jfi.
at*

and the equation (21) becomes,

cost

dy
dt
<

sin

after the substitution,

(22)

It is easy to find all the functions of

for it

may

which

satisfy this equation,

be written, after multiplication by 2 dy /dt,

whence

where a

is

an arbitrary constant.

Consequently

or

71

= 0.

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

34]

The left-hand

side

is

that this difference

65

the derivative of arc sin (y/a)

a sm(nt

It follows

nt.

must be another arbitrary constant

b,

whence

+ &),

which may also be written in the form


y

=A

sin nt

+ B cos nt.

Returning to the original variable x, we see that all the functions of


x which satisfy the given equation (21) are given by the formula

where

=A

A and B

are

sin (n arc cos a)

+ B cos (n arc cos a),

two arbitrary constants.

To every relation between x and y there corresponds,


a relation
by means of the transformation x = f(t, u), y =
u*),
34.

Problem

II.

and

u.

<f>(t,

between

respect to

It is required to express the derivatives

x in terms of t,

This problem

is

and

u.

the derivatives of

u with

seen to depend upon the preceding

of y with

respect to

when

t.

it is

noticed that the formulae of transformation,

give us the expressions for the original variables x and y as func


t if we imagine that u has been
replaced in

tions of the* variable

We

these formulas by its value as a function of t.


need merely
apply the general method, therefore, always regarding x and y as
composite functions of t, and u as an auxiliary function of t.

We

find then,

first,
8<jt

dy

_dy

dx

dx

dt

dt

8<ft

du

du dt

dt

df

df du

dt

du dt

and then
d?y
2
dx"

or,

__

dx

d (dy\
\dxj

dt

dt

performing the operations indicated,


,

SuBtdt

du*\dt)
t

gu

du dt

dfr*

\ dt

du dt/\dt*

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

66

[II,

33

is expressible in terms of t, u, and


2
dn u/dtn
the derivatives du/dt, d?vi/dt ,
,
Suppose, for instance, that the equation of a curve be given in
The formulae for the rectangular coor
polar coordinates p

In general, the nth derivative y (n)

/(o>).

dinates of a point are then the following

Let p

= p cos

p sin w.

<D,

be the successive derivatives of p with respect to w,


From the preceding formulae

p",

considered as the independent variable.

we

find

=
dy =
d x =
dx

p sin w

cos (a dp
sin

o>

cosu)

dp

dz p

sinw d 2 p

d2 y

p cos w

e?w,
d<a,

2 sin w

dai

dp

p cos

2 cosw

rfw ffy

p sin

da?,
7(o

2
,

whence
2
<&e

+
dij

dif

d^x

=
=

dp

+p

2 du dp

The expression found above

rfw

d<a

+p

d2 p

c?w

3
.

for the radius of curvature

becomes

+ *p m -pp

35. Transformations of plane curves.

Let us suppose that to every

of the same plane cor


we make another point
point
If
we
denote the coordinates
known
construction.
some
respond by
of a plane

of the point
by (x, y)
in general, two relations

and those of
by (X, F), there will exist,
between these coordinates of the form

X=f(x,y),

(23)

Y=4>(x,

y}.

These formulae define a point transformation of which numerous


examples arise

in

Geometry, such as projective transformations, the

transformation of reciprocal radii,


a curve c, the corresponding point

When

etc.

the point

m describes

M describes another curve C, whose

properties

may

be deduced from those of the curve

nature of the transformation employed.


cessive derivatives of y with respect to x,
sive derivatives of F with respect to X.
is
y",

necessary to be able to express


-.

and we

This
find

is

precisely the problem

Let y
and F

?/",

F",

and from the


be the suc
the succes

To study the curve C


in

terms of

it

which we have just discussed

F",

x, y,

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

36]

67

dY

It is seen that Y depends only on x, y, y


so forth.
Hence,
the transformation (23) be applied to two curves c, c which are
tangent at the point (x, ?/), the transformed curves C, C will also

and

if

be tangent at the corresponding point (A F). This remark enables


us to replace the curve c by any other curve which is tangent to it
in questions which involve only the tangent to the transformed
,

curve C.

Let us consider, for example, the transformation defined by the


formulae

Y=
which

is

x2

the transformation of reciprocal radii, or inversion, with


the cor
Let m be a point of a curve c and

the origin as pole.

responding point of the curve C. In


order to find the tangent to this curve

C we need

only apply the result of


ordinary Geometry, that an inversion
carries a straight line into a circle

through the pole.


Let us replace the curve
tangent mt.

The

inverse of

by

mt

its
is

through the two points Mand O,


whose center lies on the perpendicular
circle

<-

A
FIG. 5

upon mt. The tangent MT to this circle


the angles Mmt and mMT are equal,
and
AM,
the complement of the angle mOt. The tangents mt

Ot let fall from the origin


is

perpendicular to

since each

and

is

MT are therefore antiparallel with respect to the radius

36. Contact

transformations.

vector.

The preceding transformations

are

most general transformations which carry two tangent


Let us suppose that a point
curves into two other tangent curves.
is determined from each point m of a curve c by a construction
not the

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

68

[II,

36

which depends not only upon the point m, but also upon the tangent
to the curve c at this point.
The formulae which define the trans
formation are then of the form
(24)

X = /(*,

y, y-),

and the slope Y of the tangent


by the formula

y,

Y=<j>(x,

to the

dx

y)

transformed curve

is

given

dy

dy>

In general, F depends on the four variables


apply the transformation (24) to two carves

and if we
y
which are tangent
C will have a point

x, y,
c,

y"

at a point (x, y~), the transformed curves C,


(X, Y) in common, but they will not be tangent, in general, unless
happens to have the same value for each of the curves c and c
.

y"

In order that the two curves

C and C should always

be tangent, it
should not depend on
that is,
and (x, y, y ) should satisfy the

is necessary and sufficient that Y


that the two functions f(x, y, y )

y";

<

condition

In case this condition

is

satisfied,

the transformation

is

called a

contact transformation.
It is clear that a point transformation
particular case of a contact transformation.*

is

Let us consider, for example, Legendre s transformation, in which


the point M, which corresponds to a point (x, y) of a curve c, is given
by the equations

X=y

from which we

Y=xy -y;

find

_dY
_xjf _
~
-

dX

y"

which shows that the transformation


In like manner we find

dY
dX
V

11

a contact transformation.

is

dx

y"dx

y"

=r

dX
*Legendre and Ampere gave many examples of contact transformations. Sophus
Lie developed the general theory in various works see in particular his Geometric
der Beruhrungstransformationen. See also JACOBI, Vorlesungen iiber Dynamik.
;

TRANSFORMATIONS

37]

II,

and so

From

forth.

the preceding formulae

=Y

= XY -Y,

69

it

follows that

X,

which shows that the transformation is involutory.* All these prop


by the remark that the point whose coordinates

erties are explained

X=

xy
y is the pole of the tangent
y Y
2
the point (x, y) with respect to the parabola x
denote the pole of the tangent at
general, if
respect to a directing conic 2, then the locus of
are

to the curve c at

2y

m to

= 0.

But, in

a curve

with

the point
is a,
is precisely the polar of the point
curve C whose tangent at
with respect to 2. The relation between the two curves c and C is
therefore a reciprocal one and, further, if we replace the curve c by

tangent to c at the point m, the reciprocal curve


will be tangent to the curve C at the point M.
another curve

from a fixed point O in the plane of a curve c, a perpen


upon the tangent to the curve at the point m, the locus of
the foot
of this perpendicular is a curve (7, which is called the pedal of the
It would be easy to obtain, by a direct calculation, the coordinates
given curve.
of the point Jlf, and to show that the trans
Pedal curves.
be let

dicular

OM

If,

fall

formation thus defined

is

a contact transfor

mation, but it is simpler to proceed as follows.


Let us consider a circle 7 of radius E, de
scribed about the point

be a point on

as center;

and let ?MI

OM such that Om\ x OM= E

The point mi

the pole of
with respect to the circle
transformation which carries
is

2
.

the tangent mt
and hence the
c into

the

is

result of a transformation of reciprocal po-

followed by an inversion. When the


point m describes the curve c, the point mi,
the pole of mt, describes a curve Ci tangent
lars,

with respect to
to the polar of the point
the circle 7, that is, tangent to the straight line miti, a perpendicular let fall
Tto the curve C and the tangent m\ti to the
from mi upon Om. The tangent

Hence, if we draw
angles with the radius vector OmiM.
are equal, since they are the comple
the normal MA, the angles
and
It
is the middle point of the line Om.
ments of equal angles, and the point
follows that the normal to the pedal is found by joining the point Mto the center
of the line Om.

curve

Ci

make equal

AMO

AOM

y"

37. Projective transformations. Every function y which satisfies the equation


= is a linear function of x, and conversely. But, if we subject x and y to

the projective transformation


*

That

is,

two successive applications


TRANS.

original coordinates.

of the transformation lead us

back to the

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

70

aX + bY+c

X+

a"

b"

Y+

c"

a"

[II,

X+ b Y +
X
Y+
-f

38

c
c"

b"

= should
Hence the equation
In order to verify this we will first remark that the
general projective transformation may be resolved into a sequence of particular
transformations of simple form. If the two coefficients
and
are not both
a straight line goes over into a straight line.

become d ^Y/dX"2

y"

0.

a"

zero,

we

will set

X\ =

a"

= and a
on the supposition that a
time

ab"

ba"

-\-

b"

b"

Y+
a"

b"

c"

0,

is

a"

The preceding formulae may

not zero.

X and Y by their values

then be written, replacing

b"

and since we cannot have at the same


we will also set YI
a
+ b Y+ c
in terms of

Xi and

l5

in

the form

a Xi + /3 FI + 7
Xi

YI

A!

YI

AI

Xi

It follows that the general projective transformation can be reduced to a


succession of integral transformations of the form

aX + bY +

c,

X+ b Y+

combined with the particular transformation


x

Performing

this latter transformation,

~ dy
dx

we

= Y

find

_-.-_
~~
~

and
y"

~y~

= -

XY"(-

dx

X*)

Y".

Likewise, performing an integral projective transformation,

dy

_
~

dt/
dx

+b Y
a + bY
_ (ab -ba
(a + bY

we have

)Y"

3
)

In each case the equation


= 0.
goes over into
We shall now consider functions of several independent variables, and, for
definiteness, we shall give the argument for a function of two variables.
Y"

y"

38. Problem III.

ent variables

x and

Let w
y,

= f(x,

and

let

y) be a function of the two independ


be two new variables connected

u and v

with the old ones by the relations

It is required to express the partial derivatives

and y in terms of u,
u and v.

variables x
respect to

v,

and

of u with respect to the


the partial derivatives of
with
u>

TRANSFORMATIONS

II,

Let w

71

which results from/(x, y) by the


F(u, v) be the function
Then the rule for the differentiation of composite

substitution.

functions gives
do

c oj

cu

dx cu

Cd)

dv

dx cv

a)

d\ff

<J>

whence we may
D(<f>,

d ta

(jt

C\}/

dy dv

and du/dy;
change
vanished,

find

d<a/dx

the

\ji)/D(u, v)

dw

=A

o~
ex
(25)

d(a
a
cu

Cd)

Cu) __

cy

the determinant

for, if

variables

of

performed

Hence we obtain the equations

would have no meaning.

where A, B, C,

dy du

-^

cu

d>

~z~

+u

cv

Coi
~^~~>

cv

u and v

are determinate functions of

formulae solve the problem for derivatives of the


show that the derivative of a function with respect

and these

first order.

to

is

the

They
sum of

the two products formed by multiplying the two derivatives with respect
The derivative with respect to
to u and v by A and B, respectively.

obtained in like manner, using C and D instead of A and B,


In order to calculate the second derivatives we need
respectively.
first derivatives the rule expressed by the preced
to
the
only apply

is

ing formulae

doing

<o

575
C/X

==

or,

/8u>\

2~\\

Q<Kf

=A

so,

we

d I

==

"-~/

d&

2\p

GOT/

t/JC /
/

(31

find

\\

- +B
o>

(A
cu\ Cu

C/it

to
- \
cv /

+B

w
ry- (A cu
dv\
.-

+ B -5.

performing the operations indicated,

^=
^-^ 2

+
A[A-z+Br-%:+-^-CU CU
CU CV
v

^"^

-B t-^

My

cy

-z

CU CV

0v cv

</

2
2
find 8 2 (a/dxdy, 3 <a/di/

and the following derivatives


which are to be carried out
we need only replace the operations d /dx and d /dy by the operations

and we could
in like

manner.

In

all differentiations

A-Z-+B-Z-*
Cv
du

cu

D^-,
cv

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

72

[II,

Hence everything depends upon the calculation

respectively.

38

of the

coefficients A, B, C, D.

Example

Let us consider the equation

I.

(26)

+26 -- +

CO

ex

where the

coefficients a,

tion to as simple a

cy*
;

and

let

v,

us try to reduce this equa

We observe first that if a = c = 0, it would


the equation.
We may then suppose that c,

form as

possible.

be superfluous to try to simplify


Let us take two
for example, does not vanish.

and

= 0,

ci/

are constants

6, c

dJ

(i3

new independent

variables u

defined by the equations

u
where a and

/3

are constants.

ay,

py,

Then we have
u

<

cu

<jj

cx

d<a

du

and hence,

in this case,

A=B=

du

8y

C=

1,

a,

cv

D = p.

The general formulae then

give
"

dx?

cucv

~dii?

"ai?

eu 2

ducv

and the given equation becomes

+ 26a + ca2 )^ +

(a

2 [a

b(a

It

au a

(a

-(-

CB

remains to distinguish several cases.


First case.

+ ca/3]-^- +

ft)

au-^

.)-

2 6r

cr2

Let

0,

62

ac>

0.

Taking

for

a and

the two roots of the equation

the given equation takes the simple form

0.

cudv
Since this

may be

written

Let
see that dta/Su must be a function of the single variable, w, say/(w).
F(u) denote a function of u such that F (u) =f(u). Then, since the derivative
of w
F(u) with respect to u is zero, this difference must be independent of w,
The converse is apparent. Returning to
and, accordingly, u = F(u) + *().

we

the variables x and y,


(26) are of the form

it

follows that

all

the functions

w which

satisfy the equation

TRANSFORMATIONS

38]

II,

where

and $ are arbitrary functions.

73

For example, the general integral of

the equation
c2 w

cy

which occurs

O c

a2

w
,

dx 2

in the theory of the stretched string, is

w =f(x
ac

and

|3

ay)

<f>

(x

ay).

0.
Taking a equal to the double root of the equa
some other number, the coefficient of d^w/dudv
becomes zero, for it is equal to a + ba + p(b + car). Hence the given equation
2 =
It is evident that w must be a linear function of
0.
reduces to 5 2
w = vf(u) + (u), where f(u) and (u) are arbitrary functions. Returning to
the variables x and y, the expression for w becomes

Second

tion a -f

Let b 1

case.

2
-f cr

26r

0,

w/cz>

t>,

<f>

<f>

(x

+ Py)f(x +

[x

+ ay +

ay)

<f>(x

ay),

which may be written

- a)y]f(x +

= yF(x + ay) +

(p

ay)

<f>(x

ay),

or. finally,

<l>(x

ay).

ac
Third case. If 62
0, the preceding transformation cannot be applied
without the introduction of imaginary variables. The quantities a and /3 may
then be determined by the equations
<

+ 26a + c a 2 =
a

b(a

p)

which give

The equation

2& 2

2b

a + /3=

a/3=

of the second degree,

26

r2 H

whose roots are a and


becomes

c2

importance in

Example
x

= p cos

0,

which

is

many branches

II.
<,

0,

has, in fact, real roots.

Aw =
This equation Aw

-ac =

262
r H

set

-ac
c2

a2

du 2

c2 w
H

The given equation then

0.

c 2

known

of

as Laplace s Equation, is of fundamental


mathematics and mathematical physics.

Let us see what form the preceding equation assumes when we


= p sin 0. For the first derivatives we find
8

= du cos^

8p
i

Su
H

dx

dy
du

("ui

p sin

<b

-\

p cos
*

<z>,

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

74
or,

[H,a9

dw/dx and du/cy,

solving for

du
-

COS

du
-

du

du

sin

dp

dip

cosrf)

du

dip

rf>

i
<p

dx

du

=sm0

dy

dp

Hence

u
--

2
a/?

sin 2

0a 2 w

39.

But

---- du

du

t
(

8<f>/

S2 w

cos

2 sin

dp

d<t>\

simp
p

2sin0cos<dw

</>

d2

u/dy 2

is

analogous to

dip

this.

sin 2

0cw

dp

d<f>

Adding the two, we

find

The preceding method

Another method.
the function

dp

dtf>

and the expression for

when

sind>

------- ------p

dp

d2
<t>

sin0

costf>

dp\
COS 2

---- du\ --

du

whose

in certain cases it

is the most practical


partial derivatives are sought is unknown.
is more advantageous to use the following

method.
y) be a function of the two independent variables x
If x, y, and z are supposed expressed in terms of two aux
iliary variables u and v, the total differentials dx, dy, dz satisfy the
relation

Let
and y.

=f(x,

dz

ex

which

is

/>

-^-

dx

-dy.
cy

equivalent to the two distinct equations

_
du

dx du

dz

_d_fdx

dv

dx dv

dy du

dy dv

whence df/dx and df/dy may be found

as functions of u,

v,

dz/du,

But to find the succeeding


dz/dv, as in the preceding method.
derivatives we will continue to apply the same rule.
Thus, to find
d

2
f/dx and

d 2f/dxdy,

we

with the identity

start

dx 2

which

is

>

dxcy

equivalent to the two equations


d

(dx)
du

= d fdx
dx 2 du

ay

dy

dx dy du

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

39]

75

where

dec

dx dy dv

ov

supposed that df/dx has been replaced by its value cal


2
Likewise, we should find the values of d f/dx dy and
by starting with the identity

it is

culated above.
2

a2

82

df\

?T ***

dxdy

dy/

~cT~a
2

*%

dy

The work may be checked by the fact that the two values of
found must agree. Derivatives of higher order may be

c 2f/8x dy

calculated in like manner.

Application to surfaces. The preceding method is used in the study


of surfaces.
Suppose that the coordinates of a point of a surface S

two variable parameters u and v by means

are given as functions of

of the formulae

x=f(u,v),

(27)

The equation

of the surface

$(u,v),

may

= f(u,v).

be found by eliminating the vari

ables u and v between the three equations (27); but we may also
study the properties of the surface S directly from these equations
themselves, without carrying out the elimination, which might be
practically impossible.

It should be noticed that the three

D(,

D(u,

-y)

Jacobians

v)

cannot

all vanish identically, for then the elimination of w and v


would lead to two distinct relations between x, y, z, and the point
whose coordinates are (x, y, %) would map out a curve, and not a sur
face. Let us suppose, for definiteness, that the first of these does not
0.
Then the first two of equations (27)
and the substitution of these values in the
third would give the equation of the surface in the form z = F(x,
y).
In order to study this surface in the neighborhood of a point we need

vanish

may

D(f,

<j>)/D(u,

be solved for u and

v)

v,

know the partial derivatives p, q, r,s,t,


of this function F(x, y)
in terms of the parameters u and v.
The first derivatives p and q
to

are given by the equation

dz

which

is

equivalent to the

= p dx

-f-

q dy,

two equations

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

76

[II,

40

^ =- fpn ^4-n^
-- r~
TT

T;

du

du

r q

a
cv

cv

cv

du

from which p and q may be found. The equation of the tangent


plane is found by substituting these values of p and q in the equation

Z-

= p(X -

*)

+ q(Y - y),

and doing so we find the equation

The equations (28) have a geometrical meaning which is easily


They express the fact that the tangent plane to the

remembered.

surface contains the tangents to those two curves on the surface which
are obtained by keeping v constant while u varies, and vice versa*

Having found p and


r, s, t by means

to find

p =/i(w, v), q
of the equations
q,

= f (u,
2

v),

we may proceed

= r dx + s dy,
dq = s dx + dy,

dp
\

each of which

is

equivalent to two equations

and so

forth.

40. Problem IV. To every relation between x, y, z there corresponds


by means of the equations

(30)

x =/(w,

w),

v,

<

(M, v, w),

= \j/(u,

v,

w),

a new relation between

It is required to express the partial


u, v, w.
derivatives of z with respect to the variables x and y in terms of u, v, w,
and the partial derivatives of iv with respect to the variables u and v.

if

This problem can be made to depend upon the preceding. For,


we suppose that w has been replaced in the formulae (30) by a

function of u and

v,

we have

x, y, z

expressed as functions of the

* The
equation of the tangent plane may also be found directly. Every curve on
the surface is defined by a relation between u and w, say v
U (u) and the equations
of the tangent to this curve are

X-x
df
fdu
The elimination

df
-f
dv

Y-y
+ ~ n ()
^
du
dd>

()

d4>

dv

Z-z

~
d4>

-^-

du

d&
-

dv

(M)

of IT(a) leads to the equation (29) of the tangent plane.

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

41]

77

two parameters u and v; and we need only follow the preceding


method, considering /,
^ as composite functions of u and v, and
w as an auxiliary function of u and v. In order to calculate the
first derivatives p and y, for instance, we have the two
equations
<,

P a

T
*

cT~

T~
ow ~o8u

cu

1+7
,

--P ^--o
,

"^

dw

dv

dv

8w

\d

dv

dw cu

du

\8v

+ a^
8w

a_w

The succeeding

derivatives may be calculated in a similar manner.


In geometrical language the above problem may be stated as fol
lows To every point
of space, whose coordinates are
y,

(x,

z),

there corresponds, by a given construction, another point M, whose


coordinates are X, Y, Z. When the point
maps out a surface S,
the point
maps out another surface 2, whose properties it is pro

posed to deduce from those of the given surface S.


The formulae which define the transformation are of the form

x =f(x

>

y>

),

y=
<t>

(*, y, *),

Let
Y)

be the equations of the two surfaces S and 2, respectively. The


is to express the partial derivatives P, Q, R, S,T,
of the

problem

function

$(A",

Y) in terms of

x, y, z

and the partial derivatives


But this is precisely the

of the function F(x, y).


above problem, except for the notation.

p,

q, r, s,

t,

The first derivatives P and Q depend only on x, y, z, p, q and


hence the transformation carries tangent surfaces into tangent sur
faces.
But this is not the most general transformation which enjoys
;

this property, as

we

shall see in the following example.

41. Legendre s transformation. Let z =f(x,


y) be the equation of
a surface S, and let any point
(x, ?/, z) of this surface be carried
into a point M, whose coordinates are X, Y, Z, by the transformation

X=p,
Let

Y=

q,

px

qy

z.

Z = $ (X,

Y) be the equation of the surface 2 described by the


z, p, q replaced by /, df/dx, df/dy, respec
we have the three coordinates of the point
expressed as

point M.
tively,

If

we imagine

functions of the two independent variables x and

y.

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

78
Let P,

Q, R, S,

Y).

$>(X,

Then the

41

denote the partial derivatives of the function


relation

dZ =

PdX+ QdY

becomes

p dx +

[II,

q dy

+ x dp + y dq

dz

= P dp +

Q,

dq,

or

+ y dq = P dp -f

x dp

Q dq.

Let us suppose that p and q, for the surface S, are not functions of each
other, in which case there exists no identity of the form \dp + p.dq=. 0,
unless X

fi

Then, from the preceding equation,

0.

In order to find R,

S,

T we may
dP
dQ

when X,

which,

Y, P,

dx

dy

start

= RdX +
= SdX+

follows that

with the analogous relations

SdY,
TdY,

are replaced by their values,

= R (r dx + s dy) +
= S (r dx + s dy~) +

it

S (s dx

T(sdx

+
+

dy)

dy}

become

whence

and consequently

From
x

rt

the preceding formulae

= P,

rt

y=Q,

we

find, conversely,

p=

= PX+QY-Z,
-S

RT-

RT- ^

rt

2
.S

X,

Y,

R
t

RT -

S2

which proves that the transformation


is

is involutory.
Moreover, it
a contact transformation, since X, Y, Z, P, Q depend only on x,

These properties become self-explanatory, if we notice


that the formulae define a transformation of reciprocal polars with
respect to the paraboloid
y, z, p, q.

x2
Note.
rt

point

2z

0.

for R, S, T become infinite, if the relation


In this case the
holds at every point of the surface S.

The expressions

M describes a curve, and not a surface, for we have

II,

TRANSFORMATIONS

42]

,,

79

D*,y

*,y)

and likewise

D(X, Z)
D(*,y)
This

let

is

= Jfo

+ gy - *) =

;>*

(*,

^=

?/)

which we had not considered.

precisely the case

42. Ampfere s transformation. Retaining the notation of the preceding article,


us consider the transformation

X
The

Y=

x,

relation

becomes

dZ =

q,

qy

z.

PdX + QdY

qdy + ydq - dz = Pdx + Qdq,

or

p dx = Pdx + Qdq.

y dq

Hence

Q=y

P=-P,
and conversely we
x

= X,

It follows that this

The

transformation also

dP =
r

R -f

dx

Ss

=-

dy
r,

Y.

an involutory contact transformation.

is

relation

is,

p = - P,

z=QY-Z,

y=Q,

next becomes
that

find

EdX+ SdY

= R dx + S (s dx +
St = - s,

dy)

whence

Starting with the relation

dQ = SdX + TdY, we

find, in like

manner,

r=l.
t

As an

application of these formulae, let

vis

try to find

all

the functions /(x, y)

Let S be the surface represented by the


Y) the equation
equation z =f(x, y), S the transformed surface, and Z =
of S.
From the formulae for R it is clear that we must have

which

satisfy the equation rt

s2

0.

4>(X,

R~
and * must be a linear function of

where

^ -~

S~
:

and ^ are arbitrary functions

of F.

It

follows that

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

80

and, conversely, the coordinates


as functions of the two variables

= X,

= Xt (Y) +

y, z) of

(a;,

X and
z

y(Y),

[II,

a point of the surface S are given

Y by

the formulae

(Y)

Y[X<t>

f (Y)]

X<f,(Y)

The equation of the surface may be obtained by eliminating


and Y
amounts to the same thing, by eliminating a between the equations
z

The

= ay
= y

(a)

t(Y).

or,

what

(a),

-x<t>(a)-t

43

(a).

moving plane which depends upon the


found by differentiating the first with respect
to this parameter.
The surfaces defined by the two equations are the so-called
developable surfaces, which we shall study later.
first

of these equations represents a

parameter a, while the second

is

43. The potential equation in curvilinear coordinates.

The

calculation to which

a change of variable leads may be simplified in very many cases by various


devices.
We shall take as an example the potential equation in orthogonal
curvilinear coordinates.* Let

F (x,

y, z)

- p,

FI(X, y, Z)=PI,
F*(X, y,

)=P2i

be the equations of three families of surfaces which form a triply orthogonal


system, such that any two surfaces belonging to two different families intersect
at right angles.
Solving these equations for x, y, z as functions of the parame
ters p, pi, PQ,

^6

obtain equations of the form


fx-<t>(p,

=
j
l*=

31 )

and we may take

<Pi(p,

02

PI, pa),
Pi, Pa),

(p, Pi, pa);

p, p t p^ as a system of orthogonal curvilinear coordinates.


Since the three given surfaces are orthogonal, the taagents to their curves of
intersection must form a trirectangular trihedron.
It follows that the equations

must be

where the symbol


indicates that we are to replace
by
and add. These conditions for orthogonalism may be written in the
following form, which is equivalent to the above
satisfied

x>

then by

<i,

2,

*
Lame",

TraiU des coordonnees curvilignes.

differ entiel, Vol.

I,

p. 181.

See also Bertrand, Traitt de Calcul

H,

TRANSFORMATIONS

43]

81

Let us then see what form the potential equation

ax2

assumes

in the variables p, p 1? p 2

az2

dy*
First of

we

all,

find

dv _ dv dp

8V

dpi

aF apa

ax

dpi

dx

dp z dx

dp dx

and then
a2

F_~ a^F/aA

ax

a2

\ax/

a/

a2

aF av

ap a^.
ax

"aaT

"a7

ax2

a Pl a P2
|

dpidpz ax

\dx/

p^

apapi

ax

-\ax/

a/>ap

api

ax2

ap a

ax2

ax

ax

Adding the three analogous equations, the terms containing derivatives of the
a 2 V / dp dpi fall out, by reason of the relations (33), and we have

second order like

a2

a2

~ +A

(34)

^ +A

A 2 (p)

2 ( P1 )

op

Lam&s

where AI and A 2 denote

The

differential

calculated.

From

differential

parameters of the
the equations (31)

first

api

aj^

apg

api

ax

ap 2

ax

a 01

ap

a 01 api

ap

ax

api

ax

a0 2

a_p

a0 2

api

ap

ax

api

ax

-,

-,

dp

pT,
apa

order Ai(p), Ai(pi), Aj(p 2 ) are easily

a^

dp

2 (p 2 )

we have

ax

whence, multiplying by

cpi

parameters

a^ ap
ap

a 01 ap 2

_
_

ax

apa

a0 2 ap 2 _

.
_

ax

ap 2

respectively,

and adding, we

dp

a0
ap
ax

_
~
/a0\ 2

\dp)

/a0A 2 /a0 2
+
\dp/
\dpj

Then, calculating dp/dy and dp/dz in like manner,


2
i

*/

\dy/

/ap\ 2

\dz/

it is

easy to see that

1
(d<f>\

...

find

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

82

43

[II,

Let us now set

a=
dp

where the symbol


by 0i, then
indicates, as before, that we are to replace
by 02) and add. Then the preceding equation and the two analogous equations
<f>

be written

may

A!(P)

Ai(pi)

Lame* obtained the expressions for A2


pa

A!(p 2 )

HI

=
HZ

A 2 (pi), A 2 (p2 )

(p),

by a rather long calculation, which we may condense

as functions of

p, pi,

in the following form.

In the identity (34)

A2

F=

F
-+
H
1

a2

dp

let

HI

us set successively
a2

dp*

Cfr

&V +

T
dpi

52^

HI

cpj

HZ

HI

-TT +
Cpj

d<p/dp,

Moreover,

d<j>i/dp,

y,

a0

-- =0,

dp

cpz

W VF +

A2 ( p )

cp2

(p),

+ **( pl -^ +
iF
cpi
op
)

A 2 (pi), A 2 (p2 ).

dfa/dp, respectively, and adding,

^(pz) -

oe>4>

~d~p

62

_
~

Up*

For instance, multiplying

we

find

ag

2 lp~

differentiating the first of equations (32) with respect to pi,

~~

~dp ~dp\

we

find

~
2

dpi dp dpi

we have

o0 ev _~ _

ap"

"ap|

i a

ap

and consequently

A 2 (p)= -

--

2HHi

dp

2HH*

dp

0,

cpz

we have

In like manner

dpz

dpi

This gives the three equations

.a 2

dp

V = z.

c>

*->

and

.8V
,aF
+ A 2 (p 2
+ A 2 (pi)

.8V
2 (p)

epjj

V=

which we need only solve for Aa

by

x,

a2

H -^ + A

2Hp_

\H

EXERCISES

H. EXS.]

83

Setting

*=i,
this

zr,=

formula becomes

A2 (p) =
and

*,=

in like

manner we

find

A2 (p!) =

h\

A.)
hhzj

(log

api \

Hence the formula

(34) finally

(log
\

cpz

--

ra2 F

ll*z

fifii

/.

LV

az 2

A"

becomes

ax2

A 2 (p 2 ) =

log

\aF~l
I

*!*/

<>P

^/

(35)

condensed form,

or, in

Fa

Let us apply

this

dV\

/ h

a
,

ftj

nr

aF\

/ &2

dF\~|

^T^ s

The formulae

formula to polar coordinates.

of transforma

tion are

and

where
values

replace pi and p 2

<f

sin0cos</>,

and the

coefficients

ft,

have the following

hq

fti,

&

hi

h%

p sin

Hence the general formula becomes

A 2 F=
or,

_ _ Fa

Ip

P sine \_dp

i
-

2 sin(?

aF\
-

expanding,
Ao

F=

F
F ----i a2

a2

ap

which

is

a*?

a /

2
2
p sin

a2

F
2

a^>

c0J

- -i

aF\

(sin^

de\

dp]

aF\~|
-J h

(-

a0 \sin^ a^ /

cot0aF
aF -----

ap

a<?

susceptible of direct verification.

EXERCISES
1.

Setting

determinant D (u,
exists between M,

x2
t>,

v,

+
w>)

v = x + y + z, w = xy +
+
/D (, y, 2) vanishes identically.

w.

Generalize the problem.

z2

yz

zx, the functional

Find the relation which

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

84

pi, EXS.

Let

2.

==.

un

Vi1 _ x
-r 2
l

a-

*n

Derive the equation


W2,

i,

M,,)

Using the notation

3.

x3

= COS 0i,
= sin 0i cos 02
= sin 0i sin 02 cos0 3

Xn

Xi
X2

sin0 n _ 1 cos0 n

sin 0i sin 02

show that
(Xl, Xg,

Xn )

^_

1 )n s i nn

^ lS J n n-l^ 2Sm n-2^ g

Prove directly that the function

4.

where

and

a. is

satisfies

8 in 2

n _ ! sin

n.

F(x, y} defined by the two equations

= ax+ yf(a) +
= x + yf (a) +

an auxiliary variable,

0(or),
(a),

the equation

s2

rt

where /(a)

0,

(a) are arbitrary functions.

Show

5.

in like

manner that any

implicit function z

F(x, y) defined by

an equation of the form

where

(z)

and ^

are arbitrary functions, satisfies the equation

(z)

rg
6.

Prove that the function z


z

where

is

equation pq
7.

(a)

[y

(a)]

2pqs

satisfies in like

+ tp2 =

0.

F(x, y) defined by the two equations


2,

an auxiliary variable and

(a)

a)

(a)

(a),

an arbitrary function,

satisfies

the

z.

Prove that the function z


[Z

()]

Z2

(y2

manner the

F(x, y) defined by the two equations

_ a 2),

equation pq =

[z

((r)]

(Q,)

aa.2

xy.

8*. Lagrange s formulae. Let y be an implicit function of the two variables


x and a, defined by the relation y = a +
and let u =f(y) be any func
tion of y whatever.
Show that, in general,
x<j>(y);

[LAPLACE.]

II,

EXERCISES

EM.]
The proof

Note.

da
where u

is

is

based upon the two formulas

F,
du~\
F(u)~ =

dx

|_

F F(u)\dM~l

if

a and M

M\\

<(,(y)

dx

cu
da

v)

(J>(u,

~i
I

,.,

da-

^dx:/o
v),

r~

S"

x =f(u,

and the nth derivative of u with

to /(a);
i

-!

ff/*\

show

da_\

of y whatever, and F(u) is an arbitrary function of u.


the formula holds for any value of n, it must hold for the

Setting x = 0, y reduces to
respect to x becomes

If

du

dx ]_

any function

shown that
value n + I.

It is

9.

85

\_

are two functions which satisfy the equations

dj

dj

du

dv

dv

du

that the following equation

is satisfied

<j>

identically

10. If the function F(x, y, 2) satisfies the equation

show

that the function

satisfies

the

same equation, where

11. If V(x, y, z) and Vi(x,


show that the function

U=
satisfies the

12.

F(z,

y, z)

y, z)

is

A;

a constant and r2

x2

+ yz + z 2
[LORD KELVIN.]

are two solutions of the equation

(x

y2

z2)

FI

A^V =

0,

(x, y, z)

equation

What form

does the equation


(x

x 8 )7/"+

(1

- Sx 2 )?/ -

assume when we make the transformation x


13.

What form

xy

= Vl

=
t-

does the equation


2

=
Sx2

dx

dy

assume when we make the transformation x


14*. Let 0(xi, x 2 ,
x n MI, MS,
,
variables Xi, x 2 ,
x n , MI, u 2 ,
Mn ,
,
,
with respect to the variables MI, M 2 ,
;

= u,

= l/v?

u n ) be a function of the 2 n independent


homogeneous and of the second degree

,.

If

we

set

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

86
S

and then take p\ pz


,

-=pz,

~^-=p n

CU n

CUz

Exs.

cd>

C(t>

-=pi,

CUi

[II,

p n as independent variables in the place of Ui u z


,

un

goes over into a function of the form

the function
<f>

i,

Derive the formulae

X2

d<f>

N be the point of intersection of a fixed plane P with the normal MN


M of a given surface S. Lay on the perpendicular to the
Find the tangent plane to the
plane P at the point N a length Nm = NM.
Let

15.

erected at

off

any point

describes the surface S.


surface described by the point m, as
The preceding transformation is a contact transformation. Study the inverse

transformation.
16. Starting from each point of a given surface S, lay off on the normal to
Find the tangent plane to the surface 2 (the
the surface a constant length I.
parallel surface) which is the locus of the end points.

Solve the analogous problem for a plane curve.

to any point
of
17*. Given a surface S and a fixed point O join the point
the surface S, and pass a plane
and the normal
to the
through
In this plane
surface S at the point M.
draw through the point O a per
pendicular to the line OM, and lay off on it a length OP = OM. The point
;

OMN

MN

OM

OMN

describes a surface 2, which is called the apsidal surface to the given surface S.
Find the tangent plane to this surface.

The transformation is a contact transformation, and the relation between the


and 2 is a reciprocal one. When the given surface S is an ellipsoid
and the point
is its center, the surface 2 is Fresnel s wave surface.
surfaces

<S

Show

18*. Halphen s differential invariants.

dx2 / da*

dx2 dx dx*

remains unchanged when the variables


mation ( 37).
If in the

19.

of x, y,

we

z,

expression

x,

Pdx + Qdy +

v,

\dx*

y undergo any projective transfor

where P, Q,

fidz,

are any functions

set

Z = ^(M, v,
y = (u, v, w)
x=/(u, B, 10),
w are new variables, it goes over into an expression
,

<f>

where

that the differential equation

>),

of the

form

Pidu + Q\dv + Ridw,


where PI,

Qi,

RI

are functions of

v,

Show

w.

satisfied identically:

gi =

z)

I) (M, v,

w)

-P(Si

g>

that the following equation

is

II,

EXERCISES

Exs.]

87

where

/* _
du

\dv
Let

20*. Bilinear covariants.

where

JTx,

2,

0</

be a linear differential form

-^n are functions of the n variables x lt x2

xn

Let us

consider the expression

where

and where there are two systems

d and

of differentials,

5.

If

we make any

transformation
Xi

4>i(yi,

y2

2/ n ),

(i

1, 2,

the expression Qj goes over into an expression of the

Q d = Y dy l +

F2

Yn are functions

of yi,

y2

n),

same form

+ Yn dy n

where FI,

.,

yn

Let us also set

and

Show
tively,

that

H=H

identically, provided that

we

replace dx,

and

dxt,

respec

by the expressions

Syi

The expression //

is

-\

5j/ 2

Sy n

called a bilinear covariant of Qj.

21*. Beltrami s differential parameters.

If in

a given expression of the form

Edx* + 2Fdxdy + Gdy*,


where E, F, G are functions of the variables x and y, we make a transformation
z =/(M, v), y =
), we obtain an expression of the same form:
<f>(u,

EI du 2

+ 2Fidudv+

Gj dv2 ,

FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

88

Exs.

[II,

where EI, FI, G\ are functions of u and v. Let 0(x, y) be any function of the
and y, and 0i(u, v) the transformed function. Then we have, iden

variables x
tically,

ex dy

ax

ffj

G!

+*

du

\dy

dv

dv

-F

Ff
I

where x
/ (ex
d are arbitrary constants, show that the relation

22. Schwarzian.
a, 6, c,

Setting y

(ax

b)

+<8),

is

identically satisfied,
respect to the variable

23*. Let

and

let

where x

x",

"

",

T/",

and

denote the derivatives with

t.

u and v be any two functions of the two independent variables x and

y,

us set

U=

au
a"

where

yy

a function of

is

a, &, c,

c"

+
+

bv
u

6"

+c
+

F=

c"

are constants.

a w +
w+

a"

6"

Prove the formulae

+c
+

c"

c*udv_G*vdu

d*U

dV _ cPV SU

dx2 dx

ax2

dx

gx2 dx

dx*

dx

(u, v)

du

d*u dv

d*v

dx2 dy

ex2 dy

/dv
\dx dxdy

dx dxdy/

(u, v)

dV ~
ax2 ~dy

a2

V dU

~d& Hy

dx dxdy

ex dxdy/

(ff.F)

and the analogous formulae obtained by interchanging x and

du dv

du dv

dx dy

dy dx

y,

where

dU dV

dV dU

dx

dx

dy

dy

[GOURSAT and PAINLEVE, Comptes rendus,

1887.]

CHAPTER

III

ELEMENTARY APPLICATIONS
MAXIMA AND MINIMA

TAYLOR

S SERIES

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER


TAYLOR S SERIES

I.

44. Taylor s series with a remainder. In elementary texts on the


Calculus it is shown that, if f(x) is an integral polynomial of
degree n, the following formula holds for all values of a and h
:

This development stops of


(n +

l)th vanish.

/(x) which
infinite

is

If

we

itself,

not a polynomial, the second member contains an


In order to find the proper value to
of terms.

number

assign to this development,


for the difference

f(a

since all the derivatives past the

try to apply this formula to a function

h)

-f(a)

2f

we

f>

(a )

will first try to find an expression

li

f^

___ /W(a)
J)

/"(a)

with the hypotheses that the function /(#), together with its first n
n)
derivatives / (a:), f"(x),
f^ (x), is continuous when x lies in the
interval (a, a -f A), and that f (n \x) itself possesses a derivative
,

"

+ J)

(x) in the

given, let

same

interval.

The numbers a and a

-f

h being

us set

(2)

is any positive integer, and where P is a number which is


defined by this equation itself.
Let us then consider the auxiliary
function

where p

89

TAYLOR S SERIES

90

=f(a +

A)

-/() ~
_ O+ h
1.2-

It is clear

and

from equation

(x)

/-A

*)"

"

(a

44

+ h-x
J

1.2..-

"ii

(2),

[in,

which defines the number P, that

from the hypotheses regarding f(x) that the func


possesses a derivative throughout the interval (a, a -f A).
= must have a root
Hence, by Rolle s theorem, the equation
(#)
a + Oh which lies in that interval, where
is a positive number
which lies between zero and unity. The value of
(x), after some
results

it

tion

<(x)

</>

<t>

easy reductions, turns out to be

The

first

other than a

P= h

p~

n -p +

h.

(l

cannot vanish for any value of x


Hence we must have

factor (a -f h

x~)

+
0)"-*

!/(

+J

>

(a

whence, substituting this value for

Ofy,

where

in equation (2),

0<^<1;

we

find

(3) /I

where
JL

=
.

We

n .p

shall call this formula Taylor s scries with a remainder,

R n the remainder.

and

This remainder depends upon the


In practice,
left undetermined.
we
have
which
positive integer p,
about the only values which are ever given to p are p = n + 1 and
p = 1. Setting p = n + 1, we find the following expression for the
remainder, which is due to Lagrange
the last

term or

setting

1,

we

find

Ill,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

44]

91

an expression for the remainder which is due to Cauchy. It is


will not be the same, in general,
clear, moreover, that the number
in these
is

two

continuous when x

a,

we assume

If

special formulae.

the remainder

may

further that

(n

+ 1)
(a:)

be written in the form

where e approaches zero with h.


Let us consider, for definiteness, Lagrange s form. If, in the gen
eral formula (3), n be taken equal to 2, 3, 4,
successively, we
get a succession of distinct formulae which give closer and closer
approximations for f(a -f- A) for small values of h. Thus for n = 1
,

we

find

1.2

which shows that the difference

/(*
is

+ *) -/(a) -*/*()

an infinitesimal of at least the second order with respect to


is finite near x = a.
Likewise, the difference

provided that

_//

+
,

f(a
/\

7 \

_//

A)/

_/l /
\
-f
(a)
*"

f(a)
\ /

1 V

\ /

J.

is

h,

/"

JL

an infinitesimal of the third order

vf(a)
\ /

h)J

-f
v
~1

*^

////
\

f (a)

*/

and, in general, the expression

(a)
\ /

-w!

f (n) \(a)f

1.
is an infinitesimal of order n
But, in order to have an exact
idea of the approximation obtained by neglecting R, we need to
an
know an upper limit of this remainder. Let us denote by

M*

upper limit of the absolute value of


of x = a, say in the interval (a
a
17,

Kt
provided that h
|

* That
defined in

which

is,

<
|

y
-f

i^r
i<

"

+ 1)

rj).

(#) in the neighborhood

Then we evidently have

M)

77.

+ )(z) when |z
The expression
must be carefully distinguished from the expression
J

3/>|/(

68,

a\<ij.

"

the

"

upper

limit,"

an upper

limit,"

is used here to denote a number greater than or equal to the absolute value of
the function at any point in a certain interval. In this paragraph and in the next
TRANS.
a.
/( + i)(a;) is supposed to have an upper limit near x

TAYLOR S SERIES

92

45

[III,

This result may be interpreted geomet


that
we
wished
to study a curve C, whose equa
rically.
Suppose
tion is y =f(x), in the neighborhood of a point A, whose abscissa
is a.
Let us consider at the same time an auxiliary curve
whose
45.

Application to curves.

C",

equation

line

is

-f-

h, parallel to

the axis of

y,

meets these two curves

two points
and
which are near A. The
ordinates, by the general formula, is equal to
in

This difference

is

difference of their

an infinitesimal of order not

less

than n

-+-

and

a
consequently, restricting ourselves to a small interval (a
77,
rj),
the curve C sensibly coincides with the curve C
By taking larger
.

and larger values of n we may obtain in this way curves which


differ less and less from the given curve C; and this gives us a
more and more exact idea of the appearance of the curve near the
point A.
Let us

curve

first set

= \.

at the point

Then the curve

C"

is

the tangent to the

and the difference between the ordinates of the points


and
of the curve and its tangent, respectively, which have the same
abscissa a -f h, is

Let us suppose that /"()


0, which is the case in general.
preceding formula may be written in the form
=

where

h.

ber

and

rj

c approaches zero with


can be found such that

Since
<

f"(a)

/"(a)

0,

when h

a positive

The

num

between
rj
+ e will have

lies

For such values of h the quantity /"()


the same sign as
a
an(i hence y
Y will also have the same
77.

/"(

sign as

/"(a).

)>

If /"(a)

is

positive, the ordinate

y of the curve

is

Ill,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

46]

93

greater than the ordinate F of the tangent, whatever the sign of h


and the curve C lies wholly above the tangent, near the point A.
;

a ) is negative, y is less than Y, and the


if
below the tangent, near the point of tangency.
If f"(a) = 0, let / (p) () be the first succeeding derivative which
does not vanish for x = a. Then we have, as before, if f (p) (x) is
continuous when x = a,

On

the other hand,

curve

/"(

lies entirely

and it can be shown, as above, that in a sufficiently small interval


a
^ a -f- 17) the difference y Y has the same sign as the product
(
A p/ (p) (a). When p is even, this difference does not change sign
with h, and the curve lies entirely on the same side of the tangent,
Y
near the point of tangency. But if p be odd, the difference y
its
at
the
tangent
changes sign with h, and the curve C crosses
point of tangency.
of inflection

it

now

Let us

In the latter case the point

occurs, for example,

take n

= 2.

Y =f(a) +
whose axis
ordinates

is

if

The curve C

is

called a point

0.

"(a)

is

in this case a parabola

(x

parallel to the axis of y\

and the difference of the

is

Y has the same sign as A 8 / "() for


does not vanish, y
sufficiently small values of h, and the curve C crosses the parabola

If

"(a)

at the point A.

to the curve

This parabola is called the osculatory parabola


the parabolas of the family

for, of

Y = mx z + nx + p,
this one

point

comes nearest to coincidence with the curve C near the


(see

213).

of development. The formula (3) affords a


development of the infinitesimal f(a + K) ~f( a }
But, still more generally, let
according to ascending powers of h.
x be a principal infinitesimal, which, to avoid any ambiguity, we

46. General

method

method

for the

TAYLOR S SERIES

94
will

suppose positive

and

[III,

46

y be another infinitesimal of the

let

form
y

(4)

where n l} n z

A lX + A 2 x*
i

+ ...+x P (A p +

c ),

np are ascending positive numbers, not necessarily


-, A p are constants different from zero, andc is
integers,
another infinitesimal. The numbers HI, A l n 2 A 2
may be cal
,

A l} A t

culated successively by the following process.


First of all, it is
clear that HI is equal to the order of the infinitesimal y with
respect to x, and that

x approaches

is

equal to the limit of the ratio

n
y/x when
i

Next we have

zero.

xn

ui

=A

x"*

----|

(Ap

+ c)

x"p,

which shows that n z is equal to the order of the infinitesimal M I?


and A 2 to the limit of the ratio u^/x n
A continuation of this
the
terms.
It
is
then
clear that an infini
succeeding
process gives
tesimal y does not admit of two essentially different developments of
If the developments have the same number of terms,
the form (4).
coincide
while if one of them has p terms and the other
they
-i.

p+

q terms, the terms of the

method

first

applies, in particular, to the

occur also in the second.

development of f(a

This
f(a)

A)

according to powers of h and it is not necessary to have obtained


the general expression for the successive derivatives of the func
;

tion f(x) in

us a practical

On the contrary, this method furnishes


of calculating the values of the derivatives

advance.

means

Examples. Let us consider the equation


(5) F(x, y)

where

= Ax n + By +

xy<S>(x,

y)

Cx n +

+ Dy +

= 0,

(x, y) is an integral polynomial in x and y, and where the


terms not written down consist of two polynomials P(x) and Q(y),
which are divisible, respectively, by x n + and y 2 The coefficients A
4>

B are each

supposed to be different from zero. As x approaches


zero there is one and only one root of the equation (5) which ap
proaches zero ( 20). In order to apply Taylor s series with a

and

remainder to this

root,

we should have

to

know

the successive deriv

which could be calculated by means of the general rules.


But we may proceed more directly by employing the preceding
method. For this purpose we first observe that the principal part
atives,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

46]

Ill,

equal to
the substitution

of the infinitesimal root


tion (5)

we make

is

(.4

/E)x

For

if in

95
the equa

and then divide by x n we obtain an equation of the same form

(cc,

yi)

As x approaches zero
in y lt namely By^.
the equation (6) possesses an infinitesimal root in y lt and conse
quently the infinitesimal root of the equation (5) has the principal
which has only one term

(A/B)x

part
?/!

n
,

as stated above.

(Al B)x**] and

is

where y z

is

we may

Likewise, the principal part of

set

another infinitesimal whose principal part

may

be found

by making the substitution

in the equation (6).


Continuing in this

way, we may obtain for this root y an expres

sion of the form

(ap

.n

e)x

+ MJ H

1-

which we may carry out as far as we wish. All the numbers n


np are indeed positive integers, as they should be, since
H!, n z
we are working under conditions where the general formula (3) is
,

In fact the development thus obtained is precisely the


applicable.
same as that which we should find by applying Taylor s series with

x.
and h
a remainder, where a
Let us consider a second example where the exponents are not
Let us set
necessarily positive integers.

TAYLOR S SERIES

96

[III,

46

where

and fa, y u
are two ascending series of positive
a, ft, y,
numbers, and the coefficient A is not zero. It is clear that the prin
a
and that we have
cipal part of y is Ax
,

which

J]_

tt

00

- A x a (B x^ + Cix* +
+ B^ + dx* H----

Cx*

an expression of the same form as the original, and whose


is simply the term of least
degree in the numerator.
It is evident that we might go on to find
by the same process as
many terms of the development as we wished.
is

principal part

Let

/ (x)

be a function which possesses n

replacing a by x in the formula

f(x

-/(x) + -f(x) +

h)

we

(3),

~f"(x)
l

*"

+ ..-+
1

fi

Then

successive derivatives.

find

[/00(x)

e]

where e approaches zero with h. Let us suppose, on the other hand, that we
had obtained by any process whatever another expression of the same form for

f(x

h)

= /(x) +

hfa

(x)

A2 02

(X )

hn

faty +

/]

These two developments must coincide term by term, and hence the coefficients
are equal, save for certain numerical factors, to the successive
0i>

02>

<t>n

derivatives of /(x)

This remark

sometimes useful

is

-_.

1.2

-n

1. 2-

in the calculation of the derivatives of certain

functions.

Suppose, for instance, that


of a function of a function

we wished

to calculate the nth derivative

u=

where

y=f(u),

0(x).

Neglecting the terms of order higher than n with respect to

0(X

h)

0(X)

(X)

-^
1

0"(X)

we have

**
,

2i

h,

and likewise neglecting terms of order higher than n with respect


f(u

k)

~f(u)

f(u)

If in the right-hand side k

to k,

"

0W(Z );

be replaced by the expression

*"(

x)

&

and the resulting expression arranged according

to ascending powers of
evident that the terms omitted will not affect the terms in h, h2
hn
,

A, it is
.

The

HI,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

47]

coefficient of

divided by

/i",

for instance, will be equal to the nth derivative of

coefficient of h n in the

For greater detail concerning


Cours d Analyse (p. 59).

this

development of

method, the reader

for the

is

referred to Hermite s

Let f(x) and


(x) be two functions
same value of the variable x = a. Let us try

47. Indeterminate forms.*

</>

approached by the ratio

to find the limit

f(a
<f>(a

h approaches

/[</>()]

and hence we may write

where Ai denotes the

which vanish

97

This

+ K)
+ h)

merely a special case of the problem


of finding the limit approached by the ratio of two infinitesimals
The limit in question may be determined immediately if the prin
as

zero.

is

cipal part of each of the infinitesimals is known, which is the case


whenever the formula (3) is applicable to each of the functions
Let us suppose
/(cc) and
(x) in the neighborhood of the point a.
that the first derivative of f(x) which does not vanish for x = a is
that of order p, f (p \a)
and that likewise the first derivative of
(s)
for x = a is that of order q,
which
does
not
vanish
(a).
(cc)
and
the
the
functions
formula
to
each
of
Applying
f(x)
(x)
(3)
<f>

<

<

<

and dividing, we

where

and

find

are

two

It is clear

infinitesimals.

from this result

that the given ratio increases indefinitely when h approaches zero, if


q is greater than p and that it approaches zero if q is less than p.
(7)
(p) a
If q
a as ^ s
p, however, the given ratio approaches /
( )/^
( )
;

limit,

and

this limit is different

from

zero.

Indeterminate forms of this sort are sometimes encountered in finding the


Let

tangent to a curve.

=/(<),

*(t),

* See also

7.

*(l)

TAYLOR S SERIES

98

[m,

48

be the equations of a curve C in terms of a parameter t. The equations of the


tangent to this curve at a point M, which corresponds to a value t of the param
eter, are, as

we saw

in

5,

Z -

(tv)

(*o)

(o)

These equations reduce to identities if the three derivatives / (),


(t), $ (t) all
In order to avoid this difficulty, let us review the reasoning
vanish for t = t
be a point of the
by which we found the equations of the tangent. Let
<f>

curve

Then

the equations of the secant

near to M, and

For the sake

let to

h be the corresponding value of the parameter.

MM

are

of generality let us suppose that all the derivatives of order less

= t but that at least


the functions /(),
(t),
(t) vanish for t
one of the derivatives of order p, say
(
), is not zero.
Dividing each of the
denominators in the preceding equations by hp and applying the general for
mula (3), we may then write these equations in the form

than

(p>

1) of

\f/

<t>

/<*>>

to)

where

e, e

e"

J)

(to)

&>

are three infinitesimals.

+
If

(to)

let

h approach zero, these

">

we now

e"

equations become in the limit

which form

all indetermination has disappeared.


points of a curve C where this happens are, in general, singular points
the curve has some peculiarity of form.
Thus the plane curve whose
equations are

in

The
where

X
passes through the origin, and
is the axis of x, and the origin

<3

= dy / dt = at that point.
a cusp of the first kind.

dx/dt
is

The tangent

If the sequence of derivatives of the function


in
unlimited
the
interval (a, a -f h), the number n in the
f(x)
formula (3) may be taken as large as we please. If the remainder
48. Taylor s series.
is

Rn

approaches zero when n increases indefinitely,


the following formula

down

we

are led to write

which expresses that the

/() +

series

/ () +

+ iT^r^ ^"W +

Ill,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

48]

convergent, and that

is

formula (7)

is

fiable unless

is infinite,

ence of the
(7)

may

"

sum

"

is

the quantity f(a

But

it is

h).

This

not justi

properly speaking.
the remainder R n approaches zero when
whereas the general formula (3) assumes only the exist

Taylor

we can show that

first

Replacing a by

1 derivatives.

x,

the equation

be written in the form

Or, again, replacing

(8)

its

s series,

99

/(*) =/(0)

This latter form

is

h by x and setting

+ / (O) +

a,

0,

--

we

find the

formula

often called Maclaurin s series; but

it

should

these different forms are essentially equivalent.


The equation (8) gives the development of a function of x accord
ing to powers of x the formula (7) gives the development of a func

be noticed that

all

tion of
all

that

h according
is

to

powers of h

necessary in order to pass

a simple change of notation is


from one to the other of these

forms.
It is only in rather specialized cases that

we

are able to show

Rn

approaches zero when n increases indefinitely.


value of any derivative whatever is less
the
absolute
for
If,
instance,
when x lies between a and a
than a fixed number
h, it follows,

that the remainder

from Lagrange

form for the remainder, that


+
I

I*

h\"

^l. 2- ..( +

!)

an inequality whose right-hand member


convergent
e

x
,

is the general term of a


the case, for instance, for the functions
All the derivatives of ex are themselves equal to

series. f

sin x, cos x.

Such

is

and have, therefore, the same maximum in the interval con


In the case of sin x and cos x the absolute values never
exceed unity. Hence the formula (7) is applicable to these three
Let us restrict ourselves to
functions for all values of a and h.
We find
the form (8) and apply it first to the function f(x) = ex
e

sidered.

* That is to
say, the limit of the sum of the first n terms as n becomes infinite.
For a definition of the meaning of the technical phrase the sum of a series," see
157.
TRANS.
This is essential to the con
t The order of choice is a, h, M, n, not a, h, n, M.
TRANS.
vergence of the series in question.
"

TAYLOR S SERIES

100

[III,

49

and consequently we have the formula

which applies to all values, positive or negative, of x. If a is any


x
rl Ka
and the preceding formula
positive number, we have a = e
becomes
,

Let us

now

take f(x)

= sin x.

The

successive derivatives form a

recurrent sequence of four terms cos x,


sin x,
cos a;, sin x
form another recurrent sequence 1, 0,
their values for x

Hence

for

any positive or negative value

of

and
1, 0.

x we have

(11)

and, similarly,

(12)

.o.,-l-

J!L_

Let us return to the general case. The discussion of the remain


R n is seldom so easy as in the preceding examples; but the
problem is somewhat simplified by the remark that if the remain
der approaches zero the series
der

In general it is better, before examining


whether this series converges. If for the given values of

necessarily converges.

Rn

to see

a and h the
further

series diverges,

we can say

it

at once that

is

Rn

useless to carry the discussion


does not approach zero when n

increases indefinitely.

than

all its derivatives,


1.

The function log(l


x), together
continuous provided that x is greater
The successive derivatives are as follows

49. Development of log(l 4- x).

with

is

HI,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

49]

Let us see for what values of

101

Maclaurin

a?

applied to this fu action. Writing


have, under any circumstances,

formula

(8)

may

be

the series with a remainder,

first

we

*)

= -

+ (- !)-

The remainder R n does not approach

+ *,

zero unless the series

1 and
of x between
converges, which it does only for the values
interval
in
this
x
lies
When
limit -f 1.
1, including the upper

the remainder

may

be written in the Cauchy form as follows

iyl.2-.-n

_
~
1.2
or

(9

The first factor x


1.
Let us consider first the case where x
factor
second
the
and
with
zero
6)/(l + Ox) is
(1
x,
approaches
less than unity, whether x be positive or negative, for the numer
The last factor remains
ator is always less than the denominator.
Hence the remainder
than
less
is
for
it
|x|).
finite,
always
1/(1
<

R n actually approaches zero when n increases indefinitely. This


form of the remainder gives us no information as to what happens
when x = 1 but if we write the remainder in Lagrange s form,
;

it is

An

approaches zero when n increases indefinitely.


1 would be useless,
examination of the remainder for x =
evident that

Rn

TAYLOR S SERIES

1:02

[III,

We

sin f e the series diverges for that value of x.


.

between

lies

and

49

have then, when

the formula

-f 1,

log(l+*)^-f + |

(13)

This formula

still

when x

holds

+ ....

+ (-l)-i

which gives the curious

1,

relation

Iog2l-|+|-j+. + (-1)-^ +
.

(14)

....

The formula (13), not holding except when x is less than or equal
to unity, cannot be used for the calculation of logarithms of whole
numbers.

still

Let us replace x by

The new formula

x.

holds for values of x between

the corresponding sides,

we

2
1

When

x]

x varies from

\1

and

find the

and, subtracting

formula

f---

+2n

+T-T1

to 1 the rational fraction (1

obtained,

+#)/(!

a:)

and hence we may now easily cal


steadily increases from 1 to
still more rapidly con
culate the logarithms of all integers.
series
be
obtained, however, by forming the difference
verging
may
<x>,

of the logarithms of
let

two consecutive

integers.

For

this purpose

us set

1+ x
1-x

N+1
N

an equation whose right-hand member

is

or

2N+1

Then the preceding formula becomes

a series which converges

very rapidly, especially for large values of N.


Note.

this

0,

Let us apply the general formula (3) to the function log (1 + x), setting
We find in
x, n = 1, and taking Lagrange s form for the remainder.

way
log(l

x)

---x2

Ill,

If

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

49]

we now

replace x by the reciprocal of an integer n, this

Some

n is a positive number less than unity.


be deduced from this equation.

where

1)

The harmonic

be written

may

2n2

may

103

series being divergent, the

interesting consequences

sum

v-r

\\/

r
1

-log

n
(1

which shows that


series 2(1

1 /

this

is

p)

limit,

which

decimals,
2)

is

is

1\

Hence the

n+1 =
log
n

n+
log

/n

1\
+-

difference

called Euler s constant.

C=

is smaller than the general term of the convergent


increases indefinitely the expression

*/

under consideration approaches a finite


Its exact value, to twenty places of

0.57721566490153286060.

Consider the expression

n+1
where n and p are two
7?e

the general term of a convergent series, for by the

log

approaches zero.

vw

term

When n

/p2 ).

log

For, let us write this difference in the form

finite limit.

Now 1 / p log
equation above

difference

2n
approaches a

n
,

But the

increases indefinitely with n.

31

may

positive integers

n+p

which are

to increase indefinitely.

write

2
1

2
1

+ p/

log (n

Then

TAYLOR S SERIES

104

[III,

C when n and p

where p n + P and p n approach the same value


Hence we have also

50

increase indefi

nitely.

Now
no

Hence the sum 2 approaches


approaches a limit. If this ratio does approach a
S approaches the limit log (1 + a).

the difference p n +p

limit unless the ratio

limit a, the

Setting

sum

p n approaches zero.

p/n

we

n, for instance,

n+

see that the

sum

n+2

2n

approaches the limit log 2.


50.

Development

continuous, and
tions of x,

when

m
m The function
x)
(1
x) is denned and
derivatives all exist and are continuous func

of (1

its

+x

derivatives are of the

+1

positive, for

is

same form

= m(m = m(m )(x)

fM(x)
/(

1)

1)

for the

- n + 1) (1 +
- n) (1 +

(m
(m

Applying the general formula (3),

any value of

as the given function

a)"

we

find

-...1.2and, in order that the remainder R n should approach zero,


of all necessary that the series whose general term is

(m

1)

(m

"

it is first

+ 1)

1.2-.-W
should converge.

But the

ratio of

m
which approaches
ing the case where

any term to the preceding


-\-

is

x as n increases indefinitely. Hence, exclud


is a positive integer, which leads to the ele

mentary binomial theorem, the series in question cannot converge


unless \x
1.
Let us restrict ourselves to the case in which a;
1.
<

<

Ill,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

50]

To show

105

that the remainder approaches zero, let us write

Cauchy form

it

in the

1.2...

The

first

factor

m(m

(m

1)

n~)

+l

1.2..-W
approaches zero since it
The second factor
series.
finally, the last factor (1
if

(1

m-1
+ Ox) m ~

>

and

0,

we have

1
<

(1

the

is

m~l

Ox)

(1

is less
1
<

ftc)"

Hence

1
.

ici)"

term of a convergent
than unity; and,
than a fixed limit. For,

-f &c) is less

#)/(!

(1

"

general

"-

while

if

m-

for every value of x

1<

0,

between

we have the development

-.shall postpone the discussion of the case where x =


1.
In the same way we might establish the following formulae

We

arcsm*

1 x
= * + -+
,

3 x6

^- +
.

.5...(2r?

-1)

2.4.6--.2w
8
X
-

which we

iC

iC

...

x2

"

1
"

2w-|-l

7
CC

2fl

+1

...
y + + (-l)^

TI +---,

by a simpler process, and which hold


1 and + 1.
Aside from these examples and a few others, the discussion of
the remainder presents great difficulty on account of the increas
It would therefore
ing complication of the successive derivatives.
seem from this first examination as if the application of Taylor s
series for the development of a function in an infinite series were of
shall prove later

for all values of x

between

Such an impression would, however, be utterly


for these developments, quite to the contrary, play a funda
mental role in modern Mathematical Analysis. In order to appre
ciate their importance it is necessary to take another point of

limited usefulness.
false

view and to study the properties of power series for their own

TAYLOR S SERIES

106

We

sake, irrespective cf their origin.

[III,

shall

5J

do this in several of

the following chapters.

Just

now we

will merely

remark that the

series

very well be convergent without representing the function


f(x) from which it was derived. The following example is due to
= (2/x*)eand, in
Cauchy. Let /(*) = e~ *. Then / (*)
general, the nth derivative is of the form

may

">

zero with x.*

All these derivatives vanish for x = 0,


e~ l/3* by any positive power of x approaches
Indeed, setting x = 1/z, we may write

and

known

where

is

a polynomial.

for the quotient of

it is

matter

well

how

large

that ez */z m increases indefinitely with z, no


Again, let (x) be a function to which

m may be.

the formula (8) applies

Setting F(x)

F(0)

.
<*>

<fr(x

(0),

(0)

<f>

e~ llx\ we

find

(0),

F<">(0)

^->(0),

and hence the development of F(x) by Maclaurin s series would


The sum of the series thus obtained
coincide with the preceding.
function from that from which the
different
an
represents
entirely
series

was obtained.
if two

In general,

distinct functions f(x)


are equal for x
0,

and

all their derivatives,

<f>

is

it

together with
evident that the

(a;),

assumed that /(O) = 0, which is the only assignment which would


= 0. But it should be noticed that no further assignment
necessary for / (a:), etc., at x = 0. For
*It

is tacitly

render/(:c) continuous at x
is

,,,

which defines /

(x) at

m=

lim /(a) -/(O)


x =
^~~

and makes /

(z)

_-

ft

continuous at

a:

0, etc.

TRANS.

Ill,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

61]

107

Maclaurin series developments for the two functions cannot both


be valid, for the coefficients of the two developments coincide.
Let us consider, for

Extension to functions of several variables.

51.

= f(x, y, z) of the three independent vari


definiteness, a function
and
let
us
ables x, y, z,
try to develop f(x -f h, y -f k, z
I) accord
of
to
h, k, I, grouping together the terms of the same
ing
powers
o>

Cauchy reduced

degree.

this

Let us give

lowing device.

to the preceding

problem

x, y, z, h, k,

by the fol
and let

definite values

us set
<f>

where
alone

t is

if

=f(x +

()

ht,y

to

it

Taylor

kt,

ft),

The function

an auxiliary variable.

we apply

depends on
with a remainder, we find

s series

<()

(17)

f
where
(0),
and its derivatives, for
<

<(0),

(n)
<

t,

0; and where
1 for the value

$() =/(w,
u

v,

"

1)

<

But we may consider

zero and one.

r^

-T;

*<-+

>(*),

of the function
(0) are the values

the derivative of order n

*<">(0)

<

(f)

&t,

is

(0)

where

<f>(f)

the value of
lies

between

as a composite function of

w), the auxiliary functions

=x

4- ht,

w=

kt,

K -f

It

According to a previous remark, the


being linear functions of t.
m
is the same as if t/,
expression for the differential of order m, d
Hence we have the symbolic
v, w were the independent variables.
<f>,

equation

which may be written, after dividing by dtm

A
For

0, u, v,

+ |CV

in the

form

+ LC
CW

reduce, respectively, to x, y,

equation in the same symbolism becomes

z,

and the above

TAYLOR S SERIES

108

[III,

52

Similarly,
(n

where

cc,

y, z are

to be replaced, after the expression

x
If

respectively.

+ l)

developed, by

z + Bit,
+ 6kt,
= 1 in (17), it becomes

Oht,

we now

is

set

,dx

(18)1

n Id
\cx

1f\2
.

The remainder R n may be written

in the

-!/->

cy

*-;

cz

form
n+1)

where

x, y, z

are to be replaced

+ 6h, y +

by x

6k, z

01 after

the

is expanded.*
This formula (18) is exactly analogous to the general formula
If for a. given set of values of cc, y, z, h, k, I the remainder R n

expression

(3).

we have a develop
approaches zero when n increases indefinitely,
of
whose terms is a
in
each
a
series
z
ment of f(x + h, y + k, + I)
it
is
But
I.
in
very difficult, in gen
h, k,
homogeneous polynomial
or not this remainder
whether
for
R
n
eral, to see from the expression
approaches zero.
the formula (18) it is easy to draw certain conclusions
analogous to those obtained from the general formula (3) in the
For instance, let z =f(x, y)
case of a single independent variable.
function f(x, y), together
If
S.
the
surface
of
a
be the equation
order n, is continuous
a
certain
to
derivatives
with all its partial
up
52.

in the

/(

From

neighborhood of a point (X Q y
,

h,

k)

= f(x

~)

/
I

),

h df

^-

the formula (18) gives


,

-f

fc 7

Restricting ourselves, in the second member, to the first two terms,


then to the first three, etc., we obtain the equation of a plane, then
* It

is

assumed here that

all

the derivatives used exist and are continuous.

TRANS.

Ill,

TAYLOR S SERIES WITH A REMAINDER

52]

109

that of a paraboloid, etc., which differ very little from the given sur
face near the point (x 0) y )- The plane in question is precisely the

tangent plane
*

and the paraboloid

= Ax + 2 Bxy +
2

that one of the family

is

Cy*

which most nearly coincides with the given surface S.


The formula (18) is also used to determine the limiting value of
Let f(x, y) and
a function which is given in indeterminate form.
= a, y = b, but
vanish
for
x
which
both
functions
be
two
(#, T/)
<

which, together with their partial derivatives up to a certain order,


Let us try to find the limit
are continuous near the point (a, ).
ratio
the
approached by

when x and y approach a and

b, respectively.
derivatives df/da, df/8b,
vanish simultaneously, we may write

the four

k[T*-+<}

<(>(a

+ h,b +

e,

c,,

e{

that
all

8<f>/db

+ k(%-

k)

/d<f>

+ \,+
.

\Ta
c

first,

do not

d<f>/8a,

K)

where

Supposing,

first

,
k

^)

approach zero with

\db

h and

When

&.

h and k approach zero

the point

and we will sup

(x, y) approaches (a, b~),


pose that the ratio k/h approaches a certain limit a, i.e. that the
point (x, y) describes a curve which has a tangent at the point (a, b~).
Dividing each of the terms of the preceding ratio by A, it appears

that the fraction f(x,

y)/<$>(x,

o^~

y) approaches the limit

"+"

ca

~oT

do

--P

-Z

ca

OL

-^r-

cb

This limit depends, in general, upon a,


which x and y approach their limits a and
that this limit should be independent of
relation

i.e.
b,

upon the manner

respectively.
it is

_
da db
should hold

and such

is

db da

not the case in general.

in

In order

necessary that the

TAYLOR S SERIES

110

[HI,

53

vanish
If the four first derivatives df/Sa, df/Sb,
we should take the terms of the second order in the
d<l>/da,

8<f>/db

simultaneously,

formula (18) and write

f(a

+ K) _

h, b

where e, e
c u e/, e / are infinitesimals.
Then, if a be given the
same meaning as above, the limit of the left-hand side is seen to be
,

c",

a H- %-? a
+ 2 f-fj
V?
a
cb
co

<ya

which depends,

in general,

upon

a.

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

II.

Let (x
equation

53. Singular points.

of a curve

C whose

?/

is

be the coordinates of a point


If the two first par
0.
F(x, y~)
)

derivatives 8F/dx, 8F/dy do not vanish simultaneously at this


point, we have seen ( 22) that a single branch of the curve C passes
through the point, and that the equation of the tangent at that
tial

point

is

where the symbol d p + q F /dx$ dyl denotes the value of the derivative
+ vp
p
If dF/dx Q and dF /dy both van
fip
/8x di/* for x = x y = y
,

Let us suppose
ish, the point (x y ) is, in general, a singular point*
that the three second derivatives do not all vanish simultaneously
x y
for x
y and that these derivatives, together with the third
,

derivatives, are continuous near that point.


the curve may be written in the form.

Then the equation

* That
is, the appearance of the curve is, in general, peculiar at that point.
TRANS.
exact analytic definition of a singular point, see 192.

of

For an

Ill,

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

53]

;_ g \24-2

111

(19)
1

[OF
I

cF

y*

where x and y are to be replaced in the third derivatives by


- y ), respectively. We may assume
X() + Q(x- B ) and ?/ + 0(y
that the derivative d*F/dy$ does not vanish; for, at any rate, we
Then, setting
could always bring this about by a change of axes.
2
ic
the
=
and
t (x
ar
(x
equation
dividing by
)
(19)
y
)
y
,

becomes

(20)1

0,

fyo

P (x

where

approaches x

x
.

t*)

is

Now

a function which remains finite

let

If these roots are real

ti

and

when x

be the two roots of the equation

#2

and unequal,

i.e. if

the equation (20)

may

be written in the form

(t

,)

(t

*2

+ (x - x,) P =

0.

=x

t l9 t
the above quadratic has two distinct roots t
2
which
roots
two
As x approaches x that equation has
approach # t
and 2 respectively. The proof of this is merely a repetition of

For x

Let us set
the argument for the existence of implicit functions.
the
write
down
t l -\- u, for example, and
t
equation connecting x

and u:

where Q (x, u) remains

finite,

while x approaches x and u approaches

and let
tz
Let us suppose, for definiteness, that t
of
value
denote an upper limit of the absolute
Q(x, ), and ra a
h and x + h,
x
between
t 2 + u, when x lies
lower limit of t t
zero.

>

TAYLOR S SERIES

112

[III,

53

and u between

h and -f h, where h is a positive number less than


be a positive number less than h, and rj another
positive number which satisfies the two inequalities
t2

ti

Now

let c

m
<

77

If

a;

h,

rj

e.

<

be given such a value that x

is

less

than

77,

the left-hand

side of the above equation will have different signs if


e and then
Hence that equation has a root which
-+- c be substituted for u.

approaches zero as x approaches x

and the equation (19) has a

root of the form

!/o

- *o) (*i +

(a

a),

where a approaches zero with x


x
It follows that there
branch of the curve C which is tangent to the straight line
.

=
y<>

*i

(*

is

one

z<>)

at the point (x , T/ O ).
In like manner it

is easy to see that another branch of the


curve passes through this same point tangent to the straight line
x ). The point
is called a double point; and
y
yQ = t 2 (x

the equation of the system of tangents at this point may be found


x ), (y
by setting the terms of the second degree in (x
y ) in
to
zero.
equal
(19)
If

Inside a suffi
T/ O ) is called an isolated double point.
(cc
ciently small circle about the point Af as center the first member
F(x, ?/) of the equation (19) does not vanish except at the point
the point

itself.

For, let us take

= x + p cos

<f>,

as the coordinates of a point near


,2

?/

+ p sin

Then we

~ cos

"

<^>

sin 4

<f>

find

sin 2

+ PL

where L remains finite when p approaches zero. Let


be an upper
limit of the absolute value of L when p is less than a certain
posi
tive

number

r.

For

all

values of

<

between

and 2?r the expression


c2

cos A sin

d>

+ -T-T- sin

Ill,

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

53]

has the same sign, since

its roots

113

be a lower
are imaginary. Let
it is clear that the coefficient

Then

limit of its absolute value.


of p 2 cannot vanish for any point inside a circle of radius p<m/H.
has no root other than p
Hence the equation F(x, y)
0, i.e.

=x

y= y

inside this circle.

In case we have
dx 8y
the two tangents at the double point coincide, and there are, in gen
to the same line, thus
eral, two branches of the given curve tangent
forming a cusp. The exhaustive study of this case is somewhat

and will be left until later. Just now we will merely


remark that the variety of cases which may arise is much greater
than in the two cases which we have just discussed, as will be seen

intricate

from the following examples.


The curve y 2 = x s has a cusp of the

first

kind at the origin, both

branches of the curve being tangent to the axis of x and lying on


The
different sides of this tangent, to the right of the y axis.

2x 2 y + x* x 5 = has a cusp of the second kind, both


curve y 2
branches of the curve being tangent to the axis of x and lying on
the same side of this tangent for the equation may be written
;

=x

z%

and the two values of y have the same sign when x


but are not real unless x is positive. The curve

is

very small,

has two branches tangent to the x axis at the origin, which do not
becomes
possess any other peculiarity for, solving for y, the equation
;

y~

x2

3 x2

V8 -

1+x

x2

and neither of the two branches corresponding to the two signs


before the radical has any singularity whatever at the origin.
It may also happen that a curve is composed of two coincident
branches.

Such

is

the

case

for

the curve

represented by the

equation

When the point (x, y) passes

across the curve the first

vanishes without changing sign.

member F(x, y)

TAYLOR S SERIES

11-4

Finally, the point (cc y )


the case for the curve y 2

may

is

[III,

54

be an isolated double point.


Such
4
0, on which the origin is an

+x +y =
4

isolated double point.


54.

F (x

>

three

In

first

that point

manner a point

of a surface S, whose equation is


a
general,
singular point of that surface if the
partial derivatives vanish for the coordinates x , y , z of

like

=
)

y>

0, is, in

dF _
w,

5
CX
Q

ZF
-

CF =
7

0,

0.

CZ Q

CIJ^

The equation

of the tangent plane found above


(
22) then reduces
an identity and if the six second partial derivatives do not all
vanish at the same point, the locus of the tangents to all curves on
to

the surface S through the point


second order. For, let

is,

in general, a cone of the

be the equations of a curve C on the surface


functions f(), $(), \l/(t) satisfy the equation
the

first

and second

differentials satisfy the

dF
-^

ex

y
dx

cF

cF

+ 7T-

dy

cy

cF
-5

dz

cz

F(x,

y, z)

0,

and

0,

dF Y
()F
cF
+ ~dz)
+~d*x
+ ^-d
cz
ex
I
Cy

Then the three

two relations

2)

d,j

cy

dx

S.

dF

y
J

= 0.
+ ~d*z
cz

For the point x


x y
z the first of these equations
y z
reduces to an identity, and the second becomes

r=dx dz =
dxdy + 2 ^- dy dz + 2 -fcx
dx oz
dy

0y

The equation
dx, dy, dz
line

0.

d*t

of the locus of the tangents is given


by eliminating
between the latter equation and the equation of a tangent

dx

dz

dy

which leads to the equation of a cone

of the second degree

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

in,M]

(21)

rV
a%;

(V
^A

c2

=-

2=

-I-r-

F(Y

(A
\

x nO/} (\ Y

C^-

?/o)

(Z

V 4-

11
y

, v,*

115

2s

+2^

F
^~

the other hand, applying Taylor s series with a remainder


and carrying the development to terms of the third order, the equa

On

tion of the surface becomes

(22)

1.

CF

in the ter)ns of the third order are to be replaced- by


where x, y,
x + 0(x-x ), y + 8(y-yd, z + 0(z-s ), respectively. The
the terms of
equation of the cone T may be obtained by setting
in
z
z
the
x
in
x
the second degree
equation (22) equal
y
y
,

to zero.

Let us then,

first,

suppose that the equation (21) represents a real


Let the surface 5 and the cone T be cut by a

non-degenerate cone.

distinct generators G and G of


plane P which passes through two
find
the
to
In
order
the cone.
equation of the section of the sur
us
let
this
face 5 by
imagine a transformation of coordinates
plane,
the
which
carried out
changes
plane P into a plane parallel to the

then sufficient to substitute z


evident that for this curve the point

xy plane.
It is

It is

z<>

from what we have just seen,

is

in the equation (22).

a double point with

this section is

composed
two branches tangent, respectively, to the two generators G, G
therefore resembles the two nappes
The surface S near the point
Hence the point n
its vertex.
near
of a cone of the second degree

real tangents

of

is

called a conical point.

When

the equation (21) represents an imaginary non-degenerate


fi.
is an isolated singular point of the surface
the
cone,
point
Inside a sufficiently small sphere about such a point there exists no
x
other than x
set of solutions of the equation F(x, y, z)

y =y

=z

For, let

be a point in space near

p the

TAYLOR S SERIES

116

MM

distance

Then

we

if

and

a,

(3,

[m,

y the direction cosines of the line

55

M M.

substitute

=X +

the function F(x,

pa,

= Z + py,

becomes

y, 2)

where L remains finite when p approaches zero. Since the equation


(21) represents an imaginary cone, the expression
or H-----h 2)

cannot vanish when the point


2

Let
and

(a,

/?,

+ yS +

y) describes the sphere

1.

be a lower limit of the absolute value of this polynomial,


be an upper limit of the absolute value of L near the
Af
If a sphere of radius
be drawn about
as center,
point
2
it is evident that the coefficient of
in
the expression for F(x, y, z)
p
let

m/H

cannot vanish inside this sphere.

Hence the equation

F(x, y,z) =
has no root except p = 0.
When the equation (21) represents two distinct real planes, two
nappes of the given surface pass through the point A/ , each of

which

is

tangent to one of the planes.

Certain surfaces have a

line of double points, at each of which the tangent cone degenerates


into two planes.
This line is a double curve on the surface along

which two distinct nappes cross each other. For example, the circle
whose equations are z = 0, x 1 + y 2 = 1 is a double line on the surface
whose equation is
4

2z 2( x *

+ ,f) -

(r*

+ ,f-

l)^

0.

When

the equation (21) represents a system of two conjugate


imaginary planes or a double real plane, a special investigation is
necessary in each particular case to determine the form of the sur
face near the point
The above discussion will be renewed in

the paragraphs on extrema.


55.

Extrema

of functions of a single variable.

be continuous in the interval

(a, 6),

and

let

Let the function f(x)


c

be a point of that

SINGULAR POINTS

55]

Ill,

interval.

maximum

The function /(#) is


minimum) for x

or a

MAXIMA AND MINIMA


said to have an

=c

if

a positive

117

extremum

number

77

(i.e.

can be

found such that the difference f(c -\- A) f(c), which vanishes for
h = 0, has the same sign for all other values of h between
rj

and

If this difference is positive, the function f(x) has a


c than for any value of x near c
it is said

i).

smaller value for x


to

have a minimum

ence f(c

-f A)

/(c)

is

On

the contrary, if the differ


function
is said to have a
the
negative,

at that point.

maximum.
If the function f(x) possesses a derivative for
tive

must vanish.

c,

that deriva

For the two quotients

-h

each of which approaches the limit / (c) when h approaches zero, have
hence their common limit / (c) must be zero. Con

different signs

which lies between


(#)
versely, let c be a root of the equation
a and b, and let us suppose, for the sake of generality, that the

first derivative which does not vanish for x = c is that of order n,


and that this derivative is continuous when x = c. Then Taylor s
series with a remainder, if we stop with n terms, gives

which may be written

/(

in the

form

+ A) -/() =

Let rj be a positive number such


c approaches zero with h.
and c
that |/(n) ( c ) is greater than e when x lies between c
77.
77
For such values of x, /(n) (c) -f c has the same sign as f*- n) (c), and
n (n)
If
consequently /(c -f A)
/(c) has the same sign as A / (c).

where

is

there

odd, it is clear that this difference changes sign with A, and


c.
If n is even,
is neither a maximum nor a minimum at x

f(c + A)

(n)
/(c) has the same sign as/ (c), whether A be positive
or negative
hence the function is a maximum if / (c) is negative,
(

and a minimum if f(n) (c) is positive. It follows that the necessary


and sufficient condition that the function f(x) should have a maximum
or a minimum f or x = c is that the first derivative which does not
vanish for x = c should be of even order.

TAYLOR S SERIES

118

[III,

56

Geometrically, the preceding conditions mean that the tangent to


the curve y =f(x) at the point A whose abscissa is c must be par
allel to the axis of x, and moreover that the point A must not be
a point of inflection.
Notes.

When the hypotheses which we

have made are not

satisfied

the function f(x) may have a maximum or a minimum, although


the derivative / (#) does not vanish.
If, for instance, the derivative
is infinite

for

c,

the function will have a

maximum

or a mini

Thus the function y = a^ is at


the derivative changes sign.
and
the
a minimum for x
0,
corresponding curve has a cusp at the
the
the
tangent being
y axis.
origin,

mum

if

When,

as in the statement of the problem, the variable


which lie between two limits a and b, it

restricted to values

happen that the function has

its

absolute

maxima and minima

cisely at these limiting points, although the derivative

/ (x)

is

may
pre
does

not vanish there.


Suppose, for instance, that we wished to find
the shortest distance from a point P whose coordinates are (a, 0)
z
2
R 2 0. Choosing for our
to a circle C whose equation is x
y

independent variable the abscissa of a point

M of

the circle C,

we

find

d2
or,

= PM = (x Z

making use

+ y = x + y - 2 ax + a
2

2
,

of the equation of the circle,

d2

The general

a)

rule

=R +
2

a*

would lead us to try

2 ax.

to find the roots of the derived

But the paradox is explained if


equation 2 a = 0, which is absurd.
we observe that by the very nature of the problem the variable x
If a is positive, d 2 has a minimum
R and
R.
must lie between

for

=R

and a

maximum

for x

R.

56. Extrema of functions of two variables. Let f(x, y) be a con


tinuous function of x and y when the point M, whose coordinates
The
are x and y, lies inside a region ft bounded by a contour C.
function f(x, y) is said to have an extremum at the point
(x 0) ?/ )
of the region O if a positive number rj can be found such that the

difference

which vanishes

for h

=k=

0,

of values of the increments h

keeps the same sign for all other sets


and k which are each less than T in

Ill,

SINGULAR POINTS

50]

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

119

Considering y for the moment as constant and


becomes a function of the single variable x and, by

absolute value.

equal to

?/o,

the above, the difference

cannot keep the same sign for small values of h unless the deriva
Likewise, the derivative df/dy
tive df/dx vanishes at the point
must vanish at Q and it is apparent that the only possible sets of
values of x and y which can render the function f(x, y) an extremum are to be found among the solutions of the two simultaneous

equations

*=o,
tix

Let x

=x

=y

f=o.
cy

be a set of solutions of these two equations.

shall suppose that the second partial derivatives of f(x, y) do


whose coordinates
not all vanish simultaneously at the point

We

are
y ), and that they, together with the third derivatives,
Then we have, from Taylor s expansion,
continuous near

are (x
all

=
1.2

(23)

(3)

+
We

can foresee that the expression

will, in general,

dominate the whole discussion.

Q it is necessary and
In order that there be an extremum at
sufficient that the difference A should have the same sign when the
inside a sufficiently small square
point (X Q + h, y + k) lies anywhere
as center, except at the center, where
drawn about the point
A = 0. Hence A must also have the same sign when the point

inside a sufficiently small circle whose


k) lies anywhere
for such a square may always be replaced by its
center is A/
Then let C be a circle of radius
inscribed circle, and conversely.
All the points inside this
r drawn about the point
Q as center.
(x

+ h,

circle are given

by

TAYLOR S SERIES

120
where

is

<

to vary from

to 2

[111,

and p from

TT,

r to

not to introduce this restriction.

A becomes

expression for

A=

what follows

substitution, the

this

Making

We might,

r.

indeed, restrict p to positive values, but it is better in

56

2
(A cos

+ 2 B sin

<

+ C sin

cos
<f>

<f>

2
<)

+ ^- Z,

where

and where Z

is

a function whose extended expression

it

would be

useless to write out, but which remains finite near the point (X Q y
).
It now becomes necessary to distinguish several cases according to
,

the sign of

B 2 - A C.

First case.

Let

Bz

cos

AC
<

has two real roots in tan


of

>

Then the equation

0.

+ 2 B sin

<,

cos

<

<p

and the

+ C sin

first

2
</>

member

is

the difference

Hence we may write

two squares.
2

A
o"

a ( a cos ^

+ b sin ^)

2
""

P(

a>

cos

b>

sin ^) 2 ]

+^L

>

where

a
If
<f>

>

0,

be given a value which

a cos

<

fta

aft

0,

>

satisfies the

=jfc

0.

equation

+ b sin = 0,
<

will be negative for sufficiently small values of p


be
while, if
=
such that a
6
A
will
be
for
infinitesimal
+
0,
positive
<

sin<

cos<f>

Hence no number r can be found such that the differ


has the same sign for any value of
when p is less than r.
It follows that the function f(x, y) has neither a maximum nor a
minimum for x = x y = y
values of

ence

p.

<

Second

case.

Let

B2

AC

cos 2
</>

<

The expression

0.

+ 2.Bcos

cannot vanish for any value of

<.

Let

be a lower limit of

its

absolute value, and, moreover, let


be an upper limit of the abso
lute value of the function L in a circle of radius R about
(z , y ) as

121

Finally, let r denote a positive number less than R and less


H. Then inside a circle of radius r the difference A will

center.

than

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

57]

Ill,

3m/

2
have the same sign as the coefficient of p i.e. the same sign as A
Hence the function f(x, y~) has either a maximum or a mini
or C.
,

mum

for x

To

= XQ

?/o-

recapitulate, if at the point (x

we have

*
*">(>,

^dx dy

there

is

neither a

there

is

either a

maximum

maximum

nor a minimum.

or a

The ambiguous

The

case.

if

minimum, depending on the

2
the two derivatives c f/dx%, o^f/dyl.
derivatives are negative, a minimum

57.

But

There
if

maximum

is

sign of
these

if

they are positive.

case where

B2

AC

is

not cov

The geometrical interpretation


ered by the preceding discussion.
be the
shows why there should be difficulty in this case. Let
surface represented by the equation z

= f(x,

?/).

If the function

f(x, y) has a maximum or a minimum at the point (X Q , y ), n ear


which the function and its derivatives are continuous, we must have

which shows that the tangent plane


whose coordinates are (x 0) y

to the surface
),

must be

In order that there should be a

at the point

parallel to the xy
or a minimum it

maximum

plane.
should lie
is also necessary that the surface S, near the point
,
led
we
to study
hence
are
of
the
on
one
side
tangent
plane
entirely

the behavior of a surface with respect to


point of tangency.

its

tangent plane near the

Let us suppose that the point of tangency has been moved to the
and that the tangent plane is the xy plane. Then the equa

origin

tion of the surface is of the

(24)

where

a, b, c

ax 2

is

+ ax +
s

cy*

3 /3x*y

are constants, and where a,

and y which remain


tion

2 bxy

form

/8,

y, 8

+ 3 yxy + Sy
2

are functions of

when x and y approach zero. This equa


same as equation (19), where x and y have

finite

essentially the

been replaced by zeros, and h and k by x and

y, respectively.

TAYLOR S SERIES

122

[III,

57

In order to see whether or not the surface S lies entirely on


one side of the xy plane near the origin, it is sufficient to study the
This section is given by the
section of the surface by that plane.

equation

ax*

(25)

cy

ax*

= 0;

ac
has a double point at the origin of coordinates. If b
the
negative, the origin is an isolated double point ( 53), and

hence
is

+ 2bxy +

it

= y = 0, when the point


equation (25) has no solution except x
lies inside a circle C of sufficiently small radius r drawn
(x, y)
about the origin as center. The left-hand side of the equation (25)

keeps the same sign as long as the point (x, y) remains inside this
S which project into the
circle, and all the points of the surface
interior of the circle

same side of the xy plane except


case there is an extremum, and the por

are on the

In this
the origin itself.
tion of the surface S near the origin resembles a portion of a sphere

or an ellipsoid.
the intersection of the surface S by its tangent
If b 2
ac> 0,
plane has two distinct branches C lf C z which pass through the
the
origin, and the tangents to these two branches are given by

equation

ax*

+ 2bxy +

cy

0.

Let the point (x, y) be allowed to move about in the neighborhood


As it crosses either of the two branches C x C 2 the
of the origin.
left-hand side of the equation (25) vanishes and changes sign.
,

Hence, assigning to each region of the plane in the neighborhood


of the origin the sign of the left-hand side of the equation (25), we
find a configuration similar to Fig. 7.
Among the points of the
surface which project into points inside a circle about the origin in
the xy plane there are always some which

below and some which lie above the


xy plane, no matter how small the circle
lie

The general aspect of the sur


face at this point with respect to its tan
gent plane resembles that of an imparted

be taken.

hyperboloid or an hyperbolic paraboloid.


The function f(x, y) has neither a maxiFlG

The

case where b 2

ac

mum nor a minimum at the origin.


= is the case in which the curve

of

intersection of the surface by its tangent plane has a cusp at the


will postpone the detailed discussion of this case. If the
origin.

We

Ill,

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

58]

intersection

is

123

composed of two distinct branches through the

origin,

there can be no extremum, for the surface again cuts the tangent
plane. If the origin is an isolated double point, the function f(x, y~)

has an extremum for x

It

0.

may

also

happen that the inter


composed of two

section of the surface with its tangent plane is


For example, the surface K
coincident branches.

2 x*y -f x*
y*
2
all along the parabola y = x
The
tangent to the plane z =
2
4
2
2 x y -}- x is zero at every point on this parabola, but is
function ?/
positive for all points near the origin which are not on the parabola.
is

58. In order to see which of these cases holds in a given example it is neces
sary to take into account the derivatives of the third and fourth orders, and some
times derivatives of still higher order. The following discussion, which is usually

When
is applicable only in the most general cases.
the equation of the surface may be written in the following form
by using Taylor s development to terms of the fourth order:
sufficient in practice,

62

ac

(26)

- f(x,

y)

= A(xsinu -y cos w) 2 +

fa

(x,

y)

--[x

24 \ dx

iW
y

, ftr

dy /

Let us suppose, for definiteness, that A is positive. In order that the surface S
lie entirely on one side of the xy plane near the origin, it is necessary that
all the curves of intersection of the surface by planes through the z axis should
But if the surface be cut
lie on the same side of the xy plane near the origin.
should

by the secant plane

xtan

the equation of the curve of intersection

p cos 0,

0,

found by making the substitution

is

= p sin

in the equation (26), the

new axes being the

plane on the xy plane.

Performing

where

sin

-f

trace of the secant

find

Kp

Lp*,

independent of p. If tan w ^ tan 0, z is positive for sufficiently small


hence all the corresponding sections lie above the xy plane near the
Let us now cut the surface by the plane
;

y
If the

cos w sin 0) 2

and the

we

this operation,

is

values of p
origin.

= A p 2 (cos

<j>

old z axis

corresponding value of

is

x tan

u.

not zero, the development of z

is

of the form

Hence the section of the surface by this plane has a


p.
It follows that the
point of inflection at the origin and crosses the xy plane.
Such is
function /(x, y) has neither a maximum nor a minimum at the origin.
the case when the section of the surface by its tangent plane has a cusp of the
and changes sign with

first

kind, for instance, for the surface


z

= w2

x8

TAYLOR S SERIES

124

[HI,

58

= for the latter substitution, we would carry the development out to


If
terms of the fourth order, and we would obtain an expression of the form
where K\

a constant which

is

We

the fourth order.

be readily calculated from the derivatives of


K\ is not zero. For infinitesimal val

may

shall suppose that

ues of p, z has the same sign as K\ if K\ is negative, the section in question lies
beneath the xy plane near the origin, and again there is neither a maximum nor
x4 whose
a minimum. Such is the case, for example, for the surface z = y 2
2
=
consists
of
the
two
x
intersection with the xy plane
Hence,
parabolas y
;

K=

at the same time, it is evidently useless to carry the


and K\
investigation farther, for we may conclude at once that the surface crosses its
tangent plane near the origin.

unless

But

if

>

K=

and KI

at the

>

same time,

made by

the sections

all

planes

above the xy plane near the origin. But that does not
show conclusively that the surface does not cross its tangent plane, as is seen

through the z axis

lie

by considering the particular surface


z

(y

x 2 ) (y

2 x 2 ),

its tangent plane in two parabolas, one of which lies inside the other.
In order that the surface should not cross its tangent plane it is also necessary

which cuts

that the section of the surface

through the z axis should

made by any

cylinder whatever which passes


Let y = (x) be the

wholly above the xy plane.

lie

<f>

equation of the trace of this cylinder upon the xy plane, where (x) vanishes for
x = 0. The function F(x) =/[x, 0(x)] must be at a minimum for x = 0, what
<f>

ever be the function


In order to simplify the calculation we will suppose
(x).
that the axes have been so chosen that the equation of the surface is of the form
z

where

is

positive.

With

= Ay 2 +
this

3 (x, !/)

<f>

system of axes

we have

=0
at the origin.
The derivatives of the function F(x) are given

"

^>0

dx dy

dx*

dyQ

8xo

by the formulae

$"

X)

dxdy

dy

+4 -*-*
6

d2

dx dy

fart

4.

(x)

12

W
*

*(x)

53 f

^3 f
-^-

dx 2 dy

^
^

0"

dy

"(),

cy

^ ^(z)

f
+ 6 -^3
3

^-

dxdy2
2

2
<f>

4>"

dy

//2

8/
dy

g*^

Ill,

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

59]

from which, for x

= 0, we

125

obtain

c !/0
If

tf>

(0)

does not vanish, the function F(x) has a minimum, as is also apparent
But if (()) = 0, we find the formulas

from the previous discussion.

<

Hence, in order that F(x) be at a minimum,

and

that the following quadratic

r
dx*
be positive for

necessary that d*f/x% vanish

tf>"(0),

cx2 T~
dy

values of

it is

in

dy

>

0"(0).

easy to show that these conditions are not satisfied for the above function
3x 2 y + 2z4 but that they are satisfied for the function z = y2 + x*.

It is

all

form

= y2

that the latter surface lies entirely above the xy plane.


attempt to carry the discussion farther, for it requires extremely
nice reasoning to render it absolutely rigorous.
The reader who wishes to exam
ine the subject in greater detail is referred to an important memoir by Ludwig
It is evident, in fact,

We

shall not

Scheffer, in Vol.

XXXV of the Mathematische Annalen.

59. Functions of three variables.

function of the three variables


tion

is

said to have an

of values x

Let u

x, y, z.

= f(x, y, z) be

a continuous

Then, as before, this func

extremum (maximum or minimum)


number rj can be found

a positive

if

for a set

so small

that the difference

which vanishes

for

sets of values of h, k,

k
I,

= = 0,
I

has the same sign for

each of which

is

all

other

less in absolute

value

than

If only one of the variables *, y, z is given an increment,


i].
while the other two are regarded as constants, we find, as above,

that u cannot be at an

extremum unless the equations

are all satisfied, provided, of course, that these derivatives are con
tinuous near the point (or y0) z
Let us now suppose that x y z
are a set of solutions of these equations, and let
be the point
,

~).

whose coordinates are xw yQ


sphere can be drawn about

There will be an extremum

so small that f(x, y, z)

f(x

0)

if
,

z)

TAYLOR S SERIES

126

[III,

59

inside the sphere.


has the same sign for all points (x, y, z) except
Let the coordinates of a neighboring point be represented by the

equations

= x + pa,

= z + py,
= 1 and let us replace

= y + pft,

where a, ft, y satisfy the relation a 2 + /3 2 + y2


z in Taylor s expansion of f(x,
x y
x
y z
;

y,
) by pa,
This gives the following expression for A

py, respectively.

A=
where

ft,

<f>(a,

pft,

[>O,

+.--],

y)

ft,

y) denotes a quadratic

form in

ft, y whose coeffi


and where Z is a

a,

cients are the second derivatives of f(x, y, z),

function which remains finite near the point


The quadratic
Q
form may be expressed as the sum of the squares of three distinct
linear functions of a, ft, y, say P, P
multiplied by certain con
stant factors a, a
except in the particular case when the dis
criminant of the form is zero. Hence we may write, in general,
,

P",

a",

= aP + a P +
2

*(a,

ft,

y)

2
a"P"

where a, a
are all different from zero. If the coefficients a, a
have the same sign, the absolute value of the quadratic form
will
remain greater than a certain lower limit when the point a, ft, y
,

a"

a"

<f>

describes the sphere


2

ft

+y =
2

1,

and accordingly A has the same sign as a, a


when p is less than
a certain number.
Hence the f imction f(x, y, z) has an extremum.
If the three coefficients a, a
do not all have the same sign,
a"

there will be neither a

example, that a

>

0,

<

a"

maximum
0,

and

P =

let

nor a minimum.
us take values of

Suppose, for
a,

ft,

y which

0.
These values cannot cause
0,
satisfy the equations
to vanish, and A will be positive for small values of p.
But if, on
the other hand, values be taken for a, ft, y which satisfy the equa

P=

P"

= 0, A

will be negative for small values of p.


the same for any number of independent variables
the discussion of a certain quadratic form always plays the prin
In the case of a function u
cipal role.
f(x, y, z) of only three

tions

0,

P"

The method

is

independent variables it may be noticed that the discussion is


equivalent to the discussion of the nature of a surface near a singu
lar point.

For consider a surface 2 whose equation


F(*>

y,

=f(x

>

y>

*)

-f(*o, y

is

O = 0;

Ill,

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

60]

127

this surface evidently passes through the point


n whose coordi
if the function f(x, y, z) has an extremum
and
nates are (x y
),
is a singular point of 2Hence, if the cone of
there, the point
,

is imaginary, it is clear that F(x, y, z) will keep the


tangents at
as center, and
same sign inside a sufficiently small sphere about

/(#

2/j

w iH

maximum

surely have a

cone of tangents

or

is real,

is

minimum. But if the


two real distinct planes,

or a

composed of

several nappes of the surface pass through A/ , and F(x, y, z)


changes sign as the point (x, y, z) crosses one of these nappes.
60. Distance from a point to a surface. Let us try to find the maximum and the
values of the distance from a fixed point (a, b, c) to a surface S whose

minimum
equation

is

F(x,

y, z)

The square

0.

d*

(x

a)2

of this distance,

(y

6)

c),

x and y, for example, if z be


a function of two independent variables only,
= 0. In order
considered as a function of x and y defined by the equation
is

that

u be

at

an extremum for a point

(x, y, z)

of the surface,

we must

have, for

the coordinates of that point,


1

du

2 dx
1

du
_

(x

a)

(z

&

(z

2 dy

We find,

in addition,

dFdz =

-\

dx

dz
ix
dz

c)

= 0,
=

0.

cy

F=

from the equation

dF

c)

the relations

dFdz =

dF
U,

dx

dz

0,

dz

dy

rt

U,

dy

whence the preceding equations take the form


a

_
~~

djr
dx

This shows that the normal

"

d_F_

c_F_

dz

dy

to the surface

at the point

(x, y, z) passes through


Hence, omitting the singular points of the surface S, the
the
points sought for are the feet of normals let fall from the point (a, 6, c) upon
In order to see whether such a point actually corresponds to a maxi
surface S.
mum or to a minimum, let us take the point as origin and the tangent plane as
the xy plane, so that the given point shall lie upon the axis of z. Then the func

the point

(a, 6, c).

tion to be studied has the

form

u
where z

is

= x* +

y2

(z

c)2,

a function of x and y which, together with both its first derivatives,


= y = 0. Denoting the second partial derivatives of z by r, s, t,

vanishes for x

we

have, at the origin,

^=
dx*

2(1 -or),

-fiL
dxdy

1*

^ = 2(l-cO,
dy

TAYLOR S SERIES

128
and

it

(r

C2 2

(1

cr) (1

roots of the equation A (c)


2
+ 4 (s2 rt) = 4 s2 + (r
)

61

only remains to study the polynomial


A(C)

The

[III,

=
t)

2.

ct )

C 2( S 2

rt )

(r

_L

are always real by virtue of the identity


There are now several cases which must

be distinguished according to the sign of

s2

rt.

0.
First case. Let s 2
rt
The two roots Ci and c 2 of the equation A (c) =
have the same sign, and we may write A(c) = (s 2
Let us
rt) (c
Ci) (c
Cj).
<

now mark the two points A\ and A%

of the z axis

whose coordinates are

c\

and

c2

These two points lie on the same side of the origin and if we suppose, as is
always allowable, that r and t are positive, they lie on the positive part of the
If the given point A (0, 0, c) lies outside the segment AiA z
z axis.
A(c) is
In order to see
negative, and the distance OA is a maximum or a minimum.
which of the two it is we must consider the sign of 1
cr.
This coefficient
does not vanish except when c = 1 /r and this value of c lies between Ci and c 2
;

cr is positive
hence 1
cr is posi
But, for c = 0, 1
(1/r) = s /r
tive, and the distance OA is a minimum if the point A and the origin lie on
the same side of the segment A\A%.
On the other hand, the distance OA i& a

since

maximum
When the

if

nor a maximum.

and the origin lie on different sides of that segment.


between AI and A 2 the distance is neither a minimum
The case where A lies at one of the points AI, A 2 is left in

the point

point

lies

doubt.
of the two roots c\ and c 2 of A (c) =
is
and the origin lies between the two points
If the point A does not lie between A\ and A 2
A\ and J. a
A(c) is positive
and there is neither a maximum nor a minimum. If A lies between AI and
A 2 A (c) is negative, 1 cr is positive, and hence the distance OA is a minimum.

Second

positive

s2

Let

case.

and the other

rt

is

>

0.

One

negative,

Third case.

Let

s2

rt

0.

seen, as above, that the distance

Then A(c) =

OA

(r

minimum

t) (c

cj),

and

it

is

easily

the point
and the origin
lie on the same side of the point AI, whose coordinates are
(0, 0, Ci), and that
there is neither a maximum nor a minimum if the point AI lies between the point

and the

is

if

origin.

A 2 are of fundamental importance in the study of curva


they are the principal centers of curvature of the surface S at the point 0.

The points AI and


ture

61.

the

Maxima and minima

maxima and minima

are connected

We often need to find

of implicit functions.

of a function of several variables

which
Let us consider, for

by one or more relations.

example, a function to = f(x, y, z, tt) of the four variables


which themselves satisfy the two equations
/i (*, y,

*,

0,

/,(*, y,

z,

M)

x, y, z, u,

= 0.

For definiteness, let us think of x and y as the independent vari


and of z and u as functions of x and y defined by these equa

ables,
tions.

Then

the necessary conditions that

u>

have an extremum are

HI,

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

61]

dx

and the

^^

+ dz

dx

129

=
!/+?
+ 3?!?
du dy
dy
dy

dz

du dx

partial derivatives dz/dx, du/dx, dz/dy,

are given

du/dy

by the relations

=o
M_i.^^4.M^
dz dx^ du dx
--P 0/i0"_n
--,0/10*,
o
P
~^T~
"TT~

^z/

The elimination

0/,0*

"a

"o~

oz cy

cy

du dx

0/,0u

P a
cu

U-

"a~

cy

du/dy leads

of dz/dx, du/dx, dz/dy,

?!f

4.

dz dx

0/,

",

du dy

"5

^* dy

4.

dx

0/i
"^

a*

dx

to the

new

equations of condition

.p

ft

/)(*, *, u)

= 0, /2 = 0, determine the val


which, together with the relations /x
But the equa
ues of x, y, z, u, which may correspond to extrema.
of \ and p.
find
values
we
can
that
tions (27) express the condition
which

satisfy the equations


-

-t-

3
02

-^-

-I- w.

OX

IT-

OX

"j

Jl

^=o

3s

ds

"

"o

I*

dy

dy

"a~

=w

oy

^
^
=
+ X^4
du
du
dw
2

0-

hence the two equations (27) may be replaced by the four equations
unknown auxiliary functions.
(28), where X and p. are
The proof of the general theorem is self-evident, and we may
state the following practical rule

Given a function
/m
^2
iCjj
Atm

*F
*, \

n)

of n variables, connected by h distinct relations

in order to find the values of

x^

a; 2

of the auxiliary function

regarding \ 1} X 2

XA as constants.

function an extremum we must equate

to

xn which

may

render this

zero the partial derivatives

TAYLOR S SERIES

130
62. Another example.

mum

[III,

We shall now take up another example,

62

where the mini

not necessarily given by equating the partial derivatives to zero.


