SE151TermProjectReport Jimmy Nikko v2

SE 151A
Design of Reinforced Concrete
Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge
RFI Response
On behalf of Situ-Sera Engineering, we would like to apologize for the errors found in our previous
submission. We have ensured that every noted error was fixed. Should any other errors be found, the
engineers at Situ-Sera Engineering will guarantee a timely and accurate response.
The following changes have been made:
Section 2 Dimensions & Section Properties,
Dimensions of the slab cross section were updated
Section 4 Structural Analysis
The plots were made clearer
Section 5 Slab/Deck Design
The final design is highlighted
SE 151A
University of California, San Diego

Department of Structural Engineering

SE 151A: Structural Concrete Term Project
Professor Jose Restrepo
Winter 2015
Wenjin Situ (A97034409)
Nicholas Sera (A09849716)
March 18th, 2015
SE 151A
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. References .
2. Dimensions & Section Properties .....
a. Slab (Deck)...
b. Girder...
c. Column & Pile......
3. Design Loads.....
a. Slab (Deck)...
i.
Dead Load...
ii.
Superimposed Dead Load....
iii.
Live Load.
b. Girder ..
i.
Dead Load...
ii.
Superimposed Dead Load...
iii.
Live Load....
4. Structural Analysis ......
a. Slab (Deck)..
i.
Model..
ii.
Load Combinations....
iii.
Bending Moment Diagrams of Load Combinations...
iv.
Shear Force Diagrams of Load Combinations
v.
Design Envelopes...
b. Girder ....
i.
Model..
ii.
Load Combinations.
iii.
Bending Moment Diagrams of Load Combinations...
iv.
Shear Force Diagrams of Load Combinations...
v.
Design Envelopes...
5. Slab/Deck Design.....
a. Flexure Design of Critical Sections....
b. Design for shear .....
6. Girder Design...
a. Flexure Design of Critical Section..
i.
Rough Design.
ii.
Positive Moment (Bottom reinforcement)..................................
iii.
Negative Moment (Top reinforcement)......................................
iv.
Bar Spacing.....
v.
Effective Section Properties....
vi.
Design Strength Mn- and Mn+...............................................
b. Design of Shear Reinforcement ......
7. Development of Longitudinal Reinforcement......................................................
a. Slab Reinforcement..................................................................................
i.
Longitudinal Bar Development...................................................
5
5
5
6
7
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
11
12
13
13
14
14
14
17
19
20
22
22
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
27
28
28
31
31
31
SE 151A
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
ii.
Shrinkage and Temperature.........................................................
iii.
Cross Section Sketches................................................................
b. Girder Reinforcement...............................................................................
i.
Longitudinal Bar Development...................................................
ii.
Cross Section Sketches.................................................................
Column Design.......................................................................................................
a. Interaction diagrams..................................................................................
b. Pu and Mu combinations............................................................................
c. Design for Shear.......................................................................................
d. Longitudinal Bar Development.................................................................
Extra Credit: Pile Design
Drawings................................................................................................................
Appendix........
Work Hours Recorded Chart..........
31
32
32
33
34
35
35
36
36
38
39
43
45
71
SE 151A
Sec. 1. References
The proposed design is a continuous two-span pedestrian bridge to be built in Sycamore Canyon located
in East San Diego County. The purpose of this bridge is to allow safe passage for pedestrians across the 5
lane low-volume roadway that is set in a small valley.
The bridge is composed of two continuous identical 46 ft long double T girders that are supported on two
neoprene bearings at each abutment and by a moment resisting bent-cap at midspan. The bent cap is
supported by an inclined column as determined by the state landscape architect for aesthetic reasons. The
depth of the slab(Deck) is 8 in and the depth of the girder is 36 in in accordance to ACI 318-11 Table
9.5(a). The column has a diameter of 4 ft.
The concrete used has a compressive strength of 4.0ksi. The grade of the steel reinforcement is ASCE
A706 Grade 60, fy=60 ksi.
Figure 1. Elevation View of Proposed Roadway Crossing

Sec. 2. Dimensions & Section property
2.a Slab/Deck
The design of the slab is shown in Figure 2 below. It has a thickness of 6 inches at the two edges and a
overall depth of 8 inches at the center. The top of the slab has a length of 186 inches while its bottom is
160 inches long. The slab is assumed to consist of a series of 1 foot long one-way solid planks supported
by the girders. The left and right ends of the planks are modeled as cantilevers. The cross-section of the
slab is shown in Figure 3, and Figure 4 shows the simplified model.
The overall thickness of the slab is demanded to be at least 8 deep by the client, while it should also
satisfy ACI 318-11 codes. In this case, the ratio of the span is less than . According to Table 9.5 (a) of
ACI 318-11, the depth should be greater than L/20 for one way solid slab and simply supported structure.
Therefore, the depth of the slab is determined to be 8 inches by Equation 1 below.
h=max(144/20 in, 8 in)= 8
Equation 1.
SE 151A
Figure 2. Slab geometry (unit in inches)
Figure 3. Slab cross section(inch)
Figure 4. Simplified Model(in)

With the dimensions found, the section properties of the slab are calculated in Table 1. Detail calculations
can be found in Figure 5 in Appendix.
Table 1. Section properties of Slab
Area of Slab (in2)
96
Centroid of Slab (in)
Moment of Inertia of Slab, Izz (in4)
512
Elastic Section Modulus of Slab (in3)
128
2. b Girder
The girder is simplified into 4 sections of lengths 2ft, 46 ft, 46 ft, and 2ft with supports 2 feet from the
end of each span and an inclined column at midspan.The simplified model is shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Simplified Model of Girder ( inches)
SE 151A
Using the simplified model, the girder depth can be determined based on ACI 318-11 Table 9.5(a). The
2ft span is too short to be considered to provide continuity therefore the 552 inches span is treated as one
end continuous. In general, a section is considered continuous if its length exceeds 1/4th of the main
length. Based on Table 9.5(a), the minimum thickness h for one end continuous solid one-way slab is
determined by Equation 2:
h=L/18.5=552/18.5=29.8 Equation 2.
To simplify manufacturing, the depth of the girder is determined to be 36. The dimensions of the cross
section of the double T girder are shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7. Double T Girder cross section

Based on the dimensions of the girder, its section properties are calculated in Table 2. Detail calculations
is shown in Figure 8 in Appendix .
Table 2. Section properties for the girder
Area of Girder (in2)
2.358*103
Centroid of Girder (in)
25.197
Moment of Inertia of Girder, Izz (in4)
2.474*105
Elastic Section Modulus (Top) (in3)
2.29*104
Elastic Section Modulus (Bot) (in3)
9.817*103
2.c Columns & Pile

The column has a circular cross section with a diameter of 4 ft as shown in Figure 9. The pile is also
circular with a diameter of 6 ft as shown in Figure 10. The area and moment of inertia are calculated in
Table 3. Details of the calculations can be found in Figure 11 in Appendix.
SE 151A
Figure 9. Column cross section
Figure 10. Pile cross section

Table 3. Section properties of column
Area of Column (in2)
2.895*104
Moment of Inertia of Column, Izz(in4)
2.606*105
Table 4. Section properties of pile

