Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1(5)
http://www.epmresearch.org/html/ocra/Default.asp?cnt=1
Exposure descriptors
Exposure
Description of exposure
magnitude/amplitude
duration
frequency
posture
x.
x.
x.
movements
x.
x.
x.
x.
x.
(external) force
x.
vibration
contact forces
Localized compressions on
anatomical structures of the
hand or forearm
Others: exposure to cold, slippery surfaces of objects. Lack of proper recovery periods. Other
"additional factors" are also considered e.g the requirement for extreme precision, the use of
inadequate gloves, required use of rapid or sudden wrenching movements.
www.ttl.fi/workloadexposuremethods
June 2009
OCRA
2(5)
Brief and structured assessment of the risk factors for the job as a whole (exposure or risk
index)
Fields of the working life where the method has been used
Ceramic ornament finishing, auto body sanding, door and window sanding, supermarket check-out,
preserved vegetables packing, auto seta assembly & sewing, meat processing, manual feeding in
ceramic line (Grieco 1998); manufacturing industry (Occhipinti 2007); ironwork industry (Najarkola
2006); toll collectors (Capodaglio 1998); pottery manufacturing (Clerici 2005); industry workers and
cleaners (Colombini 2004); industry workers (d'Angelo 2006, Spigno 2003, Zecchi 1998);
construction workers (Filosa 2005);
www.ttl.fi/workloadexposuremethods
June 2009
OCRA
3(5)
Validity
Face validity / Contents validity
Does the method seem to be valid for the aimed purpose?
yes
+-
Concurrent validity
How well does the method correspond with more valid method/s?
1) Comparison of the checklists OCRA, OREGE, Strain Index, ACGIH
(Apostoli 2004) (Italian, English summary)
12 workstations assessed from video
" The comparison revealed variability between the methods in situations of middle risk, while the
methods substantially gave similar results in situations without any risk or with high risk. Methods
could not reveal every component of the risk in a reproducible and univocal way also when the risk
assessment was accordant. It is necessary a following analytical evaluation of each risk factor
contributing to define the sintetic index."
2) Strain Index vs. RULA, REBA, ACGIH TLV, and OCRA (Jones 2007)
www.ttl.fi/workloadexposuremethods
June 2009
OCRA
4(5)
"Predictive validity"
How well has the risk-estimation of the method been shown to be associated
with or predicting musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)?
Prevalence of upper limb disorders compared with OCRA (Occhipinti
2007); (Occhipinti 2004)
There is a high degree of association between OCRA Index and Prevalence of workers with one or
more UL-WMSDs.
Conclusions
Strengths of the method
Takes into account recovery periods. Gives an accurate (?) output
OCRA makes it possible to compare different work contexts.
Seems to be a useful tool to design or redesign of the workplace as well as job rotation and
organization.
Estimates the workers risk level by considering all the repetitive tasks in a complex job.
The OCRA Checklist is easy and quick to use.
Describes the risks related to exposure in terms of green-yellow-red (easy to understand).
References
Apostoli P &al. [Comparative analysis of the use of 4 methods in the evaluation of the biomechanical
risk to the upper limb]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2004;26(3):223-41.
Capodaglio EM &al. [An ergonomic study of postures of toll collectors]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon.
1998;20(1):24-30.
Clerici P &al. [An example of the evaluation of risks of repeated movements in pottery plants located
in western Liguria]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2005;27(2):213-9.
www.ttl.fi/workloadexposuremethods
June 2009
OCRA
5(5)
Colombini D & Occhipinti E. [Results of risk and impairment assessment in groups of workers
exposed to repetitive strain and movement of the upper limbs in various sectors of industry]. Med Lav.
2004;95(3):233-46.
Colombini D & Occhipinti E. Preventing upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders (ULWMSDS): new approaches in job (re)design and current trends in standardization. Appl Ergon.
2006;37(4):441-50.
d'Angelo R &al. [Musculo-skeletal disorders and diseases in the complex metal-mechanical industry].
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2006;28(2):182-4.
Filosa L &al. [Risks for construction workers: analysis of the upper limb posture]. G Ital Med Lav
Ergon. 2005;27(2):220-34.
Grieco A. Application of the concise exposure index (OCRA) to tasks involving repetitive movements
of the upper limbs in a variety of manufacturing industries: preliminary validations. Ergonomics.
1998;41(9):1347-56.
Jones T & Kumar S. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessments in a repetitive high-risk sawmill
occupation: Saw-filer. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2007;37(9-10):744-53.
Najarkola M. Assessment of risk factors of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMSDS) by
OCRA method in repetitive tasks. Iranian J Publ Health. 2006;35(1):68-74.
Occhipinti E. OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the
upper limbs. Ergonomics. 1998;41(9):1290-311.
Occhipinti E & Colombini D. [Proposal of a concise index for the evaluation of the exposure to
repetitive movements of the upper extremity (OCRA index)]. Med Lav. 1996;87(6):526-48.
Occhipinti E & Colombini D. [The OCRA method: updating of reference values and prediction
models of occurrence of work-related musculo-skeletal diseases of the upper limbs (UL-WMSDs) in
working populations exposed to repetitive movements and exertions of the upper limbs]. Med Lav.
2004;95(4):305-19.
Occhipinti E & Colombini D. The occupational repetitive action (OCRA) methods: OCRA index and
OCRA checklis. In: Stanton N, Brookhuis K, Hedge A, Salas E, Hendrick HW, eds. Handbook of
human factors and ergonomics methods. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press 2005: 15:1-14.
Occhipinti E & Colombini D. Updating reference values and predictive models of the OCRA method
in the risk assessment of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs. Ergonomics.
2007;50(11):1727-39.
Spigno F &al. [Biomechanical risk for the upper limbs: experience at a factory of feeding electric
cables]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2003;25 Suppl(3):159-60.
Zecchi G & Venturi G. [Repetitive movements of the upper extremities: the results of assessing
exposure to biomechanical overload and of a clinical study in a group of workers employed in the
production of plywood and veneer panels]. Med Lav. 1998;89(5):412-23.
www.ttl.fi/workloadexposuremethods
June 2009