Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
JPRS:
3699
12 August I960
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
Approved for Public Release
Distribution Unlimited
tiiSs Is V/J fc L; LI
tf lie
:, v h K,.K
Reproduced From
Best Available Copy
19991006 071
U. S. JOINT PUBLICATIONS RESEARCH SERVICE
205 EAST U2nd STREET, SUITE 300
NEW YORK 1?, N. T.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
F 0 % B IT $ % B:
This publication wae frtgtftt&'titader contract
by the UNITED STABS JfOlHT FflBUCATIONS RESEARCH SERVICE,
.-<
3699
UOOO-D/12
- INTRODUCTION
This is a serial publication containing selected translations
on all categories of. economic subjects and geography. This report
contains translations on the subjects listed in the table of contents below.
Table of Contents
Page
10
28
78
IOU
111
126
135
llj.6
l4ll9-D
N
P20
K20
7-1%
ii * \6%
17.3 - 2%
Copyright by:
Lite Ttture, I960.
1;036-D
% of Mined
Coal Used to
Produce Coke
Year
Coal
Mined
Total
Coke
Produced
1937
100
100
30
1*6
1938
92
75
38
38
1939
113
78
36
32
191*0
129
112
1*1
1*1
19hl
131*
111
27
39
191*2
ll*l*
117
28
38
191*3
158
128
26
38
150
135
29
1*2
66
58
26
19hh
191*5
.
.
1*1
(continued)
5 -
Coal
Mined
Total
Coke
Produced
Of this,
in Metallurgical
Plants
% of Mined
Coal Used to
Produce Coke
191*6
87
68
31*
37
19h?
99
102
36
1*8
191*8
109
135
33
58
192*9
101*
11*7
32
66
1950
113
151
32
63
1951
112
150
35
63
1952
126
170
36
63
1953
125
180
1*2
67
1951*
iia
188
1*2
62
1955
11*6
196
1*7
58
1956
163
206
1)6
63
1957
158
209
50
62
1958
167
205
50
57
1959
178
221
58
I960
186
239
61
60
1965
231
339
67
68
This crude survey shows clearly that during the war mining
rose much more rapidly than did coke production, and the share of
coking coal usually did not exceed 1*0$ of the total mined.
In 191*1*3 when maximum production was achieved, the utilization
of all capacity of all coking plants totaled only 80$. Of course
this was only because five new batteries at ioxxr coking plants were
brought on stream during the year, with a total capacity exceedrnc;
1,000,000 toii of cok3
I960
i;l56~D
Kreis Karlsbad
Live births
Deaths
Immigration
Emigration
Kreis Aussig
Live births
Deaths
Immigration
Emigration
Kreis Reichenberg
Live births
Deaths
Immigration
Emigration
1956
<
-&~r*
>-"-
8,036
2,3tf
35,92*2
15,909
7,687
2,321
13,281
13,883
7,870
2,1|11
10,930
12,009
12,305
5,830
12,21
5,71*3
lit, 362
13,731
ll,7iu
6,182
13,063
12,018
8,319
7,828
it, 820
9,737
9,318
Uk,Bh$
16,317
8,723
U,769
11,797
12,152
h,l59
10,236
11,597
1959,
~ 13 -
'
- 18 -
Conclusion
Czechoslovak production of machine tools offers engineering
customers at home and abroad a wide assortment of progressive
production machines. Through the application of domestic and
international division of labor and specialization of production,
together with the standardization of designs, the number of types
of machine tools produced, many of which have thus far had to be
imported, from capitalist countries, will be further increased.
Even though Czechoslovak production does not include all types of
machines, together with that cf the USSR and the GDR (German
Democratic Republic) and the other People's Democracies, it presents
a sufficient selection to satisfy even the most exacting production
The planned and concentrated direction of the production of
thin entire industry, the effective arrangement of production
programs between friendly nations, the coordination of research
with development and production, the establishment of contacts
and exchange of experiences with the most important foreign research institutes and, last but not least, the stabilization of
sales through long-term plans for the development of the economies
of the countries of the socialist camp, headed by the USSR, assure
Czechoslovak machine tool production a firm and common line of
future development aimed at the principle goal catching up with,
and surpassing, the world technical level in this industry.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure U.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 22.
Figure 23.
Figure 2k.
Figure 2$.
Figure 26.
Figure 27.
Figure 28.
Figure 29.
Figure 30.
Figt-re 31.
Figure 32,
Figure 33.
Automatic production line for the machining of railroad car bearing boxes.
Copyright by:
I960.
369U-D
Pages 1-28
Karel Cizek
Introduction
The effective effectiveness of growing individual varieties
of forage crops is computed and examined in this study primarily
on the basis of the results which the Research Institute of Agricultural Economics of the Czechoslovak Academy of Agricultural
Sciences obtained for the years 1957 and 1958. In 195?, 10 state
farms (which included all four production areas) were inspected
and their forage crops studied. Besides the forage crops grown
in state farms not represented among the selected state farms
were also examined, particularly if they were of special importance.
The 1958 data, which were used to provide additional material and
make the results more accurate, concern chiefly forage plants and
were collected in 15 different state farms.
Since the purpose of this study is to make general conclusions on the basis of the fundamental criteria of the economic
evaluation of fodder valid for wide categories of practical cases,,
and this study concerns all types of the basic forage crops, the
representativeness of the ascertained results was verified, while
processing the material and evaluating it, by comparing the basic
established indices with the state-wide figures (covering several
years), insofar as the latter were available from the agencies
which had prepared them. This study, then, should provide assiste.no
in this matter.
66
0.6
69.0
176
78.8
18.
Oats:
grain
straw
7.0
0.8
60.0
17.0
70.S
18.2
Corns
grain
straw
7.0
1.0
80.0
18.0
906
196
13.0
1,6
70.0
13.3
896
tf.7
13.0
1.8
70.0
18.0
20.7
896
Indexes
thereof!
in corn
and beet
growing
areas
Oats
Corn
Legume
(mixtures)
22.61
26.11
30.1*8
35.66
17.81
21.31
28.02
63,51*
12.28
18.28
163
2017
220
2727
11*2
11*31
260
3386
2ll*
1185
2262
3058
1614*
3775
1506
II.
