Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
thyroidism)on
plasma T C ; metabolism, we have
carried out a series of studies on turnover of chylomicrons and very low density lipoprotein-triglyceride
(VLDL-TG) in onegroup o f patients with hypothyroidism and in another with hyperthyroidism. Our
findings indicate that thyroid hormones have multiple
actions o n T G metabolism thatcaninfluencetheir
plasmaconcentrations.However,
in spite of these
actions, many patients in both categories of thyroid
dysfunction are able to compensate so a s t o maintain
plasma T G concentrations in the normal range.
METHODS
Patients
Journal of LipidResearch
307
Abstract Studies on plasma triglycerides (TG) were perf'ormed in I O nonobese and 16 obese patients with hypothyroidismand
in 13 with hyperthyroidism.Nonobese,
hypothyroid patients generally had normal
levels of 'TG,
but obese patients often had hypertriglyceridemia. In most
hypothyroid patients I-thyroxine treatment lowered plasma
TC, and most hyperthyroidpatientshad
low TG.One
mechanisnlwherebythyroidhormonesmightdecrease
plasma T G could be t o increase lipoprotein lipase (LPL).
However, post-heparinLPL was not increased after therapy,
nor was it increased in hyperthyroid patients. In contrast,
low levels ofposthypothyroidpatientshadabnormally
heparin hepatic triglyceride lipase. In hypothyroid patients
withouthypertriglyceridemia,clearance
of chylomicrons
was normal. A few obese, hypothyroid patients with f'asting
hypertriglycel-idemia had low clearance of chylomicrons,
which may have been due in part to competition for re~novalof excess endogenous TG. Thus, 110 evidence was
obtainedfora
significant abnormality in chylomicron
metabolism in hypothyroidism.
Nonobese,
hypothyroid
patients had normal
synthesis and clearance of very l o w
densitylipoprotein(Vl,DL)-?C.Incontrast,VLDL-TG
synthesis was increased in 8 obese, hypothyroid patients,
andfractionalclearancerateswere
relatively low cornpared t o obese,euthyroid subjects. Instrikingcontrast,
hyperthyroidpatientshadremarkable
facility in clearing
V1,DL-TG.IThus,
TG m e t d b o h n is not grossly deranged in hypothyroidism,butthyroidhormonesapparently can promotecatabolism of VLDL. -Abrams, J. J.,
S. M. Grundy, and H. Ginsberg. Metabolism of plasma
triglycerides in hypothyroidismandhyperthyroidism
in
man. J . Lipid Res. 1981. 22: 307-322.
I(lc;ll
Patient
.\gc
SC\
Height
hi
168
I66
169
69
ti I
66
6.5
Y,
8"
9"
47
60
60
54
.5 4
62
54
50
61
IO"
47
I'
2 I)
3b
4"
5"
60
7 r1
M
hl
h1
hl
hl
kl
\\Cl#ht
\\eight
f Ill
kii
1;
157
54
166
158
158
188
184
I ti2
10.5
I 05
I IO
1I O
I /
"
I /
XX
X8
112
ti9
1IX
I (;
(:hole\trr~~ll
l'llll\
llr,y/fll
lIl,~/dl
> IO0
>I O 0
3 6 .5
250
0.4
0
2.0
>1 0 0
1 .5x
100
189
2 9'1
24 7
2x3
114
!)i
1I6
2I O
I .?I2
I .i
1
I9 1
I .i
1
279
1.2
5.0
2.0
2.0
0.6
I IX
I 'iH
lll,~lfll
96
I OI
IO2
"
'1
00
76
5. 5
>1 0 0
> I 00
> IO0
253
28x4
:io4
210
\c
id
Ilrgldl
5.8
ti.4
5.11
6.4
6.8
6.0
"
:>.i
6.2
10.2
4.0
'l'hese patients were hospitalized for a p~-olongedperiod for detailed studies o f cholcsterol n~etaholisnl.
Patients 2 and 3 were hospitaliled for 21 prolonged period but did not undet-go cholestr~-olt)alanc-e9tutlies.
' Patient 5 was studied as an outpatient and hospitalired only for tests.
" Patient 7 was hospitalized tor 1 month i n the hypothyroid state. but w a s twated 215 at1 outpatient,
"
"
'IABLE 2.
