Sei sulla pagina 1di 17

Seed Germination and Stress Response of Mung Bean (Vignaradiata L.

) on Various Abiotic
Factors
Custodio, SD.1 De Vera, S.1 Guillermo, KS.1 Maramba, CN.1 Salgado, CA.1
1
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of the Philippines Baguio
February 18, 2015

ABSTRACT
Seeds undergo series of events during germination, wherein a radicle
emerges through the seed coat. This experiment was conducted to understand the
phenomenon on seed germination and seedling growth. Mung Bean, scientifically
known as Vignaradiata L., was used as a test organism. It was exposed to
different stresses pertaining to temperature, pH, osmotic concentration, light, and
hormones. The effect on the rate of seed germination and growth of hypocotylroot length of the germinated seeds were observed and recorded. Data gathered
were analyzed using ONE-WAY ANOVA. On the one hand, based on the results
obtained, seed germination did not occur under low temperature. On the other
hand, increase seedling growth is high at increasing temperature, non-salty
conditions, and with the presence of hormone Gibberellin. However, seedling
growth varies in any pH and light conditions, yet, according to research, higher
rate of growth is more preferable at neutral pH and with the presence of light.
Therefore, based on the stress responses observed in the experiment, it is
indicative that seed germination and seedling growth are possible at different
conditions they have been exposed at. But under optimum conditions, they could
grow as a healthy plant.

INTRODUCTION
In this experiment, it is necessary to comprehend how seed and seedling, germinate and
grow, respectively. To observe the effects of different factors, such as temperature, pH, varying
osmotic concentration, light, and hormones, on the developmental process.
Seeds are embryonic plant in resting condition or seed dormancy. These remain dormant
or inactive until conditions are right for germination. The resumption of growth of this
embryonic plant is known to be the germination stage. Mung Bean (Vignaradiata L) belonging to
the Legume Family, like other plant species, has to meet its optimum conditions, such as having
enough sunlight and plenty of water, in order to germinate and grow as a healthy plant. (Leubner,
2000).
Seed germination is a complex physiological process triggered by imbibitions, where the
uptake of water by dry seed occur, after possible dormancy mechanisms have been released by a
prompt. Germination depends on both external and internal conditions of the growing plant. It
starts when a seed is provided with appropriate water and temperature. Seeds expand as they
imbibe water, and their enzymes and food supplies become hydrated. Hydrated enzymes become

active, thus the seed increases its metabolic activities to produce energy for the growth process.
Moreover, the size of the cell is in proportion with the increase in pressure inside caused by the
water. Under favorable conditions, rapid expansion on embryos growth culminates in the rupture
of the covering layers and emergence of the radicle. The emergence of the radicle is considered
as the completion of germination where the protrusion of the radicle tip is visible. According to
seed physiologists, this transition point is also characterized by the loss of desiccation tolerance
and is a molecular checkpoint
a developmental molecular switch from the germination
program to the seedling program. (Leubner, 2000).

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Mung bean seeds were immersed in water wherein the floating unhealthy seeds were
discarded and the sunken viable seeds were used in the experiment. There were five different setups and each tested the effects of (a) temperature, (b) pH, (c) osmotic gradient, (d) light and of
(e) hormones. Petri plates were cleaned, lined up with cotton and equally distributed with ten
mung beans. For (a), three Petri plates were wet with distilled water, saturating the cotton. Each
plate was put in a room, low (refrigerator) and high (incubator, 30) temperatures. For (b), three
plates were wet with solutions of pH 3.0, pH 11.0 and distilled water. For (c), three plates were
wet with NaCl solutions having varying concentrations of 0.5g NaCl/200ml, 2g NaCl/150ml, and
of 5g NaCl/150ml. For (d), two plates were wet with distilled water. One plate was set on a
normally lighted place while the other one was in a dark place. Lastly, for (e), three plates were
wet with distilled water (control), 20ppm gibberellic acid (GA), and with 20ppm indole acetic
acid (IAA) solution. The plates were placed in a dark area. All the plates in each set-up were
labeled accordingly. After two days, percent germination of each set-up was observed then five
days, the lengths of hypocotyl-root axis were measured using a ruler. The findings were analyzed
using statistical methods.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Germination entails a variety of biophysical and biochemical processes from the initial
imbibitions of water and the re-establishment of membrane integrity to the activation of
numerous enzymes and metabolic pathways and finally the elongation of the root which ruptures
the testa(Simon et al, 1976). It is dependent on environmental factors, such as water, light,
temperature and oxygen, thereby confirming our understanding of the ideal conditions required
for the germination of seeds in a predetermined species (Oliveira et al., 2013).
There were two separate data collections made in the experiment. The first data collection
for every set-up was done two days after the start of the experiment and then followed by a
second data collection which was done after five days.