Area of pile (in2)
6.514*104
Moment of Inertia of pile, Izz(in4)
1.319*106
Sec. 3. Design loads

3 a. Slab (Deck)
The design loads of the slab consisted of the self-weight of the pedestrian bridge, the superimposed dead
loads of the asphalt and handrail, and the live loads.
i. Dead load
The pedestrian bridge is made of concrete with a unit weight of c=150pcf. The self-weight can be
modeled as distributed trapezoidal loads as shown in Figure 12.
Figure 12. Distributed load of concrete self-weight
SE 151A
ii. Superimposed Dead load

The first superimposed dead load consisted of the uniform distributed load of the asphalt, which has a unit
weight A=101 pcf. This design load is shown in Figure 13. The second superimposed dead load is
composed of the point loads due to the weight of the handrail with linear weight of 68.5 lb/ft.This is
shown in Figure 14.
Figure 13. superimposed dead load of asphalt
Figure 14. superimposed dead load of handrails
iii. Live load

The applied live load is 86 lb/ft that can act anywhere on the entire deck.
3.b. Girder
The design loads imposed on the Girder are composed of the self-weight of the pedestrian bridge, the
superimposed dead loads of the asphalt and handrail, and the live loads.
i. Dead load
The pedestrian bridge is made of concrete with a unit weight of c=150 pcf. The self-weight dead load is
composed of 3 components: the self-weight of the girder, which is idealized as uniform distributed loads,
the self-weight of the bent cap, which is idealized as a point load located at the midspan and the selfweight of the column, which is idealized as a uniform distributed load along the length of the column
acting in the direction of gravity. This can be seen in Figure 15 below.
Figure 15. Self-weight dead load of concrete Girder

ii. Superimposed Dead load
The first superimposed dead load consisted of the uniform distributed load of the asphalt, which has a unit
weight A=101 pcf. This design load is shown in Figure 16. The second superimposed dead load is a
uniform distributed load due to the weight of the handrail shown below in Figure 17
SE 151A
Figure 16. Uniform distributed Asphalt dead load
Figure 17. Uniform distributed Handrail dead load

iii. Live load
The applied live load is 1333 lb/ft that can act anywhere on the entire deck.
Section 4. Structural Analysis

4.a. Slab
i. Model
Figure 18 below shows the simplified model used for SAP analysis.
Figure 18. Model of Simplified Slab/Deck used for SAP analysis
ii.Load Combinations
The load cases are unfactored loads. The load cases for the slab/deck are:
10
SE 151A
Case 1: Concrete Self Weight Only

Case 2: Asphalt Weight Only
Case 3: Hand Rails Weight Only
Case 4: Live Load Case 1
Figure 19.1
Figure 19.2
Figure 19.3
Figure 19.4
Figure 19.5
Figure 19.6
Four load combinations are created based on factored loads in ACI 318-11 Section 9.2 using the load
cases. These combinations are:
Combo 1: 1.4 x (Case 1+Case 2+Case 3)
Combo 2: 1.2 x (Case 1+Case 2+Case 3)+1.6 x (Case 4)
Figure 19 below shows the load cases.
Case 1:
Case 2:
Case 3:
Case 4:
Case 5:
11
SE 151A
Case 6:
Figure 19. Different Load Cases (Point Load in lb and Distributed in lb/ft)
iii. Bending Moment Diagrams of Load Combinations
The bending moment diagrams corresponding to the defined load combinations are shown in Figure 20.
Combo 1:
Combo 2:
Combo 3:
Combo 4:
Figure 20. Bending Moment Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip-in)

iv. Shear Force Diagrams of Load Combinations
Figure 21 shows the shear force diagrams corresponding to the load combinations.
Combo 1:
12
SE 151A
Combo 2:
Combo 3:
Combo 4:
Figure 21. Shear Force Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip)

v. Design Envelopes
The design envelope incorporates the four load combinations to show the maximum and minimum shear
forces and bending moments the pedestrian bridge may experience. These values will then be used to
design the deck under any of the load combinations. The design envelope for bending moment is shown
in Figure 22.1 while the envelope for shear is shown in Figure 22.2.
1. Moment Envelope:
2. Shear Envelope:
Figure 22. Design Envelopes for Slab/Deck (1.Kip-in for moments)(2.Kip for shear forces)
4. b. Girder
Figure 23 below shows the simplified model below used for the SAP analysis.
13
SE 151A
Figure 23. Model of Simplified Model of Girder

ii.Load Combinations
The load cases are unfactored loads. The load cases for the girder are:
Case 1: Concrete Self Weight Only
Figure 24.1
Case 2: Asphalt Weight Only
Figure 24.2
Case 3: Hand Rails Weight Only
Figure 24.3
Figure 24.4
Figure 24.5
Figure 24.6
Four load combinations are created based on factored loads in ACI 318-11 Section 9.2 using the load
cases. These combinations are:
Combo 1: 1.4 x (Case 1+Case 2+Case 3)
Figure 24 below shows the different load cases.
14
SE 151A
Case 1:
Case 2:
Case 3:
15
SE 151A
Case 4:
Case 5:
Case 6:
Figure 24. Different Load Cases (Point Load in lb and Distributed in lb/ft)
iii. Bending Moment Diagrams of Load Combinations
The bending moment diagrams corresponding to the defined load combinations are shown in Figure 25.
16
SE 151A
Combo 1:
Combo 2:
17
SE 151A
Combo 3:
Combo 4:
Figure 25. Bending Moment Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip-ft)
18
SE 151A
iv. Shear Force Diagrams of Load Combinations

Figure 26 shows the shear force diagrams corresponding to the load combinations.
Combo 1:
Combo 2:
19
SE 151A
Combo 3:
Combo 4:
Figure 26. Shear Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip)

v. Design Envelopes
The design envelope incorporates the four load combinations to show the maximum and minimum shear
forces and bending moments the pedestrian bridge may experience. These values would then be used to
design the deck under any of the load combinations. The design envelope for bending moment is shown
in Figure 27.1 while the envelope for shear is shown in Figure 27.2.
20
SE 151A
1. Moment Envelope
2. Shear Envelope
Figure 27. Design Envelopes for Girder (1.Kip-ft for moments)(2.Kip for shear forces)
21
SE 151A
5. Slab/Deck Design
a. Flexural Design of Critical Sections
In the deck design, the goal is to ensure that the reinforced concrete has a ductile tension-controlled
failure mode. This can be achieved by ensuring c/dt 0.375 and ensuring that a sufficient amount of
tensile reinforcement is present in the section to absorb the cracking moment. The other goal of the
flexural design is to provide enough concrete cover for the section. A rough design for a single layer of
tensile reinforcement for the positive bending moment and a single reinforcement layer for the negative
bending moment is shown in Figure 28 below.
Figure 28. Rough Design of Reinforcement (unit in inches)

