Sei sulla pagina 1di 166

Publication No.

FHWA-SA-92-045
May 1993
GEOTECHNOLOGY

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Highway
Administration

EMBANK
A Microcomputer Program to
Determine One-Dimensional
Compression Settlement Due to
Embankment Loads

Users Manual

Office of Engineering
Office of Technology Applications
400 Seventh Street, SW.
Washington, D.C. 20590

Innovation Through Partnerships

NOTICE
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Departnient of Transportation in the interest
of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use
thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or
manufacturers names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the object of this
document.

Technical
Report No.

2. Government Accession No.

Report Documentation

Page

3. Recipients Catalog No.

FHWA-SA-92-045
Title and Subtitle

5. Report Date

EMBANK: A Microcomputer Program to Determine


One-Dimensional Compression Settlement Due to
Embankment Loads
Author(s)

6. Performing Organization Code

8. Performing Organization Report No.

Dr. Alfred0 Urzua


Performing Organization Name and Address

PROTOTYPE Engineering Inc.


57 We&land Avenue
Winchester, MA 01090

Thie document was prepared


by George Tiller of AEPCO,
Inc. under the direction of Dr.
Urzua.

!. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)


11. Contract or Grant No.

DTFH61-91-P-01097
13. Type of Report and Period Covered

U.S. Department of Transportation


Federal Highway Administration
Office of Technology Applications
Washington, DC 20590

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

5. Supplementary Notes

FHWA Contracting Officers Technical Representative: Chien-Tan Chang (HRT-10)


Technical Consultants:
Richard Cheney, Jerry A. DiMaggio, Chris Dumas (HNG-31)
3. Abstract

The objective of this report is to introduce a microcomputer program for computing one-dimensional
;ompression vertical settlement due to embankment loads. The program follows the equations
presented by Lambe &Whitman (1969). Ladd (1973), and Poulos & Davis (1974). For the case of a
Strip symmetrical vertical embankment loading, the program superimposes two vertical embanknent loads. For the increment of vertical stresses at end of fill, the program internally superimpos55 a series of 10 rectangular loads to create the end-of-fill condition.
The report presents the equations and analytical procedures utilized by the program and examples
2f the capabilities of the user-friendly data entry form. The computer program is coded in the Turbo
Pascal 4.0 language and takes full advantage of the stand-alone, (single-user) characteristics
of
the IBM-PC through the use of friendly input menus and data-checking routines.
The code implements copyrighted portions of the microcomputer programs SAF-I and STRESS
developed by PROTONPE Engineering, Inc., Winchester, MA, and uses the screen editor Turbo Magic
From Sophisticated
Software.

18. Distribution Statement

7. Key Words

embankment, settlement, vertical stress,


one-dimensional, compression, void ratio

9. Security Classification (of this report)

Unclassified
Form DOT F 1700.7 (12-92)

No restrictions.
This document is available to
the public through the MClrans Support
Center, University of Florida

20. Security Classification (of this page)

21. No. of Pages

Unclassified
Reproduction of completed page authorized

22. Price

Table of Contents
Page

Introduction ......................................................................................
One-Dimensional Compression ..................................................
Soil Model .........................................................................................
Determination of Changes in Void Ratio ..................................
Determination of Vertical Strains ...............................................
Determination of Vertical Stress .................................................
Interactive Data Entry and Output Results ..............................
References ........................................................................................
12
Appendix A ......................................................I*..*.........*.*..........*.....
37
Appendix B .......................................................................................
38
Example 1 ...........................................................................

64
Example 2 ...........................................................................
99
Example 3 ...........................................................................
130
Example 4 ...........................................................................

.. .

ill

List of Figures
Figure

Page

Elastic medium underone-dimensionalcompression............. 7

Compressioncurve and compressibilityparameters


void ratio vs. consolidationstress&add 1973) ....................... 7

Compressioncurve and compressibilityparameters


vertical strain vs. consolidationstress&add 1973) ................ 8

Embankmentloading and parameters


(Poulos& Davis 1974) ...........................................................8

Superpositionschemefor symmetricalembankment
loading .....................................................................................
9

Superpositionschemeto model end of embankment


loading .....................................................................................
9

Transformationof end of embankmentto equivalent


rectangularloads .....................................................................
10

Parametersfor the determinationof incrementsof vertical


stressunderthe comer of a rectangularload .......................... 10

Superpositionschemeto determineincrementsof vertical


stressat any point undera rectangularload ............................ 11

10

Example 1: settlementof symmetricalembankmentload ...... 39

11

Example 2: approachembankmentsettlement........................65

12

Example 3: highway embankmentsettlement........................


,100

13

Example4: embankmenton layeredsoil ................................131

iv

List of Tables
Table

Page

Example 1: summaryof clay settlements................................. 39

Example2: summaryof surfacesettlements.......................... 65

Approachembankmentsettlement:summarycalculations
for incrementof stressesat depthZ = 12.5 feet ...................... 69

Approachembankmentsettlement:summarycalculations
for incrementof stressesat depth 2 = 17.5feet ...................... 70

Approachembankmentsettlement:summarycalculations
for incrementof stressesat depth Z = 22.5 feet ...................... 71

Approachembankmentsettlement:summarycalculations
for incrementof stressesat depthZ = 27.5 feet ...................... 72

Approachembankmentsettlement:summarycalculations
for incrementof stressesat depth Z = 32.5 feet ...................... 73

Approachembankmentsettlement:summarycalculations
for incrementof stressesat depth Z = 37.5 feet ...................... 74

Approachembankmentsettlement:summary calculations
for incrementof stressesat depth Z = 42.5 feet ...................... 75

10

Example3: summaryof surfacesettlements ..... ..................... 100

11

131
Example4: settlementsat point A ....*.......*.*.*.........*..*..*.......***

EMBANK

EMBANK
A Microcomputer Program to Determine OneDimensional Compression Settlement Due to
Embankment Loads
Introduction

An important part of the designof embankmentfoundationsare analysesto


predict settlements.When settlementsor differential settlementsexceed
given tolerances,the overall safetyand/or functionality of the structures
may be endangered.
The objective of this report is to introducea microcomputerprogram for
computingone-dimensionalcompressionvertical settlementdue to
embankmentloads. The programfollows the equationspresentedby Lambe
& Whitman (1969), Ladd (1973), and Poulos & Davis (1974). For the case
of a strip symmetricalvertical embankmentloading, the program
superimposestwo vertical embankmentloads. For the incrementof vertical
stressesat end of fill, the program internally superimposesa seriesof 10
rectangularloadsto createthe end-of-fiil condition.
The report presentsthe equationsand analyticalproceduresutilized by the
programandexamplesof the capabilitiesof the user-friendlydataentry
form. The computerprogram is codedin the Turbo Pascal4.0 languageand
takesfull advantageof the stand-alone(single-user)characteristicsof the
IBM-PC throughthe useof fiiendly input menusand data-checking
routines.
The codeimplementscopyrightedportions of the microcomputerprograms
SAF-I and STRESSdevelopedby PROTOTYPE Engineering,Inc.,
Winchester,MA., and usesthe screeneditor Turbo Magic from
SophisticatedSoftware.

One-Dimensional
Compression

One-dimensionalcompressionrefersto situationswhere groundsettlement


occursexclusively due to vertical straining of the soil mass,that is, when
there are no lateral strains.Geologic processesof uniform loading and/or
unloadingof large areasof soil are good examplesof one-dimensional
compressionconditions.While theseconditions arerarely perfectly
encountered,reasonableapproximationsoccur when the foundationsare large
in relation to the soil thicknessor when the points of interestfor settlement
computationsam far from the edgesof the loadedareas.
For the most generalcaseof an elastic medium of finite thicknessH, as
depictedin figure 1, the vertical deformationof an elementat a distancez
underthe surfaceis given by

6p=E(Z)sz

(1)

whereE(Z)describesthe variation of vertical strain with depth.


The total deformationis given by:
H

P=

& (z) 62

(2)

EMBANK
When a discretevariationof vertical strain versusdepthcan be established
and the compressiblematerial canbe divided in sublayers,within which the
stmin levels remainconstant,equation[2] becomes

,=tAHi=

cn EiHi

(3)

i=l

i=l

in which:
A.H;= thicknesschangeof sublayeri
Hi = initial thicknessof sublayeri
Ei = vertical strain in sublayeri
n = numberof sublayers
Equations(1) through (3) are valid for any kind of material where
deformationis proportional to strain. In the particular caseof soil, which
is a multi-phasematerial,vertical strainsunderone-dimensional
compressionconditionsare the result of changesin the void ratio (e), so that
mi
Ei = Hi

= -

&
l+fQj

(4)

in which:
Aq = changein void ratio for sublayeri = ef - cot
% = final void ratio for sublayeri
% = initial void ratio for sublayeri
Equation(3) then becomes:

(5)

Soil Model

Equations(3) and (5) arevalid for estimatingone-dimensionalcompression


settlementsof any kind of soil, cohesiveor cohesionless,provided a
relationshipbetweenstressand strain or void ratio can be established. Such
a relationshipcan be determinedby running oedometertestson
representativeundisturbedsoil samples.Figure 2 (Ladd 1973)showsa
typical compressioncurve from oedometertestresults,where valuesof void
ratio areplotted versusvertical effective stresson a semi-log scale. A
bilinear model is regularly adoptedto approximatelyrepresentthe void ratio
versusvertical effective stressrelationshipfor a loading condition. The
linear portions of the model arerepresentedby:
C, = compressionindex
C, = recompressionindex
For casesof one-dimensionalunloadingor reductionof vertical effective
stresses,the relationshipcan be representedby a third parameter,C, =
Swelling Index. In most casesthe valuesof C, and C, are very similar.
2

EMBANK

The maximum pastpressure,&,, can be understoodas a yield stress,


which establishes the limit betweenthe recompressionand virgin regions.
Overconsolidated(OC) soils are thosewhere the in situ overburdeneffective
stress, E,O,is smaller than ?&. The ratio

is called the OverconsolidationRatio. For Normally Consolidated(NC)


soils, OCR = 1.
Figure 3 &add 1973)showsa compressioncurve from oedometertest
resultswherevaluesof vertical strain versusvertical effective consolidation
stressare plotted on a semi-log scale.In this casethe model is describedby
the Virgin CompressionRatio (CR), the RecompressionRatio (RR), and
the Swelling Ratio (SR). The following relationshipsexist betweenthese
parametersand the Virgin Compression,Recompression,and Swelling
indices, C,, C,, and Cs, respectively,
cc
CR= 6%
(I+ e0)
C,
RR= ~
(W
(1 + e0)
c,
SR= (fw
(I+ e0)
whereec is the initial void ratio.

Determination of
Changes in Void
Ratio

The valuesof Ae = ef, - egi to input in equation(5) dependon the final


stresslevel within eachsublayer. If k?vfdoesnot exceedem, the reduction
in void ratio for the soil in sublayeri is:

(7)

If the final stress&fs greaterthan avrn,the value of Ael is:

Aei = eJ - eui = Cr log vm

When unloading(reductionof effective stresses)occurs,the void ratio


increasesand the soil swells. The incrementin void ratio is

EMBANK

wherethedifferenceby2- Zvl represents


theeffectivestressreduction.

Determination of
Vertical Strains

Equation(3) canbeusedto evaluatethesoil deformations.


Theexpressions
for verticalstrainsfor a givensublayercanbeobtainedfrom equations(4),
@a),and(6b).
#en GVfdoes
notexceed,, the verticalstrainis:

If thefinal stressZ$is greaterthan am, the verticalstrainis:

Ei = RR log

(11)

For unloadingconditionstheverticalstrainis

&i=- cslog-%
2
I1oy

(12)

wherezV2- O,l is thereductionin effectivestress.


Determlnatlon of
Vert lcal Stress

To useequations(6) through(12),theprogrammustcomputethe
incrementsof verticalstressasa functionof depthfor thefollowing two
typesof loads.
Strip Symmetrical Embankment Loading
PoulosandDavis(1974)presentanequationfor theincrementof vertical
stresses
dueto a verticalembankment
loadingon thesurfaceof a semiinfinite mass

EMBANK

(13)
wheretheparametersaredefinedin figure 4.
For symmetricalembankmentloading, the load is divided into two equal
vertical embankmentcomponents,and the contributionsof both are added
(seefigure 5).
End of Embankment Loading
To computethe incrementof vertical stressesdue to an end-of-embankment
condition, EMBANK superimposesa seriesof 10 flexible rectangularloads.
Figure 6 shows the superpositionscheme.
If the end of the embankmentis modeledas shown in figure 7a, then the
coordinatesthat determinethe size of eachof the rectangularloadsare given
by the expressionsin figure 7b. The value ymax= yl + lob is internally
definedin the program.
The usermust selectthe Strip SymmetricalEmbankmentloading option to
computeincrementsof vertical stressfor points beyond y = yr + 5b.
For a rectangularload the incrementof vertical stressbeneaththe comer of
the loadedareais (poulos and Davis 1974)

(14)

wheretheparametersaredefinedin figure 8.
Figure 9 shows the application of the superpositionprinciple for points
inside andoutsiderectangularloadedareas. For the end-of-fill condition, a
seriesof similar superpositionschemesare applied for eachone of the 10
remngular loads.

Interactive Data
Entry and Output
Results

Input screensand menusare employedto enter the necessarydatafor the


analysis. An input screenconsistsof a graphical display defining the data to
be enteredand an areato query the userfor the data. Menusare usedto
selectthe entry of optional dataand to control program operation. The
output of the program is compactbut complete.It includes an echo print of
the input data (embankmentgeometry,soil parameters,etc.) and the
computedtotal settlement. The output screensalso include distributions of
effective, increment,and maximumpast pressurestressesand settlement
with depth.
Appendix A containsa compilation of all the EMBANK computerscreens.
Appendix B containsfour sampleruns with handcomputations,showing
copiesof the actual input screens,menus,and output result screensusedby
the program for eachone of the four examples.

EMBANK

References

Ladd,C.C.(1973),EstimatingSettlementof Structureson Cohesive


Soils, Presentation
preparedfor theFoundations
andSoil Mechanics
Division of the ASCE,April 9-10, 1973.
Lambe,T.W. andWhitman,R.V. (1969).Soil Mechanics,JohnWiley and
Sons,New York.
Poulos,H.G. andDavis,E. H. (1978),ElasticSolutions for Soil andRock
Mechanics,JohnWiley andSons,New York.

EMBANK

,-Infinitely

Extended Uniform Load

+
incompressible

Boundary

Figure1. Elasticmediumunderone-dimensional
compression

2.8

2.6

Q,
6
6
u
Q

2.4

2.2

2.0
-----_
-

1.8

----a__
--

--

--.

Swelling A Index, C,

1.6

I
1

10

20

50

CONSOLIDATION STRESS, if,,(TSM)

Figure2. Compression
curveandcompressibilityparameters
void ratiovs.consolidationstress&add 1973)

100

EMBANK

w
--Ir\
-======I
l=--A--

---_

Recompression

---

Virgin Compression Aab

Ratio, RFI

J --.-

\\ f
CR

----p=--+

---___

30

----_

---___

T--4Swelbng
Swelling Ratio,
Ratio, SR
SR f
I

35

40
1

10

20

I
50

CONSOLIDATION STRESS, QTSM)

Figure 3. Compressioncurve and compressibilityparameters


vertical strain vs. consolidationstress(Ladd 1973)

Figure 4. Embankmentloading and parameters


(Poulos & Davis 1974)

1 I1
100

EMBANK

a+b

a+b

Figure5. Superposition
schemefor symmetricalembankment
loading

-----_--~~-----~~~~-~- -L,,
---------------------f 10
L----------------,------------------------------

b, or b,

Figure6. Superposition
schemeto modelendof embankment
loading

EMBANK

Figure 7. Transformationof end of embankmentto equivalent


rectangularloads

Uniform Vertical
Stress/Unit Area

R , = (12+ z2)2
i
Z

R, = (t? +z2)2
R3 = (I2 + d

+ 22)2

Figure 8. Parametersfor the determinationof increments


of verticalstress
underthecomerof a rectangular
load

EMBANK

CJ= p (k, + k, + k, + kJ

a=~(k,+2+3+4-k2+4-k3+4+k4)
(b) Exterior Point

(a) Interior Point

Figure 9, Superpositionschemeto determineincrementsof vertical


stressat any point undera rectangularload

11

EMBANK Appendix A

Appendix A

12

Appendix A

EMBANK Appendix A

Appendix A containsa compilation of theEMBANK programscreens.


To bring up EMBANK, first move to the directory or subdirectorywhere you have installed the program.
Then type the foIlowing at the DOS prompt
EMBANK
and press the <Return/Enter> key.
EMBANK loadsand returnsthe openingscreenas shownbelow:

one
I tiicrocomputer
prograrc
for
computing
dirrennional compression uertical
settlement
due
to enbankment loads. The program
follow
the
equations
presented
by Lanbe&Uhitrcan
<1969),
Ladd <1973) and PoulonEDauin <1974).
For
the
case of a strip symetrical
vertical
errbankment
loading
the program superiMposer
tuo
uartlcal
embankvent loads. For the incrsnent of uarticrl
the
stresses
at
end of
fill,
program
supcri~poses
Uersion

a series

of rectangular

PROTOTYPEEWCINEERINCINC.
57 Uertland tinue
Ulnchester.
IW 81898
(617) 7294363
Attn.

Urrua

loads.

1991

2. Wtktober

Dr. Alfred0

Hit

<FIB> to continue

From the openingscreen,pressthe <FlO> key to continue.EMBANK displaysthe Main Menu screen
showing all the options available to the user:
FEDERAL HIGHUW lDllIHISTRAtION

II illcrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dirmnsfonal
compression
vertical
settlertent
due to eebanknent loads. The progralr follous
the equations
presented
by LambeRUhitnan
<1969), Ladd <t973) and PouloaEDauls <1974).
For the case of a strip
synnctricsl
ucrtlcal
eabanknent
loading the program superimposes
tuo
vertical
enbanknent
loads.
For
the
lncrancnt
of vertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the progran
superImposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

Run progrm
Exit to DOS

PROTOTYPERNGINEERINGINC.
57 Uestland &m-me
Uinchastar,
HA MS96
<617) 729-p63
Mtn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

then 4-i b Make selection.

In general,the following rules apply:


1. To move betweenthe options, usethe up (T) and down (J) arrow keys or pressthe highlighted capital letter of your selection.EMBANK will selectthe option with that letter.
2. To makea selection,highlight the option of your choice and hit <Return/Enter>.
3. The bottom line of eachEMBANK screenexplains the operationsyou can perform and the
keys required to perform thoseoperations.
4. To exit a screenor to abort to the Main Menu, pressthe cESC> key.
13

EMBANK Appendix A
With the highlight on the Project Definition field, hit <Enter/Return>;EMBANK respondswith the
Project Definition screen:

PROJECTDEFIHITIOH

Hlcrocarrputc

Client
ProJact Name
Project flanagcr
File Name
Date
Computed by

= Any cllsnt
q
Highuay Embankment
= llr. John Doe
= EXAllPLEl . Ellg
= 3/16/92
<tlWDD/YY,
=m

s increment
L

dimensional cog
due to cmbankne
the equations
<1969), Ladd <l Hit <FM> to accept values For the case of
INEERIN6 INC.
enbankaent
loadlng the program superimposes
57 Uestland FIwnue
tuo vertical
embanknent
loads.
For the
Ulnchester,
Hi? 81830
Lncrerrent of vertical
stresses
at
end of I
<617) 723-2363
fill,
the progran
superimposer
a series of
Mtn. Dr. Cllfredo Urzua
rectangular
loads.
I

II

I
I

After the project is defined,press<FlO> to acceptthe values.EMBANK returnsto the Main Menu screen.
(It is important to note that EMBANK functionseven if the Project Definition values-Client, Project
Name,etc.-are not entered.)
If the userselectssoil Profile and soil param., EMBANK displaysthe following screen:

II tlicrocomputar
program for
computing
one
dimensional conprcssion
vertical
settlement
due to embankment loads. The program follous
the equations
presented
by Lambe&Uhitrtan
(1969). La&l <1973) and PouloseDauis (1974).
For the case of a strip
sywetrical
vertical
enbankuent loading the prograrc superlnporrs
loads.
tuo uertlul
embankment
For the
increnent
of uertlcal
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposer
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then U

14

Exit

to DOS

PROTOTYPEENGINEERINGINC.
57 Uestland Avenue
Uinchester,

tl+l 61833

4617) 723-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfrcdo Urrua

b Naks selection.

<Esc> b Main Nenu

EMBANK Appendix A
The compressibility of the soil can be expressedeither as void ratio or strainper Alog stress.With the
highlight on Void ratio per Alog stress,press&nter/Retunu. EMBANK displaysthe soil profile input
screen:

Layer

Nurtber

Sublayer

Elau.

of top of layer

lea.89

Number of sublayers

1 (for

Unit

= 1lS.W

- Layer
1

--------I_
Sublayer

Sublaycr

weight of soil

layer)

Type of layer
soil

Layer

prapcrtlts

=
l@iiiB4

- Layer
2
Sublayer

this

CoMpression Index

Estil

Recompression

Estimated

from e-logp

curuas

Estimated

from e-logp

curues

Index

I urues

2
S&Jelling Index
Is this

the last
bar

ttJ+-Moue

layer

of profile

No

lilt <FlB> to continue


Esc-Exit

J-Select

The elevationof the top of layer 1 can be between-999.00and 9999.00ft.: the compressiblelayerscan be
divided into 1 to 10 sublayers;and the value of the total unit weight of the soil rangesbetween62.4 and
250.0 pcf.
EMBANK acceptstwo typesof layers:compressible(it settles)and incompressible.If the user highlights
Incompressible followed by cEnter/Return>,EMBANK returnsthe following screen:

Layer

Nut&w

Sublayer

--__-_--

Eleu.

Unit

Sublayer

Sublayer

---------

of top of layar

Number of sublayers

1
Layer
1

-------I_

Sublayer

ueight

of soil

lfM.fM

1 <for

Type of larr

this

layer)

llS.eE

= lncotipressible

Layer
2
2

Is this

the last

layer

of profile
Hit

Space Bar-Next

Ltem

<F16> to continue

mt-n-nenu

For incompressiblelayers,the compressibilityparametersare not required.The user selectsthe Compressible/Incompressibleoption by pressingthe spacebar key or the Alt-M key combination to display the menu
options.

15

EMBANK Appendix A
If the soil layer is compressible,the programpromptsthe user for the Initial void ratio or the Initial
water content.
The next screenshowsthe useroptions:

Layer Nurtber =

Sublayer 1
-_--_------. Layer
1
Sublaycr

Sublayer

Elau. of top of layer

188.88

Number of sublayers

1 <for this

Unit ueight

= 115.88

propart1as

Compression

-we------

- Layer
2

Conpresslble

Type of layer
Layer soil

Sublayer

of soil

layer)

Indaw
Esliv
Index Eati

Recompression

2
Suelling

Index

Estimated

Is this

the last

layer

rlogp

from

of proflle

CUFJ~S

No

Hit <FlB> to continue


and then <Rat) to input ualuas

Prass space bar to sea menu optlona

EMBANK usesthe following equationbetweenvoid ratio and water content: Gw = Se.


When <Enter/Return>at the Initial void ratio highlight is pressed,the programresponds:

Layer

Initial

Uoid Ratio

Hit <FM>

IL

to accept

--------Layer
1

-------Sublaycr

Sublaycr

-------Sublayer

1
1
3
I

Sol1 Properties

Layer
2

= w
ualues-II

f layer

188.09

ayers

1 <for this

Unit weight of soil

Type of layer

Layer soil

properties

= Initlal

Cofipression

Index

Recompression

layer)

llS.ee

COapIeSSibh3

wld

ratlo

Estimated

fror! a-logp

curves

Index Estimated

from a-logp

curues

Estimated

from a-logp

curues

2
Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

layer

of profile

No

Hit <FM>

The programallows for void ratios between0 and 5.0.

16

to continue

EMBANK Appendix A
On the other hand, if the userselectsInitial watercontent, EMBANK displaysthe following screen:

Layer
Initial

Soil

Uatcr

Specific

PrPpertier

Content

Graulty

of Solids

= lW.e82

Hit <FlB> to accept

---------Sublayer

Sublaycr

Layer
2

1gB.M

1 (for

this

layer)

values =
Type of layer

Layer soil

= Initial

properties

Corcpression

----------Sublayer

layer

= m

Degree of Saturation
-

33.88%

Estimated

Index

Raconprassion

Cowprerrible

Index Estixated

uatcr

content

from slogp

cuwes

from e-logp curves

2
Suelling
Is this

Index

Estimated

last

the

layer

fron e-logp

of proflle

curues

t+o

Hit <Fig> to continue

The valuesof initial water contentcan rangebetweenw = 0% to 900%.


During data entry, the usercan exit to the Main Menu by pressingthe &SC> key. EMBANK responds
with the following display:

Layer Sol1 PAperties


Initial

Uater

Specific

Content

Grauity

of Solids

= p&z&q
= 199.98z

Degree of Saturatlon
-

lee.88

yers

1 (for

a011

= 115.88

Hit <FlB> to accept values 1


1

-------_I

Sublayar

Sublayer

Type of layar

Layer soil

= Initial

properties

Compression Index

---------

thls

layer)

Comprasslble
uater

content

Computed using FtDM1982)

1
3
1I

Layer
2

Sublayer

I11

-~CIDHIWISTRIWON

Index Computed using

Recorcpression

Welling

Index

Is this

the last

FHUcI<1982>

Same as recofipresslon
layer

of profllc

index

No

Hit <Fig> to continue

A Y answerwill return the program to the Main Menu without savingthe screeninformation. If the user
selectsN, the program continues.

17

EMBANK Appendix A

The next stepis to define the compressibilityindices.For the CompressionIndex, the userhasthe option
of enteringa value as obtainedin an oedometertest or using an empirical relationshipbetweenCcand the
initial water contentproposedby FHWA in the Soils and Foundations Workshop Manual (1982). The
following screendisplaysthe options:

Layer Soil

Pr

1
1
3
I

ILayer Nunber =
Sublayer

Eleu.

of top of layer

lB8.m

Number of sublayers

1 <for this

Unit ueight

= ii5.w

Layer
1

_____-___Sublaycr

Sublayer

Layer
2

of soil

Type of layer

Layer sol1 properties

= Initial

Conpression
Sublayer

layer)

Index

Conprestlble
uatcr

:,

content
.*

:;~;-~;;:xlndex
vv
1s this

the last

layer

of proflle

No

Hit <FlB> to continue


and then <Ret> to Input values

Press space bar to see wmu options

Thesetwo options are available to the useronly if the Initial water content option is selected.If Initial
void ratio is highlighted, the compressionindicescan not be computedusing the FHWA (1982) procedure.
If the userselectsEstimated from e-logp curves, EMBANK responds

Input

Ualue of

Conpression

lndex

Hit <FlB> to accept value

Sublayer

Layer
1
Sublayer

Unit ueight

1 <for this

layer)

of soil

115.BB

Type of layer

Layer soil

= Initial

properties

Corcpresslble
uatcr

content

1
Estimated

from a-logp

curuee

Index Estimated

from e-loge

curues

Estimated

from e-logp

curves

Compression Index

--------Sublayer

Number of sublayers
1

Layer
2

Recompression
Suelllng

Index

Is this

the last

layer

of profile

No

Hit <FlO> to continue

where the values of the CompressionIndex can vary between0 and 5.0.

18

EMBANK Appendix A
If the FHWA (1982) empirical procedureis selected,EMBANK shows

r-

CoAprersion

Index

The Federal

Highuay Adninistration
and Foundations
Uorkshop
Manual
Compression
Index
by dividing
moisture
content
by lge.

i-1

sol1

<FIBA> in the
<1%X) cstlnates

the

the

initial

soil

II

this
Index = Initial

Coup.
uhere

constant

L-

Uater

Content

<in

layer)

%> / Constant

= 188
Constant
Hlt

<FM>

I-----------

= m

to accept value
Corrpression

Index

Computed

using

FHUA<1982~

Layer

Recompression

Index

Swelling

Index

Is thls

the last

Estimated

from e-lagp

curves

Estimated

from e-logp

curves

layer

of proflle

No

~Hit<Fl8>tocontinue~

wherethe constantcan vary between0 and 200 with a default value of 100.
For the RecompressionIndex the userhasthe sametwo options as for the CompressionIndex:

co:-,
Layer

Number =

Sublayar

-,

Elcu.

of top of layer

lW.tM

Number of sublayars

1 (for

Unit

= 115.88

Layer
1
Sublayer

Sublayer

ueight

Layer
2

of sol1

Type of layer
Layer

Sublayer

this

layer)

soil

properties

Compressible

= Initial

Compression Index

Corcputed

Reconpresrlon

Index

uater

content

using FHLMI982~

2
SucIIing
Is thls

Index
the

last

lay

Hit
Press spaca bar to see ~IW

options

19

and than

<Ret>

<FM> to continue
to

input

values

EMBANK Appendix A
If the Estimated from e-logp curves option is selected,the programdisplays

Input

Value of

Reconpression

Index

= m

Hit <Fig> to accept value of sublayers

xumbsr
Sublayar

iee.ee

Unit ueight

-_--_------Sublayar

Sublayer

Layer
1

of sol1

1 <for this

layer)

= ll!I.BB

Iypa of layar

Layer soil

= Initial

properties

Compression Index
Layer
2
Sublryer

Recortpresrlon

Conpresslbla
uater

contsnt

Computed using FHUcI<l992~

Index Estimated

from e-log-p curues

2
Welling

Index

Estimated

Is thls

the last

layer

froo

of profllc

tilt

e-Iogp

curves

tb

<FM> to continue

where the RecompressionIndex can vary between0.0 and 5.0.


If the FHWA (1982) method is selected,the programshowsthe following screen

I
ReLonpression

Index

Ihc Federal Highuay Adninirtratlon


and Foundations
Uorkshop Ilanual
Recompression
Index
by dividing
nolsture content by 1888.
Recoup. Index = Initial
Uater
uhere Constant
= 19gB
Constant

Hit

<FtWcI~ in the
<1982>

the

soiIs

csticratcs

Initial

the

soil

is

Content

<in

layer)

%> / Constant

lble

= m

<FM> to accept values


Corrprsasion

Layer
2
Sublayer

Index

Recorrpression

ter
Computed

using

content

FtWcI<l982~

Index Computed using FtWKI982)

2
Suelling

Index

1s this

the last

Estimated
layer

from e-logp

of profile
Hit

curves

No

<FM> to continue

in which the constantcan vary between500 and 2000 with a default value of 1000.

20

EMBANK Appendix A
For the Swelling Index, EMBANK hastwo optionsas displayedin the next screen:

Aeconpresrion

Layer

thmber

Sublayer 1
__--____--Layer
1
Sublaycr

Sublayer

of top of layer

190.88

Number of sublayers

1 (for

Unit ueight

= 115.0e

of soil

Type of layer

Layer soil

= Initial

properties

Coaprehsion
Layer
2
Sublayer

l----l
=

Elm.

Index

layer)

Conpresslble
uatrr

content

Computed using FlUhX198Z~

Index

Recompression

this

Index Computed using FHlJM1982)

2
Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

lay-,

Press space bar to see mmu optlans

and then <Ret> to input

ualuss

If the userselectsEstimated from e-logp curves the program shows

Input

Ualue of

Sublayer
--------

Hit

Suelllng

index
iee.ee

<FM> to accept value


Number of sublayers

- Layer
1

_-----e-m--

Sublayer

Sublaycr

Unit weight

= iis.BB

of soil

Type of layer
Layer

soil

propcrtlcs

Comprssaion Index
- Layer
2
Sublayer

1 (for

this

layer)

Recompression

Coapressible

= Initial

uater

content

Conputsd using FHtM19821

Index Computed using FtiWKl982~

2
Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

Estimated
layer

frorc e-logp

of proflle
Hlt

curues

No

<FIB> to continue

where the Swelling Index can vary between0 and2.0.