Set-up
Effect of

Table 1. Raw data of the seed germination and seedling growth length.
Percent
Condition Germinati
Hypocotyls-Root Length (cm)
on
Room
90%
7.8 5.5 6.8 4.6 4.3 7.1 5.9 5.3

5.1

4.3

Temperatu
re
Temperatur
e

Effect of
pH

Effect of
Varying
Osmotic
Concentrati
on

Effect of
Light

Effect of
Temperatur
e

Oven
Refrigerat
or
pH 7
(distilled
water)
pH 3
pH 11
0.5 g
NaCl/200
ml
solution
2 g NaCl/
150 ml
solution
5 g NaCl/
150 ml
solution

100%

10.
7

13.
1

9.2

12.
7

13.
5

8.2

7.3

7.3

0%
90%

No seed germinated
7.2

6.7

7.0

6.9

6.5

7.3

7.2

6.9

6.4

7.1

100%
70%

5.5
6.8

6.0
6.7

6.3
5.5

4.8
5.3

6.4
4.8

4.0
5.1

3.9
5.9

3.5
6.2

3.8
4.7

5.8
5.5

100 %

4.0
0

3.9
0

4.4
0

4.7
0

5.1
0

5.0
0

4.6
0

4.1
0

5.3
0

4.8
0

40 %

1.4
0

1.1
0

1.3
0

1.2
0

1.2
0

1.2
0

1.2
0

1.1
0

1.0
0

1.2
0

100 %

1.2
0

1.3
0

1.1
0

1.1
0

1.1
0

1.2
0

1.1
0

1.2
0

1.1
0

1.2
0

5.8
0
6.8
0
7.6

4.5
0
5.4
0
8.2

5.3
0
6.0
0
7.9

4.7
0
5.8
0
8.3

5.2
0
6.2
0
8.2

4.8
0
5.5
0
7.6

5.5
0
6.6
0
7.7

5.6
0
5.6
0
8.4

5.1
0
5.5
0
8.1

Light

100 %

Dark

100%

Water
Indole
Acetic
Acid
Gibberelli
c Acid

100%

4.5
0
6.6
0
8.0

90%

2.8

2.8

3.6

3.4

3.2

3.1

2.6

3.5

3.2

3.6

100%

7.5
0

7.2
0

6.8
0

7.8
0

7.1
0

6.9
0

7.5
0

6.8
0

7.4
0

7.2
0

Data recorded and used in statistical analysis.

Figure 1. Percent germination of the mung beans observed after 2 days.


The data collected, two days after, showed great difference in the germination of mung
beans subjected at different conditions. All of The mung beans placed inside the oven at 37C,
pH 3, 0.5 g NaCl/200 ml solution, 5 g NaCl/ 150 ml solution, light conditions, dark conditions,
water and gibberellic acid germinated which shows 100% germination after two days. The
lowest number of seed germinated in the experiment was the mung beans placed inside the
refrigerator where not a single mung bean germinated which shows 0% germination after two
days.
Temperature
After five days, another set of data collection was done where the lengths of the newly
sprouted seedlings were measured. Also, the current conditions of the mung bean seedlings
during the time of data collection were as well noted.
The first condition observed was the effects of temperature. Temperature is an
environmental factor that significantly affects germination. However, there is no optimum and
uniform temperature for all species (Bewley, D. et al., 2006). Germination occurs within a
defined range and will not occur above or below these limits.

Figure 2. Lengths of the mung bean seedlings at varying temperature.