Equation 1 is used to determine the design tensile strength Mn for the reinforced rectangular beam under
the conditions that the tensile reinforcement has yielded and when the sections extreme fiber in
compression crushes at an assumed compressive strain 0.003.
When equation 1 is divided and multiplied by the effective section area b*d as shown in Figure 29,
Equation 2 can be obtained. Equation 3 represents the tensile reinforcement ratio. If Equation 3 and 4 is
substituted into Equation 2, the formula of the design flexural moment can be obtained in Equation 5.
Figure 29. Effective section area

Assuming a tension-controlled failure will occur when the extreme layer of tension reinforcement is
t0.005 based on page 40 in ACI 318-11. Based on the derivation in Figure 30, Equation 6 can be
obtained.
22
SE 151A
Figure 30. strain profile for tension-controlled failure

By equating Equation 4 and Equation 6 and setting d=dt, Equation 7 can be derived; therefore, the
maximum tensile reinforcement ratio is expressed in Equation 8.
To ensure there is enough tensile reinforcement to resist the cracking moment, the minimum
reinforcement area is defined by Equation 9 based on ACI 318-11 Section 10.5.
This Equation is nearly the equivalent to:
Therefore, in this design phase, the goal is to
make sure:
Based on ACI 318-11. Section 7.7.1 (b), the concrete cover for #5 bars and smaller is 1 to 1.5.
Table 5 below shows five analyzed reinforcement sections to check if they meet the design requirements.
23
SE 151A
Table 5. Deck Flexural Design Section Analysis
Check:
Bar. No
Diameter(in)
0.625
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Ab(in^2)
0.31
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
dt(in)
6.2
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
O.C. spacing (in)
12
No. bars/ft
As(in^2)
0.62
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.00833
0.00267
0.00533
0.008
0.0107
Mn(kip-ft)
16.0261
5.49265
10.7206
15.6838
20.3824
max
0.01808
0.01808
0.01808
0.01808
0.0181
1.2Mcr(Kip-ft)
5.69803
5.79030
5.7903
5.7903
5.7903
Mn1.2Mcr
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
max
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
From Section 4, the maximum negative moment of the deck is -5.09 kip-ft and the maximum positive
moment is 0.484 kip-ft. While top reinforcement corresponds to negative moment, bottom reinforcement
corresponds to positive moment. The optimum design should satisfy the two criteria:
For negative bending, the reinforcement should meet the cracking moment requirement, and thus has the
same design as the reinforcement design for positive moment. Therefore, the finalized design is #4 @ 6
O.C. for both the upper and bottom deck reinforcements.
24
SE 151A
b. Design for shear

Since the deck is a solid one-way slab, a simplified method is used to determine the shear reinforcement
required for each section and will be further explained in details in Section 6.d. There are 4 types of shear
reinforcement specifications possible in total. Each is based on the relative values of Vc and Vu, where
Vc is the factored concrete shear strength, and Vu is the ultimate required shear strength.
Vc is calculated using Equation 10 below, which can be found in section 11.2.1.1 of ACI 318-11. is
0.75 based on 9.3.2.3 of ACI 318-11. Vu can be found from section 4 of the design envelope generated by
SAP2000 model analysis. Vc of the slab is calculated to be 9.49 kips and Vu is 1.79 kips, based on the
analysis. Based on these values, the section is classified as Type I because Vc/2Vu and thus no need for
shear reinforcement. This case can be found in ACI 318-11 Section 11.4.6.1. The calculation of shear
design can be found in Figure 31 in Appendix.
6. Girder Design
The design of the girder can be split into two parts. The first part is from the left rubber bearing support to
the face of the bent cap (A-B). The second part is from the face of the bent cap to the face of the right
rubber bearing (B-C). For simplicity and conservatism, the design of both sections can be taken as the
larger value of the two negative and positive ultimate moments. From the previous section, the larger
value of positive moment is located in the right span: +Mu=1040 kip-ft and the larger value of negative
moment is -Mu= -1310 kip-ft. Our design goal is to achieve a tension controlled failure mode and the
design moment capacity must be greater than 1.2 times of the cracking moment.
a. Flexure Design of Critical Section
i. Rough Design
The rough flexural design for the girder needs to verify MnMu. The area of steel needed is
, where j is 0.9, Mu is the ultimate moment, d is the distance from the extreme fiber in
compression to the centroid of the tensile reinforcement, and fy is the yield stress of the steel.
ii. Positive Moment (Bottom reinforcement)
The calculated demand value for As is 8.025 in2 for the positive moment. We will be using 6 #11 rebars
total in the double T section, which have a total steel cross-sectional area of 9.36 in2. Details of the
calculation can be found in Figure 32 in the Appendix.
iii. Negative Moment (Top reinforcement)

The calculated demand value for As is 10.108 in2 for the negative moment. We will be using 6 #11 and 4
#9 rebars total in the double T section, which have a total steel cross-sectional area of 13.36 in2. Details of
the calculation can be found in Figure 32 in the Appendix.
25
SE 151A
iv Bar Spacing
The bar spacings must meet the requirement of ACI 318-11 in section 7.6. Based on this section, the
minimum clear spacing between parallel bars in a layer shall be the diameter of the rebars used, but not
less than 1 in. Thus for the design clear spacing, we use 1.5 for the #11 rebars and #9 rebars, and 0.5
for #4 rebars. Figure 33 below shows the spacing layout for the positive moment reinforcement, while
Figure 34 shows the spacing layout for the negative moment reinforcement. The calculations are shown in
Figure 35 in the Appendix.
Figure 33. Rebar spacing layout for Positive Reinforcement (unit in inches)
26
SE 151A
Figure 34. Rebar spacing layout for Negative Reinforcement (unit in inches)
v. Effective Section Properties
Based on section 8.12 in ACI 318-11 the width of slab effective as a T-beam flange should not exceed
of the span length of the beam, and the effective overhanging flange width on each side of the web should
be min(8* slab thickness, clear distance to the next web). The effective section properties of the
double-T girder are listed in Table 6 below; the meaning of the variables are shown in Figure 36. Details
of the calculation are shown in Figure 37 in the Appendix.
Table 6. Effective section properties of girder
a1(in)
64
a2(in)
13
bf(in)
93
I(in4)
2.477*105
Stop(in3)
2.301*104
Sbottom(in3)
9.815*103
27
SE 151A
Figure 36. Variable meaning for effective section properties

vi. Design Strength Mn- and Mn+
The flexural design strength of the girder is calculated using the fiber discretization method. It was done
by creating a matlab file and the script of the file is shown in the Appendix. Specifying the number of
compressive fibers to be 360, we found the design strength Mn+ to be 1709.3 kip-ft and Mn- to be 1506.4 kip-ft. On the other hand, the cracking moment for positive bending was calculated to be 387.956
kip-ft and the cracking moment for negative bending is 909.434 kip-ft. Details of the calculation can be
found in Figure 38 in the Appendix. The optimum design should satisfy the following two criteria:
for positive moment: MnMu_positive; Mn1.2*Mcr,
for negative moment: MnMu_negative; Mn1.2*Mcr,
Check: for positive moment: 1709.3 kip-ft > 1040 kip-ft ; 1383.4 >1.2*387.956
for negative moment: 1506.4 kip-ft > 1310 kip-ft; 1506.4 kip-ft > 1.2*909.434 kip-ft.
These values capacities were chosen slightly higher in order to account for any uncertainties
Therefore, we will be using 6 #11 rebars for positive bending, and 6 #11 and 2 #9 rebars for negative
bending with a total area of 18.13 in2.
6.b. Design of Shear Reinforcement