The other option is to selectthe Swelling Index as having the samevalue as the RecompressionIndex
(commonengineeringpractice).

21

EMBANK Appendix A
The next stepis to define the end of the soil profile. If layer i is not the last layer of the soil profile, the user
respondsNO to this entry. EMBANK displaysthe following screen:

1'
Layer Number =
Sublayer
--------I

Eleu. of top of layer

MB.00

Number of sublayers

1 <for this

Unit ueight

= 115. w

Layer
1
Sublayer

Sublsyer

of soil

Type of layer

Layer toll

= Initial

propertles

Conprehsion
Layer
2
Sublayer

layer)

Index

Recoapression

Compressible
uater

content

Conputed using FHlJfi<1982~


982)

Index Conputed using

2
Suelling

Index

Is thlr

the last

+tl+-Moue

Sane as recosp
layer

Hit <FlB> to continue


Em-Exit

d-Select

bar

of proflla

index

After<FlO> is pressedto continue,EMBANK displaysthe following input screenfor layer 2:

Layer

NUHber

Eleu. of tap of layer

euebe
Sublayer 1
-__--__---

-__--_---Sublayer

Sublayer

1
- Layer
2

Upper Bound:

of soil

99.99

Il.88

Type of layer

Coepm?&ble

Layer coil

= Initial

ueight.

properties

Corcpression

----------Sublrycr

Large -->

iiB.BB

Unit

- Layer
1

TOO

Estimated

fron

e-logp

curves

Index Estimated

from

e-logp

curues

from e-logp

curves

Index

Recompression

void ratio

Hit

Suclllng

Index

Is this

the last

<F9> to Preu.

Estimated
layer
Layer -

of profile

No

Hit <FlfD to continue

For layer 2 the elevationof the top of the layer must be smaller than the elevation of the top of layer 1. If
the user inputs an elevation for layer i+l greaterthan that for layer i, EMBANK trapsthe error as shown
above.The <F9> key permits the user to return to the previous layer.

22

EMBANK Appendix A
The userinputs the information for layer 2 (layer 3, etc.) in the samemanneras for the first layer. If layer i
is the last layer of the profile, the useranswersYes to the last questionas follows:

I
II====-=7
Layer Nurtber = 2
Sublayer

mee

Number of sublayers

5 <for

Unit ueight

= ite.ee

Elsu.

of top of layer

1
3
I

layer)

1
Layer
1

e------m---

Sublaycr

Sublaysr

of soil

Type of layer

Layer soil

= Initial

uold ratio

Estimated

from a-logp

curues

Index Estimated

from e-logp

curuos

Estimated

from e-logp

curues

propertlcs

Compression Index
Layer
2
Sublayer

this

Recompression

Compressible

Hit

Suelllng

Index

Is this

the last

<F9> to Prar.

Space Ear-Next

layer

of proflle

Layer -

ltsm

Hit <FlB> to continue

fut-N-Nanu

.I

The last stepis to define the elevationof the bottom of the last layer of the soil profile. EMBANK displays
the following screen:

11Layer

Number =

Sublayar
---------

Eleu. of top of layer

Number of sublayers

88.88
5 <for this

layer)

1
61~.

of bottom of last

layer

= m

Compression Index

Estimated

from e-logp

curues

Recompression

Estimated

from e-logp

curves

Estimated

from

l -logp

curues

Index

Suelllng

Index

Is this

the last

layer

Hit <F9> to Preu. Layer -

of profile
Hit

Yes

<FM>

to

continue

Press<FlO> to continue and return EMBANK to the Main Menu screen.


If the userhighlights Strain per Alog stressin the soil Profile and soil param.menu,EMBANK displays
the following soil profile input screen

23

EMBANK Appendix A

Layer Nurrber =
Sublayer

1ee.m

Number of sublayers

5 (for

Unit

= 115.w

this

layer)

1
Layer
1

Sublayer

Sublayer

weight of soil

Type of lawr
Coflpresslon

Ratio

Rscoap-ion

----------Sublayer

Elau. of top of layer

.
1

Layer
z

Suelling

Conpresrlble

e.zw

Ratio =

8.848

Ratio

2
Is this

the last

Hl

+tJ+-Moue

bar

J-Select

Esc-Exit

in which the compressibilityparametersare defined in termsof strain versusAlog stress.The input to this
screenis similar to the one for void ratio versusAlog stress.
After the elevationof the bottom of the last layer is entered,EMBANK returnsto the Main Menu the
cF10> key is pressed.
If the user selectsWater table definition, EMBANK showsthe water table definition input screen:

FEDERQLHIGHUFIYADllINISTRATION

soil

lject Definition
Profile
and soil

pra
E:1 ~plllll
Ill
I

paran.

II

Stress ;I;storly
Uertieal
stress increment
-__ _- JI
1 -_
Lbter Table Definitton
v
Units
I Lle
I
Elev.
of Yater Table
b lllcrowmputer
pro
Hit <FM> to accept values
dlmcnsionrl
conpress
due to cnbankmnt loa
the equations
presented
by La~bcSlJhitnan
<1969>, Ladd <lS73 and PoulosEDauis (1974).
PROTOTYPEEl%INEERING YNC.
For the case of a strip symmetrical vertical
superimposer
57 blestland hJF.nue
embanlment loading the progras
Ulnchester,
tW 81898
tuo vertical
embankment
(617) 729-2363
increnent
of vertical
stresses at end of
Attn. Dr. Cllfredo Ursua
a series
of
fill,
the program superimposes

EMBANK defaultsthe elevation of the water table at -999.90 ft. After the water table is defied, press
cF10> to acceptthe value and return to the Main Menu.

24

EMBANK Appendix A
If the userselectsStresshistory, EMBANK displays

I
tlicrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dinensional
compreooion
vertical
settlenent
due to enbankment
loads.
The program follow
the
equations
presented
by LanbeWhitman
(1969),
Ladd <1973> and Poulos&Dauim
<1974>.
For the case of a rtrlp
sylrmetrlul
vertical
embankment loadlng
the program
superimposes
For
the
loads.
tuo
vertical
embankment
fncrcxcnt
of
vertical
stresses
8t
end of
fill,
the program supcrixposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

E
I
PROTOTYPE EWANEERING INC.
57 Uestland
Avenue
Utnchester,
IlA 81898
<617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urzua

t Hake selection.

<Es&

b tlain

Menu

The programdefaultsto a normally consolidatedsoil. If the soil is preconsolidated,the User defined stress
history option must be selected.EMBANK displaysthe following screen:

must be defined
for
< Program interpoletcs

complete
linearly

Spaca Bar-Next

profflc
soil
bctuccn
points

item

25

Alt-tl-bnu

EMBANK Appendix A

The userhasup to 10points to define the soil stresshistory for the completesoil profile. A minimum of
two points are required,and the programinterpolateslinearly betweenpoints. The next screenshowsa
typical entry screenfor the last point of the stresshistory.

E:MEM ru
-

A
df
du
th

<I
FO
en

User Defi incd

Is2

STRESSHISTORY
Naxinun Past Pressure uith Elcu.
UARNING : Haxlwx past pressure us. Eleuation
must be deflncd far complete soil profile
< Program interpolates
llncarly
between points
Elcu.

Last point

tlaxlxurr Past Pressure

cm. ee
reL

Hit

<FS> to preu.point,

ENGINEERINGINC.
st land Ruenuc
star, Nfi 81898
7) 729-2363
r. Rlfredo Urrua

<Fl8> to accept values

Space Ear-Next

item

Alt-tl-Nenu

When the <FlO> keyis pressed,the programacceptsthe dataand returns to the Main Menu.
If the userselectsVertical stressincrement horn EMBANKs main menu screen, the program showsthe
following screen:

II I
I I
EM

I uro.iect

A Nicrocomputer prograx foe


dimensional compression
uer
due to embankment loads. The program follous
the equations
presented
by La&&Uhitnan
<1969), Ladd <1973> and PoulosRDauls <1974).
For the case of a strip ryxaetrical
wrtical
enbanknent loading the program superinposes
loads.
For the
tuo vertical
embankment
incrclrent
of uertlcal
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.

L
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrows

than

26

Deflnltlon

Y
p
PROTOTYPEENGINEERINGINC.
57 Uestland avenue
Ulnchester,
tlA 81898
<617) 729-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfredo Urzua

t Ilake selection.

<Esc> b Ilain tlsnu

EMBANK Appendix A
By pressingthe cEnter/Retunu key, the userselectsthe highlighted strip Symmetricalvertical embankment loading option. EMBANK displaysthe following screen:

Q SYNBECRICAL UERTICAL EllBANKllENT LOAD L


UERIICCIL EllBllNKllMT
Embank. slope
a
hbank.
uidth
b

coordinate

11111111

111111111111
~llIlllllllllbll---x.
.
-.
.
.
--

POINTS FOR CONPUTATIONOF


SETTLEMEWT
calculate
in
=
x

= MB.88
= 15.88
= 128.86

Height of fill
H
Unit ucight of fill

FCWDMION ELEU.
2 = 1ee.w

ncrenmt

at

ill,

of vertical
stresses
the program
ruperinposes
vctangular
loads.

a series

tTl+-flaue

end

soil pararc.
ition

Layer 1
Layer 2

of
of

$-Select

bar

t
H

ERIIY; INC.
Auanus
fi 61898
(617) 729-u63
Mtn.
Dr. fblfredo Urzua

<Fl8> to accept values

Hit

n I
1

FOOTING
= 2e.w

&c-Exit

The geometry,load, and coordinate(s)of the point(s) where settlementis calculatedare enteredinto this
screen.Note that the visual aid doesnot representthe actual geometryof the load: its objective is to guide
the userin the datainput process.
EMBANK can computethe settlementin a point or in the X-Direction.
If the userselectsthe computationof settlementin a point, EMBANK displays the following screen:

SYtlllETRIC/lL UERTICAL EtlBiWKt!ENT LOID


UERIICAL EnBANKtlENT
Embrnk. slope
a
Embank. uidth
b
Height
of fill
H
Unit ueight
of fill

FOOTING

b-i

= 2e.m.~

= 15.w
= 129.W

= X Point
=m

coordinate

n
1
-I .

11111111

111111111111

Lllllllllllllll--I-+
-M----c
.
.
-.
.
--

POINTS FOR COHPlJTcITloN OF

SETTLEHENT
calculate
in

-I

= 1w.w

soil

pararc.

ition

Layer 1
Layer 2

2
FOUNDCITION ELEU.
2

sp

1ee.ee

ERING INC.
luenua
A et890

4 Hit <FM> to accept ualues *

increment
of vertical
stresses
IIi?ill,
the progran
superimposes
1w&angular loads.

at end
a series

27

of
of

Attn.

<617) 729-2363
Dr. Alfrado Urzua

EMBANK Appendix A
For a given set of input parameters,pressthe spacebar if settlementcalculationsare desiredfor more than
one location. Delta x is the incrementof distancebetweenthe xl and x2 coordinateswhereEMBANK will
calculatesettlement.Example: xl = O.OO,
x2 = 60.00and delta x = lO.OO,EMBANK will calculate
settlementsat x = O, lo, 20, 30, 40, W, and 60.

SYMETRICAL UERTICAL EtlWtlENT

LOAD -

--I 1
r -1
I
11111111

UERTICFlL E?lWWlENI FOOTIN


Enbank. slops
a
q
am
Embank. uldth
b
q
1ae.w
Height of fill
H
= IS.88
Unit uelght of fill
= 128.88

111111~~1111
Ii
1111111111111111-JX--c

POIHTS FOR MnWTBTIOti OF


SETTLEHENT
calculate
in
= X Direction
8.88
Xl coordinate
=
x2 coordinate
=
68. BR
=m
delta x

soil

pararc.

ition

Layer 1

2
I * Lawr
21

I-*-

) POCKY.
ERIWG INC.
Avenue
a fli898

Hit <Fig> to accept values


lncrsaent
of wrtlcal
stresses
fill,
the program superinpores
rectangular
loads.

at end
a series

of
of

(617) 729-2363
Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

bttn.

The last entry on this screenis the Foundationelevation.This option permits the placementof the load at
an elevation smaller than the elevationof the top of the soil profile. EMBANK provides the rlltemativeof
computing the initial effective stressby consideringthe completesoil profile or correcting the applied load
by discountingthe effect of the excavatedsoil. A typical input screenis as follows:

SYtNlETRIChL UERTIWL

EtlBANKHEN'C LOlD

UERTICFlL E?lBlWKIlENTFOOTING
= 28.88
EMbank. slope a
Embank. width
b
= lee.88
Height of fill
H
= 15.88
unit ueight of fill
= ize.ea

xl coordfnate
x2 coordinate

delta

FWHDQTIOH ELEU.
2 = 98.88

8.80

=
=

68.86
le. 88

Layer 1

Hlt <FlR> to accept


at

effect
Depth = m

ualues

end

a series

bar

Layer

excaurtlon
as gatma*Foundrtion

+tl+-Hew

sol 1 pararr.
ltlon

t
z1--

Corcpute

inc-nt
of wrtlcal
stresses
Fill,
the program
superimposes
rectangular
loads.

11111111
llJ411&&1&4&
1(111WW11-7~
n+
.
.
-.

POINTS FOR COtiPUT~TIOHOF


SETTLMENT
= X Direction
calculate
in

n
1

c-1-

of
of

d-Select

28

qvi!!

Attn

Erc-Exit

ERIm: INC.
awlws
A 81898

29-2363
1f redo Urzus

EMBANKAppendixA
If the userexits to the Main Menu by hitting the <ES3 key, EMBANK will respondwith the following
screen:

SYtQlETRICClL VERTICAL EIWIWHENT

LOFID

UERTICAL EIIBWKHENT FOOTlN6


Enbank.

slope

Embank. uidth
b
Weight of flll
H
Unit ueight of fill

2e.m

= ree.ee
=

15.88

128.88

11111111

111111111111

FOUNDATIOH ELEU.

2=

.
.

I
z-1--

le. ee

Hit

Layer 2

effect
Depth = m

at

Till,

of wrtlcal
stresses
the program
supcrinposcs
wctangular
loads.

a serlcs

Space Bar-Next

end

r UC
eri
Abori t c

<FLB> to accept ualuen

Lncrenent

.-

8. ee
68. ee

Compute excavation
as gamma*Faundation

98.88

Layer

= X Direction

=
=
=

llllllllllIlllll-l-+
l-.4- ..

POINTS FOR COHPLITI~TION OF

SETTLEHEW
calculate
In
xl coordinate
x2 coordinate
delta Y

n
so i 1 pan.
itloll

of
of

Rttn.

<617) 729-2363
Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

I
filt-II-Hanu

iten

A Y answerwill exit the program to the Main Menu without saving the information alreadyentered.If
the userselectsN, the programcontinues.The cFlO> key accepts(saves)the valuesand EMBANK
returnsto the Main Menu screen.
From the Main Menu, selectVertical stressincrement followed by increment of stressesBeneaththe
end of a fill. EMBANK showsthe following screen:

Henu

icrocomputar program fo
dinensional- corrpresoion
uer
due to embankment loads. The progran follour
presented
by LanbeWhitnan
the equations
<1969), Ladd <1973 and Poulor&Dauis (1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical wrtlcal

embankment loading
the prograrr
superinposes
For
the
1oads.
tuo
vertical
ertbanknent
increment
of
ucrtlcal
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the Progran
superimposes
a rerlrs
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

lattur

only,

or USB arrows then 4

29

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING INC.


57 Uestland Avenue
Uinchestcr,
HR 81898
(617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfredo
Urzua

b Make selection.

<Esc>

Nain

Nanu

EMBANK Appendix A
Press<Enter/Return>to make the selectionand EMBANK displaysthis screen:
END OF FILL CONDITION
CHARKTERISTICS OF FILL
Height of fill
=
Uidth of top of fill
IJ =
Unit weight of fill
q
COORDIWTES
Point A: xl =
Point B: x2 =

tl

e.ee
38.88

15.80
58.88

-1
i&l
psraa.

lza.BB

yl =
y2 =

e.ee
38.80

ading

POINTS FOR CONPUTATIONOF SETTLENENT


calculate
in
=
xi coordinate
= ,

/
/

wz coordinate
delta x
y coordinate

FOUNDATIONELEU.

I=

--J

Hit <PM> to accept values


+tl+-tlouc

bar

~-Select.

rzua

Em-Exit

EMBANK hasa XYZ coordinatesystem,where the X and Y axesare the horizontal componentsand Z is
the vertical component.The XY diagramat the top of the screenis a plan view of the embankment.The ZY
diagram beneaththe plan view is an elevationview or crosssection.The correct orientation of the elevation
view is to picture it from the right side of the embankment,looking towardsthe XY origin, that is, towards
the left. The Y direction is consistentin both the plan and elevationviews. Point A in the plan view is at the
bottom of the slope: it is normally the origin of the XY axis. Point B in the plan view is locatedat the top of
the slope.Negative XY valuesare possiblebecauseEMBANK hasthe ability to computesettlements
outsidethe embankmentarea.
The 2 componentis the foundationelevationand is the elevation of the soil profile wherethe embankment
constructionbegins,that is, the bottom of the embankment.The magnitudeof the Z componentmust be
consistentwith the elevation given in the Soil Profile and Soil Parametersscreens.Example:Ground
surfaceelevation value input for layer 1 in the Soil Profile and Soil Parameterscreenis 100.Layer 1 is a
5 foot thick layer of highly compressibleorganic material that will be removedprior to embankment
construction.The foundation elevationz in the caseis 95.
If the userselectsthe computationof settlementin a point, EMBANK displays the following screen:
END OF FILL CONDITION
CHflRKTERISTICS OF FILL
= is.88
Weight of fill
Uldth of top of f 111 u = 58.88
Unit ueight of fill
= 1ze.88
COORDII(ATES
Polnt A: xl =
Point 8: x2 =

e.ee
38.08

yl =
yZ =

a.aB
38.88

POINTS FOR COtlWTATION OF SETTLEHENT


calculate
in
= X Point
x coordinate
=
38.ee

/
/
Y -/I

coordinate

Zm

FOUHDIWONBLEU.
L = 188.88
-

Hlt

<FlB> to accept valuer

30

t
H

EMBANK Appendix A
If calculationof settlementin the X-direction is required,EMBANK promptsthe userfor the information
displayedon the next screen:
ENDOF FILL CWDITION

CHARIlCTERISfICS
OF FILL
= 15.88
Height of fill
Uidth of top of fill u = 58.98
= 1ze.m
Unit ucight of fill
COORDINMES
Polnt A: xi = 0.00
Pofnt 8: x2 = 38.88

yl
yz

e.m

38.88

RimEdI
adlng

POINTSFORCOllPUTlTIONOF SETTLEflENT
/
calculate In
= X Direction
/
xl coordinate
=
8.88
xi! coordinate
= 88.88
Y -/--I
delta x
y coordinate

t
H

FOUNDRTION
ELEU.
2 = iae.ee
Hit <FM> to accept ualues

The last entry on this screenis the Foundationelevation.This option permits the placementof the load at
an elevationsmaller than the elevation of the top of the soil profile. The program computesthe initial
effective vertical stressby consideringthe initial soil profile and allows the userto correct the applied load
by discountingthe effect of the excavatedsoil.
A typical input screenfor this caseis shownbelow:

ENDOF FILL CONDITION


CHRRACTERISTICS
OF FILL
= 15.m
Height of fill
Uidth of tap of fill u = 5R.W
q
iz9.m
Unit ueight of fill
COORDtHATES
Point A: xl = e.ee
Point R: x2 = 38.80

pararc.

yi = 8.88
y2 = 30.88

POINTSFOR WtlWTRIIOti OF SETTlJ2iENT


= X Direction
calculate in
e.ee
xl coordinatm
=
x2 coordinte
= 8e.m
= 10.00
delta x
y coordirutm
= JB. eo
FOUNDF\TIW
ELEU.
P = 98.W
-

/
/
Y --/

T
Ii
1

Corrpute excauation effect


as ganru*Foundation Depth = m

bar

J-Select

-9

INC.
e
98
rzua

Hlt <FM> to accept values ttt-b-tfouc

Erc-Exit

Pressingthe &lo> key accepts(saves)the values, and EMBANK returnsto the Main Menu screen.

31

EMBANK Appendix A
With the highlight on the system of Units field, hit <Enter/Return>.EMBANK respondswith the Unit
Systemscreen.This is an informational screenthat definesthe systemof units required by the program.

FEDERfiL HIGHUAY ADHIHISTRATION

I Nlcroconputcrp

* Loa;j
Stress
<pressure)
* Unlt uclsht
- Unit might
of
uater
defaults
to
* Settlenent

: pounds
: psf
: pcf

dlnanrional
conpre
due to embankment
the
equations
pr
: 62.4 pcf
(1969).
Ladd <1973
: inches
For the case of a
MGINEERING INC.
embankment loading Hit <FIR> to continue
land fkmlue
tuo
uertical
eeba L
er, HI7 81898
increment
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
< 617) 729-2363
fill,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
Mtn.
Dr. Mfrado
Urzua
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

t Hake selection.

Hitting the <FlO> key returnsEMBANK to the Main Menu.


Move the arrows to highlight Maintain file and hit <Enter/Return>.EMBANK displays the Maintain file
menu,which permits data fiie managementinside the program.

dictensional
comprermion
uertical
settlertent
due to embankment loads.
The prograM follous
the
equations
pmsentad
by LscrbeRUhitman
<1969),
Ladd (19731 and Poulos&Dauis
(1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uertical
embankment loading
the program
superircposes
embankment.
tuo
uertical
a series

Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

32

Clear

entries

of

t Make selection.

<Fsc> t Plain Henu

EMBANK Appendix A
By selectingSave file, EMEL~NKdisplays

project
Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
paran.
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uertlcal
utress
increment

A lllcroconput8r
program for
computing
on8
dimensional
comuression
uertlcal
s&t.dua to smbank&t
laads.
The program f
the
aquatlons
presented
by Lanbe%u
<1969),
Ladd Cl973
and Poulos&Dauis
<1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uarticai
~:~~~~i:~~~~gr~~~d~~p8~~~po~~~
Increment
of
vertical
stresses
fill,
the progratr
sup8rimpOS8S

Destination

/
at
end
a series

Pl18

pR;~!k$?;?~::

of
of

L
ICnter

latter

only,

or usa arrous

then

b Make selection.

<Esc> t tlaln

Hanu

in which the programprompts the user for the destinationfide namefor saving the input information.
EMBANK defaultsto filename extension.EMB. This filename extensioncan be changedby the user.
When <Enter/Return>is pressed,EMBANK showsthe filename.EMB files that are in the current directory.
A typical screenwill look similar to the following screen:

FEDEMIL HIGHUC(Y ADll~HfSTRATION

--

kin

tl8nu paraa.

For the case of a strip


syrrrtetrlcal
uertical
cmbanknent
loading
the progran
superimposes
loads.
For
the
tuo
vertical
erkmhrcent
lncrenent
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superimposes
a rerlsr
of
rectangular
loads.
inter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

33

PROTOTYPE EtGINEERIffi
INC.
57 Uertland
Fiuenue
Uinchester,
tI0 91838
<617> 723-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0
Unua

b Make selection.

<Esc> Main

Menu

EMBANK Appendix A
When the Retrieve file option is selected,EMBANK shows

project Definition
soil Profile
and scil

pat-an.

Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uartlcal
stress
increment
sumten of Units

1 Hicrocortputcr
prograM for
computing
one
dlmcnslonal corcpresslon
vertical
settlement
due to enbankment loads. The program f
the equations
presented
by LanbeSU
(1969,
Ladd <lSn,
and Poulor&Dauis <

M.sr

1stt.m

only,

or use erroue

thsn

Input

t Make salectlon.

File

<Es.&

tlaln

tlenu

in which the programprompts the userfor the tilename.EMB to be retrieved.EMBANK defaultsto the
.EMBfilenameextensionof data files. This filename extensioncan be changedby the user.
If the user doesnot recall the nameof the filename.EMB files in the current directory, a list of thesecan be
displayedby pressingthe <Enter/Return>key. EMBANK showsthe following screen:

thin

llunu ----f

snt

For the case of a strip


sywetrical
uertical
embankment loading the program
superimposes
tuo uertical
mbankmnt
loads.
For
the
lncrencnt
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the pmgram
superimposes
a series
of

rectangular
Enter

letter

PROTOTYPE ENCINEERIW

INC.

57 Uest1and &m%ue
Uinchestcr,
ryI 01838
<617> -2363
Attn. Dr. llfredo
Unua

loads.
only,

or use arrous

then

+J

b Ilake

selection.

<Esc>

Main

tlsnu

The useof the arrow keys (t, 1, &, +) allows the userto selecta file. Pressthe <Enter/Return>key to
retrieve the fiie into EMBANK. The programreturns to the Main Menu screen.

34

EMBANK Appendix A
Hitting <Enter/Return> at the Clear entries field initializes all EMBANK variablesto their default values
(equivalentto loading the program from scratch).

1 FEDERRL HIGHWY RDliIRISIRATIOH \


L
4
I==-===
Haln

I
II I I

Run

A lllcrocotq2uter
progree for
computing
one
diltcnslonal
compression
vertical
settlement
due to cebankwet loads. The program follow
the equations
presented
by LaxbeMJhltean
<1969>, Ladd <197X and PoulosbDauls <1974>.
For the case of a strip
syrrrtetrical
vertical
embanknent
loading the program superlrcpones
For the
loads.
tuo uert1ca.l
enbanlulent
stresses
at end of
increment
of wrtlcal
fill,
thm program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or uee

rrous

tlalntaln
file
file

I Exit II Save

PROTOTYPEENGXNEERlffi lliC.
57 Uentland CkRnue
Uincheoter,
?#I 81898
(617) 729-2363
Mtn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

t flake selactlon.

then

tknu

project Definition
sol1 Profile
and soil param.
Uatsr table definition
Stress hletory
Uertlcal
streee lncremnt
sustem of Units

<Ret> b tiein Henu

EMBANK returnsto the Main Menu.

Selectingthe Run program option will run EMBANK. The useris referredto Appendix B for typical
exampleruns and output screens.

FRDERRLHIGHUW RDliINISTRRTION
uro.iect

tlaln tlenu Definition

.I..

Exit to DOS
computing
one
vertical
settlement
The program fallout
the equations
presented
by LaebeWhltaan
<1969), Ladd <l!l73> and PoulosbDauls (1974).
PROTOTYPERNGINEERINGINC.
For the case of a strip
synrtetrlcal
vertical
51 Uestland Ruenue
eebanknent loading tke program superimposes
Ulncheetcr,
WI 81898
For
the
loads.
tuo uertlcal
embankment
<617> 7292963
lncrenent
of
uertical
etresses at end of
Rttn. Dr. Fllfredo Ureua
fill,
the program superinpones
a series of
rectrnaular
loads.
t--

llicroconputer
progreti
dlmenslonel conpression
due to ertbanknent
loads.

lW.e.r

letter

only,

for

or use arrow

35

than 4

t Make eelectlon.

EMBANK Appendix A

WhenExitto DOS is selectedtheprogramdisplaysthefollowingscreen:

thin knu
oro.iect
.

Definition

soil
Profile
Uatsr table

and soil

parilil.

definition
Stress hlstory
Uartlc81 stress incrsmmt
syrterr of lhl1ts
tia1ntain fllc

II fllcroconputcr
progrlur for
computing
one
dinensional
wnpresslon
vertical
scttlencnt
due to embanknent loads. The prograM follous
the equations
presented
by LwbeWhttaan
<1969), Ladd Cl973 and Poulos&DauIs (1974).
For the case of a strip synnetrical
vertical
embankment loading the program, superimposes
loads.
For
the
tuo vertical
embadment
of
vertical
stresses at end of
increment
fill,
tho program superirrposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

Im INC.
57 ueetland Uincheeter,
Ml 81898
<617> 7294363
Mtn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

t Ilake selection.

@SC> l

tlain

Henu

A selectionof No returnstheprogramto the Main Menu.A Yes selectiontakesthe userbackto the


disk operatingsystemprompt.

36

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Appendix B

37

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Example 1

EMBANKAppendix B Example 1

Example No. 1:

Settlement of Normally Consolidated (NC)


Soft Clay Layer Due to Symmetrical
Embankment Load
This exampleis similar to the one presentedin the U.S. Departmentof
Transportation,FHWA, Soils and Foundations WorkshopManual, p. 161,
Figure EX-1 showsthe problem geometryand soil parameters.The
objective is to computetotal settlementof the NC clay stratumbeneath
points A through E. The clay is divided into five sublayers.
TableEX-1 presentsa summaryof the computer-calculated
and handcomputedsettlementsfor points A through E.

Table 1. Summaryof clay surfacesettlements


Settlement(in)
Computer
Hand-calculated

Point
A
B
C
D
E

13.44
13.08
12.01
10.34
8.32

13.46
12.02
8.33

SAdDY GRAVEL 20 FT

y=122 pcf
I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
e. = 2.096
y= 104 pcf

1
-CLAY-

1oFT

c, =l.lO
c, =.I1

SAND Not to scale

Figure 10. Example 1: Settlementof SymmetricalEmbankmentLoad

39

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Example No. 1:

Symmetrical Embankment Load

10

10

yy
E

d.

GRANULAR
FILL
, ?=120pcf
A

a
F

20 I

A
I
-SANDY
j

GRAVEL -

20

y=122 pd

e,, = 2.096

-CLAY-

C c 3 1.10

y=104 pcf
I
- SAND -

lo-

Subdivide compressible
stratum info live
2 sublayers
Not to scale

Determinegeostaticeffective vertical stressesat pints 1.. .5:


~T~=20x 122+ lx 104-21x62.4=
1233.6psf
$=20x
122+ 3x 104- 23x 62.4= 1316.8
iT3= 20 x 122+ 5 x 104 - 25 x 62.4 = 1400.0
$=20x
122+7x 104- 27x 62.4= 1483.2
as= 20x 122+9x 104-29x 62.4= 1560.4

Determineincrementsof vertical stressfrom figure 4 in text.