Barley-
all
enterprises
Indexes
enterprises
of corn Legume
Oats Corn (mixtures)
beet <growing
areas
9k7
77
68
755
61
lh9h
1180
121
108
$h
9$
85
862 109k
86
8k
7U
75
573
1358
1659
135
117
127
ilk
838
151
119
10k
81
Indexes
Barley
Oats
119.3
13.7
23.5
362
It06
9^>6
13.1
19.9
Legumes Average
1-3
It
86.5
11.5
16.1
100.it
12.8
19.8
Com
-/
7
llh/o
21,1
3U.1
lit98
1721
1370
171A
3519
1786
90*4
1008
31*6
397
309
392
339
398
209
233
Index
(Degree I
= 10QO
Sowing
Cultivation
1.H;
2JU-3h
i.]
25.98 '
127.2
65.7
Total
2$.hB
17.1*3
68.u
15.78
Ji.10 .
25.3
Proteins
Sta
??h
units
?crase
^
starch
-units
Potatoes
1,0
18.0
19.5
Fodder beetsi
roots
tops
0.3
1.0
7.5
5.0
8.0
6.$
0.5
1.3
0.3
15.0
15.8
9.3
66
liO.O
Sugar beets:
roots
tops
pulps
molasses
7.3
6.0
IiO.O
Indexes
Yield per hectare:
a) bulbs --roots
b) tops
c) pulp
d) molasses
Fodder
beets
172.12
Production of nutrients
per hectaret
a) proteins
b* starch units
c) increased starch
units
152,87
132.10
Sugar
beets
By-products
of suga-'
beets
337.56
112.58
112.58
198.Uo
1.68
172
3098
268
1*057
315
5883
206
2079
3356
UUB2
6377
2U0li
Fodder beets
(including
tir.-iiips)
Potatoes
^ugfr
1.C0
1.10
1,78
Thereof: Farms
1.00
l.lk
2.21
Potatoes
Fodder
beets
Sugar
beets
5U-.1
7k 1
71.9
55.8
62.3
#.*
83.0
95.0
76.8
9k.$
72.2
77.1
Fodder
Sugar
The average
of
oi
grain crop
Indexes
Potatoes
Number of hours
per aectares
a^ manual
b) tractor
c; animal-team
drawn
1^07.5
19.0
701.U
l$.h
577.0
30.3
100.h
12.8
76.U
99.3
7k.k
19-8
beets
beets
Rat.jo of amount
oy; labor hours
soint (tractor 21.ii:1.0:l|.0 l.5:1*0:6.1). 19.0:1.0 2.5 7.8:1.0:1.5
= 1,0)
The unsatisfactory state of mechanization becomes rather
obvious, especially in the case of certain important work operations such as the planting, cultivation, and plowing of potato
fields; the thinning of field and sugar beets 5 end other operations. This, together with the work operations which have not yet
been mechanized because of still-unsolved technical problems
(thinning, hoeing, combine harvesting), creates a very serious
econc.iiic problem,,
The g??eat amount of manual labor expended has had a decisive
impact on some of the most important economic factors the
profitableness and productivity of labor in growing these forage
crops and has affected the extent to which forage crops are
grown on a state-wide scale.
A comparison of the economic profitableness of growing
potatoes, field beets, and sugar beets from the viewpoint of costs
is given in Table VII.
The results presented here show a difference in regard to
the various crops examined. The production of nutrients in the
form of starch units is by far the least expensive in the case of
sugar beets; next come field beets, the least advantageous being
the potato indexes. We therefore, have the same sequence as in
the production of nutrients per hectare.
- & -
Fodder
beets
Potatoes
152
126
170.8
11*0
170.7
11*1.6
111*
139.0
Sugar
beets
89
lOOoO
82
100.-
231*
155.0
212
151
11*0.1*
100,0
216
192
139
3SS.li
138.1
100.0
Indexes
Potatoes
Fodder
beets
Sugar
beet
.= ?60
82i|
571
631
1020
HOp
171
185"
137
151
203
220
- 18 ~
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Nutrient content in %
Increase;
starch
units
Proteins
Starch
units
1.7
11.9
lU-i
1.9
1.6
1.7
0.6
1.2
11.5
1U.U
io=5
8.0
8.0
8.0
12.9
10.7
10.0
11.1
b)
c)
d)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
11.0
12.1
12.0
13.1
13.0
lli.l
e)
0.7
iU.o
15.1
6.5
7.1
36.0
27.0
15.8
37.7
h.o
33.0
39.0
1.5
12.5
lii.8
8.9
9.8
-50-
' c-(H
'd
CO
Oso tir
CO CM-J
X X
X X
X X
X X
oo
O i-t
tiD<H
; t3
CO
CO
CD
_^CO H
CMsO O
rt CM
<B
I 03
O fc
O >
*-<>
vO-=fcO
O^CM CCM CM
H X
X X
\f\t-i
OlA
H r-i
I <D
T JO tJfl
"O CO 0J
o ofl
fa
<M
CO
CO
CM
levi
X b
LAONH
OS OS-?
-tfCM Q
X X
X X
CM vr\
CM Cf\
-=t r-
'so
tnos os
NOvO
HfTm
CM CM
X X
X X
OvO
tACTs
SO CM
H CM
HsO
NrivO
HCMvO
CM O rn
X X
X x
CO \A
-3-Oin
r-osCM
X X
X X
CO CM
cr\ O
^r^co
Orjfr
X X
X X
H H
CM
CO
0)
|CM
CM
g -p
>3
0)1?
-p X fj
JH
P<
CO
^3
CM
5 e-p
8P
P.
to
H
Is0.
CO T3
S x
u
5J
V\
CO
i-t O
CMOO
(CM
>
35
CM CM
CO
o-=t
S3
5o
rs
"9
CO
5-i
-P
CD
SO
CO
CD .2
T3
CD T3
5H O
Eo
w
CO
u
o
<H
CD
CD
SH
so <n
CO
rS n
PS M
Oln
rH
en o\
o\ c^~
ps X
X X
IN-CO
co m
sOin
X X
X X
PS rS
X X
ON
W)CH
VO
der Clobvers
CD
oo
(V-sO
Grass
m
t
CD
-cj-en
CD
CON
73 0 CO
O O X>
HrH
en ON
CM H
o-sO
Os Os
OsCO
rS PS
n ri
CM -=!
