Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Institute of Microelectronics & Department of Electrical Engineering, Center for Micro/Nano Science and Engineering,
National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
b
Institute of Mechanical and Electromechanical Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin 632, Taiwan
c
Institute of Nanotechnology and Microsystems Engineering, Center for Micro/Nano Science and Engineering,
National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
d
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 4 January 2008
Received in revised form 25 February 2008
Accepted 14 March 2008
Available online 26 March 2008
Un-doped Al (09 at.%) nanoparticles and doped ZnO powders were prepared by the solgel method. The
nanoparticles were heated at 700800 8C for 1 h in air and then analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD),
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectra and photoluminescence (PL). The results of undoped (ZnO) and Al-doped ZnO (AZO) nanoparticles were also compared to investigate the structural
characteristics and physical properties. XRD patterns of AZO powders were similar to those of ZnO
powders, indicating that micro-Al ions were substituted for Zn atoms and there were no variations in the
structure of the ZnO nanoparticles. From the XRD and SEM data, the grain size of the AZO nanoparticles
increased from 34.41 to 40.14 nm when the annealing temperature was increased. The Raman intensity
of the AZO nanoparticles (Al = 5 at.%) increased when the annealing temperature was increased.
Increasing the degree of crystalline not only reduced the residual stress, but also improved the physical
properties of the nanoparticles.
2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Solgel
ZnO
Crystallization
1. Introduction
The applications of ZnO have attracted much attention in recent
years. With a wide direct bandgap energy (3.37 eV) and a larger
binding energy (60 meV), ZnO is potentially useful in various
optoelectronic applications such as optical sensors and light
emitters [1,2], etc. In addition, ZnO is also potentially useful in
surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices, gas sensing devices and
piezoelectric devices [37]. In fact, devices containing bulk ZnO,
ZnO lms, ZnO nanowires and ZnO nanoparticles have all been
demonstrated [17].
Recently, ZnO have been prepared by sputtering [8], chemical
vapor deposition (CVD) [9], molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [10],
spry pyrolysis [11], pulse laser deposition [12] and the solgel
process [13,14]. Among these methods, the solgel process is
particularly attractive because of its simplicity and acceptable
costs, however the crystalline quality of the ZnO prepared by the
solgel process might be inferior to the other methods. Notably,
the solgel processes with an annealing treatment are intimately
affect the crystallization and physical properties. Previous
literature, Kuo et al. [14] have investigated the optical and
electrical properties of solgel derived ZnO thin lms with a low
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: fyhung@mail.mse.ncku.edu.tw (F.Y. Hung).
0169-4332/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.080
5792
0:9l
b cos uB
Fig. 2. (a) XRD patterns of un-doped ZnO powders sintered at 700 and 800 8C. (b)
XRD patterns of 5 at.% AZO powders sintered at 700 and 800 8C.
5793
Fig. 4. XRD patterns of un-doped and Al-doped ZnO powders with various
concentrations. The samples were prepared at 800 8C.
Fig. 3. SEM images of the 5 at.% Al-doped ZnO powders sintered at (a) 700 8C and (b)
800 8C.
Fig. 5. (a) Raman spectra of un-doped and Al-doped ZnO powders with various
concentrations. The ZnO powders were prepared at 800 8C. (b) Raman spectra of
5 at.% Al-doped ZnO powders with different annealed temperature.
5794
The 380 cm1 mode was lifted the degeneracy of infrared active
optical phonons into a transverse (TO) branch, as is well known by
the LyddaneSachsTeller relation [23]. The 409 cm1 mode is
associated with lattice disorder along the c-axis of the ZnO crystal,
the 438 cm1 mode corresponds to E2 mode of wurtzite ZnO and a
very sharp feature. The 582 cm1 E1 (LO) corresponds to wellresolved Raman peaks due to multiphonon and resonance
processes and are related to oxygen deciency [25,30]. According
to the results of Li et al. [31], the 537 cm1 peak is a ZnC mode,
and the 658 cm1 peak was a ZnCH2 mode, which are associated
with the precursor materials in the solgel process. Relevant
studies [3234] also show that the 537 cm1 mode being very
close to the 540 cm1 mode, could most likely be assigned to
TO + TA(M) second order vibration, since the 2B1 (low) mode is
around 510520 cm1, while the contribution of the rst-order
B1(high) mode is around 560 cm1. In addition, the 658 cm1 mode
is very close to the mode near 645650 cm1, which is likely due to
the 101 cm1 E2 (low) + 521 cm1 B1 (high) [32].