Use superposition,as shown below:

40

EMBANKAppendixB

Example 1

Therefore,we computeincrementsof vertical stressas 2 times the vertical


stressincrementfor:

For the generalcaseshownbelow,


vertical stressesare given by:

In this case:
b= 20
a= 10
R,= z

Therefore:
tggp =$

tg(a+P)

=$

=+ fi= arct f
( )
*

a=arctg 4 -p
( >

We computethe stressincrementsfor z = 21,23,25,27, and 29 ft:


P=arct

8(

>

20,

a =arct + - p
8( >

21

25.463345

18.139474

823.23057

1646.4611

23
25
27
29

23.498566
21.801410
20.323137
19.025606

17.510521
16.858398
16.205718
15.566683

780.26144
740.24275
703.12764
668.78629

1560.5229

41

1480.4855
1406.2553
1337.5726

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Use superpositionas shownbelow:

- -7 \
T
7
P=24OOpSf
\\
Lxt
1
F
Z

-Z

a = 10
b = 10
d-30

d= 10

acb-d-30

For first superpositionstep,consider:


x= 10
a= 10
b=20
P=l.

x-b=

R;=t2

+ 10

tgp=+

- 10

tga=+

Computeincrementof stressesusing:

,+:--$x-b)
l

z (fr)

a=p

Seeresultsin table below:


lo2

R$=z2+

(x-b)

21

25.463345

541

- 0.3881701

975.56265

23
25
27
29

23.498566
21.801410
20.323137
19.025606

629
725
829
941

905.97194
844.79982
790.76190
742.78381

42

0.3656598
0.3448276
0.3256936
0.3081828

EMBANKAppendix B Example 1
l

For secondsuperpositionstep,consider:
I=%=3
a

R$=z *+ 102
P - 2400 psf

x-b=
*x

10

p=arcrg(+)-

Computeincrementof vertical stressesusing:

1
l

Seeresultsin the table below:

21

25.463345

18.139474

11.405161

0.3881701

23
25
27

23.498566

11.514733

0.3656598

21.801410
20.323137

17.510521
16.858398
16.205718

11.534621
11.483932

29

19.025606

15.566683

11.378733

0.3448276
0.3256936
0.3081828

Add stressincrementsfrom both superpositionsteps:

21
23
25

1377.0886
1320.6914

27
29

1217.3838
1170.0546

43

1267.5344

401.52598
414.71942
422.73460
426.62194
427.27078

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Use superpositionas shown below:

30
7
P = if00 psf
+

L400psf
)X

Xt

a
Z

&

x-o

1
Z

(a)

From figure (a) above:

a = arctg :
( >
j3 = arctg(+)(x-b)

=0-20=

a
-20

R; = z + (- 20)2
r

- j$ (x-b)
I
l

Apply expressionsaboveto computeincrementsof stressfor case(a):

2 (ft>

a = arctg(T)

a=arctg(+)-a

R~=.z~+(-~O)~

21

25.463345

18.139474

841

-0.4994055

623.37735

23

23.498566

17.510521

929

-0.4951561

611.74501

25

21.801410

16.858398

1025

-0.4878049

597.43413

27

20.323137

16.205718

1129

-0.4782994

581.47007

29

19.025606

15.566683

1241

-0.4673650

564.59633

44

(x - 6)

0, htl

EMBANKAppendix B Example 1
From Figure (b):

S = arctg
p

>

= arctg(+)-

a = arctg

(x-6)

>

-(Pe6)

= 40-20=20

R; = z2+202

S=arct

80

$4

4 /3+xa-4(,-@
a
Ri
[

Apply expressionsaboveto computeincrementsof stressfor case


W:

zm

x=
a

p=arct

g(

20
z

>

-6

a=arct

8(

!j

>

-(p+@

&

(x-6)

0, @ti

21

43.602819

11.405161

7.2925472

0.4994055 159.48697

23

41.009087

11.514733

0.4951561 179.37988

25

38.659808

11.534621

7.5772781
7.8001877

27

36.528855

11.483932

7.9678630

29

34.592289

11.378733

8.0868661

0.4782994 212.67796
0.4673650 225.97541

0.4878049 197.14946

Add stressincrementsfrom cases(a) and (b), Obtain table below:

z WI

0, (P-a

21

782.86432

23

791.12489

25

794.58359
794.14803

27
29

45

790.57174

EMBANK Appendix B Example I


Compute settlements.
Use following expression:
l

/x=&CR

log 3

i=l
I-1%I

where:

n = numberof substrata= 5
Hi = thicknessof eachsubstrata= 2 ft
CR = Virgin CompressionRatio

cc

=(l+eo)
1.10
= (1 + 2.096)
= 0.3552972

uvf = Final vertical effective stress = S,, + A 3,


tfi, = Initial vertical effective stress
. Apply expressionsabovefor -A;
2 cft)

SO@J-l9

AS, @?I0

bvf @sfl = gvo + Ad,

get table below:


pi = Hi CR

*v/

log

i-1
-%o

21
23

1233.6
1316.8

1646.4611
1560.5229

2880.0611
2877.3229

0.2616603 ft
0.2412246

25
27
29

1400.0
1483.2
1566.4

1480.4855
1406.2553
1337.5726

2880.4855
2889.4553
2903.9726

0.2226560
0.2057997
0.1905031

Total Settlement:

46

1.1218437 ft
13.46
in

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1


Apply expressions above for point c; obtain table below:

Aav (Pti

ifvf @sfI = iFvo+ A 3

pi= Hi CR

log -

avf

i-160

21

1233.6

1377.0886

2610.6886

0.2313558 ft

23

13 16.8

1320.6914

2637.49 14

0.2143639

25

1400.0

1267.5344

2667.5344

0.1989536

27

1483.2

1217.3838

2700.5838

0.1849378

29

1566.4

1170.0546

2736.4546

0.1721668

Total Settlement:

1.0017799 ft
12.02

Apply expressions above for WE;

in

obtain table below:

21

1233.6

782.86432

2016.46432

0.1516523 ft

23

1316.8

791.12489

2107.92489

0.1451995

25

1400.0

794.58359

2194.58359

0.138725 1

27

1483.2

794.14803

2277.34803

0.1323338

29

1566.4

790.57 174

2356.97 174

0.1260962

Total Settlement:

0.6940069

ft

8.33

in

47

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Compilation of Computer Screens for


Example 1

c1 tlicroconputer

program

for

colrputing

PROTOTYPERHGINRRRING INC.
57 Uettland &mwe
Uinchester,
WI @l&98
(617) 723-2363
Mtn.
stresses

superimposes
Uarslon

Dr.

F\lfredo

Urzua

at

a series

2. WOctober

of
1391

Hlt

<FiB> to continue

OPENING SCREEN

A lllcrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dlmenslonal wnprestlon
vertical
settlement
due to errbankment loads. The program follow
the
equations
presented
by LawbeWhitclan
<1969>;
For the

Ladd <19?3> and Poul&&Dauin


(1974).
case of a strip _ swnetrical
uertical
elrbanknent loading the pmgran
superimposes
tuo
vertical
embankment
loads.
For the

increnent
of vertical
stresses
fill,
the program
superimposes
rectangular
loads.
Enter

latter

only,

ENBbNK IlAIN

or

US=

at end
a series
l rrous

Exlt

of
of
then 4

to DOS

PROTOTYPEENGINEERIM INC.
57 ueat1and Rvenue
Uinchester,

ryI 01898

(617) 729-2363
Mtn. Dr. Alfmdo Urzua
t tlaka selection.

IlENU - SELECTION OF PROJECTDEFINITIOW

48

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Cl icnt
Project
Wane
Project
tlanagcr
File Name
Date
Computed by

I
h inc-nt
s

= m
client
= Enbankmnt
load
= Al8l
= RXMPLEl.EtlR
= YlY92
<tltVDD/YY~
=m

A tllcmcoMputs
dlnensional
COM
due to enbankne
the
equations
d
<1969>, Ladd <1 =
Hit <FM> to accept values
For the case of
INEERIffi
It%.
eebanknent
loading
the program
super imposes
57 Uestland
Clvenue
tuo
uertical
embankment
loads.
For the
Uinchester,
tW 81896
increment
of
uertical
stresses
at
end of
< 617) 729-2363
fill,
the program
superircposes
a series
of
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urzua
rectangular
loads.

PROJECT DEFINITIOW

SCREEN

II I
EI M BR
I

project
Uater

A tlicrocortputer
program for
computing
one
dimensional
compression
uertical
settlement
due to embankment loads.
The program follous
the
equatlons
presented
by LarrbeWhitrcan
C1969),
Ladd <1979> and PoulosBDauis
<1974).
For the case of a strip
syenetrical
uertical
embankment loading
the progra
superlrcpores
tuo
uertlul
anbankment
loads.
For
the
increment
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
flll,
the program
suprimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

Definition
table

definition

PROTOTYPE RNGINEERIWC INC.


57 Uestland
&uenue
Ulnchestcr,
t@ 81898
(617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urzua

tlakc

selection.

EtlBr%W WlIN IlENU - SELECTIOW OF SOIL PROFILE

49

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

llaln

Menu 1

program for
cortputlng
one
Hicrocorrputer
diacnslonal
compresrlon
ucrtlcal
settlement
due to embankment loads. The program follow
b

the
equations
presented
by LambeRUhItctan
<1969),
Ladd <1973> and Poulos8iDauis (1974).
For the case of a strlp
symmetrical
umtical
anbankrrent
loadlng the prograrr superirrposes
tuo uertical
embankment
increment
of
uertlcal
stresses at and of
a series
of
fill,
the progruc
superimposes

Snter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

PROTONPE GWGINLERIN6 INC.


57 Uestland Auenue
Uinchsstar,
IlA BlBSB
(6171 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. llfredo
Urzua

tlake

selection.

<Esc> l

Haln l!enu

SOIL PROFILE IlENU - SELECTIOn OF UOID RATIO PER LOG STRESS

FEDERlL HIGHWW IDNINISIRlIION

Layer

Nuder

Eleu. of

top

of layer

Number of sublayers

Sublayer

169.88

1 <for thlr

layer)

1
Unit

Layer
I

-------Sublayer

Sublayer

Sublayer

uelght

of

soil

= 122.BB

Type of layer

Layer
2

Is this

the last

Space Bar-Next

item

layer

of profile

Hit
Alt-n-Menu

No

<FlO> to continue

SOIL DESCRIPTION RND FWFIIIETERS FOR LAYER 111

50

:md

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Layer

l&parties

Sol1

-1

ADtlKt4ISIRATION

1
1
3
1

Layer

tbmber

Sublayer
-------:

Sublsyer

Sublaycr

Elau. of top of layer

Number of sublayers

= 5 (for

uaight

Unit

Layer
1

Sublayar

soil

I-

this

layer)

1e4.m

properties

Compressible
*I,

Index

Co+tprcssion
Layer
2

Type of layer
Layer

---------

of soil

88.88

Racoapreasion

Index

Sualling

Index

Is this

the last

Esti

Estimated
layer

from a-logp

of profile

curuas

lta

Hit <FS> to Prau. Layer Hlt <FlB> to continue


Press space bar to see nenu optlons and then <Ret> to lnput values

SOIL DESCRIPTIOI( WD FARClliEIERS FOR LAYER 82

Layer Soil

Initial
-

Uoid
Hit

Propertiaa

==I

Ratio

<Pig> to accapt ualuas Unit

Layer
1

-------I

Sublawr

Sublayar

of soil

Layer
2

this

II-i

layer)

Conprcssible
Initial

void ratio

Rstiaated

from e-logp

curues

Index Rstinated

from e-logp

curues

Rstinatad

from a-logp

curuas

Index

Rccoccprcmrion

5 <for

= 184.89

pmpertles

Coaprerrlon

----_I__

Type of layer
roll

88.88

ayera

uclght

Layer

Sublayer

f la*r=

Hit

Sualling

Index

Is this

the last

<F9> to

ItlITIbL

Preu.

layer
Layer

of profile
Hit

UOID RATIO - LAYER 112

51

tie

<Fig> to continue

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Input

Ualue of

Hit

Sublayer
---e--m--

Compression Index

=m

<PlR> to accept value I_

mm

Layer
1
Sublryer

Sublrycr

Unit ueight

= 104. w

of soil

layer)

Type of layer

Layer soil

= Inltlal

uold ratio

Estimated

from e-loge

properties

Cacrpresslon Index
Sublayer

5 <for this

Number of sublayers
1

Coapresslble

Layer
Reconpression

Hit

Index Estlxatsd
Estimated

Suelllng

Index

Is this

the last

layer

from e-logp

of profile

<P9> to Preu. Layer -

e-logp

from

curues
curws

curues

No

Hit <PlO> to continue

COllPRESSIOWINDEX - LAYER UZ

Input

Value of
Hit

Sublayer

Recompression

ml-Ii

<Fl8> to accept ualue -

89.88

Wusber of sublayers

Unit ueight

= 104.m

thls

5 (for

layer)

1
Layer
1

e----m---

Sublayer

Sublayer

of soil

Type of layer

Layer sol1 properttes

= Initial

Compressible

Estlrcated

uold rrtto
from rlogp

curues

Index Estimated

from a-logp

curuer

Estimated

from e-logp

curues

Compression Index

--------

Layer

1-

Recompression

Sublayer

index

Hit

Suelllng

Index

Is this

the last

layer

<P9> to Preu. Layer -

of profile

Hit <p10> to continue

RECOHPRRSSION
INDEX - LAYER 82

52

Its

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

--

i1I
3

II.

Layer Number =

Elm.

of tap of layer

limber
Sublayar
----------

of sublayers

= 5 <for thls

layer)

1
Unit ueight
- Layer
1

Sublayer

Sublaycr

of soil

= 1e4.w

Type of layer

Layer sol1 properties

Couprcssion
Layer
2
Sublayer

w.88

Index

Recompression

Compressible
Initial

Estitiatcd

Index Estircatsd

void ratio
from c-logp

curves

from a-logp

curuos

2
Sualling
Is this

c Hit

Index
the

last

<F9> to Preu.

lay
Layer

space bar to see nenu options

Press

and then <Ret> to input

values

SUELLING INDEX - LAYER UZ

1
1
3

mloH
ILayer Hurrbcr
Sublayer
--------I--

B8.W

Number of sublayers

5 <for

Unit weight

= 184. Be

thls

layer)

I
Layer
1

Sublayer

Sublrycr

1
Layer
2

Sublayer

Eleu. of top of layer

of soil

Type of layer

Layer soil

properties

= Initial

Cortprmian

Index

Recoup-ion

Compressible
wld

ratio

Estimated

from e-logp

curves

Index Eatixated

from s-logp

turues

Sacla as recorrpression

index

2
Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

layer

of profile

Hit <F9> to Preu. Layer Hlt <FM>


Rlt-H-Henu
Space Bar-Next iten

to continue

DEFIHIHG LINER 82 As LAST LINER OF SOIL PROFILE

53

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Subleyar

Eleu. of top of layer

Number of sublayers

= 5 (for

this

layer)

--------Sublayer

Sublaycr

Eleu.

of bottom of last

layer

ible

Hit <Fig> to accept ualue d


Compression Index

- Layer
2
Sublayer

80.88

Recompression

id ratlo

Estimated

Index Estinated

from c-logp

curuer

fron

curves

slegp

Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

Hit <F3> to Pm.

Same as recompression
layer

of profile

Layer -

index

Yes;

Hit <F10> to continue

DEFINING TtllClWESS OF SOIL PROFILE

FEDERRLHIGHUW RDNINISTRRTION
project

Definition

Run program

A Nicrocomputar prograM for


computing
one
Exit to DOS
diMemime
compression
vertical
settlerrent
$e to enbanknent loads. The prograM follow
1
the
equations
presented
by LaMbeEUhitMan
<1969>, Ladd <1373) and PoulosBDauis <1974).
For the case of a strip symwatrical
vertical
PROTOTYPEGNGINEERINGINC.
mbanknent loading the prograM supsriMpoae!5
57 tlestland Cluanua
tuo vertical
snbanknsnt
loads.
For the
Uinchester,
l?4 81898
incrertent
of uertical
stresses et end of
(617) 72!3-2363
superimposes
* series of
Clttn. Dr. Alfrsdo Urzua
fill,
the PPGgl-aM
rsctanguler
loads.
I======
Enter

letter

only,

OF use at-mu+ then 4

flake selection,

EHBGW tlt3IN IIENU - SELECTION OF UGTERTABLE DEFINITION

54

EMBANKAppendixB Example 1

Uatcr Table Definition


Eleu. of Uatcr Table
I Nlcrocortputcr
pro
dimensional compress
Hit <F18> to accept values
due to embankment loa
the equations
presented
by LambeWhltman
<1969>, Ladd < 1973) and PoulosSDauls <1974>.
For the case of a strip symmetrIca
uertical
PROTOTYPEENGINEERING INC.
embankment loading the program superimposes
57 Uestland Ftuenue
tuo vertical
embankment
loads.
For the
Uinchester,
W 81898
increment
of vertical
stresses at end of
(617) 729-2363
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
Dr. Alfred0 Urzua
rectangular
loads.

IJRTEATABLE AT ELEWlTlON = 188 FT.

FEDERIlL HIGHW ADHINISTRATION


1

Ilain
nenu
====li

pro.kct Dcflnition
soil Profile
and soil
Uater table definition

A tlicrocomputer
program for
computing one
dimensional compression
uertical
settlement
due to embankment loads. The program follous
the equations
presented
by Lambe&Uhitnan
(1969>, Ladd <1973> and Poulos&Dauis <19?4).
For the case of a strip synmatrlcal
vertical
embankment loading the program superimposes
tw
uertlcal
embankment
loads.
For
the
increment
of uertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use. arrow

then 4

Stress

history

User defined

stress

param.

history

PROTOTYPEENGINEERINGINC.
57 Uestland Avenue
Ulnchester,
hD 81898
<617) 729-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

t hake selection.

<Esc> t Nain Menu

CDHPRESSIBLELAYER IS DEFINED FIS NORMXLY CONSOLIDATED<DEFAULT)

55

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1.

Run program
Exit to DOS

R Hicrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dimensional
compression
uertlcal
settlement
due to embankment loads.
Tha progran
follow
the
equations
presented
by La&Whitman
(1969),
Ladd (1973
and PoulosGDauis
41974).
For the case of a strip
synnatrical
uertical
embankment loading
the program
ruporimpones
tw
uertical
embankment
loads.
For
the
increment
of
wrtical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
supsrinpases
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

PROTOTYPE EIY;IKEERING INC.


57 Uestland
Awnue
Ulnchester,
Hp 01896
<617) n9-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Ursua
+I

EHBANK HAIN HENU - SELECTION OF UERTIUX

II Hlcrocomputer
progrrn
fol
dlnensional
compression
uer
due to embankment loads.
The program follow
the
equations
presented
by LambeRUhltman
<1969>, Ladd <IS73
and PoulosSDavls
<1974>.
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
vertical
embankment loading
the program
superimposes
loads.
For
the
tuo
wrtical
embankment
increment
of
wrtical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superiMposes
a series
of
rmotangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use l rrous

then

t ilake

t Hake selection.
STRESS INCREHENT

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING INC.


57 Uentland
Avenue
Uinchemtor,
HA 81898
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urzua

selection.

<Esc> l

Hain

UERTICFIL STRESS INCREHENT HEW - STRIP SWUWTRICFIL EIIBANKHENT LOpDIMi

56

Menu

EMBANKAppendix B Example 1

SYHNETRICAL VERTICAL ENWNKNEHT LORD


URRTICRL BlBAHKtlENT
Wnk.
slope
a
Wnk.
uldth
b
tkight
of fill
W
Unit uaight
of fill

FOOIINC
= 18.88
= 38.88
= 28.88
q
iZR.BB

El+i
11111111
t
111111111111 H x

L
I

Layer

<617)
Dr.

ERING It%.
Avenue
a 018%
729-2363
Alfred0
Urrua

-1

FWNDAIION ELEU.

.
.
I

POINTS FOR COllPUTATIOH OF


SETTLENEHT
calculata
in

~1 coordirutw
x2 coordlnata
delta x

1111111111111111'-+
x+
.
Layer
t

2 = lB0.W

Hit <Fig> to l ooept

increment
fill.
the
rectangular

of
ucrtical
stresses
program
superinposcs
loeds.
+tl+-l+ovs

STRIP SWl.

I_

ueluer

at
md
a series

of
of

Mtn.
I

bar

*'-Sclcct

Esc-Exit

ElleANKflEHT LMD1NI.i GWHETRY - SETTLENENT IN X-DIRECTION

SMlEIRICIL

UERTICAL ENWMKNENI LOAD *

UERTICAL ENRAHKHENT POOPING


Enbank. slope
a
= 1e.m
Embank. uidth
b
= J&Be
Height of fill
H
= 20.08
Unit ueight
of flll
= it&B@

11111111
111111111111
1111111111111111-l-

POINTS POR COHPUTATIOHOF

X---+

SETTLEM
= X Direction
=
a.00
20. ee
=
=m

soil
ltlon

paran.

Layor

Layer

(617)
Dr.

ERING INC.
hmnum
A e1990
729-2363
filfrcdo
Urzua

--

calculab
in
xl coordlntc
x2 ooordlnate
delta
x

n
1

t
H

.
l
.
21--

FOUWDATIO)( ELW.
2 = 1m.m
Nit
increment
the
rectangular

fill,

<Fig>

to accept

of
uertlc81
stresses
progru
superimposes
lo&s.

ualuer

at
end
a wrier

of
of

Mtn.
I

DEFINING POINTS FOR CC#lPUTAIION OF SETTL0lEIJT

57

EMBANKAppendixB Example 1

thin

EM IN 1
A Hlcroconputcr

tlmu

Definition
file and soil param.
ble deflnttlon
irtory
stress LncmDwnt
system of Units
llaintain
flie

progren

for computing
one
vertical
settlement
The program follous
the equations
presented
by LambeWhitman
<1969>, Ladd <1973> and PoulorSDauts <1974>.
For the case of a strip
symmetrical vertical
embankment loading the program suprhposes
tuo
vertical
mbankrrent
loads.
For
the
increment
of uertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the prograM
superlmposss
a series of
rectangular
loads.
dInemiona1
corcpression
due to embankrrent
loads.

Enter

letter

only,

or uss armus

PROTOTYPEEtiGINEERING INC.
57 Ucstland Aunue
Uinchester,
ryI 818%
<617)

+J

then

729-2363

Dr. (Ilfredo

Mtn.

Urzua

selection.

tlake

EtiBWK IlAIN tWiU - SELECTlCWlOF RUWPROGRAIl

OWEDIilENSIONfiL SETTLEilENT ANCILVS1WFedera.l Nlghuay Adrtinistratlon


STRIP S!lHtlCTRICbL UERTICFU.CNBANKllENTLOilDING
Project
Project
Dets

Nane
: Enbankmnt
Number : gi-la
: led141

load

Client
: Any Client
Project Nanager : #y(
:Wl
Corrputed by

Settlement
Embankrcent
Embankment
Embankment

slope a

top uidth
bottom uidth

=
=

Ground Surface Eleu.


Uebr table Elau.

IP.
1
2
-

Wit

=
=

Lb&WI
TYPE THICK.
<PO
INCOnP. 2B.B
cow. ie.e
arrnu

keys

ta

1g.W
mee
48.88
lB@.Be
iee.ee

for X-Dircctlon

<ft>
<ft>
<ft)
<ft>
<ft)

Height
Unit

of fill
ueight

0f

fill

p load/unit
area
Foundation Eleu.
Unit usight 0f ud.

COEFFICIPCT
COtlP. RECOHP. SUELL.

UNIT
UEIGHI

2e.m
ize.ee
= 2488.88
= iee.ee
=
62.40

SPECIFIC
GWITY

UOID
RRTTIO

2.65

-2.10

<pcf>
----:.iee
display

---e.iie
nsrt

--e.iie
screen.

I22.00
184. ee
<FB> Print.

PROGRIIllUJTPUT SCREEN

58

<fU
<pcf)
<pef)
<ft)
<pcf)

<FlB> Nain km

EMBANKAppendix B Example 1

ONE Dl11RNSlON~L SETILEtlENT MWSlS~Federal


Highuay tilnlstration
STRIP SYllllETRlCAL VERTICAL EHB&NKliENT UWIDING
ProJect
ProJact
Date

Name
Number

: Embankment
: 91-1234
: lWBl/91

load

Cl icnt
Project
Hanagsr
Computed by

: any Cllcnt
: Ml
:Au(

for X-Direction

Settlement

/
Embankment slope a
Eabanknent
top uldth
Embankment bottom uldth
Ground Surface
Eleu.
Uatcr table
Eleu.

NQ.

i?k?

i
2

THICK.
<ft.)

INCO~P. 2e.e
cow.
le.8

Hlt

arrou

keys

18.88
2R.W
48.88
1BB.W
1w.w

=
1
=
=

<ft)
<ft>
<ft)
<It>
<rt

Kelght
of fill
W
Unit uetght
of flll
p load/unit
area
Foundation
Eleu.
Select
Send form to: QPrlntcr,

EDirk

File.

IJNlT
UEIGHT
Cpcf)

SPECIFIC
CRFIUIN

UOID
RATIO

----I.188

122.89
184. ee

-2.65

---2.18

<FE> Print.

<Fit0

to display

--e.iie
next

----8.118
screen.

llrln

Nenu

PRIMTED OUTPUT

ONE DIllENSI(mAL SETTLERENT ANALYSIS/Federal


Hlghuay kdnlnlstratlon
STRIP MltlETRlCRL
UERTICFIL Eli8bNKllENT LOiWlNG
ProJect
ProJect
Date

Name
Number

: Embankment
: 91-1234
: wei/

load

Client
ProJect
tlanager
Computed by

Settlertent
Embankwent slope a
Embankment top uidth
Embankment betton
uldth
Cround Surface
Elan.
Uater table
Eleu.

NQ.

i
2
-

<ft.>
<pcf)
<prf>
<ft))

COEFFICIENT
CORP. RECOflP. SUELL.

SELECTION OF DISH FILE

=
z9.w
= 128.88
= 2488.98
= iee.ee

Hit

TYPE

THICK.
<ft.>

INCONP. me
CONP. le.9
arrou

beys

to

=
E
=
=

i8.W
ze.ee
48.38
lee.88
18e.ee

for
<ft)
<ft)
<ft>
<ft)
<ft)

: Any c11ent
: WI
:lUi

X-Direction
Height
of fill
H
unit ueight
of fill
area
p load/unit
Foundation
Elm
Destination
EXfiNPLEl. OUT

2e.w
Z 12e.w
= 24w.w
= 188.88
File

COEFFICIENT
COIIP. RECOIIP. WELL.

UNIT
UEIGHT
<pcf>

SPECIFIC
CRMJITY

UOID
RATIO

----i.iee

122.88
184.88

2.55

--2.10

display

----e.iie
next

----a.iie
screen.

<FE> Print.

SELECTION OF DESTINATION FILE

59

<FIR> thin

<ft.>
<pcf)
<psf>
<ft)

llenu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

ONB DIMENSIONAL s&m~mmr


muysIs/lodeml
STRIP SY)MBTRICAL VERTICAL B

Project
Name
Pile NILme
Date

t Embsnkment load
I l4xamplel.Bl4a
t 10/01/91

client
project
llanager
collputod
by

Settlement
%iban)onent slope II
Bmbankment tog width
gmban)onont bottom width
Ground Surface
Blev.
Water table
8lev.
LAYBR

N'.
1
a

TYPB

INCOMP. 20.0
10.0
COMP *
SUBLAYER
TBICK.
(ft)

N.
1
a
3
4
5
6

Layer

INCOMP.
a.00
a.00
a.00
2.00
a.00

XI
strese

(RSf)
1
a
3
4
5
6

Layer
1
a
3
4
5
6

-Sit

THICK.
(ft)

INCOMP.
78a.86
791.11
794.58
794.15
790.5-l

x=
stress
(PSf)
INCOMP.
1646.46
1560.52
1480.49
1406.26
1337.57

0.00

sstt.
(In.)
SNCOMP .

1.82
1.74
1.66
1.59
1.51
---__8.31

I
D
*
=
i

uighway Administration
LOADING

10.00
20.00
40.00
100.00
100.00

for
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)

might
of fill
S
Unit welghc of fill
'D load/unit
atea
Foundation
810~.
Unit weight of Wat.

--__0.110

122.00
104.00

SOIL STRBSS88
INITIAL
(DSf)

79 .oo
77.00
75.00
73.00
71.00

INCOYP.
1089.37
1065.97
1041.58
1016.53
991.15

DNIT
WBIGST
(pcf)

__-__
0.110

BLBV.
(ft)

XI
stress
Wf 1

I Any client
t AUH
1 Am4

X-Direction

CGBFPICIUJT
COIIP. F&oMP. SWELL.
--me1.100

la33.60
1316.80
1400.00
1483.10
1566.40

5.00
sett.
(In.)
INCOMP
a.34
a.19
1.06
1.93
1.81
-----10.34

=
10.00
= 120,00
= a400.00
= 100.00
=
62.40

SPBCIPIC
GRAVITY

VOID
PATIO

---2.65

---1.10

MX.PAST

(ft)
(pcf)
(psi)
(ft)

(pcf)

PRBSS.

(Wf)
1233.60
1316.80
1400.00
1483.20
1566.40

x.
stroee
(l=f)

10.00
sett.
(111.)

1377.09
1310.69
1267.53
1217.38
1170.05

a.77
a.57
a.38
a.11
2.06
-----11.01

X=
stress
iPSf)

15.00
sett.
(Ill.)

1576.37
1497.77
1414.60
1356.64
1393.57

3.04
a.01
2.60
a.40
a .a3
-----13.08

20.00
sett.
(In.)
3.14
1.89
2.67
a.47
a.28
-----13.44

zmrow keys

to display

next

screen.

60

cm>

Print.

<no>

main menu -

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Rain Renu
project Definition
soil Profila
and soil param.
Uatnr table deflnitlon
Stress history
Uertical
struts
increment
-==I
system of Units
Run prograti
lllcrocomplter
program for
computing
one
Exit to DOS
dlmemional
corrprcrsion
vcrtlcal
settlement
due to mbankrcent loads. The program follous
the equations
presented
by Lambe6lJhitean
<1969>, Ladd <I973 and PoulosSDavis <1974>.
PROTOTYPEEWGINEERIM INC.
For the case of a strip syrtrtetrical
wrtical
57 Uentland Avenue
ectbankmmt
loading the program super imposes
loads.
Uinchaoter,
IYI 91898
For the
tuo wrtical
elrbankment
<617> 729-2969
increment
of
vertical
stresses at end of
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Ursua
fill,
the program superiaposas
a series of
rectangular
loads.
t--II

Enter

letter

only,

EMBANK tllIN

or use arrows than 4

t ilake selection.

ttENU - SELRCTIONOF tillNTAIR

FILE

FEDERAL HlGHlJAY ADHINISTRATION

mainllmu
project Definition
soil Profile
and soil parae.
Uater table definition
Stress history
Uertical
stress inc-nt
system of Units
Maintain

A tlicrocouputer
program for
computing
one
dlaensional
compression
vertical
settlement
due to embankment loads. The program follous
the equationa
pmeented
by LanbeWhitrcan
<1969), Ladd <1979> and PoulosRDavis (1974).
Far the cam of a strip
ayemetrical
vertical
embankment loading the program superimposes
tuo vertical
glbankmnt
loads.
For the
Increment
of wrtical
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loada.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

than 4

t llaka

Clear entries
PROTOTYPERNGINEERIffi INC.
57 Uestland AMnue
Uinchesterr
tM gl899
<617) 723-2363
Attn. Dr. CIlfredo Urzua
selection.

ll6INTpIN FILE IlEWU - SELECTION OF SAVE FILE

61

file

<Esc> a Plain Menu

EMBANKAppendixB Example 1

llain tlanu project


Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
paran.
Uater table
deflnltlon
Stress
history
Uartical
stress
increment
system of Units
.
.

EM KIR 1 KI

m-1
A tllcmcomputcr
program for
conputlng
one I
dlncnslonal
oonprcsslon
wrtloal
sett
Destination
Pile
due to enbanbnent
loads.
The program f
the
equatlons
presented
by LartbeBu
<1969),
l&d
41973) and Poulos&Dauls
<1974>.
For the case of a strip
synnetrlcal
wrtical
PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING UK.
cnbanhnent
loading
the progran
superinposes
57 Uestland
8wnue
tuo
wrtical
enbanknent
loads.
For
the
Ulnchastsr,
tW 81898
<617> 729-2969
lncrenent
of
uertlcal
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
attn.
Dr. plfredo
Ursua
rectangular
loads.
L
Enter

letter

only,

or usa arrows

then

Hake selection.

