Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Nanoporous Ag films on copper alloy substrates were fabricated by the galvanic replacement reaction from
the choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) containing AgCl. It was found that the morphologies
of the films were largely dependent on AgCl concentrations and plating temperatures. Interestingly, selfassembled nanoporous network of Ag films with ligament and channel width in the range of 20-80 nm was
formed on the copper alloy substrate from 0.01 M AgCl DES solution either at room temperature or at 50 C.
The as-deposited porous Ag films exhibited hydrophilic properties. On the contrary, after surface modification
by a monolayer of n-dodecanethiol, the contact angle of porous Ag film increased largely with plating times,
and a superhydrophobic surface was finally obtained with a contact angle of 160 ( 1. Wenzel and
Cassie-Baxter models were used to qualitatively illustrate the importance of the surface roughness of the Ag
films to the wetting property.
1. Introduction
Intensive research efforts are currently focused on the
fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces because of their
significance in both fundamental research and practical applications, including water-repellent coatings, self-cleaning surfaces,
and low-drag microfluidics.1-5 Superhydrophobic surfaces,
inspired by some plants leaves and insects shells, share two
common features: they are made of (or covered by) hydrophobic
materials, and the surfaces are not flat at the micro/nanometer
scales but have micro/nanobinary structures.1-5 Galvanic cell
reaction has been used extensively for producing micro/
nanobinary structures with hydrophobic and superhydrophobic
surfaces because of its facile operation and low cost.2,6,7 Copper
and copper alloys are important engineering metallic materials,
which have been attracting intensive interest to be used as
superhydrophobic substrates.7-18 Micro/nanobinary structure of
silver films on copper and copper alloys was fabricated by
galvanic exchange reactions from the aqueous AgNO3 solution.6
However, the micro/nanobinary structured silver films usually
exhibit hydrophilic property with contact angles less than 50.6
With the further surface modification process by coating low
surface energy materials, such as stearic acid7 and n-dodecanethiol,2,6 the Ag surface was turned from hydrophilicity to
hydrophobicity.
Room-temperature ionic liquids are superior media for the
electrodeposition of metals and semiconductors and have an
unprecedented potential to revolutionize electroplating because
of their wide electrochemical windows, extremely low vapor
pressures, and numerous, only partly understood, cation/anion
effects.19 Abbott et al. first described the applications of a
relatively new class of ionic liquid on the basis of eutectic
mixtures of choline chloride (ChCl) with a hydrogen bond donor
species, which is named as deep eutectic solvents (DESs).20
Moreover, unlike the conventional ionic liquids, DESs can be
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
changdong_gu@hotmail.com. Phone: +86 571 87952573. Fax: +86 571
87952856.
easily prepared at low cost and with high purity. DESs are
promising solvents used for the deposition of a range of metal
coatings including Zn,21 Cr,22 and Cu23 at high current efficiency
and also for metal dissolution processes such as electropolishing.24,25 Recently, Abbott et al. demonstrated that porous
metallic silver films can be obtained by electroless deposition
from the ChCl-based ionic liquid.26,27 However, the question
of whether the porous Ag films from ionic liquids are hydrophobic or hydrophilic has not been explored. In our opinion,
the pores and channels in the silver deposit make the silver
surface rough with nanostructures, which could confer a
potential hydrophobic property to the surface.
In this study, porous Ag films on copper alloy substrates with
different surface morphologies were fabricated by the galvanic
replacement reaction from the DES solution containing ChCl
and ethylene glycol (EG) eutectic mixtures. Surface topography
and crystal structure of these films were characterized by
scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffractometer
(XRD), respectively. The wettability of these surfaces was
extensively investigated through measuring the contact angle
(CA) of water.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Fabrication of Porous Ag Films on Cu Alloys. ChCl
(AR, Aladdin) and ethylene glycol (EG) (AR, Aladdin) were
used as received. The DES was prepared according to ref 28,
which was formed by stirring the two components in a mole
ratio of 1ChCl:2EG at 75 C until a homogeneous colorless
liquid was formed. The used substrate was a commercially
available and industry widely used copper alloy foil (cold-rolled
alloy C194). Alloy C194 has a nominal composition of 2.4%
iron, 0.03% phosphorus, and 0.1% zinc with the balance of
copper. A surface cleaning treatment of the copper alloy
substrate was conducted to remove the industrial oil from the
surface by electrolytic degreasing and deionized water rinsing.
