Ar2013 14 PDF

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops
NCIPM
okf"kZd izfrosnu
Annual Report
2013-14
jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnz

yky cgknqj 'kkL=h Hkou] iwlk ifjlj
ubZ fnYyh 110 012] Hkkjr
National Centre for Integrated Pest Management
Lal Bahadur Shastri Building, Pusa Campus
New Delhi 110 012, India
okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14
NCIPM
:
,p-vkj- ljnkuk
eqd's k lgxy
vtark fcjkg
fodkl daoj
ulhe vgen
uhye esgrk
mYys[k
Okkf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izc/a ku dsUnz] Ykkycgknqj 'kkL=h Hkou] iwlk ifjlj]
ubZ fnYyh 110 012] HkkjrA i`"B la[;k% 118
Citation
Annual Report 2013-14

National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, LBS Building, Pusa Campus,
New Delhi 110 012, India. 118p
izdk'kd
Mk- fpjaru pV~Vksik/;k;

funs'kd
jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izc/a ku dsUnz] Ykky cgknqj 'kkL=h Hkou] iwlk ifjlj]
ubZ fnYyh 110 012] Hkkjr
Published by
Dr. C. Chattopadhyay
Director
National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, LBS Building, Pusa Campus,
New Delhi 110 012 India
nwjHkk"k@ Telephone No.

QSDl@ Fax No.
bZ&esy@ Email
oSclkbZV@ Website
:
:
:
:
91-11-25843935
91-11-25841472
ipmnet@ncipm.org.in, director_ncipm@rediffmail.com
http://www.ncipm.org.in
:ijs[kk ,oa eqnz.k
eSllZ jkW;y vkWQlsV fizUVlZ] ,&89@1 ujk;.kk b.MfLV;y ,fj;k] Qsl&1

ubZ fnYyh 110 028
Design & Printed at
M/s Royal Offset Printers, A-89/1 Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I

New Delhi 110 028
ladyu o lEiknu
Compiled & Edited by
ii
ANNUAL REPORT 20132014
H.R. Sardana
Mukesh Sehgal
Ajanta Birah
Vikas Kanwar
Nasim Ahmad
Neelam Mehta
izkDdFku
Preface
h; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaku dsUnz jklukizds
eq>sdsjk"V
o"kZ 2013&14 dk okf"kZd izfrosnu izLrqr djus dk xkSjo
izkIr gksrk gSA bl izfrosnu esas dsUnz ds oSKkfudksa rFkk deZpkfj;ksa
dh egRoiw.kZ miyfCk;ksa ij izdk'k Mkyk x;k gSA eq>s bl ckr
dh izlUurk gS fd jk-l-uk-iz-ds-ns'k esa uk'khthoksa ,oa izca ku
fofk;ksa ls tqMh+ lwpukvksa rFkk ns'k ds lkoZtfud ,oa futh
dkfeZdksa ds Kku o vuqHko dk lesdu dj uk'khthoksa }kjk ns'k
esa [ksrh dh mit esa gkfu;ksa dks de djus esa ,d vge Hkwfedk
fuHkk jgk gS rFkk viuh izfrc)rk dk iqjtksj fuokZg dj jgk
gSA fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa pkoy] dikl] nygu] frygu] lfCt;ka
rFkk Qyksa dh Qlyksa ij vkbZih,e dk;Ze dk oSkhdj.k ,oa
izpkj&izlkj djus ds vykok] laLFkku dh orZeku miyfCk;ksa
dk ,d ize[q k fcUnq gS fdlkuksa dks O;kid Lrj ij rRdkfyd
uk'khtho fuxjkuh vkSj izca ku lykgdkj lsok nsus ds fy,
jk"Vh; lwpuk usVodks ds ek;e ls lesfdr fuxjkuh ,oa
tkx:drk dk;Ze dk dk;kZUo;u djukA laLFkku }kjk
le;≤ ij fd, x, los{Z k.kksa rFkk Qly vkSj uk'khtho
lykgdkj lsok ds lkFk lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh dk lesdu ds
QyLo:i ns'k dh ize[q k Qlyksa esa vkbZih,e iz.kkyh ds izHkkoh
,oa O;kid dk;kZUo;u ls bu Qlyksa esa vfkd mit izkIr
djus rFkk dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx de djus esa vikj lQyrk
izkIr gqbZ gSA
bl vofk ds nkSjku laLFkku us vuqi;
z Dq r vuqla kku djus
esa rFkk fdlkuksa rd mUur lesfdr uk'khtho izc/a ku izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa
dks miyCk djus esa ljkguh; dk;Z fd;k gSA vkbZih,e
izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds lesdu ds vykok laLFkku us fdlkuksa rd bu
izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dh mi;ksfxrk ds ckjs esa tkudkjh igqp
a kus ds
fy, dkQh iz;kl fd, gSAa fof'k"V lkWVos;jksa dks fodflr
djrs gq,] muds vuqdy
w <kapk [kM+k dj rFkk ekuo lalkku
fodkl ds ek;e ls bysDVkWfud usVofdx ds izHkkoh lesdu
ls laLFkku us {ks=h; Lrj ij uk'khtho izca ku dks dkQh
izHkkodkjh cuk fn;k gSA bl izdkj ds osc&baVjQsl lkWVos;jksa
dks miyCk djkdj dsUnz us ;kstukdkjks]a vuqla kkudrkZvksa rFkk
foLrkj dkfeZdksa dks uk'khtho izca ku laca kh leL;kvksa ls
rRdkfyd :i ls fuiVus ds fy, O;kid lwpuk vkkkj miyCk
fd;k gSA jklukizds us mi;ksxh 'kksk] f'k{kk] izf'k{k.k rFkk
take immense pleasure to present the Annual

Report of the National Centre for Integrated Pest
Management (NCIPM) for the year 2013-14, which
highlights the significant achievements made by the
Scientists and staff of this Centre. NCIPM displays its
strength to mitigate yield losses in Indian agriculture
due to pests through integration of knowledge base on
pests, management practices, products, public and
private personnel of the country. In addition to
validation and popularization of IPM technologies
among crops of rice, cotton, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables
and fruits at farmers' fields, the current highlight of
the Centre has been the integrated surveillance-cumawareness through national information networks for
large scale real time pest monitoring and management
advisory. Systematic surveys and surveillance supported
by information technology integrated with crop and
pest management advisory, effective and extensive
implementation of IPM practices among major crops
paid dividends in terms of improved yields and need based use of pesticides.
This Centre made great strides in applied research
and transfer of improved IPM technologies during the
period. Besides synthesis of new IPM technologies,
extensive efforts have also been put for effective
dissemination of the same to farmers. Effective
integration of electronic networking through
development of customized software, supporting
infrastructure and human resource development has
made pest management very effective at regional level.
Such a web-interface has allowed faster flow of pest
management issues to planners, researchers and
extension functionaries instantly and simultaneously.
NCIPM envisages larger role in making IPM practices
more effective across the country through higher levels
of integration of multidisciplinary technologies and of
stakeholders by means of improved research, education,
training and extension for an enhanced crop and
iii
NCIPM
laofkZr Qly ,oa ikfjfLFkfrdh; LokLF;] LFkk;h f"k fodkl
ds fy, cgqvk;keh izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa rFkk LVsdgksYMjksa ds mPpLrjh;
lesdu ds ek;e ls iwjs ns'k esa vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks vkSj
vf/kd izHkkodkjh cukus esa viuh cM+h Hkwfedk fuHkkus dh
ifjdYiuk dh gSA
dsUnz ds lexz fodkl esa ekuuh; MkW- ,l- v;iu] lfpo]
Ms;j ,oa Hkkvuqi ds egkfuns'kd rFkk MkW- LoIu dqekj nkk]
egkfuns'kd Qly foKku] Hkkvuqi dk lf; ;ksxnku]
lrr ekxZn'kZu rFkk izkRs lkgu vxz.kh; jgk gS] ftlds fy, eSa
rKrk ds lkFk mudk vkHkkj O;Dr djrk gwAa MkW- ih- ds
porhZ ,oa MkW- Vh- ih- jktsUnzu] lgk;d egkfuns'kd ikni
laj{k.k ,oa tSo lqj{kk] Hkkvuqi }kjk oSKkfud vkSj iz'kklfud
{ks= esa fn, x, ;ksxnku] izkRs lkgu rFkk ekxn'kZu ds fy, eSa
mudk kU;okn djrk gwAa
eSa dsUnz esa leLr oSKkkfudksa rFkk lHkh deZpkjhx.kksa dk Hkh
kU;okn djrk gwa ftUgksua s ubZ pqukSfr;ksa ls fuiVus ds fy, dM+k
ifjJe djrs gq, o"kZ ds nkSjku laLFkku dh xfrfof/k;ksa esa viuk
mR"V ;ksxnku fn;kA bl izfrosnu ds izdk'ku ds fy, eSa
izdk'ku lfefr ds lnL;ks]a MkW- ,p- vkj- ljnkuk] MkW- eqd's k
lgxy] MkW- vtark fcjkg] Jh fodkl daoj] MkW- ulhe vgen
rFkk Jherh uhye esgrk dk Hkh kU;okn djrk gwAa eSa okf"kZd
izfrosnu ladyu ,oa laiknu Vhe ds iz;klksa dh ljkguk djrk
gwAa Jh jkds'k dqekj ,oa Jh ghjk yky ls izkIr lgk;rk ds fy,
/kU;okn nsrk gwA
30 ebZ] 2014
ubZ fnYyh
iv
fpjaru pV~Vksik;k;
funs'kd
ANNUAL
ANNUAL REPORT
REPORT20132014
20132014
ecological health, sustainable agricultural growth.

The all round growth and development of the
Centre has been possible with an active involvement,
able guidance and constant encouragement received
from Hon'ble Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary, DARE and
Director General, ICAR and Dr. Swapan Kumar Datta,
Deputy Director General (Crop Science), ICAR, which
I acknowledge with great respect and gratitude. I am
also highly thankful to Dr. P. K. Chakrabarty and Dr.
T. P. Rajendran Assistant Director General (Plant
Protection & Biosafety), ICAR for their never ending
scientific and administrative involvement, inspiration
and guidance for overall growth of the Centre.
I would like to express my thanks to my Scientists
and all staff members of the institute, who really worked
hard to meet the new challenges and for making
outstanding contributions during the year. I am also
highly thankful to the members of the publication
committee Drs. H. R. Sardana, Mukesh Sehgal, Ajanta
Birah, Vikas Kanwar, Nasim Ahmad and Ms. Neelam
Mehta for bringing out this report in time. Efforts
made by the annual report compilation and editing team
are highly appreciated. Help received from Mr. Rakesh
Kumar and Mr. Hera Lal Yadav is also gratefully
acknowledged.
30 May, 2014
New Delhi
(C. Chattopadhyay)
Director
fof'k"V lkjka'k
Executive Summary
jk
"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaku dsUnz jklukizds ds

eq[; vfkns'kksa ,oa f;kdykiksa esa izeq[k Qlyksa ds fy,
vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk la'ys"k.k] oSkhdj.k rFkk izlkj
djus ds lkFk&lkFk MkVkcsl izca ku djuk] uk'khthoksa ds
iwokZueq ku ds fy, ekWMy fodflr djuk rFkk etcwr lg;ksx
dks c<+kok nsuk gSA gky gh es]a dsUnz us uk'khtho xfrf;ksa ds
lkFk&lkFk tyok;q ifjorZu ds dkj.k Qlyksa ij iM+us okys
izHkko dk vkdyu djus es]sa uk'khtho laca kh lykgdkj&lsok
tkjh djus es]sa ekuo lalkku fodkl ds {ks= esa viuh lf;rk
c<+kbZ gS] ftles iwoksZkj ioZrh; {ks= Hkh 'kkfey gSAa
cEckoM xkao] mkj izn's k esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr
esa 200 gs- {ks= esa iwlk cklerh pkoy fdLe 1121 ij lesfdr
uk'khtho izca ku vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds oS|hdj.k ls ;g
tkudkjh izkIr gqbZ gS fd fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih esa fdlkuksa
}kjk 2&4 jklk;fud fNM+dko fd, tk jgs Fks] tcfd bldh
rqyuk esa vkbZih,e dk;Ze viukus okys fdlkuksa }kjk cqikz Q
s fs tu
dk dsoy ,d jklk;fud fNM+dko fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e
ekWM~;y
w ds oSkhdj.k ls fdlkuksa dh fofk esa Hkwjk ikni ekgw
chih,p dh lef"V 5-21 izfr Vhyk dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e
viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa Hkwjk ikni ekgw dh lef"V
3-56 ekgw izfr Vhyk esa Hkkjh deh ntZ dh xbZA fdlkuksa dh
fofk okys [ksrksa esa cdkus jksx 17-7% Fkk] tcfd vkbZih,e okys
[ksrksa esa blesa tcnZLr deh ns[kh xbZ o bls NqV&iqV gh ns[kk
tk ldrk gSA e`nk ds laxfz gr izfrn'kks uewus ls bl ckr dh
iqf"V gqbZ fd fdlkuksa dh fofk okys [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e
viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa dh e`nk esa tSfod dkcZu rFkk
ftad rRo vfkd ek=k esa FksA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh viuk,
tkus ls fdlkuksa dh fofk dh rqyuk esa vfkd ykHk%ykxr
vuqikr izkIr fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w ds ,dy ?kVdksa
ds ;ksxnku dk vkdyu djus ds fy, [kjhQ 2013 ueh okys
fnuksa esa esa pkoy vuqla kku dsUnz vkjvkj,l] fpulqjk gqxyh
esa rFkk Qjojh 2014 esa vkjvkj,yvkjvkj,l lhvkjvkjvkbZ]
xs#ok] vle esa cksjks pkoy ij ,d v;;u fd;k x;k ftlesa
;g ik;k x;k fd dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx ds ctk; izfrjksi.k ds
5 fnuksa ds ckn isfz VykDyksj 750 fe-yh- izfr gs- rFkk jkbuSDlhij
dk ,d fNM+dko djus ls vfkd mit izkIr gks ldrh gSA
Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds rgr buokjesVa y bEiSDV dks'ksVa
bZvkbZD;w Vwy dk iz;ksx djrs gq, i;kZoj.k ds vusd ?kVdks]a
tSls e`nk LokLF;] ty xq.kokk] dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx ds
ynthesis, validation and dissemination of IPM

technologies for major crops along with database
management, developing pest forecasting models and
strong linkages are the major mandates and activities
of the National Centre for Integrated Pest Management
(NCIPM). Recently, the Centre has also been actively
engaged in pest dynamics vis-a-vis climatic change,
issuing pest advisory and human resource development
including for the North Eastern Hill region.
Validation of integrated pest management (IPM)

technology in rice crop cv. Pusa Basmati 1121 carried
out on 200 ha in farmers participatory mode at
Bambawad, Uttar Pradesh indicated the application of
only one chemical pesticide spray of buprofezin by IPM
practitioner-farmers as against 2-4 chemical pesticide
sprays in farmers practice (FP). Validation of IPM
module led to significant reduction in brown plant
hopper (BPH) population (3.56 hoppers /hill) in IPM
plots as against 5.21 hoppers /hill in FP. Bakanae disease
was reduced to traces in IPM plots as against 17.7% in
FP. Analysis of soil samples collected indicated higher
level of organic carbon and zinc in IPM as compared
to FP. Application of IPM technology also resulted in
higher yield and benefit: cost (B:C) ratio as compared
to FP. Studies on estimation of contribution of
individual components of IPM module at Rice Research
Station (RRS), Chinsurah (Hooghly) during kharif
(wet), 2013 and at RRLRRS (CRRI), Gerua, Assam
during Feb, 2014 in Boro rice revealed significantly
higher yields with application of pretilachlor 750 ml
a.i./ha 5 days after sowing (DAT) and one application
of rynaxypyr against no application of pesticide.
Impact of pesticides on various components of
environment like, soil health, water quality, crop health
and risk related health issues due to use of pesticides,
using environmental impact quotient (EIQ) tool was
assessed under rice cropping system. The pre-crop soil
analysis revealed high consumption of pesticides, which
izfros
2013&14
okf"kZokf"kZ
d dizfros
nunu 2013&14
NCIPM
QyLo:i Qly LokLF; ,oa ekuoh; LokLF; ds fy,
gkfudkjd fo"k;ksa ij dhVuk'kdksa dk izHkko ewY;kadu fd;k
x;kA Qly dh cqokbZ ls igys laxfz gr fd, x, e`nk izfrn'kks
ds fo'ys"k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd dhVuk'kdksa dk vfkd
mi;ksx fd, tkus ls e`nk esa thok.kqvksa dh lef"V rFkk ty dh
xq.kokk dkQh T;knk izHkkfor gqb gSA ysfdu] vkbZih,e dk;Ze
viuk, tkus okys Qly dh dVkbZ ds ckn tc e`nk izfrn'kZ
fy, x, rks muesa ekbks ,oa eSks iks"kd rRo] tSfod dkcZu
rRo vfkd ik, x,( izkfrd 'k=qvksa dh lef"V esa o`f) gqbZ
ftlds dkj.k uk'khtho dh lef"V esa dhVuk'kd dk fNM+dko
fd, cxSj deh vkbZ rFkk ykHk%ykxr vuqikr esa Hkh o`f) ns[kh
xbZA
laLFkku }kjk foaMksa 7 vkWijsfVax flLVe dk iz;ksx djrs gq,
,d lesfdr foaMks vkkkfjr ,Iyhds'ku@lkWVos;j 16 ,ech
pkoy uk'khthoksa dh fuxjkuh ds fy, Mk;Xuksfll ,oa izfrp;u
fodflr fd;k x;k gSA
uk'khthoksa }kjk Qly dks igqp
a k, x, uqdlku dks de
djus rFkk nygu mRikndrk c<+kus gsrq fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk
i)fr esa N% izeq[k nygu mRiknd jkT;ksa esa 16443-62 gs-s {ks=
esa vjgj] puk] elwj] ewx
a rFkk mM+n dh Qlyksa ij laofkZr
nygu mRiknu dk;Ze ,3ih dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;kA
vkbZih,e dh fofHkUu izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ,oa dk;Ziz.kkfy;ksa dh
izHkkodkfjrk ij ijh{k.k djus vkSj mudk oSkhdj.k djus ds
fy, U;wfDy;j vkbZih,e xkao 173 fodflr fd, x,A ,3ih
dk;Ze ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;Ze
viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa uk'khtho ds izdksi esa rFkk
jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx esa deh vkbZ vkSj mit Hkh
vfkd izkIr dh xbZA uk'khthoksa dh rRdkfyd lef"V fj;y
Vkbe ikWI;wy's ku rFkk mlds fo'ys"k.k ds vkkkj ij vkbZih,e
viukus okys fdlkuksa dks le; ij mfpr mik; djus gsrq
LFkkuh; Hkk"kkvksa esa lykgdkj lsok,a nh xbA
rhu LFkkuksa >kj[kaM] egkjk"V rFkk dukZVd esa vjgj esa
QkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh ds lesfdr izca ku ij fd, x, v;;u esa
;g tkudkjh izkIr gqbZ gS fd VkbdksMekZ fojhMs e`nk ,oa cht
mipkj ds fy, rFkk yglwu xkaB dk vdZ cht mipkj ,oa
if.kZy fNM+dko ds fy, dkQh izHkkodkjh ik, x,] tks ikjEifjd
jklk;fud QQwna uk'kdksa ds iz;ksxksa ls rqyuh; Hkh FksA
o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku jkT; f"k foHkkx] egkjk"V }kjk
jkT; ds varxZr 33 ftyks]a 348 rkyqdkvksa rFkk 43000 xkaoksa esa
lks;kchu] dikl] pkoy] vjgj rFkk pus dh Qlyksa esa e'k%
39-17] 38-68] 15-23] 10-96 vkSj 12-47 yk[k gs- {ks= esa Qly
uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj&lsok ifj;kstuk kWilSi
pykbZ tk jgh Fkh ftlesa laLFkku us vkbZlhVh vkkkfjr uk'khtho
fuxjkuh ds :i esa viuh lsok,a miyCk djkdj jkT; f"k
foHkkx dh lgk;rk dhA o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku iwjs egkjk"V esa
vi
ANNUAL
ANNUAL REPORT
REPORT20132014
20132014
greatly affected microbial population in soil and water

quality. The post-crop samples showed enhanced levels
of micro and macro nutrients, organic carbon content;
increase in natural enemy count resulting in reduction
of pest population besides increase in yield and B:C
ratio as compared to farmers practice.
A standalone window-based application (16MB)
Diagnosis & Sampling for Rice Pest Surveillance has
been developed in Dot Net Framework 4.0 using
Windows 7 operating system.
To enable increase pulse productivity by reducing
yield losses caused by pests, Accelerated Pulse
Production Programme (A3P) was implemented across
crops of pigeon pea, chick pea, lentil, green gram and
urd bean covering six major pulse growing states on
16443.62 ha in farmers participatory mode. Nuclear
IPM villages (173) were developed to validate and
demonstrate working and effectiveness of different IPM
strategies. Reduction in pest incidence, lesser use of
chemical pesticides, less number of sprays and higher
yields in A3P fields were observed as compared to nonA3P farmers. Based on the real-time population of the
pest and their interpretation, advisories in local
languages were sent to IPM farmers for taking
appropriate measures.
Studies on the integrated management of
Phytophthora blight in pigeonpea at three locations
(Jharkhand, Maharashtra and Karnataka) indicated the
combination of Trichoderma viride (soil and seed
treatment) and garlic bulb extract (seed treatment and
foliar spray) to be very effective and comparable with
the use of conventional chemical fungicides.
Crop Pest Surveillance and Advisory Project
(CROPSAP) operated by the State Department of
Agriculture, Maharashtra across 33 districts, 348 talukas
and 43000 villages of Maharashtra in 39.17, 38.68, 15.23,
10.96 and 12.47 lakh ha in soybean, cotton, rice, pigeon
pea and chickpea crops during 2013-14 was facilitated
with ICT-based pest monitoring. Pest scenario on
soybean depicted Spodoptera litura, semilooper and
girdle beetle crossed ETL 40, 41 and 21 occasssions,
respectively across Maharashtra during 2013. On
cotton, severity of pest infestation was of the order
lks;kchu esa LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk uk'khtho ik;k x;kA ,lfyVwjk] vkZd.q Myd lsehywij rFkk es[kyk Hk`x
a xzhMy chVy
us e'k% 40] 41 rFkk 21 ekSdksa ij bZVh,y dks ikj dj fy;k
FkkA dikl esa uk'khtho lae.k dh rhozrk vkjksgh e esa bl
izdkj Fkh % tSflM >ikh ykyiu >lQsn eD[kh > dk"BdhVA
iwjs jkT; esa pkoy ij uk'khtho dh fLFkfr vkjksgh e esa bl
izdkj Fkh % ihyk ruk cskd > thok.kqt ikh vaxekjh >
ikni ekgw > xky fet > ikh eksMd
+ > izLQqVuA egkjk"V
esa vjgj dk mRiknu djus okys ikap ize[q k {ks=ksa esa Qyh
uqdlku vkjksgh e esa bl izdkj Fkk % ykrqj > ukxiqj >
vejkorh > vkSjkaxkckn > ukfld ds [kaMA pus esa jch ds
nkSjku gSyhdksoikZ vkfeZtjs k uk'khtho ik;k x;k tkss uoEcj ls
Qjojh ekg rd ekStnw ik;k x;kA fofHkUu uk'khthoksa ds
bZVh,y ds vkkkj ij] lks;kchu] dikl] pkoy] vjgj rFkk pus
dh Qlyksa ds lac/a k esa ,l,e,l ds ek;e ls fdlkuksa dks
e'k% 15170] 24846] 20959] 13364 rFkk 10759 uk'khtho
izca ku laca kh lykgdkj lsok,a Hksth xbA
ljlksa ds laca k esa gfj;k.kk ds xqMx
+ kao] esokr] fjokM+h rFkk
eksfgUnzx<+ ftyksa vkSj jktLFkku ds vyoj] t;iqj] nkSlk rFkk
Hkjriqj ftyksa ds fofHkUu xkaoksa esa vk;ksftr iz{ks= losZ{k.kksa ls
;g tkudkjh izkIr gqbZ gS fd ljlksa dh [ksrh ds fy,
LDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksfl;ksje ,d xaHkhj [krjk gS] tcfd gkWVLikWV
dk izdksi ,oa rhozrk e'k% 80% rFkk 4-0 xzM
s ikbZ xbZA
gfj;k.kk ds esokr vkSj eksfgUnzx<+ ftyksa esa rFkk jktLFkku ds
vyoj ftys esa 40 gs-s {ks= esa ljlks&
a rksfj;k esa vkbZih,e ds
oSkhdj.k esa ;g iqf"V gqbZ fd fdlkuksa dh fofk ls dh tk jgh
[ksrh dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e fofk viukus okys fdlkuksa ds
[ksrksa esa LDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksfV;ksje dk de jksx izdksi ik;k
x;kA
dikl ds laca k esa vkB jkT;ksa ds varxZr 266 xkaoksa esa
1372 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey djrs gq, 1062 fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa
bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj&lsok laca kh dk;Z fd,
x,A 12 ftyksa esa lokZfkd 218 laons u'khy LFkkuksa gkWV
LikWV ij ekgw@gksij uk'khtho ik, x,A vdksyk rFkk isjecywj
esa e'k% nks vkSj ikap ekSdksa ij fejhM cx dks bZVh,y ikj djrs
ik;k x;kA jksxksa es]a vYVjusfj;k ikh vaxekjh ds laca k esa
lokZfkd laons u'khy LFkku ntZ fd, x,A vkfFkZd izHkko
fo'ys"k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd vkbZih,e viukus okys fdlkuksa
ds [ksrksa esa jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa esa dkQh deh
4-27 fNM+dko vkbZ gS] gkykafd fdlkuksa dh fofk okys [ksrksa
esa fNM+dko dkQh T;knk 7-34 fd, tk jgs FksA
los{Z k.k ds v;;uksa ls ;g irk pyk fd vfkdrj LFkkuksa
ij lQsn eD[kh 5 ls 20 fuEQ@O;Ld izfr ikh dk vkxeu
ns[kk x;kA mkj {ks= esa xSj&chVh dikl esa dqN LFkkuksa ij
ysfiMksIVsju uk'khtho LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk] bfj;sl foVsyk rFkk
jassids> leaf reddening > whiteflies >thrips. Pest

status across the state on rice followed the order of
yellow stem borer>bacterial leaf blight>plant
hoppers> gall midge > leaf folder > blast. Among
the five major pigeon pea growing regions of
Maharashtra, the pod damage was of the order
Latur>Nagpur> Amravati>Aurangabad>Nasik
divisions. Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea during rabi
attained pest status from November till February.
Dissemination of pest management advisories through
SMS based on ETL for different pests of soybean,
cotton, rice, pigeonpea and chickpea were 15170, 24846,
20959, 13364 and 10759, respectively.
In mustard, field survey conducted in different
villages of Gurgaon, Mewat, Rewari and Mohindergarh
districts of Haryana and Alwar, Jaipur, Dausa and
Bharatpur districts of Rajasthan revealed Sclerotinia
sclerotiorum to be a serious threat to the its cultivation,
and hot spots had disease incidence and severity up to
80% and 4.0 grade, respectively. IPM validated in
rapeseed-mustard across 40 ha in Mewat and
Mohindergarh districts of Haryana and Alwar district
of Rajasthan indicated lower mean disease incidence in
IPM plots over farmers practices.
In cotton, e-pest surveillance and advisory activities
were carried out in 1062 fields of 1372 farmers covering
266 villages in eight states. Hoppers indicated highest
hot spots i.e., 218 from 12 districts. Mirid bug was
found to cross economic threshold level (ETL) on two
and five occasions at Akola and Perambalur,
respectively. Among the diseases, the Alternaria leaf
blight recorded highest hot spots. Economic impact
analysis indicated significant reduction in the number
of chemical pesticide sprays to 4.27 in IPM plots from
7.34 in FP. Survey studies indicated occurrence of
whitefly at most of the places (5 to 20 nymphs/ adults
per leaf). Lepidopteran pests (Spodoptera litura, Earias
vittella and Pectinophora gossipiella) were recorded at
few locations in non-Bt cotton. Mealy bug and leaf
reddening was recorded at some locations. In south
zone, mirid bugs and white fly were observed as major
pests. Analysis of the dynamics of sap feeders across
seasons and locations of the North zone indicated the
peak population levels to be the determinant of the
izfros
2013&14
okf"kZokf"kZ
d dizfros
nunu 2013&14
vii
NCIPM
isDVhuksQksjk xksflfi;syk fjdkWMZ fd, x,A dqN LFkkuksa ij
feyh cx rFkk ikh ykyiu Hkh ns[kk x;kA nf{k.k {ks= es]a
fejhM cx rFkk lQsn eD[kh ize[q k uk'khtho ds :i esa ik,
x,A mkj {ks= ds lHkh LFkkuksa esa rFkk iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku jl
pwlus okys dhV dh lf;rkvksa o xfrfd;ksa ds fo'ys"k.k esa ;g
mYys[k fd;k x;k gS fd fdlh Hkh jl pwlus okys dhV dh
fLFkfr dks tkuus ds fy, mldh lokZfkd lef"V Kkr gksuk
t:jh gS] rHkh mldh fLFkfr dk lgh vkdyu fd;k tk ldrk
gSA v;;u esa jl pwlus okys dhV dh lef"V lhfer ikbZ xbZA
dikl esa tSflM vejkLdk fMoklVsl
a ] dk"BdhV fFkzIl
Vscl
s kb rFkk fejhM cx dSEihyksek fyfoMk ds fy, ekSle
vkkkfjr iwokZueq ku fu;e cukus ds fy, fgLVksfjdy MkVk lsV
2001&08 dk mi;ksx fd;k x;k] ftUgsa Lora= MkVk lsV
2009&13 ds lkFk oSkhr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj ftldh ikap
o"kks ds fy, mDr uk'khthoksa ds laca k esa vkSlr iwokZueq ku
lVhdrk e'k% 89] 97 vkSj 93-2% FkhA ukxiqj ds fy,
fodflr fd, x, ekSle vkkkfjr iwokZueq ku fu;eks]a ftudh
vU; dsUnzh; {ks= LFkkuksa ij tkap dh xbZ ftlds vk/kkj ij
tSflM [r =-0.86** (P<0.01)] rFkk dk"BdhV [r =-0.87**
(P<0.01)] nksuksa dh lef"V;ksa ij fd;k x;k iwokZue
q ku dkQh
lgh o LVhd ik;k x;k] ftlls ,dy LFkkuksa ds fy, ekSle
vkkkfjr fu;e cukus dh vko';drk dk ladrs feyrk gSA
mkj Hkkjr ds dikl mRiknd {ks=ksa esa pwld dhVksa dk ifjn`';
vyx&vyx ik;k x;kA yqfk;kuk esa tSflM rFkk mlds ckn
lQsn eD[kh dh lef"V vfkd Fkh] fglkj esa dk"BdhVksa dh
lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZA Jhxaxkuxj esa dk"BdhV ,oa lQsn
eD[kh dh lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZA mkj {ks= ds dikl mRiknu
okys LFkkuksa ds fy, ,- fMoklVsl
a ] Vh- Vscl
s kb rFkk csfefl;k
Vscl
s kb ds laca k esa iwokZueq ku vofk;ka 25&30] 27&36 rFkk
27&40 ekSle foKku ekud lIrkg ,l,eMCY;w ds :i esa
fukkZfjr dh xbA
[kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku 25 fj;y Vkbe iSLV MkbukfeDl
vkjVhihMh dsUnzksa [pkoy 7( vjgj 7( ewaxQyh 5 rFkk
VekVj 7] ij rFkk jch ds nkSjku 17 dsUnzksa ij uk'khtho dh
xfrfofk;ksa ij rFkk ekSle lacakh MkVk ,d= fd;k x;k vkSj
mls jklukizds ds loZj ds MkVkcsl esa viyksM fd;k x;k]
ftlesa 24 7 osc&vkkkfjr fjiksfVx ds fy, lqfokk miyCk
gSAa gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtjs k ds laca k esa lkIrkfgd MkVk vfHkxzfgr
djus ds fy, rhu Qlyksa] vFkkZr vjgj] ewaxQyh rFkk VekVj
ds fy, Qsjkseksu VSi dSp ekWM~;wy dks DykbaV lkWVos;j ls
tksM+k x;k ftlesa osc&vkkkfjr fjiksfVx ds fy, lqfokk
miyCk gSaA
yqfq k;kuk iatkc esa iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku pkoy ij ikh
eksMd
+ ds lae.k dh rhozrk ikbZ xbZA xqycxkZ dukZVd esa
vjgj ij gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtjs k dk izdksi de ns[kk x;k
tcfd ek#dk foVjkVk dk lae.k vfkd ik;k x;kA ,l- dsviii
ANNUAL
ANNUAL REPORT
REPORT20132014
20132014
pest status of any given sap feeder.

Weather-based prediction rules for jassids (Amrasca
devastans), thrips (Thrips tabaci) and mirids
(Campylomma livida) in cotton were developed using
historical data sets (2001-2008), which were validated
with independent data sets (2009 -2013) that yielded
mean prediction accuracy of 89, 97 and 93.2%,
respectively, over five years. Weather-based prediction
rules developed for Nagpur and tested across other
Central zone locations indicated significantly greater
prediction accuracies at lower populations of both
jassids [r =-0.86** (P<0.01)] and thrips [r =-0.87**
(P<0.01)] and vice versa indicating the need for finetuning of weather-based rules for individual locations.
Jassids followed by white flies at Ludhiana, increasing
thrips at Hisar, higher thrips and whiteflies at
Sriganganagar and importance of jassids as pest provided
the scenario of sap feeders in the Northern cotton
growing zone. The prediction periods in respect of A.
devastans, T. tabaci and Bemisia tabaci were deduced
as 25-30, 27-36 and 27-40 standard meteorological weeks
(SMWs) for North zone cotton growing locations.
Twenty-five real time pest dynamics (RTPD)
centers [Rice (7); Pigeonpea (7); Groundnut (5) &
Tomato (7)] during kharif 2013 and 17 during rabi
carried out the activities of pest and weather data
collection vis--vis entry and uploads to the database
of NCIPM server that supported 24x7 web-enabled
reporting system. Pheromone trap catch module for
the three crops viz., pigeonpea, groundnut and tomato
to capture week-wise data of Helicoverpa armigera and
Spodoptera litura was incorporated into client software
with simultaneous updating of the web-enabled
reporting system.
Severity of infestation of leaf folder on rice was
noted throughout the season at Ludhiana (PB). Reduced
incidence of Helicoverpa armigera on pigeonpea with
increased infestation of Maruca vitrata at Gulbarga
(KA) and of Fusarium wilt at S.K. Nagar (GJ) was also
observed. Outbreak of red hairy caterpillar for the
second successive kharif season was observed on
groundnut at Vridhachalam (TN). Early blight of
tomato dominated at Moinabad (AP) and Bengaluru
(KA), leaf curl virus at Rahuri (MH) and bacterial leaf
uxj xqtjkr esa ;qlfs j;e eqj>ku ikbZ xbZA o`)kpye

rfeyukMq esa yxkrkj nwljs [kjhQ ekSle esa yky ckyksa okys
dSVjfiyj bYyh dk izdksi ns[kk x;kA [kjhQ ds nkSjku
eksbuZ kckn vkakz izn's k rFkk csx
a yq# dukZVd esa VekVj ij
vxsrh vaxekjh] jkgwjh egkjk"V esa ikh dap
q u lae.k rFkk
eksbuZ kckn vkSj jkgwjh esa thok.kqt ikh kCck jksx ik;k x;kA
[kjhQ rFkk jch] nksuksa ekSleksa esa lHkh LFkkuksa ij vFkkZr jkgwjh
egkjk"V > csx
a yq# dukZVd > eksbZukckn vkakz izn's k esa
VekVj esa ikh eksMd
+ jksx lkekU; ik;k x;kA
[kjhQ rFkk jch ekSleksa ds nkSjku dkfnjh esa LiksMksIVsjk
fyVwjk ds fy, ihyk ruk cskd okbZ,lch ds lkFk&lkFk
ekSle pjks]a g~;fq jfLVd ekSle vkkkfjr fMlht+u Vh csLM
DyklhfQds'ku fu;e fodflr fd, x,A blh izdkj] ,lfyVwjk la[;k@ Qank@lIrkg ds iwokZueq ku ds fy, vfkdre
rhozrk vofk 34 ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku vkWfMZuy ykWftfLVd
ekWMy( vnqFkqjbZ rfeyukMq] fpulqjk if'pe caxky] djtr
egkjk"V] jk;iqj Nkhlx<+ rFkk ekaM;k dukZVd esa ykbV
VSi eksFk idM+ ds vkkkj ij ihyk ruk cskd ds iwokZueq ku ds
fy, vkuqHkfod ekWMy rFkk vnqFkqjbZ esa ikh eksMd
+ ds fy,
fMlht+u Vh csLM DyklhfQds'ku fu;e fodflr fd, x, vkSj
mudk oSkhdj.k fd;k x;kA pkoy ds pkj uk'khthoksa ihyk
ruk cskd] xky fet] dsl okWeZ rFkk gjk ikk ekgq ds
iwokZueq ku ds fy, ekSle vkkkfjr ekWMy rFkk ewx
a Qyh esa
lkIrkfgd ,oa ikf{kd varjkyksa ij ,l- fyVwjk dh vfkdre
lef"V ds iwokZueq ku ds fy, vkuqHkfod ,oa f=e U;qjy
usVodZ ekWMyksa dk oSkhdj.k fd;k x;kA
yxkrkj fofHkUu fdLeksa dh lfCt;ksa dh [ksrh djus rFkk
jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa dk vfkd iz;ksx fd, tkus ds dkj.k
gfj;k.kk ds djuky rFkk lksuhir ftyksa ds lkr xkaoksa esa 72
gs-s esa I;kt] VekVj rFkk f'keyk fepZ ij vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh
dk oSkhdj.k] ijh{k.k rFkk izlkj fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxdh
ds oSkhdj.k esa dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa dh la[;k esa deh]
mit esa o`f) dh iqf"V gqbZ vkSj i;kZoj.k vuqdy
w dhVuk'kdksa
dk iz;ksx djus ls izkfrd 'k=qvksa dh lef"V esa Hkh o`f) ns[kh
xbZA blds ifj.kkeLo:i] fdlkuksa esa vkbZih,e rFkk tSfod
dhVuk'kdksa ds ckjs esa tkx:drk Hkh dkQh c<+hA
iwlk ifjlj] ubZ fnYyh rFkk f"k foKku dsUnz] yksgk?kkV]
pEikor] mkjk[kaM esa gfjrx`g f'keyk fepZ] [khjk rFkk VekVj
ij vkbZih,e ds oSkhdj.k ds fy, ijh{k.k fd, x,A ijh{k.k
ds ifj.kkeksa esa f'keyk fepZ ds lac/a k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd
xSj&vkbZih,e dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa pwld uk'khthoks]a
vFkkZr ekgw vkSj pwf.kZy QQwna esa Hkkjh fxjkoV e'k% 17-8 ls
3-5% vkSj 63-3 ls 26-2% dh jst
a esa ns[kh xbZA VekVj vkSj
[khjs ds fy, ekgw] pwf.kZy QQwna rFkk ekstd
+s ok;jl dkWEiysDl
ds izca ku ds fy, leku fofk viukbZ xbZ vkSj leku ifj.kke
spot at Moinabad (AP) and Rahuri (MH) during kharif.

Leaf miner was common on tomato across all locations
viz. Rahuri (MH)> Bengaluru (KA) >Moinabad (AP)
during kharif as well as rabi seasons.
Decision tree based classification rules for yellow
stem borer (YSB) vis--vis weather variables, heuristic
weather-based rule for Spodoptera litura at Kadiri,
ordinal logistic model predicting S. litura (nos./trap/
week) during maximum severity period (34 SMW),
empirical models for forewarning yellow stem borer
based on light trap moth catches for Aduthurai (TN),
Chinsura (WB), Karjat (MH), Raipur (CG) and for
Mandya (KA) and of leaf folder at Aduthurai for kharif
and rabi were developed and validated. Weather-based
models for prediction of four rice pests (yellow stem
borer, gall midge, case worm and green leaf hopper),
and S. litura on groundnut at weekly and fortnightly
intervals, empirical and artificial neural network models
predicting maximum population of S. litura were
validated.
Due to increased use of chemical pesticides resulting
from continuous cultivation of different vegetables,
IPM technology was validated, demonstrated and
disseminated in seven villages in Karnal and Sonepat
Districts, Haryana in onion, tomato and bell pepper
covering more than 72 ha. Validation of IPM technology
resulted in reduction in number of sprays, increase in
yields, use of eco-safe pesticides and increase in
population of natural enemies apart from increase in
awareness and knowledge about IPM and bio pesticides
among the farmers.
Trials on IPM validation for greenhouse capsicum,
cucumber and tomato conducted at Pusa campus, New
Delhi and KVK, Lohaghat, Champawat, Uttarakhand
revealed considerable reduction in sucking pests ranging
from 17.8 to 3.5% of aphids and 63.3 to 26.2% of
powdery mildew in capsicum as compared to non-IPM.
Similar levels of management of aphids, powdery
mildew and mosaic virus complex was also achieved in
tomato and cucumber. Besides, there was increase in
yield from 1.9 to 2.8 t/1000 sq.m in cucumber, 2.2 to
3.1 t in capsicum and 12.2 to 15.0 t in tomato in IPM as
compared to non-IPM.
izfros
2013&14
okf"kZokf"kZ
d dizfros
nunu 2013&14
ix
NCIPM
izkIr fd, x,A blds vfrfjDr] xSj vkbZih,e dh rqyuk esa
vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa [khjs dh mit esa 1-9 ls 2-8 fDoa- izfr
1000 oxZ eh- {ks=] f'keyk fepZ dh mit esa 2-2 ls 3-1 Vu rFkk
VekVj dh mit esa 12-2 ls 15-0 Vu dh o`f) ns[kh xbZA
nf{k.kh xqtjkr esa vke ds jksi.k 8 gs- ds fy, tSfod
dhVuk'kdks]a ;kaf=d fofk;ks]a m|ku LoPNrk rFkk de tksf[ke
okys jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa dk foosdiw.kZ ,oa vko';drkuqlkj
iz;ksx ds vkkkj ij LFkku&fof'k"V vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w dk
dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;k] ftlls ikni laj{k.k ykxr esa deh
ykus] uk'khtho izdksi dks de djus rFkk mPp vkfFkZd ykHk
izkIr djus esa lgk;rk feyhA vke] vukj rFkk dsys ds fy,
egkjk"V ds ukS ftyksa esa 184]643 gs- {ks= esa lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh
vkkkfjr uk'khtho fuxjkuh iz.kkyh dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;kA
uk'khthoksa }kjk igap
q k, x, uqdlku ds Lrj ds vkkkj ij
fdlkuksa dks le; ij mfpr mik; djus ds fy, ,l,e,l ds
ek;e ls lykgdkj&lsok,a nh xbA
laLFkku us ykbV VSi QkWj esufs tax bUlSDV~l izkS|ksfxdh
dk vkfo"dkj fd;k gS vkSj blds varjjk"Vh; isVVas ds fy,
laLFkku us rhu ns'kks]a vFkkZr vkLVfs y;k] baMksufs 'k;k vkSj fo;ruke
esa vkosnu fd;k gSA laLFkku us [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vh;
jktkkuh {ks= fnYyh esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa iwlk
cklerh 1121 fdLea] VekVj rFkk dan o xksHkh dh Qlyksa esa
mi;qDZ r u;s vkfo"dkfjr uk'khdhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dk
oSkhdj.k fd;k gSA puk dkuiqj] mkj izn's k ds utnhd vkSj
xUus eqM
a koj] ftyk eqTtQjuxj] mkj izn's k dh Qlyksa ij
bl izkS|ksfxdh dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;k gSA
ANNUAL
ANNUAL REPORT
REPORT20132014
20132014
Site-specific IPM module comprising application

of bio-pesticides, mechanical methods, orchard
sanitation, judicious and need-based application of
chemical pesticides with reduced risk was implemented
on mango plantation in Southern Gujarat (8 ha) that
helped in reduction in cost of plant protection, lower
pest incidence that also resulted in higher economic
returns. Information technology based pest surveillance
system was implemented in nine districts of
Maharashtra for mango, pomegranate and banana
covering 184643 ha. Based on the extent of damage due
to pests, advisories were issued through SMS for timely
action on part of farmers.
The International Patent application for the
invention, Light trap for managing insects has been
filed in three countries viz., Australia, Indonesia and
Vietnam. The newly invented insect light trap was
validated in cv. Pusa Basmati 1121 of paddy, tomato,
cabbage crops in NCR Delhi during kharif season of
2013 in farmers participatory mode. The technology
has also been demonstrated on Chickpea (near Kanpur,
U.P.) and Sugarcane (village Mundvar, Distt.
Muzaffarnagar, U.P) crops.
izfros
2013&14
okf"kZokf"kZ
d dizfros
nunu 2013&14
xi
NCIPM
xii
fo"k;&lwph
Contents
izkDdFku
Preface
iii
fof'k"V lkjka'k
Executive Summary
ifjp;
Introduction
laxBukRed xBu
Organogram
Pkkoy
Rice
dikl
Cotton
13
nygu
Pulses
19
frygu
Oilseeds
29
ckxokuh Qlysa
Horticultural Crops
34
tSfod fu;a=.k
Biocontrol
48
lwpuk izk|
+s kSfxdh] uk'khtho iwokZuqeku ,oa fu.kZ; lgk;d iz.kkyh
Information Technology, Pest Forecasting and Decision Support System
10
lkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.k

Socio-Economic Issues and Impact Analysis
11
72
vU; vuqla kkfud xfrfofk;ka

Other Research Activities
12
76
ekuo lalkku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.k

Human Resource Development and Transfer of IPM Technologies
13
lqfokk,a vkSj ?kVuke
14
jktHkk"kk
79
Facilities and Events
84
Rajbhasha
15
90
vuqla kkfud ifj;kstuk,a

Research Projects
16
93
izdk'ku
Publications
17
101
lsfeukj] laxksBh] izf'k{k.k ,oa iqjLdkj

Seminars, Conferences, Trainings and Awards
18
108
dkfeZd
Personnel
19
111
ctV
Budget
20
54
114
y?kq:i
Abbreviations
115
xiii
NCIPM
xiv
ifjp;
Introduction
Qlyksa esa uk'khtho lef"V dks vkfFkZd gkfu Lrj bZVh,y

ls de djus ds fy, viukbZ tkus okyh mi;qDr j.kuhfr;ksa esa
lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku vkbZih,e dk vge LFkku gS tks
,d foKku vkkkfjr fofk gS vkSj vkfFkZd :i ls de [kphZyh
gS rFkk i;kZoj.k ds vuqdy
w Hkh gSA jklukizds dk fdlku
vkkkfjr rFkk O;kid Kku vk/kkfjr vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dks
fodflr djus dk ize[q k ms'; uk'khthoksa ds izkfrd 'k=qvksa
dh o`f) djuk rFkk mlds lkFk&lkFk NksVs ,oa lhekar fdlkuksa
dh vkfFkZd fLFkfr dks ;ku esa j[krs gq, de ykxr okys f"k
izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa ds fodflr djuk gS rkfd jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa
ds iz;ksx dh fuHkZjrk dks de fd;k tk ldsA orZeku le; es]a
vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dks fdlkuksa dks miyCk djkus ds fy,
mfpr dk;Zuhfr;ka ,oa dk;Zfofk;ka cukus dh vR;Ur vko';drk
gSA
jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku dsUnz jklukizds Hkkjrh;
f"k vuqla kku ifj"kn~ ds laLFkkuks]a vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor
vuqla kku ifj;kstukvksa ,vkbZlhvkjih] jkT; f"k fo'ofo|ky;ksa
rFkk jkT; f"k ,oa ckxokuh foHkkxksa ds ijLij ,d vareq[Z k ds
:i esa dk;Zjr gS vkSj ;g dsUnz vusd f"k ,oa ckxokuh Qlyksa
ds fy, mi;ksxh ,oa izHkkoh dk;Zuhfr;ka cukus] mudks ekU;rk
fnyokus rFkk muds izpkj&izlkj ds fy, ekxZn'kZu nsus esa vge
Hkwfedk fuHkk jgk gS] ftuesa lqkkj ykus ds fy, rFkk tehuh Lrj
ij vkbZih,e dh n`f"V ls tkx:drk ykus ds fy, fpfUgr
fd;k x;k gSA
cklerh rFkk xSj&cklerh pkoy ds fy, ns'k ds fofHkUu
f"k tyok;q {ks=ksa esa fofok Qlyhdj.k iz.kkfy;ksa vkSj fofHkUu
jkT;ks]a vFkkZr mkj izn's k] if'pe caxky] vle] vksfM'kk rFkk
dukZVd ds fy, LFkku fof'k"V vkbZih,e iSdt
s ksa dks fodflr
fd;k x;k vkSj mudk izlkj fd;k x;kA bu iSdt
s ksa dh
lgk;rk ls fdlkuksa dh fofk esa iz;ksx fd, tkus okys 12
jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e
iSdt
s s viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [skrksa esa dsoy 3 jklk;fud
fNM+dko fd, tkrs gSAa dikl esa vkbZih,e rFkk jk"Vh;
uk'khtho izca ku lwpuk iz.kkyh ,uvkbZ,lih,e dk;Zeksa ds
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a scientific

approach to harmonise economically and ecologically
viable strategies to reduce the pest population on crop
below economic threshold level (ETL). The main
motive of developing farmer-based knowledge-intensive
IPM strategies is to enhance the natural enemies of pests
with use of low-cost input technologies and reduce
dependence on chemical pesticide keeping the small/
marginal farmers in view. In the present era, there is
need to identify strategies and mechanism for
strengthening the actual transfer of IPM technologies.
The National Centre for Integrated Pest
Management (NCIPM) has been working as an interface
between ICAR institutes, AICRPs, State Agriculture
Universities and field functionaries of State Agricultural
and Horticultural Departments and is providing
directions to develop, validate and disseminate successful
harmonised IPM interventions for number of
agricultural and horticultural crops, which have been
targeted for improved competence and awareness
building in IPM at grassroots.
In basmati and non-basmati rice, development,
dissemination of location-specific IPM packages were
undertaken in different agro-climatic zones of India
covering varied cropping systems and states viz. Uttar
Pradesh, West Bengal, Assam, Odisha and Karnataka.
These packages were able to reduce the chemical
pesticide sprays from 12 to 3 in IPM plots compared
to farmers practices. IPM and National Information
System for Pest Management (NISPM) programmes
in cotton resulted in significant reduction in chemical
pesticide application and increase in the use of bio-
NCIPM
dk;kZUo;u ls jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx esa Hkkjh deh
vkbZ gS vkSj nwljh vksj tSo dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx esa o`f) gqbZ
gSA nygu mRiknu esa Hkh vkbZih,e iz.kkyh ds dk;kZUo;u ds
csgrj ifj.kke ns[ks x, gSAa blds vfrfjDr ewx
a Qyh] ljlks]a
lfCt;ka] tSls VekVj] cSxu] f'keyk fepZ] fepZ] I;kt] Qwy
xksHkh] can xksHkh] [khjk rFkk Qy] fo'ks"k :i ls vke] vukj] vkSj
dsyksa ,oa lajf{kr [ksrh ds vUrxZr mxk;s x;s [khjk rFkk VekVj
dh Qlyksa ij uk'khtho ds izHkko dks de djus esa Hkh vkbZih,e
iSdt
s dkQh izHkkoh ik, x, gSAa vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk
lgh le; ij dk;kZUo;u o vuqdj.k fd, tkus ls fdlkuksa us
Lo;a dh f"k fofk dh rqyuk esa vfkd vkfFkZd ykHk izkIr
fd;k gSA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk vkSj izHkkodkjh cukus ds
fy, laLFkku us vkbZih,e ds ?kVdksa ij xgu ,oa lqlx
a r
ijh{k.k dh O;oLFkk dk izko/kku fd;k gSAa
jklukizds us orZeku okf"kZd izfronsu esa Hkkvuqi ds
Qly vuqla kku laLFkkuks]a jkT; f"k fo'ofo|ky;ks]a vf[ky
Hkkjrh; lefUor vuqla kku ifj;kstukvks]a f"k foKku dsUnzkas
rFkk jkT; f"k ,oa ckxokuh foHkkxksa ds lg;ksx esa dh xbZ
vuqla kkfud xfrfofk;ksa ds izeq[k fcanqvksa ij izdk'k Mkyk gSAa
laLFkku us vuql/a kku ds {ks= esa vusd dk;Z fd, gS]a tSls
vuqla kkfud ijh{k.kksa ds fy, egRoiw.kZ Qlyksa esa vkbZih,e
ekWM;
~ y
w ksa ds fy, de ykxr okys lesfdr Qly izca ku
vkbZlh,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dh igpku djuk] mudk oSkhdj.k
djuk vFkok mUgsa ekU;rk fnyokuk vkSj mudk izkUs u;u djuk(
cnyrs tyok;q ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa uk'khthoksa ds ifjn`'; dk
fo'ys"k.k djuk( vkbZih,e iz.kkyh ds {ks=&okj dojst ds fy,
bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh dk dk;kZUo;u djuk( ize[q k uk'khthoksa
ds fy, iwokZueq ku iz.kkyh fodflr djuk rFkk vkbZih,e iSdt
s ksa
dk izHkko fo'ys"k.k djukA ns'k esa i;kZoj.k ds vuqdy
w Qly
dk laj{k.k djus ds fy, csgrj lsok miyCk djkus dh fn'kk
esa jklukizds lg;ksx] leUo;u rFkk fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk
i)fr ds ek;e ls lesfdr Qly izca ku ij vkSj vf/kd
vuql/a kku djus ds fy, viuh orZeku dk;Z ;kstuk dks lrr
:i ls tkjh j[ksxk rkfd fdlkuksa dh csgrj vkthfodk lqfuf'pr
dh tk ldsA
control agents and botanicals. IPM practices also

showed good promise in pulse production apart from
being effective in reducing pest load on groundnut,
mustard, vegetables like tomato, brinjal, bell pepper,
chilli, onion, cauliflower, cabbage, and fruits
particularly mango, pomegranate and banana as also in
cucumber, tomato under protected cultivation. Timely
IPM interventions proved that farmers received higher
economic returns in comparison to their own practice.
To enable cater to need of constant refinement of
technologies, well directed research trials to prioritise
components in IPM packages has been initiated by the
Centre.
The present annual report is an amalgamation of
highlights of research activities carried out by the
NCIPM in collaboration with crop research institutes
of ICAR and the State Agricultural Universities,
AICRPs, KVKs and state agricultural and horticultural
departments. The efforts include facilitating the proper
identification, validation and promotion of low-cost
Integrated Crop Management (ICM) technologies for
doable IPM modules in important crops,
implementation of e-pest surveillance for an area-wide
coverage of IPM practices, analysis of pest scenario in
the changing climatic conditions, development of
forecast system for key pests, and impact analysis of
IPM technologies. The work plan of NCIPM would
continue to strengthen the research on Integrated Crop
Management through collaboration and coordination
with farmers participatory approach for better quality
of service to the Nation in eco-friendly crop protection
that ensures better livelihood security.
"Let New India arise--out of the peasants'

cottage, grasping the plough; out of the huts of
the fisherman...... Let her emerge from groves
and forests, from hills and mountains."
Swami Vivekananda
NCIPM
pkoy
Rice
fofHkUu pkoy f"k ikfjra=kksa esa LFkku fof'k"V Synthesis and validation of location-specific IPM
vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa dk la'ys"k.k ,oa oSkhdj.k modules in different rice agro-ecosystems
cEckoM (mkj izn's k)
cEckoM ftyk xkSre cq) uxj rFkk mlds vkl&ikl ds
xkaoksa esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk izf;k esa 500 ,dM+ {ks= esa
iwlk cklerh 1121 fdLe pkoy esa yxkrj pkSFks o"kZ vkbZih,e
izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ij ,d oSkhdj.k ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA pkoy ds
ijh{k.k esa ize[q k uk'khthoksa esa ihyk ruk cskd okbZ,lch] ikh
eksMd
+ ] Hkwjk ikni ekgw chih,p] cdkus rFkk izLQqVu 'kkfey
FksA vkbZih,e esa ijh{k.k djus ds fy, 'kkfey dh xbZ dk;Zuhfr;ksa
esa <sp
a k ;k ewx
a dh gjh [kkn] dkcsuZ Msfte 1 xzk- ,-vkbZ- izfr
fdxzkds lkFk cht mipkj L;wMkseksukl yksjksll
as 3-0 1010
lh,Q;w( 5 fe-yh- izfr yhVj ikuh] jklukizds fdLe esa ikS/k
dh tM+ dks Mqcksdj j[kuk] 2&3 ikS/k izfr Vhyk dk jksi.k]
moZjdksa ukbZVkt
s u 60 fdxzk-] QkLQksjl 50 fdxzk-] iksVk'k 40
fdxzkizfr gs- rFkk ftUd lYQsV 25 fdxzkizfr gsdh nj ls
foosdiw.kZ mi;ksx] okbZ,lch fuxjkuh ds fy, Qsjkseksu VSi 5
izfr gs- dk laLFkkiu] edM+h dh o`f) vkSj laj{k.k ds fy, Hkwlh
ds caMyksa dk yxkuk 20 izfr gs-] ,d ckj 100]000 izfr gsdh nj ls Vkbdksxkz ek tSiksfude dk NksMu+ k rFkk jklk;fud
dhVuk'kdksa dk ;Fkkvko';drk vuqlkj iz;ksx tSls dk;Z 'kkfey
Fks chih,p dh vkfFkZd gkfuLrj ds vkkkj ij izHkkfor [ksrksa
esa cqikz Q
s hftu dk ,d fNM+dkoA
fdlkuksa dh f"k fofk;ksa ,Qih esa gjh [kkn rFkk cht
mipkj 'kkfey ugha Fks] ijUrq mudh f"k fofk;ksa esa 7&8
ikSk@izfr Vhyksa dk jksi.k] moZjdksa 220 fd-xzk- ukbZVkt
s u] 40
fd-xzk- QkLQksjl] 0 fd-xzk- iksVk'k izfr gs- dk vfkd iz;ksx
rFkk dhVuk'kd Mhyjksa dh lykg ij jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa
dk 2&4 ckj iz;ksx 'kkfey FksA vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys
fdlkuksa us ftad lYQsV dk Hkh iz;ksx fd;k Fkk] ij mldh
ek=k de FkhA
Bambawad (Uttar Pradesh)