(:linical
dat;l
Experimental design
Patients were atlnlittecl t o the hospital foI either
brief 01- prolonged periods depending
on whether
they underwentdetailedstudy
of theircholesterol
Inetabolism (see ;lccompanying paper; Ref. 1 1 ) . Those
(obese h~pothyroitl patients)
- \ d m i \ \ i o n l.ipi(l\
Idc.1l
Parienr
Age
SCX
VI
11"
12*
13'
14*
15"
16"
1 7"
18 h
19"
2 0''
2 1"
22*
23"
24"
25 r
2 6"
55
34
M
$1
70
50
60
45
48
hl
M
hl
61
64
31
59
L.1 I (
Height
\\clgllt
\\eight
'1 1
ISH
(:h<Jit'5lClO1
I(;
\<id
cm
k,?
c:
nr,qldl
Pnr h
nr,qldl
nqM1
lll,ql~ll
178
173
165
178
176
182
176
192
175
1 64
173
86
121
123
2.0
1.9
3.4
0 .1
27
>IOU
203
81
63
83
X9
238
194
8.2
6.2
11.2
96
86
Y7
90
X1
97
126
I13
44
198
57
55
57
52
h,i
M
180
168
I09
92
165
126
177
12.5
125
130
1Y 1
1 ?I1
132
133
136
147
150
158
1 ti0
176
2 52
59
297
437
256
0.8
>100
296
2.0
2.5
I.o
0
0
1.2
2.2
0.9
ti0
350
265
2 ti2
546
> I00
> 100
45
> 100
70
44
>1 0 0
88
150
I23
59 1
590
440
10.3
6.7
8.5
225
152
405
178
-52
200
4.2
9.7
7.5
7.8
385
2x8
0.9
77
419
329
1.6
>1 0 0
932
2.0
>1 0 0
2.58
'These patients were hospitalized f o r ;I prolonged period for. detailed s t u d y of cholesterol metaboli5tn.
These patients were hospitalized only for tests.
'' Patient 25 was hospitalized throughout the study hut did not untlet-go cholesterol halance studies.
"
I'
308
158
207
159
8:UI
7.0
8.8
6.2
Height
\Veighl
\\'right
1,
'I \H
(:h<)le\terol
1G
CI c
i
k i d
< 111
ki:
<y
Jrl,g/d/
l'JlIl,
Jlly/l//
r11,y/d/
wrq////
165
171
158
I82
.5 1
5x
32
19
4.0
2.0
91
148
1 :14
10:1
:3.0
147
.5 1
I I6
106
56
X2
6.3
2.0
189
134
21 I
1I O
1 ox
2.5 1
225
165
94
I x7
I85
111
II O
Itk'll
Palicnt Sex
\gr
YJ
2 7"
28 h
2 9f'
24
41
56
59
11
3 0 h
:3 1
3 I"
42
42
:4 2"
:4 :4c
3 I)
?A''
:4 ~3
3 6''
65
6s
2Y
34
3I
.5 5
J 7"
3 8"
30"
xr
:1I
11
kt
hl
11
11
178
181
67
74
73
76
179
172
162
81
-.
64
92
hl
l6J
180
1 x4
100
\I
177
98
F'If
I 3
6X
85
87
95
IO0
?6
1.4
103
22
I7
IO6
18
?.O
I4
2.0
3.7
4.3
2.2
I13
115
117
I19
12x
1s5
144
14
27
17
4?
3.0
12
I5
2 .o
3.4
I72
"
I l
70
3.8
7.2
5.0
6.2
5.X
5.9
8.0
4.2
4.6
7.2
7.9
Patient 27 \\':IS ho\l)itali/ed f o ~f u l l stud) but did not undel-go cholesterol balance s t ~ ~ d i e s .
trad abbre\ iaterl hosl'italizations hecause of theil- 11)I'erth~roidisn~
and did not undergo cholesterol h a l a ~ ~studies.
tr
' Thew patients \cere hospitali/etl for- a prolonged period for detailed studies o f cholesterol mct;holi\m.
,I p .'ulrrlt :16 \\;IS hosl)italired only f o t - tests.
"
/,
p .,ltlents
'
.4brarn.r, Grundy,
Methodology
T h ~ r o i df 7 r ~ ~ c l i otpstS.
n
Thyroidfunction testswere
done routinely on admission of all patients; these includedplasmath).roxine
( T 4 ) , l-esin-T, uptake, 'I.l3
(ladioimmunoassa).),thyroidstimulatinghot-rnone
(.ISH), free T 4 index, and thyroid antibodies.
Also,
each patient had an 1 l 3 ' uptake and technetium scan
todefinetheirthyroid
s i x hettel-;thesedatawere
used to calculate the I I 3 ' dose in the cases o f ' hyperthyroidism. -I4and 'I'SH were repeated weekly during
hospitalization in bothhypo- and hyperthyroidpatients; these tests were done to confirm stable thyroid
function. and i n the case of hypothy~-oid patients,t o
monitor incr-etnental doses o t ' I-thyroxine.
Plcsmcr lipids. Total plasma cholesterol and
TC; were
ctetetnlinec-t on ;I Technicon Auto Analyxr (Model
11,
Technicon Instruments Corp., Tarrytown, X I ' ) (12, 13).