<Esc> t Hain

tlenu

SAUING INPUT FILE 8S EXfDlPLEl.DAT

EM KIR 1 KI

Haln tknu =
project
Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
paran.
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uartical
stress
increnent
system of Units
llaintain
file

A Nicrocerrpuhr
pmgram for
computing
one
dlnensional
coccpresslon
uertical
sattlenant
due to enbanhnent
loads.
The program follow
the
equatlom
presented
by LambeBUhitman
<1969>, Ladd <I973
and PoulosDDauls
<1974>.
For the case of a strip
synnetrlcal
uertical
embankment loading
the pmgracr
superircposes
tuo
uertlcal
enbankmnt
loads.
For
the
increment
of
uertlcal
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERItG INC.


57 tkstland
Avanue
Uinchester.
ryI 81898
<617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
llrzua

t Wake selection.

EflBAflK NAIN IIENU - EXIT TO DOS

62

EMBANK Appendix B Example 1

Ilain tlenu project Deflnltlon


soil Profile
and sell
Uater table deflnltion
Stress history
Uertical
system

stress
of Units

pararr,

increment

Maintain f I le
Run progran
A tiicrocomputcr
program for
computing
one
dItemsiona1 ccaprersion
uertlcal
settleccent
due to enbankwnt loads. Ihe program follous
the equations
presented
by LaAe&Uhltman
<1969>, Ladd <1973) and PoulosSDauis <1974).
For the of a strip
ryrtmetrical
uerticel
ecrbankment loading the progrerr superhposes
loads.
tuo uertical
For the
embankment
fncrment
of
vertical
stresses at end of
fill,
thu program superimposes
a seriee of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use

rrous

L=,~-

PROT
57 Uettland

Uinchester,
M 81898
(617) 729-2363

Attn.

then 6J b llake selection.

EXIT TO DOS HEMJ - SELECIIOW OF YES

63

m; INC.
Rumue

Dr. Alfredo

Urzua

<Em> b tlain Henu

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

Example 2

64

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Approach Embankment Settlement

Example No. 2:

This exampleis similar to the one presentedin the U.S Departmentof


Transportation,FHWA, Soils and Foundations Workshop Manual, p. 165.
Figure EX-2 showsthe problem geometryand soil parameters.The purpose
of the exampleis to computethe settlementof the clay stratumunder points
A through D. The clay stratumis divided into sevensublayers.
TableEX-2 presentsa summaryof the computer-calculatedand handcomputedsettlementfor points A through D.

Table 2. Summaryof surfacesettlements


SurfaceSettlement(in)
Hand-calculated
Computer

Point
A
B
c

34.46
23.99
7.51

18.97

34.46

60ft

FILL
1!7
pr:

pt+

y=130 pcf

C
w
?$ s
4
35 ft

B,D

30 ft

- INCOMPRESSIBLE - y=l 1Opcf


T
y=127pcf
c&=0.35
c, =0.035
w=35%
G = 2.78

-CLAY-

-SAND

toofl

2
WC
Y
x

(b) Plan View

(a) Cross Section

Not to scale

Figure 11. Approachembankmentsettlement

65

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Example No. 2:

Approach Embankment Settlement


Problem: Computesettlement at point A in figure 11.
-

GeostaticEffective Vertical Stresses


Divide compressibleclay stratuminto seven5-ft substrata.

9 Computeeffective vertical stressesat midpoint for eachsubstrata;


obtain table below:
z = 12.5ft: Ot = 110x 10+ 127 x 2.5 - 62.4 x 7.5

949.5 psf

z= 17.5fc iY2= 110 x lO+ 127 x 7.5 - 62.4 x 12.5 = 1272.5psf


2 = 22.5ft: 03 = 110x 10 + 127 x 12.5 - 62.4 x 17.5 = 1595.5psf
z = 27.5ft: &, = 110x 10 + 127 x 17.5 - 62.4 x 22.5 = 1918.5psf
z = 32.5 fr: a5 = 110x LO+ 127 x 22.5 - 62.4 x 27.5 = 2241.5 psf
z = 37.5fc: a6 = 110x 10 + 127 x 27.5 - 62.4 x 32.5 = 2564.5 psf
z = 42.5 fr: is, = 110x 10 + 127 x 32.5 - 62.4 x 37.5 = 2887.5 psf
-

DetermineIncrementsof Effective Stress


Programdivides embankmentload into 10 3-ft high rectangularsub
loads, as shown in figure 6 of the main text.

Program extendsloads to ymax= y1 + 10bz= 0 + 10 x 60 = 600 ft.

Coordinatesof lower left and upperright comersof eachsub-loadare


as follows: (Refer to figure 7 of main text.)

Sub-LoadNo.
1
2
3

4
5
6

7
8
9
10
l

Yl

57
51
45
39
33
27
21
15
9
3

57
51
45
39
33
27
21
15
9
3

X2

163
169
175
181
187
193
199
205
211
217

y2

600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600

Note that x and y coordinatesof point A are:


xA= Iloft;

Xl

yA= 6off

The configuration of a typical sub-loadand its relation to point A is


shown below:

66

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Note: Values of x1, x2, yl. and y2


are as shown on table in
previouspagefor eachsubload, In all cases,y2 = 600
ft.

Embankment
@x= 1lOft

For each sub-load,the incrementsof vertical stressat point A must


be computedby superposition,as shown below:

K2eY2)

(110, 600)

+2x

2x

'(110.60

oqCJY,

(0)

2x

+2x

(w

(0)

2x

(W 1

Equation (14) in main text is applied to superpositionsteps(a) and


(b) for eachsub-loadin order to computethe incrementsof stress.

67

EMBANKAppendix B Example 2

ParametersR,, Rz, and R, are defined in figure 8:


R, = (12+ 2):
R,= (b*+ I*+
R, = (I*+ b* + z*+
l

Tables 1 through7 on the following pagessummarize the


computation for 2 = 12.5; 17.5; 22.5; 27.5; 32.5; 37.5: and 42.5 ft.
ParametersC, and C2 in the tablesare defined as follows:
C, = urct -$
t

c, =

so that:

a, = %(c, + q

68

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Table 3. Approach Embankment Settlement


Summary Calculations for Increment of Stressesat Depth
Z

53

= 12.5 feet
Increment

2
R22

R3

2965.25

165.25

53 540 291756.30
3637.25
9 59
59 540 291756.30

2965.25
237.25

54.54
542.74

0.23 0.23
1.34 0.22

3637.25

60.98
543.36

0.61 0.49
1.36 0.20

96.99 193.98
68.10 136.21
97.13 194.25

4381.25

381.25

67.87

0.85 0.51

84.83 169.67

65 540 291756.30

4381.25

544.04

1.38 0.19

97.22 194.44

5 197.25

597.25

75.09

1.01 0.46

9 1.39 182.77

71 540 291756.30
27 77
6085.25

5197.25
885.25

544.79

1.40 0.17

97.28 194.56

82.55

1.11 0.41

77 540 291756.30

6085.25

545.61

1.41 0.16

94.19 188.38
97.33 194.66

7045.25

1245.25

90.19

1.18 0.36

95.53 191.06

83 540 291756.30

7045.25

546.48

1.42 0.15

97.36 194.72

8077.25
39 89
89 540 291756.30

1677.25

1.23 0.32
1.43 0.14

96.24 192.48

8077.25

97.97
547.43

45

9181.25

2181.25

105.86

1.27 0.29

96.65 193.29

95 540 291756.30

9181.25

548.44

1.44 0.13

97.41 194.82

51 101

2757.25

113.83

1.30 0.26

96.89 193.79

101 540 291756.30 10357.25

549.51

1.45 0.12

97.42 194.85

121.88
550.64

1.33 0.24
1.45 0.12

97.05 194.11
97.43 194.87

15
21

33

57

65
71

83

95

107

10357.25
11605.25

3405.25

107 540 291756.30 11605.25

Cl

0,

c2

28.67

57.35

97.39 194.78

Increment of Stress = 3645.02 (psf)

where: C, =

69

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Table 4. Approach Embankment Settlement


Summary Calculations for Increment of Stressesat Depth

z = 17.5 feet
b

Increment

2
Rl

R;

3115.25
3 53
53 540 291906.30
9 59
3787.25
59 540 29 1906.30

R3

3 15.25

Cl

c2

az

3115.25
387.25
3787.25

55.89
542.88
62.20

0.16 0.17
1.25 0.30
0.45 0.43

20.80 41.59
96.18 192.37
54.57 109.14

543.50

1.28 0.27

96.52 193.05

453 1.25

531.25

68.97

0.68 0.52

74.47 148.95

65 540 291906.30
21 71
5347.25

4531.25

544.18

1.31 0.25

96.76 193.51

747.25

76.08

0.84 0.52

84.72 169.45

71 540 291906.30

5347.25

544.93

1.33 0.23

96.92 193.85

27

6235.25

1035.25

83.45

0.96 0.49

89.97 179.94

77 540 29 1906.30
33 83
7195.25

6235.25

545.74

1395.25

91.02

1.35 0.22
1.04 0.45

97.04 194.09
92.78 185.55

83 540 291906.30
39 89
8227.25

7195.25
1827.25

546.62
98.73

1.36 0.20
1.11 0.41

97.13 194.26
94.37 188.74

89 540 29 1906.30
45 95
9331.25

8227.25
2331.25

547.56
106.57

1.37 0.19

97.20 194.40

1.16 0.38

95.33 190.66

95 540 291906.30

9331.25

548.57

1.39 0.18

97.25 194.50

2907.25

114.49

1.20 0.35

95.93 191.87

101 540 291906.30 10507.25


57 107 11755.25 3555.25

549.64
122.49

1.40 0.17
1.23 0.32

97.29 194.58
96.33 192.67

107 540 291906.30 11755.25

550.78

1.41 0.16

97.32 194.65

15

65

77

51 101

10507.25

Increment of Stress = 3537.82 (psf)

where: C, =

c, =

70

EMBANKAppendix B Example 2

Table 5. Approach Embankment Settlement


Summary Cakulations for Increment of Stressesat Depth

z = 22.5 feet
Increment
b

53

R:

R22

R3

3315.25

515.25

57.66

53 540 292106.30

3315.25

9 59
3987.25
59 540 292106.30

587.25
3987.25

473 1.25

65 540 292106.30

Cl

c2

=z

0.12 0.14

16.21

543.06

1.17 0.36

94.91 189.81

63.78

0.35 0.37

44.71

543.68

1.20 0.34

95.55 191.10

731.25

70.40

0.55 0.49

64.79 129.57

4731.25

544.36

1.24 0.31

96.00 192.00

5547.25

947.25

0.71 0.54

77.21 154.43

71 540 292106.30

5547.25

77.38
545.11

1.26 0.29

96.33 192.65

27 77
6435.25
77 540 292106.30

1235.25
6435.25

84.64
545.93

0.83 0.53
1.28 0.27

84.57 169.14
96.56 193.13

33

7395.25

1595.25

92.11

0.92 0.51

88.94 177.89

83 540 292106.30

7395.25

546.80

1.30 0.26

96.74 193.49

39 89
8427.25
89 540 292106.30

2027.25
8427.25

99.74

1.00 0.48

91.62 183.23

547.75

1.32 0.24

96.88 193.76

45

9531.25

2531.25

107.50

1.06 0.45

93.31 186.62

95 540 292106.30

9531.25

548.75

1.33 0.23

96.98 193.97

51 101

3107.25

115.36

1.10 0.42

94.42 188.84

101 540 292106.30 10707.25

549.82

1.35 0.22

97.07 194.14

3755.25

123.31

1.14 0.39

95.17 190.35

107 540 292106.30 11955.25

550.96

1.36 0.21

97.13 194.27

15
21

65
71

83

95

57 107

10707.25
11955.25

32.41
89.42

Increment of Stress = 3430.22 (psf)

71

EMBANKAppendix B Example 2

Table 6. Approach Embankment Settlement


Summary Calculations for Increment of Stressesat Depth
Z

= 27.5 feet
Increment

R:.

R2

3 53
3565.25
53 540 292356.30
9

59

4237.25

59 540 292356.30
15 65
4981.25
65 540 292356.30
21 71
5797.25

765.25
3565.25

R3

59.79

Cl

c2

=z

0.10 0.12

13.19

26.38

543.29

1.09 0.41

93.17 186.33

837.25
4237.25
981.25
4981.25

65.71
543.91
72.15

0.29 0.32
1.13 0.39

37.47 74.94
94.19 188.39

1197.25

0.46 0.45
1.17 0.36
0.60 0.52

56.49 112.97
94.93 189.86
69.81 139.63

1.20 0.34

95.47 190.93
78.64 157.27
95.87 191.74

544.59

71 540 292356.30
27 77
6685.25

5797.25

78.98
545.34

1485.25

86.11

77 540 292356.30
7645.25
33 83

6685.25
1845.25

546.15

0.72 0.55
1.22 0.32

93.46

0.82 0.54

84.38 168.76

83 540 292356.30

7645.25

547.03

1.25 0.30

96.17 192.34

39

8677.25
89 540 292356.30

2277.25
8677.25

100.99
547.98

0.90 0.52
1.27 0.29

88.14 176.28
96.41 192.81

45 95
9781.25
95 540 292356.30

2781.25
9781.25

108.66
548.98

0.96 0.50
1.28 0.27

90.65 181.30
96.59 193.18

51 101 10957.25 3357.25


101 540 292356.30 10957.25

116.44

1.01 0.47

92.36 184.72

550.05

1.30 0.26

96.73 193.46

57 107 12205.25 4005.25


107 540 292356.30 12205.25

124.32
551.19

1.06 0.45
1.31 0.25

93.56 187.12
96.85 193.70

89

Increment of Stress = 3322.09 (psf)

where: C, =

72

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

Table 7. Approach Embankment Settlement


Summary Calculations for Increment of Stressesat Depth
2

= 32.5 feet
Increment

R:

53

3865.25

Rz?
1065.25

R3

62.24

Cl

C2

11.04

22.08

53 540 292656.30

3865.25

543.57

0.08 0.10
1.02 0.45

4537.25

1137.25

67.96

0.24 0.28

59 540 292656.30
5281.25
15 65

4537.25 544.18
1281.25 74.20

1.06 0.43
0.38 0.41

3 1.98 63.96
92.48 184.96
49.55 99.11

65 540 292656.30

5281.25

544.87

1.10 0.40

93.55 187.10

6097.25

1497.25

80.86

0.52 0.50

62.98 125.96

7 1 540 292656.30

6097.25

545.62

1.14 0.38

94.34 188.69

27 77
6985.25
77 540 292656.30

1785.25
6985.25

87.83
546.43

0.63 0.54
1.17 0.36

72.66 145.31
94.95 189.89

7945.25

2145.25

95.05

0.73 0.55

79.44 158.88
95.41 190.81

21

33

59

71

83

91.02 182.03

83 540 292656.30

7945.25

547.3 1

1.19 0.34

39

8977.25

2577.25

102.46

89 540 292656.30
45 95 10081.25

8977.25
3081.25

548.25
110.03

0.81 0.55
1.22 0.33
0.87 0.54

95 540 292656.30 10081.25

549.26

1.24 0.31

84.17
95.77
87.47
96.05

3657.25

117.72

0.93 0.52

89.82 179.65

101 540 292656.30 11257.25

550.32

1.25 0.30

96.27 192.55

4305.25

125.52

0.98 0.49

107 540 292656.30 12505.25

551.46

1.27 0.28

91.52 183.03
96.46 192.9 1

89

51 101
57 107

11257.25
12505.25

168.33
191.53
174.95
192.10

Increment of Stress = 3213.81 (psf)

where: c,= urct $


i 31

73

EMBANKAppendix B Example 2

Table 8. ApproachEmbankmentSettlement
SummaryCalculationsfor Incrementof Stressesat Depth

z = 37.5 feet
b

R:

RZ

R3

Cl

3
53
9
59
15
65
21
71
27
77
33
83
39
89
45
95
51
101
57
107

53
540
59
540
65
540
71
540
77
540
83
540
89
540
95
540
101
540
107
540

4215.25
293006.30
4887.25
293006.30
5631.25
293006.30
6447.25
293006.30
7335.25
293006.30
8295.25
293006.30
9327.25
293006.30
10431.25
293006.30
11607.25
293006.30
12855.25
293006.30

1415.25
4215.25
1487.25
4887.25
1631.25
5631.25
1847.25
6447.25
2135.25
7335.25
2495.25
8295.25
2927.25
9327.25
3431.25
10431.25
4007.25
11607.25
4655.25
12855.25

64.99
543.89
70.49
544.51
76.53
545.19
83.00
545.94
89.80
546.75
96.87
547.63
104.15
548.57
111.61
549.57
119.20
550.64
126.90
551.77

0.07
0.95
0.20
1.00
0.33
1.04
0.45
1.08
0.55
1.11
0.65
1.14
0.73
1.17
0.80
1.19
0.86
1.21
0.91
1.23

Increment
c2

0.09
0.47
0.25
0.46
0.38
0.44
0.47
0.42
0.52
0.40
0.55
0.38
0.56
0.36
0.56
0.35
0.54
0.33
0.53
0.32

=z
9.42
88.54
27.68
90.46
43.78
91.89
56.85
92.97
66.91
93.80
74.41
94.45
79.91
94.96
83.94
95.36
86.90
95.68
89.11
95.95

18.84
177.09
55.37
180.91
87.55
183.77
113.71
185.94
133.83
187.60
148.82
188.89
159.82
189.91
167.88
190.72
173.81
191.37
178.21
191.90

Increment of Stress = 3105.92 (psi)

where: Cl = arct f
B(

74

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

Table 9. ApproachEmbankmentSettlement
SummaryCalculationsfor Incrementof Stressesat Depth
2 = 42.5 feet
Increment
b

R:

Ri

R3

3
53
9
59
15
65
21
71
27
77
33
83
39
89
45
95
51
101
57
107

53
540
59
540
65
540
71
540
77
540
83
540
89
540
95
540
101
540
107
540

4615.25
293406.30
5287.25
293406.30
6031.25
293406.30
6847.25
293406.30
7735.25
293406.30
8695.25
293406.30
9727.25
293406.30
10831.25
293406.30
12007.25
293406.30
13255.25
293406.30

1815.25
4615.25
1887.25
5287.25
2031.25
6031.25
2247.25
6847.25
2535.25
7735.25
2895.25
8695.25
3327.25
9727.25
3831.25
10831.25
4407.25
12007.25
5055.25
13255.25

68.00
544.26
73.27
544.87
79.10
545.56
85.37
546.30
92.00
547.12
98.92
547.99
106.06
548.93
113.39
549.94
120.86
551.01
128.47
552.14

Cl

0.05
0.89
0.17
0.94
0.28
0.99
0.39
1.03
0.49
1.06
0.58
1.09
0.66
1.12
0.73
1.14
0.79
1.17
0.84
1.19

c2

0.08
0.49
0.22
0.48
0.34
0.46
0.44
0.45
0.50
0.43
0.54
0.41
0.56
0.40
0.57
0.38
0.56
0.36
0.55
0.35

0,

8.15
85.84
24.23
88.19
38.92
89.98
5 1.43
91.37
61.55
92.45
69.47
93.30
75.55
93.98
80.19
94.52
83.71
94.96
86.40
95.32

15.29
171.68
48.26
176.37
77.84
179.97
102.86
182.74
123.11
184.90
138.95
186.61
151.11
187.96
160.37
189.05
167.42
189.93
172.80
190.64

Increment of Stress = 2999.06

where: Ct =

75

(psf)

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Computesettlement.
Usethefollowingexpression:

p=~pi=~~iCR
log

i=l

i=l
a
l-1 vo

where:

n = numberof sublayers= 7
H; = thicknessof eachsubstrata= 5 ft
CR = Virgin Compression
Ratio = -

cc

Cl+ e0>

iTvf= Finalverticaleffectivestress= 5,o + A 5


Ova= Initial verticaleffectivestress
l

Determinevalueof CR:
cc

CR= Cl+ e0)

Use:

Gw=Se + e= F

Therefore:e. = T

2.78 x 0.35

M:

AssumedS = 100%

e. = 0.973
Thus:

CR = -

cc

0.35

(1-keO) (1 + 0.973)

76

= 0.177

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

. Apply expressions above; obtain table below:

12.5

949.5

3645.024

4594.524

0.60735 16 ft

17.5

1272.5

3537.818

4810.3 18

0.5 122418

22.5

1595.5

3430.215

5025.7 15

0.4419801

27.5

1918.5

3322.095

5240.595

0.3870922

32.5

2241.5

3213.811

5455.311

0.3426211

37.5

2564.5

3105.922

5670.422

0.3056625

42.5

2887.5

2999.06

5886.56

0.2743762

Total Settlement:

2.8713
34.46

77

ft
in

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

Compilation of Computer Screens for


Example 2

FEDERFlLHIGHURYIDtlINISTRATION

nicrocomputar

dimensional

program

for

conputing

ona

uertical
settlement
due
to
embankment loads.
The progrw
follow
the
squatlonr
presented
by LanbeglJhitmrn <1969),
Ladd <1973 and PoulosBDauia (1974).
For the
case of a strtp symmetrical uertical
embankment
loadtng
tha program superinposas
tuo uarttcat
embankment loads. For the increment of uartical
atratset
at
ml-d of
fill,
the
program
cuperlmposes a series of rectangular
loads.
Uersion

compression

Z.BWIktohr

PROTOTYPEEHGINEERIHG INC.
57 blestland hnue
Uinchester,
WI 61898
<617) 729~2363
Mtn.

1991

Dr. klfrsdo

Hit

Urzua

<FIB> to continue

OPENINGSCREEN

E:lfilBiRRliKaZYmil

paraM*.
Uater table definitionStress
history
Uertical
Stlncremnt
system of Units
Naintain file
Run orooram

A tllcrocorrputer
program for
corcputing
one
dimensional cespression
uertical
settlment
due
loads.._. The prograti
. to embankmmt
.
.
_follous
the

equations

presentad

by

La~beNlJhit~an

09691, Ladd <1973> and Pou~oE~D~~~P (1974).


For the case of a strip
symmetrical uertical
embankment loading the program superimposes
tue uertiul
embankwmt
loads.
For the
lnorerrsnt
of uertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or USC arrow

thcr

PROTOTWEENCINEERIHG IHC.
57 Lkst1and Avslnla
ULnchester, H6 Bi89G
<617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Cllfrado Urzua
3

flake solntian.

E?BAHH MIN IllMU - SELECTION OF ROJECT DEFINITIWi

78

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

I
Pro&t

tialrc

ProJect

Hanager

s increment
s

= Flppmach Embankment
= hlNl

= EXMPLEZ. EtlB
= YlW32
<tltVDD~YY~
=m

dleensional
oou
due to embankme
the equations
<1969>, Iadd 41
Hit <FM) to l coept ualuer m
For the case of
INEERIN8 INC.
enbankwnt loading the program ouperimposee
57 Uestland Ruenue
tuo uertlcal
embankment
loads.
For the
Uinchestsr,
tW 81888
increment
of uertical
strssses at end of
(6171 723-2363
fill,
the pmgrarr ruperlnpomes
a series of
Mtn.
Dr. 8lfredo
Urzua
rectangular
loads.

PROJECTDEFINITI(m SCREEN

Nain

project

Stress
history
Uertical
stsyrterc of Units
tiaintain
file
-

knu

Definition

lncrenent

A Illcroconputer
program for
computing
one
dimensional cenpreslon
vertical
settlement
due to mbankmnt
loads. The program follow
the equations
presented
by LactbegUhitean
<lg6g>, Ladd (1973) and Poulos&Dauis <lg74).
For the caee of a etrip
sytircetrlcal
uertlcal
embankment loading the program
superimposer
tuo uertlcal
eubankuent
loads.
For the
lncrenent
of
wrticd
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

PROTOTVPERN8INRERIN8 INC.
57 Uestland guenue
Uinchester,
IYI 818.93
(617) 729-2X3
Mtn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

then 4-l

Rake selection.

Ell8fWK ilRIN IllMU - SELECTION OF SOIL PROFILE

79

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

A nicrocoaputer
program for
corcputing
one
dlnensional
conprersion
vertical
settlement
due to mabankHent
loads.
The prograrc follows
the
equations
presented
by LambeWhitman
<1969),
Ladd (1973
and Poulot&Daulr
<1974).
For the use ef a strip
symstrlcal
wrtical
enbanknent
loading
tho program
superimposes
loads.
tuo
vertical
enbankment
For
the
increnent
of
wrtlcal
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the progran
superimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

or use arrous

only,

then

Cr

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING INC.


67 Uestland
Ruenuw
Ulnchester,
I# 91990
<617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfmdo
Urzua

p Hake selection.

<Es&

Haln

Henu

SOIL PROFILE HMU - SELECTION OF UOID RRTIO PER LO6 STRESS

Layer

Number =

Eleu.

of

top

Number of
Sublayer
-----em-

of

layer

sublayers

leg.88

1 <for

thin

layer>

I
Unit
Layer
I

Sublayer

Sublayer

might

Type of

layer

Is this

the

of

soil

= 118.00

Layer
2
Sublayer

last

^
Space Bar-Next
SOIL DESCRIPTIM

ttem

layer

of

profile

Hit
Alt-H-Henu

No

<pie>

RND PlAAHETERS FOR LAYER Xl

80

to

contlnuc

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Layer Number = 2
Sublayer
-e-1----

Eleu.

90.88

Number of sublayers

= 7 <for this

Unit ueight

= 127.88

layer)

1
- Layer
1

-------Sublryer

Sublayer

1
- Layer
2

soil

of

Type of layer

Layer sell

= b
t

properties

Corcpraslon

-----------Sublayer

of top of layer

Compressible
,I.

Index

Raconpression

Index Erti

2
Suelling

Index

is this

the last

Estimated
layer

frm

of profile

blogp

curues

No

Hit <F9> to Prev. Layer Hit <PlB> to contlnuc


Press space bar to see menu options and then <Ret> to input values

SOIL DESCRIPIIDN A)(D PMFltlETERS FOR LAYER It2

Layer Soil
Initial

Pr

Uatcr Content

Specific

Grauity

of Solids

= 7 <for this

,Degree of Saturation
-

layer)

Hit <Fig> to accept ualues

Sublayer

Sublayer

Type of layer

Layer sol1 properties

= initial

Sublayer

Recompression

content

from e-logp

curucs

Index Estimated

from e-logp

curues

Estimated

from e-logp

curues

Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

Hit <F9> to Prw.


IMTIL

wter

Estimated

Compression Index
Layer
2

Compressible

layer
Layer -

of

profile

Hit <FM> to continue

UCITERUrnTENT - LRYER t2

81

No
:

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Layar Nucrber =

Elm.

----e---e
Layer
1

--------

of top of layer

Number of sublayers

= 7 <for

Unit

= 127.88

ueight

iayar)

Corrpmssible

propert les = Initial

eater

content

Conprcmmion Index
Layrr
2
2
Is this

r-

II
this

---------Sublayer

of soil

Type of layer
Layer scil

Sublaycr

90.88

the last

layer

of

profile

No

Hit <F9> to Prev. Layer Hit <Pl3> to continue


Press space bar to see nenu cptians and then <Ret> to input values
COHPRESSXON
INDEX tlEWU - FHUM1982)

n------=

Co:C,

The Federal Hlghuay Adninirtration


GWcI> In the soil
and Foundations Uarksknp nanual (1982) cstinatcs
the
SOil
Coepraseion
Index by diuiding
the Inlttal
moisture content by 199.

this
Coxp. 11-&3X = Initial
uhero constant = 190

Constant

= m

ssible

Mt. <FM> to accept value i


Corrpresslon

-------Sublayer

Layer
2
2

layer)

Uater Content <in %) / Constant

Index

Recowpressian

eater
Computed using

Index Estinated

Suelling

Index

Is this

the last

Estimated
layer

- Hlt <F3> to Preu. Layer -

of

FHUc1<1982>

from e-logp

curues

from

curues

profile

e-logp

Ho

Hit <Fin> to continue

FHUM1982) PROCEDURE
SCREEN

82

content

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Conprcsslon

Layer

Number =

Index

Elau.

of top

Nunbar
Sublayer

of

of sublayers

9e.w

7 <for

this

layer)

1
Unit
Layer
1

Sublrycr

Sublayer

ulght

Type of
Layer

of

hyar
2

soil

properties

Suelllng

p
Press

tprce

bar

= 127.w
=

Index

the

uater

Corcputed

using

Estlnated

last

content

FHUA<1982)

Index

this

Compressible

= lnltlal

Index

Raconpresslon

Is

roll

lasr

Conpresslon

Sublayer

l8yer

from

e-logp

curuas

lay

Hit <F9> to Prev.


to see menu options

Layer and then

Hit <FM> to continue


<Ret> to lnput values

RECOHPRESSIffl INDEX HEM - FHbM198Z)

Reconpression

Index

The Federal
Hlghury
Rdtiinlstration
and Foundations
Uorkshop
tlanual
Recompmssion
Index
by dividing
moisture
content
by 1988.

<MUA) In the
rolls
<1982> estimates
the
soil
the
initial
1s layer)

Recoup. Index
uhmrm Constant

= Initial
= 1890

Uatar

Constant
Hit

L8yer
2

<in

%) / Constant

ible

= m

to

racept

ualues

Coccprmlon

-------Sublayer

<FlR>

Content

Index

Reconpmssion

Index

ter

content

Computed

using

FHlJM1982)

Computed

using

FHUMl982~

Estimated

from

2
Sualllng
IO this
Hit

<F9> to

Index
the

last

Preu.

layer
Layer

RECOHPRESSION INDEX - FtRM1982)

83

of
-

profile
Hit

e-logp

curues

No

<F10> to

PROCEDURESCREEN

continue

Sml

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

Recompression

Index ----I
I.

Layer Number= 2

Eleu.

-------Layer
1

--------

------

-___

Layer
2

of top of layer

30.88

Number of sublayers

Unit wight

= 127.88

of soil

7 <for thlr

Type of layer

Layer soil

propertler

= Initial

Conpression

Index

Recompression

layer)

Compressible
uatcr

content

Computed using FWM1982~

Index Computed using FHIA<1982>

Suelling

Index

lo this

the last

lay

Ettlmated

from

e-logp

curws

Hit <F9> to Prev. Layer


Press space bar to see nerw options and then <Ret> to Lnput ualucs
WELLING INDM - LAYER UZ

ReEowpression Index

Layer Number = 2

Sublayar 1
---w-w-Layer
i

_----_-_-

Eleu.

of top of layer

90.m

Number of sublayers

Unit ueight

= 127. w

of soil

7 <for this

Type of layer

Layer soil

= Initial

layer)

Conpressiblc

Sublayer n
Sublaycr

propertlcs

Coccpression lndew
Sublayer

L8yW
2

Recoaprsssion
Suelling
IO this

urter

content

1
Index Computed using FHWi9Rt>

Index

ths

Computed uslng PHUM1982>

last

Sane as recompression
layer

of profile

index

Hit <P9> to Preu. Layer Hit <Fig> to continue


Space Bar-Next lten
Rlt-N-tlenu
DEFINING LIYER 82 CIS LAST LAYER OF SOIL PROFILE

84

11

1
3
I

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

Layer Nuder

= 2

of top of layer

Eleu.
Hurtber

Sublayer
----s-v--

Sublayer

Sublaycr

of sublayers

90.W

7 <for

thfs

layer)

1
/

Eleu.

of botton

Hit

of last

layer

to accept

<Fl6>

Cacrprcaion

= m

iblc

I
-I

ualuc

ter content

Conputcd using FWA<l982>

Index

Layer
2

Sublayar

Index Coaputsd using FWA<i982~

Recompression

Suelling
Is thin

Index
the

Iast

Hit <F9> to Preu.

index

Same as reconpression
layer

of profile

Layer -

Yes

Hit <FM>

to

continue

=d

DEFINING THE THICKNESS OF THE SOIL PROFILE

Ilain tknu -=====q


Definition

project

E:Jfj;yN 1; silaintain

file

(I

computing
one
tlicroconputer
program for
dimensional compression
wrtical
settlement
due to et&tanhmmt loads. The program follous
the
equations
presented
by LaebeRlJhitnan
<1969). Iadd (1973) and Poulos&Dauis <1974>.
For the case of a strip
sycrrtetrical
uertical
embankment
tuo
uertlul
tncrenent

fill,

loading

the

progrm

embankment
of wrtiul
stresses
the program superimposes

rectangular

PROTOTYPEEWINEERItG INC.
57 Uestland Avanue
Ulnchestar,
M 81898

superimposes
loads.
For
the

at end
a series

of
of

Attn.

