Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
M O R P H O L O G I CH
AL
A N G EI N
ST H E
DENTURE
BEARINGAREAFOLLOWING
THEEXTRACTION
OF MAXILLARYTEETH
h i t . d ? n t .J . , 1 9 7 4 , 1 1 6 . 2 2 5 .
Alveolar Process;Atrophy; Denture, complete.immediate:
Denture,complete,upperj Denture, partial, immediate:
D e n t u r e ,p a r t i a l .r c m o r a b l e ; M o u t h M u c o \ a : P a l a t e :
Too!h Extraction.
. . r ) . s .r.r . D . D .L, . D . s .
D A V I D M . W A T T I , p r r . D .F
P E T E R R . L I K E M A N I , s . o . s . .r . o . s .
;-..,*",,u"
M A R C Hl 9 1 9 7 4
22s
--r4a
s
1,
*ilt
I
I
,:
227
cast was set up with the occlusal plane horizorLlll. The posterior pointer of the jig was
positioned on the M point, the anterior-p-ointer
on the R point and fhe cast securedto'the jig
by an elastic band passing undbrneath it. Two
lateral pointers, placed 5 irm either side of the
mid-line, contacied the surface of the palate
within the stable area to maintain the position
of the cast. From this position, the iast was
Iowered into a mix of impression plaster on the
Perspex base. The level of each cast was
identical as it was determined by a stop on the
mounting jig. Each Perspex base was oiientated
in an identical manner by a set-squareclamped
to the table of the instrument. The side of ihe
base.was set parallel to the median plane. Each
of the casts in a series was positioned on the
jig in turn and secured to d separate perspex
base.
The Tracing Instrament (Figure 3)
The base of the instrument for making the
tracings was an engineer's surface tablE. A
vertical steel plate, the paper holder, was bolted
to the back of the table. The traces were made
upon papers which were fastened to this holder
by button magnets. The main part of the instrument comprised a double jointed, counterpoised surveying arm clamped to the right side
of the table. This arm mov-edin a plane*parallel
to the-surface of the paper holder. At fhe free
end of_the surveying drm, a cranked rod passed
through two bearings and rotated about a
horizontal axis which remained pemendicular
lo the surface of the tracing paper no matter
what the _position of the suiveying arm. A
stylus with a rounded steel point oT 0.75 mm
Jiameter was fixed to the iront end of the
;ranked rod in such a manner that the point lay
228
JOURNAL
_
Ftc'
4'-Measurement of
,the traces: a, sagittal ptane; Q, coronal plane anterior to the stable area of the palate;
c, coronat ptane crossine thestabte are:a;t ih; i;dt.: iti:i;;iiffii,iiiii'iilr*"rnents:
RH ridge height; BLB
bucco-linguat breadth: IpB,}]ll1t-""r
b;fiih:-ilrj
;;6t3f ;,6td:-Foiij"ii'.""tion
measurements:B (u, m, l)
09cqal:-upper, middle a-nd
mquurements; ihe mein
.lower
ot the lingual gingival margin;
p palitat ttringi, iruniu.tr. oi irtiiE rc'.t o"*o-as buccat change;-LV verticat change
or sagittal in the plane of the tracing; MV median vertical.
MARCH19 1974
229
Errors
Calibration exoeriments were conducted to
investigatethe 6rrors from variationsin mounting the castsand superimposingthe traces. The
mean error of the former variedbetw'cen0'2 mm
and 0'5 mm, depending on the position of
measurenent. The mean errors of superimposition varied bet*.een0'1 and 0'3 mm.
The post-extraction intervals at tvhich the
traces were made varied from patient to patient
and, in order to comparethem, it was neccssary
to construct graphs of post-extractionchange
plotted against time. Graphs of buccal change,
lingual vertical, and palatal change, rvere made
for every region of the mouth traced in each
I'Aal E I.