IAH
PS X
X X
X X
X X
Os r
X X
X X
co
CO
-p
H
to
-P
XI
x!
o
fe
u
CD CD
CD TS
o o
fi
o
o
CH
e x
p g
SO so
CD
Hco
H
H rH
-P
CO
i
i
:
|
i
1
55-i -HA
CM OS
SO CM
Os{S-
CD
en os
rH
ft g -p
CO
in
CD
-P X
CD
COsO
CM ITS
CO
-P
H
-p
H
sOln
-p
J3
H
o
CD
r^-~t
S5
O
U
CO
CO -P
X!
en
in
CD
W)
CO
ft
CO
CD
CD
T3
U -P w
CD -H
ft -
P CD
co
co
-P co
CO
CO O CD
O SH 5H
O CO o
-P CO T-l
1-3
CO
CD OO
SH O O
riHri
a
o
XX
O
?H
CO
*
f-i
CO
-p
CD
ft
P
CO
rs
r-3
CD
co x!
-p o
CO 5H
o CO
o +3
CO
CD
H
cfl
-P
o
EH
o
H
-P
ft
O
?!
T5
CD
?H
CD
P
CH
O O
O
rH rH
CD CO O
CO
CO
CO
CO H CO -H O
CD T3
p
CO H
CD
ft to -P
P C0
to H
H
-p
CO Bfl-P g 's
o P CD CO p CD
to
o
to o
x! co O X! CO
O CD
-P CJ CD
U Ur-i h fc
to -P
co -p co
co
o
u
u
CO
5-1
CD
5H-P
OO
-p co
to CO *^~^ oo
o Q CO rH H
o r-i
$h
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
CO
-P -P
CO -H
OO
O O
Xl i-H rH
oo OS
P-\0\
MD <n
mov
mco
H<n
O CCM i-i
HOW
H H
ONV\
fi
"UN.
I to
o fc
NO OCM
OQvO
m-aco
H H
in
H CO
o !>
CM ON
r-t-3H H
ONH
H H
NO
to
AS
OV
tuD
CIO
_ u
gsN pe
CO
CM-d-
mCNCN
C-ONO
H m\A
NQH
en
<N
f-CN-J-
CM H
ON
<n-=ro
lAMD
33
-a-
JCOJ
CM (n3
IAO
1 t! CN
HV\
HH
#5
tVVN
en o\
0\0
NO
MO O
mco
K M
I*! X
CM ON
co en
riW
CO ON
NO CM
HCM
-3-en
NO ON.
co t
H CM
O en
in NO
NO CO
CM en
HO
NO H
\A-"t
CM m
CO
-p
H
CO
i
3
CO
CO
P
O
p
o
CO
c3
P.
CO
p
o
CO
c3
p
p to
0} *d
euco
CO
p.
3CO
1
IT
CO
CO
rl
H 3
rt
P P
CO O
_ co
u
W) rt
O
P
CO H
'*
CM
a s
^^H
co CO t<S
p u >:>
CO
O
0 8,
t-3 P
CO
P4
' H
m
co
V\
H r-i
H CM
CM CM
OO
CM
S
8 9
CO
C-CM
OlA
| co"
I P H CO
U H
O O CO
O O P <H
-"
O
Jg
p-en.
p-vo
i H
NO
n
CO TJ
fc O
CD
3*1 A
in-3;
CANO
ONH
C=f1A
CO CO H
CM co en
H CM
co
60
CO
H
H
CO
CO SO
coco
CM en
en-cJON
H H
CO
H
ON
CO
c-rj O
<n
CO
W>
CO
H
H
CO
oo O
las
&
MD HvO
HOW
HH
ON-3
ON-J
O
n
Mead
ows
i
oo so
ra
CO H
mn
H H
Spring
mixture
El -P3
S
CD '
'
CD
co
SH
mO
c-\ O
CM-^t
0>1A
H H
1ACM
oo
Osc*OsO
CM H
OssO
r-CM
no
HH
Hco
H1J\
CM H
O CM
0\n~\
CO O-
CM ON
CM OS
CM H
rH ON
H
CM-^fr
1ACJ
HH
H P"\
CO p-
H Os
CM O
H H
H i-l
O Os
mm
Os_=t
H-dt>-so
H
sOtPi
co O
cooo
4rcoso
CM Os
Hco
X X
CO
43
CO
43
CO
43
CQ
43
CQ
-P
H
H H
H
X!
o
0
u
0
<H
si
\s\
0
&3
CO
CO
ri
o
0
T3
3 0
S
H
cu
O
r3
co
0
CO
CO 4=
U 4^ CQ
0 -H
1A
Hr-i
H iH
Winter
mixture
iH
H
CO
C*-IA
COsO
Green
fodder
corn
CD
M
CO
CM CJ
CM CN
RH
SO CM
corn
(content
of 11$
starch
cfl
H
H
CO
sO-^J
rlco
H
Winter
and
summer
mixture
CD
OsCO
WS
oo
Clovers
cfl
t^-co
CM CO
0\1A
CO C
CO
CO
+3 ffl
CQ O 0
O J4 SH
O CO O
43 H
4-3 CQ -H
0OO
S-t O O
H H H
O
J3
O
U
cfl
:
Ol
CO 43
43 CO
in H
0
S T3
p 0
M
4= O
CO SH
O CO
O 4=
CO
r-t
Cfl O
43 O
O H
EH
CQ
(5
0
SH
TH
O
O
HsO
c
0
ri
4>
O
P
T3
SH
0
43
tH
CO
CO
43
CO
O
O
r,.
[adjo:'ns page Sh hers]
-3'6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
rf
H
O
h
0
a
X!