(617)
Dr.

729-2363

llfredo

loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

+I

llake

selection.

E?ll%M WIN IlMlJ - SELECTION OF UATER TABLE DEFINITIOW

85

lJrzu8

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

tiain

tknu

eu. of Uatar Table


El llicroconputar
pro
diaansional
conprass
Hit <FlR> to accept ualues
due to qnbanknant
loa
the
equations
prassntad
by LambsSUhitaan
(1969)r
Ladd <1373> and PoulomBDault
(1974).
For tha casa of a strip
sywstrical
uartical
asbankaent
loading
the prograa
suparinporer
tuo
uartiul
embankrant
loads.
For
the
incrsnent
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superinposas
a sariae
of
rectangular
loads.

UWIER TABLE RT ELEURTION 95 FT.

lhln
llenu
proJact
Dafinitlon
soil
Profile
and 0011 paraw
Uatar table deflnltion

R llicrocowputer
program for
coctputlng
one
dimenrlonl
compression
vertical
settlement
due to mbanknent
loads.
The prograa
follow
the
equations
presented
by Larrbe&Uhltnan
<1969),
kdd
<1373> and PoulosLDauis
<1974).
For ths casa of a rtrlp
syrtaetrical
wrtical
aabankaent
loading
tha progras
superlrcposas
tuo
usrtical
eabankmnt
loads.
For
the
increment
of
uertical
stresses
at
snd of
fill,
the progran
supcrinposer
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

4J

PROTOTYPE ENMNEERIN6 INC.


57 t&&land
Auenue
Uinchestor,
NA 81898
<617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urrua

a Nake selection.

<Esc> b Nain

COIIPRESSIBLE LAYER IS DEFINED AS NOAHALLY CONSOLIDATED

86

Nenu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

FEDERClL HIGHUAY ~DHINISTRCITID

F
Em EM
R tlicrocomputer
program
dimensional
comwsrsion
due to embank&
loads.
the
equations
presented

kin tlenu -1
Definition
sol1 Profile
and soil parm.
Uater table definition
project

Strtrs

for
computing
one
ucrtlcal
settlment
The program follow
by

LmbegUhitrun
PROTOTYPE ENGIHEERlIUi INC.
57 Uestland
Awnue
Ulnchester,
tlA 81898
<617> 729-2363
fittn.
Dr. Alfredo Ursua

embankrrent loading
the program
superirtpases
loads.
tuo
vcrt lcal
errbankrcent
For the
lncrewent
of uertical
stresses
at
end of

the program
loads.

file

Flntain

<1969>, Ladd (1973) and PoulosgDavls <1974>.


For the cese of a strlp
syr+atrical
uertlcel

fill,

hlrtory

superimposes

a series

of

rectangular

Enter letter

only,

EtlGAfW WIN

or use l rrous

then

HENU - SELECTIOH OF UERIICAL

t Hake selection.
STRESS IWCREHENT

I-

dilrcnsional
compressIon
due to nrbmnkment loads.
the
cquatlons
presented

superimposes
embankment loading
the program
For
the
tuo
uertical
enbankment
loade.
increment
of uertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loeds.

Enter

letter
UERTIW

only,

tknu

-i

ucr
The progran
follow
by Lambe&tJhftsan

<1969>, Ladd <1973 and PoulosSDauir (1974).


For the use of a strip syctrcetriul
uertical

thin

or use arrow

then

llakc

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING IHC.


57 Uestland Avenue

Uincheeter,
(617)
Wtn.
Dr.

selection.

HA 81898
729-2363
lllfredo
Urzua

<Eso> b tlain

STRESS INCREtlENt IlEMJ - SELECTION OF END OF FILL COHDITION

87

ilenu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

PID OF FILL

CONDITION

CWWICTERISTICS OF FILL
Height of fill
= 3e.a
Uldth of top of fill
u = lBB.B9
Unit uelght
of fill
= 139.99
COORDINATES
pojnt
A: xl =
Polnt B: x2 =

e.ee
68.88

yl =
y2 =

e.ee
i&Be

POINTS FOR CCRlFWTbTIOH OF SETTLEtlWC


celculat,e
in
= X Point
x coordinate
= ile.88

/
Y

coardlnats

t
H

-/

=m
INC.
e
SB

FWTIOW
ELEU.
x = iee.ee
Hit

<pie>

END OF FILL

FED-

to accept

valuer

GEOHETRY - POINT A COORDINRTES

HIGWAY

AMINISTRATION

Nain nenu

pro&et
oefinltlon
soil
Profilm
and soil
parerr.
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uertiul
rtrari
increment
ewten
of Unite

b nicrocorrputer
program for
computing
one.
dimensional
oorcprcsslon
ucrtical
settlement
dw to embmkment
loads.
Ihe program follous
thm mquatlons
prmrmted
by Lmbe&lJhitmen
(1969>,
Ledd (1973) and PoulosBDauis
<1974).
For the uee of . strip
symmetrical
vertical
Mnkrrmt
loading
tke progru
superirtposes
tuo
uertical
wbmkment
loads.
For
the
increment
of uertiul
stresses
at
end of
fill,
thr prograrc
superixposm
I series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERI&
INC.
57 Uestlsnd
13wnuo
Ulnche&r,
nfi 81898
t 617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfredo
Urzus

t Nake selection.

EtlBFY(( RAIN HENU - RUN PROGRAN

88

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

It*.
1
2

ONE DINRMXML SmLEHENt LWALYSIWFcderal Hlghwy Wnlnintration


INCRFJWI OF STRESSESBENEATHTHE END OF FILL CW4DITIoN
LAW8
COEFFICIENT
SPECIFIC WID
UNIT
TYPE THICK. CUW. RECOtlP. SUELL. UEI6HT CRAUITY WIT10 Settlement
<rt>
<pcf)
<In.)
IWCOllP. 18.0
CorlP. 35.0

0.350

----0.035

----8.835

lie.08
127.00

--2.78

Total

SuBLlww
NQ. THICK.
<f0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-

ItmtlP.
5.68
5.m
5.w
5.88
S.BB
5.00
Hit wrau

RLlIu.
(ft.)

INITIAL
<prf)

87.58
82.58
77.sB
72.58
67.58
62.50

949.58
1272. se
1595.58
1918.58
2241.50
2564.58

keys to display

Settlement

SOIL STRESSES
IWCREtlENT HAX.PCISTPRESS.
<psf>
<pof)
3645.83
3537.82
3438.22
3322.11
3213.84
3105.97

a.97

34.46

34.46

SETTLMENT
<in.)

949.50
1272.58
1595.58
1918.58
2241.50
2564.58

next ~cmcn.

<FE> Print.

7.29
6.15
5.30
4.65
4.11
3.67
<FIB> Main tknu -

PROCR!MlOUTPUT- PRRTILL SCREEN

N*.
I
2

ONE DImIONAL
SETTLENEWTMf4LY!XVFsderal
Hlghuay Adnlnirtration
INCRmENT OF STRESSESEMEATH THE END OF FILL WNDITION
SPECIFIC
VOID
COEFFIClMI
UNIT
LAYER
TYPE THIQ<. COHP. RECOtiP. SUBLL. NEIGHI GRAUITY RATIO Settlewent
tin.1
<f0
<pcf)
INCorlP. 18.8
COP. 35.0

----m
8.358

--w-m
8.835

&ES

118.88
127.80
Total

SUELAYER
NO. THICK ELEU.
<ft>
cft)
1
2
3
z
6
7

INCOnP.
5.m
87.58
5.88
82.58
5.80
5.W
5.88
Nlt arrou

77.58
72.50
67.50
62.58

--2.78
Settlement

-0.97

34.46

34.46
I

INITIAL
<prf)

JNC
<

949.58
1272.58

3645.03
3537.82

949.58
1272.58

7.29
6.15

1595.
191B.58
se
2241.58
2564.58

3439.22
3322.11
3213.84
3185.97

1595. se
1918.50
2241.58
2564.58

5.38
4.65
4.11
3.67

keys to display

next screen.

<FB> Print.

Url8> Haln Menu

SELECTION OF DISK FILE PRINTED OUTPUT

89

EMBANKAppendix B Example2

ONE DItMSICML
SRTTLEHENI ANALYSIS/Federal
Nlghuey Mmlnlotratlon
INCRRlENT OF STRESSESUENEFIIHTHE END OF FILL CONDITIOM
y dlrec.
=
68.88 <ft)
Unit uelght
of Ill1
= 138.88
Eltbrnkrtcnt
top uidth
= lgg.Bg <ft>
p load/unit
area
= 3we.w
Eabonkment bottom uldth
= 228.88 <ft>
Foundation
Eleu.
= 188.88
6round Surface
Eleu.
= imee <ft)
=
Uater table
Eleu.
95.98 <ft)
Unit uelght
of blat. =
62.48

LAYER
TYPE THICK.

NQ.

COEFFICIENT
CWlP. RECONP. WELL.

UNIT
UEIGHI
<pcf)

<fU

SPECIFIC
GRAUIN

UOID
RATIO

Dostinatlon
1
2

INCOllP.
COtlP.

1e.e
35.8

----8.835

a.358

SUBLAYRR
THIGH.
ELRU.
<ft.)
(ft)

N*.

Hit

arrou

keys

display

next

screen.

34.46

SETTLEHDIT
(in.1

<FlB> Ilain

llenu -

OUTPUT FILE MlE

ONB DIMENSIONAL SBlTLgWBHT ANALYSISlPed~ral


Sighway Administration
INCRBNBNT O? STRESSES BBNBATB TEB BND 01 PILL CONDITION
project
Nama
Plla Noma
Data

Bmbsnk.

for

I direc.
y dlroc.
Bmbankment top width
ankmmt
bottcm width
ground surface
Blev.
Water
table
Blov.

N* .

1
a

Client
Projact

I Approach Jmbankmmt
I RxANPLBa.mB
s 1o/oa/91

sstt1ewnt
alopo,

x =
=
=
=
=
=
i

Corputad

110.00

60.00
60.00
100.00
a10.00
100.00
95.00

(tt)

(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft.)
(ft)
(ft)

INCONP. 10.0
COWP. 35.0

----0.350

----0.035

Y I

Na.'
1
a
3
4
5
6
7
8

SOBLAYBR
TEICX.
BLEV.
(ft)
(ft)
INCONP.
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00

67.50
ea.50
77.50
71.50
67.50
61.50
57.50

INITIAL
(Pet)
949.50
ia7a.50
1595.50
1916.50
1141.50
1564.50
1887.50

arrow

keys

to dlaplay

(a)
(pcf)

Unlt

(pcf)

----0.035

weight

DNIT
WBIQBT
(pcf)

of Wat.

cram.

90

(fti)

61.40

VOID
RATIO

---a.78

---0.97

34.46

34.46

110.00
ia7.00

3645.03
3537.81
343o.aa
3311.11
3113.84
3105.97
a999 .i3

(p*f)

SPBCIPIC
QRAVITY

Settlopsnt

SOIL STP.BSSBS
INCwAx.PAsT
(PSf)
(Psi)

next

(it)
=
30.00
= 130.00
* 3900.00
= 100.00

Settlement

c?S> Print.

Settlement
tin.1

SBTTLBMSNT
(in.)

PRBSS.

7.19
6.15
5.30
4.65
4.11
3.67
3.19

949.50
1171.50
1595.50
1918.50
aa41.50
1564.50
a8.97.50
Total

Bit

60.00

Height of fill
E
Unit weight
of fill
D load/unit
area
Poundation
81W.

coPPPIcIEm
CONP. RBCONP. SWBLL.

LAYNR
TYPE TEICK.
(it)

t Any Client
2 ADN
t OUI

Nmagar
by

Total

Settlement
<in.)

PRESS.

<FE> Print.

DISK FILE PRINTED OUTPUT - DESTINITION

<pcf)

Film

Sattlrnant

SOIL STRESSES
INCREllEHT HW.PRST
<prf)
<psf>

INlTllL
<psf)

to

<pcf>
<psf)
<ft>

----e.ws
Total

34.46

(in.)

<PlO> Main Nemu-

EMBANKAppendixB Example2

file! and roil


bla deflnltlan

b IlIcrocomputer
prograM f
dimnsional
compresston
uer
due to embankment loads. The program

follow

the
equations
presented
by Lambe&UhItman
<1969),
Ladd <1973> and PoulosBDauis
<1974>.
synmstrical
um-ttcal
For the usa of a rtrlp
embankment loading ths program
superlmposss
uartiul
embankment
tuo
loads.
For ths
increment
of uertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

or use arrous then 4

only,
WNK

par..

PROTOTYPE B(CINEERIN6
57 Uestland hmua

Uinchestar,
(6171
Mtn.
Dr.

selection.

tlakc

IlQ Big90
729-2363

filfrcdo

Urzua

<EM> b Main llenu

IlllIN HENU - VERTICAL STRESS INCREllENT mu

END OF FILL

CONDITION ~-1

CWIRICTERISTICS OF FILL
Holght of fill
= 38.88
Uidth of top of fill
u = 1BB.M
Unit ucight
of fill
= 138.88
CDORDIIWES
Point b: xi =
Point B: x2 =

INC.

8.88
68.88

yi =
y2 =

1
iiil
parrm.

8.88
68.88

ading

POINTS FOR COllPUTATION OF SETTLEMENT


calculate
in
= X Point
x coordinate
= iie.ee

/
/
Y

coordinate

1
H

-H------J

+
I

qm
INC.

FOUNDATION RU%J.
s = lee.88

ie
Hit

<FIB>

END OF FILL

to accept ualues

GECMETRY - POINT C COORDIWTES

91

rsua

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

tltcrownpuhr
program for
computing
dhmsional
compression
vertical
settlertent
due to embanknent
loads.
The program fallout
the
equations
presented
<1969>, Ladd <1973> and

by

La,rtbe&Uhitnan

(19741.
uertical

POUlOS(LbUiE

of a strip ryrtmetric81
ading the program
rtiu1

strsarsr

at
l

Enter

letter

only,

end
msrlss

or use arrous

PROTOTYPEEHCINEERING INC.
57 uert1and h.mlus
Ulnchcatur,
IW 81898
<6iT) 7294363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

of
of

then +J

k Make selection.

EllBRNK MAIN MENU - RUH PROGRflN

ONE DIllENSIONAL SE'l7LEtlENT ANALYSIS/Federal


Hlghuay
INCREtlENT OF STRESSES RENERIH THE END OF FILL

Pro&t
Project

Nae
Nufkr

: dpproach Enbanknent
: 91-1235

Date

: mAw91

Settlement
Embank.

slope,

Eltbankment

top

for X = 110.00<ft)

x direr.
y direc.
uidth

Embankaent bottom uidth


Ground Surface
Eleu.
Uater table Eleu.
LAYER
HP.

Client
PraJect
llanager
Computed by

TYPE

68. Rg <ft>
68.68 <Ft)

=
=
=
=

188.88 <ft>
ZZg.gg (ft)
imee (ft)

C@lP. RECOHP. SUELL.

(ft)
i
-

armu

: M
: au

8.88 <ft)

p load/unit
Foundation

area
61s~.
Destination

UNIT
UEIGHT

SPECIFIC
GRAUIN

38.88

keys

----to

display

----next

il9.W
screen.

UOID
RATIO

Settlement

tin.1
---

<Fg> Print.

<FlE?> bin

DISH FILE PRINTED OUTPUT- DESTINITION OIJWUT FILE

92

<III)

= 138.88 41pcf)
= 39w.w
41prf)
= 109.88 <ft.)
1
File

tpcf,

INCOtP. 10.0
Hit

: Rny Client

Height
of fill
H
Unit ueight
of fill

=
=

COEFFICIENT
MICK.

Y=

timinlotration
CONDITION

Ilenu -

EMBANKAppendix B Example2
-

ONE DIMENSIONAL SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS/Federal


Highway AdministrationINCREMENT OF STRESSES BENEATH THE END OF FILL CONDITION

Project
Name
File Name
Date

: Approach Fmbankment
: EXAMPLEZ.EMB
: 10/02/91

Settlement
Embank.

for

x = 110.00

x direc.
y direc.
Embankment top width
Embankment bottom width
Ground Surface
Elev.

=
=
=
:
=

Water

table

Elev.

LAYER
TYPE THICK.
ift)

tJ*.

slope,

Client
Prolect
Manager
Computed by

60.00
60.00
100.00
220.00
100.00
95.00

(ft)

(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(Et)
(ft)
(ft)

(ft)
(pcf
lpsf
(ft)

Unit

(pcfj

weight

UNIT
WEIGHT
(pcf)

5
6

5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00

7
8

5.00

VOID
RATIO
_-__
0.97

7.51

7.51

--_-_

___--

110.00

----

0.035

0.035

127.00

2.78

Settlement

SOIL STRESSES
INCREMENT MAX.PAST PRESS.
(PSf)
(psf)

87.50
82.50
77.50
72.50
67.50
62.50
57.50

5.00

248.05
343.85
432.56
513.52
586.22
650.45
706.28

949.50
1272.50
1595.50
1919.50
2241.50
2564.50
2887.50

Settlement
(in.)

SETTLEMENT
(in.)

Hit

arrow

keys

to display

next

screen.

FEDERIIL HIGWM

Nicrocomputer

1.07
1.04

1.01

Settlement

<Fe> Print.

(in.1

7.51

<FlO>

Main Menu -

FlDllINISTRRTlON

I-

strip

1.07
1.11
1.11
1.10

949.50
1272.50
1595.50
1918.50
2241.50
2564.50
2887.50

Total

SPECIFIC
GRAVITY

-----

INITIAL
(PSf)

62.40

INCOMP.

2
3

of Wat.

0.350

SUBLAYER
ELEV.
THICK.
(ft)
(ft)

ifti
=
30.00
= 130.00
= 3900.00
= 100.00

Total

NE.

0.00

Y =

Height
of fill
H
Unit velght
of fill
p load/unit
area
Foundation
Elev.

COEFFICIENT
COMP. RECOMP. SWELL.

INCOMP. 10.0
COMP. 35.0

: Any Client
: AUM
: aum

Srmetrical

tiain tknu -I
project Definition
soil Profile
and roll
Uater table deflnftfon
strass history

param.

uertical

progran

dinensional compression ucr


due to embankment
loads. The pmgram follow
the

eqwtlom

presented

by

lambe&UhItrtan

<1969>, Ladd C13773) and PoulooBDauio <19?4>.


For thr cwm of a rtrlp
ryaaetrical
uartical
mbankmmt
loading the program
suparlmposes
For the
tuo
uertical
embankment
loads.
incrmmnt
of
umrtlcal
stresses at 8nd of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then 4

PROTOTYPE ENGIHEERIHG IHC.


57 Uestland
Avenue

Uinchestar,
(617)

Mtn.

b tlake selection.

#IA81898
723-2363

Dr. Alfred0
<Esc>

Urzua
Nain

EHBFYIK IWIN IlEtlU - SELECTION OF UERTICAL STRESS INCREtlENT MENU

93

tlenu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

END OF FILL CDtiDITIOlt

I
-=I
a

CHLRACTERIBTICBOF FILL
Height of fill
= 3B.W
Uidth of top of fill
u = 1EB.W
Unit uelght of fill
= El&Ml
COORDIMTES
Polnt A: xl =
Point B: x2 =

B.BB
68.98

yl =
yz =

param.

El.88
60.00

ading

POINTS FOR CDllWIAIION OF SETTLERENT


calculate
in
q
X Direction
Xl coordirutc
=
38. BB
xi! CoordINtc
= i9e.ee
delta x
y coordINtc

I
/
Y -H--I

FOUNDClTIOW
ELEU.
s = i0e.ee
I

Hit

<FlB> to accept valuer

END OF FILL GEOllETRY - SETTLEHER IN X-DIRECTIOW

I
KI

Haln Menu
project Definition
soil Profile
and soil pararr.
Uater table definition
Stress history
Umrtical stress iocrmmt
syrtm of Units
tiaintain
flla

A Nicrooomputm program for


computing
one
dimensional compression
vertical
SettletWIt
due to anbanhmot. loads. The progra follow
the aguationn
pmsentad
by Lscrbeeuhitmsn
<lB69>, Ladd <lsn> sod PoulosRDauls <1974>.
For the ease of a strip symmetrical uertical
eabankaent loading ths progracc tupmriwposar
tuo uertical
embankment
loads.
For the
increment
of wrtiul
stresses at end of
fltl,
the program suparimposas
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then 4

PROTOTYPEENGINEERIIS INC.
57 tkst1and Ruamue
Uinchestrw,
I@ em0
<617) 72%2363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua
p Nake selection.

ENBRNNNr\lM tlENU - RUN PROGRRU

94

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2


ONE DltlENSIONAL SETILEHENT RNCILYSIWFederal Hlghuay Administrrtlon
INCREIIENT OF STRESSES BENEATH THE END OF FILL CONDITION

Project
Project

Name

: Approach Embankment

Client

Number

: 91-1239
: mAw91

Project

Dmt.8

Caputed
Settlement

Enbank. slope,

x dtrec.

68.88 (It)

y dins

68.88 <ft>
lee.88
<ft>
ZZB.BR <ft)

Enbankment top uidth


Embankment bottom uidth
Ground Surface
Eleu.
Uater table
Eleu.

NQ.

for

LRYER
TYPE THICK.

=
=

=
=

la&e8

by

arrow

keys

38.88<ft)

fill
Destination

138.88

File

<pd)
1

MAtlZD-D.OUf

unit

0f ht.

MoiBht

COEFFICIm
COllP. RECOllP. SUELL.

62.40 <pcf>

UNIT

SPECIFIC

VOID

IJEIGM

GRCWJITY

RATIO

<pcf>
-----

----

----

to display

next

screen.

Itcone. 18.8

Hit

: auI(

Height of fill
Unit ueight of

<ft.)

client

X-Dircctlon

<ftJ
<ft)

95.88

: any
: Aun

Nanager

1lE.W

---

<FB> Print.

---

<FlB>

Nain

tlanu -

SELECTION OFDISK FILE PRINTED OUTPUT- DESTIMTION FILE

ONE DIMENSIONAL SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS/Federal


Highway
INCREMENT OF STRESSES BENEATH THE END OF FILL
: Approach Embankment
: EXAMPLEZ.EMB
: 10/02/91

Project
Name
File Name
Date

Client
Project
Manager
Computed by

Settlement
Embank.

slope,

x direc.
y direc.
Embankment top width
Embankment bottom width
Ground Surface
Elm.
Water table
Elev.
LAYER
TYPE THICK
(ft)

NI3.
1
2

INCCMP. 10.0
COMP. 35.0

1
2
3
4
5
6
I

Stress
(PSf)
INCOMP.
1607.73
1496.84
1404.36
1328.79
1267.55
1217.89
1177.30

Hit

arrow

INCOMP
4.58
3.59
2.92
2.43
2.07
1.80
1.58
______
18.97

Height of fill
H
Unit weight
of fill
p load/unit
area
Foundation
Elm.

=
30.00
= 130.00
= 3900.00
= 100.00

(ft)
(pcf)
(psf)
(ft)

Unit

(pcf)

weight

of Wat.

UNIT
WEIGHT
(PCf)

_____
0.350

110.00
1.27. 00

_____
0.035

_____
0.035

SOIL STRESSES
INITIAL
(PSf)

87.50
82.50
17.50
72.50
67.50
62.50
57.50

30.00

keys

X-Direction

(ft)
(ft)
ift)
(ft)
ift)
(ft)

ELEV.
(ft)

Sett.
(in.)

: Any Client
: AUM
: awn

COEFFICIENT
COMP. RECOMP. SWELL.

INCOMP.
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00

x=
Layer

60.00
60.00
100.00
220.00
100.00
95.00

SUBLAYER
THICK.
(ft)

Nf3.
1
2
3
4
5
6

=
=
=
=
=
1

for

949.50
1272.50
1595.50
1918.50
2241.50
2564.50
2887.50

x=

110.00

x=

Stress
(psf)

sett.
(in.1

Stress
(PSf)

INCOMP.
1946.78
1941.44
1932.52
1919.59
1902.51
1881.37
1856.48

to display

5.16
4.28
3.67
3.21
2.84
2.54
2.30

1607.73
1496.84
1404.36
1328.79
1267.55
1217.89
1177.30

SPECIFIC
GRAVITY

62.40
VOID
RATIO

____

____

2.78

0.97

MAX.PAST PRESS.
(PSf)
949.50

1272.50
1595.50
1918.50
2241.50
2564.50
2887.50
190.00
Sett.
(in. 1
4.58
3.59
2.92
2.43
2.07
1.80
1.58
18.97

23.99

next

AdministrationCONDITION

screen.

95

<F8> Print.

<FlO> Main Menu -

EMBANK Appendix 6 Example 2

fi tlIcrocofiputer
prograrr for
couputlng
one
dimensional
coflpression
vertical
settlement
due to embankrcent loads.
the progran
follous
the
equations
presented
by LanbeSUhltrun
<1969),
Ladd Cl9731 and Poulos~Dauls
<1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uertical
embankrwnt
loading
the program
superimposes
loads.
For
the
tuo
vertical
ertbankmant.
incrarrent
of
uertlcal
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the prograrr
superlwposas
a series
of
rectangular
loads.

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING INC.


57 Uestland
lkcnue
Uinchestsr,
ryI 01898
(617) 729-2363
lb-ma
Attn.
Dr. Alfmdo

L
Enter

lattw

only,

EIlB(INK lIpIN

or use arrous

then

cl

IlENU - SRLECTION OF IlAINTAIN

EM BIR II KI
A lilcrocomputer
prograM for
coaputlng
one
dluenslonal
coapression
uertlcal
settlement
due to embankwnt
loads.
The program follous
the
equations
presented
by La&e&Uhltman
(1969).
Ladd Cl973
and PoulosSDauls
<1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uertical
embarkment
loading
the program
superimposes
tuo
vertical
orrbankrtent.
loads.
For
the
increment
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
flll,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use awous
IlAINIAIN

t hake sslectlon.

then

FILE

tlaln tlenu project


Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
~arsrr.
Uatsr table
deflnltlon
Stress
history
Uertlcal
stress
Increment
system of Units

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERIM? INC.


57 Ucstland
&mue
Ulnchester,
tyI 01898
(6171 729-W
Ilttn.
Dr. plfredo
Ursua

b Hake selection.

FILE NENU - S!%ECTION OF S(WE FILE

96

<Esc> t Main &mu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

project
Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
uertic.1
stress
inc-nt

pararr.

I
llicrocompuhr
progrsu
for
computing
one
dilrenmionai
compression
uertical
s&t,Destination
File .-,
due to embankrant
loads.
The program f
EXANPLEZ.MB
the
eaurtions
u-nted
bu LambeW
<1969);
Ladd <19+9> and Poul&3Dauis
<1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uerticai
PROTOTYPE ENcINEERltiG INC.
smbankrrent
loading
the pmgrarc superimposes
57 uestimd
auenue
tuo
vertical
embankment
loads.
For
the
Uinchestar,
MI 91898
increment
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
<617) 729-2363
fill,
the prograrr
superimposes
l series
of
Mtn. Dr. Alfred0
Urzur
rectangular
loads.
L

Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous
WING

-1

then

t Make selection.

<Es&

Nain

flenu

INPUT FILE RS EXRNPLEZ.EtlB

FEDERAL HIGHURY fiDtlINISTRATION


-

I
KI
A ilicrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dtrrensionai
corcpression
uertical
settlement
due to etibankrcent
loads.
The program folious
the
equations
presented
by LambsWhitman
<1969),
Ladd <1973> and PoulosBDauis
(19741.
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uerticai
embankment loading
the program
superircposes
tuo
vertical
embankment
loads.
For
the
increment
of
vertical
stresses
at
and of
fill,
the ppograu
suparircposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

Rain tlem project


Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
param.
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uerticai
stress
increment
system of Units
Naintain
file
Run program
m
>

PROTOTVPE WCINEERIIY;
INC.
57 kstland
Avanua
Uinchester,
IW 91898
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Ursua

b Rake selection.

EllgANK NAIN NENU - EXIT TO DOS

97

EMBANK Appendix B Example 2

A tllcrocomputer
program for
computing
ens
dirransional
compression
vertical
settlement
dus to smbanlment
loads.
Ths progrm
follow
the
equatlone
p-nted
by LambeSUhitrcan
<1969),
Ladd <IS73
and Poulos&Dauis
<1974).
For the casm of a strip
sywwkrical
usrtie~l
errbanknent
loading
the prograrc rupsri~possr
tuo
usrtlcal
embankment
loads.
For
the
Increctant
of
uertical
stresses
at
and of
fill,
the program
superimposas
a ssriss
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use iwvous

then

t tlakc

57 lkst1rnd
AMnu8
Ulnchatar,
IlA gig98
<617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
lh-zua

selection.

EXIT TO DOS NENU - YES SELECTtON

98

<Esc> W Ilain

ncnu

EMBANKAppendixB Example3

Example 3

99

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3


~-

Example No. 3:

Highway Embankment Settlement


This exampleis presentedin Appendix C of the FHWA Report No.
FHWA/RD-86/W, entitled PrefabricatedVertical Drains, Vol. I:
EngineeringGuidelines.
Figure 12 depictsthe problem geometryand soil parameters.The clay
stratumis divided into threesublayers.
Table 10presentsa summaryof the computer-calculatedsettlementfor
points A through G.

Table 10. Summaryof Clay SurfaceSettlements


Point

Computer

A
B

8.92
63.07
62.17
56.50
37.96

C
D
E
F
G

Settlement(in)
Hand-calcuIated

63.09
56.53

14.44

14.46

8.92

8.95

Note that the symmetryof the problem is fully satisfied,as EMBANK


predictsthe sameamountof settlementfor points A and G.

CR = 0.2
RR = 0.04

cmy

(4 -

*It = 105pcf

60ft

SAND -

1
I

(4 m
zfrt)
-10
30
50

&II fpsf)

1000
1278

2130

Figure 12. Example 3: Highway embankmentsettlement

100

Not to scale

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

Example No. 3:

Highway Embankment Settlement

40.0

20 .O

77
T

It -105pcf
CR =0.2
RR =0.04

20.0

60.0

jt.2

20.0

Clay is overconsolidatedfrom 0 to 20 ft. A maximum past pressureof I&


= 1,000psf at z = 10 ft is used.
Settlementis computedat points B, D, F, and G and comparedto program
results.
Determinegeostaticeffective vertical stressesat points 1,2, and 3:
aI = 10 x 105- 10 x 62.4 =

426 psf

i$ = 30 x 105- 30 x 62.4 = 1278 psf


4 = 50 x 105- 50 x 62.4 = 2130 p$
Determineincrementsof vertical stressunderpoint 13;useprinciple of
superposition,as explainedin figure 5 of main text:

101

EMBANKAppendix B Example 3
Therefore,incrementsof vertical stressesare computedin this caseas
two times the vertical stressincrementfor:

For the generalcaseshown below:


The vertical stressesare given by
p+ y

- $

(x - b)

In this case:
a=

40

b=

90

b-a=

50

x=

90

x- b=

Iherefore: a,=

mp=

tan(a+p)=
.