Given
a triangle ABC; let us try to find a point
of the plane for which the sum
is

PA + PB + PC

of the distances

to the vertices of the triangle is a


Let (01, 61), (a 2 , 62 ), (a 3 63) be respectively the coordinates of the
B, C referred to a system of rectangular coordinates. Then the func

minimum.

vertices

A,
tion whose minimum
(29)

from

is

sought

= V(x - oi)a + (y-

where each

is

+ V(x - a2 2 + (y - 62 2 + V(x -

6i)

of the three radicals

is

to be taken with the positive sign. This equa


is evidently entirely above the xy plane,

S which

tion (29) represents a surface

and the whole question reduces to that of finding the point on


is nearest the xy plane.
From the relation (29) we find

a
V(x - m) +

s*

dz

V(z _

ft

(y

--

a-2

V(x -

&!)2

(y

V(x -

&!)2

a 2) 2

-bi

ai )2

+ (y -

a,)*

as)

(y

this surface

V(z -

6 2 )2

as

as )

62

y
(y

V(x - a 3 )

btf

which

(y

-b3
2
+ (y -

63 ) 2

and it is evident that these derivatives are continuous, except in the neighbor
hood of the points A, B, C, where they become indeterminate. The surface S,
therefore, has three singular points which project into the vertices of the given
The minimum of z is given by a point on the surface where the tan
triangle.
gent plane is parallel to the xy plane, or else by one of these singular points. In
order to solve the equations cz/cx

cz/dy

0,

0, let

us write them in the

form
x

V(x

+ (y-

fll )2

(y

V(x -

a2 ) 2
y

&i)

y-E>i

V(X -

a2

0,1

ai)

V(X -

&!)

Then squaring and adding, we

aa)

(y

V(x -

62 ) 2

&2

a3

as)2

(y

b3

+(y- 62 )2

find the condition

_
V(x - a2 ) 2 +
The geometrical interpretation of this result
cosines of the angles which the direction

(y

is easy
denoting by a and /3 the
makes with the axes of x and j/,
the angles which PB makes with the
:

PA

respectively,

same

axes,

and by a and

we may

the cosines of

/3

write this last condition in the form


1

+ 2 (aa +

APE by

or, denoting the angle

0,

0.

segment AB subtends an
For the same reason each of the angles BPC and
clear that the point P must lie inside the triangle

in question expresses that the

angle of 120 at the point P.

CPA

o>,

2 cos

Hence the condition

flS

must be 120.*

It is

The reader

is

urged to draw the figure.

MAXIMA AND MINIMA

SINGULAR POINTS

63]

Ill,

131

ABC, and that there is no point which possesses the required property if any
In case none of the
is equal to or greater than 120.
angle of the triangle
angles is as great as 120, the point P is uniquely determined by an easy con
In this case the minimum is given
struction, as the intersection of two circles.

ABC

P or by one of the vertices of the triangle. But is easy to show


PA + PB + PC is less than the sum of two of the sides of the tri
For, since the angles APB and APC are each 120, we find, from the
angle.
two triangles PAG and PBA, the formulae
AC = Va 2 + c 2 + oc,
AB = Vi + b + ab,
by the point
that the

it

sum

where

PA = a, PB =
Vo2 +

PC =

6,

62

06

>

c.

But

evident that

it is

Va 2

6+-,

-)-

c2

ac>

and hence

AB + AC

>

~,
2

c.

P therefore actually corresponds to a minimum.


one of the angles of the triangle ABC is equal to or greater than 120
there exists no point at which each of the sides of the triangle ABC subtends an
angle of 120, and hence the surface S has no tangent plane which is parallel to
In this case the minimum must be given by one of the vertices of
the xy plane.
The point

When

and

the triangle,
It is

evident, in fact, that this

it is

is

the vertex of the obtuse angle.

easy to verify this fact geometrically.

63. D Alembert s theorem. Let F(x, y) be a polynomial in the two variables


x and y arranged into homogeneous groups of ascending order

F(x, y)

where

H+

<f>

(x,

y)

p+i

<t>

(x, y)

+
= 0,

m (x,

y),

considered as an equation
If the equation p (x, y)
is a constant.
has a simple root, the function F(x, y) cannot have a maximum or a mini
for x = y = 0. For it results from the discussion above that there exist sec
<f>

in y/Xj

mum

+ = F(x, y) made by planes through the z axis, some


which lie above the xy plane and others below it near the origin. From this
remark a demonstration of d Alembert s theorem may be deduced. For, let/(z)
be an integral polynomial of degree m,
tions of the surface z

of

/(z)

where the

f(x

where

iy)

OQ, &o

let

=
i,

us write this in the form

&ii

ib

(ai

t&i) (x

P and Q have

and hence,

finally,

iy)

We

m, &m are real.

f(z)

where

In order to separate the real and

coefficients are entirely arbitrary.

imaginary parts

+ A m zm

= A 9 + AIZ + A 2 z* +

Q=

&

+ etix
+ bix +

biy

a^y

(a m

have then

= P+iQ,

the following meanings

P=

----

-\

ib m ) (x

iy)

m
,

TAYLOR S SERIES

132

We

will first

show that

|/(z)

or,

|,

63

[III,

what amounts

to the

same

thing, that

Q2 cannot be at a minimum for z = y =


except when a = 60 = 0. For
this purpose we shall introduce polar coordinates p and 0, and we shall suppose,

ps

-j.

for the sake of generality, that the first coefficient after


Then we may write the equations
vanish is
p

P=o +
P

Q=
+ Q2 =

which does not

b
of,

+
+

(ap cos
(bp

cos

6g +

p<f>

bp sin

p0 +

2/>p

dp sin

[(aoOp

p<f>)

p<j>)

pp
pp

+
+

b bp ) cosptf.

- a

ap

(b

bp ) sinp0]

where the terms not written down are of degree higher than p with respect
But the equation
(aoap

b bp)

cosp<j>

ap

(b

a bp )

smp<J>

to

p.

= K, which determines p straight lines which are separated by


It is therefore impossible by the above remark that
angles each equal to 2 n /p.
2
+ Q2 should have a minimum for z = y = unless the quantities
gives tan p$

aoap
both vanish.
that

-f

&o&p

boa,p

(tobp

But, since a + ft is not zero, this would require that a = 60 = ;


that the real and the imaginary parts of /(z) should both vanish at the
2

is,

origin.
If |/(z) has a minimum for z = a, y
/3, the discussion may be reduced to
the preceding by setting z = a + i/3 + z
It follows that \f(z) cannot be at a
minimum unless and Q vanish separately for
a, y = p.
The absolute value of /(z) must pass through a minimum for at least one
|

value of

z,

nitely.

In

for

it

fact,

x=

increases indefinitely as the absolute value of z increases indefi

we have

where the terms omitted are of degree


written in the form

where

less

than 2 m in

approaches zero as p increases indefinitely.

drawn whose radius

VP

R is

p.

This equation

Hence a

circle

may

be

may be

2
so large that the value of
+ Q2 is greater at every
It follows that
point of the circumference than it is at the origin, for example.
there is at least one point

a,

Vp + Q 2 is at a minimum. By the above it fol


y = /3 is a point of intersection of the two curves
which amounts to saying that z = a + /3i is a root of the equation

inside this circle for

lows that the point x

P = 0, Q = 0,

which

a,

/(*)=.
In this example, as in the preceding, we have assumed that a function of the
two variables x and y which is continuous in the interior of a limited region
actually assumes a minimum value inside or on the boundary of that region.
This is a statement which will be readily granted, and, moreover, it will be
rigorously demonstrated a

little later

(Chapter VI).

Ill,

EXERCISES

EM.]

133

EXERCISES
1.

Show

that the

number

which occurs in Lagrange s form of the re


+ 2) as A approaches zero, provided that

0,

mainder, approaches the limit l/(n


/( + 2J(a) i s not zero.
2.

Let F(x) be a determinant of order n,

Show

of x.

that the derivative

the

(x) is

all

of

sum

whose elements are functions


n determinants obtained

of the

all of the elements of a single line by their deriva


State the corresponding theorem for derivatives of higher order.

by replacing, successively,
tives.
3.

maximum and

Find the

the

minimum

values of the distance from a fixed

point to a plane or a skew curve between two variable points


between two variable points on two surfaces.
;

on two curves

4. The points of a surface S for which the sum of the squares of the dis
tances from n fixed points is an extremum are the feet of the normals let fall

upon the surface from the center

mean

of

distances of the given

fixed points.

the quadrilaterals which can be formed from four given

5. Of all
which is inscriptible in a circle has the greatest area.
theorem for polygons of n sides.
6.

an

Find the

maximum volume

sides, that

State the analogous

of a rectangular parallelepiped inscribed in

ellipsoid.

7. Find the axes of a central quadric from the consideration that the vertices
are the points from which the distance to the center is an extremum.
8.

Solve the analogous problem for the axes of a central section of an ellipsoid.

9. Find the ellipse of minimum area which passes through the three vertices
of a given triangle, and the ellipsoid of minimum volume which passes through
the four vertices of a given tetrahedron.

Find the point from which the sum of the distances to two given straight
and the distance to a given point is a minimum.
[JOSEPH BERTRAND.]

10.
lines

11.

log (3

Prove the following formulae

2)

2 log(z

1)

- 2 log (x-l) +

log(x

-3z

2)

z3

3Vx

-3z/

6\z 3

-3z

[BORDA
log(x

6)

log(x

-f 4)

+
+

log(x

log(z

of
|_x*

+
-

3)
3)

2 logx

log(z

72

- 25z2 +

4)

If
72

3 \z*

Series.]

log(x
5)
72

- 26z 2 +

y
72/

[HARO

-1

Series.]

CHAPTER IV
DEFINITE INTEGRALS
I.

SPECIAL METHODS OF QUADRATURE

64. Quadrature of the parabola.

The determination

the area

of

a problem which has always engaged


the genius of geometricians.
Among the examples which have
come down to us from the ancients one of the most celebrated is

bounded by a plane curve

Archimedes

is

quadrature of the parabola.

We

shall

proceed to

indicate his method.

Let us try to find the area bounded by the arc A CB of a parabola


Draw the diameter CD, joining the middle

and the chord A 13.


point

Connect

of

AB

AC

to the point C,

and BC, and

let

where the tangent is parallel to AB.


E and E be the points where the
tangent is parallel to .BC and

We

shall

AC,

respectively.

first

compare the area of the

triangle BEC, for instance,


with that of the triangle ABC.

Draw

the tangent

ET, which

cuts

CD at

eter

EF, which cuts

T.

Draw the diam

CB

EK

at

and
and, finally, draw
AB.
to
the
chord
parallel

F;

FH
By

an elementary property of the


parabola TC = CK. Moreover,
CT EF = KH, and hence

EF= CH/2 = CD/ 4.

The

areas of the two triangles BCE


and BCD, since they have the

FIG. 8

same base BC, are to each other as their altitudes, or as EF is


CD. Hence the area of the triangle BCE is one fourth the area
of the triangle BCD, or one eighth of the area 5 of the triangle ABC.
The area of the triangle A CE is evidently the same. Carrying out
the same process upon each of the chords BE, CE, CE E A, we

to

134

IV,

SPECIAL METHODS

65]

obtain four

new

2
triangles, the area of each of which is S/8 , and so
triangles, each having the
operation gives rise to

The nih
n
The area
S/8

forth.

135

2"

of the segment of the parabola is evidently


the limit approached by the sum of the areas of all these triangles
as n increases indefinitely that is, the sum of the following descend

area

ing geometrical progression

It follows that the required area is equal to


this sum is 4 5/3.
two thirds of the area of a parallelogram whose sides are AB and CD.
Although this method possesses admirable ingenuity, it must be

and

its success depends essentially upon certain special


The
of
the
parabola, and that it is lacking in generality.
properties
other examples of quadratures which we might quote from ancient

admitted that

writers would only go to corroborate this remark each new curve


But whatever the device, the area to be
required some new device.
:

evaluated was always split up into elements the number of which


to increase indefinitely, and it was necessary to evaluate

was made

sum
cases,* we

the limit of the


particular
of subdivision,

which

of these partial areas.


Omitting any further
will proceed at once to give a general method
will lead us naturally to the Integral Calculus.

65. General method. For the sake of definiteness, let us try to


evaluate the area 5 bounded by a curvilinear arc A MB, an axis xx
which does not cut that arc, and two perpendiculars AA and BB let
fall

upon xx from

the points A and B.

We

will

suppose

further that a par


allel to these lines

AA

BB

cannot

cut the arc in

more

than one point, as

FIG. 9

indicated in Fig. 9.
Let us divide the segment

A B

into a certain

unequal parts by the points P l9 P 2


points let us draw lines PiQi, P 2 Q 2

and meeting the arc

AB

in the points Qi,

number

of equal or

P n .\, and through these


Pn _iQ H _i parallel to AA
Q2

>

Qn

-i>

respectively.

*A
large number of examples of determinations of areas, arcs, and volumes by
the methods of ancient writers are to be found in Duhamel s TraiM.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

136

65

[IV,

Now draw through A a line parallel to xx cutting P t Q t at q


through Qi a parallel to xx cutting P 2 Q 2 at q 2 and so on. We
,

obtain in this

R
a sequence of rectangles RI, R 2
,
lie entirely inside the contour

way

Each of these rectangles may


but some of them may lie

Rn

t,

AB A

partially outside that contour, as is


indicated in the figure.
Let a ( denote the area of the rectangle R and /^ the area bounded
In the first place, each of the ratios
by the contour P _ Pi Q Qi _ l
approaches unity as the number of
fii/ a D ^2/ a
A/ a
{ ,

2>

i>

>

points of division increases indefinitely,


of the distances A P l} PiP 2
P^P,,

the ratio

L /P
i

/?,/<*,,

for example, evidently lies

at the

same time each

approaches zero. For


between ,-/ /*,-_! Q,-_i and

l f and L { are
respectively the minimum and the
distances from a point of the arc Q i _ l Q i to the axis xx
clear that these two fractions each approach unity as the

if

where

maximum
But

it is

distance

It therefore follows that the ratio

approaches zero.

+ H-----h an
A+&+ +&
a-!

which
a

or 2

between the largest and the least of the ratios tfi//3i,


a n/ Pm w iH a ^ so approach unity as the number of the
But the denominator of
rectangles is thus indefinitely increased.
this ratio is constant and is equal to the required area S.
Hence
this area is also equal to the limit of the sum a x + a 2 +
+ an as
2//?2>

lies

>

the

number

of rectangles

is

indefinitely increased in the

manner

specified above.

In order to deduce from this result an analytical expression for


the area, let the curve AB be referred to a system of rectangular
axes, the x axis Ox coinciding with xx and let y =f(x) be the
The function f(x) is, by hypothesis, a
equation of the curve AB.
,

continuous function of x between the limits a and

b,

the abscissae

of the points A and B.


x n _ l the abscissas
Denoting by x 1} x 2
of the points of division P 1} P 2
Pn _j, the bases of the above
,

x ly
x
b
xn _ l and their
rectangles are x
a, x.2
,
altitudes are, in like manner, f(a) t f(x^
-, /(<_,),
/(_i).
Hence the area S is equal to the limit of the following- sum
,

x^^

(1)
as the

( Xl

a)f(a)

number n

the differences x l

+ (x 2

*,)/(*!)

+ (b - *_,)/(*_,),

increases indefinitely in such a


a,

x2

x l}

approaches

way

zero.

that each of

SPECIAL METHODS

137

66. Examples. If the base AB be divided into n equal parts, each


a
of length h (b
nh), all the rectangles have the same base h,
and their altitudes are, respectively,

/(a), /(a
It only

h),

f(a

+ 2 A),

-,

/[

+( -

1) A].

remains to find the limit of the sum

!/() +/(

+/( +

where

as the integer
if

easy

w increases

we know how

This calculation becomes


indefinitely.
sum of a set of values f(x) corre

to find the

sponding to a set of values of x which form an arithmetic progres


such is the case if f(x) is simply an integral power of x, or,
again, if /(o;)= s mmx or /"(#)= cosmx, etc.
Let us reconsider, for example, the parabola x* = 2py, and let us try

sion

by an arc OA of this parabola, the axis of x,


and the straight line x = a which passes through the extremity A.
The length being divided into n equal parts of length h (nh = a), we
must try to find by the above the limit of the sum
to find the area enclosed

The quantity
first

inside the parenthesis


1) integers, that is, n(n

(n

foregoing

sum

is

is

the

sum

1) (2 n

of the squares of the

l)/6; and hence the

equal to

increases indefinitely this sum evidently approaches the limit


2
a*/6p (1/3) (a. a /2p), or one third of the rectangle constructed

As n

upon the two coordinates of the point A, which


the result found above.

is

in

harmony with

In other cases, as in the following example, which is due to


Fermat, it is better to choose as points of division points whose
abscissae are in geometric progression.

Let us try to find the area enclosed by the curve y


a
I (0
axis of x, and the two straight lines x
a, x

<

= Ax*,
<

b),

the

where

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

138

66

[IV,

the exponent /* is arbitrary. In order to do so let us insert between


a and b, n
1 geometric means so as to obtain the sequence

where the number a satisfies the condition a (1 4ing this set of numbers as the abscissae of the points of

b.

a)"

Tak

division, the

corresponding ordinates have, respectively, the following values

ay, Aa* (I
and the area of the pth rectangle
[a (1

a (1

a)"

Hence the sum

If

/i

a)*"

Aa*(l

2 *1

a)

is

+ a)

<-*

= Aa

+l

of the areas of all the rectangles

1 is not zero, as

parenthesis

or,

we

shall suppose

first,

is

the

sum

inside the

equal to

is

replacing a (1

a)"

by

i,

sum may be written

the original

in the

form
.

\^

M+1
zero the quotient [(1
a)
approaches
!]/<*
1
+
with
as its limit the derivative of (1
0,
respect to a for a
a)^
1
hence the required area is
that is, /i

As a approaches

If

p.

1,

this calculation

no longer applies.

The sum

of the

areas of the inscribed rectangles is equal to nAa, and we have to


find the limit of the product na where n and a are connected by the
relation

a(l

From

this

it

-I-

= b.
a)"

follows that

na

log
&

a
b
r
alog(l +

=
)

log
h

b
-

,4

log(l

IV,

SPECIAL .METHODS

67]

139

where the symbol log denotes the Naperian logarithm. As a


approaches zero, (1 + a) /* approaches the number e, and the prod
1

uct
vl

na approaches

log

Hence

log (b fa).

the required area

is

equal to

(&/)

The invention of the Integral Calculus


of
reduced the problem
evaluating a plane area to the problem of
Let y =f(xj be the
derivative is known.
function
whose
finding a
67. Primitive functions.

equation of a curve referred to two rectangular axes, where the


function f(x) is continuous. Let us consider the area enclosed by

MP

and a variable
this curve, the axis of x, a fixed ordinate
,
ordinate MP, as a function of the abscissa x of the variable ordinate.
In order to include

all

pos

sible cases let us agree to

denote by A the

sum of the

areas enclosed by the given


curve, the x axis, and the

P , MP,
straight lines
each of the portions of
this area being affected
by a certain

sign

the

for the portions to


sign
the right of
and above Ox, the sign

MP

FIG. 10

for the portions to the

P and below Ox, and the opposite convention for por


right of
P we
tions to the left of M^Pg. Thus, if
were in the position

MP

would take A equal

JI/

and likewise,

With

if

MP

to the difference

P C-

were at

these conventions

M"P",

we

shall

M P C;
A = M"P"D - M P D.
now show that the derivative

of

the continuous function A, defined in this way, is precisely /(#). As


in the figure, let us take two neighboring ordinates MP, NQ, whose

x and x -f Ax. The increment of the area A.4 evidently


between the areas of the two rectangles which have the same
base PQ, and whose altitudes are, respectively, the greatest and the
abscissae are

lies

least ordinates of the arc

H and

the

minimum by

MN.

h,

Denoting the

we may

AAz

<

<\A

maximum

ordinate by

therefore write
<

7/Ax,

//.
As Ax approaches zero, // and
A/l /Ax
dividing by Ax, h
h approach the same limit MP, or /(x), since /(x) is continuous.

or,

<

<

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

140

[IV,

<;8

Hence the derivative of A is f(x). The proof that the same result
holds for any position of the point .17 is left to the reader.
If we already know a primitive function of
f(x), that is, a function
F(x) whose derivative is/(z), the difference A
F(x) is a constant,
since its derivative
stant,

we need only

a of the line

is

zero

8).

In order to determine this con

notice that the area

MP.

is

zero for the abscissa

Hence

A =F(x)-F(a).
It follows

from the above reasoning,

of a plane area

first,

that the determination

be reduced to the discovery of a


primitive func
tion; and, secondly (and this is of far greater importance for us),
that every continuous function f(x) is the derivative
of some other

may

This fundamental theorem is proved here


by means of
a somewhat vague geometrical concept,
that of the area under a
plane curve. This demonstration was regarded as satisfactory for a
long time, but it can no longer be accepted. In order to have a stable

function.

foundation for the Integral Calculus

imperative that this theo

it is

rem should be given a purely

analytic demonstration which does not


intuition
whatever.
In giving the above
rely upon any geometrical
the
motive
was
not
its
historical interest,
geometrical proof
wholly

however, for it furnishes us with the essential analytic argument of


the new proof.
It is, in fact, the study of
precisely such sums as
and
sums
of
a slightly more general character which will be
(1)
of preponderant importance.
Before taking up this study we must
first consider certain questions
regarding the general properties of
functions and in particular of continuous functions.*

II.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

68. Upper and lower limits. An


assemblage of numbers is said to
have an upper limit (see ftn., p. 91) if there exists a number
so
large that no member of the assemblage exceeds N.
Likewise, an
exists than
assemblage is said to have a lower limit if a number
which no member of the assemblage is smaller. Thus the assem

blage of

all

positive integers has a lower limit, but no upper limit

*
Among the most important works on the general notion of the definite integral
there should be mentioned the memoir by Riemann fiber die Mb glichkeit, eine Func
tion durch eine trigonometrische Reihe darzustellen (Werke, 2d
ed., Leipzig, 1892,
p. 239 and also French translation by Laugel, p. 225) and the memoir by Darboux, to
which we have already referred Sur les fonctions discontinues (Annales de VEcole
:

Normals Suptrieure, 2d

series, Vol. IV).

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

68]

141

the assemblage of all integers, positive and negative, has neither


and 1 has
and the assemblage of all rational numbers between
;

both a lower and an upper limit.


Let (E) be an assemblage which has an upper limit. With
respect to this assemblage all numbers may be divided into two

We

shall say that a number a belongs to the first class if


of the assemblage (7?) which are greater than a,
members
there are
it
that
and
belongs to the second class if there is no member of the
classes.

assemblage

(7?)

Since the assemblage (7?) has an


greater than a.
clear that numbers of each class exist.
If A be

it is

upper limit,
a number of the
is

which

lie

first class

and

B there
between A and B,
A

evident that

<

exist

number
members

but there

is

of the second class,

it

of the assemblage (7?)


no member of the assem

The number C = (A -f jB)/2


greater than B.
blage (7?)
or
first
to
the
second
class.
In the former case
to
the
may belong
we should replace the interval (A, B*) by the interval (C, 7?), in the
which

is

by the interval (A, C). The new interval (.4^ 7^) is half
and has the same properties there exists at least
(^4, B)
one member of the assemblage (7) which is greater than A 1} bnt none
which is greater than B. Operating upon (A l} B^) in the same way
that we operated upon (A, B}, and so on indefinitely, we obtain an
latter case

the interval

unlimited sequence of intervals (A, 73), (A lf 7^), (A 2 , 7?2 ),


each
j
which is half the preceding and possesses the same property
as (A, B} with respect to the assemblage (/?).
Since the numbers
A
A
never
decrease
and
are
n
A, AI, z ,
always less than B, they
of

approach a limit A ( 1). Likewise, since the numbers B, B 1} B 2


never increase and are always greater than A, they approach a limit X
A n = (B A )
Moreover, since the difference Bn
approaches zero
as n increases indefinitely, these limits must be equal, i.e. A = A.
Let L be this common limit then L is called the iqjper limit of the
,

/2"

assemblage

(7?).

clear that

it is

From

L has

the

manner

in

which we have obtained

the following two properties

it,

No member

of the assemblage (7i) is greater than L.


There always exists a member of the assemblage (7?) which is
e, where c is any arbitrarily small positive number.
greater than L
1)
2)

For

let

us suppose that there were a

member

h (Ji
Since
greater than L, say L
0).
increases indefinitely, B n will be less than
value of

On

n.

But

>

this is impossible since

the other hand, let

Bn

Bn

of the assemblage
approaches L as n

-f

is

of the second class.

be any positive number.

after a certain

Then, after a

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

142

[IV,

A n will be greater than L


and since there are
e
of (E) greater than A n these numbers will also be greater
It is evident that the two properties stated above can
e.

certain value of n,

members
than L

69

not apply to any other number than L.


The upper limit may or may not belong to the assemblage ().
In the assemblage of all rational numbers which do not exceed 2,

number 2

is precisely the upper limit, and it belongs


the other hand, the assemblage of all irra
tional numbers which do not exceed 2 has the upper limit 2, but

for instance, the

On

to the assemblage.

upper limit is not a member of the assemblage. It should be


particularly noted that if the upper limit L does not belong to the
assemblage, there are always an infinite number of members of ()
this

which are greater than L


For if
c, no matter how small e be taken.
there were only a finite number, the upper limit would be the largest
of these and not L.
When the assemblage consists of n different

numbers the upper limit is simply the largest of these n numbers.


It may be shown in like manner that there exists a number L\
in case the assemblage has a lower limit, which has the following
two properties
:

No member of the

assemblage is less than L


a
member
There
exists
of the assemblage which
2)
where e is an arbitrary positive number.*
-\1)

is less

than

(.,

This number L
69.

Oscillation.

is

called the lower limit of the assemblage.

Let/()

be a function of x defined in the closed f

interval (a, ) that is, to each value of x between a and b and to each
of the limits a and b themselves there corresponds a uniquely deter
;

mined value of f(x}.


interval

if all

The function

the values which

it

is

said to be finite in this closed


lie between two fixed

assumes

numbers A and B. Then the assemblage of values of the function


Let
and m be the upper and
has an upper and a lower limit.

lower limits of this assemblage, respectively


*

Whenever

all

numbers can be separated

into

two

then the difference

classes

and B, according to

any characteristic property, in such a way that any number of the class A is less than
any number of the class B, the upper limit L of the numbers of the class A is at the
same time the lower limit of the numbers of the class B. It is clear, first of all, that
any number greater than L belongs to the class B. And if there were a number L
belonging to the class B, then every number greater than L would belong to the class B.
Hence every number less than L belongs to the class A, every number greater than L
belongs to the class B, and L itself may belong to either of the two classes.
is used merely for emphasis.
TRANS.
closed
See 2.
t The word
<L

"

"

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

70J

A=

M m

is

143

called the oscillation of the function f(x) in the

interval (a, b).


These definitions lead to several remarks.

In order that a func

tion be finite in a closed interval (a, b~) it is not sufficient that it


should have a finite value for every value of x. Thus the function

defined in the closed interval

0,

(0, 1) as

/(aj)

follows
for

l/aj

has a finite value for each value of x

biit

>

0,

nevertheless

not

is

it

A
defined the word, for/(ce)
in
closed
finite
the
which
is
a
function
if we take x<l / A.
Again,
interval (a, b) may take on values which differ as little as we please
finite in

we have

the sense in which

>

or from the lower limit m and still never


from the upper limit
assume these values themselves. For instance, the function /(#),

defined in the closed interval (0, 1) by the relations

f(x)

0,

has the upper limit

M=

1,

= l-x

for

0<x<l,

but never reaches that limit.

70. Properties of continuous functions.

We

shall

now

turn to the

study of continuous functions in particular.

THEOREM

A.

interval (a, b)

Letf(x) be a function which

and

an arbitrary

is

continuous in the closed

Then we can
positive number.
into a certain number of partial

always break up the interval (a, ft)


intervals in such a way that for any two values of the variable
which belong to the same partial interval, we
whatever, x and
x",

always have \f(x

f( x

<

")

Suppose that this were not

true.

Then

let

c=(a +

ft)/2;

at

would have the same prop


erty as (a, ft); that is, it would be impossible to break it up into
partial intervals which would satisfy the statement of the theorem.
Substituting it for the given interval (a, ft) and carrying out the
reasoning as above ( 68), we could form an infinite sequence of
which is half the preced
intervals (a, ft), (a l} b^, (a 2 2 ),
-, each of
For
ing and has the same property as the original interval (a, ft).
any value of n we could always find in the interval ( n n ) two

least one of the intervals (a,

c),

(c, ft)

ft

ft

would be larger than e.


numbers x and
such that |/(V)~/( X
Now let X be the common limit of the two sequences of numbers
Since the function /(#) is continuous
an ^ b, b^ b 2
a, a 1} a 2
=
for x
X, we can find a number rj such that |/(.r)
e/2
/(X)|
x"

")I

"

>

<

144

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

whenever
a n and b n

A| is less
differ from A

ja;

than

than

Then the

77.

will lie wholly within the interval


A
(A
rj,
are any two values whatever in the interval

and hence

|/<V)

-/(.x")

77)

(a n

Z>

interval (a n , b n }

and

if

* and

B ),

hence the theorem

a;"

we must have

It follows that the


hypothesis

<
|

above leads to a contradiction

70

Let us choose n so large that both

rj.

less

by

[IV,

is

made

proved.

xp _ 1} b be a method of subdivision
Corollary I. Let a, x lt x 2
,
of the interval
(a, i) into p subintervals, which satisfies the con
ditions of the theorem.
In the interval
(a, a^) we shall have
!/(*)
and, in particular,
I/O)
e
Like
Xl
,

<

\f(

wise, in the interval (x l}

and, a fortiori,

|/(0

<
I

\f(x)

/() +

we

a-,)

shall

2
|/(a)
and so forth.
<

<

|/(a)

have [/(*)

j/(*i)
in particular, for x

For the

<

last interval

we

+
= xj,

e,

shall

have
I/(*)|<|/(P-I)

<|/(a)

Hence the absolute value of


f(x)

+ pe.

the interval (a,


b~)
always
than |/(a) + pe. It follows that
every function which
continuous in a closed interval
(a, b) is finite in that interval.

remains

in

less

is

Corollary II. Let us suppose the interval (a, b) split up into 7? subintervals (a, x^, (x lt x2 ), ...,
e
(xp _v b) such that \f(x )
/2
f(x")\<
for any two values of x which
belong to the same closed subinterval.

Let
x2

77

be a positive number less than


any of the differences
a,
b
xp _ l
Then let us take any two numbers whatever

Xi

in the interval
(a, b) for

an upper limit for (/(*


fall in

it is

do

not,

and

\x

x"

easy to see that

we
must

|/<V)

x"

If the

shall

x"

f(x")\<

lie in

2 ( e /2)
c
Hence cor
another positive number rj can be

-f(x")

responding to any positive number


found such that

and let us try to find


two numbers x and
have \f(x )
e
/2.
two consecutive intervals,
<

) -/(*")).

the same subinterval,

If they

and

which

<

I/W-/CO.I<*

where x and
,

[**

*"!<

>?

function /(x)

are

x"

any two numbers of

This property
is

the interval
(a, b) for which

also expressed by
saying that the
uniformly continuous in the interval (a, b).

is

THEOREM B.
function f(x) which is continuous in a closed
interval (a, b) takes on
every value between /(a) and f(b) at least
once for some value of x which lies between a and b.

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

70]

Let us

145

consider a particular case.

Suppose that f(a) and


0, for instance.
and/(6)
least one value of x between
is negative near a and
posi
Let us consider the assemblage of values of x between
tive near b.
a and b for which /(#) is positive, and let \ be the lower limit of
A
this assemblage (a
By the very definition of a lower
b*).
first

that /(a)
/() have opposite signs,
We shall then show that there exists at
a and b for which f(x) = 0. Now/(x)

<

<

>

<

negative or zero for every positive value of h.


A)
/(A
Hence /(A.), which is the limit of /(A
A), is also negative or zero.
But /(A) cannot be negative. For suppose that /(A)
m, where
limit

is

a positive number.
Since the function /(x ) is continuous for
x = A, a number rj can be found such that )/(#)
m when
/(A)
ever \x
and
the
function
would
A,
be
rj,
negative for all
f(x)
is

<

<

values of x between

A.

limit of the values of

/(A)

Now

0.

let

function

and A + rj. Hence A could not be the lower


x for which /(ic) is positive. Consequently

<(#)

a and x

be any number between /(a) and


Then the
is
continuous
and
has
=f(x)
opposite signs for
b.
Hence, by the particular case just treated, it
/(>).

vanishes at least once in the interval

THEOREM
val (a, b)

(a,

&).

Every function which is continuous in a closed inter


actually assumes the value of its upper and of its lower
C.

limit at least once.

In the first place, every continuous function, since we have


and a lower
already proved that it is finite, has an upper limit
limit m.
Let us show, for instance, that f(x)
for at least one

value of x in the interval

(a, 5).

for
(a
b)/2, the upper limit of f(x) is equal to
at least one of the intervals (a, e), (c, b).
Let us replace (a, b)
by this new interval, repeat the process upon it, and so forth.

Taking

Reasoning as we have already done several times, we could form


an infinite sequence of intervals (a, b), (a u & t ), (o 2 & 2 ),
each of
which is half the preceding and in each of which the upper limit of
,

Then, if A is the common limit of the sequences a, a if


and b, b 1}
bn
/(A) is equal to M. For suppose that
We can find a positive number
h, where h is positive.
/(A) =
such that f(x) remains between /(A) + h/2 and /(A)
rj
h/ 2, and
therefore less than
h/2 as long as x remains between A rj
and A -f rj- Let us now choose n so great that a n and b n differ from
their common limit A by less than 77. Then the interval (a,,, &) lies

f(x)
,

is

an

M.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

146

wholly inside the interval

(A.

A.

77,

4-

*;),

[IV,

and

follows at once

it

that the upper limit of f(x) in the interval (a n

71

b n)

could not be

M.

equal to

theorem with the preceding, we see that any func


continuous in a closed interval (a, ft) assumes, at least

this

Combining
tion which

is

upper and its lower limit. Moreover


Given a function which is
be stated as follows

once, every value between its

A may

theorem

continuous in a closed interval (a, ft), it is possible to divide the inter


val into such small subreyions that the oscillation of the function in

any one of them will be less than an arbitrarily assigned positive


For the oscillation of a continuous function is equal to
of the values of /(x) for two particular values of the
difference
the

number.

variable.

The sums S and

71.

Let /(#) be a

s.

or discontinuous, in the interval (a, ft),


pose the interval (a, b) divided into a

x lt x 2

limits of

# p _i

is

a;

b.

2 ),

(xp _ l

b),

Let us sup

of smaller partial

in the interval (a^-i,

= M, (x,
s = m (x

and

#,-),

- a) + M

number

<

in

f(x)

where a

where each of the numbers


Let
and m be the
greater than the preceding.
and m the limits
the original interval, and

(a; u

intervals (a, o^),

continuous

finite function,

a)

-f-

let

(x 2

77*2(3-2

us set

-x )+--- + Mp (b - zp _
X P -I)x
H mP (*

t ),

i)-\

To every method of division of (a, b) into smaller intervals there


corresponds a sum S and a smaller sum s. It is evident that none
of the numbers
of the sums 5 are less than m(b
a), for none

hence these sums S have a lower limit /.* Like


none of which exceed M(b
sums
the
s,
a) have an upper
wise,
limit /
We proceed to show that / is at most equal to I. For this
are less than

purpose
S, s

it is

and S

evidently sufficient to show that s^S and s 5j S, where


are the two sets of sums which correspond to any

two given methods of subdivision of the interval


In the
(#1,

a 2 ),

division

* If
f(x)

(a, b).

us suppose each of the subintervals (a, a^),


redivided into still smaller intervals by new points of

first place, let

and

is

let

a constant, S

become equations.

TRANS.

s,

M = m, and, in general,

all

the inequalities mentioned

IV,

be the
is

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

72]

new

This new method of subdivision

suite thus obtained.

called consecutive to the

first.

147

Let 2 and

cr

denote the sums anal

with respect to this new method of division of the


Let us
interval (a, b), and let us compare S and s with 2 and a.
5
two
sums
and
which
of
the
the
for
2
portions
example,
compare,
ogous to

S and

from the interval

arise

Let M[ and m[ be the limits of

(a, a^).

the interval (a, y^, M[ and m^ the limits in the interval


f(x)
Then
k the limits in the interval (y t
k an(i
%i)1/2)9
the portion of 2 which comes from (a, a^) is
in

"

G/i>

-i>

cannot exceed
and since the numbers M{, M%,
lt it is clear
-, M/.
sum is at most equal to 3/j (x l
Likewise, the
a).
a:
most equal
is
at
from
the
interval
of
which
arises
2
(x l} 2 )
portion

that the above

M (x

Adding all these inequalities, we find


in like manner that a- ^ s.
show
2 = S,
Let us now consider any two methods of subdivision whatever,
and let S, s and S s be the corresponding sums. Superimposing
the points of division of these two methods of subdivision, we get a
third method of subdivision, which may be considered as consecu
be the sums
Let 2 and
tive to either of the two given methods.
to

,),

and

that

and so

it is

on.

easy to

<r

with respect to this auxiliary division.

By

the above

we have

the

relations
2<S,

2<S

(r>s,

o->s

2 is not less than a-, it follows that s ^ S and s^ S Since


none of the sums S are less than any of the sums s, the limit 7
and, since

cannot be less than the limit /


72. Integrable functions.

that

is,

function which

^/

is finite

in an inter

said to be integrable in that interval if the two sums


b~)
S and 5 approach the same limit when the number of the partial

val (a,

is

is indefinitely increased in such a


intervals
partial
approaches zero.

intervals

way

that each of those

The necessary and sufficient condition that a function be integrable


an interval is that corresponding to any positive number e another
number rj exists such that S
s is less than c whenever each of the
in

partial intervals

This condition
limit

7,

we can

is

less

is,

find a

than

first,

-r\.

necessary, for if S
so small that

number ^

and
S
|

s
T\

have the same

and

js

7|

are

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

148

72

[iv,

each less than e/2 whenever each of the partial intervals


s is less than e.
Then, a fortiori, S
77.
Moreover the condition is sufficient, for we may write *

is

less

than

s-s = s-i + i- r + r -

s,

I I
and since none of the numbers S
s can be negative,
I, I
each of them must be less than e if their sum is to be less than e.
I is a fixed number and e is an arbitrary positive
But since I
it
follows
that we must have / = 7.
Moreover S
I
e
number,
s
and /
e whenever each of the partial intervals is less than
77,
which is equivalent to saying that S and s have the same limit 7.
,

<

<

The function /(#)


(a,

),

is

and the limit 7

is

then said to be integrable in the interval


called a definite integral. It is represented

by the symbol

ff(x)dx,
*J a

which suggests its origin, and which is read the definite integral
from a to b of f(x)
By its very definition 7 always lies between
the two sums S and s for any method of subdivision whatever.
If any number between S and s be taken as an approximate value
of 7, the error never exceeds S
s.
"

dx."

Every continuous function

is

integrable.

The difference S
s is less than or equal to
(b
a), where
w denotes the upper limit of the oscillation of f(x~) in the partial
intervals.
But 77 may be so chosen that the oscillation is less than
a preassigned positive number in any interval less than 77 (
If then 77 be so chosen that the oscillation is less than (./(b
the difference S

s will

be

than

less

70).
a),

e.

monotonically increasing or monotonically decreasing function


interval is integrable in that interval.

Any
in

an

A f unction

/"(

x)

is

said to increase monotonically in a given interval

in that interval /(# )


when
any two values x
ever x
The function may be constant in certain portions of the
interval, but if it is not constant it must increase with x.
Dividing
the interval (a, b) into n subintervals, each less than 77, we may write
(a, 6) if for
>

S
=/<X>

x"

>/(")

x".

(*!

=/(a)(ar

a)

+/(* 2 ) (x _ aJt) +

a)

+/(.T )(* 2

*For the proof that I and /

exist, see

- xj

73,

-\-

+/() (b - *_!),
+f(x n _,} (b - *_,),

which may be read before

72.

TRANS.

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

72]

149

upper limit of f(x) in the interval (a, a^), for instance,


and so on for the other
/"();

for the

precisely f(x\), the lower limit


subintervals.
Hence, subtracting,
is

-s =

(x 1

-/(a)]

a) [/(zj)

+ (* 2

-/(*._,)].

None

of the differences

which occur

equation are negative, and


are less than

t]

all

in the right-hand side of this

of the differences x l

a,

x2

x l}

consequently

or
-<*[/(*)

-/()],

and we need only take

in order to

make 5

<s

<

e.

The reasoning

tonically decreasing function.


Let us return to the general case.

gral the sums S and

(2)

In the definition of the inte

i*

(z, _ i

the same for a mono-

may be replaced by more general expres


Given any method of subdivision of the interval (a, i)

sions.

let

is

4-

be values belonging to these intervals in order

*,(>

s>

Then the sum

= x i)

evidently lies between the sums S and s, for we always have


7w f
If the function is integrable, this new sum has the
^/(,.) 5 Af,-.
limit /.
In particular, if we suppose that 1? 2
^n coincide
,
,

with

a,

ajj,

a;

1 ,

(1) considered above

respectively, the
(

sum

(2) reduces to the

sum

65).

There are several propositions which result immediately from the


definition of the integral.
We have supposed that a b if we now
x _!
these
two
limits
a and b, each of the factors x
interchange
hence
changes sign;
<

Cf(x)dx

Ja

=-

Cf(x)dx.

Jb

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

150

[IV,

72

from the definition that

It also evidently follows

f f(x)dx

f(x)dx

f(x}dx,

Jo.

if c lies between a and b; the same formula still holds when


between a and c, for instance, provided that the function f(x)
integrable between a and c, for it may be written in the form

at least
lies

I)

is

= Cf(x)dx~ f f(x}dx =
ff(x)dx
Ja

Jo.

Jc

If f(x)

=
A<f>(x)

Cf(x)dx

Ja

where A and

-f B\j/(x),

are

+ f f(x)dx.
Jb

any two constants,

we have
/>

Ja

s*b

/->h

f(x)dx

=A

and a similar formula holds

The expression
eral

expression.
intervals (a, a^),

+B

I
<f>(x)dx

ij/(x*)dx,

\J a

a.

for the

sum

of any

number

of functions.

/(,-) in (2) may be replaced by a still more gen


The interval (-, I) being divided into n sub,

(#/_!,

a;,-),

let

us associate with each of the

subintervals a quantity ,, which approaches zero with the length


shall say that
x
x i _ l of the subinterval in question.
approaches zero uniformly if corresponding to every positive num

We

ber

another positive number

such that

j,-

<

whenever

a\

-rj

can be found independent of i and


x f-1 is less than 77. We shall now

proceed to show that the sum

approaches the definite integral j^ffx^dx as its limit provided


that
approaches zero uniformly. For suppose that rj is a number
,-

so small that the

two inequalities

are satisfied whenever each of the subintervals x i

than

17.

Then we may write

/(*-i)(i-*-i)- f

x _1
i

is

less

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

IV,

73]

and

it is

clear that

we

shall

151

have

- C f(x)dx

<

c(b

a)

\J a

whenever each of the subintervals


is

than

is less

77.

Thus the theorem

proved.*

73. Darboux s theorem. Given any function f(x) which is finite in an inter
val (a, 6); the sums S and s approach their limits I and /
,
respectively, when
the number of subintervals increases indefinitely in such a
way that each of
them approaches zero. Let us prove this for the sum S, for instance.

We

suppose that a<6, and that/(x) is positive in the interval (a, 6), which can
be brought about by adding a suitable constant
to/(x), which, in turn, amounts
shall

to adding a constant to each of the sums S.


Then, since the number / is the
lower limit of all the sums S, we can find a particular method of subdivision,
say
a, zi,

x2

-,

Xp-i,

6,

which the sum S is less than I + e/2, where e is a preassigned positive num
ber. Let us now consider a division of
(a, 6) into intervals less than r;, and let us
try to find an upper limit of the corresponding sum S
Taking first those inter
vals which do not include any of the points x lt x 2
Xp_i, and recalling the
for

reasoning of 71, it is clear that the portion of S which comes from these inter
vals will be less than the original sum S, that is, less than I + e/2.
On the other
hand, the number of intervals which include a point of the set Xi, x2
Xp_j
cannot exceed p
1, and hence their contribution to the sum S cannot exceed
,

(p

1) Mil,

where

is

the upper limit of /(x).

<I+e/2

Hence

+ (p-l)Mr,,

- 1) in order to make S less than


and we need only choose r) less than e/2
(p
I + f.
Hence the lower limit I of all the sums /S is also the limit of
any sequence
of
s which corresponds to
uniformly infinitesimal subintervals.
<S

be shown in a similar manner that the sums s have the limit /


function /(x) is any function whatever, these two limits I and 7 are in
In order that the function be integrable it is
general different.
necessary and
sufficient that 7 = I.
It

may

If the

74.

First law of the

mean

for integrals.

From now on we

shall

assume, unless something is explicitly said to the contrary, that


the functions under the integral
are continuous.
sign

The above theorem can be extended without

grals

we

shall

make

use of

it

in several places

difficulty to

double and triple inte

80, 95, 97, 131, 144, etc.).

The proposition is essentially only an application of a theorem of Duhamel s


according to which the limit of a sum of infinitesimals remains unchanged when
each of the infinitesimals is replaced
by another infinitesimal which differs from the
given infinitesimal by an infinitesimal of higher order. (See an article by W. F.
Osgood, Annals of Mathematics, 2d series, Vol. IV, pp. 161-178
The Integral as
the Limit of a Sum and a Theorem
of Duhamel s.)
:

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

152
Let f(x) and

<

one of which, say

throughout the interval. And


b
sake of definiteness, that a
<

i>

74

two functions which are each continuous


has the same sign

(x) be

in the interval (a, b),

[IV,

we

<(:*),

shall suppose further, for the

and

(x)

<f>

0.

>

Suppose the interval (a, b~) divided into subintervals, and let
be values of x which belong to each of these
o
2,
>

All the quantities /(,)

smaller intervals in order.


limits

M and m of f(x)

in the interval (a, b)

lie

between the

Let us multiply each of these inequalities by the factors

respectively,

which

are all positive

by hypothesis, and then add

z _,) evidently lies


The sum S/(&)
fa
between the two sums ra 2
,._,).
fa
o^) and 3/2
fa
Hence, as the number of subintervals increases indefinitely, we

them

together.

<(&)

<()

<()

have, in the limit,

m f $ (x} dx
Ja

C /(

<,

$ (x} dx

<

C $ (x) dx,

Ja

Jo.

which may be written


s*b

Xb

f(x}$(x}dx

where

/x

tinuous,

which

p.

$(x)dx,

u.

between m and M. Since the function f(x) is con


of the variable
assumes the value /t for some value
between a and b and hence we may write the preceding

lies
it

lies

equation in the form

f /(*)

(3)

Ja

<(>

(x) dx

= /(*) C $ (x) dx,


/

between a and b.* If, in particular,


=1, the
of
an inte
definition
the
dx
to
reduces
very
integral JH*
(b
a) by
becomes
the
formula
and
gral,

where

(4)

lies

<(#)

/(*)<&

(*-a)/tf).

= k.

* The lower sign holds in the preceding relations only when / (a-)
b in any case.
that the formula still holds, however, and that
a<

<

It is

evident

TRANS.

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

75]

153

75. Second law of the mean for integrals. There is a second formula, due to
Bonnet, which he deduced from an important lemma of Abel s.

Lemma. Let
and MO MI
If A and B are
ties,

s\

UQ

e be a set of monotonically
p
decreasing positive quanti
Up the same number of arbitrary positive or negative quantities.
respectively the greatest and the least of all of the sums s = u

ei,

MI

Ae Q and

will lie between

-Be

i-e.

+
+

u
t>

eiWi

Aeo

S^

>

sum

the

Bf

p up

For we have
UQ

Ui=Si

SO,

whence the sum S

i)

e2

Si (ei

Since none of the differences

are given by replacing s


by their lower limit B. In this way

and

it is

Now

<

A (e

ei

and
<j>

(x)

Sp-i
e2

we

Up

-i

fp

~i

Sp

Sp ^i,

(ep

sp

p)

Sp ep

two
and then

p are negative,

by their upper limit

find

e2

ei

-f

ep_i

S ^ Be
be two continuous functions

likewise evident that

let/(x)

ei, ei

equal to

is

So (*0

limits for

= At

v)

of x, one of which,

a positive monotonically decreasing function in the interval a


the integral f^f(x)
is the limit of the sum
is

<

<

(a;),

Then

b.

<j>(x)dx

/(a)

<f>

(a) (xi

a)

+ f(xi)

<j>

(xj) (x 2

xa)

.
.

The numbers 0(a), 0(xi),


form a set of monotonically decreasing positive
and
numbers; hence the above sum, by the lemma, lies between
where A and B are respectively the greatest and the least among the following
sums
A<f>(a)

B<f>(a),

/(a)

(X!

/(a)

(xi

/(a)

(X!

a)

a)

+/(xi)

(x 2

a)

+/(xj)

(x 2

Passing to the limit,


Ai<f,(a)

xi)

Xi)

+f(x n -

l)

(b

x n ^).

must lie between


where AI and BI denote the maximum and the minimum,
the integral
f^f(x)dx, as c varies from a to b. Since this inte

and #10

respectively, of

it

is

clear that the integral in question

(a),

gral is evidently a continuous function of its upper limit c


the following formula

76),

we may

write

(5)

fa

/(x)0(x)cZx

0(a)

T
Ja

When the function 0(x) is a monotonically decreasing function, without


being always positive, there exists a more general formula, due to Weierstrass.
In such a case let us set
= (b) + (x). Then f (x) is a positive monoton
(x)
<f>

ically decreasing function.

<f>

\fs

Applying the formula

(5) to it,

we

Jfa f(x)dx.

find

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

154
From

this

it is

76

[IV,

easy to derive the formula

C f(x)+(x)dx = C
Ja

c/a

f
i/a

/(x) 0(z) dx

f(x)+(b)dx

[0(o)

0(6)]

fV(x)
Ja

f %s)

0(a)

<*z

0(6)

f(x) dx

"u

Similar formulae exist for the case

when

the function 0(x)

is

increasing.

We

76. Return to primitive functions.


are now in a position to
give a purely analytic proof of the fundamental existence theorem
( 67). Let/(x) be any continuous function. Then the definite integral

where the limit a


limit x.

isf(x).

is regarded as fixed, is a function of the upper


proceed to show that the derivative of this function

We

In the

first place,

we have
>x

=
or,

applying the

where

lies

first

f
Jx

law of the mean

f(t)dt,

(4),

+ h. As h approaches zero,
hence the derivative of the function F(x) is /(x),

between x and x

approaches /(x)
to be proved.
;

which was

All other functions which have this same derivative are given
by adding an arbitrary constant C to F(x). There is one such
function, and only one, which assumes a preassigned value
x
a, namely, the function

T/O

for

When

there

is

no reason

to fear

ambiguity the same

letter

is

used to denote the upper limit and the variable of integration, and
dx i g written in place of
dt.
But it is evident that
/*/"(*)
f*f(t)
a definite integral depends only upon the limits of integration and
The letter
the form of the function under the sign of integration.

which denotes the variable of integration is absolutely immaterial.


Every function whose derivative is /(x) is called an indefinite
and is represented
integral of /(x), or & primitive function of
/"(x),

by the symbol

r
f(x)dx,

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

70]

the limits not being indicated.

By

we

the above

155

evidently have

Conversely, if a function F(x) whose derivative is /(x) can be


discovered by any method whatever, we may write

f(x)dx

F(aj)+ C.

C we need only note that


Hence C =
F(a), and

In order to determine the constant


left-hand side vanishes for x

a.

the
the

fundamental formula becomes

= F(*)-F(a).

f(x)dx

(6)
C/ U

If in this formula /(a- ) be replaced

by

F (x),

it

becomes

F (x)dx,
F(a)-F(a)*= *Jf
a
or,

applying the

first

law of the mean for integrals,

where lies between a and x. This constitutes a new proof of the


law of the mean for derivatives but it is less general than the one
given in section 8, for it is assumed here that the derivative F (a:) is
;

continuous.

We

shall consider in the next chapter the simpler classes of func


Just now we will merely state

whose primitives are known.


a few of those which are apparent
tions

A(x

a
a) dx

at once

(-

a-fl^O;

dx

cos x dx

sin

dx

-f

h C,

sin

x dx

0;

cos x

-f-

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

150

[IV,

= log/(x) +

76

C.

of the fundamental formula (6) was based upon the


the function f(x) was continuous in the closed inter
that
assumption
If this condition be disregarded, results may be obtained
val (a, b).
2
which are paradoxical. Taking f(x) == I/a; for instance, the for

The proof

mula

(6) gives
f"^

The

= i_i.

x2

\J} a

left-hand side of this equality has no


unless a and b have the same sign

in our present
the
but
right-hand side

meaning

system
has a perfectly determinate value, even when a and b have different
We shall find the explanation of this paradox later in the
signs.
taken between imaginary limits.
study of definite integrals
leads to the equation
Similarly, the formula (6)

/()

/(*>

between a and b,
opposite signs, f(x) vanishes
and neither side of the above equality has any meaning for us at
shall find later the signification which it is convenient

If /(a)

and/() have

We

present.
to give them.

Again, the formula (6)


2
/() = !/(!+ * ), we find

may

lead

arc tan b

to

ambiguity.

arc tan

Thus,

if

a.

Here the left-hand side is perfectly determinate, while the righthand side has an infinite number of determinations. To avoid this
ambiguity,

let

us consider the function

This function F(x) is continuous in the whole interval and van


Let us denote by arc tan x, on the other hand, an
ishes with x.
between - Tr/2 and + Tr/2. These two functions have the
angle

iv,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

77]

same derivative and they both vanish for x = 0.


they are equal, and we may write the equality

r b dx

Jm

= r
+ x* J

r a dx

dx

+ x* J

-.

157

It follows that

= arc tan b

arc tan a,

x*

where the value to be assigned the arctangent always


-7T/2 and +7T/2.
In a similar manner we may derive the formula

dx

>b

lies

between

arc sin a,

arc sin b

I/O

where the radical is to be taken positive, where a and b each lie


1 and + 1, and where arc sin x denotes an angle which
between
lies between
Tr/2 and + Tr/2.
77. Indices.

of this branch as

the primitive F(x) is multiply determinate, we


values F(a) and follow the continuous variation

when

In general,

should choose one of the

initial

x varies from a

to

Let us consider, for instance, the integral

b.

fobzar*. J.f-^w+/

J.

^+<?

(*)

where

and where P and Q are two functions which are both continuous in the interval
If Q does not vanish
time.
(a, b) and which do not both vanish at the same
between a and 6, /(x) does not become infinite, and arc tan/(x) remains between
But this is no longer true, in general, if the equation Q =
7f/2 and + rt/2.
has roots in this interval. In order to see how the formula must be modified, let
us retain the convention that arc tan signifies an angle between
if/2 and + if/2,
and let us suppose, in the first place, that Q vanishes just once between a and b
We may write the integral in the form
for a value x = c.

(x)dx

Ja
where

infinite

and e are two very small positive numbers. Since /(x) does not become
c + e and 6, this may again be written
between a and c
e, nor between
f dx

arc tan/(c

+
Several cases

arc

e)

tan/ (6)

may now present

arc tan/(a)

arc tan/(c

themselves.

Suppose, for the sake of definite-

ness, that/(x)

be positive

will be very

becomes infinite by passing from


and very large, and arc tan /(c
e)

fC+t
I

Jc-e

oo

to

oo.

Then/(c

e)

will

near to ir/2; while

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

158
/(c

and very

will be negative

large,

[IV,

and arc tan/(c

e ) will

78

be very near

Also, the integral J^lV wil1 be verv small in absolute value; and,
passing to the limit, we obtain the formula
7T/2.

f(x)dx

TT

arc tan/(6)

arctan/(a).

show

that it would be necessary to subtract n if


/(x)
In the general case we would divide the interval
into subintervals in such a way that /(x) would become infinite
just once

Similarly,

it is

passed from
(a, 6)

easy to

co to

in each of them.

Treating each of these subintervals in the above manner and


adding the results obtained, we should find the formula
f (x) dx
.

*s

+j

arc tan/(6)

arc tan/(o)

+ (K -

x,

(x)

K denotes the number of times that /(x) becomes infinite by passing from
co, and K the number of times that /(x) passes from
to +
The number K K
called the index of the function /(x) between a and
where

oo to

oo

is

When/(x) reduces

oo.

6.

to a rational function

Vi/V,

this

index

may

be calculated

by elementary processes without knowing the roots of V. It is clear that we


may suppose Vi prime to and of less degree than V, for the removal of a poly
nomial does not affect the index. Let us then consider the series of divisions
necessary to determine the greatest common divisor of Fand FI, the sign of the
remainder being changed each time. First, we would divide V by FI,
obtaining
a quotient Qi and a remainder
F2 Then we would divide FI by F2 obtaining a
quotient Q2 and a remainder
Vs and so on. Finally we should obtain a con
stant remainder
F + 1. These operations give the following set of equations
.

= FiQi - F2
= F2 Q2 - F8

F
F!

The sequence
F,

(7)

FI,

of polynomials

a,

Vr.it

-,

r,

Fr +

-..,

Fn

Fn +

has the essential characteristics of a Sturm sequence


1) two consecutive poly
nomials of the sequence cannot vanish simultaneously, for if they did, it could
be shown successively that this value of x would cause all the other
polynomials
to vanish, in particular Vn + \; 2) when one of the intermediate
polynomials FI,
:

,Vn vanishes,

the

number

of changes of sign in the series (7) is not altered,


c.
_i and Vr + \ have different signs for x
It
follows that the number of changes of sign in the series
(7) remains the same,
= 0. If Fi/F passes from + oo to oo,
except when x passes through a root of

Pai
for

if

Fr

vanishes for x

c,

number

by one, but it diminishes by one on the other hand


V\/V passes from co to +00. Hence the index is equal to the difference
the number of changes of sign in the series (7) for x = 6 and x = a.
this

increases

We

if

of

78. Area of a curve.


can now give a purely analytic definition
of the area bounded by a continuous plane curve, the area of the
For this purpose we need
rectangle only being considered known.

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

78]

159

72.
Let
the results of
only translate into geometrical language
interval
in
the
closed
continuous
is
which
function
(a, b),
f(x) be a
in
b and that f(x)
and let us suppose for definiteness that a
<

>

Let us consider, as above (Fig.


the plane bounded by the contour AMBB A
the interval.

9,
65), the portion of
composed of the seg

axis, the straight lines AA and BB parallel to


the y axis, and having the abscissae a and b, and the arc of the curve
whose equation is y =f(x). Let us mark off on A B Q a certain
A

ment A B

of the

MB

whose abscissae
P,_i, Pi}
and through these points let us draw
meet the arc A MB in the points
parallels to the y axis which
Let us then consider, in
respectively.
Qi-D
Qi,
bounded
of
the
the
by the contour
plane
portion
particular,

number

of points of division

are x 1} x 2 ,

#;_!, x i}

#2>

0>i>

P l} P2

the highest
Qi-iQiPiPi-iQi-i, an(i l et us m ark upon the arc Q.-^Q,and the lowest points, that is, the points which correspond to the
and to the minimum m of f(x) in the interval
maximum
the figure the lowest point coincides with

(#,_!,

(In

a;,-).

<2,-_j.)

Let Rf be the area of the rectangle P base Pi-i-P, with the altitude JJ/ and
i

f,

rectangle Pf-iP^Q,--! erected

tude

erected upon the


let r{ be the area of the

si si _

upon the base P,-^^ with the

alti

Then we have

and the results found above ( 72) may now be stated as follows
whatever be the points of division, there exists a fixed number /
which is always less than 2A\ and greater than 2r,., and the two
sums 2Ri and 2r approach / as the number of sabintervals P ^ P
increases in such away that each of them approaches zero. We shall
call this common limit I of the two sums 2-Ri and 2r the area of
Thus
the portion of the plane bounded by the contour AMBB A A.
:

the area under consideration


integral

is

defined to be equal to the definite

ax,
(<)

This definition agrees with the ordinary notion of the area of a


plane curve. For one of the clearest points of this rather vague
notion is that the area bounded by the contour P -iPiQ n Q _ P _ l
i

between the two areas R and r of the two rectangles Pj_iP,-*,- s -i


and Pi-iPiiiQi-i; hence the total area bounded by the contour
AMBB A A must surely be a quantity which lies between the two
lies

sums 2/? and 2r,-. But the definite integral / is the only fixed quan
sums for any mode of
tity which always lies between these two
subdivision of A Q B since it is the common limit of 2-R, and
f

2r<.

160

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

[IV,

79

The given area may also be defined in an infinite number of other


ways as the limit of a sum of rectangles. Thus we have seen that
the definite integral /

where

&

is

is

also the limit of the

any value whatever

sum

in the interval
(x _ 1}
t

a;,).

But the

element

of this

sum

represents the area of a rectangle whose base is P.-.jPj


is the ordinate of
any point of the arc Q _ l n Q
It should be noticed also that the definite
integral / represents
the area, whatever be the position of the arc
with respect to
the x axis, provided that we adopt the convention made in
67.

and whose altitude

AMR

Every

definite integral therefore represents an area


an integral is called a quadrature.

hence the calcu

lation of such

The notion

of area thus having been

there remains no reason

arguments which

why

it

made rigorous once for all,


should not be used in certain

renders nearly intuitive.


For instance, it is
perfectly clear that the area considered above lies between the areas
of the two rectangles which have the common base A B and which
have the least and the greatest of the ordinates of the arc A
it

MB,

respectively, as their altitudes.


a rectangle whose base is A B

It is therefore equal to the area of

and whose altitude is the ordinate


of a properly chosen point
which is a restate
upon the arc AMB,
ment of the first law of the mean for integrals.

The following remark is also important. Let


f(x) be a func
which is finite in the interval (a, b) and which is discontinuous

79.

tion

in the

finite

manner described below for


number of values between

a and
is

b.
Let us suppose that
/(a-)
continuous from c to c +
&(&>0),

and that f(c -f c ) approaches a cer


which we shall denote

tain limit,

+ 0), as e approaches zero


through positive values and like
f( c

FIG. 11

wise let us

suppose that f(x) is


continuous between c k and c and
- c) approaches a limit
that/(c
- 0) as e approaches zero
f(c
through positive values. If the two
- 0) are different, the function
limits f(c + 0) and
f(c
f(x) is dis
continuous for x = c.
It is usually agreed to take for
/(c) the

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

80]

161

If the function /(a;) has a certain


4- 0) +f(c
0)]/2.
of points of discontinuity of this kind, it will be repre
Let c
sented graphically by several distinct arcs AC, C D, D B.

value [f(c

number
and

example, be the abscissae of the points of discontinuity.

d, for

Then we

shall write
/~>

Xb

f(x)dx

s*d

f(x)dx

i/a

s*b

f(x)dx

*J c

f(x)dx,

i/a*

in accordance with the definitions of

72. Geometrically, this definite


BB A A.
area
bounded
by the contour A CC
integral represents the
If the upper limit b now be replaced by the variable x, the definite

DD

integral

is still

tinuous

a continuous function of

we

c for

still

have

example,

we

x.

F (x )=f(x

In a point x where f(x)

con

is

For a point of discontinuity,

).

have

shall

S>C+fl

F(c

K)

F(c) =

f(x) dx

hf(c

BK),

<

<

1,

and the

ratio \_F(c
0)
0) or f(c
A)
F(c)]/h approaches f(c
or
This
is
an
h
is
as
negative.
according
example of a
positive
function F(x) whose derivative has two distinct values for certain

values of the variable.


80. Length of a curvilinear arc. Given a curvilinear arc AB; let us
take a certain number of intermediate points on this arc,
1
2)

m m
,

m n -\,

and

let

us construct the broken line A?n 1

mn _ B
l

by

connecting each pair of consecutive points by a straight line.


If the length of the perimeter of this broken line approaches a

number of sides increases in such a way that each of


them approaches zero, this limit is defined to be the length of the
arc AB.
Let
limit as the

be the rectangular coordinates of a point of the arc AB expressed


in terms of a parameter t, and let us suppose that as t varies from

a to

b (a
continuous

the arc

<

AB

and
are continuous and possess
and that the point (x, y, z) describes
without changing the sense of its motion. Let

b)

the functions /,

first

derivatives,

<,

\j/

DEFINITE INTEGRALS
be the values of

Then the

line.

or,

,.,

&

77,,

lie

80

which correspond to the vertices of the broken


c is given
by the formula

side

applying the law of the mean to x

where
is

[IV,

between

and

,._!

tt

very small the radical differs very

In order to estimate the error we

#,_!,

When

the interval

(,._!,

/,)

from the expression

little

may

-,

write

in the

it

.--

.)]

form

But we have
!/

() + / (**1

and consequently

Hence,

if

each of the intervals be made so small that the oscillation

of each of the functions

we

interval,

/ (*),

<f>

(t),

(*) is less

than c/3 in any

shall have

where
M<J

and the perimeter of the broken

line

The supplementary term 2e,-(,than e2(fc


that is, than
._,),
#,-

c(/>

small as
small,

it

is

less in absolute value

is

Since

may

be taken as

equal to the definite integral

s=C
c/

a).

AB

This definition
<f>

,-_,)

please, provided that the intervals be taken sufficiently


follows that this term approaches zero hence the length S

(8)

therefore equal to

we

of the arc

is

may

(l

be extended to the case where the derivatives

are discontinuous in a finite

number

of points of the arc

AB,

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

80]

which occurs when the curve has one or more corners.

AB

divide the arc

into several parts for each of

163

We need only

which/

<

^ are

continuous.
It results from the formula
(8) that the length S of the arc
between a fixed point A and a variable point M, which
corresponds
to a value t of the parameter, is a function of t whose derivative is

2
whence, squaring and multiplying by dt we find the formula
,

dS

(9)

= dx +
2

dy*

+ dz

2
,

which does not involve the independent variable. It is also


easily
remembered from its geometrical meaning, for it means that dS is
the diagonal of a rectangular parallelepiped whose
adjacent edges are
dx, dy, dz.

Note.

Applying the first law of the mean


which represents the arc

correspond to the values


s

where

the chord
c2

the interval

M M^ by
n

1}

of the parameter (^

= arc JUoJ/i = (t, -

lies in

for integrals to the

MM

definite integral

(t

V/
^).

(0)

On

+ 4,

(0)

whose extremities
*
we find
),
>

,/,"(0),

the other hand, denoting

we have

c,

= [/CO -/Co)]

Applying the law of the mean for derivatives to each of the


we obtain the formula

ences f(ti)f(tn ),

differ

where the three numbers

belong to the interval (


rj,
By
^).
the above calculation the difference of the two radicals is less than
e,
,

provided that the oscillation of each of the functions/ ^), (),


is less than
e/3 in the interval (# ^). Consequently we have
<

or, finally,

1s

If the arc

MM
Q

is infinitesimal,

tl

approaches zero; hence

and therefore also 1


c/s, approaches zero. It follows that the
of an infinitesimal arc to its chord approaches unity as its limit.

c,

ratio

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

164

81

[IV,

Example. Let us find the length of an arc of a plane curve whose


as independent
equation in polar coordinates is p = /(w). Taking
variable, the curve is represented by the three equations x = p cos w,
z =
hence
y = p sin
<o

o>,

ds
or,

dx 2

dy

= (cos

to

p sin

dp

simplifying,
ds 2

2
o>

e?a>)

+P

dp

+ (sin wdp

-}-

p cos to

By

= R + R cos

ds
or, letting

=R

o>

dta [sin

vary from

is

a).

we have

the preceding formula


2

d^ 2

Let us consider, for instance, the cardioid, whose equation


p

c?w)

(1

cos
o>)

=4R

cos 2

^ do

2
,

to TT only,

ds

and the length of the arc

= 2 R cos

f/o)

is
f

&R sin
where w and
ities of

u^ are the polar angles

the arc.

The

which correspond

to the

extrem

total length of the curve is therefore 8 R.

81. Direction cosines. In studying the


properties of a curve we are
often led to take the arc itself as the independent variable. Let us
choose a certain sense along the curve as positive, and denote
by s

AM

the length of the arc


between a certain fixed point A and a vari
able point M, the sign being taken
or
lies in
according as
the positive or in the negative direction from A. At
any point

of the curve let us take the direction of the tangent which coincides
with the direction in which the arc is increasing, and let a,
be
ft,

the angles which this direction makes with the


positive directions
of the three rectangular axes Ox, Oy, OK.
Then we shall have the

following relations
COS

dx

To

COS

ft

dy

COS y

dz

Vrfz

+ dif + dz

ds

which sign to take, suppose that the positive direction of


the tangent makes an acute angle with the x axis then x and s
increase simultaneously, and the sign + should be taken.
If the
angle a is obtuse, cos a is negative, x decreases as s increases, dx/ds
find

IV,

ALLIED GEOMETRICAL CONCEPTS

82]

165

negative, and the sign -f- should be taken again.


case the following formulae hold

Hence

is

in

any

cos

(10)

= dx

cos

>

dy
= ~r

cos y

as

as

dz-

>

ds

with respect to the same


otherwise arbitrary.

dx, dy, dz, ds are differentials taken

where

independent variable, which

is

segment of a straight line. Let MM^ be a segment


whose extremities describe two curves C, C x
On

82. Variation of a

of a straight line

each of the two curves

us choose a

let

point as origin and a positive sense of


motion, and let us adopt the follow
ing notation s, the arc AM; s 1} the arc
the two arcs being taken with
l
l
:

the same sign

angle between

the length MM
the
MM^ and the positive di
I,

MT;

rection of the tangent

between

AT,

1}

B,

the angle

M and the positive direction

FIG 12

We

of the tangent M^ 7\.


try to find a relation

proceed to
between $, 6 1 and the differentials

Let

ds,

ds l}

be the coordinates of the points M,

(x, y, z), (x 1} y lt z^
respectively, a, ft, y the direction angles of
Then we have
direction angles of M^ 7\.

= (x -

arO"

MT, and

+ (y - y^ + (z -

a^, fa,

dl.

ly

y l the

ztf,

from which we may derive the formula


ldl

= (x- x^ (dx

dxj

+ (y -

y,)

(dy

- dyj +

(z

- z^ (dz

dzj,

which, by means
for

of the formulae (10) and the analogous formulae


be written in the form

C lf may
dl

Ix
I

+
But

/x,
-L
^6
\

+J

?/,
Jl

COS

x
cos

z
-j

z,

l>

cos ft

-f

(/

COS y ds
/
I

z,

11

?/,

>/i

<*!

(3

+ -*-j

cos

l>

y\) fl, (z
z-^/l are the direction cosines of
Likewise
coefficient of ds is
cos 0.

and consequently the

the coefficient of ds l

(10

11

C03

x^)/l, (y

(a;

M M,

x,

is

dl =

cos ^; hence the desired relation

ds cos 6

ds! cos

is

0,.

We shall make frequent applications of this formula


proceed to discuss immediately.

one such

we

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

166
Theorems

83.

and

let the

of

Graves and

two tangents

E and E

Let

of Chasles.

[IV,

be two confocal

83

ellipses,

MB to the interior ellipse E be drawn

MA,

M, which

lies

difference

MA

from a point
on the exterior ellipse E
The
arc ANB remains con
+
.

MB

M describes the

stant as the point

ellipse

OA

and OB,
the arc O M, I and I the distances
and
BM, 6 the angle between MB and the positive

and

Let

denote the arcs

AM

<r

T.
direction of the tangent
Since the ellipses
T is
and
are confocal the angle between

MA

AM

coincides
6.
equal to it
Noting that
FlQ 13
with the positive direction of the tangent at A,
is the negative direction of the tangent at B, we find from the

BM

and that

formula (10

),

successively,
dl

ds
ds

dl

d<r

cos 6

do-

cos 6

whence, adding,

+ )=d (s -s)=d (arc ANB),


1

d(l

which proves the proposition stated above.


The above theorem is due to an English geometrician, Graves. The following
theorem, discovered by Chasles, may be proved in a similar manner. Given an
If from a point
on that
ellipse and a confocal hyperbola which meets it at N.
and MB
the two tangents
branch of the hyperbola which passes through

be drawn to the

ellipse, the difference of

difference of the tangents

III.

the arcs

number

NB will

be equal to the

INTEGRATION BY PARTS

which cannot be evaluated


two general processes which we shall discuss

of definite integrals

directly yield to the


in this section.

Change

NA

MB.

CHANGE OF VARIABLE

large

84.

MA

MA

of variable.

If in the definite integral /*/(*) dx the


new independent variable t by means

variable x be replaced by a
of the substitution x

new

<f>(t),

definite integral is obtained.

continuous and possesses a


and that
proceeds from
a to b without changing sense as t goes from a to ft.
The interval (a, ft) having been broken up into subintervals by
xn _ l} b
tn _
let a, x l} x z
the intermediate values a, t v t,
ft,
be the corresponding values of x ==
Then, by the law of the

Let us suppose that the function


continuous derivative between a and

is

<f>(t)

ft,

<f>(f)

l ,

<f>(t).

mean, we shall have

where B

value of

Let
between t _ and
x which lies between x _ and x

lies

?,-.

,-

<(0,-)

be the corresponding

Then the sum

IV.

CHANGE OF VARIABLE

5*1

(x,

a)

+ /(&) (x, -

+/(,) (6

approaches the given definite integral as


may also be written

and

in this

form we see that

new

xn _

But

limit.

its

approaches the

it

167

this

sum

definite integral

Ja

This establishes the equality

as its limit.

(\Y\
L L
\J

which

f(x~\dx
v

,/

va

"

called the

formula for the change of variable. It is to


new differential under the sign of integration
is obtained by replacing x and dx in the differential
f(x}dx by their
values
and (t)dt, while the new limits of integration are the
values of t which correspond to the old limits.
By a suitable choice
is

be observed that the

<}>

<f>(t)

of the function

the
<()

new

evaluate than the old, but


rules in the matter.

may

integral

it is

turn out to be easier to

impossible to lay

down any

definite

Let us take the definite integral

for

instance,

and

let

dx

/
Jo

(x

us

make

a)*

p*

the substitution x

-f- fit.

It

becomes

dx

dt

tan

or,

+ arc tan

returning to the variable x,


1 /
x - a
-arc tan
l

Xot

\-

arc tan

a
-

made in establishing the formula (11) were


Thus it is not necessary that the function
should
always move in the same sense as t varies from a to f3. For defiall

the hypotheses

necessary.

<()

niteness let us suppose that as t increases from a to


y (y
/8),
then as t increases from y to
steadily increases from a to c (c
i)
decreases from c to I. If the f unction /(x) is continuous in
/3,
<

<()

>

<()

the interval (a,


vals (a,

the formula may be applied


which gives

c),

c), (c, b),

to each of the inter

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

168

or,

L*v,$84

adding,

On the other hand, it is quite necessary that the function


should be uniquely denned for all values of t. If this condition be
disregarded, fallacies may arise. For instance, if the formula be

<f>(t)

applied to the integral f_ l dx, using the transformation x


we should be led to write
+i

1?

/2
,

/ *-J

which

is evidently incorrect, since the second integral vanishes.


In
order to apply the formula correctly we must divide the interval
In the first of
1, 0), (0, 1).
1, -f- 1) into the two intervals (
(

these

we should

take x

second half interval


to

We

1.

we

Vr

then find a correct


+

dx
1

it

let

result,

vary from 1 to

= ~\/t

and

t/O

and

ft

be replaced by x

().

and

in the

becomes

<()

/[<()]<

In the

0.

vary from

namely

which shows that the transformation x =


F(x), whose derivative is /(#), into a function
is

let t

<~i

If the upper limits b

Note.

formula (11),

and

should take x

carries a function

<()

whose derivative

This also follows at once from the formula for the

derivative of a function of a function.

Hence we may

write, in

general,

which

is

integrals.

the

formula for the change of variable in indefinite

ivr,

INTEGRATION BY PARTS

85]

169

by parts. Let u and v be two functions which,


with
their
derivatives u and v are continuous between a
together
and b. Then we have
85. Integration

d(uv) _
dx

dv

du

dx

dx

whence, integrating both sides of this equation,

we

find

C dhm) = C dv
C du
dx
u
\
dx.
dx+ v
b

-----

dx

Ja
This

may

dx

Ja

Ja

be written in the form


f*b

/*b

u dv

(12)

= \_uv~\l -

\J a

we

v du,

*J a

where the symbol [F(x)] denotes,

If

dx

in general, the difference

replace the limit b

by a variable limit x, but keep the limit a


which
amounts
to passing from definite to indefinite inte
constant,
grals, this formula becomes
(13)

u dv

uv

v du.

Thus the calculation of the integral / u dv is reduced to the cal


culation of the integral fvdu, which
may be easier. Let us try,
for example, to calculate the definite integral

rx m logxdx,

ra

+ 1^0.

\J ct

Setting u

= logic,

c\logx.x m

Ja

xm +

/(m

+ 1),

n^+
dx=\

+1

log X

m+1
This formula

is

not applicable

if

iogarr

m +1 J

L
"

case

the formula (12) gives

in

+ 1 Ja

Xm +

x m dx

16

~(m+l)
m+1 =
in
;

that particular

we have

It is possible to generalize the

sive derivatives of the


+1
(
u,
v ,
-.., w

formula (12). Let the succes


two functions u and v be represented by

>;

v",

v (n + \
1

"

M",

-,

Then

the application of the

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

170

formula (12) to the integrals


following equations

85

leads to the

dv<*-",

s*b

/>6

uv (n + 1) dx=

fudv, fu

[IV,

udv^

(n)

]*

[>w

Ja

Ja
s*\>

=1
Ja

Ja
~b
/

^ --

r>t>

v^dx

I*-

r<"

|>

wV

J*

/-.b

u<*>v

dx

=1
Ja.

Ja

u^do

=[

(
"]a

Multiplying these equations through by


and then adding, we find the formula

+l

+1

and

1 alternately,

(n

Ja
n+l) dx
which reduces the calculation of the integral fuv^
H

l)

to the cal

vdx.

culation of the integral


In particular this formula applies when the function under the
of a polynomial of at most the wth
integral sign is the product
function v.
order
of
1) of a known
(n
degree and the derivative
(M + 1)
no
contains
member
second
the
integral
For then w
0, and
f*i<

signs.

Suppose, for instance, that

we wished

to evaluate the definite

integral

fW(*)*,

\J

wi
n+v
where /(x) is a polynomial of degree n. Setting u =/(z), v = e /u)
x
has been taken
the formula (14) takes the following form after
,

e"

out as a factor

The same method,

or,

what amounts

to the

same

thing, a series of

definite integrals
integrations by parts, enables us to evaluate the

Ja
where f(x)

is

c,osmxf(x)dx,

a polynomial.

*/m

sinmxf(x)dx,

IV,

INTEGRATION BY PARTS

86]

171

s series with a remainder. In the formula


(14) let us
u
replace
by a function F(x) which, together with its first n + 1
n
derivatives, is continuous between a and b, and let us set v = (b
x)
Then we have

86.

Taylor

= n(n - l)(b
= (-!)!. 2 .--W, y + = 0,
= b,
vanish for
v, v
1

n(b

v"

a;)"-

-re)"-

-.,

"

>

v<>

and, noticing that

v",

i/"-

a:

following equation from the general formula

= (-!)

n\F(b)

-n\F

n\F(a)

-jF

(a) (b

-a)

(a)(b

ri\

-a)

we obtain the

----

F<>

(a) (b

~]

a)

which leads

to the equation

ay

-n,

rb

-7
?i

Since the factor


b,

x)

(i

we may apply the law

)(a-)(&-a;)

^.

!i/ a

keeps the same sign as x varies from a to


of the mean to the integral on the right,

which gives
I

Ja

where

lies

\x)(b

- x)dx =

between a and

b.

+
F<

(f)

87. Transcendental character of e

Hermite

to

equation whose coefficients are


Setting a

and w

dx

Substituting this value in the preced

ing equation, we find again exactly Taylor


form of the remainder.

famous theorem due

f (b- x}

Ja

From

formula, with Lagrange

the formula (15) we can prove a


e is not a root of any algebraic

The number

all integers.*
in the formula (15),

it

becomes

JT
* The
present proof
used by Hermite.

is

due to D. Hilbert,

who drew

his inspiration

from the method

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

172

87

[IV,

where
F(x) =/(x)

and

this again

written in the form

may be

F(b)

(16)

Now

us suppose that

let

cients are

all

integers

=
were the root of an algebraic equation whose

coeffi

Then, setting b

+/ (z)

0, 1, 2,

c\e
,

wi,

c 2 e2

----1-

cm em

0.

and adding
c m we

successively, in the formula (16),

the results obtained, after multiplying them respectively by

c l5

obtain the equation


e

(17)

~* dx

m. We proceed
where the index i takes on only the integral values 0, 1, 2,
which is up to
if
the
is
relation
a
such
that
polynomial
/(x),
show
to
impossible
,

the present arbitrary, be properly chosen.


Let us choose it as follows
:

/(X )

---

(P

where p

a prime

is

I)

number

XP~ I

(X

l)p(x-2)P---(x -m)P,

1
-

This polynomial

greater than m.

of degree

is

of the coefficients of its successive derivatives past the pth


are integral multiples of p, since the product of p successive integers is divisible
for
1) derivatives, vanishes
by p!. Moreover /(x), together with its first (p
are all integral mul
it follows that F(l), F(2),
and
,
F(m)
x
m,
-,
1, 2,

mp

-|-

and

all

tiples of p.

It only

remains to calculate F(0), that

is,

=/(0)
In the

first

place, /(O)

= /O- 2

=/(0) =

=
>(0)

0,

while /Cp>(0),

have just shown.


integral multiples of p, as we
- 1) !,
I
only multiply the coefficient of XP~ in/(x) by (p

are

all

To

find

/^ +
-

/</

which gives

1)

1
>(0),

(0)

(1

we need

m)p.

Hence the sum


c

is

F(0)

equal to an integral multiple of

increased by

i- c (l

m)p.

be divisible
p be taken greater than either m or c the above number cannot
be
an
will
sum
from zero.
of
the
different
integer
first
the
hence
(17)
portion
by p
We shall now show that the sum
If

can be made smaller than any preassigned quantity by taking p sufficiently


As x varies from to i each factor of /(x) is less than m hence we have
;

large.

IV,

INTEGRATION BY PARTS

88]

f(x)e-*dx

from which

it

m mp+ P -\

e~ x dx<

Jo

(p-1)!

173

(P-1)I

follows that

2<f/(x)<

/o

As p increases indefi
c
+ cm
where
is an upper limit of
+ Ci +
nitely the function 0(p) approaches zero, for it is the general term of a conver
It
gent series in which the ratio of one term to the preceding approaches zero.
follows that we can find a prime number p so large that the equation (17) is
impossible hence Hermite s theorem is proved.
.

88. Legendre s polynomials.

Pn (x)

Let us consider the integral

a polynomial of degree n and Q is a polynomial of degree less


us try to determine Pn (x) in such a way that the integral van
We may consider n (x) as the nth derivative of a
ishes for any polynomial Q.
polynomial R of degree 2n, and this polynomial R is not completely determined,
for we may add to it an arbitrary polynomial of degree (n
1) without changing

where

is

than n, and

let

its

We may therefore

nth derivative.

together with

its first

set

Pn = d n R/dx n

where the polynomial E,


= a. But integrating

vanishes for x

1) derivatives,

(n

by parts we find

rQQ dnE dx--

Ja
and

since,

by hypothesis,

E(o)=0,

(a)

0,

B(-J)(o)=0,

-,

the expression
R( -

Q (6)
must also vanish

if

1)

(6)

n
(&)>

~l

Qf-

>

B(6)

The polynomial R (x)

(b) fi(

- 2)

(6)

Qf.*

)(b)

If

a)

(x

b)

R (b) =

0,
is

0,

-,

E<-i)(6)

(18)

0.

therefore equal, save for a constant factor, to the product

the limits a and 6 are

Legendre

R (b)

is to be arbitrary, the quantities


are themselves arbitrary; hence we must also have

and the required polynomial


save for a constant factor, in the form
(x

(b)

the integral is to vanish.


Q of degree n 1

Since the polynomial


Q(&)i

- Q

and

1,

--

Pn (x)

completely determined,

respectively, the polynomials

Choosing the constant

polynomials.

is

2.4.6...2nax

[(x
LV

C
2

Pn

are

with Legendre, we will set

!)].

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

174
If

we

also agree to set

y =

-AO

y-

1,

-<M

we

1,

Xr

JL Z

In general,

>

2i

n.

n is a polynomial of degree n, all the exponents of x being even or


Leibniz formula for the nth derivative of a product of two factors

17) gives at

once the formulae

-T.(-l)

(19)

-Z(l)

By

the general property established above,

l,

(20)

where

tf>

-3x

5x3

"2i

odd with

88

have

shall

r = 3x*~

= x,

[IV,

(x) is

X,

t <t>(x)dx

(-!)"

0,

less than
always have

any polynomial of degree

are two different integers,

we

shall

In particular,

n.

if

and n

(21)

J-i

This formula enables us to establish a very simple recurrent formula between

three successive polynomials


n
Observing that any polynomial of degree n
can be written as a linear function of
Xi,
n it is clear that we may set
.

are constants.
In order to find C3 for example, let us
Ci, C2
multiply both sides of this equation by ^Tn _ 2 and then integrate between the
limits
1 and + 1.
By virtue of (20) and (21), all that remains is

where C

C
J_1

2
""

"~

and hence C3 = 0. It may be shown in the same manner that C = 0, 5 = 0,


The coefficient Ci is zero also, since the product xXn does not contain
Finally,
to find Co and C 2 we need only equate the coefficients of x n + 1 and then equate
the two sides for x = 1.
Doing this, we obtain the recurrent formula
.

x".

(n

(22)

+ l)Xn + l

(2n

+ l)xXn +

nX,,_i

0,

which affords a simple means of calculating the polynomials


The relation (22) shows that the sequence of polynomials
/oo\

~V

~TT

\&)

-^-Oi

-**-!}

~Y~
-"-2i

n successively.

~y

"

-"-n

1
possesses the properties of a Sturm sequence. As x varies continuously from
to + 1, the number of changes of sign in this sequence is unaltered except when
But the formulse (19) show that there are n
x passes through a root of
n = 0.

changes of sign in the sequence (23) f or x =


has n real roots between
the equation
n =
follows from Rolle s theorem.

1,
1

and none for x = 1. Hence


and -f 1, which also readily

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

89]

175

GENERALIZATIONS OF THE IDEA OF AN INTEGRAL


IMPROPER INTEGRALS LINE INTEGRALS*

IV.

89. The integrand becomes infinite. Up to the present we have sup


finite between the limits of inte
posed that the integrand remained
In certain cases, however, the definition may be extended
gration.
Let us first
to functions which become infinite between the limits.

consider the following particular case f(x) is continuous for every


value of x which lies between a and b, and for x
b, but it becomes
b.
for
definiteness
that a
will suppose
a.
infinite for x
:

Then the
b (e

>

We

<

0) has a definite

+e

and

be taken.

If

taken between the limits a

integral of f(x)

value, no matter how small

this integral approaches a limit as e approaches zero,


natural to denote that limit by the symbol

Jf/(*)

it is

usual and

dx.

If a primitive of /(cc), say F(x~), be

known, we may write

C
Ja +

and

limit as

examine F(a

sufficient to

is

it

approaches

zero.

We

Mdx

-f-

e)

for convergence

toward a

have, for example,

lL
the term

increases indefinitely as e approaches zero.


1
and it is
than unity, we may write l/e?~ = e
Hence in this case
clear that this term approaches zero with c.
If

fj.

But

>

if

1,
/u,

l/c^"

C"

fi

1,

we

we may

write

Mdx

I
Tr
X
Ja
(

"

the definite integral approaches a limit, and

If

is less

^~
a)

have;

/:
/a4

M dx = M (b
log

and the right-hand side increases indefinitely when

approaches

zero.

To sum

up, the necessary and sufficient condition that the given inte
should
gral
approach a limit is that /x should be less than unity.
*It is possible, if desired, to read the next chapter before reading the closing sec
tions of this chapter.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

176

The
tion

straight line x

[IV,

89

an asymptote of the curve whose equa

is

is

U
if

p.

It follows

is positive.

from the above that the area bounded by

the x axis, the fixed line x


b, the curve, and
finite value provided that //,<!.
If a primitive of f(x)

not known, we

is

asymptote, has a

its

may compare

the given

integral with known integrals. The above integral is usually taken


as a comparison integral, which leads to certain practical rules which
are sufficient in many cases.
In the first place, the
limit b

upper

does not enter into the reasoning, since everything depends


upon the
manner in which f(x} becomes infinite for x = a. We may therefore
replace b by any
to writing

f*+f

number whatever between a and

= fa +( + f*

number of roots near x


the same sign between a and
nite

We

will first

that the integral


f*

Then, if \f(x)

val, the definite integral

Hf(x )
is

is

is
^

<f>

positive in the interval (a, b),


dx approaches a limit as e

(x)

\<<j>(x)

fa + f(x)dx
t

throughout the whole inter

also approaches

positive throughout the interval (a,


For, since f(x) is less than
</>

f(x)dx
+

infi

that f(x) keeps

immediate.

*J a

which amounts

c.

prove the following lemma

zero.

approaches

we may suppose

a,

Let $(x) be a function which

and suppose

b,

In particular, unless f(x) has an

<

Ja +

limit.

the demonstration

b),

(x),

we have

^(x}dx.
e

Moreover f* f(x)dx increases as c diminishes, since all of its ele


+f
ments are positive. But the above inequality shows that it is con
stantly less than the second integral hence it also approaches a
limit.
If f(x} were always negative between a and
b, it would
;

be necessary merely to change the sign of each element.


Finally,
the function f(x) has an infinite number of roots near x =
a, we
may write down the equation

if

f+

*Ja

The

f(x) dx
f

|/(*)|

second
<$(*).

c/a +

integral

Now

[/(*)

/(or)

\\dx-f

<Ja

\f(x) dx.
|

+s

on the right approaches a limit, since


the function f(x)
\f(x)\ is either positive

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

89]

or zero

between a and

and

b,

value cannot exceed 2

its

177

<(#);

hence

the integral

f
i/a

also approaches a limit, and the lemma is proved.


It follows from the above that if a function f(x) does not approach
a, but always remains less than a fixed
any limit whatever for x

integral approaches a limit.


sin(l/x)dx has a perfectly definite value.

number,
l

fQ

the

Thus

the

integral

Suppose that the function /(#) can be written in

Practical rule.
the form

where the function

ij/(x)

remains

finite

when x approaches

a.

remains less in absolute value than


1 and the function
If
(x~)
a fixed number M, the integral approaches a limit. But if ^ 1 and
the absolute value of ty(x) is greater than a positive number ra, the
fjL

<

\]/

/JL

integral approaches no limit.

The

part of the theorem

is very easy to prove, for the abso


than M/(x
aY, and the integral of the
1.
latter function approaches a limit, since p,
In order to prove the second part, let us first observe that ^(a*)

first

lute value of f(x)

is less

<

keeps the same sign near x =


exceeds a positive number m.

between a and

b.

a,

since its absolute value always


shall suppose that \(/ (x)

We

>

Then we may write

dx

4-

and the second integral increases indefinitely as e decreases.


These rules are sufficient for all cases in which we can

find an

for
^/(.i") approaches,
exponent p such that the product (x
x = a, a limit A different from zero. If /* is less than unity, the
limit b may be taken so near a that the inequality

holds inside the interval

(a, J),

where L

is

a positive

number

greater

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

178

than
I

if

p^

[IV,

Hence the
\.

1, b

may

integral approaches a limit.


be taken so near to a that

"

I./

V"V

On the other hand,

n
a
)

/, r

89

\t>.

where I is a positive number less than K\.


inside the interval (a,
Moreover the function f(x), being continuous, keeps the same sign
b
hence the integral f
f(x)dx increases indefinitely in absolute
|

>),

value.*

Examples. Let/(x) = P/Q be a rational function. If a is a root


m
of order m of the denominator, the product (x
a) /(x) approaches
Since m is at least equal to
a limit different from zero for x = a.
unity, it
limit as

clear that the integral f

is
e

approaches

But

zero.

P and R

two polynomials and

is prime to its deriv


-R(ar)
/(z) approaches a limit for x = a if a
Thus
a root of R(x), and the integral itself approaches a limit.

ative, the
is

all

consider the function

/(*)

where

f(x)dx increases beyond

we

if

are

product (x

a)

1/2

the integral

dx

J
f
-\

approaches 7r/2 as e approaches zero.


l
1/2
loga;
Again, consider the integral ff \ogxdx. The product #
has the limit zero.
Starting with a sufficiently small value of x, we

may

therefore write log x

<

Mx~ 1/2 where


,

is

a positive

number

Hence the

chosen at random.

Everything which

integral approaches a limit.


has been stated for the lower limit a

may

be

repeated without modification for the upper limit b. If the function


f (cc) is infinite for x b,we would define the integral Ja /(#) dx to be
the limit of the integral
/ ( x ) dx as c approaches zero. If /(#)
/J*"

is infinite

at each limit,
b

the integral

"

f(x)dx

ently of each other.


we may write

*The

first

we would

Let

and

part of the proposition

may

can be found (0
an exponent
approaches a limit A as a; approaches a,
a limit

if

/JL

define

f (x~) dx

as the limit of

both approach zero independ


be any number between a and b. Then

as

also be stated as follows: the integral has

<

/*

<

1)

such that the product (x


a)>*f(x)
A = not being excluded.

the case where

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

90]

. f

/(*)<&

Ua +

<J

a-

179

+ c

f(x)dx

*J c

+f

and each of the integrals on the right should approach a limit in


this case.
if f(x) becomes infinite for a value c between a and b,
the integral */(%) dx as the sum of the limits of
define
would
we
e
b
two
the
integrals f~ f(x)dx, fc +f f(x)dx, and we would proceed
in a similar manner if any number of discontinuities whatever lay

Finally,

between a and

b.

noted that the fundamental formula

It should be

(6),

which was

established under the assumption that f(x) was continuous between


a and b, still holds when f(x) becomes infinite between these limits,

provided that the primitive function F(x~) remains continuous. For


the sake of definiteness let us suppose that the function f(x) becomes
Then we have
infinite for just one value c between a and b.
I

f(x) dx

lim

t) a

and

if

F(x")

is

a primitive of /(x), this

f(x) dx

Xft

lim F(c
=0

f(x) dx

=0t/a

F(a)

lim I
f(x) dx
e = 0c/c + e

may

be written as follows

F(b)

lim F(c
f=0

e).

Since the function F(x) is supposed continuous for x


c, F(c
e)
have the same limit F(c), and the formula again
e
and F(c
)

becomes

f j (xj ix
I

*J a

The following example

is

illustrative
1

dx

-Jx

If the primitive function F(x) itself becomes infinite between a and


for the integral on the left has as yet
b, the formula ceases to hold,

no meaning

in that case.

The formulae

may

for

change of variable and for integration by parts

be extended to the

new kinds

of integrals in a similar

manner

by considering them as the limits of ordinary integrals.


90. Infinite limits of integration.
is

continuous for

Then

all
l

the integral

Let/(x) be a function of x which

values of x greater than a certain number


a, has a definite value, no
f(x) dx, where I
.

>

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

180

[IV,

90

how large I be taken. If this integral approaches a limit


increases indefinitely, that limit is represented by the symbol

matter
as

f
If a primitive of f(x) be
integral approaches a limit.

f(x)dx.

known, it is easy to decide whether the


For instance, in the example
dx

arc tan

Jo

the right-hand side approaches Tr/2 as I increases indefinitely, and


this is expressed by writing the equation
7T

Ja
Likewise,

if

is

positive

and

kdx

//,

is

different

from

zero,

we have

c/a

If
I

/A is

greater than unity, the right-hand side approaches a limit as

increases indefinitely,

and we may write

kdx

On

the other hand,

nitely with

if

/i

is less

The same

I.

is

than one, the integral increases indefi


= 1, for the integral then
p.

true for

results in a logarithm.

When no

primitive of /(#) is known, we again proceed by com


parison, noting that the lower limit a may be taken as large as we
Our work will be based upon the following lemma
please.
:

Let
a, and suppose that
(x) be a function which is positive for x
l
the integral
dx
a
limit.
Then
the
approaches
integral f f(x) dx
JJ (x)
also approaches a limit provided that
\f(x) ^
() for all values of
>

<f>

<f>

<

x greater than

The proof

a.

of this proposition

is

exactly similar to that given above.

If the function f(x) can be put into the

/() =

form

*<

ty(x) remains finite when x is infinite, the follow


theorems
be
can
ing
demonstrated, but we shall merely state them

where the function

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

91]

181

p.

and
If the absolute value of ^ (x~) is less than a fixed number
greater than unity, the integral approaches a limit.
If the absolute value of (x) is greater than a positive number m

is

(]/

and

p.

is less

than or equal

to

unity, the integral approaches no limit.

For instance, the integral


/

cos ax

iT^
approaches a limit, for the integrand
cos

ax

dx

may

1 cos

be written

ax

i+*-**rT|
and the coefficient of 1/x 2 is less than unity in absolute value.
The above rule is sufficient whenever we can find a positive num
ber p, for which the product x*f(x) approaches a limit different from
zero as x becomes infinite.
The integral approaches a limit if p, is
greater than unity, but it approaches no limit if p. is less than or
equal to unity.*

For example, the necessary and

sufficient condition that the inte

gral of a rational fraction approach a limit when the upper limit


increases indefinitely is that the degree of the denominator should

exceed that of the numerator by at least two units.


take

Finally,

if

we

P and R are two polynomials of degree p and r, respectively,


the product x r/2 ~"f(x) approaches a limit different from zero when
x becomes infinite. The necessary and sufficient condition that the
where

integral approach a limit is that

be less than r/2

The rules stated above are not always


whether
or not an integral approaches a
ing
91.

f(x)

= (sin x)/x

is
p.

less

and

1.

1.

sufficient for
limit.

determin

In the example

for instance, the product x*f(x) approaches zero if


than one, and can take on values greater than any given
number if p, is greater than one. If p. = 1, it oscillates between + 1

None

proach a limit.

of the above rules apply, but the integral does ap


Let us consider the slightly more general integral

* The
integral also approaches a limit
zero as x becomes infinite.

if

the product x^f(x) (where

M>

1)

approaches

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

182

sin
-ax S1

/i e-~The integrand changes sign

for

a;

91

dx,

[IV,

a>0.

We

kir.

are therefore led to

study the alternating series

(24)

where the notation used


/

is

as

+ (_ !)

...

27T

e~ ax

Jo
sin

i<

that

is,

cc

+ WT

Moreover the general term a n

Hence the above

than 1/n.

sin
--dx,

It is evident that the integrand decreases as

a n-

.,

term a n may be written

nir for x, the general

y
an +

BIT

Substituting y

the following:

sm x

is

n increases, and hence

less than

f*(l/mr)dy,

series is convergent, since the

we proceed in the series,


and the general term approaches zero. If the upper limit I lies
between mr and (n + 1) TT, we shall have
absolute values of the terms decrease as

-dx

Sn

6a n

0<9<1,

where Sn denotes the sum of the first n terms of the series


(24). As
I increases
indefinitely, n does the same, a n approaches zero, and the
integral approaches the sum S of the series (24).
In a similar manner it may be shown that the integrals

r+*

r+
sino; 2 ^x,

Jo

Jo

which occur in the theory of diffraction, each have finite values.


The curve y = sin a; 2 for example, has the undulating form of a sine
curve, but the undulations become sharper and sharper as we go out,
,

since the difference ^/(n


x 2 approaches zero as

sin

Remark. This
indefinitely sin

last
2

+ I)TT
n

^/n7^ of two consecutive roots of


increases indefinitely.

example gives rise


between

oscillates

approach a limit even

if

to
1

an interesting remark.

and

1.

Hence an

As x

increases

integral

the integrand does not approach zero, that

is,

may

even

if

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

92J

the x axis
of the

is

remains positive when x

The following

which the function /(x) does not change

in

f(kn)

= /(x).

not an asymptote to the curve y

same kind

is

is

an example

The

sign.

function

x6 sin 2 x

and

positive,

183

does not approach zero, since


let us con

it

In order to show that the integral approaches a limit,

kit.

sider, as above, the series

flo

<*i

where

As x

varies

from

nit to (n

1)

TT,

x6

is

x6 sin 2 x

6
constantly greater than n

7t

6
,

and we may

write
l)rr

A primitive

function of the

new

==

integrand
arc tan

f n*7t6

dx

is

+ n n6

tan x),

and as x varies from mt to (n + 1) TT, tan x becomes infinite just once, passing
from + co to
oo.
Hence the new integral is equal ( 77) to 7T/V1+ ns 7f6 and
we have
,

It follows that the series

approaches a

2a

*2
_

Vl +
is

(n

+
-

1)

n3 it

TT"

convergent, and hence the integral J^ /(x) dx

limit.

On the other hand, it is evident that the integral cannot approach any limit
For
/(x) approaches a limit h different from zero when x becomes infinite.
beyond a certain value of x, /(x) will be greater than h/2 in absolute value
if

and will not change sign.


The preceding developments bear a close analogy to the treatment of infinite
series.
The intimate connection which exists between these two theories is
brought out by a theorem of Cauchy s which will be considered later (Chapter
We shall then also find new criteria which will enable us to determine
VIII).
whether or not an integral approaches a limit in more general cases than those
treated above.

92.

The function

The

T(a).

definite integral

T(a)= f

(25)

Jo

V-

has a determinate value provided that a


For, let us consider the two integrals

r
I

x a - e- x dx,

is

e-*dx

positive.

r
I

-l
-*<fe,

184

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

[IV,

93

where t is a very small positive number and is a


very large positive number.
The second integral always approaches a limit, for past a
sufficiently large value
a+
of x we have x a - e~ x
As for the first
1/x 2 that is, e x
the
I

<

>x

integral,
1 - a
product x
f(x) approaches the limit 1 as x approaches zero, and the necessary
and sufficient condition that the integral approach a limit is that 1 - a be less
than unity, that is, that a be positive. Let us
suppose this condition satisfied.

Then

the

sum

of these

two

limits

integral of the second kind.

is

the function T(a), which

This function T(a) becomes

is

also called

Euler

a approaches
zero, it is positive when a is positive, and it becomes infinite with a.
It has
a minimum for
= 1.4616321-.., and the corresponding value of T(a) is
0. 8856032-.

Let us suppose that


er x

differential of

a>

1,

and integrate by

infinite as

parts, considering e~ x dx as the

This gives

but the product x a ~ l e- x vanishes at both limits, since a


only the formula
(26)

r(o)

(a

l)T(o

1,

>

and there remains

1).

The repeated

application of this formula reduces the calculation of Y(a) to


the case in which the argument a lies between
and 1. Moreover it is easy to
determine the value of T(a) when a is an integer. For, in the first
place,

and the foregoing formula therefore

and, in general,

if

is

(27)

gives, for

2, 3,

a positive integer,

r(n)

= 1.2.3...(n-l) =

(n-l)l.

Let AB be an arc of a continuous plane curve,


be
a
continuous
function of the two variables x and
y)
where
x
and
denote
the coordinates of a point of AB
y along AB,
y
with respect to a set of axes in its plane. On the arc AB let us
93. Line integrals.

and

let

P (x,

take a certain number of points of division li m z


whose
coordinates are (x lt y^, (x 2 yz ),
., and then upon each
(x i; y.),
of the arcs
_^rn i let us choose another point n { (,., ^.) at random.
let
us
consider the sum
Finally,
,

{ ,

(28)
,

*,*! -*,_,

-..

these partial intervals. When the number of


points
increased indefinitely in such a way that each of the
differences x
x _ l approaches zero, the above sum
approaches a

extended over
of division

all

is
i

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

93]

185

which is called the line integral of P(x, y) extended over the


arc AB, and which is represented by the symbol

limit

JAB

P(x, y)dx.

In order to establish the existence of this limit, let us first sup


pose that a line parallel to the y axis cannot meet the arc AB in
more than one point. Let a and b be the abscissae of the points A

and

Then

and

y=

be the equation of the curve AB.


a continuous function of x in the interval (a, b), by

B, respectively,
is
<(#)

let

<f>(x)

hypothesis, and if we replace y by


resulting function $(cc)
P[x, <(X)]

<f>(x~)

is

in the function P(x,


y), the

Hence we

also continuous.

have

and the preceding sum may therefore be written

*(,) to

in the

form

a)

It follows that this surn

approaches as

its

limit the ordinary definite

integral
I
i/a

and we have

finally the

&(x)dx=

P[x,

<t>(x)~\dx,

t/a

formula

P(x, y}dx

I
JAB

P[x, t(x)-]dx.

I
Ja

If a line parallel to the y axis can


we should divide the arc

meet the arc

AB

in

more than

one point,

into several portions, each of

met

is

in but

which

one point by any line

parallel to the y axis.


arc is of the form A

If the given

CDB

(Fig. 14),

where C and D are


which the abscissa has an

for instance,

points at

extremum, each of the arcs A C, CD,


DB satisfies the above condition, and

we may
I

JACDB

But

it

FIG. 14

write

P(x,

I P(x,
y)dx= J,T

y)dx

JCD

P(x, y)dx

f
JOB

P(x,y)dx.

should be noticed that in the calculation of the three integrals

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

186

[IV,

on the right-hand side the variable y in the function P(x,


must be replaced by three different functions of the variable

93

y)
x,

respectively.

Curvilinear integrals of the form JAR Q(x, y)dy may be denned


manner. It is clear that these integrals reduce at once

in a similar

to ordinary definite integrals, but their usefulness justifies their


introduction.
may also remark that the arc AB may be com

We

posed of portions of different curves, such as straight lines, arcs of


circles, and so on.

case which occurs frequently in practice is that in which the


coordinates of a point of the curve AB are given as functions of a
variable parameter

and

where

together with their derivatives


() and
t.
We shall suppose that as t varies
<

\(/(t),

<j>(t)

are continuous functions of

describes the arc AB without changing


ft the point (x, y)
Let the interval (a, /?) be divided into a
the sense of its motion.

from a to
certain

and let t _ and t be two consecu


which correspond, upon the arc AB, two points
whose coordinates are (#,_!, y _i) and (x,-, y ), respec

number

tive values of
m,...!

and

lies

0,.

a point

or,

to

Then we have

tively.

where

of subintervals,

(,-,

between

17,)

ti _

of the arc

and

_l

t{

To

this value

hence we

0,

may

there corresponds

write

passing to the limit,

P(x,

/.4

An analogous

formula for

Adding the two,

(29)

we

JQdy may

P<&

-f

Qdy

J^l

which
course,

is
if

be obtained in a similar manner.

find the formula

= f
/

Of
the formula for change of variable in line integrals.
the arc AB is composed of several portions of different

and \fr() will not have the same form


curves, the functions
along the whole of AB, and the formula should be applied in that
<f>(t)

case to each portion separately.

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

t)4]

187

We

of a closed curve.
have already defined the area of a
of
the
bounded
an
arc A MB, a straight line which
plane
portion
by
does not cut that arc, and the two perpendiculars AA Q BB let fall

Area

94.

from the points A and B upon the straight line (


65, 78, Fig. 9).
Let us now consider a continuous closed curve of any shape, by
which we shall understand the locus described by a point
whose

y =

coordinates are continuous functions x

of a

=f(),
param
which assume the same values for two values t and T of
the parameter t.
The functions f(f) and
may have several
distinct forms between the limits t and T; such will be the case,
eter

<f>(t)

<j>(t~)

for instance, if the closed contour

Let

several distinct curves.

M M

denote points upon the curve


values t
t l} t 2
t _ l
t
-,
,

lt

t ,

be composed of portions of

J/2

-,

M_uM

if

M_ M
n

lt

corresponding, respectively, to the


t n _ j, T of the
parameter, which

increase from

zero, is called

the area of the closed curve C.*

Connecting these points in order by straight


The limit
lines, we obtain a polygon inscribed in the curve.
approached by the area of this polygon, as the number of sides is
indefinitely increased in such a way that each of them approaches
to T.