O
b
0
CO **
X)
h
CO
CO CQ 43 ft CO 43
43 +3 CQ
43 CQ
CQ H
CQ H
O CT5+5 C-O
O 3 to P 0
CQ
CQ O
43 x) ep O X! CO
O
0 0 0
0 fc SH i-t JH H
CO O CO CO 0
H 4= G 43 43 B
CO T3 CQ T\ O ffl'ri
0
** -^ ~
O O
CO *^-x O O
CO CO O O *-^o 0
ririflrlr)
0
"
Working stage
Crop
in Kcs
in %
53.6
53.7
60.2
380
I486
55.2
359
33.8
0.6
2.0
0.3
0.7
S$S
581i
1*8.8
51.2
315
Mixture hays
hi.5
Silage corn
25.8
3U.0
0.3 52.2 lk
8.1 66.1 1025 1770
3.0 63.0 51i0 108U
28.1
60.9
Fodder cabbage
33.1
3152
72.7
5U7
58.9
70.9
70.8
U5.7
37.8
UU.5
29.8
709
925
677
988
609
697
"in %
lli.it
37.1 2293
85.6 322
15.5
8U.5
h39
Meadows grass
16.8
83.2
U97
619
62U
17. h
82.6
UBk
681*
52.5
53X
59.1
51.7
60.8
57.9
itf. 8
79.6
rH
en
CM
CO
-St
CM
s
o
'
CD
CO
h
o
'
CA1A
-St tA
--st
-StlA
3$
m-=t
X X
O OS
X X
CM
CO
CO
X X
CM
8
en
&
ON NO
rS
VQCO
3
H H
X M
\OlA
ri
m
(B
0)
a .o w>
CO
LA
tA
"O cfl CO
OOP
vo-
g
OS
covo
CM r-r
-st-st
CM
tu
En
1
8
&
CA
H
bJO
_=]--st
CM <n
'A
(D
iC
0\H
OO
-St
1A
.5
&
IACO
ro-st
CM
o
co
b
CM
ON
CO
CM
CM
CM
CO
is
0)
CO,
CO -1
"g-6
*' A
2
P*
Tl W
*&
O
O -P A RJ
4> CO O CD
II
CO
<D
CO
co
P
d
ro o
p 13
co H
CO p
bO-P to
-S.a.
4?
s PH
X X
ra
o
w
ri
_
o o
co C5
H -H
..B-3 A :a
-P
o ra
CO
-p
CO
CO
fc -P,
CO
P* C
r-l
CO
CO
K P
CO
X!
o
CO
to
CO
CO
to
H CM
cntfN
lA^O
CO
0
CtO
co
43 CO
W
T>
^ H ra
_ CO c0
T3
Q) 49 CO
jj
Oh
txo'cfl
-P
H C3
43 O
0
.0
o o S ' xi
O H ^ ^ ^
0 4
fc P ra
CD
43 O "
CO
to
a
co
CA
co
CO
i-l
-3
CO
o\m
ON en
NOMD
H
co
ON
rl\A
CM CM
<*)
H
CM CM
ON
CM
0\O\
mcJN
CM CM
O v\
CM r>-
vO
rri CM
rri
to
>
o
en
co
CO
0\
CO
CM
CM
H
ON
co
rri
rri
O
vO
vO
o-=f
<n-cr
ra
NO
c
O
<M
H
fi
Os
m
CVJ CM
&
<D
bo
CO
CO
o
H
co -=f
CM
CO
c-o
CO
-=f en
CM en
\1\
NO
co
CM
CM
CO NO
co c~en-=f
O H
NO
en
TJ-K
S
en
H
H
H
ON NO
l-i CM
rri
H
CO
CO
IS
^ e
en
H
fc _
en
ofi
" is
QT) O
*H O O
<H
Ov
ON
ON
CO
H
0\
LA
C
CM
CM
1
Ti
^S..C i-S
ririO CO bu
tan rt CO H U -P CO
CO ri 1-1
en fH +3
O-P
ri
iH
O
CO
(O
ri o
^^
O >ri
CO
CA
rH
H
en
co
en
H
CM
(1)
en
H
ri
en m
CM
tr\
ON CM
en
JO
envo
CM
CM CM
-3
en
en NO
mco
XAtn
NO ON
CM NO
ON
rri
-=t-=r
co
bo
co
to
p
CO CO
ri w
O
H ri
ri
rafij
O? M
-y
IS
bo+' ra
XI U
h n -p
CO
a ca -ri
O O -P -P to -P
to
CO H
ri 10
0
-p - T3
SUCO <g
CO TJ
Qi CO
H in
c) rt U
POP
O <M
riE-) H =$
cO
^3 CO
O
.Q
'd
ri
H f-1 P
o
O p ,C
P to o
2
-O
g-CO13
_
T5
to
CO
- 67 -
CO
H ro
43 CO
0
to
CO
T3
0)
to
CO
CO
U
O
ri
CO
O P
f-i d
CO
+3
CO
Ovoron
H os-dO co co
IAONCO
COCO tP\H
ONO. H
OA c-=t
CM CAIA
ON NO CA
i-l H H
lAtANO
rivOC
CA \A CM
Wriri
VA
r !
-T f;
CM
c.
NO
0 H
p
s
CO p
ri
CM
H
ri O <A
r-i-^t ON
CM-=T ON
CM CA-Ct
C^-IANO ^
\AO\ gNCA
COWOO
CO
U +3
ON co
Mno
rtrt ri
ON CA C;
c-.j
CO NO c\
CO ri CO H
CJ
H r-i
t-
P
O
E-iCO
HPn
CO
gg
op
O Pm
H _
ft
ri
-P
o
pi
o
bg-N
CO
+3
in
a;
+3 CO
0)
OKI
-a to
o> -
-a H
CO
CO
CO
CO
oowm
pCO sP
o
u
VACO-Ct
ON CO VN
CM mm
CO
-d-
\AXA-^
OOO/LA
Hri
CO ON XANO
co o CANO
ON-dTri H
\D H r-i
CM CM ri
NO
JOu\
t^-LAiH
CM CAXA
CM-CfLT\NO
NO CM o-
o
o
NO H CA
NO
UX^ ON
NCJrl
ON
ON-dCA
CA-CTLA
in
rAGO -=t
Wriri
r-vo
CA
H
X!