Post hrpnrin LPI, and HTGL c ~ t i ~ ~ i Post-heparin
ti~.~.
plasnla was obtained from blood drawn 15 min after
intravenous in.jection o f ' 60 I U/kg sodium heparin
(Riker Labs., Inc.) Subjects had been f'asting for 14 h r
prior t o sampling. Sanlples lvere cooled immediately
o n ice and centrifuged at4C for 30 min at 480 g. T h e
and G I T L J ~Triglyceride
P~~
metabolism in hypo- and hyperthyroidism
309
310
RESULTS
Plasma lipids
Results for TG in plasma and VLDL are presented
along with post-heparin lipase activities for nonobese
and obese patients with hypothyroidism and hyperthyroid patients in Tables 4-6, respectively. In nonobese, hypothyroid patients, plasma total T G was alAbrams, Gmndy, and Ginsberg
31 1
P;rtient"
-~
Pel-iod
f SU ( I t ) "
NI,!@
I
II
I (;
l'l~l\lll'l
VI.1)I. .I.(;
H.l'G1,
1.1'1.
~~
234 t 77
139 t 3 8
111,g
pmol FAlhrlml
Id/
1743.2
90
6.0
10.3
3.9
114k 2
I17 t 24
68
71
3.8
14.2
10.6
25.3
I
I1
87 2 18
76 t 1 1
49
41
4.7
10.5
8.6
12.0
I
I1
104 2 26
106 2 23
.5 9
61
150 t x9 (3)
92 ( 1 )
22.3
32.4
26.1
143 ? 18
1 I O f 18
96
24.0
I1
65
3X.0
12.8
17.7
I
II
13 1 t 30
I18 ( 1 )
89
104
16.9
18. 1
6.7
27.4
I 3 9 f 32
152 t 28
YO
102
24.7
28.1
16.3
10.6
178
162
21
27
I25
I10
20.0
11
21.8
26.7
I
I1
1% t 34
I:%) -+ 5 3
140
82
11.6
19.8
I 8.0
1.47 t I4
I 1 x -+ 9''
98 t 12
78 2 7"
14.9 t 2.8
21.6 t17.8
3.2"
14.1 2 2.6
t 2.7"
22.7
15.4 f 1.:1
16.8 t 1 . 0
6
7
8
11
9
10
Mean k SEM
I1
?
?
IO0
22.0
5'L
22.7
'r
f 2.1
14.0 t 1.2
14.4
" See footnotes i n '1'at)lr I <14 t o whether- patiettts wet-e stutlietl t o t - hr-ief o t - pt.olongetl periods
inpatients.
" Unless otherwiw intlic;Itetl, the d a t a t o t - mean t SI) represent six \;dues taken during the
last 3 weeks of each pe~-iotl;
if the patient WIS ;ttlmitted onl! for t a t s , the number i n parentheses
gives how many nmlsuretnenta \ c r ~ - enl;ltle.
L)
Iffct
' " > . ences
between Pet-iotls 1 (11)pothpt-oitl) and I 1 (eu&h)t.oicI)wet-e n o t significant a t
P < 0 . 0 5 by pait-ed atl;tl)sis.
" L)ifferetlte signiflc;lnt I)! paitxd an:tt\\i\ (I' < 0 . 0 . 5 ) .
" Ages l o r nol~mall l l C l l < I l l t l \ Y O I I l C I l IaIlgetl I'ronl 2 0 t o 50 \IS.
;L
(.
312
II
normalclearance
of chylornicr-ons despite f'asting
hyper.tl.iglyceridemia. .Ihe ~-etnainder hadpr-olonged
residencetimes as was typical of manyeuthyroid,
hypeI-triglyceridenlic patients. A finding o f ' some interest MW t h a t nonchylomicrorl-~l.(; during duodenal
in contrast
infusion f'requently increasedmarkedly
l o o n l y small increments i n this same f ~ x t i o no f '
cuthyl-oicl s u b j e c l ~ .'Treatlnent w i t t i T r atrikingly reduced
residence
times
o f ' chylomic~~ot~-'l'(;
a s it
lowet-ed total fasting TG. O n the other hand, the ap~o~~-~I~~~
parently abnormal risein n o n c t ~ y l o ~ n i c ~ persisted after therapy i n most o f ' the patients.