A validation trial on IPM technology in rice was
carried out for the 4th consecutive year in 500 acres
with cv. Pusa Basmati 1121 at Bambawad (District
Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) and adjoining villages in
farmers participatory mode. Yellow stem borer (YSB),
leaf folder, brown plant hopper (BPH), Bakanae and
blast were the major pests. Major IPM interventions
included: green manuring with Sesbania (Dhaincha) or
green gram, seed treatment with carbendazim (1 g a.i.
/kg), seedling root dipping in Pseudomonas fluorescens
(3.0 X 1010 cfu; 5 ml/l of water, NCIPM strain), planting
of 2-3-seedlings/ hill, judicious application of fertilizer
(60 N:50 P:40 K kg / ha) and ZnSO4 @ 25 kg/ha,
installation of pheromone traps (5/ha) for YSB
monitoring, fixing of straw bundles (20/ha) for
augmentation and conservation of spiders, one release
of Trichogramma japonicum @ 100,000/ha and needbased application of chemical pesticides (one spray of
buprofezin in selected fields based on ETL-counts of
BPH).
The farmers practices (FP) involved no green
manuring, no seed treatment, planting of 7-8 seedlings
/hill, higher doses of fertilizer (220 N: 40 P: 0 K kg /
ha), and 2-4 applications of chemical pesticides on the
advice of pesticide dealers. Non-IPM farmers had also
applied zinc sulphate but at lower dosages.
Observations on pest incidence were recorded from
40 IPM fields and 20 FP fields by selecting 20 hills from
five spots @ four hills/spot in each field. Soil analysis
was carried out for microbial and nutrients from IPM
NCIPM
40 vkbZih,e viukus okys rFkk 20 ,Qih viukus okys
[ksrksa ls uk'khtho ds izdksi ij iz{s k.k fd, x, ftlds fy,
izR;sd [ksr esa 20 Vhyksa dks pkj Vhyk izfr LFkku ds fglkc ls ikp
LFkkuks ls p;u fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e rFkk ,Qih [ksrksa ls izkIr
e`nk esa thok.kqvksa ,oa iks"kd rRoksa ds fy, e`nk fo'ys"k.k fd,
x,A dhVuk'kdksa ds vof'k"Vksa dk vkdyu djus ds fy, dVkbZ
ds le; vuktksa ds izfrn'kksaZ uewuksa dk Hkh fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;kA
uk'khtho dk izdksi@izkfrd 'k=qk

ijh{k.k ds ifj.kkeksa esa ,Qih [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e
esa ruk Hksnd] ikh eksMd
+ rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw czkmu IykaV gksij
dk izdksi de ik;k x;k rkfydk 1A edM+h dh la[;k ,Qih
and FP fields. Samples of grains at harvest were also

analyzed for estimating pesticide residues.
Pest incidence /Natural enemies

Lower incidence of yellow stem borer, leaf folder
and brown plant hoper were observed in IPM compared
to and FP fields (Table 1). Spider population was found
to be higher in IPM (1.36/hill) as against FP (1.05/hill).
Among diseases, Bakanae remained the major one in
FP fields with mean incidence of 17.7% while it was
not observed in IPM fields.
rkfydk 1% cEckoM] mkj iznsk esa o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku vkbZih,e ,oa fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih okys pkoy ds [ksrksa
esa uk'khtho dk izdksi ,oa izkfrd 'k=qvksa dk ifjn`';A
Table 1: Scenario of pests and beneficials in IPM and FP fields of Basmati rice at Bambawad, UP during 2013
Ukk'khtho/Pest
vkSlr@Mean
ihyk ruk cskd % xzflr ikS/ks @ Yellow stem borer (% infested tillers)
iRrh eksMd % xzflr ikS/ks @ Leaf folder (% infested leaves)
Hkwjk ikni ekgw l[;k@Vhyk @ BPH (Nos./hill)
edM+h la[;k@Vhyk @ Spider (Nos./hill)
cdkus (% xzflr ikS/ks @ Bakanae (% incidence)
1-05 izfr Vhyk dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e 1-36 izfr Vhyk esa
vfkd ikbZ xbZA jksxksa ds laca k es]a 17-7% ds vkSlr izdksi ds
lkFk fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa ^cdkus* ize[q k jksx ik;k x;k] tcfd
vkbZih,e [ksrksa esa bls ugha ik;k x;kA
e`nk fo'ys"k.k
iks"k.k lacakh fo'ys"k.k
izfrjksi.k ls igys ,d= fd, x, e`nk izfrn'kks uewuksa ds
fo'ys"k.k ls ;g irk pyk fd fdlkuksa dh fofk;ksa dh rqyuk esa
vkbZih,e esa tSfod dkcZu] miyCk ukbVkt
s u (N), QkLQksjl
(P), iksVk'k (K) rFkk ftad (Zn) dh ek=k vfkd FkhA Qly
ekSle ds e; esa flrEcj laxfz gr e`nk izfrn'kks ds fo'ys"k.k esa
;g ik;k x;k fd fdlkuksa dh fofk;ksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa
tSfod dkcZu rFkk ftad dh ek=k vfkd FkhA rFkkfi] fdlkuksa
dh fofk;ksa dh rqyuk es]a vkbZih,e esa ukbVkt
s u] QklQksjl rFkk
iksVkl dh ek=k de ikbZ xbZ D;ksfa d fdlkuksa us viuh fofk;ksa
esa bu iks"kdksa dk vfkd ek=k esa mi;ksx fd;k FkkA
thok.kqt lef"V
izkjaHk esa fdlkuksa dh fofk dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa
vkbZih,e@IPM
,Qih@FP
0.12
0.09
3.56
1.36
0
0.75
0.26
5.21
1.05
17.07
Soil analysis
Nutritional analysis
Analysis of soil samples collected before
transplanting indicated higher level of organic carbon,
available nitrogen, phosphorous, potash and zinc in
IPM as compared to FP. Analysis of soil samples
collected during mid-crop season (September) indicated
higher levels of organic carbon and zinc in IPM as
compared to FP. However, the level of N, P and K
was lower in IPM as compared to FP as higher level of
these nutrients was applied by the farmers in FP.
Microbial population
Count of P. fluorescens was initially higher in IPM
as compared to FP; however, during the mid-crop
season the trend was changed. Total bacteria, fungi,
and Trichoderma counts in September was higher in
IPM as against FP. No definite trend could be observed
in the population of microbials in IPM and FP fields.
pkoy | Rice
L;wMkseksukl Qyksjksll
as dh lef"V vfkd Fkh( rFkkfi Qly
ekSle ds e;karj ds nkSjku fLFkfr cny xbZA flrEcj ekg es]a
fdlkuksa dh fofk dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa dqy cSDVhfj;k]
dod QQwna rFkk VkbdksMekZ vfkd FksA vkbZih,e rFkk
fdlkuksa dh fofk okys [ksrksa esa thok.kqvksa dh lef"V esa dksbZ
fuf'pr izof` k ugha ns[kh xbZA
dhVuk'kd vof'k"Vksa dk fo'ys"k.k

vkbZih,e esa dkcZuMsfte ls cht mipkj ,d egRoiw.kZ
?kVd FkkA Qly dVkbZ ds le; pkoy ds izfrn'kks ds fo'ys"k.k
esa dkcsuZ Msfte fMVsDVscy Lrj 0-03 fdxzkizfr gs- ls de
FkkA pkoy ds ikap laxfz gr izfrn'kks esa ls vkbZih,e ds rhu
izfrn'kks 0-030&0-040 ekbksxzke izfr fdxzk- esa cqizkQ
s hft+u
ik;k x;kA fdlkuksa dh fofk ds laca k es]a 24-6% fdlkuksa us
cqikz Q
s hftu dk mi;ksx fd;k Fkk] tcfd vfkdrj fdlkuksa us
QksjVs vkSj dkjVsi gkbMkDs yksjkbM dk mi;ksx fd;k FkkA
fdlkuksa dh fofk okys lHkh izfrn'kks esa QksjVs fMVsDVscy Lrj
0-02 fdxzkizfr gs- ls de Fkk] tcfd nks izfrn'kks 0-051
vkSj 0-064 ekbksxkz e izfr fdxzk- esa cqikz Q
s hftu ik;k x;kA
lkekftd&vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k
vkbZih,e esa 32-8% fdlkuksa us cqikz Q
s hftu jklk;fud
dhVuk'kd dk dsoy ,d fNM+dko fd;k Fkk D;ksfa d muds
[ksrksa esa chih,p izfr Vhyk 8 O;Ld vFkok uotkr Hkwjk ikni
ekgw vkfFkZd gkfu Lrj ls vfkd gks x;k FkkA blds foijhr]
fdlkuksa dh fofk esa fdlkuksa us 2&4 jklk;fud dhVuk'kd
fNM+dkoksa cqikz Q
s hftu] dkjVsi gkbMkDs yksjkbM] esykfFk;ksu
dk iz;ksx fd;k FkkA fdlkuksa dh fofk dh rqyuk es]a vkbZih,e
ijh{k.k esa ykHk%ykxr ch%lh vuqikr Hkh vfkd Fkk rkfydk 2A
Pesticide residue analysis

Seed treatment with carbendazim was an important
component in IPM. Analysis of rice grain samples at
harvest indicated carbendazim below detectable level
(<0.03 g/kg). Out of five-grain samples collected,
buprofezin was detected in three IPM samples (0.030.04 g/kg). In case of FP, 24.6% farmers had applied
buprofezin whereas phorate and cartap hydrochloride
was applied by most of the farmers. In all the FP
samples, phorate was below detectable level (<0.02 g/
kg), whereas buprofezin was detected in two samples
(0.051 and 0.064 g/kg).
Socio-economic analysis
In IPM only one chemical pesticide spray of
buprofezin was given by 32.8% of farmers as BPH
crossed the ETL (8 adults or nymph/hill) in their plots
against 2-4 chemical pesticide sprays (Buprofezin, cartap
hydrochloride, malathion) in FP. IPM trial also
resulted in higher yield and beneft-cost (B:C) ratio
(Table 2) as compared to FP.
For all the pests that out of earth arise the
earth itself the antidote supplies
Lithica, c. 400 BC
rkfydk 2% cEckoM] mkj izns'k esa o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku vkbZih,e rFkk fdlkuksa dh fofk;ksa okys pkoy ds [ksrksa esa
dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx] mit rFkk vkfFkZd vkadM+ksa dk fo'ys"k.k
Table 2: Pesticide application, yield and economics in IPM and farmers practices (FP) in rice fields at Bambawad, UP
during 2013
pj
Variables
vkbZih,e
fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih
IPM
FP
0-1 spray
2-4 sprays
dqy ykxr (`/gs-)@Total cost (`/ha.)
25480
28740
vkSlr mit fDo-@izfr gs-@Mean yield (q/ha)

dqy ykHk (`/gs-)@Total returns (`/ha.)
34.63
27.69
131594
105222
'kq) ykHk (`/gs-)@Net returns (`/ha.)
106114
76482
ykxr%ykHk vuqikr@Benefit:Cost ratio
5.16
3.66
dhVuk'kd fNM+dko@Pesticide sprays (range)
pkoy dk ewY; `3800@& izfr fDoa- Rate of paddy ` 3800/- per q
NCIPM
[kjhiQ pkoy esa uk'khthoksa] ykHkdkjh thok.kqvksa

rFkk mit ij vkbZih,e ds ,dy ?kVdksa ds ;ksxnku
dk vkdyu
fpulqjk] if'pe caxky
fpulqjk gqxyh] if'pe caxky esa [kjhQ pkoy esa vkPNn
vaxekjh] vkPNn lM+u] thok.kqt ikh vaxekjh] ihyk ruk
Hksnd] ikh eksMd
+ rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw ize[q k uk'khthoksa ds :i
esa ik, x,] tcfd Ogksy
Z eSxkWV] gjh ikh ekgw gksij rFkk Hkwjk
kCck ekgw uk'khtho lkekU; :i esa ik, x,A vkbZih,e ds
,dy ?kVdksa ds ;ksxnku dk vkdyu djus ds fy, [kjhQ
2013 vknzrZ k ds fnuksa esa ds nkSjku pkoy vuqla kku dsUnz
vkjvkj,l] fpulqjk gqxyh esa rhu eq[; IykVks]a nks mi
IykVksa rFkk mi&mi IykVksa ds :i esa N% cht mipkj IykVksa ds
lkFk fLIyV&fLIyV IykV fMtkbu esa Lo.kkZ fdLe ,eVh;w
7029 ij ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA lHkh mipkjksa esa moZjd@
N: P2O5 : K2O :: 80:40:40 cSly ds :i esa iw.kZ :i esa
P2O5+K2O+1/2 N)] igyh VkWi MfS lax ds fy, 1/4 ukbVkt
s u
s u dk iz;ksx
rFkk nwljh VkWi MSflax ds fy, 'ks"k (1/4) ukbVkt
fd;k x;kA e`nk esa gjh [kkn feykus rFkk izfrjksi.k ls igys
ukbVkt
s u] QkLQksjl rFkk iksVk'k dh fLFkfr dk vkdyu
fd;k x;kA izfrjksi.k ds 20 fnuksa ds i'pkr nl fnuksa ds
varjkyksa ij uk'khthoksa ,oa jksxksa ds MkVk ntZ fd, x,A mi
IykV Lrj ij izfrjksi.k ds 20 fnuksa 20 Mh,Vh ds ckn
jkbuSDlhfij dk ,d ckj iz;ksx fd, tkus ls uk'khtho lae.k
esa Hkkjh deh ns[kh xbZ] tcfd blls igys bl izdkj dk dksbZ
Hkh vuqi;
z ksx ugha fd;k tkrk FkkA vkPNn vaxekjh ds laca k
es]a lslcsfu;k rFkk izfrjksi.k ds ikap fnuksa ds ckn 5 Mh,Vh
izfs VykDyksj ds iz;ksx ds dkj.k bl jksx dk U;wure izdksi ik;k
x;kA fofHkUu mipkjksa es]a vkPNn vaxekjh dk izdksi de ik;k
x;k D;ksfa d mipkj esa daVk y
s dh rqyuk esa tSo&dhVuk'kd
vFkok dkcsuZ Msfte dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k FkkA dkcZsuMsfte 1 xzkizfr fdxzk- cht $ lwMkseksukl yksjksl
a l
as 20 xzkizfr oxZ eh- {ks=
ds e`nk vuqi;z ksx ls dkQh de izdksi ns[kk x;kA Qly dh
dVkbZ ds le; mit laca kh vkadM+kas ls ,slk ladrs feyrk gS fd
izfrjksi.k ds ikap fnuksa ds ckn 5 Mh,Vh gjh [kkn ds LFkku ij
izfs VykDyksj 750 fe-yh- izfr gs-s {ks= ds iz;ksx ls dkQh vfkd
mit izkIr dh tk ldrh gSA
xs#vk] vle
vkjvkj,yvkjvkj,l lhvkjvkjvkbZ] xs#ok] vle esa pkj
mi&mi IykVksa rFkk pkj mi&IykV mipkjksa ds lkFk fLIyV&fLIyV
IykV fMtkbu dk iz;ksx djrs gq, pkoy dh pUnzek fdLe ij
,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA eq[; IykV ds mipkj esa izfrjksi.k ds
8
Estimation of contribution of individual components

of IPM on pests, beneficial organisms and yield
i n kharif rice.
Chinsurah, West Bengal
At Chinsurah (Hooghly, West Bengal) sheath
blight, sheath rot, bacterial leaf blight, yellow stem
borer, leaf folder and brown plant hopper are the
major pests in kharif rice whereas whorl maggot, green
leaf hopper, brown spot are the minor pests. An
experiment was conducted at the Rice Research Station
(RRS), Chinsurah (Hooghly) during kharif (wet), 2013
with cv. Swarna (MTU 7029) variety in split-split plot
design with three main plots, two sub plots and six seed
treatments as sub-sub plots to estimate the contribution
of individual components of IPM. All the treatments
were provided with fertilizer @ N : P2O5 : K2O ::
80:40:40 kg/ha (full P2O5 + full K2O + 1/2th N as
basal, 1/4th N as 1st top dressing and remaining 1/4th N
as 2nd top dressing). Status of N P K in the soil was
estimated before green manuring and transplanting. Observations on insect pests and diseases were
recorded from 20 days after transplanting (DAT)
onwards at ten-day intervals. At sub-plot level, one
application of rynaxypyr 20 DAT provided
significantly lower infestation as compared to no such
application. In case of sheath blight, lowest incidence
was observed in green manuring by Sesbania followed
by pretilachlor application 5 DAT. Among the various
treatments, incidence of sheath blight remained
significantly lower in all the treatments having biopesticide or carbendazim interventions as compared to
check.. Incidence remained lowest in seed treatment with
carbendazim @ 1g a.i./kg seed+soil application of
Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 20g/m2. Significantly higher
yield was observed in application of pretilachlor 750
ml a.i./ha 5 DAT as compared to green manuring.
Gerua, Assam
At RRLRRS (CRRI), Gerua, Assam, an
experimental trial was conducted with cv. Chandrama
of rice in split-split plot design with four sub-sub plot
treatments and four sub-plot treatments. Main plot
treatments included spraying of rynaxypyr @ 50g a.i./
pkoy | Rice
ckn 35 ,oa 120 Mh,Vh rFkk daVk y

s ij jkbuSDlhfij 50 xzkizfr
gs- dk fNM+dko fd;k x;kA
ha at 35 DAT, 120 DAT, both at 35, 120 DAT and

control.
dVd] vksfM'kk
Cuttack, Odisha
IPM validation in rice was conducted at village
Singhamapur in 30 acres with cv. Pooja. In the rice-rice
cropping system, rice variety Pooja was grown under
irrigated conditions in 35 acres. The sowing dates for
nurseries were 05 July and 12 July 2013 and dates of
transplanting were 03 Aug to 10 Aug 2013. The fertilizer
application was N-80, P-40, K-40 in three splits. A
control plot of 5 acre was also maintained. Various IPM
interventions included one application of cartap
hydrochloride (4G) at 30 DAT @ 1 kg a.i./ha, one spray
of carbendazim @ 1 g a.i./l at active tillering stage for
blast and sheath blight affected plots and one spray
before panicle initiation stage for false smut in all IPM
plots and two sprays of plantomycin+ copper
oxychloride in the bacterial blight affected plots at 8day intervals.
fla?keiqj xkao esa 30 ,dM+ {ks= esa pkoy dh iwtk fdLe

esa vkbZih,e iz.kkyh dk oSkhdj.k fd;k x;kA pkoy Qlyhdj.k
i)fr esa flafpr fLFkfr;ksa ds varxZr 35 ,dM+ {ks= esa pkoy dh
iwtk fdLe dh [ksrh dh xbZA ikS/k'kkykvksa ds fy, cqokbZ 05
tqykbZ vkSj 12 tqykbZ 2013 dks dh xbZ vkSj 03 vxLr ls 10
vxLr] 2013 rd izfrjksi.k fd;k x;kA moZjdksa dk iz;ksx
ukbVkt
s u (N)-80, QkLQksjl (P)-40, iksVk'k (K) -40 rhu fLifyV
ek=kvksa esa fd;k x;kA ,d 5 ,dM+ dk daVky
s IykWV Hkh
vuqjf{kr fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e dh fofHkUu dk;Zuhfr;ksa esa
jksikbZ ds ckn 30 fnuksa esa dkjVsi gkbMkDs yksjkbM 4th 1
fdxzkizfr gs- dk ,d fNM+dko( izLQqVu ds fy, lf; tqrkbZ
voLFkk ij rFkk vkPNn vaxekjh ls izHkkfor IykVksa esa dkcsuZ Msfte
1 xzkizfr yhVj dk ,d fNM+dko vkSj lHkh vkbZih,e IykVksa
esa vkHkklh daM QkYl LeV ds fy, kku dh ckyh f[kyus ls
igys ,d fNM+dko rFkk 8 fnuksa ds varjkyksa ij thok.kqt
vaxekjh ls izHkkfor IykVksa esa IykaVksekblhu $ dkWij
vkWDlhDyksjkbM ds nks fNM+dko 'kkfey FksA
fdlkuksa dh fofk esa ihyk ruk Hksnd okbZ,lch dk
lae.k 6-9% ik;k x;k] tks vkbZih,e esa 1-2% FkkA fdlkuksa
dh fofk esa ikh izLQqVu] vkPNn vaxekjh] ch,ych rFkk
vkHkklh daM QkYl LeV 4-1 ls 10-9% tcfd vkbZih,e es
u ds cjkcj ik;k x;k rkfydk 3A
YSB infestation was 1.2% in IPM as against 6.9%

in FP. Leaf blast, sheath blight, BLB and false smut
were observed in traces in IPM as compared to 4.1 to
10.9% in FP (Table 3).
rkfydk 3% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku fla?keiqj] dVd vksfM'kk esa vkbZih,e vkSj fdlkuksa dh fofk okys pkoy ds [ksrksa esa
uk'khtho dk ifjn`';
Table 3: Pest scenario in IPM and FP rice fields at Singhampur, Cuttack (Odisha) during 2013
uk'khtho
vkbZih,e
Pest
ihyk ruk cskd
(%) / YSB (%)
ikh izLQqVu ikh lae.k

vkPNn vaxekjh
(%) / Leaf blast (leaf infection) (%)
(%) / Sheath blight (%)
Hkwjk ikni ekgw (%) / BPH (%)

QkYl LeV (%) / False smut (%)
Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k esa fdlkuksa dh fofk dh

rqyuk esa vkbZih,e viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa ` 16]196
izfr gs- dk 'kq) ykHk izkIr fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e esa ykHk %
ykxr vuqikr 3-1 Fkk] tcfd fdlkuksa dh fofk dh rqyuk esa
;g 2-63 Fkk rkfydk 4A
IPM
FP
1.2
6.9 (3-8 %)
Trace
4.1 (3-5 %)
Trace
5.8 (4- 10 %)
Trace
8.9 (15-20 %)
Trace
10.9 (15-20%)
Socio-economic analysis indicated a net benefit of

` 16, 196 /ha in the IPM fields over FP. B: C ratio
remained 3.1 in IPM as against 2.63 in FP (Table 4).
NCIPM
rkfydk 4% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku fla?keiqj] dVd vksfM'kk esa vkbZih,e vkSj fdlkuksa dh fofk okys pkoy ds [ksrksa esa
mit o vkfFkZd vkdM+ksa dk fo'ys"k.k
Table 4: Yield and economics in IPM and farmers' practices (FP) rice fields at Singhamapur during 2013
pj
vkbZih,e
Variables
IPM
FP
dqy ykxr / Total cost

mit fDo- izfr gs- / Yield (q/ha)
20450
16550
49.8
34.1
dqy ykHk ` izfr gs- / Total return (`/ha)
63744
43648
'kq) ykHk ` izfr gs- / Net-return (`/ha)
43294
27098
3.1
2.6
ykHk @ykxr vuqikr / B:C Ratio
lw=kfe ds fy, vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk oSkhdj.k

,oa izkUs u;u
csxa yq#] dukZVd
ds- vkj- iSV] ekaM;k ftys esa 234 ,dM+ {ks= esa yxkrkj
pkSFks o"kZ Hkh lw=fe ds laca k esa lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku ds
oS|hdj.k ijh{k.k fd, x,A bl {ks= esa pkoy lw=fe]
eSyksMhxk;uh xzkfefudksyk] ruk cskd] ikh eksMd
+ ] ikh vaxekjh
rFkk izLQqVu ize[q k uk'khtho ik, x,A ijh{k.k esa dkckZs ;qjkWu
0-3 xzke izfr oxZ eh- dk mipkj rFkk izfrjksi.k ds 40 fnuksa ds
ckn [ksr esa bldk iz;ksx 1-0 fdxzkizfr gs-] ikS/k'kkyk esa
L;wMkseksukl yksjksl
a l
as 20 xzkizfr oxZ eh- vkbZvkbZ,pvkj
fdLe vFkok bfeMkDyksfizM 1 fe-yh- izfr 4 yhVj dk iz;ksx
fd;k x;k dkcksZ ;qjkWu ds lkFk doduk'kd dk dksbZ iz;ksx
ugha fd;k x;kA
ijh{k.kksa esa dh xbZ vU; xfrfofk;ksa esa Qsjkseksu VSiksa ds
}kjk uk'khthoksa dh fujarj fuxjkuh] Vkbdksxesz k tsiksfude dk
[ksrks es NksMu+ k rFkk vko';drkuqlkj ijthO;kHkksa dk vuqi;
z ksx
'kkfey FkkA
ftu ikS/k'kkykvksa esa doduk'kd ,oa dhVuk'kdksa ds vykok
dkcksZ ;qjkWu dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k Fkk] muesa L;wMkseksukl yksjksll
as
ls mipkfjr vkSj daVky
s [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa de la[;k esa xkWy]
izfr ViS vfkd la[;k esa ruk Hksnd O;Ld] de izLQqVu rhozrk]
de 'kq"d ikni rFkk vfkd mit ikbZ xbZA
Validation and promotion of IPM strategies for

nematode
Bengaluru, Karnataka
Trials for integrated pest management for
nematode were carried out for the fourth successive
year in 234 acres at K.R.Pet, Mandya district. Rice rootknot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola, stem borer,
leaf folder, blight and blast were the major pests.
Treatments carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 followed by its
field application @ 1.0 kg a.i./ ha at 40 days after
transplanting, application of Pseudomonas fluorescens
@ 20 g/sq m (IIHR strain) in nursery or imidacloprid
@ 1 ml/4 l were maintained. (No mention of fungicide
use with carbofuran)
Regular monitoring of pests through pheromone
traps, release of Trichogramma japonicum and needbased application of parasitoids were other activities
carried out.
Nursery applied with carbofuran in addition to
fungicide and insecticide recorded less number of galls,
more number of adults per trap, less blast severity and
less dried plants due to stem borer and with more yield
compared to P. fluorescens treated and control fields.
rkfydk 5% o"kZ 2013&14 esa ikS/k'kkyk ds nkSjku tM+&xkaB] xzhok izLQqVu dh rhozrk vkSj uk'khthoksa }kjk fd;k x;k uqdlku
Table 5: Overall severity of root-knot, neck blast and insect damage during nursery 2013-14
mipkj
ikS/k'kkyk esa ,Q,uih@200 lhlh xkWy@izfr 20 ikS/k
Treatment
izLQqVu izdksi (%)
FNP/200 cc in nursery
Galls/20 Seedlings
Blast incidence (%)
dkcksZ;qjkWu + 40 Mh,Vh/Carbofuran nursery + 40 DAT

ih- Qyksjkslsal & ikS/k'kkyk/P. fluorescens -nursery
224
21.55
2.6
285
34.35
2.5
vuqipkfjr daVky
s /Untreated control
418
78.35
2.8
10
pkoy | Rice
L;wMkseksukl yksjksll
as ls mipkfjr ikS/k'kkyk dh rqyuk
esa dkcksZ ;qjkWu ls mipkfjr ikS/k'kkyk rFkk 40 Mh,Vh ij iqu%
dkcksZ ;qjkWu ds mipkj ls lw=fe dh U;wure lef"V] U;wure
xkWy la[;k rFkk izLQqVu izdksi de ntZ fd;k x;kA
Nursery application with carbofuran with another

application at 40 DAT recorded least final nematode
population, least number of galls and less blast incidence
compared to nursery treated with P. fluorescens.
f'keksxk] dukZVd
Shimoga, Karnataka
Trials were undertaken in 32 acres at
Chikadadakatte, Davanagere district of Karnataka. The
treatments viz. nursery bed treatment with carbofuran
@ 0.3g a.i/m2 followed by field application at 40 days
after transplanting (DAT), application of Pseudomonas
fluorescens @ 20 g/m2 of beds, seed treatment with
Trichoderma viride (IIHR strain) @ 4 g/kg of seed and
untreated control were maintained at both the locations.
Regular monitoring of pests through pheromone
traps, release of T. japonicum (PCI strain) and spot
application of fungicides were the other activities carried
out as and when needed. The lowest (13) galls/seedling
due to Meloidogyne graminicola was recorded in
carbofuran-applied nursery, 17 galls in P. fluorescensapplied nursery, 22 galls/seedling in T. viride-treated
nursery compared to 92 galls/seedling in untreated
control. In Shimoga, the root-knot index ranged 3.5
4.5; INP: 465/200 cc soil.
In general, both nursery and 45 DAT application
with carbofuran recorded least nematode population,
less number of galls, less blast severity, also recorded
more yield compared to P.fluorescens treated, and
control fields
dukZVd ds nkokukfxjh ftys esa fpdkMkMkdkVs esa 32

,dM+ {ks= esa ijh{k.k fd, x,A ijh{k.k esa dkcksZ ;qjkWu @0-3
xzkizfr oxZ eh- {ks= ds lkFk ikS/k'kkyk D;kjh mipkj rFkk
izfrjksi.k ds 40 fnuksa ds ckn [ksr vuqiz;ksx( D;kfj;ksa esa
L;wMkseksukl yksjksll
as 20 xzkizfr oxZ eh- {ks= dk vuqi;
z ksx(
VkbdksMekZ fojhMs vkbZvkbZ,pvkj fdLe 4 xzkizfr fdxzk- dk
cht mipkj vkSj vuqipkfjr daVky
s tSls mipkj 'kkfey FksA
ijh{k.k esa ;Fkkvko';drk dh xbZ vU; xfrfofk;ksa esa
Qsjkseksu VSiksa ds }kjk uk'khthoksa dh fu;fer fuxjkuh] Vhtsiksfude ihlhvkbZ fdLe dk foekspu rFkk doduk'kdksa
dk rRdkfyd LikWV vuqi;
z ksx 'kkfey FksA dkcks;
Z jw kWu iz;ksx
dh xbZ ulZjh esa esyksMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk ds dkj.k izfr ikSk
U;wure xkWy 13] L;wMkseksukl yksjksll
as iz;ksx dh xbZ ulZjh
esa 17 xky rFkk Vh- fojhMs iz;ksx dh xbZ ikS/k'kkyk esa izfr ikSk
22 xky ntZ fd, x,] tcfd vuqipkfjr daVky
s esa izfr ikSk
92 xky ntZ fd, x,A f'keksxk es]a tM+&xkaB lwpdkad 3-5&45 dh jst
a esa Fkk( vkbZ,uih% 465@200 lhlh e`nkA
lkekU; :i ls] ulZjh rFkk jksikbZ ds 45 fnuksa ckn
dkckZs ;qjkWu ds vuqiz;ksx] nksuksa esa lw=fe dh U;wure lef"V]
de la[;k esa xky rFkk de izLQqVu rhozrk ikbZ xbZ vkSj ihyksjksll
as ls mipkfjr ,oa daVky
s QhYMksa dh rqyuk esa mit
Hkh vfkd ikbZ xbZA
dY;k.kh] if'pe caxky

24 ijxuk mkj] if'pe caxky ds ehuk vkSj gkcjk xkaoksa
esa lw=fe ij dsfUnzr jgrs gq, pkoy esa lesfdr izca ku dk
oSkhdj.k fd;k x;kA vuqipkfjr daVky
s esa izfrjksi.k ds 7
fnuksa ds ckn ih- Qyksjksll
as 7-5 fdxzkizfr gs- $ xkscj [kkn
375 fdxzkizfr gs- 7 lIrkg ckn dkcksZ ;qjkWu 3 xzkizfr fexzkizfr gs- ds vuqi;
z ksx dh rqyuk dh xbZA mipkj es]a vuqipkfjr
daVky
s dh rqyuk es]a e`nk esa tM+&xkaB lw=fe lef"V ts2 esa
dkQh deh ns[kh xbZA vuqipkfjr daVky
s dh rqyuk esa mijksDr
mipkj ls pkoy dh mit esa 31-3% dh o`f) gqbAZ
Qly dVkbZ ds le;] ihyksjksll
as vkSj dkcksZ ;qjkWu
iz;ksx fd, x, [ksrksa es]a vuqipkfjr daVky
s dh rqyuk es]a
xkfyax rFkk lw=fe dh lef"V dkQh de ikbZ xbZ vkSj kku
dh mit esa dkQh o`f) ns[kh xbZA
Kalyani, West Bengal

Validation of integrated management focusing on
nematode in rice was carried out in villages Mena and
Habra, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal. Application
of P. fluorescens @ 7.5 kg/ha + FYM @ 375 kg/ha at 7
DAT followed by application of carbofuran 3 g @ 1
kg a.i./ha at 4 weeks after transplanting (WAT) was
compared in untreated control. In treatment, root-knot
nematode population (J2) decreased significantly in soil
over untreated control. The treatment also increased
the yield of rice by 31.3% over untreated control.
At harvest, galling as well as nematode population
in the P. fluorescens and carbofuran applied fields were
significantly less in comparison to untreated control
with substantial increase in the paddy yield.
11
NCIPM
rkfydk 6% izfrjksi.k ds i'pkr fVyj la[;k] :V xky vkSj mit dh fLFkfr
Table 6: Tiller number, root gall and yield after transplantation
mipkj
Treatment
izfrjksi.k ds 7 fnuksa ds ckn ih- Qyksjksll

as @7-5 fdxzkizfr gs- $ xkscj [kkn@375 fdxzkizfr gs- 7 lIrkg ckn
dkcksZ;qjkWu@3 xzkizfr fdxzk- ldzh; rRo izfr gs- dk iz;ksx
izHkkoh fVyjksa dh
la[;k izfr Vhyk
xky dh la[;k
izfr 10 Vhyk
,Q,uih@200
lhlh e`nk
mit fDoa@
izfr gs-
No. of effective
Number of galls
FNP/200 cc soil
Yield (q/ha)
tillers/hill
/10 hills
18-22
38
57-174
59.2
11-15
198
196-300
45.1
Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 7.5 kg/ha + FYM

@375 kg/ha at 7 days after transplanting followed
by application of carbofuran 3G @ 1 kg a.i./ha at 4
weeks after transplanting
vuqipkfjr daVky
s @Untreated control
"I really enjoy how rewarding it is to provide peace

of mind to people in a panic by solving their pest
problems."
Jesse Huie, IPM Specialist
12
dikl
Cotton
chVh dikl esa uk'khtho izcaku ds fy, jk"Vh; National Information System for Pest Management
in Bt cotton
lwpuk iz.kkyh
Vh,elh ,e,e&II ds varxZr chVh dikl esa jk"Vh;
uk'khtho izca ku lwpuk iz.kkyh ,uvkbZ,lih,e ifj;kstuk
dk ms'; ize[q k dikl mRiknd {ks=ksa esa chVh dikl esa
uk'khthoksa dh xfrfofk;ksa dh fuxjkuh djuk] jkT; f"k
fo'ofo|ky;ksa ,oa jkT; f"k foHkkxksa dks uk'khthoksa ds fo#)
lykg tkjh djus rFkk chVh dikl esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk
dk;kZUo;u djus ds fy, uk'khthoksa ls lacfa kr lwpuk bdVBk
djuk FkkA ifj;kstuk ds varxZr 13 lg;ksxh iz{ks= dsUnz rFkk
nks fof'k"V dsUnz lfEefyr FksA
bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykg iz.kkyh

bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykg iz.kkyh ds varxZr vkB
jkT;ksa esa 1372 fdlkuksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, 266 xkaoksa esa
dqy 1062 [ksrksa dk los{Z k.k fd;k x;kA lHkh dsUnzkas }kjk nks
LFkk;h rFkk nks xSj fu/kkZfjr [ksrksa ls lkIrkfgd varjkyksa ij
laxfz gr uk'khtho laca kh vkdM+kas dks jklukizds dh osclkbV
ij viyksM fd;k x;kA ikh ykyiu jksx ls vfkdre bZVh,y
ns[kk x;k( ysfdu pwfa d Qly dh ifjiDork ds vkl&ikl dh
vofk esa dsoy ikh ykyiu ,d vke ?kVuke Fkk] blfy,
okLrfod vkfFkZd gkfu T;knk ugha FkhA gksijksa esa mPpre gkWV
LikWV 12 ftyksa ls 218 ns[kk x;kA vdksyk esa nks voljksa ij
rFkk isjecywj esa ikap ekSdksa ij fejhM cx dks bZVh,y ikj djrs
ik;k x;kA jksxksa es]a nks ftyksa esa nks gkWV LikWVksa esa lcls vfkd
vYVjusfj;k ikh vaxekjh rFkk mlds ckn iSjkfoYV ikap
ftyksa esa 22 gkWV LikWV ntZ fd;k x;kA
foLrkj lacakh xfrfofk;ka

chVh dikl esa uk'khtho izca ku dk;Zuhfr;ksa ij fdlkuksa
dh {kerk,a c<+kbZ xb ftlds fy, xkao Lrj ij fdlkuksa dh
lewg cSBa dsa vk;ksftr dh xbZ rFkk ,uvkbZ,lih,e ds dsUnzkas
The project, national information system for pest

management (NISPM) in Bt cotton under TMC MMII was aimed at monitoring pest activities in Bt cotton
in major cotton growing areas, sharing the pest
information with State Agricultural Universities and
State Agricultural Departments to issue the advisories
and implement IPM technology in Bt cotton against
emerging pests. Under the project, there were thirteen
cooperating field centres and two specific centres.
e-pest surveillance and advisory system

Under the e-pest surveillance and advisory system,
a total of 1062 fields were surveyed in 266 villages
covering 1372 farmers in eight states. Pest data collected
at weekly intervals from two fixed and two random
fields was uploaded at NCIPM Website by all Centres
and on-line advisories were issued. Highest ETL was
reflected by leaf reddening; but as the leaf reddening
was a common phenomenon only near crop maturity,
therefore, the actual economic loss was not significant.
Hoppers indicated highest hot spots i.e., 218 from 12
districts. Mirid bug was found to cross ETL on 2
occasions at Akola and 5 occasions at Perambalur.
Among the diseases, the Alternaria leaf blight recorded
highest hot spots in two districts followed by parawilt
(22 hot spots in five districts).
Extension activities
The capabilities of farmers on pest management
strategies in Bt cotton were enhanced through village
level Farmers Group Meetings and Trainings at NISPM
centres. A total of 356 meetings and 72 farmers training
were organized, which were attended by 8796 and 2159
13
NCIPM
esa fdlkuksa dks izf'k{k.k Hkh fn;k x;kA dqy 356 cSBdksa rFkk
72 fdlku izf'k{k.kksa dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k] ftuesa vkbZih,e
ds izlkj ds fy, e'k% 8796 vkSj 2159 fdlkuksa us Hkkx
fy;kA vU; foLrkj xfrfofk;ksa esa 127 lekpkj&i= izdk'ku]
38 jsfM;ks@Vhoh okrkZ,a rFkk 4 iz{ks= fnol lfEefyr FksA
uk'khtho laca kh lwpuk rFkk vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa dks
miyCk djkus gsrq fofHkUu leqnk;ksa vuqlfw pr tkfr & 28041]
vuqlfw pr tutkfr & 12312 rFkk efgyk fdlku & 296 dk
izfrfufkRo djus okys fdlkuksa dks 10 dsUnzkas }kjk dqy 1]91]714
,l,e,l Hksts x,A
ifj;kstuk ds rgr vkbZih,e ds izlkj ds fy, 6586 gs{ks= dks lfEefyr fd;k x;k] ftlesa 4250 fdlkuksa us lgHkkfxrk
dhA izR;sd fdlku ls ckrphr dj dqy 6989 fdlkuksa dks
izkRs lkfgr fd;k x;k] ftlds QyLo:i vkbZih,e dh xfrfofk;ksa
ds varxZr 9163 gs- vfrfjDr {ks= dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA
uk'khtho laca kh lwpuk lk>k djus gsrq lEidZ

vkbZih,e ds ckjs esa fdlkuksa esa tkx:drk ykus ds fy,
jkT; f"k foHkkx] jkT; f"k fo'ofo|ky;ksa rFkk xSj&ljdkjh
laxBuksa ds lkFk lEidZ l'kDr fd, x,A fuxjkuh MkVk ds
vkkkj ij izR;sd ftys ds fy, ikf{kd varjky ij 88 uk'khtho
laca kh fjiksVks dk ladyu fd;k x;k rFkk mUgsa lacfa kr jkT;
f"k foHkkx dks Hkstk x;kA
vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k
vkfFkZd izHkko fo'ys"k.k esa u dsoy fdlkuksa dh fofk esa
7-3 jklk;fud fNM+dkoksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa jklk;fud
fNM+dkoksa esa Hkkjh deh 4-3 ykbZ xbZ cfYd fdlkuksa dh fofk
esa 5-2 fdxzk-@gs- jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa lh; rRo fdxzk@gsdh ek=k dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa
dh ek=k dks de dj 2-8 fdxzk-@gs- ds Lrj ij yk;k x;kA
xSj&vkbZih,e 6-8% dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e 22-5% esa
ouLifr;ksa lfgr tSo&dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx c<+k;k x;kA
fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih esa 2-0 ykHk % ykxr vuqikr dh
rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa ykHk % ykxr vuqikr 2-7 FkkA rkfydk&1
ekSle laca kh izkpy vkSj uk'khtho ls mudk lglaca k

bZ&esy ds ek;e ls lHkh ifj;kstuk lk>snkjksa ds lkFk 15
fjiksfVx dsUnzkas dh nSfud ekSle fjiksVZ bdV~Bk dh xbZA la?k
,lksfl,'ku ds fu;e cukus ds fy, lacfa kr dsUnzkas ds uk'khtho
MkVk ds lkFk ekSle laca kh MkVk dk mi;ksx fd;k x;kA
,lksfl,'ku }kjk rS;kj fd, x, fu;eksa dk f"k lykg nsus ds
fy, vxys ekSle esa vuqikyu fd;k tk,xkA uk'khtho ds izdksi
dks LFkkfud :i ls thvkbZ,l ekufp=ksa esa n'kkZ;k x;kA
14
farmers, respectively for dissemination of IPM. Other

extension activities involved 127 newspaper publications,
38 radio/TV talks and 4 field days. A total of 1,91,714
SMSs were sent by 10 Centres to farmers representing
different communities (SC-28041, ST-12312 and
Women-296) to provide the pest information and IPM
intervention.
Under the project, 6586 ha area was covered for
dissemination of IPM by participation of 4250 farmers.
A total of 6989 farmers were motivated through farmerto-farmer interaction resulting an addition of 9163 ha
under IPM activities.
Linkages for sharing of pest information

Strong linkages were developed with State
Agriculture Department, State Agriculture Universities
and NGOs to create awareness among farmers about
IPM. Based on the surveillance data, 88 pest reports
were compiled at fortnightly intervals for each district
and were submitted to respective State Department of
Agriculture.
Economic analysis
Economic impact analysis indicated significant
reduction in the number of chemical sprays from 7.34
in FP to 4.27 in IPM; quantity of chemical pesticides
(a.i. kg/ha) was reduced from 5.2 kg/ha in FP to 2.8
kg/ha in IPM. Application of bio-pesticides, including
botanicals was more in IPM (23.6%) as compared to
non-IPM (6.8%). Benefit-cost ratio remained 2.70 in
IPM as compared to 2.07 in FP (Table 1).
Weather parameters and pest correlation
Daily weather report for 15 reporting stations was
shared with all the project partners through e-mail. The
weather data along with pest data of respective centres
was used for developing association rules to apply in
the next season in agro-advisories. Pest incidence was
spatially depicted in GIS maps.
dikl | Cotton
rkfydk 1% dikl ds vkbZih,e ,oa fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih okys [ksrksa esa dhVuk'kd dk iz;ksx] mit rFkk ykHk@ykxr vuqikr
Table 1: Pesticide application, yield and benefit/cost ratio in IPM and FP fields of cotton
dsUnz
Centre
QjhndksV/Faridkot
calokjk/Banswara
vkuan/Anand
jktdksV/Rajkot
[k.Mok/Khandwa
vdksyk/Akola
tkyuk/Jalna
vgenuxj/
Ahmednagar
djheuxj/
Karimnagar
xqaVwj/Guntur
csyxkao/Belgaum
eSlwj/Mysore
isjecywj/
Perambalur
dqy/Total
jklk;fud
dhVukkd
fNM+dko dh
la[;k
iz;ksx fd, x,
jklk;fud
dhVukkd dh
ek=k lh; rRo
No. of chemical fdxzk-@izfr gs-
tSo&dhVukkd
dk iz;ksx (%)
Application
of bio-pesticide
(%)
cht dikl dh
mit fDoa@gs-
dikl mRiknu
dh ykxr
Seed cotton yield
`@gs-
(q/ha)
Cost of cotton
production
(`/ha.)
ykHk&ykxr
vuqikr
Benefit-Cost
ratio
pesticide spray
Quantity of
chemical pesticide
applied (a.i. kg/ha)
vkbZih,e
IPM
,Qih
FP
vkbZih,e
IPM
,Qih
FP
vkbZih,e
IPM
,Qih
FP
vkbZih,e
IPM
,Qih
FP
vkbZih,e
IPM
,Qih
FP
vkbZih,e
IPM
,Qih
FP
5.0
4.5
6.2
5.0
4.7
4.3
4.0
3.8
9.0
6.0
8.6
11.0
5.9
6.4
7.0
5.5
4.3
8.5
2.9
3.7
3.5
3.1
3.7
0.2
5.8
13.7
4.1
16.0
5.0
4.6
5.2
0.3
0
2.0
18.0
64.2
12.8
8.0
1.5
41.8
0.0
0.0
9.1
13.0
5.1
2.3
0.6
20.9
22.0
30.0
22.5
26.9
15.1
22.9
27.5
28.7
19.5
27.0
20.4
25.0
12.2
15.8
18.7
24.9
32250
37750
52800
48600
24254
22450
63000
46750
34920
43000
57300
51400
27175
21100
62750
44750
3.3
3.2
2.2
3.2
2.8
4.1
2.0
3.2
2.7
2.6
1.8
2.8
2.0
3.0
1.4
2.7
5.0
9.0
0.7
1.0
2.0
0.0
13.5
12.3
37860
42370
1.5
1.2
4.0
2.7
2.0
4.2
12.0
3.5
4.0
7.5
0.5
1.7
1.2
2.1
2.5
3.3
2.0
4.0
55.0
36.6
61.0
3.4
5.0
11.2
20.0
0.9
26.0
13.0
20.6
23.5
24.0
10.8
15.4
18.8
49000
34457
29350
69666
66000
36725
33000
76788
2.1
2.1
3.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
2.5
1.2
4.3
7.3
2.8
5.2
23.5
6.8
22.5
18.8
2.7
2.0
42168.2 45944.5
dikl ds mHkjus okys uk'khthoksa ds fy, vkbZih,e Synthesis and validation of IPM strategies for
emerging pests of cotton
dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk la'ys"k.k vkSj oS/hdj.k
chVh o xSj&chVh dikl esa uk'khdhVks]a jksxksa o fe= dhVksa
dh fLFkfr fu/kkZj.k gsrq o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku mkjh] e/; o
nf{k.kh {ks=ksa ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa esa losZ{k.k fd;k x;kA
mkjh {ks=k
chVh ,oa xSj&chVh dikl esa uk'khthoksa rFkk izkfrd
'k=qvksa ds fy, flrEcj 2013 ds nkSjku iatkc esa QkftYdk]
eqDlrj] HkafVMk rFkk eulk ftyksa esa 10 xkaoksa es]a gfj;k.kk ds
Qrsgkckn vkSj fljlk ftyksa ds 11 xkaoksa esa rFkk jktLFkku ds
guqekux<+ ftys ds 6 xkaoksa esa los{Z k.k fd, x,A pwld uk'khthoksa
es]a vfkdrj LFkkuksa ij lQsn eD[kh 5 ls 20 fuEQ@O;Ld
izfr ikh ikbZ xbZA dqN LFkyksa ij feyhcx dk izdksi Hkh ntZ
fd;k x;k] ftldk bZukfl;l cEckokysbZ }kjk Hk{k.k fd;k
Surveys were conducted during 2013-14 in

different location of north, central and south zones to
assess the status of insect-pests, diseases and natural
enemies in Bt and non-Bt cotton.
North zone
Surveys were conducted in 10 villages of Fazilka,
Muktsar, Bhatinda and Mansa districts of Punjab, 11
villages of Fatehabad and Sirsa districts of Haryana and
six villages of Hanumangarh district of Rajasthan
during September 2013 for pests and natural enemies
in Bt and non-Bt cotton. Among sucking pests, whitefly
was present at most of the places (5 to 20 nymphs/
15
NCIPM
x;k FkkA dikl dk ikh dqp
a u jksx lh,ylh;wMh dk izdksi
lkekU; ls vfkd ntZ fd;k x;kA xSj&chVh dikl esa dqN
LFkkuksa ij ysfiMksIVsju uk'khtho LiksVksIVsjk fyVwjk] bZfj;kl
foVsyk rFkk isDVhuksQksjk xkslhfi;syk ik, x,A
e; {ks=k
vDVwcj] 2013 ds nkSjku egkjk"V ds okkZ] ;or eky]
vejkorh rFkk ukxiqj ftyksa ds 23 xkoksa esa rFkk xqtjkr ds
lqjUs nz uxj] Hkkouxj] [ksMk+ rFkk vgenkckn ftyksa ds 20 xkoksa
esa los{Z k.k fd, x,A pwld uk'khthoksa esa lQsn eD[kh 2&10
fuEQ@O;Ld izfr ikh dh lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZA tSflM]
dk"BdhV] ekgw] feyhcx] ikh ykyiu rFkk iSjkfoYV eqj>ku
tSls vU; uk'khtho Hkh ntZ fd, x,A jksxksa es]a dqN LFkkuksa ij
okkZ esa 'kkyqdk] ?kqVa h rFkk ;korer ftys ikh dqp
a u fo"kk.kq
dk 2&3% izdksi ntZ fd;k x;kA
nf{k.kh {ks=k
chVh ,oa xSj&chVh dikl esa uk'khthoksa rFkk izkfrd
'k=qvksa ds fy, tuojh] 2014 ds nkSjku rfeyukMq ds lsye
rFkk f=ph ftyksa ds 6 xkaoksa esa los{Z k.k fd, x,A bl vofk ds
nkSjku] ize[q k uk'khthoksa ds :i esa fejhM cx rFkk lQsn eD[kh
ik, x,] tcfd tSflM] dk"BdhV vkSj ekgw tSls vU; uk'khtho
Hkh ekStnw ik, x,A dqN LFkkuksa ij ikh ykyiu Hkh ik;k
x;kA
,vkbZlhlhvkbZih ds ,sfrgkfld MkVk (Vh,elh

1-5) ds vkkkj ij pwld dhVksa ds lae.k ds
iwokZuqeku ds fy, ekWMyksa dk fodkl
lhvkbZlhvkj ds lg;ksx esa dqy 18 dikl mRiknd
LFkkuksa ds fy, lgk;d lzkrs ksa rFkk ,vkbZlhlhvkbZih ds MkVk
csl ls yf{kr uk'khthoks]a vFkkZr vejkLdk fMokLkVsl
a ] csfefl;k
Vscl
s kb] fFkzIl Vscl
s kb vkSj isDVhuksQksjk xkslhfi,Yyk ds laca k
esa ,sfrgkfld MkVk ls feyku fd;k x;kA
mkjh {ks=k esa pwld dhVksa dk ifjn`'; fo'ys"k.k

o"kZ 2011 vkSj 2010 dikl ekSleksa esa QjhndksV esa tSflM]
dk"BdhV fFkzIl rFkk lQsn eD[kh dh lcls vfkd lef"V
ikbZ xbZA yqfk;kuk esa uk'khtho ds :i esa dk"BdhV ugha ik,
tkrs FksA rFkkfi] fiNys o"kks esa tSflM rFkk mlds ckn lQsn
eD[kh us uk'khthoksa dk :i kkj.k dj fy;k gSA fglkj esa
tSflMksa dh ?kVrh rFkk dk"BdhVksa dh c<+rh izof` k ikbZ xbZA
Jhuxj esa uk'khtho ds :i esa tSflM dksbZ [kkl egRo ugha
16
adults per leaf). Mealybug incidence was recorded at

few locations and it was parasitized by Aenasius
bambawalei. Moderate to high level of incidence of
CLCuD was also recorded. Lepidopteran pests
(Spodoptera litura, Earias vittella and Pectinophora
gossipiella) were recorded at few locations in non-Bt
cotton.
Central zone
During October 2013, surveys were conducted in
23 villages of Wardha, Yavatmal, Amaravati and
Nagpur districts of Maharashtra and 20 villages of
Surendranagar, Bhavnagar, Kheda and Ahmedabad
districts of Gujarat. Among sucking pests, whitefly
(2-10 nymphs/ adults per leaf) was prevailing and other
pests viz. jassid, thrips, aphids, mealybug (traces), leaf
reddening and parawilt were also recorded. Among the
diseases, 2-3% incidence of leaf curl virus was recorded
at a few locations (Shaluka, Ghunti in Wardha and
Yavatmal districts, respectively).
South zone
Surveys were conducted in six villages of Salem and
Trichy districts of Tamil Nadu during January 2014
for insect pests, diseases and natural enemies in Bt and
non-Bt cotton. During this period, mirid bugs and white
fly were observed as major pests whereas other pests
like jassid, thrips and aphids were also present. Leaf
reddening was also observed at a few locations.
Development of models to predict infestation of

sap feeders based on AICCIP historical data (TMC
1.5)
Collation of historical data on the target pests viz.
Amrasca devastans, Bemisia tabaci Thrips tabaci and
bollworms inclusive of Pectinophora gossypiella was
done from secondary sources and data base with
AICCIP for a total of 18 cotton growing locations in
collaboration with CICR was carried out.
Analysis of sap feeder scenario in North Zone

Highest mean population of jassids, thrips, and
whiteflies at Faridkot was during 2011 and 2010 cotton
seasons, respectively.
dikl | Cotton
j[krs Fks] gkykafd fiNys N% o"kks esa dk"BdhV rFkk lQsn

efD[k;ka dkQh T;knk egRoiw.kZ ekuk tkus yxk gSA
mkjh {ks= esa lHkh ekSleksa rFkk LFkkuksa esa pwld dhVksa
pwld dhV dh xfrfd;ksa ds fo'ys"k.k ls ,slk ladrs izkIr gqvk
fd fdlh Hkh pqld dhVksa dh fLFkfr dks le>us ds fy, mldh
lef"V ds Lrj eq[; fukkZjd gksrs gSa fp=&1A pwld dhVksa ds
Thrips were not pests at Ludhiana. However, jassids

followed by whiteflies gained pest status in recent years.
Decreasing trend of jassids and increasing thrips were
noted at Hisar. Jassids were insignificant as pests at
Sriganganagar although thrips and whiteflies were
highly important over the last six years.
fp= 1% dikl ds pwld dhVksa dk fofHkUu Hkkxksa esa ifjn`';

Fig. 1. Scenario of cotton sap feeders at different locations
pjedky ihd ihfj;M rFkk mudh ekStnw xh ds LFkkuksa esa

lokZfkd fHkUurk ikbZ xbZ rkfydk&2A tSflM ds fy,
Jhxaxkuxj rFkk dk"BdhVksa ds fy, yqfk;kuk dks NksMd
+ j]
mkj {ks= ds lHkh LFkkuksa ij bZVh,y ls vfkd FksA 37os ekSle
foKku ekud lIrkg ,l,eMCY;w ds lkFk Jhxaxkuxj esa
lQsn efD[k;ka lokZfkd 56-3 la-@3 ifk;ka ikbZ xbA
mkj {ks= ds LFkkuksa ds fy, tSflM] dk"BdhV rFkk lQsn
efD[k;ksa ds laca k esa iwokZuqeku vofk;ka 25&30] 27&36 rFkk
27&40 ,l,eMCY;w vkadfyr dh xbA
Analysis of the dynamics of sap feeders across

seasons and locations of the North zone indicated the
peak population levels to be the determinant of the
pest status of any given sap feeder (Fig. 1). Period of
peaks varied among sap feeders and locations with the
highest peaks above ETL at all North zone locations
except at Sriganganagar for jassids, and Ludhiana for
thrips (Table 2). Whiteflies were the highest (56.3/3
leaves) at Sriganganagar coinciding with 37 SMW.
The prediction periods in respect of jassids, thrips
and whiteflies were inferred as 25-30, 27-36 and 27-40
SMWs for North zone locations.
17
NCIPM
rkfydk 2% mkjh {ks= ds LFkkuksa esa pwld dhVksa ds fy, pjedky ihd ihfj;M
Table 2: Peak periods for sap feeders across North zone locations
LFkku
pwld dhVksa dh lokZfkd lef"V la-@3 ifk;ka

,oa vofk;ksa ,l,eMCY;w dh jsat
Location
Range of peak population (no./3 leaves) and periods (SMW) of sap feeders
tSflM
dk"BdhV
lQsn eD[kh
Jassids
Thrips
Whitefly
QjhndksV / Faridkot
fglkj / Hisar
2.8 -20.2 (28-32)
5.3-31.3 (25-32)
3.1-17.1 (29-41)
2.4-8.8 (32-39)
12.0-35.4 (29-35)
1.9-27.2 (24-41)
yqfk;kuk / Ludhiana
10.9-33.1 (24-31)
1.2-10.3 (23-30)
13.4-21.6 (24-36)
2.5-5.5 (27-38)
21.4-49.6 (29-34)
18.0-56.3 (27-37)
3.2 -11.1 (25-30)
7.3-23.1 (27-36)
5.0-30.3 (27-40)
Jhxaxkuxj / Sriganganagar
{ks=h; / Zonal
18
nygu
Pulses
vkbZih,e ds xgu vuqi;

z ksx ls vjgj] puk] ewxa ] Increasing pigeonpea, chickpea, mung, urd bean
and lentil production through intensive application
mM+n rFkk elwj dk c<+rk mRiknu
of IPM
vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks N% jkT;ksa esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k]

ftlesa ,u,Q,l,e ds varxZr fpfUgr ize[q k nygu mRiknu
{ks=ksa esa vjgj] puk] ewx
a ] mM+n rFkk elwj ds yxHkx 16443-62
gs- {ks= dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA fofHkUu vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa
dh izHkkodkfjrk dk oSkhdj.k rFkk izn'kZu&ijh{k.k djus gsrq
U;wfDy;j vkbZih,e xkao fodflr fd, x,A vkbZih,e dk;Ze
ds dk;kZUo;u ds QyLo:i dukZVd esa 9775-12 gs- es]a egkjk"V
esa 2584-4 gs- es]a e; izn's k esa 300 gs- es]a
vkakz izn's k esa 800 gs- es]a mkj izn's k esa
2571 gs- esa rFkk >kj[kaM esa 1000 gs- dks
nygu Qlyksa ds varxZr yk;k x;kA bl
dk;Ze ls vjgj] puk] ewx
a ] mM+n rFkk
elwj dh [ksrh djus okys 11098 fdlkuksa
dks ykHk feyk gSA
vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa esa LFkkuh; de
mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks fo'ofo|ky;
}kjk fodflr fdLeksa ls izfrLFkkfir fd;k
x;kA fo'ofo|ky; }kjk fodflr fdLesa
u dsoy LFkkuh; uk'khthoksa ls izfrjkskh gS]a
cfYd muls mit Hkh vfkd izkIr gksrh gSA LFkkuh; fdLeksa ls
vfkd ykHk dekus ds fy, fo'ofo|ky; esa fodflr tSo
moZjd jkbtksfc;e ,oe~ ih,lcha rFkk tSo dkjd VkbdksMekZ
iztkfr fdlkuksa dks miyCk djk, x, vkSj muds iz;ksx ds
fy, mUgsa izkRs lkfgr Hkh fd;k x;kA fdlku ikB'kkyk ds nkSjku
fdlkuksa dks ize[q k uk'khthoksa rFkk lac)
a ykHkks]a muds vkxeu
dk le;] cht mipkj rFkk fNM+dko ds p;u ,oa fNM+dko
rS;kj djus ds ckjs esa crk;k x;kA bl nkSjku dqN xkaoksa dks
fpfUgr fd;k x;k rFkk uk'khtho ds izdksi ,oa mit ij
foLr`r lwpuk ,df=r dh xbZ vkSj xSj&vkbZih,e [ksrksa ds lkFk
mldh rqyuk dh xbZA
The IPM programme was implemented in six states

covering 16443.62 ha under pigeonpea, chickpea,
mung, urd and lentil in major pulse growing areas
identified under NFSM. Nuclear IPM villages (173)
were developed to validate and demonstrate
effectiveness of different IPM strategies.
Implementation of IPM has resulted in coverage of
9775.12 ha in Karnataka,
2584.4 ha in Maharashtra,
300 ha in Madhya Pradesh,
800 ha in Andhra Pradesh,
2571 ha in Uttar Pradesh
and 1000 ha in Jharkhand
benefitting 11098 farmers
growing
pigeonpea,
chickpea, mung, urd and
lentil.
IPM strategies included
replacement of local
varieties (low yielder) with
University-developed varieties having resistance against
local pest problems along with high yield. Farmers were
also provided and encouraged to use bio-fertilizers
(Rhizobium and PSB) and bio-agents (Trichoderma spp.)
developed at University to increase benefit due to local
strains. During the FFS, farmers were educated about
key insect pests and associated beneficials, their timing
of occurrence, seed treatment, selection and decision
of making sprays. Few villages were earmarked and
detailed information on pest incidence and yield were
collected and compared with non-IPM fields.
19
NCIPM
Gulbarga and Bidar (Karnataka)
A3P programme was implemented in 3225.62 ha
fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk izf;k esa 2197 fdlkuksa dks lfEefyr
djrs gq, ,3ih dk;Ze dks vjgj ,oa puk ds varxZr 3225-62 under pigeonpea and chickpea involving 2197 farmers
gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;kA Hkkjr ljdkj ds fdlkuksa ls tqMs+ in participatory mode. Using Farmers SMSs Portal of
,l,e,l iksVy
Z dk mi;ksx
GOI, timely advice were
djrs gq, vaxhr rFkk fiNys
provided to farmers
o"kks esa dk;Ze ls tqMs+ fdlkuksa
through SMSs in Kannada
dks u dsoy dUuM+ Hkk"kk esa
language apart from regular
,l,e,l ds ek;e ls le;
farmers meet (FFS) in their
ij lykg nh xbZ] cfYd
villages. Although, average
fdlkuksa dks muds xkaoksa esa Hkh
yield in comparison to state
fu;fer fdlku cSBdksa fdlku
and national average had
ikB'kkyk ds ek;e ls Hkh
increased by 43.05 and
le; ij lykg nh xbZA
54.52%, the pest continued
;|fi jkT; vkSj jk"Vh; vkSlr
to allude and warrants all
dh rqyuk esa vkSlr mit
out efforts in coming season
43-05 vkSj 54-52% c<+h]
especially in view of change
ysfdu o"kkZ dh izof` k esa cnyko
in rainfall pattern. Unlike
Hkkjh cjlkr ds dkj.k esksQksfeuk vaxekjh jksx dh pqukSrh
ds dkj.k fo'ks"k :i ls
previous years, the
Unprecedented rain led to alarming situation of
uk'khthoksa dh pqukSfr;ksa ls
Macrophomina blight disease
Helicoverpa podborer
fuiVus ds fy, vkus okys ekSle
ds fy, leqps iz;kl fd, tkus dh vko';drk gSA fiNys o"kZ ds infestation in non-A3P areas had crossed the ETL level
foijhr] gsfydksoikZ Qyh Hksnd dk lae.k xSj&,3ih {ks=ksa esa both at 50% flowering (1.25 larvae/plant) as well as
aw h@ikni rFkk Qyh vkus 1-75 lwM
aw h@ikni podding stage (1.75 larvae/plant). Even in A3P areas,
50% iq"iu 1-25 lwM
nksuksa voLFkkvksa ij bZVh,y ls vfkd FkkA ,3ih {ks=ksa ds laca k the Helicoverpa larvae crossed ETL at peak flowering
esa rks bZVh,y iq"iu dh pje voLFkk 1-50 ds nkSjku gh ikj gks stage. The spotted bollworm and podbug infestation
x;k FkkA fpfknkj lwM
aw h vkSj ikWMcx dk lae.k c<+rk tk jgk was on increase. The incidence level of spotted
FkkA o"kkZ dh izof` k fpkhnkj lwM
aw h lef"V ds izdksi ds fy, bollworm population was found directly related with
the rainfall pattern.
izR;{k :i ls vuqdy
w ikbZ xbZA
xqycxkZ vkSj fcnj (dukZVd)
f"k foKku dsUnz] fcnj esa Hkh blh izdkj ds dk;Ze dk

dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;k] ftlls 20 xkaoksa ds 1499 fdlkuksa dks
ykHk gqvkA pus ds laca k esa rhu Cykdksa ds varxZr 12 xkaoksa ls
lacfa kr 3904 gs- esa izn'kZu&ijh{k.k fd, x, ftlesa 968 ,sls
fdlkuksa dks lfEefyr fd;k x;k tks vkbZih,e ds fofHkUu
egRoiw.kZ fufof"V;ksa buiqV ds vaxhdj.k ds dkj.k Qly
mit esa o`f) ls larq"V FksA vffxjh ds ikjEifjd chtksa ds
lkFk tsth&11 ds izfrLFkkiu ls rFkk mldh izfrjkskh {kerk ls
csgrj ikni lef"V izkIr gqbAZ fdlku VkbdksMekZ ls cht
mipkj rFkk bekesfDVu cst
a ks,V ds fNM+dko ds ifj.kke ls Hkh
lar"q V Fks D;ksfa d muds [ksrksa esa mudh lgHkkfxrk esa gh gfjr
i;kZoj.k eS=h ekWyhD;wy dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;k FkkA dhVuk'kdksa
ds de iz;ksx ls Hkh ykHkdkjh dhVks]a fo'ks"k :i ls ysMhcMZ chVy
rFkk dsEiksyfs Vl ds laj{k.k dks izkRs lkgu feyk FkkA vkbZih,e
izkS|ksfxdh dks mit] ykHk % ykxr vuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds
fNM+dko dh la[;k esa deh ds vkkkj ij rkfydk 1 esa n'kkZ;k
x;k gSA
20
Similar programme has been implemented at KVK,

