Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
peer reviewed
peer reviewed
Department of Small Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Veterinary Clinic and Hospital, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
An 8.5-month-old neutered female German Shepherd dog with a grade 1 open left
supracondylar femoral fracture was repaired with the application of an AO/ASIF
right lateral tibial head buttress (LTHB) plate applied to the lateral surface of the
femur. The unique design of this plate enabled placement of five screws in the
distal fracture fragment, thereby achieving excellent stability without compromising
stifle joint mobility. The fracture healed without long-term complications.
The LTHB plate proved to be a simple and effective method for supracondylar
femoral fracture repair and overcame the limitations of standard bone plates in
treating this type of fracture. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the use of
modified bone plates in the repair of supracondylar femoral fractures in dogs.
Keywords
Dog,
Supracondylar femoral fracture,
Lateral tibial head buttress plate.
Introduction
Fracture of the femur is the most commonly occurring fracture
type in dogs and cats. Diaphyseal fractures of the femur are
most common, followed by distal physeal fractures in immature
animals. Supracondylar femoral (SCF) fractures affecting the
distal metaphyseal region in adult dogs and cats are uncommon
(Kolata and Johnson, 1975; Braden et al., 1990).
Surgical repair options for fractures occurring through the distal
femoral physis in immature dogs and cats have been described
(Parker and Bloomberg, 1984; Whitney and Schrader, 1987;
Brinker et al., 1990a; Sukhiani and Holmberg, 1997). The use
of crossed pins is the most commonly used technique and has
been shown to be biomechanically superior in distal physeal
fractures in immature dogs (Parker and Bloomberg, 1984;
Whitney and Schrader, 1987; Sukhiani and Holmberg, 1997).
Corresponding author:
Mark Glyde
Department of Small Animal Surgery
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
University College Dublin
Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
Tel: +353 1 716 6058
Fax: +353 1 716 6061
E-mail: mark.glyde@ucd.ie
87
peer reviewed
Milton, 1993). The location of the fracture adjacent to a highmotion joint such as the stifle complicates implant placement.
Implants must avoid the intercondylar fossa, cruciate ligament
origins and articular surfaces yet permit free movement of the
patella mechanism without causing patella subluxation
(Lidbetter and Glyde, 2000).
Many SCF fracture fixation methods have been described and
include the use of crossed pins, Rush pins, dynamic
intramedullary (IM) crossed pins (modified Rush pins), single
IM pins, two or more IM pins, paired convergent pins, external
skeletal fixators, standard bone plates, customised hook plates,
reconstruction plates and lag screws (Milton et al., 1980;
Franczusk et al., 1986; Whitney and Schrader, 1987; Brinker et
al., 1990a; Klause et al., 1990; Lewis et al., 1993; Milton,
1993; Robins et al., 1993; Lidbetter and Glyde, 2000). The use
of a lateral tibial head buttress (LTHB) plate in the repair of a
pathologic femoral fracture has been reported (Dueland and
VanEnkevort, 1995). This case report aims to detail the use of
an AO/ASIF LTHB plate in an open SCF fracture in a German
Shepherd dog.
Case report
An 8.5 month-old neutered female German Shepherd dog
weighing 35kg was presented for an acute traumatic nonweight-bearing left pelvic limb lameness. Physical examination
was otherwise normal with the exception of crepitus and
instability in the distal left femur consistent with a femoral
fracture. Neurological abnormalities were not apparent.
88
peer reviewed
FIGURE 3: Craniocaudal
radiograph of the intact
contralateral femur.
FIGURE 4: Intraoperative
photograph of the LTHB plate
prior to closure. The closed
arrows indicate the proximal and
distal margins of the butterfly
fragment on the cranial femur. The
open arrow points to the lateral
ridge of the femoral trochlea.