This definition

is

seen to agree with that given in the particular case treated above.
For if the polygon A A(2 1 Q 2
BB A (Fig. 9) be broken up into

small trapezoids by lines parallel to


is

trapezoids

where

lies

,.

in

polygon,

(*,.

- *,._,)

[/(a-,-)

between x^-^ and


this

special

case,

AA

+ f(x _
{

cc

the area of one of these

)]/2, or

(a\ -*<_,)/&),

Hence the area

of the whole

approaches the definite

ff(x)dx.
Let us now consider a closed curve C which

is

integral

cut in at most two

line parallel to a certain fixed direction.


Let us
choose as the axis of y a line parallel to this direction, and as the

by any

points

axis of

curve

a;

a line perpendicular to it, in such a


the quadrant xOy (Fig. 15).

way that the

entire

lies in

The points

of the contour C project into a segment ab of the axis


and any line parallel to the axis of y meets the contour C in at
most two points, m^ and m z
Let y v = ^(cc) and ?/2 = 2 (x) be the
equations of the two arcs Am v B and Am z B, respectively, and let

Ox,

tl/

us suppose for simplicity that the points A and B of the curve C


b are taken as two of the vertices of the

which project into a and

* It is
supposed, of course, that the curve under consideration has no double point,
and that the sides of the polygon have been chosen so small that the polygon itself

has no double point.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

188

94

[IV,

The area of the inscribed polygon is equal to the differ


polygon.
ence between the areas of the two polygons formed by the lines A a,
in the two arcs Am 2 B and
ab, bB with the broken lines inscribed

AmiB,

Passing

respectively.

of the curve

to the limit, it is clear that the area

the difference between the two areas

equal to

is

bounded by the contours Am^BbaA and Am^BbaA, respectively, that


is, to the difference between
the corresponding definite in
tegrals
/tb

X6

\l/ z

(x)dx

*J a

These two integrals represent


the curvilinear integral

taken
then

first

along

along

fydx

Am B

and

If

we

Am-^B.

agree to say that the contour


FIG. 15

is

described in the positive

observer standing upon the plane and walking around


the curve in that sense has the enclosed area constantly on his left

sense

when an

hand

(the axes being taken as usual, as in the figure), then the above
may be expressed as follows the area O enclosed by the

result

contour

is

given by the formula

r
(30)
J(C)

where the

line integral is to be taken along the closed contour

in

Since this integral is unaltered when the origin


is moved in any way, the axes remaining parallel to their original
positions, this same formula holds whatever be

the positive sense.

the position of the contour


the coordinate axes.

C with

Let us now consider a contour


whatever.
to

draw a

We

shall suppose that

finite

number

pairs of points on

of

respect to

of any
it is

form

possible

lines

connecting
in such a way that the

resulting subcontours are each met in at most


two points by any line parallel to the y axis.

Such

FIG. 16

the case for the region bounded by the


contour C in Fig. 16, which we may divide into three subregions
bounded by the contours amba, abndcqa, cdpc, by means of the
is

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

95]

189

Applying the preceding formula to each


and
of these subregions
adding the results thus obtained, the line
from
the auxiliary lines ab and cd cancel each
arise
which
integrals
transversals ab and cd.

other,

and the area bounded by the closed curve C

the line integral

is still

fydx taken along the contour

given by

in the positive

sense.
it

Similarly,

may be shown

that this

same area

is

given by the

formula

n=

(31)

and

x dy\

J(C

combining these two formulae, we have

finally,

=- f
2

(32)

xdy

ydx,

J<c

where the integrals are always taken in the positive sense.


formula is evidently independent of the choice of axes.
in the form
If, for instance, an ellipse be given

This

last

x
its

area

a cos

t,

b sin t,

is

fi

2 Jo

"

ab(cos

t -{-

sm 2 f)dt =

Trab.

95. Area of a curve in polar coordinates. Let us try to find the


area enclosed by the contour OAMBO (Fig. 17), which is composed
of the two straight lines OA, OB, and the arc A MB, which is

met

in at

most one

point by any radius


Let us take
vector.

,,-/

as the pole and a


straight line Ox as

the initial line, and


be the
let p =

/(o>)

equation

-^37

of the arc
FIG. 17

A MB.

Inscribing a polygon in the arc A MB, with A and


the vertices, the area to be evaluated is the limit of the
triangles as

OMM
1
-

But the area of the triangle

p(p

Ap) sin

Aw

= Aw

P
I

OMM

as

two of

sum

of such

is

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

190

[IV,

95

It is easy to show that all the


are less than any preassigried number rj
provided that the angles Aw are taken sufficiently small, and that
we may therefore neglect the term cAw in evaluating the limit.

approaches zero with Aw.

where

quantities analogous to

Hence the area sought

is

is

the limit of the

sum 2p 2 Aw/2,

that

is, it

equal to the definite integral

where w t and w 2 are the angles which the straight lines OA and OB
make with the line Ox.
An area bounded by a contour of any form is the algebraic sum
If
of a certain number of areas bounded by curves like the above.
we wish to find the area of a closed contour surrounding the point
0, which is cut in at most two points by any line through 0, for
to 2?r. The area of a con
example, we need only let w vary from
vex closed contour not surrounding O (Fig. 17)

is

equal to the dif

0AM BO

and OANBO, each of which may


be calculated by the preceding method. In any case the area is
represented by the line integral
ference of the two sectors

C in the positive sense. This formula does


For if we pass from
not differ essentially from the previous one.
we
have
to
coordinates
rectangular
polar
taken over the curve

dx

= cos w dp

p cos w,

p sin

w c?w,

x dy

dy

y dx

=p

&m w
sin

>

w dp

+ p cos w c?w,

dta.

AMB

whose equation in oblique


Finally, let us consider an arc
coordinates is y =f(x~). In order to find the area bounded by this
BB which are parallel
arc AMB, the x axis, and the two lines AA
,

imagine a polygon inscribed in the arc AMB, and


let us break up the area of this polygon into small trapezoids by
lines parallel to the y axis. The area of one of these trapezoids is
to the

axis, let us

IV,

IMPROPER AND LINE INTEGRALS

96]

lies in

form

in the

which may be written

(z,--i

#,)/()

Hence the area

the interval (x _ l; x^.


t

191
sin

0,

where

in question is equal

to the definite integral

sin $

and

where x

of the points
It

may

f(ix) dx,

A"

denote the abscissae

A and

B, respectively.

be shown as in the similar

case above that the area

any closed contour C whatever


by the formula

is

given

x dy

bounded by

FIG. 18

y dx.

(O

Given a closed curve C (Fig. 15), let us draw at any point


the portion of the normal which extends toward the exterior,
and let a, ft be the angles which this direction makes with the axes
Note.

of x

and

y,

the angle

ft

respectively, counted
is

obtuse and dx

y dx

from

ds cos

\J (Am^B)

Along

Bm A
z

the angle

in the line integral.

we

shall still

curve

may

have dx

If

ft is

ds cos

Along the arc Am^B


Hence we may write

TT.

ft.

y cos

acute, but

we agree

to

dx

ft

is

ds.

negative along

to consider ds

Hence the area

ft.

Bm A
2

always as positive,
of the closed

be represented by the integral

y cos

ft

ds,

where the angle ft is defined as above, and where ds is essentially


This formula is applicable, as in the previous case, to a
positive.
contour of any form whatever, and it is also obvious that the same
area is given by the formula
x cos a

ds.

These statements are absolutely independent of the choice of axes.


96. Value of the integral

/xdy ydx. It is natural to inquire what will


fxdy ydx, taken over any curve whatever,

be represented by the integral


closed or unclosed.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

192

[TV,

97

example, the two closed curves OAOBO and


which have one and three double points, respec
It is clear that we may replace either of these curves by a combination
tively.
Thus the closed contour OA OBO
of two closed curves without double points.
is equivalent to a combination of the
two contours 0-40 and OBO. The
integral taken over the whole contour

Let

us

for

consider,

ApBqCrAsBtCuA

(Fig. 19)

is

equal to the area of the portion


less the area of the portion
Likewise, the other contour

0.40
OBO.

may

be replaced by the two closed

curves
tour

is

equal to the

sum

ApBqCrA and AsBtCuA, and

the integral taken over the whole con


of the areas of ApBsA, BtCqB, and ArCuA, plus twice

the area of the portion AsBqCuA. This reasoning is, moreover, general. Any
closed contour with any number of double points determines a certain number
of partial areas
2
p of each of which it forms all the boundaries.
<r

<TI,

The

integral taken over the

<r

whole contour

is

equal to a

sum

of the

form

2
p are positive or negative integers which may be found by
Given two adjacent areas
the following rule
separated by an arc ab of the
contour C, imagine an observer walking on the plane along the contour in the sense

where mi,

<r

<r,

determined by the arrows ; then the coefficient of the area at his left is one greater
than that of the area at his right. Giving the area outside the contour the coeffi
cient zero, the coefficients of all the other portions may be determined successively.
If the

joining

AB

is not closed, we may transform it into a closed curve by


given arc
extremities to the origin, and the preceding formula is applicable to
ydx taken over the radii vectores OA
region, for the integral fxdy

its

this

new

and

OB
V.

evidently vanishes.

FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY DEFINITE INTEGRALS

We

97. Differentiation under the integral sign.


frequently have to
deal with integrals in which the function tcr43e integrated depends
not only upon the variable of integration but also upon one or more

we consider as parameters. Let f(x, a) be a


continuous function of the two variables x and a when x varies from
other variables which

to

and a varies between certain limits


and a^ We proceed
a which is defined by the

to study the function of the variable


definite integral
>,r

Cf(x,a)dx,
Jxn

where a is supposed to have a definite value between a and a lf and


where the limits x and X are independent of a.

IV,

FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY INTEGRALS

97]

We

have then

(33)

F(a

Aa)

- F(a) =

+ Aa) -f(x,

[/(*, a

193

a)] dx.

JjT

is continuous, this integrand may be made


than any preassigned number c by taking Aa sufficiently small.
x in absolute
Hence the increment AF(a) will be less than e\X
value, which shows that the function F(a) is continuous.
If the function f(x, a) has a derivative with respect to a, let us

Since the function f(x, a)

less

write
f(x,

where
Aa, we

and

if

Aa)

- f(x,

a)

approaches zero with Aa.

= Aa [/. (x,

e]

Dividing both sides of (33) by

find

-q

be the upper limit of the absolute values of

value of the last integral will be less than ri\X


the limit, we obtain the formula

c,

the absolute

\.

Passing to

(34)

da

In order to render the above reasoning perfectly rigorous we must


it is possible to choose Aa so small that the quantity c
will be less than any preassigned number rj for all values of x between

show that

the given limits x and X. This condition will certainly be satisfied


For we have from
if the derivative
a (x, a) itself is continuous.
the law of the mean

f(x,

Aa) -f(x, a) = Aa/, (x, a

0Aa),

<

<

1,

and hence

If the function
for

fa

is

continuous, this difference e will be less than 77


a, provided that Aa is less than a properly

any values of x and

chosen positive number h (see Chapter VI,


120).
Let us now suppose that the limits X and x are themselves func
ti

denote the increments which correspond


to an increment Aa, we shall have
tions of a.

If A.Y

and

Aa:

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

194

F(a

+ Aa)- F(a) = f
Jx

\_f(x,

Jx
rx

/(a,

a + Aa) dx

f(x,

a+

first law of the mean


two integrals and dividing by Aa,

applying the

F(a

4-

A
F() _ C /(x, a

Aa)

Aa

-f(x, a)

Jx

last

for integrals to each of the

4- Aa-)

f(x, a)

Aa

J,

AT

-^/(^o + ^A^,
As

97

f*X+&X
/

or,

A,r)

[IV,

nr

Aa).

Aa- approaches zero the first of these integrals approaches the


we find the formula

limit found above, and passing to the limit

^=

(35)

which

is

the general formula for differentiation under the integral

sign.

be reduced to a sum of ordinary


evident that the preceding formula may be
extended to line integrals. Let us consider, for instance, the line
Since a line integral

definite integrals,

may always

it is

integral

F(a)
taken over a curve

we

shall

f
JAB
I

AB

P(x,

which

y,

is

a} dx

Q(x, y, a) dy

independent of

a.

It is

evident that

have

F\a)
where the integral

JAB
is to

P a (x,

y,

a)dx

Q a (x,

y,

be extended over the same curve.

On

the

other hand, the reasoning presupposes that the limits are finite and
that the function to be integrated does not become infinite between

We shall take up later (Chapter VIII,


the limits of integration.
in
the
which
these conditions are not satisfied.
cases
175)

IV,

FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY INTEGRALS

98]

195

to evaluate certain definite


(35) is frequently used
are more easily calcu
which
others
them
to
reducing
integrals by

The formula

lated.

Thus,

if

we have

is positive,

va

Jo

arc tan

whence, applying the formula (34) n

<-i

all

p.
vo

1 times,

we

find

r -.i:t...<.-i>r
Jo 7S
(^

98. Examples of discontinuity. If the conditions imposed are not satisfied for
values between the limits of integration, it may happen that the definite inte

Let us consider, for

gral defines a discontinuous function of the parameter.


example, the definite integral

f
J_
This integral always has a

imaginary except when

Hence the

making

l-2xcosa +

x2

the roots of the denominator are

which case

it is

evident that F(a) = 0. Sup


= cos a + t sin a, the indefi

the substitution x

a dx - = f dt =
a + x 2 J 1 + t2
I

arc tan

t.

2x cos

definite integral

F(a) has the value


cos

a\

(1 sin

where the angles are

*<***

kit, in

/sin
1

finite value, for

a=

and
posing that sin a ^
nite integral becomes

to be taken

cos

sin

arc tan

sin

a\

n/2 and x/2.

between

a
x

cos

cos

sin

But

-a = -1,

In order to determine the


difference of these angles is
n/2.
notice that the sign of the integral is the same as
Hence F(a) =
n/2 according as sin a is positive or negative.
It follows that the function F(a) is discontinuous for all values of a of the form

and hence the


sign uniquely
that of sin a.

kit.

we need only

This result does not contradict the above reasoning in the

least,

however.

e to + e, for example,
1 to + 1 and a varies from
For when x varies from
the function under the integral sign assumes an indeterminate form for the sets
of values a = 0, x = - 1 and a = 0, x = + 1 which belong to the region in ques

any value of e.
would be easy to give numerous examples

tion for
It

the integral

-4-

a:

sin

Ux
f

mx

of this nature.

dx.

Again, consider

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

196
Making the

mx =

substitution

to be

99

find

mx

sin

X
where the sign

we

y,

[IV,

taken

the sign of m, since the limits of the transformed


is positive, but should
integral are the same as those of the given integral if
be interchanged if
is negative.
have seen that the integral in the second
is

We

member is a positive number ( 91). Hence the given integral is equal to


is positive or negative.
If m = 0, the value of the
according as
integral
zero.
It is evident that the integral is discontinuous for
= 0.

N
is

VI.

APPROXIMATE EVALUATION OF DEFINITE INTEGRALS


When

99. Introduction.

resort to certain

no primitive of f(x)

is

known we may

methods

for finding an approximate value of the


definite integral
The theorem of the mean for integrals
f*f(x) dx.
furnishes two limits between which the value of the
integral must

and by a similar process we may obtain an infinite number of


Let us suppose that $(x) <f(x)
ty(x) for all values of x
between a and b (a
Then we shall also have
b).
lie,

others.

<

<

s*b

s*t>

I
<j>(x}dx<
<J

If the functions
<(#)

and

Ja

Let us consider, for example, the integral

lie.

dx

Vl-a; 4

Now Vl-z = Vl - x Vl + x\
between 1 and V2 for all values
4

Jo
is,

and the factor

between Tr/2

r
dx
Vl-cc
V2Jo Vl x
and 7r/(2V2). Two even closer
i

(1

z 2 )-

which results from the expansion of

/2

is

(1 -f 7/)-

greater
1/2

with a remainder carried to two terms.


greater than the expression

dx

lies

two integrals

series
is

z2

and unity.

dx

be found by noticing that

Vl +

of x between zero

integral lies between the

r
that

c/a

the derivatives of two known


two limits between which the value of

"Jo

Hence the given

^(a;) are

functions, this formula gives

the integral must

/-i

I f(x)dx<

x 2 dx

limits

than

may
x 2/2,

by means of Taylor

Hence the

integral

APPROXIMATE EVALUATION

y]

IV,

The second
lies

of these integrals has the value Tr/4

197
(

105)

hence /

between Tr/2 and 3 7r/8.

It is evident that the preceding methods merely lead to a rough


In order to obtain closer
idea of the exact value of the integral.

approximations we may break up the interval (a, 6) into smaller


subintervals, to each of which the theorem of the mean for inte
grals

may be

applied.

For definiteness

let

us suppose that the

Let
function /(a:) constantly increases as x increases from a to b.
a
us divide the interval (a, b~) into n equal parts (b
nh). Then,
lies between the
by the very definition of an integral,

^f(x}dx

two sums

= h\f(a)
S = h\f(a +
s

h)

+f(a +

+/(a +

-f

2A)

nh)\.

If we take (S + s)/2 as an approximate value of the integral, the


The
error cannot exceed S-s\/2= [(i - ) /2 n] [/(i) -/(a)]
form
in
the
written
be
value of (S + s)/2 may
.

(/(a)

+ /O

/[a

(ro

- 1) A] +f(a + nh)
2

Observing that \f(a


ih)
the trapezoid whose height

+/[a +

(i

+1) h~\\h/2

is

the area of

h and whose bases are /(a + ih) and


the whole method amounts to
that
we
ih
+
may say
f(a +
7t),
curve
under
the
the
area
y = f(x) between two neighbor
replacing
is

ing ordinates by the area of the trapezoid whose bases are the two
This method is quite practical when a high degree of

ordinates.

approximation is not necessary.


Let us consider, for example, the integral

dx

/
C/O

Taking n

= 4, we

and the error


mate value of
*

Found from

value being

rr/4.

find as the

is less
TT

than 1/16

which

is

the formula \S

TRANS.

approximate value of the integral

.0625.*

This gives an approxi


3.1311

correct to one decimal place,

s\/2.

In fact, the error

is

about

.00260, the exact

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

198

[IV,

100

If the function f(x) does not increase (or decrease) constantly as


x increases from a to b, we may break up the interval into sub-

intervals for each of

which that condition

is satisfied.

Another method of obtaining an approximate


is the following.
Let us determine

100. Interpolation.

value of the integral f f(x)dx


a parabolic curve of order n,

<(z)

a-iX

1-

a n xn

which passes through (n -f- 1) points B B l}


Bn of the curve
y =f(x) between the two points whose abscissae are a and b.
These points having been chosen in any manner, an approximate
,

value of the given integral

which is easily calculated.


Let (x T/O), (#!, 7/i),

points

BQ

B!,

Z/o

<(*)

where the

(x n

f
<j>(x}dx,

be the coordinates of the (n

?/)

The polynomial

furnished by the integral

is

-f

coefficient of

x _ (^ - XEQ)
(Xo)

ijt

A*!

is

-\

i/i

Xf

\-y n

-\

Xn

a polynomial of degree n,

(x-x

~ Xi(*i

}(x- x

l)

(X

(x

-*<+!)

- ay)
- Xn)

(*<

=x

which vanishes for the given values x x,


x n except for x
x
and which is equal to unity when x
Hence we have
,

U
/
a

The numbers x
x

-f

a),

a?!

-f-

$i(&

If

#(&

<

<

<

(b

(36)

where

is

KI

we

f,

are of the form

(b

6t
6H 5 1.
Setting x = a + (b
proximate value of the given integral takes the form

where

+1)

determined by

is
<f)(x)

interpolation formula in the form

Lagrange

Bn

<

a)

(A"

+ K\y\

a)

t,

the ap

A .y,,),

given by the formula


dt

"^^

77

divide the main interval

ratios are the

the numbers

(a, b) into subintervals whose


same constants for any given function /(x) whatever,
dn and hence also the numbers K are inde
U
,

pendent of f(x).

Having calculated these

{ ,

coefficients once for all,

IV,

it

APPROXIMATE EVALUATION

101]

only remains to replace y

in the

yi,

yn by their respective values

formula

(36).
If the curve f(x)

it is

whose area

is

to be evaluated is given graph


(a, 6) into equal parts,

convenient to divide the interval

ically, it is

and

199

only necessary to measure certain equidistant ordinates of


= 0,
Thus, dividing it into halves, we should take

this curve.

= 1, which gives the following formula


61 = 1/2,
2
mate value of the integral

for the approxi

Likewise, for n
1

I =

Q-

=3

we

and for n

4yi

y2 )

formula

find the

C /0

u/o

+ 3#! +

3// 2

7/s)

(7z/o

~9o

Ir

The preceding method


due

to

is

due

to Cotes.

The following method,

Let the interval

slightly different.

is

Simpson,

(a,

b~)

be

divided into 2n equal parts, and let y y 1} ?/ 2


y2n be the ordi
nates of the corresponding points of division.
Applying Cotes
formula to the area which lies between two ordinates whose indices
,

are consecutive even numbers, such as y and y 2

whence, upon simplification,


1

101.

= -- [2/0 +

we

find

Simpson

+ 2(y +
2

2/2

and y t
form

?/ 2

find an approximate value of the given area, in the

formula

---- -f
y, H

?/2n

etc.,

we

_ 2)

In Gauss method other values are assigned


The argument is as follows: Suppose that we

Gauss method.

the quantities

#,.

can find polynomials of increasing degree which differ less and less

from the given integrand


for instance, that

/(*)

we can

a,x

where the remainder

in the interval
(a, &).

f(x~)

Suppose,

write

a 2 x*

R 2H (x~)

is

+
less

a^ X

2n

~l

+ 7?

2n

(x)

than a fixed number

for all

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

200

b* The
unknown, but they do not occur

values of x between a and

coefficients a, will be in

eral

in the calculation, as

Let x

see.

x 1}

x n _ be values of x between a and

-,

101

[IV,

we

and

b,

gen
shall
let

1 which assumes the same


be a polynomial of degree n
Then Lagrange s inter
values as does /(ce) for these values of x.
<(ce)

polation formula shows that this polynomial

may

be written in the

form

where
<f

and

are at

ty k

most polynomials of degree n

I.

It is

clear that the polynomial


m (x) depends only upon the choice of
x n-i- O n th e other hand, this polynomial <,(#) must
x x
<f>

o>

i>

">

x = xa _
assume the same values as does x m for x = x x = x l}
For, supposing that all the a s except a m and also R^(x) vanish,
m
reduces to a m $ in (x).
Hence the
f(x) reduces to a m x and
m
difference x
m (x) must be divisible by the product
,

</>(a:)

<f>

Pn (x) =
It follows that a

"

(x

The

made

error

m (x)=

n, if ra

in

- a^).

(x

a-i)

Pn Q m _ n (x~), where Q m _ n (x) is a poly


n and that x m
if m
n 1.
m (x) =
dx
dx
is
by Ja (x~)
replacing f f(x~)
evidently
<f>

nomial of degree

- XQ) (x -

<

>

<J>

<f>

given by the formula

^Mr
*"
j"

VH

7?

4
i=0

2,i

(
(

The terms which depend upon

xY i)\

1
1

^o

x
*i (x
\

\b

the coefficients

a1

-,

a n _ vanish
l

identically, and hence the error depends only, upon the coefficients
an +
a -2n-\ an(l the remainder R 2n (x ). But this remain
der is very small, in general, with respect to the coefficients
a n o-n +
a.2n _
Hence the chances are good for obtaining a
<*>

">

i>

1 ,

high degree of approximation if we can dispose of the quantities


x x lt
x n _ l in such a way that the terms which depend upon
,
,

a
>

an +

i>

>

a 2n-i a ^ so vanish

necessary and
s*b
/

Ja

identically.

sufficient that the

Jo.

this

purpose

it is

nb

f*\>

P n Q u dx,

For

n integrals

P^.dx,

-,

fc/a

* This is a
property of any function which is continuous in the interval
according to a theorem due to Weierstrass (see Chapter IX,
199).

(a,

IV,

APPROXIMATE EVALUATION

102]

should vanish, where Q


already seen
the form

a polynomial of degree

is

88) that this condition

[<*-)

**.-;

We may

Pn =

0,

and these

assume that a

satisfied if

is

i.

we

We
take

have

Pn

of

<*-*)]-

take for x

It is therefore sufficient to

the equation

201

x i}

x n _ the n roots of
and b.
l

roots all lie between a

and

1,

since all other cases

be reduced to this by the substitution x = (b + ) /2 + 2 (b


a) /2.
In the special case the values of x x lf
_! are the roots of
-,

may

The values of these roots and the


polynomial Xn
values of K for the formula (36), up to n = 5, are to be found to
seven and eight places of decimals in Bertrand s Traite de Calcul
Legendre

integral (p. 342).


Thus the error in Gauss

method

C R*(x)dx

is

-"j^R^x,)

Jo,

*,

*^ a

where the functions ^ (x) are independent of the given integrand.


In order to obtain a limit of error it is sufficient to find a limit of
R^(x), that is, to know the degree of approximation with which
{

the function f(x) can be represented as a polynomial of degree


2n
1 in the interval (a, &).
But it is not necessary to know
this

polynomial

itself.

Another process for obtaining an approximate numerical value of


a given definite integral is to develop the function f(x) in series and
integrate the series term by term. We shall see later (Chapter VIII)
under what conditions this process is justifiable and the degree of
approximation which it gives.
102. Amsler s planimeter. A great many machines have been invented to
measure mechanically the area bounded by a closed plane curve.* One of the
most ingenious of these is Amsler s planimeter, whose theory affords an interest

ing application of line integrals.


Let us consider the areas AI and A* bounded by the curves described by two
points AI and A 2 of a rigid straight line which moves in a plane in any manner
arid finally returns to its original position.

A,

dinates of the points AI and


lar axes.
Let I be the distance

Let

(xi, 2/1)

and

(x 2 ,

y 2 ) be the coor

respectively, with respect to a set of rectangu

AiA 2

and

the angle which

A\A Z

makes with

description of these instruments is to be found in a work by Abdankla courbe integrate et ses applications (Gauthier-

Abakanowicx: Les integraphes,


Villars, 1886).

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

2U2

In order to define the motion of the line analytically,

the positive x axis.

102

[IV,

i, j/i,

and 6 must be supposed to be periodic functions of a certain variable parameter t


which resume the same values when t is increased by T. We have x 2 = %i + I cos 6,
= V\ + I si n an(l hence
2/2

+ PdO

yidx\

sintfdxi

I(cos0dyi

areas AI and A 2 of the curves described by the points A\ and


general conventions made above ( 96), have the following values

Az

The

AI

xidyi

A2

yidxi,

1
- r x 2 dy 2

we

Hence, integrating each side of the equation just found,


A2

AI -f

- CdO + -

fcos6dyi

y z dx 2

under the

obtain the equation

- s m0dx + f (xicosfl +
l

yis\n0)d0\

of the integrals correspond to the values t and t Q + T


is an integer which
evident that fd8 = 2Kn, where
On the other hand,
in which the straight line moves.

where the limits of each


of the variable

t.

the

It is

way

depends upon
integration by parts leads to the formulae
/

Xi cos 6 d0

f yi
But

Xi sin

01

y\ cos

sin

dx\

cos 9 dyi

have the same values for t


be written in the form

and y\ cos

tQ

and

to

T.

Heuce

may

the preceding equation

A2

d0

sin

Xi sin

AI

+ Knl2 +

CcosOdyi

si

Now let s be the length of the arc described by A i counted positive In a certain
sense from any fixed point as origin, and let a be the angle which the positive
Then we shall have
direction of the tangent makes with the positive x axis.
cos

where

sin 6 dxi

dyi

V is the angle

positive direction

(sin

cos

sin

which the positive direction

A^A Z

cos a) ds

sin

V da

makes with the


The

of the tangent

of the straight line taken as in Trigonometry.

preceding equation, therefore, takes the form


A2

(38)

AI

+ Kxt2 + ifsinVds.

Similarly, the area of the curve described by


line is given by the formula

A3

(39)

A!

Kl

any third point

of the straight

+ fsiuVds,
I

where I is the distance AiA &


Eliminating the unknown quantity fsinVds
between these two equations, we find the formula
.

Aj

IA

(*

1)

AI

+ Kxll\l - Hi

IV,

APPROXIMATE EVALUATION

102]

which may be written


A! (23)

(40)

where

(ik)

in the

203

form

Ao (31 )

+ K* (12) (23) (31) =

A 3 (12)

denotes the distance between the points Ai and

taken with

its

A\A<L

Ak

(i,

of length (a

application of this formula, let us consider


2 describe the
6), whose extremities A\ and

same closed convex curve C. The point A 3 which divides the line
ments of length a and 6, describes a closed curve
which lies wholly

into seg

C"

inside C.

we have

In this case
A2

1, 2, 8)

As an

proper sign.

a straight line

Ai,

(12)

whence, dividing by a

=-

(23)

b,

6,

A3

AI

(31)

6,

=-

a,

K=

rtab.

But AI
Hence this area is
AS is the area between the two curves C and C
independent of the form of the curve C. This theorem is due to Holditch.
If, Instead of eliminating JsinFds between the equations (38) and (39), we
eliminate AI, we find the formula
.

A3

(41)

Amsler

+ Kx(V* -

A2

2
)

planimeter affords an application

(I

l)CsinVds.

of this formula.

Let

AiA 2 A s

be a

The point being fixed, the point


2 with another rod (L4 2
rigid rod joined at
3 to which is attached a sharp pointer, is made to describe the curve whose area

The point A% then


sought.
describes an arc of a circle or
is

an entire circumference, accord


ing to the nature of the motion.
In any case the quantities A 2
,

I,

are

all

-K",

known, and the area

AS can be calculated

if

which

the in

to be
taken over the curve C\ described
by the point A\, can be evaluated.
This end A\ carries a graduated
tegral Jsin Vds,

is

f\ **

FIG. 20

circular cylinder whose axis coin


cides with the axis of the rod

AiA 3 and which can turn about this axis.


Let us consider a small displacement of the rod which carries AiA 2 A 3 into
the position AiA ^Az.
Let Q be the intersection of these straight lines. About
Q

along

its

draw the

Ai a and drop the perpendicular A{P from


imagine the motion of the rod to consist of a sliding
own direction until AI comes to or, followed by a rotation about Q which

as center

AI upon

AiA 2

circular arc

We may

In the first part of this process the cylinder would slide, with
brings a to A{.
out turning, along one of its generators.
In the second part the rotation of
the cylinder is measured by the arc aA{.
The two ratios aA\/A{P and

A{P/axcAiA{ approach
zero.

Hence ccA{

and sinF, respectively, as the arc A[A\ approaches


+ e), where e approaches zero with As. It follows

As (sinF

that the total rotation of the cylinder


SAs(sinF + e), that is, to the integral
this rotation is sufficient for the

is

proportional to the limit of the sum


Hence the measurement of

JsinFds.

determination of the given area.

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

204

[IV, Exs.

EXERCISES
1. Show that the sum 1/n + l/(n + !) +
+ l/2n approaches log 2 as n
increases indefinitely.
l
[Show that this sum approaches the definite integral fQ [1/(1 + x)]dx as its

limit.]
2.

As

in the

preceding exercise, find the limits of each of the sums

n2 +

-5-

n2 +

..-

n2

(n

I)

Vn2 - 1

Vn2 -

by connecting them with certain


the

22

Vn* -

22

(n

I)

In general, the limit of

definite integrals.

sum

as n becomes infinite, is equal to a certain definite integral whenever


1 in i and n.
a homogeneous function of degree

Show

3.

"

that

the

value

of

the

definite

integral

/2

<f>(i,

n)

log sin x dx

-(jr/2)log2.
[This

may

be proved by starting with the


.

sm

it

2*

or else

(n

sm

sin

trigonometric formula

\)it
^

known

2"-

by use of the following almost self-evident

equalities

JT

/I,

log sin x dx

By

log cos x dx

/o

4.

fy.

/sin2x\

log
/

_.

dx. ]

the aid of the preceding example evaluate the definite integral

tan x dx

2/
5.

Show

that the value of the definite integral


,1

/
Jo

is

x2

(jr/8)log2.

[Set x
6*.

tan

<p

and break up the transformed

integral into three parts.]

Evaluate the definite integral


/ITT
I
Jo

log (1

2a

cos x

+ a2

dx

[POISSOK.]

is

is

EXERCISES

IV, Exs.]

205

[Dividing the interval from to it into n equal parts and applying a well-known
formula of trigonometry, we are led to seek the limit of the expression

ra

?r

-log
n
La

2n_!

n becomes

as

a2

>

1, it is 7t

Show

1.

If

infinite.

log

a2

between

lies

Compare

and

1,

this limit is zero.

If

140.]

that the value of the definite integral

sinxdx

/ Vl

2or cos

J/o
o
where a

is

positive, is 2

Show

15*.

if

<

1,

and

is

2/a

if

+ a2
a

>

1.

that a necessary and sufficient condition that /(x) should be inte-

grable in an interval (a, b) is that, corresponding to any preassigned


a subdivision of the interval can be found such that the difference S

corresponding sums
Let/(x) and

S and

than

s is less

number

e,

the

s of

e.

be two functions which are continuous in the interval (a, 6),


be a method of subdivision of that interval.
If ,, 77.
are any two values of x in the interval (x,-_i, x,-), the sum 2/(,-) (?;,) (x,
x,-_i)
dx as its limit.
approaches the definite integral f^f(x)
9.

and

<j>(x)

let (a, Xi, Xj,

b)

<f>

<t>(x)

10. Let/(x) be a function which is continuous and positive in the interval (a,
that the product of the two definite integrals

b).

Show

/>*
is

minimum when

Xi.

where
c

is

a constant.

Let the symbol I* denote the index of a function


Show that the following formula holds:
1

11.

and

the function

f/l>

=+

if

and

if

/(x

/(x )
[Apply the last

tions /(x)

and

>

and

/(Xi)

<

0, e

=-1

if

f(x

/(Xi) have the same sign.


formula in the second paragraph of

<

77)

and

between

f(xi)

>

0,

and

77 to each of the func

l//(x).]

12*. Let U and V be two polynomials of degree n and n


1, respectively,
which are prime to each other. Show that the index of the rational fraction
V/U between the limits oo and -f oo is equal to the difference between the
number of imaginary roots of the equation U + iV = in which the coefficient
of i is positive and the number in which the coefficient of i is negative.

[HERMITE, Bulletin de

la Socidte

13*. Derive the second theorem of the


parts.

matMmatique, Vol. VII,

mean

for integrals

p. 128.]

by integration by

DEFINITE INTEGRALS

206
[Let/(x) and
b) and the

be two functions each of which

<f>(x)

[IV, Exs.

is

continuous in the inter

which, /(x), constantly increases (or decreases) and


has a continuous derivative.
Introducing the auxiliary function

val (a,

first of

*(z)

and integrating by

parts,

f /(x)

va
Since /

we

=
Ja

f*<t>(x)dx

find the equation

= f(b) *(&) - f /
va

dx
</>(x)

always has the same sign,

(x)

of the

mean

14.

Show

for integrals to the

new

it

(x)

*(x) dx

only remains to apply the

first

theorem

integral.]

directly that the definite integral

ydx extended over a

fxdy

closed contour goes over into an integral of the same form when the axes are
replaced by any other set of rectangular axes which have the same aspect.
15.

Given the formula


/**

cos Xx dx

Ja

(sin

\b

sin Xa) ,

evaluate the integrals


/^fc

/ift

x 2P + 1 sinXxdx,

i
<J

x 2^cosXxdx.

Jn

Let us associate the points (x, y) and (x y ) upon any two given curves
The point whose
respectively, at which the tangents are parallel.
coordinates are x\ = px + qx yi = py + qy where p and q are given constants,
describes a new curve C\.
Show that the following relation holds between the
16.

and

C",

corresponding arcs of the three curves


Si

17.

Show

ps

qs

that corresponding arcs of the

tf(t)

- f(t)

+t

(t),

two curves
x

=V

(t)

have the same length whatever be the functions /(f) and

From

a point
of a plane let us
n given curves Ci, C*2,
Cn which lie
distance
The locus of the points
= holds between the n
In)
F(li, k)
18.

MP

- f(t)

-*

()

<f>(t).

draw the normals -MPi,


in the same plane, and

MPn

to

k be the
M, for which a relation of the form
distances
is a curve T.
If lengths
let

Z,-,

proportional to cF/dli be laid off upon the lines MP^ respectively, according to
a definite convention as to sign, show that the resultant of these n vectors gives
the direction of the normal to F at the point M. Generalize the theorem for
surfaces in space.

that the

C be any closed curve, and let us select two points p and p upon the
C at a point TO, on either side of TO, making mp = mp
Supposing
distance mp varies according to any arbitrary law as TO describes the

curve

show that

19.

Let

tangent to

(7,

the points p and p describe curves of equal area.


mp is constant.

the special case where

Discuss

EXERCISES

IV, Exs.]

207

any closed convex curve, let us draw a parallel curve by laying oft
I upon the normals to the
Show that the area
given curve.
between the two curves is equal to
it I2 + s, where s is the
length of the given
20. Given

a constant length
curve.

21. Let C be any closed curve.


Show that the locus of the points A, for
which the corresponding pedal has a constant area, is a circle whose center is
fixed.

[Take the equation of the curve

x cos

form

in the tangential

= /().]

y sin t

22. Let C be any closed curve, C\ its pedal with respect to a point A, and C 2
the locus of the foot of a perpendicular let fall from
upon a normal to C.
Show that the areas of these three curves satisfy the relation A = AI
A2

and u are the polar coordinates of a point


on d, the coordinates of the corresponding point of C2 are p and u + n/2, and
2
those of the corresponding point of C are r = Vp 2 +
and = w + arc tan p /p.]
[By a property of the pedal

36),

if

p"

23. If a curve
is

rigidly

Show

<p

without slipping on a straight line, every point A which


C describes a curve which is called a roulette.

rolls

connected to the curve

that the area between an arc of the roulette and

its

base

is

twice the area

of the corresponding portion of the pedal of the point


with respect to C. Also
show that the length of an arc of the roulette is equal to the length of the corre

sponding arc of the pedal.

ro

[SXEINEK.]

and
be the coordi
[In order to prove these theorems analytically, let
nates of the point
with respect to a moving system of axes formed of the

OM

on C. Let s be the length of the arc


tangent and normal at a point
counted from a fixed point
on C, and let w be the angle between the tangents
at
and M. First establish the formulae

and then deduce the theorems from them.]


24*.

The error made

in

Gauss method of quadrature may be expressed in

the form

/(2n
1

where

lies

between

>()

2n

2
1

2n +

and +1.

Ll

1.2..3...
.

2
,,

(2n

71

.-,

-ft

1)J
100

.,

[MANSION, Comptes renews, 1886.]

CHAPTER V
INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

We

shall review in this chapter the general classes of elemen


functions
whose integrals can be expressed in terms of ele
tary
functions.
Under the term elementary functions we shall
mentary
include the rational and irrational algebraic functions, the exponen
tial

function and the logarithm, the trigonometric functions and


and all those functions which can be formed by a

their inverses,
finite

number

When

of combinations of those already named.

the

indefinite integral of a function f(x) cannot be expressed in terms


of these functions, it constitutes a new transcendental function.

The study
is

of these transcendental functions

and

their classification

one of the most important problems of the Integral Calculus.

I.

INTEGRATION OF RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

103. General method.

Every rational function

/(a:) is

an integral function E(x) and a rational fraction


P(x) is prime to and of less degree than Q(#).

imaginary roots of the equation


be decomposed into a
other of the two types
tion

may

A
1

(cc-a)"

The

fractions of the

Q(x~)

sum

sum

the

of

where
P(x~)/Q(x"),
If the real and

be known, the rational frac

of simple fractions of one or the

MX + N
- a) +
[(x
2

/3

type correspond to the real roots, those


of the second type to pairs of imaginary roots.
The integral of
the integral function E(x) can be written down at once.
The inte
first

grals of the fractions of the first type are given

Adx
(x-a)
A dx
x

by the formulae

A
>

(m-l)(a;-a)

=A

log (x

a),

if

m=

For the sake of simplicity we have omitted the arbitrary constant C,


which belongs on the right-hand side. It merely remains to examine
208

V,

RATIONAL FLECTIONS

103]

209

the simple fractions which arise from pairs of imaginary roots.


In order to simplify the corresponding integrals, let us make the
substitution

The

-\-

dx

fit,

ftdt.

integral in question then becomes

MX +

[(x

a)*

L-

CMa + N+MQt

0*- J

and there remain two kinds of integrals

J
Since tdt
grals

is

tdt

is

given,

(i

>

1,

dt
(i

+
+

a
)"

_ __
t

the

first

of these inte

by the formula
i

1,

/?

by the formula
tdt

The only

half the differential of 1


if

J
or, if

tat

(1+

integrals

which remain are those

of the type

dt

J
If

= 1,

the value of this integral


dt
1

If

is

arc tan

is

x
arc tan

t*

greater than unity, the calculation of the integral

may

be

reduced to the calculation of an integral of the same form, in which


the exponent of (1 -f- 2 ) is decreased by unity.
Denoting the inte
gral in question

by /, we may write
1

-j-

~7T

/i (1
From

5T~ dt
t
)"

= r
I

the last of these integrals, taking

tdt

<

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

210

__ __

and integrating by

t*dt

we

parts,

103

formula

find the

dt

2(-l)J

2(n-l)(l+<V-

(i+O"~

[v,

Substituting this value in the equation for 7n that equation becomes


,

2n
o
2n

3
O *n-l
2

t
I

-!)(! +

2 (n

2
)"~

Repeated applications of this formula finally lead to the integral


arc tan t.
Retracing our steps, we find the formula

(2n

where

72

()

3) (2n

5)

which

a rational function of

is

We will merely
the numerator

observe that the denominator

easily calculated.
2
1
and that
(1

is

is

)"~

of degree less than 2n


2 (see
97, p. 192).
It follows that the integral of a rational function consists of
is

terms which are themselves rational, and transcendental terms of


one of the following forms
:

log (SB

log [(x

a),

a)

arc tan

/8 ],

y _
-

f-f

Let us consider, for example, the integral /[l/(# 4


The
1)] dx.
denominator has two real roots -f 1 and
and
two
1,
imaginary
roots

+i

and

We may

i.

1
x*

~
1

therefore write

x-l

Cx

7)

In order to determine A, multiply both sides by x


1 and then set
x = 1. This gives A = 1/4, and similarly B =
The iden
1/4.
assumed
written
in
form
therefore
be
the
tity
may
r.r

or,

+D

simplifying the left-hand side,

D
~_ Cx + 2

-1
It follows that

C=

2(1 + x
and 7) =

1
T"

*^

1/2, and

we

\
-Ly
"I

!/

.^ / V
Trl*^

^^ 11/

*/

1-.-

(x

1\

( nr*
\

which gives
rfa;

have, finally,

1
A / ~t
V
t

-L

\
1^

^
/

V,

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

104]

211

The preceding method, though absolutely general, is not


The work may often be shortened by using
the
simplest.
always
device.
Let
us consider, for example, the integral
a suitable
Note.

dx

1)"

If

>

1,

we may

either break

tions byliieans of the roots


formula similar to that for

make

the substitution x

up the integrand into partial frac


and
1, or we may use a reduction
But the most elegant method is to
which gives
)/(!
2),

+1
/.

(1 -f

4*

dx

(I-*)

(!-*)

/7
(*

=
1)-

2dz

/"*

/1

~\2

rf*

"

4"-

2n
2
by the binomial theorem, it only remains
Developing (1
z)
to integrate terms of the form Az* where \L may be positive or
t

negative.
104. Hermite s method.

We

have heretofore supposed that the

fraction to be integrated was broken up into partial fractions, which


presumes a knowledge of the roots of the denominator. The fol

lowing method, due to Hermite, enables us to find the algebraic


part of the integral without knowing these roots, and it involves
only elementary operations, that

is

to say, additions, multiplications,

and divisions of polynomials.


Let f(x)/F(x) be the rational fraction which is to be integrated.
We may assume that f(x) and F(x) are prime to each other, and

we may

suppose, according to the theory of equal roots, that the


polynomial F(x) is written in the form

X l} A 2
A ^ are polynomials none of which have multiple
and no two of which have any common factor. We may now
break up the given fraction into partial fractions whose denomina
X pp
tors are X lt X\,
where

roots

X*

X\
where
est

^4, is

common

a polynomial prime to X
For, by the theory of high
divisor, if X and Y are any two polynomials which are
t

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

212
prime

and

to each other,

nomials

that

BX + AY= Z.
X = X Y = X\ Xpp and Z =/(*).
lt

Then

this identity

+ AX\--.Xl=f(x),

BXi
or,

104

any third polynomial, two other poly

A and B may always be found such

Let us set
becomes

[v,

dividing by F(x),

from the preceding identity that if f(x) is prime to


X*.
prime to X 1 and B is prime to X\
F(x~),
Kepeating the
the
fraction
process upon
It also follows

is

B
and so on, we

finally reach the

It is therefore sufficient to

form given above.

show how

to obtain the rational part

of an integral of the form

/A

dx

~"

where

is
<(.x)

a polynomial which

prime to

is

by the theorem mentioned above,


and C such that

we can

derivative. Then,
two polynomials B

its

find

and hence the preceding integral may be written

f A_dx_ C
J
~J

B<}>+

4>*

If

is

in the

form

C $dx
fBdx
r
1+
~~J
J

T(V

#>"-

greater than unity, taking

u=C,
and integrating by

parts,

C c 4Sdx =
J
4?

we

get

(n-\}r~

C C

n-lj

fi-"

whence, substituting in the preceding equation, we find the formula

C A dx

~( W

-1)^"-

C A^dx
1+ J -&=*

V,

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

104]

where A!

is

2, we may apply the same


the process may always be
in the denominator is equal to

a new polynomial.

process to the

new

If n
and so on

integral,

213

>

continued until the exponent of


and we shall then have an expression of the form
<

one,

A dx

*(*>

where R(x)

C \Ldx

a rational function of x, and ^ is a polynomial whose


but which
may always suppose to be less than that of
is

degree we
is not necessarily prime to
To integrate the latter form we must
know the roots of
but the evaluation of this integral will intro
<f>,

<.

<,

duce no new rational terms, for the decomposition of the fraction


leads only to terms of the two types
\[//<f>

Mx + N

x-a

2
(z-a) +

2
/3

each of which has an integral which is a transcendental function.


This method enables us, in particular, to determine whether the
integral of a given rational function

The necessary and

is itself

a rational function.

should be true

sufficient condition that this

that each of the polynomials like ^ should vanish


has been carried out as far as possible.
It will

for

is

be noticed that the method used

when

formula
Let us now

in obtaining the reduction

essentially only a special case of the preceding

method.

consider the more general integral

+ 2Bx +

(Ax*

From

C)

the identity

A(Ax* + 2Bx + C)- (Ax +


it is

evident that

C
J (Ax* +

we may

=
C)

A
AC -

Integrating the last integral by parts,


-f

B)

(Ax*

= AC-

dx

B* J (Ax*

2Bx +

AC-B*J
-SJ
(Ax
\

B*

write

**

2Bx +

B)

Ax + B
Tt
+ 2Bx
+
i

C\

y^v

C)

we

n
..

dx

+ B)
(Ax
^

1
C)"-

+ B)dx
+ 2Bx + C)

(Ax
(Ax*

find

Ax + B

=
2(n-

2n-2J

(Ax*

is

the process

+ 2Bx +

C)

214

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

whence the preceding

relation

[V,

104

becomes

Ax + B
(Ax*

+ 2Bx +

2(n- \)(AC -

C)

2n-3
-

2n

/*

AC -

+ 2Bx

B*)(Ax*
2

Ax
(4z*

C]

Continuing the same process, we are led eventually to the integral

dx
^Ix 2

which

is

a logarithm

B2 -

if

+ 2Bx + C
and an arctangent

AC>0,

As another example, consider the

C 5x + 3x J (x + 3x+
3

From

B2 -

1)

AC<0.

dx.
,

the identity

5x 3
it is

if

integral

we may

evident that

+ 3x
3x +
+
(x
/5x
8

Integrating the

first

6x(x

1)

dx
l)3

6x(x 2

(x

I)

whence the value of the given


5x 8

l)

=J ^^3x +

i)tfg

3X

3x

write

integral on the right by

6 ( g8

Cx
J (X

3x

(X

integral

3x

3X
is

-dx

-J
we

parts,

-x

=
~
3

dX

l)*

+
1)2

dx

(xM+

find

OX

dx
(x
(

3x

1)2

seen to be

Note. In applying Hermite s method it becomes


necessary to solve the fol
lowing problem given three polynomials A, B, C, of degrees m, n, p,
respectively,
two of which, A and B, are prime to each
other, find two other polynomials u and v
such that the relation Au + Bv = C is
:

identically satisfied.

In order to determine two


polynomials u and v of the least possible degree
which solve the problem, let us first
suppose that p is at most equal to m +
1.
Then we may take for u and v two
polynomials of degrees n - I and m - 1,
The
respectively.
+ n unknown coefficients are then given by the system of

n-

m+

linear

non-homogeneous equations found by equating the

For the determinant of these equations cannot


vanish, since,
find two polynomials u and v of
degrees n - 1 and m - 1 or
the identity Au + Bv = 0, and this can be true
only when

common

If the

if it

coefficients.

did,

we could

which satisfy
and B have a

less

factor.

degree of

is

and obtain a remainder

m + n, we may divide C by AB
m + n. Then C = A BQ + C

equal to or greater than


whose degree is less than

C"

and, making the substitution u - BQ = MI, the relation Au


C
Aui + Bv
This is a problem under the first case.
.

+ Bv = C reduces

to

V,

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

105]

105. Integrals of the type

/R(x, ^Ax?

integrals of rational functions


grals of irrational functions.

is

it

We

2Bx

215

c) dx.

After the

natural to consider the inte

commence with the

shall

case in

a rational function of x and the square root


of a polynomial of the second degree. In this case a simple substitu
tion eliminates the radical and reduces the integral to the preceding

which the integrand

is

This substitution

case.

the radical

is

self-evident in case the expression under


b.
If we set ax
ax
b
t*,

+ =

of the first degree, say

is

the integral becomes

^ax^b]dx =

Cll(x,

J/V\

t]

>

and the integrand of the transformed integral is a rational function.


If the expression under the radical is of the second degree and
has two real roots a and b, we may write

A(x-a)(x-b) = (x-b)

and the substitution


x

or

= Aa - bt
A t*

2
>

actually removes the radical.


If the expression under the radical sign has imaginary roots, the
above process would introduce imaginaries. In order to get to the

bottom of the matter,

Then x and y
equation

y denote the radical

let

^Ax

-f

2Bx

are the coordinates of a point of the curve

C.

whose

is
2

(1)

= Ax +
2

2Bx

C,

and

it is evident that the whole


problem amounts to expressing the
coordinates of a point upon a conic by means of rational functions
of a parameter.
It can be seen geometrically that this is possible.

For,

if

a secant

J3

t(x

a)

be drawn through any point (a, /3) on the conic, the coordinates of
the second point of intersection of the secant with the conic are
given by equations of the
functions of t.
If the trinomial

cient

A must be

Ax 2

first

degree,

+ 2Bx + C

and are therefore rational

has imaginary roots, the coeffi


not, the trinomial will be

positive, for if it is

negative for all real values of x.

In this case the conic (1)

is

an

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

216

hyperbola.

[V,

105

straight line parallel to one of the asymptotes of

this hyperbola,

= x Vyi + t,

cuts the hyperbola in a point whose coordinates are

2B

r~

t*

2t

t*

2B

an ellipse, and the trinomial A x 2 + 2Bx + C


must have two real roots a and b, or else the trinomial is negative
If

<

0,

the conic

is

The change

for all real values of x.

cisely that

moving secant

As an example

let

bola in

Making

= x + k is an hyperbola, and the straight line


which
is
t,
parallel to one of the asymptotes, cuts the hyper
a point whose coordinates are
2

auxiliary conic if

+y=

a)

+ k) Vz + k

The

t(x

us take the integral

(x

of variable given above is pre


this conic by the

which we should obtain by cutting

the substitution indicated by these equations,

_=

dt ft*
~

C dx _

k\

4tdt

find

7~

we

or, returning to the variable x,

dx

where the right-hand side


In general,

if

AC

is

Vcc 2

is

(Ax

2Bx

determined save for a constant term

not zero, we have the formula

Ax + B

Ix
2

+ Cy

B VAx 2 + 2Bx + C

AC

In some cases it is easier to evaluate the integral directly without


removing the radical. Consider, for example, the integral

dx

2Bx

+C

V,

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

105]

ff the coefficient

is

positive, the integral

_ C
J ^A*x + 2ABx + AC J
=
setting Ax + B
r

^/Adx

or

217
be written

may

VJdx
+ ) + AC 2

B*

t,

dt

^AJ

-VA

B*

t-AC

Returning to the variable

dx

x,

we have

the formula

f 2Bx

+C

2
If the coefficient of x

+A

Ax*

negative, the integral

is

may

+ 2Bx
be written in

the form

/7

/*

doc

B 2 - (Ax - BY

V- Ax + 2Bx + C J VJ
2

The quantity A C

+B

is

Hence, making the

necessarily positive.

substitution

Ax - B =

+B

^/A C

2
,

the given integral becomes

r dt
V.4
I J Vl Hence the formula

I
t

V.4

in this case is

dx

V- Ax +

Ax

=
2Bx

-^=

1
show that the argument of the arcsine varies from
x
the
two
of
varies
between
roots
the
trinomial.
+
In the intermediate case when ^4=0 and B
0, the integral is

It is easy to

to

arc sin

1 as

algebraic

f
J
Integrals of the type

dx

- a) V^x +
(x
2

2Bx

+C

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

218

[V,

reduce to the preceding type by means of the substitution x


We find, in fact, the formula

dx
a) -^/Ax*

(x

2Bx

100

= a -f 1/y.

dy

where

A!

= Aa + 2Ba +

B = Aa +

C,

B,

It should be noticed that this integral is algebraic if and only if


the quantity a is a root of the trinomial under the radical.
Let us now consider the integrals of the type f Va: 2
A dx. Inte

grating by parts,

we

rVa;"

On

find

+ A dx = x Va: + A
2

hand we have

the other

fx

I.
= C Va;

dx

Va: 2

=
From

these two relations

Va: 2

it is

-f

A dx

-\-Adx-A

C
J/

+ A7

Adx
-

Va; 2

log (x

Va: 2

+ A)

easy to obtain the formulae

(2)

r
I

+ A + - log

(or

Va: 2

^),

2
*

The following formulae may be derived

in like

manner:

x*dx
(5)

arc sin

106. Area of the hyperbola. The preceding integrals occur in the evaluation
of the area of a sector of an ellipse or an hyperbola.
Let us consider, for

example, the hyperbola

V,

106]

and

let

axis,

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

AMP

us try to find the area of a segment


bounded by the arc AM, the
This area is equal to the definite integral

and the ordinate MP.

a
that

is,

by the formula

MP = y =

(6/a)

Vx 2

a2 dx

(2),

a2

But

219

Vx 2

a2 log (?-

a 2 and the term (b/2a) x


,

area of the triangle OMP.


Hence the area
the arc
and the radii vectores OA

Vx 2

a2

of the sector

AM

and OM,

S=

is

precisely the

0AM, bounded

by

is

1 e*

/x
loj

+ Vx 2 -

a2\
I

= -1 oft log ( -x
.

\a

This formula enables us to express


the coordinates x and y of a, point
of the hyperbola in terms of the area S.

In fact, from the above and from the

equation of the hyperbola,


show that

it is

easy to
FIG. 21

(e"

The functions which occur on the right-hand


and sine :

h
b

side are called the hyperbolic

cosine

cosh x

e*

e~ x
sinh x

The above equations may


x

therefore be written in the form

a cosh

2S
ab

,
b
sinh

ab

These hyperbolic functions possess properties


analogous to those of the trigo
nometric functions.* It is easy to deduce, for instance, the
following formulae
x =
= cosh x cosh y +
= sinh x cosh y +

cosh 2 x
cosh

(x

sinh (x
*
is to

+
+

y)
y)

sinh 2

1,

sinh x sinh y,

sinh y cosh

x.

table of the logarithms of these functions for


positive values of the argument
be found in HoueTs Recueil desformules

numeriques.

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

220
may be shown
may be expressed
It

[V,

107

manner that the coordinates of a point on an ellipse


terms of the area of the corresponding sector, as follows

in like
in

a cos

2S
y

ab

2S

b sin

ao

In the case of a circle of unit radius, and in the case of an equilateral hyperbola
whose semiaxis is one, these formulae become, respectively,

x
z

=
=

cos2S,
cosh2S,

= sin2-S;
= sinh2/S.

7/

evident that the hyperbolic functions bear the same relations to the equi
lateral hyperbola as do the trigonometric functions to the circle.
It is

107. Rectification of the parabola. Let us try to find the length of the arc of
= x 2 between the vertex
and any point M. The general

a parabola 2py
formula gives

d
pj7w^y
*

Jo
or,

applying the formula

The algebraic term in this result is precisely


for we know that OT = x/2, and hence

we draw

(2),

2p

If

r^sv

x2

x*

x2

4p*

the straight line connecting

T to

the length

x 2 (x 2

-4-

4p

MT

of the tangent,

v^)

the focus F, the angle

MTF will

be a right angle.
have

Hence we

FT

n2

a-2

H.J

=I

whence we may deduce a

curi

ous property of the parabola.


Suppose that the parabola
rolls without slipping on the x
"

FIG. 22

7""

axis, and let us try to find the


locus of the focus, which is sup
posed rigidly connected to the

parabola. When the parabola


= arc OM. The point T has come into a
to the x axis,
tangent at
T = 3/T, and the focus F is at a point F which is
position T such that

is

found by laying
nates

X and

OM

off

Y of

T F = TF

the point

on a

line parallel to the

are then

axis.

The coordi

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

V,108]
and the equation
tions.

From

the

221

by eliminating x between these two equa

of the locus is given


first we find

x
to

+ Vx 2 + p 2 = pe P

which we may add the equation

Vx2 +

x
since the product of the
two equations, we find

two left-hand

and the desired equation of the locus

sides

pe

j>

is

equal to

p*.

Subtracting these

is

This curve, which


is

somewhat

is called the catenary, is quite easy to construct.


similar to that of the parabola.

108. Unicursal curves.

Let us now consider,


Let

Its

form

in general, the inte

grals of algebraic functions.

F(x, y)

(6)

be the equation of an algebraic curve, and let R(x, y) be a rational


function of x and y.
If we suppose y replaced by one of the roots
of the equation (6) in R(x, y), the result is a function of the single
variable x, and the integral

called an Abelian integral with respect to the curve


When
(6).
the given curve and the function R(x, y) are arbitrary these inte
grals are transcendental functions. But in the particular case where
is

is unicursal, i.e. when the coordinates of a


point on the
curve can be expressed as rational functions of a variable param
eter t, the Abelian integrals attached to the curve can be reduced at

the curve

once to integrals of rational functions.

For, let

be the equations of the curve in terms of the parameter


t as the new
independent variable, the integral becomes

R(x, y}dx

and the new integrand

is

evidently rational.

t.

Taking

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

222

shown

It is

in treatises on Analytic

[v,

108

Geometry* that every

uni-

cursal curve of degree n has (n


l)(n
conversely, that every curve of degree n

2)/2 double points, and,


which has this number of

double points is unicursal. I shall merely recall the process for


obtaining the expressions for the coordinates in terms of the param

Given a curve C B of degree n, which has 8 = (n


!)(.
2)/2
double points, let us pass a one-parameter family of curves of degree
3 ordinary points
2 through these 8 double points and through n
n
eter.

on Ca

These points actually determine such a family, for

1,

whereas (n
2)(n -(-l)/2 points are necessary to determine uniquely
2.
Let P(x, y) + tQ(x, ?/) =
be the equation
a curve of order n
of this family, where t is an arbitrary parameter. Each curve of the
family meets the curve

C n in

2) points, of

n(n

which a certain

num

3 ordinary points chosen


ber are independent of t, namely the n
above and the 8 double points, each of which counts as two points of

But we have

intersection.

- 3 + 28 = n - 3 + (ft -l)(n - 2) = n(n - 2) -1,


and there remains just one point of intersection which varies with t.
The coordinates of this point are the solutions of certain linear equa
tions whose coefficients are integral polynomials in t, and hence they
are themselves rational functions of

t.

Instead of the preceding

we

might have employed a family of curves of degree n 1 through the


3 ordinary points chosen at
(n
l)(w
2)/2 double points and 2n

Cn

pleasure on
If

is

degree

2)/2
(n
l)(w
therefore unicursal, as

2,

0,

every curve of the second


seen above.
If n = 3,

we have

the unicursal curves of the third degree


1,
l)(w
(n
2)/2
are those which have one double point.
Taking the double point
as origin, the equation of the cubic is of the
4>s

where

and

(x, y)

fa (x, y)

form
,

2 are homogeneous polynomials of the degree of their


tx through the double point meets the cubic
secant y
in a single variable point whose coordinates are
3

<

indices.

<

(!,

<MM)

*See,

e.g.,

Q
*i(M)

<&(!,
"

Niewenglowski, Cours de Geometric analytique, Vol.

II,

pp. 99-114.

V,

.RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

108]

223

A unicursal curve of the fourth degree has three double points.


In order to find the coordinates of a point on it, we should pass a
family of conies through the three double points and through another
point chosen at pleasure on the curve.
Every conic of this family
would meet the quartic

in just one point which varies with the


gives the abscissae of the points of

The equation which

parameter.

would reduce to an equation of the first


the
factors
degree
corresponding to the double points had
been removed, and would give x as a rational function of the
intersection, for instance,

when

We should proceed to find y in a similar manner.


parameter.
As an example let us consider the lemniscate
which has a double point at the origin and two others at the imagi
nary circular points. A circle through the origin tangent to one of
the branches of the lemniscate,
x*

- y}

t(x

meets the curve in a single variable point.


equations,

or,

we

Combining these two

find

dividing by x

y,

This last equation represents a straight line through the origin which
cuts the circle in a point not the origin,
a
_o

+ a
+ a*

3
*(<

t*

2
)

whose coordinates are

2
2
_ a t(t

t*

a2)

a<

These results may be obtained more easily by the following


process, which is at once applicable to any unicursal curve of the
fourth degree one of whose double points is known.
The secant
=
\x
cuts
the
in
lemniscate
two
whose
coordinates
are
y
points

The expression under the


by
cal.

radical is of the second degree.


Hence,
2
105, the substitution (1
A)
X)/(l
(a/t) removes the radi
It is easy to show that this substitution leads to the
expressions

just found.

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

224

[V,

109

Note. When a plane curve has singular points of higher order, it


can be shown that each of them is equivalent to a certain number of

In order that a curve be unicursal,

isolated double points.

it is suffi

cient that its singular points should be equivalent to (n


l)(n
2)/2
For example, a curve of order n which has
isolated double points.
1 is unicursal, for a secant through
a multiple point of order n
the multiple point meets the curve in only one variable point.

109. Integrals of binomial differentials.


in

ing types

R\_x, (ax

b)

\dx

where
a, a
,

a
,

xa \ xa

b, ~V

-f-

+ d)dx,

ex

-)dx,

",

and where the exponents


For the first type it is

denotes a rational function

are commensurable numbers.

a",

sufficient to set

+b=

R(X, ~vax

R(x

ax

the other integrals

Among

which the radicals can be removed may be mentioned the follow

ax

-f b

In the second type the substitution

leaves merely a square root of an expression of the


second degree, which can then be removed by a second substitution.
t*

Finally, in the third type we may set x


denominator of the fractions n-, a
,

three exponents m, n,

we may

common

Let us suppose that the


If p is an integer, the

differentials.

p
made

rational

just seen.

by means of the substitution

In order to discover further cases

x (ax n

The transformed

are commensurable.

dx

is

consider a class of

of integrability, let us try the substitution ax n

form

which are called binomial


expression may be
x = t D as we have

D where

a",

In connection with the third type


differentials of the

integral

is

of the

same form

t.

This gives

+ by dx =
-H
|W^
naj
\ a /

the exponent which takes the place of p is (m


the integration can be performed if (m
l)/w

"

dt.

as the original,

+
is

1.

1) /n
an integer.

and

Hence

RATIONAL FUNCTIONS

V,109]

On

the other hand, the integral

whence

it is

may

225

be written in the form

clear that another case of integrability

l)/w = (m + l)/w + p

is

that in which

an integer. To sum up, the


np
(m
one of the three numbers
whenever
can
be
performed
integration
In no other case can the
is an integer.
(in
+p
2^
+l)/n, (m+V)/n

4-

by means of a finite number of elementary


n, and p are rational.

integral be expressed

functional symbols
In these cases it

is

when m,
is

convenient to reduce the integral to a simpler


n
Setting ax

form in which only two exponents occur.

/As
= (}

dx

we

find

n
= -1/Asl-,
dt,

n a

x m (ax n

= bt,

IP /*\!ii
lt
+ bydx = n
J
"

"

\a/

Neglecting the constant factor and setting q

(m

l)/n

1,

we

are led to the integral


/

tydt.

The

cases of integrability are those in which one of the three num


p q is an integer. If p is an integer and q r/s, we

bers p, q,

should set

l+t =

u*.

us

If q

Finally,

if

should set
an integer and p
r/s, we
+ q is an integer, the integral may be

is

written in the form

and the substitution 1 + t = tus where p


As an example consider the integral

r/s,

Here
is

m = 1,

an integrable

= 3, p = 1/3,
case.

Vl +

x 3 dx

and (m

3
Setting x

t,

removes the

+ l)/w + p = 1.

Hence

the integral becomes

dt,

and a second substitution

+ =
t

radical.

tu 8 removes the radical.

this

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

226

II.

110.

ELLIPTIC

Reduction

of degree/?

AND HYPERELLIPTIC INTEGRALS

of integrals.

which

is

110

[V,

prime

Let P(x) be an integral polynomial

The

to its derivative.

integral

where R denotes a rational function of x and the radical y

Vp(ce),

cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions, in general,


when p is greater than 2. Such integrals, which are particular
cases of general Abelian integrals, can be split up into portions which
and logarithmic functions and a certain number

result in algebraic

which give rise to new transcendental functions


which cannot be expressed by means of a finite number of elemen
of other integrals

We

tary functional symbols.


proceed to consider this reduction.
The rational function R(x, y) is the quotient of two integral
polynomials in x and y. Replacing any even power of y, such as
2q
9
g+ l
q
y
by [P(V)] and any odd power, such as y*
by y [_P(x)~] we
may evidently suppose the numerator and denominator of this frac
>

>

tion to be of the first degree in y,

A
in
R(x,
J)
v

+ By
+ Dy

>

where A, B, C, D are integral polynomials


numerator and the denominator each by C
by P(x), we may write this in the form
R(x, y}

Multiplying the
2
Dy, and replacing y

in x.

--

are polynomials.
The integral is now broken
of
which
the
first
up
parts,
JF/K dx is the integral of a
rational function.
For this reason we shall consider only the second

where

F, G,

into

integral

and

two

fOy/K dx, which may

also be written in the

form

fpft
where

M and N are

integral polynomials in

M/N

sum

of partial fractions

may

x.

The

rational frac

be decomposed into an integral part E(x) and a

tion

V,lio]

AND HYPERELLIPTIC INTEGRALS

ELLIPTIC

227

where each of the polynomials A is prime to its derivative.


shall therefore have to consider two types of integrals,
,-

/xV
If the degree of P(x)
in terms of the first p

Adx

dx

Ym may be expressed
Yp _ 2 and certain

p, all the integrals


1 of them, F , Yi}

is

We

-,

algebraic expressions.

For, let us write

P(X)

a xp

a^x*

It follows that

~JZ(

2
mP(x)
_ 2mx
1

VP(Z)

x m P (x)

The numerator
highest term

is

of this expression

(2m

+ p~)a

~
x m+p l

of degree

is

m +p

1,

and

its

Integrating both sides of the

above equation, we find

2x

Vp(xj=(2m+p}a Ym+p _ +
l

.--,

where the terms not written down contain integrals of the type
Y whose indices are less than m + p 1. Setting m = 0, 1, 2,
,

succes
successively, we can calculate the integrals Yp _ l} Yp
1 integrals
sively in terms of algebraic expressions and the p
,

YO>

YI,

Yp _ 2

With

respect to the integrals of the second type we shall distin


the
two cases where
is or is not prime to P(x)>
guish

1) If X is prime to P(x), the integral Z n reduces


an algebraic term, a number of integrals of the type

the

to

sum of

Yk and a new
,

integral

B dx

f-X V P(x)
where

is

a polynomial whose degree

is less

than that of X.

and also to P(ar), X n is prime


to PA".
Hence two polynomials A and fi can be found such that
+ p.X P = A, and the integral in question breaks up into
two parts:
Since

X is prime

to its derivative

XX"

f ii== f *^_
J X n ^P(x) J VP(X)

c
J

Xn

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

228

The

first

integral,

is

part

when n

sum

>

In the second

of integrals of the type Y.

1, let

110

[V,

us integrate by parts, taking


1

f I

~\./ T-)

tt

*3/

TT~"

**

(n

-I)*-

which gives

r^px dx =
X

(n-l)X

n~

rwp + pp*

-pV7>

n-lJ

2J"-

VP(a:)

The new integral obtained is of the same form as the first, except
is diminished by one.
that the exponent of
Repeating this
is
i.e. as long as the exponent of
as
often
as
possible,
process
of
the
form
a
result
obtain
we
than
finally
unity,
greater

VP

J .YVP

P(x)

Xn ~

where B, C, D are all polynomials, and where the degree of


always be supposed to be less than that of X.

B may

have a common divisor D, we shall have X = YD,


SD, where the polynomials D, S, and Y are all prime to each
Hence two polynomials X and
other.
may be found such that
n
in the form
written
be
=
the
and
A
XD +
integral may
2) If

and

P=

/u.

p.Y",

/Adx
jpVp
The

first

of the

new

C \dx

J r n Vp

J Dn

integrals

is

fidx

of the type just considered.

The

second integral,

D is a factor of P, reduces to the sum of an algebraic term


a
number of integrals of the type Y.
and

where

For, since

Dn

nomials A! and

prime to the product D S, we can find two poly


such that X^" -f piD S = /x. Hence we may write

is

//,!

C
J
Replacing
form

by DS,

dx_
n
>

let

= C\dx + Cr^

VP J VP

D"

VP

us write the second of these integrals in the

AND HYPERELLIPTIC INTEGRALS

ELLIPTIC

V,110]

and then integrate

it

by

parts, taking

229

--11
-

which gives

r,

Cjidx^

D"VP

This

again a reduction formula but in this case, since the expo


even
1/2 is fractional, the reduction may be performed

is

nent n

occurs only to the first power in the denominator, and


an expression of the form
obtain
finally

when

p.dx

J D VP
n

where

H and K are

To sum up our

KVP

"fP

we

C Hdx

polynomials.

we

results,

see that the integral

M dx
can always be reduced to a sum of algebraic terms and a number of
integrals of the

two types
JO

///)

\JiJCi

VP

/rpftl

where

ra is less

derivative

and

"V

-**-\

/7 Tf
UJU

xVp

p 2, where X
and where the degree of

than or equal to
also to P,

is

prime
is less

to its

than

This reduction involves only the operations of addition,

that of X.

multiplication, and division of polynomials.


are known, each of the rational
If the roots of the equation
into
a sum of partial fractions of
can be broken
fractions

X=

X /X

up

the two forms

Bx + C

x-a

(x-af + p*

where A, B, and C are constants.

r
J (xx which reduce
to allow a to

dx
a
a)

VP(V>

to a single type,

have

This leads to the two new types

C
(Bx
J [_(xx - a) 2 +

we agree
sort are
this
of
Integrals

namely the

imaginary values.

2
/3

first

of these, if

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

230

[V,

called integrals of the third kind.


Integrals of the type
called integrals of the first kind when ra is less than p/2

110

Ym

are

1,

and

is equal to or greater
are called integrals of the second kind when
1.
than p/2,
Integrals of the first kind have a characteristic

they remain

property,
indefinitely,

when

finite

the

and also when the upper

89, 90); but the essential distinction

The

pointed out

Up

Note.

real distinction

later.

we have made no assumption about the


polynomial P(x). If p is an odd number, it may

to the present

of the

degree

is a root of
P(x)
between the integrals of

must be accepted provisionally at this


between them will be

the second and third kinds

time without proof.

upper limit increases

limit

always be increased by unity.


1
nomial of degree 2q

For, suppose that P(x)

is

a poly

Then

let

P(x)

A x*-

us set x

-f-

1/y,

A.x^-*

where a

.-.

+ A.

2q

_v

This

not a root of P(z).

is

gives

P(x)=P(a)
where P^

(y) is a

I
i
y

+ P (a)

+ I__Lii
p(2<,-l)( fl

...

P,((/\
fJ-134,
2
"

<

1)! y-

(2q

polynomial of degree

-i-j

i/

Hence we have

2q.

and any integral of a rational function of x and Vp(a-) is trans


formed into an integral of a rational function of y and \/P l (y).
Conversely, if the degree of the polynomial P(x) under the radi
cal is an even number 2q, it may be reduced by unity provided a
root of

-f-

P(x)

is

known.

For,

if

1/y.

where Pi(y)

is

a root of P(x),

let

us set

This gives

is

of degree 2y

(2?)!
1,

and we

shall have

Hence the integrand of the transformed integral will contain no


other radical than

V,

lllj

ELLIPTIC

AND IIYPERELLIPTIC INTEGRALS

111. Case of integration


of the

in algebraic

terms.

We have

just seen that

231

an integral

form

C R[X, VP(x)]dx
can always be reduced by means of elementary operations to the sum of an inte
gral of a rational fraction, an algebraic expression of the form G VP(x)/L, and
Since we can also
a number of integrals of the first, second, and third kinds.
find

by elementary operations the rational part of the integral of a rational


it is evident that the given integral can always be reduced to the form

fraction,

]dx = F[x, VP(xj] + T,


where

F is

a rational function of x and VP(x), and where

is

sum

of inte

being prime to its deriva


grals of the three kinds and an integral fXi /Xdx,
Liouville showed that if the given integral
tive and of higher degree than X\
.

integrable in algebraic terms,


fore have, identically,

is

it is

R[x, VP(x)~\

and hence

T=

should there

0.

Hence we can

discover by

whether a given integral


the

We

equal to F[x, VP(x)].

same process

is

means of multiplications and

divisions of polynomials

integrable in algebraic terms or not,

and

in case

it is,

gives the value of the integral.

112. Elliptic integrals.

If the

polynomial P(x)

is

of the second

degree, the integration of a rational function of x and P(x) can be


reduced, by the general process just studied, to the calculation of the
integrals

/dx
VP(z)
which we know how

The next simplest


is

dx
(x

to evaluate directly

a)VP(z)
(

105).

that of elliptic integrals, for which P(x)


of the third or fourth degree.
Either of these cases can be
case

is

reduced to the other, as we have seen just above.

Let P(x) be a

polynomial of the fourth degree whose coefficients are all real and
whose linear factors are all distinct.
proceed to show that

We

a real substitution can always be found which carries P(x~) into a


polynomial each of whose terms is of even degree.
Let a, b, c, d be the four roots of P(x). Then there exists an

involutory relation of the form


(7)

Lx

x"

+ M(x +

x")

+N=

0,

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

232
which

is satisfied

coefficients L,

by x

a,

which are evidently

-+-

Let a and

ft

112

For the

x"

0,

0,

we take

satisfied if

M = cd

d,

= d.
and by x = c,
the
two
relations
satisfy
b,

+ M(a + b) -f N
+ M(c + d) + N =

Lab
Led

x"

M, N need merely

[V,

N = ab (c + d)

ab ,

cd (a

be the two double points of this involution,

+ b).

i.e.

the

roots of the equation


Zt*

These roots will both be


(cd

that

ab)*-(a

+ 2ATw + N = 0.

real if

+b-c-

d) [ai

(c

d)

cd(a

J)]

>

0,

is, if

(a-c)(a-d)(b-c)(b-d)>Q.

(8)

The

roots of P(x) can always be arranged in such a way that this


If all four roots are real, we need merely
is satisfied.

condition

Then each factor in (8) is positive.


we should choose a and b as the real
two conjugate imaginary roots. Then the

choose a and b as the two largest.


If only two of the roots are real,

roots, and c and d as the


c and a
d are conjugate imaginary, and so are the
two factors a
c and b
d.
other two, b
Finally, if all four roots are imaginary,
we may take a and b as one pair and c and d as the other pair of

conjugate imaginary roots.

In this case also the factors in (8) are

It should also be noticed that these


conjugate imaginary by pairs.
real.
methods of selection make the corresponding values of L, M,
The equation (7) may now be written in the form

~_ +

(9}

If

we

set (x

a)/(x

4-

>

ft

ft~)

= y,

x "~ a

"

or x

(3

(ft//

1),

<*)/(y

we

find

where P\(y) is a new polynomial of the fourth degree with


coefficients whose roots are
a

a-p
It is

b-

ft

c-

ft

d-

ft

real

evident from (9) that these four roots satisfy the equation

V,

ELLIPTIC

112]

-fby pairs
of odd degree.
If the four roots
y"

shall

AND HYPERELLIPTIC INTEGRALS


hence the polynomial

/ i(y) contains

233
no term

= c + d, we
b, c, d satisfy the equation a + b
one of the double points of the involution lies
Setting a
N/2M, the equation (7) takes the form
,

= 0, and

have L

at infinity.

+
x = a +y
a

x"

0,

in order to obtain a polynomial


and we need merely set
which contains no term of odd degree.
We may therefore suppose P(x) reduced to the canonical form

any elliptic integral, neglecting an algebraic term


and an integral of a rational function, may be reduced to the sum
of integrals of the forms
It follows that

dx

^AtX*+AiX*+Ai

xdx

J ^/A^+AiXt+At

x*dx

J ^A

x*+A

and integrals of the form


dx

/;(x
The

integral

dx

If we consider x, on the
the elliptic integral of the first kind.
inverse
function
of
this
other hand, as a
u,
function is called an
of
the
above
The
second
integrals reduces to an
elliptic function.
is

2
elementary integral by means of the substitution x

= u.

The

third

integral

x 2 dx

is

Legendre

integral of the second kind.

Finally,

we have the

identity

/dx
(x

The

a)Vp(x)

xdx
_ C
~J (x - a )VP(x)
2

dx
2

(x

integral

dx
2

(x
is

Legendre

/i)

VJ

x4

+ /Ijx + A.

integral of the third kind.

a2 ) VP(^)

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

234

These elliptic integrals were so named because they were


met with in the problem of rectifying the ellipse. Let

a cos
<f>

2
setting a

or,

Hence the

= dx + dy* = (a
b = e a
ds = a Vl
2

<f>

Then we

shall have

<

t>*

cos 2

2
<)

d<j>

integral

stitution cos

sin 2

first

b sin

be the coordinates of a point of an ellipse.


ds 2

113

[V,

<

t,

e cos

2
.

<

d<f>

which gives an arc of the


takes the form

ellipse, after the

sub

an ellipse is equal to the sum of an


and an integral of the second kind.

inte

It follows that the arc of

gral of the first kind

Again, consider the lemniscate defined by the equations


.

t*

An

a4

a"

a4

easy calculation gives the element of length in the form


ds 2

Hence the
the

first

dx 2

dif

arc of the lemniscate

=-

is

~p

dt*.

Ct

given by an elliptic integral of

kind.*

It sometimes happens that an integral of the


where P(x) is a polynomial of the third or fourth
degree, can be expressed in terms of algebraic functions and a sum of a finite
number of logarithms of algebraic functions. Such integrals are called pseudo-

113. Pseudo-elliptic integrals.

form

f F[x, VP(x)]

elliptic.

dx,

This happens in the following general case.

(10)

Lx

x"

+ M(x +

x")

Let

N=0

an involutory

be
the

relation which establishes a correspondence between two pairs of


four roots of the quartic equation P(x) = 0. If the function f(x) be such that

the relation

(ID
is identically satisfied, the integral

Lx
/[/(x)/VP(x)] dx

is

pseudo-elliptic.

* This is a common
property of a whole class of curves discovered by Serret
(Cours de Calcul differentiel et integral, Vol. II, p. 264).

V,

ELLIPTIC

113]

Let

a and

AND HYPERELLIPTIC INTEGRALS

235

As we have

p be the double points of the involution.


may be written in the form

already

seen, the equation (10)

(12)

Let us

now make

x"

/3

the substitution (z

a)/(x

(a-^,
(l-y)

P)

P(2)

p)

dy

This gives

y.

^L,
(1-y)*

and consequently
dx

a polynomial of the fourth degree which contains no odd powers


the other hand, the rational fraction f(x) goes over into a
which satisfies the identity
For if
rational fraction
+
y) = 0.

where PI (y)
of y ( 112).

is

On

<p(y)

4>(y),

<(

two values of x correspond by means of (12), they are transformed into two
= 0. It is evident
which satisfy the equation y +
values of y, say y and
2
Hence
that
is of the form y^(y z ), where ^ is a rational function of y
the integral under discussion takes the form
y"

y" ,

4>(y)

and we need merely

set y 2

Thus the proposition

is

reduce it to an elementary integral.


merely remains actually to carry out

z in order to

proved, and

it

the reduction.

The theorem remains


provided that

we

true

when

think of one of

the polynomial P(x)


its

is

of the third degree,

The demonstration

roots as infinite.

is

exactly similar to the preceding.


If, for example, the equation P(x)

= is a reciprocal equation, one of the


= 1. Hence,
involutory relations which interchanges the roots by pairs is x
if f(x) be a rational function which satisfies the relation /(x) + /(1/x) = 0,
x"

the integral
l)/(z

(x

/[/()/ VP(x)] dx
1)

y,

z,

is

pseudo-elliptic,

performed

in order,

and the two substitutions


it into an elementary

transform

integral.

Again, suppose that P(x)

a polynomial of the third degree,

=
b = 0, c = 1, d = I/A; 2
There
which interchange these roots by pairs

Let us set a
tions

is

o>,

exist three involutory rela

l-Jk 2
Hence,

if

/(x) be a rational function

which

satisfies

x"

one of the identities

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

236

[V,

114

the integral

f(z)dx

Vx(lis

From

pseudo-elliptic.

this others

2 2 , the preceding integral

whence

it

may

For instance,

be derived.

if

we

set

becomes

new

follows that this

)(!

integral

is

also pseudo-elliptic

if

/(z

2
)

satisfies

one of the identities

The

first

III.

of these cases

was noticed by Euler.*

INTEGRATION OF TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS

114. Integration of rational functions of sin

known

x and

cos x.

It is well

and cos a? may be expressed rationally in terms


Hence this change of variable reduces an integral

that since

of tan ce/2
of the form

t.

sinx, cosxjdx
to the integral of a rational function of

= 2 arc tan

ax

2dt

-^

sin x

>

For we have

t.

2t

>

cos x

and the given integral becomes

where &(t)

is

For example,

a rational function.

C -dx = Cdt =
sin
J t

log

a;

hence

dx

/dx
sin

* See

Hermite

a;

log tan--

lithographed Cours, 4th ed., pp. 25-28.

= l-t

2
>

TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS

237

The integral f [I/cos x~]dx reduces to the preceding


substitution x
y, which gives
7r/2

by means of the

V,

114]

dx-

/dx

x\
-

ITT

=-

log tan

cos x
coscc

\4

ITT

x
-

\4

-+

log tan

2/

The preceding method has the advantage of generality, but it is


often possible to find a simpler substitution which is equally suc
cessful.
Thus, if the function /(sin x, cos x~) has the period IT, it is
a rational function of tana;, F(tan x). The substitution t&nx
t

therefore reduces the integral to the form

f F(tan x~) dx =
As an example

let

us consider the integral

dx

A
where A, B, C,
period

IT

cos"

cos 2 x

D are

-f-

we

t,

+ C sin

sin

Hence the given

+D

find

x cos x

>

-L ~~T~

The integrand evidently has the

any constants.

and, setting tan x

sin x cos

sin 2 x

~T~

integral becomes

J
The form

of the result will

of the denominator.

we

depend upon the nature of the roots


Taking certain three of the coefficients zero,

find the formulae

/dx
cos 2

r dx
=
-;
J sin x cos x

= tan:r,

dx

/;
When
R (cos x)
first

case

r-r-

log tan x,

COt X.

of the form

R(sm x) cos x, or of the form


of
variable
is apparent.
In the
proper change
should set sin x
t
in the second case, cos x
t.

the integrand

is

since, the

we

It is sometimes advantageous to

make

to simplify the integral before proceeding

For example,

let

first

with the general method.

us consider the integral

dx
a cos x

b sin

substitution in order

-f

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

238

114

[V,

where a, b, c are any three constants. If p is a positive number


and
an angle determined by the equations
<

= p cos

we

shall

= p sin

b
</>,

<f>,

have

= V/ a

-f-

cos

o>

a
7==
Va

+b

and the given integral may be written

/dx
p cos (x

where x
<f>

tan y/2

= y.

in the

_ C
J

-</>)+

p==
Va +

d>

>

62

form

dy
y

p cos

Let us now apply the general method, setting


the integral becomes

Then

t.

sin

>

2dt

and the rest of the calculation presents no difficulty. Two different


2
2
2
2
c = a + b
forms will be found for the result, according as p 2
c
is

positive or negative.

The

integral

m cos x

"

n sin x + *p
dx
+ o sin x + c
For, let u = a cos x + b sin x +
preceding.

f
may
and

be reduced to the
let

us determine three constants

m cos x
is

-f

a cos x

-\-

sin

X,

7>

p.,

and

MI

c,

such that the equation

du
u.

\-

ax

The equations which determine these num

identically satisfied.

bers are

m = \a + p.b,
the

first

= Xb

p=

p,a,

two of which determine X and

/A.

The

\c

v,

three constants hav

ing been selected in this way, the given integral

may

be written in

the form

/du
Xt<

fi

Example. Let us try

dx

\x

-\-

u.

log u 4- v

a cos x

to evaluate the definite integral

dx
1

ecosx

where

|e|<l.

+ b sin x +

y,

TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS

115]

it first

Considering

as

an indefinite

dx
1

+ ecosx

integral,

we

find successively

dt

vT^J

e)V

by means of the successive substitutions tanx/2


Hence the indefinite integral is equal to

As x

varies

from

arc tan

\l

\i+

to x,

the arctangent varies


to ;r/V(l - e 2 ).

ll-e.

2
.

TIT^
V(l
from to

e)/(l
it/2.

+ (l-

239

f,

du
1

+ w2

= u V(l +

e)/(l

e).

x\

tan -

2/

+ e) tan x/2

increases from

Hence the given

to

definite integral

oo,

is

and

equal

There are also certain classes of integrals


which reduction formulae exist. For instance, the formula for

115. Reduction formulae.

for

the derivative of tan n

j-

whence we

(tan"-

be written

may

a;)

= (?i

-l)tan"-

x(l+

tan 2 a;),

find
~
ka,n"xdx

n-l
/tan"

x
--

C
tan"~

The exponent

of tan x in the integrand is diminished by two units.


Repeated applications of this formula lead to one or the other of
the two integrals
I

=x

dx

The analogous formula

C L/UU
J
II

tan x dx

<C

log cos x

for integrals of the type


1

c*r\i~ ** T*

fiw
W-i-C

^^
-

^
______
cot"-

n-l

r
I
I

r/-k r
i

CUu

/cot"

X fit*
(L3C

x dx

is

In general, consider the integral


sin m x cos n xdx,

and n are any positive or negative integers. When one of


these integers is odd it is best to use the change of variable given
above.
If, for instance, n
1, we should set sin x
t, which
2p

where

2 p
reduces the integral to the form />(!
t
) dt.
Let us, therefore, restrict ourselves to the case where

both even, that

is,

to integrals of the type

= f sin
si
J

"

a;

cos j "ccc?x,

and n are

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

240

which may be written

*m,m

form

in the

sin 2m

xcos 2n xsmxdx.

2n
Taking cos z since dx as the differential of
an integration by parts gives

l/(2n

pQgZn-fl^
2m 1 C sm = -sin 2m - xr
sin
r+2ft + 1
2n+lJ
l

Lm

"*"

^ cos 2

2 (m

+1
a;,

ajcos*"aj(l-sin x)cte,

"

+1 a;

2m

-**

2n

I)]cos

form

in the

sin 2
7"

-f

which may be written

116

[V,

+ n)

2 (m

ri)

-*-!,

This formula enables us to diminish the exponent m without alter


If m is negative, an analogous formula
ing the second exponent.
be obtained by solving the equation (A) with respect to /m _ lin

may

and replacing

m by

sin 1

m
~2

**..

? a;

cos 2n+1 a;

The following analogous

1-2WI

easily derived, enable

~1

2n

a;

^ m ,-i

2 (m

+ w)

2(m +
2

l2n

**,-

,-

^l-m,n

m+1 a;cos 1 ~ 8 *a;


_ sin

^-

sin 2m+1 a;cos 2n

which are

formulae,

us to reduce the exponent of cos a;

m + 1)

2 (n

1-2OT

(m

w)

+1

l2n

n)

j
-*,-+!*

Eepeated applications of these formulae reduce each of the num


m and n to zero. The only case in which we should be unable to
proceed is that in which we obtain an integral /TOiB where m + n = 0.
But such an integral is of one of the types for which reduction for
mulae were derived at the beginning of this article.

bers

116. Wallis formulae. There exist reduction formulae whether the exponents
and n are even or odd.
As an example let us try to evaluate the definite integral
n

Im =

Jo

where

is

a positive integer.

7T

2
|

Jo

An

m m xdx,

integration

by parts gives
E

7T

siu m

-1

xsinxtZx

[cosxsin-^]^o + (m

1)

Jo

sin m

-2

cos 2 xdx,

V,

TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS

117]

m ~ l x vanishes at both
whence, noting that cosz s\n

limits,

241

we

find the

formula

7T

Im

(m

1)

2
f sin- 2 x(l -

Repeated applications of
even, or to Ii

is

=1

m successively

replacing

-*a

or,

- -1
=m

Im

(13)

(m

--T05

this

if

by
T

-M

l)(/m _

/m),

formula

ivhich leads to the recurrent

if

sin 2 x)<Jx

Jo

is

formula reduce the given integral to IQ = it/2


In the former case, taking m = 2p and
odd.

2, 4, 6,

3
7

Im-2-

T
-*

we

2j>,

find

JT2p

*
>

P- 1

2n~

multiplying these equations together,

_
Similarly,

we

(2p
.

1)

5
2

2p

find the formula

12.P

+1

2p
(2j>

1)

curious result due to Wallis may be deduced from these formulae. It is


m + 1 x is less than
evident that the value of Im diminishes as
increases, for sin

sin m z.

and

if

Hence

we replace I2 p + ^2 P
new inequalities
i>

IS P

-I by their values from the formulae above,

we

find the

where we have

set, for brevity,

2244
1335
It is

evident that the ratio

nitely.

2p
2p

2
1

2p

2p

the limit one as

n/2Hp approaches

factors increases indefinitely.

increases indefi

of
product
p as the number
The law of formation of the successive factors is

It follows that 7T/2 is the limit of the

apparent.

117.

The

integral

/cos (ax

+ b) cos (a

+b

dx.

Let us consider

a product of any number of factors of the form cos (ax


b), where
a and b are constants, and where the same factor may occur several
times.

The formula
cos u cos

^+

cos (u

cos (u

v)

242

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

[V,

117

enables us to replace the product of two factors of this sort


by the
of two cosines of linear functions of x hence also the
product
of n factors by the sum of two
1 factors each.
products of n

sum

Kepeated applications of this formula


sum of the form 2 H cos (Ax

gral to a

If

immediately integrable.
/

sin

B}dx

+ B),

not zero,

is

cos (Ax -f

finally reduce the given inte

(Ax

each term of which

is

we have
4-

B}I

C,

J\.

when A = 0, /cos B dx = x cos B + C.


This transformation applies in the special case of
products of
the form
cos m a; sin n
while, in the particular case

ic,

where

and n are both positive

For this product

integers.

may

be written

and, applying the preceding process, we are led to a sum of sines and
cosines of multiples of the angle, each term of which is
immediately
integrable.

As an example

let

us try to calculate the area of the curve

which we may suppose given in the parametric form x = acos


0,
to 2-rr for the whole curve. The
y = b sin 0, where 6 varies from
formula for the area of a closed curve,

xdy

ydx,

i/(C)

gives
I

Jo

But we have the formula


2
(sin 6 cos 0)

Hence the area

= - sin

of the given curve

Sab

20

= - (1 -

cos

is
27r

[~

sin40~l

3-rrab

V,

TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS

117]

It is

now

easy to deduce the following formulae

243

C,

may be noticed in these formulae. The integrals


= f*
dx have the period 2?r
xdx
and
F(x)
f*sin.
n is even, these integrals
when
other
the
n
is
odd.
On
when
hand,
general law
n

cos"x

<J>(cc)

increase by a positive constant when x increases by 2?r.


dent a priori that these statements hold in general. For
r27r +

/-2Jr

F(x

2-Tr)

sin";rcfa;

Jo

It is evi

we have

a:

sin"

xdx,

Jz-rr

or
/o2ir

F( x

+ 27r) =

since sin x has the period 2?r.


2v

sin

sin n a;rfa;

F(x~)

x dx

is

If

is

it is

even,

a positive quantity.

integral vanishes, since sin (x

sin n

co?a;,

i/O

i/O

i/O

integral

/^2ir

r>x

sinn a;c?ic+

+ TT) =

If

evident that the


is

odd, the same

sin x.

Note. On account of the great variety of transformations appli


cable to trigonometric functions it is often convenient to introduce
them in the calculation of other integrals. Consider, for example,
this integral
the integral
Setting x
x*)*~\dx.

/[!/(!+

becomes f cos

= sin

</>

d<j>

<j>

C.

dx

which

is

ts,n<f>,

Hence, returning to the variable

the result already found in

105.

x,

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

244
The

118

[V,

wx dx.

Let us now consider an integral


R
where
/R(x)e" dx,
(x) is a rational function of x.
Let us suppose the function R(x) broken up, as we have done
several times, into a sum of the form
118.

integral

/R(x)e
x

of the form

where E(x), A l A 2
A p X 1}
Xp are polynomials, and X is
to
its
derivative.
The
prime
given integral is then equal to the
sum of the integral / E(x)e ax dx, which we learned to integrate in
85 by a suite of integrations by parts, and a number of integrals
of the form
,

There exists a reduction formula for the case when n


than unity.

is

greater

X is prime to its derivative, we can determine


and
which satisfy the identity A = \X + p.X

For, since

two polynomials
Hence we have

A.

/*

and an integration by parts gives the formula

-1

dx.

X"

Uniting these two formulas, the integral under consideration


reduced to an integral of the same type, where the exponent n
reduced by unity.

Eepeated applications of

is
is

this process lead to

the integral

dx,

where the polynomial B may always be supposed to be prime to


and of less degree than X. The reduction formula cannot be applied
to this integral, but if the roots of X be known, it can
always be
reduced to a single new type of transcendental function.
For

defmiteness suppose that all the roots are real.


Then the integral
in question can be broken up into several integrals of the form

dx.

v,

TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS

119]

245

=a+
u=
Neglecting a constant factor, the substitutions x
enable us to write this integral in either of the following forms

e"

y/u>,

C du

dy
/e"

The
is

latter integral

f [I/log

it

a transcendental function which

is

u~\du

log

called the integral logarithm.


119.

Miscellaneous integrals. Let us consider an integral of the form

inx, cos

where

a;) eta,

an integral function of sin x and cos


form

is

x.

Any term

of

this integral is of the

where

m and

n are positive

m
product sin x

cos"x

of multiples of x.

two types

We

integers.

ax

cosbxdx,

Integrating each of these by parts,

C
J
I

e"*

cos bx

dx

ax

we

ax

sinbxdx.

find the formulae

sinbx

/pQZC
ax

sin bx

dx

Hence the values of the


e

ax

cos bx dx

QQg

Jjnf*

ft,

Tb

e"*

sin bx

dx

"

cos & x dx.

integrals under consideration are

x
e"

(a cos bx -f b sin bx)L


*

a*

e"*

T
J
I

Among

have seen above that the

be replaced by a sum of sines and cosines


Hence it only remains to study the following

may

sm bx dx =

ax

(a sin bx
5
a2

r:

>

6*

b cos bx)
i

the integrals which may be reduced to the preceding


the following cases

types we may mention

/(log x) x dx

/(x) arc sin x dx

/(arc sin x) dx

/(x) arc tan x dx ,

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

246
where

denotes any integral function.

[V,

In the

first

EM.

two cases we

should take log x or arc sin x as the new variable. In the last
two we should integrate by parts, taking /(#) dx as the differential
of another polynomial F(x), which would lead to types of integrals
already considered.

EXERCISES
Evaluate the indefinite integrals of each of the following functions

1.

- x 8 - 3x 2 2
8
(x + I)

z*
(x*

I)

(x

+
3

+ Vl +

x2

identities
2

(x

4.

a2 ) 2

x"

t*

+2

of the folium of Descartes

x3

fy dx,

ay2 (2y

3a)

Saxy

where x and y

y 2 (a

one of the following

satisfy

x)

x3

(x

y 2)

a (y 2

x2 )

Derive the formulae


snv -^x cos(n

sin"

/sin
/cos
sm n -

x sin (n

l)xdx

x cos nx

+ l)xdx =

x sin (n

l)xdx

\-C,

cos- 1 xcos(n
cos"-

C,

f-

n xsinnx

+ l)xdx=
/cos"x

sinnx

nx
cos
xcosnx

C,

(7.

[EDLER.]

Evaluate each of the following pseudo-elliptic integrals

x2 )dx

/(l
6.

0.

/.

5.

cos2 x

1)

TV* tan
T
L til X

V a -f

Find the area of the loop

Evaluate the integral

+ Vx(x +

x2

3.

+ Vl +
i _ Vx

Vx + Vx +

XC*COSX,

2.

+ VI + x
i_vT^~x

1
1

I)

(l-x 2 )dx

,.>

Reduce the following

integrals to elliptic integrals

E(x)dx

Va(l

+ x6 +
)

6x(l

x*)

cx 2 (l

x2)

R(x)dx
8
2
Va(l + x ) + 6x (1 +

where R(x) denotes a rational function.

x*)

+ ex*

dx*

V,

EXERCISES

E.]
Let

7*.

Then there

a, 6, c,

247

d be the roots of an equation of the fourth degree P(x)


form

0.

exist three involutory relations of the

+ Ni

Mix"

which interchange the roots by

<=

2,

1,

If the rational

pairs.

3,

function f(x) satisfies the

identity

VP

the integral f[f(x)/


(x)] dx
matique, Vol. XV, p. 106).
8.

The

rectification of a curve of the type

a binomial differential.
9.

If

pseudo-elliptic (see Bulletin de la

is

>

1,

show

= Ax*

SocMM matM-

leads to an integral of

Discuss the cases of integrability.

that

+1
/_,

dx

(a

Vl - x 2

x)

Va2 -

Hence deduce the formula


1

X
^1C

J52

>

0,

dx

10. If

_
~

+ 2Bz +

C)

[Apply the reduction formula of


11.

1)

2.4.6..-2n

show that

dx
2

(^lx
x
X*"*

1. 3. 5-- -(2re

_
~

x2

(2ft

(2n

3)
2)

104.]

Evaluate the definite integral

sin 2 xdx
1

12. Derive the following formulae

2a cos x

a2

dx

Vl - 2ax + a 2 Vl -

JL
LI

2/3x

ax)(l

/3x)

- 2ax + a 2)(l - 2^x +

dz

TT

p?) Vl

x2

2 1

13*. Derive the formula

x m ~ l dx

I/O
,

where

and n are positive integers

partial fractions.]

it

nsin

(m<n).

M*
n
[Break up the integrand into

INDEFINITE INTEGRALS

248
From

14.

the preceding exercise deduce the formula

x n - dx
}

Setting I

p<q

(p

(P

= ft q (t +

i/O

15.

[V, Exs

l)Ip

!)*-*,

l)

it

deduce the following reduction formulae

dt,

= + !( + !)*+!/_,,
= i9 + (t + I) -* ~ (2 + q-p)I- P +

and two analogous formulae for reducing the exponent

i,

q.

16. Derive formulae of reduction for the integrals

xdx
2
V2x
+ 2Bx + C
J

z _

~J

dx
(x

2
a)* V^4z

+ 2Bx + C

17*. Derive a reduction formula for the integral

xn dx

J vnr^
Hence deduce a formula analogous

to that of Wallis for the definite integral


1

dx

vl-x*

Has

18.

the definite integral

dx

1+

Jo^
^
a

finite

19.

value ?

Show

that the area of a sector of an ellipse

and a radius vector through the focus

^j

(1

tSQ

where p denotes the parameter W/a and

and show that the area


A

ab

e the eccentricity.

where

is
<f>

20.

MNT,

t,

u V(l

Applying the gen

e)/(l

e)

succes

in question is

arc tan

may

the eccentric anomaly.

V
Also show that this expression

focal axis

e cos w) 2

method, make the substitutions tan w/2

sively,

bounded by the

is

2
= P

eral

x 4 sin 2 x

+ M/

be written in the form

ab

(*

See

e sin

p. 406.

Find the curves for which the distance NT, or the area of the
triangle
is constant
Construct the two branches of the curve.
(Fig. 3, p. 31).
[Licence, Paris, 1880; Toulouse, 1882.]

EXERCISES

V, Exs.j

21*. Setting

X 2n + l

An =
2

/.I

z 2)"cosxzdz

(1
^

2n Jo

249

derive the recurrent formula

From

this

deduce the formulae

AZ P = Ut p sin x + Vzp cos z


A.i p

+1

= Uz p +

sin

Vz p + 1 cos x

where UZ P V% p UV P + I, V^^ + are polynomials with integral coefficients, and


where 72p and U^ p + \ contain no odd powers of x. It is readily shown that
these formulae hold when n = 1, and the general case follows from the above
,

recurrent formula.

The formula

we assume

for

that

Ao p enables us
2

/4
relation of the form
7T

to show that n 2 is incommensurable.


For if
and then replace x by ir/2 in A^ p we obtain a

b/a,

a 2

4p Jo

V -*)

COB

^<b,

where HI is an integer. Such an equation, however, is impossible, for the


nand side approaches zero as p increases indefinitely.

right*

CHAPTER VI
DOUBLE INTEGRALS
I.

DOUBLE INTEGRALS METHODS OF EVALUATION


GREEX S THEOREM

two variables. Let 2 = f(x, y} be a


two independent variables x and y which is contin
uous inside a region A of the plane which is bounded by a closed
contour C, and also upon the contour itself. A number of proposi
70 for a continuous function
tions analogous to those proved in
variable can be shown to hold for this function. For
of a
120. Continuous functions of

function of the

single
A can be divided into
instance, given any positive number c, the region
the values of z at
between
the
that
a,
such
in
difference
way
subregions

any

points (x, y), (x

tivo

We

shall always proceed

follows

same subregion is less than e.


of successive subdivisions
means
by
in the

as

A divided

into subregions by drawing


to
the two axes at equal dis
parallels
The corre
tances 8 from each other.

Suppose the region

sponding subdivisions of

are either

squares of side 8 lying entirely inside C,


or else portions of squares bounded in

Then, if the prop


were untrue for the whole region
A, it would also be untrue for at least
one of the subdivisions, say A^. Sub
dividing the subregion A l in the same

part by an arc of C.
osition
x
FIG. 23

manner and continuing the process

indefinitely,

we would obtain a
for
An
A n lies between

A lf
sequence of squares or portions of squares A,
which the proposition would be untrue. The region

= a n and x = b n which are parallel to the y axis,


and the two lines y = c n y = dn which are parallel to the x axis.
As n increases indefinitely a n and bn approach a common limit A,
and c n and dn approach a common limit /A, for the numbers
for example, never decrease and always remain less than a fixed

the two lines x

number.

It follows that all the points of


250

A H approach a limiting

VI,

INTRODUCTION

120]

GREEN

THEOREM

251

The rest of
point (\, //,) which lies within or upon the contour C.
the reasoning is similar to that in
70 if the theorem stated were
;

untrue, the function f(x, y) could be shown to be discontinuous at


the point (A, /*), which is contrary to hypothesis.
Corollary. Suppose that the parallel lines have been chosen
so near together that the difference of any two values of z in
any

one subregion is less than e/2, and let -^ be the distance between
the successive parallels. Let (x, y*) and (x y ) be two points inside
or upon the contour C, the distance between which is less than
rj.
1

These two points will

two

either in the same subregion or else in


which have one vertex in common. In

lie

different subregions

either case the absolute value of the difference

f(x,y}-f(x

,y<}

cannot exceed 2e/2 = c. Hence, given any positive number


number 17 can be found such that

e,

another

positive

\f(x,

y}-f(x>,

)\<

whenever the distance between the two points (x, y*) and (x y ), which
lie in A or on the contour C, is less than
In other words, any func
rj.
,

tion

which

is

continuous in

A and on

its

boundary C

is

uniformly

continuous.

From the preceding theorem it can be shown, as in 70, that every


function which is continuous in A (inclusive of its boundary) is neces
sarily finite in A.

If

M be the upper limit and m the lower limit of


M m

the function in A, the difference


is called the oscillation.
The
method of successive subdivisions also enables us to show that the

function actually attains each of the values


and
at least once
inside or upon the contour C.
Let a be a point for which z
and b a point for which z
M, and let us join a and b by a broken

=m

which

lies entirely inside C.


As the point (x, y) describes this
z
is
a
function
continuous
of
the distance of the point (x, y)
line,
from the point a. Hence z assumes every value p. between
and

line

M at least

once upon this line

Since a and b can be joined


(
70).
an
infinite
number
of
different
broken
by
lines, it follows that the
f unction
assumes
value
between
at an infinite
and
f(x, ?/)
every

number

of points

which

lie

inside of C.

A of the plane is said to be less than I in all its


a circle of radius I can be found which entirely

finite region

dimensions

if

encloses A.

A variable

region of the plane

is

said to be infinitesimal

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

252

[VI,

121

if a circle whose radius is arbitrarily preaswhich


eventually contains the region entirely
signed can be found
a
within it. For example,
square whose side approaches zero or au
axes
approach zero is infinitesimal in all its
ellipse both of whose
On the other hand, a rectangle of which only one side
dimensions.
approaches zero or an ellipse only one of whose axes approaches zero

in all

its

dimensions

not infinitesimal in

is

all its

121. Double integrals.

into subregions a x , a 2

the subregion

a,-,

and

dimensions.

Let the region A of the plane be divided


be the area of
a n in any manner, and let

-,

u>,-

and

m,-

the limits of

/(a;,

y) in a

Consider

sums

the two

each of which has a definite value for any particular subdivision


None of the sums are less than ml* where ft is the area of

of A.

is the lower limit of f(x, y)


the region A of the plane, and where
hence these sums have a lower limit /. Likewise,
in the region A
is the upper limit
none of the sums s are greater than 3/ft, where
;

A hence

these sums have an upper limit /


Moreover it can be shown, as in
71, that any of the sums S is
greater than or equal to any one of the sums s; hence it follows
of f(x, y) in the region

that
/>/

If the function f(x, y) is continuous, the sums S and s approach


a common limit as each of the subregions approaches zero in all its

For, suppose that rj is a positive number such that the


oscillation of the function is less than c in any portion of A which

dimensions.

less in all its

is

a2

less

dimensions than

a n be less in

nii

all its

will be less than

than

eft,

where
S

ft

If each of the subregions a if


each of the differences
rj,

77.

dimensions than
e,

s will be
and hence the difference S
But we have

denotes the total area of A.

-s =

S-I+I- /

where none of the quantities S

7,

,/

-*,
s

can be negative.

7 <eft; and since e is an arbitrary posi


Hence, in particular, /
Moreover each of the numbers
tive number, it follows that 7 = /
/ and /
s can be made less than any preassigned number by
S
.

*If f(x, y)

TRANS.

is

a constant k,

M = m = Mf =

=
m<

k,

and S

= s=

mft

= MQ.

VI,

a proper choice of
/,

GREEN S THEOREM

INTRODUCTION

121]

which

Hence the sums

e.

>S

and

253

have a common limit

called the double integral of the function f(x,


y\ extended

is

over the region A.

denoted by the symbol

It is

J
-//

J(A)

and the region A


If

is called the field of integration.


be
point inside or on the boundary of the subany
77,)
it is evident that the sum
2/(, 77,-) to, lies between the two

(|,.,

region

sums S and

s or is equal to one of them.


