Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Avi S.

Adelman
Dallas, Texas 75214

March 13, 2015


The Honorable Jason Villalba
State Representative for District 114
Via fax - (512) 463-7827 Fax
Via fax - (214) 363-8701 Fax
cc:

Mickey Osterreicher, General Counsel for the National Press Photographers Association
Alicia Calzada, co-counsel for the National Press Photographers Association

Representative Villalba,
I am writing to you in order to voice my vehement opposition to (proposed) House Bill 2918,
which would prohibit photography of peace officers working in their official capacity except
when the photographer is standing more than 25 feet away and is a member of the media.
I am writing to you while wearing many hats I am a member of the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA)
I am a freelance photographer (www.AviAdelman.net)
I am a blogger (BarkingDogs.org)
I publish databases regarding police activity in Dallas (DailyCrimeReport.com and
DallasPoliceWatch.com)
I was the coordinator for the NPPAs Right to Photograph and Record in Public
program presented to more than 200 peace officers from North Texas held last October,
an event sponsored by the Dallas Police Department and Dallas Sheriffs Office (www.
RightToPhotographInPublic.com)
And, finally, I am an American citizen
Your bill, as it is now written, is unconstitutional, discriminatory, and an offense to anyone who
seeks accountability for the actions of peace officers. Please allow me to explain.
The First Amendment guarantees a free press. This is not just a right to publish the news, but
to collect it, be it with a pen and paper, a printing press, a camera, or a blog. Your bill would
prohibit anyone with a camera from documenting police activity in the public sphere.

Your bill defines news media as someone working for a licensed radio or television station,
a published newspaper (under certain conditions) or magazines. That narrow definition
immediately removes network cable outlets, freelance photographers who may or may not be on
assignment, bloggers, people who operate live-stream video feeds to websites, and of course,
John and Jane Public carrying a digital or cellphone camera.
What local or state authority will make the final determination of who does and does not
get a press passs?? What kind of test will be applied to determine who is and who isnt a
journalist?? Even the Dallas County Sheriffs Office stopped issuing press credentials many
years ago. In essence, a government agency will now decide who covers the news, and that is
unconstitutional.
Why 25 feet? Why not 50 or even 100 feet? Right now, many police departments are struggling
to define what is a safe distance for the public (not just photographers) at a police scene. Each
incident has its own dynamic for safety and access at the same time. Let the officers on the
scene make those decisions.
What about people not carrying cameras standing near an incident?? Will you have one zone
for those with cameras, and another zone for those without cameras?? What about hidden
cameras, bodycameras and audio recorders? Will you ask the officers to search each person for
contraband cameras before allowing them to watch their activity??
Mr. Villalba, your bill takes us back nearly 250 years, before there were cameras, and a small
group of people controlled the press and information. Then we had a revolution and decided a
free press and a free people were more important.
Please refer to the General Orders and Reference Materials page on the NPPA event website
- www.TheRightToPhotographInPublic.com - for additional materials, legal cites and general
orders from police departments around the country.
Please take this bill off the House calendar as soon as possible.
Regards,

Avi S. Adelman

Potrebbero piacerti anche