Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Manual
2011
The programme
Introduction
Inner attitude: The Empty Middle
Practice: To which system someone belongs
Boundaries of the personal conscience
Collective conscience and dynamics:
Triangulation
Parentification
Carrying the responsibility or load for someone else
Meditation: Revise a promise
Double image/ overlapping context
Identifications
Meditation and inner process: Difficult child
Systemic coaching interview
Methodical:
Renegotiation of your contract
Explore your position as systemic coach with regard to the system of the client
1e order of help
Introduction
Short Training Systemic Coaching
Compared to constellations, systemic coaching is a form of conversation with the
same aim as a constellation, but where there is no constellation with representatives
or objects.
Compared to Management Coaching (at least in the tradition in which I have learned
it at the time as a consultant/ coach) some differences can be mentioned:
o We make use of systemic information, information that someone has,
because he or she is part of a system. This information is often unconsciously
stored, so together with the client we should come into a state where this
implicit information can become accessible.
o We use that form of systemic thinking and phenomenological work as has
been developed in the Hellinger tradition. That means that we make use of
personal conscience, collective conscience, and possible conscience that we
call spirit, nd the principles of Bounding, Order and Balance in Give and Take
o As focus in systemic coaching we usually do not take the well being of the
client but the well being of the whole system. This inner attitude has
consequences for our relationship with the client and our relationship towards
the system or systems where the client is or was part of.
Coaching process and systemic coaching.
Experiences until now show that systemic coaching in a normal coaching process
changes the coaching relationship. Often the coaching is then finished. If something
comes to light in a constellation, this works on in the soul of the client. Constellations
are not work instructions in the meaning that it is makes clear what you have to do at
work the next morning. Systemic coaching has the same effect as a constellation. It
is systemic work without doing a constellation or maybe with only a mini constellation
with some elements, where the coach can be representative.
From systemic coaching another image arises for the client. That image keeps
working. Sometimes it means that in the following months many things shift/move. If
someone takes another inner position in a system, many things change. Many
changes take place on the level of identity, of values and views and on the level of
acting. As mentioned before, this can involve feelings of guilt. Being loyal to what was
before is often easier as it involves feelings of innocence. Falling back to ancient
behaviour is therefore logical. For a coach it must be completely acceptable if that is
the case. Whatever the client does with the insight is ok for the systemic coach. He
does not even ask afterwards. The challenge for the coach is not to want to know if
he has been successful. Already only wanting to know has its effect on the soul of the
client.
That is why the coaching relationship changes. What can you talk about together
when something essential has come to light? Actually it is often so intimate that it is
strange to talk in following coaching conversations about other subjects.
It is remarkable that many constellation facilitators realise that they quickly forget
about the constellation, sometimes already after some hours. Hellinger talks about a
form of spiritual forgetting. It is as if the system withdraws to where it belongs, the
client.
The
Empty
Middle
Determined in
leadership.
Aiming at solutions.
Allowing each
person his/her
destiny.
Without judging.
This phenomenological attitude means keeping back/in the background and being
modest. You subordinate yourself to the system/situation as a whole and you look at
it without wanting to explain/to clear up. And you accept from your inner self that
things are exactly as they are.
And at the same time you are also part of the bigger total system.
This is, in my opinion, what Bert Hellinger calls the empty middle.
Besides these aspects of the empty middle we want to mention other aspects that
are essential when observing in a systemic way, coaching and guiding / directing
constellations.
Healing in the systemic sense means to be in harmony with both, life and
death, perpetrators and victims.
Let it be clear that everyone is responsible for his/her actions and their
consequences
6. Own themes.
Does the clients theme approaches/touches yours?
While setting up you should be aware of the difference between the
clients theme and possibly your own themes that are touched/that come
up.
If your own theme starts dominating, the constellation must be stopped.
When you, as the facilitator, are in touch / in contact with the systemenergy then it is possible that emotions, overtaken from the system,
emerge.
Those are functional and it is useful to (learn to) distinguish them from
those emotions emerging, when your own theme is touched.
A, B en C
A goes into the empty middle and asks questions in order to find out from which
systems B is part of and what position B has in this system
B gives feedback to A saying which questions open more and which questions close
more
A tries to answer the question: from which (inner) place emerged the systemic
questions?