CO
f-l -p
CO -H
IACM-3;
CAONO
Ooo
CACM
CO 1ANO ON c'
C^- CM NC NO (C
_dr r-fMA'
CM ri t-i CO
ririri
C^O
ri ON
O CM
CM ri
ONIAO
CO 1ANO ON
COIArl
n ON
CM O
O <A
H <:v
PH
CO
3
CO
r-i
CO X3 CO
CO P
CO U H
No-dr-o
O P P
Wrli^ri
R co
CD
moo c
^4ci
CMNOC\A
CA-JVO
C-- CJ Ni3 NO
J3
CO CO
Jj +3
st-3
M t-4
(0
p
to
**
CD
SO
MS
E-iM
CO
Eg
Pn
go
CO
co
H $-< p
CO CO o
ri ft CO
s>4
ri
f-riNO XA
H
mco co
ON1ACO
O QOO
04tnH
Wrtnri
H r-i CM CO
NO CO O <M
CM
CM
H CO 1A
CM P-CO CM
CMriWrl
CM CM l>-
NO
ON
r-i cA (A
NO-4 (A
CM CJ -'M ri
CO ON O
CM ri 1C0\NO CM CC
ri r"! :"! <M
ri c; ^o -r
co cco
Nriri
r-i_dfCA
CN
ri ON CN! v^
O CJ O <A
CM ri ri v-vj
C-O r'i
oco_=r
En
H
H
X!
t3
CO
iH
CO -rl
CO +3 CO
to
CO CO
ft CO ^3 CO
CO
to
p
ft
o
o
to O
O, U
** O
to ,_
fi M-P
, . *u O CO O
CO
0
P
co
43
O
U
CO
"O
T3
O
to
p fc
Up H
S
'O
P T3
05
CO
CO
_ top
uo CO CO
CO r-i O +3
U -ri O to
CO *
hmoot-HQfx,rnto,o
O
ptj
Pn
1?
fn
^.
co
bD
P
CO _ co
ti
Ed u
3 P
p 43 ^ p
CQ
^
p
X X bo
&D
CO
ri
H
U co
C5
ri
tuO
C
H
M
ft
13 .CO O
to
<a
f-i
P
p
fj
.
'S
o
1
ri
id
P3 CO TO
.t
n':
O
ro
HO\H
OCJ H
o c-o
oo
-rJOJ <M
VO CN CN
(MHvO
COCJ H
mwH
-3-00 H
O r-O
-SCM CM
-a-vgcn
H
CO
CCJ
CO
en
$3
3 53
vO
CM
CO
co
O
co
CJ H CO
CO os^o
OSCJ Os
H
co
CJ CJvO
ririri
CM
vO
OsQOO
OXACO
O O H
0-=fMD
CO CJ CA
H
vO CJ CO
3
o
CO
1A
CO
NO
CJ
CO
-=t
co
CO
O
co
vO vO co
CJ CO CJ
H H i-l
CK-=t ON
CM CM vO
COCJ H
C^-IAT-O
f-\f\^-
CO
CO
-=t
H co t*~ P
co o-=t o
Q-4Q 2
H H H O
o
o\
H
*
co-3 co
co-d- H
^ _
Ib S,
,Q H
CO
CO
OO
a,
w
o
o
MT
H 54
O O
to
._ u
to Jj
CO
CO
&
CD O
IS
S
's jrj
3 "d
E os o S
hOg CO
CO
rl <H
Xi
CO
SB
0)
<u
u
o>
CD
01 <D
CO -P
OH P S3
-ft
co
So
H H a!
> -O
5 a
H CM CO
rH
CO
P
O
to CD
O U
X 0
p
0
H CD
tnwrio\
CM H-rJH
cA-d-Os
m
vO
JOlA
400\
CM SO CO
ONONCQ
C-CM-3CM CJ CM
CO
e-ooco
CN.
-dCM vO vO
inOlAON
CO C-1A<M
HHriCM
1.
CD
x:
to
P fc
CO CD
O Q*
O
O
CD
1ACVJOO OJ
ririWrt
O. <M cvl
vO H (M
-rflAXA
1A
VO
CM
Oco H O
vO coco
CO CAGO 1A
CO vOIA
H r-i H
H t-i r-t rt
cn CM H vo
[-
tlO
CO
a.
CO
0
0
rs
CQ
a
o
C3
0) p
CQ H
H CO g O O
''
S-0
P CD 3 ~
O ^ _
SOX
Bfi
O
<1) 0
tO P.C
CO
O W
-P
O
E-i
-P
H
CQ
P
CQ
O
vO-J"CO
LTNON-^ ON
XA
TLT\
HHW
vO OJ vO-=f
XfNr-coNO
CNOvHri
O H CVI CM
\r\rt H
-a- Cvivq
ONVO H fA
NO C"-CO CO
ON cvi-3-
o-d-o
a
CO
Q)
CQ
CO
a o
CQ
P
-H
C
0
CO
Os
HOJ
pi
T3
CD
CD
CQ
CO CO
CD
in
\r\0O Ov ON
r-i f3"Lf\
CO O f-H
CVI CVI H CVI
1ACO O
CM -Cfvo
C~-\AO\
CO
rH
cd
H er\ H
r-l PH iH
vO Cvl CO
OvvO lA-^f
\0 0\tnri
co vo ON r
SH,
CD <+H
P O
riririri
NCKHCO
H
cncviv\
i-iHH
CM Cvl H
S 3
O o
O
-. h
H CO
1I r-i
U CQ
CD
ONONO
a,
CD
T3
t
1
CO
o
o
w
CO
O
*H
CD
^5.
O
M
i-i
O
CO
rH /~s
CO
H
10 !H
-p CO ri W>-P CD
CD -P CO JH G vl Tl
CD CD
O-ri fl
0,10 ,o CD 1 0 3 0
CO O 0
,Q 1
-H
CH
0) h O h
O ^ 1
.. CD
S O P CD h CD U0P O P)
c'oroMciJfiiHffl
1-1 CQ fi 3
H ^ P 5H CtDP P " b CO j-i O cd CD
cO CO CO O OOOOplfn-HOP^
O 1-3 OPnfcCO OCQ^COO
umo
[Adjoins page 68 here]
Cti
Pn
CO to
CD CD
fi
^
CO CO CQ 0
CD CD CD O
CH
^
S
JJ5 Ss
4i
*H *ci
g B
CD
b0 fc b0
CO CD
rH -p .H
H P
CQ rift
^0)
^|K
JJ P CD
+3
*H *H *H 'O
1 g e s 0
1
fc b0 SH
ffi CD C CD
b0 P -H E
CO G ^ g
fH2HP.fi
0 sco CO
F>4
H
1
C
CD
03
h
O
co \r\is\
CM f~H
CJ-LQvCVl
t-H H
en
O
<T\
on
en
-=t
CVJ
<M
CO
r-co H
H ntn
H
vO
3en
-?f c- o>
SHOD
o\ ctrs
o\0 <n
<M
H H
-cf
H
CM C~\ t~-
r-it-i H
OsCVI <n
vo . m
H ov
1A
m
CM
WrlvO
rico ON
CO
'
ON
r-Q Q
\Q O -3
H r-t H
vO
CJ vO co
H
P-.