The effects of temperature to the mung beans were observed in the experiment. All of the
mung beans germinated at the three varying temperature setting after five days. The mung bean
seedlings placed at room temperature had lengths ranging from 4.3cm to 7.80cm. The mung bean
seedlings placed inside the oven where the recorded temperature was 37C, had lengths raging
from 7.0cm to 13.5cm which shows a faster seedling growth. The mung bean seedlings placed
inside the refrigerator had lengths ranging from 0.80cm to 1.3cm which shows poor seedling
growth. (Figure 2)
According to the study of Simon et al. (1979), low temperature may not only reduce
percentage of germination but also delay germination. Still on the study of Simon et al. (1979) on
mung beans, the lowest temperature at which 50% of the seeds would germinate was about
11.5oC and at temperatures a little below this, some seeds will germinate but even after
prolonged periods the majority still fails to germinate. Temperature affects the speed and
percentage of germination, primarily influencing water uptake and impacting the biochemical
reactions and physiological processes that determine germination (Taiz and Zeiger, 2009).
The measured lengths of the mung bean seedlings were also subjected to statistical
analysis (table 2 and 3) to see if there are significant differences among the varying temperature
conditions.
Table 2. The mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for the dependent variable
(Length) for each separate group (Room Temperature, Oven Temperature and Refrigerator
Temperature), as well as when all groups are combined
Descriptives
N

Mean

Std.
Deviation

LENGTH
Std.
95% Confidence Interval
Error
for Mean

Minimu
m

Maximu
m

room
oven
ref
Total

10
10
10
30

5.6700
9.6800
1.1200
5.4900

1.21568
2.59991
.13984
3.90034

Lower
Bound
4.8004
7.8201
1.0200
4.0336

.38443
.82217
.04422
.71210

Upper
Bound
6.5396
11.5399
1.2200
6.9464

4.30
7.00
.80
.80

7.80
13.50
1.30
13.50

Table 3. The table that shows the output of the ANOVA analysis of the mung bean seedling
length subjected to varying temperatures
ANOVA
LENGTH

Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total

Sum of
Squares

df

Mean
Square

Sig.

366.854

183.427

66.644

.000

74.313
441.167

27
29

2.752

We can see that the significance level is below 0.05 (table 3). Therefore, there is a
statistically significant difference in the mean length of the mung beans subjected to varying
temperatures (see appendix to see post-hoc results).

pH

Figure 3. Lengths of the mung bean seedlings at different pH.

Next, the effects of pH to the mung beans were observed in the experiment. All of the
mung beans germinated at the three varying pH setting after five days. The mung bean seedlings
added with water which is neutral had lengths ranging from 6.4cm to 7.3cm. The mung bean
seedlings added with a solution at pH 11 which is basic had lengths raging from 4.7cm to 6.8cm.
The mung bean seedlings added with a solution at pH 3 which is acidic had lengths ranging from
3.5cm to 6.3cm (Figure 3).
Neutral pH is the most preferable pH for seed to germinate. Some enzymes may be
inactivated by the very acidic environment. Sometimes, the presence of H + ions only has a
negative effect on plant development (Chodura, 2004).
In the case of some plants their growth in acid soil is possible but seed germination must
take place in less acidified environment because of the need for maintenance of the appropriate
pH of the soil solution for amylolytic enzymes initiating germination (Lee, 1998). However, acid
soil pH stimulates initial development phases of some species. These species include plants with
thick seed coats.
The effect of acid pH may be direct, manifesting itself in dissolution of the seed coat or
indirect which involves the stimulation of conditions for development of some species of fungi
whose action causes perforation of the seed coat (Vleeshouwers et al., 1995)
A study conducted by Bukvic et al. (2007) on the germination of Pisum sativum showed a
higher seed germination affected by lowering pH to 5.0, yet a further development of seedlings
was better at a higher pH.
The measured lengths of the mung bean seedlings were also subjected to statistical
analysis (table 4 and 5) to see if there are significant differences among the different pH levels.