Bidar benefiting 1499 farmers of 20 villages. Chickpea
demos were successfully conducted in 3904 ha belonging
to three blocks covering 12 villages involving 968
farmers, who were convinced with the yield gained due
to adoption of various critical IPM inputs. The
replacement of traditional seeds of Annigiri with JG11 had resulted in better plant population due to its
resistant character. Farmers were also convinced of the
result of seed treatment with Trichoderma, and
emammectin benzoate spray as green eco- friendly
molecule tried at their farms with their participation.
Use of less pesticide had also encouraged conservation
of beneficial insects especially the ladybird beetles and
Campoletis. IPM technology in terms of yield, B:C ratio
and reduction in number of pesticide sprays (Table 1).
nygu | Pulses
vuariqj (vkUkz izn's k)

f"k foKku dsUnz] vuariqj esa vkbZih,e dk f;kUo;u
fd;k x;k] ftlesa 1749 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA ,3ih
dk;Ze ds funs'Z kuksa ls fdlkuksa dks mPp mit 8-95 fDoa-@
gs- izkIr gqbAZ ftu fdlkuksa us chvkjth&1 vkSj chvkjth&2
pus esa jrqok@ Chickpea rust
Anantapur (Andhra Pradesh)

IPM has been implemented at KVK, Anantapur
involving 1749 farmers. A3P guidelines benefited them
in terms of higher yields (8.95 q/ha). Farmers who had
grown cv. BRG-1 and BRG-2 had escaped the powdery
mildew infestation. The spotted podborer infestation
in A3P as well as non-A3P areas had crossed the ETL
level at both 50% flowering (12.7 and 22.4 larvae/plant)
as well as peak flowering stages (21.3 and 35.8 larvae/
plant). Sudden increase could be attributed to excess
rain (deviation of +99.1%) received during the month
of September 2013. The crop also suffered infestation
of pod borer in A3P as well as non-A3P at 50%
flowering (1.4 and 5.2 larvae/plant) as well as peak
flowering stage (9.3 and 17.2 larvae/plant) and wilt,
which, could be managed effectively with the
Trichoderma applied as seed treatment.
fdLeksa dh [ksrh dh Fkh mUgsa pwf.kZy QQwna ds lae.k ls dksbZ

uqdlku ugha gqvkA ,3ih rFkk xSj ,3ih {ks=ksa esa fpkhnkj Qyh
cskd dk lae.k 50% iq"iu 12-7 vkSj 22-4 lwM
a h@ikni
voLFkk ij rFkk iq"iu 21-3 vkSj 35-8 lwM
a h izfr ikni dh
pje voLFkk ij bZVh,y ls vfkd FkkA blesa vpkud o`f) ds
ihNs flrEcj] 2013 esa gqbZ vfkd o"kkZ $99-1% fopyu gks
ldrh gSA ,3ih ,oa xSj ,3ih esa 50% iq"iu 1-4 vkSj 5-2 lwM
a h
izfr ikni ij iq"iu 9-3 vkSj 17-2 lwM
a h izfr ikni dh pje
voLFkk ij rFkk eqj>ku ij Qly dks Qyhcskd ds lae.k ds
dkj.k Hkh uqdlku gqvk] ftlls VkbdksMekZ iz;ksx fd, cht
mipkj ls izHkkoh :i ls fuiVk tk ldrk FkkA
pus ds laca k es]a 400 ,dM+ {ks= esa ijh{k.k fd, x,] ftlls
336 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ,uchbZth&3 ds ikjEifjd chtksa
dk tsth&11 ds lkFk izfrLFkkiu djus ls rFkk mldh izfrjksfkrk
{kerk ls csgrj ikni lef"V ikbZ xbZA xSj&,3ih esa 2-6%
lae.k dh rqyuk esa ,3ih esa QyhHksnd ds 1-2% lae.k dks
NksMd
+ j] okuLifrd Lrj ij uk'khtho laca kh dksbZ vkSj leL;k
ugha FkhA Qyh f[kyus xSj&,3ih esa 9-5% dh voLFkk ij
QyhHksnd ,d cM+h leL;k FkhA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa
dks mit] ykHk % ykxr vuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko
esa de la[;k ds vkkkj ij rkfydk 1 esa n'kkZ;k x;k gSA
pus esa pwf.kZy QQwna @Chickpea powdery mildew
Chickpea demos were implemented in 400 ha area

benefitting 336 farmers. The replacement of traditional
seeds of NbeG-3 with JG-11 resulted in better plant
population due to its resistant character. Except pod
borer infestation 1.2% in A3P as against 2.6% in nonA3P, there were not much insect-pest problems at
vegetative stage (Table 1). Podborer was a great problem
at podding stage (9.5% in non-A3P).
21
NCIPM
rkfydk 1% p;fur LFkkuks ij izeq[k nygu Qlyksa esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds vkfFkZd igyq
Table 1: Economics of IPM technology in major pulse crops at selected locations
LFkku
mit fDoa- izfr gs-
ykHk%ykxr vuqikr
Yield (q/ha)
B:C ratio
Location
vkbZih,e xSj vkbZih,e

IPM
Non IPM
vkbZih,e
xSj vkbZih,e
IPM
Non IPM
Pigeonpea
dhVuk'kd fNM+dkoksa
dh la[;k-
dhVuk'kd fNM+dkoksa
dh la[;k- esa deh
No. of pesticide
Reduction in no.
sprays
of pesticide sprays
vkbZih,e xSj vkbZih,e

IPM
Non IPM
vuariqj@Anantapur
7.07
6.4
2.0
1.7
xqycxZ@Gulbarga
10.6
9.1
3.4
2.7
fcnj@Bidar
13.7
8.2
4.0
2.1
tcyiqj@Jabalpur
13.1
7.5
cnukiqj@Badnapur
16.0
ijHk.kh@Parbhani
12.3
3.4
2.4
uSxkao@Naigoan
11.0
8.3
3.0
1.7
Qrsgiqj@Fatehpur
13.5
8.5
2.8
1.9
fetkZiqj@Mirzapur
13.6
9.8
2.7
1.75
yksgkjMkxk@Lohardaga
Chickpea
vuariqj@Anantapur
12.7
9.4
2.0
1.4
-1
xqycxZ@Gulbarga
11.7
9.7
2.6
2.0
fcnj@Bidar
13.5
10.5
2.4
1.7
tcyiqj@Jabalpur
cnukiqj@Badnapur
8.5
ijHk.kh@Parbhani
12.1
1.8
1.3
uSxkao@Naigoan
21.5
13.8
4.3
1.8
Qrsgiqj@Fatehpur
fetkZiqj@Mirzapur
11.9
8.7
2.8
1.9
3.1
Mung & Urdbean
cnukiqj@Badnapur
4.5
4.5
Lentil
tcyiqj@Jabalpur
13.5
10.0
fetkZiqj@Mirzapur
-1
9.5
7.3
2.1
1.5
22
nygu | Pulses
cnukiqj (egkjk"V)
,vkj,l] cnukiqj }kjk 240 gs- esa vkbZih,e dk dk;kZUo;u
fd;k x;k] ftlls 2 xkaoksa ds 191 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ,3ih
dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls fdlkuksa dks mPp mit 8-95 fDoa- izfr gs
izkIr gqbAZ ikjEifjd chtksa [kkn[kk vkSj ektyxkao dh foeksfpr
fdLeksa chMh,u&711] ch,l,evkj&853 vkSj ch,l,evkj&
736 ds izfrLFkkiu ls rFkk mudh izfrjkskh {kerk ls csgrj
ikni lef"V ikbZ xbZA ikh eksMd
+ ] Qyh Hksnd] IY;we eksFk]
fpfknkj lwM
a h rFkk ikWM cx lae.k dh le; ij fuxjkuh
bR;kfn djus ds dkj.k ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa dks] ikjEifjd
fdlkuksa 7 fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk es]a csgrj mit 25 fDoaizfr gs- izkIr gqbAZ jksxksa es]a QkbVksIFkksjk jksx eq[; leL;k FkhA
pus ds laca k esa vkbZih,e dks 215 gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k
x;k] ftlls rhu xkaoksa ds 164 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ykHkkafor
fdlkuksa us ikjEifjd fdlkuksa 8-5 fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk esa
mPp mit 12-5 fDoa- izfr gs- izkIr dhA de mit nsus okyh
fdLeksa dks fot;] fnfXot; vkSj chMh,u&9&3 fdLeksa ls
izfrLFkkfir fd;k x;kA xSj&,3ih 7&20% okys fdlkuksa ds
[ksrksa esa xzhok foxyu dkWyj jkWV dk izdksi vfkd FkkA 50%
iq"iu voLFkk ij QyhHksnd dk izdksi 3-29 lwM
a h izfr ikni
vfkd FkkA
ewx
a ds laca k esa vkbZih,e dks 169 gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k
x;k] ftlls nks xkaoksa ds 169 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A de mit
nsus okyh fdLeksa dks ch,e&4&7 vkSj ch,e 2002&1 ls izfrLFkkfir
fd;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa dk"BdhV
12-66 izfr ikni] ruk eD[kh 0-69 izfr ikni rFkk LiksMksIVsjk
1-6 lwM
a h izfr ikni dk izdksi vfkd FkkA ,3ih ugha viukus
okys fdlkuksa ds 3 fDoa- izfr gs- mit dh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus
okys fdlkuksa dh mit 6 fDoa- izfr gs- FkhA
Badnapur (Maharashtra)
IPM was implemented by ARS, Badnapur in 240
ha benefiting 191 farmers of two villages. A3P
interventions benefited them in terms of higher yields
(8.95 q/ha). The replacement of traditional seeds
(Khadkha and Majalgoan) with released varieties (BDN711, BSMR-853 & BSMR-736) resulted in better plant
population due to its resistant character. A3P farmers
could achieve better yields (25 q/ha) in comparison to
conventional farmers (7 q/ha) owing to the fact that
leaf roller, pod borer, plume moth, Maruca as well as
pod bug infestation could be managed due to timely
monitoring and action. Among diseases, Phytophthora
blight was of a major concern.
Chickpea IPM demonstration could be
implemented in 215 ha, benefiting 164 farmers of three
villages. Beneficiary farmers received higher yields (12.5
q/ha) in comparison to conventional farmers (8.5 q/
ha). The low productive varieties could be replaced
with cv. Vijay, Digvijay and BDN-9-3. The incidence
of collar rot was higher in non-A3P (7-20%). At 50%
flowering stage, the incidence of podborer was also on
higher side (3.29 larvae/plant).
Mungbean IPM demos were also implemented in
169 ha, benefiting 169 farmers of two villages. The low
productive varieties could be replaced with BM-4 7 and
BM. 2002-1. The incidence of thrips (12.66/plant),
stemfly (0.69/plant) and Spodoptera (1.6/plant) was
more in non-A3P farmers' fields. A3P farmers could
harvest 6 q/ha in comparison to 3q/ha by non-A3P
farmers.
ijHk.kh (egkjk"V)
vjgj laca kh ,3ih dk;Ze dks 500 gs- esa fdlkuksa dh
lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlesa pkj xkaoksa ds
450 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa
10-7 fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys vkSlr
ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit 13-10 fDoa- izfr gs- izkIr
gqbAZ ikjEifjd chtksa ;'kksnk] [kkndk rFkk ektyxkao dh
foeksfpr fdLeksa chMh,u&708] ch,l,evkj&853 rFkk
ch,l,evkj& 736 ds lkFk izfrLFkkiu djus ls Qly esa
T;knk o`f) gqbAZ ;|fi QyhHksnd dk lae.k bfV,y Lrj ls
de Fkk] rFkkfi Qly dks lsjdksLiksjk ikh kCck izdksi ls
dkQh uqdlku gqvkA
Parbhani (Maharashtra)
Pigeonpea A3P programme was implemented in
500 ha involving 450 farmers in participatory mode
covering four villages. Average A3P beneficiary farmers
could get higher yields (13.10 q/ha) in comparison
to conventional farmers (10.7 q/ha). The replacement
of traditional seeds (Yashoda, Khadkha and Majalgoan)
with released varieties (BDN-708, BSMR-853 & BSMR736) resulted in better crop growth. The pod borer
infestation level was well below the ETL, however the
crop suffered serious incidence of Cercospora leaf spot.
23
NCIPM
pus ds fy,] 500 gs- dks lfEefyr djrs gq, 317 fdlkuksa
dks vaxhr fd;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa dh 106 fDoa- izfr gs- mit dh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa dks
12-10 fDoa- izfr gs- mit izkIr gqbAZ mPp mit ds fy, eq[;
dkj.k jkbtksfc;e dk mi;ksx rFkk VkbdksMekZ ls fd;k x;k
cht mipkj FkkA fo'ofo|ky; }kjk miyCk fd, x, VkbdksMekZ
dUlksfVZ;e us ihthihvkj ds :i esa Hkh dk;Z fd;k] ftlls ikni
dk LokLF; vPNk cuk jgkA ijHkf{k;ksa dh vfkd la[;k ds
dkj.k QyhHksnd lae.k de gks ik;kA iq"iu voLFkk ij
QyhHksnd dk lae.k ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa 0-9 lwM
a h izfr
ikni dh rqyuk esa ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa 2-2 lwM
a h
izfr ikni ds [ksrksa esa dkQh T;knk FkkA
For chickpea, the 317 farmers were adopted

covering 500 ha area. Farmers under A3P could harvest
(12.10 q/ha) in comparison to 10.6 q/ha by non-A3P
farmers. The main governing factors for higher yield
were use of Rhizobium and Trichoderma seed treatment.
The Trichoderma consortium provided by University
also served as PGPR aiding good plant health. Higher
number of predators (ladybird beetle), could bring
down the level of pod borer infestation. The infestation
level of pod borer was quite high in non-A3P (2.2/
plant) in comparison to A3P (0.9/plant) at podding
stage.
uSxkao (egkjk"V)
Naigaon (Maharashtra)
Demonstration of pigeonpea A3P programme was
implemented in 500.2 ha covering two villages involving
509 farmers. The replacement of traditional seeds
(Khadkha) with BSMR-736 resulted in better yield. The
infestation of pod borer was less, in general. However,
the incidence of podfly was low in A3P (1.37/25 pods)
as against high in non-A3P areas (2.93/25 pods). Disease
incidence was negligible and did not warrant any
protective measure. Average A3P beneficiary farmer
could get higher yields (10.99 q/ha) in comparison to
conventional farmer (8.29 q/ha).
vjgj laca kh ,3ih dk;Ze dks 500-2 gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k
x;k] ftlesa nks xkaoksa ds 509 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA
ikjEifjd chtksa [kkn[kk dk ch,l,evkj&736 ds lkFk izfrLFkkiu
djus ls vfkd mit izkIr dh xbZA lkekU; :i ls QyhHksnd dk
lae.k de FkkA rFkkfi] QyhHksnd dk izdksi ,3ih 1-37 lwM
a h
izfr 25 Qyh viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa de Fkk] tcfd
,3ih dk;Ze ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa QyhHksnd dk
izdksi 2-93 lwM
a h izfr 25 Qyh vfkd FkkA jksx izdksi ux.; Fkk
vkSj blfy, dksbZ mipkjkRed o j{kksik;ksa dh vko';drk eglwl
ugha dh xbZA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa dh mit 8-29 fDoa- izfr gsdh
rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys vkSlr ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit
10-99 fDoa- izfr gs- izkIr gqbAZ
pus ls lacfa kr vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks 500-2 gs- esa dk;kZfUor
fd;k x;k ftlls nks xkaoksa ds 624 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A de
mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks fot; fdLe ls izfrLFkkfir fd;k
x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa 1-18% ds [ksrksa essa
eqj>ku dk izdksi vfkd FkkA iq"iu dh pje voLFkk ij Hkh Qyh
Hksnd dk izdksi ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa
vfkd Fkk 0-57 lwM
a h izfr ikniA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa 13-76
fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk esa ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit
21-48 fDoa izfr gs- izkIr gqbZ rkfydk 1A eqj>ku dk de izdksi
gksus ds ihNs VkbdksMekZ 10 xzke izfr fdxzk- cht ds lkFk
mipkj Fkk] ftlus ihthihvkj ds :i esa Hkh dk;Z fd;kA
tcyiqj (e; izn's k)

vjgj ds laca k esa vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks 'kkgiqjk CykWd esa
dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlls 90 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ,3ih
dk;Ze ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa 9-1 lwM
a h izfr ikni esa
QyhHksnd ds vfkd lae.k dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;Ze
viukus okys fdlkuksa 3-5 lwM
a h izfr ikni ds [ksrksa esa lae.k
24
Chickpea IPM demonstration was implemented in

500.2 ha, benefiting 624 farmers of two villages. The
low productive varieties could be replaced with Vijay.
The incidence of wilt was higher in non-A3P (1.18%).
At peak flowering stage, the incidence of pod borer
was also on higher side (0.57 larvae/plant) in non-A3P
farms. Beneficiary farmers received higher yield (21.48
ha), (Table 1). Low incidence of wilt could be attributed
to seed treatment with Trichoderma @ 10 g/kg seed,
which also served as PGPR.
Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)

IPM in pigeonpea has been implemented in 100 ha
benefiting 90 farmers of Shahapura block. The
infestation of pod borer was low in A3P (3.5 larvae/
plant) fields as against high in non-A3P fields (9.1 larvae/
plant). A3P guidelines benefited them in terms of
nygu | Pulses
de ik;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa 7-51 fDoaizfr gsdh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa 13-12 fDoaizfr gs- dks mPp mit izkIr gqbAZ
pus ds laca k esa vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks 100 gs- esa dk;kZfUor
fd;k x;k] ftlesa 6 xkaoksa ds 100 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A de
mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks tsth&315 vkSj tsth&16 fdLeksa ls
izfrLFkkfir fd;k x;kA iq"iu dh pje voLFkk ij ,3ih dk;Ze
viukus okys fdlkuksa 1-1 lwM
a h izfr ikni ds [ksrksa esa QyhHksns d
dk lae.k de Fkk] tcfd ,3ih dk;Ze ugha viukus okys
fdlkuksa 5-6 lwM
a h izfr ikni ds [ksrksa esa vfkd FkkA
elwj ds laca k esa vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks 100 gs- esa dk;kZfUor
fd;k x;k] ftlls pkj xkaoksa ds 100 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A
de mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks ts,y&1] ts,y&2 rFkk uwjh
fdLeksa ls izfrLFkkfir fd;k x;kA ,3ih dk;Ze ugha viukus
okys fdlkuksa 11-02 izfr ikni ds [ksrksa esa ,fQM ds mPp
lae.k dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;Ze viukus okys fdlkuksa
4-2 izfr ikni ds [ksrksa esa ekgq dk lae.k de ik;k x;kA
Q;qlfs j;e eqj>ku ds izdksi ds dkj.k ,3ih dk;Ze viukus
okys 3-4% ds rqyuk es ,3ih dk;Ze ugha viukus okys
9-6% fdlkuksa dh Qly dks T;knk uqdlku gqvkA ,3ih ugha
viukus okys fdlkuksa dh mit 9 fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk esa
,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa dks vfkd mit 13 izfr gs- izkIr
gqbAZ vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa dks mit] ykxr%ykHk
vuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko esa de la[;k ds vkkkj
ij rkfydk1 esa n'kkZ;k x;k gSA
iQrsgkckn (mkj izns'k)

vjgj ds laca k es]a vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks 125-6 gs- esa
dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlls ikap xkaoksa ds 160 fdlku
ykHkkafor gq,A lkekU; :i ls] QyhHksndksa dk lae.k de
ik;k x;kA ,3ih dk;Ze 0-17 lwM
a h izfr ikni viukus okys
fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa QyhHksns d uk'khtho dk lae.k de Fkk]
tcfd ,3ih dk;Ze 0-23 ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds
[ksrksa esa ;g vfkd FkkA lsjdksLiksjk ikh kCck vkSj QkbVksIFkksjk
vaxekjh ds fofokkRed izdksi ds dkj.k ,3ih dk;Ze viukus
okys ds rqyuk es ,3ih dk;Ze ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa dh
Qly dks T;knk uqdlku gqvkA ,3ih dk;Ze ugha viukus
okys fdlkuksa 8-5 fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;Ze
viukus okys fdlkuksa 13-50 fDoa- izfr gs- dks mPp mit izkIr
gqbAZ vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa dks mit] ykxr%ykHk
vuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko esa de la[;k rkfydk 1
esa n'kkZ;k x;k gSA
yksgkjMkxk (>kj[kaM)
vjgj ds laca k es]a ,3ih ds oSkhdj.k dk;Ze dks 500
gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlesa 10 xkoksa ds 494 fdlkuksa
dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA ikjEifjd chtksa fprkyh dk ujsUnz
higher yields (13.12 q/ha) in comparison to non-A3P

(7.51 q/ha).
Chickpea IPM demonstration could be
implemented in 100 ha, benefiting 100 farmers of six
villages. The low productive varieties could be replaced
with JG-315 and JG-16. Infestation of pod borer was
low in A3P fields (1.1 larvae/plant) as against high in
non-A3P fields (5.6 larvae/plant) at peak flowering stage.
Lentil IPM demonstrations were also implemented
in 100 ha, benefiting 100 farmers of four villages. The
low productive varieties could be replaced with cvs.
JL-1, JL-2 and Noori. The incidence of aphids was low
in A3P (4.2/plant) as against high in non-A3P (11.02/
plant). The crop suffered from Fusarium wilt with
incidence of A3P (3.4%) and non-A3P (9.6%). A3P
farmers could harvest 13 q/ha in comparison to 9 q/ha
by non-A3P farmers (Table 1).
Fatehabad (Uttar Pradesh)

IPM in pigeonpea has been implemented in 125.6
ha benefiting 160 farmers of five villages. The infestation
of borers was low, in general. The infestation level of
key pest podborer was low in A3P (0.17 larvae/plant)
as against high in non-A3P fields (0.23 larvae/plant).
Crop of A3P as well as non-A3P suffered with varying
levels of incidence of Cercospora leaf spot and
Phytophthora blight (Table 1). A3P guidelines
benefited them in terms of higher yields (13.50 q/ha)
in comparison to non-A3P (8.5q/ha).
Lohardaga (Jharkhand)
Validation of pigeonpea A3P programme was done
in 500 ha covering 10 villages involving 494 farmers.
The replacement of traditional seeds (Chitali) with
Narender Arhar-1 resulted in better yield. Incidence
of sterility mosaic, Fusarium wilt and Cercospora leaf
spot was common in the A3P as well as non-A3P fields.
(Table 1) Average A3P beneficiary farmers could get
higher yields (13.6 q/ha) in comparison to conventional
farmers (9.85 q/ha).
25
NCIPM
vjgj&1 ls izfrLFkkiu djus ls vfkd mit izkIr gqbAZ ,3ih
dk;Ze viukus okys rFkk ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa
esa ok> ekstd
s+ ] jksx Q;qlfs j;e eqj>ku rFkk lsjdksLiksjk ikh
kCck dk izdksi ,d leku FkkA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa 9-85 fDoaizfr ikni dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;Ze viukus okys ykHkkFkhZ
fdlkuksa dks vfkd mit 13-6 fDoa- izfr ikni izkIr gqbAZ
vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa dks mit] ykxr%ykHk vuqikr
rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko esa de la[;k rkfydk 1 esa
n'kkZ;k x;k gSA
pus ds laca k es]a vkbZih,e dk;Ze dks 300 gs- esa dk;kZfUor
fd;k x;k] ftlls 10 xkaoksa ds 32 fdlku ykHkkfUor gq,A de
mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks iwlk&362 fdLe ls izfrLFkkfir
fd;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys [ksrksa 1-2% esa rqyukRed
:i ls eqj>ku jksx dk izdksi vfkd FkkA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa
8-7 fDoa- izfr gsdh rqyuk esa ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit
11-9 fDoa- izfr ikni izkIr gqbAZ
{kerk fuekZ.k
rRdkfyd fu.kZ; ysus ds fy, rfeyukMq] vkUkz izn's k] dukZVd
rFkk vle ds jkT; inkfkdkfj;ksa dks vkbZih,e dk;Ze laca kh
ubZ lwpuk,a miyCk djkbZ xb rFkk ,d Vwy ds :i esa mUgsa
bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh lkWVos;j Hkh miyCk djk;k x;kA
Chickpea IPM demonstration was implemented in

300 ha benefiting 32 farmers of 10 villages. The low
productive varieties could be replaced with Pusa-362.
The incidence of wilt was higher in non-A3P fields
(1.2%). Beneficiary farmers received higher yields (11.9
ha).
Capacity Building
State officials of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka and Assam were provided with updates on
IPM and use of e-Pest Surveillance Software as real time
decision-making tool.
Salient achievements of A3P
, 3ih dk;Ze dh miyfCk;ka

fdlkuksa dks vukt dh mit ,oa xq.kokk c<+kus ds fy,
lw{e iks"kdksa ftad vkSj lYQj] tSo moZjdksa jkbtksfc;e
vkSj ih,lch] tSo doduk'kdksa VkbdksMekZ rFkk flaFksfVd
f=e moZjdksa ;wfj;k vkSj Mh,ih dh egkk tkuus dk
volj izkIr gqvkA
vxsrh ifjiDork bLdsi eSdfs uTe rFkk jksx izfrjks/kh
mUur fdLeks]a tSls vjgj Vh,l&3 vkj] ch,l,evkj&736]
ch,l,evkj&853] ,uMh,&1( puk tsth&11] fot;]
fnfXot;] chMh,u&9&3] vojkskh] ewax ch,e&4]
ch,e&2002&1 rFkk elwj ts,y&1] ts,y&2] uwjh] ds&75]
efYydk ds mi;ksx ls uk'khtho ,oa jksx izdksi dks
25&40% rd de djus esa lgk;rk feyhA
,l,e,l lykgdkj ls o kvks a ls le; ij rFkk
vko';drkuqlkj lgh ,oa xq.kokkiw.kZ dhVuk'kdksa dk
iz;ksx djus esa lgk;rk feyhA blls fdlkuksa dks uk'khthoksa
ds izdksi dks QSyus ls jksdus esa rFkk mlds QyLo:i
dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa dks de djus vkSj ikni laj{k.k
ykxr dks de djus esa lgk;rk feyhA
26
Farmers got an opportunity to experience the

importance of micronutrients (Zn and Sulphur),
bio-fertilizers (Rhizobium and PSB), bio-fungicides
(Trichoderma) and synthetic fertilizers (Urea and
DAP) in increasing the yield and quality of grain.
Use of improved varieties e.g., pigeonpea (TS-3R,
BSMR-736, BSMR-853, NDA-1); chickpea (JG-11,
Vijay, Digvijay, BDN -9 -3, Avrodhi); mungbean
(BM-4, BM-2002-1 ) and lentil ( JL-1, JL-2, Noori,
K-75, Mallika) with early maturing (escape
mechanism) and built-in resistance mechanism
helped in reduction of pest infestation and disease
incidence to the tune of 25-40%.
SMS advisories helped in timely and need-based
application of correct and quality pesticides. This
helped them in restricting spread of pest incidence,
thereby reducing the number of sprays and cost
of plant protection.
Farmers got confidence in use of alternative
methods of plant protection involving botanicals
and bio-agents like Neem oil, NSKE and HaNPV.
IPM strategies helped them in getting additional
yields with minimal toxic load to the environment.
This had direct impact on increase in population
of predators and parasitoids in natural eco-system.
nygu | Pulses
fdlkuksa esa ouLifr;ksa vkSj uhe rsy] ,u,ldsbZ rFkk

,p,,uihoh tSls tSodkjdksa lfgr ikni laj{k.k ds
oSdfYid iz.kkfy;ksa ds mi;ksx ds fy, fo'okl tkxkA
iz{ks=k ,oa foLrkj xfrfofk;ka

Field and Extension Activities
vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls fdlkuksa dks vfrfjDr mit

izkIr djus esa lgk;rk feyh vkSj i;kZoj.k ij Hkh de ls
de vlj iM+kA vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls izkfrd
ikfjra= esa ijHkf{k;ksa vkSj ijthO;kHkksa ds lef"V dh o`f)
esa Hkh izR;{k izHkko iM+kA
MkW- ts- ,l- lakq] f"k vk;qDr Qly us fnukad 9&13 Qjojh] 2014 ds nkSjku
lhvkbZlhvkj] ukxiqj esa vk;ksftr f"k oalr esy
a s ds nkSjku ,u,Q,l,e dh
,3ih ifj;kstuk ds varxZr foLrkj QksYMjksa dk foekspu fd;k
Dr. J. S. Sandhu, Agricultural Comissioner (Crops) released extension
folders under the A3P project of NFSM, during Krishi Vasant Mela
held at CICR, Nagpur during 9 13 Feb 2014
fetkZiqj esa iz{ks= ijh{k.k

Field demonstration at Mirzapur
vjgj esa iQkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh dk lesfdr izca ku

vjgj esa QkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh ds lesfdr izca ku ij
fofHkUu LFkkuks]a vFkkZr yksgkjnxk >kj[kaM] xqycxkZ dukZVd
rFkk cnukiqj egkjk"V esa ijh{k.k fd, x,A
ijh{k.kksa ds nkSjku 10 x 5 oxZ eh- vkdkj ds IykVksa ij
rhu iqujko`fk;ksa ds lkFk fLifyV&IykV fMtkbu esa ,dy ,oa
la;ksftr rFkk ikfjra=&eS=h mipkj fd, x,A VkbZdksMekZ
fojhMs ds Vh,p&thchvkj&13] Vh,p&,yMhth&2 rFkk Vh,p
& chMhvkj&1 fo;qDrksa dks e'k% xqycxkZ] yksgkjnxk rFkk
cnukiqj ijh{k.kksa esa iz;ksx fd;k x;kA yglqu dh xkaB
2% tyh; MCY;w@oh rRo ds vdZ dks rktk&rktk rS;kj
fd;k x;k rFkk mls cht mipkj vkSj if.kZy Qksfy;j fNM+dko
esa mi;ksx fd;k x;kA cqokbZ ls 21 fnu igys e`nk dk
VkbdksMekZ iztkfr ls mipkj fd;k x;k rFkk cqokbZ ls igys
Hkh chtksa dk mipkj fd;k x;kA cqokbZ ds 30 fnu ds ckn
vFkkZr jksx&izdksi ns[krs gh vfr'kh?kz yglqu dh xkaB dk vdZ
vkSj VkbdksMekZ fojhMs tSls tSfod dhVuk'kdksa rFkk jklk;fud
vuariqj esa iz{ks= fnol lekjksg dk vk;kstu

Field day celeberations at Anantapur
Integrated management of Phytophthora blight in

pigeonpea
The trial on integrated management of
Phytophthora blight in pigeonpea was conducted at
different locations viz. Lohardaga (Jharkhand),
Gulbarga (Karnataka) and Badnapur (Maharashtra).
Individual and combined eco-friendly treatments
were laid out in split-plot design with three replications
on 10 x 5 m2 size plots. The isolates Th-GBR-13, ThLDG-2 and Th-BDR-1 of T. viride were used in the
experiment at Gulbarga, Lohardaga and Badnapur,
27
NCIPM
dhVuk'kdksa dk fNM+dko fd;k x;kA cqokbZ ds i'pkr Qly
ij 30] 45 vkSj 60 fnuksa ds varjky ij jksx izdksi ds fy,
fuxjkuh dh xbZA
ijh{k.k ds ifj.kkeksa esa ;g ik;k x;k fd rhuksa LFkkuksa ij
vuqipkfjr fu;a=.k dh rqyuk esa leLr mipkjksa esa QkbVksIFkksjk
vaxekjh izdksi esa Hkkjh deh vkbZA rFkkfi] lHkh LFkkuksa esa
mipkj esa vjgj ds laca k esa U;wure jksx izdksi xqycxkZ esa
5-4%] cnukqij esa 6-4% vkSj yksgkjnxk esa 6-4% rFkk lokZfkd
mit xqycxkZ esa 17-6 fDoa- izfr gs-] cnukqij esa 19-8 fDoa- izfr
gs- vkSj yksgkjnxk esa 16-4 fDoa- izfr gs- ntZ dh xbZ] blds ckn
Vh3 vkSj Vh1 dk LFkku Fkk] tks lkaf[;dh; :i ls Vh6 ds
lerqY; FksA ifj.kkeksa esa ;g Hkh irk pyk fd jksx izdksi de
djus esa tSfod dhVuk'kd] tSls yglqu dh xkaB dk vdZ
thchbZ rFkk VkbdksMekZ fojhMs ikjEifjd jklk;fud
dhVuk'kdksa ls rqyuh; FksA
T1: Soil treatment with T.viride enriched FYM + Seed treatment
with garlic bulb extract (2%) + Spray with garlic bulb extract
Vh 1% VkbdksMekZ fofjMs ;q xkscj [kkn }kjk e`nk mipkj + yglqu xkaB ds vdZ }kjk cht
mipkj+yglqu xkaB ds vdZ dk fNM+dko
T.viride (10g) + Spray with garlic bulb extract
Vh 3% VkbdksMekZ fofjMs ;q xkscj [kkn }kjk e`nk mipkj + VkbdksMekZ fofjMs 10 xzk- }kjk
cht mipkj + yglqu xkaB ds vdZ dk fNM+dko
with T. viride (10g) + Spray with Ridomil
Vh 6% VkbdksMekZ fofjMs ;q xkscj [kkn }kjk e`nk mipkj + VkbdksMekZ fofjMs 10 xzk- }kjk
cht mipkj + fjMksfey dk fNM+dko
respectively. The extract of garlic bulb (2% aqueous

w/v) was freshly prepared and used in seed treatment
and foliar spray. The soil treatment with Trichoderma
spp. was done 21 days prior to sowing and seeds were
treated before sowing. The spray of biorationals i.e.
garlic bulb extract and T. viride and chemical fungicides
were done 30 DAS immediately after observation of
disease incidence. The crop was monitored after sowing
and observed for disease incidence at 30, 45 and 60 days
after sowing (DAS).
The results indicated that all treatments significantly
reduced the Phytophthora blight incidence as compared
to untreated control across three locations. But, the
lowest disease incidence (5.4% - Gulbarga, 5.8% Badnapur and 6.4% - Lohardaga) and highest yield (17.6
q/ha - Gulbarga, 19.8 q/ha - Badnapur and 16.4 q/ha Lohardaga) of pigeonpea was recorded with the
treatment (T6) at all locations, followed by T3 and T1,
which were statistically at par with T6. The result also
suggested that the bio-rational inputs, viz., garlic bulb
extract (GBE) and T. viride were comparable with the
conventional chemical fungicides in reducing the disease
incidence .
Life of farmers is solely dependent upon the

microbes present in the soil
- Parashar (Krishi Parashar, c400BC)
28
frygu | Oilseeds
frygu
Oilseeds
ewaxiQyh iQly ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho izcaku Validation of integrated pest management
technology for groundnut crop
izkS|ksfxdh dk oSkhdj.k
fofHkUu f"k ikfjra=ksa ds fy, ewx
a Qyh dh Qly ds
fy, vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds oSkhdj.k ds fy, vuUriqj
ftyk vkU/kz izn's k esa vuqla kku ifj;kstuk 'kq: dh xbZA
ikni laj{k.k mik;ksa ds fofHkUu igyqvksa ij vuUriqj ftyk
vkU/kz izn's k ls lkekftd&vkfFkZd vkkkj lEcfU/kr tkudkjh
,df=r dh xbZAZ
f"k foKku dsUnz] ,,uthvkj,;w] vkUkz izn's k

lkekftd&vkfFkZd vk/kkj dh tkudkjh vuUriqj ftyk
vkU/kz izn's k ls ,df=r dh xbZ ftls uhps n'kkZ;k x;k gS%
Research project was initiated at Anantapur,

Andhra Pradesh with a view to validate IPM technology
for groundnut crop for different agro-eco-systems. The
socio-economic baseline information was collected from
Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh on the various aspects of
plant protection measures.
KVK, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh

Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh comes under
arid region besides being rain shadow district. The
predominant cropping pattern is sole groundnut,
izkS|ksfxdh viukus okys fdlkuksa dk %
ikni laj{k.k ds fy, flQkfjksa

Plant protection recommendations
% farmers adopting / practicing
uhe ds fxjh dk vdZ@ Neem seed kernel extract

bfeMkDyksfizM ds lkFk cht mipkj@ Seed treatment with imidacloprid
VkbdksMekZ ds lkFk cht mipkj@ Seed treatment with Trichoderma sp.
VkbdksMekZ ds lkFk e`nk mipkj@ Soil treatment with Trichoderma sp.
varjQlyhdj.k@fefJr Qlyhdj.k@ Intercropping / mixed cropping
ykbV VSiksa izdk'keku Qanksa dk mi;ksx@ Use of light traps
Qsjkseksu VSiksa ;kSu tky bR;kfn dk mi;ksx@ Use of pheromone traps, etc.
vkU/kz izn's k dk vuariqj ftyk 'kq"d {ks= ds varxZr

vkrk gS] blds vykok ;g o`f"V Nk;k jsu 'ksMks okyk ftyk
gS] vFkkZr tgka ckfj'k de gksrh gSA bl {ks= esa [kjhQ ds
nkSjku ckjkuh fLFkfr ds varxZr ize[q k Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh esa
dsoy ewx
a Qyh( ewx
a Qyh $ vjgj varjQlyhdj.k gS rFkk
jch ds nkSjku mFkyh o ijrh QsykS gSA ewx
a Qyh dh ize[q k
fdLe ds&6 gSA varjQlyhdj.k es]a ewx
a Qyh vkSj vjgj dh
[ksrh djus okys fdlkuksa dk vuqikr 15%1 vkSj 21%1 FkkA
ewx
a Qyh ruk rd{k; jksx ih,l,uMh ds izdksi dks de
djus ds fy, Tokj@cktjk ds lkFk dqN gn rd lhekorhZ
5
60
10
5
70
5
10
groundnut + pigeonpea intercropping under rainfed

during kharif and fallow during rabi. The predominant
variety of groundnut was K-6. In intercropping, the
ratio of groundnut and pigeon pea followed by farmers
was 15:1 and 21:1. Border cropping with bajra /sorghum
was followed to lesser extent (<5%) to minimize
incidence of peanut stem necrosis disease (PSND). The
major biotic constraints in groundnut were leaf miner,
thrips, collar rot, PSND and late leaf spot. Usually 23 sprays were taken up by using Taiwan power sprayer
to control pests and diseases. Farmers generally used
29
NCIPM
Qlyhdj.k 5% ls de fd;k tkrk gSA ewx
a Qyh esa ize[q k
tho laca kh leL;k,a Fkha ikh eksMd
+ ] dk"BdhV] xzhok foxyu]
ih,l,uMh rFkk iNsrh ikh kCckA fdlku lkekU; :i ls]
uk'khthoksa ,oa jksxksa dks fu;af=r djus ds fy, rkbZoku ikoj
ds 2&3 fNM+dko dj jgs FksA vkerkSj ij fdlku dhVuk'kd
ds :i esa ,flQsV rFkk doduk'kdksa ds :i esa esd
a kstcs vkSj
dkcsuZ Msfte dk iz;ksx fd,A ikni laj{k.k ds fy, fdlkuksa dh
dqy ykxr ` 5000 izfr gs- 25% FkhA
[kjhQ 2013&14 ds nkSjku] tqykbZ 2013 esa igyh cjlkr
gksus ij ewx
a Qyh vkSj vjgj dh varjQly ds :i esa cqokbZ dh
xbZA Qly dks ikh eksMd
+ 16%] dk"BdhV 24% rFkk
tSflM 11% tSls uk'khthoksa ds izdksi ls uqdlku igqp
a kA
cqokbZ ds 50&65 fnuksa ds i'pkr~ o"kkZ gksus ls bu uk'khthoksa ds
vke.k esa dqN ek=k esa deh vkbZ gSA ,slk izrhr gqvk fd
Qly ueh ncko ls mHkj jgh Fkh] ysfdu ckn esa ckfj'k u gksus
ds dkj.k Qly dks mkjkskj ueh ncko dk lkeuk djuk iM+k]
ftlls ewx
a Qyh dh Qly izHkkfor gqbAZ
Mhthvkj] tqukx<+ (xqtjkr)

,d= dh xbZ vkkkj js[kk lwpuk ls ;g irk pyk fd
ewx
a Qyh dh Qly esa cqokbZ ls igys QQwna uk'kd esa esd
a kstcs
vFkok dkcsuZ Msfte vFkok Fkkbje ds lkFk cht dk mipkj
fd;k x;k FkkA Qly dks [kjirokj ls eqDr j[kus ds fy,
fdlkuksa us uk'khthoksa ds vkxeu ls igys isaMhfeFkkyhu
[kjirokjuk'kh rFkk dhVksa ds vkxeu ds ckn fDotykQksi&ih
bZFkkby [kjirokjuk'kh dk fNM+dko fd;kA
ewx
a Qyh esa ize[q k uk'khtho dk"BdhV rFkk tSflM Fks vkSj
fdlkuksa us mUgsa fu;af=r djus ds fy, eksuksksVksQkWl vFkok
bfeMkDyksfizM vFkok Mk;feFkks;Vs vFkok feFkkfeFkksDte ds
nks fNM+dko fd,A ewx
a Qyh esa jksxksa ds laca k es]a xzhok foxyu
dkWyj jkWV] ruk foxyu LVse jkWV rFkk ikh kCck vxsrh ,oa
iNsrh bl {ks= esa ize[q k jksx ik, x,A xzhok foxyu jksxksa dks
fu;af=r djus ds fy, fdlkuksa us VkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue ;k
VkbdksMekZ fojhMs ;k Vscd
w ksukstksy ;k dkcsuZ Msfte ;k esd
a kstcs
ls mipkj fd, x, cht dk iz;ksx fd;kA if.kZy jksx dks
fu;af=r djus ds fy, fdlkuksa us gsDlkdksukstksy] esd
a kstcs $
dkcZuMsfte ;k Mk;Qsuksdksukstksy QQnw @doduk'kdksa ds nks
ls rhu fNM+dko fd,A
acephate as insecticide and mancozeb, carbendazim were

used as fungicides. As a whole, the farmer spent ` 5000/
ha (25%) for plant protection.
During 2013-14 kharif season, groundnut and
pigeonpea intercrop was sown with the receipt of
monsoons during first fortnight of July 2013. Crop
suffered from biotic stress of leaf miner (16%), thrips
(24%), and jassids (11%). Rain received at 50-65 DAS
(pegging-pod initiation) stage, helped to reduce the
incidence of above pests. The crop seemed recovered
from moisture stress. But later on, no rains were received
and the crop was subjected to terminal moisture stress,
which affected the turn out of the groundnut.
DGR, Junagadh (Gujarat)

Baseline information collected indicated that seed
treatment with fungicide mancozeb or carbendazim or
thiram was given before sowing in groundnut crop.
To keep the crop weed-free farmers sprayed preemergence weedicide pendimethaline and postemergence weedicide Quizalofop-p- ethyl.
The main pests of groundnut were thrips and jassids
and farmers applied two sprays of either
monocrotophos or imidacloprid or dimethoate or
thiamethoxam for their management. Amongst
diseases, collar rot, stem rot and leaf spot (early and
late) were the main diseases of groundnut in this region.
For the management of collar rot and stem rot, farmers
applied seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum
or T. viride or tebuconazole or carbendazim or
mancozeb. For the foliar disease management, farmers
applied two to three sprays of fungicides viz.
hexaconazole mancozeb + carbendazim or
difenoconazole.
Peanut stem necrosis disease
ewx
a Qyh ruk rd{k;
30
frygu | Oilseeds
rksfj;k&ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu (LDysjksfVfu;k

LDysjksfl;ksje) ds izca ku ij v;;u
rksfj;k&ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu LDysjksfVfu;k
LDysjksfl;ksje ds izdksi rFkk izdksi dh rhozrk ds fy,
losZ{k.k
ljlksa esa LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, gfj;k.kk ds xqMx
+ kao]
esokr] fjokM+h vkSj eksfgUnzx<+ rFkk jktLFkku ds vyoj] t;iqj]
nkSlk vkSj Hkjriqj es]a vFkkZr vkB ftyksa esa 88 LFkkuksa ij los{Z k.k
fd, x,A gfj;k.kk es]a jksx izdksi 5&75% rFkk izdksi dh
rhozrk 1-0&4-0 xzM
s dh jst
a esa FkhA fjokM+h esa rFkk mlds ckn
eksfgUnzx<+ esa e'k% lokZfkd jksx izdksi 30-0% vkSj 27-9%
rFkk rhozrk 3-8 vkSj 3-6 xzM
s ikbZ xbZA
jktLFkku esa] jksx izdksi rFkk mldh rhozrk e'k%
s ds chp FkhA LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu dk
0&80% vkSj 1&4 xzM
jksx izdksi rFkk mldh rhozrk e'k% 10-1&27-0% vkSj
2-3&3-6 xzM
s ds chp FkhA Hkjriqj es]a vfkdre jksx izdksi
27-0% rFkk vfkdre izdksi rhozrk 3-6 ikbZ xbZA
LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, lesfdr jksx izcaku
dk oSkhdj.k% gfj;k.kk ds dsohds lhlh,l] ,p,;q esokr o
egsUnzx<+ o ,vkj,l ,lds,u,;w] uoxkao vyoj ds lg;ksx
esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa gfj;k.kk ds nf{k.k&if'peh
{ks=ksa ds esokr vkSj egsUnzx<+ ftyksa rFkk jktLFkku ds {ks=&III
[k vyoj esa 40 gs- esa LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, lesfdr
uk'khtho izca ku oSkhdj.k dk;Ze vk;ksftr fd, x,A jksx
izdksi de djus esa 40 ls 20% LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds
fo#) lesfdr jksx izca ku dks] fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih dh
rqyuk esa csgrj ik;k x;kA rkfydk&1
jch ekSle ds ckn Qly ds fy, vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ
fnYyh vkSj ,lds,u,;w] nqxkZijq k] jktLFkku ds lg;ksx esa
ukbVkt
s u ds fofHkUu Lrjksa dss rhu ize[q k mipkjksa rFkk fofHkUu
vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, lkr mipkjksa ds
lkFk fLifyV IykV fMtkbu esa ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA
LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu izdksi ij vuqipkfjr daVky
s esa fofHkUu
mipkj csgrj ik, x,A lQsn jrqok dk ikh o iq"ixqPN
voLFkk ij jksx de djus esa ukbZVkt
s u dh flQkfj'k ek=k
vPNh ikbZ xbZA
jk-l-uk-iz-ds- ifjlj] jktiqj [kqn]Z egjkSyh] ubZ fnYyh esa
vkB fHkUu mipkjksa ds lkFk ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA lesfdr
mipkj dks] ftlesa cqokbZ ds 60 fnuksa ij esVkySfDly 4 MCY;w
Studies on management of Sclerotinia rot

(Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of rapeseed-mustard
Survey for incidence and severity of Sclerotinia
rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of Rapeseed-Mustard
Survey of 88 locations in eight districts viz.
Gurgaon, Mewat, Rewari and Mohindergarh of
Haryana and Alwar, Jaipur, Dausa and Bharatpur in
Rajasthan was conducted for Sclerotinia rot of
mustard. In Haryana, incidence ranged 5-75% and
severity ranged 1.0 - 4.0 grades. In Rewari, highest
incidence (30.0%) and severity (3.8) were observed
followed by that in Mohindergarh [incidence 27.9%;
severity 3.6 grades].
In Rajasthan, incidence and severity ranged 080% and

1-4 grades, respectively. The incidence and severity of
Sclerotinia rot ranged 10.1-27.0% and 2.3-3.6 grades,
respectively. In Bharatpur, highest incidence (27.0%)
and severity (3.6) were observed.
Validation of integrated disease management
practices for Sclerotinia rot: Validation of integrated
disease management practices for Sclerotinia rot were
conducted in 40 hectares in Mewat and Mohindergarh
districts of South-West zones of Haryana in
collaboration with KVKs (CCS, HAU), Mewat and
Mohindergarh and Zone-III b (Alwar) of Rajasthan
in collaboration with ARS (SKNAU) Navgaon
(Alwar) in farmers participatory approach. Integrated
disease management package against Sclerotinia rot
(Table 1) was found superior over FP in reducing the
disease incidence (from 40 to 20%) (Table-1).
An experiment in split plot design with three main
treatments of different levels of nitrogen and seven subtreatments having different IPM interventions in
collaboration with IARI, New Delhi and SKNAU,
Durgapura, Rajasthan for post rainy rabi crop was
carried out. Different treatments were found superior
from untreated control in Sclerotinia rot incidence.
Recommended dose of nitrogen was found better than
50% of recommended and 150% recommended doses
in reducing the white rust on leaf and inflorescence.
An experiment with eight different treatments was
carried out at NCIPM Campus, Rajpur Khurd,
Mehrauli, New Delhi. The integrated treatment, which
31
NCIPM
rkfydk 1 % rksfj;k&ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, lesfdr izcaku vkbZ,e ,oa fdlkuksa dh fofk;ksa ,Qih
ds vuqlkj viukbZ tkus okyh dk;Zuhfr;ka
Table 1: Integrated management (IM) and farmers' practices (FP) interventions for Sclerotinia rot of rapeseedmustard
ekWM~;wy
Module
vkbZMh,e
cqokbZ ls igys
Pre sowing
IDM
Hkh"k.k xehZ esa xgjh tqrkbZ djukA

ikuh dh csgrj fudklh ds fy, [ksrksa
dks rS;kj djukA
Deep summer ploughing. Preparation
of well-drained field.
eDdk] pkoy bR;kfn tSls ukWu&gkWLV

Qly viukukA
cqokbZ ds le;
At sowing
moZjdksa N:60, P:40, K:40, S:40 fdyks

@izfr gs- dk larfq yr mi;ksx
djukA
FP
Hkh"k.k xehZ esa xgjh tqrkbZ ugha

djukA
vlarfq yr moZjd dk mi;ksx
Unbalanced fertilizer application
lfer ikniksa
dks gVkuk
Rogueing
of infected
plants
lfer ikniksa
dks ugha gVkuk
foosdiw.kZ flapkbZ
djuk
Judicious irrigation
Seed treatment with

T. harzianum) @ 10 g/kg.
50 fdxzk- ,QokbZ,e esa iwoZ&

m"ekf;r Vh- gftZ,ue@2-5 fdxzkizfr gs- dk e`nk iz;ksx djuk
Soil application of T. harzianum
@ 2.5 kg/ha pre-incubated in 50
kg of FYM.
No summer ploughing
Vh- gftZ,ue@10 xzkizfr fdxzkds lkFk cht mipkj djukA
vfkdre ikni
lef"V;ksa dk vuqj{k.k
djukA
iq"i ,oa Qyh

Lrj ij
At flowering
& pod stage
Maintenance of
optimum plant
population
LoPN ,oa izekf.kd cht dk

mi;ksx djukA
Use of clean and certified seed
Balanced application of fertilizer

(N:60, P:40, K:40, S:40 kg/ha)
,Qih
Sowing during 1631 October.
Crop rotation with non-host like

maize, rice, etc.
vDVwcj esa fnukad 16&31 ds

nkSjku cqokbZ djukA
ikSk ,oa okuLifrd

voLFkk ij
At seedling &
vegetative stage
vDVwcj esa fnukad 16&31 ds

nkSjku cqokbZ u djukA
No sowing during 1631 October
cht vkSj e`nk dk mipkj ugha

djukA
vf/kd flapkbZ djukA

High irrigation and
population
No rouging of
infected plants
No seed and soil treatment
ih $ esd
a kstSc 64 MCY;wih dk fNM+dko ;k rktk cus yglqu
dk vdZ 2% 'kkfey Fkk] ftls Qwy vkus dh voLFkk esa lQsn
jrqok dks de djus esa izHkkoh ik;k x;k fp=&1A
fdLeksa ,oa gkbfczMksa dks fodflr djus ds fy,
rksfj;k&ljlksa dk vkuqoaf'kd laokZu % lQsn jrqok] vYVjsfu;k
vaxekjh rFkk LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, u;s lzkrs ksa dk
vkuqofa 'kd laokZu fd;k x;kA ljlks&
a rksfj;k ds ize[q k jksxksa ds
fo#) N% czkfldk lefUor ijh{k.kksa dh laoh{kk dh xbZ] vFkkZr
,ohVh&I vkSj II dh le; ij cqokbZ ,oa flapkbZ ds fy, laoh{kk]
,ohVh&I ,oa ,ohVh&II dh xq.kokk ds fy, laoh{kk] le; ij
vkbZohVh ,oa vkbZ,pVh dh cqokbZ ds fy, laoh{kk] fofHkUu jksxksa
,oa leku ;wfuQkseZ jksx okyh ikS/k'kkyk ikni jksx foKku
32
includes foliar spray of metalaxyl 4 WP + mancozeb

64 WP at 60 days after sowing (DAS) was found
effective in reducing the white rust on leaf and
inflorescence and increasing yield followed by fresh
aqueous garlic bulb ( 2% w/v) extract (Fig. 1).
Genetic enhancement of rapeseed-mustard for
development of varieties and hybrids: Genetics
enhancement of new sources of resistance for white rust,
Alternaria blight and Sclerotinia rot was carried out.
Screened six Brassicas coordinated trials viz. AVT-I &
II timely sown irrigated, AVT-I & II quality, IVT
timely sown and IHT timely sown, Brassicas AVT-I
and AVT-II strains (Plant Pathology) against different
frygu | Oilseeds
fp= 1- vkbZih,e~ ?kVdksa dk ljlksa dh chekfj;ksa ,oa cht iSnkokj ij Hkko

Fig. 1. Effect of IPM component treatments on diseases and seed yield in Indian mustard
ds fo#) xq.kokk ds fy, czkfldk ,ohVh&I ,oa ,ohVh&II

ikni jksx foKku fdLeksa dh laoh{kkA ijh{k.kksa esa 138 oa'kkofy;ka
,aVht 'kkfey dh xbA czkfldk tuunzO; ,ohVh&I vkSj
,ohVh&II dh laoh{kk dh xbZ vkSj pkj oa'kkofy;ks]a vFkkZr
,lchth&13&14] ,lchth&13&23] ,lchth&13&24]
,lchth&13&25 dks ifk;ksa ij lQsn jrqos ls eqDr ik;k
x;kA bUgsa rksfj;k&ljlksa dh fdLeksa ,oa gkbfczMksa dks fodflr
djus ds fy, mi;ksx fd;k tk ldrk gSA
diseases and Uniform disease nursery (Plant Pathology)

against major diseases of rapeseed-mustard comprising
138 entries was conducted. Screening of Brassica
germplasm (AVT-I and AVT-II), four entries viz. SBG13-14, SBG-13-23, SBG-13-24, SBG-13-25 were found
free from white rust incidence on leaves and could be
utilized in development of varieties and hybrids in
rapeseed-mustard.
.the cup of joy is full only when the findings find

practical applications
Louis Pasteur
33
NCIPM
ckxokuh iQlysa
Horticultural Crops
lCth iQlysa
Vegetable crops
I;kt
Onion
Validation of adaptable IPM technology in 4 ha
area covering 10 progressive farming families was carried
out in Singohi, Singoha and Rambha villages, District
Karnal (Haryana).
djuky gfj;k.kk ftys ds fla?kksb]Z fla?kksok rFkk jkaHkk

xkaoksa esa 4 gs- {ks= esa vaxhdj.kh; vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk
oSkhdj.k fd;k x;k] ftlesa 10 mUur'khy [ksfrgj fdlkuksa dks
'kkfey fd;k x;kA
vkkkj js[kk lwpuk

miq;DZ r xkaoksa ds ckjs esa vkkkj lwpuk ,d= dh xbZA
fdlkuksa dh lkekftd&vkfFkZd fLFkfr ls ;g irk pyk fd
mijksDr xzkeh.kksa dk eq[; dk;Z [ksrh] Ms;jh rFkk deh'ku ij
Qlyks a dh V s f Ma x djuk gS A gkyka f d fdlku tS o
fu;a=.k@vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa ds ckjs esa tkudkjh j[krs Fks]
ysfdu os uk'khthoksa dks fu;a=.k djus ds fy, iw.kZ :i ls
jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ij gh fuHkZj jgrs FksA ,d Qly ekSle
esa vkSlru izR;sd fdlku 7&8 jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa dk fNM+dko
djrk gS ftldh dher ` 6250&7500@ekSle@gs- gSA bu
jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa esa lkekU;r% Mk;feFkks;Vs ] fFk;kesFkksDte]
izkis kbusc] bfeMkDyksfizM] lkbijesfFku] esd
a kstcs rFkk ,sflQsV gSa
vkSj dhVuk'kdksa dks fefJr :i ls mi;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA
ikS/k'kkyk rFkk eq[; Qly esa I;kt ds ftu fofHkUu
uk'khthoksa ds fy, vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk oSkhdj.k fd;k
x;k muesa mHkjh D;kjh jsTM cSM] VkbdksMekZ ;qDr xkscj [kkn
dks ikS/k'kkyk dh e`nk ds lkFk feykuk] L;wMkseksukl Qyksjksll
as
ds lkFk ikSk dh tM+ dks Mqcksuk] uhys jax ds VSi Qans LFkkfir
djuk rFkk uhe] fLiukslM
s ] esd
a kstSc vkSj ,sflQsV dhVuk'kdksa
dk vko';drkuqlkj fNM+dko djuk 'kkfey FkkA
vkbZih,e dk;Ze ds dk;kZUo;u ls uk'khtho dh

fLFkfr rFkk vkfFkZd igyq
vkbZih,e dk;Ze ds dk;kZUo;u ls ize[q k uk'khtho]
34
Base line information

Base line information was collected about the above
mentioned villages and socio-economic status of farmers
revealed farming, dairying and commissioning for crop
produce as the predominant profession of villagers.
Farmers of the hamlet were though aware about the
biocontrol / IPM technologies but were wholly
dependent on chemical pesticides for pest control. On
an average, every farmer applied 7-8 sprays (worth
` 6250-7500/ season/ ha) of chemical pesticides in a
season. The commonly used pesticides were dimethoate,
thiamethoxam, propineb, imidacloprid, cypermethrin,
mancozeb and acephate and use of mixtures of pesticides
was quite prevalent.
The IPM interventions for various pests of onion
validated in nursery as well as main crop included raised
bed, mixing nursery soil with farm yard manure
enriched with Trichoderma, seedling root dip treatment
with Pseudomonas fluorescens, erection of blue coloured
traps, needbased sprays of neem, spinosad, mancozeb
and acephate pesticides.
Pest status and economics of IPM implementation

The mean incidence of key insect pest viz. thrips
vFkkZr dk"BdhV dk izdksi vkbZih,e viukus okys fdlkuksa ds

