Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Sr No
Subject
1
Supply Chain Management
2
Social Marketing
Major
Mkt
Mkt
Entrepreneurship Development
Mkt
4
5
6
1
2
3
Mkt
Mkt
Mkt
HR
HR
HR
4
5
6
Remark
Announced
shortly
Assignment already
given in class room
Announced
shortly
HR
Announced
shortly
HR
Announced
shortly
HR
Announced
shortly
Subject Name
Marks:
Faculty Signature:
Date:
1) Design a distribution scheme for marketing ajin temple of Mount Abu you should reach the
villagers of Kerala.
2) Describe the marketing of Pharmaceutical Druges. Explain the complete process.
HR
LABOUR LAWSIV
CASES IN HR
Case No. 1
VRS : Voluntary Retirement Scheme
Garuda Enterprises Ltd. is a public limited company employing more than
1600 regular employees apart from about 250 contract employees. There is a
strong union operating in the company and the management union relations
are cordial. January 2011 was the month when many employees were on leave
and management had initiated action against some employees for absence
without leave during 2010. Both these were a regular feature in the company
every January.
This January 2011, however, the company decided to launch a VRS scheme to
reduce its permanent workforce and rationalize the manpower. The scheme was
worked out and published for the employees on 27th January. The Scheme
5
stated that employees must submit their applications on or before 31st January
2011 and management will then take a decision about acceptance or nonacceptance of the VRS applications. Among the various applicants there were
two applicants against whomaction for absence without leave was initiated and
one applicant who was on leave during 27 to 31 January. The two applicants
against whom disciplinary action was initiated submitted their applicationson
28th and 29th January respectively. The third applicant, who was on leave,
resumed on 4th February 2011 and then submitted his application on 5th
February 2011. Company considered all applications and rejected some
applicationsincluding these 3 applications. The reasons forwarded by the
Company were that in case of two employees, disciplinary action was in
processand in case of the third employee he submitted his application afterthe
due date i.e. 31st January 2011. Towards end of February the two employees
were awarded punishment of 2 days suspension without
wages.Upon hearing that their applications were rejected, the 3 employees went
to Union and the Union is now agitated about the action of management in not
accepting the VRS application of these 3 employees.
Questions :
(i) Is the action of management right? How ?
(ii) What can the Union do in this respect?
(iii) What should be the principles involved in operating a VRS scheme ?
Case No. 2
Dravid Power Ltd.Gratuity Case
Dravid Power Ltd. was founded in 1965 and it now employs 550
workmen and staff. All the labour laws are applicable to the company and
company is implementing all the provisions to its best.In January 2009 the
management revised the salaries of all employees.In calculating the new
salaries the Accounts staff committed some mistakes and among various
employees one Mr. Kusalkar was given Rs. 5,000 more per month. Mr. Kusalkar
also did not bother much
as he thought that this is his revised wage.In December HR department
informed Mr. Kusalkar he would be superannuated as he was completing 60
years of age on 15th December.He was also informed that he would be in
employment till 31st
6
December and paid all his dues on 31st December. On 31st December when Mr.
Kusalkar got the statement of dues, he noticed that his gratuity amount was
only Rs. 2,50,000 which according to his calculation ought to be Rs. 3,10,000.
He approached the HR department where he was told that there was a mistake
in calculating his revised salary and he was paidRs. 5,000 excess for last 12
months which amount was adjusted from the gratuity amount payable to him.
Mr. Kusalkar did not agree and said that the revised salary was granted to him
by management and at this stage it cannot be called as a mistake when
payment for 12 months is made. He said that he amount was adjusted; he
would not participate in the send offfunction and not accept the last gift of
management.
Questions :
1. Was the HR department right in adjusting the amount of excess
wages paid ?
2. Was Mr. Kusalkar right in stepping out of the send off function,
and not accepting the last gift of management ?