C observes it all and gives feedback about when A and B are together in the field and
when not
Change places
10
11
can be respected by passing on new insights by, for example, publishing those
insights.
A capable energetic female manager in Amsterdam was head of a group of
employees and wondered why they did not achieve as much as could be expected,
considering their training and experience.
What appeared was that several employees had a Jewish background and they
received a grant from a fund for relatives of holocaust victims. Then the manager
realised that the fact they received this grant contributed to their state of feeling a
victim and so they were limited in their possibilities. She went back to work with new
insights.
How big should a golden handshake be so that the person involved and the
organisation feel acknowledged and free again? What is a suitable payment for a
consultant so that the organisation and the consultant feel free again at the end? The
inner price barometer can give you an idea. Imagine you get twice as much money
for a service or product you have just given. Does it make the transaction and the
whole stronger or weaker? Does it make you and the other system feel freer or more
bound? And what happens if you get one and a half times the amount? Or two third?
Order
Personal conscience is also at work in a third area of feelings of guilt and innocence.
What is the right place for me in the system, a place I can trust, which gives me
safety and quietness so that I can do my work well.
If someone works from the right place it is coupled with feelings of innocence.
In organisations the right place is much more difficult to determine than in families. In
families it follows the flow of life: grandparents come before parents who come before
children who come before grandchildren. And in the family the first child comes
before the second etc.
In organisation the right place is connected to several, sometimes-contradictory
principles. Seniority is important, the fact of how long a person is part of an
organisation. The place in the hierarchy is important: if someone considers
him/herself better than the boss, this is often coupled with feelings of guilt.
The professional group is important, as well as specialism. In a group practice the
physiotherapists have another place than the doctors.
The order of training someone followed can also be important or the different jobs a
person has had can influence personal conscience.
When an engineer decides to become a social worker he will get a totally different
strength if he still respects his ancient training and job than if he rejects that part of
his life and considers it as a lost part of his life and the wrong choice.
Collective conscience
Collective conscience works unconsciously, in service to the system as a
whole.
The function of collective conscience is to guarantee the progress of the
system as a whole. And then the system as a whole comes before the
12
13
14
Practice
Personal conscience and practice the clinic eye
In threes: A (client), B (coach), C observes the whole, including A and B
and keeps an eye on the time
A explores the boundaries of his or her personal conscience and how
others reacted to that or would react if he/she reaches those boundaries
or would cross them
B asks questions and observes: the movements (in the soul) of client A.
A can clarify where (in the body) he/she feels something
For B (and C) it is a practice of the clinic eye: what can be seen in A
when he is telling his story; how can you see that he is bounded with the
whole or maybe where he is struggling with loyalties.
After a while B wonders: as a coach, where are the boundaries of my
personal conscience?
Some suggestions for questions:
In the present time
Which behaviour in your work, organisation, professional group, family,
would bring you to or over the boundaries of:
-belonging
-balance in give and take
-order
In your career in the past, where were you guilty in the field of:
-belonging
-balance in give and take
-order
and what was the effect?
If you think about a next step in your career or for example introducing a
change in your company
-to who or what would you render yourself guilty?
-what would you leave behind?
15
What possibilities and restriction arise when the three basic principles are or are
nor respected in an organisation system.
A dynamic is a pattern of relations or positions among elements of a system. So
what is important is what happens in between the elements, not in the elements.
The purpose of a dynamic is to bring something to light about the system that is
related to the existence of the system as a whole. It has a signal function and
carries the care for the survival of the whole system, even if a dynamic can be
painful for individuals or some elements in the system.
The truth is a term we use for that what wants to come to light. A fact, an event in
the history of the organisation when
> something or somebody was lost or excluded
> a debt came into being
> an order was disturbed or inverted
That truth is the source of the dynamic, bound with the original event and
therefore with primary feelings. That is why it is impossible to find solutions
from here. The elements caught in the dynamic are bound to secondary
feelings of overtaken feelings and with them there are no solutions possible.
Dynamics are the heart of the constellation. To recognise the essential dynamics and
those with the strongest weight or power is essential to work towards a solution. In
the training we pay a lot of attention to learning how to recognise dynamics. You can
practise by assimilating the following dynamics, possibly with examples, and by
feeling what the inner movement is, which goes with the dynamic.
Then you can try to feel what the effect of an intervention or resolving sentence is.