[ksrksa esa de 5-1 izfr ikni ik;k x;k] tcfd fdlkuksa dh
fofk ,Qih okys [ksrksa esa ;g dkQh T;knk 9-2 izfr ikni
FkkA LVseQk;fy;e vaxekjh izdksi fdlkuksa dh fofk;ksa okys
[ksrksa esa dkQh T;knk] vFkkZr 5-5 0&9 jsfVax izfr ikni ik;k
x;k] tcfd vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa ;g vis{kkr de 2-1
FkkA vkbZih,e dk;Ze ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa
1-2 dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e dk;Ze okys fdlkuksa ds [kskrsa esa
I;kt ihyk ckSuk izdksi ekewyh :i ls de 10-4% Fkk rkfydk
1A bl ckr ij xkSj fd;k x;k fd tuojh&Qjojh ekg esa
cs&ekSle cjlkr gksus ds dkj.k ^,y&28^ I;kt fdLe dk
jksi.k nsjh ls fd;k x;k] ftlesa dkj.k LVseQk;fy;e vaxekjh
dk izdksi dkQh T;knk ik;k x;k vkSj de mit izkIr gqbAZ
blds QyLo:i] cktkj esa I;kt dh vkiwfrZ Hkh de gqbAZ
was found to be lower i.e. 5.1 per plant in IPM fields

as against higher incidence of 9.2 per plant in farmers'
practice (FP) fields. Among the diseases, Stemphylium
blight incidence was very high i.e. 5.5 (0-9 rating) per
plant in farmers' practices fields (FP) where as it was
relatively low (2.1) in IPM fields. Onion yellow dwarf
incidence was marginally low (0.4%) in IPM fields as
compared to non-IPM fields (1.2) (Table 1). It was also
observed that due to occurrence of unusual rains during
January-February months, planting of cultivar `L-28'
was delayed resulting in higher incidence of
Stemphylium blight and consequently leading to low
marketable yields.
rkfydk 1% djuky gfj;k.kk ftys ds fla?kksok] fla?kksgh rFkk jkaHkk xkaoksa esa I;kt ds vkbZih,e ,oa ,Qih [ksrksa esa
uk'khtho dh fLFkfr rFkk izkfrd 'k=q dk ifjn`';
Table 1: Pest status and natural enemy scenario in IPM and FP fields of onion in Singoha, Singohi and Rambha
villages, district Karnal (Haryana)
uk'khtho
vkbZih,e
,Qih
Pest
IPM
FP
dk"BdhV@ikni Thrips/plant
5.1
9.2
2.1
5.5
0.4
1.2
LVseQk;fy;e vaxekjh
I;kt ihyk ckSuk
(0-9) / Stemphylium blight (0-9)
(%) / Onion yellow dwarf (%)
fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih okys I;kt ds [ksrksa dh rqyuk

esa vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa izkfrd 'k=q] fo'ks"k :i ls edfM+;ksa
dh lef"V vfkd ntZ dh xbZA
ftu I;kt mRikndksa us vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh viukbZ
muds jklk;fud fNM+dkoksa rFkk mit ij dkQh izHkko iM+kA
vkbZih,e okys [skrksa esa de fNM+dkoksa 5-3 rFkk vfkd mit
181-3 fDoa-@gs- ds dkj.k vkbZ ih,e viukus okys fdlkuksa
dks mPp ykHk % ykxr vuqikr 2-24%1 izkIr gqvk] tcfd
nwljh vksj fdlkuksa dh fofk okys [ksrksa esa vfkd fNM+dkoksa
8-7 rFkk de mit 165-8 fDoa- izfr gs- ds dkj.k bu
fdlkuksa dks de ykHk % ykxr vuqikr 2-04%1 izkIr gqvk
rkfydk 2A
Higher natural enemy population especially of

spiders was recorded in IPM fields of onion compared
to that in FP.
The implementation of IPM technology by onion
growers had significant impact on quantity of chemical
sprays and yield. Less number of sprays (5.3) in IPM
and higher (8.7) in non-IPM fields and at the same time
an increased yield of 181.3 q/ ha in IPM and 165.8 q/
ha in farmers' practices (FP) fields was obtained
resulting in the higher BCR of 2.24:1 and 2.04:1 in
IPM and non-IPM fields, respectively (Table 2).
35
NCIPM
rkfydk 2% djuky gfj;k.kk ftys ds fla?kksok] fla?kksgh rFkk jkaHkk xkaoksa esa I;kt dh Qly esa vkbZih,e ds vkfFkZd igyq
Table 2: Economics of IPM in onion crop in Singoha, Singohi and Rambha villages, district Karnal (Haryana)
uk'khtho
vkbZih,e
Pest
jklk;fud fNM+dkoksa dh la[;k @Number of chemical sprays

ikni laj{k.k@fNM+dko dh ykxr
(`/gs-)
ikni laj{k.k lfgr [ksrh dh ykxr
@Cost of plant protection/sprays (`/ha)
(`/gs-)
@Cost of cultivation including plant protection (`/ha)
vkSlr mit fDoa-@gs- @Mean yield (q/ha)
,Qih
IPM
FP
5.3
8.7
7687.5
6625.0
80575
80762.7
181.3
165.8
dqy ykHk
(`/gs-)@Gross return (`/ha)
180525.0
165091.3
'kq) ykHk
(`/gs-)@Net returns (`/ha)
99950.0
84328.8
2.2:1
2.0:1
ykHk % Ykxr vuqikr@B:C ratio
f'keyk fepZ
vkbZih,e ds oSkhdj.k] ijh{k.k] izkUs u;u rFkk fdlkuksa
}kjk cM+s iSekus ij vkbZih,e viuk, tkus ds fy, ijh{k.kksa ds
izlkj gsrq gfj;k.kk ds djuky ftys ds varxZr apk lekuk]
nkgk ckthanu] enukiqj rFkk fljlh xkaoksa ,d dLck esa
f'keyk fepZ ij 60 gs- esa ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA f'keyk
fepZ mRikndksa dks vkbZih,e dh leLr laLrqr dk;Zuhfr;ksa o
e;LFkkvksa dk izn'kZu fn[kk;k x;kA blds vykok] fdlkuksa ds
fy, iz{ks= Ldwy vk;ksftr fd, x, rFkk mUgsa e`nk
lkSjhdj.k]mHkjh cht D;kjh] VkbdksMekZ dk lfEeJ.k] Qsjkseksu
VSiksa ds ek;e ls O;Ld eksFk iraxk ds vkxeu ij fuxjkuh]
;wlfs j;e eqj>ku gkfu dks de djus ds fy, fMi Vidk
flapkbZ dk mi;ksx] gjs yscy okys dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko dh
le;kofk vkSj i;kZoj.k eS=h dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko dh
le;kofk rFkk i;kZoj.k eS=h dhVuk'kdksa dk lgt p;u]
,p,,uihoh] fLiuklsM] uhe vkkkfjr mRiknks]a tSls fof'k"V
tSo dhVuk'kdksa dk mi;ksx rFkk izkfrd 'k=qvksa dh igpku
djus esa izf'k{k.k Hkh fn;k x;kA dk;Ze dk ms'; yksgs ds
NYyksa fjax okys ikWyhFkhu 'khVksa ls doj fd, x, jsTM+ cSMksa
mHkjh D;kfj;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, LoLFk ikS/k'kkyk fodflr
djuk Fkk] D;ksfa d budh vofk yach gksrh gSA vkbZih,e okys
[ksrksa esa uhe vkkkfjr vkSj mfpr ek=k rFkk le; ij p;fur
dhVuk'kd ds iz;ksx ls jklk;fud iz;ksxksa esa deh vkbZA blds
QyLo:i] vkbZih,e viukus okys [ksrksa es]a fdlkuksa dh fofk
okys [ksrksa dh rqyuk es]a mPp mit rFkk mPp ykHk % ykxr
vuqikr ns[kk x;kA
36
Bell Pepper
More than 60 ha of bell pepper area was taken up
in Uncha Samana, Daha-Bajindan, Madanpur and Sirsi
villages, a hamlet in Karnal District of Haryana for
IPM validation, demonstration, promotion and
dissemination of trials and for wider adaptation by
farmers. All recommended IPM interventions were
carried out and demonstrated to bell pepper growers.
Farmers' field schools were organized and trainings
were imparted to farmers on soil solarisation, raised
seed bed, mixing of Trichoderma, monitoring of
emergence of adult moths through pheromone traps,
using drip irrigation to minimise Fusarium wilt damage,
timing the spray of green labeled pesticides and proper
selection of eco-safe pesticides, use of specific
fdlkuksa ds fy;s ikB'kkyk ds ek;e ls vkbZih,e viukus okys

fdlkuksa ds lkFk ckrphr
Interaction with IPM farmers through Farmers' Field School
biopesticides like HaNPV, spinosad, neem-based

products and identification of natural enemies.
Emphasis was on raising of healthy nursery using raised
beds covered with polythene sheets supported by iron
rings because of its longer duration. IPM fields had
reduced chemical pesticide applications due to the needbased and selective pesticide use in proper doses at
proper time. Higher yields and in turn higher BCR
were observed in IPM fields as against FP fields.
uhy xk; ls laj{k.k / Protection from rose (Neel Gai)
VekVj
VekVj esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ijh{k.k] izkUs u;u rFkk
izlkj ds fy, gfj;k.kk ds lksuhir ftys ds iyjh xkao esa
10 gs-+ esa ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA fdlkuksa dks e`nk
lkSjhdj.k] VkbdksMekZ lfEeJ.k cukus] uk;ykWu ds tkyksa ls
ikS/k'kkyk D;kfj;ksa dks doj djus vkSj Qkn ViS Qly ds :i
esa xans s dk jksi.k djus] Qsjkseksu vkkkfjr O;Ld eksFk iraxk dh
fuxjkuh djus] lk;adky esa tSxjh ds lkFk eS=h ,oa de
tksf[ke okys dhVuk'kdksa dk mi;ksx djus rFkk izkfrd
'k=qvksa dh igpku djus bR;kfn ds ijh{k.k fn[kk, x, vkSj
mUgsa izf'k{k.k Hkh fn;k x;kA blds vykok] fdlkuksa ds fy,
VekVj iz{ks= Ldwy rFkk fdlku xks"Bh Hkh vk;ksftr dh xbZ]
ftlesa 60 ls Hkh vfkd fdlkuksa us Hkkx fy;kA bl xkao esa ik,
x, ize[q k uk'khtho ikh eksMd
+ rFkk Qy cskd Fks] ftUgsa
vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk mi;ksx dj lQyrkiwod
Z fu;af=r
fd;k x;kA blds QyLo:i] bu uk'khthoksa dk izdksi fdlkuksa
dh fofk dh rqyuk esa ekewyh de ik;k x;kA
vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds izkUs u;u ds fy, vusd dk;Ze
pyk, x,] tSls vaxhr [ksrksa dk fu;fer nkSjk djuk] fdlkuksa
ls ckr djuk] fdlkuksa ds fy, fdlku xks"Bh] fdlku ikB'kkyk
Tomato
Ten hactare of tomato was undertaken for
demonstration, promotion and dissemination of IPM
technology in Palari village in Sonepat District of
Haryana. Farmers were given demonstration and
training for soil solarisation, Trichoderma mixing,
covering nursery beds with nylon nets and marigold
planting as trap crop, pheromone-based adult moths
monitoring and spray of specific biopesticide like
HaNPV with jaggery in evening, use of eco-safe and
reduced risk pesticides and identification of pest damage
and natural enemies etc. Farmers' Field School and Kisan
Ghosthi on IPM in tomato were also conducted, which
was attended by more than 60 farmers. Leaf curl and
fruit borer were observed as major pests and were
managed successfully using IPM technology and their
incidence was marginally lower than FP.
Promotional activities were carried out by
regularly visiting the adopted fields, interacting with
farmers, organizing the Farmer' Field Schools (FFS's),
Qsjkseksu ;kSutky VSi ,oa xsna k
ikniksa dh LVSfdax
Pheromone traps and marigold
Staking of plants
37
NCIPM
vk;ksftr djuk] foToy n`'; izpkj rFkk bySDVkWfud ehfM;k
ds ek;e ls izpkj djukA
Kisan Ghosthi, display of visual-aids and publicity

through print and electronic media.
djsyk
Bitter Gourd
A preliminary trial on validation of IPM
technology was initiated in bitter gourd in village
Padhana, Karnal District of Haryana. Base line
information was collected about the village and socioeconomic status of farmers indicated bitter gourd as a
major crop grown in village apart from tomato and
rice. Crop information revealed pumpkin beetle, fruit
fly, Alternaria cucumarina and Pythium fruit rot as
the major pests and total unawreness about IPM/
biocontrol practices among the farmers. Interacation
with the farmers revealed that on an average a bitter
gourd grower spent about ` 45000 - 50000 per ha on
chemical pesticides in a season.
djsys ds laca k esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds oSkhdj.k ds

fy, gfj;k.kk ds djuky ftys esa ikkuk xkao esa ,d izkjafHkd
ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA bl xkao ds ckjs esa vkkkj js[kk
lwpuk ,d= dh xbZ ftlls fdlkuksa dh lkekftd&vkfFkZd
fLFkfr dk irk pyk fd xkao esa VekVj vkSj pkoy ds vykok
ize[q k :i ls djsys dh [ksrh dh tkrh gSA Qly laca kh lwpuk
ls ;g irk pyk fd xkao dh Qlyksa esa lhrkQy e`x
a ] Qy
eD[kh] vYVjusfj;k dqdeq fs juk rFkk fifFk;e ize[q k uk'khtho
ik, tkrs gSAa fdlkuksa dks vkbZih,e@tSfod fu;a=.k fofk;ksa
ds ckjs esa dqN Hkh tkudkjh ugha FkhA fdlkuksa ls ckrphr ds
nkSjku ;g Kkr gqvk fd fdlku djsys esa jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa
dk fNM+dko djrs gSa vkSj ,d ekSle esa fdlku vkSlru
` 45]000&50]000 izfr gs- ds ewY; ij djsyk csprs gSA
a
fepZ
fepZ dh Qly ds fy, tqykbZ 2013 ls Qjojh 2014 ds
nkSjku jk;pwj ds nsonqxkZ ftys esa lqd
a 's kokjgy ds ijh ".kk
ifj;kstuk bykds esa vkbZih,e ij ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA
uk'khtho ifjn`';
c;knkxh esa vkbZih,e viukus oyks [ksrksa esa vxLr ekg ds
nkSjku dk"BdhV dh vfkdre xfrfofk ikbZ xbZ] ftldh
vkSlr lef"V izfr ikh 1-71 dk"BdhV Fkh] tcfd vkbZih,e
ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa dk"BdhV dh lef"V 2-52 izfr ikh
ikbZ xbZA flrEcj ekg ds nkSjku vkbZih,e viukus okys [ksrksa
esa c#Fkh dh lokZfkd lef"V izfrikh 1-0 ikbZ xbZ] tcfd
vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa c#Fkh dh lef"V 1-33 izfr
ikh FkhA iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku ekgw rFkk lQsn eD[kh dh lef"V
fcydqy ugh ds cjkcj FkhA vDVwcj ekg ds nkSjku vkbZih,e
viukus okys rFkk vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa Qy
Hksnd] ,p- vkfeZtjs k dh lef"V e'k% 0-82 vkSj 1-68 lwM
a h
izfr ikni ikbZ xbZA vkbZih,e rFkk xSj&vkbZih,e nksuksa [ksrksa
esa fu"i=d fMQksfy;sVj ds dkj.k uqdlku ux.; FkkA nwljh
vksj] vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e
viukus okys [ksrksa esa ijHk{kh] vFkkZr dksfDlusfyM ,oa kblksiykZ
dh lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZA lkekU; :i es]a vkbZih,e okys
[ksrksa esa iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku ikh kCck vYVjusfj;k@ldksLZ iksjk
dh rhozrk vfkd ikbZ xbZA vDVwcj ds rhljs lIrkg esa pwf.kZy
QQwna ikbZ xbZ tks vkbZih,e ,oa xSj&vkbZih,e [ksrksa esa e'k%
38
Chilli
An IPM trial was undertaken for chilli crop in the
Upper Krishna Project area at Sunkeshwarhal, in
Deodurga district of Raichur during July, 2013 to
February, 2014.
Pest scenario
In Byadagi, peak activity of thrips was noticed
during August with a mean peak population of 1.71
thrips per leaf in IPM plot while non-IPM plots
recorded a peak of 2.52 thrips per leaf. Highest mite
population i.e. 1.0 per leaf was noticed in IPM-plot
during September while in non-IPM plot, it was 1.33
mites per leaf. There was negligible population of both
aphids and white fly throughout the season. The activity
of fruit borer, H. armigera was noticed during October
with 0.82 and 1.68 larvae per plant in IPM and non
IPM plots, respectively. In both IPM and non IPM
plots, damage due to defoliators was negligible. On the
other hand, predatory population viz. coccinellids and
Chrysoperla was higher in IPM plots compared to nonIPM. In general, leaf spot (Alternaria/Cercospora)
severity was slightly higher in non-IPM plots
throughout the season. Powdery mildew appeared in
the third week of October with incidence reaching upto
36% and 37.4% in IPM and non-IPM plots, respectively.
Anthracnose incidence began during second week of
36% vkSj 37-4% FkhA vDVwcj ds nwljs lIrkg ds nkSjku

,aFkzDs ukst ds izdksi dk izkjaHk gqvk vkSj fnlEcj ds vafre
lIrkg esa ;g vius pje ij igqp pqdk FkkA ;qlfs j;e eqj>ku
dk izdksi de 18-3% ik;k x;k A
mit ,oa vkfFkZd igyq

c;knkxh fdLe ds xSj&vkbZih,e [ksrksa esa 19 dh rqyuk esa
vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa 13 gLr{ksi gq,] tcfd ;w,l 341 fdLe
esa vkbZih,e rFkk xSj vkbZih,e ij e'k% 14 vkSj 18 ijh{k.k fd,
x,A c;knkxh esa vkbZih,e viukus okys [ksrksa esa vkSlr mit
27-50 fDoa- izfr gs- Fkh vkSj 'kq) ykHk ` 1]51]415@& Fkk] tcfd
vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa lw[kh fepZ dh mit
24-25 fDoa- izfr gs- Fkh vkSj 'kq) ykHk ` 26]315@& FkkA ;w,l 341
esa Hkh blh izdkj dh fLFkfr ntZ dh xbZA
ijoy
gfj.k?kkVk] if'pe caxky
if'pe caxky ds ufn;k ftys esa gfju?kkVk ds varxZr
mkj jktkiqj xkao esa 14 fdlkuksa ds IykVksa esa vkbZih,e
izkS|ksfxdh dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA
jksi.k rFkk ikni vadjq .k ds nkSjku rFkk 3 lIrkgksa ds ckn
VkbdksMekZ fofjMs 7-5 fdxzkizfr gs- $ xkscj [kkn 375 fdxzkizfr gs- dk vuqi;
z ksx rFkk ikni vadjq .k ds 6 lIrkgksa ds ckn
dkcksQ
Z jq ku 3 th 0-3 xzkizfr ikni dk vuqi;
z ksx tSls dk;Z
fd, x,A
ijh{k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd vuqipkfjr daVky
s 4-9 xkB
lwpdkad 529-6 izfr 200 lhlh e`nk dh rqyuk esa e`nk ds
mipkj fd, x, IykVksa esa tM+&xkB lwpdkad vkjdsvkbZ rFkk
tM+&xkB lw=fe lef"V ts2 de Fkh] vFkkZr e'k% 2-9 vkSj
119-3 daVky
s dh rqyuk esa vafre Qkbuy lw=fe lef"V Hkh
de 77-5% FkhA vr% vuqipkfjr IykVksa dh rqyuk esa mipkj
fd, x, IykVksa esa 53% mit vfkd izkIr dh xbZA
cSxa u vkSj VekVj

tksjgkV] vle
cSx
a u vkSj VekVj dh Qlyksa ds laca k esa vle ds tksjgkV
ftys esa nkfupkiqjh] xksyk?kkV] vysx
a eksjk rFkk cksyksek eksjku
xkao] fV;ksd esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa 1 gs- esa ikni
ijkthoh lw=fe esykMksxk;uh budkWxfuVk ls xzflr IykVksa
esa lesfdr izca ku ekWM;
~ y
w dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA ijh{k.k esa
dkcksZ ;wjku 0-3 xzk- lh; rRo izfr oxZ eh- esa ikS/k'kkyk cSM
mipkj $ 1 ?kaVs rd dkcksl
Z YQku 500 ihih,e ds lkFk tM+
Mqck;s j[kuk] izfrjksi.k ls igys [ksr esa dkcksZ ;wjku@ 0-3 xzk-
October and reached its peak in last week of December.

Incidence of Fusarium wilt was low (upto 18.3%).
Yield and Economics

Numbers of interventions were 13 in IPM plots as
against 19 in non-IPM plots of cv. Byadagi while in
cv. US 341, it was 14 and 18, respectively in IPM and
non IPM plots. IPM plots of cv. Byadagi recorded an
average yield of 27.50q/ha with a net profit of
` 1,51,415/- as against ` 1,25,100/- in non-IPM plots
with 24.25 q/ha of dry chilli and net gain of ` 26,315/in IPM plot. Almost similar trend was recorded with
US 341.
Pointed gourd
Haringhata, West Bengal
IPM validation was carried out in village Uttar
Rajapur, Haringhata, district Nadia, West Bengal in
plots of 14 farmers.
Treatments included Trichoderma viride
application @ 7.5 kg/ha + FYM @ 375 kg/ha at
planting and at three weeks after emergence of plant
followed by application of carbofuran 3G @ 0.3 g a.i./
plant at 6 weeks after emergence.
It was observed that treated plots had lower (2.9)
root-knot index (RKI) and root-knot nematode (119.3)
population (J2) in soil over untreated control (4.9; 529.6
per 200 cc soil). The treated plots had higher fruit yield
of pointed gourd by 53% over untreated control. The
final nematode population was also lower to the extent
of 77.5% over control. Thus, the treated plots had
higher yield of 53% compared to untreated ones.
Brinjal and tomato

Jorhat, Assam
Integrated management module was demonstrated
in plots infested with plant parasitic nematodes
(Meloidogyne incognita) in Danichapori, Golaghat
district, Alengmora and Boloma Moran Gaon, Teok,
in Jorhat district of Assam in farmers' participatory
mode in 1 ha in brinjal and tomato crops. Nursery bed
treatment with carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 + root dip
treatment with carbosulfan @ 500 ppm for 1 hr,
39
NCIPM
lh; rRo izfr oxZ eh- ds lkFk mipkfjr ikS/k'kkyk D;kfj;ksa
esa ikSk yxkuk $ uhe [kyh 500 fdxzkizfr gs- dk iz;ksx ikS/
k izfrjksi.k ls igys fd, x, rFkk vuqipkfjr daVky
s Hkh j[kk
x;kA ijh{k.k ds ifj.kkeksa esa ;g ik;k x;k fd lw=fe lef"V
dks de djus esa cSx
a u ds ikSkksa ds izfrjksi.k ls igys [ksr esa
dkcksZ ;wjku 0-3 xzkizfr oxZ eh- $ uhe dsd 500 fdxzkizfr
gs- dk vuqi;
z ksx dkQh izHkkodkjh ik;k x;kA [ksr esa izfrjksi.k
ls igys dkcksZ ;wjku 0-3 xzkizfr oxZ eh- $ uhe dsd 500
fdxzkizfr gs- ds lkFk mipkj fd, x, lkSjhr ikS/k'kkyk esa
VekVj ds ikSks mxkus ls lw=fe dk lae.k de ik;k x;kA
lajf{kr f"k esa vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy

vizy
S ls fnlEcj] 2013 ds nkSjku mkjk[kaM ds vuqla kku
dsUnz rFkk yksgk?kkV vkSj pEikor f"k foKku dsUnzkas esa f'keyk
fepZ] [khjk vkSj VekVj dh Qlyksa ds fy, gfjrx`g xzhu gkml
fLFkfr;ksa ds varxZr vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxdh fodflr djus ds
ms'; ls fofHkUu ekWM;~ y
w ksa ij ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd, x,A
f'keyk fepZ
f'keyk fepZ ij ijh{k.k ds fy, vkbZih,e }kjk viukbZ
xbZ dk;Zuhfr;ksa esa cqokbZ ds le; dkcsuZ Msfte 1 xzke izfr
fdxzk- ls cht mipkj dj LoLFk ikS/k'kkyk rS;kj djuk]
QkesfZ yu@5 yh izfr oxZ eh- MSfpax ds lkFk ikWyhgkml dk
?kweu ;wehxs'ku vkSj e`nk lkS;d
Z j.k rFkk xkscj [kkn@1
fdxzkds lkFk VkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue laokZ (2 x 109cfu/g) tSls
tSodkjdksa ds izcyhr xkscj [kkn vFkok ih- Qyksjksll
as (2
x 1012cfu/ml)@1 ,e,y izfr 500 fdxzk- xkscj [kkn feJ.k
dk iz;ksx tSls dk;Z fd, x,A tM+&foxyu lw=fe@dVokeZ
rFkk e`nk tfur jksxksa dks jksdus ds fy, izfrjksi.k ds ckn 'kh?kz
dkcksZ ;wjku 3th 6 xzkizfr oxZ eh- vkSj dkWij vkWDlhDyksjkbM
1 xzkizfr yh- ds lkFk D;kjh esa iz;ksx fd;k x;kA pwld
uk'khthoksa ekgw@lQsn efD[k;ksa dks fu;af=r djus ds fy,
ckxokuh rsy ds ,d ;k nks fNM+dko fd, x,] ftudh ihys
fpifpisa Qkanks VSiksa ls fu;fer :i ls fuxjkuh dh xbZA
izfrjksi.k ds 30 fnuksa ds ckn 15 fnuksa ds varjkyksa ij
bfeMkDyksfizM 17-8 ,l,y 0.01% dk ;Fkk vko';drk iz;ksx
fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa vkbZih,e
ekWM;
~ y
w ds vaxhdj.k ls jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds 10&12
fNM+dkoksa ds eqdkcys 4&5 fNM+dko rd deh ykbZ xbZA
vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w ls uk'khtho ds izdksi esa Hkh deh vkbZ
ftlds QyLo:i vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa 22-3 fDoaizfr 1000 oxZ eh- dh rqyuk esa mPp f'keyk fepZ mit 31
fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh- izkIr dh xbZ rkfydk 3A
40
seedling raised in solarised nursery beds treated with

carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 + neem cake @ 500 kg/ha
on the field before transplanting and untreated control
were maintained. It was observed that application of
carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i. /m2 + neem cake @ 500 kg/ha
in the field before transplanting brinjal seedlings was
effective in reducing nematode population. Tomato
seedlings raised in solarised nursery bed treated with
carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 + neem cake @ 500 kg/ha
in the field before transplanting had less infestation of
nematode.
IPM in protected cultivation

Trials on IPM modules for greenhouse capsicum,
cucumber and tomato were conducted at Research
Station and KVK, Lohaghat, Champawat, Uttarakhand
during April to December, 2013 with a view to develop
IPM technology for these crops grown under protected
cultivation.
Capsicum
IPM interventions on greenhouse cucumber
comprised of raising healthy nursery by applying seed
treatment with carbendazim @ 1 g a.i./kg at time of
sowing. Soil solarization and fumigation of polyhouse
bed with formalin (@ 5 l/m2) drenching and using
fortified FYM (mix bioagents such as Trichoderma
harzianum culture (2 x 109 cfu/g) @ 1 kg/500 kg of
FYM and/or P. fluorescens (2 x 1012 cfu/ml) 1 l/500 kg
FYM. Application of carbofuran 3G @ 6 g/sq m and
copper oxychloride @ 1g/l just after transplanting for
preventing root-knot nematode, cut worms and soil
borne diseases. One or two sprays of horticultural oil
were included for controlling sucking pests (aphids/
whiteflies), which were regularly monitored through
yellow sticky traps.
Need-based application of imidacloprid 17.8 SL @
0.01% was done at 15-day intervals just 30 days after
transplanting. The adoption of IPM module resulted
in reducing the number of chemical sprays to 4-5 from
10-12 in non-IPM plots. IPM module reduced the
incidence of pests resulting in higher capsicum fruit
yield (31 q/1000 sq m) as compared to non-IPM
practices (22.3 q/1000 sq m) (Table 3).
Rkfydk 3% gfjrx`g f'keyk fepZ ds vkbZih,e rFkk xSj&vkbZih,e IykVksa esa uk'khtho dh fLFkfr ,oa mit
Table 3: Pest status and fruit yield in IPM and non-IPM plots of capsicum in greenhouse
pj
vkbZih,e
xSj&vkbZih,e
Variable
IPM
Non-IPM
ekgq la- izfr ikni / Aphids (no./plant)
3.5
17.26
lQsn eD[kh la- izfr ikni / Whiteflies (no./plant)

pwf.kZy QQwna
(%) / Powdery mildew (%)
Ekkstd
s+ ok;jl dkEIysDl (%) / Mosaic virus complex (%)
mit fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh- / Yield (q/1000 sq m)
[khjk
[khjs dh Qly ds fy, viukbZ xbZ vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ka
mlh izdkj Fkha tSls f'keyk fepZ esa viukbZ xbZ FkhaA [khjk esa
vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w viuk, tkus ls uk'khthoksa ds izdksi esa deh
vkbZ] ftlds dkj.k xSj vkbZih,e fofk;ksa 19-0 fDoa- izfr
1000 oxZ eh- dh rqyuk esa mPp [khjk mit 27-6 fDoa- izfr
1000 oxZ eh- izkIr dh xbZ rkfydk 4A
3.1
13.86
26.2
63.3
13.5
34.5
31
22.3
Cucumber
The IPM interventions for cucumber crop in
greenhouse cultivation was same as for capsicum. IPM
module reduced the incidence of pests, which resulted
into higher cucumber fruit yield (27.6 q/1000 sq m) as
compared to non-IPM practices (19.0 q/1000 sq m)
(Table 4).
rkfydk 4% gfjrx`g esa vkbZih,e rFkk xSj vkbZih,e IykVksa esa ukkhtho dh fLFkfr vkSj mit
Table 4: Pest status and fruit yield in IPM and non-IPM plots of cucumber in greenhouse
pj
vkbZih,e
xSj&vkbZih,e
Variable
IPM
Non-IPM
ekgw la- izfr ikni Aphids (no./plant)
3.8
10.4
24.2
54.7
10.7
24.8
27.6
19.0
pwf.kZy QQwna
(% O;kidrk) / Powdery mildew (% incidence)
Ekkstd
s+ ok;jl dkEIysDl
(% O;kidrk) / Mosaic virus complex (% incidence)
mit fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh- / Yield (q/1000 sq m)
VekVj
VekVj [khjs dh Qly ds
fy, viukbZ xbZ vkbZih,e
dk;Zuhfr;ka mlh izdkj Fkha tSls
f'keyk fepZ esa viukbZ xbZ FkhaA
VekVj esa vkbZih,e ekWM~;y
w
viuk, tkus ls uk'khthoksa ds
izdksi esa deh vkbZ] ftlds
dkj.k xSj vkbZih,e fofk;ksa
122-3 fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh
dh rqyuk esa mPp VekVj mit
150 fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh-
izkIr dh xbZ rkfydk 5A
Tomato
The IPM module for
tomato
crop
in
greenhouse cultivation
was same as for capsicum.
IPM module reduced the
incidence of pests, which
resulted into higher tomato
fruit yield (150 q/1000 sq
m) as compared to nonIPM practices (122.3 q/
1000 sq m) (Table 5).
yksgk?kkV esa gfjr x`g VekVj esa vkbZih,e
IPM in Greenhouse tomato in Lohaghat
41
NCIPM
rkfydk 5% gfjrx`g VekVj ds vkbZih,e rFkk xSj vkbZih,e IykVksa esa uk'khtho dh fLFkfr vkSj mit
Table 5: Pest status and fruit yield in IPM and non-IPM plots of tomato in greenhouse
pj
Variable
lQsn eD[kh la- izfr ikni @Whiteflies (no./plant)

pwf.kZy QQwna
(% O;kidrk)
iNsrh vaxekjh
@Powdery mildew (% incidence)
(% O;kidrk)
@Late blight (% incidence)
mit fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh- @Yield (q/1000 sq m)
vkbZih,e
xSj&vkbZih,e
IPM
Non-IPM
3.8
14.4
14.2
33.4
5.3
16.3
150
122.3
tM+&xkB lw=kfe uk'khtho iQly dh tM+ksa esa Effect of bio-agents on the penetration of roots by
root-knot nematodes
izdksi ij tSodkjdksa dk izHkko
ulZjh esa tM+&foxyu fd'kksj lw=fe;ksa ds Qly dh
tM+kas esa izdksi dks jksdus ds fy, VkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue vkSj
L;wMkseksul Qyksjksll
as dh laHkkouk
dh [kkst djus gsrq lhoh jeu QSyks
iz f 'k{k.k dk;Z e ds nkS j ku
vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh ds ,d
gfjr x`g esa ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA
IykfLVd VS ds izdks"Bksa dks dksdksihV]
oehZD;wykbV rFkk ijykbZV ehfM;k
ds lkFk 3%1%1 ds vuqikr esa Hkjk
x;kA Hkjs gq, izR;sd izdks"B esa VekVj
jksg.kh fdLe dk ,d&,d nkuk
cks;k x;k ftlesa mfpr ek=k ls
flapk x;kA
An experiment involving fungal and bacterial

bioagents, Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas
fluorescens, was conducted in a greenhouse at IARI,
New Delhi during the training of CV
Raman Fellow to investigate the potential
of Trichoderma harzianum and
Pseudomonas fluorescens to prevent root
penetration by root-knot nematode
juveniles in the nursery. Plastic tray cells
were filled with media comprising
cocopeat, vermiculite and perlite in the
ratio of 3:1:1. Each completely filled cell
was sown with one tomato seed (cv.
Rohini) and judiciously watered.
The thrice replicated treatments in the

experiment were Trichoderma harzianum,
ijh{k.k esa fd, x, mipkjksa esa
Pseudomonas fluorescens and a control. Five
VkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue] L;wMkseksul
weeks later, the bio-agent treated seedlings
Qyksjksll
as rFkk ,d daUVky
s 'kkfey lhoh jeu QSyks] MkW- fdaXtys vkslh ijh{k.k ds were inoculated with five freshly hatched
FkkA ikap grkas ds ckn tSodkjdksa fy, VekVj cht ds mipkj gsrq IykfLVd VS ds root-knot nematode juveniles each.
izdks"Bksa dks Hkjrs gq,
ls mipkfjr ikSkksa dks ikap izR;sd CV Raman Fellow Dr Kingsley Osei filling Nutrient application in the form of NPK
uotkr tM+&xkB lw=fe;ksa ds lkFk cells of plastic tray to nurse tomato for 19:19:19 (procured from National
the experiment
Chemical Fertilizer Ltd, India) was done
lajksfir fd;k x;kA 25 yh- ikuh esa
in solution form @ 25 ml/l water to
ukbVkt
s u] QkLQksjl rFkk iksVk'k moZjd 19%19%19 jk"Vh;
jklk;fud moZjd fy-] Hkkjr ls [kjhns x, ds vuqikr esa ,d treatments twice
?kksy rS;kj fd;k x;k] ftldk nks ckj iz;ksx fd;k x;kA
VkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue ls mipkfjr VekVj ds ikS/ks o`f)]
Hkkj] 'kq"dHkkj ds fglkc ls vPNs ik;s x;s ,oa muesa tM+&xkaB
lw=d`fe dk izdksi Hkh de ik;k x;kA
42
Tomato plants treated with Trichoderma

harzianum performed better in terms of height, weight,
dryweight and suppression of root-knot nematode
penetration.
iQy okyh iQlysa
Fruit Crops
vke
Mango
Validation of mango IPM technology was carried
out in two locations viz. Valsad and Navgaon districts
of Gujarat.
vke esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk ijh{k.k xqtjkr ds nks

LFkkuks]a vFkkZr oylkM vkSj uoxkao esa fd;k x;kA
vke ds izeq[k uk'khthoksa dk izcaku

fdlkuksa ds vke ds cxhpksa esa vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk
dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;k] tgk dslj ,oa vYQkalksa vke fdLeksa
ij ikjaifjd fofk;ka] ;kaf=d@e'khuh fofk;ka] thok.kqt ,oa
lqjf{kr dhVuk'kdksa dk bZVh,y vkkkfjr vuqi;z ksx dk oSkhdj.k
fd;k x;kA
uk'khthoksa dh ekSle vkkkfjr O;kidrk

iwjs o"kZ ds nkSjku vHkZd gksij dh lef"V esa mrkj&p<+ko
ns[kk x;k vkSj 8 ls 9 ekSle foKku ekud lIrkgksa ds nkSjku
vHkZdksa dh vfkdre lef"V 29-7 vHkZd izfr vke&xqPN ikbZ
xbZA vHkZd dh lef"V dk vfkdre rkieku ('r' = 0.4) rFkk
kwi ('r' = 0.4364) ds lkFk ldkjkRed vkSj U;wure rkieku ('r'
Z k (r = - 0 .5) ds lkFk
= - 0-3964) ,oa vkSlr vkisf{kr vknzr
udkjkRed lglaca k ns[kk x;kA dk"BdhV dh lef"V dk
vfkdre rkieku ('r' = 0.5) rFkk kwi ('r' = - 0.5) ,oa o"kkZ ('r'
= - 0.3) ds lkFk udkjkRed lg&laca k ns[kk x;kA ebZ ls
tqykbZ ds eghuksa ds nkSjku vke dh Qly ij Qy eD[kh dh
gkfu ns[kh xbZA ;g ,d la;ksx gh gks ldrk gS fd le; ls
igys ckfj'k ;k mPp vknzrZ k ds dkj.k iNsrh ifjiDou okyh
fdLeksa esa Qy eD[kh dk izdksi vius pje ij gksrk gSA iwjs o"kZ
ikh xky fet izkVs ksdkWuVsfjfu;k eSfV;kuk dk jksx ntZ fd;k
x;kA uoEcj ls ebZ ekg rd CykWlkWe fet] bjkslksfe;k bafMdk
dh ekStnw xh ns[kh xbZA ijHkf{k;ksa es]a edM+h] dkWfDlusfyM] xzhu
ysl foax cx kblksiykZ iztkfr ik, x, tks vke vHkZdksa dk
Hk{k.k djrs FksA
ize[q k jksxksa es]a tuojh ekg ds nkSjku pwf.kZy QQwna ikbZ xbZ
tks ekpZ ekg rd tkjh jghA tuojh&vizSy ekg ds nkSjku
ifk;ksa ,oa buQyksjksll
as jSfpl rFkk Qyksa ij ,sFa kzd
s ukst+ dk
teko ik;k x;kA vkBosa ekud lIrkg esa pwf.kZy QQwna 19%
iq"i xqPNksa ij dk mPpre izdksi ik;k x;k] 12osa ekud
lIrkg esa iq"i xqPNksa ij ,sFa kzDs ukst+ viuh ijkdk"B 29% ij
Fkk] tcfd NksVs Qyksa LVksu lkbt ij ,sFa kzDs ukst+ dk izHkko
14osa ekud lIrkg esa viuh vafre ifjdk"Bk 36-5% ij
FkkA
Management of major pests of mango

IPM interventions comprising cultural practices,
mechanical methods, application of microbial and ETLbased application of safer pesticides were validated on
Kesar and Alphonso varieties of mango at farmers'
orchards.
Seasonal abundance of pests
Population of hopper fluctuated throughout the
year wherein highest population (29.7 hoppers/panicle)
was observed from 8th to 9th standard meteorological
weeks. Hopper population had significant positive
correlation with maximum temperature (r=0.4), sun
shine hours (r=0.4364) and significant negative
relationship with minimum temperature (r=-0.3964),
average relative humidity (r=-0.5). Thrips population
had significant positive correlation with maximum
temperature (r=0.5) and sun shine (r =0.5) and
significant negative correlation with average relative
humidity (r=-0.5) and rainfall (r=-0.3). Fruit fly
damage to the mango crop is observed mainly during
May - July, more predominant in late maturing varieties
coinciding with early rains or high humidity. Leaf gall
midge (Protocontarinia matteiana) was recorded
throughout the year. Blossom midges, Erosomiya indica
was observed from November to May. Spiders,
coccinellids and green lace wing bug (Chrysoperla sp.)
were recorded predating upon mango hopper.
Amongst the major diseases, incidence of powdery
mildew was observed during January-March.
Anthracnose development on leaves and inflorescence
rachis and fruits was observed during Jan- April.
Highest occurrence of powdery mildew (19% on flower
panicles) was observed in 8th standard week, anthracnose
peaked (29%) on flower panicles during 12th standard
week while, it was 36.5% on stone sized fruits during
14th standard week.
43
NCIPM
uk'khtho ifjn`'; rFkk vkbZih,e dk vkfFkZd

fo'ys"k.k
vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys cxhpksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e
viukus okys cxhpksa es]a nksuksa fdLeksa vFkkZr dslj ,oa vYQkalksa
esa vHkZdksa gksij dh la[;k] pwf.kZy QQwna rFkk ,sFa kzDs ukst+ dh
rhozrk de ikbZ xbZA vkbZih,e ekWM;~ y
w ds dk;kZUo;u ls dslj
vkSj vYQkalksa vke Qyksa esa fdlkuksa dh fofk ds 11&12 mPp
fo"kkDr dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e okys
cxhpksa esa dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx 6 ckj esa deh ns[kh xbZA
blds ifj.kkeLo:i ikni laj{k.k dh ykxr esa deh vkbZ rFkk
uk'khthoksa dk izca ku Hkh csgrj <ax ls gks ik;kA dslj vkSj
vYQkalks fdLeksa esa vke dh mit] fdlkuksa dh fofk e'k%
6641 vkSj 8610 fdxzkizfr gsdh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e viukus
okys cxhpksa esa e'k% 9200 vkSj 13680 fdxzkizfr gs- vfkd
ikbZ xbZ rkfydk 6A
Pest scenario and economics of IPM

Number of hoppers, thrips and intensity of
powdery mildew, anthracnose was low in IPM
orchards as compared to the non-IPM orchards in both
the varieties. Adoption of IPM module also resulted in
less number of applications of pesticides i.e. six each in
Kesar and Alphonso varieties as compared to farmers
practice of 11-12 sprays of highly toxic pesticides, thus
reducing the cost of plant protection and better
management of the pests. Mango fruit yield in Kesar
and Alphonso cultivars was higher in IPM orchards (9200
and 13680 kg/ha) than farmers' practices (6641 and 8610
kg/ha), respectively (Table 6).
rkfydk 6% o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku dslj vkSj vYQkalks vke fdLeksa esa uk'khtho ifjn`'; rFkk vkbZih,e dk;Ze dk
vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k
Table 6: Pest scenario and economics of IPM in Kesar and Alphonso varieties of mango during 2013-14
izkpy
dslj*
vkbZih,e
,Qih
Parameter
vYQkalks**
vkbZih,e
,Qih
gksij izfr Vguh ;k iq"ixqPN@Hoppers/twig or panicle
IPM
3.37
FP
6.85
IPM
3.35
FP
6.82
dk"BdhV izfr Vguh ;k iq"ixqPN@Thrips/twig or panicle
5.87
11.02
3.20
6.15
Qy eD[kh % Qy gkfu@Fruit Fly (% fruit damage)
3.80
8.62
4.00
6.80
pwf.kZy QQwna % gkfu rhozrk@Powdery mildew (% disease intensity)
4.40
7.85
4.60
6.70
,saFkzsDukst+ % gkfu rhozrk@Anthracnose (% disease intensity)
8.27
14.32
6.57
12.30
11
12
25004
36108
33404
48068
1,61,630
1,16,217
3,76,200
2,36,775
9236
6641
13680
8610
370.25
265.65
547.20
344.40
6.5
3.2
11.3
4.9
[ksrh dh dqy ykxr ` izfr gs- leLr buiqV@No. of sprays of pesticide

dqy vk; ` izfr gsDVs*@Total cost of cultivation `/ha (all inputs)
vkSlr mit fdxzkizfr gs-@Gross Income (`/ha)*
Qy mit Qy la[;k izfr isM+ @Mean Yield (kg/ ha)
dhVuk'kd fNM+dko dh la[;k@Fruit bearing (No. of fruits/ tree)
ykHk % ykxr vuqikr@Benefit Cost ratio
cktkj ewY;% dslj% ` 350@20 fdxzk( vYQkalks%
550 izfr 20 fdxzk-
Market price: Kesar: ` 350/20 kg; Alphonso: ` 550/20 kg
fo'ys"k.k esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudyk fd fdlkuksa dh fofk ds

vuqlkj dslj fdLe 6-5%1 dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr
viuk, tkus esa vYQkalks fdLe 11-3%1 vkfFkZd :i ls T;knk
ykHkdkjh gSA vke dk mRiknu djus okys fdlkuksa dh vkbZih,e
ds ?kVdksa ds ckjs esa tkx:drk ,oa tkudkjh c<+kbZ xbZA
44
It was concluded that adoption of IPM

interventions in Alphonso cultivar were more
economical (11.3:1) as compared to that of Kesar cutivar
(6.5:1). The awareness and knowledge towards
IPM components had been enhanced among mango
growers.
esuMfju (larjk oxhZ;) iQy

ih,;w] yqfk;kuk( ,ldsvkj,;w] chdkusj( vle f"k
fo'ofo|ky;] vle( ,uvkjlh flVl] ukxiqj rFkk ,udSi]
ubZ fnYyh ds lg;ksx esa Hkkjr ds rhu fHkUu f"k tyok;q {ks=ksa
esa larjk oxhZ; Qy esuMfju uk'khthoksa ds lesfdr izca ku ds
fy, ,d usVodZ ifj;kstuk dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k tk jgk gSA
ih,;w] yqfk;kuk (iatkc)

ifj;kstuk ds laca k esa vcksgj iatkc ds iatdks'kh xkao dks
vaxhr fd;k x;kA fdUuw ds isMk+ as dks uqdlku igqp
a kus okys
fpfUgr ize[q k uk'khthoksa esa QkbVksIFkksjk rFkk pwld uk'khtho FksA
izR;sd xkao esa 0-4 gs- esa ikap fdlkuksa dks vaxhr fd;k
x;k] tgka vkbZih,e ?kVdksa dk oSkhdj.k fd;k tk jgk FkkA
QkbVksIFkksjk dks fu;af=r djus ds fy, vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds
izeq[k ?kVdksa esa csflu flapkbZ nzk.s kh&flapkbZ fofk dk izlkj
rFkk VkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue dk iz;ksx djuk vkSj mlds ckn
izHkkfor Vgfu;ksa ij vylh ds rsy dk fNM+dko djuk] e`nk
dh iyokj Mfas pax cukuk rFkk lqjf{kr tSo&dhVuk'kdks@
a
QQwna uk'kdksa dk if.kZy iz;ksx djuk 'kkfey FkkA flVl flyk
ds izca ku ds fy, vko';drkuqlkj thok.kqt vuqi;
z ksx rFkk
de tksf[ke okys dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k vkSj
leqnk; vkkkj ij muds mi;ksx dks c<+kok fn;k x;kA
vcksgj iatkc ds iatdks'kh xkao dh tula[;k 5500 gS]
ftlesa ls 150 fdlku ifjokj fdUuw dh [ksrh djrs gSAa bl {ks=
esa [kjhQ esa dikl rFkk jch ekSle esa xsgaw dh [ksrh dh tkrh
gSA vr% bl {ks= esa fujarj [ksrh dk;Z pyrk jgrk gSA fdlkuksa
dks Qly mRikndrk c<+kus esa ikWyhusVjksa dh Hkwfedk ds ckjs esa
Hkh dksbZ tkudkjh ugha FkhA vkSlru :i ls fdlku ` 43]000
& 45]000 izfr gs- fdUuw dh [ksrh ij [kpZ dj jgs FksA fdlku
Qjojh ls fnlEcj rd 15&20 dhVuk'kd fNM+dko djrs FksA
fdlku Qjojh ekg esa isM+ ds kM+ Vd
a ij uhys dkWij ,oa pwus
ykbe dk ysi yxkrs FksA fdlkuksa dks cksMkZ feJ.k rS;kj djus
esa rduhdh tkudkjh dkQh de Fkh vkSj os bldk mi;ksx Hkh
lgh <ax ls ugha djrs FksA fdlkuksa }kjk crk, x, vfkdrj
dhVuk'kdksa esa ysEcMklk;gsyksfFkzu] lk;ijesfFkzu] QsuosyjsV]
Vk;ktksQkWl] fFk;ksfeFkksDt+e] bfeMkDyksfizM dUQkbMj]
QksjVkby ,,y 80 MCY;wih ,yhVs] vxksuZ flksfdt+e feFkk;y
443 'kkfey FksA dhVuk'kdksa dk vuqi;
z ksx djus ds fy,
fdlkukas }kjk ikoj vkkkfjr rFkk VDS Vj pkfyr Lizs e'khuksa dk
mi;ksx fd;k tkrk FkkA Lizs Vsd
a esa dksbZ iz{kksHkd ,ftVsVj]
vFkkZr VSd
a ds Hkhrj dhVuk'kd fgykus&<qykus okyk ;a= o
Mandarin orchards
A network project for integrated management of
pests of mandarin in three different agro-climatic
regions of India is being implemented in collaboration
with PAU, Ludhiana; SKRAU, Bikaner; Assam
Agricultural University, Assam; NRC Citrus, Nagpur
and NCAP, New Delhi.
PAU, Ludhiana (Punjab)
Panjkosi village in Abohar (Punjab) was adopted
for the purpose. Major pests identified were
Phytophthora and sucking pests affecting the kinnow
trees.
Five farmers were adopted with 0.4 ha each in this
village, where IPM components are being validated.
Major components of IPM technology for Phytophthora
was popularizing basin method of irrigation and
application of Trichoderma harzianum followed by
linseed oil on affected twigs, soil drenching and foliar
application of safer bio-pesticides/fungicides. For
management of citrus psyilla, need-based application
of microbial and reduced risk pesticides and their
application on community basis were promoted.
Panjkosi village has 5500 population and among
them, 150 farmers' families are mainly engaged in
kinnow cultivation. Other crops in the area are cotton
in summer and kharif seasons and wheat in the rabi
season; hence, there was intensive cropping. They had
no knowledge about the role of pollinators in
enhancing crop productivity. On an average, farmers
were spending ` 43000-45000/ha on kinnow cultivation.
Number of applications of pesticides were 15-20 from
February to December. The farmers pasted the trunk
with blue copper and lime in the month of February.
The technical knowhow of the farmers about
preparation of bordeaux mixture and its application
was very poor and using wrong proportions. Most of
the pesticides as told by farmers were
lambdacyhalothrin, cypermethrin, fenvalerate,
triazophos, thiomethaxom, imidacloprid, (confidor),
fosetyl AL 80 WP (Aliette), ergon kresoxim methyl
443. Power operated and tractor driven spray machine
was used in application of pesticides. Spray tank was
not provided with any type of agitator and hence
45
NCIPM
O;oLFkk ugha Fkh ftlds dkj.k dhVuk'kd VSd
a ds Hkhrj uhps
te tkrk Fkk ;k fLFkj jgrk Fkk vkSj blfy, dhVuk'kdksa dk
,d tSlk vuqi;
z ksx ugha fd;k tkrk FkkA bl izdkj ds
fNM+dko ikniksa ds fy, fo"kSys gks ldrs gSAa
,,;w] vle
flVl flyk rFkk vU; pwld dhVksa ,oa ruk Hksndksa }kjk
mRiUu gfjr jksx xzhfuax fMft+t+ vle ds frulqfd;k {ks= esa
[kklh esuMfju ds fy, ize[q k pqukSrh FkhA
ckxokuh iQlyksa (dsyk] vukj vkSj vke) ds

fy, iQly uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj
lsok,a
egkjk"V ds ukS ftyksa esa iz{ks= esa rSukr dfeZ;ksa }kjk dsyk]
vukj rFkk vke dh fuxjkuh dh xbZ rFkk jklukizds esa dsUnzh;r
loZj ij uk'khtho gkfu dks vadksa esa n'kkZ;k x;k FkkA Qyksa dh
gkfu jksdus rFkk mipkjkRed mik;ksa ds fy, yf{kr fdlkuksa
dks eksckby Qksu ij ,l,e,l ds ek;e ls vRikofk lykgdkj
lsok,a nh tkrh Fkh rkfydk 7A bl {ks= esa dsys esa ik, tkus
okys eq[; uk'khthoksa esa flxkVksdk ,oa dk"BdhV] vukj esa
thok.kqt ikh kCck] eqj>ku rFkk dk"BdhV] vke esa vHkZd
gksij dk"BdhB] pwf.kZy&QQwna vkSj ,sFa kzDs ukst+ FksA
pesticides settled down and uniform application of

pesticides could not be made. Such type of spraying
could be phytotoxic to plants.
AAU, Assam
Greening disease transmitted by citrus psyilla and
other sucking insect and trunk borer were a major threat
to khasi mandarin in Tinsukia region of Assam.
Crop pest surveillance and advisory for

horticultural crops (banana, pomegranate and
mango)
Monitoring of pests of banana, pomegranate and
mango in nine districts of state of Maharashtra was
carried out through field scouting and digitization of
pest damage on centralized server at NCIPM. Based
on the extent of damage and action threshold, shortterm advisories were issued to targeted farmers through
SMS on mobile phones (Table 7). Major pests monitored
were sigatoka and thrips in banana; bacterial leaf spot,
wilt and thrips in pomegranate; hoppers, thrips,
powdery mildew and anthracnose in mango.
rkfydk 7 % dsyk] vke vkSj vukj ds fy, vkdM+ksa dk izos'k MkVk ,aVh rFkk uk'khtho izcaku 2013&14
Table 7: Data entries and pest management advisories for banana, mango and pomegranate (2013-14)
Qly
ftyk
MkVk ,aVh la[;k
Crop
District
Data entries (nos)
,l,;w }kjk uk'khtho lacakh

tkjh dh xbZ lykgdkj
lsok,a la[;k
uk'khtho LdkmV
uk'khtho eWkuhVlZ
Pest scout
Pest monitor
Pest Management advisories

issued by SAUs (nos)
dsyk@Banana
Jalgaon
518
64
452
vke@Mango
Thane
619
608
Raigad
1390
267
25
Ratnagiri
6343
487
106
Sindhudurga
874
207
21
vukj@Pomegranate
46
Nashik
2239
453
561
Ahmednagar
380
160
80
Solapur
966
145
401
Sangli
324
135
445
Total
13653
2526
2095
jk"Vh; f"k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy 'kfDr Strategic research for pest dynamics on mango in
(,uvkbZlhvkj,) ds vkhu tyok;q ifjorZu ls vke relation to climate change under National Initiative
on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)
uk'khthoksa dh lf;rkvksa ds fy, j.kuhfrd 'kksk
o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku ns'k ds N% f"k tyok;q {ks=ksa ds fy,
vke uk'khthoksa ds izdksi rFkk vtSfod dkjdksa ij MkVk dks
fMftVkbt dj fuxjkuh dh xbZA ns'k ds lHkh f"k tyok;q
{ks=ksa esa vke vHkZd dh lef"V rFkk dhVksa esa Qy eD[kh vkSj
pwf.kZy QQwna ,oa ,sFa kzDs ukst+ dk izdksi ns[kk x;kA o"kZ 2013 ds
MkVk ds v;;u ls ;g irk pyk fd vkbZlh,vkj vkjlhbZvkj
jkaph 80-75 izfr xqPN esa 16osa ,l,eMCY;w ekSle foKku
ekud lIrkg esa bfM;ksLdksIl Dyk;fifyl] bZ- ukbfo;ksLisjll
rFkk vefjVksMl vVfdulksuh rFkk mlds ckn lhvkbZ,l,p
y[ku 16-85 izfr xqPN esa 19osa ,l,eMCY;w es]a ,vkj,l
isfj;k 9-55 izfr xqPN esa 46osa ,l,eMCY;w esa vHkZdksa dh
lokZfkd lef"V lokZf/kd ikbZ xbZ vkSj vU; rhu LFkkuksa esa 25 ,l,eMCY;w esa lcls de 1-69 & 1-95 izfr xqPN lef"V
ikbZ xbZA ,vkj,l isfj;k 30-3 izfr xqPN izfr ViS esa dk"BdhVksa
fLVksfFkzIl MkslfZs yl vkSj ,l- esXuhQsjbs Z ,oa fjfQQksjksfFkzIl
w,uVVs l dh lef"V lokZfk Fkh vkSj rFkk vkbZlh,vkj]
vkjlhbZvkj jkaph 33-25 izfr xqPN izfr Qkan vkSj vU; LFkkuksa
ij 1&10 ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku budh lcls de 1-30 & 103 izfr xqPN lef"V ns[kh xbZA lhvkbZ,l,p] y[ku esa yhQ
oscj vksFkkZxk ,Dlfousfl;k ds dkj.k 36osa ,l,eMCY;w esa
izfr ikni tkyksa dh la[;k lokZfkd 37-8 Fkh] mlds ckn
vkbZlh,vkj] vkjlhbZvkj jkaph 30-4 esa nwljs ,l,eMCY;w esa
rFkk ,vkj,l- isfj;k 13-6 izfr xqPN dk LFkku FkkA
lhvkbZ,l,p] y[ku vkSj vkjlhbZvkj jkaph esa fet
izkd
s ksuVsfjfu;k esVfj;suk dh gkfu ntZ dh xbZ gkykafd vU;
LFkkuksa ij bldh gkfu de ntZ dh xbZA vkjlhbZvkj jkaph]
,vkj,l rFkk isfj;k esa dsoy ,sFa kzDs ukst+ vkSj pwf.kZy QQwna gh
ntZ fd, x,A
Digitization of data on the incidence of pests of

mango and abiotic factors were monitored for six agroclimatic regions of India during 2013. Population of
mango hopper, fruit fly among insects and incidence
of powdery mildew, anthracnose were observed
ubiquitously in all the six agro-climatic regions of India.
A perusal of the data during year 2013 revealed that
highest population of the hoppers (Idioscopus clypealis,
I. niveosparsus and Amritodus atkinsoni) was recorded
at ICAR RCER Ranchi (80.75/ panicle) in 16th SMW
followed by CISH Lucknow, (16.85/panicle) in 19th
SMW, ARS Paria (9.55/panicle) in 46th SMW and very
low (1.69 -1.95 per panicle) at other three locations
occurring in 2-5 th SMWs. Population of thrips
(Scirtothrips dorsalis and S. mangiferae and
Rhiphiphorothrips cruentatus) was very high at ARS
Paria (30.3/panicle/trap) and at ICAR, RCER Ranchi
(33.25/ panicle/trap) and at other locations it remained
low 1.30-10.3/panicle during 1-10 SMWs. At CISH,
Lucknow, number of webs/tree due to leaf webber
(Orthaga exvinacea) were maximum (37.8 ) during 36th
SMW followed by that in ICAR RCER Ranchi (30.4)
during 2nd SMW and ARS Paria (13.6/panicle). Midge
(Procontarinia matteriana) damage was recorded at
CISH Lucknow and RCER Ranchi, whereas at other
location damage was very low. Anthracnose and
powdery mildew were recorded at RCER Ranchi,
ARS, Paria only.
To those who are hungry, God is bread

Mahatma Gandhi, 1946
47
NCIPM
tSo fu;a=k.k
Biocontrol
iwoksZkj {ks=k esa e`nk tfur jksxksa ds izcaku ds fy, Exploration of native Trichoderma spp. for the
management of soil borne diseases in North East
?kjsyw VkbdksMekZ iztkfr dh [kkst
Region
VkbdksMekZ ds vuqi;
z ksx ls ikni dh o`f esa izkUs u;u
rFkk jksx izdksi esa deh ykuk
ikni dh o`f) c<+kus esa lgk;rk nsus okys y{k.kks]a jksx
izdksi esa deh ykus rFkk rnkuqlkj mit c<+kus ds fy;s can
ikk xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh] ljlksa vkSj gjh eVj esa VkbdksMekZ
dk ck;ksfizfeax y{k.ko.kZu fd;k x;kA can xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh]
ljlksa rFkk gjh eVj ds chtksa dh rktk rS;kj fd, x, tSo
fu;a=.k VkbdksMekZ ds lkFk 5&10 xzke izfr fdxzk- dh nj
ls cht Lyjh ds :i esa ck;ksfizfeax dh xbZA VkbdksMekZ
vkiwfrZ dh vU; fofk gS e`nk esa mldk iz;ksx djukA le`)
VkbdksMekZ iztkfr 1 fdxzk- dks 21 fnu ,Mokal esa iw.kZ :i
ls lM+h ,QokbZ,e xkscj [kkn@100 fdxzkds lkFk lajksfir
fd;k x;k vkSj mls c<+us rFkk cgqx.q ku ds fy, NksM+ fn;k
x;k rFkk can xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh] ljlksa rFkk gjh eVj dh
cqokbZ ds le; 5 fdxzk-@oxZ eh dh nj ls bldk iz;ksx fd;k
x;kA
cqokbZ ds 30 fnuksa Mh,,l ds ckn pkjksa Qlyksa ds [ksrksa
dh fLFkfr fjdkWMZ dh xbZ rFkk lHkh Qlyksa ds ikSksa dh o`f)
dk fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;k fp= 1A cqokbZ ds 30] 45 ;k 60
fnuksa ds ckn can xksHkh rFkk Qwy xksHkh esa xzhok foxyu jksx
izdksi jk;tksDVksfu;k lksykuh] eVj esa ;wlfs j;e vkWDlhiksje
,Q- iztkfr ikblh rFkk ljlksa esa LDysjksfVfu;k LDysVksfl;ksje
ruk foxyu jksx izdksi ntZ fd;k x;k vkSj izR;sd Qly
dh dVkbZ ds i'pkr va f re mit Hkh ntZ dh xbZ
fp= 2&3 ftlls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd VkbdksMekZ ds lHkh
fo;qDrksa ls [ksrksa ds mitkiu rFkk ikSkksa ds o`f) o fodkl
esa u dsoy dkQh lqkkj gqvk cfYd can xksHkh ds xzhok
foxyu izdksi esa deh vkbZ rFkk mit esa o`f) Hkh gqbAZ
rFkkfi] Vh,p&22ch fo;qDr esa mPp ikSk o`f) 1848-9]
U;wure xzhok foxyu izdksi 3-2% rFkk csgrj mit
48
Plant growth promotion and reduction in disease

incidence by Trichoderma spp.
The promising isolates of Trichoderma spp. were
characterized for biopriming, plant growth promoting
characteristics, reduction of disease incidence and
corresponding yield increase in cabbage, cauliflower,
mustard and field pea. The seeds of cabbage,
cauliflower, mustard and field pea were bioprimed with
freshly prepared biocontrol (Trichoderma) in the form
of slurry @ 5-10 g/kg seed. Another important method
of delivery of Trichoderma is soil application/soil
treatment. The potential Trichoderma spp. (1 kg) were
inoculated in well-rotten FYM (100 kg) 21 days in
advance, allowed to grow, multiply in it and was applied
(5 kg/m2, wet weight basis) in the field at the time of
sowing of cabbage, cauliflower, mustard and field pea.
The field emergence of four crops was recorded at
30 days after sowing (DAS) and seedling vigour of all
crops was calculated (Fig. 1). The disease incidence
(Rhizoctonia solani) induced collar rot in cabbage and
cauliflower, Fusarium oxysporum f sp. pisi in pea and
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum stem rot in mustard) was
recorded at 30, 45 and 60 DAS and final yield was
recorded after harvest of each crop.
All isolates of Trichoderma significantly improved
the field emergence and seedling vigour (Fig 1), reduced
the collar rot incidence and increased yield (Fig. 2) of
cabbage. However, highest seedling vigour (1848.9) and
yield (25.8 q/ha), lowest collar rot incidence (3.2%) was
recorded with isolate Th-22b. This isolate was followed
tSo fu;a=.k | Biocontrol
25-8 fDoa- izfr gs- ntZ dh xbZA bl fo;qDr ds ckn Vh,p&4]