Table 4. The mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for the dependent variable
(Length) for each separate group (water, pH11, pH3), as well as when all groups are combined.
Descriptives

water
ph11
ph3
Total

N
10
10
10
30

Mean
6.9200
5.6500
5.0000
5.8567

Std.
Deviation
.30478
.73673
1.12940
1.11840

LENGTH
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Std.
Lower
Upper
Error
Bound
Bound
.09638
6.7020
7.1380
.23298
5.1230
6.1770
.35715
4.1921
5.8079
.20419
5.4390
6.2743

Minimu
m
6.40
4.70
3.50
3.50

Maximu
m
7.30
6.80
6.40
7.30

Table 5. The table that shows the output of the ANOVA analysis of the mung bean seedling
length subjected to pH levels

ANOVA
LENGTH

Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total

Sum of
Squares

df

Mean
Square

Sig.

19.073

9.536

14.969

.000

17.201
36.274

27
29

.637

We can see that the significance level is below 0.05 (table 5). Therefore, there is a
statistically significant difference in the mean length of the mung beans subjected to different pH
level (see appendix to see post-hoc results).

Osmotic Concentration

Figure 4. Lengths of the mung bean seedlings at different osmotic concentrations.


After that, the effects of varying Osmotic Concentration to the mung beans were
observed in the experiment. All of the mung beans germinated at the three varying osmotic
concentration setting after five days. The mung bean seedlings added with 0.5 g NaCl/ 200 ml
solution had lengths ranging from 3.9cm to 5.3cm. The mung bean seedlings added with 2 g
NaCl/ 150 ml solution had lengths raging from 1.0cm to 1.4cm. The mung bean seedlings added
with 5g NaCl/ 150 ml solution had lengths ranging from 1.1cm to 1.3cm (Figure 4).
In many plant type, germination and seedling growing phase is very sensitive to salt
stress. In general, the highest germination percentage occurs in non-salty conditions and it
decreases depending on the ascending salt concentrations (Khan et al,2009). Seeds germination
begins with water intake but it decreased by the salt (Othman, 2005). The decrease in water

intake of the seed in salty conditions, osmotically and by the ion toxicity with accumulation of
Na and Cl ions highly around the seeds, prevents the seed germination.
In the experiment, low solute concentration showed the highest hypocotyl-root axis
length and the high solute concentration showed low or none hypocotyls-root axis length. The
higher the salt concentration, the lower is the hypocotyls-root axis length. Higher solute inside
the seed, then there is lower solute concentration in the outside environment. As the solute moves
out, water goes inside the seed.
Strong delay of germination was observed mainly at the higher level of salt
concentration. A study by Jamil et al. (2005) reported that germination of Brassica species
( cabbage, cauliflower, canola) decreased as the salinity concentration increased.
According to the study conducted by Rahman et al(2009), ascending salt concentrations
not only prevent the germination of the seeds but also extend the germination time by delaying
the start of germination. High salt concentration decreases germination percentage. Salt tolerance
studies which have done during germination time are important for determining the plants salt
tolerance in the early and late growing phases (Zapata et al., 2003).
Seeds require higher amount of water uptake during the germination under the salt stress
due to the accumulation of the soluble solutes around the seeds which increases the osmotic
pressure. This causes excessive uptake of the ions which results in toxicity in plants (Jones,
1986). Moreover, water potential gradient between the external environment and the seeds also
inhibits the primary root emergence (Eneas Filho et al., 1995).
The measured lengths of the mung bean seedlings were also subjected to statistical
analysis (table 6 and 7) to see if there are significant differences among the different osmotic
concentrations.
Table 6. The mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for the dependent variable
(Length) for each separate group (0.5g NaCl/ 200 ml solution, 2 g NaCl/ 150 ml solution, 5g
NaCl/ 150 ml solution ), as well as when all groups are combined
Descriptives
LENGTH

0.5g
2g
5g
Total

N
10
10
10
30

Mean
4.5900
1.1900
1.1600
2.3133

Std.
Deviation
.48178
.11005
.06992
1.66085

Std.
Error
.15235
.03480
.02211
.30323

95% Confidence Interval


for Mean
Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
4.2454
4.9346
1.1113
1.2687
1.1100
1.2100
1.6932
2.9335

Minimu
m
3.90
1.00
1.10
1.00

Table 7. The table that shows the output of the ANOVA analysis of the mung bean seedling
length subjected to varying temperatures

Maximu
m
5.30
1.40
1.30
5.30

ANOVA
LENGTH

Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total

Sum of
Squares

df

Mean
Square

Sig.