o
*H
o
a)
bO
n>
,Q
,g
rt
CO
o
03
fc fc
0)
TJ >
Tf O
OH
PnO
03
C0
sir
Co
fcfisS
tH
O J3
CO
uo
0
O
XI
r-i
6
ri
CO
IE
-P
P CO
O
P TJ
-Cf H C^CM
r-i c^ CM
lAO\vO-=f
r*\sO 0\H
OsCOvO IV
OCQIA
vO-CtCM
OslAC
'8
4riW<n
riWOI
CO
HOSCNH
WOHW
riririH
rirllA
SO CM-=f
H CM CO
mriW-3
riwn
-CfCM Os
CD
CO
T> U) O
O CO O
^ CO rt
PLi CD
in
ri
0)
ri -ri
O B
CO
C-mOQ t^-CM
OriOvOW
OJCO H OS rj
piHri
rri
S*o
*->
h
0) CO
o
CO
o oco o f>nOXA-4<>
ririHriH
o
-p
ft-P
0)
co
P
ri
CO
m CM Xrx-^sO
CD p
CO D*
O to
-P
. CO
ON
CD
O
CO
CO
S3
H Q
Jen
r-i HH
Pi
0)
uj r-i y~*
P^CMirssO -=f
CO
I 0)
fl) p
CO C
CO
CO
o
o
COsOCCO
-3" CM lAC^MD
1A
lA
OsCMTX
H rri
rriUNOJ CM O
OsvO OCO CM
H
r-i
H CO 0)
-P
o o
rri CM cr\
CM
m-3-trwo
sO ClAf0*
Ostrs Osf>
O CO CM O
mriHri
C~\ O H
Os-=f H
Os-=f CM
-CfO^CM
CM
H
P"\
Ovncpro,-^
OS-^CM vO O
O CM O OS CD
S
H
O
P.
O
!H
CO
CO
CO 43
-P Q)
0)
CO
tO CD CD
ri
ft 0) X CO CO
JL,
CO O X>
CD __
hC
O
>5
SU
0)
H O fc 0) -P
co
TJ
CO
H CO P
43 bDTJ +3
CO O CO CO 0) O p O O !>
hUWO^I O CO P<4 P-t CO
W
ft
o
CO
ft
o
to TS
0 0
to CH <H
I .
.
i> P
p SP
|S&
^ fel3
ri J! I1
fH O -ri to CO
OB
A
.S3
CD Lip ^1
bo M o
co CO +3 X> >
JH r-i C
. Q
O ri ri 1 r-1
H CO 3 O
ilaged
orage
orage
CO
CO o4
in
3 CO CD
O +3
U CO
H CM m-^-
and corn
o
O
ri
0)
P A si
to
M|3 Jj
q o
" Tf
i
ft QJ
CO S
-P
-rj
S
bo
ft
CO
CO
o
H
P
..o "8
ra
CO
CO
S.
coco
H
-=f C-COCO
CM
CM-^t H CM
cn NO '
-=f
CM-3^
CO ON
\AN
P"\NO
-3HW1A
O CONO rj
PI
>-CO H CM
NO n\At-
On
CO
CD
to
C8
CO
CD
P
H
CO
CO
P
'H -H
p
o
p
8^
H XI
O
to
CO
I O
CD (3
CO
CD
CO
o
o
&
CO
CD
I o
CD
CD
CO
o o
3&
O P
CO
CD
ri CO
in
CMAONOS
ON
CO
H CO
H CM
C*
CD
CO
^t
-bftpCO
fc
PL.
<n H \A-d-
CO
to
p
vo
CM
1
a
0)
CO
CO
H
CO
iH CM
m-d-inNO
CM NO
NO NO
O CM
HiAoo m
CO ONOWO
r H NO H
CM CM H r-i
CD
&
CO
ft
CO
,5m
-3"V.
CO
*
o
u
CD
CO
CD
IH
bfl
CD
CD g
CO
to CO
CO CD
3 CO CO
&0 P
CO
ft
o
h
"8
CD
ft
ft
ft
&0
CM
C*-
CD
8,SxU
ffliri O CO c
urn
a 8
O
Js
<H 'h CD k fc
CD 13 CD 0*
.*%
,13
co
i H
CD
B
fn to CO
p JL, & bp
P CD O
CO-rtVi Oflri ft
U\S
Pn ts
O SCO
369U-D
Jindrich
^^
introduction
Agricultural production under socialism is regulated accords r-?
,0 plans and on a scientific basis. One of the requisites of the
planned regulation of agricultural production is its proper connec-SSi^S fh6r brarhGVf ^^ti ^d nonproduction acUviSes
xthin each area. A qualitatively impr^d an^ hfl^^^iv Sn!,,---rritonal unit may be established only on the basis of a correct
combination of these factors.
The development of agricultural production one of the maia
tranches of the national economy is a very serious question in
territorial planning. Agricultural production consists, however,
not only of vegetable and animal production, it extends also to
other forms of production and includes the distribution of needed
agricultural services, the distribution of the labor force throughout agriculture, etc. Only by solving all of these questions will
".t be possible to put agricultural production on a truly planned
oasis and to create realistic conditions for its development by
placing construction projects in the most rational locations, by
putting the labor force where it is needed, by expanding mechanization, and the like. This means that the advance and growth of
collective and state farms as well as of other farms and sub-sections,
cannot be insured without the coordination of broader interrelationships within a territory The development and growth of agricultural production cannot, therefore, be approached and handled
from the point of view of one single district or the economic range
of one individual community, but must be correlated with broader
territorial plans.