It therefore also
approaches the double integral as its limit whatever be the method

of choice of the point (,-, 77,).


The first theorem of the mean

may be extended without difficulty


Let f(x, y) be a function which is continuous
in A, and let
y) be another function which is continuous and
which has the same sign throughout A. For definiteness we shall
to

double integrals.
<f>(x,

suppose that

<$>(x,

f(x, y] in A,

Adding

it is

y)

positive in A.

is

If

M and m are the limits of

evident that*

these inequalities and passing to the limit,

all

we

find the

formula
I

J
where

/x

lies

the value

/A

this in the

(1)

J(A)

Ax

>

y)<K

between

x y)dxdy
>

= nl
J

*(*

J(A)

M and m.

at a point (,

77)

Since the function f(x, y) assumes


inside of the contour C, we may write

form

Jff
J(A)

f(x,

y)4>(x,

y)dxdy =/(,

77)

\\
J

4>(x,

J<A

which constitutes the law of the mean for double integrals. If


= 1, for example, the integral on the right, ffdx dy, extended
y~)

<(a:,

over the region A, is evidently equal to the area


In this case the formula (1) becomes

ff

(2)

If

f(x, y)

equations.

f(x, y) dx dy

J J(A)
is

a constant k,

we

shall

The following formula

have

fl/(

M = m = k,

77)

of that region.

and these inequalities become


M= k. TRANS.

holds, however, with

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

254

[VI,

122

To the

analytic notion of a double integral corre


Let f(x, y) be
notion of volume.
sponds the important geometric
contour C.
a
closed
inside
and
continuous
is
which
a function
upon
122. Volume.

We

shall further suppose for definiteness that this function is posi


Let S be the portion of the surface represented by the equa
tive.

T whose projection
=f(x, y) which is bounded by a curve
denote
shall
C.
We
contour
is
the
by E the por
upon the xy plane
the cylinder
and
the
surface
the
bounded
of
tion
S,
xy plane,
by
space
A
of
the
The
C.
is
section
whose right
region
xy plane which is
in
C
subdivided
contour
the
bounded by
any manner, let a,- be
being
the area of
c
and
contour
a
bounded
the
one of
by
subregions
c cuts
curve
is
the
section
whose
The
this subregion.
right
cylinder
and
Let
a
curve
s
bounded
5
a
the
surface
of
p
out
by
y
portion
tion z

t-,

o>

from the xy plane are a mini


Pf be the points of s whose distances
a
mum and maximum, respectively. If planes be drawn through
these two points parallel to the xy plane, two right cylinders are
and whose altitudes are the
obtained which have the same base
{

o>

and m of the function /(cc, y) inside the contour c,, respec


volumes Vt and v { of these cylinders are, respectively,
The
tively.
The sums S and s considered above therefore repre
and
w,-m,-.*
co,
and ^v of these two types of cylin
sent, respectively, the sums 2F
limit of these two sums the volume
common
the
call
shall
We
ders.
It
E
of
the
of
may be noted, as was done in the case
space.
limits

portion
of area ( 78), that this definition agrees with the ordinary concep
tion of

meant by volume.
S lies partly beneath the xy plane, the double integral
to the
the sign
represent a volume if we agree to attach

what

is

If the surface
will still

volumes of portions of space below the xy plane. It appears then that


sum of volumes, just as
every double integral represents an algebraic
a simple integral represents an algebraic sum of areas. The limits of
are replaced in the case of a
integration in the case of a simple integral
double integral by the contour which encloses the field of integration.
123. Evaluation of double integrals.

The evaluation

of a double

evaluations of two simple


integral can be reduced to the successive
the field of integration
where
the
case
consider
us
first
Let
integrals.

*By the volume of a right cylinder we shall understand the limit approached by
in
the volume of a right prism of the same height, whose base is a polygon inscribed
a right section of the cylinder, as each of the sides of this polygon approaches zero.
but is useful in showing that the
[This definition is not necessary for the argument,
definition of

volume

in general agrees with our ordinary conceptions.

TRANS.]

VI,

INTRODUCTION

123]

GREEN

THEOREM

255

R bounded by the straight lines x = x x = X,


x
X and y F. Suppose this rectangle
where
Y,
y
to be subdivided by parallels to the two axes x = x
y = yk
=
=
The
of
the
small
k
area
n
rectangle
1, 2,
TO).
1, 2,
(i
R ik bounded by the lines x = #,_ a; =
y = yk _ y = y k is
a rectangle

is

y = y

<

<

( ,

or,-,

Hence

the double integral

where

(,*,

inside or

sum

the limit of the

is

is

any point
one
of the
upon
r) ik )

sides of

l ,

ik

We shall employ the indetermination


(it>

Vik)

the

of

n order

the calculation.

mark
is

first

points

to simplify
Let us re

of all that

if

/(a-)

a continuous function in

the interval

(a,

),

and

the interval

if

(a,

b~)

be subdivided in any
such
#,-)

can be found in each subinterval (x i _ l

manner, a value

that

For we need merely apply the law of the mean


the subintervals

for integrals to each of

&) to find these values of

&.
the portion of the sum S which arises from the row of rec
= a:,-.! and x x is
tangles between the lines x
(a, Xj), (a^,

a- 2

),

(#_,,

Now

^
Let us take ^ a = |/2 =
in such a way that the
/(*,-!

i?n)(yi

^ im

= x^

l}

)G/2

//i)

and then choose

i;

2/0) +/(,-!> i7,-s)(y

!/

way

[ ,

for each of the

two consecutive parallels to the y


(5)

S = *(or )(x

77,2,

- yO H

Y
equal to the integral f f(x i _- y)dy, where the integral
If
evaluated under the assumption that x i _ l is a constant.

is

ceed in the same

sum

is

to be

we pro

rows of rectangles bounded by

axis,

we

finally find the equation

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

256
where we have

[VI,

123

set for brevity

*00 =

f(x y) dy>

JV*

This function

defined by a definite integral, where x

4>(x),

is

con

As all the
sidered as a parameter, is a continuous function of x.
x i _ approach zero, the formula (5) shows that S
intervals x
approaches the definite integral
i

..r

(#)

dx

Jx.

Hence the double

6)

integral in question is given

f
JfJ(,R)

/(*>

!/)

dxdy

= f
J*t

dx

by the formula

Aff(x,

y) dy

In other words, in order to evaluate the double integral, the function


f(x, y) should first be integrated between the limits y and Y, regard
ing x as a constant and y as a variable ; and then the resulting func
tion^ which is a function of x alone, should be integrated again between
the limits x

If

and X.

we proceed

in the reverse order,

i.e. first

evaluate the portion

S which comes from a row of rectangles which lie between two


consecutive parallels to the x axis, we find the analogous formula
of

J/ J(R)

A comparison

/(*>

x;r

is

/>r

dx

Jx

An

dy

Jy

Jx9

f(x, y)dx.

of these two formulae gives the

which

y)dxdy

f(x,

V(S

^x

/->Y

=
y) dy

dy

Jy

Jx

f(x,

y)dx

called the formula for integration under the integral sign.


is that the limits x
X, y , Y

essential presupposition in the proof

are constants, and that the function f(x, y}


the field of integration.

Example. Let z

cc

new formula

^-

/JU>*

= xy/a.

Then the

is

continuous throughout

general formula gives

VI,

GREEN S THEOREM

INTRODUCTION

123]

In general, if the function f(x,


alone by a function of y alone,
/

J
The two

<t>(x)$(y)dxdy

shall

Jxn

J(R)

the product of a function of x

is

y*)

we

257

have

$(x)dx x

.I

integrals on the right are absolutely independent of each

other.

Franklin * has deduced from this remark a very simple demonstration of cer
and f (x) be two functions

Let
tain interesting theorems of Tchebycheff.
which are continuous in an interval (a, b), where

extended over the square bounded by the

lines

<f>(x)

<

b.

o,

Then

6,

the double integral

a,

b is equal

to the difference

2(6

a)

C
Ja

<t>(x)\l/(x)dx

C
Ja

(p(x)dx

x C

\f/(x)dx.

*/a

But all the elements of the above double integral have the same sign if the two
lunctions 0(z) and ^(z) always increase or decrease simultaneously, or if one of
them always increases when the other decreases. In the first case the two func
tions
and \f/(x)
^(y) always have the same sign, whereas they have
Hence we shall have
opposite signs in the second case.
(f>(x)

(f>(y)

(b

-a) C

Ja

<j>(x)t(x)dx

whenever the two functions


<j>(x)

out the interval

(a, b).

(b-

a)

On
f
Ja

>

C
x C ^(x)dx
J a $(x)dx
Ja

and \f/(x) both increase or both decrease through


we shall have

the other hand,

<f>(x)^(x)dx

<

f 0(z)dz x f
Ja

Ja

whenever one of the functions increases and the other decreases throughout the
interval.

The sign of the double integral is also definitely determined in case 0(z) ^(z),
for then the integrand becomes a perfect square. In this case we shall have
(b

-a]

whatever be the function 0(z), where the sign of equality can hold only when
is
<p(x)

The

a constant.
solution of an interesting problem of the calculus of variations may be
and Q be two fixed points in a plane whose
this result.
Let

deduced from

coordinates are

(a,

A) and

(6,

any curve joining these two

Let y =/(z) be the equation of


where /(z), together with its first derivative

B), respectively.

points,

* American Journal
of Mathematics, Vol. VII, p. 77.

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

258

124

[VI,

The problem is to
(a, b).
which the integral f^ y 2 dx is a
and noting
minimum. But by the formula just found, replacing
by
that /(a) = A and f(b) = B by hypothesis, we have

(x), is

supposed

be continuous in the interval

to

find that one of the curves

y=f(x)

for

y"

<f>(x)

*dx^(B(b-a) )Cy
a
The minimum value

of the integral

is

therefore (B

actually assumed when y is a constant,


fixed points reduces to the straight line PQ.
is

i.e.

A)*/(b
a), and that value
the curve joining the two

when

124. Let us now pass to the case where the field of integration is
bounded by a contour of any form whatever. We shall first suppose
that this contour is met in at most two points by any parallel to the
y axis. We may then suppose that it is composed of two straight
lines x = a and x = b (a
6)
B
and two arcs of curves APB
and A QB whose equations are
A
re~
YI = : (cc) and F2 = $2
spectively, where the functions
and
are continuous be
2
tween a and b. It may happen
that the points A and A coin
cide, or that B and B coin
<

<

(#)>

<

<f>!

FIG. 25

cide, or both.

This occurs, for

a convex curve like an ellipse.


Let us
again subdivide the field of integration R by means of parallels to
the axes. Then we shall have two classes of subregions regular if
instance, if the contour

is

they are rectangles which

lie

wholly within the contour, irregular

they are portions of rectangles bounded in part by arcs of the


contour.
Then it remains to find the limit of the sum
if

where

o>

is

the area of any one of the subregions and (,

rj)

is

a point

in that subregion.

Let us

first

evaluate the portion of S which arises from the row

xi _ l x
x
of subregions between the consecutive parallels x
These subregions will consist of several regular ones, beginning
with a vertex whose ordinate
ordinate

is

point (,

77)

is

y ^

Y and
t

going to a vertex whose

Y and

several irregular ones. Choosing a suitable


in each rectangle, it is clear, as above, that the portion

y"

S which comes from these regular rectangles may be written


the form
of

in

VI,

GREEN S THEOREM

INTRODUCTION

124]

(,-_ i,

259

y)dy.

and 2 (a;)
Suppose that the oscillation of each of the functions
x ) is less than 8, and that each of the
l}
differences yk
yk _ is also less than 8. Then it is easily seen that
<

<i(#)

in each of the intervals (x { _

x _ 1 and x
the total area of the irregular subregions between x
xt
is less than 48(x
;_,), and that the portion of S which arises
i

x _^) in absolute value,


from these regions is less than 4:HB(x
where H is the upper limit of the absolute value of f(x, y) in the
whole field of integration. On the other hand, we have
{

/(*<-i>

y)dy

and since \Yl

/(,-i,

y}dy+

Jf\

and |F2

y"\

ny

s*Yi

f*Yt

XV"

Jy

J Y*

are each less than 28,

we may

write

f/fa-u y)dy= JC f(xM)

Jy

The portion of S which arises from the row of subregions under


consideration may therefore be written in the form

where

0,-

between

lies

+ 1.

and

The sum SH8 2,O

(x

ar

_j)

than 87/8(6
a) in absolute value, and approaches zero with
which may be taken as small as we please. The double integral

less

therefore the limit of the

is
8,

is

sum

where

Hence we have the formula

7)

In the

f
JfJ(R)

f(*, V)

first

the limits
constants.

dxd = fdx f
Ja
JY

integration x
are
l

Y and F2

l/

f(x, y) dy.

is

to be regarded as a constant, but

themselves

functions

of

x and not

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

260

[VI,

124

Example. Let us try to evaluate the double integral of the function xy/a
over the interior of a quarter circle bounded by the axes and the circumference

X2

The limits for x are


Hence the integral

and R, and

The

is

#2

constant, y

may vary from

to

VR

z2

is

p r^

Jo

if

yl

Jo

_.

,
2

Jo

<

value of the latter integral

is

i(fe

easily

Jo

/.(. ^
J

shown

be R*/8a.

to

When the field

of integration is bounded by a contour of any form


whatever,
may be divided into several parts in such a way that
the boundary of each part is met in at most two points by a parallel
it

We

might also divide it into parts in such a way that


y axis.
the boundary of each part would be met in at most two points by
any line parallel to the x axis, and begin by integrating with respect
to x.
Let us consider, for example, a convex closed curve which lies
to the

= a, x = b, y = c, y = d,
the
four
which
lie
A,
B, C, D, respectively, for which x
points
upon
and y2 = 2 (cc)
or y is a minimum or a maximum.* Let y =
be the equations of the two arcs ACS and ADB, respectively, and
= 2 (y) be the equations of the two arcs CAD
let o^ =
(y) and x 2
and
are continu
and CBD, respectively. The functions
ous between a and b, and i/^ (y) and i/^ (y) are continuous between c
and d. The double integral of a f unction /(x, y), which is continuous
inside this contour, may be evaluated in two ways.
Equating the
inside the rectangle formed by the lines x

<

1/^1

<#>i()

\j/

<f>i(x~)

values found,

we

obtain the formula

~&
I

(8)

Jo,

fa(x")

~y 2

dx

f(x,

~fi

y}dy

t/c

i/i/j

dy

-.T,
I

/(or,

y)dx.

lyj-,

It is clear that the limits are entirely different in the

two

integrals.

Every convex closed contour leads to a formula of this sort. For


example, taking the triangle bounded by the lines y = 0, x = a,
y = x as the field of integration, we obtain the following formula,

which

is

due

to

Jo

Lejeune Dirichlet

dx

Jo

f(x,

*The reader

y)dy=\dy\
Jo
Jy
is

f(x, y)dx.

advised to draw the figure.

VI,

GREEN S THEOREM

INTRODUCTION

125]

261

125. Analogies to simple integrals. The integral JJf(t)dt, considered as a


There exists an analogous theorem for
function of x, has the derivative /(x).
double integrals. Let f(x, y) be a function which is continuous inside a rec

bounded by the straight

tangle

lines

= a,

A, y

The double integral of /(x, y) extended over a


x = a, x = X, y = b, y = F,(a
A, b Y

X
X and Y of the variable corner, that

<

<

<

nates

<

b,

J5,(a

<

A,

<

B).

rectangle bounded by the lines


.B), is a function of the coordi

is,

F(X,Y)= JCa dxCf(x,y)dy.


Jb
Setting *(x)

= fb

/(x, y) dy, a first differentiation with respect to

= *(X) = f

second differentiation with respect to


2

/<-*,

X gives

V)dy.

F leads to

the formula

(9)

The most general function u(X, Y) which satisfies the equation (9) is evi
dently obtained by adding to F(X, Y) a function z whose second derivative
It is therefore of the form
d 2 z/dXdY is zero.
u(X, Y)

(10)

where

and
<t>(X)

functions

function

\1<(Y)

= C

Ja

Y
dx C f(x, y) dy
Jb

X=a

Y= b

and then

V(Y) =
whence we

<f(X)

+ f (F)

are two arbitrary functions (see 38). The two arbitrary


such a way that u(X, Y) reduces to a given

may be determined in
V(Y) when X = a, and

Setting
conditions

to another given function

in the preceding equation,

+ *(F)

0(a)

U(X) when Y b.
we obtain the two

U(X) - t(X) + f (6)

find

= F(F) - *(a)
and the formula

(10) takes the

u(X, Y)

(11)

*(&)

= (
a

F(6)

- 0(a)

<i>(X)

= U(X) - F(6)

form

*/

dx ( /(x,
Jb

y)

dy

+ U(X) + F(F) - F(6)

Conversely, if, by any means whatever, a function u(X, Y) has been found
which satisfies the equation (9), it is easy to show by methods similar to tne
above that the value of the double integral is given by the formula

(12)

f dx f
/6

/(x,

y)dy

u(X, Y)

u(X,

b)

u(o,

F)

u(a, b).

i/a

analogous to the fundamental formula (6) on page 156.


is in a sense analogous to the formula for integration
Let A be a finite region of the plane bounded by one or more curves

This formula

is

The following formula


by

parts.

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

262

[VI,

126

A function /(a;, y) which is continuous in A varies between its


and its maximum V. Imagine the contour lines /(x, y) = v drawn
where v lies between v and F, and suppose that we are able to find the area of
the portion of A for which /(x, y) lies between v and v.
This area is a func
tion F(v) which increases with u, and the area between two neighboring contour
of

any form.

minimum

lines

is

F(v

+ A) -

F(v)

= AvF

(v

If this area

0Av).

be divided into

infinitesi

mal portions by lines joining the two contour lines, a point (, 77) may be found
in each of them such that /(, i})
v + 6A.v.
Hence the sum of the elements
of the double integral / ffdxdy which arise from this region is
(V

It follows that the

that

is

double integral

is

equal to the limit of the

sum

to say, to the simple integral

v
v

This method

by two contour

is

(v)

dv

= VF( F) -

especially convenient

when

rv
I

the

F(v) dv

field of

integration

/(x, y)

For example, consider the double


the interior of the circle x 2

2
j/

/(x,

y}=

bounded

V.

// Vl + x 2 + y 2 dx dy extended over
we set v = Vl + x 2 + y 2 the field of
contour lines v = 1 and v = \/2, and the

integral

1.

If

bounded by the two


function F(v), which is the area of the circle of radius Vv 2
Hence the given double integral has the value
I).
7[(v*

integration

is

lines

is

/v/iT
|

The preceding formula

2itv 2 dv

2ir

J\
is

(2V5-1).

1, is

equal to

readily extended to the double integral

where F(o) now denotes the double integral


y)dxdy extended over that
portion of the field of integration bounded by the contour line v =f(x, y).
ff<f>(x,

126. Green s theorem.

tive of a

known

integrations
integration.

may

If the function
f(x, y}

is

the partial deriva

function with respect to either x or y, one of the


be performed at once, leaving only one indicated

This very simple remark leads to a very important


is known as Green s theorem.

formula which
*

Numerous

applications of this method are to be found in a


series, Vol. IV, p. 233).

(Journal de Liouville, 1st

memoir by Catalan

VI,

GREEN

INTRODUCTION

126]

Let us consider

first

a double integral

THEOREM

263

// cP/dy dx dy extended

over a region of the plane bounded by a contour C, which is met


in at most two points by any line parallel to the y axis (see Fig. 15,
p. 188).

A and B

Let

be the points of

maximum,
Bb

respectively.
meets C in two points

A
m

at

which x

is

minimum and a
Aa and

Then the double

respectively.
to y may be written

and y z

integral after integration with respect

CCcP
J

dxd>

JJ

parallel to the y axis between


x and
z whose ordinates are y-^

~fy

= C dx C"^P dy= C
J
j ^y
j

But the two integrals fa P(x, y\)dx and fa P(x, y^)dx are line
2 B, respectively; hence
l B and
integrals taken along the arcs
the preceding formula may be written in the form

Am

Am

(13)

where the line integral is to be taken along the contour C in the


direction indicated by the arrows, that is to say in the positive
In order to extend
sense, if the axes are chosen as in the figure.
the formula to an area bounded by any contour we should proceed
as above ( 94), dividing the given region into several parts for each

which the preceding conditions are satisfied, and applying the for
mula to each of them. In a similar manner the following analogous

of

form

is

easily derived

// 1?

>

<

where the

line integral is

always taken in the same sense.


we find the formula

Sub

tracting the equations (13) and (14),

(15)

where the double integral


This is Green s formula
;

extended over the region bounded by C.


Just
applications are very important.

is

its

merely point out that the substitution Q = x and


P = y gives the formula obtained above ( 94) for the area of a
closed curve as a line integral.

now we

shall

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

264

AREA OF A SURFACE

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

II.

127

[VI,

In the evaluation of double integrals we have supposed up to the


present that the field of integration was subdivided into infinitesimal

We are now going

rectangles by parallels to the two coordinate axes.


to suppose the field of integration subdivided by any

two systems of

curves whatever.

Let u and v be the coordinates of a point

127. Preliminary formula.

with respect to a set of rectangular axes in a plane, x and y the coor


dinates of another point with respect to a similarly chosen set of
rectangular axes in that or in some other plane.

x =f(u, v),

(16)

<l>(u,

The formulae

v)

establish a certain correspondence between the points of the


shall suppose 1) that the f unctions /(w, v) and
planes.

We

two

</>(,

v),

together with their first partial derivatives, are continuous for all
points (u, v) of the uv plane which lie within or on the boundary of

A l bounded by a contour C l 2) that the equations (16)


transform the region AI of the uv plane into a region A of the
xy plane bounded by a contour C, and that a one-to-one correspond
ence exists between the two regions and between the two contours
a region

in such a way that one and only one point of A 1 corresponds to any
point of A 3) that the functional determinant A
D(f,
v)
does not change sign inside of C lt though it may vanish at certain
points of A i.

Two

<)/Z>(w,

When

the point (u, v) describes the con


may arise.
in the positive sense the point (x, y) describes the contour C
either in the positive or else in the negative sense without ever

tour

cases

We

shall say that the corre


reversing the sense of its motion.
spondence is direct or inverse, respectively, in the two cases.
The area fl of the region A is given by the line integral

Q=

J(.C

taken along the contour

new

variables

u and

in the positive sense.


In terms of the
by (16) this becomes

v defined

ft

f(u, v)

d<j>(u,

v)

Ac,)

where the new integral is to be taken along the contour C l in the


should be taken
positive sense, and where the sign -f- or the sign

VI,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

127]

265

according as the correspondence is direct or inverse.


Green s theorem to the new integral with x = u, v = y, P

=/

we

Applying

fd<f>/du,

find

d<f>/dv,

c/u

cv

D(u, v)

whence

A\

dudv
or,

applying the law of the mean to the double integral,


D(f, *)

n=

(17)

where (, rf) is a point inside the contour C l} and n l is the area of


the region A v in the uv plane.
It is clear that the sign -f or the
should be taken according as A itself is positive or negative.
sign

Hence

the correspondence is direct or inverse according as

is

positive

or negative.

The formula (17)


tional determinants

moreover establishes an analogy between func


and ordinary derivatives. For, suppose that the

region A i approaches zero in all its dimensions, all its points approach
ing a limiting point (u, v~). Then the region A will do the same, and
the ratio of the two areas O and f^ approaches as its limit the abso
lute value of the determinant A. Just as the ordinary derivative is
the limit of the ratio of two linear infinitesimals, the functional
determinant is thus seen to be the limit of the ratio of two infinites

imal areas.

From this point of view the formula (17)


mean for derivatives.

is

the analogon

of the law of the

Remarks. The hypotheses which we have made concerning the correspondence


between A and AI are not all independent. Thus, in order that the correspond
ence should be one-to-one, it is necessary that A should not change sign in the
regional of the uv plane. For, suppose that A vanishes along a curve 71 which
divides the portion of AI
positive from the portion

where A
where A

is

is

Let us consider a small arc


negative.
mini of -yi and a small portion of AI

which contains the arc mini.


This
portion is composed of two regions a\
and a\ which are separated by mini
(Fig. 26).

When the point (u, v) describes the


region a\, where A is positive, the point
(x, y) describes a region a bounded by a contour
mi HI pi mi and

mnpm

Fio. 26

mnpm, and

the two contours

are described simultaneously in the positive sense.


the point (, v) describes the region af, where A is negative, the point

When
(x,

y)

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

266

[VI,

128

whose contour nmqr is described in the negative sense as


described in the positive sense.
The region a must therefore
Hence to any point (x, y) in the common part
cover a part of the region a.
nrm correspond two points in the uv plane which lie on either side of the
describes a region a

n\m\q^n\

line

is

mini.

= x, Y = y 2 for which A = 2 y.
which encloses a segment a& of the
x axis, it is evident that the point (X, Y) describes two regions both of which
axis and both of which are bounded by the same segment AB of
lie above the
A sheet of paper folded together along a straight line drawn upon it
that axis.
gives a clear idea of the nature of the region described by the point (X, Y}.
The condition that A should preserve the same sign throughout AI is not suf
= x2 y 2 Y = 2 xy,
In the example
ficient for one-to-one correspondence.
2 is
2
=
if
But
4
the Jacobian A
always positive.
(r, 6) and (.R, w) are the
(x + y )
and
the formulae of
of
the
coordinates
respectively,
points
F),
(x,
y)
(X,
polar
transformation may be written in the form R = r2 u = 2 0. As r varies from a
varies from OtO7T + a(0<a< Tf/2), the point (.R, u) describes
to b (a
b) and
But to every value of
a circular ring bounded by two circles of radii a 2 and b2
and 2a correspond two values of 6, one of which lies
the angle u between
between and a, the other between it and it + a. The region described by the
point (X, Y) may be realized by forming a circular ring of paper which partially
As an example

consider the transformation

If the point (x, y) describes a closed region

<

itself.

overlaps

128. Transformation of double integrals. First method. Retaining


the hypotheses made above concerning the regions A and A l and the
formulae (16), let us consider a function F(x, y) which is continuous
To any subdivision of the region A l into subregions
in the region A.

a n corresponds a subdivision of the region A into subbe the areas of the two corre
an
Let to, and
sponding subregions a, and a,., respectively. Then, by formula (17),
a lf a 2

regions a l} a 2

<r,

(I),-

CTf

D(ui} vj
and v are the coordinates of some point in the region a,.
a point x, =/(,-, v,), y,- =
^.-)
v,-) corresponds
of the region a,-.
Hence, setting *(M, v) = -F[/(w, v),
v)], we
where

To

this point (,-,

<(w,-,

<(w,

may

write

D(f,

D(u i}

<#

Vi )

whence, passing to the limit, we obtain the formula

(18)

ff

J(A)

F(x, y) dx dy

F[f(u,

I
JI */Ui)

v},

<f>(u,

dudv.

v)

D(u, v)

VI,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

128]

Hence

to

267

perform a transformation in a double integral x and y should


new variables u and v,
We have seen already

be replaced by their values as functions of the


and dx dy should be replaced by A du dv.
|

how

the

new

field of integration is

determined.

In order to find the limits between which the integrations should


be performed in the calculation of the new double integral, it is in
general unnecessary to construct the contour C\ of the new field
of integration A lf
For, let us consider u and v as a system of
curvilinear coordinates, and let one of the variables u and v in the

formulae (16) be kept constant while the other varies.


in this way two systems of curves u
const, and v

We

obtain

const.

By

the hypotheses made above, one and only one curve of each of these
families passes through any
given point of the region A.

Let us suppose for


ness that a curve

family v

const,

definite-

of

the

meets the

C in at most two
MI and MI which cor

contour
points

respond to values w t and u z


of u (HI
w 2 ), and that each
<

(<

of the (v) curves which meets

the contour

between
the two curves v
a and
v

lies

^//^^f^T^

In this case

(a<b~).

Fia. 27

we should

integrate first
with regard to u, keeping v constant and letting u vary from
to w 2 where u l and u z are in general functions of v, and then inte

grate this result between the limits a and

The double

integral

is

f do f
\Ju.

V[/(

Ua

b.

therefore equal to the expression

V),

change of variables amounts essentially to a subdivision of the


by means of the two systems of curves (u) and (v).
Let w be the area of the curvilinear quadrilateral bounded by the
field of integration

curves

(it), (u
du), (v), (v -f dv ), where du and dv are positive.
this quadrilateral corresponds in the uv plane a rectangle whose
sides are du and dv. Then, by formula
A(, 77)) du dv, where
(17), w
lies between u and u
v
dv. The expres
and
between
and
v
du,
77

To

sion
|

b.(u, v)

du dv
|

is

called the element of area in the system of

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

268

[VI,

129

c du dv,
The exact value of is
\
\\ A(M, v)
be
infinitesimal
dv.
This
du
and
with
zero
may
approaches
for
since
limit
of
the
sum
the
in
w,
A(M,
v)
finding
^,F(x, y)
neglected
is continuous, we may suppose the two (u) curves and the two

coordinates

where

o>

u>

(u,

v~).

(y) curves

taken so close together that each of the

less in

e s is

ab

Hence the abso


may be made less than

preassigned positive number.

solute value than

any

lute value of the

sum 2F(x, y^tdudv

itself

any preassigned positive number.


129. Examples. 1) Polar coordinates. Let us pass from rectangu
p cos w,
by means of the transformation x
varies
as
of
the
the
all
obtain
GO.
sin
xy
p
plane
points
y
p
the
hence
from zero to 2?r. Here A
oo and
from zero to
p

lar to polar coordinates

We
+

u>

Let
dp,
p
us try first to evaluate a double integral extended over a portion of
the plane bounded by an arc AB which intersects a radius vector in
element of area

is

which

da>

also evident geometrically.

is

most one point, and by the two straight lines OA and OB which
Let
angles ^ and to 2 with the x axis (Fig. 17, p. 189).
R = w ) be the equation of the arc AB. In the field of integration
Hence the double inte
varies from ^ to 2 and p from zero to R.

at

make

<(

o>

o>

gral of a function f(x, y) has the value

If the arc

AB

p sin

GO,

CD)

p dp

a closed curve enclosing the origin,

is
GO X

c
/O cos

i/O

i/ojj

take the limits

CR

and

co 2

= 2?r. Any

we should

field of integration

can

be divided into portions of the preceding types.


Suppose, for
C
of a given
of
the
contour
outside
lies
the
that
origin
instance,

convex closed curve.

Let

OA and OB

be the two tangents from


and 7? 2 =/2( w ) be the
1

=/

the origin to this curve, and let RI


and
equations of the two arcs

ANB

between o^ and
given value of
the value of the double integral
o>

o>

(<o)

A MB,
p varies

respectively.
from RI to

is

/*
6?(0
,

2) Elliptic coordinates.

A
I

/(p cos

GO,

p sin w) p dp.

Let us consider a family of confocal conies

For a
and

7? 2 ,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

269

where X denotes an arbitrary parameter. Through every point of the plane pass
an ellipse and an hyperbola,
two conies of this family,
for the equation (19)

FIG. 28
c2 ,

and another positive root p. less than c 2 for any


(19) and from the analogous equation where X is

has one root X greater than

From

values of x and y.

replaced by p

we

find

V(X

(20)

To avoid ambiguity, we

shall consider only the first quadrant in the xy plane.


This region corresponds point for point in a one-to-one manner to the region of
the X/u plane which is bounded by the straight lines

X
It is

c2 ,

0,

cz .

evident from the formulae (20) that when the point (X, /u) describes the
this region in the direction indicated by the arrows, the point (a;, y)

boundary of

describes the two axes

transformation

is

Ox and Oy

in the sense indicated

therefore inverse, which

D(x, y)

is

verified

by the arrows.
by calculating A

The

D(X, M )

130. Transformation of double integrals.

Second method.

We

shall

now

derive the general formula (18) by another method which


depends solely upon the rule for calculating a double integral.

We

shall retain, however, the hypotheses made above concerning the


correspondence between the points of the two regions A and A.

If the formula

correct for

is

= f(n,

v)

two particular transformations

it is

evident that

it

is

also correct for the transformation obtained

by carrying out the two transformations in succession. This follows


at once from the fundamental property of functional determinants

(30)

_
D(u

D(u, v}

D(u

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

270
Similarly,
to

if

130

[VI,

the formula holds for several regions A, B, C,


-, L,
B 1) C lf
L 19 it also holds for
,

which correspond the regions A l9

the region A -{transformation

Here

B
is

-\-

Finally, the formula holds

L.

a change of axes

= x + x cos a y sin a,
A = 1, and the equation

J
ff

if

the

=y +x

sin

+y

cos a.

F(x, y} dx dy

J(A)

F(x
is satisfied,

We

+x

since the

cos

two

sin a,

-f

x sin a

+y

cos a) dx

dy

integrals represent the same volume.


formula for the particular trans

shall proceed to prove the

formation

(21^

is

d>(x

11

?/

which carries the region A into a region A which is included between


the same parallels to the x axis, y = y and y = y.
We shall sup
A
to
one
of
of A and
that
given
point
corresponds
any
point
just
pose
conversely. If a paral
to the x axis meets

lel

the boundary

of the

most two
points, the same Avill be
true for the boundary
region

/in

C"

of the region

any pair of points


and m 1 on C whose

To

m
or-

dinates are each y cor

FIG. 29

respond two points ?tt


But the correspondence may be direct or
To distinguish the two cases, let us remark that if
is
x increases with x and the points m and m and m and
shown in Fig. 29 hence the correspondence is direct. On

and m{ of the contour C


inverse.

in at

c<f>/dx

positive,

m{

lie

as

the other hand, if


is negative, the correspondence is inverse.
Let us consider the first case, and let x , Xi, x n x[ be the abscissae
d<f>/dx

m^

of the points ra ,
m. , m{,
Then, applying the for
respectively.
mula for change of variable in a simple integral, we find

f
Jr

F(x,

(*

y ), y

VI,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

130]

where y and y are treated as constants.

271

single integration gives

the formula

r
I

r*

tfi

dy\
J^O

ry
c x(
F(x,y)dx=\ dy J F^(

<

J*

But the Jacobian A reduces in this case to


preceding formula may be written in the form

d<f>/dx

Jff
J(A)

F(x,

y}dxdy

Jff
J(A

F[A(x y }, y
,

and hence the

*\dx dy

This formula can be established in the same manner if


negative, and evidently holds for a region of any form whatever.

is

d<f>/dx

In an exactly similar manner

can be shown that the trans

it

formation

(22)

=z

t(x

leads to the formula

F(r,
Jff
J(A)

= ff
J

y)dxdU

F[.r

t(x

y )]

A dx dy

J{4")

where the new

field of integration .1 corresponds point for point


the region A.
Let us now consider the general formulae of transformation

(23)

=f(x l} y

y =f,

x ),

(x,, y,)

tc

where for the sake of simplicity (a-, y) and (x l} y^) denote the coor
dinates of two corresponding points m and MI with respect to the
same system of axes. Let A and A l be the two corresponding regions

bounded by contours C and C 1} respectively. Then a third point m


whose coordinates are given in terms of those of m and
l by the
A
which
=
relations x = x l} y
y, will describe an auxiliary region
each
to
for
for the moment we shall assume corresponds point
point
x
x
The six quantities x, y, lf y l}
of the two regions A and A^
y
,

satisfy the four equations

whence we obtain the


x

relations

y =/i(*nyi),
which define a transformation of the type (22). From the equation
hence
relation of the form y = TT(X y )
y
yj) we find a
(24)

sr l

=/!(#
we may write

(25)

=f(x yO =
,

4>(x

},

=y

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

272

[VI,

131

The given transformation (23) amounts to a combination of the two


transformations (24) and (25), for each of which the general formula
Therefore the same formula holds for the transformation (23).

holds.

We

Remark.
point

Av

assumed above that the region described by the


corresponds point for point to each of the regions A and

At least, this can always be brought about. For, let us con


sider the curves of the region A l which correspond to the straight
If these curves meet a parallel to
lines parallel to the x axis in A.
.

the y axis in just one point,

evident that just one point


of
of
A.
Hence
we
need
any given point
merely divide the region A t into parts so small that this condition
If these curves were parallels to the
is satisfied in each of them.

it is

will correspond to

axis, AVO

should begin by making a change of axes.

Let S be a region of a curved sur


from singular points and bounded by a contour F. Let S
be subdivided in any way whatever, let s be one of the subregions
bounded by a contour y i} and let m^ be a point of s
Draw the tan
taken so
gent plane to the surface S at the point m i} and suppose
small that it is met in at most one point by any perpendicular to
131. Area of a curved surface.

face free

s,-

The contour

this plane.

we
by

y,-

projects into a curve

y-

upon

this plane

shall denote the area of the region of the tangent plane


yl

by

o- f

in such a

the

sum

way
2o\-

As the number of subdivisions is increased indefinitely


that each of them is infinitesimal in all its dimensions,

approaches a limit, and this limit

S of the given

the region

bounded

is

called the area of

surface.

Let the rectangular coordinates x, y, z of a point of S be given in


terms of two variable parameters u and v by means of the equations

x =/(M,

(26)

=
<f>(u,

v),

if/(u,

v)

the region S of the surface corresponds point for


of the uv plane bounded by a closed contour C.
shall assume that the functions /,
and if/, together with their

in such a

way that

point to a region

We

v),

<j>,

Let R be
partial derivatives, are continuous in this region.
subdivided, let ri be one of the subdivisions bounded by a contour c,-,

first

and let w be the area of r


To r corresponds on S a subdivision s
bounded by a contour y
Let a- be the corresponding area upon the
tangent plane defined as above, and let us try to find an expression
-

for the ratio o^/o^.

Let a

{ ,

(3^

at a point

y be the direction cosines of the normal to the surface S


z( of st which corresponds to a point (ui} Vf)
f (ic -, yt)
f

~)

VI,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

131]

273

Let us take the point m as a new origin, and as the new axes
m and two perpendicular lines m X and m Y in the
direction cosines with respect to the old axes are
whose
tangent plane
of rf

the normal at

a ft y and
respectively. Let X, Y, Z be the coordinates
of a point on the surface S with respect to the new axes.
Then,
by the well-known formulae for transformation of coordinates, we
,

a",

shall

ft",

y",

have

X=
F=
Z=

(x

t)

a"(x

or,

+ ?(y- y +?*(*- *,)


y) +
)
+ (y
y (z

*,.)

-x) +

(x

Xi)

ft"(y

y"(z

?/,) -f-

fti

,-)

is the area of that portion of the A F plane which


The area
bounded by the closed curve which the point (X, F) describes,
the point (u, v) describes the contour c
Hence, by 127,
tr,-

is

as

p(x, y)

^where

u\

and

v\

easy calculation

or,

Hswr^r

are the coordinates of

now

some point inside of

ci

An

leads us to the form

by the well-known relations between the nine direction cosines,


=s 3.

<

D(z,x)

Oi
><X>

Applying the general formula

D(u[, v

(17),

we

T*
)

D(x,y)
D(u[, v

therefore obtain the equation

*D(4O
where

u\

and

uv plane.
the point
T)fii

>y\

iJ\Jh Z)

v\

are the coordinates of a point of the region r{ in the

If this region is very small, the point


(?* f , v,.),

(M,-,

v)

is

very near

and we may write

T)fii
f^\J[t

v\
Z)

f
JT)(\ z

f\
>

Dff
z
u
\

*r\
c)

D(Ui, Vt)

u,

~r

f
C>

D(y,

where the absolute value of 6 does not exceed unity. Since the
and ^ are continuous in the
derivatives of the functions /,
<,

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

274

[VI,

i;;i

region R, we may assume that the regions rt have been taken so


small that each of the quantities e,-, e-, e- is less than an arbitrarily
preassigned number rj. Then the supplementary term will certainly

be less in absolute value than 3^0, where O is the area of the


Hence that term approaches zero as the regions st
region R.

(and

Tf)

sum

So-,

approach zero in the manner described above, and the


approaches the double integral

all

y)

(x,

()

where

a,

ft,

du dv

D(u, v)

D(u, v)

y are the direction cosines of the normal to the surface S

at the point (u,

v~).

Let us calculate these direction cosines.


tangent plane

39)

The equation of the

is

whence
a

D(u, v)

D(u, v)

y
D(x,

,
(

D(u, v)

Choosing the positive sign in the

(y>
,

Q
P

we

obtain the formula

7
D(u, v)

D(u, v)

D(u, v)

last ratio,

.D(1

The well-known identity


(aft

ba

(be

c&

(ca

ac

which was employed by Lagrange, enables us to write the quantity


F 2 where
under the radical in the form EG
,

(27)

the symbol
indicating that a; is to be replaced by y and z succes
and
the
three
resulting terms added. It follows that the area
sively
of the surface S is given by the double integral

(28)

==
/
J/ J(B
(B)

F*dudv.

VI,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

132]

275

E, F, and G play an important part in the theory


Squaring the expressions for dx, dy, and dz and adding

The functions
of surfaces.

the results,

we

ds

(29)

find

dx 2

+ dy* + dz* = E du + 2Fdu dv + G dv


2

2
.

It is clear that these quantities E, F, and G do not depend upon


the choice of axes, but solely upon the surface S itself and the inde
pendent variables u and v. If the variables u and v and the sur

face

5 are

evident that

all real, it is

EG

must be

The expression V EG
the surface S in the system

132. Surface element.

positive.

F 2 du dv

is

called the

of coordinates (u, v).


element of area of
The precise value of the area of a small portion of the siirface bounded
F 2 t)dudv,
by the curves (u), (u
du), (v~), (v -\- dv) is (j\EG

where

approaches zero with

that the term

du dv

is

du and

dv.

It is evident, as above,

negligible.

Certain considerations of differential geometry confirm this result.


For, if the portion of the surface in question be thought of as a small
curvilinear parallelogram on the tangent plane to S at the point (u, v),
its area will be equal, approximately, to the product of the lengths
of its sides times the sine of the angle between the two curves (u)
and (v~). If we further replace the increment of arc by the differ

by formula (29), are ^/Edu and


of
du
and
dv
are
taken
^/Gdv,
positive. The direction parameters
the tangents to the two curves (u) and (v) are dx/du, dy/du, dz/du
and dx/dv, dy/dv, dz/dv, respectively. Hence the angle a between
them is given by the formula
^ dx dx
ential ds, the lengths of the sides,
if

COS

=
iV

cu Gv

\du
VI"
2
a = V EG
.F /V EG.
Forming the product mentioned,
we find the same expression as that given above for the element of
area.
The formula for cos a shows that F = when and only when
the two families of curves (u) and (y~) are orthogonal to each other.
When the surface S reduces to a plane, the formulae just found

whence

reduce

we

sin

to

find

the formulae

found in

128.

For,

if

we

set

if/(u,

v)

= 0,

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

276

[VI,

132

whence, by the rule for squaring a determinant,

dx ex

E F

du dv

F G

= EG - F

2
.

du dv

Hence

^EG

reduces to |A|.

To find the area of a region of a surface whose equa


y} which projects on the xy plane into a region R in
which the function f(x, y), together with its derivatives p = df/dx and
q = df/dy, is continuous. Taking x and y as the independent vari
2
F pq, G = 1 + q 2 and the area in ques
ables, we find E = \ + p
Examples.

tion is z

1)

= f(x

tion

is

given by the double integral

(30)

where y

is

Jff
J(R)

Jff
J(R
(R)

COS y

the acute angle between the z axis and the normal to the

surface.
2) To calculate the area of the region of a surface of revolution
between two plane sections perpendicular to the axis of revolution.
Let the axis of revolution be taken as the z axis, and let z
f(x)

be the equation of the generating curve in the xz plane.


Then the
coordinates of a point on the surface are given by the equations

z=f(p),
where the independent variables p and are the polar coordinates of
the projection of the point on the xy plane. In this case we have
o>

F=0,

p-),

To

G=

P *.

find the area of the portion of the surface

bounded by two plane


whose radii are p and
should
be
allowed
to
from
p 2 respectively, p
vary
Pl to p 2
p 2 ) and
from zero to 2?r. Hence the required area is given by the integral
sections perpendicular to the axis of revolution
,

(pi<

and can therefore be evaluated by a single quadrature.


the arc of the generating curve, we have
ds*

rf

<fe

<

If s denote

VI,

IMPROPER INTEGRALS

133]

277

and the preceding formula may be written in the form

= f
I

p*

27Tp ds

Jpl

The geometrical interpretation of this result is easy 2jrp ds is


the lateral area of a frustum of a cone whose slant height is ds and
whose mean radius is p. Replacing the area between two sections
:

whose distance from each other is infinitesimal by the lateral area


of such a frustum of a cone, we should obtain precisely the above
formula for

A.

For example, on the paraboloid of revolution generated by revolv


9
ing the parabola x = 2pz about the z axis the area of the section
between the vertex and the circular plane section whose radius is r is

III.

GENERALIZATIONS OF DOUBLE INTEGRALS


IMPROPER INTEGRALS SURFACE INTEGRALS

Let f(x, y) be a function which is con


whole
in
the
tinuous
region of the plane which lies outside a closed
double
The
F.
contour
integral of f(x, y) extended over the region
133. Improper integrals.

between F and another closed curve C outside of F has a finite value.


If this integral approaches one and the same limit no matter how
C varies, provided merely that the distance from the origin to the
nearest point of C becomes infinite, this limit is defined to be the
value of the double integral extended over the whole region
outside F.

Let us assume for the moment that the function f(x, y] has a
In this case the limit of the
constant sign, say positive, outside F.
double integral is independent of the form of the curves C.
For,
Cn
be a sequence of closed curves each of which
let Ci, C z
,

encloses the preceding in such a way that the distance to the nearest
/ extended
point of Cn becomes infinite with n. If the double integral
over the region between F and C n approaches a limit /, the same will

which
Cm ,
be true for any other sequence of curves C{, C^,
,
double
of
the
I
the
value
if
be
conditions.
the
same
m
For,
satisfy
integral extended over the region between F and C m n may be
chosen so large that the curve Cn entirely encloses C m and wa
,

shall

have

<

<

/.

Moreover

increases with m.

Hence

Im

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

278
has a limit /

[VI,

133

I.
It follows in the same manner that I
I
Hence
the two limits are equal.
As an example let us consider a function f(x, y), which outside a
circle of radius r about the origin as center is of the form

<

<

I, i.e.

where the value of the numerator \f/(x, y~) remains between two
posi
numbers m and M. Choosing for the curves C the circles

tive

concentric to the above, the value of the double integral extended


over the circular ring between the two circles of radii r and R is
given by the definite integral

\l/(p

/, J,

cos

to,

p sin

o>)p

dp

between the values of the two expressions

It therefore lies

By 90, the simple integral involved approaches a limit as


increases indefinitely, provided that 2a
1
1 or a
1.
But
>

becomes

infinite

with

if

>

R
it

1.

<

If no closed curve can be found outside

which the function /(a;, y)


can be shown, as i
89, that the integral
ffffa y)dxdy approaches a limit if the integral // f(x, y) \dxdy
itself approaches a limit. But if the latter
integral becomes infinite,
has a constant sign,

the former integral


to Cayley,

is

is

it

grate this function first

and the two

r
I

Jo

dx

r
I

lines

The following example, due


Let f(x, y) = sin (x 2 + if), and let us inte
over a square of side a formed by the axes

indeterminate.

interesting.

= a,

= a.

The value

of this integral

is

sin

Jo

(a;

=
I
Jo

+ y }dy
z

sinx^dx x

Jo

cosy

dy+

Jo

cosx*dx x

Jo

siny*dy.

As a increases indefinitely, each of the integrals on the right has


a limit, by 91. This limit can be shown to be
V?r/2 in each case
hence the limit of the whole right-hand side is TT. On the other
;

hand, the double integral of the same function extended over the
quarter circle bounded by the axes and the circle x 1 + y 2 = R 3 is
equal to the expression

/I,

IMPROPER INTEGRALS

134]

279

7T

r*
r
du
\

yo

*/0

which, as R becomes infinite, oscillates between zero and 7r/2 and


does not approach any limit whatever.

We should define in a similar manner the double integral of a


function f(x, y) which becomes infinite at a point or all
along a line.
First, we should remove the point (or the
from the field of
line)

integration by surrounding it by a small contour (or by a contour


very close to the line) which we should let dimmish

For example,

indefinitely.

the function f(x, y) can be written in the form

if

f(x

^(*>

y)

in the neighborhood of the


point (a, b), where \}/(x, y) lies between
two positive numbers m and M, the double integral of
f(x, y)
extended over a region about the point
(a, b) which contains no
other point of discontinuity has a finite value if and
only if a is
less

than unity.

134. The function B(p, q). We have assumed above that the contour C
n
recedes indefinitely in every direction. But it is evident that we
may also sup
pose that only a certain portion recedes to infinity. This is the case in the above

example of Cayley

and

also in the following example.

/(x, y)

where p and q are each


first

quadrant.

and the

lines

-1

e-*

-!

Let us take the function

2
,

This function is continuous and positive in the


over the square of side a bounded by the axes
we find, for the value of the double integral,

positive.

Integrating

a and y

4x P- y
2

first

a,

C 2x2

2
J>-ie-*

Jo

dx x C 2y*i-ie-*dy.
Jo

Each of these integrals approaches a limit as a


definition of the function T(p) in
92,

becomes

infinite.

For, by the

+C

f
T(p)= Jo
whence, setting

= x2 we
,

V-ie-<(K,

find

r(p)= C

(31)

2x*P-*e-**dx.

Jo

Hence the double

integral approaches the limit T(p) T(q) as a becomes infinite.


Let us now integrate over the quarter circle bounded by the axes and the
circle z2 + y 2 = R 2
The value of the double integral in polar coordinates is
.

f*R
I

Jo

2p

-P

2<

+ i)- l e-P
dp x

/*
I

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

280
As R becomes

product approaches the limit

infinite this

T(p

where we have

[VI,

q)B(p, q),

set
rr

B(p,q)

(32)

= C

2cos?P-

l
<l>sin

<i-i<t>d<}>.

Jo

Expressing the fact that these two limits must be the same, we find the equation
T(p)T(q)

(33)

The
it

is

called Euler

integral B(p, q}
be written in the

may

form

(34)

B(p,

The formula

(33)

r(p

q)B(p,

s integral

q)= JQ
f

t9-i(l

= vV.

For example,

Setting

Hence the formula

= sin 2

<,

1/2,

we

q) to the calcu

find

(31) gives

p and

T(p)T(l-p) =

1
t)v- dt.

setting

f.
In general, setting q

taking

and

p between

l-p) =

Jo

We shall

q).

of the first kind.

reduces the calculation of the function B(p,

lation of the function T.

whence F(l/2)

see later that the value of this integral

we

find

(~
\

is jr/sin pit.

The definition of surface integrals is analogous to that


Let S be a region of a surface bounded by one or more curves F.
We shall assume that the surface has two distinct sides in such a way that if one
side be painted red and the other blue, for instance, it will be impossible to pass
from the red side to the blue side along a continuous path which lies on the sur
135. Surface integrals.

of line integrals.

and which does not cross one of the bounding curves.* Let us think of S as
m and m be two points
m let us draw that half of
The direction
the normal mn to the surface which does not pierce the surface.
thus defined upon the normal will be said, for brevity, to correspond to that side
of the surface on which m lies. The direction of the normal which corresponds
face

a material surface having a certain thickness, and let


near each other on opposite sides of the surface. At

to the other side of the surface at the point

will

be opposite to the direction

just defined.

Let z

=
<f>(x,

in at

y) be the equation of the given surface, and let -S be a region of


shall assume that the surface is met

bounded by a contour F. We
most one point by any parallel to the

this surface

z axis,

and that the function

0(z, y)

* It is
very easy to form a surface which does not satisfy this condition. We need
only deform a rectangular sheet of paper
by pasting the side B C to the side
in such a way that the point C coincides with A and the point B with D.

ABCD

AD

VI,

is

SURFACE INTEGRALS

135]

continuous inside the region

into

which T

projects.

It is

281

of the xy plane which is bounded by the curve C


evident that this surface has two sides for which

the corresponding directions of the normal make, respectively, acute

and obtuse

We shall call that side whose


angles with the positive direction of the z axis.
corresponding normal makes an acute angle with the positive z axis the upper
Now

side.

let

P(x, y, z) be a function

ofi

the three variables x, y, and z which

continuous in a certain region of space which contains the region S of the sur
face.
If z be replaced in this function by
y), there results a certain function
is

<(x,

P [x,

y,

<p(x,

y)] of

x and y alone

and

it is

to call the double integral of this function

P [x,

vf f
(A)

(35)

natural by analogy with line integrals


extended over the region A,

dx dy

y, 0(x, y)]

<s

the surface integral of the function P(x, y, z) taken over the region S of the given
Suppose the coordinates x, y, and z of a point of S given in terms of two
auxiliary variables u and v in such a way that the portion S of the surface corre

surface.

sponds point for point in a one-to-one manner to a region R of the uv plane. Let
da- be the surface element of the surface S, and 7 the acute angle between the posi
tive z axis and the normal to the upper side of S.
Then the preceding double
integral, by
131-132, is equal to the double integral

rr

(36)

P(x,

y,

z)cos7d<r,

This new expression


x, y, and z are to be expressed in terms of u and v.
however, more general than the former, for cos 7 may take on either of two

where
is,

values according to which side of the surface is chosen. When the acute angle 7
is chosen, as above, the double integral (35) or
(36) is called the surface integral

(37)

extended over the upper side of the surface

But

if 7 be taken as the obtuse


changed in sign, and the new
/ / Pdxdy extended over the
lower side of
In general, the surface integral// Pdx dy is equal to
the double
integral (35) according as it is extended over the upper or the lower side of S.
This definition enables us to complete the analogy between simple a^id double

S.

angle, every element of the double integral will be


double integral would be called the surface integral
<S.

Thus a simple integral changes sign when the limits are interchanged,
while nothing similar has been developed for double integrals.
With the gen
eralized definition of double integrals, we may say that the integral///(x, y) dx dy
integrals.

previously considered is the surface integral extended over the upper side of the
xy plane, while the same integral with its sign changed represents the surface
integral taken over the under side. The two senses of motion for a simple inte
gral thus correspond to the two sides of the xy plane for a double integral.

The expression (36) for a surface integral evidently does not require that the
surface should be met in at most one point by any parallel to the z axis. In the
same manner we might

define the surface integrals

ff Q(z,

y, z)

dy dz,

ff R x
(

v* z )

dz dx

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

282
and the more general

f fp(x,
This latter integral

[VI,

136

integral

y,

z)dxdy +

z)dydz

Q(x, y,

also be written in the

may

R(x, y, z)dzdx.

form

C f [Pcos? + Qcosa + JJcos/3]d<r,


where a,

7 are the direction angles of the direction of the normal which cor

responds to the side of the surface selected.


Surface integrals are especially important in Mathematical Physics.
136. Stokes* theorem.

P(x, y,

z),

Q(x, y,

z),

Let

R(x, y,

L
z)

be a skew curve along which the functions

are continuous.

Then

the definition of the line

integral

C Pdx + Qdy

+Rdz

J((L)

taken along the line L is similar to that given in 93 for a line integral taken
along a plane curve, and we shall not go into the matter in detail. If the curve L
is closed, the integral evidently may be broken up into the sum of three line inte
grals taken over closed plane curves. Applying Green s theorem to each of these,
it is

we may replace the line integral by the sum of


The introduction of surface integrals enables us to state

evident that

integrals.

three double
this result in

very compact form.


Let us consider a two-sided piece S of a surface which we shall suppose for
To each side of the surface
definiteness to be bounded by a single curve P.
corresponds a definite sense of direct motion along the contour r. We shall
of the contour let us draw
assume the following convention At any point

consideration,

and

let

Mn which

corresponds to the side of the surface under


us imagine an observer with his head at n and his feet at

that half of the normal

we

the positive sense


of motion which the observer must take in
shall say that that

is

order to have the region

Thus

at his left hand.

two sides of the surface corre


spond two opposite senses of motion along
to the

the contour F.

Let us

first

face which

any

is

consider a region

met

of a sur

most one point by


axis, and let us suppose

in at

parallel to the z

the trihedron Oxyz placed as in Fig. 30,


where the plane of the paper is the yz plane
and the x axis extends toward the observer.

To

the boundary

of

will correspond a

and these
two curves are described simultaneously in
Let
the sense indicated by the arrows.
z = /(x, y) be the equation of the given surface, and let P(x, y, z) be a function
which is continuous in a region of space which contains S. Then the line inte
closed contour

gral

fr

P(x, y,

z)

dx

is

in the

identical with the line integral

xy plane

VI,

SURFACE INTEGRALS

136]

P[x,

y,

283

y)]dx

<p(x,

/(C)

Let us apply Green

taken along the plane curve C.


latter integral.

theorem

126) to this

Setting

= P[z,

P(x, y)

we

for definiteness,

y,

y)]

<(>(x,

find

_ dP

y)

_8P_ S

dP_
cz cy

d<fi

cy

cz

cy

cosy

where

or, /3, 7 are the direction angles of the normal to the upper side of
Hence, by Green s theorem,

-D,

^j

P(x, y)dx

S.

dP

CC
J J (A
I

cz

cos y

dV

where the double integral is to be taken over the region A of the xy plane
bounded by the contour C. But the right-hand side is simply the surface
integral

cos

cos 7

/3

dz

extended over the upper side of S

P(x,

?/,

z)dx

dy

This formula evidently holds also

when

is

it

be.

formulae

Green

dxdy.
dy

the surface integral is taken over the


taken in the other direction along F. And
theorem, no matter what the form of the surface

the line integral

also holds, as does

may

--dzdx

J J(S) cz

other side of

if

do-

and hence we may write

J(F)

<S,

By cyclic permutation of

x, y,

and

we

obtain the following analogous

^ Q(x, y,z)dy=

Jf

C R(x,y,z)dz=
J<n

Adding the

three,

we

C i dydzJ J(S) sy

obtain Stokes theorem in

its

dzdx.
dx

general form

P(x, y, z)dx

Q(z, y, z)dy

R(x, y, z)dz

dP\,
^(dE
^
----dQ\.
2 }dydz + --- \dzdx.
)dxdy +
/d

ty/

The sense

in

which T

double integral

is

is described and the side of the surface over which the


taken correspond according to the convention made above.

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

284

IV.

[VI,

137

ANALYTICAL AND GEOMETRICAL APPLICATIONS

Let us consider, as above, a region of space bounded


surface S above that plane, and a cylinder whose
a
the
xy
plane,
by
We shall suppose that the
generators are parallel to the z axis.
137. Volumes.

is a contour similar to
section of the cylinder by the plane z
that drawn in Fig. 25, composed of two parallels to the y axis and two

APB and A QB

curvilinear arcs

If %

surface S, the volume in question

rb

Jo.

Now

is

f(x, y)

is

given, by

the equation of the


by the integral

124,

rvt

dx

f(x, y)dy.

Jy,

2
the integral f /(o:, y}dy represents the area A of a section of
a
this volume by
plane parallel to the yz plane. Hence the preceding
in the form
be
written
formula may
"

A dx.
V=f
U

(39)

The volume of a solid bounded in any way whatever is equal


For
to the algebraic sum of several volumes bounded as above.
convex
closed
a
bounded
of
a
solid
volume
the
find
by
instance, to
should circumscribe the solid by a cylinder whose gen
erators are parallel to the z axis and then find the difference between
two volumes like the preceding. Hence the formula (39) holds for
surface

we

= a and x = b
any volume which lies between two parallel planes x
surface
bounded
which
is
and
whatever, where A
by any
(a
I)
a
made
a
section
of
denotes the area
by
plane parallel to the two
the
interval
the
Let
us
(a, ) subdivided by
suppose
given planes.
be
the
areas
A
let
A
x
and
A
x
x
u
n _ l} b,
points a, l} z
of the sections made by the planes x = a, x = x lt
-, respectively.
<

Then the

definite integral

$*k dx

is

; ,

the limit of the

sum

The geometrical meaning of this result is apparent. For A,-_! (#,-

a;,-_i),

whose base is
whose height
Hence the volume

for instance, represents the volume of a right cylinder


and
the section of the given solid by the plane x
a-,-_i

is

the distance between two consecutive sections.

of the given solid is the limit of the sum of such infinitesimal cylin
This fact is in conformity with the ordinary crude notion of
ders.

volume.

VI,

APPLICATIONS

138]

A be known as a fnnction of

If the value of the area

ume

285
x,

the vol

be found by a single quadrature. As an


example let us try to find the volume of a portion of a solid of revo
lution between two planes perpendicular to the axis of revolution.
to be evaluated

may

Let this axis be the x axis and let z


f(x) be the equation of the
generating curve in the xz plane. The section made by a plane par
Hence the required
allel to the yz plane is a circle of radius f(x).
2
given by the integral TT^ [/(x)] er.
Again, let us try to find the volume of the portion of the ellipsoid

volume

is

^4.^4. f! =
a*

b*

bounded by the two planes x = x x = X. The section made by a


is an ellipse whose semiaxes are
plane parallel to the plane x =
x 2/a 2
Hence the volume sought is
x 2 /a 2 and c Vl
b Vl
,

V=

cA

To

l-

Trbc

Y8

a-A

find the total

volume we should

set

a and

X=

which

a,

gives the value %irabc.


138. Ruled surface.

Prismoidal formula.

When

the area

is

an integral

function of the second degree in z, the volume may be expressed very simply
in terms of the areas B and B of the bounding sections, the area 6 of the mean
section,

and the distance h between the two bounding

section be the plane of yz,

V = JC
But we
h

also

whence n

If

the

mean

+
2

(te

+ 2mx +

n)

dx

21

2na.

have
b

2a,

sections.

we have

&,

B=

n,

2
h/2, 2Za

Itf

+ 2ma + n

=B+B

26.

B =

la*

- 2ma + n

These equations lead

+B +
F=^[B
o

(40)

to the

formula

4&],

which

is called the prismoidal formula.


This formula holds in particular for any solid bounded by a ruled surface and
two parallel planes, including as a special case the so-called prismoid.* For,
let y = ax + p and z = bx + q be the equations of a variable straight line, where

a, 6, p,

and q are continuous functions of a variable parameter t which resume


when t increases from t Q to T. This straight line describes

their initial values

*
lel

prismoid

and contain

is

all

a solid bounded by any number of planes, two of which are paral


the vertices.

TRANS.

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

286

[VI,

a ruled surface, and the area of the section made by a plane


x = is given, by 94, by the integral

139

parallel to the plane

/T

(ax

p)(b x

q )dt,

Jto

where a

&

derivatives

and

T,

d denote the derivatives of a, 6, c, d with respect to t. These


be discontinuous for a finite number of values between t

may even

which

be the case when the lateral boundary consists of portions of


The expression for A may be written in the form

will

several ruled surfaces.

x2

rr

ab dt

rr
I

Jt

Jt n

rr
pq

+ pb )dt +

(aq

Jt

dt,

where the integrals on the right are evidently independent of x. Hence the
formula (40) holds for the volume of the given solid. It is worthy of notice that
the same formula also gives the volumes of most of the solids of elementary geometry
.

139. Viviani s problem. Let C be a circle described with a radius OA (= R)


of a given sphere as diameter, and let us try to find the volume of the portion
of the sphere inside a circular cylinder whose right section is the circle C.

Taking the origin at the center of the sphere, one fourth the required volume
given by the double integral

is

extended over a semicircle described on


dinates p and w, the angle u varies from

we

OA

dxdy

2/

as diameter.

to it/2,

and

Passing to polar coor

from

to

R cos w.

Hence

find

v=
4
If this

rim Rm Bin* w)\*du = RS i*---2 \

- I (R 3
3 Jo

3 \2

3/

volume and the volume inside the cylinder

which

is symmetrical to this one with respect to


the z axis be subtracted from the volume of the

whole sphere, the remainder

is

Again, the area

\2

of the portion of the sur


face of the sphere inside the given cylinder is

FIG. 31

ft

dxdy.
Replacing p and q by their values
polar coordinates,

we

find

x/z and

y/z, respectively,

and passing to

VI,

APPLICATIONS

140]

ftRcoiui

r>

Rf>d(>

V^ 2 -,

Jo

tt

287

4 f
Jo

f 2 (l-sinw)dw = 4R2 (- -

4fl 2

Jo

Subtracting the area enclosed by the two cylinders from the whole area of the
sphere, the remainder

is
it

^
The theorems estab

140. Evaluation of particular definite integrals.

lished above, in particular the theorem regarding differentiation


under the integral sign, sometimes enable us to evaluate certain defi
nite integrals without
proceed to give a

We

knowing the corresponding indefinite integrals


few examples.

Setting

= F(a\ = r* log

aX ^

dx

the formula for differentiation under the integral sign gives

dA _
~

log

da

(1+a

a2

xdx

Breaking up this integrand into partial fractions, we find


x

Ix

1+ax
whence
x dx

log (1

2
<*

fai
.

It follows that

1+a
a

rfa

whence, observing that

Jo
Integrating the

,4

vanishes

log(l4-

arc tan

o/-i

2(1+ a
when a

a
^ + Jr 1+a

0,

)
2

we may

write

log
0/1

(i+<>

2(1+ a

first

2
2\

.,

of these integrals

A =

T~i

by

- arc tan a
log (1
m

"2

parts,

a 2)

we

finally find

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

288

[VI,

140

v
This function is continuous
Again, consider the function x
and 1 and y between any two positive
when x lies between
.

numbers a and

Hence, by the general formula of

b.

/-&

/i

dx

/*

/?>

x v dy

dy

Ja

t/a

123,

x y dx.

UQ

But

>i

ipy

flf
I

,,
Ly

Joo

+ IJ
1

,,

+L
1

hence the value of the right-hand side of the previous equation

-=
On

the other hand,

is

log

we have
r
log

a;

whence
log x

= log

In general, suppose that P(x, y) and Q(x,

two functions

are

?/)

which satisfy the relation dP/dy = dQ/dx, and that x x^ y y^ are


Then, by the general formula for integration
given constants.
under the integral sign, we shall have
,

c?o;

p ap
-dy=\p

ty

J*

J
dy

J,Jo

p0Q
-^-dx,
^
\

J*

or

r^

r*i

(41)

[P(x,

y,}-P(x, y )-]dx=

^^o

[Q(^ 15

y)- Q

^"o

Cauchy deduced the values of a large number of definite inte


It is also closely and simply related to
grals from this formula.
Green s theorem, of which it is essentially only a special case.
For it may be derived by applying Green s theorem to the line

fPdx + Qdy taken along the boundary of the rectangle


formed by the lines x = X Q x
x^ y = y y = y l
In the following example the definite integral is evaluated by a

integral

special device.

The

integral

Jo

log (1

2a

cos x

n-

dx

VI,

APPLICATIONS

110]

has a

value

finite

if

This function

has the following properties.

F(<x)

F(-

1)

a)

For

F(a).

F(or,

from unity.

different

is

\a\

289

a)

log (1

Jo

making the substitution x

F(2

F(a

2)

= 2F(a).

2a cos x

TT

Jo

a-

a 2) dy

dx,

y,

2a

log (1

a)

For we may

cos y

F(a)

set

2F() = F() + F(-a),


whence

2F(a)

Jo

Jo
If

2a cos x

[log (1

log (I

we now make

a2)

- 2a* cos 2x +

= -1
i

+Making a second

= y,

COS x

a 2 )] dx

becomes

this

C"

\og(l-2a cosy

* Jo

2a

a*)dx.

the substitution 2x

2F(a)

+ log (1 +

+ a )dy
4

2*

log (1

substitution y

- 2a

cos y

a 4 ) dy.

z in the last integral,

lit

we

find
f*n
2

\og(l-2a cosy

X2rr

which leads

From

to the

this result

a is
The same

\ F(a

if

<

cos z

a*)dz,

F(a")

than unity, a2 approaches zero as n becomes infinite.


2
for the logarithm approaches zero.
is true of
F(a
= 0.
we
have
1,
F(a)
a|
"),

Hence,

log (1

Jo

less

have, successively,

"

If

a*)dy=

formula

we

F(a)

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

290
a

If
|

greater than unity, let us set a

is
|

F(a)

2 cos x

Jo

F(a)
Finally,

find

Hence we have
2

TT

log

ft

TT

log

can be shown by the aid of Ex. 6,


continuous for all values of a.

it

hence F(a)

Then we

log(l-2/?cos;r

than unity.

is less

\ft\

I//?.

f
Jo

=
where

141

[VI,

in this case

a2

p.

205, that F(

1)

is

141. Approximate value of logF(n + l).


great variety of devices may be
to find either the exact or at least an approximate value of a definite

employed

We proceed

integral.

We

an example.

to give

T(n

+ l) =

have, by definition,

n +00

xn

e- x dx.

Jo

The function xn e~ x assumes its maximum value nn e~ n for x = n. As x increases


from zero to n, xn e~ x increases from zero to nn e~ n (n>0), and when x increases
from n to + oo, x n e~ x decreases from nn er n to zero. Likewise, the function
nn er n e- tt increases from zero to n n er n as t increases from
oo to zero, and
decreases from nn e~ n to zero as t increases from zero to + oo. Hence, by the
substitution
n

(42)

-*

the values of x and


to

+
It

t correspond in such a way that as t increases from


oo
x increases from zero to + oo.
remains to calculate dx/dt. Taking the logarithmic derivative of each side

oo,

of (42),

we

find

2tx

dx,

dt

We

have

also,

by

(42), the

equation
tfl

n log

W
f

For simplicity let us set x = n + z, and then develop log (1 + z/n) by Taylor s
theorem with a remainder after two terms. Substituting this expansion in the
value for

2
<

we

find

nz2

[2
where

6 lies

between zero and unity.

From

this

we

find, successively,

VI,

APPLICATIONS

142]

291

whence, applying the formula for change of variable,

Y(n

The

first

1)

= 2nn

e-"

*/- C
\ / I/

"e-^dt

2n"er

As

C
V

*V<

(1

00

is

integral

e-

not

00

<2

dt

,_
= Vnr.

for the second integral, though we cannot evaluate it exactly, since we do


know 0, we can at least locate its value between certain fixed limits. For

and zero, and they are all positive


elements are negative between
+cc
is ^ ess m
between zero and + oo. Moreover each of the integrals f_ n /
+
ter^dt = 1/2. It follows that
absolute value than /
all its

<x>

F(n

(43)

= \/2nnn e~ n (

1)

V*n/
1 and + 1where u lies between
If n is very large, w/V2n is very small.

Hence,

if

we take

n"e-

as an approximate value of T(n + 1), our error is relatively small, though the
actual error may be considerable. Taking the logarithm of each side of (43), we
find the formula

log r(n

(44)

1)

(n

1) logn

+ 1 log(27r) +

e,

we have an

expression
very small when n is very large. Neglecting e,
This formula is inter
called the asymptotic value of logT(n
1).
esting as giving us an idea of the order of magnitude of a factorial.

where
which

e is

is

142.

s theorem. The formula for integration under the integral


function
any
/(x, y) which is continuous in the rectangle of inte
Hence, if two different results are obtained by two different methods

Alembert

sign applies to

gration.
of integrating the function /(x, y), we may conclude that the function /(x, y) is
Gauss deduced
discontinuous for at least one point in the field of integration.
this fact an elegant demonstration of d Alembert s theorem.
Let F(z) be an integral polynomial of degree m in z. We shall assume for
definiteness that all its coefficients are real.
Replacing z by p(cosw + isinw),
and separating the real and the imaginary parts, we have

from

F(z)

where

If

we

set

P=A

Q=A

V=

m
m smmw

cosm<,}

a/T

and

it is

+ Aip m
+ A\pm ~

arc tan (P/Q),

8V =

we

shall

aP_ p aQ
dp

dp

P*+

Q2

=P+
cos(m
sin(m

iQ,
!)&>

1)

have

8V ~
~^

q^-P^
du
8u
P2

Q2

evident, without actually carrying out the calculation, that the second

derivative

is

of the

form

&V

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

292
where

[VI, Exs.

is a continuous function of p and u.


This second derivative can only
be discontinuous for values of p and
for which P and Q vanish simultaneously,
that is to say, for the roots of the equation F(z) = 0. Hence, if we can show that
<a

the two integrals

r\du
I

(4o)

c -dp,
w*
d du

Jo

Jo

R
*

dp

c"*r*
du

d P Cu

Jo

Jo

are unequal for a given value of R, we may conclude that the equation F(z) =
has at least one root whose absolute value is less than R. But the second inte
is

gral

always zero, for


^
au

Jo

f"

and dV/dp is a periodic function of w, of period 2x.


gral in a similar manner, we find

Calculating the

first

inte

X
and

it is

easy to

show

that

dV/du

of the

is

dV _

form

m+

mA?)
2m -f
p"

du

Ag

where the degree of the terms not written down is less than 2m in p, and where
the numerator contains no term which does not involve p. As p increases indefi
nitely, the right-hand side

approaches

m.

fQ

hence the

first of

R may be chosen so large


m + where e is less than m

Hence

that the value of cV/dw, for p = R, is equal to


in absolute value.
The integral 2n (
+ e)

e,

du

is

evidently negative, and

the integrals (45) cannot be zero.

EXERCISES
1.

At any point

of the catenary defined in rectangular coordinates

by the

equation

- ea +
= 0/5
I

2 \

us draw the tangent and extend it until it meets the x axis at a point T.
Revolving the whole figure about the x axis, find the difference between the areas
described by the arc
of the catenary, where A is the vertex of the catenary,
let

AM

and that described by the tangent


point

M,

(2)

MT

(I)

as a function of the abscissa of the

as a function of the abscissa of the point T.


[Licence, Paris, 1889.]

Using the usual system of trirectangular coordinates, let a ruled surface


The plane zOA revolves about the x axis, while the gen
erating line -D, which lies in this plane, makes with the z axis a constant angle
whose tangent is X and cuts off on OA an intercept OC equal to Xa0, where a
is a given length and 6 is the angle between the two planes zOx and zOA.
2.

be formed as follows

EXERCISES

VI.Exs.]

293

the solid bounded by the ruled surface and the planes


1) Find the volume of
xOy, zOx, and zOA, where the angle 6 between the last two is less than 2n.
the portion of the surface bounded by the planes xOy,
2) Find the area of

zOx, zOA.
[Licence, Paris, July, 1882.]
3.

&2 X2

Find the volume of the solid bounded by the xy plane, the cylinder
a 2&2 anc[ the elliptic paraboloid whose equation in rectangular
a2y2

_|_

coordinates

is

2z

&

y*

p2

q*

[Licence, Paris, 1882.]


4.

Find the area of

the curvilinear quadrilateral bounded by the four con-

focal conies of the family

which are determined by giving X the values

c 2 /3,

2c 2/3, 4c a /3, 5c 2/3, respectively.


[Licence, Besan^on, 1885.]

5.

Consider the curve

= \/2 (sin x

cos x)

where x and y are the rectangular coordinates of a point, and where x varies
from 7T/4 to 5?r/4. Find
:

1)

the area between this curve and the x axis

2) the

volume of the

3) the lateral

by revolving the curve about the x axis

solid generated

area of the same solid.


[Licence, Montpellier, 1898.]

6.

In an ordinary rectangular coordinate plane let A and B be any two


be any curve joining A and B which, together
y axis, and let
whose area is a preAB, forms the boundary of a region

AMB

points on the
with the line

AMBA

assigned quantity S.
over the curve

AMB

of the following definite integral taken

Find the value


:

my] dx

m is a constant,

where
<t>

[<t>

(y}e

and where the function

- m]dy,

<f>(y),

together with
[Licence,

7.

By

>

+ 00

/
ft

Jo
/O

e- x

different ways,

show

Jo
that,

sinaxdydx

provided that a

+ 00

8.

Nancy, 1895.]

+00

two

derivative

calculating the double integral


ft

in

its

continuous.

(y), is

sin

ax

is

not zero,

ft
,

Find the area of the lateral surface of the portion of an ellipsoid of revo
an hyperboloid of revolution which is bounded by two planes perpen

lution or of

dicular to the axis of revolution.

DOUBLE INTEGRALS

294
To

9*.

area A

find the area of

[VI, Exs.

Half of the total

an ellipsoid with three unequal axes.

given by the double integral

is

1-

X2

C"

dxdy

extended over the interior of the ellipse 62 x2 + a2 ?/ 2 = a 2 ft2 Among the methods
employed to reduce this double integral to elliptic integrals, one of the simplest,
125.
due to Catalan, consists in the transformation used in
Denoting the
.

integrand of the double integral by v, and letting v vary from 1 to +


easy to show that the double integral is equal to the limit, as I becomes

cc,

it is

infinite,

of the difference
il

7tabl(P-l)

This expression

is

nab

an undetermined form

but we

may

write

--

>

and hence the

limit considered above is readily seen to be


+00

/.2

Ttab

ab

dv
1,2

10*. If

from the center of an

dicular be let fall

which

is

ellipsoid

ellipsoid

upon the tangent plane

J
\

(V

2_l +

whose semiaxes are

a, 6, c

C2

\
&*/ -

a perpen

to the ellipsoid, the area of the surface

the locus of the foot of the perpendicular

whose semiaxes are

^W 2_1 +

a2

is

equal to the area of an

be/a, ac/b, ab/c.

[WILLIAM ROBERTS, Journal de

Liouville, Vol. XI, 1st series, p. 81.]

EXERCISES

VI, EXB.]

11.

295

Evaluate the double integral of the expression

(*

V)"f(v)

extended over the interior of the triangle bounded by the straight lines y = i
= x, and x = in two different ways, and thereby establish the formula

dx

From

this result

(x

y) f(y)

dy

f(y)

dy

deduce the relation


X

x-

C f(x)dx=
f\x
J*9
(n-l)!^x

- y)f(y)dy.

In a similar manner derive the formula


X

f(x)

dx

=
2

\
6

f
2n Jr

*(x*

2
2/

and verify these formulae by means of the law for differentiation under the
integral sign.

CHAPTER

VII

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS
INTEGRATION OF TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

I.

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

143. Triple integrals. Let F(x, y, z) be a function of the three


variables x, y, z which is continuous for all points M, whose rec
tangular coordinates are (cc, y, z), in a finite region of space
bounded by one or more closed surfaces. Let this region be sub

()

divided into a number of subregions (e^, (e 2 ~),


(e n ), whose vol
v
be
coordinates
of any
and
let
the
umes are v l9 v z
,
n
(., 17,-, )
,

point

m,-

of the subregion

(e,-).

Then

the

sum

(i)

approaches a limit as the number of the subregions (e.) is increased


indefinitely in such a way that the maximum diameter of each of

them approaches

zero.

the function F(x,


is

y,

This limit

called the triple integral of

is

z) extended throughout the region (), and

represented by the symbol

JJJ

(2)

The proof that

F(x,

dx dy dz

y, z}

this limit exists is practically a repetition of the

proof given above in the case of double integrals.


Triple integrals arise in various problems of Mechanics, for
instance in finding the mass or the center of gravity of a solid
filled with a heterogeneous sub
Suppose the region
body.
stance, and let p.(x, y, z) be the density at any point, that is to say,

()

the limit of the^ratio of the mass inside an infinitesimal sphere about


and /x 2
the point (x, y, ) as center to the volume of the sphere. If

are the
it is

and

maximum and

the

minimum

value of

/t

in the subregion

evident that the mass inside that subregion


fujv,-;

hence

it

is

equal to

v,./i(,.,

suitably chosen point of the subregion


296

17.-,

(e ).
(

,.),

lies

where

(e^),

between ^v,

(,-,

7;,-,

,-)

is

It follows that the total

VII,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

143]

297

mass is equal to the triple integral fffp dx dy dz extended through


out the region ().
The evaluation of a triple integral may be reduced to the suc
Let us suppose

cessive evaluation of three simple integrals.

first

a rectangular parallelepiped bounded by the


six planes x
x
x
z
z = Z.
Let (E)
X, y
F, z
y y
be divided into smaller parallelepipeds by planes parallel to the
that the region

()

three

yk _

The volume of one


and we have to
,_!),

coordinate planes.

o^j) (yk

(x f

is

(z t

of

the

latter

is

find the limit of

sum

the

(3)

where the point (, w

any point inside the corresponding


first that part of S which arises
parallelepiped.
from the column of elements bounded by the four planes
ij ikl

lW ) is

Let us evaluate

the points

all

taking

= y/c-i(x {

ikl

yM

iw )

upon the straight

This column of parallelepipeds gives

-x_
i

)(yt

yt_i)[^(*,-_i,

y^i, Ci)(i

line

rise to

the

ar.-.j,

sum
],

s may be chosen in such a way that the


123, the
inside
the
bracket
will be equal to the simple integral
quantity

and, as in

*(**-!
It only

But

yt-i)

F( x

Jz

i-i>

yt-u

*) d*-

remains to find the limit of the sum

this limit is precisely the double integral

$(x,

?/)

dx dy

extended over the rectangle formed by the lines x


y = 2/o y = Y. Hence the triple integral is equal to
>

dx

or,

pX
I

*(x, y)dy,

its value,

replacing &(x, y) by
(4)

Jv

J*,

*,*

f*Y

dx

f*Z

dy
Jvn

*J *a.

F(x,y,z)dz.

=x

= X,

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

298

[VII,

144

The meaning of this symbol is perfectly obvious. During the first


integration x and y are to be regarded as constants. The result will be
a function of x and y, which is then to be integrated between the limits
and F, x being regarded as a constant and y as a variable. The
?/
result of this second integration is a function of x alone, and the last
step is the integration of this function between the limits x and X.

There are evidently as many ways of performing this evaluation


on three letters, that is, six. For instance,

as there are permutations

the triple integral

equivalent to

is

rZ

f*Y

r>X

dz

J*

J*

dx

r>

F(x,

y,

z)dy =

J*a

*() denotes the double integral of F(x, y, z) extended over


Y.
We
x x
the rectangle formed by the lines x
X, y
y y
of
the
with
the
this
formula
rediscover
part
might
by commencing

where

arises from the layer of parallelepipeds bounded by the


two planes z = z _ l z = z
Choosing the points (, 77, ) suitably,
the part of S which arises from this layer is

sum S which

and the

rest of the reasoning

is

similar to that above.

Let us now consider a region of space bounded in any


manner whatever, and let us divide it into subregions such that any
line parallel to a suitably chosen
fixed line meets the surface which
144.

bounds any subregion in at most


two points. We may evidently
restrict ourselves without loss of
generality to the case in which a
line parallel to the z axis meets
the surface in at most two points.
The points upon the bounding
surface project upon the xy plane
into the points of a region A
bounded by a closed contour C.

To every
FIG. 32

and

(x, y)

inside

cor

We

shall suppose that the functions


fa( x y}Let us now
are continuous inside C, and that
l
t
>

point

respond two points on the bounding surface whose coordinates are


.

<j>

<<j>

VII,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

144]

299

divide the region under consideration by planes parallel to the coor


Some of the subdivisions will be portions of paral
dinate planes.
The
part of the sum (1) which arises from the column
lelepipeds.
of elements

y = yk

is

bounded by the four planes x =


by 124, to the expression

Xf_ l}

{ ,

= yk _i,

equal,

(x f

,._!>

(yk

- yt _,)

where the absolute value of

F(x

yt _ lt

may be made

z)

dz

+ fk
,

than any preassigned


parallel planes sufficiently near together.
e ik

number c by choosing the


The sum

less

approaches zero as a limit, and the triple integral in question

is

therefore equal to the double integral

y) dx dy

<(x,

extended over the region (J) bounded by the contour C, where the
function
y) is denned by the equation
3>(z,

r**

(*>

y>

Jz.

*)**

y axis meets the contour C in at most two


are y = ^ (x) and y = fa (x), respectively,
whose
coordinates
points
while x varies from x l to a; 2 the triple integral may also be written
in the form
If a line parallel to the

rt

rx

(5)

dx

i/Xj

The

limits z 1

and

z2

dy

y^

rz

F(x,

Jz l

y,

z)dz.

depend upon both x and y, the limits y t and yz


and finally the limits x l and a? 2 are constants.

are functions of x alone,

We may

invert the order of the integrations as for double inte


grals, but the limits are in general totally different for different
orders of integration.
Note.

If ^(x) be the function of

rz

*()

=|
Jv,

x given by the double integral

dy

J*,

F(x, y, z) dz

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

300

[VII,

145

extended over the section of the given region by a plane parallel to


the yz plane whose abscissa is x, the formula (5) may be written

This

is

the result

we should have

obtained by starting with the

Xf_ l} x = x
layer of subregions bounded by the two planes x
this
contributes
to the
Choosing the points (, r), ) suitably,
layer
total sum the quantity

Example. Let us evaluate the


out that eighth of the sphere x2

triple integral

y*

z2

fffz dx dy dz extended through

fi*

which

lies in

the

first

octant.

If

integrate first with regard to z, then with regard GO y, and finally with regard
to x, the limits are as follows x and y being given, z may vary from zero to
2
x 2 and x itself
x2
x being given, y may vary from zero to V.R2
V-R 2
y

we

may

vary from zero to B.

/*//
I

J J J

whence we

Hence the

zdxdydz =

~V2-:r2

(*R
I

integral in question has the value

dx

Jo

/>V

dy

Jo

ff2-x2-y4

zdz,

Jo

find successively

zdz

Jo

-x2 -y ),

if
2 Jo
and it merely remains
by the substitution x

Hence the value

to calculate the definite integral

= B cos

<f>,

x2)^dx, which,

is,

by

116,

Let

=
y=
z = $(u,
x

(6)

(R*

takes the form

of the given triple integral

145. Change of variables.

\f

/(?/,, v,

<(?*,

w),

v,

w},

v,

w)

be formulae of transformation which establish a one-to-one corre

spondence between the points of the region (E~) and those of another
region (^i). We shall think of u, v, and w as the rectangular coor
dinates of a point with respect to another system of rectangular

VII,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

145]

301

If F(x, y, ) is a
coordinates, in general different from the first.
continuous function throughout the region (), we shall always have

mF(x, dx dy dz
mF[f(u,
y, 2)

;>

(7)

D(f,
v,

dudv dw,

w),

D(u,

i>

v,

where the two integrals are extended throughout the regions


(E)
and (E-i), respectively. This is the formula for change of variables
in triple integrals.
In order to show that the

commence by remarking that

formula

always holds, we shall

(7)

holds for two or more particular


will hold also for the transformation obtained
by
if it

transformations, it
carrying out these transformations in succession, by the well-known
properties of the functional determinant ( 29). If it is applicable
to several regions of space, it is also applicable to the region obtained

We shall now proceed to show, as we did for


double integrals, that the formula holds for a transformation which
leaves all but one of the independent variables unchanged,
for
by combining them.

example, for a transformation of the form

(8)

We

=x

?/

y z

\!/(x

two points M(x, y, z) and


(x y ,z } are
same system of rectangular axes, and that a parallel
to the z axis meets the surface which
bounds the region (E) in at most two
points. The formulae (8) establish a corre
spondence between this surface and another
surface which bounds the region (E ). The
cylinder circumscribed about the two sur
shall suppose that the

referred to the

faces with its generators parallel to the


z axis cuts the plane z
along a closed

curve C.

Every point

inside the contour

m. of the region

A
C

the projection of
of the first surface,

is

FIG. 33

two points m^ and m 2


whose coordinates are z 1 and z2 respectively, and also of two
points m[ and m 2 of the second surface, whose coordinates are z[
and z 2 respectively. Let us choose the notation in such a way
,

and z[<z 2
The formulae (8) transform the point m^
3
into the point m{, or else into the point
To distinguish the
2
two cases, we need merely consider the sign of d\f//dz
If dty/dz is

that z l

<z

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

302

[VII,

145

and the points l and 2 go into the


On the other hand, if c\(//dz is
respectively.
t and
2 go into
negative, z decreases as 2 increases, and
s and
m{, respectively. In the previous case we shall have

positive, z increases with %

points m{ and

ra^,

I
*/Zi

F(x, y, z)dz

^ dz

F^x,

y, t(x, y, 2 )]

F\x,

y,

$(x, y, **)] jfc dz

V|>,

y,

t(x, y, z )]

Jzi

whereas in the second case


/"**>

F(x, y, z)

dz

=-

/* 2
I

Jz{

Jz^

In either case we may write

(9)

*F(x, y,

z)dz

If

dz

*) ZJ

C/Zj

we now consider the double

two

integrals of the

sides of this

equation over the region A, the double integral of the left-hand side,

dxdy I
JII
Je
J(A)
is

F(x,

y,

z)dz,

precisely the triple integral fffF(x, y, z) dx dy dz extended through


Likewise, the double integral of the right-hand

out the region (E).


side of (9)

is

equal to the triple integral of

F[x y
,

which readily follows when


extended throughout the region (E
x and y are replaced by x and y respectively. Hence we have in
~),

this particular case

J J J (E)

F(x, y, z) dx dy dz

dx

di

dz

But

in this case the determinant D(x, y, z)/D(x y z } reduces to


Hence the formula (7) holds for the transformation (8).
d(j//dz
,

Again, the general formula (7) holds for a transformation of the


type
(10)

*=/(*

y ,*%

=
<t>(x

,y<,zi),

VII,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

145]

We

where the variable z remains unchanged.

303

shall suppose that

the formulae (10) establish a one-to-one correspondence between


the points of two regions (E) and ( ), and in particular that the

R and R made in (E) and ( ), respectively, by any


plane parallel to the xy plane correspond in a one-to-one manner.
Then by the formulae for transformation of double integrals we
sections

shall have

(11)

RT

i/

fi-r.

?.

A*(r

-j/

j-

^ dx dy

f.

D(x y

The two members


z

=z

of this equation are functions of the variable


Integrating both sides again between the limits z v

alone.

and 2 between which z can vary


formula

JJ

F (x

y,

>

z)

(), we

in the region

find the

dx dv dz

J(E)

Jill
=

F^^^,^^,^,^
rrr
J(E

JJ

D(x

dx dy dz

,y<)

= D(x, y)/D(x y
But in this case D(x, y, z)/D(x y
Hence
)
the formula (7) holds for the transformation (10) also.
We shall now show that any change of variables whatever
,

(13)

= f(x

l}

yl} zj,

=
<j>(

Xl ,

y l} zj,

~).

= ^(x

lt

y 1}

j)

be obtained by a combination of the preceding transformations.


For, let us set x = x l} y = y lt z = z. Then the last equation of
(13) may be written z = if/(x y z^, whence z v = 7r(x , y z
Hence the equations (13) may be replaced by the six equations

may

(14) x
(15)

=/[*

TT(X<,

xi,

y}

)],

yi,

= ftx
*

<,

ir(x

=
<j>(xi,

yi,

)],

~).

=z

,).

The general formula (7) holds, as we have seen, for each of the
transformations (14) and (15).
Hence it holds for the transforma
tion (13) also.

We

might have replaced the general transformation (13), as the


reader can easily show, by a sequence of three transformations of
the type (8).

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

304
146.

we

Element

of volume.

Setting F(x,

[VII,

=I

y, K)

146

in the formula (7),

find

//***//
The

du dv dw

left-hand side of this equation

Applying the law of the mean

the volume of the region (").


on the right, we find

is

to the integral

the relation

(16)

D(u,

where Vi

is

v,

the volume of (^i), and

This formula

point in (#1).

Chapter VI.

are the coordinates of

rj,

some

exactly analogous to formula (17),


that the functional determinant is the limit

shows
two corresponding

It

of the ratio of

is

infinitesimal volumes.

in (6) be assigned a constant value,


v,
while the others are allowed to vary, we obtain three families of
If one of the variables u,

surfaces,

const., v

= const., w =

const.,

by means

of

which the

region (T) may be divided into subregions analogous to the parallelopipeds used above, each of which is bounded by six curved faces.

The volume
(u),

(u

of one of these subregions

+ dv),

du), (v}, (v

(w),

AF =

D(w,

v,

bounded by the surfaces


is, by (16),

(w + dw}
c f

-j-

w)

c?<

c?v

dw

dv, and div are positive increments, and where c is infini


tesimal with du, dv, and dw. The term e du dv dw may be neglected,
as has been explained several times ( 128). The product

where du,

dV =

(17)

D(u,

v,

w}

the principal part of the infinitesimal AF, and is called the element
of volume in the system of curvilinear coordinates (u, v, w).
Let c?s 2 be the square of the linear element in the same system of
is

coordinates.

o/

dx

= ~- du
cu

Then, from
^i /*

vv

(6),

-P

- dw.

dy

Ow

~JL

-r-

du

dz

= -^cu

du

whence, squaring and adding, we find

=H du*+H. dv*+H dw +2F dvdw+2F. dudiv+2F dudv,


2

VII,

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

14fi]

305

the notation employed being

(19)
(7 IT

C OC G OT

dw

du dw

(JOT

O *y

du dv

where the symbol AJ means, as usual, that x is to be replaced by y


and z successively and the resulting terms then added.
The formula for dV is easily deduced from this formula for ds*.
For, squaring the functional determinant by the usual rule,

we

find

= M,

F,

whence the element

volume

of

is

equal to

\M du dv dw.

Let us consider in particular the very important case in which


the coordinate surfaces (u), (?;), (w) form a triply orthogonal system,
say, in which the three surfaces which pass through any
The tangents to
in
point
space intersect in pairs at right angles.
the three curves in which the surfaces intersect in pairs form a tri-

that

is to

= 0,
0, F2
rectangular trihedron. It follows that we must have FI
The
formulae
for
sufficient.
these
conditions
are
also
and
0;

^=

dV and
(20)

ds*

ds

then take the simple forms

=H

a.

du*

These formulae

+H

may

dv

+ H dw
s

dV

2
,

also be derived

from certain considerations of

Let us suppose du, dv, and dw very small,


infinitesimal geometry.
and let us substitute in place of the small subregion defined above a
small parallelopiped with plane faces. Neglecting infinitesimals of
higher order, the three adjacent edges of the parallelopiped may be
taken to be \fn\ dii, ^/If2 dv, and \/^ dw, respectively. The for
mulae (20) express the fact that the linear element and the element of

volume are equal to the diagonal and the volume of this parallelo
faces repre
piped, respectively. The area ^/H1 H2 du dv of one of the
sents in a similar

As an example
(21)

manner the element

of area of the surface (w).

consider the transformation to polar coordinates

= p sin0cos<,

= p sin

= p cos 6,

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

306

[VII,

146

where p denotes the distance of the point M(x, y, z) from the origin,
6 the angle between OM and the positive z axis, and
the angle
which the projection of OM on the xy plane makes with the positive
x axis. In order to reach all points in space, it is sufficient to let p
from zero to TT, and
from zero to 2?r.
vary from zero to +
<f>

<

<x>,

From

(21)

we

find

ds 2

(22)

+P

dp

+P

d6 2

sin 2

2
0d<j>

whence

dV =

(23)

These formulae

The three

may

2
p sin 6 dp dO

.
d<f>

be derived without any calculation, however.

families of surfaces

are concentric spheres


(0),
about the origin, cones of revolution
about the z axis with their vertices

(/a),

(<)

and planes through


These
respectively.
surfaces evidently form a triply
orthogonal system, and the dimen
at the origin,

the

axis,

sions of the elementary subregion


are seen from the figure to be dp,

p dO, p sin

d<j>

the formulae (22)

and (23) now follow immediately.

To

FIG. 34

calculate in terms of the va

riables

p, 0,

and

<

a triple integral

extended throughout a region bounded by a closed surface S, which


contains the origin and which is met in at most one point by a radius
vector through the origin, p should be allowed to vary from zero to R,
where R
is the equation of the surface
6 from zero to TT
/(0,

<f>)

and

<

from zero

to 2?r.

V=

d<j>

Jo

The

first

Jo

dO

Jo

- c

d+

i/O

is

we may

write

R 3 sin
dQ.

t/0

made of

and z defined
cylindrical coordinates r,
r sin w, z
z.
It is evident that
y
<a,

by the equations x

is

P sinOdp.

integration can always be performed, and

Occasional use

For example, the volume of such a surface

= r cos

to,

and

dV = r dw dr dz

VII,

147. Elliptic coordinates.

The surfaces represented by the equation

(24)

where X
conies.

an

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

147]

is

-1=0,

a variable parameter and a

>

>

0,

c>

form a family of confocal

in space there pass three surfaces of this family,

Through every point

ellipsoid,

307

a parted hyperboloid, and an unparted hyperboloid.

For the equa

tion (24) always has one root \i which lies between b and c, another root X 2
between a and 6, and a third root X 3 greater than a. These three roots \i, X2 , Xg

are called the elliptic coordinates of the point whose rectangular coordinates are
Any two surfaces of the family intersect at right angles if X be given
(x, y, z).
:

the values Xi

and X 2

tracted, a division

by

and the resulting equations be sub

for instance, in (24),

X2 gives

Xi

(25)

a)

6)(X 2

b)

c)(X 2

= 0,
c)

which shows that the two surfaces (Xi) and (X 2 ) are orthogonal.
In order to obtain x, y, and z as functions of Xi X 2 X 3 we may note that the
,

relation
(X

is

o)(X

6)(X

c)

x2 (X

Setting X
obtain the values

identically satisfied.

tion,

we

6)(X

c)

a,

y2

(X

6,

c)(X

c,

- a) - z 2 (X - a)(\ - b)
= (X - Xi)(X - X 2 )(X - X 3 )

successively, in this

equa

- a)(a-X )(q-X 2 )

(X 3

b)(a

(a

(26)

(a

(X 8

c)

b)(b

c)

C )(X,

(a

c)(b

c)

whence, taking the logarithmic derivatives,


,

dx

x
2 V Xi

X2

X2

-p

2 \Xi

Forming the sum

of the squares, the terms in

4 L(Xi

a)

X3

Xs

c/

(\!

(X,

6)

XQft,

dXidX 2 dX 2 dX 8 dX 3 dXi must dis


Hence the coefficient of dXj is

(X!

by their values and simplifying,


1

(27)

^)

d\ 3

~T

appear by means of (25) and similar relations.

or, replacing x, y, z

X3

*-5
UZ

X2

- XQ

4(X 1 -a)(X 1 -6)(X 1 -c)

c)

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

308
The

[VII,

148

and 3f8 of d\\ and d\g, respectively, may be obtained from


The element of volume is
cyclic permutation of the letters.

coefficients 3f2

this expression

therefore

by

-VMi M2 Mz

d\i d\2 d\ a

Consider the triple integral

148. Dirichlet s integrals.

xpyiz r (l

dxdydz

z)

taken throughout the interior of the tetrahedron formed by the four planes
x = 0, 2/ = 0, z = 0, x + y + z = 1. Let us set

where

and

new variables. These

f are three

r/,

TJ

formulae

|r;f ,

may be written in the form

the inverse transformation is

When

x, y, and z are all positive and x + y + z is less than unity,


17, and f all
between zero and unity. Conversely, if
17, and f all lie between zero and
The tetra
unity, x, y, and z are all positive and x + y + z is less than unity.
hedron therefore goes over into a cube.
,

lie

In order to calculate the functional determinant,

transformation
z

Z.

X=f, F=)j,

Z=

?;f ,

D(x,

y, z)

D(,

T,,

dg

rV +

*i

/0

D(x,

77,

D(X,

f)

triple integral

t/O

z)

D(JT, r, Z)

Y, Z)

Jo

=F

F, y

+r+2 (i-

_ lyfy

i 7+r+i

l)

Canceling the
found to be

+ 4)

common

of

a- ^ra- f)df.

f,

a function of

77,

and a func

written in the form

X C 7 9 + + l(l
-

T? )?dr,

/o

X f
/o

introducing T functions (see (33),

T(p

becomes

/0

+ 9 + r + 2(l

r,,

J>(|,

The integrand is the product of a function


Hence the triple integral may be
tion of f.

(28)

us introduce the auxiliary

Hence the functional determinant has the value

and the given

or,

let

which gives x

T(q

p. 280),

+ r + 2)T(p+l)
+ q + r + 3)

Y(p

T(q

+r+

2)

factors, the value of the given triple integral is finally

r(p+i)r( g +i)r(r+pr(+i)

VII,

149]

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION
A

149. Green s theorem.*

derived for triple integrals.

309

formula entirely analogous to (15),


126, may be
Let us first consider a closed surface S which is

met in at most two points by a parallel to the z axis, and a function R(x, y, z)
which, together with dR/dz, is continuous throughout the interior of this surface.
All the points of the surface S project into points of a region
of the xy plane

bounded by a closed contour C. To every point of A inside C corre


= 2 (x, y).
spond two points of S whose coordinates are z\ =
(x, y) and z 2
The surface S is thus divided into two distinct portions /Si and 83
We shall
which

is

<f>\

<j>

suppose that z\ is less than z 2


Let us now consider the triple integral
.

dz

dxdydz

taken throughout the region bounded by the closed surface S. A first integra
may be performed with regard to z between the limits z\ and z 2 ( 144),

tion

which gives R(x, y, z 2 )


R(x,
equal to the double integral

J J[Jfc(,

The given

y, z t ).

y, z 2 )

triple integral is therefore

R(x, y, Zi)]dxdy

over the region A. But the double integral


surface integral ( 135)

f f R(x,

y, z 2 )dxdy is

equal to the

R(x, y, z)dxdy

taken over the upper side of the surface /S2


Likewise, the double integral of
R(x, y, Zi) with its sign changed is the surface integral
.

R(x,y,z)dxdy
Jff
J(sj
taken over the lower side of

/ / /

where the surface

<Si

aT*

integral

is

Adding these two

^* = ff R ^ y

integrals,

Z)

we may

write

dxd 2/

to be

extended over the whole exterior of the sur

face S.

By the methods already used several times in similar cases this formula may
be extended to the case of a region bounded by a surface of any form whatever.
Again, permuting the letters

and

z,

we

III

^ dxdy

III

-Qdxdydz= JCJC

JJJ**
*

z, y,

obtain the analogous formulae

dz

Q(x, y, z)dzdx.

<^

Occasionally called Ostrogradsky s theorem. The theorem of 126 is sometimes


Riemann s theorem. But the title Green s theorem is more clearly established
and seems to be the more fitting. See Ency. der Math. Wiss., II, A, 7, b and c.
called

TRANS.

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

310
Adding these three
triple integrals

formulae,

we

150

[VII,

Green

finally find the general

theorem for

(29)

= C
J

P(x,

dy dz

y, z)

Q(x, y, z) dz dx

R(x, y, z)dxdy,

J(S)

where the surface integrals are to be taken, as before, over the exterior of the
bounding surface.
= R = QorQ = y, P R = Q or R = z,
If, for example, we set P = x, Q
P = Q = 0, it is evident that the volume of the solid bounded by S is equal to
any one of the surface integrals
(29

CC

CC

xdydz,

J J(S)

J(S)

JCC
J(S)

ydzdx,

zdxdy.

150. Multiple integrals. The purely analytical definitions which have been
given for double and triple integrals may be extended to any number of vari
ables.
We shall restrict ourselves to a sketch of the general process.

We

shall say for brevity


Let Xi x2
%n be n independent variables.
t
x n of these variables represents a point in
that a system of values x\ x%
x ) = 0, whose first member
,
space of n dimensions. Any equation F(x\, x 2 ,
,

tl

a continuous function, will be said to represent a surface; and if F is of the


Let us consider the
first degree, the equation will be said to represent a plane.
totality of all points whose coordinates satisfy certain inequalities of the form
is

ti(xi,X3,-.-,x H

(30)

)<0,

.-., k.

l, 2,

We shall say that the totality of these points forms a domain in space of n
dimensions. If for all the points of this domain the absolute value of each of
is
the coordinates x,- is less than a fixed number, we shall say that the domain

finite.

If the inequalities

(31)

we

xJ^X!<x},

shall call the

which define

D are

x<;x2<x 2

of the

-,

domain a prismoid, and we

form

<<x

^xj,,

shall say that the

xf are the dimensions of this prismoid.


lies on the frontier of the
point of the domain
functions fr in (30) vanishes at that point.
tities x\

Finally,

domain

if

we

positive

quan

shall say that

at least one of the

x n) be a function which
Now let Z) be a finite domain, and let f(x\ x 2
continuous in that domain.
Suppose D divided into subdomains by planes
= (t = 1, 2,
n), and consider any one of the prisparallel to the planes x t
,

is

moids determined by these planes which lies entirely inside the domain D.
Ax n be the dimensions of this prismoid, and let i 2
Let Axi Ax 2
n
be the coordinates of some point of the prismoid. Then the sum
,

S=

(32)

formed

for all

S/(fc,

,--,) AX! Ax 2

the prismoids which

lie

Ax

entirely inside the

a limit I as the number of the prismoids

is

domain

Z),

approaches

increased indefinitely in such a

way

VII,

that

CHANGE OF VARIABLES

INTRODUCTION

150]

them approach

of the dimensions of each of

all

I the n-tuple integral of f(x\ x 2


denote it by the symbol
limit

The evaluation

=ff-

*2,

dx n

z n )dzidz 2

We

zero.

shall call this

taken in the domain

z,,)

311

D and shall

"fffai

be reduced to the evaluation of


this in general, we need only
(n
l)-tuple integral, it will also be true for an
For this purpose let us consider any point (xi x2
xn )
n-tuple integral.
of D. Discarding the variable z n for the moment, the point (x\ x 2
xn _ i) evi
We shall suppose
dently describes a domain D in space of (n
1) dimensions.
of an n-tuple integral

n successive simple integrals.


show that if it is true for an

may

show

In order to

that to any point (x 1? X2,


x n _i) inside of JK there correspond just two
,
xn _i; x^) and
points on the frontier of Z), whose coordinates are (xi, X2,
,
x n _i x^2) ), where the coordinates x^ and x^2) are continuous func
,
(xi, x 2 ,
tions of the n
1 variables x\ x 2
x n -i inside the domain IX. If this con
;

dition were not satisfied,

we should

that the condition would be

met by each

(xi

treated in

124, that the part of

x2

xn -i)-

It is easy to

S which

r
Ax 1 Ax 2 ---Ax n _ i
where

e
|

may

(i)

it is

*(xi, x 2

which correspond

we

to the (n

(34)

in the

domain

integral,

it

is

to the

did in the similar case

column

this

--^x^dXn +

-,

xn

we now

If

of prismoids

is

~\
e

set

-i)=J

(1)

clear that the integral I will be equal to the limit of the

is,

domains so small
Let us now

be made smaller than any positive number whatever by choos

S*(xi, x 2
that

from

arises

/(x 1 ,x2

ing the quantities Ax* sufficiently small.

(33)

show, as

r *w

into

of the partial domains.

consider the column of prismoids of the domain

same point

domain

divide the

x n _i)AxiAx 2

sum

Ax n _i,

l)-tuple integral

fff- --J^Xi,

x2

xn -i)dxi---dxn -i,

The law having been supposed

ZK.

evident,

to hold for an (n
l)-tuple
it holds in general.
Consider the totality of points

by mathematical induction, that

We

might have proceeded differently.


Then the
Xn) for which the coordinate x n has a fixed value.
xn _i) describes a domain 8 in space of (n
point (xi, x 2
1) dimensions,
and it is easy to show that the n-tuple integral I is also equal to the expression
(xi

za

(35)

where 0(x n) is the (. l)-tuple integral /// -ffdxi


dxn-i extended through
out the domain 5. Whatever be the method of carrying out the process, the limits
for the various integrations depend upon the nature of the domain D, and

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

312
vary

general for different orders of integration.


by inequalities of the form

in

150

[VII,

An

exception exists in case

D is a prismoid denned
The multiple

integral

and the order

in

is

then of the form

which the integrations are performed may be permuted in any


altering the limits which correspond to each of the

way whatever without


variables.

The formula

for change of variables also

may

be extended to n-tuple integrals.

Let
Xi

(36)

0,-(zi, zg,

x n ),

= l,

-,n,

2,

be formulae of transformation which establish a one-to-one correspondence between


the points (xi z 2 .,--, xn ) of a domain jy and the points (xi
domain D. Then we shall have
,

x2

xn ) of a

(37)

The proof
argument

similar to that given in analogous cases above.


that we shall attempt here.

is

sketch of the

is all

1) If (37)

holds for each of two transformations,

it

also holds for the trans

formation obtained by carrying out the two in succession.