The design for shear can be divided into different types based on the relative values Vu,Vc,n*Vc. The
different types are listed below.
Type I.
When Vu Vc/2, no shear reinforcement is needed.
Type II.
When VcVu>Vc/2, minimum shear reinforcement is used to meet 11.4.6.1 of ACI 318-11:
; the stirrup set O.C. spacing is restricted by min (d/2,24 in) based on section
11.4.5.1 of ACI 318-11.
28
SE 151A
Type III.
When 3*VcVu>Vc, it is recognized as moderate shear zone. According to 11.1 and 11.2 of ACI 31811: Vs=(Vu -Vc)/. The stirrup spacing can be found
.Similar to Type II, the spacing should
be less than d/2 and 24 in (11.4.5.1 of ACI 318-11).
Type IV.
When 3Vc<Vu5Vc, it is identified as the high shear zone, in which Vs=2Vc. ACI places tighter
restrictions on the spacing of the shear reinforcement based on section 11.4.5.3: s cannot be greater than
d/4 and 12 in.
Type V.
When Vu>5Vc, it is identified as likely shear failure zone caused by crushing the concrete carrying
shear, and this is not permitted by ACI. Therefore, the maximum permitted value for Vs is 4*Vc by ACI
318-11.
The two spans are designed identically to have the capacity to support the most critical shear values.
The shear design plot is shown in Figure 42 below from the face of the rubber bearing support to the face
of bent cap at mid-span. Figure 39 to 41 in the Appendix show the required spacing for different types of
shear design.
Figure 42. Shear Design Plot for Left Hand Span (critical section)
29
SE 151A
Zone 1 (0 to 2 ft)
The required shear reinforcement for Zone 1 is of Type I. There is no shear requirement required for this
zone, but the minimum shear reinforcement to be used is 4 #4 @ 16 O.C. to match Zone 3 and 5.
Zone 2 (2 to 4 ft)
The required shear reinforcement for Zone 2 is of Type III.The reinforcement that will be used in this
zone is 4 #4 @ 5 O.C..
Zone 3 (4 to 13 ft)
The required shear reinforcement for Zone 3 is of Type II. The reinforcement is used as 4 #4 @ 16 C.C..
Zone 4 (13 to 27 ft)
The required shear reinforcement for Zone 4 is of Type I. There is no shear requirement required for this
zone, but the minimum shear reinforcement to be used is 4 #4 @ 16 O.C. to match Zone 3 and 5.
Zone 5 (27 to 35 ft)
The required shear reinforcement for Zone 5 is of Type II. The reinforcement that will be used in this
zone is 4#4 @ 16 O.C..
Zone 6 (35 to 45.3 ft)
The required shear reinforcement for Zone 6 is of Type III.The reinforcement that will be used in this
zone is 4 #4 @ 5 O.C..
We use the shear design from the left span and mirror it to the right hand span. The final shear
reinforcement design for the girder is shown as follows:
0 to 2 ft
2 to 4 ft
4 to 35 ft
35 to 45.3 ft
45.3 to 50.7 ft
50.7 to 61 ft
61 to 92 ft
92 to 94 ft
94 to 96 ft
4 #4 bars spaced at 16 inches center to center

No Shear Reinforcement Needed Due to Bend Cap
Below is a figure showing all of the flexural and shear reinforcement in the Girder
30
SE 151A
Figure 43. Steel Reinforcement in the girder

7. Development of Longitudinal Reinforcement and Miscellaneous Requirements
7.a Slab Reinforcement
The longitudinal bar development is designed off of the positive moment 5.81kip-in and a negative
moment of 61.09kip-in
i. Longitudinal Bar Development
The bars used were #4 bars spaced 6 inches on center for the top and bottom longitudinal reinforcement.
The longitudinal bar development for #4 bars is 19 in (rounded up from 18.97 in) The calculation may be
found in Figure 44 in the Appendix. This reinforcement size and spacing is kept constant throughout the
entire length of the bridge.
ii. Shrinkage and Temperature
The temperature and shrinkage reinforcement will be perpendicular to the flexural reinforcements. Based
on ACI 318-11 Section 7.12.2, Ast0.0018*hdeck*s, where Ast is the total cross-sectional area of steel, hdeck
is the height of the slab, and s is the spacing between the temperature and shrinkage reinforcements. #4
bars @ 12 O.C. were tried first and were then checked to ensure that the spacing was not more than five
times of the slab thickness nor greater than 18 inches.
Check: Ab=0.2in2>12*8*0.0018 (O.K)
12<5*8(O.K)
12<18(O.K)
A model of the deck reinforcement is shown in Figure 45, 46 and 47 below.
Figure 45. Slab Reinforcement for Temperature & Shrinkage and Flexure (unites in inches)
31
SE 151A
Figure 46. Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement.

iii. Cross Section Sketches
Figure 47. Cross section view of deck reinforcement
7.b Girder Reinforcement

The longitudinal bar development is designed off of the positive moment 1040 kip-ft and a negative
moment of 1310 kip-ft
i. Longitudinal Bar Development
The bars used were #9 and #11 for the top longitudinal reinforcement and #11 for the bottom longitudinal
reinforcement. The development length for #9 bars is 8ft (rounded up from 5.796ft) and the development
length for #11 bars is 8 ft (rounded up from 7.246ft). The development length of the #9 bars was rounded
up to match the development length of the #11 bars for easier constructability. The calculation may be
found in Figure 44 in the Appendix. This reinforcement varies throughout the length of the girder as
shown in the figures below. The length of the required flexural reinforcement was determined using ACI318 12.10.3 and 12.2.2. Details on the calculation can be found in the Appendix Figure 49.
For both the positive and negative flexural reinforcement, the cut off length was chosen from the
maximum from the left and right span of the bridge.
For the negative reinforcement, Bars B were chosen to be cut off. Bars B consist of 4#9 bars totaling
to an area of 4 in2. The B bars were determined to be 9 ft measured from the center of the bent cap. ACI
32
SE 151A
section 12.12.3 and 12.10.5 were used to determine these lengths. Details on the calculation can be found
in the Appendix Figure 50 and 52
For the negative reinforcement, the A bars were chosen to continue through the length of the bridge.
The A bars consist of 6#11 bars totaling to an area of 9.36 in2 The minimum length of Bars A are 19
ft measured from the center of the bent cap. Although the bars A are not required for flexural stability
of the bar, the reinforcement continues throughout the length for the bridge in order for the installment of
shear reinforcement. ACI section 12.12.3 and 12.10.5 were used to determine these lengths. Details on the
calculation can be found in the Appendix Figure 51 and 53.
For the positive reinforcement, Bars B were chosen to be cut off. Bars B consist of 2#11 bars totaling
to an area of 3.12 in2. The B bars were determined to be 10 ft measured from the center of maximum
moment which is located 18 ft measured from the simple support. ACI section 12.11.1 and 12.10.5 were
used to determine these lengths. Details on the calculation can be found in the Appendix Figure 56 and
57.
For the positive reinforcement, the A bars were chosen to continue through the length of the bridge.
The A bars consist of 4#11 bars totaling to an area of 6.24 in2. The reinforcement continues throughout
the length for the bridge in order for the installment of shear reinforcement. The ACI section 12.12.3 and
12.10.5 were used to determine these lengths. Details on the calculation can be found in the Appendix
Figure 55.
The positive reinforcement hook near the rubber bearing has a clear distance of 12.25 in which is larger
than .5db=7.05 in. Details on the location of the hook can be found in Figure 57 in Section 9: Drawings
ii Cross Section Sketches