nrm
Nledian
plane
(n -- 18)
Ir
(n
t
.37)
-I
nlnr
nlnt
m4l
illnl
n|Dl
nltlr
ntil
nt|il
1.60
1.85
2.20
2 40
2.80
1.05
3 20
3.35
3 50
360
0 80
0.95
l.l5
1 30
1.60
I 85
'1.' 70
l.9i
2.05
2 20
2.30
8.20
8 65
9 00
935
2 75
2 85
3.00
325
2.90
3 00
190
2.90
350
3.90
505
580
680
0.60
0 95
1.25
1 55
1.95
2.20
2.50
Il0
142
160
1.70
2 28
2 48
2.65
2.78
6.05
1.92
' 1.35
2 00
5.40
8 05
9'00
9 85
l0 30
l0 75
Dlln
77
(n-.9
t = .1 . 1 )
nlnt
2 60
3.00
52
230
10.1
130
ltxtl
nlll1
ililt
tnill
tltIl
3 55
3.85
4.25
4.65
4 U0
5.10
5.30
5.6-s
3.10
3 25
1.50
3.70
1.85
3.90
3 9_5
0 90
0.95
I 15
1.30
r.35
1.45
1.50
1.55
230
Lingual
vertical
Median
vettrcal
Buccal
1.40
2.20
025
050
0 60
0 75
0 50
0.85
I.20
I.45
I 90
2 20
2.65
2 85
2.90
1 10
3.20
3 35
260
2.95
315
3.25
3.10
3.50
3 60
11 . 9 0
Lingual
vertical
Transverse
palatal
Buccal
2.55
080
135
I70
200
235
305
435
5.30
6.20
7 60
8 85
10.45
I1 05
il 35
12.25
r 2 50
I 65
2.15
2.45
2.85
3'00
315
.330
3.40
3 55
2.35
2.70
't.25
2 9s
3.40
3.55
3 65
3.75
3.85
8.05
9 45
10.10
1t 1l
0'60
1 00
1 35
2.t0
Lingual
l'20
1 65
vertical
2'75
4 45
5.55
Transverse
palatal
n:number of patients in sample.
t : n u m b e ro f t e e t h i n s a m p l e .
6 35
Tine in wcekssinceexlra.lion
8
1
2
1
6
2
mD1
52
78
10,1
130
3 20
3.45
3.75
3 95
4.10
4.20
29O
'77O
3l0
320
340
345
805
840
925
945
'130
445
470
'1.90
5.00
lnnl
2 30
2 60
2.80
085
1'45
190
210
230
245
27o
3.05
,140
495
535
585
625
710
100
180
215
295
3,15
365
405
Lingual
vert lcal
Transverse
p a l a t aI
buccal
mm
buccal
120
165
200
225
250
265
280
29O
295
315
330
340
390
4','O
5.25
570
645
705
795
860
890
915
935
1025
170
2'35
260
280
295
310
340
355
365
380
400
410
2.00
22O
230
250
255
260
2'7O
280
285
685
760
805
905
975
1060
185
Linsual
145
165
vertical
600
Transverse 395
505
palatal
n:number of patients in sampl
t : n u m b e r o f t e e t hi n s a m p l e ,
n
X
THE l\{oLARs
llolt
illnl
ttnl
3 95
ll 90
39
2.t0
1.10
11..15 11.70
(_
t.15
Buccal
Lingual
vert ical
Transverse
2.' 15
palJ l f,l
E 8
(n-.8
r- 12)
78
l/lnl
ttm
Frc'.5.sagittal
rlonths
I I l0
150
nlm
8
ll)
nttt
2.65
Buccal
2
(n:
r
ll0
1 25
TABLE III.-AVERAGE
6 6
10.1
nlnr
0 65
nlnl
(n-.9
t:16)
tnnt
0 35
(n: l5
16)
t
1ll
78
0 80
TABLF Il.
4l{
52
Lingual
vertrcal
Sagittal
palatal
Buccal
Sagittal
3.30
4 70
palataI
n : number of patients in sample.
t nunber ol tecth in sample,
(n-15
r- 28)
39
Buccal
Linsual
vertical
Observationsand Discussion
( I ) Rate of Change
For every tooth extracted the amount of change
of contour was plotted against time and 3il
graphs were constructed to enable post-extraction changesto be studied. In every case,a
'.+
ll20
ll4
1l'65
FrLi. t
canine
and 3(
faplc
tion,
decrt
extra
averi
b,u"el
asp
yean
\11
--
rapid change was observed shortly after extraction, and there was a general trend towards a
decrease in the rate of change as the Dostextraction time increased. An a-ssessment
of the
averagerate of change in the sampleswas made
by expressingthe averagechangesin each region
as perc^entagesof the average changes at 2$
years after extraction.