And how maybe something gets into movement that can grow.
The dynamics are placed in a number of main groups. This list is not exhaustive. It is
a stocktaking of observations until now. There probably will be more later.
16
17
Dynamic: Triangulation.
Triangulation is a disturbance of the order. Someone has arrived at the
place on the above hierarchic layer, often in a conflict situation among
the people concerned. In daily life the client perceives it as a role as a
mediator. And it is also tempting, because it gives status and therefore
this place quickly becomes presumptuous /arrogant and is considered
with suspicion by the others in the organisation. Not seldom during
training the following remark slipped out of my mouth: I think you are at
the wrong place. You should have been the director And often it was
purifying. Actually the employees have nothing to do with what is at work
among the managers on the nearest higher level. Conflicts should stay
there. Involving an employee is an invitation to entanglement.
De-entanglement is possible when the employee says: I am only the coworker. The manager says: You are the employee, I am your boss, and
next to me are my colleagues. What is going on among us we can
handle ourselves. Keep out of it
Suggestions for questions to find out if there is triangulation:
Does it happen that you are sucked into situations, on a next
higher level, where actually you have nothing to do?
Are you sometimes drawn into conflicts as a mediator?
Are you sometimes tempted/seduced?
Are you colleagues sometimes jealous because you mix easily with
people from a higher level?
In your family (for women) were you more a fathers daughter
(triangulated) or a mothers daughter?
In your family (for men) were you more a fathers son or a mothers
son (triangulated)?
18
Dynamic : Parentification.
I feel better than my boss; I have come in a position above my boss. The
movement is that someone feels above someone who has a higher
position in the order (according to the dynamic of the system).
And then the order is disturbed. This can be seen in the constellation in
several ways. In posture, the head a little bit backwards and sometimes
a disdainful glance. The person lower in rank stays or tends to stay left of
a higher person in rank. The person higher in rank is not looked at.
Arrogant tone and statements by the representative. Asking to say the
employee: I am only the employee can test this dynamic.. To restore
the order it is sometimes necessary for the employee to bow lightly for
the person higher in rank. Parentification in organisations leads to
restlessness and loss of energy. The attention is more focused on the
persons own position than on his/her work. Someone who enters an
organisation and listens and observes, can quickly see if this dynamic is
at work. A specialist can feel superior to his/her boss, which is true
concerning competence. But at the same time he/she can feel superior
to the boss in everything so also as if he/she is the manager.
By looking for the solution it is good to restore the order and the boss
says to the employee: You are good at your job and that is why I
appreciate you. If this is said sincerely the employee can say: And you
are my boss and you can count on me as your employee. Triangulation
as well as parentification lead to fading the clarity in the order. By
working towards a solution it is important to come to clear statements
about who is who.
You arrived after me, I am the boss and you the employee. That can
start an inner movement that leads to a clear limit. That gives each one
in the organisation the opportunity to be autonomous and bound at the
same time.
Suggestions for questions to find out if there is parentification:
Do you sometimes feel bigger/better than your boss?
Do you often have an opinion/ judgement, that makes you feel
better than those or what you have an opinion about?
As a child, had you maybe arrived at the position of your parents
parents?
As a child, did you look after younger children?
In what kind of situations do you feel your chin going up a bit?
19
20
21
22
Dynamic: Identifications
Following somebody, leading someone elses life.
Someone tends unconsciously to follow a person, who has not been
honoured or who left the system prematurely. For example: an
employee tends to follow a founder who was expelled from the
company after a conflict, years before.
Or a member of the management team of an organisation after a
fusion/merger tends to follow dismissed employees.
In the constellation this dynamic becomes visible by someone staring
into the distance, to the back of a representative who is set up looking
outside the circle, or who feels an inner movement to leave the circle
facing outwards. Sometimes a representative stares to the ground.
This dynamic is tested by putting the representative behind someone
else who died earlier or who left the system earlier in another way. If
this feels better for the representative the dynamic is clear.
A direction of a solution is to let the person who was followed turn
round and to let him/her look at the other person until he/she can
really see him.
It may help to let the follower say: I follow you. Then the pressure in
the system is enhanced and works as a waking-up signal for the one
who is followed. He can say then: Please, stay . I appreciate that
you see me, but you do not help me, nor the company, by following
me
The follower can say: I will stay a bit longer. This inner movement
sometimes needs time. This process can be done in imagination in a
systemic coaching situation.
