Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Please evaluate yourself and your colleagues based on the criteria below. After each name giv
space below (and within the box) please provide any comments re: your evaluation in the "co
name. The comments will be kept private and not shared with any of your team members.
Evaluation scale: 1 = lowest 5 = highest
1: very poor performance, unacceptable
2: less than acceptable performance
3: average performance
4: good, solid performance
5: exceptional performance
Comment
Did the student commit appropriate time to the HW/Case and meet the
deadlines set forth by the team? - % effort
Comment
Did the student attend team meetings and contribute effectively during
team meetings with valuable ideas, suggestions, and insights to the
HW/Case? - % effort
Comment
Did the student carry out tasks thoroughly, accurately, and in a timely
fashion? - % effort
Comment
Allison Olazo
Student 1
Student 2
2
Always complaining about working
and unable to meet demands of
assignments
no conflicts
no conflicts
5.00
3.71
Barry Ladizinski
Vipul Bhatia
Student 3
Student 4
no conflicts
no conflicts
4.57
4.29
Criteria
Student 1
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
4
I researched and had a draft of
my part but I couldn't finish
task by due date/time
because I had to wait on
others to complete their part.
4
I assisted each with their
assigned questions. I had an
emergency at work and
couldn't attend changed
meeting date/time
5
I was frustrated we couldn't
meet on the date/time we
initially agreed upon but I
didn't mention it.
5
Comment
Comment
leader
Overall, how many points would you assign to the
student in scale 1 to 5?
4.71
Allison Olazo
Barry Ladizinski
Student 2
Student 3
No conflicts
No conflicts
contributor
contributor
3.86
4.57
Vipul Bhatia
Student 4
3
2
Couldn't find valuable
information on his topics so I
don't think he put too much
effort
5
No conflicts
contributor
3.57