Vh,p&25,] Vh,p&17] Vh,p&27] Vh,p&10] Vh,p&12 ch]
Vh,p&19 lh] Vh,p&2] Vh,p&16 lh] Vh,p&7] Vh,p&11
rFkk Vh,p&9 ch dk LFkku FkkA Vh,p&8 ch lcls de izHkkoh
fo;qDr ik;k x;kA
by Th-4, Th-25a, Th-17, Th-27, Th-10, Th-12b, Th19c, Th-2, Th-16c, Th-7, Th-11, Th-9b and least effective
isolate was Th-8b.
fp=- 1- can xksHkh] xksHkh ,oa eVj ds ikSkksa esa csgrj o`f) djus esa VkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dk izHkko
Fig. 1. Effect of Trichoderma isolates in improving seedling vigour of cabbage, cauliflower and pea
Qwy xksHkh ds laca k esa Hkh mDr izdkj ds ifj.kke ntZ fd,
x,] ftlesa VkbdksMekZ ds lHkh fo;qDr ikSk dh o`f) c<+kus]
xzhok foxyu izdksi vkj- lksykuh de djus rFkk Qwy xksHkh
dh mit esa leuq:i o`f) djus esa dkQh izHkkodkjh ik, x,A
rFkkfi] xksHkh ds ikSk dh o`f) c<+kus laca kh lwpdkad 1630-5
fp= 3] xzhok foxyu vkiru 4-6% de djus rFkk lokZfkd
mit 23-8 fDoa- izfr gs- fp= 4 ds fy, Vh,p&22 ch
fo;qDr dks rFkk mlds ckn Vh,p&4] Vh,p&17] Vh,p& 25 ,]
Vh,p&9 ch] Vh,p&8ch] Vh,p&7 rFkk Vh,p&2 fo;qDrksa dks
vfrizHkkoh ik;k x;k vkSj Vh,p&11 fp= 3&4 fo;qDr dks
lcls de izHkkoh ik;k x;kA
VkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dks ikSk dh o`f) c<+kus dh {kerk]
eqj>ku ;qlfs j;e vkWDlhLiksje ,Q- iztkfr ikblh de
djus rFkk lw[kh eVj ds cht dh mit c<+kus okys y{k.kksa
ds vkkkj ij Hkh izHkkodkjh ik;k x;kA rFkkfi] lw[kh eVj
ds chtksa ds ikni fodkl lwpdkad 1630-5 dks c<+kus] U;wure
eqj>ku 4-6% izdksi rFkk mit 12-5 fDoa- izfr gs- esa
lokZfkd o`f) djus esa Vh,p&9 ch fo;qDr dks lcls vfkd
dkjxj ik;k x;k fp= 2A blds ckn Vh,p&22 ch] Vh,p&12
Similar trend was also recorded with cauliflower,

where all isolates of Trichoderma were found
significantly effective in improving seedling vigour,
minimizing collar rot (R. solani) incidence and yield.
But, the isolate Th-22b was found most effective in
improving seedling vigour index (1630.5) and yield
(23.8q/ha) (Fig.1), reducing collar rot incidence (4.6%)
of cauliflower (Fig.2). The other promising isolates of
Trichoderma in their descending order of chronology
were- Th-4, Th-17, Th-25a, Th-9b, Th-8b, Th-12b,
Th-7, Th-2 and least effective isolate was Th-11.
The efficacy of Trichoderma isolates with their
inherent properties of plant growth promotion
(seedling vigour), minimizing wilt (Fusarium
oxysporum f. sp. pisi) incidence and improving yield
of dry field pea seed was also found encouraging.
However, the isolate Th-9b was most effective in
improving plant vigour index (1630.5), yield (12.5q/
ha) and reducing wilt (4.6%) incidence of dry field pea
seeds (Fig. 1, 2). The isolate Th-9b was closely followed
49
NCIPM
fp=- 2- xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh esa xzhok foxyu izdksi vkj- lksykuh] eVj esa eqj>ku izdksi ;qlfs j;e vkWDlhLiksje ,oa mit ij VkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dk izHkko
Fig. 2. Effect of Trichoderma isolates on incidence collar rot (Rhizoctonia solani) and yield of cabbage, cauliflower and incidence of
wilt (Fusarium oxysporum) and yield of pea
ch] Vh,p&2] Vh,p&8 ch] Vh,p&7 rFkk Vh,p&11 fo;qDrksa by Th-22b, Th-12b, Th-2, Th-8b, Th-7 and Th-11 was
least effective for the same properties.
dks leku y{k.kksa ds fy, de dkjxj ik;k x;kA
VkbdksMekZ ds vk'kktud fo;qDrksa dks ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k
The promising isolates of Trichoderma were also
foxyu dks de djus rFkk nwljh
found effective in
reducing Sclerotinia
vksj mit esa leuq:i o`f) djus
rot of mustard and
es a Hkh iz H kkoh ik;k x;kA
increasing yield. Lowest
Vh,p&22 ch fp= 3 fo;qDr
Sclerotinia rot (1.1%)
dks rFkk mlds ckn Vh,p&9
incidence and highest
ch] Vh,p&10] Vh,p&16 lh]
yield (11.9 q/ha) of
Vh,p&12 ch] Vh,p&17]
mustard was observed
Vh,p&2] Vh,p&8 ch]
with the isolate Th-22b
Vh,p&19 lh] Vh,p&25 ,]
(Fig.3), followed by ThVh,p&27 vkSj Vh,p&7 fo;qDrksa
9b, Th-10, Th-16c, Thdks ljlks a es a U;w u re
12b, Th-17, Th-2, ThLDysjksfVfu;k foxyu 1-1%
8b, Th-19c, Th-25a, Thizdksi rFkk lokZfkd mit 1127, Th-7, and the isolate
fp=- 3- VkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dk LDysjksfVfu;k ruk foxyu
9 fDoa- izfr gs- ds fy, izHkkoh
ij rFkk ljlksa dh mit ij izHkko
Th-11 was least effective
ik;k x;k] tcfd Vh,p&11
Fig. 3 Effect of Trichoderma isolates on Sclerotinia rot
for the same properties.
fo;qDr dks leku y{k.kksa ds fy,
and yield of Indian mustard
lcls de izHkkoh ik;k x;kA
50
uk'khtho izca ku ds fy, vko';d ;kaf=kd midj.kksa

dk fodkl
fofHkUu iQlyksa esa uoksUes"kh dhV jks'kuh vkdZZ"k.k
iQank dk ifj"dj.k] oSkhdj.k vkSj izlkj
Development of mechanical devices needed for pest

management
Refinement, validation and popularization of
innovative insect light traps in different crops
dhV jks'kuh vkdZ"Z k.k Qanks ds fy, fofHkUu ekWMyksa ij The different models of the insect light trap were
conceptualized. The
fopkj fd;k x;kA varr% ,d ,sls
improved cone shaped
dhV ykbV VSi dh vfHkdYiuk
model of insect
fMtkbu vkSj va'kkdu fd;k x;k
collecting
filter
tks mUur 'kadq dksu vkdkj ekWMy
chamber was designed
dh rjg Fkk rFkk mlesa fQYVj pSEcj
and fabricated. The
dye of the cone shaped
Hkh yxk gqvk FkkA m|e@fofuekZrk
model had also been
ls 'kaDokdkj dksu tSlk vkdkj
got fabricated by the
ekWMy dh MkbZ dk Hkh va'kkdu
entrepreneur. The
QSczhds'ku djok;k x;kA vU;
newly
designed
ykHkksa ds vykok bl u;s vfHkdfYir
system has ease in
ekWMy esa dhVksa dks idM+u@
s ,d=
mUur dksu vkdkj okys fQYVj pSEcj ds lkFk ykHkdkjh dhVksa
assemblage
and
ds
fy,
la
j
f{kr
ykbV
V
S
i
transportation of the
djus rFkk muds ifjogu esa lgtrk
Light
trap
safer
to
beneficial
insects
with
the
improved
gadget besides other
feyrh gSA
cone shaped filter chamber
benefits.
pkoy
[kjhQ ekSle 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vh; jktkkuh {ks=
,uhlhvkj esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk es]a kku dh Qly ds
laca k esa fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa iwlk&cklerh 1121 fdLe ij
mijksDr dhV ykbV ViS ksa dk oSkhdj.k fd;k x;kA dhV ykbV
VSi esa idM+s x, dhVks]a fQYVj pSEcj esa idM+s x, dhVksa esa ls
Hkkx fudyus okys dhVksa dh la[;k] Qly ij uk'khdhVksa dh
lef"V ds izdksi dk v;;u fd;k x;k rFkk VSi ds fcuk
daVky
s ds lkFk rqyuk dh xbZA dhV ykbV VSiksa ij] uk'khtho
fuxjkuh Vwy ds :i es]a v;;u fd;k x;kA dhV ykbV VSiksa
esa idM+s x, dhV vfkdrj gsfeIVsjk] dksfy;ksIVsjk rFkk ysfiMksIVsjk
oa'keksa ls lacfa kr FksA dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ls dkQh
la[;k esa dhV ftudk 'kjhj vkdkj NksVk ;k Hkkxus esa lQy
ik, x,A uk'khtho fuxjkuh Vwy ds :i esa jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k
Qank ls kku dh Qly ij ruk Hksnd rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw
czkmu IykaV gksij ds vke.k ds le; dk irk pykA
fdlkuksa dks ykbV VSi izkS|ksfxdh bR;kfn ds rduhdh Kku]
fofuns'Z ku] mi;ksx djus dh fofk] j{kksik; rFkk ykHkksa ds ckjs
esa tkudkjh nh xbZA
Qly ekSle ds nkSjku Hkwjk ikni ekgw] uhykioZrk Y;wxus l
dh lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZA ykbV ViaS dk uk'kdhVksa dh lef"V
Rice
The above insect light traps had been validated in
Pusa-Basmati 1121 on the farmers' fields in paddy crop
in NCR Delhi during kharif season 2013 in a farmers'
participatory mode. The insects trapped in the insect
light trap, the total number of insects escaped after
trapping in the filter chamber, the attack of insect pests'
population on the crop was studied and compared with
control without trap. The light traps had also been
studied as pest monitoring tool. In the insect light trap,
insects mostly belonging to insect orders: Hemiptera,
Coleoptera, Lepidoptera were found trapped. A large
number of insects (having smaller body size) had been
found escaped/filtered out from the insect light trap
The light trap as pest monitoring tool indicated the
time of attack of stem borer and brown plant hopper
on the paddy crop. The farmers were educated about
the technical knowhow, specifications, mode of
operation, safety precautions and benefits of the light
trap technology, etc.
During the crop season, the population of brown
plant hopper Nilaparvata lugens was observed to be
high. The light trap could also be used for monitoring
51
NCIPM
dh fuxjkuh djus ds fy, Hkh mi;ksx fd;k x;k D;ksfa d blesa
nksuksa gh fyaxksa ds uk'kdhVksa dks idM+k tkrk FkkA ftu IykVksa
esa ykbV VSi LFkkfir fd, x, Fks ogka ykbV VSi ugha yxk,
x, [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa mPp mit vkSj ykHk%ykxr vuqikr izkIr
fd;k x;k rkfydk 1] 2] 3A
the population of insect pests as it was trapping both

the sexes. Higher yield, B:C ratio was obtained in fields
where light trap was installed in comparison to nonlight trap plots (Table 1, 2, 3).
rkfydk 1% [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vh; jktkkuh {ks=]

ubZ fnYyh esa vkbZih,e viukus okys rFkk fdlkuksa dh
fofk;ksa ,Qih okys [ksrksa esa uk'khtho dk izdksi
rkfydk 2% [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vh; jktkkuh {ks=]

ubZ fnYyh esa iwlk&1121 pkoy mRiknu dh mit ,oa
vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k
Table 1: Pest incidence in IPM and farmers' practices (FP)

paddy fields at NCR, Delhi during kharif 2013
Table 2: Yield and economics of Pusa - 1121 rice production

during kharif season 2013 in NCR, New Delhi
uk'khtho@ykHkdkjh
pj
vkbZih,e
,Qih
Pest/Beneficial
IPM
FP
Variable
ruk Hksnd (%) / Stem borer (%)
2.7
6.0
ikh eksMd
+ (%) / Leaf folder (%)
5.8
9.2
Hkwjk ikh ekgw izfr Vhyk / BPH/hill
6.7
edM+h izfr Vhyk / Spiders/hill
1.4
vkbZih,e xSj ,Qih

IPM
Non-IPM
dqy ykxr ` izfr gs-/Total cost (`/ha)

vkSlr mit fDoa-@gs-/Mean yield (q/ha)
30654
39176
42.50
33.50
dqy ykHk ` izfr gs-/Total return (`/ha)
1,72,125
1,35,675
9.2
'kq) ykHk ` izfr gs-/Net return (`/ha)
1,41,471
96,499
0.8
ykxr%ykHk vuqikr / B :C ratio
5.62:1
3.46:1
kku dk ewY;
@`
4050@& izfr fDoa-
Rate of paddy @ ` 4050/- per q
rkfydk 3% o"kZ 2013 ds [kjhQ ekSle ds nkSjku kku iwlk cklerh 1121 ds [ksrksa esa LFkkfir jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank
fofHkUu vkdkj ds ds fNnzksa ls Hkkx x, dhVksa dk izfr'kr
Table 3: Percentage escape of insects from light trap pores of (different sizes) installed in paddy (Pusa Basmati 1121)
fields during kharif season 2013.
vofk
jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ds fNnzksa ls Hkkx

x, dhVksa@izfr jkf= dk izfr'kr
fNnzksa dk vkdkj 5 fe- eh-
jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ds fNnzksa ls Hkkx

x, dhVksa@izfr jkf= dk izfr'kr
fNnzksa dk vkdkj 3 fe- eh-
% insects escaped/night from

the pores (pore size 5mm)
% insects escaped/night from

the pores (pore size 3mm)
38 ,l,eMCY;w /38th SMW
52.4
52.1
39 ,l,eMCY;w @39th SMW
72.0
39.7
Period
VekVj
o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vh; jktkkuh {ks= fnYyh esa VekVj
dh Qly ij fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa u, fodflr
dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dks oSkhdj.k ds fy, LFkkfir fd;k
x;kA fdlkuksa dks dhV ykbV VSi izkS|ksfxdh bR;kfn dk
rduhdh Kku] fofuns'Z ku] mi;ksx djus dh fofk] j{kksik; rFkk
ykHkksa ls voxr djk;k x;kA jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks esa idM+s x,
rFkk muesa ls Hkkx x, uk'khdhVksa dk vkdyu fd;k x;kA
VekVj dh Qly ds fy, LFkkfir jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanksas dk
Qly rFkk blds fofHkUu ?kVdksa bR;kfn ij uk'khdhVksa ds
vke.k ds vkkkj ij izHkko v;;u fd;k x;k rkfydk&4A
52
Tomato
In a farmers' participatory mode, the newly
invented insect light traps were installed for validation
in tomato crop on the farmers' fields in NCR Delhi
during 2013. The farmers were educated about the
technical knowhow, specifications, mode of operation,
safety precautions and benefits of the light trap
technology, etc. The insects trapped and filtered out
had been observed. Impact of insect light trap installed
in the tomato crop had also been observed in terms of
attack of insect pests on the crop and its different
attributes, etc. (Table-4).
rkfydk 4 %o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vh; jktkkuh {ks= fnYyh esa VekVj ds fofHkUu izkpyksa ij fofHkUu mipkjksa dk izHkko
Table 4: Impact of different treatments on different parameters on tomato crop during 2013 season in NCR-Delhi
pj
jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank LFkkfir fd, x, [ksr
daVksy
Fields where light traps installed
Control
Ukk'kdhVksa }kjk Qyksa dks igqp

a kbZ xbZ gkfu dk % / % fruit damaged by insects
0.4
1.2
vkSlr Qy la[;k izfr ikni @Average number of fruits/plant
58.8
53.5
Variable
rkfydk 5% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku VekVj ds [ksrksa esa LFkkfir jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks esa idM+s x, rFkk VSi ds fNnzksa ls
Hkkx x, dhV
Table 5: Insects trapped and filtered out from insect light trap in tomato crop fields during 2013 season in NCR-Delhi
,l,eMCY;w
SMW
dqy idM+s x,
dhV
dqy Hkkx x, dhV

Total insects escaped
Total insects
trapped
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
vkSlr /Average
376
377
7359
557
1428
1970
772
460
21
1480
lkkkj.k jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank esa

ekj fn, tkus okys dhVksa dh la-
cpk, x, dhVksa dk %
% insects saved
To be killed in ordinary
insect light trap
1254
18227
2933
5013
7319
2463
2281
2653
2197
4926.7
lkSj@cSVjh tkZ ls pkfyr dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ds

u, fMtkbuksa ij Hkh fopkj fd;k x;kA uoksUes"kh fodflr
dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank ds ckSf)d laink vfkdkjksa vkbZihvkj
jkbV dks lajf{kr djus ds fy, dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank ds
VM
s ekdZ dks Hkh fMtkbu fd;k x;k vkSj mls isVVas vkfQl
ubZ fnYyh esa tek fd;k x;kA bls Vsjk uke fn;k x;k gS vkSj
yksxks ij vafdr fd;k x;k gSA
1630
18604
10292
5570
8747
4433
3053
3113
2218
6406.7
76.9
98.0
28.5
90.0
83.7
55.6
74.7
85.2
99.0
76.9
The new design of solar/battery operated insect

light traps had also been conceptualized and studied.
To protect IPR rights of innovative insect light trap
invented, the trademark of insect light had also been
designed and filed in "Patent office", New Delhi, which
has been named as "Tera" with logo.
jklukizds Hkkvuqi] ubZ fnYyh esa vkfo"dkj fd, x, rFkk jklukizds }kjk
isVVas djk, x, dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dk VM
s ekdZ
Trademark of insect light trap as invented and patented
at NCIPM (ICAR), New Delhi
53
NCIPM
lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh] uk'khtho iwokZuqeku

,oa fu.kZ; lgk;rk iz.kkyh
Information Technology, Pest Forecasting
and Decision Support System
egkjk"V esa iQly esa uk'khtho dh fuxjkuh rFkk Crop pest surveillance and advisory project
(CROPSAP) in Maharashtra
lykgdkj lsok ifj;kstuk (kWilSi)
o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku] egkjk"V esa lks;kchu] dikl]
kku] vjgj rFkk pus dh Qlyksa esa e'k% 39-17] 38-68] 1523] 10-96 vkSj 12-47 yk[k gs- {ks= esa 33 ftyks]a 348 rkywdkvksa
rFkk 43]000 xkaoksa esa kWilSi ifj;kstuk dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k
x;kA jkT; f"k foHkkx] egkjk"V }kjk bl ifj;kstuk dk
dk;kZUo;u fd;k rFkk jklukizds us mUgsa vkbZlhVh&vkkkfjr
uk'khtho fuxjkuh djus ds fy, yxkrkj ikaposa o"kZ esa Hkh
lgk;rk nhA
ekWulwu ds 'kq: gksus lkekU; ;k foyafcr] Qly dk
jksi.k twu ekg ds var esa vFkok ugha] 29 ekud ekSle lIrkg
,l,eMCY;w 16&22 tqykbZ] 30 ,l,eMCY;w 23&29 tqykbZ
rFkk 31 ,l,eMCY;w 30 tqykbZ & 5 vxLr ds nkSjku e'k%
60 fe-eh- ls vf/kd] 50 fe-eh- rFkk 10 fe-eh- ls de o"kkZ gksus
vFkok ugha gksus tSls fcUnqvksa ij fopkj djrs gq, lks;kchu ij
LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk dh rhozrk ds iwokZueq kuksa dk vkdyu fd;k
x;k rFkk MkWV usV seodZ 4-0 izkS|ksfxdh dk iz;ksx djrs gq,
vkdyuksa dks kWilSi esa lekfo"V fd;k x;kA nsjh ls ekWulwu
'kq: gksus vkSj 29] 30 ,oa 31 ,l,eMCY;w ds laca k esa e'k%
60 fe-eh- ls vf/kd rFkk 50 fe- eh- vkSj 10 fe-eh- ls de o"kkZ
gksus ds lkFk nsjh ls jksi.k ds dkj.k uk'khtho ds izdksi QSyus
dk iwokZueq ku fd;k x;kA lkekU; ekWulwu ds lkFk lkekU;
frfFk;ksa esa jksi.k rFkk lkekU; o"kkZ ds vkkkj ij ;g iwokZueq ku
yxk;k x;k fd lks;kchu ij uk'khtho dh ekewyh rhozrk gksxh
;k izdksi fcydqy Hkh ugha gksxkA
54
CROPSAP was operated across 33 districts, 348

talukas and 43000 villages of Maharashtra in an area of
39.17, 38.68,15.23, 10.96 and 12.47 lakh hectares in
respect of soybean, cotton, rice, pigeonpea and chickpea
crops, respectively during 2013-14. Implemented by the
State Department of Agriculture, Maharashtra,
NCIPM facilitated the ICT-based pest monitoring for
the fifth successive year.
Considering the onset of monsoon (normal or
delayed), planting of crop (before June end or not),
rainfall of > 60 mm, <50 mm and 10 mm in respect
of 29 SMW (16-22 July), 30 SMW (23-29 July) and 31
SMW (30 July - 5 Aug) or not, severity predictions
were evolved and incorporated into CROPSAP
software using Dot Net Framework 4.0 technology.
While delayed onset of monsoon and delayed planting
with rainfall >60 mm , <50 mm and <10 mm in
respect of 29, 30 and 31 SMWs predicted the outbreak,
normal monsoon with normal planting dates with
rainfall events not meeting the conditions of outbreak
predicted low to moderate severity or no outbreak
situation.
lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh] uk'khtho iwokZuqeku ,oa fu.kZ; lgk;rk iz.kkyh | Information Technology, Pest Forecasting and Decision Support System
lks;kchu
lkaxyh ftys ds lHkh rglhyksa esa ,l- fyVwjk ds ,dy
ykokZ dh lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZ] gkykafd vU; ftyksa dh
rglhyksa esa blesa fHkUurk FkhA
egkjk"V ds vU; LFkkuksa dh
rqyuk esa iq.ks ftys ds gosyh
rglhy esa 0-72@eh- iafDr ds
ekSle vkSlr ds lkFk ,l- fyVwjk
dh lokZfkd vkSlr lef"V ikbZ
xbZA o"kZ 2013 ekSle ds nkSjku
gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtjs k ykokZ dh
lef"V dkQh de ikbZ xbZA
Soybean
Solitary larva of S. litura were relatively higher
across teshils of Sangli while it was variable among
teshils of all other
districts. Haweli teshil of
Pune had the highest
mean population of
solitary S. litura with a
seasonal mean of 0.72/m
row over other locations
of Maharashtra. Larval
numbers of Helicoverpa
armigera were too low
during the 2013 season.
eSlksLdsy ds vkkkj ij lHkh

Temporal dynamics
fp= 1- egkjk"V esa lks;kchu dhVksa dh fLFkfr 2013
fu"i=dksa ,l- fyVwjk] ,pat a mesoscale of district
Fig. 1. Status of soybean pests across Maharashtra (2013)
vkjfetsjk vkSj lh- ,D;wVk ds
for all defoliators
fy, ftyks a dh vLFkk;h
(S.
litura,
H.
armigera
and
C.
acuta) indicated nonxfrfd;ksa ls ;g irk pyk fd Qly ekSle ds nkSjku dksbZ Hkh
damaging population during the crop season although
gkfudkjd uk'khdhVksa dh lef"V ugha ikbZ xbZ] gkykafd 27osa
occurrence was observed between 27 and 39 standard
,oa 39osa ekSle foKku ekud lIrkgksa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku
meteorological weeks (SMWs). Semilooper was
uk'khdhVksa dk vkxeu ns[kk x;k FkkA fiNys ikap _rqvksa relatively higher at Dhule between 31 and 34 SMW.
2009&13 ds nkSjku ,l- fyVwjk vkSj lh- ,D;wVk ds rqyukRed Comparative scenario for S. litura and C. acuta over
ifjn`'; ls ;g fu"d"kZ fudyk fd o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku lks;kchu five seasons (2009-13) indicated lowest population levels
ij uk'khthoksa dh lef"V lcls de ikbZ xbZ fp= 1A
on soybean during 2013 (fig. 1).
dikl
fofHkUu ftyksa esa vusd ekSdksa ij tSflM ,ejkLdk
fMokLVsUl dk vkxeu ,oa rhozrk ns[kh xbZA egkjk"V ds
leLr LFkkuksa esa dikl ij dk"BdhV fFkzIl Vckdh rFkk
lQsn eD[kh csfefl;k Vckdh
dk izdksi lkekU; ik;k x;kA
tqykbZ ekg ls dk"BdhVksa rFkk
lQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V ns[kh
xbZ ftlesa vxLr ekg ds e; ls
o`f) gksus yxh fp= 2A
egkjk"V esa ,d ;k vU; LFkkuksa
ij feyh cx] fQukdks D dl
lksyus ksfIll dk vkxeu ns[kk x;k]
ij mldh lef"V dkQh de FkhA
uanjq cj] ;korey rFkk okkZ ftyksa
esa feyhcx dk vkxeu fujarj ns[kk
x;kA
Cotton
Occurrence and severity of jassid (Amrasca
devastans) was noted on many occasions across several
districts. Thrips (Thrips tabaci) and whitefly (Bemisia
tabaci) incidence on cotton was common across all
locations of Maharashtra.
Thrips and whiteflies were
seen from July onwards with
their increase from midAugust (fig. 3)
fp= 2- egkjk"V esa dikl ds ekSle esa pwld dhVksa ,oa ikh ykyiu
dh fLFkfr
Fig. 2. Status of sap feeders and leaf reddening during cotton
growing season in Maharashtra
Mealy bug Phenacoccus

solenopsis occurred at one or
other
locations
of
Maharashtra at very low levels
with
its
continuous
occurrence at Nandurbar,
Yeotmal and Wardha districts
(fig. 4).
55
NCIPM
ukaMM
s ]+ okkZ] ijHk.kh] fgaxksyh rFkk ukxiqj ftyksa esa vkjksgh
e esa ikh ykyiu dk izdksi lokZfkd FkkA rFkkfi] tyxkao]
ijHk.kh] chM] ukaMM
s ] vgenuxj rFkk tkyuk esa vDVwcj ekg
ds nwljs lIrkg ls Qly dh dVkbZ rd 10% ls de ikh
ykyiu jksx ik;k x;kA
Incidence of leaf reddening was high at Nanded>

Wardha> Parbhani> Hingoli> Nagpur districts.
However, Jalgaon, Parbhani, Beed, Nanded,
Ahmednagar and Jalna had <10% incidence of red
leaves from 2nd week of October till harvest.
Rice
Yellow stem borer (YSB) damage was significant
rhljs ekSle foKku ekud lIrkg ds nkSjku dsoy x<+fpjkSyh
rd
esa ihyk ruk Hksnd okbZ,lch dh gkfu dkQh 38% ikbZ xbZA only at Gadchiroli with maximum of 38% during 3
SMW. Highest infestation of
blh LFkku ij 31oss ekud lIrkg
3% of gall midge was noted
ds nkSjku xky fet dk lokZfkd
during 31 st SMW at
3% lae.k ik;k x;kA ekSle ds
Gadchiroli. Leaf folder damage
e;e esa uanjq cj ftys esa ikh eksMd
+
was highest at Nandurbar
gkfu lokZfkd 12% ikbZ xbZA
district (12%) during midflrEcj ekg ds nkSjku 32 ekSdksa ij
season. Bacterial leaf blight
thok.kqt ikh vaxekjh ch,ych
(BLB) was above ETL on 32
jksx bZVh,y ls ij ik;k x;kA
occasions during September.
Increasing blast incidence at
kwys rFkk ukxiqj esa izLQqVu izdksi
Dhule and Nagpur was
c<+rk gqvk ik;k x;kA mPp LFkkuksa
fp= 3- egkjk"V esa pkoy ds dhVksa dh fLFkfr
dh rqyuk esa ukxiqj] kwys rFkk Hkkankz Fig. 3. Status of rice pests across Maharashtra (2013) notable. Nagpur >Dhule
>Bhandara had relatively
esa vkjksgh e esa mPp izLQqVu
higher
blast
disease
over
other locations. Pest status
jksx ik;k x;kA iwjs egkjk"V esa uk'khthoksa dh fLFkfr vkjksgh
e esa bl izdkj Fkh% okbZ,loh > ch,ych > ikni ekgw >xky across Maharashtra on rice followed YSB>BLB> plant
hoppers> gall midge > leaf folder > blast (Fig. 3).
pkoy
fet >ikh eksM+d > izLQqVu fp= 3A
vjgj
uoEcj vkSj fnlEcj ds nkSjku Qyh Hksnd }kjk vjgj dh
Qly dks igqp
a k, x, uqdlku dk izfr'kr lokZfkd FkkA
puk
,p- vkfeZtjs k ds izof` k dh xfrf;ksa rFkk blds ifjek.k
esa LFkku&nj LFkku fHkUurk ikbZ xbZ] tks fnlEcj ;k tuojh esa
viuh ijkdk"Bk ij FksA vejkorh rFkk mlds ckn ykrwj] iq.ks
vkSj vkSjx
a kckn esa eqj>ku izdksi lcls vfkd ik;k x;k]
gkykafd bu LFkkuksa esa eqj>ku izdksi esa fHkUurk FkhA fnlEcj
ekg ds nkSjku lcls vfkd eqj>ku izdksi ik;k x;kA
uk'khtho izcaku lacakh lykgdkj lsokvksa dk izlkj

o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku lks;kchu] dikl] kku] vjgj
rFkk pus ds fy, fofHkUu uk'khthoksa ds bZVh,y ifjn`'; ij
fdlkuksa dks Qly ds vkkkj ij ,l,e,l ds ek;e ls e'k%
15170] 24846] 20959] 13364 rFkk 10759 lykgdkj loks,a
tkjh dh xbZ fp= 4A
56
Pigeonpea
Damage to pigeonpea pods due to pod borer
complex measured as per cent pod damage was highest
during November and December.
Chickpea
The dynamics of trend of H. armigera and its
magnitude varied between locations with peaks either
during December or January. Wilt incidence varied
with division, being the highest for Amravati followed
by Latur, Pune and Aurangabad. Highest wilt incidence
was found during December.
Dissemination of pest management advisories
Dissemination of pest management advisories
through short mail services (SMS) across the crops-based
on ETL scenario of different pests in soybean, cotton,
rice, pigeonpea and chickpea were 15170, 24846, 20959,
13364 and 10759 during 2013-14. Their distribution
across divisions and crops is given below (Fig 4).
fp= 4- egkjk"V esa 2013 ds nkSjku uk'khtho ca/ku ij tkjh dh xbZa lykg
Fig. 4. Pest management advisories issued at Maharashtra during 2013
tyok;q ifjorZu ds lacak esa uk'khthoksa dh Pest dynamics in relation to climate change
xfrf;ka
Implementation of real time pest dynamics (RTPD)
rRdkfyd uk'khtho xfrdh fuxjkuh flLVe dk
dk;kZUo;u (vkjVhihMh)
o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku pkj Qlyks]a vFkkZr pkoy] vjgj]
ewx
a Qyh rFkk VekVj esa yxkrkj rhljs o"kZ uk'khtho dh
fuxjkuh rFkk ekSle ds iwokZueq ku ds fy, 10 f"k ikfjra=ksa ds
varxZr 10 jkT;ksa ds 10 f"k tyok;q {ks=ksa esa 26 dsUnzksa ij
vkjVhihMh dk v;;u gsrq dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;kA [kjhQ
2013 ds nkSjku pkoy 7( vjgj 7( ewx
a Qyh 5 rFkk VekVj
7 dks feykdj iPphl 25 vkjVhihMh dsUnzkas us rFkk jch
2013 ds nkSjku 17 dsUnzkas us vkjVhihMh dk dk;kZUo;u fd;kA
bu dsUnzkas us uk'khthoksa dh xfrf;ksa rFkk ekSle ds laca k esa
vkadM+s ,d= fd, rFkk mUgsa jklukizds ds loZj esa viyksM
fd;k] ftlesa 24 x 7 osc vkkkfjr fjiksfVx dh lqfokk miyCk
dh xbZ FkhA
,uvkbZlhvkj, (fuk) xzkgd lkWVos;j dk v|ru

rFkk osc&vkkkfjr fjiksfVx
vjgj] ewx
a Qyh rFkk VekVj rhu Qlyksa ds fy, fodflr
Qsjkseksu ViaS dSp ekWM;~ y
w dks gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtjs k ,oa LiksMksIVsjk
fyV;qjk ds laca k esa lkIrkfgd vkkkj ij MkVk vfHkxzfgr djus
gsrq xzkgd lkWVos;j esa lekfo"V fd;k x;k] ftlesa lkIrkfgd]
ekfld rFkk okf"kZd vkkkj ij eksFk iraxk idM+ lwpuk
viyksM+ djus ds fy, osc vkkkfjr fjiksfVx lqfokk miyCk dh
xbZ gSA
pkoy uk'khthoksa ds Mk;Xuksfll ,oa fuxjkuh

izfrp;u ds fy, fof'k"V lkWVos;j
foaMksa 7 vkWijsfVax flLVe dk iz;ksx djrs gq, MkWV usV
seodZ 4-0 esa ,d lesfdr foaMks vkkkfjr izkx
s kz e 16 ,ech
Recording of weather data as part of RTPD was

done at 10 agro-climatic zones of 10 states spread across
12 agro ecological regions were implemented with pest
and weather monitoring during 2013-14 for the third
year in four crops viz. rice, pigeonpea, groundnut and
tomato. Twenty five RTPD centers [rice (7); pigeonpea
(7); groundnut (5) & tomato (7)] during kharif 2013,
and 17 during rabi recorded the pest dynamics and
weather data vis-a-vis entry and uploads to the database
of NCIPM server that supported 24X7 web-enabled
reporting system.
Up gradation of NICRA client software and webenabled reporting

Pheromone trap catch module for the three crops
viz. pigeonpea, groundnut and tomato to capture week
wise data of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura
was incorporated in the client software with
simultaneous updating of the web-enabled reporting
system for retrieval of moth catch scenario on weekly,
monthly and yearly basis.
Customised software for diagnosis & sampling for
rice pest surveillance
A standalone window-based application (16MB)
"Diagnosis & Sampling for Rice Pest Surveillance" has
been developed in Dot Net Framework 4.0 using
Windows 7 operating system. Diagnosis and sampling
of variables viz. plants (4), insects (23), diseases (8),
57
NCIPM
pkoy uk'khtho fuxjkuh ds fy, Mk;Xuksfll rFkk izfrp;u
fodflr fd;k x;k gSA ikniksa 4] dhVksa 23] jksxksa 8] ykHkdkjh
6 rFkk ykbV ViS idM+ 16 tSls pjksa ds Mk;Xuksfll rFkk
izfrp;u lSia fyax ds fy, muds y{k.k] fp=ksa besft+t+ rFkk iz{s k.k
dh izf;k ds vkkkj ij xzkgd lkWVos;j esa lekfo"V fd;k x;kA
ekSle ifjn`'; ds lkFk&lkFk uk'khtho dh cnyrh

fLFkfr
pkoy
yqfk;kuk iatkc esa 15 ls 70% dh jst
a esa ikh eksMd
+
izdksi ik;k x;kA ykbV VSi idM+ esa Hkh ikh eksMd
+ uk'khtho
dh rhozrk ns[kh xbZA pkoy ds ysfiMksIVsjl uk'khthoksa dh eksFk
iraxk idM+ ds rqyukRed v/;;u esa ikh eksMd
+ ds vykok
lQsn rFkk xqykch ruk Hksnd uk'khthoksa dh c<+rh izof` k ns[kh
xbZA U;wure rkieku ds fopyu ds fo'ys"k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k
fd izR;sd o"kZ twu vkSj vDVwcj ekg ds nkSjku U;wure rkieku
esa dkQh o`f) 0-3 & 40 ls- gqbZA dqN xkaoksa esa Hkwjk ikni ekgw
chih,p] uhykioZr Y;qxl
as ds dkj.k gksij cuZ ik;k x;kA
[kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku vnqFkqjkbZ rfeyukMq esa OgksyZ
eSxkWV ik;k x;k] ftlus Qly dks cgqr de uqdlku igqpk;k
FkkA jch 2013 ds nkSjku vnqFkqjkbZ esa izfrjksi.k ds 30 fnuksa
Mh,Vh ds ckn ihyk ruk Hksnd okbZ,lch] fLiksQkxk
buljV~vYl 81-2%] dkys f'kjk okyk Hksnd Mh,pch] dkbyks
ikyhkbll 12-5%] xqykch ruk Hksnd ih,lch] fllsfe;k
buQjsl
a 6-2% uk'khtho ik, x,A vDVwcj 2013 ds nkSjku
ukxkifVue rfeyukMq ds fdyosyjq CykWd esa 2&3 lIrkgksa ds
'kq"d fnuksa ds ckn cjlkr ds dkj.k ,dy :i esa cqokbZ fd,
x, pkoy lhvkj 1009 ,oa chihVh 5204 fdLesa esa pkoy
feyhcx] czfs ofu;k jsgh dk izdksi ik;k x;kA
[kjhQ ekSle ds nkSjku djtr egkjk"V esa vfkd ckfj'k
ds dkj.k ikS/k'kkykvksa rFkk izfrjksfir pkoy Qly izHkkfor
gqb]Z ftlds dkj.k pkoy dk iqu% jksi.k fd;k x;kA bl izdkj
dh fLFkfr dslokWeZ ds vkxeu ds fy, vuqdy
w FkhA vDVwcj
2013 esa ckny;qDr ekSle rFkk fNViqV ckfj'k ls pkoy dh
vxsrh fdLeksa dh Qly ij ifjiDou dh voLFkk ij pkoy
vkehZokWeZ dk dkQh T;knk izdksi ik;k x;kA thok.kqt ikh
vaxekjh rFkk izLQqVu rhozrk de FkhA
;|fi ekaM;k dukZVd esa [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku ize[q k
uk'khthoksa dk izdksi bZVh,y ls de Fkk] ysfdu eSljw ] mkj
58
beneficials (6) and light trap catches (16) were

incorporated with their description, images and
procedure of observations.
Changing pest status vis-a-vis weather scenario

Rice
Leaf folder was observed with incidence ranging
from 15 to 70% at Ludhiana (Pb). Severity of leaf folder
was also reflected in light trap catches. Comparison of
fp= 5- yqf/k;kuk esa jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qans es idM+s x, pkoy ds

ysfiMksIVsju uk'khtho
Fig. 5. Light trap catches of rice lepidopteran pests at Ludhiana
moth catches of lepidopterous pests of rice showed

increasing trends of white and pink stem borers besides
leaf folder. Analysis of deviation of minimum temperature
from its indicated significant increase of minimum
temperature by 0.3 - 40C between June and October of
each year. Hopper burn due to brown plant hopper
(BPH), Nilaparvata lugens was observed in some villages.
Damage due to whorl maggot was in traces during
kharif 2013 at Aduthurai (TN). Stem borer complex at
Aduthurai (TN) in rabi yellow stem borer (YSB)
Scirpophaga incertulas (81.2%) >dark headed borer
(DHB), Chilo polychrysus (12.5%) >pink stem borer
(PSB), Sesamia inferens (6.2%) at 30 DAT. Rice
mealybug, Brevenia rehi outbreak in direct- seeded rice
(cvs. CR1009 and BPT5204) in Kilvelur block of
Nagapattinam district (TN) during October 2013 was
noticed following prolonged dry spell of 2 - 3 weeks
followed by rains.
At Karjat (MH) during kharif season, excess rainfall
had affected nurseries as well as transplanted rice leading
to replanting. This situation was favourable for
caseworm occurrence. Cloudy weather and intermittent
rains in the month of October 2013 caused heavy
dUuM+ rFkk dksiky ftyksa esa chih,p Hkwjk ikni ekgw dk

izdksi ekewyh FkkA flrEcj 2013 ds nkSjku dkosjh ls lVs
yxHkx 1200 gs- esa nsjh ls jksi.k fd, tkus rFkk vfkd cjlkr
ds dkj.k dslokWeZ dk izdksi dkQh QSy x;k FkkA ikbyhu
pokr ds dkj.k vfkd o"kkZ gksus rFkk jkf= esa de rkieku
ds dkj.k dslhihvkbZ ds 400 gs- ls Hkh vfkd {ks= esa xzhok
izLQqVu uSd CykLV dh rhozrk ikbZ xbZA
jk;iqj Nhlx<+ esa ruk Hksnd rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw
chih,p uk'khtho ik, x,] ftuds }kjk Qly dks uqdlku
igqp
a k, tkus ds dkj.k de mit izkIr gqbAZ MSM gkVlZ ds :i
esa ruk Hksnd lae.k dh rhozrk 6-5 vkSj 36-2% ds chp Fkh]
tcfd lQsn d.kZ dh rhozrk 23-7% FkhA bl {ks= esa Hkwjk ikni
ekgw us dkQh T;knk uqdlku fd;k Fkk] ftldh lef"V dh jst
a
23&77 O;Ld lef"V izfr 20 Vhyk FkhA dbZ LFkkuksa ij gksij
cuZ ds y{k.k ik, x, rFkk o"kkZ( cknyksa okyk ekSle bldh
rhozrk ds fy, vuqdy
w ik;k x;kA o"kZ 2007 vkSj 2008 ds
ekSleksa dh rqyuk esa ?kVrs rkieku rFkk c<+rh o"kkZ ds dkj.k
eq[; :i ls cksjks ekSle ds nkSjku fpulqjk if'pe caxky esa
o"kZ 2011 ls yxkrkj ihyk ruk Hksnd okbZ,lch dk mPp
izdksi ns[kk tk jgk gS fp= 6A
incidence of rice armyworm at the maturity stage of

early varieties of rice crop. Bacterial leaf blight and blast
severity was low.
Although at Mandya (KA) the incidence of major
pests was below ETL in 2013 kharif, moderate incidence
of BPH was observed in parts of Mysore, Uttarkannada
and Koppal districts. Late planting combined with
excess rainfall during September resulted in outbreak
of case worm in about 1200 ha of cauvery command.
More than 400 ha of KCPI had severity of neck blast
caused by excess rainfall brought about by Phailin
cyclone vis-a-vis lower night temperatures.
At Raipur (CG), stem borer and BPH were the
pests limiting grain yield. While the intensities of stem
borer infestation observed as dead hearts ranged
between 6.5 and 36.2%, white head was up to 23.7%.
BPH had caused significant losses with population
range of 23-777 adult counts per 20 hills. The symptom
of hopper burn was observed at several places and the
rains, cloudy weather favoured the severity. Chinsurah
(WB) continued to have higher incidence of YSB from
2011 during Boro season mainly due to the decreasing
temperature regimes and increased rainfall over 2007
and 2008 seasons (Fig 6).
fp= 6- fiNys o"kksZa es rkieku o o"kkZ vk/kkfjr vkd"kZ.k Qans es idM+s x, ihyk ruk Hksnd ds o;Ld
Fig. 6. Trap catches of yellow stem borer moth over years compared to temperature and rainfall
lHkh LFkkuksa dh rqyuk esa ls yqfk;kuk iatkc rFkk eaM;k

dukZVd esa ikh eksMd
+ ds dkj.k Qly dks dkQh uqdlku gqvk
gS] tcfd [kjhQ ds fiNys rhu ekSleksa ls fpulqjk if'pe
caxky vkSj djtr egkjk"V esa fNV&iqV izdksi ns[kk x;kA ,d
ekSle ls nwljs ekSle ds chp fo"kerkvksas ds dkj.k lHkh LFkkuksa ij
jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dh okf"kZd idM+ ls [kjhQ dh okLrfod
o lgh izof` k dk vanktk ugha yxk;k tk ldkA
Among all the locations, Ludhiana (PB) and

Mandya (KA) had considerable damage due to leaf
folder, and Chinsurah (WB) and Karjat (MH) had stray
incidence over the past three seasons of kharif. The
yearly light trap catches did not reflect the exact trend
at all locations possibly due to the variations between
seasons in a given location.
59
NCIPM
vjgj
uoEcj vkSj fnlEcj ekg ds chp fpkhnkj Qyh Hksnd
ek#dk rFkk Qyh eD[kh esykuksvkxzkes kbt+k }kjk Qly dks
dkQh uqdlku igqp
a k;k x;kA okjaxy vkUkz izn's k esa lkekU;
:i ls uk'khtho] fo'ks"k :i ls gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtjs k rFkk
ek#dk foVjkVk dh ekStnw xh de FkhA vDVwcj 2013 ds nkSjku
235-2 fe-eh- o"kkZ gksus ds QyLo:i vfkd ueh ds dkj.k dqN
LFkkuksa ij feyhcx dk NqV&iqV izdksi ns[kk x;k] ysfdu eqj>ku
izdksi dkQh T;knk FkkA iqMd
q ksVkbZ rfeyukMq esa iq"iksa esa dkQh
T;knk ek#dk ds tky 22 izfr ikni ik, x,] mlds ckn
IY;we eksFk 18 lwM
a h izfr ikni] uhyh cVjykbZ 12-5 lwM
a h izfr
ikni rFkk ,p- vkfeZtjs k 11 lwM
a h izfr ikni ik, x,A Qyh
vHkZdksa ikWM cx esa Dysfoxjsyk fxCckslk 25 izfr ikni rFkk
mlds ckn fjiVkWjVl isMl
~ fVl 3 izfr ikni vkSj ustk+ jk
fofjMqyk 2-5 izfr ikni dh ekStnw xh dkQh T;knk ikbZ xbZA
Qyh cskdksa es]a Qyh eD[kh esykuksvkxzkes kbt+k vkWCV~;l
q k vkSj
,p- vkfeZtjs k dk uqdlku e'k% 40% vkSj 8% FkkA
xqycxkZ dukZVd esa fiNys nks ekSleksa dh rqyuk esa o"kZ
2013 ds nkSjku ,p- vkfeZtsjk rFkk yxHkx lHkh jksxksa
vYVjusfj;k] ;qlfs j;e rFkk ujca;rk ekstd
s+ jksx ,l,eMh
dk izdksi de ns[kk x;kA uhyh cVjykbZ rFkk fpkhnkj Qyh
Hksnd dk izdksi fiNys o"kks dh rqyuk esa nqxuq k FkkA
o"kZ 2011 ds ekSle esa 40 vkSj 44 ekud lIrkg ,e,eMCY;w
rFkk 46 vkSj 52 ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku ,e- foVjkVk }kjk
Qly dks igqp
a k;k x;k uqdlku vfkd FkkA o"kZ 2013 ds
nkSjku 38 vkSj 40 ,l,eMCY;w ds chp vfkd uqdlku ds
dkj.k rFkk mlds ckn 45 vkSj 46osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku
yxkrkj mPp uqdlku ls ekSle ds dkj.k dqy feykdj T;knk
uqdlku ns[kk x;kA de o"kkZ okys o"kks o"kZ 2012 ds nkSjku
466 fe-eh- dh rqyuk esa vfkd o"kkZ okys o"kks 2011 vkSj
2013 esa e'k 655 vkSj 640 fe-eh esa ,e- foVjkVk ds dkj.k
vfkd uqdlku gqvkA Qly dks uqdlku igqp
a kus esa o"kkZ ds
izR;{k izHkko ds ctk; o"kkZ dk Qly ?kVuke&foKku ij
iM+us okys izHkko dh T;knk Hkwfedk gSA ftlds QyLo:i ,efoVjkVk Qly dks T;knk uqdlku igqp
a krk gSA
lHkh LFkkuksa ij ,p- vkfeZtjs k rFkk ,e- foVjkVk ds fLFkfr
dh leh{kk djrs gq, ;g ik;k x;k fd xr o"kks dh rqyuk esa
vjgj ds lHkh v;;uxr LFkkuksa ij ,p- vkfeZtjs k dh izof` k
de gksrh tk jgh FkhA xqycxkZ dukZVd esa rFkk mlds ckn
jkgqjh egkjk"V vkSj ,l- ds- uxj xqtjkr esa nksuksa uk'khthoksa
dk vkxeu vfkd FkkA o"kZ 2011 34 o"kkZ fnolksa esa 950 feeh- o"kkZ vkSj 2012 22 o"kkZ fnolksa esa 630 fe-eh- o"kkZ dh
rqyuk esa o"kZ 2013 40 o"kkZ fnolksa esa 1032 fe-eh- esa vfkd
60
Pigeonpea
Spotted pod borer (Maruca) and pod fly
(Melanagromyza) damage were dominant between
November and December months. At Warangal (AP)
insect pest load was low in general and for Helicoverpa
armigera and Maruca vitrata in particular. Sporadic
incidence of mealybugs and severe wilt incidence at
certain locations was due to excess moisture (235.2 mm
of rainfall) during October. Pudukottai (TN) had
highest Maruca webs on flowers (22/plant) followed
by plume moth (18 larvae/plant), blue butterfly (12.5
larvae/plant), and H.armigera larvae (11/plant). Among
the pod bugs, Clavigralla gibbosa was dominant
(maximum: 25/plant) followed by Riptortus pedestris
(3/plant) and Nezara viridula (2.5/plant). Among pod
borers, podfly (Melanagromyza obtusa) and H. armigera
damage to pods was 40 and 8%, respectively.
Gulbarga (KA) had decreasing incidence of H.
armigera and almost all diseases (Alternaria, Fusarium
and sterility mosaic disease SMD) during 2013 over
previous two seasons. Blue butterfly and spotted pod
borer incidence was twice higher over previous years.
The level of damage of M. vitrata between 40 and
44 SMWs, and 47 and 52 SMWs were higher in the
2011 season, the early higher damage between 38 and
40 SMWs followed by continued higher damage
between 45 and 46 SMWs during 2013 resulted in
higher seasonal damage. The higher rainfall years (655
and 640 mm in 2011 and 2013, respectively) had higher
M. vitrata damage over low rainfall year (466 mm
during 2012). More than the direct effect of rainfall, it
is the influence of rainfall on crop phenology in turn
affecting the damage due to M. vitrata.
Perusal of status of H. armigera and M. vitrata
across locations indicated declining trend of the former
at all pigeonpea study locations over years with overall
occurrence of both the pests being higher at S.K. Nagar
(GJ) >Rahuri (MH) and Gulbarga (KA). Fusarium
wilt at S.K. Nagar (GJ) was higher during 2013 (rainfall:
1032 mm; rainy days: 40) during 2013 over 2011 (950
mm in 34 rainydays) and 2012 (630 mm in 22 rainy
days). Rahuri (MH) had less severity of diseases over
S.K. Nagar (GJ) and Gulbarga (KA).
o"kkZ ds dkj.k ,l- ds- uxj xqtjkr esa ;qlfs j;e eqj>ku
vfkd ik;k x;kA ,l- ds- uxj rFkk xqycxkZ dukZVd dh
rqyuk esa jkgqjh egkjk"V esa jksxksa dh rhozrk de FkhA
ekSle ds nkSjku uk'khtho ds vkxeu ds fy, vuqdy
w uh;
lkkuksa rFkk uk'khthoksa dh lokZfkd lef"V vkSj rhozrk ds
dkj.k mRiUu jksxksa dks ;ku esa j[krs gq, Qly ?kVuke
foKku ij uk'khthoksa ds xfrf;ksa ds izHkko dks vyx djus dk
,d izkjafHkd iz;kl fd;k x;kA blds fy, Qly dh voLFkk]
fdlh Hkh fof'k"V LFkku rFkk fdlh Hkh ekSle@o"kZ ds nkSjku
lHkh LFkkuksa ds foxr o"kks ds Qly ij uk'khthoksa dh lokZfkd
lef"V dh ekStnq xh vFkok rhozrk dh rqyuk dh xbZA nksuksa gh
fLFkfr;ksa es]a uk'khthoksa dh lef"V@rhozrk rFkk Qly dh
voLFkk esa fHkUurk,a ikbZ xb ftlls ;g vuqeku yxk;k tk
ldrk gS fd uk'khthoksa dh xfrf;vksa o lf;rkvksa esa
ikfjfLFkfrdh; var%f;k'khy ?kVdksa tSo ,oa vtSo dh ize[q k
Hkwfedk gksrh gS] rFkk ekSle esa vlkekU; mrkj&p<+ko ds izHkko
dks vklkuh ls ekik tk ldrk gSA
ewaxiQyh
o`)kpye rfeyukMq esa [kjhQ ds yxkrkj nwljs o"kZ
2012 ,oa 2013 esa 34 ,l,eMCY;w ls yky ckyksa okys
dSVjfiyj] ,elsDrk iztkfr;ksa dk izdksi QSy x;k Fkk] tks
vxLr ds lHkh lIrkgksa rFkk flrEcj dk igyk i[kokM+k
fo'ks"k :i ls 35osa o 36osa ,l,eMCY;w esa ds nkSjku yxkrkj
ckfj'k ds dkj.k QSykA o"kZ 2011 rFkk mlls igys ftu o"kks
esa 35osa rFkk 36osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku ckfj'k ugha gqbZ Fkh rc
dSVjfiyj dk izdksi Hkh ugha QSyk FkkA Qly ds ifjiDou
voLFkk ds nkSjku iNsrh ikk kCck 8 xzM
s dh rhozrk rd rFkk
'kq"d tM+ foxyu 5&10% dk izdksi ns[kk x;kA
twukx<+ xqtjkr esa [kjhQ 2011 ds nkSjku vfkd o"kkZ
800 fe-eh- ls vfkd ds vykok eq[; :i ls vfkdre ,oa
U;wure rkieku esa ekewyh varj ds dkj.k uk'khthoksa ekgw]
tSflM] dk"BdhV rFkk ikh lajq xd dh lef"V de ikbZ xbZ
tcfd if.kZy jksxksa dh rhozrk vfkdre ikbZ xbZA dkfnjh
vkUkz izn's k rFkk kkjokM+ dukZVd esa fLFkfr foijhr FkhA
lkekU; :i ls] jch dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ ds nkSjku ikh lqjx
a d
yhQ ekbuj dk lae.k vfkd FkkA tyxkao esa 2012 70%
ls vfkd rFkk 2013 90% ls vfkd ds nkSjku lokZfkd
dk"BdhV lae.k ik;k x;k] tcfd jch 2012 ds nkSjku
lae.k 80% ls vfkd ik;k x;kA
In view of the seasonal means of insect pests and

diseases represented largely by the peak populations
and severity, respectively a preliminary attempt to
seggregate the effect of dynamics of pests dependent
on crop phenology was made through comparison of
crop age coinciding with highest population or severity
over years for a particular location, and over locations
in respect of a particular year/season. In either of the
cases both population/severity of pests as well as crop
age were different implying the dominant role of
ecological interactive forces (biotic and abiotic)
determining the population dynamics, although
glimpses of effect of weather extremities at a given
space and time could be inferred relatively easily.
Groundnut
Outbreak of red hairy caterpillar, Amsacta spp, for the
second successive season (2012 & 2013) of kharif at
Chinnavadavadi village of Vridhachalam (TN)was
noticed from 35 SMW mainly attributable to the receipt
of continuous rains during all weeks of August and first
fortnight of September (esp. 35 & 36 SMW). The nonoutbreak season of 2011 and before did not have rains
during 35 and 36 SMWs. Late leaf spot (up to severity
of 8 grade) and dry root rot (5-10%) incidence was
observed during crop maturity phase.
Junagadh (GJ) had lower insect pests (aphids, jassids,
thrips, leaf miner) and highest severity of foliar dieases
during 2011 kharif mainly due to narrow differences
between maximum and minimum temperature regimes
in addition to higher rainfall (> 800 mm) and the
reverse trend at Kadiri (AP) and Dharwad (KA). Leaf
miner infestation was higher during kharif over rabi,
in general. Jalgaon (MH) had the highest thrips
infestation during 2012 (>70%) and 2013 (>90%) of
kharif, and 2012 of rabi (>80%).
VekVj
Tomato
In Rajendranagar (AP) and Bengaluru (KA)
incidence of big bud phytoplasma was confirmed
during rabi that had caused elongated calyx uniting to
form green bud like sterile structure.
jktsUnz uxj vkUkz izn's k rFkk csx

a yq# dukZVd esa jch ds
nkSjku fcx cM+ QkbVksIykTek ds izdksi dh iqf"V dh xbZ]
Continuous rainfall during kharif 2013-14 at

Moinabad (AP) led to low levels of aphids and whiteflies
61
NCIPM
ftlls dSyDs l cM+k gks x;k ,oa vkil esa feydj gjs dyh dh
rjg lajpuk cu xbZ tks fd okK FkhA
[kjhQ 2013&14 ds nkSjku eksbukckn vkUkz izn's k esa
Qly fodkl dh iw.kZ vofk ds nkSjku ekgw vkSj lQsn efD[k;ksa
dh de lef"V ikbZ xbZA iq"iu rFkk Qy yxus dh voLFkk ds
nkSjku ,p- vfeZtjs k rFkk Qly fodkl ds igys dqN lIrkgksa
ds nkSjku ikh lqja xd izdksi ns[kk x;kA blds foijhr] 29osa
,oa 44osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku yxkrkj o"kkZ gksus ds dkj.k
34&77 ,l,eMCY;w ds chp thok.kqt kCck izdksi c<+rk tk
jgk Fkk] tks Qly ifjiDou dh voLFkk rd 60&85% rd
igqp
a x;k FkkA jch VekVj ij ekpZ vkSj vizy
S ekg esa thok.kqt
vaxekjh dk Hkh izdksi vfkd 80% rd FkkA
csx
a yq# dukZVd esa [kjhQ dh rqyuk esa xzh"e esa jl pwlus
okys dhVks]a lSi QhMjksa vFkkZr VSVkuk;dl ;wjVkbdh vkSj
csfefl;k Vscl
s kbdh lef"V dkQh vfkd ikbZ xbZ rFkk xzh"e
dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ esa gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtjs k dk izdksi ih =
0-05* vfkd ik;k x;kA o"kZ 2012 ds nkSjku xzh"e esa igyh
cjlkr gksus rFkk mlds ckn ,p- vkfeZtjs k vkSj ,l- fyVwjk ds
fy, 17osa ,l,eMCY;w 20 fe-eh- o"kkZ esa vkSj o"kZ 2013 esa ,lfyVwjk ds fy, 11osa ,l,eMCY;w 5 fd-eh- o"kkZ rFkk ,pvkfeZtjs k ds fy, 15osa ,l,eMCY;w 33-2 fe-eh- o"kkZ esa
Qsjkseksu Qkn VSi idM+ esa ;g ik;k x;k fd ,l- fyVwjk dh
rqyuk esa ,p- vkfeZtjs k ds vkxeu o izdVu ds fy, vfkd
ueh dh vko';drk gksrh gSA o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku csx
a yq#
esa VekVj ikh dqp
a u csx
a yq# lae.k] dqdeq ks ekstd
s+ lae.k
ekstd
s+ ,oa ifk;ksa esa eqMu+ rFkk ewx
a Qyh cM uSksfll lae.k
dh iqf"V gqbAZ csx
a yq# dukZVd ds dqN LFkkuksa esa iNsrh
vaxekjh dh vf/kd O;kiDrk ;gka rd dh 100% Hkh ns[kh xbZA
VekVj esa ch- Vscl
s kb dh lef"V }kjk mRiUu ikh dqp
a u izdksi
ik;k x;k] tks [kjhQ dh rqyuk esa xzh"e dky esa vfkd FkkA
dY;k.kh if'pe caxky esa o"kZ
2011 esa jch ds nkSjku dksjkbuhLiksjk
dk izdksi ik;k x;k] gkykafd 44osa
vkSj 50osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku blds
vkxeu esa fHkUurk,a ns[kh xbA o"kZ
2011&12 dh rqyuk esa fiNys nks
ekSleksa 2012&13 vkSj 2013&14
esa jch ekSle ds nkSjku ikh dqp
a u
izdksi rFkk vxsrh vaxekjh jksx de
ik;k x;kA leLr uk'khthoksa es]a jksxksa
ds izdV gksus rFkk jksxksa ds viuh
62
throughout the crop growth period, H. armigera

between flowering and fruiting stage and leaf miner
incidence during first few weeks of crop growth. On
the contrary continuous rainfall between 29 and 44
SMWs resulted in increasing bacterial spot incidence
from 34 - 47 SMW reaching 60- 85% at crop maturity.
Bacterial blight also had high incidence (up to 80%)
during March and April on the rabi tomato.
At Bengaluru (KA), sap feeders viz.Tetranychus
urticae and Bemisia tabaci were significantly higher in
summer compared to kharif, and the incidence of
Helicoverpa armigera was (p=0.05*) greater in kharif
compared to summer. The first summer showers and
subsequent pheromone trap catches observed in SMW
17 (20 mm rainfall) for H. armigera and S. litura during
2012 and after SMW 11 (5 mm rainfall) for S. litura
and after SMW 15 (33.2 mm rainfall) for H. armigera
during 2013 indicated existence of higher threshold
moisture required for H. armigera over S. litura for
emergence. Virus diseases viz. tomato leaf curl
Bengaluru virus, cucumo mosaic virus (mosaic and leaf
distortion), and groundnut bud necrosis virus (necrosis
ring spots similar to topso virus) were confirmed at
Bengaluru during 2013-14. Heavy incidence even up to
100% of late blight was observed at some places in
Bengaluru (Karnataka). Incidence of tomato leaf curl
virus was B. tabaci population dependent and higher
during summer over kharif.
Kalyani (WB) had the incidence of target spot

Corynespora during rabi since 2011 with differences in
its onset between 44 and 50 SMWs. Leaf curl incidence
and early blight during rabi season of the previous two
years (2012-13
and 2013-14)
were lower as
compared to
2011-12. Even
with all the
insect pests, the
initiation and
the peak period
followed similar
pattern (Table 1)
fp= 7- dY;k.kh if'pe caxky es o"kkZ cnyko vk/kkfjr forj.k
associated with
Fig. 7. Changing rainfall distribution at Kalyani (West Bengal)
rkfydk 1 % jch VekVj esa uk'khthoksa dk vkxeu rFkk mudh ekStwnxh dk pje dky
Table 1: Initiation and peak periods of insect pests in rabi tomato
uk'khtho
Insect pests
,fQM psia k@Aphids

lQsn eD[kh@Whiteflies
c#Fkh@Mites
dk"BdhV@Thrips
ikh lqja xd@Leaf miner
,l- fyVwjk@S. litura
,p- vkfeZtsjk@H. armigera
vkxeu
Initiation
40
37
40
37-38
40-41
38-39
42-43
2011&12
pje dky
Peak
46
46
44
46
46
46
48
vkxeu
Initiation
42-43
40-41
43-44
43-44
47-48
41-42
49-50
2012&13
pje dky
Peak
50
45
49
50
5
47
3
vkxeu
2013&14
pje dky
Initiation
47-48
45-46
47-48
47-48
51-52
46-47
2
Peak
50
47
51
49
8
47
5
rkfydk esa fn, x, eku ekSle foKku ekud lIrkg ,l,eMCY;w ds leuq:i gSAa
Values in the table correspond to the Standard Meteorological weeks (SMW)
ifjdk"Bk ij igqp
a us dh izfr Bhd oSlh gh Fkh tSlh vxLr
ekg esa Hkkjh cjlkr ds dkj.k [kjhQ ls jch esa jksi.k dh frfFk;ksa
eq[; [ksrksa esa vDVwcj esa jksi.k esa cnyko gksus ij FkhA
the shift in planting dates from kharif to rabi (October

planting in main fields) due to heavy rainfall during
August.
yqfk;kuk iatkc esa [kjhQ ds nkSjku ,fQM psia k rFkk

lQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V de ikbZ xbZA ikh lqjx
a d uk'khtho
dh lef"V esa uoEcj ls fnlEcj ekg ds nwljs lIrkg ls o`f)
ns[kh xbZ] tks fnlEcj ekg esa viuh ijkdk"Bk ij igqp
a xbZ FkhA
Aphids and whiteflies were low at Ludhiana (PB)

during Kharif with the leaf miner population increasing
from 2nd week of November to mid-December with
peak in December.
fnlEcj 2013 ds vkf[kjh lIrkg ls rkieku rFkk ikyk

iM+us esa deh vkus 25&30 fnlEcj] 2013 rFkk 4&7 tuojh]
2014 dh vofk esa ikyk iM+us okys fnu ls ikh lqjx
a d lef"V
esa deh ns[kh xbZA Qjojh ds nwljs i{k vkSj ekpZ 2014 ds chp
a k;k
,p- vkfeZtjs k }kjk Qyksa dks vfkdre 15-1% uqdlku igqp
x;kA vxLr esa vfkd o"kkZ vkSj mPp rkieku ds dkj.k vknzZ
iru jksx T;knk 12-5 & 60% Fkk] ftlds dkj.k [kjhQ
VekVj ds fy, flrEcj ds igys lIrkg ds nkSjku eq[; [ksrksa
esa varjky Hkjus dh t:jr eglwl gqbAZ vDVwcj ds e; esa
cks;h x;h ikS/k'kkyk esa 70&80% vknzZ iru jksx gqvk] ftlds
dkj.k jch Qly ds fy, ikS/k'kkyk dh cqokbZ iqu% djuh iM+hA
vxLr ekg ds var rd VekVj ikh dqp
a u lae.k jksx 8% Fkk]
tks flrEcj ds 'kq#vkrh fnuksa ls uoEcj ds var ds chp dh
le;kofk esa c<+dj e'k% 22 vkSj 44% gks x;k FkkA
[kjhQ 2013&14 ds nkSjku jkgwjh egkjk"V esa ikh lqjx
a d
vkSj lQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V vfkd ikbZ xbZ] tcfd eksbuZ kckn
vkUkz izn's k rFkk csx
a yq# esa fiNys ekSleksa ,oa o"kks dh rqyuk
esa de lef"V ikbZ xbZA jkgwjh esa 2012 ls [kjhQ 2013 rd
ikh lqjx
a d rFkk lQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V vfkd Fkh vkSj
2012 ls 2013 jch rd mudh lef"V;ksa esa deh dks ntZ dh
xbZA o"kZ 2012&13 ds [kjhQ rFkk jch nksuksa ekSleksa ds nkSjku
Leaf miner population declined to traces with

lowering of temperature and frost from December last
week (frost days: 25-30th December 2013, 4-7th January
2014). H. armigera damage to fruits was at peak of 15%
between 2nd fortnights of February and March 2014.
Damping off incidence was high in August (12.5 - 60%)
due to heavy rains and high temperature necessitating
gap filling in main fields during 1st week of September
for the kharif tomato. 70-80% damping off occurred
in nursery sown during mid-October leading to
resowing of nursery for the rabi crop. Tomato leaf
curl virus incidence was 8% at the end of August and
increased to 22 and 44% during early September to
November end, respectively.
Rahuri (MH) had higher leaf miner and whiteflies
during kharif of 2013-14, Moinabad (AP) and Bengaluru
(KA) had low populations over seasons and years.
Increased leaf miner and whiteflies from 2012 to 2013
in kharif and their decrease from 2012 to 2013 rabi was
noted at Rahuri (MH). Early blight was recorded from
all climatic zones irrespective of seasons and years. Early
blight severity highest maximum (> 50%) at Bengaluru
63
NCIPM
csx
a yq# dukZVd esa vxsrh vaxekjh rhozrk vfkdre 50% ls
vfkd FkhA o"kZ 2012&13 ds nkSjku csx
a yq#] jk;iqj Nkhlx<+
rFkk jkgqjh esa pwf.kZy QQwna ikbZ xbZ vkSj csxyq# esa bldh rhozrk
lokZfkd 20% FkhA 2013&14 esa jch dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ ekSle
esa pwf.kZy QQwna dh rhozrk vfkd FkhA ikh dqp
a u jksx iwjs ns'k
esa ik;k x;k vkSj vfkdrj LFkkuksa ij [kjhQ dh rqyuk esa jch
ekSle esa ;g vfkd ik;k x;kA dyh vaxekjh cM CykbV
jktsUnz uxj vkakz izn's k] jkgwjh egkjk"V vkSj jk;iqj Nkhlx<+
rd gh lhfer Fkk] gkykafd csx
a yq# dukZVd rFkk okjk.klh
mkj izn's k esa Hkh bls NqV&iqV :i esa ik;k x;kA v;;u fd,
x, LFkkuksa dks NksMd
+ j jch dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ ekSle ds nkSjku
thok.kqt kCck jksx rhoz Fkk] tcfd yqfk;kuk iatkc vkSj
dY;k.kh if'pe caxky esa ;g fcydqy Hkh ugha ik;k x;kA
(KA) during both kharif and rabi seasons of 2012-13.