Before the plating process, the substrate was dried with flowing
air. Porous Ag films on the Cu alloys were obtained by facilely
immersing the cleaned copper alloy foils into 0.01 or 0.1 M
Figure 1. Surface morphologies of as-deposited Ag films on Cu alloys from 0.01 M AgCl DES solution at RT, where the insets are the corresponding
high resolution images. The deposition time is (a) 1, (b) 5, and (c) 10 min. (d) The EDS mapping analysis corresponding to c. The peaks of Cu and
Fe in Figure 1d are from the Cu alloy substrate.
13616
Gu et al.
Figure 2. Surface morphologies of as-deposited Ag films on Cu alloys from 0.01 M AgCl DES solution at 50 C. The deposition time is (a) 1,
(b) 5, and (c) 30 min. (d) Typical cross section SEM image of as-deposited porous Ag films. The sample shown here is obtained from 0.01 M AgCl
DES solution at 50 C for about 30 min.
Figure 4. Surface morphologies of as-deposited Ag films on Cu alloys from 0.1 M AgCl DES solution at RT. The deposition time is (a) 20 s, (b)
1 min, and (c) 5 min.
13618
Gu et al.
interface.38,39 It is therefore expected that the distinct surface
wetting for Ag films with nanosized grains observed above can
be described using the well-known Youngs equation, cos )
(SG - SL)/LG, by considering the size dependences of SG
and SL.37 In this equation, represents the surface tensions
involved in the system, is the contact angle, S is the solid, L
is the liquid, and G is the gaseous phase. However, it is not
feasible since this equation is only applicable to a liquid droplet
on a flat surface,5 while the surface is rough in our case. Instead,
the water CA on rough surfaces should be explained with the
roughness in light of the other two models, namely, Wenzel40
and Cassie-Baxter41 models. In the Wenzel model, the CA is
given by
cos w ) r cos
(1)
conditions studied in this paper exhibit very distinctive wettability as shown in Table 1. Significantly, after the surface
modification process, the sample obtained from 0.1 M AgCl
DES solution at RT for about 5 min exhibits a superhydrophobic
surface with a CA of 160 ( 1 as shown in Figure 6 and Table
1. The CA hysteresis () is defined as the difference between
advancing (a) and receding angles (r), which is about 30 for
this case, as shown in Figure 6b.
For nanoscaled materials, the surface or interface energy is
found to decrease as the size declines,37 which can be explained
by the atomic coordination imperfection at the surface or
TABLE 1: Comparison of CA Values of the Ag Film Surfaces before and after the Surface Modification with n-Dodecanethiola
The Ag films were obtained from 0.01 M AgCl DES solution at RT and at 50 and from 0.1 M AgCl DES solution at RT. All samples
were obtained for the deposition time of 5 min. The corresponding r and f values are calculated from eqs 1 and 2, respectively.
(1) Sun, T.; Feng, L.; Gao, X.; Jiang, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38,
644652.
(2) Shi, F.; Song, Y. Y.; Niu, H.; Xia, X. H.; Wang, Z. Q.; Zhang, X.
Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 13651368.
(3) Lifton, V. A.; Taylor, J. A.; Vyas, B.; Kolodner, P.; Cirelli, R.;
Basavanhally, N.; Papazian, A.; Frahm, R.; Simon, S.; Krupenkin, T. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 043112.
(4) Gu, C. D.; Zhang, T. Y. Langmuir 2008, 24, 1201012016.
(5) Feng, X. J.; Jiang, L. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 30633078.
(6) Gu, C. D.; Ren, H.; Tu, J. P.; Zhang, T. Y. Langmuir 2009, 25,
1229912307.
(7) Safaee, A.; Sarkar, D. K.; Farzaneh, M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254,
24932498.
(8) Qu, L.; Dai, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1398513990.
(9) Xu, W.; Liu, H.; Lu, S.; Xi, J.; Wang, Y. Langmuir 2008, 24,
1089510900.