Table 9 presentsrcsults
for thehyperthyl-oid
gIoup. T h e residence time of'chylornic~1-on-'I'(~
was i n
TABLE 5.
mgid
ptnol F.4ihriml
tngidl
(?I)"
11
11I
409 f 125
403 f 88
328
323
13.4
20.4
9.3
9.4
12
I1I
260 (1)
40 (1)
195
10.3
18.5
IO. 1
174 f 29
195 f 24
102
118
18.7
28.7
17.2
20.5
122
114
14.8
19.2
190 (1)
11.9
19.1
I1I
13
I1I
14
15
200 (1)
13.4
I1I
179 f 30(9)
167 4 31(21)
125
I15
17.5
iO.8
4.8
6.0
16
I11
557
294
243
50
4.59
227
23.0
27.6
20.3
16.0
f 13
108 f 21
88
63
13.1
15.0
- <
.J
5.0
136 2 32 (5)
105 ( I )
88
.5 1
17.9
28.8
11.6
11.1
1559
11.2
21.9
14.4
I1I
18
I 1I
19
I1I
20
I11
21
11I
22
I 1I
I1I
23
137
1806 ? 372
l l 7 7 f 611
1005
292 2 48
179 f 34
225
I25
20.0
60.8
8.I
870
381
734
303
19.2
50.4
18.8
17.1
29
12.3
20. I
10.8
15
487 2 118
3 3 6 f 80
397
264
12.2
-
10.0
f 298
f 71
60 ( I )
40 (1)
1.5
17
Mean
SD
7.0
15..i
-
24
I1I
178 f 37
158 It 27
14.1 125
17.1 107
4.5
11.7
25
I1I
224 f 4
214 f 27
141
133
16.3
21.1
12.1
10.6
26
I 1I
1 7 9 f 36
111 f 49
106
12.9
16.6
11.1
14.8 t 1.1
24.2 t :3.gC
12.9 f 1 . J
12.9 ? 1.2''
SEM
11
~
384
226
~~
108
71'
52
302
I99
~
f 95
2 63'
9 . 3
See footnotes in Table 2 as to whether patients were studied for brief or pt-olongeci periocls as
inpatients.
See footnote b of 'I'ahle 4.
r [I'~fferences
..
between Periods I (hypothyroid) and 11 (euthyroid) were significant a t P < 0 . 0 2
hy paired analysis.
" Differences not significant at P < 0 . 0 5 .
"
313
T A B L E 6.
P;uienlo
I'&d
ll1gldl 2
27
I
II
SD
tl.1 G I .
\ ' l J ~ I .I ' G
P l ~ l \ l l l ~'1.G
l
iI1 I
prrrol F z 4 1 l ~ ~ ~ n r I
lll,~Ill/
24
23
64 t 14
62 c 18
LPI.
9.2
11.4
5.6
5.2
116 t 22 (4)
104 f 20 (4)
70
II
59
10.2
17.1
7.3
29
1
11
108 2 31 (4)
1 0 1 t 24 (4)
62
57
32.0
11.7
10.7
6.0
30
I
I1
55 ( I )
98 i 20 (4)
26
36
28.4
40.8
10.7
II
103 t 62
x3 t 28 (2)
59
46
63.5
42.1
1.5.8
35.2
I
I1
I S 1 c 21 ( 3 )
171 t- 9 ( 3 )
83
I18
66.8
22.6
10.1
17.6
76
71
30.0
12.1
/ I12.4
82
20.4
20.8
15.9
28
31
32
33
I1
35
I
II
I
II
I23 t 2 3
1 I 7 t 31
28.0
c 26
I30 f 22
124
"
17.1
9.0
186 t 18
132
231
171
12.2
10.2
5.6
.5.7
28
36
I
II
66 ( I )
72 ( 1 )
25
29
3 1.9
19.6
17.0
17.1
37
I
II
50
89
5 (4)
23 (6)
37
50
5.8
4.6
.5.4
10.6
118 t- I O (6)
1 3 0 ( I26.5
)
72
82
32.4
14.1
65
107
16.3
11.7
8.~5
17.6
622 8
7 3 f 11"
27.5 t- 5 . 3
20.7 f 3.2"
38
I14.3
I
39
I
11
Mean t SEkl
I
II
f
f
1I
O 2 30
158 t 27
106
IO
119 t 13"
11.6 t 1.6
14.0 5 2.2'
' See footnotes in Table 3 a s t o \\hethe). patients wett studied for hr-id0 1 . prolonged periods
as inpatients.
See footnote b of 'I'ahle 4.
' DifferencebetweenPeriods
1 (hypoth\roid) a n d I I (euthyroid) were n o t statistically
significant at P < 0.05 1)) paired analy4s.