77.753

38.876

468.181

.000

2.242
79.995

27
29

.083

We can see that the significance level is below 0.05 (table 7). Therefore, there is a
statistically significant difference in the mean length of the mung beans subjected to varying
osmotic concentrations (see appendix to see post-hoc results).
Light

Figure 1. Lengths of the mung bean seedlings at differently lighted areas


Then, the effects of light exposure to the mung beans were observed in the experiment.
All of the mung beans germinated at the two different light setting, lighted place and dark place,
setting after five days. The mung bean seedlings placed under the lighted place had lengths
ranging from 4.5cm to 5.6cm. The mung bean seedlings placed at the dark area had lengths
raging from 5.4cm to 6.8cm (Figure 5).
Mung bean germinates even without exposure to light. Large seed with thin coat that
does not need light to start germination. Both the amount of light which includes length of
exposure and photosynthetic photon flux density and quality of light are environmental cues that
signal conditions potentially suitable for seedling establishment and survival (Pons, 2000).

According to the study conducted by Serrano-Bernardo et al (2007), light is important for


seed germination and that many species respond to the environment with the optimal growth and
development according to the light they receive. In accordance with the result of our study, some
seeds germinate similarly in light and darkness while others do it more readily either under light
or darkness conditions. Also, light requirements for germination can vary with temperature
(Serrano-Bernardo et al., 2007).
Knowledge of species-specific light requirements for germination could indicate whether
restoration practitioners should time seed sowing efforts to plant canopy development or whether
excess sedimentation common in new restorations in agricultural landscapes reduced seed
germination of plants on wetland areas (Jurik et al., 1994).
The measured lengths of the mung bean seedlings were also subjected to statistical
analysis (table 8 and 9) to see if there are significant differences between the availability of light.
Table 8. The mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for the dependent variable
(Length) for each separate group (lighted place, dark place), as well as when all groups are
combined
Descriptives

light
dark
Total

N
10
10
20

Mean
5.1000
6.0000
5.5500

Std.
Deviation
.46188
.52281
.66610

LENGTH
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Std.
Lower
Upper
Error
Bound
Bound
.14606
4.7696
5.4304
.16533
5.6260
6.3740
.14894
5.2383
5.8617

Minimu
m
4.50
5.40
4.50

Maximu
m
5.80
6.80
6.80

Table 9. The table that shows the output of the ANOVA analysis of the mung bean seedling
length subjected to varying temperatures
ANOVA
LENGTH

Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total

Sum of
Squares

df

Mean
Square

Sig.

4.050

4.050

16.644

.001

4.380
8.430

18
19

.243

We can see that the significance level is below 0.05 (table 9). Therefore, there is a
statistically significant difference in the mean length of the mung beans subjected different light
availability.

Hormones

Figure 2. Lengths of the mung bean seedlings added with different hormones
Lastly, the effects of hormones to the mung beans were observed in the experiment. All of
the mung beans germinated at the three different hormone setting after five days. The mung bean
seedlings added with Gibberellic Acid had lengths ranging from 6.8cm to 7.5cm. The mung bean
seedlings added with Indole Acetic Acid had lengths raging from 2.6cm to 3.6cm. The mung
bean seedlings added with water had lengths ranging from 2.6cm to 3.6cm (Figure 6).
The evidence for hormone participation comes from the association of hormone
concentration with specific development stages, effects of applied hormones and the relationship
of hormones to metabolic activities. The applications of gibberellins increases the seed
germination percentage by adding the fact that gibberellins also increases the amino acid content
in embryo and cause release of hydrolytic enzyme required for digestion of endospermic starch
when seeds renew growth at germination (Chauhan, J. S. et al., 2009).
The measured lengths of the mung bean seedlings were also subjected to statistical
analysis (table 10 and 11) to see if there are significant differences among the different
hormones.
Table 10. The mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for the dependent
variable (Length) for each separate group (GA, IAA, water), as well as when all groups are
combined
Descriptives

Mean

Std.
Deviation

LENGTH
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Std.
Lower
Upper
Error
Bound
Bound

Minimu
m

Maximu
m

GA
IAA
water
Total

10
10
10
30

7.2200
3.1800
8.0000
6.1333

.33267
.35528
.29059
2.17166

.10520
.11235
.09189
.39649

6.9820
2.9258
7.7921
5.3224

7.4580
3.4342
8.2079
6.9442

6.80
2.60
7.60
2.60

7.80
3.60
8.40
8.40

Table 11. The table that shows the output of the ANOVA analysis of the mung bean seedling
length subjected to varying temperatures
ANOVA
LENGTH

Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total

Sum of
Squares

df

Mean
Square

Sig.