2) Any change of variables may be obtained by combining two transforma
tions of the following types
(38)

Xi

(39)

zi

x2

xf,

Xa,

xn _i

x;,_i,

xn

n (xi, xg,

x;,),

The formula

3)
(37) holds for a transformation of the type (38), since the
given n-tuple integral may be written in the form (34). It also holds for any
transformation of the form (39), by the second form (35) in which the multiple

integral

These conclusions are based on the assumption that


by mathematical

be written.

may

The usual reasoning


l)-tuple integral.
induction establishes the formula in general.
(37) holds for

an (n

As an example
I

let

= CC-

us try to evaluate the definite integral

f xf x?2

x"

(1

xi

x2

-----

x n f dxi dx 2

---

dx n

where ai, cr 2
an
are certain positive constants, and the integral
extended throughout the domain D defined by the inequalities
,

G<X!,

0<z 2

The transformation

0<x n

xi

x2

+x n

<

1.

is

to be

VII,

TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

151]

D into

carries

new domain IX

it is

easy to show as in
,

The new integrand


+-+ .+

II.

integral

(40)

--,

<<!,

148 that the value of the functional determinant

X2

-,

Xn)

t n-i

fc

is

-2

therefore of the form

is

-i^

and the given

defined by the inequalities

0<&<1,

0<fi^l,

and

313

+-+

may

-*...^ (1 _ f y (1 _ &)

...(1

_&,)-.,

be expressed, as before, in terms of T functions

T(

INTEGRATION OF TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

151. General method. Let


P(x, y) and Q(x, y~) be two functions of
the two independent variables x and y.
Then the expression

Pdx + Qdy
is not in general the total differential of a
single function of the
variables x and y.
For we have seen that the equation

du

(41)
is

two

= Pdx + Qdy

equivalent to the two distinct equations

(42)

*<-,),

(*,).
.

Differentiating the first of these equations with respect to y and the


second with respect to x, it appears that u(x, y) must satisfy each
of the equations
C2 u

cxdy

dP(x, y)

82 u

dy

Cydx

dQ(x, y)
dx

necessary condition that a function u(x, y) should exist which


requirements is that the equation

satisfies these

(43)

dx
Cy _.!
should be identically satisfied.
This condition is also sufficient.
For there exist an infinite

number

of functions u(x, y) for which the first of equations


(42)
All these functions are given by the formula

is satisfied.

=
/
Jx
n

P(x,y)dj.

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

314

[VII,

151

where x is an arbitrary constant and Fis an arbitrary function of y.


In order that this function u(x, y) should satisfy the equation (41),
it is necessary and sufficient that its partial derivative with respect
to

x should be equal to Q(x,

f_

that the
y), that is,

dp

fe

<

Jxn
should be

But by the assumed

satisfied.

ftx

7\T>

f*

dx

_=^

Cy

si

f)

-z-dx
CX

The right-hand
there are an

y)

relation (43)

Q(x, y)

whence the preceding relation reduces

equation

Q(x

y)

we have
,

to

Hence
side of this equation is independent of x.
number of functions of y which satisfy the

infinite

formula
equation, and they are all given by the

= f
An

Q(o,

an arbitrary value of y, and C is an arbitrary constant.


It follows that there are an infinite number of functions u(x, y)
which satisfy the equation (41). They are all given by the formula

where y

is

(44)

and

differ

P(x, y} dx

f
Jx

Q(x

/Q

from each other only by the additive constant

C.

Consider, for example, the pair of functions

a;

+ my
+ y*

which

mx

y
x2

x2

+y

Setting x

satisfy the condition (43).

and y

= 1,

formula for u gives

C -^dy
C*x + my.
+
2 dx+
,

u=l
Jo

x*

+y

C,

whence, performing the indicated integrations, we find

u
or,

= -1 [log(a; + y )]* + m
*
2

arc tan

x~\
-

log y

yjo

simplifying,

1
*

log(cc

-f

m arc tan - +
y

C.

C,

the

VII,

TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

151]

The preceding method may be extended

any number of inde

to

We shall

give the reasoning for three variables.


be three functions of x, y, and z. Then the total

variables.

pendent
Let P, Q, and

315

differential equation

du

(45)
is

= Pdx +

Q dy

+ R dz

equivalent to the three distinct equations

= P,

(46)

= R.

Q,

2
Calculating the three derivatives d^u/dxdy, d u/dydz, d^u/dzdx in
two different ways, we find the three following equations as neces

sary conditions for the existence of the function u

d_P_d_Q,
dx
dy

2Q

= fL^

dz

dy

<LR

= dJL.

dx

dz

Then, by the
Conversely, let us suppose these equations satisfied.
there exist an infinite number of functions u(x, y, z) whose

first,

partial derivatives with respect to x and y are equal to


respectively, and they are all given by the formula

u
where

P(x,

Z denotes an

y,

z)dx

Q(x

arbitrary function of

tive du/dz should be equal to R,


the equation

it is

y,

z)dy

R(x,

- R(x

y, z}

+ R(x

y, z)

Q,

+ Z,

necessary and sufficient that

satisfied.
Making use of the relations (47),
to hold, this condition reduces to the equation

y, z)

and

In order that the deriva

z.

should be

assumed

- R(x

z)

which were

= R(x,

y, z}

R(x ,y ,z).

an infinite number of functions u(x, y, z) exist


which satisfy the equation (45). They are all given by the formula
It follows that

f* x

(48)

where x

JxK
,

P(x, y, z)dx

f* z

pv
/

Jy

Q(x

y,

z)dy+

\
c>

R(x ,y z)dz
,

yn z a are three arbitrary numerical values, and C


,

arbitrary constant.

+ C,

za

is

an

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

316

[VII,

152

Pdx + Qdy. The same subject may be


The integral
treated from a different point of view, which gives deeper insight
Let P(x, y) and Q(x, y}
into the question and leads to new results.

x>y)

152.

be two functions which, together with their first derivatives, are


continuous in a region A bounded by a single closed contour C.
It may happen that the region A embraces the whole plane, in
which case the contour C would be supposed to have receded to

The

infinity.

line integral

taken along any path

D which

ties (x

lies in

will

depend

in general

upon

try to find the conditions under


this integral depends only upon the coordinates of the extremi
be any two points
and
y ) and (x i} yv ) of the path. Let

Let us

the path of integration.

which

Pdx + Qdy

first

be any two paths which connect these


two points without intersecting each other between the extremities.
Taken together they form a closed contour. In order that the values
of the line integral taken along these two paths L and L should be
of region A, and let

L and L

it is evidently necessary and sufficient that the integral taken


around the closed contour formed by the two curves, proceeding

equal,

always in the same sense, should be

zero.

issue is exactly equivalent to the following


under which the line integral

Hence the question at


What are the conditions

fPdx + Qdy
taken around any closed contour whatever which

should vanish

The answer
theorem

to this question

Pta + a Ay

where C

is

integral

is

if

in the region

an immediate result of Green

is

(49)

that

lies

=//(|f

double
any closed contour which lies in A, and where the
whole interior of C. It is clear

to be extended over the

the functions

P and Q

satisfy the equation

the line integral on the left will always vanish.


also necessary.

For,

if

dP/dy

This condition

is

dQ/dx were not identically zero

VII,

TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

152]

317

in the region A, since it is a continuous function, it would


surely be
possible to find a region a so small that its sign would be constant
But in that case the line integral taken around the
inside of a.

boundary of a would not be


If the condition (43

is

by

zero,

(49).

identically satisfied, the values of the

integral taken along two paths L and


and
are equal provided the
points

between the same two


two paths do not intersect
and N. It is easy to see that the same thing is true
when
the
two paths intersect any number of times between
even
and N. For in that case it would be necessary only to compare

M
between M

the values of the integral taken along the paths L and L with its
value taken along a third path
which intersects neither of the
L",

and N.
preceding except at
Let us now suppose that one of the extremities of the path of
integration is a fixed point (x 0) y }, while the other extremity is a
variable point (x, y) of A.
Then the integral
V)

X(*,
o-

Pdx + Qdy

Vo>

taken along an arbitrary path depends only upon the coordinates


The partial derivatives of this
(x, y*) of the variable extremity.
function are precisely P(x, y) and Q(x, y).

For example, we have

s*(x + A:r, y)

F(x

+ As,

y)

F(x, y}

P(x, y} dx,

/(*

for

we may suppose

that the path of integration goes from (x y )


to (x -f Ace, y) along a line parallel to
y~)
,

to (x, y), and then from (x,


the x axis, along which dy

may

write

F(x
v

?/)

F(L

Taking the limit when

Fy =

= 0.

+ Ace,-*

v)

Applying the law of the mean, we

= P(x +
Ace

0Az, y},

0<0<1.

approaches zero, this gives

Fx = P.

The

line integral F(x, y}, therefore, satisfies the


Similarly,
total differential equation (41), and the general integral of this
Q.

equation is given by adding to F(x, y) an arbitrary constant.


This new formula is more general than the formula (44) in that
the path of integration is still arbitrary.
It is easy to deduce (44)

from the new form.

To avoid ambiguity,

let (x
y ) and (a^, yi) be
two extremities, and let the path of integra
be the two straight lines x = x y = y^ Along the former,

the coordinates of the


tion

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

318

=x
=
y
y

is

l}

= 0, and
= 0, and x

dx

dy

y varies from y

[VII,

153

Along the second,


Hence the integral (50)

to y t

varies from x to

equal to

r,
I

J;/

which
But

differs

from (44) only

in notation.

might be more advantageous to consider another path of


be the equations of a curve
Let x = /(), y =
integration.
and
let
t be
supposed to vary con
y ) and (x lt y^,
joining (x
t
t
as
the
to
point (x, y) describes the curve
tinuously from
Then
we shall have
between its two extremities.
it

<}>()

pdx

Qdy

=
I
Jf

>

/<%,

If the path be
#),
example, we should set x = x + tfa
to 1.
and we should let t vary from
y = y + t(y
y,,),
(x, y) of the equation (41)
Conversely, if a particular integral
be known, the line integral is given by the formula

where there remains but a single quadrature.


a straight

for

line,
l

(x.

y)

L
which

is

3>(x,

y)

3>(x

yc),

analogous to the equation (6) of Chapter IV.

153. Periods.
first place,

contours.

More general

cases

may

be investigated.

In the

Green s theorem applies to regions bounded by several


Let us consider for defmiteness a region A bounded by
an exterior contour C and two contours
and
which lie inside the first (Fig. 35). Let P
and Q be two functions which, together with
C"

C"

their first derivatives, are continuous in this

region.

and

C"

(The regions inside the contours C


should not be considered as parts of

the region A, and no hypothesis whatever

made regarding
Let the contours

C and

C"

and Q inside these

is

regions.)

be joined to the contour C by trans

and cd. We thus obtain a closed contour abmcdndcpbaqa,


which may be described at one stroke. Applying Green s
theorem to the region bounded by this contour, the line integrals
versals ab

or F,

VII,

TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

153]

319

which arise from the transversals ab and cd cancel out, since each
It follows that
of them is described twice in opposite directions.

fPdx + Qdy

f/Y-JJ
\&;

r/0

line integral is to be taken along the whole boundary of


in the senses
the region A, i.e. along the three contours C, C , and
indicated by the arrows, respectively, these being such that the

where the

C",

region j\ always lies on the left.


If the functions P and Q satisfy the relation dQ/dx
dP/dy in
the region A, the double integral vanishes, and we may write the

resulting relation in the

(51)

form

Pdx + Qdy =

Pdx + Qdy +

J(C )

J(C)

where each of the

Pdx

J(C")

line integrals is to

be taken in the sense desig

nated above.

Let us now return to the region A bounded by a single contour


C, and let P and Q be two functions which satisfy the equation

= dQ/dx, and which, together with their


continuous except at a finite number
of points of A, at which at least one of
dP/dy

the functions

or

is

first

derivatives, are

discontinuous.

We

shall suppose for definiteness that


there are three points of discontinuity
a, b, c in

Let us surround each of

A.

these points by a small circle, and then


join each of these circles to the contour

C by a cross cut (Fig. 36). Then the


integral j Pdx -\-Qdy taken from a fixed
point (x T/O) to a variable point (.r, y)
along a curve which does not cross any
,

of these cuts has a definite value at every point.

FIG. 36

For the contour C,

the circles and the cuts form a single contour which may be described
shall call
at one stroke, just as in the case discussed above.

We

such a path
taken along

direct,

from

and shall denote the value of the

line integral

y ) to M(x, y) by F(x, y}.


to
We shall call the path composed of the straight line from
a point a whose distance from a is infinitesimal, the circumference
a loopof the circle of radius aa about a, and the straight line a
it

(x

circuit.

The

line integral

fPdx

-f

Qdy taken along a

loop-circuit

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

320

153

[VII,

reduces to the line integral taken along the circumference of the


circle.
This latter integral is not zero, in general, if one of the
functions P or Q is infinite at the point a, but it is independent of
the radius of the circle.

It is a certain constant

two senses

A, the

double

which the circumference


be
described.
we
shall
denote
B and
C the
may
Similarly,
by
values of the integral taken along loop-circuits drawn about the two
singular points b and c, respectively.
and
Any path whatever joining
may now be reduced to a
sign corresponding to the

in

combination of loop-circuits followed by a direct path from


to M.
For example, the path
be
reduced
to
a
combination
mdefM may

M
M mdM M deM M efM

and
fM. The path
then
be
reduced
to
a
about
the singular
M^mdM^ may
loop-circuit
and
for
the
other
two.
the
point a,
similarly
Finally,
path
fM
of the paths

is

equivalent to a direct path.

of integration, the value of the line


(52)

F(x, y)

where m,

n,

is

y)

+ mA +

+ pC

nB

and p may be any positive or negative

integers.

The

are called the periods of the line integral.


evidently a function of the variables x and y

quantities A, B,
integral

= F(x,

whatever be the path


will
be of the form
integral

It follows that,

admits of an infinite number of different


origin of this indetermination

is

That
which
determinations, and the

apparent.

Remark. The function F(x, y} is a definitely defined function


whole region A when the cuts aa, b/3, cy have been traced.
But it should be noticed that the difference F(m)
between

in the

the values of the function at two points


and
of
sides
a
cut
does
not
opposite
necessarily vanish.
/""

A- /: +
i/a;

/"

F(m )

which lie on
For we have

r*o

/+/

J,,i

Jmf

which may be written

But

is
j"^

zero

hence
J^-F<X)= A.

It follows that
to

all

the cuts.

the difference F(ni)

along aa.

F(m

is

constant and equal


for each of

The analogous proposition holds

VII,

TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

154]

Example.

The

321

line integral
"

xdy

ijdx
~f~

i/fll

y
In order to find the corre

has a single critical point, the origin.


let

sponding period,

= p cos

integrate

2
along the circle x

=p

2
.

we have

this circle

Along

us

o,

whence the period

is

=p

sin w,

xdy

ydx

= p^dto,

= 2?r. It is easy to verify


equal to /
is the total differential of arc tan
y/x.
"dw

for the integrand

this,

Common roots of two equations. Let


and Y be two functions of the
and y which, together with their first partial derivatives, are con
tinuous in a region A bounded by a single closed contour C.
Then the expres
154.

variables x

sion

(XdY

2
YdX)/(X* + Y

the derivative of arc tan

Y/X.

satisfies the

Hence the

(53)

condition of integrability, for

it is

line integral

taken along the contour C in the positive sense vanishes provided the coeffi
dx and dy in the integrand remain continuous inside (7, i.e. if the two
= 0, Y = have no common point inside that contour. But if these
curves

cients of

of common points a, 6, c,
inside C, the value
of the integral will be equal to the sum of the values of the same integral taken
as
along the circumferences of small circles described about the points a, b, c,

two curves have a certain number

centers.
Let (a, 0) be the coordinates of one of the common points. We shall
suppose that the functional determinant D(X, Y)/D(x, y) is not zero, i.e. that
= are not tangent at the point. Then it is pos
the two curves
and
sible to draw about the point (a, /3) as center a circle c whose radius is so small

that the point (JT,

which
circle c

is
(

Y)

describes a small plane region about the point

bounded by a contour 7 and which corresponds point


25 and 127).

(0, 0)

for point to the

As

the point (x, y) describes the circumference of the circle c in the positive
sense, the point (X, Y) describes the contour y in the positive or in the negative
sense, according as the sign of the functional determinant inside the circle c is

But the definite integral along the circumference of c is


positive or negative.
in one revolution, that is,
2x. Similar
equal to the change in arc tan

Y/X

reasoning for

where

all of

the roots shows that

denotes the number of points

-^(^, Y)/D(x, y) is positive, and


determinant is negative.

common

to the

two curves

at

which

N the number of common points at which the

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

322
The

on the

definite integral

around

in going

c,

that

is,

describes the contour C.

contour

is

composed

left is also

155

[VII,

equal to the variation in arc tan Y/X


Y/X as the point (x, y)

to the index of the function

the functions

If

X and Y are polynomials, and

if

the

number of arcs of unicursal curves, we are led


more rational functions, which involves only

of a finite

to calculate the index of one or


and Y,
elementary operations ( 77). Moreover, whatever be the functions
we can always evaluate the definite integral (54) approximately, with an error
less than 7t, which is all that is necessary, since the right-hand side is always a

multiple of

2it.

The formula (54) does not give the exact number of points common to the
two curves unless the functional determinant has a constant sign inside of C.
Picard s recent work has completed the results of this investigation.*

The results of the preceding paragraphs


without essential alteration to line integrals in space. Let P,
be three functions which, together with their first partial derivatives,

155. Generalization of the preceding.

may be extended
Q,

and

-B

are continuous in a region (E) of space bounded by a single closed surface S.


Let us seek first to determine the conditions under which the line integral

(55)

(v

j/

yo Zo) and (x, y, z) of the path of inte


depends only upon
This amounts to inquiring under what conditions the same integral
vanishes when taken along any closed path T. But by Stokes theorem ( 136)
the above line integral is equal to the surface integral
the extremities (x

gration.

CC/
j

JJ

\ dx

--p\j}dx dy +T /^ R --t>

f>Q\^

\a*

dy/

dy dz

dz/

SR
---

5P
+/
^\cz
,

}dz dx

ex/

extended over a surface S which is bounded by the contour T. In order that


should be zero, it is evidently necessary and sufficient that

this surface integral

the equations

8P_BQ
dy
should be satisfied.

dx

^Q =

^,

dz

dy

<3jR

= eP

dx

If these conditions are satisfied,

dz

U is a function of the

dx + Q dy +
ables x, y, and z whose total differential is
valued in the region (E). In order to find the value of

R dz,

and which

U at any

vari

is

single
point, the path

be chosen arbitrarily.
If the functions P, Q, and E satisfy the equations (56), but at least one of
them becomes infinite at all the points of one or more curves in (E), results
of integration

may

analogous to those of 153 may be derived.


If, for example, one of the functions P, Q, R becomes infinite at all the points
will admit a period equal to the value of the
of a closed curve 7, the integral
line integral taken along a closed contour which pierces once and only once a

surface

<r

bounded by

7.

We may also consider questions relating to

surface integrals which are exactly

analogous to the questions proposed above for line integrals. Let A, B, and C
be three functions which, together with their first partial derivatives, are
*

TraM

d Analyse, Vol.

II.

VII,

TOTAL DIFFERENTIALS

155]

323

continuous in a region (E) of space bounded by a single closed surface S. Let 2


be a surface inside of (E) bounded by a contour r of any form whatever. Then
the surface integral

(57)

= C

A dy dz + B dz dx + C dx dy

in general upon the surface S as well as upon the contour r. In order


that the integral should depend only upon F, it is evidently necessary and suffi
cient that its value when taken over any closed surface in (E) should vanish.

depends

Green s theorem ( 149) gives at once the conditions under which this is true.
For we know that the given double integral extended over any closed surface is
equal to the triple integral

dB

dA

dC\,

\dxdydz

dz /

dy

extended throughout the region bounded by the surface. In order that this latter
that the
integral should vanish for any region inside (E), it is evidently necessary
functions A, B, and C should satisfy the equation

dx

This condition

is

+
~dz~

Ity

also sufficient.

Stokes theorem affords an easy verification of this fact. For if A, J5, and C
are three functions which satisfy the equation (58), it is always possible to deter
mine in an infinite number of ways three other functions P, Q, and R such that

~
In the

first

place,

if

dx

dx

dz

dz

dy

number, for they remain unchanged

if

P, Q,

dx

f *B(x,

y, z)

dz

and

be replaced by

dz

dy

respectively, where X is an arbitrary function


R = 0, the first two of equations (59) give

P=

dy

these equations admit solutions, they admit an infinite

<f>(x,

of x, y,

Q=- C

y),

A(x,

and

z.

y, z)

dz

y) and \f/(x, y) are arbitrary functions of x and y.


values in the last of equations (59), we find

where

<f>(x.

dA

d
h

~
or,

making use

B\
)

dx

d\b

dx

$(x, y)

Substituting these

_,.

C7(j y, z)

dy

of (58),

=
dx

One of
The

d<f>

dz H

dy

Again, setting

the functions

or

C(x, y, z

dy

still be chosen at random.


having been determined, the surface integral, by

^ may

functions P, Q, and

Stokes theorem, is equal to the line integral


evidently depends only upon the contour F.

f(r) Pdx + Qdy + Rdz, which

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

324

[VII, Exs.

EXERCISES
Find the value

1.

of the triple integral

x -y) 2

+ 3az-

4a*]dxdydz

extended throughout the region of space defined by the inequalities


x2

x2

-az<0,

7/

2
2/

-2a 2

z2

<0.

[Licence, Montpellier, 1895.]

Find the area

2.

of the surface

and the volume

of the solid

& 2 y2

bounded by the same

= C

F(X, F, Z)
considered as a function of

xo

surface.

JT,

dx C dy C /(z,
z

Jo

F, and Z.

(z

which

lies in

the

Reduce

first

C C
I

C x,a x a *
y

<

[Proceed as in

Reduce

solid

= 3a

bounded by the surface

xyz

octant.

x a F(x\
"

Zj

x2

D defined

extended throughout the domain


Xi

z2 8

125.

to a simple integral the multiple integral

J J

<

y, z)dz

Generalize the results of

Find the volume of the portion of the

4.

6.

Investigate the properties of the function

3.

5.

X2

by the

^ xn

xn ) dx\ dx%
inequalities

x\

x2

148.]

to a simple integral the multiple integral

extended throughout the domain

D defined

by the

inequalities

7*. Derive the formula


n

f f f--- JCdx 1 dx---dxn =


JJJ

dxn

iri
-

xn

^a

EXERCISES

VII. Exs.]

where the multiple

integral

is

325

extended throughout the domain

D denned

by the

inequality

Derive the formula

8*.

n
C F(a cos 6
r27T

"de

b sin

cos

sin 0) sin 6

c sin

d<j>

- 2n C

Jo

/0

where

a,

F(uR) du

&,

and

are three arbitrary constants,

and where

B = Va2 +

b2

c 2.

[POISSON.]

double integral is equal to a certain surface inte


[First observe that the given
2
2
2 =
1.
Then take the plane
gral taken over the surface of the sphere x + y + z

ax

by

cz

&s the plane of xy in a

new system

of coordinates.]

be the equation in polar coordinates of a closed surface.


Let p = F(6,
that the volume of the solid bounded by the surface is equal to the double

9*.

<f>)

Show

integral

(a)

ip cos y do-

extended over the whole surface, where

da-

represents the element of area, and 7


exterior normal.

makes with the

the angle which the radius vector

10*. Let us consider an ellipsoid

whose equation

is

us define the positions of any point on its surface by the elliptic coordi
and
that is, by the roots which the above equation would have if /*
The application of the formulae (29) to
were regarded as unknown (cf.
147).

and

let

nates

/>,

---

the volume of this ellipsoid leads to the equation


"

r"

dv

Jo

Likewise, the formula (a) gives

- p2

>&

i/O

11.

Jb

V(62-p

)(

C2

dv

-p 2 )(,2 -62 )(c 2 -,2

2
)

Determine the functions P(z, y) and Q(x, y) which, together with their
and for which the line integral

partial derivatives, are continuous,

+ a,y +

/3)dx

Q(z

a,

p)dy

taken along any closed contour whatever is independent of the constants


and depends only upon the contour itself.

a and

/3

[Licence, Paris, July, 1900.]

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS

326

12*. Consider the point transformation defined

As

[VII, Exs.

by the equations

z ) describes a surface S the point (x, y, z) describes a sur


y be the direction angles of the normal to S a
-/ the
direction angles of the corresponding normal to the surface S
and
and
the corresponding surface elements of the two surfaces.
Prove the formula

the point (z

Let a,

face S.

/3,

y)

coscr-

+r

y)

cos

d<r

d<r

13*. Derive the formula (16) on page 304 directly.


may be expressed by the surface integral
[The volume

V=

z cos

d<r

J(S)

and we may then make use


D(f, *, *)

D(x ,y ,z
which

is

dx

easily verified.]

of the identity

D(/,

J>(/,

D(y ,z

dy

0)

D(z ,x

3z

D(x

it,

CHAPTER

VIII

INFINITE SERIES

SERIES OF REAL CONSTANT TERMS


I.
GENERAL PROPERTIES TESTS FOR CONVERGENCE
156. Definitions and general principles. Sequences. The elementary
in all texts on College Algebra
properties of series are discussed

We shall

and on Elementary Calculus.

review rapidly the principal

discussions.
points of these elementary
First of all, let us consider an infinite sequence of quantities
SQ

(1)

SZ

Si,

Sn ,

which each quantity has a definite place, the order of precedence


if s n approaches
being fixed. Such a sequence is said to be convergent
a limit as the index n becomes infinite. Every sequence which is
in

not convergent
of

two ways

is

sn

This may happen in either


become and remain larger than any
may approach no limit even though it

said to be divergent.

may

finally

preassigned quantity, or
does not become infinite.

sn

In order that a sequence should be convergent,


sufficient that, corresponding

positive integer n should


less

than

In the
a limit

to

first place,

positive

number

e,

sn is

any positive integer p.

the condition

n becomes

and

necessary

exist such that the difference sn+p

in absolute value for

s as

any preassigned

it is

infinite,

is

necessary.

For

number n always

if s n

approaches

exists for

which

is less than
n+p
sn
It follows that the absolute value of sn+p
in
value.
absolute
e/2
will be less than 2 e/2 = c for any value of p.
In order to prove the converse, we shall introduce a very impor
tant idea due to Cauchy.
Suppose that the absolute value of each

each of the differences

sn , s

s n+l ,

of the terms of the sequence (1) is less than a positive

number N.

and -fThen all the numbers between


may be separated into
number
two classes as follows. We shall say that a
belongs to the
class

if

there exist an infinite

number
327

of terms of the sequence (1)

INFINITE SERIES

328

156

[VIII,

which are greater than the given number. A number belongs to


the class R if there are only a finite number of terms of the
It is
sequence (1) which are greater than the given number.
evident that every number between
N and + N belongs to one
of the two classes, and that every number of the class A is less
than any number of the class B. Let S be the upper limit of the
numbers of the class A, which is obviously the same as the lower
limit of the numbers of the class B.
Cauchy called this number the
grande des limites) of the terms of the
This number S should be carefully distinguished

greatest limit (la plus

sequence (1).*

from the upper limit of the terms of the sequence

(1) (

For

68).

instance, for the sequence

11

1
"

11

the upper limit of the terms of the sequence


limit is 0.

is 1,

while the greatest

The name given by Cauchy is readily justified. There always


number of terms of the sequence (1) which lie
and S + e, however small e be chosen. Let us then
between S
consider a decreasing sequence of positive numbers t l} c 2
en
where the general term ^ approaches zero. To each num
of the sequence (1)
ber
of the sequence let us assign a number
S
and
We
which lies between S
shall
thus obtain a
+
e,
e^
an
to
the
suite of numbers a 1? a 2
belonging
sequence (1)
which approach S as their limit. On the other hand, it is clear
from the very definition of S that no partial sequence of the kind just
mentioned can be picked out of the sequence (1) which approaches
a limit greater than S.
Whenever the sequence is convergent its
limit is evidently the number S itself.
Let us now suppose that the difference s n+p
s n of two terms of
the sequence (1) can be made smaller than any positive number c
for any value of p by a proper choice of n.
Then all the terms of
the sequence past s n lie between s
Let S be the
e and s n + e.
exist an infinite

,-

lt

greatest limit of the terms of the sequence.


By the reasoning just
given it is possible to pick a partial sequence out of the sequence (1)

which approaches 5

as its limit.

sequence, after a certain one, lies


*

The

Since each term of the partial

between

sn

and

sn

c,

it

is

Resumes analytiques de Turin, 1833 (Collected Works, 2d series, Vol. X, p. 49).


definition may be extended to any assemblage of numbers which has an upper

limit.

CONSTANT TERMS

VIII, Ufi7]

329

s n is at most equal to e.
S
Now
be any term of the sequence (1) whose index
is greater
than n. Then we may write

clear that the absolute value of

let s m

and the value of the right-hand side is surely less than 2c.
Since e
is an arbitrarily preassigned positive number, it follows that the
general term s m approaches S as its limit as the index m increases
indefinitely.

If S is the greatest limit of the terms of the sequence


(1),
number
greater than S belongs to the class B, and every num
every
ber less than S belongs to the class A.
The number S itself may

Note.

belong to either

class.

Given any

157. Passage from sequences to series.

infinite

sequence

the series formed from the terms of this sequence,

is

+U

H-----\- U n

----

-\

said to be convergent if the sequence of the successive

S
is

(2)

?/

Sl

1( 1

Sn

sums

+ Un

Let 5 be the limit of the latter sequence, i.e. the


convergent.
which the sum Sn approaches as n increases indefinitely:

limit

v=n

Then S

is

called the

lim S

= lim

?/.

sum of the preceding

series,

and

this relation is

indicated by writing the symbolic equation

= MO + MI

H-----h

un

which is not convergent is said to be divergent.


evident that the problem of determining whether the series
convergent or divergent is equivalent to the problem of determin
series

It is
is

ing whether the sequence of the successive sums S0) Slf


convergent or divergent. Conversely, the sequence
S 0)

s li

"
2>

s n)

will be convergent or divergent according as the series


SQ

+ Oi - s + (s
)

*i)

H-----1- (*

---a.-i) H

52

is

INFINITE SERIES

330

For the sum Sn of the

convergent or divergent.

is

of this series

sequence.

The

is

We

[VIII,

first

precisely equal to the general term


shall apply this remark frequently.

series (2) converges or diverges

S + Vn +

(3)

sn

157

terms

of the given

with the series

+ *++

obtained by omitting the first p terms of (2).


For, if S n (n
p)
denote the sum of the first n + 1 terms of the series (2), and 2 n _ p
>

sum

the

of the

p+

1 first terms of the series (3),

i.e.

2 n - P = uo + u \ H-----h Mp_i is independent of w.


Hence the sum 2 n - P approaches a limit if Sn approaches a limit,

the difference Sn

and conversely.

It follows that in

determining whether the series


many of the terms at the

converges or diverges we may neglect as


beginning of a series as we wish.

Let S be the

+1

first

sum

terms, and

Ti

+1

Rn

of a convergent series, Sn the sum of the first


sum of the series obtained by omitting the

the

terms,

=U

RH
It is evident that

we

+l

shall

-----h
+2 H

Un + p

-\

---- .

always have

It is not possible, in general, to find the sum S of a convergent


If we take the sum 5 of the first n -+- 1 terms as an approxi

series.

mate value of S, the error made is equal to R n Since Sn approaches


S as n becomes infinite, the error R n approaches zero, and hence the
number of terms may always be taken so large
at least theoret
that the error made in replacing S by Sn is less than any
ically
In order to have an idea of the degree of
preassigned number.
.

approximation obtained,

Rn

it

is sufficient

to

know an upper

limit

It is evident that the only series which lend themselves


readily to numerical calculation in practice are those for which

of

R n approaches zero rather rapidly.


of properties result directly from the definition of con
shall content ourselves with stating a few of them.

the remainder

number

vergence.

We

1) If each of the terms of a given series be multiplied by a constant


k different from zero, the new series obtained will converge or diverge
with the given series; if the given series converges to a sum S, the sum

of the second series

is

kS.

VIII,

2)

CONSTANT TERMS

158]

If there

two convergent series

be given

wo
io

331

+
+

+w H
+ wH

MI

vi

whose sums are S and S

MH H

1-

vn H

respectively, the

new

series obtained by

adding the given series term by term, namely,

Oo
and

o)

sum

+ (MX + Vj) +
S

-f-

the term-by -term addition of

converges,

its

is

+ (M +

The analogous theorem holds

for

series.

convergent

3) The convergence or divergence of a series is not affected if the


values of a finite number of the terms be changed. For such a change
would merely increase or decrease all of the sums S n after a certain

one by a constant amount.


4)

The

test for

convergence of any infinite sequence, applied to


*
gives Cauchy s general test for convergence

series,

In order that a series be convergent

and sufficient
number
that, corresponding
any preassigned positive
e, an integer
n should exist, such that the sum of any number of terms what
is less than c in absolute value.
For
ever, starting with u ll+l
Sn + p
Sn = U n + + U n + 2 H
?+
it is

necessary

to

\~

In particular, the general term


zero as n becomes infinite.

Cauchy
apply

it

u n+l

Sn+l

Sn must approach

test is absolutely general, but it is often difficult to


It is essentially a development of the very

in practice.

We shall proceed to recall the practical rules most


used
for
frequently
testing series for convergence and divergence.
None of these rules can be applied in all cases, but together they
notion of a limit.

suffice for

the treatment of the majority of cases which actually arise.

158. Series of positive terms.

We

shall

commence by

investigating

a very important class of series,


those whose terms are all posi
tive.
In such a series the sum Sn increases with n.
Hence in

sum Sn should
The most
for the convergence of such a series is based upon com
the given series with others previously studied.
The

order that the series converge

remain

less

general test
parisons of

it is

sufficient that the

than some fixed number for

all

values of n.

following propositions are fundamental for this process


* Exercices

de Mathtmatlques, 1827.

(Collected Works, Vol. VII, 2d series, p. 267.)

INFINITE SERIES

332

159

[VIII,

If each of the terms of a given series of positive terms is less


than or at most equal to the corresponding term of a known convergent
1)

of positive terms, the given series is convergent. For the sum


S n of the first n terms of the given series is evidently less than the
sum S of the second series. Hence Sn approaches a limit S which

series

is

than S

less

2)

If each of the terms of a given

series of positive terms is greater

than or equal to the corresponding term of


of positive terms, the given series diverges.

a known divergent series


For the sum of the first

n terms of the given series is not less than the sum of the first
n terms of the second series, and hence it increases indefinitely
with

n.

We may
lemma.

compare two

also

series

by means of the following

Let

(U)

MO

(V)

+
+

Vl

+ MJ H
+ Va +

...

un
,

...

If the series (7) converges, and if,


v n+l /v n 5: u n+l /u n , the series (V)
we
have
a
certain
term,
always
after
series
also converges.
the
If
(7) diverges, and if, after a certain
have
u
we
term,
always
n+ i/u n ^v n+} /v n , the series (F) also diverges.

be two series of positive terms.

In order to prove the first


u n+i/ u n whenever n

statement, let us suppose that


Since the convergence of a
series is not affected by multiplying each term by the same con
stant, and since the ratio of two consecutive terms also remains
v n+i/ v n^

>

2).

unchanged, we may suppose that vp


should have vp + ^up + 1 vp+2 ^up + 2

<

up and
,

etc.

it is

evident that

Hence the

must converge. The proof of the second statement


Given a series of positive terms which is known
to diverge,

we may make use

is

series

we

(F)

similar.

to converge or

of either set of propositions in order

determine in a given case whether a second series of positive


terms converges or diverges. For we may compare the terms of
to

the two series themselves, or


consecutive terms.

we may compare

the ratios of two

159. Cauchy s test and d Alembert s test. The simplest series which
can be used for purposes of comparison is a geometrical progression

The
is r.
It converges if r
1, and diverges if r ^ 1.
of
of
a
series
terms
with
a
geometrical
given
comparison
positive
progression leads to the following test, which is due to Cauchy:
whose ratio

<

VIII,

CONSTANT TERMS

159]

If the nth

333

\u n

of the general term u n of a series of positive


is
constantlyjess than a fixed number less
than unity, the series converges. If ~\/un after a certain term is con
stantly greater than unity, the series diverges.
root

terms after a certain term

For

in the first case ~\/un

<k<l,

whence u n

of the terms of the series after a certain one

n
<k

is less

Hence each
than the corre

sponding term of a certain geometrical progression whose ratio is


than unity. In the second case, on the other hand, ~\/u
n
whence wn
Hence in this case the general term does not

less

>l

>l.

approach zero.
This test is applicable whenever
fact,

the following proposition

may

V^

approaches a limit.

be stated

In

If -Vu n approaches a limit I as n becomes infinite, the series will


converge if I is less than unity, and it will diverge if I is greater than
unity.

doubt remains if I
1, except when ~^fu n remains greater than
unity as it approaches unity, in which case the series surely diverges.

two consecutive terms of a given series


two consecutive terms of a
geometrical progression, we obtain d Alembert s test:

Comparing the

ratio of

of positive terms with the ratio of

If in a given

of positive terms the ratio of any term to the


a
certain
term remains less than a fixed number
preceding after
less than unity, the series
converges.
If that ratio after a certain
series

term remains greater than unity, the series diverges.

From

this

theorem we

may deduce

the following corollary

un+l /un approaches a limit I as n becomes infinite, the


series converges if I
1, and diverges ifl>l.
The only doubtful case is that in which 1 = 1; even then, ifu
n
If the ratio

<

remains greater than unity as

it

n+l /u
approaches unity, the series is divergent.

General commentary. Cauchy s test is more general than d Alembert s. For


suppose that the terms of a given series, after a certain one, are each less than
the corresponding terms of a
decreasing geometrical progression, i.e. that the
general term u n is less than Arn for all values of n greater than a fixed integer p,
where
is a certain constant and r is less than
rvl 1
and
unity. Hence Vu n
the second member of this
inequality approaches unity as n becomes infinite.

<

/",

a fixed number between r and 1, we shall have after a cer


Hence Cauchy s test is applicable in any such case. But it
may happen that the ratio u n + \/Un assumes values greater than unity, however
far out in the series we may go.
For example, consider the series

Hence, denoting by
term \/M n
k.

tain

A;

<

r sin
|

a +
|

r2 sin
1

2a +
\

r n sin
\

na

-{
\

INFINITE SERIES

334

159

[VIII,

where r 1 and where a is an arbitrary constant. In this case


whereas the ratio
<

v un = r v

sin net
|

<

r,

sin(n + l)

number

assume, in general, an infinite


increases indefinitely.

may

Nevertheless,

advantageous to retain d Alembert


For instance, for the series

it is

many

convenient in

of values greater than unity as


s test, for it is

more

cases.

x
~

A H~

x2

x3
~

"

xn
~T~

1.2.3

1.2

1.2---W,

the ratio of any term to the preceding is x/(n + 1), which approaches zero as n
becomes infinite whereas some consideration is necessary to determine inde
;

n as n becomes infinite.
pendently what happens to Vun = x/\/l 2
After we have shown by the application of one of the preceding tests that each
of the terms of a given series is less than the corresponding term of a decreasing
2
it is easy to find an upper
Ar n
geometrical progression A, Ar, Ar
of
the
first m terms is taken in place of
when
the
sum
made
the
error
limit of
For this error is certainly less than the sum of the
the sum of the series.
.

geometrical progression

Ar m + Ar m +

When
two
.

Ar m
l

each of the two expressions

limits are necessarily the same.

+ uix +

(4)

-\iun and Un + i/u H approaches a limit, the


For, let us consider the auxiliary series

u 2 z2 H-----h u n

x"

H----

In this series the ratio of any term to the preceding


Hence the
approaches the limit Ix, where I is the limit of the ratio u n + \/u n
I /I.
series (4) converges when x
Denoting the
1/Z, and diverges when x

where x

is

positive.

>

<

limit of

by

-\/Un

the expression

the series (4) converges

two
and

tests

if

<

1/i

-\/u n x

also approaches a limit

and diverges

should not give contradictory results,

if

it is

>

1/i

x,

and

In order that the

evidently necessary that

were greater than T, the series (4) would


be convergent, by Cauchy s test, for any number x between 1/Z and 1/i whereas
the same series, for the same value of x, would be divergent by d Alembert s test.
I

should be equal.

for instance,

If,

Still

limit.*

more generally, if Un + \/u n approaches a limit Z,


n approaches the same
For suppose that, after a certain term, each of the ratios
>Xu

Un +

lies

between

as small as

we

and

U,,

e,

+2

U,,

,,

where e is a positive number which may be taken


n sufficiently large. Then we shall have

please by taking

or

*Cauchy, Cours d Analyse.

CONSTANT TERMS

Vlll,

160]

As

number p

the

335

two terms on
and left of this double inequality approach I -f e and I
e,
Hence for all values of m greater than a suitably chosen number
increases indefinitely, while n remains fixed, the

the extreme right


respectively.

we

shall

have

and, since
the

e is

number

It

an arbitrarily assigned number,

as

should be noted that the converse

follows that

not true.

is

sequence

b are

two

a2 62

a6,

a,

1,

where a and

it

Vu^

approaches

its limit.

a"

6,

The

different numbers.

ing is alternately a and


as n becomes infinite.

6,

an bn

Consider, for example, the

~l

a"6

n
,

-,

any term to the preced


approaches the limit Va6

ratio of

whereas the expression

-s/u^

The preceding
tain expressions

proposition may be employed to determine the limits of cer


which occur in undetermined forms. Thus it is evident that
2
1
n increases indefinitely with n, since the ratio n \/(n 1)1

the expression v
increases indefinitely with
.

the expressions

n.

manner it may be shown that each of


approaches the limit unity as n becomes infinite.

In a similar

v n and v^ogn

limit. Cauchy formulated the preceding test


a more general manner. Let an be the general term of a series of positive
terms.
Consider the sequence

160. Application of the greatest

in

on,

(5)

a;,

ajj,

-,

a*,

If the terms of this sequence have no upper limit, the general term an will not
approach zero, and the given series will be divergent. If all the terms of the
sequence (5) are less than a fixed number, let w be the greatest limit of the terms

of the sequence.

The

series

Sa n

is

convergent if

is less

than unity, and divergent if u

is

greater

than unity.

a be a number between
first part of the theorem, let 1
Then, by the definition of the greatest limit, there exist but a finite
It follows
a.
number of terms of the sequence (5) which are greater than 1
1
a for all values of n
that a positive integer p may be found such that 3/a n
In order to prove the

w and

1.

<

Hence the series 2a converges. On the other hand, if


1,
let 1 + a be a number between 1 and w.
Then there are an infinite number of
terms of the sequence (5) which are greater than 1 + a, and hence there are an
It follows that
infinite number of values of n for which a n is greater than unity.
the series Sa n is divergent in this case. The case in which w = 1 remains in doubt.
greater than p.

re

>

Cauchy s theorem. In case un+l /un and \u n both approach


without
remaining constantly greater than unity, neither
unity
d Alembert s test nor Cauchy s test enables us to decide whether
the series is convergent or divergent.
We must then take as a
161.

comparison series some series which has the same characteristic

INFINITE SERIES

336

[VIII,

161

is known to be convergent or divergent.


The following
proposition, which Cauchy discovered in studying definite integrals,
often enables us to decide whether a given series is convergent or

but which

when

the preceding rules fail.


be a function which is positive for values of x greater
than a certain number a, and which constantly decreases as x

divergent

Let

<f>(x)

increases past x
Then the x axis

approaching zero as x increases


an asymptote to the curve y =

a,

is

indefinitely.

and the

<f>(%),

definite integral

1
or

may

The

may

<f>(x~)dx

not approach a finite limit as

increases indefinitely.

series

(6)

4>(

a)

4,(a

+!)+

<(>

converges if the preceding integral approaches a limit,


does not.

and

diverges if

it

For, let us consider the set of rectangles whose bases are each
-,
unity and whose altitudes are
1),
n), respec
<f>(a),

<f>(a

<f>(a

Since each of these rectangles extends beyond the curve


the sum of their areas is evidently greater than the area

tively.

y
between the x axis, the curve y
x = a + n, that is,
</>(#),

=
<j>(x),

and the two ordinates x

= a,

Xa
On

the other hand,

altitudes
<j>(a

+1),

<j>(a

we consider the rectangles constructed

if

common

inside the curve, with a

2),

base equal to unity and with the


-f- n), respectively, the sum of

<j>(a

the areas of these rectangles


the curve, and we may write

is

evidently less than the area under


+n

Xa
the integral fj
indefinitely, the sum

Hence,

if

<j>(z)

-\

a+n

<j>(x)dx

is

sum

in question approaches a limit


convergent. On the other hand, if the inte
increases beyond all limit as n increases indefinitely,

hence the series (6)


the same

<f>(a

It follows that the

-f L.

gral f

dx approaches a limit L as I increases


+
+ n) always remains less than

----

<f>(a)

<f(a)

+(x)dx.

true of the
<a

is

-f

sum
<t>a

+1 +

<

",

VHi,

CONSTANT TERMS

161]

as is seen

from the

337

Hence

of the above inequalities.

first

case the series (6) diverges.


Let us consider, for example, the function

= l/x*,

<(ce)

in this

where

/u,

= 1.

This function satisfies all the requirements


and a
of the theorem, and the integral // [1/a^] dx approaches a limit as
It
is greater than unity.
I increases indefinitely if and only if
is

positive

/u,

follows that the series

111
T
2*

1*

_! +

n*

3*

if p. is greater than unity, and diverges if /x ^ 1.


1
consider
the function
I/ [x(logo;) ], where log a;
A.gain,
2.
denotes the natural logarithm, p. is a positive number, and a

converges

<(#)

Then,

if /*

1,

we

shall have

i
^-[(log7 ) -^-(log2)

c/2

1-

The second member approaches a limit if /t


1, and increases
= 1 it
In the particular case when
1.
indefinitely with n if
is easy to show in a similar manner that the integral increases
beyond all limit. Hence the series
>

/u,

"t"

2 (log 2)*

<

/j.

o\u

r f\

w(logn)

if /t
511, and diverges if
More generally the series whose general term

converges

_\U.4

/i

3 (log 3)*

>

/u.

is

n log

7i

log

n log 8

?i

n(log

log""

p
ri)*

In this expression log 2 n


1, and diverges if /x ^ 1.
converges if /t
denotes log log n, log 8 n denotes log log log n, etc. It is understood,
of course, that the integer n is given only values so large that
>

p
The missing terms in
log n are positive.
The
considered are then to be supplied by zeros.
theorem may be proved easily in a manner similar to the demon
=
strations given above.
1, the function
If, for instance, /t
2

log n, log n, log n,

the series

x log x log 2 x
the derivative of (log
approaches a finite limit

is

a:)

if

(log

/(l

/A),

and only

if

xY
and

//.

>

this latter function


1.

INFINITE SERIES

338
s

Cauchy

[vill,

theorem admits of applications of another

that the function


</>(x)

sort.

162

Let us suppose
let us con

conditions imposed above, and

satisfies the

sum

sider the

<j>(n)

4>(n

1)

<f>(n

p)

where n andp are two integers which are to be allowed to become infinite. If the
series whose general term is
is convergent, the
preceding sum approaches
zero as a limit, since it is the difference between the two sums S n + + i and S n
p
each of which approaches the sum of the series. But if this series is divergent,
no conclusion can be drawn. Keturning to the geometrical interpretation given
<p(n)

we

above,

find the double inequality

0(x)dx<0(n)

t/n

l)

+<(n

p)<</>(n).+

t/n

approaches zero as n becomes

Since
<f>(ri)

sum

the

0(n

infinite, it is

evident that the limit of

same as that of the definite integral /n +p 0(x)dx,


depends upon the manner in which n and p become infinite.
"

in question is the

and this
For example, the

limit of the

sum
1

+p

+P

is the same as that of the definite integral


[1/x] dx
p/n). It is
log(l
clear that this integral approaches a limit if and only if the ratio p/n approaches a
limit.
If a is the limit of this ratio, the preceding sum approaches
log(l + a)
f"

as

its limit,

as

we have already
sum

seen in

49.

Finally, the limit of the

Vn
is

the

same

Vn +

Vn + p

as that of the definite integral

I+P j

f
\J n

Vx

Vn + p

Vn).

In order that this expression should approach a limit, it is necessary that the
p/Vn should approach a limit a. Then the preceding expression may be
written in the form

ratio

2Vn + p + Vn
1

and

it is

evident that the limit of this expression

162. Logarithmic criteria.

Taking the

11
j^

2M

is

a.

series

1
n^

Cauchy deduced a new test for convergence


analogous to that which involves -\/u n

as a comparison series,

which

is

entirely

vm,

CONSTANT TERMS

162]

339

is always
If after a certain term the expression log(l/w n )/lognthan
which is greater
unity, the series
greater than a fixed number
If after a certain term log(l/wn)/logn is always less
converges.

than unity, the

series diverges.

If log(l/w n )/log n approaches a limit

and

the series converges if I


1,
1 remains in doubt.
I
>

which

as

increases indefinitely,
The case in
diverges if
I

Ki.

In order to prove the

part of the theorem,

first

we

will

remark

that the inequality


log
is

k log n

>

un

equivalent to the inequality

>

un
since k

1,

>

Likewise,

nk

un

or

<

-Tk

the series surely converges.


if

log

<

Un

log w,

1/n, whence the series surely diverges.


This test enables us to determine whether a given series con
a certain
verges or diverges whenever the terms of the series, after
than
the
corresponding terms of
one, are each less, respectively,

we

shall

have un

>

the series

where A

is

a constant factor and

Un

we

shall

have log

?/

log n

//.

p.

1.

For,

if

A
<

log

<

-S^n

>

or

lo
.

log

>

/A

log

log n

and the right-hand side approaches the limit /A as n increases


If K denotes a number between unity and p., we
indefinitely.
shall have, after a certain term,

log

INFINITE SERIES

340

[VIII,

163

Similarly, taking the series

__
~r n log w(log 2

n(\og n)^

ri)*

we

obtain an infinite suite of tests for con


be obtained mechanically from the preceding

as comparison series,

vergence which may


by replacing the expression \og(l/un )/logn by log[l/(/m n )]/log 2
then by

lognu

log

?i,

8
log n

and so forth, in the statement of the preceding tests.* These tests


apply in more and more general cases. Indeed, it is easy to show
that if the convergence or divergence of a series can be established
by means of any one of them, the same will be true of any of those

which follow.
with these

It

that no matter how far we proceed


no one of them will enable us to determine

may happen

trial tests,

whether the series converges or diverges. Du Bois-Reymond f and


Pringsheim have in fact actually given examples of both convergent
and divergent series for which none of these logarithmic tests deter
mines whether the series converge or diverge. This result is of great
theoretical importance, but convergent series of this
type evidently

converge very slowly, and it scarcely appears possible that they


should ever have any practical application whatever in problems
which involve numerical calculation.

Raabe s or Duhamel s test. Retaining the same comparison


but
series,
comparing the ratios of two consecutive terms instead
of comparing the terms themselves, we are led to new tests which
163.

to be sure, less general than the preceding, but which are


often easier to apply in practice.
For example, consider the series
are,

of positive terms
(7)

?/

+m+

wa H

un

-i

* See
Bertrand, Traitt de Calcul differential et integral, Vol.
de Liouville, 1st series, Vol. VII, p. 35.
t
J

I,

p. 238;

Journal

Ueber Convergenz von Reihen


(Crelle s Journal, Vol. LXXVI, p. 85, 1873).
Allgemeine Theorie der Divergenz
(Mathematische Annalen, Vol. XXXV,
.

1890).

In an example of a certain convergent series due to du


Bois-Reymond it would
be necessary, according to the author, to take a number of terms
equal to the volume
of the earth expressed in cubic millimeters in order to obtain merely half the sum of
the series.

VIII,

in

CONSTANT TERMS

163]

which the

ratio

u n + /u a approaches unity, remaining constantly


l

Then we may write

than unity.

less

341

!+
where a n approaches zero as n becomes
this ratio with [n/(n
first

+1)]

infinite.

The comparison

of

leads to the following rule, discovered

by Raabe* and then by Duhamel.f

If after a certain term the product nan is always greater than a


fixed number which is greater than unity, the series converges. If
after a certain term the

same product

is

always

than unity, the

less

series diverges.

The second part of the theorem follows immediately.


nan 1 after a certain term, it follows that

For, since

<

ratio un + /u n
terms of the harmonic

and the

n+l

ac H

greater than the ratio of two consecutive


Hence the series diverges.
In order to prove the first part, let us suppose that after a certain
term we always have nan >k>l. Let p. be a number which lies
l

between 1 and

k,

<

is

series.

p.

<

k.

Then the

series surely converges if

term the ratio u n + /u n is


of two consecutive terms of the

after

a certain

[_n/(n

+ 1)]

term

is

n~*.

The necessary condition that

than the ratio

less

whose general
should be true

series

this

that

is

(8)

or,

in

developing (1

+ 1/n)

by Taylor

theorem limited to the term

1/n

l+-W + 7T

-i<

where Xn always remains


infinite.

less

l+a

than a fixed number as n becomes

Simplifying this inequality, we

<

nan

may

write

it

Zeitschrift fur Mathematik und Physik, Vol. X, 1832.


Journal de Liouville, Vol. IV, 1838.

in the

form

INFINITE SERIES

342

The

103

[VIII,

left-hand side of this inequality approaches


as its limit as n
infinite.
Hence, after a sufficiently large value of n, the
/u.

becomes

left-hand side will be less than


It follows that

the series

na n which proves the inequality


,

(8).

is

convergent.
approaches a limit

If the product na n
the preceding rule.

The

may apply

n becomes

as

series is

infinite,

convergent

if

we

1>1,

= 1,

except when nan


approaches unity remaining constantly less than unity in that case

and divergent

if

1.

<

doubt exists

if

the series diverges.


If the product na n approaches unity as its limit, we may compare the ratio
w + i/^n with the ratio of two consecutive terms of the series

which converges if
terms of the given series

/*>!>

and diverges

may

"

where

ft,

product

if

The

M^l-

ratio of

two consecutive

be written in the form

ft,
+n

approaches zero as n becomes infinite. If after a certain term the


logn is always greater than a fixed number which is greater than unity,
converges. If after a certain term the same product is always less than

ft,

the series

unity, the series diverges.


In order to prove the first part of the theorem, let us suppose that

Let

/A

be a number between

a certain term

and

k.

Then the

series will surely

ft,

log n

converge

>

if

>

1.

after

we have
u +l
un
"

(9\

which may be written

in the

<

~n+1

logn

[
Llog(n

T
l)J

form

logn
or,

applying Taylor

theorem to the right-hand

where X B always remains

nl

log n

less

Simplifying this inequality,

it

side,

than a fixed number as n becomes

becomes

infinite.

VIII,

CONSTANT TERMS

lt>;]

343

(n + 1) log (1 + 1/n) approaches unity as n becomes


be written, by Taylor s theorem, in the form

The product

may

infinite, for it

(10)

where

approaches zero.

approaches

fj.

as

The right-hand side of the above inequality therefore


and the truth of the inequality is established for suffi
since the left-hand side is greater than k, which is itself

its limit,

ciently large values of n,


greater than /^.
The second part of the theorem

may be proved by comparing

+ i/w,, with the ratio of two consecutive terms


term is l/(nlogn). For the inequality

of the series

ttn

lg n
+

__
>

un

which

is

to be proved,

may

+ -n

log(n

1)

be written in the form

n/

<(*

log n

1_

+ !) log/1 +
V

The right-hand

the ratio

whose general

--).

*/

side approaches unity through values

which are greater than

The truth of the inequality is there


unity, as is seen from the equation (10).
fore established for sufficiently large values of n, for the left-hand side cannot
exceed unity.
From the above proposition it may be shown, as a corollary, that if the prod
uct (8 n log n approaches a limit I as n becomes infinite, the series converges if I
1,
and diverges if
The case in which I = 1 remains in doubt, unless /3 n logn
>

l<l.

always less than unity. In that case the series surely diverges.
If p n log n approaches unity through values which are greater than unity, we
may write, in like manner,

is

log n

where
approaches zero as n becomes infinite. It would then be possible to
prove theorems exactly analogous to the above by considering the product
>

7,,log n,

and so

Corollary.

forth.

If in

a series of positive terms the ratio of any term to the pre

ceding can be written in the form


.
l

r
---

un

where

/j.

is

n +n
i

a positive number, r a constant, and

value remains less than a fixed


verges If r

H
1

is

greater than unity,

number

as

n increases

and diverges

a quantity

whose absolute

indefinitely, the series con

in all other cases.

INFINITE SERIES

344
For

we

if

shall

we

164

[VIII,

set

have

na n =
r
-

l-

and hence lim na n


if

<

1.

The only

r.

It

follows that the series converges if r


1, and diverges
In order
is that in which r = 1.
>

case which remains in doubt

to decide this case, let us set

From

we

this

find

+1

log n

__ log

-**

log n

and the right-hand side approaches zero as n becomes infinite, no matter how
Hence the series diverges.
small the number /* may be.
Suppose, for example, that u n + \/u n is a rational function of n which ap
proaches unity as n increases indefinitely

~ 2 ----\

Then, performing the division indicated and stopping with the term

may

write

Un +

un

where 0(n)

is

_L
i -r

CTl

in

1/n2

we

^(^

bl -L
-r

>

nz
.,

a rational function of n which approaches a limit as n becomes

the preceding theorem, the necessary and sufficient condition that


the series should converge is that
infinite.

By

bi
is due to Gauss,
general tests for convergence.

This theorem

>

ai

+1

who proved

164. Absolute convergence.

We

it

shall

whose terms may be either positive


term all the terms have the same

directly.*

now

It

was one

of the first

proceed to study series


If after a certain

or negative.

sign, the discussion reduces to

Hence we may restrict ourselves to series


previous case.
which contain an infinite number of positive terms and an infinite
the

(Collected Works, Vol. Ill, p. 138.) Disquisitiones generates circa seriem infinitam

1+

a.B
=
l.y

VIII,

CONSTANT TERMS

164]

number

We

of negative terms.

lowing fundamental theorem

Any

shall prove first of all the fol

whatever

is convergent if the series


formed of the abso
the
terms
of
of the given series converges.

series

lute values

345

Let

UQ

(11)

M! H-----h

u H----

be a series of positive and negative terms, and

l\+

(12)

L\

.--+

let

be the series of the absolute values of the terms of the given series,
where Un
un
If the series (12) converges, the series
(11) like
.

wise converges.

This
For we have

157.

is

a consequence of the general

theorem of

and the right-hand side may be made less than any preassigned num
ber by choosing n sufficiently large, for any subsequent choice of p.
Hence the same is true for the left-hand side, and the series (11)
surely converges.

The theorem may

also be proved as follows

un

= (u n + Un ) - Un

and then consider the auxiliary


(13)

(u

+U +
-)

(u i

series

+U)+
l

Let us write

whose general term

...+ (u n

+ C7 ) +
n

is

un

+ Un

Let Sn Sn and SJ denote the sums of the first n terms of the series
Then we shall have
(11), (12), and (13), respectively.
,

The series (12) converges by hypothesis. Hence the series (13)


also converges, since none of its terms is negative and its
general
term cannot exceed 2Un
It follows that each of the sums Sn and
.

SJ, and hence also the sum Sn approaches a limit as n increases


,

indefinitely.

Hence the given

series (11) converges.

It is evident

that the given series may be thought of as arising from the subtrac
tion of two convergent series of positive terms.

Any

series is said to be absolutely convergent if the series of the

absolute values of
the terms

may

be

In such a series the order of


changed in any way whatever without altering the
its

terms converges.

INFINITE SERIES

34G

sum of the

Let us

series.

first

[VIII,

KM

consider a convergent series of posi

tive terms,

(14)

whose sum

is S,

and

+aH-----\-a

----

-\

let
b

(15)

+b +

.-.

+ bn +

..-

be a series whose terms are the same as those of the

first

series

arranged in a different order, i.e. each term of the series (14) is to


be found somewhere in the series (15), and each term of the series
(15) occurs in the series (14).

Let Sm be the sum of the first m terms of the series (15). Since
these terms occur in the series (14), it is evident that n may be
chosen so .large that the first m terms of the series (15) are to be
found among the first n terms of the series (14). Hence we shall have
all

Sm

<

Sn

<

S,

series (15) converges and that its sum


a similar manner it is clear that S 5 S

which shows that the


not exceed

S.

In

S does
Hence

S.
The same argument shows that if one of the above series
and
(14)
(15) diverges, the other does also.
The terms of a convergent series of positive terms may also be
grouped together in any manner, that is, we may form a series each
of whose terms is equal to the sum of a certain mimber of terms of

Let us first
the given series without altering the sum of the series.*
and
let
consecutive
terms
are
that
grouped together,
suppose

A,

(16)

be the

new

+ A + Ai +
l

>"+A

....

series obtained, where, for example,

Then the sum Sm of the first m terms of the series (16) is equal to
m.
the sum 5 V of the first N terms of the given series, where N
As m becomes infinite, N also becomes infinite, and hence Sm also
>

approaches the limit

S.

Combining the two preceding operations, it becomes clear that any


convergent series of positive terms may be replaced by another series
each of whose terms is the sum of a certain number of terms of the
given series taken in any order whatever, without altering the sum of
* It is often said that
parentheses may be inserted in a convergent series of positive
TRANS.
terms in any manner whatever without altering the sum of the series.

Vlll,

CONSTANT TERMS

165]

347

It is only necessary that each term of the given series


the series.
should occur in one and in only one of the groups which form the
terms of the second series.
Any absolutely convergent series may be regarded as the differ

ence of two convergent series of positive terms hence the preceding


It is evident that an
operations are permissible in any such series.
;

absolutely convergent series


of numerical calculation as

may
if it

be treated from the point of view


were a sum of a finite number of

terms.
165.

A series whose terms do not all

Conditionally convergent series.

have the same sign may be convergent without being absolutely con
This fact is brought out clearly by the following theorem
vergent.
on alternating series, which we shall merely state, assuming that it
is

already familiar to the student.*

series whose terms are alternately positive and negative converges


absolute value of each term is less than that of the preceding,
the
if
and if, in addition, the absolute value of the terms of the series

diminishes indefinitely as the number of terms increases indefinitely.

For example, the

series

i-| + |-* + + (-l)-; +


We saw in 49 that its sum is log 2.

converges.
of the absolute values of the terms of this series

harmonic

series,

which diverges.

series

is

The

series

precisely the

which converges but

is called a conditionally conver


of Cauchy, Lejeune-Dirichlet, and
necessity of distinguishing between

which does not converge absolutely

The investigations
gent
Riemann have shown clearly the
series.

absolutely convergent series and conditionally convergent series.


For instance, in a conditionally convergent series it is not always

allowable to change the order of the terms nor to group the terms

These operations
together in parentheses in an arbitrary manner.
the
sum
of
such
or
alter
a
series,
may change a convergent
may
For example,

series into a divergent series, or vice versa.

let

us

again consider the convergent series

i* It
there.

is

pointed out in

TRANS.

+
2,3

1(K>

1
-

2n+l

that this theorem

is

_!_
+2

2n

a special case of the theorem proved

INFINITE SERIES

348
whose sum

is

m becomes infinite.

order,

166

evidently equal to the limit of the expression

+1

!,

as

[VIII,

2n

2,

Let us write the terms of this series in another

putting two negative terms

~2~4 + 3~ 6~~8

after each positive term, as follows

~~
"*"

"*"

2n

+1

+4

4r* -f 2

"*"

easy to show from a consideration of the sums S3n SStl+l and


S3n+2 that the new series converges. Its sum is the limit of the

It is

expression

yV 2n i+
=o \

as

becomes

2w

infinite.

+1

4ra

evident that the

it is

From

+2

_!_
+2

+4

the identity

4n

sum

4w

4:7i

2 \2n

+1

of the second series

2n
is

+ 2,

half the

sum

of

the given series.


In general, given a series which is convergent but not absolutely convergent,
possible to arrange the terms in such a way that the new series converges

it is

toward any preassigned number A whatever. Let Sp denote the sum of the
first p positive terms of the series, and S g the sum of the absolute values of the
first q negative terms, taken in such a way that the p positive terms and the q
negative terms constitute the first p + q terms of the series. Then the sum of
Sq As the two numbers p and q increase
the first p + q terms is evidently Sp
.

each of the sums Sp and Sq must increase indefinitely, for otherwise


the series would diverge, or else converge absolutely. On the other hand, since
the series is supposed to converge, the general term must approach zero.
We may now form a new series whose sum is A in the following manner
Let us take positive terms from the given series in the order in which they occur
indefinitely,

in it until their

sum exceeds A.

Let us then add to these,

in the

order in which

they occur in the given series, negative terms until the total sum is less than A.
Again, beginning with the positive terms where we left off, let us add positive
terms until the total sum is greater than A. We should then return to the
It is clear that the sum of the first n terms of the
negative terms, and so on.
new series thus obtained is alternately greater than and then less than A, and

that

it

differs

from

166. Abel s test.

by a quantity which approaches zero as

The following

test,

due

to Abel, enables us to establish the

convergence of certain series for which the preceding tests


based upon the lemma stated and proved in 75.
Let
MO

ui

its limit.

fail.

The proof

is

VIII,

CONSTANT TERMS

166]

349

be a series which converges or which is indeterminate (that is, for which the sum
of the first n terms is always less than a fixed number A in absolute value).
let

Again,

fQ

en

numbers which approach

be a monotonically decreasing sequence of positive


Then the series
zero as n becomes infinite.

foU

(17)

eiMi

en

Wn

converges under the hypotheses made above.


For by the hypotheses made above it follows that

for

any value

of

n and
|u,

Hence, by the lemma just referred

p.

+ U n+p e n+p

+ ie,, + i

<

Sine? en+ i approaches zero as n becomes infinite,

be

write

2Aen + i.

n may be chosen

than any preassigned positive number for

less

we may

so large that

sum

the absolute value of the

will

to,

all

values of p.

The

157.
by the general theorem of
reduces to the series
+ un +

series (17) therefore converges


When the series u
MI
1

+1-

-!-,

+1

whose terms are alternately + 1 and


1, the theorem of this article reduces to
165 with regard to alternating series.
the theorem stated in

As an example under

sin 6

which
is

is

sin 2

is

if

sin

0,

sum

the

sin 3 6

For

convergent or indeterminate.

zero, while

nometry,

the general theorem consider the series

if

sin

0, every term of the series


n terms, by a formula of Trigo

sin 6

of the first

equal to the expression


nft

sin

.9
sin -

/n

sin

+1

which

is less

than
|

I/sin (6/2)
sin 6
I

converges for

all

values of

6.

in absolute value.

sin 2
T

It

sin
I

may

It

n6
-j-

-f-

be shown in a similar manner that the

series

12

cos 6

converges for

all

values of

cos 2 6

except

follows that the series

n6

cos

n
2krt.

INFINITE SERIES

350

[VIII,

Corollary. Restricting ourselves to convergent series,


Let
general theorem.
MO + MI H----- u n +

we may

state a

167

more

f-

be a convergent series, and

let

be any monotonically increasing or decreasing sequence of positive numbers


which approach a limit k different from zero as n increases indefinitely. Then
the series
e

(18)

+ eii

H-----h

H----

also converges.

For definiteness

us suppose that the

let

always increase.

Then we may

write
e

ei

a-i

en

an

where the numbers a a\


an
form a sequence of decreasing positive
numbers which approach zero as n becomes infinite. It follows that the two
,

series

ku

kui

both converge, and therefore the series

II.

ku n

(18) also converges.

SERIES OF COMPLEX TERMS

167. Definitions.

we

In this section

MULTIPLE SERIES

shall deal with certain gen

eralizations of the idea of an infinite series.

Let

(19)

u,

i, z

un

be a series whose terms are imaginary quantities:

Such a series is said to be convergent if the two series formed of


the real parts of the successive terms and of the coefficients of the
imaginary parts, respectively, both converge:

+
&. + &1+6.+- -+^ +
a

(20)

(21)

a,

a 2 -f

an

---

=
=

^".

Let S and
be the sums of the series (20) and (21), respectively.
Then the quantity S = S +
is called the sum of the series
(19).
It is evident that S is, as before, the limit of the sum Sn of the first
n terms of the given series as n becomes infinite. It is evident
S"

is"

that a series of complex terms


two series of real terms.

is

essentially only a combination of

VIII,

COMPLEX TERMS

168]

When

MULTIPLE SERIES

351

the series of absolute values of the terms of the series (19)

converges, each of the series (20) and (21) evidently converges abso
l and IVI =
lutely, for \a n
In this case the series (19) is said to be absolutely convergent. The
sum of such a series is not altered by a change in the order of the
<

vX +

terms, nor by grouping the terms together in

Conversely, if each of the series (20)


the series (22) converges absolutely, for

any way.

and (21) converges

y a* + b\

;>

an

absolutely,
|

bn

.
\

of
Corresponding to every test for the convergence of a series
absolute convergence of
positive terms there exists a test for the

Thus, if the absolute value


a cer
of the ratio of two consecutive terms of a series \un + /un \, after
con
series
the
than
tain term, is less than a fixed number less
unity,
1
=
k
u
Then, since
n+l /un
u,
For, let 7,
verges absolutely.

any

series whatever, real or imaginary.

we

after a certain term,

shall

which shows that the

rl

series of absolute values

+ Un +

If \u n+l /un

the series converges if

<

have also

U + U +
converges.

<

approaches a limit

<

1,

and diverges if

>

as
1.

n becomes infinite,
The first half is

In the second case the general term u n does not


approach zero, and consequently the series (20) and (21) cannot
The case I = 1 remains in doubt.
both be convergent.
self-evident.

More

generally,

if to

be the greatest limit of Vt7n as n becomes

infinite, the

For in the latter case the


and diverges if
The case in
the general term does not approach zero (see
161).

series (19) converges if

w<l,

modulus of
which w = 1 remains

doubt

in

w>l.

the series

may

be absolutely convergent, simply

convergent, or divergent.

168. Multiplication of series.

Let

(23)

Ul

uz

"+-,

(24)

Vl

v,

vn

Let us multiply terms of the first


be any two series whatever.
series by terms of the second in all possible ways, and then group

INFINITE SERIES

352

the products u Vj for which the sum i+j of the sub


the same we obtain in this way a new series

all

together
scripts

168

[VIII,

is

U
(25)

+ (H

+( u

If each of the

VI
<>v

series

series (25) converges,

+ UlV ) + ( M
+ u vn _
l

+u

vi

+W

hw B Vo)H

-{

and (24)

(23)

and

its

sum

is absolutely convergent, the


the product of the sums of the

is

two given

series.
This theorem, which is due to Cauchy, was gener
by Mertens,* who showed that it still holds if only one of the
(23) and (24) is absolutely convergent and the other is merely

alized
series

convergent.
Let us suppose for definiteness that the series
(23) converges
absolutely, and let wn be the general term of the series (25):

Wn =
The proposition

0^n

MlW-l

1-

Un V

we can show

will be proved if

that each of the

differences

+W
^o + w

^0

-\

W Sn

1"

+ w 2n+l

~ (U + %
- (u + u

approaches zero as n becomes


in each case,
it

we

(v n + l

w n+ i(v

1-

-\

infinite.

)
n

(l

+ i)0o

s, it

h V 2n )

-\

-f

h Vn )

Vl H

+ *i

Since the proof

shall consider the first difference


only.

according to the u

-{

vn + 1 )

the same

is

Arranging

becomes

HI (W n + 1

v_i)+

u n + a (v

-\

+ V 2n _,) H

h M.,-1

h v n _ 2)-\

.+

\-u 2n v

Since the series (23) converges absolutely, the sum U + Ul H


f- Un
than a fixed positive number A for all values of n. Like
wise, since the series (24) converges, the absolute value of the sum
is less

vo

+ Vi +

vn

is

less

than a fixed positive number B.

corresponding to any preassigned positive number


exists such that

Moreover,

number

A +B
c

for any value of p whatever, provided that n


m.
Having so chosen
n that all these inequalities are satisfied, an upper limit of the
quan
u l} u z
U1} U2
tity 8 is given by replacing u
., u 2n by U
L\ nJ
>

* Crelle s
Journal, Vol.

LXXIX.

VIII,

COMPLEX TERMS

169]

MULTIPLE SERIES

v n + 2 -\-----\- v n + p by (./(A
respectively, v n + l
vn _ l , v
vt
of the expressions v

353

+ B), and finally each


v by B.
+ vn _
2

This gives
8
1

<

+ Ul

"

Un

or

A
whence,

+B

finally,

8
1

<
1

e.

+B
Hence the difference 8 actually does approach

zero as n becomes infinite.

Consider a rectangular network which is lim


and
to
the
left, but which extends indefinitely down
upward
ward and to the right. The network will contain an infinite number
of vertical columns, which we shall number from left to right from
It will also contain an infinite number of horizontal
to + oo
to + oo
we
which
shall number from the top downward from
rows,
Let us now suppose that to each of the rectangles of the network a
169. Double series.

ited

is assigned and written in the corresponding rec


a
be
the quantity which lies in the ith row and in the
Let
ik
tangle.
kih column. Then we shall have an array of the form

certain quantity

(26)

We

shall first suppose that each of the elements of this array is real

and

positive.

Now let an infinite sequence of


across this array as follows

1)

curves

Any

C lt C 2

Cn

be drawn

one of them forms with the two

which bound the array a closed curve which entirely


surrounds the preceding one 2) The distance from any fixed point
to any point of the curve C B which is otherwise entirely arbitrary,
becomes infinite with n. Let S be the sum of the elements of the
array which lie entirely inside the closed curve composed of C,- and
straight lines

INFINITE SERIES

354

[VIII,

169

the two straight lines which bound the array.


If S n approaches a
limit S as n becomes infinite, we shall say that the double series
\-~r-

+-r>

(27)

and that its sum is S. In order to justify this definition,


necessary to show that the limit 5 is independent of the form
of the curves C.
Let C{, z
Cm
be another set of curves
which recede indefinitely, and let S{ be the sum of the elements
inside the closed curve formed by C- and the two boundaries.
If m
be assigned any fixed value, n can always be so chosen that the
curve Cn lies entirely outside of C m
Hence S m Sn and therefore
Sm ^ S, for any value of m. Since Sm increases steadily with m, it
must approach a limit S
5 as m becomes infinite. In the same
it
follows
that
S
S
Hence S = S.
way
For example, the curve C. may be chosen as the two lines which
form with the boundaries of the array a square whose side increases
indefinitely with i, or as a straight line equally inclined to the two
converges,
it is

C"

<

<

<

boundaries.
00

+ fan) +

The corresponding sums


11

If either of these

Ol)H

-----

Ka + a

are, respectively, the

H-----h

n\

sums approaches a limit

as

-!, n

following

H-----H

n becomes

0n)

infinite,

>

the

other will also, and the two limits are equal.


The array may also be added by rows or by columns.

For, sup
pose that the double series (27) converges, and let its sum be 5. It
is evident that the sum of
any finite number of elements of the series
cannot exceed 5. It follows that each of the series formed of the

elements in a single row


(28)

% +

converges, for the

*!

sum

<*.

of the first n

+1

0, 1, 2,

terms a ;o

cannot exceed S and increases steadily with n.


the series formed of the elements in the ith row.
(29)

o-

o-,

o-,

an

a, n

sum of
Then the new series

Let

o-,

be the

surely converges.
For, let us consider the sum of the terms of the
This sum cannot exceed S, and
array 2 tt for which i^p, k^r.
increases steadily with r for any fixed value of p; hence it

approaches a limit as r becomes


(30)

<r

o-,

infinite,
-f-

and that limit

tr

is

equal to

VIII,

COMPLEX TERMS

1(50]

MULTIPLE SERIES

355

+ o^ + + vp cannot
any fixed value of p. It follows that
exceed 5 and increases steadily with p. Consequently the series (29)
Conversely, if
converges, and its sum 2 is less than or equal to S.
each of the series (28) converges, and the series (29) converges to a
for

sum

<r

2, it is

sum

evident that the

of any finite

Hence S

of the array (26) cannot exceed 2.

5=

number of elements
and consequently

2,

s.

The argument

just given for the series

formed from the elements

rows evidently holds equally well for the series formed


from the elements in individual columns. The sum of a convergent
double series whose elements are all positive may be evaluated by
rows, by columns, or by means of curves of any form which recede
in individual

indefinitely.

In particular, if the series converges when added by rows,


when added by columns, and the sum will be the

will surely converge


number of
same.
it

terms

may

example
is less,

theorems proved for simple series of positive


be extended to double series of positive elements. For

if each of the elements of a double series of positive elements


than the corresponding elements of a knoivn con

respectively,

vergent double series, the first series is also convergent; and so forth.
double series of positive terms which is not convergent is said

to be divergent.

The sum

of the elements of the corresponding


all limit

array which lie inside any closed curve increases beyond


as the curve recedes indefinitely in every direction.

Let us

now

consider an array whose elements are not all positive.


it is unnecessary to consider the cases in which

It is evident that

the elements are negative, or in which only a finite number of


elements are either positive or negative, since each of these cases
reduces immediately to the preceding case. We shall therefore sup
pose that there are an infinite number of positive elements and an
all

Let a lk be the
of negative elements in the array.
If the array 7\ of positive elements,
general term of this array T.
each of which is the absolute value a ik of the corresponding element
infinite

number

said to be absolutely convergent. Such


an array has all of the essential properties of a convergent array of
in T, converges, the array

is

positive elements.

In order to prove

and

T",

us consider two auxiliary arrays T


is formed from the array T
The array

this, let

defined as follows.

by replacing each negative element by a

zero, retaining the positive

is obtained from
Likewise, the array
a
zero and chang
element
the array
by
replacing each positive
of
the
Each
arrays T and
ing the sign of each negative element.

elements as they stand.

T"

T by

T"

INFINITE SERIES

356

[VIII,

converges whenever the array 7\ converges, for each element of

169

for example, is less than the corresponding element of 7^. The sum
of the terms of the series T which lie inside
any closed curve is

equal to the difference between the sum of the terms of


lie inside the same curve and the sum of the terms of
lie

inside

T
T"

which
which

Since the two latter sums each approach limits as

it.

the curve recedes indefinitely in all directions, the first sum also
approaches a limit, and that limit is independent of the form of
the boundary curve.
This limit is called the sum of the array T.
The argument given above for arrays of positive elements shows
that the same sum will be obtained by evaluating the
array T by
rows or by columns. It is now clear that an array whose elements
are indiscriminately positive and negative, if it converges
absolutely,
may be treated as if it were a convergent array of positive terms.

But

it is

essential that the series 7\ of positive terms be

shown

to

be convergent.
If the array TI diverges, at least one of the arrays T and
If
diverges.
only one of them, T for example, diverges, the other
being convergent, the
sum of the elements of the array T which lie inside a closed curve C becomes
infinite as the curve recedes indefinitely in all directions,
irrespective of the
T"

T"

form of the curve.


If both arrays
and
diverge, the above reasoning
shows only one thing,
that the sum of the elements of the array T inside
a closed curve C is equal to the difference between two sums, each of which
7"

T"

increases indefinitely as the curve C recedes indefinitely in all directions.


It
may happen that the sum of the elements of T inside C approach different
limits according to the form of the curves C and the manner in which
they
recede, that

to say, according to the relative rate at which the number of


and the number of negative terms in the sum are made to increase.
The sum may even become infinite or approach no limit whatever for certain
methods of recession. As a particular case, the sum obtained on
evaluating by
rows may be entirely different from that obtained on evaluating by columns if
is

positive terms

the array

is

not absolutely convergent.

The following example


1

/1\

2\2/

/2\

SW

(31)

3V3/

/l\"

2\2/

/2\

3\3/

due

/2\

3\3/

l^V-^-V

2V2/

is

1/

Arndt.*

/3

4\4/

V-1/ 3 V

3V3/
n

to

/2\"

3V3/

4\4/
1

Let us consider the array

P+

I/^liV--

P\ P

p\ p

p+

/3\"

4\4/

* Grunert s
Archiv, Vol. XI, p. 319.

VIII,

COMPLEX TERMS

169]

MULTIPLE SERIES

357

of positire and an infinite number of negative


formed from the elements in a single row or from
The sum of the series formed from the
those in a single column converges.
terms in the nth row is evidently

which contains an

Each

elements.

infinite

number

of the series

2\2
Hence, evaluating the array (31) by rows, the result obtained
sum of the convergent series

+
2a

which
(p

is

l)th column, that

converges, and

its

"

2Ml

equal to the

"

the other hand, the series formed from the elements in the

On

1/2.

+
28

is

sum

is,

is

jj-1
p

-1

p+

Hence, evaluating the array (31)


sum of the convergent series

by

p+

p(p +1)

columns, the result obtained

is

equal to the

which

is

1/2.

This example shows clearly that a double series should not be used in a
calculation unless it is absolutely convergent.

We

shall also

meet with double

series

whose elements are complex


two other

quantities. If the elements of the array (26) are complex,


and
may be formed where each element of
arrays
T"

7"

real part of the corresponding element of T


is the coefficient of i in the corresponding

is

and each element of


element of

T.

the
T"

If the

array 7\ of absolute values of the elements of T, each of whose


elements is the absolute value of the corresponding element of T,

converges absolutely, and


converges, each of the arrays T and
The sum of
the given array T is said to be absolutely convergent.
T"

the elements of the array which lie inside a variable closed curve
approaches a limit as the curve recedes indefinitely in all directions.

independent of the form of the variable curve, and it


The sum of any absolutely
of the given array.
be
evaluated
also
by rows or by columns.
convergent array may

This limit
is

is

called the

sum

INFINITE SERIES

358

[VIII,

170

An absolutely convergent double series may be replaced by a simple


formed from the same elements. It will be sufficient to show that the
rectangles of the network (26) can be numbered in such a way that each rec
tangle has a definite number, without exception, different from that of any other
In other words, we need merely show that the sequence of natural
rectangle.
numbers
170.

series

0,

(32)

1,

2,

n,

-..,

-.-,

and the assemblage

of all pairs of positive integers (i, fc), where i^O, k>0, can
such a way that one and only one number of the sequence (32)
will correspond to any given pair (i, k), and conversely, no number n corresponds
to more than one of the pairs (t, k).
Let us write the pairs (i, k) in order as

be paired

follows

off in

(1,0),

(0,0),

(0,1),

(2,0),

(1,1),

-..,

(0,2),

which i + k = n are written down after


those for which i + k
n have all been written down, the order in which those
of any one set are written being the same as that of the values of i for the various
pairs beginning with (n, 0) and going to (0, n). It is evident that any pair (i, k)
will be preceded by only a, finite number of other pairs.
Hence each pair will
have a distinct number when the sequence just written down is counted off
according to the natural numbers.
where, in general, all those pairs for
<

Suppose that the elements of the absolutely convergent double series SSaa- are
down in the order just determined. Then we shall have an ordinary series

written
(33)

doo

io

oi

2o

ii

floa

+ ao +

a-i,i

whose terms coincide with the elements of the given double series. This simple
and its sum is equal to the sum of the given
double series. It is clear that the method we have employed is not the only pos
sible method of transforming the given double series into a simple series, since
series evidently converges absolutely,

the order of the terms of the series (33) can be altered at pleasure.

Conversely,

any absolutely convergent simple series can be transformed into a double series
in an infinite variety of ways, and that process constitutes a powerful instrument
in the proof of certain identities.*
It is evident that the concept of double series is not essentially different from
that of simple series.
In studying absolutely convergent series we found that
the order of the terms could be altered at will, and that any finite number of

terms could be replaced by their sum without altering the sum of the series.
An attempt to generalize this property leads very naturally to the introduction
of double series.

The notion of double series may be generalized.


we may consider a series of elements a mn with two
oo to + oo
subscripts ra and n, each of which may vary from
The elements of such a series may be arranged in the rectangles of
171.

In the

Multiple series.

first

place

a rectangular network which extends indefinitely in


*Tanuery, Introduction a

hi theorie

desfauctions d une

all directions

variable, p. G7.

VIII,

it

COMPLEX TERMS

172]

evident that

is

type we have

it

MULTIPLE SERIES

359

be divided into four double series of the

may

just studied.

more important generalization is the following. Let us consider


a series of elements of the type
,,. .., mp where the subscripts
from to -f oo or from
values
on
GO
take
m
tK. 1}
any
2
,
p may
,

m
+ oo, but may be

by certain inequalities. Although no


such convenient geometrical form as that used above is available
to

when

the

number

restricted

of subscripts exceeds three, a slight consideration

shows that the theorems proved for double series admit of immediate
Let us first sup
generalization to multiple series of any order p.
Let S l
are
real and positive.
the
elements
all
that
pose
MI ,,,..., mp
be the sum of a certain number of elements of the given series, S2
,

and a certain number of terms previously neglected,


sum of
S a the sum of S2 and further terms, and so on, the successive sums
Sn
S 1} S2
being formed in such a way that any particular
-,
element of the given series occurs in all the sums past a certain one.

the

<S\

If

Sn approaches a limit S as n becomes

infinite,

said to be convergent, and S is called its sum.


double series, this limit is independent of the
is

the given series


in the case of

As

way

in

which the

sums are formed.

successive

If the elements of the given multiple series have different signs


complex quantities, the series will still surely converge if the

or are

series of absolute values of the

terms of the given series converges.

Cauchy s theorem. The following theorem,


a generalization of Cauchy s theorem ( 161), enables us to
determine in many cases whether a given multiple series is conver
172. Generalization of

which

is

gent or divergent.

Let/(.x, y) be a function of the

two variables x

and y which is positive for all points (x, y) outside a certain closed
curve T, and which steadily diminishes in value as the point (x, y)
Let us consider the value of the double
recedes from the origin.*
over the ring-shaped region between
dx
extended
dij
integralJJ"/^, y}
T and a variable curve C outside T, which we shall allow to recede
and let us compare it with the double
indefinitely in all directions
series 2/(wi, n), where the subscripts m and n may assume any posi
;

tive or negative integral values for

which the point (m, n)

Then the double series


a
limit, and conversely.
approaches

side the fixed curve T.


integral

* All that
x\>X2

ond

hypotheses.

is

necessary for the present proof

y\>y^

outside T.

TRANS.

It is

is

lies

out

converges if the double

that/to,

l/i)>/(a; 2)

easy to adapt the proof to

still

7/ 2 ) whenever
more general

INFINITE SERIES

360

= 0, x =

[VIH,173

x=
and y = 0, y =
2,
1, y =
2,
F
divide the region between
and C into squares or portions of squares.
Selecting from the double series the term which corresponds to that
corner of each of these squares which is farthest from the origin, it

The lines x

is

evident that the

1,

sum 2/(w,

n) of these terms will be less than the

value of the double integral


dx dy extended over the region
///(#, y)
between F and C. If the double integral approaches a limit as C
recedes indefinitely in all directions, it follows that the sum of any

number
number

of terms of the series whatever

is always less than a fixed


hence the series converges. Similarly, if the double series
converges, the value of the double integral taken over any finite
hence the integral
region is always less than a fixed number
;

approaches a

The theorem may be extended

limit.

to multiple

any order p, with suitable hypotheses in that case the


of
integral
comparison is a multiple integral of order p.
As an example consider the double series whose general term is
2
2 M
where the subscripts m and n may assume all integral
l/(?n + n )
values from
oo to + o except the values m = n
0.
This series
for
For the double integral
1, and diverges for /x^l.
converges
p.
series of

>

dx dy
extended over the region of the plane outside any circle whose
center is the origin has a definite value if ^
1 and becomes
>

infinite if

(133).
More generally the multiple
p.<l

series

whose general term

is

+ m\ + -.. + miy
m = m = = mp =

(m\

where the
verges

III.

if

set of values

2n

>

SERIES OF VARIABLE TERMS

excluded, con

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE

173. Definition of uniform convergence.

(35)

is

j9.*

(x)

+ KJ (*)+... + u

A
n

series of the

(x)

form

-,

whose terms are continuous functions of a variable x in an inter


val (a, i), and which converges for every value of x belonging to
that interval, does not necessarily represent a continuous function,

*More general theorems

are to be found in Jordan

C ours d Analyse, Vol.

I,

p. 163.

VIII,

VARIABLE TERMS

173]

361

we might be tempted to believe. In order to prove the fact we


4
need only consider the series studied in

as

+x

(1

a;

(1

a;

2
)"

which satisfies the above conditions, but whose sum is discontinuous


for x
Since a large number of the functions which occur in
0.
mathematics are defined by series, it has been found necessary to
study the properties of functions given in the form of a series. The
first question which arises is precisely that of determining whether

sum

or not the

of a given series

is

a continuous function of the

Although no general solution of

variable.

this

problem

is

known,

study has led to the development of the very important notion

its

of uniform, convergence.
series of the type (35), each of

which

whose terms

is

a function of x

defined in an interval (a, 6), is said to be uniformly con


vergent in that interval if it converges for every value of x between

a and

is

and

if, corresponding to any arbitrarily preassigned positive


a positive integer N, independent of x, can be found such
that the absolute value of the remainder R n of the given series

b,

number

c,

R n = U n + () +
l

is

less

which

The

than

-----H
MH + S (*) H

^ n+p (x) ----\

n^N

for every value of


and for every value of x
the interval (a, &).
latter condition is essential in this definition.
For any pre
e

lies in

assigned value of x for which the series converges it is apparent


from the very definition of convergence that, corresponding to any
can be found which will satisfy
positive number e, a number

the condition in question.


it

is

But, in order that the series should con


necessary further that the same number

verge uniformly,
should satisfy this condition, no matter what value of x be selected
in the interval (a, b). The following examples show that such is not

always the

The

series

val (0, 1).

case.

Thus

in the series considered just

above we have

in question is not uniformly convergent in the inter


For, in order that it should be, it would be necessary

(though not sufficient) that a number


1

N exist,

such that

INFINITE SERIES

362
for all values of

[VIII,

in the interval (0, 1), or,

what amounts

17.5

to the

same thing, that

Whatever be the values of

and

there always exist, however,

e,

positive values of x which do not satisfy this inequality, since the


right-hand side is greater than unity.

Again, consider the series denned by the equations

=
The sum of the

first

n terms of this

S n _ lf

series is evidently

The

approaches zero as n increases indefinitely.

Sn (#), which

series is therefore

x
In order
nxe~" *.
convergent, and the remainder R n (cc) is equal to
that the series should be uniformly convergent in the interval (0, 1),
it

would be necessary and

trarily preassigned positive


that for all values of n
>

corresponding to any arbi


exist such
a positive integer

sufficient that,

number

e,

if x be replaced by 1/w, the left-hand side of this inequality is


l/n which is
1.
Since e
greater than 1/e whenever n
equal to e~
may be chosen less than 1/e, it follows that the given series is not

But,

>

uniformly convergent.

The importance

of uniformly

convergent series rests upon the

following property:

The sum of a series whose terms are continuous functions of a


an interval (a, i) and which converges uniformly in that
interval, is itself a continuous function of x in the same interval.
variable x in

Let X Q be a value of x between a and b, and let x -f h be a value


neighborhood of X Q which also lies between a and b. Let n

in the

be chosen so large that the remainder

fl() = u n +
is less

(x)

u n+z (x) H----

than e/3 in absolute value for all values of x in the interval


e is an arbitrarily preassigned positive number.
Let/(cc)

(a, b),

where

be the

sum

where

Then we may write

of the given convergent series.

denotes the

sum

of the

first

-f 1

terms,

().

<}>(x)

K*) =

M uO*0

M,

00 H

VIII,

VARIABLE TERMS

17.5]

363

Subtracting the two equalities

f(x

we

It)

<f>(x

A)

+R

tt

(x

+ A),

find

f(x

h)

-/(*)

The number

was

[>(x

A)

<(*)]

+ /^(^u +

A)

- TJ.^o).

we have

so chosen that

On the other hand, since each of the terms of the series is a continu
ous function of x,
is itself a continuous function of x.
Hence
a positive number 77 may be found such that
<(o:)

whenever h

is less

than

whenever
=x

for x

Note.

\h

is

than

less

It follows that

rj.

we

shall have, a fortiori,

This shows that f(x)

rj.

is

continuous

would seem at

first very difficult to determine whether


uniformly convergent in a given interval.
The following theorem enables us to show in many cases that a

It

or not a given series

is

given series converges uniformly.

Let
MO (a:)

(36)

be

series each

interval (a,

b),

of whose terms

and

is

(*)

a continuous function of x in an

let

Jf.

(37)

MI (x)

Jtfi

+ ... + *; + ...

a convergent series whose terms are positive constants.


Then,
tf un ^
n for a H values of x in the interval (a, b) and for all
be

values of n, the first series


(36) converges uniformly in the interval
considered.

For

it is

evident that

we

shall

have

INFINITE SERIES

364

for all values of x between a

the remainder

Rn

and

we

of n greater than N,

shall also

whenever n is greater than N, for


For example, the series

N be

If

b.

of the second series

[VIII,

is

less

174

chosen so large that


e for all values

than

have

values of x in the interval

all

(a, b).

M + Mi sin x + Mjj sin 2x ----- M smnx ---have the same meaning as above, converges
where M M M
,

l}

-\

\-

-\

uniformly in any interval whatever.


174. Integration and differentiation of series.

Any series of continuous functions which converges uniformly in an


interval (a, b) may be integrated term by term, provided the limits of
integration are finite and lie in the interval (a, b*).
Let x and x v be any two values of x which lie between a and b,
e for all values
and let N be a positive integer such that R B (ar)|
N. Let f(x) be the sum of
of x in the interval (a, b) whenever n
<

>

the series

and

let

us set

rx

/*i.

Dn

Jxt

f(x) dx

rx

u dx

Jr

The absolute value of D n


Hence Dn approaches zero

rx

Uidx

-----

Jx

tA
is less

u n dx

than

x^

rx

whenever

R n dx.

Jx

as n increases indefinitely, and

n^

we have

the equation
r*i
I

J*t

r*i
Jft

rx
r*
-----hi u H (x)dx
Ui(x)dx-\
(x)dx+l
^x
J*
1

f(x}dx=\

-\

----

Considering X Q as fixed and Xj as variable, we obtain a series

J*t

u Q (x)dx-\----

+lu

(x )dx-\

----

J*o

which converges uniformly in the interval (a,


continuous function whose derivative is f(x).

b)

and represents a

VIII,

VARIABLE TERMS

174]

365

Conversely, any convergent series may be differentiated term by term


the
if
resulting series converges uniformly.*

For, let

f(x)

(a;)

Ul (x)

u n (x) -\----

be a series which converges in the interval (a,

ft).

Let us suppose

that the series whose terms are the derivatives of the terms of the

given series, respectively, converges uniformly in the same interval,


let
denote the sum of the new series

and

<(z)

Integrating this series term by term between two limits x and


each of which lies between a and b, we find

= [u

Jx
/

(a:)

M O (* O )]

[MJ

(a;)

x,

*SJCK

or

This shows that

is
<f>(x)

Examples.

1)

The

the derivative of /(x)

integral

dx

cannot be expressed by means of a finite number of


elementary
Let us write it as follows

functions.

/e

The

dx

= C dx
J

x.

C ex
x
J

(-/

dx

may be developed
For we have

last integral

values of

= log x

-f

in a series

C ex
x
J

dx.

which holds for

all

and this series converges uniformly in the interval from


R to + R,
no matter how large R be taken, since the absolute value of any
* It

is

function.

assumed in the proof also that each term of the new


The theorem is true, however, in general.
TRANS.

series is

a continuous

INFINITE SERIES

366
term of the

[VIII,

174

than the corresponding term of the con

series is less

vergent series

It follows that the series obtained

by term-by-term integration

^ =l+ I + 2Y72 +
OC^

OC

3C

+ nl.2...n +

converges for any value of x and represents a function whose deriva


tive is (tf

!)/.

The perimeter

2)
is e is

equal,

an

of

1 12,

by

whose major axis

ellipse

is

2a and whose eccentricity

to the definite integral

4c f
/o

The product

sum

e2 sin 2

lies

between

and

e2

<j>

(<

Hence the

1).

radical

is

equal to the

of the series given by the binomial theorem

Vl

--

= 1 -- e2 sin 2

e 2 sin 2

e4

<f>

2n

sin*^>

The series on the right converges uniformly, for the absolute value of each of
its terms is less than the corresponding term of the convergent series obtained
by

setting sin

since,

by

Hence the

1.

116,

C\

.,.

sin^"0a*

Jo

we

shall

--

series

be integrated term by term; and

may

1.8.6...(2n-l)
2

it

2n

have

Vl-e

2
sinV<Z0

Jo

= -Sl2
(

- e2
4

e*

eft

----

256

64

3.6...(2n-3)-|
2.4.6--.2n J

If the eccentricity e is small,

a very good approximation to the exact value of the


obtained by computing a few terms.
Similarly, we may develop the integral

integral

is

f Vl-

e 2 sin 2

0drf>

Jo
in a series for

any value

of the

Finally, the development of


leads to the formula

upper limit

Legendre

<f>.

complete integral of the

first

kind

Vlll,

VARIABLE TERMS

174]

367

The definition of uniform convergence may be extended to


whose terms are functions of several independent variables.
example,

series

For

let

(x, y)

+ % (x, y)

u n (x,

y}-\

be a series whose terms are functions of two independent variables x


and let us suppose that this series converges whenever the
ij,

and

bounded by a closed contour C.


lies in a region
(x, y}
series is said to be uniformly convergent in the region R if,

point

The

corresponding to every positive number e, an integer


such that the absolute value of the remainder R n

whenever n

N can be found
is

less

than

equal to or greater than N, for every point (x, y)


It can be shown as above that the sum of
inside the contour C.
is

such a series

is

a continuous function of the two variables x and

provided the terms of the series are

in this region,

all

continu

ous in R.

The theorem on term-by-term

integration also

may

If each of the terms of the series is continuous in

denotes the

sum

of the series,

f( x y}dxdy
>

=11

we

shall

ul

un (x,y}dxdy-\

where each of the double integrals

is

if

f(x, y)

have

u9 (x, y) dx dy

+ 11

be generalized.

R and

(x,

y)dxdy

-\

extended over the whole inte

any contour inside of the region R.


Again, let us consider a double series whose elements are functions

rior of

of one or

more variables and which converges absolutely for all sets


domain D. Let the

of values of those variables inside of a certain

elements of the series be arranged in the ordinary rectangular array,


let R c denote the sum of the double series outside any closed

and

curve

C drawn

in the plane of the array.


uniformly in the

series is said to converge

Then the given double


domain D if correspond

ing to any preassigned number c, a closed curve K, not dependent


on the values of the variables, can be drawn such that R c
e for
<

any curve

C whatever

lying outside of
of the variables inside the domain D.

K and

It is evident that the preceding definitions

extended without

for

any

set of values

and theorems may be


any order whose

difficulty to a multiple series of


elements are functions of any number of variables.

INFINITE SERIES

368
Note.
integrate

If
it

a series does not converge uniformly, it


term by term. For example, let us set

SH (x) = nxe-*?,
The

(x)

whose general term


approaches zero as n becomes
series

f(x)

=
is

u n (x) converges, and

(z)

not always allowable to

its

sum

is

1, 2,

zero, since

Sn (x)

Hence we may write

infinite.

1*1

is

= S n - Sn ^

u a (x)

0,

175

[VIII,

MS (x)

u, (x)

whence J f(x) dx = 0. On the other hand, if we integrate the series term by


term between the limits zero and unity, we obtain a new series for which the
sum of the first n terms is

which approaches 1/2 as

its

n becomes

limit as

infinite.

175. Application to differentiation under the integral sign. The proof


of the formula for differentiation under the integral sign given in

97

is

based essentially upon the supposition that the limits x


If X is infinite, the formula does not always hold.

and X are finite.


Let us consider,

for example, the integral

F(a)

= f

"

max

i/O

This integral does not depend on


y = ax it becomes

dx

a, for if

>

we make

the substitu

tion

y
If we tried to apply
we should find

the ordinary formula for differentiation to F(a~),

F (o-) =
This

cos

ax dx

Jo

surely incorrect, for the left-hand side is zero, while the


right-hand side has no definite value.
Sufficient conditions may be found for the application of the
ordinary formula for differentiation, even when one of the limits
is

by connecting the subject with the study of series.


consider the integral

is infinite,

us

first

Let

p+
f(x)dx,

which we shall suppose to have a determinate value ( 90). Let


a u a2
an
be an infinite increasing sequence of numbers, all
,

Vni,

VARIABLE TERMS

175]

greater than a

where a n becomes

infinite

369

with

ra

/"

we

If

n.

set

+i

Ja n

Ja^
the series

converges and its sum is


nn
is equal to fa f(x) dx.
It

f(x)

we

we

= cosx,

shall

f(x) dx, for the

sum Sn of

be noticed that the converse

should

for example,

If,

j*"

is

the

first

n terms

not always true.

set

0,

TT,

an

-,

mr,

-,

have

Un =
Hence the

series

cos x dx

nit

converges, whereas

the integral

fo cosxdx

ap

becomes infinite.
Now let f(x, a) be a function of the two variables x and a which
is continuous whenever x is equal to or greater than a and a lies
If the integral J f(x, a) dx approaches a
in an interval (a
i)-

proaches no limit whatever as

>

limit as

becomes

infinite, for

function of a,

any

of a, that limit

value"

is

r +x
(a)=

f(x,a)dx,
i/a.

which may be replaced, as we have just shown, by the sum


of a
convergent series whose terms are continuous functions

of a

(a)

\f(x,

a) dx

U, (a)

=
/

/(ar,

^t

A,

a)

rfx

continuous whenever the series converges uni


m
formly.
By analogy we shall say that the integral f* f(xt a) dx
to any
converges uniformly in the interval (a aj if, corresponding
a can
of
number
a
independent
preassigned positive quantity e,
+
for
e whenever I
be found such that f "f(x, a)dx
N,
any value

This function F(a)

is

>

<

of a which lies in the interval (a


* See

TRANS.

W.

F.

a^*

OSGOOD, Annals of Mathematics, 2d

If the integral converges


series, Vol. Ill (1902), p. 129.

INFINITE SERIES

370

For

if

f(x,

cr)

uniformly, the series will also.

we

[vm,i75

a n be taken greater than N,

shall have
\R.\

r+*

Jan

dx

hence the function F(a) is continuous in this case throughout the


interval (a
a^.
Let us now suppose that the derivative df/da is a continuous
,

when x ^ a and a

function of x and a

<

<

a^ , that the integral

da
has a

value for every value of a in the interval (a

finite

that the integral converges uniformly in that interval.


in question may be replaced by the sum of the series

dx

=F

(a-)

F!

(tr)

The

a^, and
integral

+ Fn (a)

where

The new

series converges uniformly, and its terms are


equal to the
corresponding terms of the preceding series. Hence, by the theorem
proved above for the differentiation of series, we may write

In other words, the formula for differentiation under the integral sign
provided that the integral on the right converges uniformly.
The formula for integration under the integral sign ( 123) also
may be extended to the case in which one of the limits becomes
still holds,

Let f(x, a) be a continuous function of the two variables


a a
a a
If the integral // V(*, ) dx is uni
in
the
interval
formly convergent
(a a^, we shall have
infinite.

x and

a, for x

>

<

<

r+*
/

(A)

/>

A|

To prove

r^
f,
dx
da
f(x,a}da=\
^
J
J
us

this, let

first select

f(x,a)dx.

number

>

then

have

C
(B)

^u

ra

dx

/
a

J*f

ra

f(x,

a)da= J

da
Ja

f(x, a)dx.

we

shall

VIII,

As

VARIABLE TERMS

176]

371

increases indefinitely the right-hand side of

this

equation

approaches the double integral


+ ao

f(x, a)dx,

between these two double integrals

for the difference

is

equal to

r +x

ai

da

/(cc,

<x)dx.

Jl

Suppose

N chosen

+ :0

a)dx

/(x,

so large that the absolute value of the integral


than c whenever / is greater than N, for any

is less

Then the absolute value of the


value of a in the interval (a a^.
a
and therefore it
difference in question will be less than c a 1
Hence the left-hand
zero as I increases indefinitely.
will
,

approach

side of the equation (B) also approaches a limit as


the symbol
nite, and this limit is represented by

becomes

infi

/!

X+0

dx

f(x, a) da.

J*t

This gives the formula (A) which was to be proved.*


176. Examples.

1)

Let us return to the integral of

F(a}-

er"*

The

is positive.

dx,

Jo
where a

91

integral
/
I

er ax sin x dx

Jo
* The formula for differentiation may be deduced easily from the formula (A). For,
a en
for a
suppose that the two functions f(x, a) and fa (x, a) are continuous
*
+
that the two integrals F(a) = fa */(*, ) dx and *() = fa *S ( x ^ dx have
x
a
<

<

>

;>

finite

values

and that the

the formula (A),

if

a lies

latter

fduC
J

"/<*t)d*=

"o

"o

where

converges uniformly in the interval (a

in the interval (a

<*!)

>

Jmt

dx

may
f

du

= (
Ja

+
*/(*,
o

a)dx- C

Ja o

From

C fu (x,u)du,

a has heen replaced by u under the integral sign.


be written in the form

"*(!*)

Jao

i).

Jao

for distinctness

formula

we have

f(x,

whence, taking the derivative of each side with respect to a, we find

But

this

INFINITE SERIES

372

[VIII,

176

obtained by differentiating under the integral sign with respect to a,


converges
all values of a greater than an
For
arbitrary positive number k.

uniformly for
we have

~ +00

+<=0

e- ax smxdx<l

Ji

and hence the absolute value


values of

e~ ax dx

greater than
It follows that

of the integral

k, if

*-

N, where

>

(X)

on the

is

left will be less than e for all


chosen so large that keky 1/e
>

sin

er al

Ji

ctj&

Jo

The

indefinite integral

was calculated

F (a) =

~e-<*

+ a sinx)~| +
Jo
+ a2

(cosx

I"

whence we

119 and gives

in

+ a2

find

=C-

F(a)

arc tan

C may be determined by noting that the definite integral F(a)


as a becomes infinite. Hence C = x/2, and we finally find the

and the constant


approaches zero
formula

e~ ax
,.

J
This formula

is

sin
Sll

dx

arc tan

established only for positive values of n-, but we saw in


is the sum of an
alternating series whose remainder n

the left-hand side

91 that
is

always
than 1/n. Hence the series converges uniformly, and the integral is a con
tinuous function of a, even for a = 0. As a approaches zero we shall have in
less

the limit
+ao

(39)

Jo
2) If in the

formula

rv-<fc=^
Jo
of

134

we

set

= yVa,

where
+

(40)

r
t/o

is

positive,

we

find

and it is easy to show that all the integrals derived from this one by successive
differentiations with respect to the parameter a
converge uniformly, provided
that a is always greater than a certain positive constant A;. From the
preceding
formula we may deduce the values of a whole series of integrals :

22

(41)

EXERCISES

VIII, Exs.]

We

number

these an infinite

By combining

373

of other integrals

/^

-4-

be evaluated.

oo

t-**W**

Jo

and we

All the integrals on the right have been evaluated above,

\n
=
1 ^0032^ -^--^
/-

may

have, for example,

(2/3)

+ /_iy,
7

2 fl 2

Vn

a-i

^*

"

1.2.3.--2n

find

...

1.8.6..

.(8n-l)8

2"

or, simplifying,
/

*>

e~ a v*cos2pydy

(42)

^o

_ 5!

Iff

%/-

\a

EXERCISES
1.

Derive the formula

[Z"

=1+

(logZ)><]

Si lOgZ

uz"

where Sp denotes the


at a time.

sum

^1.2

(logz)

of the products of the first

"

h
1

(logz)"

n natural numbers taken p


r

,,

[MURPHY.]
[Start with the formula

(log)

1.2
and
2.

differentiate

n times with

+ ..1

respect to z.]

Calculate the value of the definite integral

j
by means
3.

of the formula for differentiation

under the integral

Derive the formula


*

^
r + e -+ &dx
=

=1

Jo
[First

show

that dl/da

=-

21.]

sign.

INFINITE SERIES

374
4.

Derive the formula

J_
e

by making use of the preceding


5.

From

the relation

derive the formula

a_

*?

da

exercise.

= = VTre- 2,.*

Va

rviil,

CHAPTER IX
POWER SERIES

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

In this chapter we shall study two particularly important classes


power series and trigonometric series. Although we shall
speak of real variables only, the arguments used in the study of

of series

power

without change to the case where the

series are applicable

variables are complex quantities, by simply substituting the expres


sion modulus or absolute value (of a complex variable) for the expres
sion absolute value (of a real variable).*

POWER

I.

SERIES OF A SINGLE VARIABLE

177. Interval of convergence.

+ AiX + A

(1)

where the

coefficients

Let us
2

X*

A 1} A 2

first

consider a series of the form

AH X

-f

-,

are all positive, and where

the independent variable A is assigned only positive values.


evident that each of the terms increases with A
Hence,
.