Powdery mildew was prevalent at Bengaluru (KA),
Raipur (CG) and Rahuri (MH) with Bengaluru
recording higher severity (upto 20%) during 2012-13
and 2013-14, severity being higher during kharif than
rabi. Leaf curl was also recorded across the country,
being higher in rabi over kharif in majority of the
locations. Bud blight was restricted to Rajendranagar
(AP), Rahuri (MH), and Raipur (CG) with traces at
Bengaluru (KA) and Varanasi (UP). Bacterial spot was
severe during kharif compared to rabi irrespective of
the study locations and absent at Ludhiana (PB) and
Kalyani (WB).
iwokZuqeku djus ds fy, ekWMyksa dk fodkl
Development of models for forecasting
o"kZ 2006&07 ds MkVk lsV dk mi;ksx djrs gq, vnqFkqjbZ

rfeyukMq] djtr egkjk"V] jk;iqj Nkhlx<+ rFkk fpulqjk
if'pe caxky ds LFkkuksa ds fy, rhu ls ikap i'p lIrkgksa
ySx ohd ls ekSle dkjdks]a tSls vfkdre rkieku] U;wure
rkieku] izkr%dkyhu ,oa lk;adkyhu vkisf{kd vknzrZ k rFkk
o"kkZ ij vk/kkfjr ihyk ruk Hksnd okbZ,lch ds fy, lh
4-5 ,YxksfjFe dyu&fofk dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fu;e vkkkfjr
fMlht+u Vh csLM oxhZdj.k fd;k x;kA ;fn rhljs lIrkg esa
okbZ,lch dh i'p lef"V] ikapos i'p lIrkg esa vkisf{kd
vknzrZ k rFkk rhljs i'p lIrkg ds fy, o"kkZ e'k% >46@ViS @lIrkg] 54.4% rFkk 66.6 fe-eh- gSa rks ;g vuqeku
yxk;k tkrk gS fd uk'khtho dh rhozrk vfkd gksxhA fpulqjk
if'pe caxky esa vuqLrjrk 83-5% ikbZ xbZA
LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk ds fy, LokuqHkkfod g~;fq jfLVd ekSle
vk/kkfjr fu;e cuk, x, ftlesa ekSle lac/a kh ekunaMks]a tSls
vfkdre rkieku 28&340 ls-] U;wure rkieku 18&220 ls-]
vkisf{kd vknzZrk izkr%dkyhu 55&65%] vkisf{kd vknzZrk
lk;adkyhu 40&50% rFkk 20 fe-eh- ls vf/kd o"kkZ rFkk
dkfnjh vkakz izn's k ds ,l- fyVwjk ds vkB o"kks 2006&13 ds
nkSjku Qsjkseksu ViS idM+ lac/a kh MkVk dks 'kkfey fd;k x;k Fkk
ftuds vkkkj ij mPp rhozrk 400 ls vfkd] lkekU; rhozrk
200&400 vkSj U;wure rhozrk 200 ls de dk iwokZueq ku
fd;k x;kA ikap ekSle vkkkfjr ekunaMksa esa ls ;k rks lHkh
ekunaMksa us ;k pkj us ;k rhu us ;k blls de ekunaMksa us e'k%
mPp] lkekU; rFkk de rhozrk dk iwokZueq ku fd;kA fiNys rhu
ekSleksa dh rqyuk esa iwokZueq ku dh vkSlr lVhdrk 97% FkhA
kkjokM+ dukZVd ds ewx
a Qyh Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds
64
Decision tree-based classification using C4.5

algorithm enabled frame decision rules for yellow stem
borer (YSB) vis-a-vis weather variables viz. maximum
temperature, minimum temperature, morning, evening
relative humidity and rainfall from three to five lag
weeks for the locations of Aduthurai (TN), Karjat
(MH), Raipur (CG) and Chinsura (WB) using data sets
of 2000-2007. If lag population of YSB during the third
week, relative humidity in the fifth lag and rainfall for
the third lag week are >4.6/trap/week, 54.4% and
66.6mm, respectively the severity of pest attack would
be higher; 83.5% concordance was found for Chinsura
(WB).
Heuristic weather-based rule for Spodoptera
litura viz., maximum temperature 28-340C, minimum
temperature 18-22 0C, relative humidity (morning) 5565 %, relative humidity (evening) 40-50% and rainfall
> 20 mm predicting the severity viz., high (> 400),
moderate (200 - 400) and low (< 200) based on
pheromone catches of S. litura of Kadiri (AP) over
eight years (2006-2013) was developed. Satisfying all the
five, four and three or less, out of five weather-based
criteria predicted high, moderate and low severity,
respectively. Mean accuracy of prediction over the last
three seasons was 97%.
Ordinal logistic model predicting the weekly
male moth of S. litura (nos./trap/week) during higher
population period (34 SMW) was developed for the
fy, [kjhQ ekSle 26 ls 44 ,l,eMCY;w ds 22 o"kks 1990&2011

ds uk'khtho ,oa tyok;q laca kh MkVk dk mi;ksx djrs gq,
vkWfMZuy ykWftfLVd ekWMy fodflr fd;k x;k] ftlls uj
eksFk] ,l- fyVwjk la[;k izfr ViS izfr ikni dh vfkd lef"V
34 ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku mldh lkIrkfgd lef"V dk
iwokZueq ku fd;k tkrk gSA vkuqikfrd vkWM~ ekWMy dks G Lrjksa
(g= 0, 1, 2), Y vkmVde vkSj nks fizfMDVj ( 1 ,oa 2) ds
lkFk fuEu :i ls n'kkZ;k x;k gS %
iwokZueq kuh; Js.kh 0] 1] 2 rkfydk 2 bl izdkj gS =

32osa ,l,eMCY;w dk vfkdre rkieku vkSj = 32osa ,l,eMCY;w
dh vkisf{kr vknzrZ kA vkWMl
~ fo"kerk dks bl izdkj n'kkZ;k
x;k gS %
groundnut cropping system of Dharwad (KA) using

pest and weather data of twenty two years (1990-2011)
for kharif season (26 to 44 SMW).The proportional odds
model with an outcome (Y) with G levels (g=0, 1, 2)
and two predictor (X1 and X2) is defined by
Here is the predictive category (0, 1, 2) (Table 2 ).

= maximum temperature of 32nd SMW and =
relative humidity morning of 32nd SMW, and odds
are defined as
rkfydk 2% /kkjokM+ esa ewaxQyh ij LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk dk izlkj

Table 2: Distribution of Spodoptera litura in groundnut at Dharwad
uk'khtho mxzrk Js.kh
vuqfer oxhZdj.k (g)
MkVk dk oxhZdj.k lHkh dk %
Pest severity category
Ordered classification (g)
Distribution of data (% of total)
Y=2
27.27
U;wu (<200) / Low (<200)

lkekU; (200-400) / Medium (200-400)
Y=1
31.82
mPp (>400) / High(>400)
Y=0
40.91
gkykafd ekWMy dh lkFkZdrk dk ,dk;ds lwpuk ekunaM

,vkbZlh rFkk Ldkokt+Z ekunaM ,llh dk iz;ksx djrs gq,
ewY;kadu fd;k x;k] ij fo'ys"k.k esa ,l- fyVwjk ij nks iwoZ
lIrkgksa 32osa ,l,eMCY;w ds esa vfkdre rkieku rFkk
izkr%dkyhu vkisf{kd vknzrZ k dk dkQh izHkko ns[kk x;kA 32osa
,l,eMCY;w ds vfkdre rkieku ij izR;sd fMxzh o`f) ds
fy, mPp ;k lkekU; vkWMl
~ dh rqyuk esa mPp uk'khtho
vke.k laca kh vkWMl
~ 8-6 ds xq.kkad esa o`f) gqb]Z tcfd
izkr%dkyhu vkisf{kd vknzrZ k ds fy, vkWMl
~ vuqikr 6-4 dk
xq.kkad FkkA o"kZ 2012 vkSj 2013 ds fy, iwokZueq kfur izkf;drkvksa
rFkk izfs {kr izfrf;kvksa ds la;kstu ds chp izfr'kr dkWudkWMsl
vkSj fMldkWudkWMsl ds vkkkj ij ekWMy dk oSkhdj.k fd;k
x;k ftlesa dkWudkWMsl ds fy, lekurk rFkk fMldkWudkWMsl
ds fy, vlekurk ikbZ xbZA
While the adequacy of the model was assessed using

Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Schwarz
criterion (SC), the analysis revealed the significant
influence of maximum temperature and morning
relative humidity prior to two weeks (of 32 SMW) on
S. litura. For each degree increase in maximum
temperature of 32 SMW, the odds of being high pest
attack (as opposed to lower or medium) increased by a
multiple of 8.6 as compared to the odds of being high
or medium (as opposed to low), while the odds ratio
for morning relative humidity was a multiple of 6.4.
The validation of the model done in terms of percent
concordance and discordance between association of
predicted probabilities and observed responses for 2012
and 2013 showed match and non-match, respectively.
vnFkqjbZ rfeyukMq] fpulqjk if'pe caxky] djtV

egkjk"V] jk;iqj Nkhlx<+ ds fy, o"kZ 2000 ls 2010 rd
ds rFkk ekaM;k dukZVd ds fy, 1995 ls 2010 rd ykbV ViS
Empirical models for forewarning yellow stem

borer at different centers based on light trap moth
catches (data sets of 2000 to 2010) for Aduthurai (TN),
65
NCIPM
ls idM+s x, eksFk ds vkadM+kas MkVk lsV vkSj fofHkUu ,l,eMCY;w
ds laca k esa vfkdre rkieku] U;wure rkieku] izkr%dkyhu
vkisf{kd vknzrZ k] lka;dkyhu vkisf{kd vknzrZ k rFkk o"kkZ tSls
ekSle dkjdksa ds vkkkj ij fofHkUu dsUnzkas ij ihyk ruk cskd
dh iwoZ psrkouh nsus ds fy, vkuqHkkfod ekWMy fodflr fd,
x,] ftuesa ekSle ds iwokZueq ku ds lIrkg ls N% i'p lIrkgksa
rd ds ekSle fufof"V;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;k] ftlls fofHkUu
lIrkgksa ds fy, iwokZueq ku ekWMyksa dks ik;k x;k rkfydk 3A
;|fi vnqFkqjbZ rfeyukMq] djtV egkjk"V] rFkk jk;iqj
Nkhlx<+ LFkkuksa ds fy, [kjhQ ds nkSjku oSkhdj.k vuqekfur
Chinsura (WB), Karjat (MH), Raipur (CG) and of 1995

to 2010 for Mandya (KA) and weather variables viz.,
maximum temperature, minimum temperature,
morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity
and rainfall were obtained for different SMWs.
Weather inputs up to six lag weeks from week of
forecast were considered to device forecast models for
different weeks (Table 3).
While validations were approximate for Aduthurai
(TN), Karjat (MH) and Raipur (CG) locations during
rkfydk 3% pkoy ihyk ruk cskd okbZ,lch dh iwoZ psrkouh ds fy, ekWMy
Table 3: Models for forewarning of rice yellow stem borer (YSB)
LFkku
iwokZuqeku ekud lIrkg
ekW M y
Location
Standard meteorological
week of forecast
Model
R2
vnFkqjbZ^ / Aduthurai^
49
Y= 992.480 + 498.581 Z31 -1943.671 Z21
0.92
djtV^ / Karjat^
37
Y= 1158.505+ 162.787 Z21 - 0.910 Z121 + 0.290 Z141
0.94
35
Y= 54931 + 1039.533 Z21 + 3.270 Z131 - 111.218 Z20
0.93
16
Y= -37.12967 + 1.483 Z351 + 0.225 Z341 + 0.376 Z450
0.92
Y= -5952.100 + 11.936 Z31 - 683.513 Z20 + 1099.650 Z21
0.86
jk;iqj^ / Raipur ^
fpulqjk/ Chinsura
&
&
ekaM;k/ Mandya
17
^: [kjhQ &: jch ekSle

^: kharif season &: rabi season
Fks] fpulqjk if'pe caxky vkSj ekaM;k dukZVd ds fy, jch

ds nkSjku iwokZueq ku e'k% ;k rks de Fks ;k T;knk FksA
yqfk;kuk iatkc rFkk vnqFkqjbZ rfeyukMq esa [kjhQ ds
nkSjku vkSj fpulqjk if'pe caxky ,ao ekaM;k dukZVd esa
ikh eksMd
+ ds iwokZueq ku ds fy, leku i)fr viukbZ xbZ
rkfydk 4&5A
kharif, the rabi predictions for Chinsurah (WB) and Mandya

(KA) were under and over predictions, respectively.
Similar approach for leaf folder prediction during
kharif at Ludhiana (PB) and Aduthurai (TN), and rabi
for the later location yielded models (Table 4 -5).
rkfydk 4% [kjhQ kku ds nkSjku ikh eksM+d dh iwoZ psrkouh ds fy, ekWMy
Table 4: Models for forewarning of leaf folder during kharif paddy
LFkku
Location
ekud lIrkg ij iwokZuqeku
ekW M y
Standard meteorological week of forecast
Model
yqfk;kuk iatkc/ Ludhiana (PB)
vnqFkqjbZ rfeyukMq/ Aduthurai (TN)
R2
32
Y= -14104.0 + 283.61Z21
0.58
33
Y= 10266.0 + 1.30 Z131
0.61
34
Y= 407.73 + 1.53 Z131 + 550.99 Z21 - 4.78Z121
0.67
35
Y= 339.8 + 1.229 Z131 + 383.158 Z21
0.67
36
Y= 1298.87 + 1.812Z131+ 452.31Z21
0.68
32
Y= 235.288 + 5.174 Z11 + 0.001Z151
0.64
33
Y= 316.145 + 5.140 Z11 - 0.0009Z151
0.63
34
Y= 330.305 + 5.100 Z11 - 0.0008Z151
0.64
35
Y= 210.979 + 4.182 Z11 + 0.003Z151
0.67
Subscript digits indicate weighted and unweighted coefficients of max. temp. (1), min. temp. (2), morning relative humidity (3) and bright sunshine hours (5)
66
lkekU;r%] uk'khthoksa ihyk ruk Hksnd vkSj ikh eksMd

+
dh iwokZueq ku dh xbZ vkSj izfs {kr lef"V folaxfr;ka ikbZ xbZ]a
tks ekSle esa fofo/krk rFkk ekWMy fodflr djus esa mi;ksx
fd, x, foxr o"kks fgLVksfjdy MkVk ds MkVk dh rqyuk esa
gkfy;k o"kks ls lac)
a ekSle ?kVuke ds dkj.k gks ldrs gSAa
blds vykok] vU; Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh rFkk ikfjra= ds
var%f;k'khy ?kVdksa dh Hkh mijksDr folaxfr;ksa esa Hkwfedk gks
ldrh gSA
In general, there are discrepancies in the predicted

and observed population of insects (YSB and leaf
folder), possibly arisen due to the weather variability
and extreme events of weather associated with the recent
years (as evidenced through the pest scenario analysis)
over those used in the model development (historical
data sets) not to rule out other cropping system and
ecosystem interactive forces playing a major role.
VekVj esa if.kZy jksxksa ds fy, vkuqHkfod ekWMy Empirical models for foliar diseases of tomato
dY;k.kh i-ca- ls o"kZ 2011&12 vkSj 2012&13 nks ekSleksa
ds nkSjku VekVj ds ekSle dkjdksa rFkk if.kZy jksxksa VkjxsV
LikWV] ikh dap
q u vkSj vxsrh vaxekjh ds izkjafHkd lglac/a k esa
lHkh ekSle pjks]a /kwi ds ?kaVksa dks NksMd
+ j] 0-01 izfr'kr ij
udkjkRed ik, x,A
rFkkfi] ekSle pjksa ds lekos'ku ls fd, x, LVsi Mkmu
lekJ;.k fo'ys"k.k esa vfkdre rkieku Vh eSDl-] pedrh
kwi ds ?kaVs ,l,l rFkk vkSlr ok"i ncko ,eohih vkSj
yf{kr LikWV ds fy, vafre izkXoDrk] ikh dqp
a u ds fy,
pedrh kwi ds ?kaVs ,l,l vkSj vkSlr ok"i ncko ,eohih
rFkk vxsrh vaxekjh jksx ds fy, vfkdre rkieku Vh eSDl-
,oa vkSlr ok"i ncko esa lehdj.k cuk;s x;s rkfydk 6A
Preliminary correlation of weather variables and

foliage diseases (target spot, leaf curl and early blight)
of tomato of two seasons viz. 2011-12 and 2012-13 of
Kalyani (WB) revealed that all weather variables are
negatively correlated at 0.01% but for sun shine hours.
However, step down regression analysis made
through inclusion of weather variables yielded
equations with maximum temperature (T max.),
sunshine hours (ss) and mean vapour pressure (mvp) as
ultimate predictors of target spot, ss and mvp for leaf
curl and Tmax. and mvp for early blight disease
(Table 6).
rkfydk 6% dY;k.kh esa VekVj ds jksxksa dk vkuqHkfod iqokZuqeku ekWMy

Table 6: Empirical models to forecast diseases of tomato at Kalyani (WB)
jksx
ekW M y
lek;ksftr R2
Disease
Model
Adjusted R2
yf{kr LikWV
Target spot
VekVj ikh dqp

a u
Tomato leaf curl
vxsrh vaxekjh
Early blight
= 113.532-1.432(VheSDl)*-1.107(ss)-17.647(,eohih)**
= 113.532-1.432(Tmax.)*-1.107(ss)-17.647(mvp)**
0.91
= 124.814-2.595(,l,l)-31.824(,eohih)*
= 124.814-2.595(ss)-31.824(mvp)*
0.91
= 43.668-2.595(VheSDl)*-5.180(,eohih)**
= 43.668-2.595(Tmax)*-5.180(mvp)**
0.79
iwokZuqeku ekWMyksa dk oSkhdj.k

LokuqHkfod iwokZueq ku fu;e % vnqFkqjbZ rfeyukMq ,oa
jk;iqj Nkhlx<+ rFkk kkjokM+ dukZVd ,oa dkfnjh vkakz
izn's k LFkkuksa ds laca k esa e'k pkoy vkSj ewx
a Qyh ds fy,
fodflr fd, x, fu;e vkkkfjr ekWMyksa ds iwokZueq ku dh
lVhdrkvksa dks ek=kRed vkuqHkfod ekWMyksa dh rqyuk esa
iwokZuqeku ds fy, fo'oluh; ,oa mi;ksxh ik;k x;k
rkfydk 7A
Validation of prediction models

Heuristic prediction rules: Prediction accuracies of
the rule-based models developed for rice and groundnut
pests for Aduthurai (TN) and Raipur (CG), and
Dharwad (KA) and Kadiri (AP) locations, respectively
indicate their reliable utility in forewarning over the
quantitaive empirical models (Table 7).
67
NCIPM
rkfydk 7% pkoy ,oa ewaxQyh ds uk'khthoksa ij LFkku ,oa o"kZ vk/kkfjr iwokZuqeku ekWMyksa dk oS/khdj.k
Table 7: Validation of forecasts of rice and groundnut pests over locations and years
Qly
LFkku
uk'khtho
Crop
Location
Insect pest
iwokZuqeku lVhdrk* (%)

Prediction accuracy* (%)
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
ihyk ruk cskd
96.2
86.5
85.5
pkoy
vnqFkqjbZ rfeyukMq
Rice
Aduthurai (TN)
Yellow stem borer
96.0 (98.1)
96.0 (100)
85.5 (100)
jk;iqj Nkhlx<+
xky fet
100 (100)
100 (100)
Raipur (CG)
Gall midge
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(98.7)
(86.5)
77.7
84.2
100
84.2
100
100
100
90.5
100
dsl okWeZ
Case worm
gjh ikh ekgw

Green leaf hopper
ewx
a Qyh
kkjokM+ dukZVd
,l- fyVwjk lkIrkfgd
Groundnut
Dharwad (KA)
S. litura (weekly)
,l- fyVwjk ikf{kd

S. litura (fortnightly)
dkfnjh vkakz izns'k
,l- fyVwjk lkIrkfgd
Kadiri (AP)
S. litura (weekly)
*: dks"Bdksa esa fn, x, vkadM+s iwokZuqeku lVhdrk,a gS]a tks lesfdr uk'khthoksa ds fy, ekWMy( ekSle vkkkfjr ekunaM vkSj uk'khthoksa dh rhozrk ij vkkkfjr gS]a
fu;e http://ncipm.org.in/nicra ij miyCk fd, x, gSAa
*: Figures in parentheses are prediction accuracies based on model for combined pests; Weather-based criteria and pest severity and rules
are available at http://ncipm.org.in/nicra
pkoy vkSj dikl vkkkfjr iQlyhdj.k iz.kkfy;ksa Development of decision support systems for major
ds izeq[k uk'khthoksa ds fy, fu.kZ; lgk;rk insect pests of rice and cotton-based cropping
systems (NAIP)
iz.kkfy;ksa dk fodkl (,u,vkbZih)
dikl lSi iQhMjksa (jl pwlus okys dhV) ds fy,
ekSle vkkkfjr iwokZuqeku dh tkap
o"kZ 2001&08 dh le;kofk ds ,sfrgkfld MkVk lsV dk
mi;ksx djrs gq, dikl lSi QhMjks]a vFkkZr tSflM vejkLdk
fMokLVsl
a ] dk"BdhV fFkzIl Vckdh vkSj fefjMh dSEihyksek
fyohMk ds fy, ekSle vkkkfjr iwokZueq ku fu;e cuk, x,A
ekSle vkkkfjr fu;eksa dks Lora= tkap MkVk lsV 2009&13
ds lkFk oSkhr fd;k x;k] ftUgsa ekWMy fodflr djrs gq,
mi;ksx ugha fd;k x;k FkkA tSflM] dk"BdhV rFkk fefjM ds
laca k esa vkSlr iwokZueq ku lVhdrk e'k% 89] 97 vkSj 93-2%
FkhA bu ekSle vkkkfjr fu;eksa dks lkIrkfgd vkkkj ij
uk'khtho dh rhozrk vkfFkZd Fkzl
s gksYM Lrj ds vkkkj ij de]
lkekU; rFkk mPp rhozrk dk vkdyu djus gsrq mi;qDr
izca ku dk;Zuhfr;ka cukus ds fy, mi;ksx fd;k tk ldrk gSA
68
Testing of weather-based prediction for cotton sap

feeders
Weather-based prediction rules for cotton sap
feeders' viz. jassids (Amrasca devastans), thrips (Thrips
tabaci) and mirids (Campylomma livida) were
developed using historical data sets for the period 20012008. The weather-based rules were validated with
independent testing data sets (2009 -2013) not used in
model building. The mean prediction accuracy over
five years in respect of jassids, thrips and mirids was
89, 97 and 93.2%, respectively. These weather-based
rules can be used to estimate weekly pest severity
(low, medium and high based on economic threshold
level) for taking up appropriate management
interventions.
e; {ks=k ds dikl mRiknd LFkkuksa ds fy, ekSle

vkkkfjr iwokZuqekuksa dh tkap
,- fMokLVsl
a rFkk Vh- Vscl
s kb ds fy, lHkh LFkkuksa ij
ekSleksa ds nkSjku e'k% c<+rh rFkk ?kVrh izof` k;ka uksV dh
xbA ukxiqj ds fy, fodflr fd, x, ekSle vkkkfjr iwokZueq ku
fu;eks]a ftudh e; {ks= ds LFkkuksa ds fy, tkap dh xbZA
tSflM rFkk dk"BdhV nksuksa ds laca k esa iwokZueq ku lVhdrkvksa
esa dkQh varj ik;k x;kA
Testing of weather-based predictions for cotton growing locations of Central zone

Increasing and decreasing trends of population
levels for A. devastans and T. tabaci, respectively were
noted over seasons across all locations. The weatherbased prediction rules developed for Nagpur location
was tested for different locations of Central zone that
indicated varying degree of accuracies for both jassids
and thrips.
p;fur lCth iQlyksa (cSaxu vkSj VekVj) esa Development of expert system for pest
uk'khtho izcaku ds fy, fo'ks"kK ra=k dk fodkl management in selected vegetable crops (Brinjal
o"kZ ds nkSjku fdLeksa ds p;u] Qly dVkbZ rFkk HkaMkj.k
ekWM~;y
w ksa ds fy, izkx
s zkfeax iwjh dh xbZA fdLe ds fy,] p;u
iz;ksDrk ;wtj+ dks Qly rFkk Qly cks;s tkus okys LFkku dks
p;u djuk gksxkA iz;ksDrk p;u ds ckn ra=@flLVe mu
fdLeksa dh lwph iznf'kZr djrk gS] ftUgsa mDr LFkku ds fy,
laLrqr fd;k x;k gSA blds vfrfjDr] vfklwfpr fdLeksa ij
fDyd djrs gq, iz;ksDrk Qlyksa ds ckjs esa leLr lwpuk,a] tSls
Qlyksa dk fooj.k] foekspu fjyhftax djus okyh ,tsl
a h]
Qly ls lacfa kr uk'khtho fujkskh mik;] bR;kfn ns[k ldrk
gSA fo"k;ijd fo'ks"kKksa ds lq>koksa ij uk'khtho igpku ekWM;~ y
w
dk iqu% fMtkbu cuk;k x;kA uk'khtho dh igpku ds fy,
iz;ksDrk dks pkj ckrksa dk p;u djuk gksxk] vFkkZr Qly dh
voLFkk] Qly ds izHkkfor Hkkx] uk'khtho }kjk igqpkbZ xbZ
vkjafHkd gkfu ds y{k.k rFkk vafre gkfu;ksa ds y{k.kksAa iz;ksDrk
ds p;u lysD'ku ds vkkkj ij bUQjsl
a batu flLVe esa
miyC/k izklafxd ukWyt
s &csl Kkukkj dh [kkst djrk gS vkSj
;FkkFkZ ;k laHkkfod uk'khthoksa dh igpku djrk gSA flLVe es]a
uk'khtho dh igpku djus ds fy, uk'khtho }kjk Qly dks
igqp
a k, x, uqdlku dh rLohj iznf'kZr djus dk Hkh fodYi
fn;k x;k gSA vfHkKkr uk'khtho ij fDyd djus ij flLVe
okafNr uk'khtho ds ckjs esa lqlx
a r lwpuk iznf'kZr djrk gSA
bl lac/a k es]a fo"k;ijd fo'ks"kKksa us Hkh dqN lq>ko fn, Fks]
ftUgsa flLVe esa 'kkfey dj fy;k x;k gS rkfd bls vfkd
lwpukizn ,oa iz;ksDrk ds iz;ksx ds fy, lgt cuk;k tk ldsA
vHkh rd flLVe ds lHkh ekWMyksa ds fy, izkx
s kz feax iwjh dj yh
xbZ gS vkSj flLVe dks fMcfxax nks"k gVkus ds fy, fujh{k.k
ds vkhu j[kk x;k gS] tks vHkh Hkh tkjh gSA fMcfxax rFkk tkap
iwjs gksus ds ckn bls iz;ksDrkvksa ds fy, jklukizds dh osclkbV
ij miyCk djk;k tk,xkA
and tomato)
During the year, programming for selection of
varieties, harvest and storage modules was completed.
For variety, selection user has to select crop and
location. Thereafter, system lists the varieties
recommended for that location. Further clicking on
listed varieties, user can see all the information about
them such as description, releasing agency, its pest
resistance, etc. Pest identification module too was
redesigned based on domain expert's suggestions. For
pest identification, user has to make four selections i.e.
crop stage, parts affected, initial and final pest damage
symptoms. On the basis of user selection, the inference
engine searches the knowledge base and identifies the
exact pest or probable pests. In the system, option to
display pest damage picture too has been added to
facilitate pest identification. On clicking the identified
pest, system displays the relevant information about
that pest. The domain experts also suggested some
changes, which were incorporated into the system to
make it more informative and user-friendly. As of now,
programming for all the modules of the system has
been completed and system has been put under
debugging which is continuing. Once debugging and
testing is over, this would be hosted on centre's website.
On completion, the outcome of the project in the
form of expert system would cater to the needs of KVK
personnel, extension workers and progressive farmers.
69
NCIPM
mijksDr izf;k lEiUu gksus ij ifj;kstuk ifj.kke rgr]
fo'ks"kK ra=@flLVe ds :i es]a f"k foKku dsUnzkas ds dkfeZdks]a
foLrkj dk;ZdrkZvksa rFkk mUur'khy fdlkuksa dh vko';drkvksa
dh iwfrZ djsxkA
eykoh (vizQhdk) esa dikl ds fy, rduhdh

lgk;rk dk;Ze% eykoh (vizQhdk) esa vkbZlhVh
vkkkfjr uk'khtho fuxjkuh dk dk;kZUo;u
bl ifj;kstuk dk ms'; eykoh vhdk esa O;ogk;Z
izk;ksfxd vkkkj ij dikl esa vkbZlhVh vkkkfjr uk'khtho
fuxjkuh iz.kkyh fodflr djuk rFkk mldk dk;kZUo;u djuk
gSA eykoh esa bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh iz.kkyh ds dk;kZUo;u ds
fy, jklukizds ds oSKkfudksa dh ,d Vhe us eykoh esa uk'khtho
ifjn`';] fuxjkuh iz.kkyh rFkk miyCk vkbZlhVh volajpuk ds
ckjs esa vkkkj js[kk lwpuk laxfz gr djus ds fy, fnukad 27
uoEcj ls 4 uoEcj] 2013 ds nkSjku eykoh vhdk dk nkSjk
fd;kA
vkkkj js[kk lwpuk

eykoh ns'k dks vkB f"k fodkl izHkkxksa ,MhMh esa ckaVk
x;k gS] ftuesa 28 ftys gSAa izR;sd ftys esa ,d ftyk f"k
fodkl dk;kZy; Mh,Mhvks rFkk dqy 190 foLrkj ;kstuk {ks=
bZih, gSAa f"k fodkl izHkkxksa us ftyk f"k fodkl dk;kZy;
ds ek;e ls xkao vkSj foLrkj ;kstuk {ks=ksa bZih, ds Lrjksa ij
iz{ks= QhYM fnol vk;ksftr dj jk"Vh; Lrjksa ij fofHkUu
f"k f;kvksa o fofk;ksa dk izkUs u;u fd;k gSA
Technical assistance programme for cotton in

Malawi (Africa): Implementation of ICT-based
pest surveillance in Malawi (Africa)
The project is aimed to develop and implement an
ICT-based e-pest surveillance system in cotton in
Malawi (Africa) on feasible pilot scale. A team of
NCIPM scientists visited Malawi during 27 Nov to
4 Dec 2013 to collect the baseline information about
the pest scenario, surveillance system and ICT
infrastructure available in Malawi for implementation
of e-pest surveillance system.
Baseline information
The country has been divided into eight Agriculture
Development Divisions (ADD) covering 28 districts.
Each district is having one District Agricultural
Development Office (DADO) and in total 190
Extension Planning Areas (EPAs). Various practices
were promoted at national levels by ADDs through
DADO by organizing field days at the village and EPA
level.
Baseline information was collected in Balaka and
Machinga districts at district level from respective
DADOs.
DADO, Balaka: Interaction with Incharge,

DADO and officers of EPAs indicated that most of
the area under cotton (95%) was rainfed and only 5%
ftyk f"k fodkl dk;kZy; Mh,Mhvks }kjk ftyk Lrj area was irrigated. Prevailing cropping system involved
cotton followed by cotton maize (intercropped with
ij cykdk rFkk efpaxk ftyksa esa vkkkj js[kk ,d= dh xbZA
pigeon pea) or sorghum was planted in irrigated area
Mh,Mhvks] cykdk % izHkkjh Mh,Mhvks
cropping system
ds lkFk rFkk bZih, ds vfkdkfj;ksa ds
that comprised
of maize after
lkFk ckrphr djus ds nkSjku ;g Kkr
maize or cotton
gqvk fd dikl ds varxZr vfkdrj {ks=
followed by
95% flafpr FkkA {ks= esa dikl rFkk
vegetables (in
mlds ckn dikl] eDdk vjgj ds lkFk
certain areas).
varjQlyhdj.k iz.kkyh viukbZ tkrh gS
Literacy rate is
vkSj Tokj dk Hkh jksi.k fd;k tkrk gS]
high (90%) both
tcfd flapkbZ okys {ks= esa eDdk ds ckn
among males
eDdk ;k dikl rFkk mlds ckn lfCt;ksa
and females. Life
ftyk f"k fodkl dk;kZy;] cykdk esa mifuns'kd ds lkFk
dqN {ks=ksa esa dh Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh
expectancy was
,ulhvkbZih,e dh Vhe
viukbZ tkrh gSA iq#"kksa rFkk efgykvksa
low (45 for
NCIPM team with Deputy Director and officers at District
nksuksa esa mPp f'k{kk nj 90% gSA vusd
males; 43 for
Agricultural Development Office, Balaka (Malawi)
70
dkj.kksa ds pyrs ekuoh; thou

vof/k de gS iq#"kksa ds fy, 45(
efgykvksa ds fy, 43A lkekU;
:i ls] uk'khtho izca ku ds fy,
fdlku pwld uk'khthoksa ds fy,
nks fNM+dko rFkk ckWyokeZ xksy
'kyHk ds fy, pkj ls N% fNM+dko
djrs gSAsa ;|fi ukbVkt
s u (N)]
QkLQksjl (P) rFkk iksVk'k (K)
dks 90%0%20&30 fdxzkizfr gs- ds
vuqikr esa iz;ksx djus dh laLrqfr
dh xbZ gS] ij fdlkuksa }kjk dikl
esa fdlh Hkh moZjd dk iz;ksx ugha
fd;k tkrk gSA dikl dh vkSlr
mit 800 fdxzkizfr gs- gSA
fdlkuksa ds lkFk ukudqca k xkao eykoh] vhdk ds

,ulhvkbZih,e Vhe dh ckrphr
Interaction of team NCIPM with farmers of
Nankumba village (Malawi, Africa)
xkao % jklukizds dh Vhe us bZih,] cktkys rFkk bZih,]

myksuXoh dk izfrfufkRo djus okys nks xkaoksa ds fdlkuksa ds
lkFk ckr dhA bZih,e cktkys ds varxZr 271 xkao rFkk bZih,]
myksuXoh ds varxZr 190 xkao gSAsa xkaoksa esa 700 ifjokj jgrs gSsa
vkSj izR;sd ifjokj esa 6&10 yksx gksrs gSAa fdlku lkekU;
fdLeksa dh [ksrh djrs gSa ftlesa ,ltsM 9314 vkSj D;w,e 301
'kkfey gSAa ewyr% nksuksa xkao o"kkZfJr gSAa
f"k ,oa [kk| lqj{kk ea=kky; esa cSBd

f"k ,oa [kk| lqj{kk ea=ky; ,evks,,Q,l esa nks
vyx&vyx cSBdsa vk;ksftr dh xbZ]a ,d lqJh flVkbu lhfe;kEcks] mi funs'kd iz{ks= Qly rFkk nwljh Jh ,Q- ,efcxh lkftok] fu;a=d] lwpuk ,oa izkS|ksfxdh izca ku lsok ds
lkFkA ifj;kstuk ds f;kdykiksa ds dk;kZUo;u gsrq f"k
laca kh vkbZlhVh volajpukvksa ds fy, f"k ,oa [kk| lqj{kk
ea=ky; ,evks,,Q,l esa ,d loZj miyCk gSA leLr f"k
foHkkx izHkkxksa rFkk ftyk f"k fodkl dk;kZy;ksa esa daI;wVj]
baVjusV dusfDVfoVh rFkk eksckby lqfokk,a miyCk gSAa xkao esa
fofHkUu lsY;wyj lsok iznkrkvksa ds ek;e ls eksckby VsyhQksuh
lsok miyCk dh xbZ gSA
females) due to various

reasons. For pest
management, in general,
the farmers carried out
two sprays for sucking
pests and four to six
sprays for bollworms.
Though N: P: K
recommendation is 90:
0: 20-30 kg/ha but no
fertilizer was applied in
cotton by the farmers.
Average seed cotton
yield is 800 kg/ha.
Villages: Interaction was undertaken with farmers

from two cotton growing villages representing EPA,
Bazale and EPA, Ulongwe. There were 271 villages
under EPA, Bazale and 190 villages under EPA,
Ulongwe. There were 700 households and each family
having 6-10 persons. Common varieties grown by the
farmers included SZ 9314 and QM301. Both the villages
were mainly rainfed.
Meeting at Ministry of Agriculture & Food Security

Two separate meetings were held at Ministry of
Agriculture and Food Security (MOAFS), one with
Ms. Christine C. Miambo, Deputy Director (Field
crops) and the second with Mr. F.M. Biggi Sajiwa,
Comptroller, Department of Information and
Technology Management Services. One server is
available at MOAFS for agriculture ICT infrastructures
for implementation of project activities. All the
Agriculture Development Divisions and District
Agriculture Development Offices are equipped with
the computers, internet connectivity and mobile
facilities. Mobile telephony is prevalent in the villages
through various cellular service providers.
71
NCIPM
Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj

izHkko fo'ys"k.k
Socio-Economic Issues and Impact
Analysis of IPM
gfj;k.kk esa {ks=kh; Lrj ij pkoy esa vkbZih,e Impact assessment of IPM technology in rice at
regional level in Haryana
izkS|ksfxdh ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu
gfj;k.kk esa {ks=h; Lrj ij cklerh pkoy esa vkbZih,e
izk|
S ksfxdh ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu fd;k x;k ftls o"kZ 2013&14
ds nkSjku ikuhir ftys ds Nktiqj xkao esa bls oSkhr fd;k
x;k FkkA gfj;k.kk esa cklerh pkoy ds varxZr dqy {ks= 622 yk[k gs-s Fkk vkSj mRikndrk 25-87 fDo-a@gs-s FkhA o"kZ
2002&2005 ds nkSjku Nktiqj xkao esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh
ds oSkhdj.k ls ;g irk pyk fd fdlkuksa dh f"k fofk;ksa
dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ls izkIr 'kq) ykHk
` 17]500@& izfr gs-s FkkA ;fn gfj;k.kk jkT; ds lexz
cklerh pkoy dh [ksrh esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh viukbZ xbZ
gksrh rks fdlkuksa dks u dsoy ` 10-88 fcfy;u dk ykHk
gksrk] cfYd 1430 Vu jklk;fud uk'khthouk'kd dh Hkh
cpr gksrhA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh v{kq..krk dk ,slk izHkko gS
fd Nktiqj xkao esa 10 o"kks ls vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh u
viuk, tkus ds ckotwn vkt Hkh fdlkuksa }kjk vkbZih,e
izkS|ksfxdh viukbZ tk jgh gS] tSlk fuEu rkfydk esa n'kkZ;k
x;k gS %
Impact assessment of IPM technology was

conducted at regional level in Haryana in Basmati
rice as it was validated in Chajjpur village in District
Panipat during 2013-14. Total area under Basmati rice
in Haryana was 6.22 lakh ha and the productivity
was 25.87 q/ha. Validation of IPM technology in
Chajjpur village during 2002-2005 indicated that net
profit of IPM technology over farmers' practice was
` 17,500/ha If the IPM technology was adopted in
Basmati growing area in whole of Haryana, the net
benefit of ` 10.88 billion would accrue to farmers
and the savings in chemical pesticides would be of
1430 tonnes. Sustainability of IPM technology shows
that IPM technology was still being adopted by
farmers after ten years of withdrawal from village
Chajjpur as indicated in Table 1 below.
rkfydk 1% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku Nktiqj] gfj;k.kk esa pkoy esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh vaxhdj.k lwpdkad %
Table 1: IPM technology adoption index (%) in rice during 2013 in Chajjpur, Haryana
izkS|kfxdh
vaxhdj.k lwpdkad %
Technology
Adoption Index (%)
nks ikS/k izfr Vhyk @ Two seedlings per hill

moZjd dk foosdiw.kZ iz;ksx @ Judicious fertilizer application
79
ikuh dk foosdiw.kZ iz;ksx @ Judicious use of water
88
<sp
a k dk jksi.k @ Dhaincha plantation
90
tSo dkjdksa dk iz;ksx @ Use of bio-agents
95
jlk;fud uk'khthouk'kdksa dk iz;ksx rRdkfyd vuqiz;ksx
Use of chemical pesticide (spot application)
72
90
Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.k | Socio Economic Issues and Impact Analysis of IPM
p;fur lCth iQlyksa esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa Study on the constraints in adoption of IPM
technologies in selected vegetable crops
ds viukus lEca/h ck/kvksa dk v;;u
o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku v;;u djus ds fy, gfj;k.kk ds
lksuhir ftys esa jk; CykWd ds varxZr ikYnh xkao dk p;u
mn~n's ; gsrq fd;k x;kA bl xkao esa jklukizds lCth dh
vkbZih,e Vhe }kjk fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa LFkku
fof'k"V xksHkh vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ka fodflr dh xbZ gSa vkSj
bls c<+kok Hkh fn;k x;k gSA bl xkao esa v;;u djus dk
ms'; vkbZih,e izf'kf{kr xksHkh mRikndksa }kjk vkbZih,e
izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa ds vaxhdj.k esa vkus okyh leL;kvksa o dfBukbZ;ksa
dk irk yxkuk FkkA vfu;fer :i ls pqus x;s 68 fdlkuksa ds
los{Z k.k }kjk eq[; ck/kkvksa dh igpku dks rkfydk&2 esa n'kkZ;k
x;k gSA
The village Paldi, Block Rai, District Sonepat of

the state Haryana was purposely selected to conduct
the study during year 2013-14. The location specific
cauliflower IPM technologies have been developed and
promoted in the village Paldi, Sonepat, Haryana by
the vegetable IPM team of NCIPM in farmers'
participatory mode. This study was conducted with
the objective to identify the constraints in the adoption
of IPM technologies as perceived by the IPM trained
cauliflower growers. The main constraints identified
by surveying the sixty eight randomly selected farmers
are presented in Table-2.
rkfydk 2% xksHkh dh [ksrh djus okys fdlkuksa }kjk vkbZih,e dk;Ze vaxhdj.k esa eglwl dh tkus okyh leL;k,a
Table 2: Constraints perceived by the farmers in adoption of IPM in cauliflower
%
leL;k,a
tokc nsus okys fdlku
Constraint
% respondents
Lkekftd&vkfFkZd] ifjfLFkfrdkjd] volajpukRed rFkk uhfrxr leL;k,a
Socio-economic, situational, infrastructural and policy constraints
NksVh Hkwfetksr vkdkj / Small size of land holding
51.47
fokh; lalkkuksa dk vHkko / Lack of financial resources
66.17
tSo uk'khthouk'kdksa ds vkiwfrZ dk vHkko\ vkbZih,e ?kVd

Lack of supply of bio-pesticides? IPM components
95.58
fdlkuksa esa vkilh lg;ksx esa deh / Poor cooperation among farmers
73.53
detksj ,o vizHkkoh jkT;&foLrkj leFkZu iz.kkyh / Weak and inefficient state extension support system
jkT; foLrkj ,tsfa l;ksa }kjk vkbZih,e ij izf'k{k.k nsus ds fy, rFkk fdlkuksa ds fy, ,Dlikstj
vuqHko izkIr djus gsrq nkSjksa dh vi;kZIr O;oLFkk
98.52
Lack of provision for IPM training and exposure visit by state extension agency
91.11
dhVuk'kd daifu;ksa }kjk dhVuk'kdksa ds vfkd iz;ksx ds fy, tcnZLr izpkj&izlkj rFkk vukpkj
Aggressive propaganda and malpractices by the pesticide companies
97.05
le; ij xq.kokkiw.kZ vkbZih,e ?kVdksa o lkefxz;ksa dks miyCk u djkus esa laLFkkxr leFkZu esa deh
Lack of institutional support of timely and quality IPM components
94.11
vkbZih,e dh fofk ls mRikfnr mit ij izhfe;e ewY; dh dksbZ O;oLFkk dk u gksuk

No provision for premium price for IPM produce
86.76
tkudkjh ,oa lwpuk laca kh leL;k,a / Knowledge and information constraints

fdlkuksa rd izekf.kr vkbZih,e lwpuk igqp
a kus dh foQyrk
Absence of authentic IPM information delivery at door step
98.52
jkT; foLrkj ,tsfa l;ksa }kjk vkbZih,e ds lac/a k esa mi;ksxh foLrkj lkfgR; miyCk u djk ikuk
Poor availability of quality extension literature on IPM by state extension agency
85.29
izkS|ksfxdh; laca kh leL;k,a / Technological Constraint

vkbZih,e esa T;knk esgur rFkk T;knk etnwjksa dh vko';drk / More time and labour consuming
61.17
73
NCIPM
bl v;;u ds fu"d"kZ esa ;g mYys[k fd;k x;k Fkk fd
cM+s {ks= esa xksHkh vkbZih,e ds izkUs u;u ds fy, mDr leL;kvksa
dk lekkku djuk csgn t:jh gSA blds fy, vkbZih,e ds
LVsdgksYMjksa i.kZkkjdksa dks ,d IysVQkeZ ij ,d lkFk
yk;k tkuk pkfg, rFkk mudh lh; Hkkxhnkjh ls leL;kvksa
dk gy <w<a k+ tkuk pkfg,A ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd lwpuk ,oa
fufof"V buiqV miyCk djkus esa jkT; foLrkj ,tsfa l;ksa
dh lf; Hkwfedk fuf'pr :i ls fdlkuksa dks vkbZih,e ds
vaxhdj.k ds fy, izkRs lkfgr djsxhA blds fy, fdlkuksa dh
lgHkkfxrk i)fr ds ek;e ls fdlkuksa dks mi;ksxh ,oa
izekf.kd xksHkh vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds gLrkarj.k ,oa
izlkj ds fy, jkT; foLrkj ,tsfa l;ksa dh Hkwfedk dks l'Dr
fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA fdlkuksa ds la?k ,lksfl,'ku
rFkk Lo;a lgk;rk lewg Hkh vuqla kku ,oa foLrkj laLFkkvksa
ds lg;ksx esa vkbZih,e vkSj foLrkj lsokvksa esa lgk;rk
nsdj uk'khtho laca kh lykgdkj lsok,a nsus esa vge Hkwfedk
fuHkk ldrs gSAa
pkoy iQlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds varxZr bZvkbZD;w

dk iz;ksx djrs gq, i;kZoj.k ij uk'khthouk'kdksa
ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu
mkj izn's k ds lhrkiqj ftys esa pkoy Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh
ds varxZr bZvkbZD;w dk iz;ksx djrs gq, f"k foKku dsna &
z II]
dfr;k] lhrkiq j ] lh,l,lvkjvkbZ ] vkjvkj,l rFkk
lhvkbZ , l,p] y[ku ds lg;ks x es a i;kZ o j.k ij
uk'khthouk'kdksa ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu fd;k x;kA 14 fofHkUu
xkaoksa ds fdlkuksa ls vkkkj&js[kk lwpuk ,d= dh xbZ vkSj
mldk fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;kA bu xkaoksa esa jgus okys vfkdrj
fdlkuksa ds ikl tksrus ;ksX; Hkweh dkQh de gSA fdlkuksa dh
lgHkkfxrk i)fr es]a vkbZih,e dk;Ze ds varxZr 31 fdlkuksa
dks vaxhr djrs gq, rFkk bruh gh la[;k esa ,Qih fdlkuksa
dks lfEefyr djrs gq, vkbZih,e dk;Ze dk oSkhdj.k 62
,dM+ {ks= ij fd;k x;k FkkA blds vfrfjDr] daVky
s ds :i
esa ikap ,dM+ Hkwfe dk p;u fd;k x;k] tgka fdlh izdkj
dksbZ izf;k ugha dh xbZA
Qly dh fofHkUu voLFkkvksa izfrjksi.k ls igys] e/;
Qly ekSle ds le; esa rFkk Qly ekSle mijkUr ij ty
esa fo|eku jlk;fud vo'ks"kksa ds uewuksa dk fo'ys"k.k fd;k
x;kA izR;sd vaxhr fdlku ds fy, e`nk LokLF; dkMZ
fodflr fd, x,A
uk'khtho ds ifjn`'; ij ,d= dh xbZ lwpuk] vko';d
fufof"V;ks buiqV dh miyCkrk rFkk dSyUs Mj vkkkfjr ,oa
yscy nkoksa ds cxSj [krjukd dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx dh
74
The study concluded that the amelioration of these

constraints for the promotion of cauliflower IPM in
larger area is needed on priority. The constraints may
be overcome with the active involvement of various
stakeholders of IPM at one platform. The pro-active
role of state extension agencies in information delivery
and input supply certainly will motivate the farmers
for adoption of IPM. SHGs could also play vital role
in providing pest advisory services by facilitating IPM
and extension services to farmers in collaboration with
research and extension institutions.
Impact assessment of pesticides on environment

using EIQ tool under rice cropping system
Impact of pesticides on environment was assessed using
EIQ tool under rice cropping system, at Sitapur district,
Uttar Pradesh in collaboration with KVK-II, Katia, Sitapur,
CSSRI, RRS and CISH, Lucknow. Base line information
of farmers from 14 different villages was collected and
analyzed. Majority of farmers living in these villages having
small land holdings. In farmers' participatory mode, the
validation of IPM program was carried out by adopting
31 farmers under IPM and equal number using farmers'
practice, covering 62 acres area. In addition to this, five
acre land was selected as control, where no interventions
were made.
The samples of soil and water were analyzed for
pesticide residues, at different crop stages (pretransplantation, mid and post crop season). Soil health
cards were developed for each adopted farmer.
Based on the information collected on pest
scenario, availability of critical inputs, practice of using
calendar-based and hazardous pesticides without label
claims, six IPM modules were synthesized, each with
five replicates, and observations were made in these
modules as well as in KVK farm and untreated control.
Major pest problems observed were leaf folder, stem
borer, plant hoppers, hispa, gundhi bug, bacterial blight
and blast. In a few fields, heavy infestation of white tip
and root-knot nematode was recorded.
The pest and natural enemy count was observed in
IPM, farmers' practice (FP) and untreated control, at
different intervals.The yield data revealed no significant
differences among modules, but methods (IPM and
Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.k | Socio Economic Issues and Impact Analysis of IPM
fofk ds vkkkj ij 6 vkbZih,e ekWM~;y

w ksa dks la'ysf"kr fd;k
x;k izR;sd ekWM;
~ y
w esa ikap iqujko`k Fks rFkk f"k foKku
dsna z }kjk bu ekM~;y
w ksa o daVky
s dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
ize[q k uk'khthoksa }kjk mRiUu leL;kvksa esa ikh eksMd
+ ]
ruk cskd] ikni vHkZd IykaV gksij] fgLik] xakh cx] thok.kqt
vaxekjh rFkk izLQqVu FksA dqN [ksrksa esa 'osrkxz jksx OgkbV
fVi vkSj tM+ foxyu lw=fe Hkh fjdkWMZ fd, x,A
fofHkUu e;karjksa ij vkbZih,e] fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih
rFkk daVky
s esa uk'khtho ,oa izkfrd 'k=q dh lef"V ikbZ xbZA
ekWM;
~ y
w ksa esa mit ,oa vkadM+kas dh n`f"V ls dksbZ [kkl varj ugha
Fkk] ij vkbZih,e vkSj fdlkuksa dh f"k fofk;ksa o iz.kkfy;ksa
esa dkQh varj 5% egkk dk vk/kkj ij ik;k x;kA
fofHkUu vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w ksa ds ykHk % ykxr vuqikr
yxHkx ,d tSls FksA xSj&vkbZih,e ekWM~;y
w ksa ds laca k esa
ekewyh varj ik;k x;kA rFkkfi] ekWM;~ y
w 7 ,e 7 'ks"k ekWM;~ y
w ksa
ls fcydqy vyx FkkA fdlkuksa }kjk vius Lrj ij fofHkUu f"k
f;kvks@
a fofk;ksa dks viuk, tkus ds dkj.k ,slk varj ns[kk
tk ldrk gSA rFkkfi] lqO;ofLFkr izf;k rFkk lqioz kgh f"k
f;kvksa ls vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w viukus okys fdlkuksa dks dkQh
T;knk vkfFkZd ykHk izkIr gqvkA
farmers' practice) and weeds wounts were significantly

different (P<0.05).
The benefit:cost ratios of different IPM modules
were almost at par. However, the module 7 (M7) was
quite different from rest of the modules. The difference
might have arisen because of different agricultural
practices followed by the farmers at their end.
However, the systematic approach and streamlined
agricultural practices created significant economical
return in IPM modules.
One is constantly reminded of the infinite lavishness and fertility of Nature

inexhaustible abundance amid what seems enormous waste. And yet when
we look into any of Her operations..... we learn that no particle of Her
material is wasted or worn out. It is eternally flowing from use to use,
beauty to yet higher beauty.
John Muir, 1889
75
NCIPM
vU; vuqlakkfud xfrfofk;ka

