Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

ChE 145 1st Sem 2014-15

Fifth Long Exam: Reactor Design from Experimental Data


Group #

TOPIC

REACTOR

Methyl Formate Production


by Dimerization of
Formaldehyde

CSTR

Trans-2-Wolftene Production
by Isomerization of Cis-2Wolftene

Batch

Toluene Production by PtCatalyzed Dehydrogenation


of Methylcyclohexane

PFR

Gas Phase Conversion of


Hydrogen Sulfide to Sulfur

CSTR

Formation of Dithiomalic Acid


in Glacial Acetic Acid

Batch

Oxidation of of Thioglycolic
Acid to Corresponding
Disulfide

Batch

Pd-Catalyzed Hydrogenation
of Polystyrene to
Poly(cyclohexylethylene)

Batch

Section U
Alexa
Argayoso

Mariz
Lacanilao

Jesserie
Miraflor

Section X
Raymond
Hernandez

Diane
Tiongco

Ellaine Mallari

Jayz Rayco

Jashline
Baagale

Deo Flores

Aleli Paule

Clarence
Cusap

Gian Bado

Alleya
Gapaz

May
Madrid

Minette
Mimay

Melvin de
Leon

Carlos Matias

Licelle
Evangelista

Iya Gutierrez

Abbey
Baynosa

Joshua Bon
Roco

Section F
Lara Mae
Lumbres

Fritz Frayre Chin Tapia

Yuki dela
Cruz

Pau Ferrer

Grace
Loresco

JP Penuliar

Nikki
Tenorio

Erika
Caraan

Philip
Arcenal

Aron-Jorge
Rosales

Abhelito
Centeno

Jamel Alzol

Via
Siachongco

Camille
Robas

Elli Borbo

Erika
Somera

Richard
Sison

Robert
Abad

NJ Panganiban

Jason
Casio

Aiza
Caboles

Joyal
Borromeo

Steph
Lopez

Myra
Abaoag

Dain
Medina

Aura
Escasura

JK Santiago

Sophia
Alfonso

Kevin Andal Mae Belen

Sab Saberon Jarid Clacio

Abe Tabing

Mau
Gonzales

Karl Palisoc

Princess
Requiso

Carmelle
Homez

April
Ramirez

Bes Bondoc

Kaye
Magtagob

> Deadline of Paper and Visual Aids: December 5, Fri, 1pm at DChE
> Final grade for this Long Exam will be the average of the scores given by three judges, including me, based on the following criteria
Matrix for Judging (Scale of 1-10)
Criteria for Judging
10 to 9
8 to 6

Bien
Malonzo

Johnwin
Aguilar

Pau Anillo

Raemiel
Limpiada

Darwin
David

Neve Adia

Jed
Albarico

Dewin Nery

5 to 1

Very good overall presentation and durability of the visual


aids. It is unique and attention-catching.

Good overall presentation and durability but not unique and


attention-catching.

Not so presentable and durable, not unique and


attention-catching

Clarity (30%)

Even audience without chemical engineering background will


understand clearly how and why the methods were done.

Somehow clear but it is not easily understood by audience


outside the chemical engineering field.

Uses jargon terms without any explanation. No


storyline and the methods of how experimental data
was used to design reactor are not clear.

Correctness (40%)

Pearson coefficient to get rate law is at least 0.99, the methods


are correct and the assumptions are valid.

Acceptable rate law and methodology for converting


experimental data for reactor design.

Unacceptable Pearson coefficient for rate law,


methods are vague and assumptions are invalid.

Creativity (30%)

Joy Saturno Vel Burata

Instructor-in-charge: JMRDikitanan

Potrebbero piacerti anche