Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Printed in the UK
PII: S0953-8984(00)06909-5
1. Introduction
The range of universal critical behaviour in complex fluids (micelles, polymers, ionic fluids
etc) is so small that it may not be experimentally accessible. In some cases, they exhibit a
complex non-monotonic crossover from Ising to mean field behaviour [1]. Due to the limited
extent of the asymptotic (Ising) regime, understanding the thermodynamic behaviour in the
crossover region is extremely relevant from an experimental point of view in order to avoid
puzzling results with respect to the experimental values of the critical exponents [2].
Ionic micellar systems are interesting since depending on the salt content their phase
diagram may present an intersection between a critical line and a surface of first order phase
transitions [3]. On one hand, this makes them useful for testing some of the theoretical
predictions for systems near a critical end point (CEP) [4]. On the other hand, in driving the
system below the CEP, they offer the possibility of studying the critical behaviour of systems
in a metastable state.
In recent years, it has been found that for some systems the decay of the order parameter
fluctuations is more complex than for simple fluids [57]. Although such a behaviour was
already predicted by the asymmetric H model many years ago [8], two-exponential correlation
functions had only been reported for a mixture near its vapourliquid critical line [9].
In this work we will report some experimental results for an ionic micellar system:
dodecylammonium chloride (DAC) + water + KCl. Since the salt content is the same in
the two coexisting phases, the system can be considered as pseudobinary. The system shows
an upper critical solution temperature. At low values of [KCl] the critical line intercepts the
Krafft line, i.e. the line at which the a solid phase of pure surfactant is in equilibrium with the
liquid.
In section 2 we will discuss the behaviour of the order parameter for three different values
of [KCl], and compare it with other systems previously measured. In section 3 we present the
results of the osmotic compressibility for a metastable critical sample. Finally, in section 4
we comment on the decay of the order parameter fluctuations for the same sample.
Corresponding author.
0953-8984/00/SA0459+05$30.00
A459
A460
(1)
where = 0.325 0.001 and = 0.51 0.02 are critical exponents; t = (T Tc )/Tc ;
and the Bi are critical amplitudes. Both in the C7 E5 and the DAC systems, the range of
validity of the simple scaling is small (t < 104 ) when compared to mixtures of simple fluids
[10]. In the DAC systems this range decreases as the CEP is approached. Also, for the above
systems B1 > 0, which means that the effective exponent eff = d log(w)/ d log t presents a
monotonic crossover from the Ising value ( = 0.325) to the mean-field value ( = 0.5) upon
increasing t [1]. According to Fisher [2] and Bagnuls and Bervillier [11], the crossover will
depend upon the internal scale length characteristic of each system. As a consequence, it
should be possible to define a universal crossover curve eff against tr , where tr = tat , where
at is related to [11]. Figure 1 shows the crossover master curve for eff for the micellar
systems studied in this work, and for other systems previously studied and for which B1 > 0.
We have considered at = 1 for the methanol + n-heptane system since eff 0.325 over the
whole experimental range. In order to make a more strict test of this theoretical prediction, we
have included in figure 2 the systems polystyrene + acetone and 2-butanol + water which are
not too far from a double critical point. In these two cases the field t is defined according to
Malomuzh and Veytsman [12]. The quality of the crossover curve is very good. When values
of eff for some ionic fluids are considered they deviate from the master curve. This reflects
the need of using two crossover parameters for each system, as pointed out by Anisimov et al
[1].
Figure 1. Master curve for the effective critical exponent of the order parameter in different systems.
The shift factor aT has been calculated with respect to the methanol + n-heptane system. The field t
for the systems polystyrene + acetone and 2-butanol + water has been calculated according to [12].
A461
Figure 2. Universal crossover function for the reduced susceptibility 0 as a function of the
reduced temperature = t/Gi. The dashed line represents the mean-field (MF) behaviour. The
empty squares correspond to the DAC + water + KCl system at the four values of [KCl] studied
in this work. The crosses, circles and full triangles correspond to the microemulsion of Seto et al
[15].
= (1 + 2.3330
= t/Gi
0 = a0 Gi
/ /
[01 + (1.23330
]
(2)
where a0 is related to the bare mass term of the free energy, and Gi is the Ginzburg number.
As observed in figure 2, equation (2) is able to describe the susceptibility data of the DAC
systems for the four salt concentrations considered in the present work. Figure 2 also includes
the results of Seto et al for a three-component microemulsion [15]. The present set of results
covers the whole crossover region from the asymptotic Ising region ( < 1) to the mean-field
one ( > 300), and points out that the critical metastable system behaves like the stable ones.
Similar conclusions can be drawn from the data.
A462
Figure 3. Relaxation time distribution functions for the metastable system DAC + water + KCl
(0.205 M) corresponding to a scattering angle of 90 and for different values of T = |T Tc |.
A463
Figure 4. Temperature and wavevector (q) dependence of the decay rate of the slow-relaxation
mode (slow ) for the metastable system with [KCl] = 0.205 M. Notice the crossover from a q 2 to
a q 3 regime. T = |T Tc |.
the critical reduced diffusion coefficient is well described by the Kawasaki function derived
from the mode coupling theory. This is in agreement with recent predictions of Anisimov et al
[16], and with the findings for the DAC systems above the Krafft line [10].
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by DGES under grant 96/609 and by Fundacion Ramon
Areces.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
Anisimov M A, Povodyrev A A, Kulikov V D and Sengers J V 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3146
Fisher M E 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 1911
Laughlin, R G 1996 The Aqueous Phase Behaviour of Surfactants (London: Academic)
Fisher M E and Barbosa M C 1991 Phys. Rev. B 43 11 177
Rouch J, Tartaglia P and Chen S H 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1947
Yajima M, Hair D W, Nakatani A I, Douglas J F and Han C C 1994 Phys. Rev. B 47 12 268
Martin A, Casielles A G, Munoz M G, Ortega F and Rubio R G 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 2151
Hohenberg P C and Halperin B I 1977 Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 435
Ackerson J and Hanley H J M 1980 J. Chem. Phys. 73 3568
Kumar A, Krishnamurthy H R and Gopal E S R 1983 Phys. Rep. 98 58
Bagnuls C and Bervillier C 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 435
Malomuzh N P and Veytsman B A Phys. Lett. 136 239
Martin A, Ortega F and Rubio R G 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 1871
Belyakov M Y and Kiselev S B 1992 Physica A 190 75
Seto H, Schwahn D, Nagao M, Yokoi E, Komura S, Imai M and Mortensen K 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 629
Anisimov M A, Agayan V A, Povodyrev A A, Sengers, J V and Gorodetskii E E 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 1946