Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
TITLE
STAFF
DEADLINE/HAND-IN
ASSESSORS
Martin Carrolchick et al
No poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his
appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists. You
cannot value him alone; you must set him, for contrast and comparison, among the
dead.
(T.S. Eliot)
In light of the lecture Tradition & Originality you will be aware of a brand of originality, endorsed by T.S. Eliot,
that fuses the old and the new in pursuit of a more sophisticated, nuanced meaning.
Eliots conception of originality is more interested in refreshing reinterpretation than novelty. Ultimately, this
type of originality, reliant on the poets awareness of tradition, is superior to the more conventional idea of
originality, not only because of its comprehensiveness, but also because its assumption that artistic meaning
only emerges from contextualization affords us a reliable way to measure aesthetic value.
Originality as Eliot envisions it is more persuasive than the OEDs definition partially because it is more
comprehensive. Instances of true innovation free from tradition are far and few between. The invention of
fire might be such an innovation, but little else matches that level of newness. Photography, for example, may
seem like a groundbreaking innovation, but it actually takes root in pre-existing bodies of technical knowledge
and, moreover, is aesthetically judged on principles established by other visual forms like painting. For all its
newness, it could only have been invented with the help of the past, and it can only be valued relative to the
past. Innovation is largely derivative of past progress. Even reactionary movements, like Dada and punk
subculture, rely on tradition to give purpose to their rebellion. Very little, it seems, arises beyond the context
of history and developing precedents.
Eliots version of originality is also striking for its emphasis on the importance of contextualization. Tradition
provides a context by which we can judge aesthetics separate from the immediate real-world contexts in
which works are created. The implication of this reliance of works upon one another is salient: no art exists in
a vacuum. The meaning and merit of an artwork only arise through its relationships to other artworks. Were
we to disregard tradition, we would have no clear, objective way to deem one work more valuable than
another. Nor would we be able to produce completely meaningful art in the first place, for as Eliot posits: No
poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his appreciation is the
appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists. You cannot value him alone; you must set him, for
contrast and comparison, among the dead.
AIM
Your aim is to write an illustrated essay that identifies a contemporary practitioner within your preferred
field of the Creative Arts (Pathway) and present an argument for their work to be part of a tradition
Your Objectives include
To research examples of historical and contemporary practice that relate to your work
To review the effect of significant contextual factors on the production of specific works in
relation to your work
To analyse and evaluate other artists and designers intentions
To identify and develop your understanding of the critical context of your own interests and
ideas within the subject.
To identify books journal and magazine articles, exhibition catalogues, primary sources and
internet sites etc that will be relevant to your subject.
To look beyond simple, popular assumptions about art
To present your report in a professional word-processed document
To reference all secondary sources accurately within your final Report (blog or word-processed
document)
Materials Required
Internet Access; OCVC Library; Visits to Museums and Galleries; Sketchbook/Notebook
Recommended Research
Author
Title
Arnheim R
Visual Thinking
Unit
4
Fashion as Communication
P (editors)
Hebdige D
4
4
Visual Culture
Architecture Now
Contemporary Textiles: The Fabric of Fine Art (Black Dog Publishing, 2008) ISBN
978-1906155292
Papanek V
Design for the Real World (Thames & Hudson, 1985) ISBN 978-0897331531
Raizman D
A History of Modern Design: Graphics and Products Since the Industrial Revolution
Grosenick U
Strinati, D
0415235006
Sturken, M and
The Study of Dress History (Manchester University Press, 2002) ISBN 978-
Cartwright L
Taylor L
0719040658
Walker S
Making Contemporary Art: How Todays Artists Think and Work (Thames and
M
Weintraub L
In order to pass this unit, you need to demonstrate that you can meet all the learning outcomes for the unit. The
assessment criteria for a pass grade (below) describe the level of achievement required to pass this unit.
To achieve a pass grade you must show that you are able to:
p1
Explore techniques and processes using appropriate media safely (IE, CT)
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
PLTS (Personal Learning and Thinking Skills): This summary references in the brackets the elements of the
personal, learning and thinking skills applicable in the pass criteria. It identifies opportunities for learners to
demonstrate effective application of the referenced elements of the skills.
Key
IE
independent
enquirers
CT creative thinkers
RL reflective learners
SM self-managers
TW team workers
EP effective participators