Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
1
Yes
No
Number of Respondents
95
Number of Persons
100
80
60
40
20
0
95
Yes
No
5
Response
Chart:1
Interpretation:
From the above analysis of the given sample of 100 respondents it is concluded that out
of 100 people 95 people likes to eat chocolate while only 5 people dont prefer to eat
chocolate.
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
2
0-10
14
10-20
42
20-30
33
ABOVE 30
11
RESPONDENTS
NUMBER OF
RESPONDENTS
AGE GROUPS
50
40
30
20
10
0
42
33
0-10
14
11
10 to 20
20 to 30
Above 30
AGE GROUPS
Chart:2
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that I have surveyed 100 respondents out
of which 14, 42, 33, 11 belongs to age group 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, above30 respectively.
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
3
0-10
7
5
10-20
35
6
NO CONSUMTION
AGE GROUPS
20-30
24
8
1
ABOVE 30
5
5
1
NUMBER OF CONSUMERS
1
6
1
8
NONE
NESTLE
2
5
7
35
24
CADBURY
1
5
5
0-10 10 to 20 to Above
20
30
30
AGE GROUPS
Chart:3
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that people of different age groups prefer
mostly Cadbury brand of chocolate while Nestle brand is least preferred by the age group
between 10-20. People of age group above 30 equally likes to have both brands.
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
4
BRAND PREFERENCE
Table:4
BRANDS
CADBURY
NESTLE
PREFERENCE BY CONSUMERS
73
22
Brand Preference
No. of Persons
80
73
60
40
22
Cadbury
Nestle
20
0
1 Brands
Chocolate
Chart:4
Interpretation:
From the above analysis of given sample of 93 respondents who eat chocolates it is
concluded that only 22 people prefer to eat Nestle chocolates while 73 people likes to eat
Cadbury chocolates.
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
5
PURCHASE OF CHOCOLATES
PURCHASE OF CADBURY CHOCOLATES
Table:5
SUB- BRANDS
DAIRY MILK
5 STAR
PERK
CELEBRATIONS
TEMPTATIONS
CADBURY CHOCOLATES
NUMBER OF RESPONDANTS
69
64
61
49
41
Number of Persons
80
69
64
61
60
49
40
41
20
0
1
Sub-brands of Cadbury Chocolate
Dairy Milk
5 Star
Perk
Celebrations
Temptation
Chart:5
Interpretation:
From the above analysis of given sample of 73 respondents who eat Cadbury chocolates
it is concluded that mostly people has purchased Dairy Milk sub-brand of Cadbury while
Temptation is least purchased by the people.
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
6
SUB- BRANDS
KIT KAT
MUNCH
MILKY BAR
BAR- ONE
MILK CHOCOLATE
19
20
18
s 16
n
o 14
s
r
e 12
P
f 10
o
r 8
e
b 6
m
u 4
N
2
0
17
18
15
11
Mun ch
Milky Bar
Bar-One
Milk Chocolate
Chart:6
Interpretation:
From the above analysis of given sample of 22 respondents who eat Nestle chocolates it
is concluded that mostly all sub-brands are purchased by people but top most is Munch
followed by Milky Bar and Kit Kat. While surveying we have found that many people
are not aware of Milk Chocolate.
12
11
9
7
10
11
11
9
7
9%
7%
13%
12%
11%
11%
11%
10%
7%
9%
Dairy Milk
5 Star
Perk
Celebrations
Temptation
Kit Kat
Munch
Milky Bar
Bar-One
Milk Chocolate
Chart:7
Interpretation:
From the above analysis it is concluded that overall Dairy Milk is purchased by people
followed by 5 Star while Temptation and Milk Chocolate is least purchased by people.
CADBURY CHOCOLATES
GRAND TOTAL AVERAGE
OF
PREFERENCE
OF RESPONDANTS)
RANKS
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
8
315
220
176
136
91
4.3
3
2.4
1.86
1.24
1
2
3
4
5
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that in Cadbury Brand, Dairy milk is the
most preferred sub-brand as it is ranked first by the respondents. While Temptation is the
least preferred sub-brand of Cadbury chocolates.
NESTLE CHOCOLATES
GRAND
AVERAGE
TOTAL OF
KIT KAT
MUNCH
MILKY BAR
BAR-ONE
MILK
PREFERENCE
70
64
65
45
30
RANKS
1
3
2
4
5
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
9
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that in Nestle Brand, Munch is the most
preferred sub-brand as it is ranked first by the respondents. While Milk Chocolate is the
least preferred sub-brand of Cadbury chocolates.
GRAND TOTAL
435
295
391
344
301
354
344
297
268
342
AVERAGE
4.58
3.1
4.12
3.62
3.17
3.73
3.62
3.13
2.82
3.6
RANK
1
9
2
4
7
3
4
8
10
6
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
10
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that on an average mostly people are
influenced by flavor/taste followed by quality, brand and image. It is surprised to know
that very few people are influenced by price followed by shape of the chocolate.
GRAND TOTAL
335
235
307
277
231
271
262
224
213
262
AVERAGE
4.6
3.2
4.2
3.79
3.16
3.71
3.59
3.07
2.92
3.59
RANK
1
7
2
3
8
4
5
9
10
5
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that on an average mostly people are
influenced by flavor/taste followed by quality, packaging and brand. Here color and
shape are not all influencing people while purchasing Cadbury chocolates.