89
peer reviewed
90
Discussion
LTHB plates are designed for use in humans with proximal
tibial fractures but they have been used for repair of
supracondylar femoral fractures in humans (Schatzker and Tile,
1996) and for repair of a pathologic distal femoral fracture in a
dog (Dueland and VanEnkevort, 1995). LTHB plates have the
same shaft thickness as the AO/ASIF 3.5 broad plate; however,
the shaft is 2mm wider (14mm). They have five to 13 shaft
holes and range in length from 130 to 274mm. One end of the
plate is curved either right or left with an abaxial angle of 13
degrees and widens to a maximum width of 26mm. The
thickness of this widened end of the plate gradually reduces to
1.57mm centrally. The shaft screw holes are of the dynamic
compression design. The widened section of the plate has three
round holes and one oval hole most adjacent to the shaft
(Figure 7). All of the screw holes, including the shaft holes, will
fit either 4.5mm or 6.5mm screws (Dueland and VanEnkevort,
1995). The designation of the plates as either right or left is in
reference to their application to proximal tibial fractures in
humans.
Repair of distal femoral and SCF fractures in adult dogs presents
significant biomechanical and technical challenges. Achieving
effective stability and implant security while avoiding both intraarticular structures and interference with the patellar mechanism
is difficult (Milton, 1993; Lidbetter and Glyde, 2000).
Little information exists on the relative biomechanical merits of
the different fixation methods for SCF fractures (Sukhiani and
Holmberg, 1997). Crossed pins, paired convergent pins and
peer reviewed
91
peer reviewed
92
Conclusion
A LTHB plate was used successfully to repair a comminuted
grade 1 open SCF fracture in a German Shepherd dog. The
unique plate design overcame the limitations of a short, caudally
bowed distal fragment that typically makes fixation of these
fractures difficult. Effective fracture fixation was achieved
without compromising the principles of internal fixation or the
articular surfaces of the stifle joint.
LTHB plates should be considered for repair of SCF fractures in
large breeds of dogs. Further studies are warranted to evaluate
the biomechanical effect of plate contouring necessary in
application of these plates and to assess larger case numbers and
long-term results of LTHB plate repair of SCF fractures in dogs.
References
Anson, L. (1993). Emergency management of fractures. In: Textbook of
Small Animal Surgery. Edited by D. Slatter. Second edition, pp
1603-1610. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Anderson, A.A. (1998). Osteomyelitis. In: Manual of Small Animal
Fracture Repair and Management. Edited by A.R. Coughlan and A.
Miller. First edition, pp 317-327. Cheltenham: BSAVA.
Aron, D. (1996). Femoral external fixators. External Fixateurs
Workshop, Sydney, Postgraduate Foundation in Veterinary Science
University of Sydney. pp 15-16.
Braden, T.D. (1993). Histophysiology of the growth plate and growth
plate injuries. In: Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery.
Edited by M.J. Bojrab. Second edition, pp 1027-1041. Philadelphia:
Lea and Febiger.
Braden, T.D., Eicker, S.W., Abdinoor, D. and Prieur, W.D. (1990).
Characteristics of 1000 femur fractures in the dog and cat.
Veterinary Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 3: 130-134.
Brinker, W.O., Piermattei, D.L. and Flo, G.L. (1990a). Distal
femoral fractures. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and
Fracture Treatment. Second edition, pp 129-133. Philadelphia:
Saunders.
Brinker, W.O., Piermattei, D.L. and Flo, G.L. (1990b). Open
fractures. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture
Treatment. Second edition, pp 50-54. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Brinker, W.O., Piermattei, D.L. and Flo, G.L. (1990c). Fractures:
classification, diagnosis and treatment. In: Handbook of Small
Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Treatment. Second edition, pp
35-45. Philadelphia: Saunders.
peer reviewed
93
peer reviewed
Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7AD.
Preston Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Keywords
Poultry,
Biotype,
Campylobacter jejuni,
Phagetype,
Phenotype.