Comparing the AZO with the ZnO nanoparticles (Fig. 5(a)), A1
(TO) and E1 (LO) modes are shifted to the high frequency side. With
increasing the Al dopant concentration, the intensity of E2 (high)
E2 (low), E2 (high), A1 (TO) and E1 (LO) modes decreased. The 438
and 582 cm1 modes decreased with an increased Al concentration, which contributed to Al ions in the ZnO lattice substituting for
Al in the Zn position. The intensity of the 331, 385, 438 and
582 cm1 modes decreased with increasing the Al concentration.
Fig. 5(b) shows the room temperature Raman spectra for 5 at.%
Al-doped ZnO powders at 700 and 800 8C for 1 h in air. From the
results, all peak intensities increased clearly when the temperature
was increased. The same tendency was also observed in Al-doped
ZnO samples using spray pyrolysis [35], and shows that the
crystalline quality of the lms had been improved. Notably, the
spray pyrolysis [35] is different from the solgel method; our
present solgel method was able to avoid surface point defects at
higher annealing temperatures.
According to a relevant study [26], an increase in Raman peak
intensity indicates that the residual stress had reduced leading to
higher crystalline quality. In addition, the reduction of the relative
peak-intensity 385 cm1 A1 (TO) to 414 cm1 E1 (TO) at low
temperature is associated with lattice disorder along the c-axis of
the ZnO crystal [36]. However, the intensity ratio of 385 cm1 A1
(TO) to 414 cm1 E1 (TO) increased from 0.944 to 0.956 with
increasing the annealing temperature. On the other hand, the
increase of the second-order modes to the rst-order modes
decrease with increasing annealing temperature, due to the better
crystallization of the thin lms and this again supports the secondorder nature of the 537 and 658 cm1 mode.
3.4. Optical properties of ZnO powders
Photoluminescence (PL) was used to check the optical quality
and the possible effects of Al doping. Fig. 6 shows the PL spectra of
the AZO nanoparticles using 325 nm UV light from a He-Cd laser at
room temperature. In Fig. 6(a), the ZnO and AZO nanoparticles
were heat treated at 800 8C for 1 h in air. In this spectrum, the ZnO
powders contain a UV emission band at 375 and 386 nm, and a
strong and broad green emission band occurs at about 533 nm
(inset in Fig. 6(a)). Hsieh et al. [37] showed that the near band
emission of 375 nm was caused by the transition from conduction
band to valence band. Another UV emission of 386 nm was
attributed to the free exciton recombination in ZnO. On the other
hand, the strong green emission (533 nm) resulted primarily from
intrinsic defects. The intrinsic defects are associated with deep
level emissions such as oxygen vacancies or zinc interstitials [38].
Notably, the oxygen vacancies and interstitials were induced by
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
Acknowledgement
[24]
[25]
References
[1] R.F. Service, Science 895 (1997) 276.
[2] T. Makino, C.H. Chia, T.T. Nguen, Y. Segawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (2000) 16321634.
[3] E. Fortunato, P. Barquinha, A. Pimentel, A. Goncalves, A. Marques, L. Pereira, R.
Martins, Thin Solid Films 487 (2005) 205211.
[4] H. Gong, J.Q. Hu, J.H. Wang, C.H. Ong, F.R. Zhu, Sens. Actuators B 115 (2006) 247
251.
[5] J. Song, J. Zhou, Z.L. Wang, Nano Lett. 6 (2006) 16561662.
[6] I.S. Jeong, J.H. Kim, S. Im, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 (2003) 29462948.
[7] Z.Z. Zhang, Y.M. Lu, D.Z. Shen, B. Yao, J.Y. Zhang, B.H. Li, D.X. Zhao, X.W. Fan, Z.K.
Tang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 031911.
[8] Z.G. Yu, P. Wu, H. Gong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 132114.
[9] J.H. Park, S.J. Jang, S.S. Kim, B.T. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 121108.
[10] P. Fons, H. Tampo, A.V. kolobov, M. Ohkubo, S. Niki, J. Tominaga, R. Carboni, S.
Friedrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 045504.