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
11
Table:13
FACTORS
FLAVOR/TASTE
PRICE
QUALITY
PACKAGING
FORM
BRAND
IMAGE
COLOR
SHAPE
QUANTITY
GRAND TOTAL
427
337
367
338
332
358
328
332
335
328
AVERAGE
4.81
3.6
3.86
3.56
3.49
3.77
3.45
3.49
3.52
3.45
RANK
1
4
2
5
7
3
9
7
6
9
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that on an average people are most
satisfied with the flavor/taste of a chocolate followed by quality and brand. It is
surprising to know that although people are satisfied with quality but unsatisfied with the
quantity.
IN CADBURY CHOCOLATE
Table:14
FACTORS
GRAND TOTAL
AVERAGE
RANK
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
12
334
269
282
272
264
282
247
259
258
255
4.6
3.68
3.86
3.73
3.62
3.86
3.38
3.55
3.53
3.49
1
5
2
4
6
2
10
7
8
9
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that on an average people are most
satisfied with the flavor/taste of a chocolate followed by quality and brand. It is
surprising to know that although people are satisfied with quality but unsatisfied with the
quantity and image.
IN NESTLE CHOCOLATE
able:15
FACTORS
FLAVOR/TASTE
PRICE
QUALITY
PACKAGING
FORM
GRAND TOTAL
93
68
85
66
68
AVERAGE
4.2
3.09
3.86
3
3.09
RANK
1
8
2
10
8
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
13
76
81
73
77
73
3.45
3.68
3.32
3.5
3.32
5
3
6
4
6
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that on an average people are most
satisfied with the flavor/taste of a chocolate followed by quality and image. It is
surprising to know that although people are satisfied with quality but unsatisfied with the
form and packaging.
FORM PREFERENCE
Table:16
FORM OF CHOCOLATE
NUMBER
HARD
NUTTIES
CRUNCHY
CHEW
RESONDENTS
33
25
29
20
OF
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
14
Number of
Consumers
40
30
33
25
29
20
20
10
HARD
NUTTIES
CRUNCHY
CHEW
0
1
Forms
Chart:8
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that most of the people likes to eat hard
chocolate and chew form of a chocolate is least preferred.
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
28
48
19
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
15
Number of
Consumers
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
48
28
19
SMALL
BIG
FAMILY PACK
1Pack
Chart:9
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that out of sample of 95 people who eat
chocolates likes to buy big pack. Family pack is mostly preferred by aged people only.
NUMBER OF
ADVERTISEMENT
SUGGESTION FROM FRIENDS AND
RESPONDENTS
65
16
RELATIVES
ATTRACTIVE DISPLAY
11
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
16
15
9
25
Number of Consumers
80
ADVERTISEMENT
60
SUGGESTION
FROM FRIENDS
AND RELATIVES
40
ATTRACTIVE
DISPLAY
65
16 11 15
20
25
9
0
1Factors
DOCTOR'S
ADVICE
BRAND
AMBASSDORS
INGREDIENTS
Chart: 10
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that Advertisement is the best measure to
attract customers to purchase more. Its impact is much more than other factors. While
friends and relatives and brand ambassadors also play a significant role in this regard.
MEDIA OF ADVERTISEMENT
Table:16
MEDIA OF ADVERTISEMENT
TELEVISION
NEWSPAPERS
BROCHURES
HOARDING
DISPLAY
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
82
7
3
4
15
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
17
Number of Customers
100
80
82
60
40
20
15
Television
Newspapers
Brochers
Hoarding
Display
0
Media Of
1 Advertising
Chart:11
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that television emerges as the best media
for advertisement of chocolates that compel consumers to buy. It is much more than other
ways as out of 95 respondents 82 are attracted to by through television media while
brochures are the least attracting media.
FREQUENCY OF CONSUMPTION
Table:20
FREQUENCY OF CONSUMPTION
ONCE IN A FORTNIGHT
DAILY
WEEKLY
MONTHLY
QUARTERLY
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
16
17
39
18
5
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
18
Frequency of Consumption
Number of
Consumers
50
39
40
Once in a
fortnight
Daily
30
16
20
17
18
10
Weekly
Monthly
0
1Frequency
Quarterly
Chart:12
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that mostly people purchase chocolates
weekly. Only 15 out of 95 purchase chocolates quarterly.
REASONABLE PRICE
Table:21
PRICE OF CHOCOLATE
BELOW 5
5-10
10-20
20-30
ABOVE 30
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
6
23
51
4
11
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
19
Number of
Consumers
Reasonable Price
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
51
Below5
5 to 10
23
6
10 to 20
11
20 to 30
Above 30
1Price
Chart: 13
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that the consumer thinks 10-20 Rs is the
reasonable price of a chocolate. So it must be worthwhile to know this as it may effect
the sale of chocolates.
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
26
24
45
OF PREFERED BRAND
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
20
Number of consumers
Brand Loyalty
50
40
30
20
10
0
45
26
Postpone Purchase
Switch Brand
24
Search in other
Shop
1 Consumers in
Action of
absence of Prefered Brand
Chart:14
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that mostly people are loyal to the brand
as in the absence of availability of their preferred brand mostly people like to search for it
or they are ready to postpone their purchase.
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PREFERED PRODUCT
NO, NOT AT ALL
MAY CONSIDER
NO, SHALL NOT
CANT SAY
35
27
4
29
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
21
Number of Consumers
35
30
29
27
May Consider
20
10
Can't Say
0
1 Reactions
Chart:15
Interpretation:
According to the above analysis it is concluded that mostly people are addicted to the
same flavor or taste and they dont want to change it as out of 95 respondents 35 are not
ready to try new brand at any cost.
FINDINGS
CONSUMER RESEARCH:
Consumer research deals with consumer and their problems and solution to
the problems. In this I came to know about the consumers need and expectation
levels regarding products and ascertainable levels of consumer satisfaction.
PRODUCT RESEARCH:
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
23
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
26