= 5 [P+ 2.25a]
(b-4
-=z

50
Z

90

-=-

a=arc

90

dl
-

z +

Computestressincrementsfor z = 10,30, and 50 ft:

zm

p=arctar

10

78.69006

30
50

59.03625
45.0

a=arc

4)

F -p

4.969741
12.52881
15.94539

102

bz= 5 [j + 2.25a]

2% PSf

1,248.222

2,496.444

1211.473
lJ23.294

2,422.940
23246.5870

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

Determineincrementsof vertical stressunderpoint D: useprinciple of


superposition,as indicatedbelow:

For (1) we have:


x= 140
a=40
b=90
(x - b) = 50
x
-=a

4o= 90
=,R;=

R;= 2*+(x-b)*

z*+ 50*

=Bp=arc

100
-6

$1
Z

tm(S+p+a)=~
@fI
*a=arc

140
-sZ

The resultsfor z = 10,30, and 50 ft are:

R;= z*+ 502

-+--b)

fl, bw9

78.69006
59.03625

5.599341
14.26451

1.62497
4.60449

2,600
3,400

0.1923077
0.4411765

45.0

18.43495

6.911229

5mo

0.5

103

3.726639
70.87047
194.1161

EMBANK Appendix 6 Example 3

For the secondsuperpositionstep (2) we have:


x= 40
a=40
b= 90
(x--)=(40-90)=

-50

x
40
-z--=1
a 40
R; = z= -I- SO=

ma=

40
Z

a,=

p
Ic

p+

40
-

*a=arc
$1

y-<(x-b)]*al=fk+a+$]

The resultsfor z = 10,30, and 50 ft are indicatedin the table below:

z0
10
30
50

a
75.96376
53.13011
38.65981

R;= z= + 50=

78.69006
59.03625
45.0

uoo
3,400
5,000

(x - b)
3
0.1923077
0.4411765
0.5

CJz
(PSfi
2,301.003
1,908.943
1,559.829

Add stressincrementsfrom steps(1) and (2) to obtain the stress


increments.Seetable below:

10
30
50

2.301.003 + 3.726639
1,908.943+ 70.87047
1,559.829+ 194.1161

104

2,304.7296
L979.8135
1.753.9451

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3


Determineincrementsof vertical stressunderpoint F; useprinciple of
superpositionas indicatedbelow:

For superpositionstep(1) we have:

- b)
x= 180
a=40
b= 90
(x - b) = 90
x
180
= 4.5
-=-zi
a
R:= z*+ 90*

tan(a+p+s)=~
d 1
*a=arc

180
-6-p
Z

The resultsfor z = 10.30, and 50 ft are indicated in the table below:

R;= z*+ 50*

-$(X-b)

q (PSI

83.65981

2.25457

0.9057924

8,200

0.1097561

7 1.56505
60.9454

6.340192
9.400786

2.632437
4.12971

9,000
10,600

0.3
0.4245283

105

0.5843725
13.85309
50.84445

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

For thesecondsuperposition:

(y,= PA P+y=$x-b)
[

x= 0
a=40
b= 90
(x-b)=

-90

R;= z2+ 902

tana2
tan(a+p)=

*a=arc

40
d)
-

90
- -a

*p=arc
-iI

Thus:

[ 1

P
x

p+$

Theresultsfor z = 10.30,and50 ft areindicatedin the tablebelow:


R;= z2 + 902

10

75.96376

30

53.13011

7.696052
18.43495

50

38.65981

22.28558

-t&x-b)

0,mfi

8,200

0.1097561

194.2307

gsm
10,600

0.3

494.7734

0.4245283

647.3508

Determineactualincrementsof stressby addingtheincrementsfrom


superposition
steps(1) and(2). Resultsareindicatedin tablebelow:

10

194.2307+ 0.5843725

194.81507

30

494.7734 + 13.85309

508.62649

50

647.3508 + 50.84445

698.19525

106

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3


Determineincrementsof vertical stressunderpoint G; useprinciple of
superpositionas indicatedbelow:

A.

d=190

a+b-d--l0

(2)

For superpositionstep(1) we have:


x= 190
a=40
b= 90
(x - 6) = 100

x z =4.15
-=
a
R;= z2+ 1002

tan(a+fl+s)=E
+ 1
190

*a=arc

x -6)

-s-p
1OOz
R22

a or= p p+4.75a?r

The results for z = 10,30, and 50 ft are indicatedin the table below:

z(f-0

10

84.28941

1.896518

0.8012836

10,100

0.0990099

30
50

73.30075
63.43495

5.389313

2.337304

0.2152294

8.130105

3.691383

10,900
12,500

R;= z2+ 1002

107

0.4

(x- b)

or (psf)
0.4134162
10.02816
38.13693

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3


For the secondsuperposition
step(2). we have:

x=- 10
a= 40

b=90
(x-b)=(x
-=
a

lo-90)=

- 100

- 0.25

R;=z2+ 1002

tan&10

10
-

*s=at-c

$1
4)
Z

tan(a+S)=50

*a=uxc

-6

tan(a+ p+6)= 100

*p=arc

xa

ti

E!

-6-a

p+--+-b)
a

50

1OOz

a 6,= fl p- 0.25a - -

?r

Ri

The resultsfor z = 10,30, and 50 ft are indicated in the table below:


z(fi)

10

45.0

33.69006

30

18.43495

40.6013

50

11.30993

33.69007

R$= z2+ 1002

5.599341

(x- b)

0, (psf)

10,100

0:0990099

14.26451

10,900

0.2752294

276.162

18.43495

12,500

0.4

457.3714

39.57881

Determineactual incrementsof stressby adding the incrementsfrom


superpositionsteps(1) and (2). Resultsare indicatedin table below:

39.57881 + 0.4134162
276.162 + 10.02816
457.3714 + 38.13693

10
30
50

108

39.992226
286.19016
495.50833

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3


Computesettlements:useexpressionindicatedbelow:

where:
k( = thicknessof eachsublayer= 20 ft
RR = 0.04
CR = 0.2
b,, = Maximum pastpressure= 1,000psf at z = 10 ft
%f = Final vertical effective stress = b, + A b,

5, = Initial vertical effective stress


l

10

Apply expressionsabovefor point B; obtain table below:

30

426
1278

2496.444
2422.946

1000
1278

50

2130

2246.587

2130

2922.444
3700.946
4376.587

Total Settlement:

2.1594571
1.8471276
1.2510239
5.2576085 ft
in
63.09

9 Similarly, at point D:
z(fi)

qo @sf)

A 5, WI

10

426

2304.7296

30
50

1278
2130

1979.8135
1753.9451

6,, (psf-)
1000
1278
2130

2730.7296

2.0415871

3257.8135
3883.9451

1.6255815
1.0435739

Total Settlement:

4.7 107425 ft
56.53

in

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

10

426

194.81507

1000

620.81507

30

1278

508.62649

1278

1786.6265

0.5820117

50

2130

698.19525

2130

2828.1953

0.4925 192

Total Settlement:

0.1308421

1.2053729 ft
14.46

in

At point G:

39.992226

1000

465.99923

0.03 11753

10

426

30

1278

286.19016

1278

1564.1902

0.35 10348

50

2130

495.50833

2130

2625.5083

0.3633352

Total Settlement:

0.7455453 ft
8.95

110

in

EMBANKAppendixB Example3

Compilation of Computer Screens for


Example 3

-1

FEDERRL HI6HUf& ADtlINISIRATION

I R [u KI
A tlicrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dlmennional compression uertical
settlement
due
to embankment loads. The program follow
the
equations
presented
by LambeRUhitman (19691,
Ladd
<1973> and PoulosRDauis (1974).
For the
uertical
embankment
case of a strip nywetrical
loading
the program superimposes
tuo
uertlcal
esbankment loads. For the increment of uertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the
program
superimposes a series of rectangular
loads.
Usrsion

2. WOctober

PROTOTYPEENGINEERlNG INC.
57 Uestland fluenue
Uinchester,
WI 81898
<617)

Dr. Rlfredo

Mtn.

1991

728-2363

Urzua

Hit <Fl9> to continue


OPENINGSCREEN

FEDERRL HIGHURYRDllINISTRRIION

Plain Menu -

soil

Profile

Uater

table

and soil

param.

deflnition

Stress history
Uertlcal
htsystem of Units
tlaintain
file

increwnt

Run program

A tllcrocomputer
program for
computing
one
dimensional comprestlon
vertical
settlement
due to embankment loads. The program follous
the equations
p-nted
by LambeRUhitman
<1969>, Ladd (1973) and PoulosRDauir (1974).
For the case of a strip
symnetrical
vertical
embankment loading the program superimposes
For
the
tuo vertical
errbankmnt
loads.
of
uertiul
stresses at end of
increment
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use

EUB~URtwn HENU -

rrous

smxxon

111

Exit

then 4

to DOS

PROTOTYPEMGINEERIffi INC.
57 Uestland Ruewe
Uinchester,
IlR 819%
Attn.

(617)
Dr.

729-2363

llfredo

t Rake selection.

OF PROJECTDEFINITION

Unua

EMBANK Appendix 6 Example 3

FEDERALHIGHURYRDNINISTRATION

= Any c1imnt

= Highuay Embankment

tns

squattons

<1969>, Ladd <1


For the case of

Hit

<Fig> to accept

ualues

INEERING INC.

mbankmnt
loading
the program
superimposes
tuo
ucrtlcal
mbankrant
loads.
For the

lncrmcnt
of vertical
strsssss
flll,
the program superimposes
rectangular

at
a

snd
ssriss

57 bhstland

AVMIe

Ulwhkrrtar,
I@ Bl8sB
<617) 729-2363
Mtn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

of
of

loads.

PROJECTDEFINITION SCREEN

FEDERFlL HIGHWIY RDflINISTRATION

b tlicrocomputar
prograM for
computing
one
dirrsnsional
compression
uertical
ssttlartant
dus to embankrrent loads. The program follow
the squatlons
presentsd
by LaclbsgUhitrran
<1969), Ladd <1973) and Pot.hs&DatAs <1974>.
For ths case of a strip synmstrical
usrtical
smbankmsnt loading the prograM supsriaposss
tuo
usrtiul
embankwnt
For the
loads.
lncrswnt
of uertical
stresses at and of
fill,
the prograrr suparimposas
a series
of
rsctangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

EtlBMK

IlAlN

or use arrow

then

PROTOTYPEWCINEERING INC.
57 Uastland &~~nue
Uinchatar,
IYI 81838
<617) 729-2363
attn. Dr. Alfred0 Ursua
4

Hake

selection.

IIENU - SELECTION OF SOIL PROFILE

112

EMBANKAppendix B Example3

Ilain tknu Definltlon

project
I
K

A llicrocoaputer
program for
ccmputlng
one
dinenslonal
compression
uertical
settlement
due to e&ankment loads. The prcgrarc follow
the equatlons
presented
by Lat+&Uhltean
(1969), Ladd <1973) and PoulosRDauis (1974).
For the caee of a strip syctcratrieal uertlcal
embankment loading the progran superimposer
loads.
For the
tuo uertical
embankment
increment
of wrrtlcal
stresses at end of
fill,
the program superilrpooem a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

Ietter

only,

or use arrour

then +l

PROTOTYPEENCIN6ERIN6 INC.
57 Uestland hsnue
Uinchester,
tla ela9e
(617) 723-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

t flake selection.

<Esc> t tlaln Menu

SOIL PROFILE HENU - SELECTION OF STRAIH PER LOG STRESS

Layer

Nuaber

Sublayar
--------

Nunber of sublayers

Unit wight

= ias. w

3 (for

thfs

layer)

1
- Layer
1

-------Sublayer

Sublayer

of soil

Conpressible

a. 200

Recompression Ratio =

6.949

Type of lasr
Compression Rat10

---------

- Layer
2

Sublayer

El.BB

Eleu. of top of layer

Suelling

= m

Ratio

2
Is this

the last

layer

of profilm

4 Nit

L
Space Bar-Next

item

No

<Fl0> to continue

mt-n-nenu

SOIL DESCRlPTlON AHD MRbtlETERS FOR LFIYER Xl

113

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

FEDERbL HIGHW ADtlIWISTRIIIOH

I
Eleu.
Sublayer

of top of layer

Number of sublayers

= 3 <for thlt

Unit uelght

= 1e5.90

1
Layer
1

Sublayer

Sublayer

of soil

Layer
2

layer>

Corrprerrible

0.200

Recompression Ratio =

0.648

Type of layer
Compression Ratio

Sublayer

e.ee

Suslling

Ratlo

-I

= Sara as Recoup. Ratio

2
Is thlr

the last

layer

of profile

Hit <Fig> to continue

b
Space &rNaxt

ltsm

Alt-n-nenu

DEFINING LAYER Xl AS LhST LAYER OF SOIL PROFILE

FEDERALHIGWW ADflINISTRITION

I=

Layer Nunber =

Eleu.

of top of layer

Number of sublayers
Sublayer

1P
ess
d

8.88

3 <for

thls

layer)

-_-------

Elm.

Sublaycr

Sublaycr

of bottom of lest

layer

iblc

-I

Hit <FM> to accept ualur


Rcconpression

--------

Suelling
Sublayer

Ratio

8.848

= Sam as RBCOM~.Ratio

2
It

Ratio

this

the last

layer

of profile

Yes

Hit <FM> to continue

DEFINING THICKNESS OF SOIL PROFILE

EMBANKAppendixB Example3

tlain Henu
uro.iect
Def initlon
_
soil Profile
and scil

I Nlcroconputer
pmgrau for
computing
one
dimenoianal conp-ion
uertical
settlement
due to embankment loads. The prograa folloun
the equations
p-nted
by LambegUhitman
<1969), Ladd <1973> and PouloaeDsuit (1974).
For the caee of a strip
symmetrical uertical
ambanknant loading the program superiupotor
tuo uertical
embankment
loads.
For the
increment
of usrtiul
stresses at end of
fill,
the program suPerirrposes
l series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

Uertical
strmis
rytten of Units
Naintain file
Run progran
Exit to DOS

parau.

increment

PROTONPB DUXNEERIffi INC.


57 usst1rnd kwnwm
Uinchester,
IW 81898
<bin 729-2969
Attn. Dr. dlfredo Urrua

then 4

t Hake selection.

BIB(yI( WIN HRNU- SELECTION OF UgTER TABLE DEFINITICM

F
Eli

kin Menu ===-==q


project Definition
soil Profile
and soil param.

l-l

Stress h;stoky
1 Uertical
stress
.nition

qm

increment

Eleu. of Uater Table


A llicromnputer
pm
Hit <FIB> to accept ualuer -I
dimensional compress
due to embank&k
loa
the equations
p-nted
by LambegUhitman
<1969>, Ladd Cl973 and PoulonBDauir C1974).
PROTOTYPEQW;INRRRING INC.
For the case of a strip
synnetrical
uertlcrl
57 bktland
Auanua
enbenkment loading the pmgrrrr
superimposes
Uinchester,
M 01898
loads.
For the
tuo uertiul
embankment
<617) 729-2363
lncrerrent
of wrtical
stresrar
at and of
Attn. Dr. Rlfredo Urzua
flll,
the plagmu
suparinposer
a series of
rectangular
loads.

IJMER TABLE AT ELEUATION = 9.8 FT.

115

.
I

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

IlaIn Hcnu I
Deflnltion

project

soil

EM ##I 1 KI
fi

for

dirtenrional

tlicrocomputer
program
conprcssion
due to cmba&t
loads.
the cquatlons
presented

ucrtlcA

(19691,

conputlng

table

and roil

param.

daflnitlon

one

settlement
The progran
follow
by

LambeWhttrcan
<lS74>.
uwtlcal
symmetrical

Ladd <1973> and P~ul~sSDaui~


of a strip
ading ths

rtical

program
strrsnas

PROTOTYPE WCINEERIN6 INC.


57 Uestland &mum
Uinohestnr,
HA SlSSS
<617> 723-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urzua

superimpooss
at

end

then

*J

of

oupcrir4pooera series of

Enter

Profile

Uater

letter

only,

or use arrow

Nakc selection.

<Esc> t Hain flenu

SOIL IS OUERCONSOLIMTED - USER DEFINED STRESS HISTORY

-h-

Habin tianu -

A 111
STRESS HISTORY
dl
llaxinurc Past Pressure
4th
Elm
-I
UtWNING : llaximum past pressure
du
us. Pluuation
th
<1
Fo
em
tu

must be defined
for
interpolates

< Program

soil profilm
betucen points

Prexsur8

Last

>

WGINEERING INC.
Eleu.

tkiximurr

-18. tie
2
l-e

conplete
linearly

Past

1888. afl
-

Hit

to accept

wluat

Space &r-Next

ttea

<FlR>

point

Alt-H-tlenu

STRESSHISTORY - POINT tll

116

rtland
Rwnum
ster,
tlR glg3B
7) 729-2363
r. Alfred0
Ursua

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

Ie def initlon
:ress

hlstory

STRESSHISTORY

r\

t2

dl
du
th
<I

?laxitw~ Past Pressure


uith Elev.
lJmNIr& : tlaxinurc past pressure vs. Elevation
must be dkfined for complete so11 profile
< Frogran interpolates
linearly
betueen points

)
EWGINEERIWG INC.

FO

en
tu

Elev.

in

tlaxinun

Hlt

US>

Last point

1286. en

-30.60

fi
l-8 -

Past Pressure

to

preu.point,

<FiB>

&land

Gm
to accept

mlues

Auenue

rter,
ItR 61898
7) 729-2363

r. Alfred0

lhua

Space Bar-Next

ltan

Alt-IWlenu

STRESS HISTORY - POINT ttt

,la and roll

param.

ia deflnltlon

di
du
th

Cl
Fo
em
tu
in

fi I
,I&=

n3

STRESS HISTORY
Past Pressure
uith Eleu.
: ttaxlnun part pressure
vs. Elevation

llaxtnun

UlmNlffi
must be dcflned for
< Prcgrm interpolates

conplcte
linearly

sell profile
betueen points

Elev.

Pressure

Last

-50. w

tlaxlt~u~

Past

>
MiINEERfNG
INC.
Avenue
sbr,
tlfi 61898
7) 729-2363
r. Alfred0
Urzua

&land

point

2138. ea

Hit <F9> to preu.point,

<FM> to accept

Space Bar-Next

iten

ualuem

Rlt-n-nenu

STRESS HISTORY - POINT 03

117

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

A tlicrocomputer
program for
cmputing
one
dieensional
amp-ion
vertical
settlement
due to embankmmt
loads.
The program follouo
the
equations
presented
by LambegUhitean
<1969>, Ladd (1973) and PoulosgDauis
<1974>.
For the case! of a strip
symrtstrical
uertical
ertbankrrent
loading
the prcgree
superimposes
tuo
uertical
embankrrant.
loads.
For
the
increment
of
wrtical
stresses
at
end of
fill,.thc
program
superimposss
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

E?WMK WIN

IlMu

or use arrow

then

PROTOTYPE EMXNEERING INC.


57 Uest1and Avsnue
Uinchester,
IYI 81898
<617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0
Ursua

tlakc

selection.

- SELECTION OF UERTICAL STRESS If#ZREMENT

la and soil

dimensional
corcprcrrion
uer
due to enbankment
loads.
The program follous
the
equations
presented
by LambeWhttean
<1969>, Ladd <1973> and PoulosgDauis
<1974>.
For the case of a strip
syrtrtetrical
uertical
embankrrent
loading
the program
superimposes
tuo
vertical
abankrtant
loads.
For
the
increment
of
wrtical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superircposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous

then

t tiake

PROTOTYPE EMINEERING INC.


57 Us&land
Awnue
Uinchester,
cw\ 91898
(617) 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. llfredo
Urnua

selection.

<Es&

VERTICAL STRESS INCREllENT MENU - SRLECTIOII OF STRIP SYtRi.

118

parre.

b Rain

EH8bNKllENT

Henu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

- SW?lETRICLL UERIIUU EtMNKtlENT LOCI0

n1 I

UERTICAL RlE&WlENT FOOTlN6


Embank. slope
a
= 48.88
Embank. uidth
b
= 148.88
Height of fill
H
q
28.88
Unit ueight of ftll
= 125.88

co 11 paran.
ltlon

POINTS FOR CO~~FUTI~TION


OF
SETTLEMENT
in
= e *1
calculate
x

coordinate

=-

.
.

X Point
r=!--Yl --r.1,
I

Layer 2

-1
I

FOUNDATIOWELRU,
2=
8.80
ERING IHC.
Hit
increment
the
rectangular

fill,

<Fi8>

to accspt

of
vertical
stresses
progran
superimposes
loads.
+tl-+Nouc

STRIP SWI.

at

ualues

end

a series

of

(617)

of

Clttn. Dr.

Avenue
A BiB98
R3-2363
Rlfredo Urzua

I
bar

4-Select

Esc-Exit

VERTICAL ENBRNKWNTMAD - SELECTION OF X DIRECTION

WWIETRICAL

UERTICAL EflBhNKHENT LOllD b


I

UERTlChL EBBMKtlENT
Enbmk. slop
a
Embank. uidth
b
Height of fill
H
Unit ueight
of fill

FOOTINS
=

48.88

11111111
t
H
111111111111
1111111111111111-1.

= 148.88
= 28.88
q
it5.88

n
X

so 11 param.
ition
1

POINTS FOR COHPlJTClTION


OF
SETTLEHENT
= X Dlrectlon
calculate
in
xl

coordinate

x2 coordinate
delta x

-18.88

= 198.88
=pmlHq

FOUNDCITICM ELEU.
z=
8.00

ERING INC.
-

Hit
increnent

fill,
the
rectangular

of

uertlcal

progran

<F18> to accept ualucr

stresses
superimposes

at

end

a series

loads.

fiucnue
1 81898

of
of

Mtn.

(617) 725-2363
Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

DEFINING R,B 8 6 POINTS FOR CONPUTATIONOF SETTLEllENT

119

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

project Definition
coil Profile
and soil pane.
Uater table deflnltion
Stress history
Uertical
stress incmnsnt
system of Units
II lllcrocowutcr
program For comutlm
one
Exit to DOS
dixenstonal~coaprks~on
ucrtlcalsettieRnt
L
due to mbankment
loads. The program follous
the
equations
presented
by Lmdx&Uhitxan
b
<1969>, kdd cl973
and PoulosLDauIs
<1974>.
For the case of a strip
syemotrtcal
uertiul
PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING IW..
embankment loading the program
superirtposeo
57 Ueotland
CkRnue
For the
tuo
vertical
enbankaent
loads.
Winchester, WI 01899
<617> 729-2363
increment
of vertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the progran
superimposes
a series
of
Attn. Dr. Fllfredo
Urzua
rectangular
loads.
Bntm

letter

only,

or use arrous

EllBLWK WIti

then

Hake selection.

MEW - RlM PROGRiM

ONE DItlENSIONtX SETTLEtlEHT INALYSIWFederal


Hlghuay Adntnirtration
STRIP SYHHETRICAL UERTICAL EnBANKtlEwTLOADING
Projpct

Name

Pro&A.

Number

Data

: Highway
: 91-1236
: iwaw91

Client

Gmbankrtsnt

Esbmlwent slope a
Rmbanbment top uidth
Embankment bottom uidth
Ground Surface Eleu.
Uatw table
Eleu.

t@.

LAYER
TYPE THtCK.

: Any Client

Project

fianager

: Wl

Computed by
Scttlcecnt
=
=

=
=
=

for

49.89 <ft>
199.89 <ft)
18g.W <ft)
8.88
8.08

CONP.

<ft)
(ft.1

: alA

X-Dircctlon
Height

of f111 W
of fill
p load/unit
area

Unit

weight

Foundation

Unit

RECOHP.
RATIO

Hit

COtlP.

arrou

60.0

28.88 <It>
: 125.99 <pcf)
= 25ea.m <psf>

Elm.

ueight

0.88

of Uat. z

SUELL.

<Et)

62.48 <pcf)

UNIT
UEIGHT

<ft>
1

(pcf)
e.zee

ksym to display

8.848

next screen.

0.848

<FR> Print.

PR06RAHOUTPUTPWTIAL SCREEN

120

105. ee

<FIB> tlain

llenu -

EMBANKAppendixB Example3

ONE DIKENSIOKfiL SEl7LEllEWT btiALYSIWFedera1 Hlghuay Mmlnlstratlon


STRIP SmnETRICllL UERTICRL EllBCINKHENTuwu)ItG

Project

Wane

Pro-t

Number : 91-1236
: 1emv91

Data

: Highuay

: Any Client
Cl lent
Project tlanager : Wtl
Computed by
: aum

Embankment

Scttlmwnt
slope L
top uldth
Embankment bottom uidth
Ground Surfece 61~.
U&or
table Elw.
Elrbanhttent

Emhnkmnt

=
=
=
=

COtlP,

LAYER

fi=.

RECotlP.

H
of fill
uelght of fill

SUELL.

2B.EE <ft)
125.9g <pcf>

WIIT
UEIGHT
<pcf>

COKP. 68.8

Hit

Height
Unit

WIT10

TYPE THICK.
<fV

for X-Dlrcctlon

49.88 <ft)
lgg.gB <ft>
180.98 <ft
<ft
e.w
e.ee <ft

ta.ze0

rrou keys to display

next

0.040
screen.

0.840
<Fe> Print.

185.09
<FlB>

Ilain

Henu -

SELECTION OF DISK FILE PRINTED OUTPUT

ONE DIllE)(SIONAL SETTLENEWT~WALYSIWFedcraI Hlghuay Adrtlnlrtratlon


STRIP SWRlETRICRL UERTICAL EHgAWKtlENTLOWING
: Hlghuay
Nane
Number : 91-1236

ProJect
ProJcct
Date

ProJect

Settlement
=
=
=
=
=

I
-

Hit

!F
ConP.
arrou

66.8

keys

0. tee

to display

: aw

=
2e.w <ft)
Height of fill
H
Unit uelght of fill
= 1ZS.W <pcf)
Flla Destination

RECOtlP.

SUELL.

UNIT
UEICHT
<pcf)

0.040

105.w

RATIO

THICK.
<f+.)

: Fyw

for X-Direction

48.98 <ft>
19E.M <ft>
189.80 <ft>

conp.
NP.

tlrnager

Computed by

: lV0Ml

Embankment slope a
Embankment top uldth
Embankment bottom uldth
Ground Surface
$1~~
Uatmr table
Blau.

: t%y Client

Client

Embankment

8.040

next screen.

<Fg> Print.

<FlB> Hain Menu -

SELECTIW OF OUTPUTDESTINATION FILE NMIE

121

EMBANKAppendixB Example3
-

OUB DIMENSIONAL SBTTLENBNT ANALYSIS/lOdQr~l


STRIP 8YmlBTB ICAL VBRTICAL -

Project
Nom0
lllo
Hama
Data

I aightay
Bmbankmont
I xXAKPLB3.m4B
* 10/03/91

client
Project
Kanagor
Computed by

W .
1

I
=
=
=
z

40.00
100.00
180.00
0.00
0.00

LAYBB
TYPB TEICX.
(it)

COUP.

COXP.

0.100

SVBLAYBR
TBICX.
(ft)

w .
1
a
3

10.00
10.00
ao*oo

adgbt

(tt)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ftl

RBCONP .

0.040

0.040

105.00

SOIL STRBSSBS
XNITfAL
(r-f)

BLBV.
(ft)
-10.00
-30.00
-50.00

90.00
sott.
(in.)

X=J
strose
(Pf)

190.00
Sat.
(in.)

1
a
3

39.99
186.19
495.51

0.37
4.19
4.36
_--_-8.9a

1496.44
1421.95
aa46.59

as.91
aa.
15.01
-----63.07

39.99
186.19
495.51

0.37
4.19
4.36
-----8.91

next

scram.

FEDERAL HIGHJW

diwtoiorul
compression
due to enbankmmt loads.
the

equations

<1369>, L&d

presented

08~

letter

010s

Uln

Menu -

uer
The program
by

follow
turbe&lJhltmn

<1973> ma PoulorwwJlr

only,

Print.

FlDllItiISTRATIOll

<1974).

For the case of a strip


synmetriul
uertieal
embanksent
loading the program
euperlmposeo
loads.
For the
uertlcal
embankment
tuo
incrercmt
of
wrtical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the progrem
rupcrinposco
a series
of
rectangular
loads.

Enter

(paf)
(ft)
(pet)

1000.00
la80.00
1130.00

X=
Stroan
(Pet)

to display

(pcf)

NAX.PAST PRESS.
(c-f)

416.00
1178.00
1130.00

-10.00
Stat.
(ill.)

keys

10.00 (ft)

5 195.00
= a500.00
s
0.00
i
61.40

WIT
NBIOET
(Dcf)

X=
Strom
(Wf)

arrow

ii

SWBLL.

Layor

-Hit

of fill

unit
weight of fill
p load/unit
mm
Foundation
Blev.
vnit weight of WUZ.

RATIO

60.0

t Any Client
I Am4
t mm

for X-Direction

SWztlomont
mbankment
SlOpa a
lmbanhont
top width
Babankmont b&tar
width
around Surface ~10~.
Water
table Blov.

Eighway Administr~tiouLOADXNG

or use arrow

then 4-l

Hake

PROTOME RHCINEERIN6 INC.


57 Ueetland Avenue
UInchartm,
IlA BiR98
<617) 729-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfredo Urzua
sclectlon.

<Esc> t tlain

EflWtK MAIN NENU- SELECTION OF VERTICAL STRESS INCREIlENT NENU

122

Menu

EMBANKAppendixB Example3

= SYtl?lETRICAL UERTICFU, UWWHMT


UBRTICIL EtiBlNKHEKT FOOTING
Embank. slope
a
= 40.00

Embank. uldth
Hclght of fill
Unit uelght of

= 148.88

fill

= ix.88

UMD -1

rb---(
-i11111111
1
111111111111H

mee

u
X

1111101111111114-+

n
soil

SETTLEWIT

-*-

calculate
in
xl coordlnatc
x2 coordlnatc

delta

= X Dlrectlon
= 148.88
= 18e.ee

=m

Layer

.
.

Layer 2

pat-u.

itlon

Xd

POINTS FOR COllPUTllTION OF

z1--

POURDIlTIONELEU.
z=
e.ee
,I

. Hit

<Pie>

to

accept

:;;nc.

u;lluer

A 01898
increment

at

fill,

of uertlcrl
stresses
the program superlmponen
rectangular
loads.

a series

end

of

4617) 7293363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Lb-ma

of

DEFINING D,E R F PGItfTS FOR CGWUTATIDN OF SRTTLRtlMT

project

liain llanu
Definition

soil Profile
and soil paraw
Uater table deflnltlon
Stress history
Uertical
stress incrmwnt
systcn
of Unltt
nafntrin
I

fllcrocoquter

for
coqwting
one
uertlcal
settlement
The program follous

progrw

dlwmsional
-pression
due to embankment loads.
the equations
presented

by LambeBUhltnan
<1969>, Ladd (1973
and PoulosEDauls <1974>.
For the case of a strip
ryrrmctrlcal
uertical
embanktwnt
loading the program
superimposes
tuo
wrtiul
embankment
loads.
For the
increment
of
vertical
stresses at end of
1111, the program
superimposes
a serias
of

rectangular
Enter

file

PROTOTYPEEttGINEERItK IIKC.
57 Ueotland Avenue
Uinchoster,
tlQ Gl898
<617) 729-2363
fittn. Dr. Cllfredo Urzua

loads.
letter

only,

or use arrous

EllBbNK IlAIN tlacl

than

b Ilake selectton.

