Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Vinay K. Singh*
1 Introduction
Composite is a material formed with two or more components, combined as a macroscopic structural unit with
one component as a continuous matrix, and other as reinforcements with significantly different physical or chemical properties, which remain separate and distinct on a
macroscopic level within the finished structure. Normally,
the matrix is the material that holds the reinforcements
together and has lower strength than the reinforcements.
Most commercially produced composites use a polymer
matrix material called as resin solution [1].
Composite resin technology has continuously evolved
since its introduction by Bowen [2] as a reinforced Bis-GMA
system. A major breakthrough in composite technology
was the development of photo-curable resins [3]. Continued development resulted in materials with reduced
particle size and increased filler loading that significantly
improved the universal applicability of light-cured composite resins [4].
at 8 wt% of hardener (HY-951) when mixed with resin (CY230). Therefore in the present study 8 wt% of HY-951 has
been used.
2.4 Method
Epoxy resin (CY-230), hardener (HY-951), and walnut particles with different weight percentages were used. Different weight percentage (wt%) of walnut particles (15, 20,
25, 30 wt%) and epoxy resin were mixed by mechanical
stirring at 3000 rpm. Based on the curing curve [23], the
solution obtained by mixing of walnut particles with resin
was kept in the furnace at a temperature of 90 10C for
2h [21]. At intervals of 30min the solution was taken out
of the electric furnace and remixed by a mechanical stirrer
at the same speed. After 2h the whole solution was taken
out and allowed to cool to 45C. When a temperature of
45C was attained the hardener HY-951 (8 wt%) was mixed
immediately [21]. Due to the addition of hardener a highly
viscous solution was obtained which was remixed at high
speed by the mechanical stirrer. The viscous solution so
obtained was poured into different moulds for sample
preparation. Tensile, compression and bending tests were
conducted on a 100 kN servo hydraulic universal testing
machine (ADMET, USA) under displacement mode of
control of 1 mm/min. The results are presented and discussed in subsequent sections.
3 Results
3.1 Density
Density is one of the most important properties of the particle board material. The density of walnut particles reinforced composite for various weight percentages along
with density of epoxy resin are presented in Table 1.
Table 1 reveals that increase in weight percentage of
reinforced particles, i.e., the walnut particles in the resin
Walnut particle
(10 wt%)
(g/cm3)
Walnut particle
(15 wt%)
(g/cm3)
Walnut particle
(20 wt%)
(g/cm3)
Walnut particle
(25 wt%)
(g/cm3)
Epoxy
(g/cm3)
1
2
Mean
SD
1.169
1.172
1.168
1.168
0.0020
1.161
1.167
1.163
1.161
0.0031
1.159
1.164
1.159
1.159
0.0029
1.157
1.156
1.157
1.156
0.0006
1.179
1.184
1.186
1.179
0.0036
properties of the composite. In the present investigation SEM was carried out on LEO435V6 instrument and
voltage was kept 20kV for bio composite containing different weight percentage of walnut particles to evaluate
the particle size, particle matrix interface and dispersion
of walnut particles in the epoxy resin matrix.
Figure 1(A) and 1(B) show the SEM micrographs of different bio composite material investigated in the present
work. In all cases, good dispersion of walnut particles in
the resin matrix has been observed. Figure 1(A) and 1(B)
show the SEM micrograph of composite containing 10
wt% and 25 wt% of walnut particles, respectively. It is
seen in the figures that walnut particles are well dispersed
in the epoxy resin matrix in a preferred orientation.
Hence, from the above micrographs it is can be concluded that due to uniform dispersion of walnut particles
in epoxy resin, a remarkable effect on the mechanical
properties may be obtained.