The location of the cut off reinforcement can be seen in Figure 58 below.
Figure 58. Zones within the longitudinal girder flexural reinforcement (Not to scale)
Zone 1 has 6#11 bars and 4#9 bars at the top and 4#11 bars on the bottom
33
SE 151A
Figure 59. Girder flexural reinforcement in zone 1
Zone 1 has 6#11 bars at the top and 4#11 bars on the bottom


34
SE 151A
8. Column Design
a. Interaction Diagram
The interaction diagram shown in Figure 63 was formed using a Matlab code applying the concept of
fiber discretization to reinforced concrete columns. This code can be found in the Appendix. The diameter
of the column was previously defined to be 4 while the reinforcement was assumed to be composed of
12 bars. With the interaction diagram, the reinforcement ratio of the column was determined as well as
the required diameter of each bars, The value of Pn is capped at:
to prevent brittle failure due to concrete crushing.
Figure 63. Interaction Diagram of Column

Each red cross represents a different Mu, Pu pair found using the load combination detailed in section 4
of the structural analysis section,
35
SE 151A
b. Pu, Mu Combinations
The load combinations can be found in Section 4 of the structural analysis section, Table 7 below shows
the Pu,Mu combinations from SAP analysis.
Table 7: Pu Mu Combinations
Load Combination
Location
Mu(kip-ft)
Pu(kip)
Combo 1
Top
525
584
Bot
1201
584
Top
620
621
Bot
1347
621
Top
671
561
Bot
1054
561
Top
400
560
Bot
1323
560
Combo 2
Combo 3
Combo 4
c. Design for Shear

Based on ACI 318-11 Section 21.6.4, the plastic hinge region should be greater than the maximum of :
a. The depth of the member at the joint face or at the section where flexural yielding is likely to
occur (48 in)
b. One-sixth of the clear span of the member (44 in)
c. 18 in.
According to ACI 318-11 Section 21.6.4.3, the spacing of transverse reinforcement along the length l0 of
the member shall not exceed the the least of:
a. of the minimum member dimension (12 in)
b. 6 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar (10.14 in)
c. Equation 21-2 with the provision that the spacing will not exceed 6 nor be less than 4
Therefore, the spacing is determined to be 4 inches for sections within plastic hinge region. Based on
7.10.5.1, the transverse size for longitudinal size #14 should be at least #4 rebar. The spacing of the hoops
within the remainder of the column will be taken as the minimum of the following criteria:
a. 16 times of the longitudinal rebar diameter (27.04 in)
b. 48 times of the hoop wire diameter (24 in)
c. Least Dimension of Column (48 in)
36
SE 151A
Thus, a transverse bar spacing 27 inches will be specified for the remainder of the column. However, for
the ease of construction and be conservative, the company uses a spacing of 14 inches. Table 8
summarizes the spacing of shear reinforcement of the column design. Figure 65 shows the detailing of the
transverse reinforcement.
Table 8. transverse spacing of column design
Plastic Hinge Length
48
Spacing and bar size in the plastic hinge region
#4 @ 4 O.C.
Remaining Bar Size and Spacing
#4 @ 14 O. C.
Figure 65. Transverse spacing of column (inches)

Applying the interaction diagram shown in Figure 63, the required reinforcement ratio is found to be less
than 1%, and the results using 8 #14 rebars will be sufficient. However, given the inexperience of the
designers and the importance of the column for structural integrity, 10 #14 will be used for the
longitudinal reinforcement of the column. This provides a new reinforcement ratio of 1.24% which more
than exceed the require. Figure 64 details the column flexural reinforcement layout.
37
SE 151A
Figure 64. Column Reinforcement Cross Section Cut (inches)
d. Longitudinal Bar Development

The longitudinal bar development is based on ACI 318-11 Section 12.3.2. Based on ACI,
deformed bars and deformed wire ldc should be the larger of
is defined as 1.0 based on 12.2.4 (d), db is 1.69 inches for #14. ldc is therefore determined as 33
inches. The company decides to have the longitudinal development length of the column to be 33
inches for the portions of both bent cap and pile for the ease of construction. Even though the
development length is longer than the depth of the bent cap, we can leave the longitudinal bars to
extend outside of the bent cap for connection purpose. Figure 66 shows the detailing for the bent
cap, while Figure 67 shows the detailing for the reinforcements in the pile.
Figure 66. Bar Development into the Bent Cap(inches)
38
SE 151A
Figure 67. Bar Development into the Pile (inches)

9. Extra Credit: Pile Design
The pile of the bridge has a circular cross session with a diameter of 6, and the height of the pile is 90 ft.
The company idealizes the pile as P-y spring system with the bottom joint constrained by a pin. The
tributary areas are given as:
The empirical relationship for the springs is given by:
Figure 68 shows the spreadsheet used to generate the SAP model, while Figure 69 shows the generated
model of the pile using SAP 2000.
39
SE 151A
Figure 68. Excel sheet for SAP Model
Figure 69. Generated SAP Model
Applying the axial forces and moments in the top joint with the demand values from section 4, we can
obtain the demand loads and moments with SAP 2000. We have also included the self-weight of the
concrete pile in the applied axial loads. Table 9 shows the Pu, Mu combinations for the pile design. The
calculation of the self weight of the pile is shown in Figure 70 in the Appendix.
40
SE 151A

Table 9. Load Combos
Load combo
Pu+concrete self weight (kip)
Mu (kip-ft)
966
1201
1003
1347
943
1054
942
1323
Moment diagrams of applied P,M combinations:
Combo 1:
Combo 2:
Combo 3:
Combo 4:
The company then calculate the required ratio using the normalized P-M diagram of the column section,
and normalize the demand load and moment of the pile with the section of pile:
Pu/(Agfc)
Mu/(AgfcD)
Figure 71 shows the generated P-M interaction diagram, the matlab codes used to generate this plot can
be found in the Appendix.
41
SE 151A
Figure 71. P-M interaction Diagram for pile

Since the required ratio is less than 1%, the company decides to have 18 #14 rebars for the longitudinal
rebars design to have 1% steel ratio. Figure 72 shows the designed cross section of the pile.
Figure 72. Pile Cross section