It is
if

the

any particular value of A, say X l} it converges


a fortiori for any value of A less than X l
Conversely, if the series
diverges for the value A2 it surely diverges for any value of A
We shall distinguish the following cases.
greater than A2
series converges for

1)

Such

The

series (1) may converge for any value of


is the case, for example, for the series

1 f
"

I+

whatever.

lT2

A"

>

"

+ l72T^ +

""

2) The series (1) may diverge for any value of A except


The following series, for example, has this property

A=

+ A + 1 2A

+1.2.3-.-

nX n

3) Finally, let us suppose that the series converges for certain


values of A and diverges for other values.
Let x be a value of A

for

which

it

converges, and

let

* See Vol.
II,

be a value for which

2GG-275.

375

TKAKS.

it

diverges.

SPECIAL SERIES

376

From

the remark

made

series converges if

above,

<A

follows that

it

and

j,

[IX,

it

is less

if

diverges

than

AT>A 2

X2 The
The only
But all
.

2
uncertainty is about the values of A between X l and
the values of A for which the series converges are less than

we

hence they have an upper limit, which


values of
of

the values of

and

Since all the

shall call R.

which the

for

which

for

177

series diverges are greater than any value


converges, the number R is also the lower limit of
for which the series diverges. Hence the series
(1)

it

diverges for all values of


greater than R, and converges for all values
less than R.
It may either converge or diverge when
R.
of

X=

For example, the

series

In this case R =1.


converges if A
1, and diverges if A ^ 1.
This third case may be said to include the other two by suppos
<

ing that

R may

be zero or

may become

Let us now consider a power

(2)

where the

-f

a1 x

+a

infinite.

series, i.e.

a series of the form

+ an x +

and the variable x may have any


From now on we shall set A = |a,-|, X = \x\.

coefficients a,

whatever.

series (1) is the series of absolute values of the

real values

Then the

terms of the series

Let R be the number defined above for the series

(1).

(2).

Then the

any value of x between


It remains
of x whose
This follows immediately from a funda

series (2) evidently converges absolutely for

- R and + R, by the very definition of the number R.


to be shown that the series (2) diverges for any value
absolute value exceeds R.
mental theorem due to Abel *
:

If the

for any particular value x it converges


values of x whose absolute value is less than
\x \.

series (2) converges

absolutely for

any

In order to prove this theorem, let us suppose that the series (2)
be a positive number greater than
converges for x = x and let
the absolute value of any term of the series for that value of x.

Then we

shall have, for

any value of

A
and we

may

lt

n,

<M,

write
/

/X
<M

Recherche sur la sene

in

(m

1)

-\

2t

IX,

POWER

177]

SERIES

377

whenever

It follows that the series (1) converges

X<|cc

|,

which

proves the theorem.


x the series (1)
In other words, if the series (2) converges for x
is less than x
of absolute values converges whenever
Hence
,

R was

cannot exceed R, for

|cc

supposed to be the upper limit of

for which the series (1) converges.


up, given a power series (2) whose coefficients may have
either sign, there exists a positive number R which has the follow

the values of

To sum

The series (2) converges absolutely for any value of x


ing properties
R and -f R, and diverges for any value of x whose absolute
between
:

The

value exceeds R.

which

origin

if

is

interval

R,

is

R)

This interval extends from

convergence.

called the interval of


cc in the case in

oo to

conceived to have become infinite, and reduces to the


= 0. The latter case will be neglected in what follows.

The preceding demonstration gives us no information about what


R.
The series (2) may be absolutely
happens when x = R or x =
For example,

convergent, simply convergent, or divergent.


for each of the three series

for the ratio of

any term to the preceding approaches x as

in each case.

The

series diverges for

first

series diverges for

= 1, and converges for


= 1.

aj

1.

1.

R=

its limit

The second
The third con

verges absolutely for x

The statement

Note.
for

it is

theorem may be made more general,


argument that the absolute value of any

of Abel

sufficient for the

term of the series

+a

be less than a fixed number.

----1- a X
n

Whenever

H---this condition is satisfied,

the series (2) converges absolutely for any value of x whose absolute
value is less than \x
.

The number

is

which

is

the greatest limit of the Sequence

in

160,

For

if

we

connected

in

a very simple

consider the analogous sequence

way with

the

number

to

defined

SPECIAL SERIES

378

[IX,

evident that the greatest limit of the terms of the new sequence is
1/w
1/w, and diverges if
sequence (1) therefore converges if

The

<aX.

it is

178. Continuity of a

series

<

>

178

hence

power series. Let f(x) be the sum of a power


R to + R,
in the interval from

which converges
f(x)

(3)

We

shall first
let R be a positive number less than R.
that the series (3) converges uniformly in the interval from
than R
R
to
For, if the absolute value of x is less

and

remainder

Rn

Rn =

of the series (3)

is

a n+l x n + l

show

R
,

the

+ an+p xn + P +

less in absolute value

than the remainder

4.+I*** +-*.+;****
But the series (1) converges for
of the corresponding series (1).
R.
R , since R
may be found
Consequently a number

X=

<

such that the latter remainder will be


number c whenever n ^ N. Hence

less

Rn

positive

provided that

\x\

<

than any preassigned


<

whenever n

>

is a continuous
f(x} of the given series
R.
and
R
For, let x
function of x for all values of x between
is evident
It
R.
than
number whose absolute value is less
be

It follows that the

sum

any

number R may be found which is less than R and greater


than \x \. Then the series converges uniformly in the interval
sum f(x) of the
(_ R + R as we have just seen, and hence the
1

that a

~),

series is continuous for the value

since x belongs to the interval

in question.

R of the
and
The function f(x} remains continuous,

This proof does not apply to the end points


interval of convergence.

+R

however, provided that the series converges for those values.


x = R, its
Indeed, Abel showed that if the series (3) converges for
series
sum for x = R is the limit which the sum /(#) of the
approaches
as x approaches R through values less than J?.f

Let S be the sum of the convergent series

al

+a

R* -\----

an

R"

H----

* This theorem was proved by Cauchy in his Cours d Analyse. It was rediscovered
by Hadamard in his thesis.
to the case of
t As stated above, these theorems can be immediately generalized
series of

imaginary terms. In this case, however, care


TRANS.
See Vol. II, 266.

the generalization.

is

necessary in formulating

IX,

m]

and

let

SERIES

379

n be a positive integer such that any one of the sums

than a preassigned positive number e. If we set x = R0, and


to 1, a; will increase from
to R, and we
increase from

is less

then

POWER

let

shall have

/(z) =/(0J?)

n be chosen

If

+a

+a

n $R"

R(l

4. ....

write

+ # (1 + +
+
--+a n+l R + + an+p R n+ ? +
ai

0)

(4)-

+a

we may

as above,

S -f(x)

0R

a n R n (l

0")

-.

and the absolute value of the sum of the series in the second line can
B + 2
H+P
On the other hand, the numbers O n +
not exceed e.
-,
Abel
s
lemma
in
form a decreasing sequence. Hence, by
75,
proved
l

we

shall

have
n + l
Rn +
\a n + l 6

-i

+ a n+p O n+p R n+p

----

It follows that the absolute value of the

<

sum

n
6 +lt

<

e.

of the series in the

Finally, the first line of the right-hand


which
side of the equation (4) is a polynomial of degree n in
vanishes when 0=1. Therefore another positive number rj may be
third line cannot exceed

e.

found such that the absolute value of this polynomial is less than c
and unity. Hence for all such values
whenever lies between 1
r\

we

of

shall

have
\S~f(x)\<3e.

Hence f(x)
e is an arbitrarily preassigned positive number.
approaches S as its limit as x approaches R.
In a similar manner it may be shown that if the series (3) con
But

R, the sum of the series for x


verges for x
the limit which /(x) approaches as x approaches
R.
greater than
to the preceding.

An

application.

if

Indeed,

we

replace

S =UQ +
S = v +

(6)

be two convergent
(7)

R is equal to
R through values

x, this

case reduces

This theorem enables us to complete the results of

UI
vl

+
+

series, neither of
(ot>i

4-

Uiu

U Z ----\

t>

u n H----

H-----h

which converges absolutely.

H----

168

Let

regarding the multiplication of series.


(5)

x by

uo

H-----

1-

no) H----

The

series

SPECIAL SERIES

380
converge or diverge.

may
the

sums

power

If

two given

of the

it

sum S

its

converges,

series, i.e.

<S<S

[IX,

is

179

equal to the product of

For, let us consider the three

series

f(x)

=
=

tf>(x)

vix

v n x n H----

-\

-----h

Each of these series converges, by hypothesis, when z = 1. Hence each of them


1 and + 1.
For any such
converges absolutely for any value of x between
value of x Cauchy s theorem regarding the multiplication of series applies and
gives us the equation
/(*)0(z)

(8)

*(z).

By Abel s theorem, as x approaches unity the three functions /(x), #(x), \ft(x)
approach S, S and 2, respectively. Since the two sides of the equation (8)
meanwhile remain equal, we shall have, in the limit, S = SS
The theorem remains true for series whose terms are imaginary, and the proof
,

same

follows precisely the

lines.

If a

179. Successive derivatives of a power series.

=a +

f(x)

which converges

av x

+a

in the interval

x 2 -\-----h

*"

power

series

H----

R, -f R) be differentiated term

by term, the resulting power series

In order to prove this, it will be


converges in the same interval.
show that the series of absolute values of the terms of

sufficient to

the

new

series,

A
where A

+ 2A

and

|a,.|

X=

X-\
\x\,

nA n Xn ~

converges for

-\

and diverges for

X<R

X>R.

For the

first

ber between

R, and let R be a
part let us suppose that X
X
the
R R. Then
and R,
auxiliary series
<

num

<

<

4-

Y 4-

4-

I}*

converges, for the ratio of any term to the preceding approaches


X/R which is less than unity. Multiplying the successive terms
,

of this series, respectively,

by the factors

IX,

POWER

179]

each of which
obtain a

new

is less

SERIES

A1

is

than a certain fixed number, since

<R,

we

series

which also evidently converges.


The proof of the second part is similar

where

381

+ 2A X +
2

to the above.

+ nA n Xr +

If the series

>

greater than R, were convergent, the series

A X
l

2A t X*

+ .-- + nA n X n

and consequently the series 2^ n


would con
is
less
than
the
each
of
its
terms
since
corresponding term of
verge,
Then R would not be the upper limit of the
the preceding series.
values of X for which the series (1) converges.

would converge

also,

X"

The sum /j (a:) of the series (9) is therefore a continuous function


x inside the same interval. Since this series con
R -f- R ), where R
R f1 (x)
verges uniformly in any interval (
of the variable

<

174.
the derivative of f(x) throughout such an interval, by
Since R may be chosen as near R as we please, we may assert that

is

the function f(x) possesses a derivative for any value of x between


R and -f R, and that that derivative is represented by the series
obtained by differentiating the given series term by term *
:

/(*)

(10)

+ na n x*- + ....

2a2 x

Repeating the above reasoning for the series (10), we see that f(x)
has a second derivative,

= 2a + 6a
2

/"(a)

+ w (n - 1) a n x n ~ +
2

-,

and so forth. The function f(x) possesses an unlimited sequence of


derivatives for any value of x inside the interval
+ R), and

(/,

these derivatives are represented by the series obtained by differen


tiating the given series successively term by term
:

(11)
If

we

or, in

=
=

f<*\x)

set

1.2---na n

2.3---n(n

in these formulae,

we

+ l~)a

---+ l x-i

find

general,

Although the corresponding theorem

proof follows

somewhat

different lines.

is

true for series of imaginary terms, the

See Vol.

II,

266.

TRANS.

SPECIAL SERIES

382

The development of /(#) thus obtained


ment given by Maclaurin s formula

is

179

[IX,

identical with the develop

/(*)

=/(0)

+ f/

(<>)

+ iTf^/^O) +

+
f^/"(<>)

-.

an
are equal, except for certain
The coefficients a 0) a l9
numerical factors, to the values of the function f(x) and its succes
sive derivatives for x = 0. It follows that no function can have two
,

distinct developments in
if

Similarly,

series.

power

a power series be integrated term by term, a new


obtained which has an arbitrary constant term and

power series is
which converges

in the

same interval

as the given series, the given


If we integrate again,
first two terms are arbitrary
and so

series being the derivative of the

we

obtain a third series whose

new

series.

forth.

Examples. 1) The geometrical progression


X

X s -\-----

+ X*

whose ratio is
x, converges
+ 1, and its sum is 1/(1 + x).
and x, where x
the limits
of log (1

x*)

found in

49

2)

(l)

X n -\----

for every value of x

<

between

= 1,

for the series on the right con

=1- x +* - x +
2

^-^

and

+1

(-

...

we may
x2

1
)"

"

write

Integrating this series term by term between the limits


Ice

Since the

<

1,

new
TT

and

= 1.

For any value of x between

where

Integrating it term by term between


1, we obtain again the development

This formula holds also for x


verges when x

\-

we

find

series converges for

111

= 1,

it

follows that
1

and

x,

row EH

17 ]

IX,

3) Let F(x) be the

m
where

is

sum

m(m

1)

[m

(m

p +1)
1.2.--OJ-1)

which

is

a:

<

(in,

Then we

1.

(m

(m -1).

a;)

have

p +1)
J

-1

1.2..

(1+

shall

and then

terms

collect the

in

Using the identity

powers of x.
1)

!)

<

Let us multiply each side by

(m

i(m

383

of the convergent series

any number whatever and


!

like

SERIES

(m

-(m

!)

/>)

m(?rc

we

easily verified,

find the

p -f-1)

(m

1)

1.2--.J9

1.2-.-.P

formula

or

From

this result

we

find, successively,

F (x) _ m
~F(x)~l+x
log [/

()]

= m log (1 +

a-)

log

or

To determine the constant C we need merely notice that F(0) = l.


Hence C = 1. This gives the development of (1 + a*) found in 50
"

Y_1.
4) Replacing
we find

m(m-l)...(m-.p+l)

a;

by

x 2 and

/,

1.32.4

H-----

=1+,1

by

1/2

,
1

in the last

formula above,

1.3. 5- ..(27tv
^
2.4.6
2n

1 and +1.
This formula holds for any value of x between
x
where
and
both
sides
between
the
limits
x,
grating

<

obtain the following development for the arcsine


arc

x
sm x = -

a-

7:

-^

-f

1.3a; 5

+^

-=-

H----,

3 5
.

(2n

z
-1) x

g
2.4.6---2n
.

"

+l

Inte
1,

we

SPECIAL SERIES

384

[IX,

180

180. Extension of Taylor s series.

Let/(x) be the sum of a power


which converges in the interval ( R, + R~), a- a point inside
that interval, and x + h another point of the same interval such
that |a; + h\
R.
The series whose sum is f(x + A),
series

<

may be

ai(

A)

+a

(x

A)

\-

an (x

A)"

-]

replaced by the double series obtained by developing each


and writing the terms in the same power

of the powers of (x
A)
of h upon the same line
:

-f-

2a 2 x h

(12)

n(n

1)

1.2

This double series converges absolutely. For if each of its terms


be replaced by its absolute value, a new double series of positive
terms is obtained
:

(13)

If

we add

we

the elements in any one column,

obtain a series

which converges, since we have supposed that x


h
R. Hence
the array (12) may be summed by rows or by columns.
Taking
the sums of the columns, we obtain f(x
Taking the sums
A).
|

<

of the rows, the resulting series


2
A, and the coefficients of A, h

is

are

tively.

(14)

arranged according to powers of

f (x

),f"(x

)/2l,

respec

Hence we may write


A) =/(.r

+
.L

71

we assume that A
R
x
This formula surely holds inside the interval from x
R +\x
to x + R
but it may happen that the series on the right
\x
converges in a larger interval. As an example consider the function
if

<

IX,

(1

POWER

180]

SERIES

386

not a positive integer.


The development
x
for
all
x
of
holds
values
of
1 and
between
powers
x
which
lies
in
of
that
be
a
value
interval.
Then
x
we
Let

x~)

where

is

according to

+ 1.
may

write
(i

+ x} m =

(i

+ x + x - XY = (i +

<r

(i

m
*)

where
z

We may

now develop

new development

(1

=X X
l+X

+ z) m

will hold

according to powers of

whenever

If x
1 and 1 + 2x
between
former
interval
than
the
larger

\z\

<

is positive,

1, i.e.

the

and

2,

this

for all values of

new

interval will be

Hence the new formula

(1, +!)

enables us to calculate the values of the function for values of the


variable

which lie outside the original interval. Further investiga


remark leads to an extremely important notion,
that

tion of this

of analytic extension.

We

shall consider this subject in the second

volume.
Note.

It is evident that the theorems

proved for series arranged


may be extended immedi

according to positive powers of a variable x

a, or,
ately to series arranged according to positive powers of x
more generally still, to series arranged according to positive powers
whatever. We need only consider
of any continuous function
them as composite functions,
being the auxiliary function.
Thus a series arranged according to positive powers of I/a; con
verges for all values of x which exceed a certain positive constant in
absolute value, and it represents a continuous function of x for all
such values of the variable. The function Va/2
a, for example, may
2
be written in the form
The expression (1 a/ar )*
x(\
a/a: )*.
2
may be developed according to powers of I/a; for all values of x
a
in
which exceed
absolute value.
This gives the formula
<(x)

<f>(x)

(2P

2.4.6---2p

3)

a"

a-

a whenever x
which constitutes a valid development of Va; 2
Va.
When x
Va, the same series converges and represents the func
>

<

tion

Va: 2

a.

This formula

may

be used advantageously to obtain

a development for the square root of an integer whenever the first


perfect square which exceeds that integer is known.

SPECIAL SERIES

386

181

[IX,

Dominant functions. The theorems proved above establish a


close analogy between polynomials and power series. Let (
r, + r)
be the least of the intervals of convergence of several given power
When |cc|<r, each of these series
series /i (x), /2 (x),
-,/ (#)
and
they may be added or multiplied together
converges absolutely,
181.

by the ordinary rules for polynomials. In general, any integral poly


nomial in /1 (x),/2 (a;),
,/() may be developed in a convergent

power series in the same interval.


For purposes of generalization we shall now define certain expres
Let f(x~) be a power
sions which will be useful in what follows.
series

f(x)

and

aj_x

+a

x2

h an

-)

x"

be another power series with positive coefficients

let
<f>(x)

<f,(x)

a^x

a 2 x2 H

f-

an x n

-\

which converges in a suitable interval. Then the function


said to dominate * the function f(x) if each of the coefficients a n

is

<(a;)

is

greater than the absolute value of the corresponding coefficient of

/(*):
1
\<

0\<C*0,

Poincare has proposed the notation


f(x)
to express the relation

which

<

<(*)

between the two functions f(x)

exists

and
<f>(x~).

The

lowing fact,
Let P(a a\,

which

of f(x)
ties

aQ

it
<(#),

dominant functions is based upon the fol


an immediate consequence of the definition.
be a polynomial in the first n -f- 1 coefficients

utility of these

whose

is

coefficients are all real

and

positive.

!,
-, a n be replaced by the corresponding
is clear that we shall have

|P(Oo, a 1}

-,

a n ~)\<P(a

For instance, if the function


the series which represents

<f>(x)

[<(:r)]

In general,

a 1}

If the quanti
coefficients of

an ).

dominates the function /(#),


dominate [/(ic)] 2 and so

will

w iU

dominate [/()]". Similarly, if


and
are dominant functions for / and /t respectively, the product
will dominate the product jff\ and so forth.
on.

[<(#)]"

<f>

^>!

<<j

*This expression
pour

la fonction

majorantes."

will be used as a translation of the phrase


est
Likewise, "dominant functions will be used for
"

<p(x)

"

/(a;)."

TRANS.

majorante
"

fonctions

IX,

POWER SERIES

181]

387

Given a power series/(x) which converges in an interval ( R,


R),
the problem of determining a dominant function is of course indeter
But it is convenient in what follows to make the domi
minate.
nant function as simple as possible. Let r be any number less than

R and arbitrarily near R.


the absolute value of
shall call

its

Since the given series converges for x

terms will have an upper

Then we may

M.

write, for

any value of

limit,

= r,

which we

n,

or

Hence the

series

Mx n

M + M-xr

r"

r
n

whose general term is M(x /r ), dominates the given function /(x).


This is the dominant function most frequently used. If the series
/(x) contains no constant term, the function

M
may

be taken as a dominant function.

It is evident that r

that

may

be assigned any value less than R, and


with r. But
can never be less than

M decreases, in general,

not zero, a number p less than R can always be found


such that the function -4 /(1
x/p) dominates the function /(x).
For, let the series

If

is

M + M -r + M ^r +

+ M^ +

where
than rA

/M

whence

|a n p

>

be a
and n
,

first

>

n
<

1,

dominant function.

we

shall

On the

dominates the function f(x).


ently.

than or

r"

If p be a

number

less

have

other hand, |ac

We

shall

=A

Hence the

series

make

use of this fact pres

More generally still, any number whatever which


equal to A may be used in place of M.

is

greater

SPECIAL SERIES

388

may be shown

It

is

in a similar

a dominant function, where


The knowledge

Note.

/t

[IX,

manner that

is

if

0,

182

the function

any positive number whatever.

of a geometrical progression

which dominates the func

tion f(x) also enables us to estimate the error made in replacing the function
f(x) by the sum of the first n + 1 terms of the series. If the series M/(l
x/r)

dominates /(z),

of the given series

of the

dominant

evident that the remainder

it is

is

less in absolute value

than the corresponding remainder

It follows that the error in question will

series.

be less than

(T
jfW
182. Substitution of one series in another.

(15)

=/(>/)

iy 4-

Let

y+

an

be a series arranged according to powers of a variable y which con


R.
Again let
\y\<.

verges whenever
/1

A\

-JL

be another
2

series,

TitA

which converges

w.

in the interval

r,

r).

If

in the series (15) be replaced by their


y ) y )
developments in
series arranged according to powers of x from
(16), a double series
y>

+
I

,.

7,

.,

(17)

is

obtained.

7,

7,

~.

a 2 (b\

We

shall

now

investigate the conditions under which

this double series converges absolutely.


In the first place, it is
necessary that the series written in the first row,

IX,

POWER

182]

should converge absolutely,


is also sufficient.

condition

i.e.

SERIES

that

For

\b

389

should be less than R.*

This

if it is satisfied,

the function
<(>(x)

dominated by an expression of the form m/(l


x/p), where
number
than
and
where
r.
We
greater
any positive
p
\b
Let R be another
therefore suppose that m is less than R.

will be

is

<

may

number which lies between m and R. Then the function


dominated by an expression of the form

positive

f(y)

is

R
If y be replaced by wi/(l
x/p) in this last series, and the powers
of y be developed according to increasing powers of x by the binomial

theorem, a

new double

series

M ^
mx
M j^
+

(18)

+ nMt-

is obtained, each of whose coefficients is positive and greater than


the absolute value of the corresponding coefficients in the array (17),
since each of the coefficients in (17) is formed from the coefficients

a*!,

a2

b 0) bi, b 2

-by means of additions and multiplications

The double

series (17) therefore converges absolutely pro


only.
vided the double series (18) converges absolutely. If x be replaced
its absolute value in the series (18), a necessary condition for abso
lute convergence is that each of the series formed of the terms in any

by

If this condition be
one column should converge, i.e. that \x\
p.
column
of
in
the
is equal to
the
sum
the
terms
satisfied,
(n + l)th
<

Then a further necessary condition

is

that

we should have

or

(19)

in

* The case in which the


TRANS.
what follows.

series (15) converges for

= R (see

177) will

be neglected

SPECIAL SERIES

390

[IX,

182

Since this latter condition includes the former, \x\


p, it follows
it is a necessary and sufficient condition for the absolute con
<

that

vergence of the double series (18). The double series (17) will
therefore converge absolutely for values of x which satisfy the
It is to be noticed that the series
inequality (19).
converges
<j>(x)

and that the corresponding value of y


For the inequalities
absolute value.

for all these values of x,


less

than

in

i. t

m.

x,

is,

On

f[$(x)~\-

\x\

necessitate the inequality


(17) by columns, we find

that

is

$(x)\<.R

Taking the sum of the

series

the other hand, adding by rows, we obtain a


powers of x. Hence we may write

series arranged according to

where the

coefficients c

CQ

=
<ZQ

c i} c 2

-f- fti

are given by the formulae

ft 2

t>o

~r

~r

<^

"o

i
>

(21)

which are easily

verified.

The formula

(20) has been established only for values of x which


the
inequality (19), but the latter merely gives an under
satisfy
limit of the size of the interval in which the formula holds. It may

be valid in a

much

solution requires a
shall return to

We

it later.

1) Since the number R which occurs in (19) may


as we please, the formula (20) holds whenever x

Special cases.

be taken as near

This raises a question whose


larger interval.
of
of a complex variable.
functions
knowledge

the inequality \x
p(l
m/R). Hence, if the series (15)
for
value
of
converges
y whatever, R may be thought of as infinite,
any
be
r
taken
as
near
as we please, and the formula (20) applies
p may
satisfies

whenever

<

|a;|

<

r,

that

is,

in the

same interval

in

which the

series

In particular, if the series (16) converges for all


(16) converges.
values of x, and (15) converges for all values of y, the formula (20)
is

valid for all values of

x.

IX,

POWER

182]

2)
tion

When

391

SERIES

the constant term b of the series (16) is zero, the func


dominated by an expression of the form

is
<(z)

l- p

An
r and where m is any positive number whatever.
where p
case
shows
that
the
in
the
that
used
to
similar
general
argument
formula (20) holds in this case whenever x satisfies the inequality
<

(22)
v

z|<

where

This
\b

<

is

is

evidently

Examples.

1)

arises

satisfied,

+ x).

in

and the

Cauchy gave a method

The inequality
depend upon

practice.

coefficients c n

for obtaining the binomial

theorem from

Setting

write

whence, substituting the

If the

often

case

the development of log(l

we may

R as we please. The corresponding interval


than
that given by the inequality (19).
larger

special

R +

as near to

is

of validity

P
r

first

expansion in the second,

right-hand side be arranged according to powers of x, it is evident that


will be a polynomial of degree n in ju, which we shall call

the coefficient of

x"

n 1, and must
This polynomial must vanish when ^ = 0, 1, 2,
reduce to unity when ^ = n. These facts completely determine Pn in the form

Pn (n)-

.M

~"""
p _M(M-l)---(M-n+l)
P
"

2) Setting z

where

(1

z) /*,

where x

lies

between

and

1,

we may

write

SPECIAL SERIES

392
The

first

\x\<

the
this

1.

first

183

is valid for all values of y, and the second is valid whenever


Hence the formula obtained by substituting the second expansion in
holds for any value of x between
1 and + 1.
The first two terms of

expansion

formula are

T
It

[IX,

follows that

(1

x)

/*

approaches

zero through positive values.

f(

of a

series

power

the interval

r,

less

than

e as

z approaches

__
Let us

consider the reciprocal

first

_
b 2 x*

l+b lX +

...

which begins with unity and which converges


-f-

in

Setting

?).

we may

through values

183. Division of power series.

Ax

__

bv

b 2 x 2 H----

write
/(*)

=1 ~

=
r+~y

y2

whence, substituting the first development in the second, we obtain


an expansion for f(x) in power series,
(25)

f(x)

=1-

+ (b\ - 6.) * +
2

b lX

which holds inside a certain

-,

In a similar manner a devel

interval.

opment may be obtained for the reciprocal


whose constant term is different from zero.

of

any power

series

Let us now try to develop the quotient of two convergent power


series

$(x)
If b

is

ti

not zero, this quotient

= ( a +a

+a

biX

may

x*

b 3 x*

----

-\

be written in the form

--

Then by the case just treated the left-hand side of this equation is the
product of two convergent power series. Hence it may be written
in the

form of a power

series

which converges near the origin

-f

Clearing of fractions and equating the coefficients of like powers


we find the formulae

of x,

IX,

POWER

184]

an

(27)

l cH

from which the


sively.

+ biC

+---

H_l

coefficients c

SERIES
b H c9

c lt

393
0, 1, 2,

may be

cn

-,

calculated succes

same as

It will be noticed that these coefficients are the

we should

obtain by performing the division indicated by the


ordinary rule for the division of polynomials arranged according to
increasing powers of x. .

those

If b

that

= 0, the result is different.


= x fa (x), where is a

Let us suppose for generality


and \l/\(x) is a

A;

ij/(x~)

power

series

whose constant term

positive integer

Then we may write

not zero.

is

and by the above we shall have also

It follows that

the given quotient

"77

*tI

ck

,~

<

expressible in the form

is

-j- Cj.

+ j a; -p

where the right-hand side is the sum of a rational fraction which


becomes infinite for x = and a power series which converges near
the origin.
Note.

In order to calculate the successive powers of a power

venient to proceed as follows.


(a

a\x

Assuming the

a n xn

"

it is

series,

con

identity

ct x

c n xn

us take the logarithmic derivative of each side and then clear of fractions.
This leads to the new identity

let

na n xn - 1

(29)
a,(

The

coefficients

-)(c

Cix

n
4- c n x

x"

the various powers of x are easily calculated.


Equat
we find a sequence of formulae from which
may be found successively if c be known. It is evident that

of

ing coefficients of like powers,


CQ, Ci,

cn

184. Development of
according to powers of

2xz

1/Vl
z.

-|-

Setting y

z2

Let
z 2,

2xz

us develop

we

or
1

(30)

Vl^2xzTP

2xz

~
2

28

- (2xz
8

1/Vl - 2xz
when

shall have,

z 2) 2

\y\<

z2
1,

SPECIAL SERIES

394

[ix,i86

Collecting the terms which are divisible by the same power of


expansion of the form

-- = p

(31)

VI -

?xz

+ p lZ + pzZ 2 +

...

z2

+ pnZ n +

z,

we

obtain an

...,

where
2

Pn is a polynomial of the nth degree in x. These poly


be determined successively by means of a recurrent formula. Dif
ferentiating the equation (31) with respect to z, we find
and where,
nomials

in general,

may

(1

2xz

by the equation

or,

(x

Equating the

is

Vl n is

z",

(1

2xz

z 2 )(Pi

+ 2P 2 z

obtain the desired recurrent formula

and moreover P
and the formula

=X

between three consecutive Legendre


= X\ P2 = 2 Hence Pn = n

(31)

P!

be written

may

~
2xz

z2

the Legendre polynomial of the nth order


-V
-&-n

id

=
2

We

we

identical with the relation

88),

for all values of n,

Pn * n +

coefficients of

This equation

where

(31),

+ PIZ +

z)(P

polynomials

+ z 2 )*

shall find later the interval in

II.

POWER

2n dxn

which

this

i\_n

\\&*

1)1

formula holds.

SERIES IN SEVERAL VARIABLES

185. General principles.

The

properties of power series of a single

may be extended easily to power series in several independ


ent variables. Let us first consider a double series 2 a mn x m y n where
variable

and n vary from zero to + oo and where the coeffi


cients a mn may have either sign. If no element of this series exceeds
a certain positive constant in absolute value for a set of values
x
x y = 2/0) the series converges absolutely for all values of x and
which
y
satisfy the inequalities \x\
\x \, \y\
\y \.
the integers

o>

<

<

For, suppose that the inequality


I

amn x Vo \<M

or
|

a mu

M
<

xo m \yo\
,

IX,

DOUBLE POWER SERIES

185]

395

is satisfied for all sets of values of


and n. Then the absolute value
of the general element of the double series 2a mn .r m
is less than the
m
n
But
corresponding element of the double series 2M\x/x
\y/y

the latter series converges whenever

sum

is

|#|<|a:

|,

|y|<|y

an d

its

|>

M
2/o

we

by taking the sums of the elements by columns and then


adding these sums.
Let r and p be two positive numbers for which the double series
2 a mn \rm pn converges, and let R denote the rectangle formed by the
four straight lines x = r, x =
= p, y
For every point
r, y
p.
inside this rectangle or upon one of its sides no element of the
double series
as

see

m n
exceeds the corresponding element of the series
^\amn \r p in abso
lute value.
Hence the series (33) converges absolutely and uni

formly inside of R, and it therefore defines a continuous function


of the two variables x and y inside that region.
It may be shown, as for series in a
single variable, that the
double series obtained by any number of
term-by-term differen
tiations converges absolutely and
uniformly inside the rectangle

bounded by the lines x = r


= r + c, y = p e y = p + e
c, x
where c and e are any positive numbers less than r and
p, respec
These series represent the various partial derivatives of
tively.
m - n is
F(x,y). For example, the sum of the series 2 ma mn x
y
equal
to cF/dx. For if the elements of the two series be
arranged accord
,

ing to increasing powers of x, each element of the second series is


equal to the derivative of the corresponding element of the first.
m n
Likewise, the partial derivative d m+n F/dx dy is equal to the sum
of a double series whose constant factor is a l 2
1 2
n.
ran
.

Hence the

amn are equal to the values of the correspond


ing derivatives of the function F(x, y) at the point x = y
0, except
for certain numerical factors, and the formula
(33) may be written
in the form
coefficients

/8 m + "F\

F(x,
\

y)=

>yj

SPECIAL SERIES

396

186

[IX,

It follows, incidentally, that no function of two variables can have


two distinct developments in power series.
If the elements of the double series be collected according to
their degrees in x and y, a simple series is obtained
:

F(x, y)

(35)

<

fa

<f>

<

where
is a homogeneous polynomial of the nth degree
y which may be written, symbolically,

in

x and

</>

The preceding development therefore


s series (

Taylor
Let (a-

coincides with that given by

51).

be a point inside the rectangle R, and (x +


be a neighboring point such that x + h
+ \k\
r, \y
for any point inside the rectangle formed by the lines
,

~)

<

ar

[r-|a:

|],

h,

<

[p

- |y

p.

k)

Then

|],

be developed in a power series arranged


xv and y
y
according to positive powers of x
the function F(x, y)

may

F\

ZdT
1.2

For

if

m f)i/n / x=x
,!

1. ;*..*"*

each element of the double series

be replaced by its development in powers of h and k, the new multi


Arrang
ple series will converge absolutely under the hypotheses.
ing the elements of this new series according to powers of h and k,

we obtain the formula


The reader will be

(36).

able to

show without

difficulty that all the

preceding arguments and theorems hold without essential altera


tion for power series in any number of variables whatever.
in n
functions. Given a power series f(x, y, z,
)
shall say that another series in n variables
y, z,
)
is
dominates the first series if each coefficient of
positive
y,z,
)
and greater than the absolute value of the corresponding coefficient
186.

Dominant

variables,

we

</>(,

<j>(x,

of f(x, y,

z,

).

The argument

in

185 depends essentially upon

IX,

DOUBLE POWER SERIES

186]

the use of a dominant function.


verges for x

r,

d>(x,

= p,

if

the series 2,\a mn x

con
"y"\

the function

y}

For

397

x\

/x\
3/2 -

m /vY*
-

)
\ r/

y\

is greater than any coefficient in the


where
The function
dominates the series 2,a mn x m yn

>

\P/

series 2,\amn r

m
p"\,

is

another dominant function.

For the

coefficient of

x m yn in

1/^(3*,

y)

equal to the coefficient of the corresponding term in the expan


sion of M(x/r -+- y/p} m+n and therefore it is at least equal to the
m n in
coefficient of x
is

<f>(x,

y).

Similarly, a triple series

where r, r
which converges absolutely for x = r, y = r z =
is
dominated
an
are three positive numbers,
by
expression of the
form
,

r",

r"

y>

l_Ul_\/l_-

and also by any one of the expressions

M
x\[~.
-

/?/

!-(-,
r/\_
)

If f(x, y, z) contains no constant term,

sions diminished

by

may

182)

\r

z\

~1

r"/

any one of the preceding expres

M may be selected as a dominant function.

The theorem regarding the


another

substitution of one

power

series in

be extended to power series in several variables.

If each of the variables in a convergent power series in p variables


yp b & replaced by a convergent power series in q variables
y\i y-ii
x \j x ii
xq which has no constant term, the result of the substitu
tion may be written in the form of a power series arranged according
)

*>

to

powers of x

x2

xq provided that the absolute value of each


,

of these variables is less than a certain constant.

SPECIAL SERIES

398

[IX,

186

Since the proof of the theorem

number

of variables,

is essentially the same for any


shall restrict ourselves for definiteness to

we

Let

the following particular case.


(37)

be a power series which converges whenever y


-bm

(y=-t>i*--b 2

(38)
f

Cj

00

^2

~~r~

x^
**^

"

~T~

j*

<

and

<

and

let

..,
~J~

<C

be two series without constant terms both of which converge if the


absolute value of x does not exceed p. If y and z in the series (37)
be replaced by their developments from (38), the term in y m becomes
a new power series in x, and the double series (37) becomes a triple
z"

series,

each of whose coefficients

may be calculated from the coeffi


means
of additions and multiplications
by
It remains to be shown that this triple series converges abso
when the absolute value of x does not exceed a certain con
from which it would then follow that the series could be

cients a mn

only.

lutely
stant,

bn

and

cn

arranged according to increasing powers of


the function f(y, z)

In the

x.

first place,

dominated by the function

is

(39)

and both of the

series (38) are

dominated by an expression of the form

N
(40)
,

(x\
N= ^T^
.V (-)
\P/
L*i

n
,

>

71=

where

M and N are two positive numbers.

If

y and z

in the double

series (39) be replaced by the function (40) and each of the products
m n
y z be developed in powers of x, each of the coefficients of the result

ing triple series will be positive and greater than the absolute value
of the corresponding coefficient in the triple series found above. It
will therefore be sufficient to

show that

this

new

verges for sufficiently small positive values of x.


the terms which arise from the expansion of any
series (39) is

MAT

-"

Vp/

triple series con

Now

the

sum

of

term ym z* of the

IX,

REAL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

187]

which is the general term of the


two series
x \m

series obtained

Mry _p_
L*\rl 1 _ x

399

by multiplying the

x
P

term by term, except for the constant factor M. Both of the latter
series converge if x satisfies both of the inequalities

<

<

It follows that all the series considered will converge absolutely,


and therefore that the original triple series may be arranged accord
ing to positive powers of x, whenever the absolute value of x is less
than the smaller of the two numbers pr/(r + JV) and pr /(r + N).

Note.

The theorem remains valid when the

series (38) contain

r and c
r
For
provided that \b
the expansion (37) may be replaced by a series arranged according
to powers of y
b and z
c
by 185, which reduces the discus

constant terms b

and

<

\<

sion to the case just treated.

III.

IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS

ANALYTIC CURVES AND SURFACES


187. Implicit functions of a single variable. The existence of implicit
functions has already been established (Chapter II, 20 et ff.) under
certain conditions regarding continuity.
When the left-hand sides

of the given equations are power series, more thorough investigation


is possible, as we shall proceed to show.

an equation whose left-hand side can be developed


power series arranged according to increasing powers
x
x
and
of
y
y Q where the constant term is zero and the coeffi
is
cient of y
Then the equation has one and
y
different from zero.
root
which
as
one
x
approaches XQ and that root
only
approaches n
can be developed in a power series arranged according to powers of

Let F(x, y~)


in a convergent

be

>/

For simplicity let us suppose that x = y = 0, which amounts to


moving the origin of coordinates. Transposing the term of the first
degree in y, we may write the given equation in the form
(41)

= f(x, y} = a^x +

a 20 a; 2

a n xy

+ a^y* H

SPECIAL SERIES

400

[IX,

187

where the terms not written down are of degrees greater than the
second. We shall first show that this equation can be formally sat
isfied by replacing y by a series of the form

if

= Cl x +

(42)

c2

x*

-.-

cn x

---

the rules for operation on convergent series be applied to the series


For, making the substitution and comparing the coeffi
right.

on the

we

cients of x,

ci

find the equations

c2

io>

a so

-f

anCj

a 02 cf,

and, in general, cn can be expressed in terms of the preceding c s


k
and the coefficients a ik where i
n, by means of additions and

Thus we may write

multiplications only.
cn

(43)

where Pn
integer.

is

<

= Pn (a

10

an

w>

a0n ),

a polynomial each of whose coefficients is a positive


of the operations performed will be estab

The validity
we can show

that the series (42) determined in this way


shall do this by
all
for
sufficiently small values of x.
converges
means of a device which is frequently used. Its conception is due
lished

if

We

to

Cauchy, and
Let

it

is

based essentially upon the idea of dominant

functions.

be a function which dominates the f unction /(x, y), where # 00 = bol =


Let us then
and where b mn is positive and at least equal to a mn
.

consider the auxiliary equation


(41

Y=

Y=C,x+

The values

2b mn x m Y n

=b

lo

C2

C 15 C 2

b 20

...

+c

z"

form

+ --..

can be determined as above,

b n C l -{-b 02 Cl,

-,

in general

(43

=P

C.

\c n

<
\

positive

Cn

and

(b w ,b 20

,*)

from a comparison of the formulae (43) and (43 )


since each of the coefficients of the polynomial Pn is
Hence the series (42) surely converges
\a mn \^b mn

It is evident

that

C 2 x*

of the coefficients

and are
and

Y)

to find a solution of this equation of the

and try
(42

4>(x,

EX,

REAL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

187]

401

whenever the series (42 ) converges. Now we may


dominant function
Y) the function

select for the

<j>(x,

"

where M,

r,

equation (41

M ~ M 7Y
Then the

and p are three positive numbers.


)

auxiliary

becomes, after clearing of fractions,

-L

*
r

This equation has a root which vanishes for x

0,

namely

F=
The quantity under the

radical

may

be written in the form

where
P

Hence the

root

Y may

be written

]
It follows that this root

verges in the interval


cide with that which

Y may

be developed in a series which con


and this development must coin

a, -f a),

we should obtain by direct substitution, that


the series (42) converges, a fortiori, in
Accordingly
).
the interval (
This is, however, merely a lower limit of
a, + a).
the true interval of convergence of the series (42), which may be
is,

with (42

very

much

larger.

It is evident

from the manner

in

which the

coefficients c n

were

determined that the sum of the series (42) satisfies the equation (41).
= 0, and
Let us write the equation F(x, y) in the form y
f(x, y)
=
be substi
let y
P(x) be the root just found. Then if P(x) +
tuted for y in F(x, y), and the result be arranged according to
powers of x and z, each term must be divisible by z, since the whole
expression vanishes
then F[x, P(x) -f *]

when

= sQ(#,

=
)

We shall have
for any value of x.
where Q(x, z) is a power series in x

402
and

SPECIAL SERIES
z.

z be replaced by

if

Finally,

[IX,

P(x} in Q(x,

we

z),

188

obtain

the identity

where the constant term of Q t must be unity, since the


of y on the left-hand side

(44)

is

unity.

y) = [y

F(x,

coefficient

Hence we may write

P(x)] (1

ax

fa

...).

This decomposition of F(x, y) into a product of two factors is due


to Weierstrass.
It exhibits the root y =
P(x), and also shows that
there is no other root of the equation F(x,
= which vanishes
y)
with x, since the second factor does not approach zero with x and
y.

The preceding method

Note.

for determining the coefficients cn is

46. But it is now evident


essentially the same as that given in
that the series obtained by carrying on the process
indefinitely is

convergent.
188.

The general theorem. Let us now consider a system of p equa

tions in

-f q variables.

0,

-,y,)=

...........

0,

(*u **

yi>y 2 ,

%)==

o,

i(i,*a
x2

(x 1}

*
,x9

yi,y a
yi,y 2

>*;

F1} F

yP )

series near that point.

suppose that the Jacobian

D(Fl} F2

yk = 0,
We shall further

Fp vanishes when x

where each of the functions


and is developable in power

Fp )/D(y

-,

not vanish for the set of values considered.

Under

y2

yp ) does

these conditions

and only one system of solutions of the equations

there exists one

(45)

of the form

where fa, fa,


when x l = a; 2 =

<

y,

are

xq

power

series in

x l} x 2

= 0.

a*,

tvhich vanish

In order to simplify the notation, we shall restrict ourselves to


the case of two equations between two dependent variables u and v
and three independent variables x, y, and z
:

/^CN
(4o)

(F = au
l

<

F =
2

a u

-f bv

Since the determinant ab

equations (46)

may

Vv

+ ex +dy + ez
+cx+dy+ez

----

-\

^----

= 0,
= 0.

ba is not zero, by hypothesis, the two


be replaced by two equations of the form

IX,

REAL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

188]

403

mnpqr

(v

^b mnpqr

where the left-hand sides contain no constant terms and no terms


It is easy to show, as above, that
of the first degree in u and v.
these equations

be satisfied formally by replacing u and v by

may

power

series in x,

(48)

and z

//,

2c,. t

,a;V*S

= 2c

x yk z
{

ikl

1
,

where the coefficients c ikl and c\ kl may be calculated from a mnpqr and
In order to
b mn r by means of additions and multiplications only.
show that these series converge, we need merely compare them with
the analogous expansions obtained by solving the two auxiliary
(

equations

and p are positive numbers whose meaning has been


to a single
explained above. These two auxiliary equations reduce

where M,

r,

equation of the second degree

+ 4M _

if

+z

,r.

2P

4Af

2p

4(p

___
~

+ 2M)

+z

which has a single root which vanishes for x

__

= y = z = 0,

namely

4( P

-f

2M)
r

where a

= r [p/(p + 4M)]

This root

may

2
.

be developed in a convergent power series when


to
x, y, and z are all less than or equal

ever the absolute values of

Hence the series (48) converges under the same conditions.


v t be the solutions of (47) which are developable in
x and
If we set u = ?/ t + u v = v^ -f v in (47) and arrange the
series.
result according to powers of x, y, z, u v each of the terms must
be divisible by u or by v
Hence, returning to the original varia
bles x, y, z, u, v, the given equations may be written in the form

a/3.

Let

-/ +(-iH =0,

SPECIAL SERIES

404

[IX,

189

are power series in x, y, z, u, and v.


where /,
In this
ft
form the solutions u = u l} v = v-i are exhibited. It is evident also
that no other solutions of (47 ) exist which vanish for x = y = z = 0.
For any other set of solutions must cause ffa
to vanish,
and a comparison of (47) with (47 ) shows that the constant term
is unity in both / and
l} whereas the constant term is zero in
= cannot be met by
and
hence
the
condition
both/!
ffa
u
v
which
and
functions
vanish
x
when
replacing
by
y = z = 0.
,

<f>,

<&/\

<j>

<;

</i

Let us consider the equation

189. Lagrange s formula.

(49)

where

is

a function which

=
<t>(a)

(y

x$(y)

developable in a power series in y

is

<j>(y)

4>(y)

a)

(a)

(y

a)2
0"(a)

a,

which converges whenever y


a does not exceed a certain number. By the
187, this equation has one and only one root which
general theorem of
approaches a as x approaches zero, and this root is represented for sufficiently
small values of x by a convergent power series
y
In general,

if

is

f(y)

aix

a2 x2

-f

a function which

developable according to positive

is

a, an expansion of f(y) according to powers of x may be obtained


powers of y
by replacing y by the development just found,

f(y) =f(a)

(50)

and

this

+A

expansion holds for

The purpose

of

Lagrange

+ A 2 x* +

A,,x

all values of x between certain limits.

formula

AI,
terms of

A2

to determine the coefficients

is

-,

An

be noticed that this problem does not differ essentially


from the general problem. The coefficient A n is equal to the nth derivative of
f(y) for y = 0, except for a constant factor n!, where y is defined by (49); and
this derivative can be calculated by the usual rules.
The calculation appears to
be very complicated, but it may be substantially shortened by applying the fol
lowing remarks of Laplace (cf. Ex. 8, Chapter II). The partial derivatives of
in

a.

It will

the function y defined by (49), with respect to the variables x


by the formulae

whence we

and

a, are

find immediately
d

i*.i\

(51)

ox

where u =f(y).

On

the other hand,

da

da
it is

!
acJ

easy to show that the formula

W-

-!><*)

dx I

c>a

given

IX,

is

REAL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

189]

identically satisfied,

where F(y)

is

405

an arbitrary function of

y.

For either

side becomes

We

on performing the indicated differentiations.

for

shall

now

prove the formula

any value of n. It holds, by (51), for n = 1. In order to prove it in gen


assume that it holds for a certain number n. Then we shall have

eral, let us

dx + l

But we

also have,

from

(51)

da n

and

(51

~l

),

du

l-

cxj
ca L
ca [*]-[>*
L

caJ

whence the preceding formula reduces


cn +

dx

to the

form

Bn

which shows that the formula in question holds for all values of n.
Now if we set x = 0, y reduces to a, u to /(a), and the nth derivative of u
with respect to x is given by the formula

da"-

Hence the development

of f(y)

/(2/)=/(a)

by Taylor

+ z0(a)/

(a)

s series

becomes

(52)

It gives an expression for the


is the noted formula due to Lagrange.
shall find later the
root y which approaches zero as x approaches zero.

This

We

limits

between which

Note.

It follows

this

formula

is

applicable.

from the general theorem that the root

y,

considered as a

be represented as a double series arranged according


This series can be obtained by replacing each of the
to powers of x and a.
Hence the series (52) may
coefficients A n by its development in powers of a.
function of x and a,

may

be differentiated term by term with respect to

Examples.
(53)

1)

a.

The equation
y

+ ?(y*~l)

SPECIAL SERIES

40G

has one root which is equal to a when x


following development for that root

190

[IX,

0.

Lagrange

27

da

formula gives the

(54)

_J_M" d- (q2-l)n

1.2...nV27

On

the other hand, the equation (53)

may

do--

be solved directly, and

Vl

2ax

x2

its

roots are

The root which is equal to a when x = is that given by taking the sign ~~.
Differentiating both sides of (54) with respect to a, we obtain a formula which
differs from the formula (32) of
184 only in notation.
2)

Kepler

equation for the eccentric anomaly u,*

(55)

e sin

which occurs in Astronomy, has a root u which is equal to a f or e = 0.


formula gives the development of this root near e = in the form
(56)

1.2 da

Laplace was the

Lagrange

"

da-i

1.2..-n

show, by a profound process of reasoning, that this


series converges whenever e is less than the limit 0.662743
first to

190. Inversion.

Let us consider a series of the form

(57)

where

aix

a z x2

a n xn

from zero and where the interval of convergence is( r, + r).


If y be taken as the independent variable and x be
thought of as a function of y,
by the general theorem of 187 the equation (57) has one and only one root which
approaches zero with y, and this root can be developed in a power series in y
ai is different

(58)

The

coefficients bi, b 2

(57)

by

biy

-f

b2 y

b^y

bn

y"

63,
may be determined successively by replacing x in
expansion and then equating the coefficients of like powers of y.
The values thus found are
,

this

bi

&2

The value
Lagrange

of the coefficient bn of

formula.

3
,

af

the general term

may

be obtained from

For, setting
^(X)

the equation (57)

bs

a?

<*!

may

tti

a2 X

OnX n

~l

be written in the form


1

*See
p. 356.

p. 248,

TRANS.

Ex. 19; and ZIWET, Elements of T?teoretical


Mechanics, 2d

ed.,

IX,

REAL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

l!ii]

and the development


is given by Lagrange

of the root of this equation

formula

s
1

where the subscript

which approaches zero with y

form

in the

d-i

?/"

407

\"
"

indicates that

we

are to set x

after performing the

indicated differentiations.

The problem
191.

tion of

just treated has

sometimes been called the reversion of series.

we

Analytic functions. In the future


any number of variables x, y, z,

shall say that a func

is

analytic

developed, for values of the variables near the point x


in a power series arranged according to increasing

~x

o>

2/o

~z

"
o>

values of the differences x

if it

can be
z

powers of

which converges for sufficiently small


x
The values which ar y z
.

may
may be restricted by certain conditions, but we shall
not go into the matter further here. The developments of the pres
ent chapter make clear that such functions are, so to speak, inter
take on

Given one or more analytic functions, the operations of


integration and differentiation, the algebraic operations of multipli
cation, division, substitution, etc., lead to new analytic functions.
related.

Likewise, the solution of equations whose left-hand member is ana


Since the very simplest functions,

lytic leads to analytic functions.

such as polynomials, the exponential function, the trigonometric


functions, etc., are analytic, it is easy to see why the first functions
studied by mathematicians were analytic. These functions are still
predominant in the theory of functions of a complex variable and in

the study of differential equations.

Nevertheless, despite the funda


it must not be forgotten

mental importance of analytic functions,

that they actually constitute merely a very particular group


the whole assemblage of continuous functions.*
192. Plane curves.

Let us consider an arc

AB

among

of a plane curve.

We

AB

shall say that the curve is analytic along the arc


if the
coordinates of any point
which lies in the neighborhood of any
fixed point
of that arc can be developed in power series arranged

according to powers of a parameter


(59)

T"

y=

-rw-^o + aiC

to)+*2(t

=y +b
f(f)

which converge for


* In the second

whose derivatives

(t-

b z (t

y + ... + a n (t
- t y + + b n (t to

sufficiently small values of

volume an example of a non-analytic function


exist throughout an interval (a, b).

will be given, all of

SPECIAL SERIES

408

192

[IX,

A point 3/o will be called an ordinary point if in the neighbor


hood of that point one of the differences y
x can be
y x
as
a
of
the
series
in
other.
convergent power
represented
powers
for
can
be
in
a
series
in
If,
example, y
y
developed
power
x0)
x
,

(60)

^(x

>

ca

(x

H-----1- c n (x

H---- ,

h and -a- + h, the point (x y is


an ordinary point. It is easy to replace the equation (60) by two
equations of the form (59), for we need only set
for all values of x between x n

~)

(61)

from zero, which is the case in general, the equa


tion (60) may be solved for x
x in a power series in y
y which
is valid whenever y
is
In this case each of
y
sufficiently small.
the differences x
x , y
y can be represented as a convergent
If c v is different

power

series in

zero, that

axis.

is

In that

oped in a

powers of the

other.

This ceases to be true

to say, if the tangent to the curve


case, as

we

shall see presently,

series arranged according to fractional

It is evident also that at a point

is

if c t is

parallel to the

may

be devel

powers of y

where the tangent

is

parallel to

the y axis x
x can be developed in power series in y
yoy but
cannot
be
x
t/o
y
developed in power series in x
If the coordinates (a-, ?/) of a point on the curve are given by the
.

that point is an ordinary point if


equations (59) near a point
,
at least one of the coefficients a l} bi is different from zero.*
If a l
is

not zero, for example, the

in

powers of x

of y

t-t

in

first

equation can be solved for

and the second equation becomes an expansion


of
x
x when this solution is substituted for
powers
,

The appearance

of a curve at an ordinary point is either the cus


tomary appearance or else that of a point of inflection. Any point
which is not an ordinary point is called a singular point. If all

the points of an arc of an analytic curve are ordinary points, the


arc is said to be regular.
* This condition is
sufficient, but not necessary.
However, the equations of any
curve, near an ordinary point
may always be written in such a way that 04 and
b l do not both vanish, by a suitable choice of the parameter. For this is
actually

accomplished in equations

(61).

See also second footnote,

p. 409.

TRANS.

IX,

KEAL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

193]

and

If each of the coefficients a


is

different

the form (x

from zero, the


xu )* = (t

hand member

is

first
)

b v is zero,

409

but a 2 for example,


,

of equations (59)
----f a 8 (t
) -\

may

]*,

be written in

where the

developable according to powers of

t
t
is developable in powers of (x
if t
a^)*, and
second equation of (59) be replaced by that development,
a development for y
z )*
y in powers of (x

right-

Hence

in

we

the

obtain

In this case the point (z y is usually a cusp of the first kind.*


The argument just given is general. If the development of
x
x in powers of t
t
begins with a term of degree n, y
y
can be developed according to powers of (x
aThe appearance
).
of a curve given by the equation (59) near a point
(x y ) is of
,

~)

one of four types

a point with none of these peculiarities, a point


of inflection, a cusp of the first kind, or a cusp of the second kind.*
:

Skew curves.
skew curve is said to be analytic along an arc
the coordinates x, y, z of a variable point
can be developed
in power series arranged according to powers of a parameter t
t
193.

AB if

- n ---+
y
) +
t,} + -..,
(* SS K9 +Cl (t-tj + -~+ Cn (t - ) n +
f

(62)

=x +
=y +

ai(t

b, (t

-----h a n
*) H
(t

tu

-i

b n (t

in the

M
x

is

xoi y

so can be developed in
powers of the third.
z

y<

according to

-,

of the arc.
neighborhood of any fixed point
point
said to be an ordinary point if two of the three differences

power

series arranged

It can be shown, as in the preceding paragraph, that the


point
will surely be an ordinary point if not all three of the coefficients

a l ,b l

cl

vanish.

point must

Hence the value

of the parameter

for a singular

satisfy the equations f

^=

dy_

dt

dt

Q
U

dz_
dt

* For a
cusp of the first kind the tangent lies between the two branches. For a
cusp of the second kind both branches lie on the same side of the tangent. The
point is an ordinary point, of course, if the coefficients of the fractional powers
TRANS.
happen to be all zeros.
t These conditions are not sufficient to make the point 3f
which corresponds to
a value t of the parameter, a singular point when a point
of the curve near Jf
Such is
corresponds to several values of t which approach t as
approaches
the case, for example, at the origin on the curve defined by the equations x = t 3
,

SPECIAL SERIES

410
Let x

[IX,

z be the coordinates of a point


equations are given in the form

whose

F(x,y,z)=0,

(63)

where the functions Fand

The point

F,(x,

194

on a skew curve T

0,

</,*)=

are power series in x

will surely be an ordinary point if not all three of

the functional determinants

D(F, F,}

(F,

D(x, y)

FQ

D(F,

D(y, z)

FQ

D(z, x)

vanish simultaneously at the point x = x y = ?/ z = z


For if
the determinant D(F, Fi)/D(x, y), for example, does not vanish at
the equations (63) can be solved, by
X Q and y
188, for x
yQ
,

as

power

series in z

194. Surfaces. A surface S will be said to be analytic throughout


a certain region if the coordinates x, y, z of any variable point
can be expressed as double power series in terms of two variable
t
and u
HO
parameters t

x =
y
y =
=
U

ex
J

(64)

a 10 (t
b 10 (t
c

io(t

+
) +
+

oi( M

b 01 (u

<o)

- OH
-w)

c oi ( u

o)

-\

of that region, where


any
1 and
the three series converge for sufficiently small values of t
will
u
u
of
the
surface
be
said
to
be
an
point
ordinary
in the neighborhood of

point

if

fixed point

one of the three differences x

D(x, y}

D(z, x)^
D(t, u)

D(t, u)

can be

Every point

D(y, g)

expressed as a power series in terms of the other two.


for which not all three of the determinants

D(t, u)

vanish simultaneously is surely an ordinary point. If, for exam


ple, the first of these determinants does not vanish, the last two of
the equations (64) can be solved for t
equation becomes an expansion of x

and u

and the

first

x in terms of y

y and
u
these
values.
upon replacing
by
Let the surface S be given by means of an unsolved equation
F(x, y, z) = 0, and let x
y z be the coordinates of a point
of the surface.
If the function F(x, y, z) is a power series in
x
x y
zo) an(i ^ n t a ll three of the partial derivatives
z
z

o>

and u

y<

dF/dx 8F/8y 8F/dz vanish simultaneously, the point 3/


an ordinary point, by
188.
,

is

surely

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

IX,195J

411

The definition of an ordinary point on a curve or on a sur


be an
independent of the choice of axes. For, let 3/ (x y
)
Then the coordinates of any neigh
ordinary point on a surface S.
Note.

face

is

boring point can* be written in the form (64), where not all three of
the determinants D(y, z)/D(t, u), D(z, x)/D(t, u}, D(x, y)/D(t, it}
u
u
t
Let us now select any new
vanish simultaneously for t

axes whatever and let

A =

+ fay + yiz + 8
y -f y z + S
x + fay + y z + 8

ai x

Y= a^x +
Z=

a3

{3 2

be the transformation which carries

1}

the

x, y, z into

new

coordinates

X, Y, Z, where the determinant A = D(X, Y, Z)/D(x, y, z)


ent from zero.
Replacing x, y, z by their developments
we
obtain
three
analogous developments for X, Y, Z
(64),

is

differ

in series
;

and we

cannot have
1>(X,

Y}

for

ii

J^Z) =~ D(Z, X} =

Z>(

D(t, u)

J)(t, if)

D(t, u)

since the transformation can be written in the

X = A X + B Y+
y = A X + B Y+
z

form

C\Z + D ly
C Z + J9
= A X + B Y+C Z + D
1

and the three functional determinants involving


vanish simultaneously unless the three involving

.Y,

x, y,

Y,
z,

cannot

also vanish

simultaneously.

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

IV.

195. Calculation of the coefficients.

MISCELLANEOUS SERIES
The

series

which we

shall study

section are entirely different from those studied above.


Trigonometric series appear to have been first studied by D. Ber
in

this

noulli, in connection

with the problem of the stretched string. The


we are about to give,

process for determining the coefficients, which


is due to Euler.

Let
first

/(a:) be

a function defined in the interval

suppose that a and

tively,

which

is

have the values

TT

We shall
+ TT, respec

(a, &).

and

always allowable, since the substitution


x

(a -f 1}

2-7TX

7T

r-*o

* See footnote,
p. 408.

TRANS.

SPECIAL SERIES

412

Then

reduces any case to the preceding.


(65) /(#)

= -^ -f (i cos x + b

holds for

all

(tn

sin x)

\-

-\

values of x between

TT

and

195

[IX,

the equation

if

(am cos mx

TT,

+ & m sin mx)

where the

-\

coefficients

ao) a
a bm
are unknown constants, the following device
shall first write down
enables us to determine those constants.
i>

bi>

>---

m>

We

for reference the following formulae, which were established above,


for positive integral values of m and n
:

L
f
\J

sin

mx dx =

cos

= 0,

rfa;

if

cos wcc cos

nx dx

71

"

cos(m
^

ri)x
*

+ cos (m + ri)x rfx =

if

= TT,

if

m 3=

/cos

-mxdx =

r+

0;

"

sin

\J

dx

V/-7T

7T

(66)

m^

mx

sin

nx dx

cos

(m

7T

+*

n) x

r+
I

r+

7r
.

sm 2 ma;rfx=

sin

cos

(m

-f

n)x ^

o
2

C/-7T

"

"

cos 2mrc

^x

=TT,

ifw^O;

mx cos nx dx
77

sin

(m

+ n) x +

sin (TO

n)x

__

TT and -f
Integrating both sides of (65) between the limits
the right-hand side being integrated term by term, we find
/"

-\-

/^

7T

/(x) dx

J-TT

"t"

TT,

dx

7ra

/-

which gives the value of a


Performing the same operations upon
after
the equation (65)
having multiplied both sides either by cos mx
.

IX,

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

195]

413

or by sin mx, the only term on the right whose integral between
TT
and + TT is different from zero is the one in cos 2 mx or in sin 2 mx.

Hence we
+

find the formulae

"

mx dx =

f(x) cos

(*

7nz m ,

The values

respectively.

f(x) sin

\J

TT

follows

mx dx =

7rb m ,

TT

of the coefficients

be assembled as

may

=-

**

am

/(a) da,

t/

=-

/(a) cos

*i^/

(67)
bm

r +)r

f(a~) sin

I
"

T7 t/-n-

ma da,

jr

mar

c?nr.

The preceding calculation is merely formal, and therefore tenta


For we have assumed that the function f(x) can be developed

tive.

in the form (65), and that that development converges uniformly


between the limits
TT and -f TT.
Since there is nothing to prove,
a priori, that these assumptions are justifiable, it is essential that
we investigate whether the series thus obtained converges or not.

Eeplacing the coefficients a and

b{

simplifying, the

S m+l =

sum

+7r

fl

/()

-^

of the first

+ cos(a

a-)

by

(m +

from (67) and


seen to be

their values

1) terms

+ cos2(rt

is

1
-----

x}-\

\-COSm(a

x) \da.

But by a well-known trigonometric formula we have

-sin

+ cos a -f cos 2a +

+ cos m a =

2m -+1

>

2sm.

whence
.

sin

or, setting

(68)

=x
S

2m-+ 1
(a

a-)

-f-

The whole question is reduced to that of


sum as the integer m increases indefinitely.

finding the limit of this


In order to study this

question, we shall assume that the function f(x) satisfies the fol
lowing conditions
:

SPECIAL SERIES

414

The function f(x)

1)

and

TT,

except for

a,

between
c

and

we
we

shall call f(c


shall call f(c

approaches zero, f(c


+ 0). Likewise, f(c
0) as

we

-f-

c)

is

It

where f(x)
and /(TT

is

is

TT

value

e)

approaches a limit which


approaches a limit which
If the function f(x)

zero.

approaches
shall have /(c)

f(c
f(c + 0)
0), f(x)
to take the arithmetic mean of these values
=

for /(c).

its

in the following

continuous for x = c,

is

of values of x, for which

TT.

is

As

h.

number

196

manner. Let c be a number


For
value
of
c a number h can be found
+
any
continuous between c
h and c and also between

and

such that f(x)

between

shall be in general continuous

finite

may change suddenly


TT

[IX,

+ 0) =/(c 0). If
= c, and we shall agree
[/(c + 0) + f(c
0)]/2
f(c

discontinuous for x

evident that this definition of /(c) holds also at points


We shall further suppose that /( TT + e)

continuous.

which we

shall call /(
TT
0) and
zero
values.
through positive
approaches
/(TT
The curve whose equation is y f(x) must be similar to that of
have
Fig. 11 on page 160, if there are any discontinuities.
that
the
function
in
is
the
from
seen
interval
integrable
already
/(x)

approach

e)

limits,

0), respectively, as

We

to

TT

TT,

and

it is

evident that the same

is

true for the product

of f(x) by any function which is continuous in the


2) It shall be possible to divide the interval (
finite

number

of subintervals in such a

way

same
TT,

thaty(cr)

interval.

+ TT)

is

into a

a monoton-

ically increasing or a monotonically decreasing function in each of

the subintervals.

For brevity we shall say that the function f(x) satisfies Dirichlet s
conditions in the interval (
It is clear that a function
TT,
TT).

which
finite

is

number

Dirichlet

196.

for

<S

TO

continuous in the interval

TT,

maxima and minima

in

TT)

and which has a

that interval, satisfies

conditions.

f
(x) [sin nx/sin x] dx. The expression obtained
leads us to seek the limit of the definite integral

The
+1

of

integral

sin

nx

f(x) since dx
Jo

n becomes infinite. The first rigorous discussion of this ques


was given by Lejeune-Dirichlet.* The method which we shall
employ is essentially the same as that given by Bonnet. t
as

tion

* Crelle s Journal, Vol. IV, 1829.


t Mtmoires des savants etrangers publics par

Academic de Belgique, Vol. XXIII.

IX,

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

196]

Let us

first

415

consider the integral


r>h

./

(69)

nx

sin

<K*)~

dx
>

c/O

where h is a positive number less than TT, and


which satisfies Dirichlet s conditions in the interval

is

a function

<j>(x)

a constant C,
we may write

it is

is

easy to find the limit of


sink
I

sin

J=C\
Jo
and the limit of J

as

If
<f>(x)

For, setting y

= nx,

2-dy,

n becomes

Next suppose that

176.
infinite is CTr/2, by (39),
a positive monotonically decreasing

is
<f>(x)

function in the interval


all

/.

(0, A).

The integrand changes sign


Hence J may be written

(0, h).

for

values of x of the form kir/n.

j= Uo - Ul + u - u +
2

+ (- I) m

+ (- 1)*%- +

where

sn nx

"

Jk*

0",,

<

<

1,

dx

supposed to lie between mir/n and


Each of the integrals uk is less than the preceding.
(ra -f T)7r/n.
For, if we set nx = &TT + y in u k we find

and where the upper limit h

is

kw\

sin y

A:TT

it is evident, by the hypotheses regarding <(#), that this inte


Hence we shall have
gral decreases as the subscript k increases.

and

the equations
./

= UQ

which show that /


a positive number

lies

less

\Ml

between
than

ii

?/

But

and n

that

Jo

^4/

y^ s

^"i)

is

u^

It follows that

to say, less

is

than the integral

smnx
-dx.
x

this integral is itself less than the integral

Jo

where A denotes the value of the

definite integral //[(sin y)/y~\ dy.

416

SPECIAL SERIES

The same argument shows that the


.

[IX,

196

definite integral

sm nx

Xh *(x)- x -dx,
where

shown

any positive number less than h, approaches zero as n


If c lies between (i
l)?r/n and i-rr/n, it can be

c is

becomes

infinite.

as above that the absolute value of

"

nx

sin

<p(x)

Jc

than

is less

dx

snnx

Jiz
n

and hence, a fortiori,

less

than

_
c

Hence the integral approaches zero as n becomes infinite.*


This method gives us no information if c = 0. In order

to dis

cover the limit of the integral J, let c be a number between


and h, such that
is continuous from
to c, and let us set
<f>(x)

<l>(x)

<f>(c)

Then

\f/(x").

interval (0, c) from


value zero when x

J=

nx

/""sin

I
<(c)

JO

and then subtract

is

i^(a-)

the value

dx

we

i(-f 0),

(7r/2)<T

(70)

nx

sin

$(x)

Jo

/e
JO

in the

dx

when x

in

the

to the

form

-- dx

nx

sin

Jc

find

I
I

<(c)

write

0)

<(+

we

If

c.

and decreases

positive

f(x)

sinnx
-dx+
-^

,->

I
<#>(x)

Jc

smnir
x

In order to prove that ./ approaches the limit


(Tr/2)
0), it will
be sufficient to show that a number m exists such that the absolute
^>(+

* This result
of the

mean

may

be obtained even more simply by the use of the second theorem


Since the function
is a decreasing function,

for integrals (75).

<f>(r)

that formula gives


.

()

sin

nx

ax

0(c)

-J-J

sin

wx dx

and the right-hand member evidently approaches

-1

<f>M

-j*
zero.

(cos

nc

cosn|)

IX,

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

196]

value of each of the terms on the right


positive

made

number e/4 when n

is

417
than a preassigned

is less

greater than m.

the remark

By

above, the absolute value of the integral


sin

nx

ax

Jo
is less

than

A$(+

=A

0)

[<(+

0)

<(e)].

Since
<(z)

approaches

x approaches zero, c may be taken so near to zero that


A [>(+ 0) - (c)] and (7r/2)[>(+ 0) - (c)] are both less than e/4.
The number c having been chosen in this way, the other two terms
on the right-hand side of equation (70) both approach zero as n
becomes infinite. Hence n may be chosen so large that the abso
0) as

<(+

lute value of either of

them

(71)

We

is less

than

e/4.

It follows that

lim/=|*(+0).
A
(=QO
shall

now proceed

to

remove the various

restrictions

which

x ) ^ n the preceding argument. If


is
a monotonically decreasing function, but is not always positive, the
function \j/(x)
+ C is a positive monotonically decreasing func
tion from
to h if the constant C be suitably chosen.
Then the

have been placed upon

<f>(

<f>(x)

<f>(x)

formula (71) applies to


*

sinnx

(*

dx

(*)

JO

Moreover we may write

\j/(x).

= C

C h sinnx

sinnx
<K*)-

-dx-C

Jo

dx,
JO

and the right-hand side approaches the limit (w/2) \j/(-{that

is,

<#(+

0)

<(#)

Ch
I

Jo

Hence the

(?r/2) C,

0).

is a monotonically increasing function from


to
a monotonically decreasing function, and we shall have

If
is

(?r/2)

^(*)

sin nx
- dx = - C

sin

h,

<f>(x~)

nx
- dx.

t7o

in this case also.


(7r/2)<(+ 0)
that
is
function
which satisfies DirichFinally, suppose
any
let s conditions in the interval (0,
Then
the interval (0, A)
A).

integral approaches
<(#)

may

be divided into a finite

number

each of which

of subintervals

(0, a), (a, b),

a monotonically increasing
or decreasing function. The integral from
to a approaches the limit
of
Each
the
other
which are of the type
integrals,
(7T/2)
0).
(b, c),

-,

(7,

A), in

is

<f>(x~)

<(-)-

sinnx

=/
Ja

dx,

418

SPECIAL SERIES

approaches

For

zero.

if

is
<f>(x~)

[IX,

a monotonically increasing function,


can be formed
\j/(x)

for instance, from a to b, an


auxiliary function
in an infinite variety of
ways, which increases
to

b, is

continuous from

Then each

to a,

monotonically from
from a to b.

and coincides with

<f>(x)

of the integrals

sinnx

approaches

$(+

sinnx
<**,

/
t/O

which

107

0) as

n becomes

infinite.

Hence

their difference,

is

It follows that the formula


precisely H, approaches zero.
which satisfies Dirichlet s condi
(71) holds for any function
tions in the interval (0, h).
<f>(x)

Let us

now

f=f(x)dX)

(72)

where f(x)
to A.

consider the integral

is

(X/K7T,

a positive monotonically increasing function from


may be written

This integral

x n
ff x \
= C vf(
)~
1

Jo

and the function


tf>(x)

to h.

lim 7

(73)

-,

sill

= f(x) x/sin x

increasing function from


that

sm x J

is

dx,

a positive monotonically

Since /(+ 0)

= /(+

<(+

0), it follows

0).

This formula therefore holds

if
f(x) is a positive monotonically
function
from
to
h.
It can be shown by successive
increasing
as
that
the
restrictions upon f(x) can all be removed,
steps,
above,

and that the formula holds


Dirichlet

for

any function f(x) which

conditions in the interval (0,

satisfies

li).

197. Fourier series. A


trigonometric series whose coefficients are
given by the formulae (67) is usually called a Fourier series. Indeed
it was Fourier who first stated the theorem that
any function arbi

trarily defined in an interval of length 2?r may be represented by a


series of that type.
By an arbitrary function Fourier understood

a function which could be represented


graphically by several cur
vilinear arcs of curves which are
usually regarded as distinct curves.
shall render this rather vague notion
precise by restricting our
discussion to functions which
Dirichlet s conditions.

We

satisfy

IX,

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

197]

419

In order to show that a function of this kind can be represented


we must find the
by a Fourier series in the interval ( TT, + TT),
Let us divide
limit of the integral (68) as m becomes infinite.

two integrals whose limits of integration are


and let us
and (TT
(TT + x)/2 and 0, respectively,
r)/2, and
=
of
these
z
in
the
second
make the substitution y
integrals.
Then the formula (68) becomes

this integral into

sn
*

1
TT

When

lies

between

lie

Jo

between
and TT.

TT

ox

s,

Jf(x
v

and

sin

2z)

4-

TT,

(TT

Hence by the

(2m

sm

1) *

dz

a;)/2 and (TT


last article the

+ #)/2

both

right-hand

side of the preceding formula approaches

as

m becomes infinite.

It follows that the series (65) converges

and

TT and + TT.
sum is/(x) for every value of x between
Let us now suppose that x is equal to one of the limits of the
Then S m + may be written in the form
TT for example.
interval,

that

its

= -1

C*.,
J/(
7rJ

The

first

Setting y

TT

+
,

2y)

sin(2m4-1)// j
-dy
i

smy

TT
integral on the right approaches the limit /(
the
form
2 in the second integral, it takes
TT

0)/2.

sm*
Hence the sum of the trigonometric
= TT. It is evident
0)] /2 when x
0) +/(
that the sum of the series is the same when x = + TT.
we
If, instead of laying off x as a length along a straight line,

which approaches /(TT


series is [/(TT

lay

it off

0)/2.
TT

as the length of an arc of a unit circle, counting in the

420

SPECIAL SERIES

[IX,

197

positive direction from the point of intersection of the circle with


the positive direction of some initial
diameter, the sum of the series

any point whatever will be the arithmetic mean of the two limits
approached by the sum of the series as each of the variable points
ra and
taken on the circumference on opposite sides of ra,
m.
If the two limits /(
TT +
approaches
are
0) and f(ir
at

ra",

0)

different, the point of the circumference

on the negative direction

of the initial line will be a point of


discontinuity.

In conclusion, every function which


(

TJ

val

may

-f-

is defined in the interval


Dirichlet
s conditions in that inter
satisfies
be represented by a Fourier series in the same interval.

and which

"")

More generally, let f(x) T^e a function which is defined in an


interval (a, a
2?r) of length 2?r, and which satisfies Dirichlet s
conditions in that interval.
It is evident that there exists one and

only one function F(x) which has the period 2?r and coincides with
This function is represented, for
/(#) in the interval (a, a + 2?r).
all values of x, by the sum of a
trigonometric series whose coeffi
cients a m and b m are given by the formulas
(67):

am

The

F(r) cos

coefficient

a m for example,
,

r*

am

mx dx,

F(x) cos

*V-tte

bm

may

F(x) sin

mx dx

be written in the form

i
mx dx + -

r-

2 *-

F(x) cos

vj_ n

mx dx,

where a

is supposed to lie between 2hir


TT and 2hjr + TT.
Since
has
the period 2?r and coincides with
F(x}
f(x) in the interval
(a, a + 2?r), this value may be rewritten in the form

=~

/ (.r) cos

mx dx

2jr

f(x) cos

mx dx

ft

we should
bm

(75)

mx dx +

Jm*+m

,^a +

t/

^a: + 2T

!r

f(y) cos

V.

Similarly,

"

Ja

(74)

/l2

am

find

=~
"ft

Ja

f(x) sin

mx dx

Whenever a function f(x) is defined in any interval of length 2?r,


the preceding formulae enable us to calculate the coefficients of its
development in a Fourier series without reducing the given interval
to the interval

TT,

TT).

IX,

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

198]

198. Examples.
it

<

It

J-ir

r
JI -n

am

nm

If

by

Tt

Jo

dx

If

7T/4 for

is

it

is

odd, b m

cosmTT

cos(

mir)-

>

is

4/mir.

Multiplying

all

the coeffi

of the series

2m + 1

x
0, and + ff/4 for
and the sum of the series
<

<

-,

mit

sum

-i-

of discontinuity,

mx dx =

Jo

Sin3x

cos

T* sin mx ax
A =

see that the

(76)

r*
JQ

-\

Tt

is zero.

-\

j
sm mx dx

we

mxdx

7T/4,

<

It

J -T,

even, b m

is

<

cos

= ~I f
71

cients

dx

It

Let us find a Fourier series whose sum is


1 for
f or
x
+ it. The formulae (67) give the values

1)

+1

and

0,

<

421

<

<

The point x = is a point


when x = 0, as it should be.
when sin x is positive,
?r/4
it.

zero

is

More generally the sum of the series (76) is 7t/4


when sin x is negative, and zero when sin x 0.
The curve represented by the equation (76) is composed of an infinite number
of segments of length n of the straight lines y =
7T/4 and an infinite num
ber of isolated points (y

The

2)

0,

on the x

kit)

coefficients of the Fourier

axis.

development of x

in the interval

from

to

27T are

do

dm

1
-Tt

= -1

om

r-*
I

Tt

xdx

Jo

r2

2?r,

x cos mxdx

r2

rxcos?/ixl 2;r

"

x sin

-{

Jo

11171

\_

n Jo

c^
-mit Jo

rxsinmx-l 2 *

"

Jo

mx dx =

--1

-\

mit

\_

Jo

(**"

iwt Jo

sin

mx dx =

cos

2
mx dx = ---

Hence the formula


x

__

it

22

sinx

sin3x

sin 2x

is valid for all values of x between


and 2?r. If we set y equal to the series on
the right, the resulting equation represents a curve composed of an infinite num
ber of segments of straight lines parallel to y
x/2 and an infinite number of

isolated points.

Note.
to say,

if

function /(x) defined in the interval ( - Tt, + Tt) is even, that is


x) =/(x), each of the coefficients b m is zero, since it is evident that

If the

/(

nO
I

J-n
Similarly,

if

coefficients a m

/(x)
is

is

n-n

f(x) sin

mx dx

Jo

/(x) sin

mx dx

an odd function, that is, if /( x) =


a
A function /(x) which

zero, including

/(x),
is

each of the

defined only in

SPECIAL SERIES

422
the interval from

to

it

may

be defined

in the interval

of the equations

/(-*)= /()
if

we choose

by a

to

do

or

/(

z)

from

to

it

by either

= - f(x)

Hence the given function /(x) may be represented


by a series of sines, in the interval from to ic.

so.

199

[IX,

either

series of cosines or

199. Expansion of a continuous function. Weierstrass theorem.


function which is defined and continuous in the interval
(a,

Let /(z) be a

The following

6).

remarkable theorem was discovered by Weierstrass Given any


preassigned posi
tive number e, a polynomial
P(x) can always be found such that the difference
f(x)P(x) is less than e in absolute value for all values of x in the interval (a, 6).
Among the many proofs of this theorem, that due to Lebesgue is one of the
simplest.* Let us first consider a special function \j/(x) which is continuous in
:

the interval

and

and which is defined as follows ^(x) = for


Then \f/(x) =
1, where fc is a given constant.
x
+ 1 we shall have

(1, +1)

2kx for
Moreover for -

V (x)

<

<

<

(x -f

x 0,
x |) k.
<

<

same values

for the

<

of x the radical can be developed in a


uniformly con
It follows that
x|, and

vergent series arranged according to powers of (1 - x 2 ).


hence also i//(x), may be represented to any desired

degree of approximation in

the interval

by a polynomial.
Let us now consider any function whatever, /(x), which is continuous in
the interval (a, 6), and let us divide that interval into a suite of subintervals
ax
a2
ai), (a\ a 2 ),
(a,,_i a n ), where a = a
a n = 6,
a,,_i
1,

(<*oi

in such a

1)

<

<

<

<

<

that the oscillation of /(x) in any one of the subintervals is less


than e/2. Let L be the broken line formed by
connecting the points of the
curve y =f(x) whose abscissae are a a x a 2
b.
The ordinate of any point
on L is evidently a continuous function 0(x), and the difference
is
/(x)
less than e/2 in absolute value.
For in the interval (a M _!, aM ), for example,

way

<f>(x)

we

have

shall

/(x)

where x

a M _i

=
0(a M

0(x)

[/(x)

-/(<v_,)]

(1

a^_i).
unity, the absolute value of the difference/

The function

can be
</>(x)

6)

[/(x)

Since the factor d

split

up

into a

sum

is less
<f>

of

is

-/(aM )]

0,

positive

and

than

e(l

n functions

less

e)/2

than
e/2.

same type as
of L.
Then

of the

A n be the successive vertices


For, let A Q AI, A 2
equal to the continuous function
(x) which is represented throughout the
interval (a, 6) by the straight line A A l
extended, plus a function 0i(x) which
is represented by a broken line
A whose first side A Q A\ lies on the
A{
x axis and whose other sides are readily constructed from the sides of L.
Again,
the function fa (x) is equal to the sum of two functions 2 and
where f 2 is
^
2
zero between a and cti, and is represented by the
extended
straight line
V (x).

</>(x)

is

between
first

aj

and

while

represented by a broken line A(, Ai


whose
Finally, we shall obtain the equation
where
is a continuous function which vanishes
+
+
and o,-_i and which is represented by a segment of a
straight line
6,

three vertices

= fi +
between a

A\A i
A2
An

</"2

lie

</-

2 is

on the x axis.
,

* Bulletin des sciences


mathtmatiques,

p. 278, 1898.

IX,

TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES

200]

423

= mx + n, where m
between ai_i and b. If we then make the substitution
and n are suitably chosen numbers, the function \j/i(x) may be defined in the
interval (
1, + 1) by the equation
can be represented by a polynomial with any desired degree of
Since each of the functions f;(x) can be represented in the
interval (a, 6) by a polynomial with an error less than c/2n, it is evident that the
sum of these polynomials will differ from /(x) by less than e.

and hence

it

approximation.

It follows from the preceding theorem that any function f(x) which is contin
uous in an interval (a, b) may be represented by an infinite series of polynomials
e
be a sequence
which converges uniformly in that interval. For, let i c2
of positive numbers, each of which is less than the preceding, where e n approaches
zero as n becomes infinite. By the preceding theorem, corresponding to each of
,

a polynomial P(x) can be found such that the difference /(z)


P,(x)
Then the series
the interval (a, b).
e,- in absolute value throughout

the

e s

less

than

^1

(3)

+ P2 (X) t

Pi

(X)]

+ [Pn (X) - P.-i ()] +

For
which
Moreover the series con

converges, and its sum is/(x) for any value of x inside the interval
the sum of the first n terms is equal to P B (x), and the difference /(x)
is less

than

e,,

approaches zero as n becomes

is

infinite.

(a, b).
<S

Sn will be less
verges uniformly, since the absolute value of the difference /(x)
than any preassigned positive number for all values of n which exceed a certain
fixed integer

200.

N, when x has any value whatever between a and

continuous function without a derivative.

b.

We shall conclude this chapter

by giving an example due to Weierstrass of a continuous function which does


not possess a derivative for any value of the variable whatever. Let 6 be a posi
Then the function
tive constant less than unity and let a be an odd integer.
F(x) defined by the convergent infinite series
-r

F(x)

(78)

b"

cos

(a"

nx)

x, since the series converges uniformly in any


product ab is less than unity, the same statements
hold for the series obtained by term-by-term differentiation. Hence the func
We shall
tion F(x) possesses a derivative which is itself a continuous function.
is

continuous for

all

interval whatever.

now show that

values of

If the

the state of affairs

is

essentially different

if

the product ab exceeds

a certain limit.
In the

first

place, setting

m-l

Sm = -

b"

b"

(cos [a TT(Z

h)]

cos (a n TTX) }

{cos

h)]

cos

H=U
R, n

we may
(79)

[a"

TT(X

write
ffl*Li!fiL>.
h

.+*..

(a"

nx)}

SPECIAL SERIES
On

the other hand,

function

na n h
|

easy to show, by applying the law of the

it is

cos(a"7rz),

[IX,

that the difference

cos[a"7r(z

Hence the absolute value

in absolute value.
\

cos(a

h)]

Sm

of

mean

200

to the

itx) is less

than

than

is less

m-l
an b n

= n

ab-l

n=(l

and consequently also less than 7r(ab) /(ab 1),


lower limit of the absolute value of B m when h

We

always have

shall

where a m

an integer and m

is

= am +

am x
lies

/j

ab

assigned a particular value.

>1.

,,

+ 1/2.

1/2 and

between
p

Let us try to find a

if

is

If

we

set

5S

,
1
a"

where em is equal to
1, it is evident that the sign of h is the same aa that of
e m and that the absolute value of h is less than 3/2a m
Having chosen h in this
way, we shall have
an - n a m 7c(x + h) = an - m n(a m + e m ).
a"7f(x + h)
.

Since a

is

odd and

em

1,

the product an -

(a m

-f

am +

e m ) is

even or odd with

a m + 1, and hence
cos[a"7r(z

Moreover we

shall

coa(a

or, since

m am

a"~

n
7tx)

is

=
=

follows that

A)]

l)

m am
=
7rz)
- m a Tt cos
m )

cos(a"-

cos

(a"

even or odd with


CQS

It

have

we may

(fin 7f%\

am
1

m
cos[a"-

*(a m

m n)

"

(a"

m)]

^""*

m^

COS {a n

7T^

write
(

_ 1)g, +

*
i

"m

n
Since every term of the series is positive,
it is greater than 6 m since

consequently

or, since

\h\<

3/2a

its
,

sum is greater than the

lies

between

1/2 and

m
,

If

a and b satisfy the inequality


a6>l

(80)

we

shall

have
3

whence, by

ab-l

(79),

F(x

+ h)-

F(x)
>

|B|-|S n

a6-l

first

term, and

1/2.

Hence

EXERCISES

IX, Exs.]

425

As becomes infinite the expression on the extreme right increases indefinitely,


while the absolute value of h approaches zero.
Consequently, no matter how
be chosen, an increment h can be found which is less than
in abso
and for which the absolute value of [F(x + h)
F(x)~\/h exceeds any
preassigned number whatever. It follows that if a and b satisfy the relation (80),
small

lute value,

the function F(x) possesses no derivative for

any value of x whatever.

EXERCISES
1.

Apply Lagrange

formula to derive a development in powers of x of that


ay + x which is equal to a when x = 0.

root of the equation y 2

Solve the similar problem for the equation y

2.

xy m + l

Apply the

0.

result to the quadratic equation a


bx + ex 2
0.
Develop in powers of c that
root of the quadratic which approaches a/6 as c approaches zero.

Derive the formula

3.

l+x
Show

4.

that the formula

Vl +
holds whenever x

Show

5.

is

2 \1

greater than

2.4

x/

1/2.

that the equation


c

2 1

x2

holds for values of x less than

when x
|

>

4 \1

in absolute value.

G \1

x2

What

is

the

sum

of the series

1.2

Show

7.

and

powers

when sinx

respectively,
of sin x

m2 - 1

mx =

[Make use

2 2 0)
l)(m
sm s x + (m
sm 5 x
1.2.3.4.5
m 2 (m 2 -4) 4
sm x
1.2.3.4
.

?n 2
1

sin 2 x H

of the differential equation

satisfied

From

dy 2
is

sinmx and cosmx which reduce

are developable in series according 10

1.2.3
1.2

which

1-2.3

+*

L
cos

that the branches of the function

1,

sm mx = m f sm x

8.

Derive the formula

6.

to

x2 /

by u

dy

cosmx and by u = sinmx, where y

sinx.J

the preceding formulae deduce developments for the functions

cos (n arc cos x)

sin (n arc cos x)

CHAPTER X
PLANE CURVES
The curves and

surfaces treated in Analytic Geometry, properly

speaking, are analytic curves and surfaces. However, the geomet


rical concepts which we are about to consider involve only the exist
ence of a certain number of successive derivatives. Thus the curve

whose equation is y = f(x) possesses a tangent if the function f(x)


has a derivative / (#) it has a radius of curvature if / (#) has a
;

derivative

/"(cc);

and so

forth.

I.

ENVELOPES
Given a plane curve C whose

201. Determination of envelopes.

equation
(1)

f(x, y, a)

involves an arbitrary parameter a, the form and the position of the


If each of the positions of the curve C is
curve will vary with a.

tangent to a fixed curve E, the curve E is called the envelope of the


curves C, and the curves C are said to be enveloped by E.
The
before
is
to
establish
the
existence
us
problem
(or non-existence) of

an envelope for a given family of curves C, and to determine that


envelope when it does exist.

Assuming that an envelope E

exists, let (x, y] be the point of tanE


of
with
that
one
of
the
C which corresponds to a cer
curves
gency
tain value a of the parameter. The quantities x and y are unknown
functions of the parameter a, which satisfy the equation (1).
In

order to determine these functions, let us express the fact that the
tangents to the two curves E and C coincide for all values of a.

Let Sx and 8y be two quantities proportional to the direction cosines


of the tangent to the curve C, and let dx/da and dy/da be the
derivatives of the unknown functions x =
Then a
y = $(&)
<(),

necessary condition for tangency

is

dx
da

dy

da

C *
426

X,

ENVELOPES

201]

427

On the other hand, since a in equation (1) has a constant value for
the particular curve C considered, we shall have
(

+ ^Sy =
dy

sx

(3)

dx

0,

"

which determines the tangent to C. Again, the two unknown func


=
y = ^() satisfy the equation

tions x

<(),

f(x, y, a)

where a

also,

is

now

cfdx

oITda
ex

df
+ cfdt/
aj+a=
da
oa

combining the equations

cy

(2), (3),

The unknown functions x =


y
and the equation (1). Hence
<(),

an envelope

exists, is to be

and

(4),

= \f/(d) are solutions of this equa

tion
case

Hence

the independent variable.

(4)

or,

= 0,

the equation of the envelope, in

found by eliminating the parameter a

between the equations f


0, df/da = 0.
Let R(x, y)
be the equation obtained by eliminating a between
(1) and (5), and let us try to determine whether or not this equation

Let C be the particu


represents an envelope of the given curves.
which corresponds to a value a of the parameter, and let

lar curve

y ) be the coordinates of the point


(atwo curves
,

/(*, y, a

(6)

The equations
x

=
<f>(a),

(1)

*-

0,

of intersection of the

<>.

t/a

and (5) have, in general, solutions of the form


which reduce to x and y respectively, for

\j/(a),

Hence

ti

for a

aQ

we

dx \da/o

shall

c // Q

have

\da/o

This equation taken in connection with the equation (3) shows


that the tangent to the curve C coincides with the tangent to the
curve described by the point (x, y*), at least unless df/dx and

df/dy
unless the point
Q is a singular point for the
curve C
It follows that the equation R(x,
represents either
y)
the envelope of the curves C or else the locus
of singular points on
are both zero, that
.

these curves,

is,

PLANE CURVES

428
This result

may be

[X,

202

has

If each of the curves

supplemented.

one or more singular points, the locus of such points is surely a part
0.
of the curve R(x, y)
Suppose, for example, that the point (x, y)
Then x and y are functions of a which
a
is such
singular point.

satisfy the three equations


^\

f(x,y,a) = Q,

= 0,

/>

= 0,

0.
It follows that x and y
=
obtained
the
eliminating a between
by
equation R(x, y)
satisfy
In the general case the
0.
and df/Sa
the two equations /

and hence also the equation df/da

curve R(XJ y)
one of which

=
is

is

composed

two analytically

of

the true envelope, while the other

distinct parts,
the locus of

is

the singular points.

Example. Let us consider the family of curves

= /-2/ +
2

/(*,*/,)

The

-)

elimination of a between this equation and the derived equation

gives y*

(*

jf.

l,

= 0,
1.

which represents the three straight

The given family

by a translation of the curve

of curves

y*

+x =
2

lines

0,

may be generated
along the x axis.

This curve has a double point at the origin, and it is tangent to


I at the points where it cuts the
each of the straight lines y =
line
the
y = is the locus of double points,
straight
y axis. Hence
lines
two
the
whereas
y = 1 constitute the real envelope.
straight
202.

If the curves

C have an

envelope E, any point of the envelope

the limiting position of the point of intersection of two curves of


the family for which the values of the parameter differ by an infini

is

tesimal.

For, let
f(x, y, a)

(7)

f(x,y,a

0,

h)

two neighboring curves of the family. The


the points of intersection of the two
determine
equations (7), which
be
replaced by the equivalent system
curves, may evidently
be the equations of

f(x,

y,

a)

f(x,
0,

y,

h)-f(x,y,
-

a)

0,

X,

ENVELOPES

202]

429

as h approaches zero, that


the second of which reduces to Sf/da
two
curves
of
the
second
the
as
approaches the first. This prop
is,

In Fig. 37, a, for instance, the


of the two neighboring curves C and C
as C approaches the curve C
approaches the point of tangency
erty

is

fairly evident geometrically.

point of intersection

FIG. 37, b

as its limiting position. Likewise, in Fig. 37, b, where the given


curves (1) are supposed to have double points, the point of intersec
tion of two neighboring curves C and C approaches the point where

cuts the envelope as

The remark

just

made

approaches C.
explains

the locus of singular points

why

found along with the envelope. For, suppose that f(x, y, a) is a


?/ ) chosen at
polynomial of degree m in a. For any point
Q (x
is

random

in the plane the equation

(8)

/(.r

7,0,0

will have, in general,


distinct roots. Through such a point there
different curves of the given family. But if the
pass, in general,

point

lies

on the curve

R (or,

y)

= 0,

the equations

are satisfied simultaneously, and the equation (8) has a double root.
The equation R(x, y)
may therefore be said to represent the
locus of those points in the plane for which two of the curves of

the given family which pass through


one.

The

figures 37, a,

and

37,

b,

have merged into a single


clearly the manner in which

it

show

two of the curves through a given point merge into a single one as
that point approaches a point of the curve
R(x, y) = 0, whether on
the true envelope or on a locus of double points.

PLANE CURVES

430
It often

Note.

becomes necessary to

[X,

203

find the envelope of a family

of curves
F(x, y, a,

(9)

ft)

whose equation involves two variable parameters a and b, which


= 0. This case
themselves satisfy a relation of the form
ft)
does not differ essentially from the preceding general case, however,
for
may be thought of as a function of a defined by the equation
<f>(a,

ft

the rule obtained above, we should join with the given


the
equation
equation obtained by equating to zero the derivative
of its left-hand member with respect to a
<

0.

By

dFdt __
-n

dp
~0

07

ca

But from the

relation

ft)

<f>(a,

d(fr

we have
db
da

d<f>

da

"

da

co

db

also

whence, eliminating db/da, we obtain the equation

_
da db

db

da

and
The parameters a and

required envelope.
between these three equations
203. Envelope
of a straight line

<f>

ft

if

0,

may

determine the
be eliminated

desired.

As an example

of a straight line.

F=

which, together with the equations

let

us consider the equation

D in normal form
zcosa + y

(11)

where the variable parameter

is

with respect to this parameter,

0,

f(a)

the angle a.
Differentiating the left-hand side
find as the second equation

we

xsinct

(12)

sin

y cos

f(a)

0.

These two equations (11) and (12) determine the point of intersection of any
one of the family (11) with the envelope E in the form

(x=f(a)cosa -f
y = f(a) sin a + f

It is

(a) sin
(a) cos

a,

which is described by this


easy to show that the tangent to the envelope
For from the equations (13) we find
the line D.
(z, y) is precisely

point

whence dy/dx

cot

dx

dy

= - [/() + /"()] sin a da


= [/(a) +
cos a da

a which
,

/"(a)]

is

precisely the slope of the line D.

X,

ENVELOPES

203]

Moreover,
point upon

if

it,

431

denote the length of the arc of the envelope from any fixed

we

have, from (14),


ds

dy*

[/(a)

/"(a)]

da-

whence

da

+/

[//(or)

Hence the envelope

known

for /(a) the derivative of a

As an example

let

(<*)].

be a curve which

will

easily rectifiable

if

we merely choose

function.*

us set f(a)

sin

we

cessively in the equation (11),

is

cos a.

Taking y

find (Fig. 38)

OA =

AB

= I. The required
respectively hence
curve is therefore the envelope of a straight
line of constant length Z, whose extremities
;

The formulae

on the two axes.

lie

always

= suc
OB = Zcosa,

and x

sin a,

(13) give in this case

sin 3

and the equation

cos 3

a-

of the envelope

-A*

is

AA?

if*-

which represents a hypocycloid with four


cusps, of the form indicated in the figure.
As a varies from to 7T/2, the point of con
tact describes the arc

DC.

s=

p IG

Hence the length


3 1 sin

of the arc, counted

a cos a da =

sin 2

Jo

from D,

is

a.

Let I be the fourth vertex of the rectangle determined by OA and OB, and
the foot of the perpendicular let fall from / upon AB.
Then, from the tri
angles AMI and APM, we find, successively,

AM = AI cos a =
Hence

AP = sin
AB with the envelope.

OP = OA

the line

cos 2

AP = AM sin a =

a, and the point


Moreover

is

cos 2

a sin a

the point of tangency of

BM = l-AM=lsm*a;
hence the length of the arc

Each

DM = 3BM/2.

which occur

of the quantities

in the

formula for

s,

= f (a) + ff(a)

daf,

the angle between the x axis and the perpendicular


let fall upon the variable line from the origin
is the distance
from the
from
origin to the variable line; and /
is, except for sign, the distance
the point
where the variable line touches its envelope to the foot
of the perpen

has a geometrical meaning

is

ON

dicular let fall upon the line from the origin.

Legendre

formula.

ON

f(<x)

(<*)

The formula

MN

for 5 is often called

PL AXE CURVES

432
204. Envelope of a

where

a, 6,

[X,

Let us consider the family of

circle.

and p are functions

of a variable

parameter

204

circles

The

t.

points where a

circle of this family touches the envelope are the points of intersection of the
circle

and the straight

line
(x

(16)

This straight line

by the center

is

a) a

(y

b) b

and

the variable circle (15),

M T to the curve C described

perpendicular to the tangent

(a, 6) of

pp

its

distance from the center

p dp/ds, where

is

denotes the length of


the arc of the curve C measured from

some

fixed point.

Consequently, if the
meets the circle in the two

line (16)

points
bisected

and
the chord
T
by the tangent

angles.
consists

of

/<j[

It follows

two

NN

is

at right

that the envelope

which

parts,

are,

in

general, branches of the same analytic


curve.
Let us now consider several
special cases.
1) If

tact

NN

is

constant, the chord of con

reduces to the normal

PP

to

the curve C, and the envelope is com


posed of the two parallel curves C\ and

FIG. 39

C{ which are obtained by laying off the constant distance p along the normal,
on either side of the curve C.
reduces to the tan
2) If p = s + K, we have p dp/ds = p, and the chord
gent to the circle at the point Q. The two portions of the envelope are merged
into a single curve T, whose normals are tangents to the curve C. The curve C
is called the evolute of T, and, conversely, T is called an involute of C
(see
206),
If dp
ds, the straight line (16) no longer cuts the circle, and the envelope is

NN

>

imaginary.

Secondary caustics.

Let us suppose that

the radius of the variable circle


tional to the distance

is

propor

from the center to a

fixed point 0. Taking the fixed point O as


the origin of coordinates, the equation of the

becomes

circle

where

A; is a constant
factor,
of the chord of contact is

(x
If 8

a)

and

(y

b)

and the equation

k*(aa

E
+

bb

0.

FIG. 40

denote the distances from the

center of the circle to the chord of contact and to the parallel to


2
origin, respectively, the preceding equation shows that 5 = k d

through the
Let P be a
k*MO, and let C be the
.

point on the radius

MO

(Fig. 40),

such that

MP =

it

X,

CURVATURE

05]

the equation just found shows that the chord of con

Then

locus of the center.

433

the perpendicular let fall from


upon the tangent to C at the center M.
denote that branch of the
Let us suppose that k is less than unity, and let
as does the point 0.
which lies on the same side of the tangent

tact

is

MT

envelope

Let

MN

MO

the two angles which the two lines


r, respectively, denote
make with the normal MI to the curve C. Then we shall have

and

_
=

Mq

~_ Mp

sin

_ Mq _ MQ _

~~

and

M~ MP~ k

Now let us imagine that the point is a source of light, and that the curve C
which O lies from another medium
separates a certain homogeneous medium in
whose index of refraction with respect to the first is l/k. After refraction the
will be turned into a refracted ray MR, which, by the law of
incident

OM

ray

MR

Hence all the refracted rays


the extension of the line NM.
are normal to the envelope, which is called the secondary caustic of refraction.
The true caustic, that is, the envelope of the refracted rays, is the evolute of the
refraction,

is

secondary caustic.
The second branch
it

would correspond

of the envelope evidently has

to a negative index of refraction.

no physical meaning
If

we

set k

1,

the

becomes the locus


reduces to the single point 0, while the portion
with respect to the tangents to C.
of the points situated symmetrically with
This portion of the envelope is also the secondary caustic of reflection for inci
envelope

dent rays reflected from C which issue from the fixed point 0. It may be shown
in a manner similar to the above that if a circle be described about each point of
C with a radius proportional to the distance from its center to a fixed straight
the envelope of the family will be a secondary caustic with respect to a
system of parallel rays.
line,

II.

205. Radius of curvature.

CURVATURE
The

first

idea of curvature

is

that the

greater than that of another if it recedes


more rapidly from its tangent. In order to render this somewhat
vague idea precise, let us first consider the case of a circle. Its

curvature of one curve

is

curvature increases as

its

radius diminishes

it

is

therefore quite

curvature the simplest func


tion of the radius which increases as the radius diminishes, that
Let AB be an arc of a circle
of the radius.
is, the reciprocal
natural to select as the measure of

its

l/R

subtends an angle o at the center. The angle


and
between the tangents at the extremities of the arc AB is also
Hence the measure of the curva
the length of the arc is s =
This last definition may be extended to
ture of the circle is w/s.
of radius

R which

<o,

R<a.

Let AB be an arc of a plane curve without a


at the
point of inflection, and w the angle between the tangents
extremities of the arc, the directions of the tangents being taken
the direction from A
in the same sense according to some rule,
an arc of any curve.

434

PLANE CURVES

toward B, for instance.

Then the quotient w/arc

AB

is called

the

the point B approaches the


this quotient in general approaches a limit, which is called
the curvature at the point A.
The

As

average curvature of the arc AB.


point

[X,205

radius of curvature at the point A is


defined to be the radius of the circle

which would have the same curvature


which the given curve has at the point

it is

therefore equal to the recipro


Let s be the

cal of the curvature.

length of the arc of the given curve

measured from some fixed point, and


a the angle between the tangent and

FIG. 41

some

fixed direction,

the x axis, for example.

Then

it is

clear

that the average curvature of the arc AB is equal to the absolute


value of the quotient Aa/A.s hence the radius of curvature is given
;

by the formula

R=

As

,.

lim

Aa

dsart

Let us suppose the equation of the given curve to be solved for y


in the form y =f(x).
Then we shall have

= arc tan y

da

y"dx
y
"

ds

and hence
(

*=

17
>

y,,

Since the radius of curvature


indicates that

we

essentially positive, the sign


are to take the absolute value of the expression
is

on the right. If a length equal to the radius of curvature be laid


from A upon the normal to the given curve on the side toward
which the curve is concave, the extremity / is called the center of
off

curvature.

The

circle described

about 7 as center with

called the circle of curvature.


The coordinates (x
center of curvature satisfy the two equations
is

R
,

as radius
)

of the

which express the fact that the point lies on the normal at a dis
tance R from A.
From these equations we find, on eliminating x l}

X,

CURVATURE

205]

In order to

tell

435

which sign should be taken,

us note that

let

if

y"

is

y must be positive hence the positive


positive, as in Fig. 41, y^
is negative, y
y is nega
should be taken in this case. If
;

sign

y"

tive,

and the positive sign should be taken in

this case also.

The

coordinates of the center of curvature are therefore given by the

formulae
1

(18)

**-*=-

yi-9*=jf->

1
,

fT-

the coordinates of a point (x, y) of the variable curve are


we have, by 33,
given as functions of a variable parameter t,

When

and the formulae (17) and (18) become


jz

+ dy*?

(dx*

**

j
}

dy(dx*

+ dif~)
&x
=

dxd y-dyd*x
2

and the radius of curvature is


first kind y can be developed according
hence
to powers of x l/2 in a series which begins with a term in x
of
radius
the
therefore
is infinite, and
y has a finite value, but

At a point of inflection
At a cusp of the
infinite.

y"

0,

y"

curvature

is zero.

When

Note.

the coordinates are expressed as functions of the arc s of the

curve,

x
the functions
<f>

and f

<P(s)

dy2

da 2

(/>"

Solving these equations for

where

(20)

and hence they


<

cially elegant

f (a)

satisfy the relation


2(S)

since dx 2

<

and

\f/

+
,

/2

(S)=1,

also satisfy the relation

-fy

^i"

we

find

and the formula for the radius of curvature takes on the espe
form

1,

s[*

PLANE CURVES

436

[X,

206

206. Evolutes. The center of curvature at


any point is the limit
ing position of the point of intersection of the normal at that point
with a second normal which approaches the first one as its
limiting
For the equation of the normal is
position.

where

and

Y are

the running coordinates.

In order to find the

limiting position of the point of intersection of this normal with


another which approaches it, we must solve this equation simulta

neously with the equation obtained by equating the derivative of the


left-hand side with respect to the variable parameter x,

i.e.

The value of Y found from this equation is precisely the ordinate


of the center of curvature, which proves the proposition. It follows
that the locus of the center of curvature is the envelope of the
normals of the given curve,

i.e.

its

evolute.

Before entering upon a more precise discussion of the relations


between a given curve and its evolute, we shall explain certain con
ventions.

Counting the length of the arc of the given curve in a


from a fixed point as origin, and denoting by a the

definite sense

angle between the positive direction of the x axis and the direction
of the tangent which corresponds to increasing values of the arc,
we shall have tan a
y and therefore

cos

On the right the sign -f- should be taken, for if x and s increase
simultaneously, the angle a is acute, whereas if one of the varia
bles x and s increases as the other decreases, the angle
is obtuse
81).

Likewise,

tangent, cos

(3

if (3

dy/ds.

COS

denote the angle between the y axis and the


The two formulae may then be written
or

= dx
as

where the angle a

is

>

Sin

~
= dy

-j

as

counted as in Trigonometry.

On

the other hand, if there be no point of inflection upon the


given arc, the positive sense on the curve may be chosen in such a
way that s and a increase simultaneously, in which case R
ds/da

along the arc. Then it is easily seen by examining the two


possible cases in an actual figure that the direction of the segment
all

X,

CURVATURE

206]

437

starting at the point of the curve and going to the center of curva
a -f 7r/2 with the x axis. The coordinates
ture makes an angle a 1
f the center of curvature are therefore given by the formulae
X
L
y\)
(

>

xl

+ R cos

=x

sin a,

"/

=
+
(\
a

+ R cos a,

whence we find
cfaj
efo/!