This dynamic is sometimes more difficult to see through questions.
But we give some suggestions so that you have an idea in which
direction to search and we complete that inner image with a
meditation difficult child.
Suggestions for questions to find identification
Does it happen that you are not completely here?
Do you know reckless behaviour or do you practise extreme
sports?
Are you restless and could you be called a wandering soul?
Do you sometimes feel as if you live someone elses life?
23
24
Systemic coaching
Bibi Schreuder
With systemic questioning a similar process is started in the client as in a
constellation.
As a coach, go therefore to the Empty Middle, connected with your own background,
open for what is and what comes.
Tune in to the client and his question, beyond judgement.
Listen to the question, sentence by sentence and open up for all mentioned and still
other possible systems.
Scan the systems and superpose the three principles in thought.
What about belonging? Maybe questions arise in you such as: who or what is not
named or seen? Maybe someone has been excluded? Someone is missing? Or you
ask: Has a goal or ideal been lost? Or Who do you honour with this?
What about order? Maybe questions arise such as: Could it be possible that you feel
bigger or better than your director? If you imagine your school class, than where is
your position ?
What about the balance in give and take? Maybe questions appear such as: Are
you very good in giving? Can you also take? For who are you working so hard? What
does your illness do for the system actually?
You can drop politeness, curiosity, asking about feelings. Listen in silence and only
if a question presses on, you ask the question.
Unfortunately the coach has not much to do and is more silent than speaking. By
questioning you can let the client explore what resonates, where maybe there is a
context overlap (something old from the own family system melted with something in
the present work situation). Then you can explore if you want to differentiate the two
contexts.
You make suggestions, starting with: What if? (What if you turn round and you know
that the director is behind you? What if you see the parents behind the children? And
what if your parents stand behind you?
Always with considerable time and silence between the questions, so that the client
can let appear the images.
You observe where and which changes you experience in the client and you follow
the process. You stop if a first movement perseveres, in agreement with the client.
For example with: I see that you expire deeply and that you nod; does that mean that
it is sufficient now?
Round off with the client in a way that your both are free again and so that the
process in the client can continue. So resist, and endure, as a coach, your curiosity,
your amazement (about how simple it is or how quick) and your worries if it all will
work out well. Keep your leadership and say: Ok that was it!
25
Practice
Systemic coaching interview, conditions for excellence
In threes:
Client
Facilitator/coach
Meta-coach
The client goes into an inner state of remembering where he or she excelled in his or
her work
The coach asks questions :
- which systems were present there in that successful situation?
- how was your position (and possibly those of others) in each of those systems
considering : - balance in giving and taking
- order
- what was, who were all involved, included?
- what about personal conscience?
- what gave force, energy in the situation?
en
-what more could be completed?
Meta-coach: his or her role is to take care that the coach keeps working on the
systemic level.
Feedback:
What teaches this about the dynamic in successful work situations?
26
Practice
Systemic Coaching Interview, Looking at it as a whole
In pairs: one person is the coach, the other person has a coaching
question.
Aim of the exercise is to find out in a coaching discussion if there is
possibly a systemic question, starting from the question of the person
being coached.
1. The person being coached states his/her question.
2. The coach asks systemic questions.
You can use the questions and interventions that are described at the
different dynamics.
Ending.
The person being coached and the coach look together at what this
discussion has brought up, which questions had more effect and which
had not.
Feedback to the coach.
Change places.
27
28
Practice
1st order of helping
The first order of helping is:
Resist the temptation as a coach to take the position of a parent.
Because when a coach becomes a parent, the client becomes a child
This I call a therapeutic relationship that can last forever
The coach feeds on the client and
Sometimes the coach secretly does not want the client to find a solution..
Bert Hellinger
Practice:
In sixths: client, coach and four representatives
The coach goes into the parent position intentionally.
Then the client and the coach sit on chairs opposite each other; both can say one
sentence
How is the relationship?
Then the client invites two people to stand behind her/his chair as her/his parents.
What changes in he relationship coach client?
Then the coach invites two people to stand behind him/ her as his/her parents
What changes in the relationship coach-client?
The coach collects which insights this exercise gives him/ her about him/herself.
Enjoy!!
Bibi Schreuder and Jan Jacob Stam
29