In districts where plans have already been drawn up, further
organizational aspects of agricultural production will be much
easier to solve, since these plans will help in making sound decisions as to the locations of investment construction projects in
accordance with the conditions of the given territory.
in the
Territorial Plans
A comprehensively prepared agricultural report can be used
for both short- and long-term planning. The analytical parts of
the report may not be used because they sum up all accessible material as of a certain date and evaluate it from the point of view
of its complexity., They can, however, be incorporated in other_
eventual proposals or when changes are decided upon. It is obvious
that proposals mast be verified and adjusted as regards their
practical application, as changes in the basic conditions will
reoui^e this and unexpected developments must be taken into account
The -parts of the territorial plans which deal with agriculture can,
however, remain an orientation guide for further and more detailed
study
For the organs of the national committees at all levels o.\e
repc.-o is an effective aid in making direct decisions as to the
expediency of a certain development, the orientation of agricultural production, the elimination of discovered disproportions in
the territory, and judging the effectiveness of the allocation of
agricultural investments.
Along with the organs of the national committees, other
central agencies are being familiarized with previously unknown
facts, since it is tremendously important that these agencies have
comprehensive over-all knowledge of all components of the national
economy. Without a thorough knowledge of the development of the_
territory, problems are often treated outside their context. This
at times includes problems which in the course of further developments are dropped entirely,' '
- 105 - "
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
EvalAiajWon^f^he^Prop
Last year we tried to evaluate the enterprises' investment
plans for decentralized construction. We mainly compared how the
plans differed from the prerequisites which we evolved at the
Ministry in describing the normatives.
For example, a mere cursory analysis of the proposed organisation plan of the MCHP [Ministerstyo Chemickeho Prumyslu, "Ministry
of the Chemical Industry"J for 1959 showed that the extent of GO
in it was in all $% below the volume the Ministry judged. On the
other hand, the proportion of reproduction investments in decentralized construction increased on the whole negligible and reached
only 32.5$ of the total decentralized construction without GO. In
the 1959 plan this portion of the investments was reduced, which we
designate in the old and new methods as so-called "machinery and
equipment not included in the estimate of constructed objectives"
(in favor of decentralized constructions). The total volume of this
part of the decentralized-construction plan for 1959 is about 10$
below the actual fact for last year and almost \0> below the same
for 1957. For the present it is hard to judge whether this decline
is correct or whether it is to the detriment of the main renovation
of the machine park.
But the number of new constructions undertaken has substantially exceeded the prerequisites of the Ministry. Whereas the
Ministry' an describing the normatives last year posited that about
- 113 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1958
1959
100
32.k
67.6
100
39.5
60.5
1 Sep '59
plan
100
100
$96
35-7
58.7
36.1
U.8
5.2
II
III
IV
VI
VII
. '" U.8
5.6
7.6
6.7
6.5
7.3
10.1
8.U
VIII
IX
7.3
8.1
7.0
7.3
8.5
9.9
10.3
8.8
9.k
96
"
61.0$
1+6.0$
70.8$
75.7$
68.1$
68,1$
69.2$
68,ij$
76.It$
65.6$
62.6$
60.9$
76.1$
- 117
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
7 .-.72$
hh,
3.02$
6.10$
3.85$
2h.hS%
1^.08$
6.10$
lj0.20$
26.5$
8.1$
1.2$
rubber
plastics
fuels, technical
gases
paper and cellulose
7.0$
k.%
2lwl$
25.6$
At this step in the work the ffinistry tried for the first
time to determine the decentralized-investments requirement
according to the individual years from 1961 to 1965. The basic
deficiency of the requirements determined in this way was the fact
that the trend of decentralized investments was downward:
1961
1962
1963
1961*
without GO
100
96
81
66
including GO
ICO
100
93
87
hl.9fo
2h.9%
12.1$
fuels
rubber
9M
Plants of the
Ministry ofs
Average Fulfillment
of Performance Worms
Before
Reform
After
Reform
Proportion of
Technically Substantiated Norms
Fuels
119
108
80-90
130
109
70-80
Chemical Industry
185
116
80-90
Heavy-Machine
Construction
237
122
50-60
General-Machine
Construction
215
116
55-65
Total
173
105
109
111
80-90
Food Industry
151
168
ConsumerGoods
Industry
85-95
75-80
Hourly Wage .
Bonus
Simple Hourly
Wage
Fuels
h9
36
1$
hh
38
18
91
Chemical Industry
21*
$6
20
Heavy-Machine
Construction
Precision-Machine
Construction
63
26
11
Consumer-Goods Industry
62
30
Food Industry
6h
31
Total
$h
37
35%).
The thorough check on the production technology used in
plants introducing the new wage system and the achievement of a
whole series of technical and organizational measures and improvements are largely responsible for this favorable result. According
to incomplete data the technical and organizational measures adopted
in the plants during the first half of last year resulted in a
saving of over Kcs 180,000,000 and improvements worth over Kcs
60,000,000.
Experience so far fully guarantees that the new wage system
will be introduced successfully throughout our entire industry
during the first half of next year and that the established goals
in the wages field will be achieved, as well as better economic
results than originally expected.
Although favorable results have so far been achieved in the
introduction of the new wage system, certain difficulties can not
be overlooked which the introduction of the new wage system will
still encounter in the future in enterprises and plants where wage
irregularities are greatest. Every effort must now be made toward
responsible preparation in these plants, especially in the field
of technical standardization.
And so it should likewise be realized that the introduction of the new wage system does not complete the improvement of
our wage system, the reform of which can not be regarded as a oneshot operation, but as a permanent process involving systematieand regular attention to wage questions. It would be a very
serious error if the attention now being devoted to wage questions
by Party and union organs, plant administrations and the workers
themselves were to be relaxed after the introduction of the wage
to 10C$
100-12$
over 120/?
75
16
69
18
Chemical Industry
Heavy-Machine
Construction
11
6
63
31
15
33
52
General-Machine
Construction
17
k2
la
Consumer-Goods
Industry
32
&
Ik
Foods Industry
86
12
66
22
Fuels
Foundries and Ore
Mines
Total
GF-C: 35?!H&
CD
&
O
H
CD
CO
a.
n to
CO <H
T3 fH
0)
O
P
PH
u
Q
1A
Os
r*-
-dH
O
vO
H
O
CO
CV1
"to
0.