In the

=
=

cos

ads

cos

a da

sin

ads

sin

tZa

a dR

show that dy l /dx l

these formulas

first place,

=
+ cos a dR =
sin

sin

a cR,

cos

rf7?

cot a,

which

proves that the tangent to the evolute is the normal to the given
Moreover
curve, as we have already seen.

ds\

or dsi

dx\

dy\

dR*

Let us suppose for definiteness that the radius

dR.

of curvature constantly increases as we proceed along the curve C


and let us choose the positive sense of
l to Jl/2
(Fig. 42) from

motion upon the evolute (D) in such a way


that the arc s 1 of

(Z))

increases simultane

Then the preceding formula


becomes d$i = dR, whence s t = R + C. It
R 1} and we
follows that the arc /!/2 = R 2
ously with R.

see that the length of any arc of the evolute


equal to the difference between the tivo

is

radii of curvature of the curve C which cor


respond to the extremities of that arc.

This property enables us to construct the


be
involute C mechanically if the evolute

(Z>)

FIG. 42

If a string be attached to (D) at an


arbitrary point A and rolled around (D) to /2 , thence following the
given.

tangent to

the point

string, now held


struction may be

taut,

is

will describe the involute

wound

as the

This con

further on round
(Z>).

stated as follows

On

each of the tangents

IM of

where I + s
the evolute lay off a distance IM
const., s being
I,
values
various
the length of the arc AI of the evolute.
Assigning
to the constant in question, an infinite number of involutes may be
drawn, all of which are obtainable from any one of them by laying
off

constant lengths along the normals.

PLANE CURVES

438
All of these properties

may

[X,

be deduced from the general formula

for the differential of the length of a straight line

dl

dar 1

207

COS

(Zcr 2

(D!

COS

o>.

segment

82)

segment is tangent to the curve described by one of its


extremities and normal to that described by the other, we may set
= 7T/2, and the formula becomes dl da^ = 0. If the
TT, w.2
straight line is normal to one of the two curves and Z is constant,
= 0, and therefore cos 2 = 0.
dl = 0, cos
The theorem stated above regarding the arc of the evolute depends
essentially upon the assumption that the radius of curvature con
If
stantly increases (or decreases) along the whole arc considered.
this condition is not satisfied, the statement of the theorem must
In the first place, if the radius of curvature is a maxi
be altered.
mum or a minimum at any point, dR = at that point, and hence
Such a point is a cusp on
dxi = dy l = 0.
If the

<0l

o>

<DI

the evolute.

(Fig. 43),

for example, the radius


at the point

If,

of curvature

is

we

maximum

shall

have

= IM
arc 77, = IM -

arc//!

A-!/!,

72 3/a

whence
arc /! 7/2

2 737
t

to the difference
207. Cycloid.
circle

which

72

72
Hence the difference 7
77
and
not
and
arcs
the
two
between
2
Hi

is

equal

their sum.

cycloid is the path of a point upon the circumference of a


without slipping on a fixed straight line. Let us take the

The

rolls

n
Fio. 44
fixed line as the

x axis and locate the origin at a point where the point chosen on
When the circle has rolled to the point 7 (Fig. 44)

the circle lies in the x axis.

the point on the circumference which

was

at

has come into the position M,

X,

CURVATURE

207]

439

where the cirenlar arc IM is equal to the segment OI. Let us take the angle
between the radii CM and CI as the variable parameter. Then the coordinates
of the point

M are

= 01 - IP =

- E sin 0,

R(f>

MP = 1C + CQ = R

- R cos 0,

on the two lines 01 and IT, respec


where
and Q are the projections of
It is easy to show that these formulae hold for any value of the angle 0.
tively.
In one complete revolution the point whose path is sought describes the arc
If the

OBO\.

motion be continued

=
y =

sin

R(l

and the slope

cos 0)

dx

<p)

R(<}>

dy

of the tangent

is

0/2, the triangle

d<f>
<(>)

d-x

d*y

infinite

number

find

= Rsin0d0 2
= .Rcos0 d0 2

seen to be
sin

dx

MTC =

the preceding formulae

= R(l cos
= R sin d0

dy ~
which shows that the tangent

we obtain an
we

indefinitely,

From

of arcs congruent to this one.

at

cot

cos

MTC being

the straight line


T, since the angle
Hence the normal at
is the

is

isosceles.

MI

straight line
through the point of tangency I of the fixed straight line with
the moving circle.
For the length of the arc of the cycloid we find
(Zs 2

if

= E2 d02 [sin 2 +

(1

cos 0) 2 ]

= 4R 2 sin 2 - d0 2

the arc be counted in the sense in which

the arc from the point

as origin,

we

<f>

= 2it, we

ds

= 2R sin

4fi(

~ d0

Hence, counting

have

1-cos-Y
2/

OBO

find that the length of one whole section


t is 8R.
is therefore 4.R,
from the origin to the maximum

OMB

length of the arc


the length of the arc

2i

increases with 0.

it

shall

V
Setting

or

The
and

BM (Fig. 44) 4R cos 0/2. From the triangle MTC the


2R cos 0/2 hence arc BM 2MT.
length of the segment MT
is

is

Again, the area up to the ordinate through

A=

f
Jo

ydx= JoC E 2 (l-2cos0 +

sin

2
A= /3-0-2sm0 + - 20\
4 ^)#
V"

is

cos 2 0)d0

Hence the area bounded by the whole arc OBOi and the base OOi
is,

three times the area of the generating circle.

is 37T.K 2 ,

that

(GALILEO.)
The formula for the radius of curvature of a plane curve gives for the cycloid

PLANE CURVES

440

[X,

208

On the other hand, from the triangle MCI, MI = 2R sin 0/2. Hence p = 23fl,
and the center of curvature may be found by
extending the straight line MI
This fact enables us to determine the evolute
past I by its own length.
easily.

For, consider the circle which is symmetrical to the generating circle with
Then the point
respect to the point I.
where the line
cuts this second
circle is evidently the center of
l = MI. But we have
curvature, since

MI

arc

TtR

arc

or

BOi, the point

OB

IM =

TtR

arc

IM = nE -

= OH - OI = IH = T E

BB

already described, with respect to

appearance

describes a cycloid which is congruent to the first one, the


and the maximum at O. As the point
describes the arc
describes a second arc B Oi which is symmetrical to the arc
.

208. Catenary. The catenary is the plane curve


to a suitably chosen set of
rectangular axes is

Its

01,

Hence the point


cusp being at

arc

is

indicated by the arc

MAM

whose equation with respect

in the figure (Fig. 45).

FIG. 45

From

(21)

we

find

denote the angle which the tangent


for y gives
If

X
e~ a

ea

ea

The radius

of curvature

is

cos0

MPN,

en

given by the formula

y"

But, in the triangle

TM makes with

MP =

MNcostf,- hence

COS

=
e

"

a2

the x axis, the formula

a
-

X,

CURVATURE

209]

It follows that the

the normal

MN.

The length

radius of curvature of the catenary is equal to the length of


evolute may be found without difficulty from this fact.

The

of the arc

AM of

the catenary

px e a

y sin

tangent

If
<f>.

MT, we

_y
e

dx

Jo
or s

441

given by the formula

is

a I *
a
-

_ *\
1

2\

Pm

a perpendicular
be dropped from
from the triangle PMm,

(Fig. 46)

upon the

find,

Mm = MP sin = s

<f>

Hence the arc


209.

AM

is

Mm.

equal to the distance

The curve described by the point m (Fig. 45) is called the


an involute of the catenary and has a cusp at the point A. The

Tractrix.

tractrix.

It is

length of the tangent to the tractrix is the distance mP. But, in the triangle
= a hence the length
measured along the tangent to
y
the tractrix from the point of tangency to the x axis is constant and equal to a.

MPm, mP =
The

tractrix

is

mP

cos</>

the only curve which has this property.

Moreover, in the triangle


TP,
radius of curvature and the normal
is

Mm
is

mT = a

2.

Hence the product

a constant for the tractrix.

of the

This property

shared, however, by an infinite number of other plane curves.


The coordinates (xi, y\) of the point TO are given by the formulae

x\

x/ a
or, setting e

cos

(f>

eu

e ~a

tan 0/2, the equations of the tractrix are

xi

(22)

a cos

a log (tan-

As the parameter 8 varies from n/2 to n, the point (x l y v ) describes the


Amn, approaching the x axis as asymptote. As varies from n/2 to 0,
,

point (xi yi) describes the arc


the y axis. The arcs Amn and
,

and

AM

Am n
Am n

symmetrical to the

first

with respect to

correspond, respectively, to the arcs

210. Intrinsic equation. Let us try to determine the


equation of a plane
when the radius of curvature R is given as a function of the arc s,
=
Let a be the angle between the tangent and the x axis then
= ds/da, and therefore
ds
ds
<f>(s).

da =

AM

of the catenary.

curve

E
R

arc

the

first

integration gives

a=

tt

ds
-

*()

PLANE CURVES

442

and two further integrations give x and y


x

XQ

+J

cos

a ds

[X,

in the

form

+ f

sin

J *o

*o

a ds

210

The curves defined by these equations depend upon the three arbitrary con
But if we disregard the position of the curve and think
2/o, and a

stants x

only of its form, we have in reality merely a single curve.


sider the curve C defined by the equations

the general formulae

For,

if

we

first

con

be written in the form

may

X cos
X n

=x +
= 2/0 +

si

O-Q
<*o+

Y cos

cr

the positive sign be taken. These last formulae define simply a transforma
If the negative sign be selected, the curve obtained
tion to a new set of axes.
A plane curve is
axis.
is symmetrical to the curve C with respect to the
if

therefore completely determined, in so far as its form is concerned, if its radius


The equation B
#(s) is
of curvature be known as a function of the arc.
More generally, if a relation between
called the intrinsic equation of the curve.

any two of the quantities B, s, and a be given, the curve is completely deter
mined in form, and the expressions for the coordinates of any point upon it
be obtained by simple quadratures.
For example, if B be known as a function of a,
ds = /(a) da, and then
dx = cos af(a) da,

may

dy

sin

af(a) da

B =/(), we

first

find

If J? is a constant, for instance,

whence x and y may be found by quadratures.


these formulae give

and the required curve


from the consideration

XQ
is

+ B sin a

B cos a

This result

a circle of radius B.

is

otherwise evident

of the evolute of the required curve, which must reduce


to a single point, since the length of its arc is identically zero.
As another example let us try to find a plane curve whose radius of curva

ture

is

proportional to the reciprocal of the arc,

B=

a?/s.

The formulas

give

ds

and then

Although these integrals cannot be evaluated in explicit form, it is easy to gain


an idea of the appearance of the curve. As s increases from to + cc, x and y
each pass through an infinite number of maxima and minima, and they approach
Hence the curve has a spiral form and approaches
the same finite limit.
asymptotically a certain point on the line y

x.

CONTACT OSCULATION

X,2ll]

CONTACT OF PLANE CURVES

III.

211. Order of contact.

C and C

Let

be two plane curves which


on C let us assign,

To every point

are tangent at some point A.

according to

443

any arbitrary law whatever, a point

on C

the only

requirement being that the point


should approach A with m. Taking
the

a.TcAm

what amounts

or,

to

Am

the same thing, the chord


the principal infinitesimal, let us

what law of correspond

investigate

make the

ence will

as
first

order of the infin

mm

with respect to Am as
large as possible. Let the two curves
be referred to a system of rectangular
itesimal

or oblique cartesian coordinates, the axis of

common tangent AT.

y not being parallel

to

the

Let

(C)

</=/(*),

(C")

Y=F(x)

be the equations of the two curves, respectively, and let (o


y ) be
the coordinates of the point A.
Then the coordinates of
will
be [a- -f h, f(x -f A)], and those of
will be [#
k, F(x Q
&)],
,

m
+

where k is a function of h which defines the correspondence between


the two curves and which approaches zero with h.

Am

The principal infinitesimal


may be replaced by h
ap, for
the ratio ap/Am approaches a finite limit different from zero as the

m approaches the point A. Let us now suppose that


is
an infinitesimal of order r -f 1 with respect to h, for a certain

mm

point

method of correspondence. Then mm


denote the angle between the axes, we

mm = [F(x +
1

/(*

jfe)

+ *) + (k-

is

of order 2r

h) cos

be an infinitesimal of order not less than r -f

where a and
approaches

/3

-f

a h,* +

F(x

are functions of h

zero.

The second

k)

-f(x

OJ

h and F(x

hence each of the differences k

1,

k)
f(x
that is,

+ A) =

which approach

of these formulae

a/t^ 1 )

If 6

2
2
A) sin 6

(k

-f(x +

A)

must

finite limits as

may

= fih

+ A)

ph +\

*1

be written in

the form

F(x

+ 2.

shall have

PLANE CURVES
If the expression

F(x

+h+

[X,2ii

ah r+l ) be developed

in

powers of

a,

the terms which contain a form an infinitesimal of order not less

than r

Hence the

-f 1.

&
is

difference

F(x Q

an infinitesimal whose order

+ h)-f(x +
is

h)

not less than r

+1

and may exceed

equal to the distance mn between


are cut by a parallel
the two points in which the curves C and
of
order
the
infinitesimal
Since the
to the y axis through ra.
r

But

1.

this difference

is

C"

mm

is

increased or else unaltered by replacing

by

n, it

follows that

the distance between two corresponding points on the two curves is an


infinitesimal of the greatest possible order if the two corresponding

points always
ble order is r

on a parallel to the y axis. If this greatest possi


1, the two curves are said to have contact of order r

lie

at the point A.

This definition gives rise to several remarks. The y axis


whatever not parallel to the tangent A T. Hence, in
order to find the order of contact, corresponding points on the two
Notes.

was any
curves

line

may be

defined to be those in which the curves are cut by


any fixed line D which is not parallel to the tan

lines parallel to

The preceding argument shows that


gent at their common point.
the order of the infinitesimal obtained is independent of the direc
tion of

7),

a conclusion which

is

easily verified.

Let

mn

and

mm

of the curve C which are not


be any two lines through a point
Then, from the triangle
parallel to the common tangent (Fig. 46).

mm

n,

mm

sin

mn

sin

mm

mnm and mm n
which is zero or TT, since the chord m n
approaches the tangent AT. Hence mm /mn approaches a finite
limit different from zero, and mm is an infinitesimal of the same
The same reasoning shows that mm cannot be of
order as mn.
order
than
higher
mn, no matter what construction of this kind is
used to determine m from m, for the numerator sin mnm always
approaches a finite limit different from zero.
The principal infinitesimal used above was the arc Am or the
chord Am. We should obtain the same results by taking the arc
An of the curve C for the principal infinitesimal, since Am and An
are infinitesimals of the same order.
As the point

approaches the point A, the angles

approach limits neither of

X,

CONTACT

212]

OSCULATION

445

two curves C and C have a contact of order r, the points m


on C may be assigned to the points m on C in an infinite number
of ways which will make mm an infinitesimal of order r + 1,
for
that purpose it is sufficient to set k = h + aha +
where s^r and
where a is a function of h which remains finite for h = 0. On the
If

other hand,

if s

<

r,

mm

the order of

cannot exceed

5 -f 1.

212. Analytic method. It follows from the preceding section that


the order of contact of two curves C and C is given by evaluating
the order of the infinitesimal

with respect to h.
Since the two curves are tangent at A,
It may happen that others of the
(x ).
F(x^)
/() and F (x )
derivatives are equal at the same point, and we shall suppose for

=f

the sake of generality that this

F(x )=f(x o)

(23}

is

true of the first

\
I F"(* )

-.,

=/"(*),

but that the next derivatives -F (n +

Applying Taylor

s series to

n derivatives

F (* ) =/ (*),
F^(x ) =/>(x
+

),

and /
are unequal.
(cc )
(a- )
each of the functions F(x) and f(x), we
1)

(n

1)

find

or,

subtracting,

F~y=

(24)

where

and

1.2.^(

are infinitesimals.

It follows that the order of contact


equal to the order n of the highest derivatives of F(x)
and f(x) which are equal for x
x
The conditions (23), which are due to Lagrange, are the necessary
c

of two curves

is

and

sufficient conditions that

order n

x should be a multiple root of

1 of the equation
But the roots of this
F(z) =/(<r).
equation are the abscissae of the points of intersection of the two

PLANE CURVES

446
curves

C and

C"

hence

it

contact of order n have n

may

212

[X,

be said that two curves which have

1 coincident points of intersection.

y changes sign with h if n is


(24) shows that F
and
that
it
if
does
not
n
is
odd.
Hence curves which have
even,
contact of odd order do not cross, but curves which have contact of

The equation

even order do cross at their point of tangency.


It is easy to see why
Let us consider for definiteness a curve C

this should be true.

which cuts another curve C in three points near the point A. If


be deformed continuously in such a way that each of

the curve

C"

the three points of intersection approaches A, the limiting position


of C has contact of the second order with (7, and a figure shows that

the two curves cross at the point A.

This argument

is

evidently

general.
If the equations of the two curves are not solved with respect to
Y and y, which is the case in general, the ordinary rules for the

calculation of the derivatives in question enable us to write down


the necessary conditions that the curves should have contact of

order

n.

culties.

The problem

We

shall

is therefore free from any particular


examine only a few special cases which

diffi

arise

First let us suppose that the equations of each of the


frequently.
curves are given in terms of an auxiliary variable

(X = A
f(u),

"

(c)

an(^ A (^o) =
and that ^( ) =
i- e
that the curves are tan
gent at a point A whose coordinates are f(t ),
Iff (to) w not
-

<

<K^o)

(Xo)>

<f>(t(,)-

zero, as

we

shall suppose, the

common tangent

is

not parallel

to

the

and we may obtain the points of the two curves which have
the same abscissae by setting u = t. On the other hand, x
x is of
the first order with respect to t
t
and we are led to evaluate the
with respect to t
t
In order that the two
order of i/f()
curves have at least contact of order n, it is necessary and sufficient
that we should have
y

axis,

<()

(25)

,K*

<X*o) ,

(<o)

=*

(<b)

(*o)

Co)

and the order of contact will not exceed n if the next derivatives
(n + 1)
and (n + 1) (*o) are unequal.
(*o)
consider
the case where the curve C is represented by the
Again,
two equations
4>

<A

(26)

*=/(0,

X,

CONTACT

212]

OSCULATION

447

and the curve C by the single equation F(x, y} = 0. This case may
be reduced to the preceding by replacing x in F(x, y) by /() and
considering the implicit function y
^(t) defined by the equation

KO] =

F[/(0,

(27)

Then the curve C

is

also represented

(28)

*=/(*)>

In order that the curves C and

o.

by two equations of the form

^CO-

should have contact of order n at

A which

corresponds to a value tn of the parameter, it is


But the
necessary that the conditions (25) should be satisfied.
are
function
successive derivatives of the implicit
given by the
i/r()
a point

equations

?+ 2

[/
(29)

Hence necessary conditions


by
t

for contact of order

n will be obtained

inserting in these equations the relations

=t

The

x ==y(

),

i/^o)

==

resulting conditions

<(^o

may

be expressed as follows

Let

^wo given curves will have at least contact of order n if and

only if
(30)

=
F(<o)

The

0,

F(*o)

0,

..-,

R")(^)

= 0.

are the values of t which cor


roots of the equation F()
two given curves. Hence
to
of
intersection
of
the
respond
points

the preceding conditions amount to saying that t


t is a multiple
root of order n, i.e. that the two curves have n + 1 coincident points
of intersection.

PL AXE CURVES

Given a fixed curve C and another curve

213. Osculating curves.

C which depends upon n

it is

way

-f-

F(x,

(31)

[X,213

parameters

y, a, b,

c,

a, b,

t)

c,

I,

0,

1 parameters in such a
possible in general to choose these n
that C and C shall have contact of order n at any preassigned

For, let C be given by the equations x =/(), y


point of C.
Then the conditions that the curves C and C should have contact
of order

where

at the point

tQ

<KO-

are given by the equations (30),

where

F(0
If

be given, these n

+1

equations determine in general the n +1


The curve C obtained in this way is

-,
parameters a, b, c,
called an osculating curve to the curve C.
/.

Let us apply this theory to the simpler classes of curves. The


equation of a straight line y = ax -+ b depends upon the two param
eters a and b
the corresponding osculating straight lines will have
;

contact of the

first order.
If y =f(x) is the equation of the curve C,
the parameters a and b must satisfy the two equations

A x = ax
o)

hence the osculating line

f (x ) =

b,

we should

the ordinary tangent, as

is

expect.

The equation
(32)

of a circle
(x

a)

(y

- by -

R*

depends upon the three parameters a, b, and R hence the corre


sponding osculating circles will have contact of the second order.
;

Let y

= f(x)

be the equation of the given curve

and

we

shall obtain

R by

requiring that the circle should


meet this curve in three coincident points. This gives, besides the

the correct values of

a, b,

equation (32), the two equations


(33)

-a + (y- b}y = 0,

1+

(y

V)y"

0.

The values

of a and b found from the equations (33) are precisely


the coordinates of the center of curvature ( 205) hence the oscu
;

lating circle coincides

with the

tact is in general of order two,


circle

of curvature. Since the con


may conclude that in general the

circle

we

of curvature of a plane curve crosses the curve at their point

of tangency.

CONTACT

X,2i:<]

OSCULATION

449

All the above results might have been foreseen a priori.


since the coordinates of the center of curvature

For,

depend only on

any two curves which have contact of the second


y\ and
But the center of curva
order have the same center of curvature.

x, y,

y",

ture of the osculating circle is evidently the center of that circle


itself; hence the circle of curvature must coincide with the oscu
lating circle.

On

the other hand, let us consider two circles of


The difference between their radii,

curvature near each other.

which
is

equal to the arc of the evolute between the two centers,


hence one of
greater than the distance between the centers
is

the two circles must

happen

wholly inside the other, which could not


both of them lay wholly on one side of the curve C in

if

lie

the neighborhood of the point of contact.


cross the curve C.

It follows

that they

There are, however, on any plane curve, in general, certain points


which the osculating circle does not cross the curve this excep
tion to the rule is, in fact, typical. Given a curve C which depends
upon n + 1 parameters, we may add to the n + 1 equations (30) the

at

new equation

provided that we regard t as one of the unknown quantities and


determine it at the same time that we determine the parameters
I.
It follows that there are, in general, on any plane
a, b, c,
curve C, a certain number of points at which the order of con
tact with the osculating curve C is n -f 1. For example, there are
usually points at which the tangent has contact of the second order
,

In order to find
these are the points of inflection, for which
0.
the points at which the osculating circle has contact of the third
y"

order, the last of equations (33)

must be differentiated again, which

gives

or finally, eliminating y

b,

(i+yv-*yY"-o.

(34)

The points which satisfy this last condition are those for which
dR/dx = 0, i.e. those at which the radius of curvature is a maxi
mum or a minimum. On the ellipse, for example, these points are
the vertices on the cycloid they are the points at which the tan
;

gent

is

parallel to the base.

PLANE CURVES

450

[X,214

214. Osculating curves as limiting curves. It is evident that an


osculating curve may be thought of as the limiting position of a
which meets the fixed curve C in n
curve
1 points near a fixed

C"

which is the limiting position of each of the points


of intersection.
Let us consider for definiteness a family of
curves which depends upon three parameters a, b, and c, and let
t n + Aj
t + hi, and t + 7t 3 be three values of t near t
The curve
C which meets the curve C in the three corresponding points is

point

of C,

given by the three equations


(35)

F(t

AO

F(t

A2 )

F(t

A,)

Subtracting the first of these equations from each of the others and
applying the law of the mean to each of the differences obtained,

we

find the equivalent system

(36)

F(^

where & t

lies

between h l and

A 1)

0,

(f

7/,

*i)

0,

(*

= 0,

+fc 2 )

and & 2 between A x and h z

Again,

subtracting the second of these equations from the third and apply
ing the law of the mean, we find a third system equivalent to either
of the preceding,

(37)

Fft

where ^

lies

zero, &!,

k2

+ AO-O,

(f

*i)

0,

F"ft,

/,)

0,

between 7^ and 2
As u 2 and h s all approach
and ^ also all approach zero, and the preceding equa
.

7?

7?

tions become, in the limit,

which are the very equations which determine the osculating curve.
The same argument applies for any number of parameters whatever.
Indeed, we might define the osculating curve to be the limiting
position of a curve C which is tangent to C at p points and cuts C
at q other points, where 2p + q = n + 1, as all these p + q points
approach coincidence.
For instance, the osculating

circle is the limiting position of a

which cuts the given curve C

in three neighboring points. It


also the limiting position of a circle which is tangent to C and
which cuts C at another point whose distance from the point of

circle
is

tangency

is infinitesimal.

Let us consider for a moment the latter

property, which is easily verified.


Let us take the given point on C as the origin, the tangent at
that point as the x axis, and the direction of the normal toward the

EXERCISES

X, Exs.]

451

center of curvature as the positive direction of the y axis.


oiigin,

0.

Hence R

and therefore, by Taylor

1/y",

At the
s series,

where e approaches zero with x. It fol


lows that R is the limit of the expres
2
= OP 2 /( 2MP ) as the P oint
sion
/(2y)

M approaches the origin.


hand,

let

On

the other

be the radius of the circle

is tangent to the x axis at the


and
which passes through M.
origin
Then we shall have

Ci which

OP =

Fia

Mm = MP(2R - MP)
l

or
;2

OP
2MP
hence the limit of the radius

M_P.
^

-tti

is really

equal to the radius of

curvature

EXERCISES
Apply the general formulae

1.

bola
2.

to find the evolute of

an

ellipse

of an hyper

of a parabola.

Show

that the radius of curvature of a conic

is

proportional to the cube

of the segment of the normal between its points of intersection with the curve
and with an axis of symmetry.
3.

Show

that the radius of curvature of the parabola

segment of the normal between the curve and the


4. Let F and F be the
normal at that point, and

is

equal to twice the

MN

an ellipse,
a point on the ellipse,
the
point of intersection of that normal and the
Erect a perpendicular
to
at jV, meeting
foci of

N the

major axis of the ellipse.


at K.
At
erect a perpendicular

is

directrix.

NK

KO

to

MF, meeting

the center of curvature of the ellipse at the point

MN
MN at

MF

0.

Show

that

M.

For the extremities of the major axis the preceding construction becomes
Let .4 CM/ be the major axis and BO B the minor axis of the ellipse.
On the segments OA and OB construct the rectangle OA EB. From E let fall
a perpendicular on AB, meeting the major and minor axes at C and D, respec
Show that C and D are the centers of curvature of the ellipse for the
tively.
points A and B, respectively.
5.

illusory.

6.

Show

given spiral.

that the evolute of the spiral p

ae mu

>

is

a spiral congruent to the

PLANE CURVES

452

[X, Exs.

7. The path of any point on the circumference of a circle which rolls with
out slipping along another (fixed) circle is called an epicycloid or an hypocycloid.
Show that the evolute of any such curve is another curve of the same kind.
8. Let AB be an arc of a curve upon which there are no singular points and
no points of inflection. At each point m of this arc lay off from the point m
along the normal at m a given constant length I in each direction. Let wtj and

As the point
describes the arc AB,
2 be the extremities of these segments.
the points mi and
2 will describe two corresponding arcs AiBi and
t B2
Y
Derive the formulae Si = S
and 2 are the
18, S 2 = S + W, where S,
i
is the angle
2
2 respectively, and where
lengths of the arcs AB, A\B\, and
between the normals at the points
and B. It is supposed that the arc -Ai-Bi

<S

A B
A

lies

on the same side of

AB as the

<S

evolute,

and that

it

does not meet the evolute.

[Licence, Paris, July, 1879.]

9. Determine a curve such that the radius of curvatures p at any point


measured from any fixed point A on the curve
and the length of the arc s
2
2
where a is a given constant length.
satisfy the equation as = p + a

AM
,

[Licence, Paris, July, 1883.]


10.

at 0.

be a given curve of the third degree which has a double point


revolves about the point O, meeting the curve C in
right angle

Let

two variable points

MON

M and N.

Determine the envelope of the straight line MN.


= x 3 and z3 + y s = f*xy.

In particular, solve the problem for each of the curves Xy 2

[Licence, Bordeaux, July, 1885.]


11.

Find the points


x

at

which the curve represented by the equations

a (nw

sin u),

a (n

cos w)

has contact of higher order than the second with the osculating

circle.

[Licence, Grenoble, July, 1885.]

12. Let m, mi , and


Find
2 be three neighboring points on a plane curve.
the limit approached by the radius of the circle circumscribed about the triangle
formed by the tangents at these three points as the points approach coincidence.
13. If the evolute of a plane curve without points of inflection is a closed
curve, the total length of the evolute is equal to twice the difference between the
sum of the maximum radii of curvature and the sum of the minimum radii of

curvature of the given curve.


14.

At each point

with the normal.

of a curve lay off a constant segment at a constant angle


that the locus of the extremity of this segment is a

Show

curve whose normal passes through the center of curvature of the given curve.
15. Let r be the length of the radius vector from a fixed pole to any point of
a plane curve, and p the perpendicular distance from the pole to the tangent.
Derive the formula R =
rdr/dp, where R is the radius of curvature.
16. Show that the locus of the foci of the parabolas which have contact of
the second order with a given curve at a fixed point is a circle.

Find the locus of the centers of the ellipses whose axes have a fixed direc
and which have contact of the second order at a fixed point with a given

17.
tion,

curve.

CHAPTER XI
SKEW CURVES
I.

OSCULATING PLANE

M T be the tangent at a point M


MT and a point M of
limiting position as the point M

Let

215. Definition and equation.

of a given

F near

skew curve

F.

plane through

in general approaches a
If it does, the limiting position of the
approaches the point M.
plane is called the osculatiny plane to the curve F at the point M.

We

shall proceed to find its equation.

Let

*=A9

(i)

*-rtO

*(0

be the equations of the curve F in terms of a parameter t, and let t


h be the values of t which correspond to the points
and
and

Then the equation

&f, respectively.

A(X
where the

of the plane

MTM

-*)+ B(Y-y) + C(Z- 3) =

coefficients

^4,

B,

is

0,

and C must satisfy the two relations

(2)

(3)

Expanding f(t

h),

<j>(t

A) and

\j/(t

-f A)

by Taylor

series,

the

equation (3) becomes

After multiplying by 7^, let us subtract from this equation the equa
and then divide both sides of the resulting equation by

tion (2),

A 2/2.

Doing

so,

we

find a

system equivalent to

<)

where d,

e2

and

c3

a]

(2)

^[^"(0

approach zero with

A.

and

cs

(3)

^/(0 +

**"(0

453

In the limit as A

approaches zero the second of these equations becomes


(4)

0,

+ cy (o = o.

SKEW CURVES

454
Hence the equation

of the osculating plane

[XI,

is

A(X-x) + B(Y-y-) + C(Z-z) =

(5)

where A, B, and C

Q,

satisfy the relations

(Adx + Bdy + C dz =

Co)

215

<

(Ad

+ Bd

Cd*z

= 0.

The coefficients A, B, and C may be eliminated from (5) and (6),


and the equation of the osculating plane may be written in the form

X -x Y

Among
is

plane

tangent, and

dy

dz

d*

d*z

which pass through the tangent, the osculating


which the curve lies nearest near the point of tan-

us consider any other plane through the


be
the function obtained by substituting
F(f)
+
h) for X, F, Z, respectively, in the left-hand
h), \li(t
this, let

let

f(t
h), $(t -f
side of the equation (5), which
tion of the new tangent plane.

where

77

= 0.

dx
d?x
the planes

the one

To show

gency.

Z -z

approaches zero with

we shall now assume


Then we shall have

The

h.

to be the

equa

distance from any second

of F near
to this plane is therefore an infinitesimal of
point
the second order; and, since F(t) has the same sign for all sufficiently
small values of h, it is clear that the given curve lies wholly on one

side of the tangent plane considered, near the point of tangency.


These results do not hold for the osculating plane, however. For

that plane, Af"


coordinates of a point of
order.

Doing

so,

B<f>"

we

Cif/"

F must be

hence the expansions for the


carried to terms of the third

find
h*

from a point of T to the osculating


an infinitesimal of the third order; and, since F(f) changes
sign with A, it is clear that a skew curve crosses its osculating plane
at their common point.
These characteristics distinguish the oscu
lating plane sharply from the other tangent planes.
It follows that the distance

plane

is

XI,

OSCULATING PLANE

216]

455

The results just obtained are not


of the osculating plane satisfy the

216. Stationary osculating plane.

valid

if

the coefficients A, B,

relation

+ Bd*y +

A ds x

(7)

If this relation

is satisfied,

Cd*z

0.

the expansions for the coordinates must


we should obtain a

be carried to terms of the fourth order, and


relation of the form

A d*x

The

osculating plane

which

(7) is

and

also,

it

+ B d*y + C d* z
any point of F for
Cd*z does not vanish

said to be stationary at

is

if

satisfied;

d*x

+ Bd*y +

F(t) changes sign with h and


Moreover the distance

does not in general,

the curve does not cross its osculating plane.

from a point on the curve to the osculating plane at such a point is


an infinitesimal of the fourth order. On the other hand, if the
relation

d*x

+ Bd*y +

Cd*z

satisfied at the

is

same

point,

the expansions would have to be carried to terms of the fifth order

and so

on.

Eliminating A, B, and
obtain the equation

(8)

C between

the equations (6) and (7),

dx

dy

dz

d*x

d*y

we

0,

ds z

whose roots are the values of t which correspond to the points of F


where the osculating plane is stationary. There are then, usually,
on any skew curve, points of this kind.
This leads us to inquire whether there are curves all of whose

To be precise, let us try to find


osculating planes are stationary.
all the possible sets of three functions x, y, z of a single variable t,
which, together with all their derivatives up to and including those
of the third order, are continuous, and which satisfy the equation
(8) for all values of t between two limits a and b (a
b).
<

Let us suppose first that at least one of the minors of A which


2
correspond to the elements of the third row, say dx d^y
dy d x, does
not vanish in the interval (a, b).
The two equations
(

dz

d*z

= C dx +
=C dx+
l

C 2 dy,
C3
<Py,

SKEW CURVES

456

216

[XI,

C2

which are equivalent to (6), determine C\ and


functions of t in the interval (a, &).
Since A =

0,

as continuous

these functions

also satisfy the relation

d*z

(10)

+C

z
C\d x

d*y.

Differentiating each of the equations (9) and

we

making use

of (10),

find

d\ dx + dC dy =
dC = dC = 0. It
2

whence
and C 2

is

a constant

2
dC\ d x

+ dC

d*i/

follows that each of the coefficients

hence a single integration of the

first

of

equations (9) gives


z

where C s

is

C\x

+C

another constant.

<7

This shows that the curve F

is

plane curve.
If the determinant dxd 2 y
dyd 2 x vanishes for some value c of the variable t
between a and b, the preceding proof fails, for the coefficients Ci and C% might
be infinite or indeterminate at such a point. Let us suppose for definiteness
that the preceding determinant vanishes for no other value of t in the interval
2
dzd*x does not vanish for
(a, 6), and that the analogous determinant dxd z
t = c.
The argument given above shows that all the points of the curve F which
correspond to values of t between a and c lie in a plane P, and that all the
points of F which correspond to values of t between c and 6 also lie in some
dzd*x does not vanish for t = c; hence a number h
plane Q. But dxd^z
can be found such that that minor does not vanish anywhere in the interval
Hence all the points on T which correspond to values of t
h, c + h).
(c
between c
h and c + h must lie in some plane R. Since E must have an
infinite number of points in common with P and also with Q, it follows that
these three planes must coincide.
Similar reasoning shows that all the points of F lie in the same plane unless
all three of the determinants

dxd^y

dyd 2 x,

dxd 2 z

dyd^z

dzd?x,

dzd^y

vanish at the same point in the interval (a, b). If these three determinants do
vanish simultaneously, it may happen that the curve F is composed of several
portions which lie in different planes, the points of junction being points at
which the osculating plane is indeterminate.*
If all three of the preceding determinants vanish identically in a certain
interval, the curve

straight lines.

may

is

If dx/dt

a straight line, or

is

of several portions of

composed

does not vanish in the interval

(a, 6),

for example,

we

write

d 2 zdx

"This

singular case seems to have been noticed


from a purely analytical standpoint.

Interest only

dzd 2 x

first

by Peano.

It is

evidently of

XI,

OSCULATING PLANE

217]

where C\ and

C2

Finally, another integration gives

are constants.

y
which shows that T

is

457

Cix+C"i,

a straight

= Ca z+CJ,

line.

217. Stationary tangents. The preceding paragraph suggests the study of


certain points on a skew curve which we had not previously defined, namely
the points at which we have

d2x

dx

d*y

dy

d*z

dz

The tangent

at such a point is said to be stationary.


It is easy to show by the
formula for the distance between a point and a straight line that the distance
from a point of T to the tangent at a neighboring point, which is in general an
infinitesimal of the second order, is of the third order for a stationary tangent.
If the given curve T is a plane curve, the stationary tangents are the tangents at

the points of inflection.


The preceding paragraph shows that the only curve
whose tangents are all stationary is the straight line.
At a point where the tangent is stationary, A = 0, and the equation of the
But in general this indetermination
osculating plane becomes indeterminate.

can be removed.

For, returning to the calculation at the beginning of

215

and carrying the expansions of the coordinates of


to terms of the third order,
it is easy to show, by means of
(11), that the equation of the plane through
and the tangent at
is of the form

X-x
f
where

ti

e2

c8

Y-y

(t)

<t>

Z-z
=

y/()

(t)

o,

h.
Hence that plane approaches a perfectly
and the equation of the osculating plane is given by
equations (6) by the equation

approach zero with

definite limiting position,

replacing the second of

Bds y
If the coordinates of the point

the second of the equations

(6)

M also satisfy the equation

d x

d3 y

ds z

dx

dy

dz

should be replaced by the equation

Ad<ix

= Bdiy + Cdvz =

0,

where q is the least integer for which this latter equation is distinct from the
dx = Bdy + C dz = 0. The proof of this statement and the exami
equation
nation of the behavior of the curve with respect to its osculating plane are left
to the reader.

Usually the preceding equation involving the third differentials


coefficients A, B, C do not satisfy the equation

is sufficient,

and the

Bd*y
In this case the curve crosses every tangent plane except the osculating plane.

SKEW CURVES

458
218. Special curves.
relation of the form

218

[XI,

Let us consider the skew curves T which satisfy a

xdy-ydx =

(12)

where

is

From

a given constant.

we

(12)

-yd s x + dxd*y -

find immediately

= Kd 3 z.

dyd*x

Let us try to find the osculating plane of T which passes through a given point
The coordinates (x, ?/, z) of the point of tangency must satisfy
(a, b, c) of space.
the equation
a
z b
z
y c

which, by means of (12) and

dx

dy

dz

d2 x

d2 y

d*z
be written in the form

may

(13),

ay-bx + K(c-z) =

(14)

0,

Q.

Hence the possible points of tangency are the points of intersection of the
curve F with the plane (14), which passes through (a, 6, c).
3
Again, replacing dz, d?z and d z by their values from (12) and (13), the equa
tion A = 0, which gives the points at which the osculating plane is stationary,
becomes

A=

\ (dx d

- dy d 2 x) 2 =

hence we shall have at the same points


d2 x

d*y

dx

is

It is

stationary.
easy to write

down

is

- xd 2 y _

2
7/d x

ydx

dy

which shows that the tangent


plane

d2 z

dz

xdy

stationary at any point at which the osculating

the equations of skew curves which satisfy (12)

for

example, the curves

= At m

= Bt,

Ct m + n

where A, B, C, m, and n are any constants, are of that kind. Of these


3
t
and the skew quartic
the simplest are the skew cubic x = t, y = i 2 z
,

t,

3
,

The

t*.

x
is

circular helix

a cos

a sin

another example of the same kind.


In order to find all the curves which satisfy

= Kt

(12), let

the form
If

we

d(xy

Kz)

2ydx.

set

x =/(),
the preceding equation becomes

xy-Kz =

4>(t),

us write that equation in

XI,

ENVELOPES OF SURFACES

219]

Solving these three equations for


in the

and

z, y,

z,

we

459

find the general equations of

form

(15)

= 1%L,

=/(<),

Kz

are arbitrary functions of the parameter t. It is clear, how


where f(t) and
ever, that one of these functions may be assigned at random without loss of
<f>(t)

In fact

generality.

new

we may setf(t) =

since this

amounts

to

choosing/() as a

parameter.

II.

ENVELOPES OF SURFACES

Before taking up the study of the curvature of skew curves,

we

shall discuss the theory of envelopes of surfaces.

Let S be a surface of the family

219. One-parameter families.

f(x,y,z,a)=0,

(16)

where a
is

is

the variable parameter. If there exists a surface


which
to
each
of
the
S
surfaces
a
curve
E
the
surface
tangent
C,
along
called the envelope of the family (16), and the curve of
tangency
is

S and E is called the characteristic curve.


In order to see whether an envelope exists it is evidently neces
sary to discover whether it is possible to find a curve C on each of

of the two surfaces

the surfaces S such that the locus of

all these curves is tangent to


each surface S along the corresponding curve C. Let (x, y, z) be
the coordinates of a point
on a characteristic. If
is not a
is
singular point of S, the equation of the tangent plane to S at

df
dx
i* *^
1

Y -*)

<-

df

df

^y

Cviv

+ ;( r - y) +

(*-)- o.

As we pass from point to point of the surface E, x, y, z, and a are


evidently functions of the two independent variables which express
the position of the point upon E, and these functions satisfy the
Hence their differentials satisfy the relation
equation (16).
-/ dx

(17)

OX

~ du +
cy

Moreover the necessary and


plane to

dz

cz

0.

sufficient condition that the

dy

dz

by (17),

da
+ Jva

should coincide with the tangent plane to S


dx

or,

-/-

t?

= 0.

tangent
is

SKEW CURVES

460

[XI,

220

Conversely, it is easy to show, as we did for plane curves ( 201),


that the equation R(x, y, z)
0, found by eliminating the param

one or
(18), represents
is
an
which
of
more analytically distinct surfaces, each
envelope
of the surfaces S or else the locus of singular points of S, or a com

eter

a between the two equations (16) and

201, the characteristic curve


value of a
represented by the equations (16) and (18) for any given
S with a
of
of
intersection
curve
is the limiting position of the

bination of the two.

Finally, as in

neighboring surface of the same family.


220. Two-parameter families.

Let S be any surface of the two-

parameter family
f(x,

(19)

where a and

b are

y,

z,a,V)

=0,

the variable parameters.

There does not

exist,

in general, any one surface which is tangent to each member of this


be any arbitrarily
<()
family all along a curve. Indeed, let b
relation between a and b which reduces the family (19) to

assigned
a one-parameter family. Then the equation (19), the equation
and the equation
b =
<f>(a),

for any
represent the envelope of this one-parameter family, or,
the
fixed value of a, they represent the characteristic on
correspond
This characteristic depends, in general, on
(a),
ing surface S.
and there are an infinite number of characteristics on each of the
<f>

There
surfaces S corresponding to various assignments of <(a).
both
a
b
and
fore the totality of all the characteristics, as
vary arbi
does not, in general, form a surface. We shall now try to
discover whether there is a surface E which touches each of the
not along a curve. If such a
family (19) in one or more points,

trarily,

surface exists, the coordinates (x, y, z) of the point of tangency of


of the two variable
any surface S with this envelope E are functions
hence their dif
parameters a and b which satisfy the equation (19)
;

ferentials dx, dy, dz with respect to the independent variables


and b satisfy the relation

XI,

ENVELOPES OF SURFACES

221]

461

Moreover, in order that the surface which is the locus of the point
of tangency (x, y, z) should be tangent to S, it is also necessary
that we should have

or,

by

(21),

Since a and b are independent variables,

(22}

must be

da
satisfied

-f-

it

follows that the equations

cb

simultaneously by the coordinates (x, y, z~) of the


Hence we shall obtain the equation of the

point of tangency.

if one exists, by eliminating a and b between the three


The surface obtained will surely be tan
equations (19) and (22).
gent to S at (x, y, z) unless the equations

envelope,

dx

dy

dz

are satisfied simultaneously by the values (x, y, z) which satisfy (19)


and (22) hence this surface is either the envelope or else the locus
of singular points of S.
;

We have seen that there are two kinds of envelopes, depending


on the number of parameters in the given family. For example,
the tangent planes to a sphere form a two-parameter family, and
each plane of the family touches the surface at only one point.
On

the other hand, the tangent planes to a cone or to a cylinder

form a one-parameter family, and each member of the family


tangent to the surface along the whole length of a generator.
221. Developable surfaces.

of planes
(23)

is

The envelope of any one-parameter family

called a developable surface.


z

is

ax

+ yf() +

Let
<K)

be the equation of a variable plane P, where a is a parameter and


where /(a) and <() are any two functions of a. Then the equa
tion (23)

(24)

and the equation


x

+ yf (a) +

* ()

represent the envelope of the family, or, for a given value of a, they
But these
represent the characteristic on the corresponding plane.

SKEW CURVES

462

221

[XI,

two equations represent a straight line hence each characteristic


is a straight line G, and the developable surface is a ruled surface.
We proceed to show that all the straight lines G are tangent to the
same skew curve. In order to do so let us differentiate (24) again
;

with regard to

a.

The equation obtained

y/(a)

(25)

<

on G. We proceed to show that G


determines a particular point
to the skew curve F which
describes as a varies.
is tangent at

The equations of F are precisely (23), (24), (25), from which, if we


desired, we might find x, y, and z as functions of the variable
parameter a. Differentiating the first two of these and using the
third of them, we find the relations
dz

(26)

+ /(a)

a dx

d>j

dx

+ / () dy =

which show that the tangent to F is parallel to G. But these two


straight lines also have a common point hence they coincide.
;

F is the plane P itself. To


to
show
that the first and second
prove this it is only necessary
a satisfy the relations
z
to
of
with
differentials
x, y, and
respect
The osculating plane

to the curve

dz

The
hold.

first

of these

is

the

Differentiating

d*z

it

ad*x

a dx

of equations (26), which is


again with respect to a, we find
first

+ f(a}d

known

to

+ [dx + f(a)dy ]da,

which, by the second of equations (26), reduces to the second of the


equations to be proved.
It follows that

any developable surface


of the tangents to a certain skew curve T.
curve F

may

may be

reduce to a point at a finite


is either a cone or a cylinder.

then the surface

whenever /"(a)

defined as the locus

In exceptional cases the


or at an infinite distance

= 0.

This will happen

Conversely, the locus of the tangents to any skew curve F

developable surface.

For, let

be the equations of any

skew curve

F.

y)

The

osculating planes

+ C(Z -

z)

is

XI,

ENVELOPES OF SURFACES

221]

form a one-parameter family, whose envelope


ceding equation and the equation

dA(X

is

- x) + dB(Y - y) + dC(Z -

2)

463
given by the pre

t the same equations


represent the charac
corresponding osculating plane. We shall show that
this characteristic is precisely the tangent at the corresponding

For any fixed value of


teristic in the

point of

A dx
The

F.

It will be sufficient to establish the equations

+ Bdy + C dz =

first

of these

is

dA dx

0,

the

+ dB dy -f dC dz =

of (6), while the second

first

is

easily

obtained by differentiating the first and then making use of the


second of (6). It follows that the characteristic is parallel to
the tangent, and it is evident that each of them passes through
the point (x, y, z) hence they coincide.
This method of forming the developable gives a clear idea of
the appearance of the surface. Let AB be an arc of a skew curve.
;

At each point
of AB draw the tangent, and consider only that
half of the tangent which extends in a certain direction,
from A
toward B, for example. These half rays form one nappe Si of the
developable, bounded on three sides by the arc AB and the tan
gents A and B and extending to infinity. The other ends of the tan

gents form another nappe S2 similar to Si and joined to Si along the


arc AB. To an observer placed above them these two nappes appear
to cover each other partially.
gent to F through any point

of the developable in

It is evident that

any plane not tan


two nappes Si and S 2
two branches of a curve which has a cusp at O.
of

AB

cuts the

The skew curve F

is often called the edge of regression of the


surface.*
developable
It is easy to verify directly the statement just made.
Let us
take O as origin, the secant plane as the xy plane, the tangent to F as
2, and the osculating plane as the xz plane.
Assuming
that the coordinates x and y of a point of F can be expanded in powers
of the independent variable 2, the equations of F are of the form

the axis of

az z 2

a 3 z*

-\

=b

z*

for the equations

dx

_ dy _

dz y

dz

dz

dz*

The English term edge of regression does not suggest that the curve is a locus
The French terms "arete de rebroussement and "point de rebroussement
are more suggestive.
TRANS.
of cusps.

"

"

"

"

SKEW CURVES

464
must be

Hence the equations

satisfied at the origin.

222

[XI

of a tangent

at a point near the origin are

Z=

Setting

0,

F of

the coordinates .Y and

the point where the tan

gent meets the secant plane are found to have developments which
2
8
begin with terms in z and in
respectively hence there is surely
;

a cusp at the origin.


Example. Let us
z

t 8.

edge of regression the skew cubic


of the osculating plane to the curve is

select as the

The equation

*-3

(27)

Jr

+ 3tr-Z =

t,

2
,

0;

hence we shall obtain the equation of the corresponding developable by writing


down the condition that (27) should have a double root in t, which amounts to
eliminating

between the equations

*The

0.

result of this elimination is the equation

(XY -

Z)

- 4(X2 - F)(F 2 -

which shows that the developable


It

Z=

is

JTZ)

0,

of the fourth order.

should be noticed that the equations (28) represent the tangent to the given

cubic.

F(x, y) be
the equation of a developable surface, the function F(x, y) satisfies
rt
the equation s 2
0, where r, s, and t represent, as usual, the
three second partial derivatives of the function F(x, y).
222. Differential equation of developable surfaces.

If z

For the tangent planes to the given surface,

Z =pX + qY +

px

qy,

must form a one-parameter family hence only one of the three


coefficients p, q, and z
px qy can vary arbitrarily. In particular
there must be a relation between p and q of the form f(p, q) = 0.
2
s must vanish
It follows that the Jacobian D( p, q)/D(x, y) = rt
;

identically.

2
s
0, p and q
Conversely, if F(x, y) satisfies the equation rt
two
distinct
there
were
If
are connected by at least one relation.
be
of
the
form
would
relations, p and q would be constants, F(x, y)

ax

-f

by

c,

and the surface

= F(x,

y)

would be a plane.

If there

XI,

ENVELOPES OF SURFACES

223]

465

a single relation between p and q, it may be written in the form


where p does not reduce to a constant. But we also have
a

is

= f(p\

v (rt
y(rt

zpx

hence
rt

0.

derivatives

qy

is

_ n - D(*-px-qy,p\
also a function of p, say

*l/(p),

Then the unknown function F(x, y) and


p and q satisfy the two equations

whenever
its

partial

Differentiating the second of these equations with respect to x and


with respect to ?/, we find

=
Since

L*

ff

does not reduce to a constant,

^W + f

we must have

hence the equation of the surface is to be found by eliminating


between this equation and the equation

which is exactly the process for finding the envelope of the family
of planes represented by the latter equation, p being thought of as
the variable parameter.

of

223. Envelope of a family of skew curves.


skew curves has, in general, no envelope.

one-parameter family
Let us consider first

a family of straight lines

(29)

= az+p,

= bz +

q,

a.
a, b, p, and q are given functions of a variable parameter
shall proceed to find the conditions under which every member
Let z
of this family is tangent to the same skew curve T.
<(a)

where

We

line

touches

envelope T.
the
equations
represented by
z
<(<*),

its

(29) together with the equation


an(l the direction cosines of the tangent to T will be pro

portional to dx/da, dy/da, dz/da,

<

M at

which the variable straight


Then the required curve T will be

be the z coordinate of the point

() +

*() +JP

b<j>

i.e.

to the three quantities

(a)+b

<l>(a)

(a),

SKEW CURVES

466
where a

tively.

The necessary and

p and
,

the straight line

q are the derivatives of

a, b, p,

and

sufficient condition that this

q,

223

respec

tangent be

we should have

itself is that

dx
da
that

[XI,

dz_

d_y

da

da

dz
da

is,

The unknown function

must

<(a)

satisfy these

two equations;

hence the family of straight lines has no


envelope unless the two
are compatible, that

is,

unless

aq
If this condition is satisfied,

-b p = 0.

we

shall obtain the envelope

by setting

<t>(a}=-p /a<=-q</b>.

It

easy to generalize the preceding argument. Let us consider a


one-parameter family of skew curves (C) represented by the equations
is

(30)

F(x, y,

where a

a,

a)

*( x y,z,a)

Q,

the variable parameter.


If each of these curves C is
same curve T, the coordinates (x, y,
z) of the point
at which the envelope touches the curve C which
corresponds to
the parameter value a are functions of a which
satisfy (30) and
is

tangent to the

which also satisfy another relation distinct from those two.

Let

dx, dy, dz be the differentials with respect to a displacement of


along C since a is constant along C, these differentials must satisfy
;

the two equations

dF
-jdx

0*

dx

dF
-7

^
*y

-dx

dF

dy

+ -^-dy +
dy

On

the other hand,

and a with respect


tials satisfy the

J =
dz
+ -^**

let &r, 8y, &s,

a*

(32)

cy

A
= Q.

cz

8a be the differentials of

to a displacement of

equations

dz

0,

M along

T.

x, y, z,

These differen

XI,

ENVELOPES OF SURFACES

223]

The necessary and

sufficient conditions that the curves

be tangent are

dx _ dy
~Sx~ 8~y

making use of (31) and

or,

467

~~

C and T

dz
~Sz

(32),

It follows that the coordinates (x, y, z) of the point of tangency

must

satisfy the equations

*=

F-0,

(33)

dF

^=

0,

d&

^=

0,

0.

if the family (30) is to have an envelope, the four equations


a.
Conversely, if these
(33) must be compatible for all values of
four equations have a common solution in x, y, and z for all values
of a, the argument shows that the curve T described by the point
it to the correspond
y, z) is tangent at each point (x, y, z) upon

Hence,

(x,

ing curve C. This is all under the supposition that the ratios between
dx, dy, and dz are determined by the equations (31), that is, that the
point (x,

y, 2) is

not a singular point of the curve C.

If the curves

Note.

are the characteristics of a one-parameter


0, the equations (33) reduce to

family of surfaces F(x, y, z, a)


the three distinct equations

F.p,

(34)

|f

0,

hence the curve represented by these equations is the envelope


This is the generalization of the theorem
of the characteristics.
proved above for the generators of a developable surface.
The equations
in the

of a one-parameter family of straight lines are often written

form
x

(35)

-x _y -yo_z - z
^

where XQ yo
,

Zo

o, &, c

are functions of a variable parameter a.

It is

easy to

Let I
find directly the condition that this family should have an envelope.
denote the common value of each of the preceding ratios then the coordinates
;

of

any point of the straight


x

la ,

by the equations

lb

ZQ

Ic

is to determine whether it is possible to substitute for I such a


that the variable straight line should always remain tangent to

and the question


function of

line are given

SKEW CURVES

468
the curve described
that

by the point

The necessary condition

(z, y, z).

224

[XI,

for this

is

we should have
Xp

,q<n

^oo;

+gZ_

2/6

Denoting by

the

common

26

l
.

value of these ratios and eliminating I and


we find the equation of condition

from

the three linear equations obtained,

(37)

0.

If this condition is satisfied, the equations


(36)

determine

I,

and hence

also the

equation of the envelope.

III.

CURVATURE AND TORSION OF SKEW CURVES

224. Spherical indicatrix.

Let us adopt upon a given skew curve F


let s be the length of the arc

AM

a definite sense of motion, and

measured from some fixed point A as origin

to

any point M, affixing


the sign -f or the sign
according as the direction from A toward
is the direction adopted or the
be
opposite direction. Let
the positive direction of the tangent at M, that is, that which cor

MT

responds to increasing values of the arc. If through any point O in


space lines be drawn parallel to these half rays, a cone S is formed
which is called the directing cone of the developable surface formed

by the tangents to F. Let us draw a sphere of unit radius about O


as center, and let 2 be the line of intersection of this
sphere with
the directing cone. The curve 2 is called the spherical indicatrix

FIG. 48

of the curve F.

curves

is

The correspondence between the points of these two


to a point
of F corresponds the point m where
MT pierces the sphere. As the point describes the

one-to-one

the parallel to

CURVATURE

TORSION

curve F in the positive sense, the point


s

and

m describes

the curve

in

we

shall adopt as positive.


Then the corre
increase simultaneously (Fig. 48).

a certain sense, which

sponding arcs

469

o-

O be displaced, the whole curve 2


translation
hence we may suppose that
the
same
lies
undergoes
at the origin of coordinates.
Likewise, if the positive sense on the
It is evident that if the point
;

curve F be reversed, the curve 2 is replaced by a curve symmetrical


but it should be noticed that the
it with respect to the point
mt
to
the
sense
of
2 is independent of the sense of
tangent
positive
to

motion on

T.

to the directing cone along the generator Om is


CZ
For, let
parallel to the osculating plane at M.
of the sphere being
the center
be the equation of the plane
,

The tangent plane

AX + BY +

Omm

at

hence,

spond to

if t

M and M

and
parallel to the two tangents at
h are the parameter values which corre
respectively, we must have

This plane

at the origin.

and
}

is

Af (t) + BV(t) + Cf (0 =

(38)

Af(t

(39)

The second
*)

A)

B#(t

of these equations

which becomes,

k)

may

0.

+ Cf (* +

A)

0.

be replaced by the equation

+c

in the limit as h approaches zero,

(40)

Af"()

B<j>"()

+ Cf 09 =

0.

(38) and (40), which determine A, B, and C for the


at
m, are exactly the same as the equations (6) which
tangent plane
determine A, B, and C for the osculating plane.

The equations

225. Radius of curvature. Let


be the angle between the positive
T at two neighboring points
directions of the tangents
and
of F.
and
Then the limit of the ratio w/arc
as
,
F
is
called
the
curvature
of
at
the
,
M,
approaches
point
just as
o>

MT

MM

for a plane curve.

The

reciprocal of the curvature

is

called the

MM

radius of curvature ; it is the limit of arc


/to.
Again, the radius of curvature R may be defined to be the limit
of the ratio of the
arc

MM

two infinitesimal arcs


arc

MM

arc

mm

VX

arc

MM

mm
mm

chord

mm for we
chord mm

and

have

SKEW CURVES

470

[XI,

mm

mm
m

225

and (chord
(arc raw )/(chord)
The arcss( = 3/Af
limit
as
the
unity
approaches
approaches
and o-(=mm ) increase or decrease simultaneously; hence

and each of the fractions

)/<a

*=

(>

Let the equations of T be given in the form

where
point

x=f(t),

(42)

*(0,

lKO

Then the coordinates of the


the origin of coordinates.
are nothing else than the direction cosines of MT, namely
is

dx

dy

ete

efo

Differentiating these equations,

- dx d
ri
2
s

where

>

dB=

we

find

- -

ds d*y

- dy d*s

,22
ds

indicates as usual the

obtained by replacing x by

= dz
3
ds

sum

of the three similar terms

x, y, z successively.

Finally, expanding
find

2
and making use of the expressions for ds 2 and ds d s, we

Sdx*
ds4

By Lagrange

identity

131) this equation

may

be written in

the form
,

A*

where

dyd?z

!A

dzd^y,

B*

C*

-*T

B = dzd

dxd*z,

=
Then

a notation which we shall use consistently in what follows.


the formula (41) for the radius of curvature becomes

and

it is

evident that

z".

x",

y",

The

irrational, but

it

is

a rational function of

x, y, z,

y z
,

expression for the radius of curvature itself

is

is

essentially a positive quantity.

XI,

CURVATURE

226]

Note.

curve

r,

471

If the independent variable selected is the arc s of the


the functions /(*), <(), and
^(s) satisfy the equation
/"(*)

Then we

TORSION

shall

*"()=!

= * (),
dp =

=/ (*)
(45)

*"()

have
y

ft

=/"(*) fe,

dy

4>"(s)ds,

=
=

and the expression for the radius of curvature assumes the


partic
ularly elegant form
(

^=

44/ )

226. Principal normal.

through

M (on

[/"()]

[*"(*)?

+ Cf ()]*

Center of curvature.

T) parallel to

w,

Let us draw a
2 at m. Let

the tangent to

line

MN

be the direction on this line which corresponds to the


positive direc
The new line
is called the
principal normal to T at

MN

tion mt.

that normal which lies in the


osculating plane, since mt is
perpendicular to Om and Omt is parallel to the osculating plane
The direction
is called the positive direction
(
224).
of the
normal.
This
direction
is uniquely defined, since the
principal
posi
tive direction of mt does not
depend upon the choice of the positive
direction upon T.
shall see in a moment how the direction in
is

it

MN

We

question might be defined without using the indicatrix.


If a length
be laid
equal to the radius of curvature at
on
from the point A/, the extremity C is called the center

MC

MN

curvature of T at M, and the circle drawn around


is called the circle
ing plane with a radius

off

of

in the osculat

MC

of curvature. Let
ft
y be the direction cosines of the principal normal. Then the
coordinates (aj u y lt z-^ of the center of curvature are

>

>

But we

also have

= ^_^^i_ p^.
ds

da-

and similar formulae for


the expression for

x,

we

ds

da-

/?

dsd z x

and y

dxd z s
ds

Replacing a by

find

x^x + R^da&x
-7^
ds
2

its

value in

SKEW CURVES

472
But the

R 2 may

coefficient of

be written

226

[XI,

form

in the

S dx *- dx

d*x

ds*

ds*

terms of the quantities A, B, and C,

or, in

Bdz

Cdy
ds*

The values

may be written down by cyclic permutation


and the coordinates of the center of curvature
the form

and

of y l

from

this value of x l

may

be written in

zl

B dz
A dz

C dx
(46)

ds*

B dx

dii

These expressions for x lt y : and z v are rational in


,

x"

y"

x, y, z,

z".

MN

passes through the


perpendicular to
plane Q through
T
We shall proceed
at M.
curve
cross
the
not
does
and
tangent
lie
to show that the center of curvature and the points of T near

MT

on the same side of


variable the arc
the. coordinates

To show

Q.

this, let

us take as the independent

M as origin. Then
M are of the form

T counted from
of T near
point

of the curve

X, Y,

of

a,

dx

the expansions for Y and Z being similar to the expansion for X.


But since s is the independent variable, we shall have

dx

dz x

da

da

ds

ds 2

ds

da-

and the formula for

d<r

ds

becomes

1.2
If in the equation of the plane Q,

a (X

*)

J8

(F

y)

1
,

XI,

CURVATURE

227]

F,

A",

Z be replaced by these

and

member

the value of that

where

t]

values of

W+

<

is

rf)

TORSION

473

expansions in the left-hand member,


to be

found

+ 0(5 +

I (! +

approaches zero with s. This quantity is positive for all


s near zero.
Likewise, replacing (X, Y, Z} by the coordi

Ra , y Rfi , z .Ry ) of the center of curvature, the


Hence
result of the substitution is R, which is essentially positive.
nates (x

the theorem

is

227. Polar

proved.
Polar surface.

line.

The perpendicular A

to the oscu

lating plane at the center of curvature is called the polar line. This
For, in
straight line is the characteristic of the normal plane to T.

the first place,


to

evident that the line of intersection

is

it

two neighboring points


T hence
each of the lines MT and

normal planes

at

M and M

of the

perpendicular

also perpendicular to

it is

is

approaches M, the plane mOm approaches


parallelism to the osculating plane hence the line D approaches a
On the other hand, to
line perpendicular to the osculating plane.
show that it passes through the center of curvature, let s be the

the plane

mOm

As

independent variable

then the equation of the normal plane

a(X -x) + fi(Y-y) + y(Z

(47)

and the characteristic

| (X

(48)

x)

is

is

-*)*,

denned by (47) together with the equation

+ |(Y -

y}

(Z

-1=

This new equation represents a plane perpendicular to the principal


normal through the center of curvature hence the intersection of
;

two planes

the polar line.


The polar lines form a ruled surface, which is called the polar
It is evident that this surface is a developable, since we
surface.
the

is

have just seen that

it

the envelope of the normal plane to F.

is

a plane curve, the polar surface is a cylinder whose right


section is the evolute of F in this special case the preceding state
ments are self-evident.
If

is

228. Torsion.

new

If the

words

"tangent

line"

in the definition of

osculating plane," a
225) be replaced by the words
geometrical concept is introduced which measures, in a manner,

curvature

"

Let
be the angle
the rate at which the osculating plane turns.
and
between the osculating planes at two neighboring points
a>

SKEW CURVES

474
then the limit of the ratio

MM

[XI,

228

as
is called
/arc
,
approaches
the torsion of the curve F at the point M.
The reciprocal of the
torsion is called the radius of torsion.
o>

The perpendicular

to the osculating plane at


is called the
Let us choose a certain direction on it as positive,
we
shall determine later which we shall take,
and let
be

binormal.

a",

ft",

y"

the corresponding direction cosines.


The parallel line through the
the
unit
at
a
origin pierces
sphere
point n, which we shall now put

into correspondence with the point


of T.
The locus of n is a
curve
and
it
is
to
as
spherical
above, that the radius
show,
easy
,

T may

of torsion

sponding arcs
have

be defined as the limit of the ratio of the two corre

MM

and nn of the two curves T and

Hence we

shall

1--^,
dr
2

where T denotes the arc of the curve


The coordinates of n are
which are given by the formulae
.

a",

ft",

215)

A
q"=

ft"

where the radical

From

formulae.
da",

dp",

==,

=>

dy";

da"

"=

taken with the same sign in all three


it is easy to deduce the values of

to be

is

y",

these formulae

for example,

(X

B2

+ C*)dAA(AdA + BdB + CdC)


(A + B + C )
+
+
2

2
whence, since dr

2
da"

dft"

2 f

dy"

m SA* S**-IS(***)7
(A + B + C )
2

or,

by Lagrange

2 2

s identity,

S^dC-CdB}*
(A + B + C )
2

2 2

where & denotes the sum of the three terms obtained by cyclic per
mutation of the three letters A, B, C. The numerator of this expres
sion may be simplified by means of the relations

Adx+ Bdy + C dz = 0,
dB dy + dC dz = 0,

dA dx

-f-

whence
dx

B dC - C dB

CdA - AdC

A dB

d*

- B dA

XI,

CURVATURE

228]

where

475

K is a quantity defined by the equation (49) itself.


2

_
~
2

(A

K is defined by

where

TORSION

dz

(49)

dx

or,

This gives

+ B* +

C 2) 2

expanding,

dx

dy

ds x

da y

dx

dy

dz

dx

d*z

da x

d*y),

where

denotes the

mutation of the three

sum

of the three terms obtained by cyclic per


But this value of
is exactly

letters x, y, z.

the development of the determinant

A*

is

216]; hence

[(8),

+ B* + C

and therefore the radius of torsion

given by the formula

^2_|_^2_j_ ^2

T=

(50)

If we agree to consider T essentially positive, as we did the radius


of curvature, its value will be the absolute value of the second mem

should be noticed that the expression for T is rational


hence it is natural to represent the
y, z
radius of torsion by a length affected by a sign.
The two signs

But

ber.

in x, y,

it

z,

z"

x",

y",

which T may have correspond to entirely different aspects of the


curve F at the point M.
Since the sign of T depends only on that of A, we shall investigate

the difference in the appearance of F near


when A has different
Let us suppose that the trihedron Oxyz is placed so that an

signs.

observer standing on the xy plane with his feet at


and his head in
the positive z axis would see the x axis turn through 90 to his left
if

the x axis turned round into the

y axis

(see footnote, p. 477).

MN

has been so
Suppose that the positive direction of the binormal
b
chosen that the trihedron formed from the lines MT, MN,
b has
the same aspect as the trihedron formed from the lines Ox, Oy, Oz

MN

that

with

is, if

the curve F be

moved

MN

MT

into such a position that


with Oy, the direction

M coincides

MN

with Ox, and


will coin
O,
b
cide with the positive z axis. During this motion the absolute value
of T remains unchanged hence A cannot vanish, and hence it cannot
;

SKEW CURVES

176

228

[XI,

In this position of the curve T with respect to


in the figure the coordinates of a point near the origin

even change sign.*


the axes

now

will be given by the formulae

=
=
\y
f*

(51)

provided that the parameter t is


For with the system of axes
at the origin.
so chosen that t =
2
=
=
d z = when t = 0. Moreover
dz
employed we must have dy

where

e,

e"

approach zero with

we may suppose that a


t

will

>

at

change a t to

0, for

The

be positive near the origin, but


On the other hand, f or t 0, A

is
c3

the sign of
>

0,

e3

x and z

t,

a change in the parameter from


coefficient & 2 is positive since

cz

to

y must

be either positive or negative.


Hence the sign of A
1 J 2 c 3 dt*.

may

= 12a

There are then two cases to be distinguished. If


t
h
are both negative for
0, and both positive
.

<

<

where h is a sufficiently small positive number i.e.


an observer standing on the xy plane with his feet at a point P on

f or

<

<

h,

y
M
/

,-

"X

^v

M"

FIG. 49, 6

FIG. 49, a

MM

at
the positive half of the principal normal would see the arc
his
MM"
at
arc
the
and
right
his left and above the osculating plane,
below that plane (Fig. 49, a). In this case the curve is said to be
On the other hand, if c 3 0, the aspect of the curve
sinistrorsal.
would be exactly reversed (Fig. 49, b), and the curve would be said
These two aspects are essentially distinct. For
to be dextrorsal.
drawn on the
example, if two spirals (helices) of the same pitch be
same right circular cylinder, or on two congruent cylinders, they
will be superposable if they are both sinistrorsal or both dextrorsal
but if one of them is sinistrorsal and the other dextrorsal, one of
them will be superposable upon the helix symmetrical to the other
one with respect to a plane of symmetry.
<

* It would be
easy to show directly that A does not change sign when
one set of rectangular axes to another set which have the same aspect.

we

pass from

XI,

CURVATURE

229]

TORSION

477

In consequence of these results we shall write

r __4i*<?

(52)

at a point where the curve is dextrorsal T shall be


positive, while
shall be negative at a point where the curve is sinistrorsal.
dif
ferent arrangement of the original coordinate trihedron
would
Oxyz
i.e.

lead to exactly opposite results.*

229. Frenet s formulae. Each point


of T is the vertex of a trirectangular trihedron whose aspect is the same as that of the trihe
dron Oxyz, and whose edges are the tangent, the principal normal,
and the binomial. The positive direction of the principal normal is

That of the tangent may be chosen at pleasure, but


already fixed.
this choice then fixes the positive direction on the binormal. The dif
ferentials of the nine direction cosines
(a, ft, y), (a ft /). (a",
of these edges may be expressed very
simply in terms of R, T, and
1

the direction cosines themselves,

We

to Frenet.f

=a

ds

The

dft
*ds

>

dy-

ft

>

"

1.

Since the trihedron (MT,

aspect as the trihedron Oxyz,

MN,

the other hand, the formula for

by (49) and the relation

da
ds

* It

"

=^

(A

da"

-AdB} +
(A

or,

y
i

R
(

228) are

MN

has the same

b)

=
l

B(B dA

we must have
or

On

ds

where

y")

by means of certain formulae due


dft, and dy

direction cosines of the positive binormal

~"--

ft",

have already found the formulae for da,

da

/KQN
oo

A =

may

C(C dA

+B +C
2

+B +C

be written

- A dC)

)*

A,

Cft-By
~
+ B 2 + C 2) 3

q A

^ + &+ C

12

usual in America to adopt an arrangement of axes precisely opposite to that


Hence we should write T = + (A* + B^ + C 2 )/A, etc. See also
the footnote to formula (54), 229.
TRANS.
is

described above.

Nouvelles Annales de Mathematiques, 1864,

p. 281.

SKEW CURVES

478

The
dp"

229

[XI,

a is precisely 1/T, by (52). The formulae for


be calculated in like manner, and we should find

coefficient of

and

dy"

may

ds

ds

which are exactly analogous to


In order to find da d(3 dy
,

ds

(53).*

us differentiate the well-known

let

formulae
2

cm

replacing da,

d(3,

dy,

da",

+
+

(3

/3/3

d/3",

+
+

dy"

yy

= l,
= 0,

by their values from (53) and

This gives

(54).

a da

dp +

ft

+ J3

a da

d/3

y dy

y dy

ds

= 0,
= 0,

ds

whence, solving for da

ds

The formulae

dft

dy

(53), (54),

ds

ds

and (55) constitute Frenet

s formulae.

The formulae (54) show that the tangent to the spherical


is
described by the point n whose coordinates are
can
be
verified
This
normal.
to
the
geometrically.
principal
parallel
and whose directrix is the
Let S be the cone whose vertex is at
Note.

curve

a",

curve

The generator On

tangent to the cone

S along

is

Om

/?",

y"

perpendicular to the plane which is


(
228). Hence S is the polar cone

But this property is a reciprocal one, i.e. the generator Om


of 5 is surely perpendicular to the plane which is tangent to
along On. Hence the tangent mt to the curve 2, since it is perpen
to S.

.S"

On and Om, is perpendicular to the


is
For the same reason the tangent nt to the curve
nt
are
mt
and
mOn.
It
follows
that
to
the
plane
perpendicular
dicular to each of the lines

plane mOn.

parallel.
* If

Frenet

we had written the formula for the torsion in the form l/T= A/ (A* + B* + C 2
a /T, etc.
s formulae would have to be written in the form
/ds =

[Hence

),

da"

this

would be the form

if

the axes are taken as usual in America.

TRANS.]

XI,

CURVATURE

230]

TORSION

479

230. Expansion of x, y, and z in powers of s. Given two functions


T \l/(s) of an independent variable s, the first of which

R=

<(s),

there exists a skew curve T which

is completely defined
except for its position in space, and whose radius of curvature and
radius of torsion are expressed by the given equations in terms of
is positive,

some

the arc s of the curve counted from

fixed point upon it.


rig
orous proof of this theorem cannot be given until we have discussed
the theory of differential equations. Just now we shall merely show

how

on the

to find the expansions for the coordinates of a point

required curve in powers of s, assuming that such expansions exist.


Let us take as axes the tangent, the principal normal, and the

dx

i (*y\
1 \C&/I

o^z\

-ri)

1.2 VdsVo

shall

+
+

/<?_

Vo^

/ o

W/o +

1.2.3
g

/rf

^\

1.2.3\A i /t

are the coordinates of a point on F.

and

have

/d x\

123 \ds

+ 172

#, y,

Then we

T.

*=I
(56)

where

on

O, the origin of arcs

binormal at

dx

as

d x

-r-T

a,

as

da

But

-7-

as

ll

whence, differentiating,

d*x

_ ~_ a dR
R 2 ds

~d&~

la

"

R \R

T,

In general, the repeated application of Frenet

formulae gives

of R, T, and their successive


where L n
n P n are known functions
In a similar manner the successive
derivatives with respect to s.
derivatives of y and z are to be found by replacing (a, a
by
But we have, at the origin,
and
respectively.
/?
,

(/3,

(y,

/8")

y"),

$ = 1,^ = 0,

- 0, an 0,
0, y
ft
hence the formulas (56) become

1,

3
.s

(56

2R

dR

BR* ds

QRT

a")

= 0, $ = 0, ^ = 1

SKEW CURVES

480

[XI,

where the terms not written down are of degree higher than
It is understood, of course, that R, T, dR/ds,
0.
by their values for 5

231

three.

are to be replaced

These formulae enable us to calculate the principal parts of cer


For instance, the distance from a point of the
curve to the osculating plane is an infinitesimal of the third order,
tain infinitesimals.

and

principal part is
the curve to the x axis,

its

i.e.

The distance from a point on

/6RT.

to the tangent, is of the second order,

and

its principal part is s*/2R (compare


214).
culate the length of an infinitesimal chord c.

Again,

We

let

us cal

find

where the terms not written down are of degree higher than
This equation may be written in the form

four.

c is an infinitesimal of the
which shows that the difference s
8
2
third order and that its principal part is s /24#
manner
it
be
shown
that
the shortest
In an exactly similar
may
at
the
and
the
distance between the tangent
origin
tangent at a
neighboring point is an infinitesimal of the third order whose prin
s
This theorem is due to Bouquet.
cipal part is s /12RT.
.

231. Involutes and evolutes.

second curve F

if all

A curve

I\ is called an involute of a

the tangents to F are

among

the normals to I\,

and conversely, the curve F is called an evolute of F^ It is evident


that all the involutes of a given curve F lie on the developable sur
face of

which F

is

the edge of regression, and cut the generators of

the developable orthogonally.


of F, (a, ft, y) the
Let (x, y, z) be the coordinates of a point
direction cosines of the tangent MT, and I the segment MMi between

where a certain involute cuts


and the point
a
are
coordinates of
l

MT.

Xl

whence

=X + la,

7/

= dx +
= di/ +
dzi = dz +

dx l

dyi

1=:7/

/yS,

Ida
l</(3

dy

Kl

+ a dl,
+ (3 dl,
+

y dl.

=z+

ly,

Then the

XI,

CURVATURE

231]

TORSION

481

In order that the curve described by Afx should be normal to


it is necessary and sufficient that a dx^ + (3 dy l + y dz should vanish,
i.e.

that

we should have

a dx

(ldy

ydz

dl

+ {3dp +

l(ada

y dy)

0,

which reduces to ds -\- dl = 0. It follows that the involutes to a


given skew curve F may be drawn by the same construction which
was used for plane curves ( 206).
Let us try to find

the evolutes of a

all

given curve F, that is, let us try to pick


out a one-parameter family of normals to
the given curve according to some contin

uous law which will group these normals


Let
into a developable surface (Fig. 50).

D be an evolute, the angle between the


normal MM^ and the principal normal MN,
FIG.
and the
and I the segment MP between
l on the principal normal.
projection P of the point
<

M
M

coordinates (x i} yi, z^) of

/"

(57)

ly"

we

see

by projecting the broken

The tangent

successively.
must be the line

MM

Then

the

are
"

as

50

line

tan

<,

tan

<,

tan

<,

MPM^

upon the three axes

to the curve described by the point

itself,

that

is,

dx l

dz l

Let k denote the common value of these ratios

then the condition

dx l = k(x l
x) may be transformed, by inserting the values of
and dx l and applying Frenet s formulae, into the form
a ds 1
\

- 4) +
K/

+
The conditions

(
\

a"

M^

we must have

T
d(l tan

kl)
I

- ^-

x^

kl tan

>

=0.

dy^
k(z l
z) lead to exactly
]c(y^
y) and dz l
similar forms, which may be deduced from the preceding by repla
and (y, y
cing (a, a
respectively. Since the
by ((3, /3
,

a")

")

y"),

SKEW CURVES

482

determinant of the nine direction cosines

[XI,

is

231

equal to unity, these

three equations are equivalent to the set

dl

(58)

ds
I

tan

Ids
d(l tan

kl,

kl tan

<f>

<)

.
<f>

From the first of these I R, which shows that the point P is the
center of curvature and that the line
is the polar line.
It fol
lows that all the evolutes of a given skew curve T lie on the polar sur

PM

face. In order to determine these evolutes completely it only remains


to eliminate k between the last two of equations
Doing so
(58).
and replacing I by R throughout, we find ds
T
Hence
may

<

d<j>.

be found by a single quadrature

(59)

-*

we

consider two different determinations of the angle


which
the difference
correspond to two different values of the constant
If

<

<

between these two determinations of


It follows that two

normals

to the

<

remains constant

curve

all

along T.
to two

T which are tangent

different evolutes intersect at a constant angle.


Hence, if we know
a single family of normals to T which form a developable surface,
all other families of normals which form
developable surfaces may

be found by turning each member of the given family of normals


through the same angle, which is otherwise arbitrary, around its
point of intersection with T.

Note

If

formula gives

is

=
<f>

a plane curve, T is infinite, and the preceding


= is
The evolute which corresponds to

<.

<

the plane evolute studied in


206, which is the locus of the centers
of curvature of F.
There are an infinite number of other evolutes,

which

lie

lute.

We

on the cylinder whose right section is the ordinary evo


shall study these curves, which are called helices, in the
next section. This is the only case in which the locus of the cen
ters of curvature is an evolute.
In order that (59) should be satis

= 0, it is necessary that T should be infinite or


should vanish identically hence the curve is in any case a
plane curve ( 216).
fied

by taking

that

<

XI,

CURVATURE

232]

Note

If the curve

II.

is

TORSION

an evolute of

483
follows that

T, it

is

an

Hence

involute of D.

= d(MM

ds t

l) ,

where s x denotes the length of the arc of the evolute counted from
some fixed point. This shows that all the evolutes of any given
curve are rectifiable.
232. Helices. Let C be any plane curve and let us lay off on the perpendic
ular to the plane of C erected at any point
on C a length
proportional to
the length of the arc a- of C counted from some fixed point A. Then the skew

mM

curve F described by the point


as the

xy plane and

z=/(o-),
be the coordinates of a point

(60)
is

the relation

where

<t>(v)

in

*(cr),

=1

2
<

denotes the length of the arc of T.

K<r,

<f>

satisfy

= cr Vl + K 2 + J7,
= Vl + -K 2 since H = 0.

It follows that s

and a- be counted from the same point A on


The direction cosines of the tangent to F are

C, s

<r

(61)

is

independent of

angle with the z axis

(r, it is

evident that the tangent to

F makes a constant

Any

curve whose tangent


In order to prove

this property is characteristic

makes a constant angle with a fixed


this, let

the coordi

hence, from (60),

or, if s

Since y

Then

o".

The functions / and

the given factor of proportionality.

terms of the arc


of the curve F will be

x=/(<r),

TO of

nates of the corresponding point

where

Let us take the plane of

called a helix.

is

let

straight line is a helix.

us take the z axis parallel to the given straight line, and let C be the
F on the xy plane. The equations of F may always

projection of the given curve


be written in the form
(62)

=/(<r)

z
<t>(v),

^(<r)

2
2 =
where the functions / and
4satisfy the relation /
1,
amounts to taking the arc o- of C as the independent variable.
<

</>

v/V / 2 4-

dS

rf/2

_1_

for this merely


It follows

that

1/~1

should
hence the necessary and sufficient condition that y be constant is that
It follows that
be constant, that is, that \f/(a-) should be of the form Kcr + z
the equations of the curve F will be of the form (60) if the origin be moved to
.

the point x = 0, y = 0, z = z
Since y is constant, the formula dy/ds = y /B shows that y = 0.
principal normal is perpendicular to the generators of the cylinder.
.

Hence the
Since

it is

also perpendicular to the tangent to the helix, it is normal to the cylinder, and
It follows that the
therefore the osculating plane is normal to the cylinder.

SKEW CURVES

232

[XI,

binormal lies in the tangent plane at right angles to the


tangent to the helix
hence it also makes a constant angle with the z axis, i.e.
is constant.
Since y = 0, the formula dy /ds = - y/B - y"/ T shows that y/R +
= 0;
y"/ T
hence the ratio T/R is constant for the helix.

y"

Each of the properties mentioned above is characteristic for the helix. Let
us show, for example, that every curve for which the ratio T/R is constant is a
helix.

(J.

BERTRAND.)

From Frenet

formulae

we have

T_
_dp ~
_dy _
~
~
7 ~

dc^
da"

hence,

if

a constant, a single integration gives

is

a"

where A, B,

dy

dp"

= Ha - A

multiplying them by a,

/3,

= Hp -

$"

new

are three

constants.

y, respectively,

Aa +

B,

y"

= Hy - C

Adding these
we find

three equations after

Bp + Cy = H,

ABC

or

Aa + Bp +
\*A*

Cy

+ B* -r C 2

But the three quantities


2

^/

(72

A +

+ B2 + C2

Vvl 2

(72

are the direction cosines of a certain straight line A, and the


preceding equa
tion shows that the tangent makes a constant angle with this line.
Hence the

given curve

Again,

is

let

a helix.

us find the radius of curvature.

R
whence, since y

_da
_
~
~

By

(53)

pi

and

(61)

we have

~ds~

0,

<63)

This shows that the ratio

+ K 2)/R

(1

is

independent of K.

But when

K=

this ratio reduces to the reciprocal 1/r of the radius of curvature of the
right
section C, which is easily verified ( 205).
Hence the
formula

be written in the form

R=

r(l

may

preceding

2
),

which shows that the

ratio of the radius

of curvature of a helix to the radius of curvature of the


corresponding curve
is a constant.
It is

now

easy to find

For, since the ratio

T/R

all

the curves for which

and

are both constant.

constant, all the curves must be helices, by Bertrand s


theorem. Moreover, since
is a constant, the radius of curvature r of the
curve C also is a constant. Hence C is a circle, and the
required curve is a
is

helix which lies on

a circular cylinder.

This proposition

is

due to Puiseux.*

* It is assumed in this
proof that we are dealing only with real curves, for we
assumed that A 2 + B* + 2 does not vanish. (See the thesis by Lyon Sur les
<?

courbes a torsion constante, 1890.)

XI,

CURVATURE

233]

TORSION

485

233. Bertrand s curves. The principal normals to a plane curve are also the
the parallels to the
principal normals to an infinite number of other curves,
given curve. J. Bertrand attempted to find in a similar manner all the skew

curves whose principal normals are the principal normals to a given skew
curve F. Let the coordinates x, y, z of a point of F be given as functions of the
Let us lay off on each principal normal a segment of length I, and let the
arc
.

coordinates of the extremity of this segment be

X = x + la

(64)

X,

Y = y + lp,

F,

Z=

then

ly

we

shall

have

sufficient condition that the principal normal to the curve


described by the point (X, F, Z) should coincide with the principal normal to F
is that the two equations

The necessary and

I"

dX +

dY+y

dZ =

0,

y (dXd 2 Y

- dYd*X) =

should be satisfied simultaneously. The meaning of each of these equations is


hence the length of the segment I should be a
From the first, dl =
evident.
;

2
in the second equation by their values
Replacing dX, d JT, dF,
from Frenet s formulae and from the formulas obtained by differentiating
Frenet s, and then simplifying, we finally find

constant.

whence, integrating,

I+l-

(65)

where

is

1
.

It follows that the required curves are

the constant of integration.

those for which there exists a linear relation between the curvature

On

and

the torsion.

easy to show that this condition is sufficient and that


the length I is given by the relation (05).
A remarkable particular case had already been solved by Monge, namely
the other hand,

it

is

that in which the radius of curvature

is

a constant.

In that case (65) becomes

defined by the equations (64) is the locus of the centers


R, and the curve
of curvature of F. From (64), assuming I
R = constant, we find the equations
I

T"

which show that the tangent to T is the polar


ture R of F is given by the formula

da"

2
d/3"

line of F.

The radius

of curva

dy"*

is constant and equal to R.


The relation between the two curves
therefore a reciprocal one each of them is the edge of regression of
It is easy to verify each of these statements for
the polar surface of the other.
the particular case of the circular helix.

hence

F and F

also

is

SKEW CURVES

486
Note.

It is

curvature

is

[XI,

23*

easy to find the general formulae for all skew curves whose radius of
Let R be the given constant radius and let a, /3, 7 be any

constant.

three functions of a variable parameter which satisfy the relation

a 2 + /32 + y 2 = 1.

Then the equations

X=

(66)

= Vda2 +

2
2
d/3 + (fry
represent a curve which has the required prop
easy to show that all curves which have that property may be
obtained in this manner. For a, /3, 7 are exactly the direction cosines of the
is the arc of its spherical indicatrix ( 225).
curve defined by (66), and

where daand

it is

erty,

<j

CONTACT BETWEEN SKEW CURVES


CONTACT BETWEEN CURVES AND SURFACES
IV.

The order

234. Contact between two curves.

skew
and

of contact of

two

Let F

same way as for plane curves.

curves is defined in the

To each point
be two curves which are tangent at a point A
F
of
a
A
us
let
of F near
according to such a law
assign
point
A
We proceed to find
and
that
simultaneously.
approach
.

I"

MM

maximum

with respect to the


order of the infinitesimal
If
arc
of
this
maximum order
the
F.
infinitesimal
AM,
principal
curves
have
contact
the
two
that
shall
is n
of order n.
1, we
say
*
in
axes
of
a
Let us assume
trirectangular
space, such
system
to
the
common
not
is
that the yz plane
tangent at A, and
parallel
the

let

the equations of the two curves be

/N
If

f(x\.
V
/

/fN

./

(
\

Y=

F(x),

ZQ are the coordinates of A, the coordinates of

M and M

are, respectively,

[x -f

h,

f(x

+ A),

<f>(x

/*)]

[ar c

k,

F(x

+ k},

4>(.r

&)] ,

A; is a function of h which is defined


by the law of corre
and
and which approaches zero
spondence assumed between
with h. We may select h as the principal infinitesimal instead of

where

MM

AM

should
(211); and a necessary condition that
be an infinitesimal of order n + 1 is that each of the differences

the arc

k-h,
* It

is

F(x

()

7c)

- f(x +

h}

&(x

fc)

<K*o

A)

easy to show, by passing to the formula for the distance between two points

in oblique coordinates, that this assumption is not essential.

CONTACT

XI,L;a]

487

+1

should be an infinitesimal of order n

or more.

It follows that

we must have

k-h = ah

+l

<D(z

where
its

a,

ft,

y remain

value h

F(x

k)

finite as

$(x

+
+

A + 1)
+

<rA"

ahn +

+l

1
,

zero.

Replacing k by

of these equations, the latter

- /(*,, +
+
X(>

<j>(

A)
A)

= /8A- +
=

two

1
,

yA"*

and
+ A + ahn+l ) by Taylor s
+
the terms which contain a will have a factor
hence,

Expanding F(x

<t>(z

series, all

in

h)

= yh

h approaches

first

become

+
+

+ h) = /3h

-f(x

K)

<fr(x

ahn+l from the


F(x,

A"

order that the preceding condition be satisfied, each of the

differences

F(x

+ A) - f(x +
n

should be of order n
order n

order n

A)

or more.

-f 1

4>(a;

h)

<f>(

X()

It follows that if

MN between

A)

MM

is

of

the points
and
of the
1,
two curves which have the same abscissa x -f h will be at least of

the distance

Hence the maximum order

1.

of the infinitesimal in

question will be obtained by putting into correspondence the points


of the two curves which have the same abscissa.

This

maximum

are tangent

we

order

shall

is

easily evaluated.

Since the two curves

have

Let us suppose for generality that we also have

but that at least one of the differences

MM

does not vanish.


Then the distance
will be of order n + 1
and the contact will be of order n. This result may also be stated
as follows
To find the order of contact of two curves Y and T con
:

sider the two sets of projections (C,


and (C l C{) of the given
curves on the xy plane and the xz plane, respectively, and find the
C")

order of contact of each set ; then the order of contact of the given
curves F and
will be the smaller of these two.
I"

SKEW CURVES

488
If the

(F

two curves F and F are given

*(

o)

*(

o)

= * (*o)

form

if

*(*o)

236

Z=*(M),

= =

they will be tangent at a point u


*(*o)

in the

r=*(w),

X=.f(u),

[XI,

"KM

* (*o) =

<A

(V>

we suppose that f (t ) is not zero, the tangent at the point of


contact is not parallel to the yz plane, and the points on the two

T/*

curves which have the same abscissa correspond to the same value
In order that the contact should be of order n it is neces
of t.
sary and sufficient that each of the infinitesimals
1 with respect to
should be of order n
\l/(t)
*()

<(Y)

<$()

i.e.

and
that

we should have

(*o)

* (*)=
and that

*
*

(*o)

(<),

-,

=
* (M =
*

(n)

(*o)

"

4>

"

Co)

(^),

at least one of the differences

should not vanish.


It is easy to reduce to the preceding the case in which one of the
curves F is given by equations of the form

(67)

and the other curve F by two implicit equations

of
212, we could show that a necessary
condition that the contact should be of order n at a point of F
where t = t is that we should have

Resuming the reasoning

(F(*.)

where

F(0

0,

[Ft^-0,
=

nf(t)>

(*o)

F|(o)

*(0 -KO]

=
=

0,

-..,

0,

r
f

(0

F<">(*

Fi->(*

=
=
)
)

0,

0,

F,

Let F be a curve whose equations are


and let F be one of a family of curves in

235. Osculating curves.

given in the form (67),


2n + 2 parameters a, b, c,
(69)

F(x,

y,z,a,b,-->,l)

I,

which

0,

is

defined by the equations

(*, y,

z,a,b,c,

>,

I)

0.

XI,

CONTACT

235]

489

2 parameters in such
it is possible to determine the 2n
T
of order rti with
curve
contact
has
the
that
corresponding
way
The curve thus determined is
the given curve F at a given point.

In general
a

called the osculating curve of the family (69) to the curve T.


which determine the values of the parameters a, b, c,

equations

The
,

It should be noted that


2 equations (68).
are precisely the 2n
and
these equations cannot be solved unless each of the functions

contain at least n

-f-

For example,

1 parameters.

if

the curves

F are plane curves, one of the equations (69) contains only three
hence a plane curve cannot have contact of order
parameters
with a skew curve at a point taken at random on
two
than
higher
;

the curve.
the
Let us apply this theory to the simpler classes of curves,
on
four
line
A
the
circle.
line
and
straight
depends
param
straight
eters
hence the osculating straight line will have contact of the
;

It is easy to show
we write the equations of

that it coincides with the tangent,


the straight line in the form

first order.

for if

= az + p,

= bz + q,

the equations (68) become

where (x

these equations,

is

we

the supposed point of contact on F.

Solving

find

which are precisely the values which give the tangent. A neces
sary condition that the tangent should have contact of the second
order

is

that xJ

= az^

= bztf,
xo

The points where


The family of

that

is,

zo

l/o

happens are those discussed in 217.


space depends on six parameters;
hence the osculating circle will have contact of the second order.
Let the equations of the circle be written in the form

(x, y, z)

F, (x, y, z)

this

all circles in

= A(x = (x-

a)
2

a)

+
+

B(y
(y

b)

C(z

-W+( -

=0,

c~)

c)

- /2 = 0,
2

SKEW CURVES

490
where the parameters are

R, and the

two

circle are

A(x

) -f

A *2
at

a)

B(y -b}

C(z

e)

236

ratios of the three

The equations which determine

coefficients A, B, C.

(x

a, b, c,

[XI,

the osculating

0,

+B %
+C *1-0,
at
at

(y

-H>-

and ^(), respec


<(),
of these equations show that the
third
tively.
of the curve F.
plane of the osculating circle is the osculating plane
If a, b, and c be thought of as the running coordinates, the last

where

x, y,

and s are to be replaced by /(),

The second and the

two equations represent, respectively, the normal plane at the point


at a point whose distance from
(x, y, z) and the normal plane
center of the osculating circle
Hence
the
infinitesimal.
is
(x, y, z)
is the point of intersection of the osculating plane and the polar
It follows that the osculating circle coincides

line.

with the

circle

foreseen by noticing that two curves


which have contact of the second order have the same circle of
are the same for the two
curvature, since the values of y z
of curvature, as

we might have

z"

y",

curves.
236. Contact between a curve and a surface.

and T a curve tangent


near

let

M and M

to

at a point A.

Let S be a surface

To any point

M of

of 5 according to such a law that


simultaneously. First let us try to find what

us assign a point

approach A
will render the order
and
law of correspondence between
a. maximum.
with respect to the arc
of the infinitesimal
Let us choose a system of rectangular coordinates in such a way
that the tangent to T shall not be parallel to the yz plane, and that
Let
the tangent plane to S shall not be parallel to the z axis.
be the coordinates of A Z = F(x, y) the equation of S

MM

(*oi

y<

*o)

y =f(x),

AM

infinitesimal

<fr(x)

MM

1 the order of the


the equations of T and n
The
for the given law of correspondence.
;

CONTACT

491

are [x + h, f(x + A),


+ &)]. Let X, Y, and
be
the
coordinates
of
In
order
that
should
Y)
F(X,
be of order n + 1 with respect to the arc AM, or, what amounts to

coordinates of

<f>(x

Z=

the same thing, with respect to h,

differences

least of order

X-x =
where
have

a,

+1
ah"
ft,

x,

1,

y,

that

and

Y-y = /3h

y remain

finite as

ahn + y

F(x

and the difference F(x, y)

n+

necessary that each of the

it is

z should be an infinitesimal at

that

is,

MM

we should have

Z-z=

l
,

h approaches

F(X, F)

Hence we

zero.

+ (3h n + ) -z = yh n +
l

- z = yh n +

shall

l
,

z will be itself at least of order

This shows that the order of the infinitesimal

MN, where

+ 1.

is

the

point where a parallel to the z axis pierces the surface, will be at


least as great as that of
The maximum order of contact

MM

which we shall

of contact of the curve and the surface


therefore that of the distance
with respect to the arc
call the order

MN

is

AM

or with respect to h.
Or, again, we may say that the order of con
tact of the curve and the surface is the order of contact between T

and

the curve

in which the surface

is

cut by the cylinder

which

projects T upon the xy plane.


(It is evident that the z axis may be
any line not parallel to the tangent plane.) For the equations of
the curve T are

y=f(x),

Z=F[>,

/(*)]

*(*),

and, by hypothesis,

*(*)
If

we

also

K*o),

* (*) = *

(*).

have

the curve and the surface have contact of order


tion $(x)

n.

Since the equa

gives the abscissae of the points of intersection of


the curve and the surface, these conditions for contact of order n
<t>(x)

at a point

A may

be expressed by saying that the curve meets the

surface in n -f 1 coincident points at A.

T is given by equations of the form x =f(f),


and the surface S is given by a singly equation

Finally, if the curve

<(<),

\fr(f),

of the form F(x, y,


0, the curve T just defined will have equa
z}
tions of the form x
*
=/(*), y
<(),
w(), where ir(t) is a func

tion defined

by the equation
+(),*(*)]

0.

SKEW CURVES

492

[XI,

237

In order that F and F should have contact of order n, the infini


t
must be of order n + 1 with respect to t
7r(Y)
\l/(f)
that is, we must have
tesimal

Using F()
tions

may

234, these equa

to denote the function considered in

be written in the form

These conditions may be expressed by saying that the curve and


the surface have n + 1 coincident points of intersection at their
point of contact.
If 5 be one of a family of surfaces which depends on n + 1
the parameters may be so chosen that S
, I,
parameters a, b, c,

has contact of order n with a given curve at a given point


called the osculating surface.
In the case of a plane there are three parameters.

surface

this

is

The equations

which determine these parameters for the osculating plane are

Af

(t}

Af (t)
Af"(t)

D=
+
(t) + C$ (t) +
=
+ B# (t) + Cy ()
=
+
+
B<j>

B4"(t)

It is clear that these are the

C^"(f)

i.e.

"(t)

0,
0.

same equations we found before

the osculating plane, and that the contact


If the order of contact is higher,
order.

Af

0,

Bt"

()

for

in general of the second

is

we must have

Cf"(f)

= 0,

the osculating plane must be stationary.

The equation of a sphere depends on four


hence
the
osculating sphere will have contact of the
parameters
For simplicity let us suppose that the coordinates
third order.
x, y, K of a point of the given curve F are expressed in terms of the
237. Osculating sphere.
;

arc s of that curve.

and whose radius

is

at a given point
F(*)

0,

where

F()

In order that a sphere whose center is (a, b, c}


p should have contact of the third order with

(a;,

y, z)

(*)

= (x -

on

F,

0,

F"(*)

a)

-f-

we must have

(y

i)

0,

(z

F"(*)

c)

- p*

= 0,

XI,

CONTACT

238]

and where

493

z are expressed as functions of s.


Expanding the
condition and applying Frenet s

x, y,

of the equations of
find
we
formulae,
last three

F 0)

(x

a)

(y

O/

{3

*)

+ (* - c)y = 0,
+ (* + 1=
)

0,

\R

/z

b)

These three equations determine a, 6, and c. But the first of them


represents the normal plane to the curve F at the point (x, y, z) in
the running coordinates (a, b, c), and the other two may be derived
from this one by differentiating twice with respect to s. Hence
the center of the osculating sphere is the point where the polar line
touches its envelope. In order to solve the three equations we may

reduce the last one by means of the others to the form


(x

from which
a

it is

a) a

(y

J)0r, +

J
c)

yr

=T

D
,

easy to derive the formulae

+ Ra

-T^a",

Hence the radius

= y + R? - T

of the osculating sphere

is

given by the formula

is constant, the center of the osculating sphere coincides with


the center of curvature, which agrees with the result obtained in
233.

If

238. Osculating straight lines. If the equations of a family of


curves depend on n -f 2 parameters, the parameters may be chosen
in such a way that the resulting curve C has contact of order n with
For the equation which expresses
a given surface S at a point M.

that

C meets S

there are n

-f-

at

M and

the

-f 1

equations which express that

1 coincident points of intersection at

2 equations for the determination of the parameters.

constitute

SKEW CURVES

494

[XI,

EM.

For example, the equations of a straight line depend on four


of a given surface S,
Hence, through each point
parameters.
there exist one or more straight lines which have contact of the
second order with the surface. In order to determine these lines,

let

us take the origin at the point M, and let us suppose that the

z axis is not parallel to the tangent plane at M.


Let z
F(x, y)
be the equation of the surface with respect to these axes. The

required line evidently passes through the origin, and


are of the form

_z_

Hence the equation


that

cp

its

equations

F(ap, bp) should have a triple root p

we should have

is,

where p,

ap

+ bq,

denote the values of the

q, r, s, t

first

and second deriva

tives of F(x, y) at the origin. The first of these equations expresses


that the required line lies in the tangent plane, which is evident

a priori.
and
ft/a,

The second equation


its

is

2
roots are real if s

a quadratic equation in the ratio


Hence there are in

rt is positive.

general two and only two straight lines through any point of a given
surface which have contact of the second order with that surface.
rt is positive
These lines will be real or imaginary according as s 2
We shall meet these lines again in the following
or negative.

chapter, in the study of the curvature of surfaces.

EXERCISES
1.

Find, in finite form, the equations of the evolutes of the curve which

cuts the straight line generators of a right circular cone at a constant angle.
Discuss the problem.
[Licence, Marseilles, July, 1884.]
2.

Do

skew curves T

which the three points of intersection


with the tangent, the principal normal, and the binormal are

there exist

for

of a fixed plane
the vertices of an equilateral triangle ?

3. Let T be the edge of regression of a surface which is the envelope of


a one-parameter family of spheres, i.e. the envelope of the characteristic circles.
Show that the curve which is the locus of the centers of the spheres lies on
Also state and prove the converse.
the polar surface of T.

4.

space.

on

Let T be a given skew curve,

Through

this parallel a

draw a
segment

Ma

point on T, and

line parallel to the polar line to

a fixed point in

at

ON equal to the radius of curvature of

M, and lay off


at M. Show

EXERCISES

XI, Exs.]

495

and the curve


described by the
that the curve F described by the point
center of curvature of F have their tangents perpendicular, their elements of
T"

length equal, and their radii of curvature equal, at corresponding points.

[ROUQUET.]
If the osculating

5.

show
of

sphere to a given skew curve F has a constant radius a,


a, at least unless the radius of curvature

on a sphere of radius
constant and equal to a.

that F

is

lies

6. Show that the necessary and sufficient condition that the locus of the
center of curvature of a helix drawn on a cylinder should be another helix on a

cylinder parallel to the first one is that the right section of the second cylinder
should be a circle or a logarithmic spiral. In the latter case show that all the
helices lie on circular cones which have the same axis and the same vertex.
[Tissox, Nouvelles Annales, Vol. XI, 1852.]
7*. If two skew curves have the same principal normals, the osculating
planes of the two curves at the points where they meet the same normal make
a constant angle with each other. The two points just mentioned and the cen

two curves form a system of four points whose anharThe product of the radii of torsion of the two curves

ters of curvature of the

monic

ratio is constant.

at corresponding points

is

a constant.

[PAUL SERRET
8*.

and

Let

x, y, z

MANNHEIM

SCHELL.]

be the rectangular coordinates of a point on a skew curve F,


Then the curve F defined by the equations

s the arc of that curve.

I a"ds,

yo

are the running coordinates,


where x yo,
and the curve defined by the equations
,

z<>

Z sin0,

where

I P"ds,

T= y cos0 + y

is

ty"ds,

called the conjugate curve to F;

sin0,

Z=

cos0

-f

2 sin0,

are the running coordinates and 6 is a constant angle, is called


JT, F,
a related curve. Find the orientation of the fundamental trihedron for each of
these curves, and find their radii of curvature and of torsion.
If the curvature of F is constant, the torsion of the curve F
the related curves are curves of the Bertrand type ( 233).

is

constant, and
find the

Hence

general equations of the latter curves.


9.

Let F and

I"

be two skew curves which are tangent at a point A. From


two curves in the

AM

AM

and
from
lay off infinitesimal arcs
along the
same direction. Find the limiting position of the line

MM

[CAUGHT.]
10. In order that a straight line rigidly connected to the fundamental trihe
dron of a skew curve and passing through the vertex of the trihedron should
describe a developable surface, that straight line must coincide with the tangent,
at least unless the given skew curve is a helix.
In the latter case there are an
infinite

number

of straight lines

which have the required property.

SKEW CURVES

496

For a curve of the Bertrand type there

exist

[XI, Exs.

two hyperbolic paraboloids


of whose generators

rigidly connected to the fundamental trihedron, each


describes a developable surface.
,

Bivista di Mathematical,, Vol. II, 1892, p. 155.]

11*. In order that the principal normals of a given skew curve should be the
binormals of another curve, the radii of curvature and the radii of torsion of
the first curve must satisfy a relation of the form

A /JL
\R*
where

and

1\ =
TV

are constants.

[MANNHEIM, Comptes rendus,

1877.]

[The case in which a straight line through a point on a skew curve rigidly
connected with the fundamental trihedron is also the principal normal (or the
binormal) of another skew curve has been discussed by Pellet (Comptes rendus,
May, 1887), by Cesaro (Nouvelles Annales, 1888, p. 147), and by Balitrand
(Mathesis, 1894, p. 159).]
12. If the osculating plane to a

sphere whose center

skew curve F

show

is

always tangent to a fixed

that the plane through the tangent perpen


dicular to the principal normal passes through 0, and show that the ratio of
the radius of curvature to the radius of torsion is a linear function of the arc.

State

is

0,

and prove the converse theorems.

CHAPTER

XII

SURFACES

CURVATURE OF CURVES DRAWN ON A SURFACE

I.

239. Fundamental formula. Meusnier s theorem. In order to study


the curvature of a surface at a non-singular point M, we shall sup
pose the surface referred to a system of rectangular coordinates

such that the axis of z

is not parallel to the tangent plane at M.


If the surface is analytic, its equation may be written in the form

(1)

F(x,y),

where F(x, ?/) is developable in power series according to powers of


x
X Q and y
y in the neighborhood of the point
)
(x y
But the arguments which we shall use do not require the
(
194).

assumption that the surface should be analytic we shall merely


suppose that the function F(x, ?/), together with its first and second
We shall use
derivatives, is continuous near the point (x
y
:

Monge

It is

notation, p,

q, r, s,

t,

~)

for these derivatives.

seen immediately from the equation of the tangent plane

that the direction, cosines of the normal to the surface are propor
tional to p, q, and
1.
If we adopt as the positive direction of the
normal that which makes an acute angle with the positive z axis,

the actual direction cosines themselves

A,

/*,

v are

given by the

formulae
\
A

u,

Let C be a curve on the surface S through the point M, and let


the equations of this curve be given in parameter form then the
functions of the parameter which represent the coordinates of a
point of this curve satisfy the equation (1), and hence their differ
;

entials satisfy the

two relations

(4)

= p dx + q di/
+ q d*y + r dx + 2s dxdy + t dy*.
dz

(3)
<Pz

= p d*x

497

SURFACES

498

[XII,

239

of these equations means that the tangent to the curve C


In order to interpret the
the tangent plane to the surface.
second geometrically, let us express the differentials which occur in
If the independent
it in terms of known geometrical quantities.

The

first

lies in

we

variable be the arc a of the curve C,

dx: _
~ a

^/_o
~

~fo

do-

^f_

"

dv*

da 2

<&*

da2

=
~

letters a, ft, y, a , /3 y R have the same meanings as in


Substituting these values in (4) and dividing by

where the
229.

&y__P_
~

d*x_<^

do-~ y

have

shall

that equation becomes

y -pa -gp*
R^/l + p* + q 2
or,

by

(2),

\a

fji/3

=
= ra + 2sa@ +
2

vy

+ p.(3 + vy is nothing but the cosine of the


included between the principal normal to C and the positive
direction of the normal to the surface hence the preceding formula
may be written in the form
But the numerator Xa

angle

ra 2

COS 6
(5)

+ tfB*

2sa/3

is exactly equivalent to the formula (4); hence it


contains all the information we can discover concerning the curva

This formula

ture of curves

drawn on the

Since

surface.

and

Vl + p* +

are both essentially positive, cos and ra -f 2saft


tf} have the same
is acute or
sign, i.e. the sign of the latter quantity shows whether

obtuse.

