Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

SMANIKA B

Widyah Angreini Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri


case N-1-1, on the matter of moratorium of Indonesian workers

Moratorium of Indonesian workers.


The Government side would like to ask the court to decide that,
1. Whether there has been a grave need to carry out the moratorium by Indonesia
2. Whether Indonesia has provided every possible protection for Indonesian workers
Statement of Fact
There are so many cases happened in Indonesia especially the cases about the
prosperity of society in Indonesia. Many society never get their equal rights to achieve the
prosperity. In this case, the real cases of society that dont get their equal rigths from
government is Indonesian workesrs that work in foreign. Why itss become a cases? As we
know that Indonesian workers that do their job in abroad doesnt get their equal rights as
workers. For example, like a torturing, sexual crime, and etc. It prove that government not
give the protection to Indonesian workers, especially in abroad. Because of that,
moratorium is needed. Moratorium in this case is to erasing an appointment between
Indonesia and the country it self. And its also a way to stop dispatch Indonesian workers to
abroad in a over particular periode. So, moratorium is a really good step to help our abroad
workers to get their freedom and give their equal rigths and its really needed.
Summary of Pleadings
First, the Government pleads the court o decide that there has been a grave need to
carry out the moratorium by Indonesia. Indonesia never get problems in the cases of our
workers in abroad. Indonesia always facing with so many cases in international about
Indonesian abroad workers. First case that always made our emotion coming is about the
country it self that cannot appreciate well our workers. They do everything like forced and
crime. The physic and sexual crime are cases that what actually we can heard in the public.
Next case, is about our government. Government not solve this problem seriously to stop
this case and let them. We can see the real case in public is Kikim Komalasaris problem.
Kikim is an Indonesian workers that work in Arab Saudi that dead because of misstreatment

SMANIKA B
Widyah Angreini Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri
case N-1-1, on the matter of moratorium of Indonesian workers
from her boss. Kikims boss do the descipable turtoring and its have proven in the Arabs
court. After government know this problem, the government try to solve this problem with
make a policy. The policy is moratorium. Moratorium is the best way to solve this
problem, because the purpose of moratorium is to give warning to pertinent abroad in order
to give the more protection to indonesin workers that work in that country and it can make
the abroad think again if they want to conducived. Because if Iindonesia not dispatch the
workers in abroad its mean that they wiil be shortage workers and it give the damage to
that country.
The second, the Government pleads to decide that indonesia has provided every
possible protection to Indonesian workers. After we see that many cases about Indonesian
workers. We believe that government not give the best protection to Indonesian workers in
abroad. It can seen by many cases about them, like turtoring, sexual crime, and etc. The
protection from government come when the cases about them appeared in the public and
its very late. If the government always give the best protection, this case wiil not happend.
And like the the other cases beside Kikims case, we know there is an Indonesian workers
was dead in Arab Saudi because the turtoring of her boss. The government know this case
after this case happened a year before. Its

prove how low government give them

protection. And we can conclude that the Government not give protection yet to the
workers abroad.

SMANIKA B
Widyah Angreini Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri
case N-1-1, on the matter of moratorium of Indonesian workers
The moratorium of Indonesian workers
The oppotition side would like to ask the court to decide that,
1. Whether there hasnt been a grave need to carry out the moratorium by Indonesia
2. Whether Indonesia hasnt provided every possible protection for indonesian
workers.
Statement of Fact
All governmnet of the country always give protection to all ociety, in this case
indonesia governmnet give protection to indonesian workers, whether indonesian workes
that in foreign or in domestic. When in this case there are so many casess of indonesian
workers in abroad, the government should not wrong, because we can see that many illegal
indonesian workers.
Summary of Pleads
The first, the opposition pleads the court to decide that there hasnt been a grave
need to carry out the moratorium by Indonesia. All of reas country in the world have the
problem obout the walfare of all society. In this case, indonesian has the problem about
indonesian workers. Many indonesian workers that work in abroad and there are so many
acses about that, like turtoring , sexcual cases, and so on. The governmnet always try to do
everthing to give protection to them and try to solve this problem. But in this case the
moratorium is not the best way tio finish this problem. Moratorium is stopped to send the
indonesian workers in a particular period. until the that abroad can give guarranty of safety
of them. But, in this case if the government cant do moratorium ti finish this problem. The
government must consider the harm and the advantage of this policy. Because when the
government do teh moratorium, its mean that the national income is decrease, because the
exchange is decrease. It can threatening the walfare of the society in this country, because
the money or gift to fulfil the necessity of the country. There is the other way to finish the
problem, like always supervise and give more protection to Indonesian workers that work

SMANIKA B
Widyah Angreini Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri
case N-1-1, on the matter of moratorium of Indonesian workers
in abroad. And degrease the number of Indonesian works that wiil send in the abroad that
has the problem.
The second, Indonesia hasnt provided every possible protection for indonesian
workers. In give the protection to indonesian workers, in the status quo, the government
always give protection to Indonesian workers, especially Indonesian workers that work in
abroad. The example of protection are best training and government give protection, like
the indonesian workers that has the bad action , they can report this problem to KEDUBES
of Indonesian in that coutry. And this case we cant to blame government if there are so
many cases of crime to Indonesian workers in abroad. Because in Indonesia many ocnum
that send the Indonesian workers without the official license form the government and
usually we call it ilegal of Indonesian workers. The governmnet dont know the condition
of ilegal indonesian workers in abroad because they dont have data about them. And the
protectoion also in form politic asylum to the Indonesian workes that have the problem in
that country.

Potrebbero piacerti anche