For the ease of construction, the spacing of transverse reinforcement of the pile is determined to be the
same as the transverse reinforcement of the column in the plastic region, which is 4 inches. #5 rebars will
be used for the transverse reinforcement. Figure 73 shows the detailing of the reinforcement.
42
SE 151A
Figure 73. transverse spacing of pile
10. Drawing
Figure 55 Dimensions of Girder Flexural reinforcement
43
SE 151A
Figure 56 Dimensions of Girder Flexural reinforcement bar cutoff
Figure 57 Details of the positive standard hook
44
SE 151A
11. Appendix:
Figure 5. Slab section properties hand calculation
45
SE 151A
Figure 8. Girder section properties hand calculation
Figure 11. Column&pile section properties hand calculation
46
SE 151A
Figure 31. Shear Design of Deck
Figure 32. Rough Design Calculations to meet minimum steel area requirement
47
SE 151A
Figure 35. Hand calculation of Bar spacing
Figure 37. Effective section properties of Girder section
Figure 38. Cracking moment calculations for positive and negative bending
48
SE 151A
Figure 39. Girder Shear Design part I
Figure 40. Girder Shear Design part II
49
SE 151A
Figure 41. Girder Shear Design part III
50
SE 151A
Figure 48. Negative Girder Bar development part I
51
SE 151A
Figure 49. Negative Girder Bar development part II
52
SE 151A
Figure 50. Negative Girder Bar development part III
Figure 51. Negative Girder Bar development part IV
53
SE 151A
Figure 52 Negative Girder Bar development part V
54
SE 151A
Figure 53 Negative Girder Bar development part VI
55
SE 151A
Figure 54 Positive Girder Bar development part I
56
SE 151A
Figure 55 Positive Girder Bar development part II
Figure 56 Positive Girder Bar development part III
57
SE 151A
Figure 57 Positive Girder Bar development part IV
58
SE 151A
Figure 58 Hook Lengths
Figure 70. Pile weight
Code to determine positive moment capacity using fiber discretization

%Fiber Discretization Positive Moment
clear, clc
f_y=60; %ksi
%variable
f_c=4;
%ksi
%variable
h=36;
%in
%variable
%variable
59
SE 151A
%step 1
%width
b=zeros(1,360);
i=1:1:360; %number of horizontal fibers
b(1,1:round(8/h*360))=93;
b(1,round(8/h*360)+1:360)=16; %variable
t=h/length(i); %thickness
%step 2
y_c(i)=(i-1/2)*t;
a_c(i)=b(i).*t;
%step 3
B=.85 - (f_c - 4) * .05;
if B>=.65
B=B;
else
B=.65;
end
%step 4
n=0;
error(n+1)=1;
error(n+2)=1;
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
while (sign(error(n+1))==sign(error(n+2)))
n=n+1;
a=n*t;
%step 5
c=a/B;
%step 6 stress and force in reinforcement
n_r=1; % # of layers of reinforcement %variable
E=29000; %ksi
E_y=f_y/E;
E_cu=-.003;
phi=-E_cu / c;
y_s=zeros(1,n_r);
y_s(1,1:n_r)=[33.3];
%variable
d_t=y_s(1);
A_s=zeros(1,n_r);
A_s(1,1:n_r)=[1.56*3]; %variable
for i=1:n_r
E_s(i) = phi * (y_s(i) - c);
f_s(i) = sign(E_s(i))*min(abs(E_s(i)*E), f_y); %stress in layer i
F_s(i) = A_s(i) * f_s(i);
%force in layer i
end
%step 7
for i=1:1:360
if i<=n
F_c(i) = -.85 * f_c * a_c(i);
else
F_c(i) = 0;
60
SE 151A
end
end
%step 8
error(n+2) = sum(F_s) + sum(F_c);
if sign(error(n+1))==-sign(error(n+2)) & (abs(error(n+1)) < abs(error(n+2)))
n=n-1;
a=n*t;
%step 5
c=a/B;
phi=-E_cu / c;
for i=1:n_r
E_s(i) = phi * (y_s(i) - c);
F_s(i) = A_s(i) * f_s(i);
%force in layer i
end
%step 7
for i=1:1:360
if i<=n
F_c(i) = -.85 * f_c * a_c(i);
else
F_c(i) = 0;
end
end
break
end
end
%step 11
M_n=-1*(sum(F_c.*y_c)+sum(F_s.*y_s))/12; %kip-ft
%step 12
k=c/d_t;
if k<=.375
disp('Failure: tension-controlled failure')
phi_2=.9;
elseif k>=.6
disp('Failure: compression controlled failure')
phi_2=.65;
else
disp('Failure: transition')
phi_2=.65 + .25 * ((1/ k)-5/3);
end
disp('Beta_1 ='), disp(B)
disp('Nominal Moment Strnegth, M_n (kip-ft) ='), disp(M_n)
disp('curvature * h (radians) ='), disp(phi * h)
disp('c/d_t ='), disp(k)
disp('E_s1/E_y^2 ='), disp(E_s(1)/E_y)
disp('Phi Factor ='), disp(phi_2)
disp('Phi*M_n (kip-ft)= '), disp(phi_2 * M_n)
61
SE 151A
Code to determine negative moment capacity using fiber discretization

%Fiber Discretization Negative Moment
clear, clc
f_y=60; %ksi
%variable
f_c=4;
%ksi
%variable
h=36;
%in
%variable
%variable
%step 1
%width
b=zeros(1,360);
i=1:1:360; %number of horizontal fibers
b(1,1:round(28/h*360))=16;
b(1,round(28/h*360)+1:360)=93; %variable
t=h/length(i); %thickness
%step 2
y_c(i)=(i-1/2)*t;
a_c(i)=b(i).*t;
%step 3
B=.85 - (f_c - 4) * .05;
if B>=.65
B=B;
else
B=.65;
end
%step 4
n=0;
error(n+1)=1;
error(n+2)=1;
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
while (sign(error(n+1))==sign(error(n+2)))
n=n+1;
a=n*t;
%step 5
c=a/B;
n_r=2; % # of layers of reinforcement %variable
E=29000; %ksi
E_y=f_y/E;
E_cu=-.003;
phi=-E_cu / c;
y_s=zeros(1,n_r);
y_s(1,1:n_r)=[33.3,29.53];
%variable
d_t=y_s(1);
A_s=zeros(1,n_r);
A_s(1,1:n_r)=[1.56*3,1];
%variable
for i=1:n_r
E_s(i) = phi * (y_s(i) - c);
62
SE 151A
F_s(i) = A_s(i) * f_s(i);