In the

first place, let

us consider

all

the curves on the sur

which have the same osculating plane


face S through the point
(which shall be other than the tangent plane) at the point M. All
these curves have the same tangent, namely the intersection of the
osculating plane with the tangent plane to the surface. The direc
tion cosines a, /?, y therefore coincide for all these curves. Again,
the principal normal to any of these curves coincides with one of
the two directions which can be selected upon the perpendicular to the
be the angle which the
tangent line in the osculating plane. Let
o>

normal to the surface makes with one of these directions then we


= TT to. But the sign of ra 2 + 2sa/3 + tfP
shall have 6 =
or
;

o>

shows whether the angle

is

acute or obtuse

hence the positive

XII,

CURVES ON A SURFACE

239]

499

direction of the principal normal is the same for all these curves.
Since 6 is also the same for all the curves, the radius of curvature

them all that is to say, all the curves on the sur


which have the same osculating plane have
the
point
face through
the same center of curvature.
the same for

is

It follows that

we need only study

the curvature of the plane

First let us study the variation of the


curvature of the sections of the surface by planes which all pass
sections of the surface.

through the same tangent MT.


2
z
generality, that ra + 2sa(3 + fy3

We may
>

suppose, without loss of


change in the direction

0, for a

of the z axis is sufficient to change the signs of r, s, and t.


For all
these plane sections we shall have, therefore, cos
and
the
0,
If
is
acute.
be
the
of
radius
curvature
6
of
the
section
R!
angle
by the normal plane through MT, since the corresponding angle
>

is zero,

we

shall

have
1 __ ra*

R
Comparing

this

of curvature of

+ 2sa(3 +

t/3

formula with equation

any oblique

section,

(5),

we

which gives the radius

find

cos0

W^-JT
R=

or

R! cos

0,

which shows that the

center of curvature of

any

oblique section is the projection of the center of curvature of the


normal section through the same tangent line. This is Meusnier s

theorem.

The preceding theorem reduces the study

of the curvature of

oblique sections to the study of the curvature of normal sections.


shall discuss directly the results obtained by Euler.
First let

We

us remark that the formula (5) will appear in two different forms
for a normal section according as ra 2 + 2saft + t{P is positive or
negative.

In order to avoid the inconvenience of carrying these

two

we

signs,

shall agree to affix the sign


or the sign
to the
R of a normal section according as the direction

radius of curvature

from

M to the center of

curvature of the section

is

the same as or

opposite to the positive direction of the normal to the surface.


With this convention, R is given in either case by the formula
1
(7)

ra*

28ap

+ tF

SURFACES

500

[XII,

which shows without ambiguity the direction


of curvature

in

239

which the center

lies.

From

(7) it is easy to determine the position of the surface with


to
its tangent plane near the point of
For if
respect
tangency.
2

2
2
0, the quadratic form ra
2saft }- tfi keeps the same
of
r
and
t
the
of
as
the
normal
sign
sign
plane turns around
the normal; hence all the normal sections have their centers of

rt

<

curvature on the same side of the tangent plane, and therefore all
on the same side of that plane the surface is said to be convex

lie

and the point is called an elliptic point. On the


2
2
if
s
rt
+ 2sa(3 + tfi 2 vanishes for two
0, the form
contrary,
particular positions of the normal plane, and the corresponding
normal sections have, in general, a point of inflection. When the
normal plane lies in one of the dihedral angles formed by these two
planes, R is positive, and the corresponding section lies above the tan
gent plane when the normal plane lies in the other dihedral angle,
R is negative, and the section lies below the tangent plane. Hence
at such a point,

>

in this case the surface crosses its tangent plane at the point of
Such a point is called a hyperbolic point. Finally, if
tangency.
s

rt

0, all

the normal sections

lie

on the same side of the tan

gent plane near the point of tangency except that one for which
the radius of curvature is infinite.
The latter section usually
crosses the tangent plane.
Such a point is called a parabolic point.
It is easy to verify these results by a direct study of the differ
z
ence n
z of the values of z for a point on the surface and for

the point on the tangent plane at


For
point (x, y} on the xy plane.
z

= p(x

a*

M which

+ q(ij

whence, for the point of tangency (xn

du _

cz

dx

dx

projects into the

same

we have

?/

i/

),

^M

_n

dy

and
d2 u

It follows that if s 2

(ft

d2 u

u is a maximum or a minimum at
M. it has the same sign for all other
On the other hand, if s 2 rt 0, u
points in the neighborhood.
has neither a maximum nor a minimum at M, and hence it changes
sign in any neighborhood of M.
(

56),

and

since

rt

<

u vanishes

0,

at

>

XII,

CURVES ON A SURFACE

240]

The

240. Euler s theorems.

501

In order to study the varia

indicatrix.

tion of the radius of curvature of a normal section, let us take the


as the origin and the tangent plane at
as the xy plane.
point

With such a system

we

of axes

p=

have

shall

= 0,

and the

formula (7) becomes

= r cos

(8)

2
<

2s cos

sin

<

<f>

sin 2
<,

where
is the angle which the trace of the normal plane makes
with the positive x axis. Equating the derivative of the second
member to zero, we find that the points at which R may be a maxi
<

mum

minimum

stand at right angles. The following geomet


convenient means of visualizing the variation of R.
Let us lay off, on the line of intersection of the normal plane with
the xy plane, from the origin, a length Om equal numerically to the
or a

rical picture is a

square root of the absolute value of the corresponding radius of cur


The point ra will describe a curve, which gives an instanta

vature.

neous picture of the variation of the radius of curvature. This ciirve


is called the indicatrix.
Let us examine the three possible cases.
2
rt
0.
In this case the radius R has a constant sign, which
1) s
we shall suppose positive. The coordinates of
are
cos
and r)
V-R sin
hence the equation of the indicatrix is
<

= V#

<

<

re

(9)

which

is

the equation of an ellipse whose center is the origin. It is


R is at a maximum for the section made by the normal

clear that

plane through the major axis of this ellipse, and at a minimum for
the normal plane through the minor axis. The sections made by two
planes which are equally inclined to the two axes evidently have the
same curvature. The two sections whose planes pass through the

axes of the indicatrix are called the principal normal sections, and
the corresponding radii of curvature are called the principal radii of
If the axes of the indicatrix are taken for the axes of x
curvature.

and

y,

we

shall

have

0,

R
With

T cos 2

<

sin 2

(8)

<j>

and
<f>

Tr/2, respectively

(10)

^cos

R and R 2

hence 1/Ri
sin

<ft

<fr

>

becomes

<.

these axes the principal radii of curvature

to

and the formula

r,

correspond

1/R 2

t,

and

SURFACES

502
2) s

rt

The normal

0.

>

which

values of

sections

240

which correspond to the

satisfy the equation

<f>

r cos 2

have

[XII,

<

2s cos

sin

<

<j>

sin 2

<

Let L(OL^ and L^OL 2 be the inter


two planes with the xy plane. When the trace of

infinite radii of curvature.

sections of these

the normal plane lies in the angle L^OL^^ for example, the radius
is positive.
Hence the corresponding portion of the

of curvature
indicatrix

where

is

and

point m.

represented by the equation

is

L[OL l and L Z OL Z
other angle

the previous case, the coordinates of the


an hyperbola whose asymptotes are the lines
When the trace of the normal plane lies in the

are, as in

77

This

L ^OL lt R

is

negative, and the coordinates of

= V R cos

<f),

Hence the corresponding portion

which

is

t]

sin

of the indicatrix

conjugate to the preceding hyperbola.

m are

<.

is

the hyperbola

These two hyper

bolas together form a picture of the variation of the radius of curva


If the axes of the hyperbolas be taken as the
ture in this case.
x and y axes, the formula (8) may be written in the form (10), as in

the previous case, where now, however, the principal radii of curva
ture R and R 2 have opposite signs.

2
rt
0.
3) s
fixed sign, which

In this case the radius of curvature

has a

we

The indicatrix is still


shall suppose positive.
the equation (9), but, since its center is at the origin

represented by
and it is of the parabolic type, it must be composed of two parallel
If the axis of y be taken parallel to these lines, we
straight lines.
shall

have

0, t

0,

and the general formula

-=
it

(8)

becomes

rcos*$,

or

R
This case may also be considered to be a limiting case of either of
the preceding, and the formula just found may be thought of as the
limiting case of (10), when R 2 becomes infinite.

XII,

CURVES ON A SURFACE

241]

503

Euler a formulae may be established without using the formula (5). Taking
of the given surface as the origin and the tangent plane as the xy
the point
plane, the expansion of z by Taylor s series may be written in the form

rz 2

2sxy

~o-

where the terms not written down are

ty*
-

-"

of order greater than two.

In order

made by a plane y = x tan 0, we

to find the radii of curvature of the section

may

introduce the transformation

and then

set

=
2

x cos

y sin

<t>

x sin

y cos

<

This gives the expansion of z in powers of x

0.

r cos 2

<(>

2s sin

cos
<f>

<f>

sin 2
2J

|-

1.2
214, leads to the formula (8).

which, by

The

Notes.

section of the surface

rz 2

by

2sxy

its

ty*

<j>

3 (x,

y)

given by the equation

is

tangent plane

and has a double point at the origin. The two tangents at this point are the
asymptotic tangents. More generally, if two surfaces S and Si are both tangent
at the origin to the

xy plane

is

xy plane, the projection of

=
where
for S.

on the

(r

- n)x2 +

2(8

Sl )xy

(t

t^y*

-,

r\, s\, ti have the same meaning for the surface Si that r, s, t have
The nature of the double point depends upon the sign of the expression
2

(s

their curve of intersection

given by the equation

Si)

(r

ri)(t

ti).

If this

expression

is

zero, the curve of intersection

has, in general, a cusp at the origin.

To recapitulate, there exist on any surface four remarkable posi


tions for the tangent at any point two perpendicular tangents for
:

which the corresponding radii of curvature have a maximum or a


minimum, and two so-called asymptotic, or principal,* tangents, for
which the corresponding radii of curvature are infinite. The latter are
to be found by equating the trinomial ra 2 -+-2saft + t{P to zero ( 238).
We proceed to show how to find the principal normal sections and
the principal radii of curvature for any system of rectangular axes.
241. Principal radii of curvature. There are in general two different
normal sections whose radii of curvature are equal to any given

value of R.
value of

is

The only exception

is

the case in which the given


which case

one of the principal radii of curvature, in

The reader should distinguish sharply the directions of the principal tangents
and the directions of the principal normal sections
To avoid confusion we shall not use the term principal
(the axes of the indicatrix)
TRANS.
tangent.
(the asymptotes of the indicatrix)
.

504

SURFACES

[XII,

241

only the corresponding principal section has the assigned radius


of curvature.
To determine the normal sections whose radius of
curvature is a given number R, we
determine the values of

may

a,

y by the three equations

ft,

Vl + p + a* =
ra* + 2sa/3 + tft\
2

-J

It is easy to derive

=p a + qft,

a2

/3

+ y =l.
2

from these the following homogeneous combina

tion of degree zero in a and

ft

<**

+ ft* + (pa + qpf

It follows that the ratio


ft/ a is given

a\l + p* - rD) +

D Vl +p +

2aft(pq

by the equation

- sD) + (?(!+

<f

tD)

= 0,

where R
If this equation has a double root, that
q
root satisfies each of the equations formed
by setting the two first
derivatives of the left-hand side with respect to a and
ft equal to
zero
2

(12)
I

a(pq-

sD}

=0,

D)

+ ft(l + q* -

tD)

0.

and replacing D by its value, we obtain an


Eliminating a and
equation for the principal radii of curvature
:

On the other hand, eliminating D from the equations


(12), we obtain
an equation of the second degree which determines the lines of inter
section of the tangent plane with the
principal normal sections
:

-pqr]
From

the very nature of the problem the roots of the


equations (13)
real.
It is easy to
verify this fact directly.
In order that the equation for R should have
equal roots, it is

and (14) will surely be

necessary that the indicatrix should be a circle, in which case all


the normal sections will have the same radius of curvature. Hence
the second member of
must be
of the ratio

independent

(11)

which necessitates the equations

pq

ftfa,

XII,

CURVES ON A SURFACE

241]

505

The

At
points which satisfy these equations are called umbilics.
such points the equation (14) reduces to an identity, since every
diameter of a circle is also an axis of symmetry.
It is often possible to determine th e principal normal sections
from certain geometrical considerations. For instance, if a surface
S has a plane of symmetry through a point
on the surface, it is

clear that the line of intersection of that plane with the tangent
is a line of symmetry of the indicatrix
hence the sec
plane at

tion by the plane of symmetry is one of the principal sections. For


example, on a surface of revolution the meridian through any point
is one of the principal normal sections
it is evident that the
plane
;

of the other principal normal section passes through the normal to


the surface and the tangent to the circular parallel at the point.
But we know the center of curvature of one of the oblique sections

through this tangent line, namely that of the circular parallel itself.
It follows from Meusnier s theorem that the center of curvature of
the second principal section is the point where the normal to the
surface meets the axis of revolution.

At any point of a developable surface, s


rt
0, and the indica
trix is a pair of parallel straight lines.
One of the principal sec
2

tions coincides with the generator,

curvature

is infinite.

The plane

and the corresponding radius of

of the second principal section is


All the points of a developable

perpendicular to the generator.


surface are parabolic, and, conversely, these are the
only surfaces
which have that property ( 222).
If a non-developable surface is convex at certain
points, while other
points of the surface are hyperbolic, there is usually a line of para

which separates the region where s


rt is positive from
the region where the same quantity is negative. For example, on the
anchor ring, these parabolic lines are the extreme circular parallels.
2

bolic points

In general there are on any convex surface only a finite number of umbilics.
proceed to show that the only real surface for which every point is an
umbilic is the sphere. Let X, p, v be the direction cosines of the normal to the
surface.
Differentiating (2), we find the formulae

We

ax
CX
dfj.

or,

by

_
~ pqs-(l+q*)r
(l + p2 +9 2)J

5X

_ pqr-(l+p*)s

dp

(15),

=
~
dy

^
=
~
dx

_ pqt-(l +

Sy

=
~
dx

-dy

q*)s

SURFACES

500

[XII,

242

first equation shows that X is independent of y, the second that /x is inde


pendent of z hence the common value of d\/cx, dp/dy is independent of both
x and y, i.e. it is a constant, say I/a. This fact leads to the equations

The

X=

-X
-

Va2 -

-Mo

(x

2
)

(y

2
2/o)

a
X

Va2 -

(x

2
)

(y

yo)

y -2/0
)

Va2 -(x-x
whence, integrating, the value of z

which

is

surface

is

+ Va -

2
)

-(2/-2/o)

found to be

(x

2
)

(y

)*

the equation of a sphere. It is evident that if 8\/dx


dp/dy = 0, the
But the equations (15) also have an infinite number of
a plane.

is

2
2
imaginary solutions which satisfy the relation 1 + p + q = 0, as we can see by
with
to
x
and
with
this
respect to y.
respect
equation
differentiating

II.

ASYMPTOTIC LINES

CONJUGATE LINES

242. Definition and properties of asymptotic lines.

At every hyper

bolic point of a surface there are two tangents for which the corre
sponding normal sections have infinite radii of curvature, namely

The curves on the given surface


each of their points to one of these asymptotic
If a point moves along any
directions are called asymptotic lines.
curve on a surface, the differentials dx, dy, dz are proportional to
the asymptotes of the indicatrix.

which are tangent

at

For an asymptotic tangent


the direction cosines of the tangent.
dx and dy at any point
differentials
hence
the
roP
tft*
2saf3

of an asymptotic line

must

rdx 2

(16)

satisfy the relation

2sdxdy

+ tdif = 0.
=

If the equation of the surface be given in the form z


F(x, y), and
we substitute for r, s, and t their values as functions of x and y,
this equation

may

be solved for dy/dx, and

we

shall obtain the

two

solutions

We

shall see later that each of these equations has an infinite num
ber of solutions, and that every pair of values (x y ) determines
It follows that there pass
in general one and only one solution.
,

through every point of the surface, in general, two and only two

XII,

242]

ASYMPTOTIC LINES

asymptotic lines
lines

upon the

all

CONJUGATE LINES

507

these lines together form a double system of

surface.

Again, the asymptotic lines

may be

defined without the use of

any metrical relation the asymptotic lines on a surface are those


curves for which the osculating plane always coincides with the tan
gent plane to the surface. For the necessary and sufficient condition
:

that the osculating plane should coincide with the tangent


plane to
the surface is that the equations

dz

p dx

q dy

d2 z

p d^x

q d*y

should be satisfied simultaneously (see


The first of these
215).
equations is satisfied by any curve which lies on the surface. Dif
ferentiating it, we obtain the equation
d*z

p d*x

q d*y

dp dx

dq dy

which shows that the second of the preceding equations may be


replaced by the following relation between the first differentials
:

dp dx

(18)

+ dqdy= 0,

an equation which coincides with (16). Moreover it is


easy to
Since the radius of
explain why the two definitions are equivalent.
curvature of the normal section which
of the indicatrix

is infinite,

totic line will also

be

by -Meusnier s theorem, at least unless


perpendicular to the normal plane, in which
theorem becomes illusory. Hence the osculating

the osculating plane


case Meusnier

is tangent to an
asymptote
the radius of curvature of the asymp

infinite,

is

an asymptotic line must coincide with the tangent plane,


at least unless the radius of curvature is infinite
but if this were
true, the line would be a straight line and its osculating plane
plane to

would be indeterminate.

It follows

from this property that any

projective transformation carries the asymptotic lines into asymp


totic lines.
It is evident also that the differential equation is of

the same form whether the axes are rectangular or oblique, for the
equation of the osculating plane remains of the same form.
It is clear that the

asymptotic lines exist only in case the points of

the surface are hyperbolic.

But when the surface

is

analytic the

differential equation (16) always has an infinite number of solu


1
rt is positive or negative.
As a
tions, real or imaginary, whether s

generalization we shall say that any convex surface possesses two sys
tems of imaginary asymptotic lines. Thus the asymptotic lines of an
unparted hyperboloid are the two systems of rectilinear generators.

SURFACES

508

243

[XII,

For an ellipsoid or a sphere these generators are imaginary, but


they satisfy the differential equation for the asymptotic lines.
lines of the surface

Example. Let us try to find the asymptotic


z = x m y*.
In this example we have
r

and

= m(m

l)x

m - 2 yn

mnx m -

the differential equation (16)

may

may

yn

-1

n(n

l)x

2
y"-

be written in the form

x dy/
This equation

\x dy

be solved as a quadratic in (ydx)/(xdy).

Let hi and h^ be

the two families of asymptotic lines are the curves which


project, on the xy plane, into the curves

the solutions.

Then

243. Differential equation in parameter form. Let the equations of


the surface be given in terms of two parameters u and v
:

x=f(u,

(19)

v),

$(u,v},

^(u,v}.

Using the second definition of asymptotic lines, let us write the


equation of the tangent plane in the form

A(X -

(20)

x)

+ B(Y - y) +

C(Z

z)

0,

where A, B, and C satisfy the equations

ov

dv

8v

39.
Since the
for A, B, and C found in
as
this
line
is
the
same
of
an
tangent
asymptotic
osculating plane
must
the
coefficients
these
same
equations
satisfy
plane,

which are the equations

Adx +
Ad*x
The

first

entiating

which
set

of these equations, as above, is satisfied identically. Differ


it, we see that the second may be replaced by the equation

dA dx

(22)
is

Bdij + Cdz =0,


+ Bd*y + Cd?z = 0.

+ dBdy + dCdz =

0,

the required differential equation.


If, for example, we
1 in the equations (21), A and B are equal, respectively,

p and q of z with respect to x and


the equation (22) coincides with (18).
to the partial derivatives

y,

and

XII,

244]

ASYMPTOTIC LINES

CONJUGATE LINES

509

This equa
Examples. As an example let us consider the conoid z =
z =
and the equations (21)
is equivalent to the system x = u, y =
<f>(y/x).

tion

w>,

become

A + Bv =

These equations are

Bu +
(v)
C = u, A =

we

satisfied if

</>(),

C<j>

set

# (),

.B

# ()

hence

the equation (22) takes the form


2
24>

utf>"(v)dv

(v)dudv

0.

One
tors.

solution of this equation is v


const., which gives the rectilinear genera
Dividing by dv, the remaining equation is

dv
<t>"(v)

<j>

whence the second system


by the equation w 2

defined

(v)

du
u

on the surface
which project on the xy plane into the

of asymptotic lines are the curves

=
K<f>

(v)

curves

Again, consider the surfaces discussed by Jamet, whose equation

may

be

written in the form

z and u = y/x, the differential equation of


written in the form

Taking the independent variables


the asymptotic lines

may be

JTW

/(u>

from which each of the systems of asymptotic

lines

may

be found by a single

quadrature.

A helicoid is a surface defined by


The reader may show that the
pf"(p)

dp*

equations of the form

differential equation of the asymptotic lines is

- 2h dw dp +

p*f

(p)

du*

from which w may be found by a single quadrature.


244. Asymptotic lines on a ruled surface. Eliminating A B, and C
between the equations (21) and the equation
,

n*
A
JT. /-/2
\JU
*J

we

^^

J-f

sj*
U/

.-I*

I/

/"*

[^

\*>

& __

^-72 fj

Uv

||
V/

find the general differential equation of the asymptotic lines

f
du

du

du

df

8$

d$

dv

dv

dv

(23)

<j>

diff

=0.

SURFACES

510

[XII,

244

This equation does not contain the second differentials d z u and d 2 v,


for

we have
CUCV

CV

du dv

dv*
ov*

and analogous expressions for d2 y and d 2 z. Subtracting from the


2
third row of the determinant (23) the first row multiplied by d u
2
d
the
differential
and the second row multiplied by
v,
equation
becomes
cu

_
du

en

df_

c_$

cj,

do

cv

cu cv

0.

vtr

Developing this determinant with respect to the elements of the


first row and arranging with respect to du and dv, the equation

may

be written in the form

D du + 2D
2

(24)

where D,

and

D"

du dv

D"

dv*

= 0,

denote the three determinants

(25)

As an

application let us consider a ruled surface, that

is,

a surface

whose equations are of the form

where x

a,

/8,

y are

all

functions of a second variable param

u = 0, the point (a- y z ) describes a certain


On the other hand, if we set
curve F which lies on the surface.
v
const, and let u vary, the point (x, y, z) will describe a straighteter

v.

If

we

set

XII,

ASYMPTOTIC LINES

245]

CONJUGATE LINES

511

line generator of the ruled surface, and the value of u at any point
of the line will be proportional to the distance between the point
the point (x , y , s ) at which the generator meets the
(x, y, z) and

curve

It is

F.

evident from the formulae (25) that D = 0, that


is a polynomial of the second
u, and that
Z>

independent of
degree in u:
is

D"

D"

Since dv

is

a factor of (24), one system of asymptotic lines consists

of the rectilinear generators v


const. Dividing by dv, the remain
ing differential equation for the other system of asymptotic lines is
of the form
CL

(26)

tl>

dv

+ Lu + Mu + N = 0,
2

are functions of the single variable v. An equa


L, M, and
tion of this type possesses certain remarkable properties, which we
shall study later.
For example, we shall see that the anharmonic

where

ratio of

monic

any four

solutions is

a constant.

It follows that the

anhar

which a generator meets any four


of the other system is the same for all generators,

ratio of the four points in

asymptotic lines

which enables us to discover all the asymptotic lines of the second


system whenever any three of them are known. We shall also
see that whenever one or two integrals of the equation
(26) are
known, all the rest can be found by two quadratures or by a single
quadrature.
Thus, if all the generators meet a fixed straight line,
that line will be an asymptotic line of the second system, and all

the others can be found by two quadratures.


If the surface pos
sesses two such rectilinear directrices, we should know two asymp

second system, and it would appear that another


would
be required to find all the others. But we can
quadrature
obtain a more complete result.
For if a surface possesses two
rectilinear directrices, a protective transformation can be found
which will carry one of them to infinity and transform the surface
into a conoid but we saw in
243 that the asymptotic lines on a
conoid could be found without a single quadrature.
totic lines of the

245. Conjugate lines.

Any two

conjugate diameters of the indica-

S are called conjugate tangents.


the surface there corresponds a conjugate
tangent, which coincides with the first when and only when the given
trix at a point of a given surface

To every tangent

to

SURFACES

512

[XII,

245

an asymptotic tangent. Let z = F(x, y) be the equation of


m and m be the slopes of the projections of
two conjugate tangents on the xy plane. These projections on the
xy plane must be harmonic conjugates with respect to the projec
is

tangent

the surface S, and let

two asymptotic tangents at the same point of the sur


But the slopes of the projections of the asymptotic tangents

tions of the
face.

satisfy the equation

+ 2s +
p.

2
.

tp.

In order that the projections of the conjugate tangents should be


harmonic conjugates with respect to the projections of the asymp
totic tangents, it is necessary and sufficient that we should have
r

(27)
If

+ s (m + m ) + tmm =

be a curve on the surface

the envelope of the tangent

S,

at points along this curve is a developable surface which


At every point
is tangent to S all along C.
of C the generator of
this developable is the conjugate tangent to the tangent to C.
Along

plane to

C, x, y,

2,

p,

and q are functions of a single independent variable


of the developable is defined by the two equations

a.

The generator

Zdz

+p

dx

- p(X q dy

x)

- q(Y -

dp (X

y)

0,

dq( Y

x~)

y}

the last of which reduces to

y
x

dp

rdx

dq

dx

+ sdy
+

tdy

m be

the slope of the projection of the tangent to C and


Then we shall have
of
the
slope
projection of the generator.

Let

*y
dx

=m

y-

and the preceding equation reduces


the theorem stated above.

y
x

=m

to the

the

>

form

(27),

which proves

Two one-parameter families of curves on a surface are said to


form a conjugate network if the tangents to the two curves of the
two families which pass through any point are conjugate tangents
It is evident that there are an infinite number of
on any surface, for the first family may be
networks
conjugate
the
second family then being determined by a
assigned arbitrarily,
at that point.

differential equation of the first order.

XII,

CONJUGATE LINES

ASYMPTOTIC LINES

245]

513

Given a surface represented by equations of the form (19), let us find the
conditions under which the curves u = const, and v = const, form a conjugate
network.

we move along

If

tangent plane

is

the curve v

const.

the characteristic of the

represented by the two equations

A(X -

x)

+ B(Y -y) + C(Z -z) =

0,

In order that this straight line should coincide with the tangent to the curve
= const., whose direction cosines are proportional to dx/dv, dy/dv, dz/dv, it
is necessary and sufficient that we should have

cv

dv

dv

dA

dx

dB dy

dC

du

dv

du

du dv

dv

dz

first of these equations with regard to u,


be replaced by the equation

Differentiating the

second

may

(28)

dudv

we

see that the

dudv

and finally the elimination of A, JB, and C between the equations (21)
leads to the necessary and sufficient condition

This condition

is

dy

dz

du

du

dx

dy

dz

dv

dv

dv

du dv

cu dv

du dv

equivalent to saying that

differential equation of the

(29)

where

dx
du

and

(28)

0.

are three solutions of a

x, y, z

form

du dv

du

M and N are arbitrary functions of

u and

v.

follows that the

It

knowl

edge of three distinct integrals of an equation of this form is sufficient to


determine the equations of a surface which is referred to a conjugate network.
= = 0, every integral of the equation (29) is
For example, if we set
the sum of a function of u and a function of v hence, on any surface whose

M N

equations are of the form


(30)

x=/(u)+/i(t>),

*(u)+^(w),

^(u)

the curves (u) and (v) form a conjugate network.


Surfaces of the type (30) are called surfaces of translation.

^i(t),

Any such

surface

be described in two different ways by giving one rigid curve F a motion of


translation such that one of its points moves along another rigid curve T
For,

may

SURFACES

514

[XII,

246

M M

be four points of the surface which correspond, respectively,


MQ, MI
2
to the four sets of values (u
o), (M, v ), (w
), (u, v) of the parameters u and u.
By (30) these four points are the vertices of a plane parallelogram. If is fixed
and u allowed to vary, the point MI will describe a curve T on the surface like
let

wise,

if

is

kept fixed and v

is

allowed to vary, the point

will describe

another curve T on the surface. It follows that we may generate the surface by
or by
giving F a motion of translation which causes the point M% to describe
It is
giving T a motion of translation which causes the point MI to describe T.
evident from this method of generation that the two families of curves (M) and (v)
are conjugate.
For example, the tangents to the different positions of T at the
r",

various points of T form a cylinder tangent to the surface along F


tangents to the two curves at any point are conjugate tangents.

III.

hence the

LINES OF CURVATURE

246. Definition and properties of lines of curvature. A curve on a


given surface S is called a line of curvature if the normals to the
surface along that curve form a developable surface.
If z
f(x, y)
is the equation of the surface referred to a
system of rectangular
axes, the equations of the

normal

Y=-qZ

to the surface are

+(y+qz).

The necessary and sufficient condition that this line should describe
a developable surface is that the two equations

- Z dq +

d(y

+ qz) =
Z

should have a solution in terms of

223), that

is,

that

we

should have
d(x

+ pz} _

d(y

qz)

dq

dp
or,

more simply,
dx

+ p dz
dp

dy

-\-

q dz

dq

Again, replacing dz, dp, and dq by their values, this equation may
be written in the form
(l

+ p*)dx + pqdy _ pqdx


rdx + sdy
sdx +

tdy

This equation possesses two solutions in dy/dx which are always


real and unequal if the surface is real, except at an umbilic.
For,
if we replace dx and dy by a and /3,
respectively, the preceding

XII,

LINES OF CURVATURE

246]

515

241] for
equation coincides with the equation found above [(14),
the determination of the lines of intersection of the principal normal
sections with the tangent plane. It follows that the tangents to the
lines of curvature

We

indicatrix.

through any point coincide with the axes of the

shall see in the study of differential equations that

is one and only one line of curvature through every nonsingular point of a surface tangent to each one of the axes of the
These lines are
indicatrix at that point, except at an umbilic.
always real if the surface is real, and the network which they form

there

once orthogonal and conjugate,

is at

and the

differential equation (33) is

(a2

we

In this example

xy/a.

If

lines of curvature of the paraboloid z

Let us determine the

Example.

a characteristic property.

2
2/

)dx

(a

dx

z2 )dy 2

dy

or

Vz 2 +

Vy 2 +

a2

=Q
a2

take the positive sign for both radicals, the general solution
(x

which gives one system

+ Vz 2 +

a 2 )(y

Vy 2 +

4-

of lines of curvature.

(34)

Vy2 +

may be

the equation of this system

a2

a2 )

If

we

Vx2 +

is

C,

set

a2

written in the form

+ VX2 +

a*

= C

by virtue of the identity


(z

Vy 2 +

a2

Vz 2 +

a2 )

a*

[xy

+ V(x2 +

a2 )(j/2

a2 )]

It follows that the projections of the lines of curvature of this first system are
represented by the equation (34), where X is an arbitrary constant. It may be
shown in the same manner that the projections of the lines of curvature of the
other system are represented by the equation

(35)

From the
(35) may be

Vy 2 +

a2

Vx2 +

a2

/*.

az of the given paraboloid, the equations (34) and


equation xy
written in the form

Vx 2 +

z2

+ Vy 2

-f

z2

C,

Vx2 +

z2

- Vy 2 +

z2

=C

Vz 2 + z 2 and Vy 2 + z 2 represent, respectively, the dis


It follows that the lines
tances of the point (z, y, z) from the axes of z and y.
of curvature on the paraboloid are those curves for which the sum or the difference
of the distances of any point upon them from the axes of x and y is a constant.
But the expressions

SURFACES

516
247. Evolute of a surface.

face S.

As a

point

Let C be a

247

[XII,

on a sur

line of curvature

M describes the curve

C, the

normal

MN to the

surface remains tangent to a curve T.


Let (X, Y, Z) be the coor
dinates of the point A at which
is tangent to T.
The ordinate
Z is given by either of the equations (32), which reduce to a single

MN

e<

{nation since

is

The equations

a line of curvature.

(32)

may

be written in the form

z_z_

+P

(1

r dx

+ pq dy ^pgdx + (l+ ?
s dx + tdy
+ s dy

dx

dy

Multiplying each term of the first fraction by dx, each term of the
second by dy, and then taking the proportion
by composition, we
find

dx 2

r dx 2

+ (p dx +
+ 2s dx dy +

dy*

g dy}*
t

dif

Again, since dx, dtj, and dz are proportional to the direction cosines
ft, y of the tangent, this equation may be written in the form

a,

*5

-_

a2

+ (pa +
+ 2sp +
2

/?
2

ra 2

tfi

+ 2safi

this formula with


(7), which gives the radius of curva
of the normal section tangent to the line of curvature, with
the proper sign, we see that it is equivalent to the equation

Comparing

ture

where

Z-z=

(36)

= RV

the cosine of the acute angle between the z axis and the
direction
of the normal.
But z
Kv is exactly the value
positive
of
for the center of curvature of the normal section under con
v is

of tangency A of the normal


T
with
coincides
the
center of curvature of the
envelope
normal
section
to
C
at
M. Hence the curve F is
principal
tangent

sideration.

MN

It follows that the point

to its

the locus of these centers of curvature.

If

we consider

all

the lines

of curvature of the system to which C belongs, the locus of the cor


responding curves r is a surface 2 to which every normal to the

given surface S

tangent at

The other
The normal
which

is

is tangent.
For the normal
to the curve r which lies on 2.

line of curvature

C through

MN,

M cuts

for example,

is

at right angles.
always tangent to a curve T
the locus of the centers of curvature of the normal sections
to

S along C

is

itself

XII,

LINES OF CURVATURE

248]

517

The locus of this curve T for all the lines of curva


tangent to
ture of the system to which C belongs is a surface 2 to which all
the normals to S are tangent. The two surfaces 2 and 2 are not
C".

usually analytically distinct, but form two nappes of the same sur
face,

which

is

then represented by an irreducible equation.

The normal MN to S is tangent to each of these nappes 2 and 2


at the two principal centers of curvature A and A of the surface S
at the point M.
It is easy to find the tangent
planes to the two nappes at the points A and A
(Fig. 51).

As

the point

M describes the curve

MN

normal
describes the developable
surface D whose edge of regression is F at
the same time the point A where
touches
2 describes a curve y distinct from F since
the straight line
cannot remain tangent to
two distinct curves F and F
The developable
D and the surface 2 are tangent at A hence
C, the

MN

MN

the tangent plane to 2 at A is tangent to D


It follows that it is the plane
all along MN.

NMT, which

passes through the tangent to C.


Similarly, it is evident that the tangent plane
to 2 at A is the plane
through the tan

NMT

gent to the other line of curvature

NMT

FIG. 51

NMT

The two planes


and
stand at right angles. This fact
leads to the following important conception.
Let a normal
be
from
O
in
on
the
surface
S, and let A and
dropped
any point
space

OM

be the principal centers of curvature of S on this normal.

The

tangent planes to 2 and 2 at A and A , respectively, are perpendic


ular.
Since each of these planes passes through the given point 0, it
is clear that the two nappes of the e volute of any surface S, observed

from any point O in space, appear to cut each other at


The converse of this proposition will be proved later.
248. Rodrigues

of the normal,

formulae.

and

If

X,

/A,

right angles.

denote the direction cosines

one of the principal radii of curvature, the


corresponding principal center of curvature will be given by the
formulae
(37)

X=

Z=

Rv.

As the point (x, y, z) describes a line of curvature tangent to


the normal section whose radius of curvature is R, this center of

SURFACES

518

[XII,

249

curvature, as we have just seen, will describe a curve F tangent to


the normal MN; hence we must have

dX

_dY _dZ

X
or,

replacing X, Y, and

fji

by their values from (37) and omitting the

common term dR,


dx

R d\ _

-f

dy

Rdp.

_ dz + Rdy
v

p.

The value

of any of these ratios is zero, for if we take them


by
composition after multiplying each term of the first ratio by X, of

the second by p., and of the third by v, we obtain another ratio


equal to any of the three but the denominator of the new ratio is
;

unity, while the numerator

X dx
is

identically zero.

Rodrigues
(38)

fj.

dy

dz

R(\ dX

p.

dp.

v dv)

This gives immediately the formulae of Olinde

dx

+ R dX = 0,

dy

+ Rdn =

0,

dz

+ Rdv =

0,

which are very important

in the theory of surfaces.


It should be
that
these
formulae
to
a
noticed, however,
apply only
displacement
of the point (a;, y, z) along a line of curvature.

249. Lines of curvature in parameter form. If the equations of the


surface are given in terms of two parameters u and v in the form
(19), the equations of the normal are

Xx _ Yy_Zz
B

where A, B, and C are determined by the equations (21).


The
and
sufficient
condition
that
line
this
should
describe
a
necessary
developable surface

(39)

is,

by

223,

dx

dy

dA

dB

ABC

dz

0,

dC

x, y, z, A, B, and C are to be replaced by their expressions


in terms of the parameters u and v; hence this is the differential
equation of the lines of curvature.

where

XII,

LINES OF CURVATURE

249]

As an example

us find the lines of curvature on the helicoid

let

whose equation

is

a arc tan x

A cos + B sin =
Taking

find

A=

a sin

0,

B=

a cos
becomes

+ V/o2 +

for example,

a2

0.

-f

Ca =

dp

and integrating, we find

= ae-o,

or

[e-ec - e~(-

The

projections of these lines of curvature on the xy plane are


are easily constructed.

The same method enables us


\, n, v

we

o)]

all spirals

which

to form the equation of the second

degree for the principal radii of curvature.


A, B, C,

After expansion and simpli

de-

or

are

Ap sin + Bp cos

fication the differential equation (39)

Choosing the sign

equivalent to the system

In this example the equations for A, B, and

C = p, we

519

With the same symbols

shall have, except for sign,

B2 + C 2

We

shall adopt as the positive direction of the normal that which


If .R is a principal radius of
given by the preceding equations.
curvature, taken with its proper sign, the coordinates of the corre
is

sponding center of curvature are

where

R = p^A* + B 2 + C 2

If the point (x, y, z) describes the line of curvature tangent to the


principal normal section whose radius of curvature is R, we have
seen that the point (X, Y, Z) describes a curve F which is tangent
to the

dx

normal to the surface.

+ p dA +
A

A dp

dy

Hence we must have

+ p dB + B dp _
B

dz

+ pdC + Cdp
C

SURFACES

620
or,

denoting the

common

values of these ratios by dp

+ pdA A K
+ pdB - BK=
dz + pdC - CK=
(dx
dy

Eliminating p and

0.

from these three equations, we

ox
^

du

du

dC by

K,

0,

find again the

differential equation (39) of the lines of curvature.

replace dx, dy, dz, dA, dB, and

250

[XII,

But

if

we

the expressions

dx

dC

^ dv,
dv

tin

respectively, and then eliminate du, dv,


for the determination of p

T
du

dC
Hh

a~
cv

and K, we

find an equation

(41)

0.

B -f C this equation becomes an


replace p by R/ ~vA*
for
the
radii
of curvature.
equation
principal
The equations (39) and (41) enable us to answer many questions
If

we

which we have already considered. For example, the necessary


and sufficient condition that a point of a surface should be a para
bolic point is that the coefficient of p 2 in (41) should vanish.
In
order that a point be an umbilic, the equation (39) must be satisfied

for all values of

As an example
helicoid.
in this

With a

example

du and dv

let

= MCOS,

A=
and the equation

us find the principal radii of curvature of the rectilinear

slight modification of the notation used above,

(41)

as mv,

B=

acosv,

sin v,

C=

we

shall

have

av,

u,

becomes

2
2
R
Hence the principal radii of curvature of the helicoid
(a + u )/a.
are numerically equal and opposite in sign.

whence

250. Joachimsthal s theorem. The lines of curvature on certain


surfaces may be found by geometrical considerations. For example,
it is quite evident that the lines of curvature on a surface of revolu
tion are the meridians and the parallels of the surface, for each of

XII,

LINES OF CURVATURE

251]

521

tangent at every point to one of the axes of the


This is again confirmed by the remark
that the normals along a meridian form a plane, and the normals
in each case the normals
along a parallel form a circular cone,

these curves

is

indicatrix at that point.

form a developable surface.

On

a developable surface the

first

system of lines of curvature

The second system consists of the


of the generators.
the
of
generators, that is, of the involutes of
orthogonal trajectories

consists

the edge of regression


If

rature.

we know one

231). These can be found by a single quad


of them, all the rest can be found without

All of these results are easily verified directly.


of the theory of evolutes of a skew curve led Joachimsthal to a very important theorem, which is often used in that

even one quadrature.

The study

Let S and S be two surfaces whose line of intersection C


The normal
to S along
to S along
describes a developable surface, and the normal

theory.
is

C
C
is

a line of curvature on each surface.

MN
MN

describes another developable surface. But each of these normals


normal to C. It follows from 231 that if two surfaces have a

common
that

line of curvature, they intersect at

a constant angle along

line.

Conversely, if two surfaces intersect at a constant angle, and if


their line of intersection is a line of curvature on one of them, it is
For we have seen that if one
also a line of curvature on the other.

family of normals to a skew curve

C form

a developable surface,

the family of normals obtained by turning each of the first family


through the same angle in its normal plane also form a developable
surface.

Any

curve whatever on a plane or on a sphere is a lie of curva


It follows as a corollary to Joachimsthal s

ture on that surface.

theorem that the necessary and

sufficient condition that

a plane curve

or a spherical curve on any surface should be a line of curvature is


that the plane or the sphere on which the curve lies should cut the

surface at a constant angle.

We

have already considered [


251. Dupin s theorem.
43, 146]
The origin of the theory of
triply orthogonal systems of surfaces.
such systems lay in a noted theorem due to Dupin, which we shall
proceed to prove

Given any three families of surfaces which form a triply orthogonal


system : the intersection of any two surfaces of different families is a
line of curvature on each of them.

SURFACES

522

[XII,

251

We shall base the proof on the following remark. Let F(x, y, z) =


be the equation of a surface tangent to the xij plane at the origin. Then
we shall have, for x y = z 0, dF/dx = 0, dF/cy = 0, but cF/dz does
not vanish, in general, except when the origin is a singular point.
It follows that the necessary and sufficient condition that the x and
y axes should be the axes of the indicatrix
2
s = c
z/cx dy

value of this second derivative

r\

f\

r\

CX CZ

Ci

Cy CZ

<7y

J"^

CZ*

is

is

that s

0.

But the

given by the equation


O

V 7

CZ

Since p and q both vanish at the origin, the necessary and sufficient
condition that s should vanish there is that we should have

dx dy

Now let the three families

of the triply orthogonal system be given

by the equations

where

F F F
l

fA
(4:0)

satisfy the relation


1

<3\

-^

cx

ox

J
I

_1

cy

cy

<

^cz

1
"

f\
^

cz

and two other similar relations obtained by cyclic permutation of


in space there passes,
1, 2, 3.
Through any point
in general, one surface of each of the three families. The tangents to
the three curves of intersection of these three surfaces form a trirec-

the subscripts

In order to prove Dupin s theorem, it will be


tangular trihedron.
sufficient to show that each of these tangents coincides with one of
the axes of the indicatrix on each of the surfaces to which it

tangent.
In order to

is

as origin and the


show this, let us take the point
edges of the trirectangular trihedron as the axes of coordinates
then the three surfaces pass through the origin tangent, respec
;

tively, to the three coordinate planes.

At the

origin

we

for example,

l&Y-o.

Uo,

I^Uo,

l^) = o.

shall have,

XII,

LINES OF CURVATURE

251]

The axes

of x

=
z)

and y

523

will be the axes of the indicatrix of the surface

at the origin if (c^F^/dx dy)

0.

To show

F(x, y,
is the case, let us differentiate (43) with respect to
terms which vanish at the origin we find

y,

that this

omitting the

\ /
e

1^\

\dx

/d_F\\

\ dz / \dy

di/

or

relations analogous to (43) we could deduce two


equations analogous to (44), which may be written down by cyclic

From

two

the

permutation

_
;

From

(44) and (45)

evident that

it is

we

shall

have also

which proves the theorem.


A remarkable example of a

triply orthogonal system is furnished


It was doubtless the
in
147.
discussed
by the confocal quadrics
led
which
Dupin to the gen
investigation of this particular system
on an ellipsoid
lines
of
curvature
the
that
It follows
eral theorem.

or an hyperboloid (which had been determined previously by Monge)


are the lines of intersection of that surface with its confocal quadrics.

The paraboloids represented by the equation


.1

(/

o~

_
,

where X is a variable parameter, form another triply orthogonal


system, which determines the lines of curvature on the paraboloid.
Finally, the system discussed in

24G,

=
is

triply orthogonal.

y,

SURFACES

524

[XII,

252

The study of triply orthogonal systems is one of the most interest


ing and one of the most difficult problems of differential geometry.
very large number of memoirs have been published on the subject,

the results of which have been collected by Darboux in a recent


work.* Any surface S belongs to an infinite number of triply

orthogonal systems. One of these consists of the family of surfaces


S and the two families of developables formed by the

parallel to

normals along the


on the normal

on S. For, let O be any point


S at the point M, and let MT
the two lines of curvature C and

lines of curvature

MN

to the surface

and MT be the tangents to


which pass through M; then the tangent plane to the parallel sur
face through O is parallel to the tangent plane to S at M, and the
tangent planes to the two developables described by the normals to
S along C and C are the planes MNT and MNT respectively. These
three planes are perpendicular by pairs, which shows that the system
C"

is

triply orthogonal.

An

infinite

number

of triply orthogonal systems can be derived

from any one known triply orthogonal system by means of succes


sive inversions, since any inversion leaves all angles unchanged.
Since any surface whatever is a member of some triply orthogonal
system, as we have just seen, it follows that an inversion carries the
lines

of curvature on any surface over into the lines of curvature on

the transformed surface.

It is easy to verify this fact directly.

252. Applications to certain classes of surfaces. A large number of problems


have been discussed in which it is required to find all the surfaces whose lines
AVe shall proceed to
of curvature have a preassigned geometrical property.
indicate

some

of the simpler results.

which one system of lines of


Joachimsthal s theorem, the plane of each of the
Hence all the normals to the
circles must cut the surface at a constant angle.
First let us determine all those surfaces for

curvature are

circles.

By

surface along any circle C of the system must meet the axis of the circle, i.e.
The sphere
the perpendicular to its plane at its center, at the same point 0.
as center is tangent to the surface all along C hence the
through C about
;

required surface must be the envelope of a one-parameter family of spheres.


Conversely, any surface which is the envelope of a one-parameter family of

spheres

is

a solution of the problem, for the characteristic curves, which are

circles, evidently

form one system of

lines of curvature.

Surfaces of revolution evidently belong to the preceding class. Another


interesting particular case is the so-called tubular surface, which is the envelope
of a sphere of constant radius whose center describes an arbitrary curve F. The
characteristic curves are the circles of radius

whose planes are normal


*

Lemons sur

les

to T.

The normals

systemes orthogonaux

whose centers

to the surface are also

ft les

on r and
normal to T

lie

coordonntes curvilignes, 1898.

XII,

LINES OF CURVATURE

252]

525

hence the second system of lines of curvature are the lines in which the surface
cut by the developable surfaces which may be formed from the normals to r.
If both systems of lines of curvature on a surface are circles, it is clear from

is

the preceding argument that the surface may be thought of as the envelope of
either of two one-parameter families of spheres.
Let
S 2 S3 be any three
spheres of the first family, C\ C2 C3 the corresponding characteristic curves,
and MI
C2 C3 are cut by a line of curva
2
s the three points in which Ci
<Si

ture
C"

is

M M

of the other system. The sphere


which
also tangent to the spheres Si , S 2 , S s at MI ,

C"

<S

is

tangent to the surface along

JV/2

respectively.

Hence

the required surface is the envelope of a

This surface

three fixed spheres.

is

family of spheres each of which touches


the well-known Dupin cyclide.
Mannheim

gave an elegant proof that any Dupin cyclide is the surface into which a certain
anchor ring is transformed by a certain inversion. Let 7 be the circle which
is

orthogonal to each of the three fixed spheres Si, S 2 83. An inversion whose
is a point on the circumference of 7 carries that circle into a straight line
,

pole

00

and

carries the three spheres Si, S 2 , Ss into three spheres 2i, 2 2


7
that is, the centers of the transformed spheres lie on

orthogonal to

Let Ci,

OO

23

OO

C2 C

be the intersections of these spheres with any plane through


O(y, C a circle tangent to each of the circles C{, C2
3, and 2 the sphere
on which C is a great circle. It is clear that 2 remains tangent to each of the
,

spheres Si,

S2 2 3
,

as the whole figure

revolved about

is

00

and that the

envelope of 2 is an anchor ring whose meridian is the circle C


Let us now determine the surface for which all of the lines of curvature of
one system are plane curves whose planes are all parallel. Let us take the xy
.

plane parallel to the planes in which these lines of curvature

x cos a

sin

a=

F(a,

lie,

and

let

z)

be the tangential equation of the section of the surface by a parallel to the xy


plane, where F(a, z) is a function of a and z which depends upon the surface

under consideration. The coordinates x and y of a point of the surface are


given by the preceding equation together with the equation
x sin

The formulae
(46)

Any

a +y

a=

dF
da

for x, y, z are

dF
sin

Fcos<r

da

surface

cos

may

a,

= Fs ma-\

da

cos a,

z.

be represented by equations of this form by choosing the

The only exceptions are the ruled surfaces whose


properly.
It is easy to show that the coefficients A, B, C
directing plane is the xy plane.
of the tangent plane may be taken to be
function F(a,

z)

A=

cos

.B

sin

C=

dF

dz

hence the cosine of the angle between the normal and the z axis

In order that
ture,

it

is

is

all the sections by planes parallel to the xy plane be lines of curva


necessary and sufficient, by Joachimsthal s theorem, that each of

SURFACES

526

[XII,253

these planes cut the surface at a constant angle, i.e. that v be independent of a.
This is equivalent to saying that z (a, z) is independent of a, i.e. that F(a, z)

is

form

of the

F(a,

z)

t(z)

f (a)

where the functions


and
are arbitrary.
Substituting this value in (46), we
Bee that the most general solution of the problem is given by the equations
\f/

(47)

-|

x
y

=
=

f(a) cos a
\j/(a)

sin

a+

() sin a +

f (a) cos a +

cos
<f>(z)

<(z)

sin

a
a

These surfaces may be generated as follows. The first two of equations (47),
and a variable, represent a family of parallel curves which are
the projections on the xy plane of the sections of the surface by planes parallel
to the xy plane.
But these curves are all parallel to the curve obtained by set
= 0. Hence the surfaces may be generated as follows Taking in the
ting
xy plane any curve whatever and its parallel curves, lift each of the curves verti
cally a distance given by some arbitrary law ; the curves in their new positions form
a surface which is the most general solution of the problem.
for z constant

<f>(z)

It is

easy to see that the preceding construction

following

plane

rolls

may be replaced by the


The required surfaces are those described by any plane curve whose
without slipping on a cylinder of any base. By analogy with plane

This fact may


curves, these surfaces may be called rolled surfaces or roulettes.
be verified by examining the plane curves a
const.
The two families of lines

of curvature are the plane curves z

IV.

const,

and a

const.

FAMILIES OF STRAIGHT LINES

The equations of a straight line in space contain four variable


Hence we may consider one-, two-, or three-parameter
parameters.
families of straight lines, according to the number of given relations
between the four parameters. A one-parameter family of straight

A two-parameter family of straight


surface.
a line congruence, and, finally, a three-parameter
family of straight lines is called a line complex.
lines

form a ruled

lines

is

called

253. Ruled surfaces.

Let the equations of a one-parameter family

of straight lines (G) be given in the form

(48)

= az+p,

bz

q,

where a, b, p, q are functions of a single variable parameter u. Let


us consider the variation in the position of the tangent plane to the
surface S formed by these lines as the point of tangency moves along

any one of the generators


equation z

= z,

G.

The equations

give the coordinates x,

y, z

(48), together with the


on S in terms

of a point

XII,

FAMILIES OF STRAIGHT LINES

253]

of the two parameters z and u


is
tangent plane at

1=0,

z+p

39, the equation of the

hence, by

+q

b z

b p q denote the derivatives of


Eeplacing x and y by az -f p and bz
simplifying, this equation becomes

where a

a, b,

to u.

In the

(b z

(49)

we

first place,

p, q with respect

and

respectively,

q,

- aZ -p) - (a z + p )(Y -

q }(X

527

bZ

q)

0.

see that this plane always passes through the

generator G, which was evident a priori, and moreover, that Jthe plane
moves along G, at least
turns around G as the point of tangency

is independent of z, i.e. unless


p )/(b z
)
discard
this
we
shall
a q
bp
0,
special case in what follows.
in
linear
ratio
is
Since the preceding
z, every plane through a gen

unless the ratio (a z

<?

As the
is tangent to the surface at one and only one point.
the
in
recedes
either
of
generator
indefinitely along
point
tangency
direction the tangent plane P approaches a limiting position P ,
which we shall call the tangent plane at the point at infinity on that
erator

The equation

generator.

is

(X- aZ -p)-a (Y-bZ -q) = 0.


angle between this plane P and the tangent
b

(50)

Let w be the
a point
and (a,

of this limiting plane

M
/?,

plane

of the generator. The direction cosines (a


P and P are proportional to
y) of the normals to
(x, y, z)

ft

ab

and
b z

+q

z+p ),
1

-(a

b(a

z+p )-a(b z + q ),

respectively; hence

cos

u>

aa

(3/3

yy

Az
j=^

Az*

+B
+ 2Bz + C

where

=a

+b
=
B ap + b
C=p +q

After

art

12

easy reduction,

we

+(ab -ba Y,

+ (ab -

tan

CD

find,

-B
=
=
Az + B
-

bp

+(aq -bp y.

(51)

ba }(aq

by Lagrange

(a q

identity

- b p } Vl -f
Az + B

a*

at

131),

SURFACES

528

It follows that the limiting plane

at a point

plane v
the formula

KI

The point

_B_
A~

is

ap

the tangent plane

plane

is

z { is given

+ (aV - ba )(ag - bp
+ b + (ab -baj
2

by

~)

called the central point of the generator, and the tan


O t is called the central plane. The angle 6 between

gent plane P! at

whose ordinate

g
2

253

perpendicular to the tangent

is

of the generator

[xii,

Tr/2

at any point
of the generator and this central
and the formula (51) may be replaced by the

o>,

formula
tan o
b

p ) Vl
1

Let p be the distance between the central point O^ and the point M,
taken with the sign + or the sign
according as the angle which
makes with the positive z axis is acute or obtuse. Then we
Oi

shall

have p

= (z

t)

Vl -f

a2

-j-

2
,

and the preceding formula may

be written in the form

tan0

(53)

where

k,

which

is

fy,

called the parameter of distribution,

is

defined by

the equation
>*

<-

a>*

The formula (53) expresses in very simple form the manner in which
the tangent plane turns about the generator. It contains no quantity
which does not have a geometrical meaning we shall see presently
that k may be defined geometrically. However, there remains a cer
:

tain ambiguity in the formula (53), for it is not immediately evident


in which sense the angle
should be counted. In other words, it is

not clear, a priori, in which direction the tangent plane turns around
the generator as the point moves along the generator. The sense of
this rotation

may

be determined by the sign of

k.

In order to see the matter clearly, imagine an observer lying on a


moves from his feet toward
generator G. As the point of tangency
his head he will see the tangent plane P turn either from his left

to his right or vice versa.

show that the


way remains unchanged if the

little reflection will

sense of rotation defined in this

observer turns around so that his head and feet change


places.
Two hyperbolic paraboloids having a generator in common and

XII,

FAMILIES OF STRAIGHT LINES

253]

529

lying symmetrically with respect to a plane through that generator


Let us now move
give a clear idea of the two possible situations.
the axes in such a way that the new origin is at the central point O l
,

the

new

z axis is the generator

tral plane

itself,

and the xz plane

It is evident that the value of the

tribution (54) remains unchanged during this


and that the formula (53) takes the form

(53

tan0

is

the cen

parameter of dis

movement

of the axes,

&*,

where 6 denotes the angle between the xz plane P l and the tangent
For the value of u which
plane P, counted in a convenient sense.
corresponds to the z axis we must have a = b = p
q = 0, and the
equation of the tangent plane at any point
(b e

M of that axis becomes

+ q )X-(a z+p )Y=Q.

In order that the origin be the central point and the xz plane the
central plane, we must have also a = 0, q =
hence the equation
of the tangent plane reduces to Y = (b z/p ^X, and the formula (54)
;

k=b

It follows that the angle


in (53 ) should be
/p
counted positive in the sense from Oy toward Ox. If the orienta
tion of the axes is that adopted in
228, an observer lying in the

gives

z axis will see the tangent plane turn from his left toward his right
if k is positive, or from his right toward his left if k is negative.
The locus of the central points of the generators of a ruled surface
is

called the line of strict ion.


The equations of this curve in terms
u are precisely the equations (48) and (52).

of the parameter
Note.

same

at

If a q

= bp

for a generator G, the tangent plane is the


If this relation is satisfied

any point of that generator.

for every generator, i.e. for all values of u, the ruled surface is a
developable surface ( 223), and the results previously obtained can

be easily verified.
the tangent plane

For
is

if

a and

the same at

do not vanish simultaneously,


points of any generator G,

all

and becomes indeterminate for the point z = p /a ==


q /b i.e.
for the point where the generator touches its envelope. It is easy
to show that this value for z is the same as that given by (52) when
a q = bp
It follows that the line of striction becomes the edge
,

of regression on a developable surface.


is infinite

If a

The parameter of

distribution

for a developable.

=b =

the central point

for every generator, the surface


is

indeterminate.

is

a cylinder and

SURFACES

530

[XII,

254. Direct definition of the parameter of distribution.

The

254

central

point and the parameter of distribution may be defined in an entirely


different manner.
Let G and G^ be two neighboring generators cor
to
the
u and u -f- h of the parameter, respectively,
values
responding
and let GI be given by the equations

(55)

Let

(a

+p

Aa) z

common

perpendicular.

(Aa)

Aa Ay

_
V(Aa)

+ (Aft) +

=+

V(Aa)
v

As h approaches
<*)/8

Ay.

G and G

zero,

(Aft)

a the

approaches

(Aft)

(a Aft

- 6 Aa)

(6

+ Aft)Ap]

- & Aa) 2
-

Aft

Aa)

V(a

Aa)[(a + Aa) Ay

(a Aft

Va + b + 1

(sin

Ap

Aft
2

and

(X, Y, Z) the point where G meets the


Then, by well-known formulae of Analytic

_ _ Aa Ay + Aft Aj? + (a Aft

Aft)

G and G l} and

Geometry, we shall have

sin

= (b +

be the shortest distance between the two lines

angle between

-f Aj5,

2
-f-

Aa)

+ (b + Aft) + 1
2

approaches the quantity

defined by (52),

Hence the

central point is the limiting


perpendicular to G and G l while

k.

position of the foot of the common


the parameter of distribution is the limit of the ratio (sin a)/8.
In the expression for 8 let us replace Aa, A&, A/?, Ay by their
,

expansions in powers of h:

Aa

ha

and the similar expansions for

h2
a"

Aft, A/?,

----

-\

Ay.

Then the numerator

of

the expression for 8 becomes

while the denominator


to h.

is

always of the first order with respect


an infinitesimal of the first

It is evident that 8 is in general

order with respect to h, except for developable surfaces, for which


b j)
But the coefficient of h s /2 is the derivative of a q
bp

a y

hence this coefficient also vanishes for a developable, and the shortest
distance between two neighboring generators

is

of the third order

This remark is due to Bouquet, who also showed that if


230).
this distance is constantly of the fourth order, it must be precisely
zero; that is, that in that case the given straight lines are the
(

XII,

FAMILIES OF STRAIGHT LINES

255]

531

tangents to a plane curve or to a conical surface. In order to prove


Aft
to
this, it is sufficient to carry the development of Aa Ay
A/>

terms of the fourth order.


255. Congruences. Focal surface of a congruence.
family of straight lines

(56)

= az+p,

bz

Every two-parameter

q,

where a, b, p, q depend on two parameters a and ft, is called a line


Through any point in space there pass, in general, a
congruence.
certain number of lines of the congruence, for the two equations (56)
determine a certain number of definite sets of values of a and

ft

when

any relation between a and ft


be assumed, the equations (56) will represent a ruled surface, which
and z are given definite values.

a-,

y,

is

not usually developable.

If

In order that the surface be developable,

we must have
da dq
or,

db dp

replacing da by (da/da) da

(*tr\
(57)

^~

r*

0,

-f (da/d/3) dft, etc.,

112
^

**

dft

This

^}\ca

a quadratic equation in dft/da.


obtain
two distinct solutions,
ally
is

dft

(oo)

dft
\j/i

(cr, ft)

Solving

\I/2

(<*)

rtnr

<x

either of

dft

p)

it,

we should usu

which defines a developable surface. Under very gen


which we shall state precisely a little later and

eral limitations,

which we shall just now suppose fulfilled, each of these equations


is satisfied by an infinite number of functions of a, and each of them
has one and only one solution which assumes a given value ft when
a = a
It follows that every straight line G of the congruence
.

belongs to two developable surfaces, all of whose generators are


members of the congruence. Let F and F be the edges of regression

two developables, and A and A the points where G touches


The two points A and A are called the focal
respectively.
points of the generator G.
They may be found as follows without
of these

F and F

integrating the equation (57). The ordinate z of one of these points


must satisfy both of the equations
z

da

-f-

dp

.~

db

dq

532
or,

SURFACES

[XII,

255

replacing da, db, dp, dy by their developments,

Eliminating z between these two equations, we find again the equa


tion (57).
But if we eliminate dp/da we obtain an
equation of the
second degree

whose two solutions are the values of z for the focal


points.
The locus of the focal points A and A consists of two
nappes
2 and 2 of a surface whose equations are given in parameter form
by the formulae (56) and (59). These two nappes are not in general
two distinct surfaces, but constitute two portions of the same ana
The whole surface is called the focal surface. It is
lytic surface.
evident that the focal surface is also the locus of the
edges of regres
sion of the developable surfaces which can be formed from
the lines
of the congruence.

For by the very definition of the curve T the


is a line of the
congruence; hence a is a

tangent at any point a

focal point for that line of the


congruence.
is tangent to each of the

of the congruence
is

tangent to each of two curves which

lie

Every straight

line

nappes 2 and 2 for it


on these two nappes,
,

respectively.

By an argument

precisely similar to that of

247

it is

easy to

determine the tangent planes at A and A to 2 and 2


(Fig. 51).
As the line G moves, remaining tangent to r, for
example, it also
remains tangent to the surface 2
Its point of
tangency A will
describe a curve y which is
Hence
necessarily distinct from r
the developable described by G
during this motion is tangent to 2
.

at

since the tangent planes to the

two surfaces both contain the


the tangent line to y
It follows that the
tangent plane
to 2 at A is
precisely the osculating plane of r at A.
Likewise,
the tangent plane to 2 at A is the
at A
osculating plane of
line

G and

These two planes are called the focal


planes of the generator G.
It may happen that one of the
nappes of the focal surface degen
erates into a curve C.

In that case the straight lines of the con


tangent to 2, and merely meet C.
One of the
families of developables consists of the cones circumscribed about
2

gruence are

all

XH,

FAMILIES OF STRAIGHT LINES

aw]

whose

vertices are on C.

If both of the

533

nappes of the focal surface

the two families of developables


degenerate into curves C and
consist of the cones through one of the curves whose vertices lie
C",

on the other.
is

congruence

If both the curves

arid

are straight lines, the

called a linear congruence.

256. Congruence of normals. The normals to any surface evidently


form a congruence, but the converse is not true there exists no
surface, in general, which is normal to every line of a given con
gruence. For, if we consider the congruence formed by the normals
:

to a given surface S, the two nappes of the focal surface are evidently
the two nappes 2 and 2 of the e volute of S ( 247), and we have seen

that the two tangent planes at the points A and A where the same
normal touches 2 and 2 stand at right angles. This is a character
istic

we

property of a congruence of normals, as

shall see

by trying

to find the condition that the straight line (56) should always remain
normal to the surface. The necessary and sufficient condition that it

should

is

that there exist a function /(a,

/3)

such that the surface 5

represented by the equations

(60)
is

= az+p,

normal to each of the lines (6 ).

8x

8x
b

dp^
or,

bz

replacing x and y by az

ing by

Va +

I)

+p

+ q,

It follows that

we must have

dz

dy

z=f(a,p-)

dz

W W
and bz

q,

respectively,

and divid

+ 1,
a dp

dq
~

"

^( g Va +

&*

ft

+l)+

Va

t~

"

-0;

=0.

Va
The necessary and
patible

(62)

is

sufficient condition that these equations be

com

SURFACES

534
If this condition

z can be found

is satisfied,

The

[XII,

256

from (61) by a single

surfaces obtained in this

quadrature.
way depend upon a con
stant of integration and form a one-parameter family of parallel
surfaces.

In order to find the geometrical meaning of the condition


(62), it
should be noticed that that condition, by its very nature, is inde
pendent of the choice of axes and of the choice of the independent

We may therefore

variables.

choose the z axis as a line of the con

gruence, and the parameters a and ft as the coordinates of the point


where a line of the congruence pierces the xy plane. Then we shall
have p = a, q = ft, and a and b given functions of a and ft which van
ish for a = ft = 0. It follows that the condition of
integrability, for
the set of values a = ft = 0, reduces to the equation
=
da/dft
8b/da.

On

the other hand, the equation (57) takes the form

Qj"%

**"!*

0/3

"-

\tfa

Oy-l

lxl

AW AJ

!**

V/

da

<?/?/

which

is the equation for determining the lines of intersection of


the xy plane with the developables of the congruence after a and

have been replaced by


and ?/, respectively. The condition
= db/da, for a = ft = 0, means that the two curves of this
kind which pass through the origin intersect at right angles that
ft

da/dft

the tangent planes to the two developable surfaces of the congru


ence which pass through the z axis stand at right angles. Since the
is,

line

taken as the z axis was any line of the congruence, we

may

state

sufficient condition that the straight lines

of a

the following important theorem:

The necessary and

given congruence be the

normals of some surface

is

that the focal planes

through every line of the congruence should be perpendicidar

to

each

other.
Note.
the line

If the parameters a and ft be chosen as the cosines of the


angles which
makes with the x and y axes, respectively, we shall have

a
Vl~- a2 -

and the equations

(61)

Vl -

a*

VI +

a2

p*

become

(63)

Vl- *-/3V

eft

dft

62

Vl -

a*

XII.

FAMILIES OF STRAK1IIT LINES

2,-i7]

535

Then the condition of integrability (62) reduces to the form dq/da = dp/ dp, which
means that p and q must be the partial derivatives of the same function F(a, p)

dF

dF
ejs

p) can be found by a single quadrature.


solution of the total differential equation

where F(a,

It follows that z is the

d(-

Badp

dp

whence
z

where C

= Vl - a 2 - p

C+

F-

da

an arbitrary constant.

is

257. Theorem

Malus.

of

If

rays of light from a point source are reflected (or

refracted) by any surface, the reflected (or refracted) rays are the normals to
each of a family of parallel surfaces. This theorem, which is due to Malus, has

been extended by Cauchy, Dupin, Gergonne, and Quetelet to the case of any
number of successive reflections or refractions, and we may state the following
more general theorem
:

If a family of rays of
that property after

normal

light are

any number of

to

reflections

some surface at any time, they retain


and refractions.

may be regarded as a refraction of index 1, it is evidently


prove the theorem for a single refraction. Let S be a surface nor
mal to the unrefracted rays,
an incident ray which meets the surface of
Since a reflection

sufficient to

mM

MR

the refracted ray.


separation S at a point M, and
incident ray, the refracted ray, and the normal

MN

angles

n sin

and r

(Fig. 52) satisfy the relation

sin

For definiteness we
n is

r.

pose, as in the figure, that


unity.

Let

denote the distance

By
lie

Descartes law, the


and the

in a plane,

shall sup

than

less

Mm, and

us lay off on the refracted ray extended


a length I =
equal to k times I, where
A; is a constant factor which we shall deter
let

Mm

mine presently.
surface S

We

The point

describes a

proceed to show that


k may be chosen in such a way that
is
normal to S
Let C be any curve on S.
.

shall

Mm

As

the point
describes C the point
describes a curve T on the surface 2, and
the corresponding point
describes another

FIG. 52

curve

C"

on S

Let

s, cr, s

be the lengths of the arcs of the three curves C, r,

C measured from

corresponding fixed points on those curves, respectively,


w the angle which the tangent
to the
TI to r makes with the tangent

MT

normal section by the normal plane through the incident ray, and
and
the
and Mm respectively. In order to find
angles which
T\ makes with
a unit length and project it upon 3/Tlt
cos0, for example, let us lay off on
<

<p

Mm
Mm

SURFACES

536

[XII,

M 7\.

first directly, then by projecting it upon NT and from


T upon
and the similar projection from Mm upon -MTi, give the equations

sin

Applying the formula (10

of

cos

cos

ments

Mm

and

Mm

we

<p

da- cos

denotes the angle between


cos

ds cos

assuming k

di

dcr(k sin

sin r)

n,

Mm

follows that

It
,

3fm

is

is

normal

normal

also

m M and the tangent to

ds cos

sin

da- cos u sin r

by k dl, we find

or,

82 for the differential of a segment to the seg

=
=

dl

dl

sin r cos o

This,

find
dl

where

cos

<f>

258

to

C",

to the surface

ds cos

C".

Hence, replacing

0.

and, since C is any curve whatever on


S
This surface S is called the anti.

It is clear that S is the envelope of


caustic surface, or the secondary caustic.
as center with a radius equal to n times
the spheres described about

hence we

may

Mm

theorem

state the following

Let us consider the surface S which is normal to the incident rays as the envelope
of a family of spheres whose centers lie on the surface of separation 2. Then the
anticaustic for the refracted rays is the envelope of a family of spheres with the

same

centers, whose radii are to the radii of the corresponding spheres of the first
family as unity is to the index of refraction.

composed of two nappes which correspond, respectively,


which are numerically equal and opposite in sign. In
general these two nappes are portions of the same inseparable analytic surface.
This envelope

is

to indices of refraction

258. Complexes. A line complex consists of all the lines of a three-parameter


Let the equations of a line be given in the form

family.

(64)

Any

complex may

line

az

+ p,

bz

be defined by means of a relation between

a, b, p, q of

the form

F(a,b,p,q)

(65)

and conversely.

0,

a polynomial in a, b, p, q, the complex is called an


The lines of the complex through any point (x yo, Zo) form
algebraic complex.
a cone whose vertex is at that point its equation may be found by eliminating
If

is

a, 6, p,

q between the equations (64), (65), and

(66)

Hence the equation


r

(yi)

+p

yo

of this cone of the complex

vi x

/7\

az

\z

ZD

y ~ y
z - ZQ

x z

bz

q.

is

xz

Z/oZ

yz

>

Similarly, there are in any plane in space an infinite number of lines of the
complex these lines envelop a curve which is called a curve of the complex.
If the complex is algebraic, the order of the cone of the complex is the same as the
;

XII,

FAMILIES OF STRAIGHT LINES

-5,s]

class of the curve of the complex.

if

For,

we wish

to find the

537
number

of lines of

P
P

the complex which pass through any given point


and which lie in a plane
through that point, we may either count the number of generators in which
cuts the cone of the complex whose vertex is at A, or we may count the number
of tangents which can be drawn
in the plane P. As the number

from A to the curve of the complex which lies


must be the same in either case, the theorem is

proved.
If the cone of the complex is always a plane, the complex
and the equation (65) is of the form

Aa + Bb + Cp + Dq +

(68)

Then
is

the locus of

all

A(x -

XQ)

point, that

bp)

+ F=

said to be linear,

0.

any given point

(XQ, 3/0, ZQ)

is

B(y

+ D(y

The curve

the lines of the complex through

the plane whose equation


(

E(aq

is

of the complex, since


is, all the lines of the

C(x

2/)

z x)

+ E(y Q x -

x y)

F(z

0.

must be of class unity, degenerates into a


complex which lie in a plane pass through a

it

linear com
single point of that plane, which is called the pole or the focus.
plex therefore establishes a correspondence between the points and the planes
of space, such that any point in space corresponds to a plane through that
point,
and any plane to a point in that plane.
correspondence is also established

A
D

the straight lines in space.


Let
be a straight line which does not
and F the foci of any two planes through D, and A
belong to the complex,
the line
Every plane through A has its focus at its point of intersection

among

FF

<p

with the line D, since each of the lines

and

evidently belongs to the


and A belongs to the
complex. It follows that every line which meets both
complex, and, finally, that the focus of any plane through I) is the point where
</>F

<f>F

that plane meets A.


The lines
and A are called conjugate lines; each of
is the locus of the foci of all planes
through the other.
If the line

D recedes

to infinity, the planes

through

it

become

them

parallel,

and

clear that the foci of a set of parallel planes lie on a straight line.
There
always exists a plane such that the locus of the foci of the planes parallel to it
is perpendicular to that plane.
If this particular line be taken as the z axis,
it is

the plane whose focus is any point on the z axis is parallel to the xy plane.
By
(69) the necessary and sufficient condition that this should be the case is that

A = JB = C = D = 0,

and the equation

(71)

complex takes the simple form

aq-bp + K=0.

(70)

The plane whose focus

of the

is

at the point (x, y, z) is given

Xy -Yx + K(Z-z) =

by the equation

Q,

JT, Y, Z are
As an example

where

the running coordinates.


let us determine the curves whose tangents belong to the
Given such a curve, whose coordinates x, y, z are known
preceding complex.
functions of a variable parameter, the equations of the tangent at any point are

Xdx

Y-y
dy

Z-z
dz

SURFACES

538
The necessary and
complex
that

is,

is

that

that

it

sufficient condition that this line

should

lie in

218

in

is

to the

the point

given

(x, y, z),

ydx = Kdz.

xdy

saw

should belong

the plane (71) whose focus

we should have

(72)

We

[XII, Exs.

how

to find all possible sets of functions x, y, z of

parameter which satisfy such a relation

a,

single

hence we are in a position to find

the required curves.


The results of 218

may be stated in the language of line complexes.


example, differentiating the equation (72) we find

For

xd*y -yd*x = Kd*z,

(73)

and the equations


(x, y, z) is

theorem

(72) and (73) show that the osculating plane at the point
precisely the tangent plane (71); hence we may state the following

// all the tangents to a skew curve belong to a linear line complex, the osculating
plane at any point of that curve is the plane whose focus is at that point.

(APPELL.)
in
Suppose that we wished to draw the osculating planes from any point
space to a skew curve F whose tangents all belong to a linear line complex. Let
be the point of contact of one of these planes. By Appell s theorem, the

straight line
is

the point 0.

line

belongs to the complex hence


if the point
of T
;

Conversely,

MO, which belongs to the complex,

lies

lies in

the plane

whose focus

that plane, the straight


in the osculating plane at
hence
lies in

that osculating plane passes through O.


It follows that the required points are
the intersections of the curve with the plane whose focus is the
point
(see
218).

Linear line complexes occur in many geometrical and mechanical applica


The reader is referred, for example, to the theses of Appell and Picard.*

tions.

EXERCISES
1. Find the lines of curvature of the
developable surface which is the
envelope of the family of planes defined in rectangular coordinates by the
equation

= ax +

y<f>(a)

where a is a variable parameter,


and R a given constant.

+ R Vl + a 2 +

<f>(a)

2
<p

(a)

an arbitrary function of that parameter,


[Licence, Paris, August, 1871.]

2. Find the conditions that the lines x = az +


a, y - bz + /3, where a, 6, a, /3
are functions of a variable parameter, should form a developable surface for
which all of the system of lines of curvature perpendicular to the generators lie

on a system of concentric spheres.


[Licence, Paris, July, 1872.]
* Annales
scientifiques

tie I

Ecole

Normale superieure, 1876 and

1877.

XII,

EXERCISES

Ex S .]

539

Determine the lines of curvature of the surface whose equation in rec

3.

tangular coordinates

is

ez

cos x cos y

[Licence, Paris, July, 1875.]

Consider the ellipsoid of three unequal axes denned by the equation

4.

x2

y2

z2

*-

and the

in the xz plane.
of
Find, at each point
elliptical section
1) the
values of the principal radii of curvature B\ and -R 2 of the ellipsoid, 2) the rela
tion between HI and R%, 3) the loci of the centers of curvature of the principal
sections as the point
describes the ellipse E.
:

[Licence, Paris,

November, 1877.]

5. Derive the equation of the second degree for the principal radii of curva
ture at any point of the paraboloid defined by the equation

-+T=
6
a
ift

/j.2

2z

Also express, in terms of the variable z, each of the principal radii of curva
ture at any point on the line of intersection of the preceding paraboloid and the
paraboloid denned by the equation

X
[Licence, Paris,

6.

Find the

loci of the centers of

paraboloid defined by the equation xy

November, 1880.]

curvature of the principal sections of the


= az as the point of the surface describes

the x axis.
[Licence, Paris, July, 1883.]
7.

Find the equation of the surface which

vature of

is

the locus of the centers of cur

the plane sections of a given surface


of the surface.
through the same point
all

S by planes which

all

8. Let
T be any tangent line at a point If of a given quadric surface,
center of curvature of the section of the surface by any plane through

and

the center of curvature of the evolute of that plane section.


as the secant plane revolves about MT.

pass

the

MT,

Find the

locus of

[Licence, Clermont, July, 1883.]


9. Find the asymptotic lines on the anchor ring formed by revolving a
about one of its tangents.

[Licence, Paris,
10. Let

circle

November, 1882.]

be a given curve in the xz plane in a system of rectangular coordi


is described by a circle whose plane remains parallel to the
xy plane and whose center describes the curve C, while the radius varies in such
a way that the circle always meets the z axis.
Derive the differential equation
nates.

surface

of the asymptotic lines

on

this surface, taking as the variable

parameters the

SURFACES

540

[xn, Exs.

coordinate z of any point, and the angle which the radius of the circle through
the point makes with the trace of the plane of the circle on the xz plane.
Apply the result to the particular case where the curve C is a parabola

whose vertex

is

at the origin

and whose axis

is

the x axis.

[Licence, Paris, July, 1880.]


11. Determine the asymptotic lines on a ruled surface which is tangent to
another ruled surface at every point of a generator A of the second surface,
every generator of the first surface meeting A at some point.

12. Determine the curves on a rectilinear helicoid whose osculating plane


always contains the normal to the surface.

[Licence, Paris, July, 1876.]

Find the asymptotic

13.

(1

lines

on the ruled surface defined by the equations


y

u) cosv,

(\

w)sinv,

[Licence,
14*.

The

u.

Nancy, November, 1900.]

S by planes through a straight line A and the


cones circumscribed about S with their vertices on A

sections of a surface

curves of contact of the

form a conjugate network on the surface.


[KOENIGS.]
15*.

upon

it

As

a rigid straight line moves in such a way that three fixed points
always remain in three mutually perpendicular planes, the straight line

always remains normal to a family of parallel surfaces. One of the family of


surfaces is the locus of the middle point of the segment of the given line bounded
by the point where the line meets one of the coordinate planes and by the foot
of the perpendicular let fall upon the line from the origin of coordinates.

[DARBOUX, Comptes rendus, Vol. XCII,

On any surface one imaginary


which the equation 1 + p 2 + q 2

16*.

for

p. 446, 1881.]

line of curvature is the locus of the points


is satisfied.

[In order to prove this, put the differential equation of the lines of curvature
in the form

(dp dy

dq dx)(l

+ p* +

q-)

(p dy

q dx)(p dp

q dq)

0.]

[DARBOUX, Annales de VEcole normals, 1864.]

INDEX
names numbers in italic are page numbers and num
roman type are paragraph numbers, which are the same as in the original

[Titles in italic are proper

bers in

edition.]

Abdank-Abakanowicz

Assemblages 140, 68.


Asymptotic lines 506, 242.
Asymptotic value of F 291, 141.
Average value theorem : see Law
the mean.

201, ftn.

Abel: 153, 75; 215, 105; 348, 166;

577, 177.

Abel

lemma: 153, 75 378, 166

379,

178; test: 348, 166; theorem: 577,

of

177.

Balitrand: 495, ex. 11.


Beltrami: 87, ex. 21.

Abelian integrals : see Integrals.


Absolute value : see Value.
see Curves
Algebraic curves

and

Bernoulli, D.: 411, 195.

Bertrand

Functions, implicit.

Algebraic equations
theorem.

see

Ampere: 68, ftn.; 78, 42.


Ampere s transformation

Amsler: 201, 102.


Amsler s planimeter
Analytic extension

Alembert

80, ftn.

133, ex. 10

see Covariants.

Binomial differentials : 247, ex. 8.


Binomial theorem 104, 50 383, 179
:

391, 182

201, 102.

Bonnet

etc.:

see

196.

480, 230.

s series

133, ex. 11.

Bruno, Faa de

406,

474, 228.

4U,

Bouquet

Borda

248, ex. 19

Bilinear covariants
78, 42.

Analytic functions, curves,


Functions, Curves, etc.

Anomaly, eccentric

484, 232 485, 233.


Bertrand s curves : 485, 233.

385, 180.

63, 32

201, 101

34, ex. 19.

189.

Apsidal surfaces

Appell

Calculus of variations

see Surfaces.

538, 258.

Cardioid, length

see Variations.

154, 80.

Catalan : 262, ftn. 294, ex. 9.


Catenary: 220, 107; 292, ex. 1; 440,

s theorem : 538, 258.


Approximate evaluation see Evalua

Appell

208.

tion.

Archimedes

Cauchy:

134, 64.
Arcsine, series for : 383, 179.
Arctangent, series for: 382, 179.
:

Area, of a curve
see

also

curve:

135, 64

Quadrature
187,

P dx + Q dy

of

in oblique

91, 44

106, 50

s test (series constant terms):


332, 159; theorem (series constant
terms) : 335, 161 ; theorem (integral

convergence

189,

Caustics

95.

Arndt: 356, 169.


Array 353, 169 see also Double
and Infinite series.

29, 18

Cauchy

coordinates

in polar coordinates

352, 168; 359, 172; 378, ftn.; 391,


182 400, 187; 495, ex. 9 ; 535, 257.

94; see also Integral


of a surface 264,

191, 95

15S, 76
a closed

272, 131

7,

183, 91; 288, 140; 328, 156; 331,


157 332, 159 ; 335, 160 347, 165

test)

432, 204

359, 172.
536, 257.

Cayley: 279, 134.


series

Change

of variables

mation
541

see also

Transfor

definite integrals: 166,

84;

INDEX

542

double integrals: 264, 127; line in


tegrals : 186, 93 ; multiple integrals :

curve (center, radius, etc.): 469, 225;


; of a surface : 497, 239 ff.

471, 226

312, 150 ; triple integrals 300, 145.


Characteristic curve: 459, 219.

(principal centers of) : 128, 61 501,


240; (principal radii of): 128, 61;

Chasles : 166, 83.


Chasles theorem : 166, 83.
Center of curvature : see Curvature.

of

Cesaro: 495, exs. 10 and

501, 240; 503, 241; 519, 249; lines

11.

Complex variable

575.

plane : 5, 5
62, 32
92, 45
192 426, 201 ff ; regular : 408,
skew: 5, 5; 51, 27; 409, 193;
215 ff.; unicursal: 215, 105;
;

convergence

see

Con

vergence.

Conies (as unicursal curves) : 21 5, 105


222, 108.
Conjugate curves: 495, ex. 8; lines:
511, 245 ; tangents : see Tangents.
;

Conoid

509, 243.

(of

plane curves): 443, 211;

skew curves)
4S6, 234 ;
curves and surfaces) 490, 236.
:

(of

(of

Congruences, line : 53.7,255; linear:


533, 255 ; of normals : 533, 256.

Contact

etc.): 536, 258.

Conditional

521, 250, 251.


:
see also
221, 108

Functions, implicit ; analytic : 407,


192 409, 193 ; deficiency of : 221,
108
see also Curves, unicursal ;

(algebraic, linear, cone of,

Complexes

514, 246

Curves, algebraic

407,
192 ;
453,

221,

108.

Curvilinear integrals

see

Integrals,

line.

Cusp

113, 53

403, 192.

Cuspidal edge: see Striction, line of.


Cuts (for periodic function) : 3 IS, 153.
Cyclide (Dupin
Cycloid

524, 252.

s)

438, 207.

Contact transformations

see

D Alentbert:

Trans

formations.

131, 63; 201, 142; 332,

159.

Continuity (definition) : 2, 3 12, 10


uniform : 144, 70 251, 120.
;

Alembert

:
327, 156 350, 167; 354,
169; 359, 171; see also Infinite series,

Darboux:

Integrals, etc. ; absolute


344, 164
351, 167 555, 169; conditional: 347,
165; interval of: 375, 177; of inte

Darboux

6, ftn.; 140, ftn.


151, 73;
524, 251; 540, exs. 15 and 16.
;

Deficiency

theorem
:

:
151, 73.
221, 108 ; see also Inte

grals, Abelian,

and Curves, unicursal.

grals: 369, 175; uniform: 367,174.


Convex surfaces : 500, 239.

Definite integrals

Coordinates, elliptic: 268, 129; 307,


147 ; orthogonal : see Orthogonal
systems ; polar 31, ex. 1
66, 34

Density

74,

38

Corner

268, 129.

(of

a curve)

see

434, 205

32;

448, 213

66, 34;

Hospital, de.

296, 143.

5, 5

12,11;

J7, 13; extensions of definition of:

265, 127

38, 21

Descartes folium

of implicit func
42, 24 ; rules

40, 23

246, ex.

Determinants, functional
tional determinants.
:

Developable surfaces

Development

(radius of) : 63,


433, 205; of a skew
;

see Integrals.
L"

for: 15, 11.

Forms.

Curvature, of a plane curve (center of)


63, 32 433, 205 (circle of) : 63, 32

see

Derivatives, definition of

tions

6, 5.

Cotes: 199, 100.


Covariants, bilinear: 87, ex. 20.
Cubic curves (unicursal) : 222, 108.

Cubic forms

De V Hospital:

17, 13
:

constant

Continuous functions : see Functions.


Contour lines : 262, 125.

Convergence

test (series of

332, 159 ; theorem


terms)
131,
63 291, 142 see also Roots, exist
ence of.

in series

2.

see

Func

see Surfaces.
:

405, 189

see

also Infinite series, Taylor s series,

Fourier

s series, etc.

INDEX
Dextrorsal (skew curve) : 476, 228.
Differential equations : see Equations ;
invariants: see Invariants; notation:
87,
19, 14 ff. ; parameters : 81, 43
;

ex. 21

510, 244.

Differentials, binomial
differentials

Binomial

see

definition of

19, 14

higher orders: 20, 14; total: S3,


16 313, 151 ff. see also Integrals,
;

line,

P dx + Q dy.

and Integral

Differentiation, order immaterial

543

Ellipse, area of:

366, 174.
: 294, ex. 9 ; volume
of: 285, 137.
Elliptic coordinates : see Coordinates ;

Ellipsoid, area of

functions

13,

Envelopes

(of

faces)

370, 175; of line

Equations,

integrals:

194, 97; of series: 364,

174; 380, 179; 405, 189.


Direction cosines: 164, 81.

148; 347,

^,

Func

Double integrals see Integrals, double.


Double points, of a curve 112, 53
:

221, 108; of involutions: 232, 112;


of unicursal curves : 222, 108.

Power series,

182

353, 169;

see

also

367, 174;

Infinite

series

and Substitution of series.


Duhamel: 135, ftn.; 151, ftn.; 340,
163.

terms)

test

s
:

(series

of

constant

Dupin: 521, 251; 524, 252 535, 257.


Dupin s cyclide 524, 252 ; theorem
;

see

Anomaly.

of regression : 463, 221.


Element of area: 267, 128

Element of volume

line of;

80,

(ol

Alembert
a curve)

s
:

Remainder and

see

103, 49 ; integrals :
280, 134 see also Function

constant

184, 92

theorem (surfaces) 501, 240.


Evaluation, approximate (of definite
:

integrals)

101

207,

nimeter

197, 99
ex. 24

199, 100
see

(factorials)

also

201,
Pla141

291,

291, 141.
Evaluation of integrals

297, 143

:
287,
811, 160

140
;

373,

176.

Evolute:

432, 204; 436, 206; 480,


516, 247.
Existence of roots : see Roots and
;

Functions, implicit.
Exponential, series for

Extrema:

275, 132.
304, 146.

tangential

Euler

231

521, 251.

Edge, cuspidal: see Striction,

(classi
s)

Euleri 184, 92; 236, 113; 246, ex. 4;


280, 134 411, 195 501, 240.

254, 123

340, 163.

Eccentric anomaly

see Dif

72, 38.

and

Roots

see

(log T)

Duhamel

see

Evaluation.

double.

388,

(reduction of)

207, ex. 21.


Error, limit of

Division of series: 392, 183.


Dominant functions see Functions.

series:

Asymptotic

etc.

theorem

Double

Equations, partial differential


fication) : 73, 38
(Laplace

of

tions.

see

(developable

Equations, total differential

43

condi

7.

differential

Equations, intrinsic (of a curve) : 441,


210; reciprocal: 234, 113; solutions

6, ftn.
Discontinuity : 4, 4
Discontinuous functions: see

Double power series

452, ex.

308, 148

ferentials, total.

319, 153.
Dirichlet: 250, 124; 308,
196.
165
Dirichlet s integrals
tions: 414, 195.

plane curves) 426, 201 ;


:
465, 223 ; (of sur

surfaces, asymptotic lines, etc.)

lines,
:

; integrals
500, 239.

Surfaces, developable

Direct path (for periodic functions)

points

459, 219.

Epicycloid

Functions

see

skew curves)

11; of integrals: 154, 76; 192, 97;


194, 97; 368, 175

see Integrals

(of
:

189, 94; 220, 106;


19; length of: 234, 112;

248, ex.

128, 61

100, 48.

116, 65; 118, 56; 125, 69;


;

251, 120

and Minima.

see also

Maxima

INDEX

544
Families

253

straight

(of

526,

lines)

Fermat : 137, 66.


Finite functions : see Functions.

cubic

Forms, binary
determinate

531,

in

Indeterminate

forms.

Reduction

see

formulae.

see also

407, 191 ff. ;


analytic :
279, 134 ; continuous : 143,

q)

70; 200, ftn.;

250, 120; 362, 173;

422, 199; see also Con


discontinuous ^, 4
161,

378, 178;
tinuity

79;

denned by

6 and 7;
192, 97
195,

205, exs.

98;

195,

integrals

98; 221, 108; dominant: 386, 181;


396, 186; elliptic: 33, 112; expo
nential

92

313,

see

Exponential

279, 134

290, 141

:
183,
308, 148 ;

T(a)

homogeneous:

150;

18;

9,

hyperbolic: 219, 106; implicit: 35,


20;
147,

23
see

25; 395, 187; integrable

-45,

72

Logarithm

monotonic

148,

72; periodic: SIS, 153; primitive:


see Primitive functions and Inte
grals; rational: 3, 3; 158, 77; 205,
ex. 12
05, 103; real variables: 2,
;

2; 11, 10; (etc., see special titles) ;


transcendental 221, 108 236, 114
422, 199; trigonometric: 700, 48;
:

220, 106;

36, 114; trigonometric

(inverse): 104, 50;

35,

309, 149

305, 149

375, 153.
378, ftn.

Halphen: 33, ex. 11; 56, ex. 18.


Harmonic series 103, 49 347, 165.
Haro s series: 183, ex. 11.
Helicoid

509, 243

579, 249.

Helix: 482, 231; ^53, 232.


Hermite 97, 46 777, 87; 205, ex. 12
:

236, ftn.
^-j.,,
Hessians 55, 30.
:

Higher dimensions
Highest

:
370, 150.
divisor :
77, 104.

common

Hilbert: 171, 87.


Hospital, de V : see

Houel: 219,

L"

Hospital, de.

106.

Hyperbola, area of 218, 106.


Hyperbolic functions see Functions.
:

Hyperbolic point

500, 239.

Hypocycloid: 242, 117; ^5,


Implicit functions

Alembert

ex. 7.

see

Functions and

see

theorem.

Improper integrals see Integrals.


Incommensurable numbers 7^, ftn.
:

777, 87; 249, ex. 21.


Indefinite integrals

see Integrals.

Independence of Path: 376, 152; see


also Integral P dx + Qdy; of sur~
face

33,

155

see also Integrals,

surface.

Indeterminate forms

Index

179.

Fundamental theorem of Algebra


D Alembert s theorem.

335, 160

205, ex. 8 ; inverse : 41,


^06, 190 ; logarithmic :

50, 26

Functional determinants: 46, 25; 52,


28 58, 29 265, 127 304, 146.
;

328, 156
377, 177.

Hadamard:

:
477, 229.
Fresnel: 86, ex. 17.
Fresnel s wave surface: 86, ex. 17.

:
262, 126 288, 140
316, 152
318, 153.
Green s theorem : 288, 140

316, 152

477, 229.
formulae

Functions,

Greatest limit

Green

ff.

Trigonometric series.
Franklin: 257, 123.

B (p,

23.

351, 167

Fourier: 418, 197.


Fourier s series: 418, 197

see

Higher dimensions.
Gergonne: 535, 257.
Goursat: 35, ftn.; 45, ftn.; 88, ex.
Graves 166, 83.
Graves theorem 166, 83.
:

Formulse of reduction

439, 207.
function: see Function T(a).

Gauss: 199, 101; 291, 142; 344, 163.

30

60,

see

Frenet

Geometry of higher dimensions

Focal planes : 532, 255 ; points


255 ; surface : 531, 255.

Frenet

Galileo

Gamma

ff.

(of

exs. 11

70, 8

97, 47.

a function): 757, 77;

and 12

322, 154.

Indicatrix: 507, 240

ff.

05,

INDEX
Infinite, definition of

Infinite limits

series:

Infinite

improper.
183,

99, ftn.;

1;

2,

Integral Pdx + Qdy, and Green s


theorem; logarithm: 245, 118 ; mul

4, 4.

see Integrals,

constant terms: 329, 157 ff.; devel


opment in 93, 46 98, 48 201, 101
:

375, 177; 404, 189; 411, 195; 418,


also

see

199;

422,

197;

differentiation of : 364,
;
380, 179; 405, 189 ; division of :
392, 183 ; dominant see Functions,
dominant ; Fourier s 418, 197 ff ;
series, etc.

174

harmonic

103, 49 347, 165 ; of in


see Substitution of series

and Double
s

integration of:

series;

McLaurin

see

multiplication of:

178;
157

reversion

substitution of

sum

series;
see also

Taylor
195

331,

terms:

positive

ff. ;

Mc-

364, 174; 368, 174;

201, 101;

Laurin

finite series

of

series

158;

379,

1;

329,
100 ;

2,

407,
see Substitution of

of: 99, ftn.; 329, 157;

Convergence
s series

Taylor

trigonometric

see

4H,

variable terms: 860, 173;

ff.;

Double

see also

ff.

Q dy

358, 171 ; 367,


316, 152 ff. ;

pseudo-elliptic : 234, 113 246, ex. 5


247, ex. 7 ; surface : 280, 135 ff. ; 322,

19, 14

see

155; triple: 296, 143; xdy -ydx:


189, 94 191, 96 206, ex. 14.
;

Integraphs: 201, 102.


Integration, of binomial differentials
224, 109; of

integrals:

123;

256,

mechanical
201, 101

:
201, 102 ; of series
364, 174
368, 174 ; see

also Integrals.

Interpolation: 198, 100.


Interval function defined in
:

2, 2

7,

of convergence : see Convergence.


Intrinsic equations : see Equations.
Invariants : 59, 30 70, 37.
;

Inverse functions

see Functions.

Inversion, of functions : see Func


tions ; transformation of : 66, 35

69, 36.

Involutes: ^5^,204; 436,206; 480, 231.


Involutions: 231, 112; 234, 113; 247,
ex. 7.

Involutory transformations

series, etc.

Infinitely small quantity

P dx +

Taylor

174

310, 150

tiple

156; alternating: 182,


complex terms : 350, 167 ff. ;

327,

91;
91 ;

545

78, 41

69, 36

79, 42.

also Infinitesimal.

Infinitesimal:

14; 150, 72; 252,

19,

120.

55, ftn.

Integrable functions
Integrals, Abelian

Jacobians

see Functions.

215, 105; 221, 108;


differentiation of see Dif
:

:
226, 110 ;
ferentiation of integrals ; definite :
see also Evaluation of
149, 68 ff.
;

integrals
tic

double

250, 120

Functional

see

determi

nants.

Jamet

509, 243.

Joachimsthal

520, 250.

Joachimsthal

Jordan

ellip

ff.;

226, 110; 231, 112; 233, 112;


246, ex. 6 ; functions defined by

theorem

520, 250.

360, ftn.

see

Jacobi: 22, ftn.; 3#, ex. 5; 46, ftn.;

Functions

hyperelliptic

226,

Kelvin, Lord
s

110; improper: 175, 89; 179, 90;


183, 91
236, 140
277, 133
289,

Kepler

161; 553,173; 369, lib; indefinite:


154, 76 208, 103 ff. see also Func

Koenigs

55, ex. 10.

equation

249, ex. 19

406,

189.
:

540, ex. 14.

tions, primitive,

and Evaluation of

integrals; integration of: see Inte


gration of integrals ; line : 184, 93

201, 102 263, 126 316, 152 322,


155 see also Differentials, total, and
;

Kepler: 406, 189.

Lagrange

198, 100
212.

Lagrange
tions)

5,
;

7,

274, 131

formula

34, ex. 8

20, 18

90, 44

^-4, 189

(implicit

404, 189

445,

func

formula

INDEX

546
(interpolation)
274, 131.

198, 100

identity

Lame: 80, ftn.; 82, 43; 325, ex. 10.


Laplace : 73, 38 84, ex. 8 404, 189.
Laplace s equation : 73, 38.
;

253, 121

8,

Lebesgue: 422, 199.

Legendre: 33, ex. 9;

36; 275, 88;

6<9,

366, 174; 394, 184.


:

77, 41.

Leibniz

27, 17

Leibniz formula 27, 17.


Lemniscate: 22S, 108; 5^,

29, 18.

Meusnier: 497, 239.


Meusnier s theorem

Minimum

5,

497, 239.
55
see also

226,

Extremum.
Mobius strip 280, ftn.
Monge: 29, 18 44, 24
:

Monotonically

523, 251.

functions

increasing

see Functions,

monotonic.

Multiple series: 310, 150

ff.,

358, 171;

567, 174.
Multiplication of series

7,6; 19,

52, 120

s series: 99, 48; 382,


179;
Taylor s series.
Mean, law of the see Law.
Mechanical quadrature 201, 102.
Mertens: 352, 168.

polynomials
33, ex. 9
275, 88; 201, 101; formula: ^252,
203; integrals: 233, 112; 566, 174;
394, 184 ; transformation
68, 36
s

Legendre

ff.

see also

252, 74; 205, ex.13; generalizations:


10, 8
98, 48
265, 127.
;

3,3; 116, 55

McLaurin

for integrals (2d law)

Extremum.

see also

8; 25,11; 16, ftn.; 55,48; 255,76;


05, 127; for integrals (1st law) : 252,

74

24.

Maximum

Laugel: 140, ftn.


Law of the mean, for derivatives

Mansion 207, ex.


Mass: 296, 143.

Murphy: 373,

ex.

see Series.

1.

Length
Lie,
1

L"

262, 80

26^, 80

Newton
Normal

112.
etc.

68, ftn.

8.

2,

a lower

8.
;

an

ftn.; 140, 62; greatest:


Greatest limit ; of error
see
:

Evaluation

of integration

see In

the lower: 142, 68;

tegrals;

upper : 2^2, 62.


Line complexes : see Complexes
see Congruences ;
gruences

con
inte

Line of striction : see Striction.


Linear transformations
see Trans
:

formations.
Liouville: 231, 111.
.57,

28

102, 49;

382, 179.

Loop-circuit: 523, 153.

Lyon

555, 257.

theorem

Mannheim

tal: 272, 87.

see Contact,

Ordinary points see Points.


Orthogonal systems, of curves: #75,
:

132; triple: 80, 43


Oscillation

521, 251.

52, 120; 448, 213.

142, 69;

Osculating plane: 453, 215

sphere : 492, 237.


Osculation : ,95, 45
;

^55, 216

455, 216;

448, 213 453,


488, 235 492, 237.
;

Osgood: 53, ftn.; 252, ftn.; 369, ftn.


Ostrogradsky : 309, ftn.
Ostrogradsky s theorem : 309, 149.

Parabola
555, 257.

88, ex. 23.

255, 64 257, 66 220, 107.


Parabolic point : 500, 239 520, 249.
Paraboloid: 525, 246; 523, 251.
:

495, exs. 7 and 11 524, 252.


;

30,

: 142, ftn.
272, 87; 249, ex. 21; transcenden

Painleve

Mams

256

plane curves

4$4, ftn.

Mains

501, 240.
555,

Numbers, incommensurable

215
100, 49

226.

Order of contact
;

of

the

grals : see Integrals.


Line of curvature : see Curvature.

Logarithm

497, 239

19; principal (skew curves): 471,

140, 68

upper: 91,
see

length of : 30, 19

Hospital, de, theorem: 10,


:

sections

Normals, congruence

Hospital, dei 10,

Limit

19, ftn.

INDEX
Parallel curves

207, ex. 20

86, ex. 16.


Parameter of distribution

surfaces

differential

Differ

see

equations

see

207, exa. 21

22.

:
see Equations
Transformations ; radii

Reduction formulse
104;

Periodic functions

Poincare: 386, 181.


Point transformations

see Transfor

:
110, 53 408, 192.
114, 54
Points, singular : 110, 53
319, 153 ; 408, 192 ; 409, ftn.
Poisson : 204, ex. 6 325, ex. 8.
;

Riemann: 140,
;

Green

see Coordinates.

Roberts

473, 227.
Polar surface : 473, 227.

Laplace

equa

ftn.; 309, ftn.;

ff. ;

double:

theorem

139, 67; 154, 76

Principal normals, tangents, etc.

Protective transformations
formations.
Pseudo-elliptic integrals
Puiseux : 484, 232.

see

7, 7.

Roulette

207, ex. 23

Rouquet 495,
Ruled surfaces
:

134, 64

220, 107

526,

see Surfaces.

Trans

Series

series,

135, 65

ex. 22.

Sequences: 327, 156

see also Infinite

series.

160,

see also Area, Integrals, etc.

535, 257.

ex. 4.

Schwarz 11, 9.
Schwarzian : 88,

see Integrals.

Quadrics, confocal : 533, 251.


Quartic curves 223, 108.
:

see also

294, ex. 10.

see

Infinite

Double

series,

series,

Simpson: 199,

Taylor

etc.

:
234, ftn. 495, ex.
Serret s curves : 234, ftn.

Serret

Quetelet

Kcheffer: 125, 56.


Schell : 495, ex. 7.

309, ftn.

see

Normals, Tangents, etc.


Pringsheim: 340, 162.
Prismoid : 285, 138 310, 150.
Prismoidal formula: 285, 138.

theorem.

252.

see also Integrals.

78

347,

tion.

407, 190.
511, 244.

Roots, existence of: 3, 3; 291, 142;


see also Functions, im
321, 154
plicit, and D Alembert s theorem.

375, 177

s
s

Rolle s theorem

Polynomials, continuity of : 3, 3 ; rela


214, 104.
tively prime : 211, 104

Quadrature

Rodriguez: 33, ex. 8; 517, 248.


Rodrigues formula : 517, 248.

series:

90, 44

165.

Riemann

see

s series)

Reversion of series

394, 186.
Primitive functions

210,

98, 48.

Points, ordinary

103;

26, 110; 227, 110; 239, 115;

Riccati equations

Potential equation

see Length.

208,

Remainder (Taylor

mations.

16, and 17;


49, ex. 21.
Regression, edge of: 463, 221.
Regular curves : see Curves.

see Functions.

Periods: 318, 153.


Picard : 322, 154 538, 258.
Planimeter: 201, 102.

Polar coordinates

240, 116; 244, 118; 248, exs. 15,

Pellet: 495, ex. 11.

Power

see

Rectification of curves

456, ftn.

Pedal curves: 69, 36;

Polar line

polars

see Transformations.

Equations, partial differential.

and

see

Reciprocal equations
differential

Partial

Curvature, Torsion.
Rational functions : see Functions.

ential.

Peano

Raabe 340, 163.


Raabe s test 340, 163.
Radius of curvature, of torsion:
:

528, 253

530, 254.

Parameters,

547

7.

100.

110, 53; 114, 54;


319, 153; 408, 192; 409, ftn.

Singular points:

Sinistrorsal (skew curve)

476, 228.

INDEX

548
Skew curves
Steiner

see Curves.

Tractrix

207, ex. 23.

Stokes: 282, 136.

Stokes theorem
Striction, line of

Subnormal

Substitutions

nates: 65, 34; 76, 40; etc.; of curves:


66, 35; of independent variable : 61,
31

388, 182

397,

series.

see Transformations.

70, 38

74,

59, 30

39

Change

of variables

68, 36

77,

of coordi

of integrals

point

40 ; projective

lytic: 410, 194ff.

66, 35

36.

Trigonometric functions:

apsidal: 86, ex.

see

66, 35

78, 41

Surface integrals : see Integrals.


Surfaces: 75, 39; 497, 239 ff. ; ana

37; reciprocal polars: 69, 36;


; reciprocal radii : 66, 35
69,

69,

19.

Subtangent: 30,

78,

174, 88.

Double

see also

77,

41; 79, 42; linear

Substitution of series

186

529, 253.

30, 19.

171, 87.

Sturm

:
174, 88.
Sturin sequences

441, 209.

Transformations, contact : 67, 36


41
78, 42 ; involutory : 69, 36

282, 136.

Transcendental numbers

17; developable: 79,42; 461,221;


464, 222 505, 241 ; focal : 531, 255 ;
parallel: 86, ex. 16; ruled : 285, 138
;

509,244; 526, 253; translation 513,


245 ; tubular : 524, 252 ; unilateral :

tions

series

Triple integrals

see

Func

411, 195.

see Integrals.

Triply orthogonal systems : see Orthog


onal systems.

280, 135; wave: 86, ex. 17.

Umbilics

:
505, 241 52 0, 249.
Uniform curves, continuity, conver
;

infinitesimal
see
Curves,
Continuity, Convergence, Infinitesi
mal, etc.
Unilateral surfaces see Surfaces and

gence,

Tangential equations

207, ex. 21.

Tangents, asymptotic : 503, 240 ; con


jugate 511, 245 ; length of : 30, 19 ;
:

principal: 503, 240; stationary: 457,


217 ; to curves (plane) : 5, 5 ; 63, 32

97,47; to curves (skew)

92, 45;

51, 27

22

76, 39

Tannery
Taylor

to surfaces

and

16, 12

39,

ftn.

ff.

95, 48

384, 180

ff.

596, 185.

Tchebycheff: 257, 123.


ferentiation of series

see Dif

integration

Tests for convergence

see

Conver

Tissot

495, ex.

see Kelvin, Lord.

6.

Torsion and Radius of torsion

and 474,

see Limit.

Value, absolute

375.

Wallis: 240, 116.


Wallis formula: 240, 116.

473

surface

Weierstrass

86, ex. 17.

6, 5;

153, 75; 200, ftn.;


402, 87; 422, 199.
Weierstrass theorem: 422, 199.
:

228.

Total differentials

3,

Viviani: 286, 139.


Viviani s formula : 286, 139.
Volume: 254, 122 284, 137; 325, ex. 8;
326, ex. 13.

Wave

gence.
:

see Integration of series.

Wm.

limit

Upper

Term-by-term differentiation

Thompson, Sir

strip.

Variable, complex : 575.


Variations, calculus of : #57, 123.

89, 44

^97, 51

Mobius

5,

555, ftn.

s series

171, 86

see Differentials.

Ziwet

406, ftn.

r>

f*35 6 7

RETURN
TO *

Astronomy/Mathematics/Statistics Library

100 Evans Hall

642-3381

DUE AS STAMPED BELOW

OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
BERKELEY, CA 94720

UNIVERSITY

FORM NO. DD

19

u.

BERKELEY LIBRARIES

3^
V .l

Potrebbero piacerti anche