Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
AS COLLECTED FROM A
VA R I E T Y O F S O U RC E S
C O M P I L E D
B Y
R O B E R T
H A N D
Introductory Comments
The following is an attempt to collect and organize scoring and weighting
systems for both accidental and essential dignities from a variety of sources.
While most authorities seem to agree concerning the essential dignities (namely,
that planets in domicile get 5 points, in exaltation get 4, triplicity 3, bound or
term 2, and face 1), there was a wide variety of systems for scoring the
accidental dignities and debilities. What may surprise some readers is the
complexity of these systems and detail into which they go. Readers familiar with
Jyotish will also discover that in the Western tradition, contrary to widespread
belief, there is a system corresponding to Shad Bala, the system use in Hindu
astrology to measure a planet's strength.
However, I believe a caution is in order. Both Shad Bala and the system described
here suffer from the same basic fault, a tendency to combine apples and oranges.
We do not find any weighting system at all in the oldest surviving Greek texts. So
far in the Arabic Era texts we have found only systems for weighting the
essential dignities but none for the accidental dignities. This is also true in Hindu
astrology. What scholars believe to be the oldest Hindu texts discuss each of the
Balas as being a different kind of strength with a different facet of the planet's
energy being strengthened or weakened. The same appears to be true of the
Greek and Arabic Era texts.
The basic problem is that astrology has never explicitly (in written works at least)
set forth the principles that make up each planetary energy that can be
strengthened or weakened by placement in a sign or because of a planet's
placement with respect to the houses or other planets. The nearest thing to this
is to be found in Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos where he discusses the planetary virtues
with respect to Hot, Cold, Wet, and Dry. Otherwise we do not really know what
it means when we say that a planet is strong or weak. Is the strength that Saturn
gets by being conjunct the Ascendant the same kind of strength that it gets by
being in Capricorn, Aquarius, or Libra? I think that most would agree that these
are not the same kind of strengths, but I also think that few of us could pin down
exactly what the differences are.
Therefore, I offer the following with the strong recommendation that what I
have said be taken into consideration as the reader studies the systems
presented here.
Dignities and Debilities Weighting Systems from Various Sources
Essential Dignities
Type
Weight
Notes
Domicile
Exaltation
Triplicity
Terms
Face
Mutual Reception by
Domicile
Mutual Reception by
Exaltation
Mutual Reception by
Triplicity
3*
Mutual Reception by
Bounds
2*
Mutual Reception by
Face
1*
Essential Debilities
Type
Weight
Detriment or
Opposition to
Domicile, Usual
Value
-5
Detriment or
Opposition to
Domicile,
Montulmo
-2
Fall or Opposition to
Exaltation, Usual
Value
-4
Fall or Opposition to
Exaltation,
Montulmo
-5
Peregrine
-5
House
Lilly
Montulmo
Schoener
Ibn Ezra
Wilson
1st
11
12
2nd
-2
3rd
view cart
4
6
3
(https://arhatmedia.foxycart.com/cart?cart=view)
5
RO BE RT H AND (HTTP ://WWW.ARHATM EDIA .CO M / IN DEX 2 . HTM L #AB O UT- N AV)
R ESO URCES (HT TP ://WWW.A RHATME DI A.CO M/ IN DE X 2 .HTM L# SER VI C ES- N AV)
4th
5th
7 (index2.html)
7
6th
-2
-3
-4
7th
10
10
8th
-2
-4
-4
9th
10th
12
11
11th
12th
-5
-5
-5
Schoener and Ibn Ezra use similar systems which have no debility, only less
dignity. Lilly, Wilson, and Montulmo have both positive and negative scores.
Given this fact their ranges of values are quite similar but there is much
disagreement on the relative ranking of the houses. Schoener is unique in
granting the tenth house more than the first. The other all make the first house
either greater to or equal to the tenth. There is also disagreement about whether
the sixth or the twelfth is the worst house, and Montulmo ranks the second as
being one of the worse houses.
Schoener and Ibn Ezra recognize these as dignities and debilities but do not
assign explicit scores to them. It should probably be assumed that they all have
weights of +1 or -1, if weighting is appropriate at all.
II. Dignities and Debilities Arising from Planetary Motion
Lilly
Montulmo
Wilson
Direct
Ascending in Auge
Swift in Motion
Slow in Motion
-2
-1
-2
-2
Descending in Auge
-2
Retrograde
-5
-5
Montulmo
Wilson
Cazimi
-2
-1
-2
-2
-2
--2
-2
-4
-4
-4
Combust
-5
-5
-5
-4
`
Schoener and Ibn Ezra also recognize the dignities and debilities that are scored
here as 0, but do not assign explicit scores to them. It should probably be
assumed that they all have weights of +1 or -1, if weighting is appropriate at all.
IV. Aspects and Other Relations to Other Planets and Fixed Stars
Lilly
Montulmo
Wilson
Besieged by
Benefics
Partile
Conjunction with
Benefics
Partile
Conjunction with
Caput Draconis
Partile Trine or
Sextile with
Benefics*
Applying Trine of
Benefic*
Applying Sextile
of Benefic*
Conjunction with
Regulus
Conjunction with
Spica
-3
-0
Conjunction with
Benefic Star
Partile Square of
Malefic
Partile
Opposition of
Malefic
Conjunction with
Cauda Draconis
Besieged by
Malefics
Conjunction with
Algol
Conjunction with
Malefic Fixed
Star
Void of Course
Feral
-4
-3
-5
-4
-4
-4
-5
-4
-5
-5
-5
-5
-5
-5
-2
-3
Schoener and Ibn Ezra also recognize the dignities and debilities that are scored
here as 0, but do not assign explicit scores to them. It should probably be
assumed that they all have weights of +1 or -1, if weighting is appropriate at all.
V. Dignities and Debilities Due to Sect, Masculine &
Feminine (Except Degrees).
Lilly
Montulmo
Wilson
Conformity of Quadrant
Security
Hayz
Contrariety of Hayz
-2
VI. Miscellaneous
Lilly
Montulmo
Wilson
Lucid Degree
Bounds of a Benefic
Increasing in Number
Bounds of a Malefic
-1
Decreasing in Number
-1
Void or SmokeyDegree
-3
-3
Via Combusta
-2
Eclipse of Luminaries
-5
-2
-2
-2
-4
-4
-5
In Gemini
In Virgo
-5
Combust
-5
-3
-4
-5
-6
-6
V. Miscellaneous
!
#
(index2.html)
"
-2
(mailto:info@arhatmedia.com)
(https://www.facebook.com/robert.hand.98284)