MARCFI19 1974
231
.l-v
.rv
,T-v
Frc. 8.-The part of the palate which remained stable
over the 212-yearperiod of the study is indicated by the
stippled area on the diagram.
1 week
6 wks
10 wks
/T-'\j
18 wks
rl\J
20 wks
/r-v
/r-v
28 wl(s
F r c . 1 0 . -'I
patient.
to the Pl
socketing.
/T\J
/I-YJ
232
off at tl
catedin
portion
the con
gum fitt
with un
bone. I
ing denl
L"+-r
A s a m p l e o f l 2 i m n r e d i a t ed e n t u r e p a t i e n t s
was comptred with a sampleof l0 patientswith
dentures fitted after heaiing. The amount of
buccaland vcrtical cha.ngcin the central incisor
legion is illustrated in the graphs in figure 12.
4 wks
The stippledareas.representlhe
rangeoichange
observedin the whole sample. ThJcontinuous
lines represent the change in patients with
immediate dentures and ihe intcrrupted lines
8 wks
t h e c h a n g e si n p a t i e n t sw i t h d e n t u r e sf i t t e da f t e r
h c a l i n g . l t c a n b e s e e nt h a t s l i g h t l yl e s sc h a n g e
t o o k p l a c e i n t h e p a t i e n t sw i t h i m m e d i a t ed e i _
tures, but statistical tests indicated that the
differencewas not significant. It can be seen
12 wks
that the difference between the immediate
denture patients and the ordinary denture
patients diminished with time, so that. at 2l
years, the differencewas completelynegligible.
27 wks
(6) Changes in Incisive Papilta and Ruge
A changein the position of the incisivepanilla
'*as
relative to the stable area of the palate
44 wks
o b s e r v e di n e v e r yc a s ef o l l o w i n g t h e e x t r a c t i o n
o f t h e m a x i l l a r yc e n t r a li n c i s o r s - a n d
c h a n g c si n
the shape of the prpilla were also fouid to
accompanythc loss of theseteeth.
142 wks
. On average.the papilla moved forward about
1 . 6m m ( r a n g e 0 . 6 t o 2 . 7 m m ) a n d u D w a r d s
about 2.3 mm (range 1.3 to 4.0 mm). This
Frc..10.-Seriesof tracingsthroughthe {l regionof one movemetrt of the papilla has an
important
pauenr. I ne smooth contour of the ridge
is attributed lmpttcatlon. As rcsorption proceeds,the rela_
-incisive
to .the provision of an immediate dinture *iitrour
tions.hipbetween the
ptpilla and the
socketing.
incisive fossa changes. Thc foisa tends to
occupy a.more posterior position as the bone
resorbswhilethe papilla movesforwards. Thus,
t h e l o s s at e n d st o l i e p o s t e r i o rt o t h e p r p i l l a i n
the edentulousmouth.
T h e i n c i s i v ep r p i l l a p r o v i d e sa r o u s h g u i d e
t o t h e p o s i r i o no f t h e n r a x i l l a r yc a n i n c i . I i i t h e
de.ntulous-mouth, a coronai plane through the
middle of the papilla generally passesth"rough
the canrne crowns but after the teeth are lost
the caninesshould be locatedin a coronal plane
passing through the posterior border oi the
papilla. The so-called canine eminence in the
Frc. Il.-Diagram illustratingmethod of removal of
edentulous mouth often lies distal to the true
plasterteeth lrom the cast prior to immediatedenture
canine position. particularly where there has
mnstructio.n..The cast is trimmed as indicated by the been
much resorption. It is formed by the
rnterruptedlines.
buttress of bone between the larger canine
socket anteriorly and the sma-llerfirs-l oremolar
off at the level of the gingival papille as indi_
socketposteriorly.
cated in the.diagram (fig. I | ) anii fhe remaining
. Changes in the position and shape of the
portion of the tooth should be carved to follow
rugre followed the extraction of anteiior teeth.
the contour of the ridge. Cutting sockets and
The g.reatest
changetook placc in the first pair
gum fitting the teeth usually resu-lts in a
ridge
ol 'pnmary rugie'(Lysell1
. 9 5 5 )w
, h i c ha p p e a r e d
witlr. uneven thickness of mucosa overlying t[e
to be carried forward and upwards *iitr tt e
bone. This provides poor support for iuiEeea_ papilla
by the hinge like .movement of the
rng dentures.
mucosa concomitant with the underlying bony
M A R C H1 9 1 9 7 4
2 weeks
t.+r
L-+J
W
W
r.:.?-r:
MARGIN
RANGE & AVERAGEVERTICAL POST'EXTMCTION CHANGES AT LINGUAL G!'IG[VAIN SAGTTTAL TRACES THROUGH !IL.