%force in layer i
end
%step 7
for i=1:1:360
if i<=n
F_c(i) = -.85 * f_c * a_c(i);
else
F_c(i) = 0;
end
end
%step 8
error(n+2) = sum(F_s) + sum(F_c);
if sign(error(n+1))==-sign(error(n+2)) & (abs(error(n+1)) < abs(error(n+2)))
n=n-1;
a=n*t;
%step 5
c=a/B;
phi=-E_cu / c;
for i=1:n_r
E_s(i) = phi * (y_s(i) - c);
F_s(i) = A_s(i) * f_s(i);
%force in layer i
end
%step 7
for i=1:1:360
if i<=n
F_c(i) = -.85 * f_c * a_c(i);
else
F_c(i) = 0;
end
end
break
end
end
%step 11
M_n=-1*(sum(F_c.*y_c)+sum(F_s.*y_s))/12; %kip-ft
%step 12
k=c/d_t;
if k<=.375
disp('Failure: tension-controlled failure')
phi_2=.9;
elseif k>=.6
disp('Failure: compression controlled failure')
phi_2=.65;
else
disp('Failure: transition')
phi_2=.65 + .25 * ((1/ k)-5/3);
63
SE 151A
end
disp('Beta_1 ='), disp(B)
disp('Nominal Moment Strnegth, M_n (kip-ft) ='), disp(M_n)
disp('curvature * h (radians) ='), disp(phi * h)
disp('c/d_t ='), disp(k)
disp('E_s1/E_y^2 ='), disp(E_s(1)/E_y)
disp('Phi Factor ='), disp(phi_2)
disp('Phi*M_n (kip-ft)= '), disp(phi_2 * M_n)
Column Fiber Discretization:

fc=4;%ksi
fy=60;%ksi
%find beta
x=0.85-(fc-4)*0.05;
if x<=0.85
beta=x;
elseif x<=0.65
beta=0.65;
else
beta=0.85;
end
diameter=48;%in
nb_guess=8; %8 rebars evenly distributed
h=diameter; %total height of the section is its diameter
n1=200;
%fiber layers
n=0;
%fiber in compresion
Ag=pi*diameter^2/4; %area of the concrete
rho=[0.01,0.04]';
%steel ratio
Ast=Ag.*rho;
%steel area
Ab_guess=(Ast./nb_guess);
%approx. area for each rebar
db_guess=sqrt(4*Ab_guess/pi); %approximate the area as square
ey=fy/29000;
%steel yield strain
%radial location of rebar
bars=[1 2 2 2 1];
%number of bars in each layer
As=zeros(5,2);
t=h/n1; %thickness of each layer
b=[];
yc=[];
Pn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
Mn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
phi_Pn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
phi_Mn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
Mn=zeros(2,1);
64
SE 151A
phi_Mn=zeros(2,1);
phi_Pn=zeros(2,1);
Pn=zeros(2,1);
radius=diameter/2;
for i=1:n1
yc(i)=(i-0.5)*t;
if i<=n1/2
b(i)=sqrt(radius^2-(radius-yc(i))^2)*2;
else
b(i)=b(i-(2*(i-n1/2)-1));
end
Ac(i)=b(i)*t;
end
rb=0.5*db_guess;
rb=0.5*(rb(1)+rb(2));
ys1=diameter-0.5-1.5;
ys2=radius+((radius-1.5-0.5-0.5*rb)*sind(45));
ys3=radius;
ys4=h-ys2;
ys=[ys1;ys2;ys3;ys4;h-ys1];
dt=ys1;
while n<=0.8*n1-1
n=n+1;
for i=1:2
As(:,i)=bars'*Ab_guess(i);
end
a=n*t;
c=a/beta;
Fs=zeros(5,2);
Fc=zeros(n,1);
for i=1:5
es(i)=0.003/c*(ys(i)-c);
fs(i)=sign(es(i))*min(abs(es(i))*29000,fy);
Fs(i,:)=As(i,:)*fs(i)';
end
for i=1:n
Fc(i)=Ac(i)*(-0.85*fc);
end
%determine reduction factor
if c/dt>=0.6
phi=0.65;
elseif c/dt<=0.6 && c/dt>0.375
phi=0.9-0.25/0.225*(c/dt-0.375); %stirrup-tie
elseif c/dt<0.375
phi=0.9;
end
65
SE 151A
for i=1:2
Pn(i,1)=(sum(Fs(:,i))+sum(Fc));
ultimate=0.8*phi*(0.85*fc*(Ag-Ast)+fy*Ast);
if Pn(i)>=ultimate
Pn(i)=ultimate;
end
end
for i=1:2
Mn(i)= (Fc(1:n)'*yc(1:n)'+Fs(:,i)'*ys)-Pn(i)*h/2;
end
Mn=Mn/12;%kip-ft;
phi_Mn=phi*Mn;
phi_Pn=phi*Pn;
for j=1:2
phi_Mn_matrix(j,n+1)=phi_Mn(j);
phi_Pn_matrix(j,n+1)=phi_Pn(j);
Mn_matrix(j,n+1)=Mn(j);
Pn_matrix(j,n+1)=Pn(j);
end
end
Pn_T=Ast*fy;
phi_Pn_T=0.9*Pn_T;
Mn_T=[0,0];
Pn_C= -(Ast*fy+0.85*(Ag-Ast)*fc);
phi_Pn_C=0.65*Pn_C;
Mn_C=[0 0];
for s=1:2
phi_Pn_matrix(s,1)=phi_Pn_T(s);
phi_Pn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=phi_Pn_C(s);
Pn_matrix(s,1)=Pn_T(s);
Pn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=Pn_C(s);
phi_Mn_matrix(s,1)=Mn_T(s);
phi_Mn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=Mn_C(s);
Mn_matrix(s,1)=Mn_C(s);
Mn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=Mn_C(s);
end
figure(1)
plot(Mn_matrix(1,:),Pn_matrix(1,:),'b','linewidth',0.3);hold on
plot(Mn_matrix(2,:),Pn_matrix(2,:),'g','linewidth',0.3)
xlabel('Mn [kip-ft]')
ylabel('Pn [kip]')
title('Pn-Mn Interraction Diagram')
legend('0.01 \rho','0.04 \rho')
grid on
set(gca,'Ydir','reverse')
figure(2)
plot(phi_Mn_matrix(1,:),phi_Pn_matrix(1,:),'b','linewidth',0.3);hold on
66
SE 151A
plot(phi_Mn_matrix(2,:),phi_Pn_matrix(2,:),'g','linewidth',0.3)
xlabel('\phiMn [kip-ft]')
ylabel('\phiPn [kip]')
title('\phiPn-\phiMn Interraction Diagram')
legend('0.01 \rho','0.04 \rho')
Mu=[525,1201,620,1347,671,1054,400,1323];
Pu=[-584,-584,-621,-621,-561,-561,-560,-560];
scatter(Mu,Pu,'rx');
grid on
Pile Design Code:

fc=4;%ksi
fy=60;%ksi
%find beta
x=0.85-(fc-4)*0.05;
if x<=0.85
beta=x;
elseif x<=0.65
beta=0.65;
else
beta=0.85;
end
diameter=48;%in
nb_guess=8; %8 rebars evenly distributed
h=diameter; %total height of the section is its diameter
n1=200;
%fiber layers
n=0;
%fiber in compresion
67
SE 151A
Ag=pi*diameter^2/4; %area of the concrete