Introduction
The past three decades have witnessed the rise of Campylobacter
enteritis in man from virtual obscurity to notoriety, with present
isolation rates superseding those of other enteric pathogens such
Correspondence:
Dr John E. Moore
Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory,
Department of Bacteriology,
Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland, BT9 7AD.
Tel:
+44 (28) 9026 3554
Fax: +44 (28) 9026 3991
E-mail: jemoore@niphl.dnet.co.uk
95
peer reviewed
96
peer reviewed
TABLE 1: Distribution of Preston biotypes and phagetypes amongst isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli recovered from
raw chicken in a poultry processing plant in Northern Ireland
TOTAL
C. jejuni isolates
Preston
No of isolates
Phagetype (with phage type)
No. of isolates
(with biotype)
6000
6002
6004
6006
6010
6014
6015
6016
6052
6100
6146
6152
6304
6321
6346
6356
6404
6410
6450
6452
6604
6704
6710
6714
24
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
30
52
69A
90
90A
91
121
125
Non-typable
30
10
10
biotypes
isolates
phagetypes
isolates
biotypes
isolates
phagetypes
isolates
2
1
2
3
4
2
1
15
Preston
biotype
No. of isolates
(with biotype)
2014
2040
2110
2454
2510
2514
2600
2640
2644
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
C. coli isolates
Preston
No of isolates
Phagetype (with phage type)
Preston
biotype
90
91
125
Non-typable
3
2
1
4
97
peer reviewed
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr Clive Leckey and Mr Neville Heaney and
staff of the Food Hygiene Laboratory, Northern Ireland Public
Health Laboratory, for laboratory assistance and Dr Claire
Hughes, for help with collection of the specimens. This work
was funded by the Department of Health and Social Services
(NI).
References
Abeyta, C., Detter, F.G., Kaysner, C.A., Stott, R.F. and Wekell,
M.M. (1993). Campylobacter jejuni in a Washington State shellfish
growing bed associated with illness. Journal of Food Protection 56:
323-325.
Aho, M., Kurki, M. and Rautelin, H. (1989). Waterborne outbreak
of Campylobacter enteritis after outdoor infantry drill in Utti,
Finland. Epidemiology and Infection 103: 133-141.
Anon. (2002a). 2000 Commuicable Disease Report. Edited by B. Smyth.
Belfast: Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (Northern
Ireland).
Anon. (2002b). Generic HACCP Model for Poultry Slaughter.
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/nis/outreach/models/HACCP
-5.doc
Bolton, F.J., Holt, A.V. and Hutchinson, D.N. (1984).
Campylobacter biotyping scheme of epidemiological value. Journal of
Clinical Pathology 37: 677-681.
Giacoboni, G.I., Itoh, K., Hirayama, K., Takahashi, E. and
Mitsuoka, T. (1993). Comparison of fecal Campylobacter in calves
and cattle of different ages and areas in Japan. Japanese Journal of
Veterinary Medical Science 55: 555-559.
Moore, J.E. and Madden, R.H. (1998). Occurrence of thermophilic
Campylobacter spp. in porcine liver in Northern Ireland. Journal of
Food Protection 61: 409-413.
Prescott, J.F. and Munroe, D.L. (1982). Campylobacter jejuni
enteritis in man and domestic animals. Journal of the American
Veterinary Medical Association 181: 1524-1530.
Salama, S.M., Bolton, F.J. and Hutchinson, D.N. (1990).
Application of a new phage-typing scheme to campylobacters
isolated during outbreaks. Epidemiology and Infection 104: 405-411.
Shane, S.M. (1992). The significance of Campylobacter jejuni infection
in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 21: 189-213.
Stich-Groh, V. (1982). Campylobacters in pig faeces. In:
Campylobacter: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Biochemistry. Edited
by D.G. Newell. Lancaster: MTP Press Ltd. pp 259-260.
Taylor, D.N., McDermott, K.T. and Little, J.R. (1983).
Campylobacter enteritis associated with drinking untreated water in
98