*
CM
CM
rl
in
H
o\
vO
CM
CM
XT
Q> U
-3"
-=f
-=f
-=t
CO
c,
O
OCM
0
H
vO
vO
vO
0
c^-
-Cf
PH
*\
<D M
a
4i r-i
e -e 0
hSin
O
<H
CD
PHXI
P CO
CD
CO
!>
*\
PH
0 -a a
fc O
CD iH
en
IS-
5=1
O
CO
n
PH
PH
CD
bO CD
0 a
-H
3 P
S
J3
0 0
sSH -ePi
in
CD -H
ft,
CD
O
s 43
CO
P
*H
CD
ft
O
r1
H-4
H CO
a CD
fH
<
O TJ CD P
a. 1
43
>
!H
4P CO M
PH
TJ
CD
CD
P.. x!
CO
CD
p
0
CD
CO
<H E
0
H
4P
CO
5H
S4
0)
PH
Hi
PH
a
0
CO -H
6 X!
u 0
O
CO
CO
CD
H
,D
1
O
Q)
+3
O
CO
in
*!
CD Xi
PH-P
DCA
CM
1A
vO
r>-
^9
H
\
CO
ON
co
-3-
vO
"">
iH
CV1
c^
O CO
vO
-3-
1S\
ON
CO
-=t
OS
en
r
O
O O
P
H
ON
C*.
vO
00
\A
ON
vfOri
TA-rl ,
OvtH
H
O
e
CO
0
vO
g
<H P e
0 0 0
CO U
fc*i U <H
p
H
p
P
3
0\
t-i
CD
w
P H
73
o
H
U
CD
1.A
ON
i:
tA
ON
ON SH
Weight of
Machine
(tons)
Theoretical
Performance
(itr'per hour)
Life-time
52
19U8
2,830
1,900
35 years
Model Z 1800
1958
1,350
1,800
25 years
Model Z 1200
1953
650
870
25 years
Type#of
Machine
Model Z
359U-D
~ iij.3 -
- l$k -
-'?..- !.-
oroduction capacity of heavy-machine construction and machine-construction metallurgy to secure this construction of steam electric
power plants, we must then allow for the fact that after we secure
the construction of a given number of electric power plants the said
foundries, forges and heavy-machine construction plants will be
producing something else again, perhaps sugar-refinery or "other
equipment.
As regards indirect investments in the line of accumulation,
there is not so close a connection there with the constructed main
capacity as in the case of indirect investments in the line of
circulating means. But indirect investments must nevertheless also,
be considered in the line of accumulation. This is apparent from
the fact that a given national-economic variant of investment construction is connected not only with various amounts of production
operating costs and various amounts of investment outlays, but it
also affects the whole machine-construction structure and thereby
foundry production as well, and that the whole complex of these
.relationships must be included, which is impossible unless we consider
indirect investments in the line of accumulation too. Moreover in
the case of many direct investments in the line of accumulation ono
?an speak of a very close and long-term connection with a given
investment program.
And.so in the comparison of the variants we allow for indirect
Investments both in the line of circulating means and of accumulation. This inclusion !of indirect investments in the line of
accumulation is difficult in practice. But it is often a question
there of the above-mentioned short-term connection and also of the
fact that all this "previous" accumulation will generally amount to
only a small percentage of the required "future" accumulation. It
is also a question of the considerably relative nature of this
inclusion - of course there is no point in going centuries back to
some original accumulation. It is finally a question of the fact
that the final considered accumulation of the various variants
requires securing a production base for it of an analogous nature
(machine-construction plants and the production of construction
materials), and. in many instances there will be no essential differences. The inclusion of indirect investments in the line of
accumulation is consequently in point only in the case of a very
long-term program that requires very different volumes of investments
in the production base of this accumulation.
And so we reach the conclusion that in calculations of the
effectiveness of investments in their allocation among the branches
we must allow for both direct and called-Up investments, taking
indirect investments into consideration both in the line of circulatin
raeans and accumulations. In deciding in which branches or fields to
1
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Investment effectiveness coefficient of over 12$, we still can not
say whether it is good or bad. And so in the allocation of invest
ments among the branches and production fields we can not be
governed by a ready-made, normatively determined effectiveness
coefficient in the initial stage of drawing up the plan, but only
oy this coefficient's method - that is by continual comparison of
ihe amount of the supplementary investments with the saving in
production operating costs secured by these supplementary investments, and by systematic consideration of the possibilities of
another, more effective use of these supplementary investments, and
by systematic consideration of the possibilities of another, more
affective use of these supplementary investments.
But there is another more cogent reason that prevents us frora
allocating investments among the branches and industrial fields
aimply, if there are substitution decisions, according to the
determined normative coefficient of the effectiveness of the investments. We see that the effectiveness of investment construction
is part of the overall effectiveness of the general development of
Jhe economy, which effectiveness results from several factors, one
of which is'the most economic.use of investment means, the use of
the most suitable kinds of raw materials, etc. Another favorable
factor in this active area is the profitable introduction of the
country into the international division of labor and the like.
In national-economic analyses of the effectiveness of investments we shall not take a one-sided view only of how economic a use
of investment means is but a synthesized view of how all the factors
of the effectiveness of economic development figure in a given investment program. Me consider the investment variant the most
effective that enables us to coordinate all the factors in the
maximum effectiveness of the national-economic development. But
meanwhile we must not drift into abstractions and overlook the fact
bhat in a specific economic situation these factors figure quite
concretely, and their extent and potential uses are presented and
defined in a definite way.
Analyses of the effectiveness of investment construction can
not be divorced from those of specific material and other balances.
And we see in the course of such a procedure that the criterion
for the coefficient for the allocation of supplementary investments
is a narrow one. We shall see this from an example.
We are now considering whether to build large gas works based
on burning coal under pressure to meet our gas requirements or gas
works based on the catalytic cracking of crude oil. Pressure gas
works produce gas at 2% lower production operating costs, but the
regular investments for their construction are five times higher
than in the case of gas works based on crude oil. Let us assume
.. -\<<
...
- END -