rho=[0.01,0.04]';
%steel ratio
Ast=Ag.*rho;
%steel area
Ab_guess=(Ast./nb_guess);
%approx. area for each rebar
db_guess=sqrt(4*Ab_guess/pi); %approximate the area as square
ey=fy/29000;
%steel yield strain
%radial location of rebar
bars=[1 2 2 2 1];
%number of bars in each layer
As=zeros(5,2);
t=h/n1; %thickness of each layer
b=[];
yc=[];
Pn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
Mn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
phi_Pn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
phi_Mn_matrix=zeros(2,0.8*n1+1);
Mn=zeros(2,1);
phi_Mn=zeros(2,1);
phi_Pn=zeros(2,1);
Pn=zeros(2,1);
radius=diameter/2;
norm_Pu=Ag*fc;
norm_Mu=Ag*fc*diameter;
for i=1:n1
yc(i)=(i-0.5)*t;
if i<=n1/2
b(i)=sqrt(radius^2-(radius-yc(i))^2)*2;
else
b(i)=b(i-(2*(i-n1/2)-1));
end
Ac(i)=b(i)*t;
end
rb=0.5*db_guess;
rb=0.5*(rb(1)+rb(2));
ys1=diameter-0.5-1.5;
ys2=radius+((radius-1.5-0.5-0.5*rb)*sind(45));
ys3=radius;
ys4=h-ys2;
ys=[ys1;ys2;ys3;ys4;h-ys1];
dt=ys1;
while n<=0.8*n1-1
n=n+1;
for i=1:2
As(:,i)=bars'*Ab_guess(i);
end
a=n*t;
c=a/beta;
Fs=zeros(5,2);
68
SE 151A
Fc=zeros(n,1);
for i=1:5
es(i)=0.003/c*(ys(i)-c);
fs(i)=sign(es(i))*min(abs(es(i))*29000,fy);
Fs(i,:)=As(i,:)*fs(i)';
end
for i=1:n
Fc(i)=Ac(i)*(-0.85*fc);
end
%determine reduction factor
if c/dt>=0.6
phi=0.65;
elseif c/dt<=0.6 && c/dt>0.375
phi=0.9-0.25/0.225*(c/dt-0.375); %stirrup-tie
elseif c/dt<0.375
phi=0.9;
end
for i=1:2
Pn(i,1)=(sum(Fs(:,i))+sum(Fc));
ultimate=0.8*phi*(0.85*fc*(Ag-Ast)+fy*Ast);
if Pn(i)>=ultimate
Pn(i)=ultimate;
end
end
for i=1:2
Mn(i)= (Fc(1:n)'*yc(1:n)'+Fs(:,i)'*ys)-Pn(i)*h/2;
end
Pn=Pn/norm_Pu;
Mn=Mn/norm_Mu;
Mn=Mn/12;%kip-ft;
phi_Mn=phi*Mn;
phi_Pn=phi*Pn;
for j=1:2
phi_Mn_matrix(j,n+1)=phi_Mn(j);
phi_Pn_matrix(j,n+1)=phi_Pn(j);
Mn_matrix(j,n+1)=Mn(j);
Pn_matrix(j,n+1)=Pn(j);
end
end
Pn_T=Ast*fy/norm_Pu;
phi_Pn_T=0.9*Pn_T;
Mn_T=[0,0];
Pn_C= -(Ast*fy+0.85*(Ag-Ast)*fc)/norm_Pu;
phi_Pn_C=0.65*Pn_C;
Mn_C=[0 0];
for s=1:2
phi_Pn_matrix(s,1)=phi_Pn_T(s);
phi_Pn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=phi_Pn_C(s);
69
SE 151A
Pn_matrix(s,1)=Pn_T(s);
Pn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=Pn_C(s);
phi_Mn_matrix(s,1)=Mn_T(s);
phi_Mn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=Mn_C(s);
Mn_matrix(s,1)=Mn_C(s);
Mn_matrix(s,0.8*n1+1)=Mn_C(s);
end
figure(1)
plot(Mn_matrix(1,:),Pn_matrix(1,:),'b','linewidth',0.3);hold on
plot(Mn_matrix(2,:),Pn_matrix(2,:),'g','linewidth',0.3)
xlabel('normalized Mn [kip-ft]')
ylabel('normalized Pn [kip]')
title('normalized Pn-Mn Interraction Diagram')
legend('0.01 \rho','0.04 \rho')
grid on
figure(2)
plot(phi_Mn_matrix(1,:),phi_Pn_matrix(1,:),'b','linewidth',0.3);hold on
plot(phi_Mn_matrix(2,:),phi_Pn_matrix(2,:),'g','linewidth',0.3)
xlabel('normalized \phiMn [kip-ft]')
ylabel('\normalized phiPn [kip]')
title('normalized \phiPn-\phiMn Interraction Diagram')
Ag_pile=pi*72^2/4;%in^2
Norm_pile_P=Ag_pile*fc;
Norm_pile_M=Ag_pile*fc*72;
Mu=[1201,1347,1054,1323];
Pu=[-966,-1003,-943,-942];
Mu=Mu/Norm_pile_M;
Pu=Pu/Norm_pile_P;
scatter(Mu,Pu,'rx');
legend('0.01 \rho','0.04 \rho','Combos')
grid on
70
SE 151A
12. Work Hours Recorded Chart
Date
Wenjin Siu (hrs)
Nicholas (Nikko) Sera

(hrs)
1/11/2015
1.5
1.5
1/14/2015
1/15/2015
2.5
1/16/2015
1/17/2015
1/18/2015
1/19/2015
2/16/2015
2/17/2015
2/18/2015
2/21/2015
2/22/2015
3/01/2015
3/07/2015
3/08/2015
3/11/2015
3/13/2014
3/14/2015
3/15/2015
3/16/2015
3/18/2015
Total
89
84.5
71

SE151TermProjectReport Jimmy Nikko v2

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

SE151TermProjectReport Jimmy Nikko v2

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

SE 151A

Design of Reinforced Concrete

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

University of California, San Diego

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 1. Elevation View of Proposed Roadway Crossing

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 2. Slab geometry (unit in inches)

Figure 3. Slab cross section(inch)

Figure 4. Simplified Model(in)

Centroid of Slab (in)

Moment of Inertia of Slab, Izz (in4)

Elastic Section Modulus of Slab (in3)

Figure 6. Simplified Model of Girder ( inches)

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 7. Double T Girder cross section

Centroid of Girder (in)

Moment of Inertia of Girder, Izz (in4)

Elastic Section Modulus (Top) (in3)

Elastic Section Modulus (Bot) (in3)

2.c Columns & Pile

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 9. Column cross section

Figure 10. Pile cross section

Area of Column (in2)

Moment of Inertia of Column, Izz(in4)

Table 4. Section properties of pile

Moment of Inertia of pile, Izz(in4)

Sec. 3. Design loads

Figure 12. Distributed load of concrete self-weight

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

ii. Superimposed Dead load

Figure 13. superimposed dead load of asphalt

Figure 14. superimposed dead load of handrails

iii. Live load

Figure 15. Self-weight dead load of concrete Girder

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 16. Uniform distributed Asphalt dead load

Figure 17. Uniform distributed Handrail dead load

Section 4. Structural Analysis

Figure 18. Model of Simplified Slab/Deck used for SAP analysis

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Case 1: Concrete Self Weight Only

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 20. Bending Moment Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip-in)

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 21. Shear Force Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip)

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 23. Model of Simplified Model of Girder

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 25. Bending Moment Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip-ft)

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

iv. Shear Force Diagrams of Load Combinations

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Figure 26. Shear Diagrams of Each Load Combination (kip)

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge

Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian Bridge