Other Research Activities
mkj&if'peh eSnkuh {ks=kksa rFkk mkj ioZrh; {ks=kksa Wheat yellow rust incidence in north-western plain
(gfj;k.kk] iatkc vkSj fgekpy izns'k) esa xsgwa esa and northern hill zone (Haryana, Punjab and
Himachal Pradesh)
ihys jrqos dk izdksi
mkj Hkkjr esa xsgaw ij ihyk jrqok egkekjh ds izdksi ,oa
iwokZueq ku dk izk;ksfxd v;;u djus ds fy, Hkkjrh; f"k
vuqla kku laLFkku vkbZ,vkjvkbZ rFkk jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho
izca ku dsUnz] iwlk] ubZ fnYyh ds oSKkfudksa dh ,d Vhe us
tuojh&ekpZ] 2014 ds nkSjku ,d la;Dq r los{Z k.k fd;kA bl
Vhe us ihyk jrqok ds izdksi dk vkdyu djus ds fy, mkj
Hkkjr ds eSnkuh {ks=ksa rFkk gfj;k.kk] iatkc vkSj fgekpy izn's k
ds igkM+h {ks=ksa esa xsgaw dh Qly okys {ks=ksa dk nkSjk fd;kA bu
{ks=ksa esa cqokbZ dh xbZ xsgaw dh izeq[k fdLeksa esa MCY;w,p 711]
,pMh 2967] ihchMCY;w 550] ihchMCY;w 551] ihchMCY;w 621]
,pMh 2932] ihchMCY;w 750] ,pMh 2894 ,oa ,pMh 2851]
ihchMCY;w 343 rFkk ckcZr LFkkuh; fdLe fdLesa 'kkfey FkhaA
igys los{Z k.k fnukad 8&9 tuojh] 2014 ds nkSjku
los{Z k.k Vhe us gfj;k.kk ds ;equkuxj ftys esa banhz CykWd ds
varxZr xsgaw dh [ksrh djus okys fofHkUu fdlkuksa ds xkaoks]a
vFkkZr cMsMh] cMksUMk] 'kkarMh( ykMok CykWd djuky ds
varxZr [ksMh+ nsonkyu] lqjk] cnleh] cSu rFkk gfj;k.kk ds gh
;equkuxj ds uaniqjk] nkeyk] nkSjkx] dqt
a y] jRux<+ xkoksa dk
nkSjk fd;kA rRi'pkr] los{Z k.k Vhe us Hkkodiqj] tusriqj vEckyk]
gfj;k.kk vkSj taxiqjk] tykyiqj] tgkathj eksgkyh] paMhx<+]
laxksoky] jktx<+] jkjk lkfgc] nksjkgk] ePNhokM+k yqfk;kuk]
iatkc rFkk efydiqj] panuiqj t[ksMk+ ] ektjk] panl
s j] xaxksoky
ijh lqjos ky] ksj] vkuaniqj lkfgc] dysljk] ukaxy jkisM]+
iatkc xkaoksa esa xsgaw dh [ksrh djus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa dk
fujh{k.k fd;kA los{Z k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd dqy feykdj xsgaw
dh Qly dh fLFkfr vPNh Fkh vkSj dsoy jRux<+ xkao nkeyk]
;equkuxj dks NksMd
+ j tgka MCY;w,p 711 xsgaw fdLe ij 3 oxZ
76
In view of conducting pilot study on epidemiology

and forecasting of yellow rust of wheat in northern
India, survey was conducted jointly by team of scientists
from Indian Agricultural Research Institute and
National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa,
New Delhi, during January - March, 2014. The team
surveyed wheat cropped areas for yellow rust in
northern plain and hill zones of Haryana, Punjab and
Himachal Pradesh. The dominant varieties sown in these
areas were WH 711, HD 2967, PBW 550, PBW 551,
PBW 621, HD 2932, PBW 750, HD 2894 and HD
2851, PBW 343, and Barbat (local variety).
During the first survey (8-9 Jan 2014), survey team
visited different wheat growing farmers fields in
villages namely Badedi, Badonda, Shantadi under Indri
Block and villages such as Kheri Davdalan, Sura,
Badsami, Ban of Ladwa Block (Karnal) and villages like
Nandpura, Damla, Daurag, Kunjal, Ratangarh in
Yamuna Nagar district of Haryana. Afterward, survey
team visited different wheat growing fields in villages
namely Bhavakpur, Janetpur (Ambala, Haryana) and
villages Jangpura, Jalalpur, Jahanjeir (Mohali,
Chandigarh), Sangowal, Rajgarh, Rara Sahib, Doraha,
Machhiwada (Ludhiana, Punjab); Malikpur, Chandpur
Jakhera, Majara, Chandesar, Gangowal, Upper
Surewal, Dher, Anandpur Sahib, Kalsera, Nangal
(Ropar, Punjab). Overall the crop was in a good
condition and was free from yellow rust and brown
rust at all the places except in one village Ratangarh
vU; vuqla kkfud xfrfofk;k | Other Research Activities
eh- jsfM;l {ks= dh nwjh 300 04'18'' N, 770 11'26-2'' E,220-51

eh- ,e,l,y ds Hkhrj 60,l rd ihyk jrqok ik;k x;k] lHkh
LFkkuksa ij xsgaw dh Qly ihyk jrqok rFkk Hkwjk jrqok ds jksx ,oa
izdksi ls eqDr ikbZ xbZA
nwljs los{Z k.k 27 tuojh] 2014 ds nkSjku Vhe us ;equkuxj
gfj;k.kk ds ck;kuk] jaMksyh] cMsMh] ykMok djuky ftyk]
jknkSj] jRux<+ rFkk ;equkuxj ftys ds vkl&ikl ds xkaoksa esa
xsgaw ds [ksrksa dk los{Z k.k fd;kA bl los{Z k.k dk ms'; fnukad
08 tuojh] 2014 dks izfs {kr ihyk jrqok jksx ds lae.k dk
utnhdh [ksrksa esa QSyus dk vkdyu djuk FkkA jRux<+ xkao
;equkuxj es]a tgka fnukad 08 tuojh 2014 dks bl jksx dks
ns[kk x;k] xsgaw dh Qly esa ihyk jrqok dk jksx ugha QSyk Fkk]
ysfdu ck;kuk xkao banhz CykWd] djuky esa ihyk jrqok dk
izdksi 40&50 ,l 290 42'44-2'' N, 760 59'53-1'' E rd ns[kk
x;kA lafer {ks= yxHkx 20 oxZ eh- FkkA Qly iw.kZ:i ls
rS;kj Fkh vkSj dVkbZ ds dxkj ij FkhA dqy feykdj] Qly dh
fLFkfr dkQh vPNh Fkh rFkk los{Z k.k fd, x, {ks=ksa esa ihyk
jrqos dk dksbZ izdksi ugha ik;k x;kA
rhljs los{Z k.k 2&4 Qjojh] 2014 ds nkSjku Hkh los{Z k.k
ds fy, mUgha ekxks banhz ] ykMok] djuky( jknkSj] fcykliqj]
flkksMk+ ( ;equkuxj( ektjk] vEckyk] ePNhokM+k] yqfk;kuk]
'kkgniqj] ekSykuk] pedj lkfgc] j'khniqj] Qwy Ms [kqn]Z ckykpkSM]+
jksiM+( yaxjaxk] uoklkgj] xjh vthr flag] 'kghn Hkxr flag
uxj ftyk] iatkc dk vuqdj.k fd;k tSls fiNys los{Z k.k ds
nkSjku viuk, x, FksA bu {ks=ksa esa ize[q k :i ls xsgaw dh ,pMh
2967] ,pMh 2339] ,pMh 2851] ihchMCY;w 621 rFkk ihchMCY;w
343 fdLeksa dh [skrh dh tkrh gSA jksiM+ ds 'kkgniqj 2040S,
760 21'436'' N, 300 57'41'' E rFkk j'khniqj 1020S, 760 23'40''
N, 300 56'9'' E esa xsgaw dh Qly lkekU; :i ls ihyh ikbZ xbZ
vFkkZr ;g ihyk jrqok ds dkj.k ugha Fkk] ijUrq NqV&iqV [ksrksa
esa 10&40 ,l 5 oxZ eh- nwjh rd ihyk jrqok ds y{k.k fn[kkbZ
fn,A
pkSFks los{Z k.k fnukad 6&7 ekpZ] 2014 ds nkSjku gfj;k.kk
ds djuky] vEckyk rFkk ;equkuxj vkSj iatkc ds djrkjiqj]
yqfk;kuk] tyakj] xqjnkliqj] gksf'k;kjiqj rFkk 'kghn Hkxr
flag uxj ftyksa dk los{Z k.k fd;k x;kA bl los{Z k.k dk ms';
iwoZ esa ik, x, ihyk jrqok lae.k dk utnhdh [ksrksa esa QSyko
dk vkdyu djuk FkkA los{Z k.k Vhe us ;g ik;k fd fdlkuksa
}kjk izkfs idksuktksy dk fNM+dko fd, tkus ls ihyk jrqok jksx
fu;af=r fLFkfr esa Fkk rFkk lae.k dsUnz ls utnhdh [ksrksa esa
QSyko ugha gqvkA ysfdu lae.k dsUnz ftls iwoZ esa fjiksVZ
(near Damla, Yamuna Nagar), where yellow rust was

observed up to 60S within 3 m2 radius (3000418N,
7701126.2E, 220.51 m MSL) on var. WH 711. Overall
crop was in a good condition at all the places and no
yellow rust incidence was recorded from any other place
visited by the survey team.
During the second survey (27 Jan 2014), visited
several wheat fields of Bayana, Randoli, Badedi, Ladwa
(Karnal district), Radaur, Ratangarh and adjoining
villages of Yamunanagar District (Haryana). The
objective of this survey was to observe the spread of
yellow rust in adjoining fields from the infection focus,
observed on 08 Jan 2014. There was no spread of yellow
rust of wheat in Ratangarh village (Yamunanagar),
where it was noticed on 08 Jan 2014. But spot incidence
of yellow rust was observed in Bayana village (Indri
Block, Karnal) to an extent of 40-50S (294244.2N,
765953.1E). The infection was observed in a spot of
approx 20 m2 area. The crop was at maximum tillering
to booting to early heading stage. The overall condition
of crop was good and healthy with hardly any disease
incidence seen in the area surveyed.
During the third survey (2-4 Feb 2014), same route
was followed (Indri, Ladwa of Karnal; Radaur,
Bilaspur, Sidhaura of Yamunanagar; Majara of Ambala;
Machiwada of Ludhiana; Shahadpur, Mulana, Chamkar
Shahib, Rashidpur, Phool de Khurd, Balachaur of
Ropar; Langranga, Nawashahar, Gari Ajeet Singh
villages of Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar district, Punjab).
The dominant varieties were HD2967, HD 2329,
HD2851, PBW 621 and PBW343. The overall health
of the crop was good with exception of general
yellowing in some isolated spots (not yellow rust) and
isolated patches of yellow rust infection focus at
Shahadpur (20-40S, 76 21' 43.6"N, 30 57' 41"E) and
Rashidpur (10-20S, 76 23' 40"N, 30 56' 9"E), Ropar
district to the extent of 10-40 S (5 m2 area). There was
no spread of disease near the infection focal point,
which was earlier detected.
During the fourth survey (6-7 Mar 2014), visited
several villages of Karnal, Ambala & Yamunanagar
(Haryana) and Kartarpur, Ludhiana, Jalandhar,
Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur and Shaheed Bhagat Singh
Nagar districts of Punjab. The objective of this survey
77
NCIPM
fd;k x;k Fkk ls fLFkr nwj&njkt bykdksa es]a vFkkZr gfj;k.kk
esa uugsjk 10S, 290 52'26-5'' N, 770 05'29-8'' E rFkk iatkc esa
xqjnkliqj vuqla kku dsUnz 1080S, 320 03'04-8'' N, 750 25'1-2''
E] gksf'k;kjiqj 2030S, 310 27'03'' N, 750 39'01'' E] nklq;k
1020S, 310 48'05-7'' N, 750 39'6-9'' E rFkk djrkjiqj 10S, 310
28'06-9'' N, 750 22'05-1'' E esa xsgaw ds dqN [ksrksa esa ihyk jrqos
ds y{k.k ik, x,A
ikaposa los{Z k.k fnukad 05 ekpZ] 2014 esa los{Z k.k Vhe us
jktLFkku ds fofHkUu xsgwa ds [skrksa dk losZ{k.k fd;kA
vkj,vkjvkbZ] nqxkZijq k 260 53'07'' N, 750 48'03'' E] t;iqj ,oa
HkkSiqjk Hkjriqj ftyk 270 25'07'' N, 770 08'06'' E tgka xsgaw esa
10&20 ,l rd ihyk jrqok ik;k x;k] dks NksMd
+ j Qly dh
fLFkfr vPNh Fkh vkSj mlesa jrqos dk dksbZ lae.k ugha ik;k
x;kA
NBs los{Z k.k fnukad 21&22 ekpZ] 2014 ds nkSjku Vhe us
gfj;k.kk essa xsgaw ds vusd [ksrksa dk losZ{k.k fd;k vkSj ;g ik;k
fd esokr ftys ds varxZr fMaxjgsjh 280 16'44-1'' N, 760 57'10''
E rFkk egsUnzx<+ ftys ds varxZr ulhciqj 280 06'26-5'' N, 760
08'12-1'' E] kukSun
a k 280 21'82'' N, 760 14'31-9'' E vkSj ddjkyk
+ j xsgaw ds
280 17'78-6'' N, 760 19'16-0'' E xkaoksa dks NksMd
vfkdrj [ksr ihyk jrqos ls eqDr ik, x, vkSj dsoy
ihchMCY;w&343 xsgaw fdLe esa ihyk jrqok ds NqV&iqV y{k.k
ik, x,A
ihyk jrqos ls xzflr [ksrksa esa

fdlkuksa ls ckrphr
ihyk jrqok 60,l

Yellow rust (60S)
Interaction with Farmers in

infected (YR) field
los{Z k.k Vhe dh vke jk; gS fd xsgaw esa ihyk jrqok jksx ,oa
izdksi rFkk mlds QSyus dh izof` k ij lrr :i ls foLr`r
v;;u fd, tkus dh vko';drk gS D;ksfa d yacs le; rd
jksx tkjh jgus ls muds foLrkj esa fof'k"V izof` k;ka ugha ns[kh
tk ldrh gSAa xsgaw dh fofokkRed izof` k rFkk xsgaw ds fHkUu
HkkSxksfyd LFkkuksa ds dkj.k los{Z k.k dh vofk ds nkSjku lHkh
LFkkuksa ij ihyk jrqok izdksi dh leku izof` k ugha ns[kh xbZA
78
was to observe the spread of yellow rust in adjoining

fields from the Yellow Rust infection focus, noticed
earlier. The survey team observed that the disease was
controlled (which was reported earlier) by spraying of
Propiconazole and there was no spread in the adjoining
field from infection focus. But some new wheat fields
located far from the infection focus (earlier reported)
have been observed, viz. Nanhera (10S, 295226.5N,
770529.8E) in Haryana and Gurdaspur Research
Farm (10-80S, 320304.8N, 75251.2E), Hoshiarpur
(20-30S, 312703N, 753901E), Dasuya (10-20S,
314805.7N, 75396.9E), Kartarpur (10S,
312806.9N, 752205.1E) of Punjab.
During the fifth survey (05 Mar 2014), visited
several fields of wheat growing areas of Rajasthan. The
crop health was good and free from any rust infection
except RARI, Durgapura (265307N, 754803E),
Jaipur and Bhaupura (272507N, 770806E),
Bharatpur district, where 10-20S yellow rust of wheat
was recorded.
During the sixth survey (21-22 Mar 2014), several
wheat growing areas of Haryana indicated that most
of the wheat fields were free from yellow rust of wheat
except Dingerheri (281644.1N, 765710E) (Mewat
dist.), Nasibpur (280626.5N, 760812.1E),
Dhanonda (282182N,761431.9E), Kakarala
(281778.6N, 761916.0E) of Mahendergarh
district, Haryana, with only traces of yellow rust in
wheat were observed in the variety PBW-343.
The survey team is in strong belief that systematic
and detailed study of incidence and spread pattern of
yellow rust of wheat is needed because the appearance
of disease over a period of time has no specific pattern.
The varietal pattern and geographical locations of wheat
has also not reflected uniform pattern of yellow rust
incidence during the survey period.
ekuo lalkku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.k | Human Resource Development and Transfer of IPM Technologies
ekuo lalkku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,e

izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.k
Human Resource Development and
Transfer of IPM Technologies
vkbZih,e izn'kZuh
IPM exhibition
f"k olar esyk
Krishi Vasant Mela

NCIPM participated in Krishi Vasant Mela at
Nagpur during 8-13 Feb 2014 for dissemination of IPM
techniques. A large number of farmers, researchers,
extension functionaries, planners and students from
different parts of the country visited the IPM stall and
showed keen interest in the validated IPM technologies.
jklukizds us vkbZih,e rduhdksa dk izlkj djus ds fy,

ukxiqj esa fnukad 8&13 Qjojh 2014 ds nkSjku f"k olar esys
esa lgHkkfxrk dhA ns'k ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa ds fdlkuks]a vuqla kkudrkZvks]a
foLrkj inkfkdkfj;ks]a ;kstukdkjksa rFkk fo|kfFkZ;ksa us vkbZih,e
LVky dk nkSjk fd;k vkSj oS|hr vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa esa
dkQh #fp fn[kkbZA
jklukizds ds LVky ij Hkkjrh; f"k vuqla kku ifj"kn~ ds ekuuh; egkfuns'kd rFkk lgk;d egkfuns'kd ikni laj{k.k o tholqj{kk
Hon'ble DG and ADG (PP and Biosafety), ICAR at NCIPM stall
Hkkvuql]a ubZ fnYyh esa iwlk f"k foKku esys esa

vkbZih,e dh izn'kZuh
jklukizds us Hkkjrh; f"k vuqla kku laLFkku] ubZ fnYyh
}kjk vius ifjlj esa v{kq..k f"k ds fy, tyok;q izfrLdanh
izkS|ksfxfd;ka 'kh"kZd ij fnukad 26&28 Qjojh] 2014 ds
IPM Exhibition at Pusa Krishi Vigyan Mela, IARI,

New Delhi
The NCIPM also participated in Pusa Krishi Vigyan
Mela organized by IARI during 26-28 Feb 2014 through
installation of an IPM stall and distribution of relevant
79
NCIPM
nkSjku vk;ksftr iwlk f"k foKku esys esa Hkh lgHkkfxrk dh]
tgka jklukizds us Hkkvuqi ds isofs y;u esa vkbZih,e ij ,d
LVky LFkkfir fd;k rFkk vkbZih,e laca kh i=&if=dk,a lkfgR;
Hkh forfjr dhA Hkkjrh; f"k vuqla kku laLFkku] ubZ fnYyh]
}kjk bl izn'kZuh dk vk;kstu izR;sd o"kZ izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk
izlkj djus ds fy, fd;k tkrk gS] tks mldh dkQh iqjkuh
ijEijk gS vkSj fdlkuks]a vuqla kkudrkZvks]a foLrkj inkfkdkfj;ks]a
m|fe;ks]a ;kstukvksa rFkk ns'k ds fo|kfFkZ;ksa esa ;g izn'kZuh
dkQh yksdfiz; gSA
jklukizds esa vkxarqdksa dk nkSjk

ns'k ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa ds fdlkuks]a vuqla kkudrkZvks]a foLrkj
inkfkdkfj;ks]a ;kstukdkjksa m|fe;ks]a i=dkjksa rFkk fo|kfFkZ;ksa
us vkbZih,e dk nkSjk fd;kA jklukizds ds f;kdykiksa ds ckjs
esa vkxard
q ksa dks voxr djk;k x;k] ftlds fy, fofHkUu
f'k{k.k lgk;rkvksa dk bLrseky fd;k x;k vkSj tSo&dkjd
iz;ksx'kkyk ij tSo&fu;a=.k dkjdksa tSlh izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk
izn'kZu fn[kk;k x;kA vkxard
q ksa dks vkbZih,e ds fl)kar]
Kku&rRoksa vkSj egkk dh tkudkjh nsus ds fy, O;k[;ku fn,
x, vkSj vkbZih,e ij o`r&fp= Hkh fn[kk;k x;kA
ns'k ds vusd jkT;ks]a tSls mkj izn's k] fcgkj] >kj[kaM] e;
izn's k] gfj;k.kk vkSj jktLFkku ds fdlkuksa vkSj foLrkj dkexkjksa
ds lkFk foLrkj inkfkdkfj;ksa us jklukizds dk nkSjk fd;kA
uk'khtho izca ku esa ,d nwljs ds vuqHkoksa dk vknku&iznku
djus ds fy, "kd&oSKkfud ijLij ckrphr laca kh l=ksa dk
vk;kstu fd;k x;kA fdlkuksa us uk'khtho izca ku esa viuh
leL;kvksa rFkk rRlaca k esa muds }kjk viukbZ tk jgh f"k
fofk;ksa ds ckjs esa foLr`r :i ls vius fopkj O;Dr fd,] tcfd
oSKkfudksa us vkbZih,e dh mfpr dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls mUgsa voxr
djk;kA vkbZih,e esa fl)karksa rFkk mlds ?kVdksa ij O;k[;ku
Hkh fn, x,A tSo&fu;a=.k iz;ksx'kkyk ds nkSjs dk izca k fd;k
x;k vkSj mUgsa vkbZih,e laca kh foLrkj lkfgR; miyCk djk;k
x;kA foLrkj v;;uksa ds fy, uk'khtho rFkk uk'khtho izca ku
laca kh fofk;ksa ,oa leL;kvksa dk iz'ukofy;ksa ds ek;e ls
izy[s khdj.k fd;k x;kA
ns'k ds vusd Hkkxksa dss Nk=ksa us Hkh jklukizds dk nkSjk
fd;kA fofHkUu f'k{k.k lkexzh dk mi;ksx djrs gq, bu Nk=ksa dks
jklukizds ds f;kdykiksa o xfrfofk;ksa rFkk vkbZih,e ds
izkUs u;u esa mldh Hkwfedk ls voxr djk;k x;kA bu Nk=ksa us
tSodkjd iz;ksx'kkyk rFkk ,ds,e;w izdks"B dk Hkh nkSjk fd;k
vkSj mUgsa vkbZih,e laca kh i= if=dk,a lkfgR; Hkh nh xbZAa
80
literature in the ICAR pavilion at IARI, New Delhi

with the theme "Climate Resilient Technologies for
Sustainable Agriculture". This exhibition is used as a
vehicle for dissemination of technologies by the IARI
every year as a long tradition and has been very popular
among the farmers, researchers, extension functionaries,
planners and students throughout the country
Visitors to NCIPM
A number of students, farmers, extension
functionaries, researchers, planners, journalists and
entrepreneurs from different parts of the country visited
NCIPM. They were apprised about the NCIPM
activities using various teaching aids, demonstrated the
IPM technologies like bio-control agents at the Bioagents Lab. Visitors were also made aware of the IPM
concept, philosophy and importance through lectures,
and were shown documentary films on IPM.
The farmers and extension workers from several
states viz. Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya
Pradesh, Haryana and Rajasthan along with the
extension functionaries visited NCIPM. Farmersscientists interaction sessions were organized for sharing
the experiences mutually in pest management. Farmers
narrated their pest problems and pest management
practices adopted, while scientists apprised about
suitable IPM solutions. The lectures on IPM concept
and its components were also organized, the visits to
bio-control lab was arranged and extension literature
on IPM was given to them. Pest problems, pest
management practices and constraints in pest
management were documented through questionnaire
for extension studies.
Students from across the country also visited
NCIPM. They were introduced to NCIPM activities
and its role in promotion of IPM using various teaching
aids. bio-control lab and AKMU cell were visited by
these students and extension literatures on IPM were
also provided to them.
Distinguised Visitors
fof'k"V vkxUrqd
vkxUrqd
frfFk
mns';
Visitors
Date
Purpose
lh,chvkbZ dSch Vhe

MkW- myfjp dqgyeku vkjMh lh,chvkbZ fLoVtjySaM vkSj izksxzke dk;Zikyd]
ikni&vuqlkj] MkW 'kku gkWCl oSf'od funs'kd] ukWyt
s cSd
a ] MkW jfo [ksrjiky daVh
funs'kd] bafM;k ,oa lkbal funs'kd] ,f'k;k] lh,chvkbZ rFkk MkW- dkO;k nlgksjk
ofj"B oSKkfud] lh,chvkbZ
16 ebZ 2013
jklukizds ds lkFk lg;ksx ds

laHkkfod {ks=ksa ij ppkZ djus gsrq
CABI team
Dr. Ulrich Kuhlmann (RD CABI Switzerland and Programme
Executive, Plant-wise), Dr. Shaun Hobbs (Global Director, Knowledge
Bank), Dr. Ravi Khetarpal (Country Director, India, and Science
Director, Asia, CABI) and Dr. Kavya Dashora (Sr. Scientist, CABI)
16 May 2013
Possible areas of collaboration

with NCIPM.
MkW- v#.k ds- kj eSjhySM

a ] ;w,l,
02 tqykbZ 2013
ty f"k esa Vhdksa ,oa jksxksipkjksa

dk fodkl% ikni foKku dh
izklafxdrk ij lsfeukj nsus gsrq
Dr. Arun Dhar, (Maryland, USA)
02 July 2013
To deliver a seminar on
"Developing vaccines and
therapies in aquaculture:
Relevance to Plant Science"
MkW- dUgS;k pkSkjh] mi lfpo f'k{kk] Hkkvuqi
12&17 vxLr 2013
lkoZtfud izki.k ij O;k[;ku

nsus gsrq
Sh. Kanhaiya Chaudhary, Deputy Secretary (ICAR)
12-17 Aug 2013
To delivere lectures on
"Public Procurement"
MkW- fiVj dsueksj] mi funs'kd] ikni laj{k.k ,oa ikni izHkkx] Hkkjr esa
,Q,vks izfrfufk]
19 flrEcj 2013
vkbZih,e ij ,d lsfeukj nsus

gsrq
Dr. Peter Kenmore, Deputy Director, Plant Production and

Protection Division, FAO
19 Sep 2013
To delivere a seminar on
IPM
MkW- Loiu dqekj nkk] mi egkfuns'kd Qly foKku vkSj MkW- ih- dspdorhZ] lgk- egkfuns'kd ikni laj{k.k] Hkkvuqi
22 vDVwcj 2013
cEckoM ftyk xkSre cq) uxj]

mkj izn's k esa cklerh pkoy esa
vkbZih,e oSkhdj.k ,oa izlkj
dk;Ze ds nkSjs gsrq
Dr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Deputy Director General (Crop

Science) and Dr. P. K. Chakrabarty, Assistant Director General
(PP), ICAR
22 Oct 2013
IPM validation and

dissemination programme
in Basmati rice being
conducted by NCIPM at
Bambawad
(District
Gautam Budh Nagar, UP)
Jh MkWuokgh byk fxusV] mik/;{k] pktZ bZ Msl fjys'kUl] pSEcj Ms dkelZ ,oa
baMLVh] vkbojh dksLV rFkk dSe#u ls ekyksx
a lkfgc ,oa MkW- ds oh izHkq
la;Dq r funs'kd] vuqla kku] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ
06 uoEcj 2013
jklukizds ds lkFk Hkkoh lg;ksx

ij ppkZ djus gsrq
Donwahi Illa Ginette, Vice President, Charge e des Relations

from Chamber de commerce at Industries de Coted'Ivoire from
Ivory Coast, Marewe Malong Sahib from Cameroon and
Dr K V Prabhu (Joint Director - Research, IARI)
06 Nov 2013
To
discuss
future
collaboration with NCIPM
81
NCIPM
ekuo lalk/u fodkl (,pvkjMh)@ Human Resource Development (HRD)

fdlkuksa ds fy, izf'k{k.k rFkk iz{ks=k fnolksa dk vk;kstu
Trainings / Farmers' field / day
-laS. No.
1-
fo"k;
Topic
fnukad
Date
pkoy dh Qly esa vkbZih,e dh Hkwfedk
31 ebZ 2013
Role of IPM in rice crop
31 May 2013
izfrHkkfx;ksa
dh la[;k
LFkku
Venue
No. of
participants
46
f"k foKku dsUnz&II] dfr;k] lhrkiqj]

mkj izn's k
Krishi Vigyan Kendra-II,
Katia, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh
2-
lw=fe laca kh leL;k,a rFkk mudk izca ku
13 twu 2013
Nematode problems and their management
13 June 2013
87
'kdqukgyh] lksjkck rkyqdk] ftyk

f'keksxk] dukZVd
Shakunahalli (Soraba tq,
Shimoga Dist), Karnataka
3-
4-
5-
ulZjh iwoZ dk;Z'kkyk dhVuk'kdksa dk foosdiw.kZ iz;ksx
03 tqykbZ 2013
Pre-nursery workshop (Judicious use of pesticides)
03 July 2013
izfrjksi.k tSo&dkjdksa dk iz;ksx
16 vxLr 2013
Transplanting (Use of bio-agents)
16 Aug 2013
Hkkjr ds iwoksZkj ioZrh; {ks= dh egRoiw.kZ

Qlyksa esa vkbZih,e
9&11 flrEcj 2013
38
Village Oripur, Gaurigunj,

Uttar Pradesh
54
iwoksZkj ioZrh; {ks= dh izeq[k Qlyksa ij lesfdr

uk'khtho izca ku
49
9 -11 Sep 2013
13&15 flrEcj 2013
37
13-15 Sep 2013
8-
9-
dYys QwVus dh voLFkk uk'khtho ,oa izkfrd 'k=q dh igpku 01 vDVwcj 2013
Tillering stage (Identification of pest and
natural enemy)
01 Oct 2013
dhVuk'kd ds iz;ksx o vuqiz;ksx esa tkudkjh lk>k djuk
28 vDVwcj 2013
Knowledge sharing in Pesticide use and

application
28 Oct 2013
f=iqjk ds iz{ks= inkfkdkfj;ksa ds fy, lesfdr

uk'khtho izca ku
20&22 uoEcj 2013
Hkkvuqi] ukxkySM
a dsUnz] >jukikuh
ICAR, Nagaland Centre,
Jharnapani
iwoksZkj ioZrh; {ks= ifjlj] mes;e

ICAR Research Complex
for NEH Region, Umiam
Integrated Pest Management on Major Crops

of NEH Region
7-
c[kkfj;k] if'peh pEikju] fcgkj

Bakharia, West Champaran,
Bihar
IPM in Important Crops of NEH Region of India
6-
vksjhiqj xkao] xkSjhxat] mkj izn's k
22
Lons'k xkao] ef.kiqj

Swadesh village Manipur
48
f"k foKku dsUnz&II] dfr;k] lhrkiqj]

mkj izn's k
Krishi Vigyan Kendra-II,
Katia, Sitapur, UP
75
20-22 Nov 2013
izKku Hkou] vxjryk

Pragyan Bhawan, Agartala
Integrated Pest Management for Field

Functionaries of Tripura
10-
11-
12-
f=iqjk ds mUur'khy fdlkuksa ds fy, lesfdr

uk'khtho izca ku
19&22 uoEcj 2013
Integrated Pest Management for Progressive

Farmers of Tripura
19-22 Nov 2013
vxys Qlyhdj.k vuqe.k ij vkbZih,e dk izHkko
29 tuojh 2014
Impact of IPM on next cropping sequence
29 Jan 2014
fdlkuksa ds vuqHko rFkk iz{ks= nkSjk
21 Qjojh 2014
Farmers experiences and field visit
21 Feb 2014
56
iwoksZkj {ks= Hkkvuqi vuqla kku

ifjlj] f=iqjk dsUnz] ysEcqpjs k
ICAR Research Complex for
NEH Region, Tripura Centre
at Lembucherra
24
vkSjhiqj xkao] xkSjhxat] mkj izn's k

Village Oripur. Gaurigunj,
Uttar Pradesh
36
lhvkbZ,l,p] lh,l,lvkjvkbZ]
y[ku] mkj izn's k
CISH, CSSRI, Lucknow,
Uttar Pradesh
82
-la-
fo"k;
fnukad
izfrHkkfx;ksa
dh la[;k
S. No.
Topic
Date
No. of
participants
13-
gfj;k.kk ,oa jktLFkku esa ljlks&

a rksfj;k ds LDysjksfVfu;k
foxyu ds izca ku ij ljlks]a iz{ks= fnol
05 ekpZ 2014
250
05 Mar 2014
Mustard Field Day on management of

Sclerotinia rot of rapeseed-mustard in
Haryana and Rajasthan
14-
lw=fe izca ku ds fy, lw=fe dh igpku djus

gsrq tkx:drk fnol
LFkku
Venue
,lds,u,;w] dsohds] uoxkao] vyoj

jktLFkku
SKNAU, KVK, Navgaon,
Alwar (Rajasthan)
14 ekpZ 2014
152
14 Mar 2014
;w,p,,l] f'keksxk
UHAS, Shimoga
Nematode Awareness Day Identification

of Nematode Management
15-
pkoy esa tM+ foxyu ds fy, lw=fe dk izca ku
15 ekpZ 2014
Rice Root-Knot Nematode Management
15 Mar 2013
182
fcMkjs xkao] f'keksxk] dukZVd

Bidare Village, Shimoga,
Karnataka
83
NCIPM
lqfo/k,a vkSj ?kVuke

Facilities and Events
iqLrdky;
Library
dsUnz dh iqLrdky; esa 2446 ls vfkd iqLrds]a fo'odks"k

vkSj fu;ekofy;ka miyCk gS]a tks uk'khtho izca ku] dEI;wVj
vuqi;
z ksxks]a vkfFkZd ,oa lkaf[;dh rFkk jlk;u foKku lfgr
f"k ds vusd vk;keksa dks lfEefyr djrs gSAa ;g dsUnz
vkbZih,e vkSj ikni laj{k.k] okf"kZd iqujh{k.kksa rFkk lkj&laxgz ksa
ds laca k esa fu;fer :i ls vusd varjkZ"Vh; ,oa jk"Vh; tuZyksa
dk vfHknku djrk gS] ftlds dkj.k dsUnz dk iqLrdky;
lkfgR; dh n`f"V ls lEiUu gSA iqLrdky; esa ikni laj{k.k ds
{ks= esa uohure izdk'ku fo|eku gSAa
The Library of the Centre now has more than 2446

books, encyclopedia and manuals, covering various
aspects of agriculture including integrated pest
management, computer applications, economic,
statistics and chemistry. NCIPM regularly subscribes
several journals on plant protection, annual reviews and
abstracts, thus enriching the literature facility regularly.
f"k Kku izcaku bdkbZ (,ds,e;w)

vkkqfud vkbZlhVh midj.kksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, laLFkku
vkbZih,e ds fofHkUu vk;keksa ij osc vkkkfjr MkVkcslksa vkSj
lwpuk ra=ksa ds fodkl esa lf; :i ls iz;kljr gSA foxr
3&4 o"kks esa dsUnz us ns'k dh egRoiw.kZ Qlyksa ds laca k esa
bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh esa nLrd nh gSA vkbZVh vkkkfjr dk;Zeksa
ds lQy dk;kZUo;u ds fy, dsUnz us Lo;a dh loZj lqfokk
LFkkfir dh gS] ftlesa nks MSy loZj & ,,l ihbZ 2900
lfEefyr gSa tks Qly MkVkcsl vkSj esy ds fy, osc ds :i
esa lsok iznku djrs gSAa bu loZjksa esa dsUnz dh osclkbV rFkk osc
ds lHkh vuqi;
z ksx lQyrkiwod
Z lapkfyr gks jgs gSAa bl
osclkbV esa lwpukvksa dks fu;fer :i ls lkekf;d fd;k tkrk
gSA laLFkku ds 50 esy ckWDl 24 ,echih,l ykbu baVjusV
lEidZ ls vuqjf{kr fd, tkrs gSAa ,ds,e;w izdks"B iz;ksDrk
fgrS"kh fo'ks"kK ra=ksa dks fodflr djus esa Hkh lac)
a gSA vkbZih,e
dh yksdfiz;rk ds ihNs ih,evkbZ,l rFkk vU; lkWVos;j
fu.kZ; fuekZ.k gsrq dkQh mi;ksxh gSAa
uSnkfud (MkbXuksfLVd) iz;ksx'kkyk

dsUnz ds ikl ,d laxgz gS] ftlesa egRoiw.kZ dhV jksxk.kq
vkSj QQwna izfrjkskh laxzfgr gS(a vkSj tSodkjdksa ds ukfHkd
laokZuksa dh iwjs ns'k esa QhYM ijh{k.k ds fy, vkiwfrZ dh tkrh
gSA le;≤ ij tSodkjdksa dh O;kid mRiknu izkS|ksfxdh
rFkk laHkkfod m|fe;ksa dks tSo dhVuk'kdksa dh xq.kokk ds
fu;a=.k ij izf'k{k.k fn;k tkrk gSA
84
Agriculture Knowledge Management Unit (AKMU)

Institute is actively engaged in development of webbased databases and information systems on different
aspects of IPM using latest ICT tools. In the last 3-4
years, the Centre has ventured into e-pest surveillance
in important crops of the country. For successful
implementation of the IT-based programmes, Centre
has established its own server facility consisting of four
servers for crop database and e-mail. Centre's website
and all the web applications are successfully running
on these servers. Information on NCIPM web site is
updated regularly. 50 mailboxes of institute staff are
maintained with 24 mbps line internet connectivity.
AKMU Cell is also engaged in developing user-friendly
expert systems, PMIS and other softwares useful for
decision making on IPM popularisation.
Diagnostic laboratory
NCIPM has a diagnostic and microbial laboratory
and has a repository of important insect pathogens
and fungal antagonists, and the nucleus cultures of
bioagents are supplied for field testing purposes across
the Nation. Trainings on mass production technology
of bioagents and quality control of biopesticides to
prospective entrepreneurs are taken up from time to
time.
lqfo/kk,a vkSj ?kVuke | Facilities and Events
izkFkehdhdj.k] fuxjkuh vkSj ewY;kadu izdks"B Prioritisation, Monitoring and Evaluation Cell (PME
cell)
(ih,ebZ izdks"B)
izkFkehdhdj.k] fuxjkuh vkSj ewY;kadu izdks"B ih,ebZ
izdks"B dsUnz ds lHkh vuqla kku ifj;kstukvksa vkSj dk;Zeksa ds
vfHkys[kksa dks vuqjf{kr djrk gSA lalnh; vfHkys[kksa dks iz'u
,oa mkj Qkby ds :i esa vuqjf{kr fd;k x;k gSA ih,ebZ
izdks"B }kjk ekfld dSfcusV] =Sekfld rFkk v)Z&okf"kZd izxfr
izfronsu] oSKkfudksa ds Ms;j izfrosnuksa dks ifj"kn dks izLrqr
djus ds fy, izkokku vkSj izf'k{k.k@lsfeukj@laxks"Bh@lEesyu
ds fy, izLrkoksa dks izkl
s l
s fd;k x;k gSA ih,ebZ izdks"B dh
vU; xfrfofk;ksa esa ifj"kn dks ekfld dSfcusV izfrosnu Hkstuk]
dsUnz ds lHkh inkfkdkfj;ksa ds izLrkoksa dks izkl
s l
s dj vkxs
Hkstuk] ifj"kn dks =Sekfld izxfr izfrosnu Hkstuk] Ms;j izfrosnu
ds fy, ifj"kn dks okf"kZd izfrosnu lkexzh] v)Z&okf"kZd y{;
vkSj ifj"kn dks oSKkfudksa ds v)Z&okf"kZd ,pokbZih,e
miyfCk;ksa dks Hkstuk 'kkfey gSA
vuqlakku lykgdkj lfefr (vkj,lh) dh cSBd

vkj,lh dh cSBd MkW- ,l- ,l- pgy] mi&dqyifr
lsokfuo`RRk ,eih;w,Vh] mn;iqj dh v;{krk esa jklukizds esa
29&30 ekpZ] 2013 dks gqbZ MkW- vkj- ts- jfoUnzk] MkW- ih- jsMM
~ h]
MkW- ,e- ds uk;d] MkW- ,- vkj- 'kekZ] MkW- ih- ,l- fojFky] MkWVh- ih- jktsUnzu] lgk- egkfuns'kd ikni laj{k.k] Hkkvuqi
rFkk jklukizds ds funs'kd MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k; us cSBd esa
Hkkx fy;kA lfefr us fiNyh vkj,lh dh ,Vhvkj fjiksVZ dk
vuqeksnu fd;kA cSBd esa jklukizds ds vuqla kkfud dk;Zeksa
Prioritisation, Monitoring and Evaluation (PME)

cell maintains records of all the research projects and
programmes of the Centre. Parliamentary records have
been maintained in the form of question and answer
file. Submission of monthly cabinet, quarterly and half
yearly progress reports, provision of material for
DARE report of the scientists to the Council and
processing proposal for training/ seminar/symposia/
conference are carried out through PME Cell. Sending
monthly cabinet report to the council, processing and
sending proposals, etc. of all the officials of the Centre,
sending 'Quarterly Progress Report' to the Council,
annual report material to Council for DARE report,
six-monthly targets and achievements of the scientists
(HYPM) of the Centre to the Council are the other
activities of the PME cell.
Research Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting

Meeting of the RAC was held during 29-30 Apr
2013 at NCIPM under the Chairmanship of Dr SS
Chahal, Ex Vice- Chancellor, MPUAT, Udaipur as
Chairman along with Dr RJ Rabindra, Dr P Reddy,
Dr MK Naik, Dr AR Sharma, Dr PS Birthal, Dr TP
Rajendran ADG (PP) and Director, NCIPM as
members. The committee also approved the action
taken report on recommendations of last RAC. The
research programmes of the institute were presented
and evaluated; recommendations were made regarding
further improvement of programmes of NCIPM. The
Council has subsequently approved the proceedings of
the meeting.
Institute Research Committee (IRC) meeting

dk izLrqrhdj.k fd;k x;k vkSj mudh leh{kk dh xbZ( dsUnz ds
dk;Zeksa esa vkSj vfkd lqkkj ykus ds fy, flQkfj'ksa dh xbA
rRi'pkr ifj"kn }kjk cSBd dh dk;Zokfg;ksa dk vuqeksnu
fd;k x;kA
laLFkku vuqlakku lfefr (vkbZvkjlh)

MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k;] funs'kd] jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho
izca ku dsUnz dh v;{krk esa laLFkku vuqla kku lfefr dh cSBd
13&14 ,oa 22 ebZ] 2013 ds nkSjku gqbAZ dsUnz ds izxfr'khy
vuqla kku dk;Zeksa ds lkFk&lkFk vkbZvkjlh dh fiNyh ,Vhvkj
The meeting of the IRC was held on 13, 14 and 22

May 2013 under the Chairmanship of Dr. C.
Chattopadhyay, Director, NCIPM. The ongoing
research programmes of the Centre were reviewed and
evaluated along with Action Taken Report of last IRC
meeting along with necessary suggestions. Technical
programme for 2013-14 was finalized thereafter. The
Director complimented the scientists for achievements
of the Centre, specifically the success achieved in
surveillance programme in Maharashtra and initiation
of ICT-based project in Malawi. Various projects,
85
NCIPM
fjiksVZ dk vko';d lq>koksa ds lkFk iqujh{k.k ,oa ewY;kadu
fd;k x;k rFkk o"kZ 2013&14 ds fy, rduhdh dk;Zeksa dks
vafre :i fn;k x;kA funs'kd us dsUnz dh miyfCk;ksa ds fy,]
fo'ks"k :i ls egkjk"V esa fuxjkuh dk;Ze rFkk eykoh esa
vkbZlhVh vkkkfjr ifj;kstuk 'kq: djus ds fy, oSKkfudksa dks
ckkbZ nhA cSBd esa dsUnz dh ck ifj;kstukvksa vkSj vU; ize[q k
dk;ZdrkZvksa dks feykdj ikap dk;Zeksa ds vkhu fopkj&foe'kZ
fd;k x;kA jklukizds esa izxfr'khy vuqla kku dk;Zeksa dh
leh{kk djus ds fy, fnukad 25&26 vDVwcj] 2013 ds nkSjku
e;kofk vkbZvkjlh dh cSBd dk vk;kstu fd;k x;kA
iapo"khZ; leh{kk Vhe (D;wvkjVh) 2008&14

fnukad 23 vizSy 2013 dks D;wvkjVh us izk-s vuqie oekZ]
izk-s ,-,u- eq[kksik/;k;] izk-s ch-oh- ikfVy] izk-s Mh-ts- iVsy ,oa
izk-s oh- dqekj pkoy vuqla kku dsUnz] fpulqjk] if'pe caxky ds
lg;ksx esa cksjks pkoy esa ,uvkbZlhvkj, fuk dk;Ze ds
varxZr uk'khtho dh xfrfof/k;ksa ij pyk, tk jgs iz{ks=
ijh{k.kksa rFkk chlhdsoh dY;k.kh if'pe caxky ds lg;ksx esa
ijoy ,oa cSx
a u dh Qlyksa ij vk;ksftr tM+ xkaB lw=fe
izca ku ijh{k.k dk nkSjk fd;kA vkjvkj,l ls MkW- ,l- ds- jkW;]
MkW- ,l- pVthZ rFkk MkW- fpjkJh xkaxy
q h] oSKkfud us Vhe dh
vxqokbZ dh vkSj cksjks pkoy esa nks LFkkuksa ij ijh{k.k fn[kk,A
vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ds vuqlkj cSx
a u esa tM+&foxyu
jksx dks de djus esa ulZjh esa VkbdksMekZ fofjMh 7-5 fdxzkizfr gsdh nj ls+ ,QokbZ,e 375 fdxzkizfr gs-s dk iz;ksx rFkk
jksi.k ds 21 fnuksa ds ckn dkcksQ
Z jq ku 0-3 xzkizfr ikni dk
iz;ksx izHkkodkjh ik;k x;kA blh izdkj ls ijoy ds laca k esa
Hkh Vh- fofjMh ds leku izHkko ns[ks x,A D;wvkjVh Vhe us
csgrj ifj.kkeksa ds fy, ijoy esa Vh- fofjMh ds nwljh ckj
iz;ksx fd, tkus dh lykg nhA if'pr caxky ds 24 ijxuk
mkj ds jkepUnzijq e esa D;wvkjVh Vhe us cksjks pkoy esa
lw=fe ds ckjs esa tkx:drk rFkk izcaku fofk;ksa dks
tkuus&le>us ds fy, vk, yxHkx 50 fdlkuksa dks lacksfkr
fd;kA Vhe us ;g Hkh lq>ko fn;k fd lw=fe ds izca ku ds
fy, ulZjh vkSj eq[; [ksr esa dkcksQ
Z jq ku vkSj L;wMkseksul
Qyksjl
s l
as ds lkFk&lkFk isflyksekblsl fyykflul Hkh iz;ksx
fd;k tk ldrk gSA
fnukad 07 vxLr] 2013 dks D;wvkjVh Vhe us xqtjkr ds
oMksnjk ftys esa kkor xkao dk nkSjk fd;k] tgka vkuan f"k
fo'ofo|ky;] vkuan ds lg;ksx esa ,uvkbZ,lih,e chVh
dikl ifj;kstuk py jgh gSA jklukizds ls MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k;]
MkW- vkj- ds- raoj rFkk ,,;w vkuan ls MkW- cksjkM] MkW- HkkjiksMk+
rFkk MkW- rwey
w Hkh D;wvkjVh Vhe ds lkFk xkao ds nkSjs esa 'kkfey
FksA
D;wvkjVh Vhe us fnukad 23 flrEcj] 2013 dks dukZVd
ds fcnj ftys esa gqeukckn CykWd ds varxZr exny xkao dk Hkh
86
including the externally-funded ones and major activities

of the Centre were deliberated in the meeting under
five programmes. Mid-term IRC was held during 2526 Oct 2013 to review the research programmes going
on in the Centre.
Quinquennial Review Team (QRT): 2008-14

On 23 April 2013 the QRT (Prof. Anupam Varma,
Prof. A.N. Mukhopadhyay, Prof. B.V. Patil, Prof. D.J.
Patel & Prof. V. Kumar) visited field trials on pest
dynamics being carried out under NICRA programme
in Boro rice in collaboration with Rice Research
Station, Chinsurah (W. Bengal) and root-knot nematode
management trial conducted in pointed gourd (Parwal)
and brinjal crops in collaboration with BCKV, Kalyani
(W. Bengal). Dr. S.K. Roy, Dr. S. Chatterjee and
Dr. Chirasree Ganguly, Scientists from RRS led the

team and showed the trials at two locations in Boro
rice. IPM interventions in brinjal crop involving the
application of Trichoderma viride @ 7.5 kg/ ha + FYM
@ 375 kg/ha in nursery followed by application of
carbofuran @ 0.3 g a. i./plant at 21 days after planting
was found effective in reducing root-knot nematodes
in brinjal. Similar effect of T. viride was also observed
in pointed gourd. Second application of T. viride in
pointed gourd was suggested by QRT for better results.
At Ramchandrapur in 24 Parganas (N), the team
addressed about 50 farmers gathered for nematode
awareness and management practices in Boro rice. It
was also suggested that along with carbofuran and
Pseudomonas fluorescens, Paecilomyces lilacinus may also
be tried for nematode management in nursery and main
field.
On 7 Aug 2013, the QRT visited Dhawat village
located in Vadodara district of Gujarat, where NISPM
nkSjk fd;k] tgka vjgj ij vkbZih,e ijh{k.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

D;wvkjVh Vhe us Hkh cklokjkt xknh 1-2 gs- Hkwfe ds vjgj
ds [ksr dk nkSjk fd;k vkSj 50 fdlkuksa ls ckr dhA ,d
mUur'khy fdlku us crk;k fd vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxdh ds vaxhdj.k
ds ifj.kkeLo:i mls xSj&vkbZih,e fdlkuksa dh rqyuk esa
vfkd ykHk izkIr gqvkA fnukad 24 flrEcj] 2013 dks Vhe us
xqycxkZ esa vQty xkao esa vk;ksftr IYl dk;Ze 2008&11
dk Hkh nkSjk fd;k vkSj mUur'khy fdlkuksa rFkk f"k foKku
dsUnzkas ds deZpkfj;ksa ds lkFk ckr dh vkSj vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh
ds izHkko ds ckjs esa tkudkjh yhA D;wvkjVh Vhe us ;w,,l]
jk;pwj dk Hkh nkSjk fd;k tgka vkbZih,e dk;Ze pyk;k tk
jgk FkkA Vhe us vkbZih,e ds izkS|ksfxdh ds v{kq..krk dh
iz'kalk dhA
fnukad 27 flrEcj] 2013 dks D;wvkjVh Vhe us cEckoM
xkao ftyk xkSre cq) uxj] mkj izn's k esa cklerh pkoy esa
cM+s iSekus ij pyk, tk jgs oSkhdj.k ijh{k.k dk nkSjk fd;kA
D;wvkjVh Vhe ds lnL; MkW- ohjsUnz dqekj us lq>ko fn;k fd
lHkh fdlkuksa dks fofHkUu enksa ds ; ds fy, [kpZ fd, x,
O;; rFkk Qly ekSle ds var esa 'kq) ykHk ds ifjdyu ds fy,
fjdkMZ vuqjf{kr djus pkfg,A mUgksua s fdlkuksa dks ykxr ykHk
vuqikr dk ifjdyu djrs gq, mlesa ifjokj }kjk fd, x, Je
ykxr dks Hkh tksMu+ s dk lq>ko fn;k x;k D;ksfa d vfkdrj
fdlku ,slk ugha djrs gSa vkSj etnwjh ykxr esa vius Je dks
'kkfey ugha djrs gSAa
jk"Vh; d`f"k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy 'kfDr (fuk)

cSBdsa
jk"Vh; f"k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy'kfDr fuk ds
varxZr tyok;q ifjorZu ds laca k esa uk'khthoksa dh lf;rk
ij vk;ksftr lewg cSBdsa 2013&14 %jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh esa
fuk ds varxZr fofHkUu rkjh[kksa ds nkSjku ^tyok;q ifjorZu ds
laca k esa uk'khtho lf;rk* Qly% pkoy] vjgj] ewx
a Qyh
vkSj VekVj ij Qly ds vuqlkj lewg cSBdsa vk;ksftr dh xb
ftuesa ns'k ds leLr Hkkxksa ls fj;y Vkbe MkbukfeDl dsUnzkas
vkjVhihMh ds lg;ksfx;ksa us lgHkkfxrk dhA
MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k;] funs'kd jklukizds us mn~?kkVh;
l=ksa dh v;{krk dh vkSj dsUnzh; 'kq"d {ks= f"k vuqla kku
laLFkku] gSnjkckn ds oSKkfudks]a vFkkZr MkW- okbZth izlkn
vkjVhihMh & pkoy] MkW- ,e,l jko vkjVhihMh% vjgj vkSj
,l nslkbZ vkjVhihMh% ewx
a Qyh vkSj VekVj us bu cSBdksa esa
leh{kk lnL;ksa ds :i esa lgHkkfxrk dh rFkk lekiu l=ksa dh
v;{krk Hkh dhA ;|fi lacfa kr vkjVhihMh dsUnz ds vuqla kku
drkZvksa }kjk dk;Z dh izxfr dk fooj.k izLrqr fd;k x;k]
jklukizds esa ihvkbZ fuk }kjk ^vkjVhihMh dh fLFkfr rFkk
2012&13 ds fy, MkVkcsl* gsrq ekax
a ksa dk izLrqrhdj.k fd;k
(Bt cotton) project activities are being carried out in

collaboration with Anand Agricultural University,
Anand. Dr. C. Chattopadhyay, Dr. R.K. Tanwar and
Mr. S.P. Singh from NCIPM and Dr. Borad, Dr.
Bharpoda and Dr. Tumool from AAU, Anand also
joined the team during their visit to the village.
The QRT also visited Magadal village of
Humnabad block in Bidar district of Karnataka on 23
Sep 2013, where IPM trial is being carried out in pigeon
pea. The team visited pigeon pea field of Sh. Basavaraj
Gadi (1.2 ha) and interacted with 50 farmers. One
progressive farmer informed that as a result of
adoption of IPM technology he could get higher yields
than non-IPM farmers. The team also visited pulse
programme (2008-11) carried out at Afzalpur village in
Gulbarga on 24 Sep 2013, interacted with KVK staff
and progressive farmers, where the team learnt about
the impact of IPM technology. The team also visited
UAS, Raichur where chilli IPM programme was going
on and IPM technology sustainability was admired by
the QRT.
On 27 Sep 2013, QRT visited large-scale validation
trial in Basmati rice being carried out in Bambawad
village (Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, UP). Dr. Virender
Kumar, Member QRT suggested that all the farmers
should maintain records for calculating the expenditure
incurred on purchasing different items and net gain at
the end of crop season. The farmers were further advised
to include the labour cost of family members while
calculating the benefit /cost ratio as most of the farmers
do not include their own efforts as cost in wages.
NICRA group meetings

Crop-wise group meetings of the 'Pest Dynamics
in relation to Climate Change [Target Crops: Rice,
Pigeonpea, Groundnut & Tomato]' under National
Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)
2013-14 were held on various dates with the
participation of associates from Centers of Real Time
Pest Dynamics (RTPD) across the country at NCIPM,
New Delhi.
Dr. C. Chattopadhyay, Director (NCIPM)
chaired the inaugural sessions, and scientists from
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture
(CRIDA), Hyderabad Drs YG Prasad (RTPD-Rice),
87
NCIPM
dk;Ze
fnukad
lgHkkfx;ksa dh la[;k
Programme
Dates
No. of participants
pkoy@Rice
26 Jul 2013
20
vjgj@Pigeonpea
30 Jul 2013
23
ewaxQyh@Groundnut
2 Aug 2013
20
VekVj@Tomato
6 Aug 2013
19
x;kA o"kZ 2013&14 ds fy, dk;Z ;kstuk] fuk vkjVhihMh

xzkgd lkWVos;j dh laLFkkiuk dk izn'kZu rFkk fjiksfVx flLVse
dh osc vkkkfjr fof'k"Vrkvksa dks vafre :i nsus ds fy, ppkZ
dh xbZA cSBdksa dh vuqeksfnr dk;Zokfg;ksa ds lkekU; :i ls
rFkk yf{kr Qlyksa ds laca k esa fof'k"V flQkfj'kksa ds dk;kZUo;u
ds fy, vuqeksfnr dk;Zokfg;ksa dks leLr vkjVhihMh dsUnzkas
rFkk jklukizds ds Vhe ds lnL;ksa dks laifsz "kr fd;k x;k gSA
laLFkku izcaku lfefr (vkbZ,elh) dh cSBd

dsUnz us viuh vkbZ,elh dh cSBd jklukizds ds funs'kd
dh v;{krk esa 24 vDVwcj 2013 ,oa 24 Qjojh] 2014 dks
vk;ksftr dh ftlesa bl dsUnz ds iz'kklfud o oSKkfud
deZpkfj;ksa ds vykok bl lfefr ds vU; lnL; ekStnw FksA
MS Rao (RTPD: Pigeonpea) and S Desai (RTPD:

Groundnut & Tomato) participated as review
members, and chaired the concluding sessions. While
summary of work progress was presented by the
researcher of the respective RTPD center, the 'status
of RTPD and requirements for data base for 2012-13'
was put forth by PI (NICRA) at NCIPM. Discussion
and finalization of work plan for 2013-14, and
demonstration of installation of NICRA (RTPD) client
software, and of web-enabled features of reporting
system were held. Approved proceedings with general
and specific recommendations in respect of target crops
have been communicated to all the RTPD centres and
NCIPM team members for implementation.
Institute Management Committee (IMC) meeting
bl cSBd ds midj.kksa dh lwph dh [kjhn o 2013&2014 ds

nkSjku jktiqj [kqnZ] egjkSyh esa fd;s tkus okys fuekZ.k dk;ks ds
izLrkoksa ij ppkZ dhA blds vykok 2013&14 ds Iyku ctV
ds rgr ,d mi'kk[kk ds Hkhrj ctV ds mi;ksx vkSj ku dk
iqu% vkoaVu dh fLFkfr dh leh{kk dh xbZA vkbZ,elh dh
dk;Zokgh ifj"kn }kjk vkxs vuqeksnu ds fy, izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
Centre held its twelfth and thirteenth IMC

meetings under the chairmanship of Director, NCIPM
on 24 Oct 2013 and 24 Feb 2014, respectively wherein
all the members were present in addition to the
administrative and scientific staff of NCIPM. Important
proposals on the list of equipment for procurement
and civil works to be undertaken at Rajpur Khurd,
Mehrauli during 2013-14 were discussed. Additionally,
the status of budget utilization and re-allocation of funds
within the same sub-head under Plan budget of 201314 was reviewed. The proceedings of IMC have been
put up for further approval by the Council.
lgefr Kkiu
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
jklukizds us 20 twu 2013 dks lhvkjvkjvkbZ] dVd ds

lkFk varj&laLFkku dk;ksZ ds fy, lgefr Kkiu ij gLrk{kj
fd;kA
jklukizds us 18 flrEcj 2013 dks vkbZ,y ,.M ,Q,l
dyLVlZ fy- ds lkFk **vQzhdk esa dikl ij rduhdh lgk;rk
dk;Ze** ifj;kstuk ds vara xZr eykoh vQzhdk esa vkbZlhVh
vk/kkfjr uk'khtho fuxjkuh ij lgefr Kkiu ij gLrk{kj fd;kA
NCIPM signed MoU with CRRI, Cuttack for

inter-institutional work on 20 June 2013.
88
NCIPM signed MoU with IL & FS Clusters Ltd.,

for project "Technical Assistance Programme for
Cotton in Africa" Implementation of ICT based Pest
Surveillance in Malawi (Africa) on 18 Sep 2013.
jklukizds us 23 fnlEcj 2013 dks vkbZthdsoh] jk;iqj

ds lkFk lg;ksxh vuql/a kku ,oa ys[k dk;Z ds fy, lgefr
Kkiu ij gLrk{kj fd;kA
NCIPM signed MoU with IGKV, Raipur on 23

Dec. 2013 for collaborative research and thesis work.
International Women's Day
varjjk"Vh; efgyk fnol

jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku dsUnz] ubZ fnYyh ds
efgyk izdks"B us vius dsUnz ds ifjlj esa 7 ekpZ] 2014 dks
varjjk"Vh; efgyk fnol euk;kA dsUnz ds lHkh efgyk LVkQ
us ,dtqV gksdj bl volj dks 'kkunkj <ax ls euk;kA
Women's Cell of the National Centre for

Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi celebrated
International Women's Day on 7 Mar 2014 with the
spirit of get together of all the women staff of
NCIPM.
jklukizds dks 18 ekpZ] 2014 dks vkbZ,lvks 9001%2008 laLFkku izek.ki= iznku fd;k x;k
NCIPM has been certified ISO 9001: 2008 Institute on 18 March 2014
89
NCIPM
jktHkk"kk
Rajbhasha
jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u dk;Z

bl dsUnz esa jktHkk"kk lac/a kh laoS/kkfud izko/kkuksa dk
vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus rFkk foHkkxh; dk;ksaZ esa jktHkk"kk
dk;kZUo;u ds izlkj gsrq fganh izdks"B }kjk Hkjiwj iz;kl fd;k
tk jgk gSA dsUnz }kjk uxj jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh
lnL;rk Hkh xzg.k dh xbZ gSA
dsUnz esa jktHkk"kk vf/kfu;e 1963] jktHkk"kk fu;e 1976
ds fofHkUu izko/kkuksa ds vuqikyu ij fo'ks"k /;ku fn;k tk jgk
gSA jktHkk"kk vf/kfu;e 1963 dh /kkjk 3 (3) dk vuqikyu
lqfuf'pr djus] fganh esa izoh.krk izkIr vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk fganh
esa dk;kZy; dk;Z djus] jktHkk"kk foHkkx }kjk 2013&14 ds
fy, fu/kkZfjr y{;ksa dh izkfIr djus] feflyksa ij fganh esa
vf/kd ls vf/kd fVIif.k;ka fy[kus] vaxt
zs h esa izkIr Ik=ksa ds
mRrj fganh esa nsus ,oa vU; tkap fcanv

q ksa ds vuqikyu ,oa
ekuuh; jktHkk"kk lalnh; lfefr dh nwljh milfefr dks fn,
x, vk'okluksa ij dk;Zokgh djus gsrq le; ij vko';d
funs'Z k tkjh fd, x, gSa ,oa jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh
=Sekfld cSBdksa esa Hkh bl ij ppkZ dh tkrh gSA
fgUnh psruk lIrkg 2013 dk vk;kstu

jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnz] iwlk ubZ fnYyh
esa fgUnh psruk lIrkg] 2013 dk vk;kstu funs'kd jktHkk"kk]
Hkkd`vuqi ds funs'Z kkuqlkj fnukd 30 flrEcj] 2013 ls 06
vDVwcj] 2013 rd euk;k x;kA fnukd 30 flrEcj] 2013 dks
lekjksg dk mn?kkVu MkW- fpjaru pksik/;k;] funs'kd dh
v/;{krk esa fd;k x;kA lekjksg esa eq[; vfrfFk ds :Ik esa
Jh lqftr dqekj fe=k] funs'kd Qly foKku Hkkd`vuqIk]
-la-
Ikzfr;ksfxrk
iqjLdkj
fotsrkvksa ds Ukke ,oa Ikn
Jqfrys[k dq'ky lgk;h deZpkfj;ksa ds fy,
izFke
Jh jktsUnz dqekj 'kkg] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh
f}rh;
Jh jktdqekj] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh
Rk`rh;
Jh egs'k dqekj] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh
Okkn&fookn
izFke
MkW- eqd's k lgxy] iz/kku oSKkfud
fo"k; % ljdkjh deZpkfj;ksa dh lsokfuo`fk vk;q
f}rh;
Jh lrh'k ckcw
c<+kusa ds izHkko
Rk`rh;&1
MkW- ,e-,l-;kno] Ikz/kku oSKkfud
Rk`rh;&2
lkaRouk
MkW- ,e-,u- HkV~V] Ikz/kku oSKkfud
90
jktHkk"kk uhfr ,oa lkekU; Kku
IkzFke
Jh ,l-ih-flag] lgk;d eq[; Rkduhdh vf/kdkjh
f}rh;
Jh jkds'k dqekj] oSKkfud
Rk`rh;
MkW- vkj-oh-flag] Okfj"B oSKkfud
fuca/k
lkaRouk
IkzFke
Jh ,- ds- vxzoky] Ikz'kklfud vf/kdkjh