- RlHi PROGRM

123

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3


-

ONE DIllStiSIOHRL SETTLEIIENTClNCILYSIWFederrl Hlghuay tilnistratlon


STRIP SWWETRICIL UERTICfIL EHBdNKtlENTLCWDINC
SIJBLCWER
SOIL STRESSES
HO.
ELEU.
TnIcH.
wIx.PMT PRESS.
IHITICIL
<ft)
<ft)
<psf)
<prf)
1

-ie.ee

ee
-58. ee
-30.

2iW
~-~

x=

168.88

188B.98

2138. ee
1278.
ee

2138.
1288.ee
m

<par)

<in.)

x =
Stress
<psf>

2384.73
1979.81

24.58
19.48

1249.88
1244.86

14.32
14.15

588.63
194.81

6.96
1.57

1753.95

12.u
---56.58

1228.38

9.49
-----37.96

698.28

5.91
-----14.44

Stress

Layer

Hit

148.88

426.86

Sett.

UVOY keys to display

Destination
EXfiN3DEF.OUT

Sett.
<in.)

next screen.

<F8> Print.

File

<F18> Main I%NJ

SELECTIo)( OF OUTPUTDESTINllTION FILE NbHE

ONE DIHXNSIONAL SBTl'LKMBNT ANALYSIS/Federal


Highway AdminiatratlonSTRIP SYBMRT~UCAL~ERTICAL KMBANKHSNT LOADING
Project
Name
Pi.10 Name
Date

I Eighway Embankment
1 KXAnPLK3.RMB
I 10/03/91

client
Project

Computed

Settlement
Ipbanlmont
elope a
tinbent
top width
tiankment
botta
width
Ground Surface
61~.
wator tab10 elev.

IAYBR
N' .

TYPE

THICK.
(ft)

COWP.

60.0

SuBJAYaR
THICK.
(ftl

N' .
1
a
3

X=

1
a
3

Streea
(Nf)
1304.73
1979.81
1753.95

Hit

arrow

40.00
160.00
180.00
0.00
0.00

(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(it)
(ft)

0.100

0.040

0.040

105.00

4a6.00
1178.00
a130.00

X=
street
(PSf)

160.00
sett.
(in.)

24.50
19.48
la.51
-----56.50

ia49.80
1144.86
laP8.38

14.31
14.15
9.49
--_--_
37.96

dinplay

next

to

UNIT
WBIGET
(pcf)

(Pd.)

(ft)

x=
stress

(PSf)
194.81
508.63
698.ao

screen.

124

=
10.00
= 115.00
= a500.00
=
0.00
I
62.40

SWELL.

BOXL STWSW
INITIAL

140.00
Bett.
tin.1

keys

Height
of fill
B
Unit weight
of fill
p load/unit
area
Foundation
Blov.
Unit weight
of Wat.

RBCOWP.
RATIO

-10.00
-30.00
-50.00

* Any Client
I AON
t aum

X-Direction

COHP.

BLBV.

a0 .oo
10.00
10.00

Layar

I
=
I
5

for

nanager
by

08~

(fit)
(pcf)

(psf)

(ft)

(pcf)

nAX.PAST PRBSS.
(Pee)
1000.00
1180.00
2130.00

180.00
Scat.
(in.)
1.57
6.96
5.91
_--_-14.44

Print.

cPlO> Main klenu-

EMBANKAppendix B Example3

Main Menu project


Definltlon
toil
Profile
and sol1
Uatsr table definition
Stress
history
m

I
lllll

IK

parml.

llicroccmputer

II

program

PoL

due to embanknmt loads. The program follour


the cquatlons
presented
by LawbelWhltman
<1969>, Ladd <1!373 and PoulorgDauis
<1974>.
For thm case of a strip
aymrrmtrical wrtlcal

PROTOTYPE WGINEERING INC.


57 Uestland
CIuenua
Uinchester,
IICI 91898

e#banknmnt
loading
the program
superinposas
For
the
tuo
uertical
embankment
loads.
incrmrrmnt
of
wrtical
rtrosra
at
snd of
fill,
the progrw
superimposer
a series
of
rmctangular
loads.

Enter

letter
UlBrW

only,

or use arrow

then

(617)
httn.

b tlakc

Dr.

selectlon.

729-2363
Fllfredo

Urzus

<Esc> b Hain

Menu

IWIN HENU - SELECTIOn OF VERTICAL STRESS 1HCREHWT HENU

SWlETRICAL UERTlCtJL EHBANKHEHT LOAD e


UERTlC&L EtlBMKIlEfiT
Embank. slope
a
Embank. uidth
b
Hmight of fill
H
Unit umlght of flll

FOOTIN
= 48.88
= 140.08

= 2e.eg
= 12S.W

POINTS FOR CDHPUTIITIOWOF


SETTLEllEHT
= X Point
calculate
in
x

coordirtatc

=m

11111111 t
111111111111
1111111111111111X--*
.
.
-*
.
.
r
21--

Layer

Layer

n
sol1
ltion

paran.

FOUHDCITICM ELEU.
2 =
e.BB
1 iztr(kNc.
-

Hit

<Fig>

to aca3pt

ualuss
n 01999

increment
the
fill,

of
wrtical
stresses
progrur
superimposes
rectangular
lords.

DEPINIW

at
end
a series

<617> 729-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0 Urzua

of
of
I

POINT C COORDINATES

125

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

project

soil

Rain

tknu

Definition
Pmfile
and wil

paron.

Uater table
definition
Stroor
history
Vertical
stress
incrmmtnt

rrstml4 of urdtr
tliintoin
A IlAcrocomputsr
progrm
for
computing
one
dicrensional
corrpression
uertical
settlertent
due to embankrant
loads. The program follow
the
equations
present.4
by Lombo6UhJtman
<1969>, ladd <IS731 and PoulosBDeuJs
(1974).
For the uee of a strip
syrrnetrlcol
uerticol
embonknent
looding
the program
superimposes
tuo uerticel
plbonlwent
loeds.
For
the
increment
of
uartiul
stresses l t and of
fill,
tha program suparircpossr
a rariss of

rectangular

file

PROCOTVPEEHcINEERIffi
INC.
57 Uertlmd
thmnue
Uinchestur,
M 01898
<617) 729-2363
Clttn. Dr. Cllfredo Urruo

lads.

Enter

letter

only,

or use orrous

then

llokc

selection.

EHRCINK HAIN HENU - RUN PROCRAH

ONE DIHENSIOWL SETTLEHENTfiNALYSIWFedere1 Hlghuey Cldcclnlstratlon


STRIP SYmETRICAL UERTICbL EKBANKHENT UWlDING
Ueter table Elev.
=
8.00 <ft>
Unit ueight
of Uat. =
62.40 <pcf)

NO.

LaYeR
TYPE THICK.
<ft)

CmP.

CONP.

0.20B

60.0

RECOnP.
RATIO
e. 848

SUELL.

Settlement

UNIT

e. 848
Total

UEIGHT
<pcf>

<in.)

165.00

62.17

Sottlmnt

=
File

Destination

NO.

1
2
3

SuELaYER
THICK. ELEU.
<ft>
<ft>
20.88
28.88
20.88

-10.88
-30.00
-58.00

INITIAL
Cpsf)

EXAN3C.OUT
SO
INCREtlENT RRX.PFISTPRESS.
(psf)
<pof>

426.00
1278.88
2130.80

2491.19
2368.48
2141.78

Hit

ormu

keys

to dinploy

next

scrcon.

25.88
21.78
14.51

Settlement

<F8> Print.

=
<FlB>

SELECTloW OF OUTPUTDESTINQTION FILE WtlE

126

SETTLMMT
<in.)

me. 88
1288.88
213e.m
Totol

62.17

62.17 <in.>
kin

tknu

EMBANKAppendixB Example3

ONB DIUBNSIONAL SBTTL~LYsIsf~ederal


Eighway AdminfotrationSTRIP SYMNSTRICAL VERTICAL EI(BAMo(ENT LoMINg
Project
Name
File Mame
Date

I Sighway lPnbankmmt
I KKAuPLB3.mm
I 10/03/91
sott1f4merIt

mbanhont
slope .
Smbanlcment tog width
Wankmmt
bottom width
Ground
Surfac.
Blav.
water t8ble
81~.

LAYBR

=
=
=
I

TYPB

TBICK.
(ft)

CONP.

60.0

x =
(ft.)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)

KECOMP.
RATIO
0.040

0 .a00

115.00

(ft)

Eofght of fill
E
Unit weight of fill
D load/unit
arm
iound.tion
Blev.
Unit weight of Nat.
SNBLL.

DNIT
WEIGHT
(pcf)

0.040

105.00
Total

N .
1
a
3

SWLAYBR
TBICK.
BLBV.
(it)
(ft)
10.00
10.00
10.00

426.00
ra70.00
ai30.00

1491.19
1360.40
ai41.78

Bit

arrow

keys

to display

next

ecreon.

IDaf)

(ft)
bet)

(in.)
61.17

Settlement

61.17

SBTT(in.)
15.88
al.70
14.51

Settlemmt

013,

(ft)
(pcf)

settlement

1000.00
ia80.00
ai30.00
Total

I
10.00
I 125.00
= 1500.00
I
0.00
.
61.40

SOIL STRBSSBS
INCNAX.PAST PRBSS.
(Rot)
(DEf)

INITIAL
(REf t

-10.00
-30.00
-50.00

1 Any Client
I AM
t aum

mnager
computed by
project

for

40.00
100.00
180.00
0.00
0.00

COl4P.

W'.

Client

Print.

6a.17

~110s Nain

(in.)

Xenu -

Main lhu
project
Dafinition
soil
Proflla
and soil

param.

Uater table definition


Stress hlstory
Uertical
stinc-nt
system of units
A tllcrocorcplter
progrur
dlmenslonal compression
due to embanhnent
loads.
the equations
presented

for
computing
one
uertical
settlement
The prograM follow

Run program
Exit- to-DOS

by LartbeSUhltlran
<1969>, Ladd <1973> and PoulosgDauis
<1974).
For the cau of a strip
synrtetrical
vertical

PROTOTYPE BlGINEERIffi

embankment loading the prograM superimposes


tuo vertical
ambanltmnt
loads.
For the
increment
of
uowtlcal stresses at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

than

57 l&&land
Uinchester,

t llaka selection.

BIBAM IlfUN IlENlJ - SELECTION OF IlIINTAIN

127

<617) 729-W
Attn. Dr. Alfred0
4

FILE

INC.

fkmua
91898
Unua

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

project
Definition
soil
Profile
and poll
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uertical
strew4
lnc-nt

pare.

A tiicrocoHputer
progmrr
for
computing
one aldimensional
umpreesion
vertical
settlement
due to esbank&t
loads.
The prograe
follow
Clear entries
the
equations
presented
by LartbeWhltean
<1969),
Ladd (1973)
and PouloshDauls
<1974>.
For the case of a etrlp
rymrretrlcal
uertlcel
PROTOTYPE By;INSSDII([;
INC.
auperlrrposer
57 uasthnd
&uanue
eebanknsnt
loading
the program
loads.
tua
vertical
mhnkmnt
For
the
Ulnchater,
IM 918sB
Lncrerrent
of
uertiul
stresses
at
end of
<617) 729-2363
fill,
the program
superlrcposes
a series
of
Mtn.
Dr. Alfred0
Ursue
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrous
llW4TFIIN

FILE

then

+f

Enter

letter

only,

OP use arrow

<Esc> t lleln

Menu

DENU - SELECTION OF SAUE FILE

computing
lllcrocomputer
program for
dlrtemlonal
coupresslon
vertical
sett
due to embankrcent loads.
The prograu
f
the
equations
presented
by La&&&l
<1969>, Ladd <1973> and PoulosLDaulr
<
ue
For the case of a strip
sysrtetrical
tuo
vertical
ecrbankrcent
increment
of
vertical
stresses
fill,
the prograrr
superleposes

Hake selection.

at
end
a eerlee

then

on

of
of

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERIWG INC.


57 Ucstland
Rueme
Uinchester,
tlU 91898
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfredo
Ureua

h Hake relsctlon.

SAUING INPUT FILE AS EXMlPLE3.EtlB

128

<Em>

t hln

Henu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 3

{ FEDEML

HIGHWQY LDllINISTRFlTION
llain tknu p
project
Definition
soil
Profile
and soil
parse.
Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Uertical
stress
incre~nt
rytten
of Units
Kaintain
file
Run program

A tlicrocomputm
program for
computing
one
dinensional
compression
uertical
settlement
due to embankrrant
loads.
The progran
follow
the
equations
presented
by LanbeBUhltnan
<1969>, Ladd cl973
and Poulos&Dauis
(1974).
For the case of a strip
eymnetrical
uertical
ambankmant
loading
the program
supsrimpoeer
tuo
uertiul
snbankmnt
loads.
For
the
increrrcnt
of
uertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
euperiaposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

EllBFlKK ll8IK

then

PROTOTYPE EWINEERIffi
INC.
57 uest1md
Auanum
Ulncheetar,
IW 81898
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Urzua

+-I

Hake selection.

KEKU - EXIT TO DOS

1 FEDERFIL HIGHUAY ADHIWISTRdTION


project

soil

lkin
Pknu
Def lnition

Profile

and soil

param.

Uater table
definition
Stress
history
Usrtical
stress
increment
systaw of Units
tlaintain
file
Run program

pmgran for
computing
one
I
Kicroconputer
dimensional
compression
vertical
sattlewd.
duu to snbanknant
loads.
The program follow
tha
equations
p-nted
by LambaSUhitnan
<1969),
Ladd <1973
and Poulos6Dauis
c1974).
For the case of a strip
symmetrical
uertical
superimposer
ectbanknent
loading
the pmgran
tuo
wertical
embankment
loads.
For
the
Lncrement
of
vertical
stresses
at
end of
fill,
the program
superimposes
a series
of
rectangular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or use arrow

then

cl

t tlake

z~TT

selection.

EXIT TO DOS HENU - YES SELECTION

129

W INC.
PROT
57 Be&land
kenue
Uinchester,
HA 81898
(617) 729-2x3
Attn.
Dr. filfredo
lb-ma

<Esc>

Hain

Menu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

Example 4

130

EMBANKAppendix B Example4

Example No. 4:

Embankment

on Layered Soil

Figure 13 showsthe problem geometryand soil parameters.The purposeof


the exampleis to comparethe settlementfor the following cases:
1. The embankmentbearson top of the organic soil.
2. The embankmentbearson top of the sandstratumafter the organic
soil hasbeenremoved.
The clay layer is divided into four sublayers.The exampleshowsthe useof
the foundationdepthoption includedin EMBANK.
Table 11presentsa comparisonof the computer-calculatedandhandcomputedsettlements.
Table 11. Settlementsat point A
Settlement(in.)
Hand-Calculated
Computer
Embankmenton top of organic soil
Embankmenton top of sandstratum

SAND

NC CLAY

23.80
10.51

23.80
10.51

y I HO pcf gssumed incompressible)

y = 127.4pcf
w I 35%
G = 2.78
Incompressible

Not to sde

Figure 13. Example 4: Embankmenton layered soil

131

EMBANK Appendix 6 Example 4

Case 1:

Embankment Bears on Top of Organic Soil

DivideNC Clay stratuminto four IO-ft thick sublayers.

Determinegeostaticverticaleffectivestresses
at points1 through5:

Ol = 1.5x 100= 150psf < 2OOpsf,


use200psf
8*=3x 100+2x 110+5(110-62.4)+5(127.4-62.4)

= 1083psf

ir, = 3 x 100+ 2 x 110+ 5( 110- 62.4) + 15(127.4- 62.4) = 1733psf

&,=3x 100+2x 110+5(110-62.4)+25(127.4-62.4)=2383psf


Z5 = 3 x 100+ 2 x 110+ 5( 110- 62.4) + 35(127.4- 62.4) = 3033psf

Determineincrementsof verticalstressunderpointA; usesuperposition


principleasexplainedin Figure5 of maintext:

+X

++x

10+30-20 -20

Thereforewe computetheincrements
of verticalstressastwo timesthe
verticalstressincrements:
Theverticalstresses
aregivenby

20

I-

xa
a,2 p+-Jr
[ a

a
B

(x -b)

In this case:
a=10

6 = 20
x=20
x-b=0

20

[ 1

a*= -, p+ $

=30z=5[B+2al

&g- (b-4
z

3 p=mfy]=

tan(a+p)=

*a=arc

Jf
Z

132

il

20
z -@

&++)

EMBANKAppendixB

Example 4

The resultsfor z = 1.5, 15,25,35, and 45 are indicatedbelow:

p=arctar

a=arc

q)

.p
1199.366
967.6019

599.6831

1.5

81.46924

15

33.69007

19.44004

483.801

25

21.80141

16.8584

370.1214

740.2428

35

15.9454

13.79948

290.2958

580.5915

45

12.52881

11.43368

235.9745

471.949

4.241609

Settlementdeterminationfor point A:
Use the following expression:
l

5
p=CH,c, log6vo+ABv
;=1l+eo %o
iwhere:
Hi = thicknessof eachsubstrata
Cc= UseFHWA procedure
For organic soil layer:

w%
C, = = 0.8
100

For NC clay:
eo= Initial void ratio; useequationGw = Se
where S = 100%= 1. Therefore,Gw = e.

For NC clay:

eo= 2.78 x 0.35 = 0.973

Apply expressionsaboveat point A, for z = 1.5, 15,25,35, and 45


ft. Resultsare indicatedin table below:

0.8310505

967.6019

2050.6019

0.4918323

740.2428

2473.2428

0.2740186

2383

580.5915

2963.5915

0.1679828

3033

471.949

3504.949

0.1114204

200

25

10.0
10.0

1083
1733

35

10.0

45

10.0

15

eo= 1.8 x 0.8

1399.366

3.0

1.5

= 1.44

For organic soil layer:

1199.366

Total Settlement:

1.7689566 ft
21.23

133

in

EMBANKAppendix B Example 4
Case 2:

10.0

Embankment Bears on Sand Stratum, After


Organic Soil has Been Removed

20.0

P=10x120=1200psf

%I1 = 120

SAND

NC CLAY

Pcf

y = 110 pcf (assumed incompressible)

y = 127.4 pcf
w = 35%
G - 2.78

Incompressible

Not to scale

Determinegeostaticverticaleffectivestresses
at points2,3,4, and5.
Thesegeostaticstresses
arem
excavationof theorganicsoil layer
(samevaluesasin Case1):

iY2= 1083psf
33= 1733psf
Z4 = 2383 psf
55 = 3033psf

Threefeetof organicsoil is excavated:


3 x loo pcf = 300 psf

Computenewembankment
loadas:
PI-P-3oopsf
Where

P= 1Ofrx 12Opcf= 1200psf

Therefore P = 1200- 300= 900psf (considersexcavation)

134

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4


Determineincrementsof vertical stressunderpoint A,; use
superpositionprinciple as explainedin figure 5 of main text:
b=30
a=10

lzqkh.

=:

z
1

d=20

d=20

y"

Thereforewe computethe incrementsof vertical stressas two times the


vertical stressincrementswhich result from:
x=20
a=10
b=20
X

a
p

x-b=0

x4

20
@

Therefore:
0.43'24

,p=(b-a)

*p=mc

L-J

tan(a+B)=b

d)
*
Z

a=arc

-p

+I

Computestressincrementsfor z = 12,22,32, and 42 ft. Resultsare


indicatedin the tablebelow:

12
22
32
42

39.80557

19.23068

391.3346

782.6692

24.44395
17.35403
13.3925

17.82974
14.65136
12.07085

300.5171
233.2837
187.671

601.0342
466.5674
375.3419

135

EMBANKAppendix S Example4
Settlementdeterminationfor point A,:
l

Use the following expression:

p= iH,

cc lo %o+ Aov

i=l l+eo

%O

where:
Hi = thicknessof eachsublayer= 10.0ft
w%
Cc= Accordingto FHWA procedure = 100
cc= -=
35% 035
100
.
2.78 tyO.35 = o.973
eo= Initial void ratio = cw =
Therefore:

Apply expressionsabovefor z = 12,22,32, and 42 ft. Resultsare


indicatedin table below:

12
22

10
10

1083
1733

782.6692
601.0342

1865.6692
2334.0342

0.4190176
0.2293869

32
42

10
10

2383
3033

466.5674
375.3419

2849.5674
3408.3419

0.1377558
0.0898873

Total Settlement:

136

0.8760476 ft
in
10.51

EMBANK AppendixB Example4

Compilation of Computer Screens for


Example 4

II
I BI R 1 KI
EM
b

program for
computing
compression wzrtlcal
settlertent
c~banlwent
loads. The progran
follow

tllorowmputer

one

dlmnslonal

to
aquatlons
presented
by Lalrbe&Uhittmn
Ladd
Cl973
awl Poulos&Dauis (1974).

due
the

PROTOTWE Q#mlEER1m
57 kst1rnd
Uinchester,

<1969>,
For
the
embankment

case of a strip sywetricrl


ucrtical
loading
tk
program superirrporw
tuo vertical
eltbenkmant loads. For the incracrant of uertical
stresses
rt
mnd of
fill,
thl
progra
superlaposes a series of rectangular
loads.
Uerslon

2.9WOctober

(6171
Mtn.

1991

Hlt
OPE?M6

INC.

Awnue
IW gi898

729-2363

Dr. llfredo

<p10> to

Urxua

continua

SCREEN

Nlcrocorcplter
progrvr
for
computing
one
dlmnsionl
wmpresslan
uertlcal
settlemnt
dus to cmbankmmt
loads. The program follow
the squatlons
presented
by LanbcWhlt~an