[11] B. Josph, K.G. Gopchandran, P.V. Thomas, P. Koshy, V.K. Vaidyan, Mater. Chem.
Phys. 58 (1999) 7177.
[12] J.J. Chen, M.H. Yu, W.L. Zhou, K. Sun, L.M. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 173119.
[13] M. Ristic, S. Music, M. Ivanda, S. Popovic, J. Alloys Compd. 397 (2005) L1L4.
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
5795
S.Y. Kuo, W.C. Chen, ChengF C.P., Superlattices Microstruct. 39 (2006) 162170.
H.M. Zhou, D.Q. Yi, Z.M. Yu, L.R. Xiao, J. Li, Thin Solid Films 515 (2007) 69096914.
G. Srinivasan, R.T. Rajendra Kumar, J. Kumar, Opt. Mater. 30 (2007) 314317.
E.J.L. Arredondo, A. Maldonado, R. Asomoza, D.R. Acosta, M.A.M. Lira, M. de la, L.
Olvera, Thin Solid Films 490 (2005) 132136.
V. Fathollahi, M.M. Amini, Mater. Lett. 50 (2001) 235239.
T. Schuler, M.A. Aegerter, Thin Solid Films 351 (1999) 125131.
H. Bahadur, S.B. Samanta, A.K. Srivastava, K.N. Sood, R. Kishore, R.K. Sharma, A.
Basu Rashmi, M. Kar, P. Pal, V. Bhatt, ChandraF S., J. Mater. Sci. 41 (2006) 7562
7570.
H. Bahadur, A.K. Srivastava, R.K. Sharma, S. Chandra, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2 (2007)
469475.
H. Li, J. Wang, H. Liu, C. Yang, H. Xu, X. Li, H. Cui, Vacuum 77 (2004) 5762.
S.B. Majumder, M. Jain, P.S. Dobal, R.S. Katiyar, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 103 (2003)
1625.
B.D. Cullity, The Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, AddisonWesley, Reading, MA,
1978, p. 102.
U. Pal, J.G. Serrano, P. Santiago, G. Xiong, K.B. Ucer, R.T. Williams, Opt. Mater. 29
(2006) 6569.
S. Music, D. Dragcevic, S. Popovic, M. Ivanda, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 23882393.
Y.J. Xing, Z.H. Xi, Z.Q. Xue, X.D. Zhang, J.H. Song, R.M. Wang, J. Xu, Y. Song, S.L.
Zhang, D.P. Yu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 (2003) 16891691.
A.E. Manouni, F.J. Manjon, M. Mollar, B. Mar, R. Gomez, M.C. Lopez, J.R. RamosBarrado, Superlattices Microstruct. 39 (2006) 185192.
F.J. Manjon, B. Mari, J. Serrano, A.H. Romero, J. Appl. Phys. 97 (2005) 053516.
D.G. Mead, G.R. Wilkinson, J. Raman Spectrosc. 6 (1977) 123129.
B.B. Li, X.Q. Xiu, R. Zhang, Z.L. Xie, Y. Chen, Y. Shi, P. Han, Y.D. Zheng, Semiconducting and Insulating Materials, SIMC-XIII 13 International conference (2004)
202205.
J. Serrano, A.H. Romero, F.J. Manjon, R. Lauck, M. Cardona, A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. B 69
(2004) 094306.
A.W. Hewat, Solid State Commun. 8 (1970) 187189.
J. Serrano, F.J. Manjon, A.H. Romero, A. Ivanov, R. Lauck, M. Cardona, M. Krisch,
Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 244 (2007) 14781482.
A.E. Manouni, F.J. Manjon, M. Mollar, B. Mar, M.C. Lopez, Ramos-BarradoF J.R.,
Superlattices Microstruct. 42 (2007) 134139.
M. Gomi, N. Oohira, K. Ozaki, KoyanoF M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 (2003) 481485.
P.T. Hsieh, Y.C. Chen, S. Kao, M.S. Lee, C.C. Cheng, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 (2007)
38153818.
K. Vanheusden, W.L. Warren, C.H. Seager, D.K. Tallant, J.A. Voigt, B.E. Gnade, J.
Appl. Phys. 79 (1996) 79837990.
B.K. Choi, D.H. Chang, Y.S. Yoon, S.J. Kang, J. Mater Sci: Mater. Electron. 17 (2006)
10111015.