'
314
34
(3)
26.1
LP-7'G
Residence
Time
C M-TG
vqM1
mi,,
Far
Lipids
Infusion
A
I'~tie111
\\'t
Pel-iod
x;
Chol
(:hol
LP-TG
CM-TG
rngldl
lllg/ll/
H ) poth! wid
1
\'OR
I
I1
390
162
177
191
427
173
287
104
30
15
I10
-87
4. I
2.0
NOR
I
II
230
200
118
119
217
226
172
169
37
118
54
50
4.9
15.8
I
I1
135
146
36
123
163
170
164
222
37
20
128
99
4.8
2.6
I
11
274
237
63
74
307
2.55
1 I8
147
32
48
55
73
4.1
6.1
NOR
NOR
NOR
I
I1
250
203
104
140
275
22 1
167
164
21
22
59
24
2.6
2.8
NOR
240
156
256
253
16
97
2.0
NOR
232
202
25 1
254
35
52
4.3
NOR
1
11
229
22 1
204
123
257
255
226
200
39
29
22
77
4.2
3.5
IO
NOR
235
113
250
193
I6
80
1.9
24
OB
277
179
293
220
11
41
1.0
20
34
19.3 t 14
139 2 18
117 f 26
128 ? 15
270 t 22
274 ? 37
217 f I5
205 t 16
189 ? 24
168 ? I7
27 t- 3
32 ? 2
25 f 5
70
71
39
176
1142 9
178
133 t 12
49 t 6
20
Mean ? SEM
10 patients
6 patients
6 patients
Euthyroid
21 subjects
"
I
I
I1
249
251
?
2
I1
10
16
27
3.4 2 0.4
4.1 rt 0.3
5.5 ? 2.1
10
6.5 ? 0.9
.-2hhre\iations: Chol. cholesterol; 'TG, triglyceride; LP-TG. lipoprotein-TC; CM-I'G, chylomicron-TG; NOR, normal; OB, obese.
315
ti
bt
Period
TG
(:h(Jl
(:I101
16
OB
0B
540
377
I347
272
186
123.5
179
205
605
970
21
24
495
I
I1
273
260
28i
278
663
279
,508
82
16
168
229
29 I
79
34 214
248
163
100
>
21
29 I O
1320
.5 3 x
3 72
2.540
I676
IO72
279
-370
336
226
30
I064
255
614
1.50
635
66
16
1540
606
408
38
~59 0
229
2 14
158
196
0B
I
I1
($70
350
20
OB
I
I1
29 1
124 126
429
197
3I3
I
II
428
I X8
950
455
207
I
I1
356 f 69
207 f 34
936 f 405
430 -c 184
239
3i.5 2
H\.~)eIt~.iglyc.er.itletllia
(euth) ~micl)
3 1 patient\
I
377
37
347
222
_t 323
749 i 256
398 f 161
119 f 45
240 2 8
4 I 4 ?270
34
50
1215
4
0.5
58
i 36
2
-43
41
279 -t 176
319 t- 140
61
13
-t
-t
34
5
I5
34
33
39
O B , obese.
11or111;1l:
316
I
I1
Mean f SEM
rnzn
lll,lg(ll
262
I 60
OB
OB
CWI.(;
I1
18
21
Time
LP- IC;
rngldi
lrI!&i
Hypothyroid
I1
CM-~IC
mains that thyroid hormone could influence catabolism of VLDL, the other TG-rich particle of plasma.
Indeed,when
plasma T G is elevated in hypothyroidism, the increase occurs mainly in VLDL. Mechanisms for endogenous hypertriglyceridemia in hypothyroidsubjectshavebeenexaminedpreviously
by
Nikkila and Kekki (4); they
estimated
turnover
rates o f plasma T G using single-exponential analysis
of VI,DI,-TG specific-activity curves following injectionof[3H]glycerol.Althoughthe
validity of their
method can be questioned (16, 20), their conclusions
are of interest nevertheless. They suggest that synthesis of plasma TC in hypothyroidism is normal, but
the fractional clearance (FCR) is markedly reduced.
In our patients with hypothyroidism, the tnajority
had normal concentrationsof VLDL-TG. Thiswas almost
invariably
true
for
nonobese
patients,
but
several of theobesealsohavenormal
T G . Among
those without increased TG, fractional clearance rates
of VLDL-TG were
in the same range
as thoseof euthyroid, normotriglyceridernic subjects. These observa-
TABLE 9. Chylomicronclearance(hyperthyroidpatients)"
rrrgMl
53
27
75
28
125
67
I1
154
97
47 211
I1
2.9
29
95
109
174
I1
30 84
148
10.4
I
11
125 31
186
117
77
175
103
I
11
196
219 20 1
229 I 1
229
I
11
92
173
166
113
33
61
209
26
34
142
182
53
175
38
101
170 3 9
I1
Mean f SEM
11 patients
9 patients
9 patients
I
I
II
2.9
190
170
32
52
228
245
75
121 95
7.0
167
54
22
31
85
4.1
53
90
6.4
121
10 1
5.7
0.3
2.7
99
5.6
66
79
2.8
f5
64 -+ 1 1
3 . 6 c 0.6
5
f7
66 f 12
8 6 - t 17
3.5
5.3
118
32
330
203
237
273
191
125
48
3.8
3
139
176 162
129 f 12
128 2 14
181 97
f 9
2.9
165
1
57
22
21
58
146
99
154
37
68
2.0
3.1
170
35
92
19
-1
74
30
207 59
rnm
15
23 161
4.3
101
153
1
I1
72
Ilfgldl
1ng/dI
78
81
-t
12
81
?
f
14
18
7.3
142 13
141 ? 15
192 f 10
14829
f 22
150
28 2 23
180 f42
25
27
71
0.6
0.9
" Abbreviations: Chol, cholesterol; TG, triglyceride, LP-TG, lipoprotein-TG; CM-TG, chylomicron-TG.