Walnut particle
(10 wt%)
Walnut particle
(15 wt%)
Walnut particle
(20 wt%)
Walnut particle
(25 wt%)
Epoxy resin
2
3
Mean
SD
0.554%
0.557%
0.548%
0.553%
0.000045
0.573%
0.579%
0.569%
0.573%
0.00005
0.581%
0.583%
0.582%
0.582%
0.00001
0.613%
0.629%
0.619%
0.620%
0.00008
0.543%
0.549%
0.546%
0.546%
0.00003
180
160
140
Stress (MPa)
120
100
80
10 wt% walnut powder
60
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Strain
Figure 2Stress-strain diagram under tension for different wt% of walnut particles.
0.08
0.09
Walnut particle
(10 wt%)
Walnut particle
(15 wt%)
Walnut particle
(20 wt%)
Walnut particle
(25 wt%)
163.00
8.49
2013.00
119.00
7.29
1388.00
114.00
6.93
1333.00
104.00
6.85
1328.00
(1)
205
9.0
190
8.5
175
160
8.0
% Elongation
145
7.5
Elongation (%)
(2)
130
7.0
115
6.5
100
10
12
14
16
18
20
Walnut particles (wt%)
22
24
Figure 3Variation of ultimate tensile strength, modulus of elasticity and elogation for different weight percentage of walnut reinforced
composite.
Table 4Compressive properties of the composite materials.
Property
Walnut particle
(10 wt%)
Walnut particle
(15 wt%)
Walnut particle
(20 wt%)
Walnut particle
(25 wt%)
UTS (MPa)
% Reduction in length
261.00
49.95
1578.00
231.00
46.61
1668.00
191.00
45.69
2321.00
135.00
31.48
2391.00
300
(4)
Stress (MPa)
250
200
3.4.4 Hardness
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Strain
(3)
Walnut
(10 wt%)
Walnut
(15 wt%)
Walnut
(20 wt%)
Walnut
(25 wt%)
Resin
Mean
SD
R-63
R-64
R-61
R-60
R-63
R-62.2
1.6431
R-67
R-65
R-66
R-68
R-64
R-66
1.5811
R-77
R-81
R-79
R-80
R-78
R-79
1.5811
R-90
R-87
R-89
R-91
R-92
R-89.8
1.9235
R-57
R-55
R-58
R-57
R-55
R-56.4
1.3416
85
45
250
40
220
Modulus of elasticity/10 MPa
190
35
160
130
10
80
Hardness (MRH)
280
90
50
310
75
70
65
60
55
30
15
20
Walnut particles (wt%)
25
50
0
10
15
Walnut particles (wt%)
20
25
280
Ultimate strength (compression)
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Hardness (MRH)
Walnut particle
(10 wt%)
Walnut particle
(15 wt%)
Walnut particle
(20 wt%)
Walnut particle
(25 wt%)
Flexural strain
1360.0
769.0
0.057
1450.0
614.0
0.042
1500.0
603.0
0.040
1560.0
439.0
0.028
flexural modulus of elasticity. But flexural stress and flexural strain was found to be higher for 10 wt% walnut filled
composites as compared with others investigated in this
report.
(5)
4 Conclusions
(6)
References
[1] Tewri M, Singh VK, Gope PC, Chaudhary A. J. Mater. Environ.
Sci. 2012, 3, 171184.
[2] Bowen RL. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1963, 66, 5764.
[3] Caughma WF, Rueggeberg FA, Curtis JWJR. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.
1995, 126, 12801286.
[4] Terry DA. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent. 2004, 16, 417422.
[5] Stark NM, Rowlands RE. Wood Fiber Sci. 2003, 35, 167174.
[6] Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y, Xu Y. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2008, 28, 6372.
[7] Ashori A, Nourbakhsh A. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 18691875.
[8] Gorokhovsky AV, Escalante-Garcia JI, Gashnikova GY,
NikulinaLP, Artemenko SE, Waste Management, vol. 25,
Pergamon Press: UK, 2005, pp. 733736.
[9] Panthapulakkal S, Sain M. Compos. Part A-Appl S. 2007, 38,
14451454.
[10] Wang Z, Wang E, Zhang S, Ren Y. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009, 29,
133138.
[11] Wang D, Sun XS. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2002, 15, 4750.