<1969),
Far the

Ladd (1979)
and Poulos&Dauis
case of a strip
syrmetrlcal

rtbankmnt loading the pmgmn


w wrtlcd
mbankmnt
t of uertical
stresses
~~~parinpossr

Entm

l&tar

only,

BW#iM IWN

<1974).

ucrtlcal
superimposes

or usa

at

end

1 sarias

rraus

of

of
then

PROTOTYPEMGINEERING INC.
57 lJest1and Ruewe
Uinchata,
M 918%
<617> 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. llfredo
Urinm
4J

b Hake selection.

NENU - SELECTION OF PROJECT DEFINITICM

137

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

FEDERAL HMMAY

AD((INISTR(\TIon

PROJBCT DgPINItlON

Client
Project
ProJact

A tllcroconp
dirtensional
due to emban
the equatlo
<1969>, hdd

Pile

nqrrc
llanagcr

nmm

Date
Coccputcd

-I

= nm, CLIENT
= EXCllWTlON EXRIIPLE
= tlv. John Doe

E inc-t
5

= aaHPLE4. LllR
by

= YEW2
=m

<NWDD/YY>

Hit CFN> to accept ualucr For the case 01


embankmmt
loading the program
superimposes
57 Uastl8nd
@umue
tuo
wrtical
embankment
loads.
For
the
Uinchemter,
M 81898
increment
of
uertical
stressas
at
end of
<617> 7292363
fill,
the program
ruperircponus
a swig
of
Attn.
Dr. Alfrmdo
Urzue
rectangular
loads.

PROJECT DUIWITIOII

tILcrocomputer
pragruI
for
computing
one
conpresslon
wrtical
settlewont
due to embankrant
loads. The program follous
the equations
presenbd
by l.anbeRUhit~rn
<1969),
Ladd (1913)
and Poulos&Dwlr
(1974).
For the wa
of a drip mtrfcal
wrtical
mbmkmant
loading the progrw
superimposer
tuo urrrtiul
embankmnt
loads.
For
the
hcrmmt
of wrtical
stresr~s at. end of
fill,
the ~rogrmm
suparirrpotar
l series
of

SCREEN

Exit

to DOS

dimensional

rect8ngular
Enter

PROTOWPE QJCIMRRIWC INC.


57 bbtl8nd
&mnw

tJlnch8ster,
M 81898
<617) ?ZS-2363
Mtn.
Dr. Mbdo
Wzua

loads.
letter

only,

BIBAII<

or use arrow

then

b Hake selection.

IWIN MENU - SELECTION OF SOIL PffWILE

138

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

thin

knu

Hicrocorcputer program for


computing one
dieenrlonel
comprcsslon
uertlcal
settlcaent
due to eabenlment loads. The progrur
follous
the cquetlons
presented
by Lembe&Uhitmen
wi69).
hid
cm73
end P0ui0t5emts
ci974~.
For tha uee of a rtrlp
syeeetriul
wrtlcel
embankment loedlng the program
superlnposes
tuo
uerticel
enbenkment
loads.
For
the
of vertical
mtreesee
et
end of
increment
fill,
the progree
superl~posee
a eerieo
of

rectangular
Enter letter

PROTOTYPE BICINEERING INC.


57 Uaetlend
Ausnue
Uincheeter,
NA 01898
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. WEredo Urzue

loede.
only,

or use arrous

then

4-l a Hake selection.

a>

Nein

Hew

SOIL PROFILE IIENU - SELECTIOn OF UOID RfiTIO PER LOG SlRESS

Layer

Number =

Eleu.

of top of layer

=
=

Number of rubleyam
Subleyer

-----we-

1 <for this

layer)

1
Unit

- Layer
1
Subleyer

Subleyer

uight

so11 properties

Co~presxlon
- Layer
2

= lge. w

of soil

Type of law
Layer

Subleyer

0.88

Index

Recorcprasaion

Index

= Initial

uold retlo

Estimated

from a-logp

curuef

Estimated

from a-logp

curves

Estimated

from hlogp

curve8

2
Suslling

Index

Is this

the lest

I
Space Bar-fkxt

Iterc

layer

No

Hit #lo>
Al t-n-nenu

SOIL DESCRIPIICM MD PWWEIERS

139

of profile

FOR LAYER gl

to continue

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

Layer Sol1 Priperties


Initial

Uater Content

Spscific

Gmuity

of Solids

Degree of Saturation

==-=-=IADNINISTRAIION
=

ae.eRz

1.88

layer

= m

---__---

Sublayer

Sublayer

roll

= 1ee.m

Sublayar

1 <for this

Type of layer

Layer sol1 pmpertlcs

= lnitlal

Conprmlon
Layer
2

E.&J

yarn

Hit <Fig> to accept values 1--

Index

Raconprssslon

layer)

Compressible
uater

content

Estimated

from rlogp

cutwe!

Index Estimated

from slogp

curuea

Estimated

from wlogp

curwu

2
Suelling

Indsx

1s this

the last

layer

of proffle

No

Hit UiB>
INITIAL

to continue

IJgTER UMTENI - LAYER gl

Coaprersion

Index

The Federal Hlghuay fidrtinistratlon


<FHUI> In the soil
the
and Foundations Uorkrhop Manual (1982) esttnatco
Compression
Index by diufding
ths
lnttlal
noisturs contsnt by 1gR.
this
Camp. Indo% = Inittal
uhrre constant
= lgg

Uater

Constant

Hit <Pit0
Layer
2

layer)

CLn 2) / Constant

ssiblc

to accept value

uater

Coaprssslon

-------Sublayer

Content

Index

Rscomp-ion

content

Computed using FHUA<iggZ>

Index Estlsatsd

fmrr slogp

curus: L

from s-logp

curuI): E

2
f

Suelling

Indsx

Is this

the last

Estimated
layer

of profile

No

Hlt <PM> to continue


COtIPRESSIONINDEX - FWG PROCEDURE
- LAYER 81

140

EMBANKAppendix B Example4

Layer

tiurtkr

Elau.

of top of layer

Wumber of sublayers
Sublayer

-3.68

1 <for this

layer)

1
Unit
. Layer
1

Sublryer

Sublaycr

of soil

might

= 1ie.m
=

Type of layer

- Layer
2

Sublayer

2
IS this

the

last

layer

of profile

Hit <F9> to Preu. Layer Hit


Space Bar-Next
item
IUt-n-llclw

Ma

VW0

to

continue

SOIL DESCRIPTIOWRND FhRCltlETERSFOR LMER 82

Index

Conprescion

Layer

Nunbar

Sublayer

--------

Eleu.

top

of

-18.88

Number of sublayers

4 <for

Unit

of soil

= 127.48

propertles

= Initial

this

layer)

uold

ratlo

1
ueight

. Layer

--------

Sublayer

Sublaycr

Type of layer
Layer

toll

Index

Conpression
. Layer
2

Sublayer

of layer

Recompression

Estimated

from rlogp

curues

Index Estimated

from a-logp

curues

Estimated

from e-loge

ourum

Suelling

Index

1s this

the last

Hit <F9> to Prev.


Space

Bar-Next

ltelr

layer

of profile

No

Layer -Hit GM>


Rlt-il-Welw

SOIL DESCRIPTIOW#u, PARAIIETERSFOR LMER 113

141

to continue

=d

EMBANKAppendix B Example 4

Layer Sol1 Properties


Initial
Specific

Grauity

Solids

of

3!5.aex

2.78

layer

= m

Degree of Saturation
-

1 yers

Hit <Fig> to accept ualues 2

_-_------

Sublayer

Sublaycr

Type of

-18.88

4 <for thlr

layer)

= 127.40
=

Iayw

propertlcs

Coxprmlon

Camp-lblc

= Initial

uatn

Estinated

Index

fmn

content

tlogp

curves

Layer

2
Sublayer

roll

soil

Layer

----------

I
I
3
I

=-II-

Uater Content

Index Estimated

Recompression

from rlogp

curums

from e-logp

curves

2
i

Suelllng

Index

Is this

the last

Hit

<FS> to Preu.

INITIAL

Estiaatsd
layer
Layer

of
-

profile

No

ffl0>

Hit

to continua

Index

Ihc Federal Highuay Administration


and Foundations
Uorkshop
Manual

Compression
Index by dlulding
xolrture
content
by 188.

y
<Flea>

the

soil
layer>

Uatsr Content <in %> / Constant

Constant

1
1
3

~011

in the

<198t) ertlrcatcs
the Initial

this
Index = Initial
uhere constant
= 188

nlble

= m

uatcr

Hit <FM> to accept value Index

Compression

Computed

using

content

FHUM1982~

Layer

Recompression

2
Sublayer

bp

Index Estlmatod

fmrr u-logp

curuas

from e-logp

curves

2
Suelling

Index

In this

the last

Hit

MflPRESSION

UATER CONTENT - LMER 83

I
* Compressfon

Corrp.

<F9> to

Estiwatsd
layer

Preu. Layer -

INDEX - FWI

of

proflle

Hit

Ho

<P10> to continue

PROCEDURE - LAYER 83

142

:d

EMBANKAppendix B Example4

Co~presrion

Layer

Eleu.

Nuder

Index ~i-1

of top of layer

Nun&r

Sublmyer 1
-a---:
-----Sublaycr n

of subleycrs

Unit uelght
Layer
1

Type of

of soil

4 <for this

= 127.48
=

propcrtla

Corrpreesion

Comprexeiblm

= lnltlrl

uatcr

wntent

Index

Recompresrlon

Computed

FHUMl982)

using

Index Estimated

from a-logp

curues

from a-logp

curues

2
Swelling
Is

thts

Index
the

lktinated

lest

leyer

of profile

Hlt <F9> to Preu. Leyer lilt


Space Ber-Next
lterr
Ilt-ll-tbnu
DEFINING LAYER 113 AS l&T

Coxpresrion

Layer Number =

Eleu.

Index

Sublayer

Sublryer

Elcu.

of

layer

of last

Hit <FM> to awept


Compression

- Leyer
2

<Pie>

to continue

kI-,

of top of layer

botton

LAYER OF SOIL PROFILE

Number of wblayern

Sublsyer

Sublayer

Iryer)

1
Layer
2

Sublsyer

lmyr

Layer toil
Subleyer

= -1G.W

-lg.W

4 <for this

layer)

lble

value

ter

content

Computed using lWM1982~

Index

Recompression

I
1
3
I

Index

Bstineted

from e-108~ curuet

Estimated

from e-logp

Hit

Suelling

Index

IO this

the last

<F9> to Prw.

layer
Layer -

of

profile
Hit

010)

DEFINING MICKNESS OF SOIL PROFILE

143

curues

Yee
to

continue

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

Nain
Nenu
-=-I
paran.

project Definition
soil Profile
and soil
Uortical

A Nlcrocomputer program for


conputlng
om
dinanrional
sattlment
_ .
. compression
. _ vertical
-.
due to smkankmnt loads. The prograrc follour
tha equations
presented
by LartbaDUhitnan
<1969), IAd (1373 l luI PouloseDauis (1974).
of l strip symmetrical usrtical
the program
tupsrinporss
iul

Enter

letter

strssssr

only,

at snd
b rarias

or use arrous

of
of
then 4

stress

increment

PROTOTYPE04GINEERING INC.
57 uustl8nd hmllm
Ulnchaater,
lW 01898
<617) 729-2363
Mtn. Dr. Llfredo lkzua
t flake selection.

WIWW r#IN llBiU - SELECTION OF UATER TgBLE DEFINITIOW

-I-

Rain

Plow. of Ud.sr

Nlcrocamputer

pro

Table

dimntlonal
mrrprms
Hit <FM> to accspt
due to embankrant loa
the oquatlona
presented
by LambeBUhltnan
<1969>, La&I <i973> and PouIosgDauin (1974).
For tha of a strip synmatrical
uartiml
msbmkmant
loading the program ruparinposar
tuo
umrtlcal
embankmnt
Ioodr.
For
the
Increment
of uertiul
strssres
at end of
fill,
the program superimposes
a series of
rmtangulr
loads.

PROTONPE MGINEEDlffi INC.


57 umtland
kwlw
Uinchmtsr,
N6 81898
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfred0
Ursua

UNIER TllBLE EIT ELlWTION -5 FT

144

EMBANKAppendix6 Example4

hln

tilcroconputer

progrur

dlmensionsl compression
due to embankmnt
loads.
the

equations

for

conputlng

knw

one

wrtlcal
settlement
The progrm
follour

presented

by

LoabeWhitmen

<1969>, Ladd (1973 and Poulos&Dauls (1974).


a strip symmetrical uerticel

PROTOWPE WcINEERIffi

57 uest.lard
Uinchester,

ical stresses
suPerimposer
Enta

letter

only,
DlBMK

at end
a srriss

OP use l rrous

of

then

t tlake selection.

Main llenu
Deflnltton
soil Profile
and roll
Uoter tobls definltlon

project

embenkment loading
the progrem
superimposes
For
the
tw
uertical
embankment
loads.

increment
of wrtlcal
str8sses
Pill,
tk progran
superimposes
rectangular
loads.
only,

IM 81898

IlAIN KENU - STRESSHISTORY

fi lllcrocorrputer
program for
computing
one
dimensional oompvesslon wrtlcal
settlement
due to cmbankmmt loads. The progruc follous
the aquatlows
presented
by La&AJhltrren
<1969>, Lodd <1973) snd PoulosgDouls (1974).
For the of a strip symccetrical wrtlcsl

letter

INC.

&Jmlue

<617) 729-2369
Mtn.
Dr. Cllfmdo Ursua

of

II
EI Ill1

Enter

or use arrow

at end
a series
then

of
of

PROTOTYPEMXNEERINS INC.
57 Uestland

fiuenue

Ulnchester,
IlA Rlg9g
(617) 729-2363
Attn.
Dr. Alfredo Urzua

k Hake selection.

<Esc>

SOIL IS DEFINED As NORMALLYCONSOLIDATED

145

porom.

flaln llenu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

A tllcroconputer
pmgree for
corputing
one
dlrcenrlorul
conpmssion
uerticsl
settlement
loads. ?ho progru
follous
dus to embankrant
the aqustlons
pressntsd by LssbeWhltnen
(19691, Ladd (1979) and Poulos&P~uis (1974).
For the csse of s strip
symmotriosl uertlcol
mbankment

loading
the
tuo usrtlcsl
mbdwsnt
Incremnt
of
wrtiul

fill.
the pmgru
rectengulsr
losds.

DlB4lM

supsrirrporsr
loads.
For
the
stresses l t end of

supsrircposes

letter

Enter

only,

WIN

PROTOTVPR ENcINEERIffi
INC.
57 tksstland
hbwwe
u1nchBster.
IYI 818%
ibin
7294x3

pi-ogmm

series

of

or uso l rrous

attn.

then 4-l

lllll IU

STRESS INCRDMCT

project Definition
soil Profile
end sail
Ueter table dmf lnltlon

Stress

a ll1crocomputa
prograM f
dlucnslonsl
conpression
v
program follows
loads. 1
due to
y Laabe6iUhltrun
the
equations
presented
<lS69>r Ladd <I973 and PoulosEDauls <1974).
For tkc case of a strip
sytisetrioal
uertical

lhmla

tlske selection.

t@MJ - SELECTION OF UERTIClL

Dr. Alfred0

param.

history

enbanktent

mbrnbmmt

tuo

loading the

program

aubanknant
incremnt
of uartlcal
stresses
fill.
tke pmgrvr
supertnposes
reotegular
loads.

Enter

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING INC.

supcrinposes

wrtlcal

letter

only,

or usa arrow

at end
e series
then

of
of
l

57 Uastland Rusnue
Uinchsster,
IlR 81898
<617) 729-2363
Attn. Dr. Rlfredo lksua

tlake selection.

<Es19 t tlatn

VERTICAL STRBBS INCREKENT- SELECTIDN OF BTRIP SYNR. ERBRNKRENTLWD

146

Nsnu

EMBANKAppendixB Example4

SmETRICAL
ueRTlca

UERTIUU, EnB#(H?lERT LORD

FtlRmmEHT P0011ti6
.
= le.w

Embank. olopc
Embank. uidth
Height of fill
Unit umight of

H
fill

= le.88
= 128.86

38.8%

11111111

111111111111
~11~111111~11111X--b

POIWIS FOR COliPUTATIOMOF


SETTLEW
calculate
ln
= X Point
x coordinate
= 29. ee

--

.
.
.
.

n
1

roll p.r.rc.
1t1on

km1

Mm2

t
H

21--

WIN6 INC.
Ausnw
A a1ese
(617) 729-2763
Rttn. Dr. Rlfrcdo Urzua

Hlt <FlR> to accept ualuss


lncrcmant
of
vertical
stmssao
Fill,
the pmgran
rupcrirrposcr
rectangular
loads.

at end
a series

of
of

STRIP SYIOR.UERTICAL g(B. LMDIHC GEOllETRYINPW SCREEN

Main tknu project Deflnltion


soil Profile
and soil param.
Uatrr table definition
Stress history
Uertical
strrnn lncrmunt
rustma of units
IGintoln
file
I Nlcrocorrputer
pmgruc for
computing
one
dilrensional
corcpression
wrtical
P~ttl~tWnt
due to embankrant loads. The program follow
the equations
presentad
by LambaeUhitrcan
<1!369, Iadd <1.973 and PoulosRDauis <1974).
For tha cara of a strip syrwetricol
uwtlcol
supsrimporas
embonkrcent loading the progrm
tuo uertlcal
Blhnkmnt
For the
1oodr.
increment
of uwtiul
stmss~s at and of
flll,
the progrw
suparirrposes
a series of
rectangular
loads.
Entrr

letter

only,

or use orrous

then *J

PROTOWPRENcINEERIffi INC.
57 Llestland &mnw
Ulnchester,
tW gl898
<617) 729-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfmdo Ursum
F Ilake selection.

BlBANK IlAIN HEtlU - RUM PROGRAHOPTION

147

EMBANK Appendix 6 Example 4

ONE DIlWMOW

SETTLEHEHTANALYSIS/Federal Highuay klministratlon


STRIP SYMETRICAL UERIICAL EllBhNKtlENT L&WING
19.99 (ft)
Height of fill
Ii
18.88
kbankrrent slope a
=
=
28.88 <ft>
Unit might of ftll
= lZ&BB
Embankment top uldth
=
40.09 Cft)
p load/unit
area
= 12w.w
Exbankrrent bottom uldth =
a.@8 <ft)
Foundaflon Elev.
=
0.w
Ground Surface Eleu.
=
62.48
-5.86 <ft)
Unit ueight of Uat. =
Uotar table Elsw.
q

we.
1
2
3

LAYW
TYPE THICK.
<It>
COtlP. 3.8
INCOHP. 7.e
CONP. 48.8

COEFFICIENT
COW. RECDNP. SUELL.
8.888
8.358

e.eBe
----e.eee

UNIT
SPECIFIC
IJEIWIT CRAUIW
<pcf)

8.888
----e.nee

lee.w
ii8.ee
127.48

SUBIAYER
THICK. ELEU.
(ft>
<rt>

Hit m-mu keys to display

next screen.

Settlement

12.54

21.23

Settlemnt

<FE> Print.

(pcf)

1.44
8.97

SOIL STRESSES
IWCREHENT NAX.PAST PRESS.
<psfl
<psf>

INITIlL
<psf)

<fL>
<pcf>
<psf>
<tt>

<in.)

1.88
--2.78

Total

t(*.

UOID
WlTIO

9.97

S-T
<in.)

<F18> Ilsln

tknu -

PROGRM OUTPUT- PbRTILL SCREEN

ONE DItlENSIONFlL SETTLEtlENT fiNfiLYSIWFedera1 Highuay f+dhlnlrtratIsn


STRIP SYtWETRICbL UERTICAL EtfB(\NKNENT WIN6

<ft)
1
2
3

COm.
INCoHP.
caw.

<pcf)

3.8
7.8
48.8

<In.>

8.888

8.888

e.eee

iw. ee

1.80

1.44

-8.358

_-_-8.888

----_
8.8~

lie. ee
127.48

----

---

2.78

0.97

12.64

21.23

Total
SIJBLWER
THICK. ELEU.
<ftA
<ft)

w.
1

3. g8

32
5
46

Scttlmnt

Hit

9.97

SOIL STRESSES
INCR

INITIAL
<psf)

<P

-1.58

200.00

1199.37

i8.ee
INCOtlP.

-15.88

1083.08

967,w

1883.88

5.90

mee
ie.ee
l&B0

-35.08
-4s. W
88
-25.

2383.88

588.59

3933.
Be
1733. g8

471.96
748.24

2383.8B
3833.
ee
1733.98

2.82
1.34
3.29

200.00

9.97

Toots1 S~ttlsrwlt
-

srrou

keys to display

next s~rem.

<F8> Print.

=
<FM>

SELECTION OF DISC FILR PRINTED OUTPUT

148

21.23

<in.)

Nain Nenu -I

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

ONE DItW+SIOML
SElTLEtiENT hNnALYSJS/Fcderal
Hlghwy
tiinistratlon
STRIP METRICRL
UERIICllL E?lBANKIlENT WING
<ft.>
<pcf)
1
2
3

COtlP.
INCOtlP.
COtlP.

3.8
7.0
48.8

8.888
0.358

8.880
v-q-e.eee

B.BBB
--me..
8.888

iee.BB
lie.08
127.48

1.88
--2.78

Total

suRLaYER
THICK.
Euu.
<ft>
<ftJ

NQ.

3. Be

2
3
4

INconP.
1e.m

le.88
10.88
l&BB

5
6

-1.58

200.00

-15.m
-2s. 88

1883. ee
1733.88
2383.ee
3833.80

-35.88
-45.60

1199.37
967.68
748.24
588.59
471.95

Hlt

arrou

kqs

21.23

to display

next

screen.

File

9.97

1883. w
1733.88
2383.88
3833.88

5.98
3.29
2.02
1.34

Settlerant

<FB> Print.

SELECTIQN OF OUTPUT DESTINATION FILE

40

12.54

Settlewent

9.97

200.00

f&ml
-

<In.)

1.44
8.97

SOIL STRESSES
INCRE
Destination

INITIAL
<psf)

21.23

<FIB>

Hain

(in.)

tknu

NWtE

DIMEWSIOUAL SP~LPY~ANALYSIS/Pod4r~lBighw~yAdrial~trrtioa
STRIP SYUETRICAL VERTICAL m
LOADIWO
Name

Project

Bila
Date

Nm

I KKCAVATIOU EXAMPLE Clf*nt


L BXANPLBI.pyB
Project
2 10/03/91
Computed
Sottlrmmt

Rmbaakmsat slop0 a
:
Bmbaakmeat top width
mbmhant
bottom width I
Orouad Surface Plev.
I
Water t&la
Blov.
1
LAYBR
NC. TYDB THICK.
(ft)
1
2
3

I I

10.00

(ft)
(it)
40.00 (ft)
0.00

by

20.00

40.0

0.800

-----

(ft)

(ft)

0.350

0.000

0.000

m--e-

100.00

-v-w-

0.000

1.80

110.00

0.000

----

3
4
5
6

127.40

ELW.
(ft)

3.00
-1.50
IWCOMP.
10.00
-15.00
10.00
-25.00
10.00
-35.00
10.00
-45.00

IWITIAL
(DOf)

aoo.00
1083.00
1733.00
1383.00
3033.00

1199.37
967.60
740.14
580.59
471.95

Total
it

arrow

10.00 (It)
. 110.00 (pcf)
.1100.00
(prf)
I
0.00 (ft)
= 62.40 (pcf)

2.78

keys to dimplay

Settlamont

mxt

mcrwa.

149

aoo.00

<P8>

Print.

9.97

0.97

13.54

21.23

SPTTLEMEWT
tin.1
9.97

1083.00
1733.00
2383.00
3033.00

Settlwmsnt

1.44

----

SOIL STRESSPS
rNCRpypWT W.PAST PRPSS.
(Daf)
(DSf)

SUBLAYNR

1
a

I sum

(ft)

Total

Nit. THICK.
(ft)

I ANY CLIWWT
t MR. JOklN DOB

Eoight of fill
H
Uaitwoightof
fill
p load/uaitusr
Foundation Plov.
Unitweight
of Wat.

20.00

-5.00

Mumoar

COPPPICIRNT
UWIT SPPCIPIC VOID
COMD. RPCOMD. SWBLL. WPIOHT ORAVITY RATIO Sottlombnt
(in.)
(pcf)

COUP. 3.0
INCOMP. 7.0
COMP.

for

5.90
3.29
2.01

1.34
I

al.13

(in.)

<PlO> Main Menu J

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

thin

b lllcrocomputer
propam for
coclputing
one
dlmeneionl
conpreseion
uertical
settlement
duo to enbankmnt loads. The program folloui
the equatione
Preeented
by LambeMJhitmen
<1969>, Ladd <1973> and Pouloe&Dauin <1974>.
cme of a etrip eymmetrlcel uerticel
rtlul

Enter
WWK

superi~porer

letter

only,

a series

PROTOWPSmGINmRIt4G INC.
57 ksstlmd
awlme
u1-,
m emse
(617) 729-m
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Umua

embmhmnt

he progruc

lknu

of

OF use WPOUS then 4

Rake selection.

M#IW IlBW - SELECTION OF UERTICAL STRESS ItKRmlmr

project Rflnition
soil Profile
and sail
U8tcr teblc definition
Stress hiotoFj

I\ lllcrocemputer
program for
computing
one
dimensional comprasoion
uertical
settlement
due to embenlumnt loads. The program follow
the equetlone
preeented
by LambeSlJhitman
<1969>, Ladd <1973 and Poulot&Dw~ls <1974>.
For thm case of l strip symrretricel
uerticel
eabenkment loading the progrm
supartnposar
tuo uertful
embanhmnt
loads.
For
the
Lnorement of umrtiul
etreeses at end of
fill,
the pmeuperimporer
e eerier of
rectangular
104s.
Snter
M

letter

only,

or use arrous

system of Units
IIainteln
file
Run program
Exit to m

then ei

PROTOTYPEmmEERItG
INC.
57 ueetlmd
6uenue
Ulncheeter,
IH 81898
<61n i79-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 lh-zue
l

flake selection.

IWH tiBW - SELECTlOWOF UERTICAL STRESS IwcRBlEM

150

pererc.

EMBANKAppendixB Example4

FRDERRL HXGlRdW WNINISTWT~

dlmenrlonrl
comprmrsion
umr
due to mbmhent
loads. Thm proGram folloum
th8 equatlonr
prmsmted
by LanbeMMt?bm
<1%9), hdd Cl973 l d Pouloslikuls
C1974).
Par tha w
of 8 strip rymwtrlcal
uertlcal
aabmkunt
loading the proRrur
wupmrlrrpoa
tuo wrtlcal
mmbanknmnt
loads. Pot- tk8
lncrarmt
of wrtic81
8tr8rus
at md of
fill,
tkm prom
supmrifiporm8
8 mrlms of
racta.ngulrr
loads.
Enter let&

only,

or use arrow

then 4

PROTOTYPERNGINEERING WC.
57 Nestland Auanw
Ulnchmstor, HA 01890
<617) 7294363
Rttn.
Dr. Alfrado
Urzua

b llakm soloctlon.

<Era> b Main tlmu

UERTICAL STRESS lWCREftE?lTNENU - SELECTIOn OF STRIP SYWN. EM.

SWlBTRftAL
UERTICAL HlRWWlRNT
Embank. slopm 8
Embank. uldth
b
Height of fill
H
Unit wlght of fill

URRTIWL

MNENT

POOTINC
= 18.W
= 3e.w
= men
= 1ZB.M

LOAD

24

ccl,,;,,,:
ULLI414JIII
IUblClllIlllIII-X.
-*.
.
r -*-

t
H

to aampt

wrtlcml
str8sma
ill,
th pmgrrrr
tuperlrrpores
wctwgulmr
loads.

,ffircnent

of

bwi

end
a serlas

LOW GLGNETRY - FouwyIIoll

ERING IHC.
Aumnua

II Bi890
729-2363
Dr. llfredo
Urzua

(617)

of

Mtn.

of
I

DEPTH AT ELEUATIOW -3 FC

151

param.

Law2

umlums

at

soi.

ltlon

POlMDATlM ELW.
z=<FM>

n
1

POINTS FOR C@WTATION OF


SETTLEm
= X Point
calculate
in
2a.w
x coordinate
=

Hit

LORD

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

SYtDiETRICAL UERTICAL EI~BI%WWT LOAD

lr

UBRTICAL EHBAWKKENT
FOOTING
Embank. slops
a
= 1e.w
Embank. uidth
b
= 3e.w
Height of fill
H
= 1e.w
Unit wight
of fill
= lZB.88

n I
1
U

11111111

soil parmm.
ition

n---)

POItffS FOR CONPUI~tIO1( OF


SETTIBEt
calculate
in
= X Point
x coordinate
=
26.88

.
.
.
.
.

-t-

m--l
Layer 2

z1-FOUNDATIONELEU.
2 = -3.w

bnputs

sxcwation

affect
Depth s m

as gammsFoundation

PRIWG IXC.
Auenus

A BiB9e
i!343G3
lfrsdo Urrur
+tl+-tioue

bar

d-Select

Esc-Exit

SELECTION OF EXMWTIOK EFFECT

project Definition
soil Profile
l ,nd esil psrsn.
Uatsr taDls definition
Strsra history
Usrtic81 stress incrswmt
systsn of Units
II tiicrscsnputsr
pmgran for
computing
one
dissnmional
compression
uertioal
settisssnt
1
due to smbaduemt
loads. The program follow
the equations
pmssnt.ed by LsmbsEUhitman

(19691,
Lsdd <I973
and Psulos&Dsui~
<1974).
For the case of a strip
symnstrical
usrticsl
mbankmsnt
loading the pmgras
rupsrisposss

PROTOTYPE ENcINEERlHc INC.

57 t&&land
6wmus
Ui~heeter,
rm 81898
(617) 729-W
Attn.
Dr. Alfmdo
Ureus

tuo

1osds. For* ths


vertical
embankmnt
increment
of usrtical
stresrsc
at snd of
fill,
the prsgrae
supsrimporss
a series of
rscbngular
loads.
Enter

letter

only,

or uss l rrous

WBAW

then

Hake selection.

nr\IN tENU - RUN PROCRM!

152

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

ONE DIKEHSIOHGL SRTLEKEHT RRALYSIWFcderal Highly


Rdctinlrtratlon
STRIP S!!lltlEfRICIL URRTIML Etl8AHKHEKTLDtWlHG
Ehbankmimt
slope a
Enbanlvsnt top uidth
Embanhmmt bottom uldth
Ground Surface Elsu.
Uatcr table Elm.

LWER
HO. TYPE THICK.
<ft>
~ 231

INCclHP.
mtlP.
KJHP.
48.8
7.8
3.8

=
:

=
=

1G.M <ft>
i!S.Bfl <ft)
48.89 <ft>
R.RR <ft)
-5.88 <It>

Hsight of fill
H
Unit ueight of fill
p load/unit
area
Foundation
610~.
Unit ueight of Uat.

0.350
--8.888

e.sefl
-v--e.eee

e.m8
9.8m
em-

lie.08
1ea.ea
127.48

I
-

Hit

wrou

next screen.

PROGRAM OUTPUT- PMTIRL

10.51
8.W

18.51

SETTLE=

<FIB>

kin

Menu -

SCREM

ONE DI?lEN!XONIL SETTLEKEHTMYSIWFederal


Highuay Fldnlnlstrrtlon
STRIP SYIIIIETRIUU. UERTlCbL EKBAHKtlEHTLOADIHG
<pcf>
<in.)
<tt>
1
2
3

COtlP.
IHCCMP.

cow.

3.8
7.8
40.8

8.888

a.eee

e.eee

iae.ee

1.w

1.44

--II-

-----

I---

iirl.ee

---

--

8.358

8.888

e.see

127.40

2.78

8.97

10.51

le. 51

Total

THICK.
<ft)

ELEU*
<ft>

S&layer

1
2
3
4
5
6

lmXP.
mm
i&es
10.86

-15. ee
-25. BB
-35. BB

ie.ee

-45.88

IHITIRL
(prf)

over foundation
1683. ee
1733. ee
2383. BB
3833. ee

arrow keys to display

8.88

Elm.

782.67
681.83
466.57
375.34

1883.
1733.
2383.
3833.
Total

Hit

Settlement

SOIL STRESSES
IHC
= Select
<

SuRLaYER

HP.

e.
---1.44
37

Settlmnt

<FR> Print.

Scttlnent
<in.>

SOIL STRESSES
IHCRQlWT llAX.PAST PRESS.

IKITIAL

tn display

keys

UOID
MT10

-2.78
1.88

Total
SUBLRYER
HQ. THICK. ELEU.

ie.ee <ft)
1 lZl3.RG (pcf)
= lZR0.0G <psf>
=
-3.00 <ft.)
=
62.48 <pcf>

UHIT
SPECIFIC
UEIGHT GRRUIW
(pcf)

COEFFICIEHT

COUP. RECOKP. SUELL.

next screen.

Be

5.83
2.75
1.65
1.es

ee

Be
ee

Settlement

<F8> Print.

<Pie> tialn Kenu

SELECTIOH OF DISC FILE PRIHTED OUTPUT

153

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

ONE DINENSIONAL SETTLENENI AWALYSIWadcrrl


Hlghwy Wxinistratlon
STRIP SYHNCTRICRLUCRTICAL CNMNKNCNTWIN6
(ft.)
<pcf)

i
3

1NaM;.
WNP ;::
CONP. 48.8

1
2
3
4
5
6

11e.w
188.80

-1.88

---1.44

0.m

8.358

127.48

2.78

8.97

16.51

le. 51

8.888

8.888

SURLAYER
THICK. ELEU.
<fU
<fO

Destinmtion

arrou kayo to display

File

Sublayer OMP foundation Elou.


INCONP.
l&Be
-15.08
lal. BR
762.67
l&W
-25.00
1733.08
681.03
18.88
-35.88
2383.00
466.57
18.88
-45. W
3833.88
375.34

Hit

Settlement

STRESSES

SOIL
INCRR

INITIRL
<pnf>

iaa3.w

5.03

1733.00
2383. W
3033.88

2.75
1.65
1.88

Total
-

<in.)

0.888
-_-__ B.we
il.WB
----

Total

NQ.

next smewn.

Sattlwent

<FR> Prtnt.

=
(Pie>

18.51 <in.)
thin

NON -

SELECTION OF OUTPUTDFSTlnr\TICM FILE WAnE

ONE DIMENSIONAL SETTLEMENTANALYSIS/Federal Highway Administration


STRIP SYMMETRICALVERTICAL EMBANKMENT
LOADING
Project Name
File Name
Date

: EXCAVATIONEXAMPLE Client
: ANY CLIENT
: EXAMPLEI.EMB
Project Manager : MR. JOHN DOE
: 10/03/91
: aum
Computed by
Settlement

Embankment slope a
Embankment top width
Embankment bottom width
Ground Surface Elev.
Water table Elev.

w.
1
2
3

=
=
=
=
=

for X =

10.00
20.00
40.00
0.00
-5.00

(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ftl
(ft)

20.00

(ft)
=
10.00
= 120.00
= 1200.00
=
-3.00
I
62.40

Height of fill
H
Unit weight of fill
p load/unit
area
Foundation Elev.
Unit weight of Wat.

(ft)
(pcfl
(psf)
(ft)
(pcf)

LAYER
TYPE THICK.
(ftl

COEFFICIENT
UNIT
SPECIFIC VOID
COMP. RECOMP.SWELL. WEIGHT GRAVITY RATIO Settlemene
(in.1
(PCf)

COMP. 3.0
INCOMP. 7.0
COMP. 40.0

0.800
-_--0.350

0.000
_-_-0.000

0.000
_____
0.000

100.00
110.00
127.40

1.80
---2.78

Total

Na.

SUBLAYER
THICK. ELEV.
(ft)
(ft)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Sublayer
INCOMP.
10.00
-15.00
10.00
-25.00
10.00
-35.00
10.00
-45.00

INITIAL
(PSf)

over foundation
1083.00
1733.00
2383.00
3033.00

Hit

arrow keys to display

Settlement

SOIL STRESSES
INCREMENT MAX.PAST PRESS.
(psf1
(PSf)

1.44
---_
0.97

0.00
10.51

10.51

SETTLEMENT
(in.1

Elev.

782.67
601.03
466.57
375.34

1083.00
1733.00
2383.00
3033.00
Total

next screen.

154

Settlement

<FE, Print.

5.03
2.75
1.65
1.08
=

10.51

(in.)

<FlO> Main Menu 1

EMBANKAppendixB Example4

II
EM
I BIB nrIII

proJect Definition
roil ProfIle
ond ooil parem.
Uoter table deflnltlon
Stress history
Uertlcol
stress incmnt
srstam of Units
=1-1Run proarmi

A IlIcroconputer
progrrrc for
colrprtlng
oiw
dimensional wprrrsion
ucrtlool
settlenent
due to mbmhment loads. The program follous
the equations
presented
by LmtMUhltcwn
<1969>, Ladd <1973) l d Poulor6Doulr <1974).
For the case of o strip symmetrical uertlul
ombonkment loading the program ouperlrrposes
tuo wrtiul
l rrbonkmmnt
of uortlcol
stresses l t end of
II ouperinposes
o series of
Enter

letter

or use wrow

only,

PROTOTYPEENGINEERING INC.
57 Ucrtlond Ruenue
Uincheoter,
tW 01898
(6171 723-2363
Attn. Dr. filfredo Urzua

then 4

EHBAWKWIN NENU - wIIwI#lW

E:MIN Ill

t Make soloctlon.

FILE OPTION

system of units

Run I klntain
file I
fi lllcroco*W
progrvl for
computing
one
dinenxionml ceion uerticol
settlement
Ml!!!!!!H
_IJ
Clear entries
due to embanka%loade.
The program follous
the equations
~reeented
by Loltbe6Uhltrcan
<1969), L8dd (1973) and PouloseDauls <1974>.
PROTOlwE ~INEERIffi
INC.
For the caee of a strip eymmtrlcol
wrtlcel
57 Ueetlond &uellue
embenkment loadins the progrorc superimposes
Ulnchartmr,
IM BISSB
tw
uertlul
enbenkmnt
loads.
For the
increment
of
umrtlul
stresses l t end of
<617) 729-2363
Attn. Dr. Alfred0 Urzuo
f Ill,
the program euperlrcposes
l serlas
of
rmctongulr
loads.

L
Enter

lcttev

only,

OP use

rrous

then d

liokc sclcctlon.

?WNWIN FILE IlENU - SELECTIOM OF SAUE FILE

155

<Es& W lleln

Henu

EMBANK Appendix B Example 4

IlaIn

llenu

project Definition
soil Profile
and soil param.
Yater table deflnltlon
Strass history
Uartlcal
stress lncremnt
systam of Units
A Hlcrocomputcr program for
computing
one
sett
dI~ens1orul corrprettlon
vertical
due to embankment loads. Ihe program f
the equations
presented
by LambeM
<1969>, Ladd <1973) and Poulor6Dauls <1974). I
For the of a strip
symmetrical wrtlul
ambankmmt loading tha program ouperlmp+ases
tuo wrtical
enbanknent
loads.
For
the
lncr-t
of uertical
stresses at end of
fill,
the prosran
suparlmposes
a series of
rectangular
loads,
htar

letter

only,

or usa

rrous

then cl

Destination

File

PROTOTYPEENGINGERIlG INC.
57 Uastland Gwnub
Ulnchostar,
RG gi898
<617> 729-2969
Rttn. Dr. Glfredo IJrsua

p llaka salaction.

<Es&

Main Hemu

SGUItDi INPUT FILE GS MAllPLE4.EtlB

E M 1; R N #
ttaintaln

file

*
tllcrommputar
progran
for
computing
one
dlnenslonsl
conpreeslon
uartical
sattlanant
duo to a&a-t
loads. Tha program follow
tha aquatlons
presented
by LanbagUhitnan
<1969), Ladd (1973 al PouloseDauls <1974>.
Far the caee of a strip
symmetrical uertical
anbanknant loading the program suparlnposas
tuo wrtlul
enbankmnt
loads.
For tha
lncranent
of wrtlcal
strasses at end of
fill,
the progran
superlmposas
a sariar of
ractangular
loads.
A

Enter

letter

only,
RiWW

or use arrous

than cl

PROTOlYP9 ~INEERIffi
INC.
57 kistland
&.WIWI
ui-,
m 0199fl
<617) 729-2369
Attn. Dr. AlfAo
lb-ma
t tlaka selection.

IlRlll llENU - EXIT TO DOS OPTIOH

156

EMBANKAppendix B Example4

thin lhu
Ddinition

project

II Nlcrocomputer
pmgrvl
for
computing
one
dhenrionml
comprrnnion
uertical
settlement
due to eAmhmnt
loads.
The progmw follow
thm equatlom
pmsentad
by Lanbdtlhitman
<1969>, Ladd <I973
and Poulos4Dauio
<1974>.
For the caee of a strip
eymmetrical
uerticel
rupsrimposar
mmbmnkment loadin
the pmgmrc
loads.
For
the
tw umrtlul
mnbmnhmnt
of hical
stresses
at. end of
lncrmwmnt
fill,
thm prmgrmm muparilrpormr
l swims
of
mct8ngul8r
loads.
Entw

latter

only,

or use arrow
WIT

then

*cl

PROT

57 uestland
uinchester,

C617) 729-2363
Qttn.

t Haka srlcctfon.

TO DOS tlEWU- YES OPTION

157

ti6 INC.
l%ueTnm
lua ei898

Dr.

Alfred0

<Es>

lhwua

C tImin

Menu

Potrebbero piacerti anche