317
Patient
17.3
18.1
2 5.8
0.173
11
I
I1
4
5
7
23.3
10.8
2039
16.4
10
"
I'
mglhdkg
,ngih,lkg IN'
112
1 I4
676
976
12.5
12.0
0.230
0.326
72
362
1004
16.I
0.300
115
15.9
6i
6.1
i.4
0.456
0.262
709
1O.Y
11.7
0.367
209
138
13.Y200
777
1215
8.9
132
I36
680
9.9
I .5 . 5
99 2 25
98 t 20
123 5 24"
755 f 204
508 ? 136
929 5 142h
136 2 7
872 11.4
2 71
I
11
0.219
756
26.1
0.26.5
10.5
0.153
0.165
11.7
0.254
11.0f 2.4
8.8 5 1.2
13.9f 2.1"
0.7
0.
167
18.3
12.0t 2.2
9.5 f 1.2
14.8 t 2.2"
12.1 0.207
2 0.8
0.254 t 0.038
0.235 t 0.056
0.261 t 0.027''
r 0.016
The difference between Periods I and I1 was not statistically significant at P < 0.05 for the live patient5 studied i n I~oth period\.
Difference between Periods I and I I significant at P < 0.05 by paired analysis.
tionsinhypothyroidpatientswithouthypertriglyceridemia plainlyindicatethatmanypatients
with
hyperthyroidism do not havea clinically significant
defect in removal of VLDL-'TG.
Following treatment of our nonobese patients with
T4,their plasma concentrations o f VI,DL-'IG actually
showed a slight increase. This
rise was the result o f '
enhanced synthesis of VLDL-TG, and it is contrary
to what might have been expected
f'rom the recent
report of Keyes and Heimberg (23). 'l'hese workers
showed in isolated, perfused rat livers that the hypothyroid state caused a reduction in oxidation of fatty
acids andagreaterproduction
of VI,DL-I'G. Although these observations undoubtedly are true, the
in vivo situation may be different. Previousinvestigators (24-31) havefoundthat
in hypothyroidism
the circulating levels of free fatty acids (FFA) are reduced that might curtail availability o f FFA as a precursor for synthesis of VLlIL-'I'<;. With T,treatment,
FFA flux should be increased which may account for
the rise in synthetic rates of VLDL-I'G in nonobese,
hypothyroid patients.
In contrast to nonobese patients, those
with both
hypothyroidism and obesity commonly had elevated
concentrations of VLDL-TG.Withoutdoubt,their
318
7.1
5.9
9.8
I03
Ill
43
384
'
Nlglh I
34
49
I1
FCR
hypertriglyceridernia was d u e partly t o overproduction of VLDL-TG and to increasing the load on the
' f G removalsystem. Thedatashowedthatobese,
hypothyroid patients, like obese, euthyroid patients
previouslystudied in ourlaboratory (20), havean
excessive production of VLDL-TG. Ineuthyroid
patients withobesity,elevatedsynthesis
of VLDL
presumably is due to enhancedfasting
FFA and
augmentedintake
o f totalcalories;bothshould
provide increased fatty acids and glucose for VLDLT G synthesis.Increasedcaloricintake
a l s o maybe
a major factor in the elevated transport of VLDL-TG
in ourobese,hypothyroidpatients.Despitetheir
hypothyroidism,most
o f theobese
subjectswere
foundtorequireincreasedcaloricintaketotnaintainconstantbodyweight.Nonetheless,theirsynthesis of VLDL-TG may have been further accentuated by hypothyroidism.Onen~echanisrncouldbe
that shown by Keyes and Heirnberg(23), i.e., curtailed
hepatic oxidation o f FFA and diversion to T G synthesis. Also, if' peripheralutilization
o f ' F F 4a n d
glucose is lessened by l o w thyroid hormone, as it nnquestionably is, any unused calories of either type
may be shunted t o the liver for synthesis of VLDL-TG.