133.875

66.937

624.934

.000

2.892
136.767

27
29

.107

We can see that the significance level is below 0.05 (table 11). Therefore, there is a
statistically significant difference in the mean length of the mung beans subjected to different
hormones (see appendix to see post-hoc results).
The experiment shows the different evidences about the contributing factors which
governs the overall development of plant. Plant growth is not only regulated by their genes but
also regulated by the growth hormones, nutrient and environmental factors.

LITERATURE CITED
Bernardo-Serrano, F., Rosua, JL., & Diaz-Miguel, M. (2007). Light and temperature effects on
seed germination of four native species of Mediterranean high mountains (Spain).
International Journal of Experimental Botany, 76, 27-38.
Bukvic G., Grljusic S., Rozman V., Lukic D., Lackovic R., Novoselovic D.(2007). Seed age and
pH water solution effects on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) germination. Not. Bot. Hort.
Agrobot. Cluj 35(1), 20-26.
Chauhan, J.S.,Tomar, Y.K., Indrakumar Singh, N., Ali,Seema and Debarati. (2009). Effect Of
Growth Hormones On Seed Germination And Seedling Growth Of Black Gram And
Horse Gram. Journal of American Science, 5(5):79-84.
Chodura P., Komosa A., Koota T.(2004). Effect of pH of media on dynamics of macroelement
content in leaves of greenhouse tomato
grown on mineral wool. Rocz. ARw
Poznaniu CCCCLVI, 29-35 [in Polish].
De Oliveira, AK, Ribeiro, JW,Pereira, KC. & Silva, CA. (2013). Effects of Temperature on the
germination of Diptychandra aurantiaca( Fabaceae) seeds. Acta Scientiarum, 35 (2),
203-208.

Eneas, Filho, J., Oliveira Neto. O. B., Prisco, J. T., Gomes Filho, E., Monteiro C. (1995), Effects
of salinity in vivo and in vitro on cotyledonary galactosidases from Vigna unguiculata
(L.) Walp. during seed germination and seedling stablishment. Revista Brasileira de
Fisiologia Vegetal, 7 (2), 135-142.
Jamil, M., C.C. Lee, S.U. Rehman, D.B. Lee and M. Ashraf. 2005. Salinity (NaCl) tolerance of
Brassica species at germination and early seedling growth. Electron. J. Environ. Agric.
Food Chem. 4, 970976.
Jones, R. A. (1986). High salt tolerance potential in Lycopersicon species during germination.
Euphytica, 35, 575-582.
Jurik TW, Wang S-C, van der Valk AG. (1994). Effects of sediment load on seedling emergence
from wetland seed banks. Wetlands 14,159165.
Khan, H.A., C.M. Ayub, M.A. Pervez, R.M. Bilal, M.A. Shahid and K. Ziaf. (2009). Effect of
seed priming with NaCl on salinity tolerance of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) at
seedling stage. Soil & Environ. 28(1): 8187.
Lee J.A.(1998). Plant-soil interactions at low pH: principles and management. R.A. Date,
N.J.Grundon, G.E. Rayment, M.E. Probert (eds.), Vegetatio ,136(2), 249-250.
Leubner, G. (2000) Seed germination. The Seed Biology Place.
http://www.seedbiology.de/germination.asp