(10) Chen, X.; Kong, L.; Dong, D.; Yang, G.; Yu, L.; Chen, J.; Zhang,
P. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 40154019.
(11) Guo, Z. G.; Liu, W. M.; Su, B. L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92,
063104.
(12) Wang, S. T.; Feng, L.; Liu, H.; Sun, T. L.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, L.;
Zhu, D. B. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 14751478.
(13) Wang, S. T.; Feng, L.; Jiang, L. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 767770.
(14) Song, W.; Zhang, J. J.; Xie, Y. F.; Cong, Q.; Zhao, B. J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 2009, 329, 208211.
(15) Qu, M. N.; Zhang, B. W.; Song, S. Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J. Y.;
Cao, X. P. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 593596.
(16) Cao, Z. W.; Xiao, D. B.; Kang, L. T.; Wang, Z. L.; Zhang, S. X.;
Ma, Y.; Fu, H. B.; Yao, J. N. Chem. Commun. 2008, 26922694.
(17) Guo, Z. G.; Fang, J.; Hao, J. C.; Liang, Y. M.; Liu, W. M.
ChemPhysChem 2006, 7, 16741677.
(18) Zhao, Y. S.; Yang, W.; Zhang, G.; Ma, Y.; Yao, J. Colloids Surf.,
A 2006, 277, 111118.
(19) Armand, M.; Endres, F.; MacFarlane, D. R.; Ohno, H.; Scrosati,
B. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 621629.
(20) Abbott, A. P.; Boothby, D.; Capper, G.; Davies, D. L.; Rasheed,
R. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 91429147.
(21) Abbott, A. P.; Barron, J. C.; Ryder, K. S. Trans. Inst. Met. Finish.
2009, 87, 201207.
(22) Abbott, A. P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D. L.; Rasheed, R. K.; Archer,
J.; John, C. Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 2004, 82, 1417.
(23) Abbott, A. P.; El Ttaib, K.; Frisch, G.; McKenzie, K. J.; Ryder,
K. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 42694277.
(24) Abbott, A. P.; Capper, G.; McKenzie, K. J.; Glidle, A.; Ryder, K. S.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 42144221.
(25) Abbott, A. P.; Ryder, K. S.; Konig, U. Trans. Inst. Met. Finish.
2008, 86, 196204.
(26) Abbott, A. P.; Griffith, J.; Nandhra, S.; OConnor, C.; Postlethwaite,
S.; Ryder, K. S.; Smith, E. L. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 20332039.
(27) Abbott, A. P.; Nandhra, S.; Postlethwaite, S.; Smith, E. L.; Ryder,
K. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 37353743.
(28) Abbott, A. P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D. L.; Rasheed, R. K.; Shikotra,
P. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 64976499.
(29) Ding, Y.; Erlebacher, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 77727773.
(30) Ding, Y.; Chen, M. W. MRS Bull. 2009, 34, 569576.
(31) Lang, X. Y.; Guan, P. F.; Zhang, L.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M. W. J.
Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 1095610961.
(32) Lang, X. Y.; Guan, P. F.; Zhang, L.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M. W. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 073701.
(33) Lang, X. Y.; Chen, L. Y.; Guan, P. F.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M. W.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 213109.
(34) Marks, L. D. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1994, 57, 603649.
(35) Wiley, B.; Sun, Y. G.; Mayers, B.; Xia, Y. N. Chem.sEur. J. 2005,
11, 454463.
(36) Penn, R. L.; Banfield, J. F. Science 1998, 281, 969971.
(37) Jiang, Q.; Lu, H. M. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 427464.
(38) Zhu, Y. F.; Zheng, W. T.; Jiang, Q. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95,
083110.
(39) Zhu, Y. F.; Lian, J. S.; Jiang, Q. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113,
1689616900.
(40) Wenzel, R. N. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 988994.
(41) Cassie, A. B. D.; Baxter, S. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944, 40, 05460550.
(42) Wang, R.; Hashimoto, K.; Fujishima, A.; Chikuni, M.; Kojima,
E.; Kitamura, A.; Shimohigoshi, M.; Watanabe, T. Nature 1997, 388,
431432.
JP105182Y