Bothmechanisms are compatible with the data ob-
Euthyroid, nonobese
(111ean t SEM)
27 patients
5.8
rra~npo~t
mgld
II
11I065
Hypothyroid
(mean 2 SEM)
8 patients
5 patients
5 patients
\'I.DI.-TC
\.'LDL-'I'G
Ingid
wgih 1-
mglhrikg
mgihrlkg I I+'
I1
26 1
200
1977
1345
23.8
16.2
28.4
19.3
0.214
0.190
16
1
11
415
289
2376
2191
24.7
22.8
26.5
24.4
0.145
0.192
17
I
11
103
76
1084
612
11.4
6.4
15.8
8.9
0.272
0.209
19
450
I827
20.3
27.0
0.108
21
513
304
2756
1984
28.4
20.3
41.8
30.1
0.135
0.163
82
80
1483
669
13.6
6.1
21.4
9.6
0.4 15
0.192
307
249
1326
1675
14.4
18.2
25.4
32.0
0.113
0.176
74
52
695
410
5.5
3.3
13.9
8.2
0.192
0.161
276 t 62
251 t 66
179 t 41"
1691 t 241
1671 t 277
1269 t 270"
17.8 t 2.8
17.4 t 3.1
13.4 t 3.0"
25.0 t 3.1
24.7 t 3.5
18.9 t 3.9"
0.199 t 0.039
0.212 t 0.094
0.183 t 0.006b
127 t 15
1414 t 248
12.3 t 2.1
19.9 t 3.4
0.3 15 t 0.049
I1
I1
24
I1
2.5
I
11
26
I1
Hplmthyroid
(mean t SEbI)
8 patients
7 patients
7 patients
Euthyroid (ohese)
( ~ n e a nt S E M )
I O patients
I
11
test
117"
( P < 0.05).
319
Patient
VLDL-TG Transport
VLDL: I'G
mglhr
lflgld/
FCR
mglhrlkg
mglhrlkg IW
344
970
6.7
19.0
5.7
16.2
0.502
0.750
hr"
1
11
27
51
28
85
811
14.0
12.2
0.347
29
I
I1
81
97
1401
1045
20.9
15.6
19.9
14.8
0.569
0.355
22
61
428
1125
.5.8
15.3
5.8
15.3
0.601
0.569
I1
116
95
11 14
1032
15.3
14.1
15.7
14.5
0.298
0.337
33
107
1500
18.6
21.0
0.404
34
I
I1
80
115
47
987
6.4
13.2
7.3
15.1
0.175
0.260
35
I
I1
120
154
442
773
6.5
11.4
7.6
13.3
0.120
0.163
II
37
39
1047
310
16.6
8.1
16.6
8.1
0.873
0.404
I
11
60
80
1094
669
10.0
6.1
15.8
9.6
0.542
0.405
7 4 * 11
6 8 + 13
87 t 13"
822 i 154
738 t 170
889 f 76"
12.1 2 1.8
10.6 i 2.0
13.2 f 1.3'
12.8 f 1.7
11.8 i 1.8
13.4 i 0.9"
0.397 + 0.1 19
0.460 f 0.088
0.405 + 0.085"
30
11
31
37
39
Mean i SEM
10 patients
8 patients
8 patients
"
1
I1
27
<lo0
Hypothyroid
8 7
9
10
I1
21 4
26
27
24
27
H) perthyroid
28 42
29
3 0 19
32
34
39
15
19
f SEM
Euthyroid subjects ( n
Mean f SEM
0
0
0
0
0
2
100-170
34
38
0
46
42
4
12
50
.i
170-250 .&
27
26
10
27 t 9
24 ?203
2
0
28
32
35
0
0
250-300
235
230
286
228
8
245
41
287
?
12
0 t0
51-5
2 4
16 34
0 2 0
10 f
154
t
244
3*2
5 2 2
17 + 4
<300
.k
Mean
28
22
24
26
29
28
9
302
11
.k
2
26 i-252
41
33
34
51
58
50
332
37
325
34
318
35
f3
SD
109
102
48
148
124
76
f
12
Chol
mgldl
mgldl
24 1
213
171
36 1
56 1
93
244
253
167
193
293
233
273
63
64
108
78
70
75
284
26 1
-rG
f 230
74
104
118
51
179
150
90
45 f
304
5
i 115
12
f110
20
503086
15
81 f
192
16
50 f
310
4
f 10
20
104
93
96
131
186
48
i 21
10)
Euthyroid hyperlipidemia
(11 = 10)
Mran -t SEM
320
4
2
0
10
0
0
3 2 2
Mean i SEM
Mean
,k
25
*3
347
f 232
40
13
'l'his work was supported in part by the Veterans Administration; D r . Jeffrey J. Ahrams was an Associate InvestiM. Grundy is a Medical Investigator
gatorandDr.Scott
o f the Veterans Administration. T h e investigation was also
supported by Grant AM-I6667 from the National Institute
o f Arthritis,Metaholism,and DigestiveDiseases and No.