Retrieved from

Othman, Y.( 2005). Evaluation of Barley Cultivars Grown in Jordan for Salt Tolerance. Ph.D
Thesis, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.
Pons TL. 2000. Seed responses to light. In: Fenner M, ed. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in
plant communities. New York, NY: CAB International.
Rahman, M., U.A. Soomro, M. Zahoor-ul-Haq and S. Gul. (2008.) Effects of NaCl salinity on
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 4(3),
398403.
Simon, E, Minchin, A, Mcmenahin, M, & Smith, JM.(1976) The low Temperature limit for Seed
Germination. New Phytologist, 77, 301-311.
Taiz, L, & Zeiger, E.(2009). Plant Physiology 4 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Vleeshouwers L.M., Bowmeester H.J., Karssen C.M.(1995). Redefining seed dormancy: an
attempt to integrate physiology and ecology. J. Ecol., 83, 1031-1037.
Zapata, P.J., M., Serrano, M.S. Pretel, A. Amoros and M.A. Botella. (2003). Changes in ethylene
evolution and polyamine profiles of seedlings of nine cultivars of Lactuca sativa L. in
response to salt stress during germination. Plant Science. 164:557563.
APPENDIX
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

Table 12. Multiple Comparisons at the effects of temperatures


Dependent Variable: LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference Std.
TEMP
TEMP
(I-J)
Error
Sig.
room
oven
-4.0100(*) .74193
.000
ref
4.5500(*) .74193
.000
oven
room
4.0100(*) .74193
.000
ref
8.5600(*) .74193
.000
ref
room
-4.5500(*) .74193
.000
oven
-8.5600(*) .74193
.000
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

95% Confidence Interval


Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
-5.8496
-2.1704
2.7104
6.3896
2.1704
5.8496
6.7204
10.3996
-6.3896
-2.7104
-10.3996
-6.7204

LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha = .05
TEM
P
N
1
2
3
ref
10
1.1200
room 10
5.6700
oven 10
9.6800
Sig.
1.000
1.000
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10.00
EFFECT OF PH
Table 13. Multiple Comparisons at the effects of pH
Dependent Variable: LENGTH
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence Interval
Mean
(J)
Difference Std.
Lower
Upper
PH
(I-J)
Error
Sig.
Bound
Bound
ph11 1.2700(*) .35695
.004
.3850
2.1550
ph3
1.9200(*) .35695
.000
1.0350
2.8050
ph11 water -1.2700(*) .35695
.004
-2.1550
-.3850
ph3
.6500
.35695
.182
-.2350
1.5350
ph3
water -1.9200(*) .35695
.000
-2.8050
-1.0350
ph11 -.6500
.35695
.182
-1.5350
.2350
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
(I)
PH
water

LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha = .
05
PH
N
1
2
ph3
10
5.0000
ph11 10
5.6500
water 10
6.9200
Sig.
.182
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10.000.
EFFECT OF OSMOTIC CONCENTRATION
Table 14. Multiple Comparisons at the effects of osmotic concentration
Dependent Variable: LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference Std.
OSMOTIC OSMOTIC (I-J)
Error
Sig.
0.5g
2g
3.4000(*) .12887
.000
5g
3.4300(*) .12887
.000
2g
0.5g
-3.4000(*) .12887
.000
5g
.0300
.12887
.971
5g
0.5g
-3.4300(*) .12887
.000
2g
-.0300
.12887
.971
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha = .
05
OSMOT
IC
N
1
2
5g
10
1.1600
2g
10
1.1900
0.5g
10
4.5900
Sig.
.971
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10.000.

95% Confidence Interval


Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
3.0805
3.7195
3.1105
3.7495
-3.7195
-3.0805
-.2895
.3495
-3.7495
-3.1105
-.3495
.2895

EFFECTS OF HORMONES
Table 15. Multiple Comparisons at the Effects of Hormones
Dependent Variable: LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference Std.
HORMONE HORMONE (I-J)
Error
GA
IAA
4.0400(*) .14636
water
-.7800(*) .14636
IAA
GA
-4.0400(*) .14636
water
-4.8200(*) .14636
Water
GA
.7800(*)
.14636
IAA
4.8200(*) .14636
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

Sig.
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

LENGTH
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha = .05
HORMO
NE
N
1
2
3
IAA
10
3.1800
GA
10
7.2200
water
10
8.0000
Sig.
1.000
1.000
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10.000.

95% Confidence Interval


Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
3.6771
4.4029
-1.1429
-.4171
-4.4029
-3.6771
-5.1829
-4.4571
.4171
1.1429
4.4571
5.1829

Potrebbero piacerti anche