(r) mrrevrs
HEALING
wrIH |MMED|ATE DENTURES n=12 (e) PATTENTSWTH DENTURES FITTED AFTER
TIME IN WEEKS SINCE EXTRACTION OF
3
III
E - l
(rz
I-.
E
A
U
tAw
o
z
U
Frc. 12.-Comparison of lingual vertical and buccal changein sagittal planes through central
incisorsin natients with immediatedenturesand denturesfitted after healing of sockets. The
stippled areas represent the range of change observed
change. A similar forward and upwards movement of the secondpair of ruge also occurred,
but later than in the case of the first pair. The
change, hou'ever, was usually evideirt by the
26th post-extraction week. In some cases the
lateral ends of the third and fourth pairs of
ruge wore observed to move upwards an.d
laterally, especially when the ruga were long.
These movements of the rugr are significant,
as changes in their position under dentures
leads to pressure upon them. This causes
flattening of the rugre and occasionallypatients
experiencediscomfort in the ruge area. The
first and second pairs of ruge are chiefly
aft-ected.
In cases of extreme resorption, the residual
alveolar ridge disappears entirely and the soft
flabby ridge which is left does not comprise any
alveolar tissue but is composed entirely of the
soft tissue of the palate. The ruge may be seen
forming transverse ridges across the anterior
part of this so-called 'soft residual alveolar
r i d g e ' ( f i g .1 3 ) .
(7) Tattoo Spot Study
In 8 patients of the sample, a tattoo spot was
placed near the gingival margin on the buccal
and lingual side of each tooth before extraction.
A total of 110 spots were tattooed. The movements of the tattoo soots indicated that the
234
Frc. i4
to4iy
cast tn(
and th
indicatr
require
;t is r
ever b
iras ta
e\trac
therefi
and re
positir
ij
.ii
:
;
J
ACKN(
\Ye ar
TABLE IV.-ANALysrs
oF MEAsuREMENTs oF HoRIzoNTAL
,,,,,,,,;,;
BREADI
o:;;' :ii:li;:[::il'i3'lH:
central incisorsagittal
oR
!fi:i?::,T,:?'"..."",
.i::#jT#iJlf
:nf,X'""
g+ruj{145 coronalsectioni
rrrst morarcoron"t
ii::t*T,?'i:j:j:tit
'Molai
iegton'combined
EZIZScoronal sections
FR.MrHELtxcuarcrNG,vAL
MARGTNS
?'l If" S.I^Y,'3.?],'J":,::$':
ro
data
ip
;3
119
j!
45
rc6
Min
*,\
Max
n:m_
x
mm
SO
mm
;! lii
f i ?Bl
;:i l3:i i3B lli
'i 3
.q !
13 6
10.3
1.27
lt.O
1.37
74
i19 I?2
??i
ic o
lo.t
1.33
7.g
14.3
,li:i,,,.rt:i"::rff
,;f
Ff,:fi
i..nr,,jl:o*.ien"i'rii,i.!',',iti?,uv..
Taffgren, A..^(_1966\
Acta odont. scand.,24. 195.
\rto t ) Actq odont. scand.,24, 563.
t !e^99^t
4fra odont. scand., 27, 5i9.
\ t 9 t z t J . p r o s r h .D e n t . , 2 1 , 1 2 0 .
WlIl;^?:,Y.-q?gO) Morphologicatchangesin
the denture bearins area
ormaxillarv ieeth. Ptr.D. itrerii-trni"?i.tty
i?'f}'Jf"lli.t-"action
(1970) Anglo-coruin.dent. Soc. Newslerter.23.
l0-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
(r-.L),#:'rdij
\uuuuu\lNuu
MARCHlg 1974
235