HI*-14 197 awarded by the National, Heart, Lung, and
Blood
Institute, HDSIDHHS. .I'he authors wish to express their
appreciation t o Marjorie
Whelan,
Joan
Rupp,
Lianne
o f . the Nursing and Dietetic Services
k i p p e r , ; ~ n others
d
o f the Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego.
Excellent technicalhelp
was also provided by Robert
Atn-ams, Grundy,and Ginsberg
Analytical Chemistry.MediadInc.,
New York. 341344.
14. Baginsky, M. La., and W. V. Brown.1979.
A new
of lipoprotein lipase
methodforthemeasurement
in postheparin plasma usingsodiumdodecylsulfate
fortheinactivationofhepatictriglyceridelipase.
J . Lipid Res. 20: 548-556.
15. Grundy, S. M., and H. Y. I. Mok. 1976. Chylomicron
clearance in normal and hyperlipidemic man.
Mrtabolbm. 25: 1225-1239.
16. Zech, I,. A . , S. M. Grundy, D. Steinberg,and
M.
Berman.1979.A
kinetic modelforproductionand
triglycmetabolism of very low densitylipoprotein
erides:evidencefora
slow productionpathwayand
32 1
322
25.Tibbling,
G. 1969. Glycerol turnover in hyperthyroidism. Clin. Chim. Acta. 24: 121- 130.
26. Harlan, W. R., J. Laszlo, M. D. Bogdonoff, and E. H.
Estes, Jr., 1963. Alterationsin free fattyacid metabolism
in endocrinedisorders.Part
I . Effectofthyroid
hormone. J . Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 23: 33-40.
27. Felt, V., and P. Husek. 1972. Effect of human growth
hormoneandthyroidstimulatinghormoneon
fatty
acid composition of serum lipids and blood glucose in
hyper- and hypothyroidism. Endokrinologie. 59: 239248.
28.Goodman,
H . M., and G. A . Bray.1966.
Role of
thyroidhormones
in lipolysis. Am. J . Physiol. 210:
1053- 1058.
29. Debons, A. F., and I . L. Schwartz. 1961. Dependence
of lipolytic action of epinephrine in vitro upon thyroid
hormone. J . Lipid Res. 2: 86-89.
30. Rich,C., E. L. Bierman,and I . L. Schwartz.1959.
Plasma nonesterified fatty acids in hyperthyroid states.
J . Clin. Invest. 38: 275-278.
31. Marks, B. H., I . Kiem, and A. G. Hills. 1960. Endocrine
influences onfatandcarbohydratemetabolism
in
man. 1. Effect ofhyperthyroidismonfastingserum
nonesterified fatty
acid
concentration
and
on
its
response t o glucose ingestion. Metabolism. 9: 11331138.
32.Fredrickson,
D. S., and R. I . Levy. 1972. Familial
hyperlipoproteinemia. In T h e Metabolic Basis of
Inherited Disease. J. B. Stanbury, J. B. Wyngaarden,
McGraw-Hill, New
and D. S. Fredrickson,editors.
York. 545-614.
resultsfornormolipidemic
subjects. J . Clin.Invest.
63: 1262- 1273.
17. Knittle, J. L., and E. H . Ahrens,Jr., 1964. Carbohydrate metabolism in t w o forms of hyperglyceridemia.
J . Clin. Inrwt. 43: 485-495.
18.Wilson, D., and R. Lees. 1972. Reciprocal changes in
the concentrations of very low and low density lipoproteins in man.J. Clin. Inrwst. 51: 1051-1057.
19. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Statistical Bulletin 40. November-December, 1959.
20. Grundy, S. M., H . Y. I . Mok, L. Zech, D. Steinberg,
and M. Berman. 1979. Transport of very l o w density
lipoprotein triglycerides in varying degrees of obesity
andhypertriglyceridemia. J . Clin. Invat. 63: 12741283.
21. Groszek, E., and S. M . Grundy. 1978. Electron microscopic evidenceforparticlessmallerthan250
f , in
very low density
lipoproteins
of
human
plasma.
Atherosclerosis. 31: 241-250.
22. Furman, R. H., R. P. Howard, L. Kappagantula,
and L. N. Norcia. 1961. Theserum
lipids
and
lipoproteins in normalandhyperlipidemicsubjects
as determined by preparative ultracentrifugation. Am.
J . Clin. Nutr. 9: 73- 102.
23. Keyes, W. G., and M. Heimherg. 1979. Influence of
thyroid status on lipid metabolism in the perfused rat
1iver.J. Clin. Invest. 64: 182- 190.
24.Rosenqvist, U., S. EfendiS, B. Jereb, and J. Ostman.
1971. Influence of the hypothyroid state on
lipolysis
in humanadipose tissuein
vitro. Acta Med.Scand.
189: 38 1-384.