MkW- uosn lkfcj] Ikz/kku oSKkfud
fo"k; % Hkkjr esa lkEiznkf;d lnHkkouk cuk,
f}rh;
MkW- ulhe vgen] lgk;d eq[; Rkduhdh vf/kdkjh
j[kus ds mik;
Rk`rh;
dkO; ikB
IkzFke
Jh ,l-ih- flag] lgk;d eq[; Rkduhdh vf/kdkjh
f}rh;
MkW- uosn lkfcj] Ikz/kku oSKkfud
Rk`rh;
dq- fgeka'kh iaokj] ,l-vkj-,Q-
jktHkk"kk | Rajbhasha
funs'kd@v/;{k jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh v/;{krk

esa jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh o"kZ 2013 esa fuEu cSBdsa
fnukad 26@4@2013] 30@9@2013] 28@12@2013 ,oa
22@3@2013 dks vk;ksftr dh xbZAa bu lHkh cSBdksa ds
dk;ZoR` r Hkh Ikfjpkfyr dj fn, x, ,oa fofHkUu eqksa ij dh
xbZ dkjZokbZ ,oa izxfr ls le;≤ ij funs'kd jktHkk"kk]
Hkkd`vuqIk] ubZ fnYyh dks Hkh voxr djk;k tkrk jgk gSA
fgUnh dk;Z'kkyk
ubZ fnYyh mifLFkr gq,A fgUnh vuqHkkx ds izHkkjh] Jh ,e- dseqykuhs }kjk fgUnh psruk lIrkg ds fo"k; esa izdk'k Mkyrs gq,
dk;Ze dk lapkyu fd;k x;kA fgUnh psruk lIrkg ds
vUrxZr fofHkUu izfr;ksfxrkvksa dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k ftlesa
dsUnz ds lHkh Lrj ds oSKkfudksa vf/kdkfj;ks]a ,oa deZpkfj;ksa us
Hkkx fy;kA fnukad 05 vDVwcj] 2013 dks fganh psruk lIrkg
dk lekiu lekjksg vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA ftlesa MkW- vks- ih;kno] funs'kd] eDdk vuql/a kku funs'kky;] iwlk] ubZ fnYyh
eq[; vfrfFk ds :Ik esa lknj vkeaf=r fd, x, FksA lekiu
lekjksg esa fganh psruk lIrkg ds nkSjku vk;ksftr izfr;ksfxrkvksa
ds fotsrkvksa dks iqjLdkj Hkh forfjr fd, x,A
jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh cSBdsa

dsUnz dh jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dk iquxZBu Hkkjr
ljdkj] x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx }kjk tkjh dk;kZy;
Kkiu la [ ;k 12024@2@92&jk-Hkk-[k&2@3 fnuka d
21@7@1992 }kjk tkjh fn'kk funs'Z kksa ds vuqlkj fuEu izdkj
fd;k x;k %&
1- MkW- fpjaru pksik/;k;] funs'kd & v/;{k]
2- leLr bdkbZ;ks@
a vuqHkkxksa ds
& lnL;x.k
izHkkjh@Vhe yhMj
3- Jherh lhek pksiM+k] mifuns'kd] & ljdkjh izfrfuf/k
jktHkk"kk] Hkk-d`-v-la-] ubZ fnYyh
4- Jh ,e- ds- eqykuh]
& lnL; lfpo
izHkkjh fgUnh izdks"B
fnukad
23@05@2013
30@09@2013
20@12@2013
dk;Z'kkyk dk fo"k;
,e ,l vkWfQl bfUMd VwYl
orZuh dk ekudhdj.k
Lkjdkjh dke&dkt fgUnh esa djus ds fy, vfHkizjs .kk
22@02@2014
fVIi.k ,oa vkys[ku
jktHkk"kk ds izfr deZpkfj;ksa ,oa vf/kdkfj;ksa esa :fp iSnk

djus ,oa dk;kZy; dk;Z fganh esa djus esa f>>d nwj djus gsrq
izR;sd frekgh esa fofHkUu fo"k;ksa ij dk;Z'kkykvksa dk vk;kstu
fd;k x;kA dk;Z'kkykvksa dk vk;kstu djus ds fy, fgUnh ds
izfrf"Br fo}kuksa dks vkeaf=r fd;k x;kA dk;Z'kkykvksa esa dsUnz
ds vf/kdkfj;ksa ,oa deZpkfj;ksa dh lgHkkfxrk c<+&p<+ dj
jghA o"kZ 2013&14 esa fuEu fganh dk;Z'kkyk,a vk;ksftr djkbZ
xbZA
fgUnh ds iz;ksx ls lEcfU/r izxfr fjiksVZ

jktHkk"kk vf/kfu;e] jktHkk"kk fu;eksa rFkk jktHkk"kk
lEcU/kh vkns'kksa ds vuqikyu ,oa jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u dh
izxfr ls lEcfU/kr frekgh fjiksVZ fu;fer :Ik ls funs'kd]
jktHkk"kk] Hkkjrh; d`f"k vuql/a kku Ikfj"kn] d`f"k Hkou] ubZ
fnYyh dks izfs "kr dh xbZA jktHkk"kk funs'kd] }kjk bu fjiksVksaZ
dh leh{kk esa fn, x, lq>koksa ,oa funs'Z kksa ds vuqikyu gsrq
mfpr iz;kl fd, x, gSAa
Laklnh; jktHkk"kk lfefr dh nwljh milfefr

}kjk dsUnz ds fujh{k.k
Laklnh; jktHkk"kk lfefr dh nwljh milafefr }kjk fnukad
17 vizSy] 2013 dks jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnz dk
jktHkk"kk lac/a kh fujh{k.k fd;k x;kA bl lfefr dh v/;{krk
ekuuh; Jh lR;ozr prqonZs h th us dhA blds lnL; Jh jes'k
cSl] Jh j?kquna u 'kekZ rFkk MkW- Jherh cksPpk >kalh y{eh FksA
fujh{k.k ds nkSjku bl lfefr us dsUnz dks uxj jktHkk"kk
dk;kZUo;u lfefr dk lnL; cuus dk lq>ko fn;k rFkk
vkeaf=r vuqns'kd
Jherh uhye esgrk] rduhdh vf/kdkjh] jklukizd]s iwlk] ubZ fnYyh
Jherh lhek pksiM+k] mi funs'kd] jktHkk"kk] Hkkd`vuql]a iwlk] ubZ fnYyh
MkW- izes flag] lsok fuo`Rr la;qDr funs'kd] foKku ,oa izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx]
izkS|ksfxdh Hkou] ubZ fnYyh
MkW- izes flag] lsok fuo`Rr la;qDr funs'kd] foKku ,oa izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx]
izkS|ksfxdh Hkou] ubZ fnYyh
91
NCIPM
dEI;wVj ij fgUnh esa dke djus ds fy, izfs jr fd;k o
lHkh izdk'ku f}Hkk"kh :Ik esa izdkf'kr djus ds fy, dgkA
Laklnh; jktHkk"kk lfefr us jklukizds ds funs'kd] MkW- fpjaru
pksik/;k; dks jktHkk"kk lac/a kh dk;ksaZ esa vkSj vf/kd lQyrk

izkIr djus ds fy, dqN ekxZn'kZu Hkh fn,A
fut Hkk"kk mUufr vgS] lc mUufr dks ewy

fcu fut Hkk"kk Kku ds] feVr uk fg; ds 'kwyA
& Hkkjrsanq gfj'pa
92
vuqla kkfud ifj;kstuk,a | Research Project
vuqlakkfud ifj;kstuk,a
Research Project
ifj;kstuk dk uke
ifj;kstuk yhMj@lg;ksxh
Name of the project
Project leader and associates Collaborators
lgHkkxh dksyScksjsVj
dk;Ze I % fofHkUu f"k&ikfjra= {ks=ksa ds izeq[k mRiknu iz.kkfy;ksa ds fy, {ks= fofk"V vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa ,oa izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds fodkl ds
fy, ,d jk"Vh; usVodZ dh LFkkiuk
Programme I: Establishment of a national network for development of area-specific IPM modules & technologies for the
major production systems of different agro-ecological zones
fofHkUu pkoy fk&ifjra=ksa esa {ks= fofkV vkbZih,e vkj- ds- raoj] ihvkbZ
dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk fodkl] izlkj vkSj lkoZtfudhdj.k
vks- ih- 'kekZ
Development,
dissemination
and vtark fcjkg
popularization of location-specific IPM ,l- Hkxr
strategies in different rice agro-ecosystems
Lkh- pV~Vksik;k;
,l- ds- jkW;] vkjvkj,l] fpulqjk] if'pe caxky

S.K. Roy, RRS, Chinsura, West Bengal
R. K. Tanwar PI
O. P. Sharma
Ajanta Birah
S. Bhagat
C. Chattopadhyay
dikl esa mHkjus okys uk'khthoksa ds fy, vkbZih,e vtUrk fcjkg] ihvkbZ
vkj- ds- raoj
dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk la'ys"k.k ,oa oSkhdj.k
Synthesis and validation of IPM strategies of vks- ih- 'kekZ
,l- ih- flag
emerging pests of cotton
ih- osadVs'ku] ,l- fnO;k] f"k foKku dsUnz] isjecywj] rfeyukMq

P. Venkatesan, S. Divya, KVK, Perambalur, Tamil
Nadu
Ajanta Birah PI
R. K. Tanwar
O. P. Sharma
S.P. Singh
chVh dikl esa ukkhtho izcaku ,uvkbZ,lih,e ds vkj-ds- raoj] ihvkbZ

fy, jkVh; lwpuk ra= % {ks= fofkV vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy ,l- osfuyk
fodkl daoj
vkSj tkx:drk vfHk;ku MhvkslhMh
National Information System for Pest vtark fcjkg
Management (NISPM) in Bt Cotton: location fujatu flag
specific IPM module and awareness campaigns ,l- ih- flag
(DOCD)
R. K. Tanwar PI
S. Vennila
Vikas Kanwar
Ajanta Birah
Niranjan Singh
S. P. Singh
ts- ,l- cjkj] lruke flag] ih,;w] {ks=h; dsUnz] QjhndksV] iatkc
ds- ds- nfg;k] vkj- ds- lSuh] Mhvksb]Z lhlh,l,p,;w]] fglkj] gfj;k.kk
iz'kkar tkewydj] ,l- jes'k ckcw ,oa vkj- ds- dY;k.k] vkj,;w]
culokM+k] vkj,l] jktLFkku
vkjlh- >kyk] Vh-,e- HkkjiksMk] ,e- th- iVsy] ,,;w] vkuan] xqtjkr
ch- ch- dikfj;k] ,e- ch-] fojkfn;k] dsohds] eSu Mh,Qvkj,l]
ts,;w rj[kkfM;k] jktdksV] xqtjkr
ihih- 'kkL=h] ,l- ds- ikjlsb]Z lhvkj,l] vkjoh,ldsohoh] [kk.Mok]
e; izn's k
oh- lksuydj] ch- vkj- ikfVy] dikl vuqHkkx] MkW- ihMhdsoh] f"k
uxj] vdksyk] egkjk"V
,-s th- ferdkjh] ,l- oh- lksuuw ]s dsohds] [kkjiqMh] tkyuk] egkjk"V
,u-oh-oh-,l- nqxkZ izlkn] th-,e-oh- izlkn jko] vkj,vkj,l
,,uthvkj,;w] xqUVwj] vkakz izn's k
Mh- lh- pkSxkyk] ,l- 'k'kh dqekj] dsohds] VqdkjkRrh ry] xksdd]
csyxe] dukZVd
okbZ- osudkUuk] osd
a Vs'oj jko] dsohds] tkeqfudqVa k] djheuxj] vkakz izn's k
oh- osd
a Vs'ku] ,l- fnO;k] dsohds] okyhdkunkiqje] isjecywj rfeyukMq
93
NCIPM
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
J. S. Brar, Satnam Singh, PAU, Regional Station,
Faridkot, Punjab
K.K. Dahiya, R.K. Saini, DOE, CCSHAU, Hisar,
Haryana
Prashant Jamulkar, S. Ramesh Babu and R.K. Kalyan,
RAU, Banswara, RS, Rajasthan
R.C. Jhala, T. M. Bharpoda, M.G. Patel, AAU, Anand,
Gujarat
B.B. Kaparia , M.B. Viradiya, KVK, Main DFRS, JAU
Tarkhadia, Rajkot, Gujarat
P.P. Shastry, S.K. Parsai, CRS, RVSKVV, Khandwa,
Madhya Pradesh
V. Sonalkar, B.R. Patil, Cotton Section, Dr. PDKV, Krishi
Nagar, Akola, Maharashtra
A.G. Mitkari, S.V. Sonune, KVK, Kharpudi, Jalna,
Maharashtra
N.V.V.S. Durga Prasad, G.M.V. Prasad Rao, RARS
ANGRAU, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh
D.C.Chougala , S. Shashi Kumar, KVK, Tukaratti Tal,
Gokak, Belgaum, Karnataka
Y.Venkanna, Venkateshwara Rao, KVK, Jamnikunta,
Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh
P. Venkatesan, S. Divya, KVK, Valikandapuram,
Perambalur Tamil Nadu
cYc I;kt lCth Qlyksa ds fy, vaxhdj.kh; vkbZih,e ,p- vkj- ljnkuk ihvkbZ
izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk la#i.k] oSkhdj.k ,oa izkUs u;u
,e- ,u- HkV~V
lqjs'k xkoaMs] Mhvksthvkj] iq.ks] egkjk"V

Suresh Gawande, DOGR, Pune, Maharashtra
Formulation, validation and promotion of H. R. Sardana, PI

adaptable IPM technology for bulb (onion) M. N. Bhat
vegetable crops
VekVj vkSj fkeyk fepZ esa vuqdwyuh; vkbZih,e ,p- vkj ljnkuk ihvkbZ
izk|
S ksfxdh dk iznkZu@fu:i.k@izfriknu vkSj izkUs u;u ,e- ,u HkV
eqd's k lgxy
,u,pch
Demonstration and promotion of adaptable IPM vkjoh- flag
technology in tomato and bell pepper (NHB)
H. R. Sardana PI
M.N. Bhat
Mukesh Sehgal
RV Singh
fepZ dh eqj>ku jksx dk izca ku
,e- ,u- HkV~V ihvkbZ

,p- vkj- ljnkuk
Management of chilli wilt
,e- ds- uk;d] ;w,,l] jk;pwj] dukZVdk

M.K. Naik, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka
M.N. Bhat PI
H.R. Sardana
cjlkrh ekSle dh xksHkh ds oS|hr vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh Mh- ch- vkgwtk ihvkbZ
dk izkUs u;u] lkoZtfudhdj.k] izlkj vkSj dk;kZUo;u
,u- lkfcj
Promotion, popularization, dissemination & D.B. Ahuja PI
implementation of validated IPM technology N. Sabir
of rainy season cauliflower
iq#"kkske dqekj vjksMk+ ] ".k dqekj vkjvkj,l] vcksgj] iatkc

MkW- ,l- ds- csjok] lgk- izkQ
s -s ikni laj{k.k ,vkj,l]
Jhxaxkuxj] ,ldsvkj,;w] chdkusj] jktLFkku
,- ds- nkl] ,uvkjlh flVl] ukxiqj] egkjk"V
f'k[kk Msdk] lhvkj,l] frulqfd;k] ,,;w] vle
"kk jkuh] vgwtk] ,ulh,ih] ubZ fnYyh
Parshotam Kumar Arora, Krishan Kumar RRS, Abohar,
Punjab
S.K. Bairwa , Asstt Professor (PP) ARS, Sriganganagar,
SKRAU, Bikaner, Rajasthan
A.K. Das, NRC Citrus, Nagpur, Maharashtra
Sikha Deka, CRS, Tinsukia, AAU, Assam
Usha Rani Ahuja, NCAP, New Delhi
94
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
fofHkUu tyok;qd ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vke ds fy, LFkku Mh- ch- vkgwtk ihvkbZ
fofkV vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxfd;ksa dk fodkl vkSj oS|hdj.k vkjoh- flag
,l- ds- lDlsuk] th-ch- dkykfj;k] ,p- kekZ] ,u,;w] uolkjh]

xqtjkr
Development and validation of site specific IPM

technologies for mango in different climatic
conditions
S.K. Saxena, G.B. Kalaria, H. Sharma, NAU, Navsari,

Gujarat
D. B. Ahuja PI
R.V. Singh
jkVh; [kk| lqj{kk feku ,u,Q,l,e&,3ih ds varxZr vks- ih- kekZ ihvkbZ
lesfdr ukkhtho izca ku ds xgu vuqiz;ksx ds ek;e ,l- osf..kyk
,l- Hkxr
ls puk vkSj vjgj ds mRiknu dks c<+kuk
Increasing production of chickpea and pigeonpea fujatu flag
through intensive application of integrated pest ,l- ih- flag
management (NFSM-A3P)
uhye esgrk
O.P. Sharma PI
S. Vennila
S. Bhagat
Niranjan Singh
S. P. Singh
Neelam Mehta
vjgj esa QkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh dk lesfdr izca ku

Integrated management of Phytophthora blight
in pigeonpea
eqdsk [kqYyj] fk ea=ky;] Mh,lh] ubZ fnYyh

,- uhjtk] Mh,lh] ubZ fnYyh
,- ds- HkkSfed] dsohoh] vkkjry] tcyiqj] e; iznsk
vkjlh- ykosdj] fk dkWyst] uSxkao] ukaMsM] egkjkV
ds- vkj- dkeys] ,l-Mh- nakrsokM] ,vkj,l cnukiqj] egkjkV
ch- oh- HksMs] ,e,;w] ijHk.kh] egkjkV
,u- vkj- iraxs] lhvks,] vkslekukckn] egkjkV
lqgkl ;syksV~Vh] ,vkj,l xqycxkZ] dukZVd
,l-ds- flag] vkbZvkbZihvkj] dkuiqj] mkj iznsk
ih- y{eh jsM~Mh] dsohds] ,ih,;w] jsM~MhiYyh] vuariqj] vkakz iznsk
Mukesh Khuller, Ministry of Agriculture, DAC, N. Delhi
A. Neerja, DAC, N. Delhi
A.K. Bhowmick, JNKVV, Adhartal, Jabalpur, Madhya
Pradesh
R.C. Lavekar, Agriculture College, Naigaon, Nanded,
Maharashtra
K.R. Kamle, S.D. Dantewad, ARS Badnapur,
Maharashtra
B.V. Bhede, MAU, Parbhani, Maharashtra
N.R. Patange, COA, Osmanabad Maharashtra
Suhas Yelshetty, ARS Gulbarga, Karnataka
S.K. Singh, IIPR, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
P. Laxmi Reddy, KVK, APAU, Reddipalli, Anantapur,
Andhra Pradesh
,l- Hkxr ihvkbZ

vks- ih- kekZ
,l- osf..kyk
ulhe vgen
,l- ih- flag
S. Bhagat PI
O. P. Sharma
S. Vennila
Nasim Ahmad
S. P. Singh
mkj&iwohZ {ks= esa e`nk tfur izeq[k jksxksa ds izca ku ds ,l- Hkxr ihvkbZ
vks- ih- kekZ
fy, nskt VkbdksMekZ iztkfr;ksa dh [kkst
Exploration of native Trichoderma sp. for the
management of key soil borne diseases (Field
pea and cole crops) in north east region
fcjs'oj flUgk] lh,;w] bEQky] ef.kiqj

Bireshwar Sinha, CAU, Imphal, Manipur
S. Bhagat PI
O. P. Sharma
95
NCIPM
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
ewxQyh dh Qly ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku dk ,l- ds- flag ihvkbZ
la'ys"k.k] oSkhdj.k rFkk izlkj&izlkj
,e- ,l- ;kno
Synthesis, validation and popularization of jkds'k dqekj
integrated pest management technology for ih- oh- oekZ
groundnut crop
ulhe vgen
SK Singh PI
M.S. Yadav
Rakesh Kumar
P. V. Verma
Nasim Ahmad
Dqynhi flag tkMksu] iwue tljksfV;k ewxQyh vuqla kku funs'kky;]
twukx<+] xqtjkr
,u- lh- osd
a Vs'ojyw] ds- osekuk] f"k vuqla kku dsUnz] dkfnjh]
vkpk;Z ,u- th- jaxk f"k fo'ofo|ky;] jktsUnz uxj] gSnjkckn]
vkakz izn's k
ih- y{eh jsMM
~ h vkSj ,e- ds- T;ksLFkkuk] f"k foKku dsUnz] jsMM
~ hikyh]
vuariqj] vkpk;Z ,u- th- jaxk f"k fo'ofo|ky; jktsUnz uxj]
gSnjkckn] vkakz izn's k
Kuldeep Singh Jadon, Poonam Jasrotia Directorate of
Groundnut Research, Junagadh, Gujarat
N.C. Venkateswarlu, K. Vemana, Agricultural Research
Centre, Kadiri, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural
University Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
P.Lakshmi Reddy and M. K. Jyosthna, Krishi Vigyan
Kendra, Reddipalli, Anantapur, Acharya N.G. Ranga
Agricultural University Rajendranagar, Hyderabad,
Andhra Pradesh.
gfj;k.kk vkSj jktLFkku esa cM+s {ks= esa ljlksa ds ,e- ,l- ;kno ihvkbZ
ljkst flag
LDysjksfVfu;k ruk foxyu ds izca ku ij v;;u
Studies on management of Sclerotinia stem rot ulhe vgen
uohu flag] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh

ts- ,y- ;kno] dsohds] eksfgUnjx<+] ,p,;w] fglkj] gfj;k.kk
,- ds- ikBd] ,vkj,l] uoxko] ,lds,u,;w] tkscusj] jktLFkku
of mustard on large area of Haryana and M.S. Yadav PI

Rajasthan
Saroj Singh
Nasim Ahmad
Naveen Singh, IARI, New Delhi

J. L. Yadav, KVK, Mohindergarh, HAU, Hisar, Haryana
A.K Pathak, ARS, Navgaon, SKNAU, Jobner, Rajasthan
uk'khtho izca ku ds fy, vko';d midj.kksa dk fodkl lqjUs nz dqekj flag ihvkbZ
Development of mechanical devices needed for Surender Kumar Singh PI
pest management
ckxokuh Qlyksa & ,vkbZlhvkjih esa lw=fe gkWVLikWV eqds k lgxy ihvkbZ
ds fy, vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk oS|hdj.k vkSj izkUs u;u uosn lkfcj
Validation and promotion of IPM strategies for ,p- vkj- ljnkuk
;w,,l] caxykSj] dukZVd

vle fk foofo|ky;] tksjgV] vle
chlhdsoh] dY;k.kh] ifpe caxky]
nematode hotspots in horticultural crops Mukesh Sehgal PI

(AICRP)
Naved Sabir
H.R. Sardana
UAS, Bangalore, Karantaka

Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam
BCKV, Kalyani, West Bengal
mPp ewY;ksa okys lfCt;ksa vkSj dV ykojksa dh lajf{kr uosn lkfcj lhlhihvkbZ
vkj- ds- raoj
[ksrh% ,d ewY; ka[kyk fl)kar ,u,vkbZih
Hkkvuql] ubZ fnYyh
Protected cultivation of high value vegetables Naved Sabir CCPI

and cut flowers: A value chain approach (NAIP) R.K. Tanwar
96
IARI, New Delhi
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
dk;Ze
II
% izeq[k ukkhthoksa ij MkVkcslksa dk fodkl vkSj bySDVkWfud usVofdx
Programme II: Development of databases on major pests and electronic networking
Qly ukkhtho fuxjkuh vkSj lykgdkjh ifj;kstuk ,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZ

lhvkjvksih,l,ih & egkjkV
fujatu flag
Crop Pest Surveillance and Advisory Project S. Vennila PI
(CROPSAP)-Maharashtra
Niranjan Singh
Ckkxokuh Qlyksa & vukj] vke vkSj dsys ds fy, Qly Mh-ch- vkgwtk ihvkbZ
lEca/kh ukkhtho fuxjkuh vkSj lykgdkjh ifj;kstuk fujatu flag
Crop pest surveillance and advisory project for ,- ds- duksft;k
horticultural crops-pomegranate, mango and D.B. Ahuja PI
banana
Niranjan Singh
A. K. Kanojia
fk foHkkx] egkjkV ljdkj] egkjkV

lhvkjvkbZMh,] gSnjkckn] vkakz izns k
,l-th- cksjdj] ds- ,l- j?kqoa kh] ,l- vkj- dqyd.khZ] ch- ihqUnzdj] ,u- ch- ks[k] ,l] ijnskh] ,u- ,e- ikfVy] ,eihdsoh]
jkgwjh] egkjkV
,l- ds- xksMls] ,e-ch- nkyoh] MkW- ch,ldsdos h] niksyh] egkjkV
vkj- Fkaxkosy]w ,uvkjlh cukuk] fVph] rfeyukMq
T;ksRluk kekZ] ,uvkjlh iksejxzus Vs ] lksykiqj] egkjkV
Department of Agriculture, Government of Maharashtra,
Maharashtra
CRIDA, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
S.G. Borkar, K.S. Raghuvanshi, S.R. Kulkarni, B.P.
Krundakar, N.B. Shaikh, S. Pradeshi, N.M. Patil, MPKV,
Rahuri, Maharashtra
S.K. Godse, M.B. Dalvi, Dr. BSKKV, Dapoli,
Maharashtra
R. Thangavelu, NRC Banana, Trichi, Tamil Nadu
Jyotsana Sharma, NRC Pomegranate, Solapur,
Maharashtra
p;fur lCth dh Qlyksa cSxua vkSj VekVj esa ukkhtho fujatu flag ihvkbZ
izca ku ds fy, fokskK ra= dk fodkl
,p- vkj- ljnkuk
Development of Expert System for pest ukosn lfcj
management in selected vegetable crops (Brinjal ,e- ,u- HkV
and tomato)
Niranjan Singh PI
H.R. Sardana
Naved Sabir
M.N. Bhat
dk;Ze
III%
jk"Vh; egkk ds ukkhthoksa ds iwokZuqeku ds fy, ekWMyksa dk fodkl
Programme III: Development of models for forecasting of pests of national importance
tyok;q ifjorZu ds laca k esa ukkhthoksa dh xfrfd;ka & ,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZ
vkj- ds- raoj
jkVh; fk tyok;q izfrLdanh igykfDr fuk
vks- ih- kekZ
,p- vkj- ljnkuk
,e- ,u- HkV~V
,e- ,l- ;kno
,l- Hkxr
fujatu flag
ih- oh- oekZ
,l- ih- flag
uhye esgrk
lg;ksfxd laLFkku
Mh- ds- nkl] fxjhk dqekj >k] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh
vejsUnz dqekj >k] vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh
lg;ksxh dsUnz
pkoy
,e- Jhfuokl izlkn] oh- >kalh y{eh] ,e- laiFk dqekj] Mhvkjvkj]
gSnjkckn] vkakz izns k
Vh- t;jkt] ,l- ekSgEen tykywhu] ,- dkfrZd;
s u] VhvkjvkjvkbZ]
vnqFkwjkbZ rfeyukMq
Mh- ds- flM~Ms xksoMk] ,e- ds- izlUuk dqekj] vkjvkj,l] eun;k] dukZVd
lat; kekZ] vkbZthdsohoh] jk;iqj] Nkhlx<+
izhrsUnz flag ljko] ih- ,l- ksjk] ts- ,l- yksj] ih,;w] yqfk;kuk] iatkc
,l-ds- jkW;] flrsk pVthZ] fouk;d tyxkodj] vkjvkj,l] fpulqjk]
ifpe caxky
,l-ds- eagnys] oSkkyh lkoar] MkW- ch,ldsdos h] niksyh] jk;x<+] egkjkV
97
NCIPM
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
vjgj
lqgkl ;sy'ksV~Vh] jpIik] oh- gosjh] ,vkj,l] xqycxZ] dukZVd
Mh- ch- iVsy] okbZ] jfoUnz ckcw] ,lMh,;w] ,lds ukxj] xqtjkr
,l- ekyrh] ,uthvkj,;w] okjaxy] vkakz izn's k
x.ks'k ihns'keq[k] ih-,u- gkjsj] v'kksd ih- pkou],eihdsoh] jkgwjh]
egkjk"V
ts dfork ijkuhkju] ,- dkfrZfd;su] Vh,u,;w] ckoau] rfeyukMq
,l- ch- nkl] ts,udsohoh] tcyiqj] e; izn's k
y{eh ih- jsM~Mh] T;ksRluk] dsohds] vuariqj] vkakz izn's k
ewxQyh
ihih- Fkh:eykbZlkeh] Mhthvkj] twukx<+] xqtjkr
,e- fljds] ,eihdsoh] tyxkao] egkjk"V
oh- jfopUnzu] ih- bfUnjk xkakh] Vh,u,;w] o`kkpye] rfeyukMq
ds- oseuk] ,u- lh- osd
a Vs'ojyw] ,vkj,l] vuariqj] vkakz izn's k
egkcys'oj gsxMs] ;w,,l] kkjokM+] dukZVd
VekVj
,e- ,p- dksnunkje] ,- ch- jk;] lqtkW; lkgk] vkbZvkbZohvkj]
okjk.klh] mkj izns'k
,l- ,l- xksly] lanhi dkSj] fouhr dqekj] vfHk'ks[k 'kekZ] 'kkdh;
Qly ij ,vkbZlhvkjih] yqfk;kuk] iatkc
lh- ch- cpdkj] ,eihdsoh] jkgwjh] egkjk"V
ds- fljh'kk] ts fnyhi ckcw] ,e- fot;] vkjoh-,l- ds- jsM~Mh]
,vkj,l] ,ih,p;w] gSnjkckn] vkakz izn's k
lqczrk nkk] chlhdsoh] dY;k.kh] if'pe caxky
lhih [kjs] ,l- ds- ikfVy] vkbZthdsohoh] jk;iqj] Nkhlx<+
oh- Jhkj] ,- ds- lDlsuk] vkbZvkbZ,pvkj] cSxyw#] dukZVd
Pest dynamics in relation to climate change- S. Vennila PI
National Initiative on Climate Resilient R.K. Tanwar
O.P. Sharma
Agriculture (NICRA)
H.R. Sardana
M.N. Bhat
M.S. Yadav
S. Bhagat
Niranjan Singh
P.V. Verma
S.P. Singh
Neelam Mehta
98
Collaborative Institutions
D.K. Das, Girish Kumar Jha, IARI, New Delhi
Amrender Kumar, IASRI, New Delhi
Cooperating Centres
Rice
M. Srinivas Prasad, V Jhanshi Laxmi, M Sampath Kumar,
DRR, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
T. Jayaraj, S. Mohamed Jalaludin, A. Karthikeyan, TRRI,
Aduthurai, Tamil Nadu
D. K. Sidde Gowda, M. K. Prasanna Kumar, RRS,
Mandya, Karnataka
Sanjay Sharma, IGKVV, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Preetinder S. Sarao, P.S. Shera, J.S. Lore, PAU, Ludhiana,
Punjab
S. K. Roy, Sitesh Chatterjee, Vinayak Jalgavkar, RRS,
Chinsura, West Bengal
S.K. Mahendale, Vaishali Sawant, Dr. BSKKV, Dapoli,
Raigarh, Maharashtra
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
Pigeonpea
Suhas Yelshetty, Rachappa V. Haveri, ARS, Gulbarga,
Karnataka
D. B. Patel, Y. Ravindrababu, SDAU, SK Nagar, Gujarat
S. Malathi, ANGRAU, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh
Ganesh P. Deshmukh, P. N. Harer, Ashok P. Chavan,
MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra
Z. Kavitha, Paranidharan, A. Karthikeyan, TNAU,
Vamban, Tamil Nadu
S. B. Das, JNKV, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh
Laxmi P. Reddy, Jyotsna, KVK, Anantapur, Andhra
Pradesh
Groundnut
P.P. Thirumalaisamy, DGR, Junagarh, Gujarat
M. S. Shirke, MPKV, Jalgaon, Maharashtra
V. Ravichandran, P. Indira Gandhi, TNAU,
Vridhachalam, Tamil Nadu
K. Vemana, N. C. Venkateswarlu, ARS, Anantapur,
Andhra Pradesh
Mahabaleshwar Hegde, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka
Tomato
M. H. Kodandaram, A.B. Rai, Sujoy Saha, IIVR,Varanasi,
Uttar Pradesh
S. S. Gosal, Sandeep Kaur, Vineet Kumar, Abhishek
Sharma, AICRP on Vegetable Crops, Ludhiana, Punjab
C. B. Bachkar, MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra
K. Sireesha, J. Dilip babu, M. Vijaya, R.V.S.K. Reddy,
ARS , APHU, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
Subrata Dutta, BCKV, Kalyani, West Bengal
C. P. Khare, S. K. Patil, IGKV, Raipur, Chhattishgarh
V. Sridhar, A. K. Saxena, IIHR, Bengaluru, Karnataka
izeq[k pkoy vkSj dikl vkkkfjr Qlyhdj.k iz.kkfy;ksa ,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZ
ds ukkhtho izca ku ds fy, fu.kkZ;d lgk;rk iz.kkfy;kas S. Vennila CC PI
ij kks/k
Decision support systems for the management
of insect pests of major rice and cotton-based
cropping systems (NAIP)
Development of models to predict infestation
of sap feeders-based on AICCIP historical data
(TMC 1.5)
,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZ

S. Vennila CC PI
99
NCIPM
ifj;kstuk dk uke
Name of the project
dk;Ze
IV%
lkekftd ,oa vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk izHkko foys"k.k
Programme IV: Socio-economic issues and impact analysis of IPM technology
pkoy esa vkbZih,e izk|

S ksfxfd;ksa esa lkekftd ,oa vkfFkZd fodkl daoj ihvkbZ
foysk.k
vkj- ds- raoj
Socio-economic analysis in IPM technologies in
rice
Vikas Kanwar PI
R. K. Tanwar
pkoy Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds varxZr bZvkbZD;w Vwy dk lqfe=k vjksMk+ ihvkbZ

iz;ksx djrs gq, i;kZoj.k ij dhVuk'kdksa dk izHkko Sumitra Arora PI
Mukesh Sehgal
ewY;kadu
Impact assessment of pesticides on environment
using EIQ tool under rice cropping system
vkuan flag] vejh'k flag ;kno] n;k 'kadj JhokLro] lkSjHk] euh"k]
dqekj fclsu] 'kSyUs nz dqekj flag dsohds] lhrkiqj
lat; vjksMk+ ] vkjvkj,l] lh,l,lvkjvkbZ] y[ku
vuqi HkV~Vkpk;Zth] lhvkbZ,l,p] y[ku
Anand Singh, Ambreesh Singh Yadav, Daya Shankar
Srivastava, Saurabh, Manish Kumar Bisen, Shailendra
Kumar Singh, KVK, Sitapur
Sanjay Arora, RRS, CSSRI, Lucknow
Anup Bhattacharjee, CISH, Lucknow
kkdh; Qlyksa ds fy, ukkhtho izca ku lwpuk lqiqnZxh vkj-oh- flag ihvkbZ
,p- vkj- ljnkuk
iz.kkyh ij v;;u
Studies on pest management information ,e- ,u- HkV~V
delivery system for vegetable crops
Mh- ch- vkgwtk
vkj- ds- ;kno] dsohds mtok

vjfoan dqekj] dsohds fkdksgiqj] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh
R.K. Yadav, KVK Ujwa
Arvind Kumar, KVK Shikohpur, IARI, New Delhi
R.V. Singh PI
H. R. Sardana
M. N. Bhat
D. B. Ahuja
dk;Ze V% vkbZih,e esa ekuo lalkku dk fodkl

Programme V: Human resource development in IPM
ekuo lalkku fodkl
eqds k lgxy
Human resource development
Mukesh Sehgal
100
izdk'ku | Publications
izdk'ku
Publications
'kksk i=k
vgen] vkbZ ,oa Hkxr ,l- 2013A vaMeku }hi lewg ds
fofHkUu Qly ewy ifjos'kksa ls fo;ksftr VkbdksMekZ iztkfr ds
tSo dkjd fo;qDrksa dh Mh,u, fQaxj fizfa VxA osftVksl & ,u
baVjus'kuy ts- IykaV- jsl-] 26% 460&466vgwtk] Mh- ch-] flag] ,l-] 'kekZ] izfrHkk] efyd] ,e-] flag] vkjoh-] ,oa dkyjk] ch- 2013A o"kkZ _rq dh xksHkh ds fy, LFkku
fof'k"V vkbZih,e izk|
S ksfxdh dk fodkl rFkk QkeZ ij oSkhdj.k
bafM;u ts- ,fxzd] lkbal] 83% 78&82vjksMk+ ] lqfe=k] eq[kthZ] bjkuh] dqekj] veu ,oa xxZ 2014A
cklerh pkoy ds vkbZih,e rFkk xSj&vkbZih,e ijh{k.kksa ls
vukt] e`nk vkSj ty esa dhVuk'kd vof'k"Vksa dk rqyukRed
v;;uA buok;j- ekWfuVj] vLle]- 186% 361&366Hkxr] ,l-] cEckokys] vks- ,e-] f=ikBh] ,- ds-] vgen] vkbZJhokLro] vkjlh- 2013A vaMeku esa VkbdksMekZ iztkfr ds
;wlfs j;e eqj>ku dk tSfod izca kuA bafM;u ts- gksfVZdYpj]
70% 397&403HkV~Vkpk;Z] ch- ds- ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2013A ljlksa esa
lM+u jksx ds fy, i`Foh vkkkfjr ekSle foKku ,oa mixzg
vkkkfjr lqnjw laons u ds la;kstu esa ,d cgqe[q kh [kkstA
daI;wVlZ ,aM bysDVkWfuDl bu ,xzhdYpj 90% 35&44
fcjkg] ,-] Hkxr] ,l-] raoj] vkj- ds ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh2014A Qly LokLF; izca ku esa cht mipkjA lrlk eq[ki=k
okf"kZd rduhdh vad] 18% 15&26fcjkg] ,-] lhegkpkye] ih-] x.ks'ku] ,l-] vgen] b'jkj ,oa
xkSre vkj- ds- 2014A vkj,ihMh&ihlhvkj fo'ys"k.kksa ds
ek;e ls bafxr nf{k.kh vaMeku dh Qy eD[kh csDVkl
s js k
iztkfr dh lef"V dh vkf.od vkuqofa 'kd lajpuk] bf.M;u
ts- ,fxzd lkbal 84% 73&6fcjkg] ,-] tehj] ,l- ds-] vuakjkt] ,-] f=ikBh] vkj- ,l- ,oa
nke jkW;] ,l- 2014A Hkkjr ds }hi lewgksa esa kku ds [ksrksa ds
canhdwV pwgks]a canhdksVk csx
a ysfll dk izdVu] ,uYl IykaV
izkVs -s lkbal] 22% 213&214-
Research papers
Ahmad, I. and Bhagat, S. (2013).DNA fingerprinting
of bio-control isolates of Trichoderma spp. isolated
from different crop rhizospheres of Andaman Islands.
Vegetos-An Internat. J. Plant Res., 26: 460-466.
Ahuja, D. B., Singh, S., Sharma, Pratibha, Malik, M.,
Singh, R. V., and Kalra, B. (2013). Development and
on - farm validation of location specific IPM technology
for rainy season cauliflower. Indian J. Agric. Sci.,
83: 78-82.
Arora, Sumitra, Mukherji, Irani, Kumar, Aman and
Garg, D. K. (2014). Comparative estimation of pesticide
residues in grain, soil and water from IPM and
non-IPM trials of Basmati rice. Environ. Monitor.
Assessm., 186: 361-366.
Bhagat, S., Bambawale, O. M., Tripathi, A. K., Ahmad,
I., Srivastava, R. C. (2013). Biological management of
fusarial wilt of tomato by Trichoderma spp. in
Andamans. Indian J. Horticulture, 70: 397-403.
Bhattacharya, B.K. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). A
multistage tracking for mustard rot disease combining
surface meteorologyand satellite remote sensing.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 90: 35-44
Birah, A., Bhagat, S., Tanwar, R. K. and
Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Seed treatment in crop health
management. SATSA Mukhapatra Annual Technical
Issue, 18: 15-26.
Birah, A., Simhachalam, P., Ganeshan, S., Ahmad, Israr
and Gautam R. K. (2014). Molecular genetic structure
of fruit fly (Bactrocera sp) population of South
Andaman revealed through RAPD-PCR analysis,
Indian J. Agric. Sci., 84: 73-6.
Birah, A., Zamir Ahmad, S. K., Anandhraj, A.,
Tripathi, R. S. and Dam Roy, S. (2014). Occurrence of
Bandicoot rat, Bandicota bengalensis in paddy fields of
Bay Islands, India, Annals Pl. Prot. Sci., 22: 213-14.
101
NCIPM
QksuMsfoyk] ,l-] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] [kjs] ,u- ,oa :fc;kysl]
Mh- 2013A eVj esa ,sjhflQs bZvkj 1 rFkk bZvkj 3 thu dk
izfrjksk djus esa l{ke gS ijUrq bZvkj 2 esa l{ke ugha gSA
;wjksfi;u ts- vkWQ IykaV iSFkksykWth 135% 557&563xks;y] ih-] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] ekFkqj] ,- ih-] dqekj] ,-]
ehuk] ih- Mh-] nkk] ,l- ,oa bdcky] ,e- ,- 2013A Hkkjr
esa vYVjusfj;k czkfldk ds fofHkUu frygu czkfldk fo;qDrksa
esa jksxk.kqtud ,oa vkuqofa 'kd fofokrkA ,uYl vkWQ IykaV
izkVs Ds 'ku lkbafll 21% 349&359xks;y] ih-] dqekj] ,-] pkgj] ,e-] bdcky] ,e- ,-] nkk]
,l- ,oa pV~Vksik;k; lh- 2013A Hkkjr ,oa ;w-ds- ds
LDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksf'k;ksje ds fofHkUu frygu czkfldk
fo;qDrksa esa jksxk.kqtud ,oa vkuqoaf'kd fofokrkA ,uYl
vkWQ IykaV izkVs Ds 'ku lkbafll 21% 377&386xks;y] ih] ekFkqj] ,l- ih-] ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2013A
czkfldk tqufl;k esa fgLVksiSFkksykWth & vYVjusfj;k czkfldk
dh var%f;k rFkk vYVjusfj;k vaxekjh xzflr ch- tqufl;k
ifk;ksa esa fgLVksdsfedy dk LFkkuh;dj.kA ,uYl vkWQ
IykaV izkVs Ds 'ku lkbafll 21% 322&328dqekj] ,-] vxzoky] vkj- ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2013A
ljlksa dh Qly esa jksxksa ds fy, ekSle vkkkfjr iwokZueq ku
ekWMyA ekSle- 64% 663&670dqekj] vfer] vjksMk+ ] lqfe=k] eks?kk] uohu] lyhe] ,l-]
,y&ns;kc] tsM-] valkjh] ,- ,oa valkjh] ,l- th- 2013A
XywFkkfFk;kWu ysfir ftad vkWDlkbM usuksikfVZdYl% dhVuk'kd
dh [kkst ds fy, ,d vk'kktud lkexzhA ,uthZ buok;j]
Qksdl] 2% 101&107dqekj] ds-] Hkxr] ,l-] ekkqjh] ds-] fcjkg] ,- ,oa JhokLro]
vkjlh- 2013A Hkkjr ds }hi lewgksa eas f'keyk fepZ ,U;we
ij ;wlfs j;e DykekbMksLiksje }kjk mRiUu ,oa fjiksVZ ugha
fd, x, Qy lM+u jksx dk izdVu] ost- lkba-] 39% 195&197ehuk] ih- Mh-] xkSj] vkj- ch-] xqIrk] tslh-] flag] ,p- ds-]
voLFkh] vkj- ih-] usre] vkj- ,l-] xksfndk] ,l-] lakq] ih,l] izlkn] vkj-] jkBh] ,- ,l-] jk;] Mh-] FkkWel] ,y-] iVsy]
th- ,-] ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2013A Hkkjr esa ljlksa dh
Qly dks cckZn djus okys ize[q k jksxksa czkfldk tqufl;k
ds iz c a ku ds fy, xS j &jklk;fud ,ts a V mfpr ,oa
i;kZoj.k vuqdy
w fodYi miyCk djkrs gSAa kIl izkVs Ds 'ku
53% 169&174ukxef.k] ih- fo'oukFk] ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l- ,oa
jsMM
~ h] ih- ,y- 2013A xkao Lrj ij gsfydksoikZ vkfet+js k
ds izca ku ds fy, vkbZih,e ekWM;
~ y
w dk ijh{k.kA ,uYl
IykaV izkVs -s lkbal] 21% 432&434-
102
Fondevilla, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Khare, N. and

Rubiales, D. (2013). Erysiphe is able to overcomw er1
and er3, but not er2, resistance genes in pea. European
J. of Plant Pathology, 135: 557-563
Goyal, P., Chattopadhyay, C., Mathur, A. P., Kumar,
A., Meena, P. D., Datta, S. and Iquebal, M. A. (2013).
Pathogenic and molecular variability among different
oilseed Brassica isolates of Alternaria brassicae from India.
Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 21: 349-359.
Goyal, P., Kumar, A., Chahar, M., Iquebal, M. A.,
Datta, S. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). Pathogenic
and genetic variability among different oilseed Brassica
isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum from India and UK.
Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 21: 377-386.
Goyal, P., Mathur, A.P., and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013).
Histopathology in Brassica juncea - Alternaria brassicae
interaction and localization of histochemicals in
Alternaria blight-infected B. juncea leaves. Annals of Plant
Protection Sciences 21: 322-328.
Kumar, A., Agrawal, R. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013)
Weather-based forecast model for diseases in mustard
crop. Mausam. 64: 663-670.
Kumar, Amit, Arora, Sumitra, Mogha, Navin, Salem,
S., Al-Deyab, Z., Ansari, A. and Ansari, S. G. (2013).
Glutathione coated zinc oxide nanoparticles: a
promising material for pesticide detection. Energy
Environ. Focus, 2: 101-107.
Kumar, K., Bhagat, S., Madhuri, K., Birah, A. and
Srivastava, R. C. (2013).Occurrence of unreported fruit
rot caused by Fusarium chlamydosporum on Capsicum
annum in Bay Island, India. Veg. Sci., 39: 195-197.
Meena, P. D., Gour, R. B., Gupta, J. C., Singh,
H. K., Awasthi, R.P., Netam, R. S., Godika, S., Sandhu,
P. S., Prasad, R., Rathi, A. S., Rai, D., Thomas, L.,
Patel, G. A., Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). Non-chemical
agents provide tenable, eco-friendly alternatives for
themanagement of the major diseases devastating Indian
mustard (Brassica juncea) in India. Crop Protection
53: 169-174.
Nagamani, P., Viswanath, K., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat,
S. and Reddy, P. L. (2013). Demonstration of IPM
module for management of Helicoverpa armigera at
village level. Annals Pl. Prot. Sci., 21: 432-434.
iku] ,l-] eq[kthZ] vkj- ,oa Hkxr] ,l- 2013A e`nk tfur
ikni jksxk.kqvksa ds fo#) VkbdksMekZ iztkfr dk ewY;kaduA
,uYl IykaV izkVs -s lkbal] 21% 197&198jfoUnz] ,p] dsupuxksoMk] ih- oh-] lgxy] ,e- ,oa 'khokuk]
,l- 2013A tM+&foxyu lw=fe;ksa ds fo#) izfrjksk ds
fy, ewx
a Qyh tuunzO; dk ewY;kaduA ikfdLrku ts- usekVksy]
31% 179&181jfoUnz] ,p-] lgxy eqd's k ekuw] Vh- th-] eqjyh] vkj- ,oa
ujflEgkewfrZ] ,p- ch- 2013A dukZVd esa I;kt ij tM+
foyxu lw=fe esykMksxk;uh budkWxfuVk dk igyk izdksiA
bf.M;u ts- usekVksy-] 43% 233&234ljnkuk] ,p- vkj-] HkV] ,e- ,u- vkSj lgxy] ,e- 2013A
fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr ds ek;e ls f'keyk fepZ
dsiflde ,ue osjk- wfVlsl
a ,y ds fy, xSj jklk;fud
vkbZih,e ,oa vkbZ,u,e izkS|ksfxdh dk ewY;kadu rFkk
oSkhdj.kA bf.M;u ts- baV-] 75% 127&131ljnkuk] ,p- vkj-] daoj] fodkl] HkV~V] ,e- ,u- ,oa flag]
vkjoh- 2013A VekVj esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds iz{ks=
dk;kZUo;u ds fy, fdlkuksa }kjk visf{kr i)fr rFkk vkfFkZd
fo'ys"k.kA bf.M;u ts- baV-] 75% 185&188flag] ,e-] 'kekZ] vks- ih- Hkxr] ,l- ,oa ik.Ms] ,u- 2013A
LDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksf'k;ksje fyc- Mh csjh ds fodkl ij
QaQnw uk'kdks]a dYpj ehfM;k] rkieku rFkk ih,p ds izHkko ls
pus esa lQsn kCcsA ,uYl IykaV izkVs -s lkbal] 21% 136&139JhokLro] Mh- ,l-] lgxy] eqd's k] f}osnh] ch- ds- ,oa flag]
,l- ih- 2013A tM+ foxyu lw=fe ds izca ku ds fy,
lqjf{kr jlk;u dh igpkuA isfLVd fjl- ts-] 32% 105&108osfuyk] ,l- ,oa vxzoky] ehuw 2013A dikl feyhcx ds
oSdfYid ijiksf"k;ksa ds :i esa Qy QlysAa ,uYl IykaV izkVs -s
lkbal] 21% 434&436osfuyk] ,l-] ,oa vxzoky ehuw 2013A lCth dh Qlyksa ij
dikl feyhcx] fQusdksdl lksyus ksfIll fVUlys dk vkxeu
,oa izdksi dh rhozrkA ,uYl IykaV izkVs -s lkbal] 21% 265&269osfuyk] ,l-] ,oa vxzoky ehuw 2014A dikl feyhcx
fQusdksdl lksyus ksfIll ds vkHkq"k.kh; ifjiks"khA bf.M;u
ts- ,fxzd] lkbal-] 84% 161&163osfuyk] ,l- ,oa vxzoky] ehuw 2014A dikl feyhcx]
fQusdksdl lksyus ksfIll dh ifjiks"kh Qlyksa ds :i esa
iztkfr;kaA ,uYl IykaV izkVs -s lkbal] 22% 191&192;kno] ,e- ,l-] flag] ,u-] flag ,l-] vgen] ,u- ,oa
xksfndk] ,l- 2013A jktLFkku vkSj gfj;k.kk esa Hkkjrh;
ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu dh O;kidrk ,oa rhozrkA
bf.M;u ts- IykaV izkVs -s ] 41% 243&252-
Pan, S., Mukherji, R. and Bhagat, S. (2013). Evaluation

of Trichoderma spp. against soil borne plant pathogens.
Annals Pl. Prot. Sci., 21: 197-198.
Ravindra, H., Kenchangowda, P. V., Sehgal, M. and
Shivanna, S. (2013). Evaluation of groundnut
germplasm for resistance against root-knot nematodes.
Pakistan J. Nematol., 31: 179-181.
Ravindra, H., Sehgal, Mukesh, Manu, T. G., Murali,
R. and Narasimhamurthy, H. B.(2013). First Incidence
of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on onion
in Karnataka. Indian J. Nematol., 43: 233-234.
Sardana, H. R., Bhat, M. N. and Sehgal, M. (2013).
Evaluation and validation of non-chemical IPM and
INM technology for bell pepper (Capsicum annum var
frutescens L). through farmers' participatory apporach.
Indian J. Ent., 75: 127-131.
Sardana, H. R., Kanwar, Vikas, Bhat, M. N. and Singh,
R. V. (2013). Farmers' driven approach for field
implementation and economic analysis of IPM
technology in tomato. Indian J. Ent., 75: 185-188.
Singh, M., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S. and Pandey, N.
(2013).Effect of systemic fungicides, culture media,
temperature and pH on growth of Sclerotinia
sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary causing white mold of
chickpea. Annal. Pl. Prot. Sci., 21: 136-139.
Srivastava, D. S., Sehgal, Mukesh, Dweivedi, B. K. and
Singh. S. P. (2013). Identification of safer chemical for
the management of root knot nematode. Pestic. Res. J.,
32: 105-108.
Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2013). Fruit crops as
alternate hosts of cotton mealybug. Annal. Pl. Prot. Sci.,
21: 434-436.
Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2013). Seasonality
and severity of cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis
Tinsley on vegetable crops. Annal. Pl. Prot. Sci., 21:
265-269.
Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2014). Ornamental
hosts of cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis). Indian
J. Agric. Sci., 84: 161-163.
Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2014). Spices as host
crops of cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. Annal.
Pl. Prot. Sci., 22: 191-192.
Yadav, M. S., Singh, N., Singh, S., Ahmad, N. and
Godika, S. (2013). Assessment of prevalence and severity
of Sclerotinia rot of Indian mustard in Rajasthan and
Haryana. Indian J. Pl. Prot., 41: 243-252.
103
NCIPM
iqLrd
Book
lgxy] eqd's k ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2013A egRoiw.kZ iz{ks=

esa vkbZih,e rFkk Hkkjr esa iwoksZ kj ioZrh; {ks= dh ckxokuh
Qlys]a jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh] 134 ihih-
Sehgal, Mukesh and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). IPM

on important field and horticultural crops of NEH
region in India, NCIPM, New Delhi. pp 134.
rduhdh lekpkj&i=k@iQksYMj@yksdfiz; ys[k
Technical bulletins/Folders/Popular articles
vgwtk] Mh] ch-] HkV] ,e- ,u- ,oa flag] vkjoh- 2014A
vxsrh Qwy xksHkh ,oa canxksHkh es lesfdr uk'khtho izca kuA
izlkj i=d la-a 27] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA
Ahuja, D. B., Bhat, M. N. and Singh, R.V. (2014). Ageti

phool gobhi avam bandhgobhi men samiket nashijiv
prabhadan. Extension folder No. 27, (Hindi), NCIPM,
New Delhi.
vgwtk] Mh- ch-] flag] vkjoh-] lDlsuk] ,l- ih- 'kekZ] gsera ]
dkyfj;k] th- ch-] iokj] lrh'k ,oa iVsy] ,u-] 2014A
vYQklks ,oa dslj vke dh iztkfr;ksa esa fVdk uk'khtho
izca kuA izlkj i=d la-a 28] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA
vgwtk] Mh- ch-] flag] vkjoh-] lDlsuk] ,l- ih] 'kekZ] gsera ]
dkyfj;k] th- ch-] iokj] lrh'k ,oa iVsy] ,u-] 2014A
nf{k.kh xqtjkr ds fy, vke ds ckxksa esa v{kq..k uk'khtho
izca ku] izlkj i=d la-a 13] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA
Hkxr] ,l-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] dqekj] lquhy] lSuh] euh"k jatu]
,oa pV~Vksik;k; lh- 2014A pus es yxus okys uk'khthoksa
dh lfp= iqLrdA izlkj i=d laa- 22] jklukizds] ubZ
fnYyhA
fcjkg] vtark] vgen] tehj ,oa f=ikBh] vkj- ,l- 2013A
kku dh Qly esa pwgk fu;a=.k] [ksrh] flrEcj] ihih 32pUnz'ks[kj] ds-] xqIrk] vks-] ;sy's ksVV~ h ,l-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr]
,l-] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] lgxy] ,e-] dqekjh] ,-] vejlsu] ,ulq'khy] ,l- ,u-] flUgk] ,- ds-] vkljs] vkj-] diwj] ds- ,l-]
lR;xksiky] ds- ,oa t;kdqekj] ih- 2014A pus ds fy,
lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku iSdt
s ] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh }kjk
izdkf'kr] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn rFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e]
gSnjkckn] ihih 43bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh 2013 dk ki lSi ckxokuhA
Qyksa dsyk] vke vkSj vukj ds uk'khthoA bZ&uk'khtho
fuxjkuh ,oa uk'khtho laca/kh lykg% ki lSi Mh- chvgwtk }kjk laikfnr] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh vkSj jkT; ckxokuh
foHkkx] f"k vk;qDr] iq.ks] ,e- ,l- ihih 67xMs] vkj- ,e-] raoj] vkj- ds-] t;dqekj] ih-] daoj] oh-] fcjkg]
vtark] flag] ,l- ih- ,oa flag] vej 2014A dikl esa ikh
ykyiu ,oa mldk izc/a ku] rduhdh cqyfs Vu 33] jklukizd]s
ubZ fnYyh] ihih 16-
104
Ahuja, D. B., Singh, R. V., Saxena, S. P., Sharma,

Hemant, Kalria, G. B., Pawar, Satish and Patel, N.,
(2014). Alphanso avm Kesar aam ki prajatiyon mey tikau
nashijeev prabandhan. Extension folder No.28, (Hindi),
NCIPM, New Delhi.
Ahuja, D. B., Singh, R. V., Saxena, S. P., Sharma,
Hemant, Kalria, G. B., Pawar, Satish and Patel, Nilesh,
(2014). Sustainable pest management in mango orchards
for southern Gujarat, Extension folder No.13,
NCIPM, New Delhi.
Bhagat, S., Sharma, O. P., Kumar, Sunil, Saini, Manish
Ranjan, and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Chane mein
lagne vale nasheejeevon ki sachitr pustika. Extension
folder 22 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.
Birah, Ajanta, Ahamd, Jamir and Tripathi, R.S. (2013).
Dhan ki fasal mein chuha niyantran (in hindi), Kheti,
September, pp 32.
Chandrashekar, K., Gupta, O., Yelshetty, S., Sharma,
O. P., Bhagat, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Sehgal, M.,
Kumari, A., Amaresan, N., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K.,
Asre, R., Kapoor, K.S., Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar,
P. (2014). Integrated pest management package for
chickpea. Published by NCIPM, New Delhi,
DPPQ&S, Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 43
CROPSAP (Horticulture) Team of E pest surveillance
(2013) Pests of Fruits (Banana, Mango and
Pomegranate)-E-Pest Surveillance and Pest Advisory:
CROPSAP (Horticulture) (ed. D.B. Ahuja) Jointly
published by National Centre for Integrated Pest
Management, New Delhi and State Department of
Horticulture, Commissionerate of Agriculture, Pune,
M. S. pp 67.
Gade, R. M., Tanwar, R. K., Jeyakumar, P., Kanwar,
V., Birah, Ajanta, Singh, S. P. and Singh, Amar (2014).
Kapas Mein Patti Lalpan Evam Uska Prabandhan,
Technical Bulletin 33, NCIPM, New Delhi, pp 16.
dqekj] laxhr] dqekj] izn;~ eq u] csuk] tqxy fd'kksj] 'ks[kj] ,e]

lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] flUgk] ,- ds-] vkljs jke] diwj] ds- ,l] 'kekZ]
vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] lgxy] ,e-] Hkwifr] Vh-] vejlsu] ,u-]
pV~ V ks i k;k;] lh-] lR;xks i ky] ds - ,oa t;dq e kj]
ih- 2014A eDdk ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku iSdt
s A
jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn rFkk
,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr] ihih 44-
Kumar, Sangit, Kumar, Pradyumn, Bana, Jugal Kishor,

Shekhar, M., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre Ram,
Kapoor, K. S., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Sehgal, M.,
Boopathi, T., Amaresan, N., Chattopadhyay, C.,
Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar, P. (2014). Integrated
pest management package for maize. Published by
NCIPM, New Delhi, DPPQ&S, Faridabad and
NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 44.
eksgu] ,l-] eksx

a k] Mh-] dqekj] fj"kh] ukxzkjs] oh-] xksDVs] uafnuh]
osfuyk] ,l-] raoj] vkj- ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] lkse's oj]
vxzoky] ehuw] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] dqekj] jkds'k] fcjkg vtark
vejlsu ,u-] flag vej] lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] vkljs jke] diwj] ds,l-] t;kdqekj] ih- ,oa lR;xksiky] ds- 2014 dikl ds fy,
lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku iSdt
s A jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w
,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn rFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr]
ihih 84-
Mohan, S., Monga, D., Kumar, Rishi, Nagrare, V.,

Gokte, Nandini, Vennila, S., Tanwar, R. K., Sharma,
O. P., Bhagat, Someshwar, Agarwal, Meenu,
Chattopadhyay, C., Kumar, Rakesh, Birah Ajanta,
Amaresan N., Singh Amar, Sushil S. N., Asre Ram,
Kapoor K. S., Jeyakumar, P. and Satyagopal, K. (2014).
Integrated pest management package for cotton.
Published by NCIPM, New Delhi, DPPQ&S,
Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 84.
izdk'k] vkuan] csra jw ] ts- ,l-] Jhfuokl] izlkn] ,e-] raoj] vkjds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] lkse's oj] lgxy] eqd's k] flag] ,l- ih-]
flag] eksfudk] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] lq'khy] ,l- ,u] flUgk] ,ds- vkljs ,e- ,oa tSu] vkj- ds- 2014A f'keksxk dukZVd esa
pkoy tM+ foxyu lw=fe] esykMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk dh
lQyrk xkFkkA izlkj i=d dUuM+ Hkk"kk esa A {ks=h; f"k ,oa
ckxokuh vuqla kku dsUnz] f"k ,oa ckxokuh foKku fo'ofo|ky;]
f'keksxk & 577225 dukZVdA
jfoUnz] ,p-] lgxy] eqd's k] euq] Vh- th-] eqjyh] vkj-] ujflagkeqjFkh
,p- ch-] ysBk ,e- ,oa tSu] vkj- ds- 2014A f'keksxk dukZVd
esa pkoy tM+ foxyu lw=fe] esykMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk dh
lQyrk xkFkkA izlkj i=d dUuM+ ,oa vaxt
zs h Hkk"kk esa A
{ks=h; f"k ,oa ckxokuh vuqla kku dsUnz] f"k ,oa ckxokuh
foKku fo'ofo|ky;] f'keksxk & 577225 dukZVdA
lkfcj] uosn] flag] ch-] lqfeFkk] vkj-] glu] ,e-] raoj] vkj-ds] vkgqtk] Mh-ch- ,oa cEckokys] vks-,e- 2014A Hkkjr esa xzhugkml
uk'khthoksa ij bZ&cqyfs Vu% vk/kkjHkwr xEHkhjrk] rduhdh if=dk]
jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA
lkfcj] uosn] flag] ,-ds-] ,oa glu] ,e-] 2014A xzhugkml
[khjs esa lesfdr uk'khtho izc/kau] rduhdh if=dk izdk'ku
jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA ihih 8
ljnkuk] ,p- vkj-] HkV~V] ,e- ukjk;.ku ,oa lkfcj] ,u2014A VekVj dh Qly esa lesfdr uk'khtho izca kuA izlkj
i=d la- 30A jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh 110012lgxy] eqd's k] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] ukxpu] ,l- oh- ,oa nkk]
,e- ,u- 2013A uk'khtho ekxZnf'kZdkA jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh
16 ihih-
Prakash, Anand, Bentur, J. S., Srinivas, Prasad, M.,

Tanwar, R. K., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, Someshwar,
Sehgal, Mukesh, Singh, S. P., Singh, Monika,
Chattopadhyay, C., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre,
Ram, Kapoor, K. S., Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar,
P. (2014). Integrated pest management package for rice.
Ravindra, H., Mukesh, Sehgal, Manu, T. G., Murali,
R., Narsimhamurthy H. B., Latha M. and Jain, R. K.
(2014). Success story of rice roo- knot nematode
Meloidogyne graminicola in Shimoga (Karnataka).
Extension folder (In Kannad). Zonal Agricultural and
Horticultural Research Station, University of
Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shimoga 577225 (Karnataka).
Sabir, Naved, Singh, B., Sumitha, R., Hasan, M.,
Tanwar, R.K., Ahuja, D.B. and Bambawale, O.M.
(Eds). E-Bulletin on Greenhouse Pests in India: Baseline
Reflect Serious Buildups 2012 publ. 2014 published by
National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New
Delhi - 110012
Sabir, Naved, Singh, A.K. and Hasan, M., (2014)
Greenhouse Kheere mein Nashijeev Prabandhan
Takneeki Patrika, NCIPM, New Delhi, pp 8.
Sardana, H. R., Bhat, M. Narayana and Sabir, N. (2014).
Tamatar ki fasal mein samekit nashijeev prabandhan.
Extension folder No. (Hindi), NCIPM, New Delhi
Sehgal Mukesh, Chattopadhyay, C., Nagchan, S. V.
and Dutta, M. N.(2013). Pest Guide. NCIPM, New
Delhi, pp 16.
105
NCIPM
lgxy] eqd's k] vjksMk+ ] lqfe=k] JhokLro] Mh- ,l- ;kno]
vejh'k flag] lkSjHk] euh"k dqekj fc'ku] flag] 'kSyUs nz dqekj]
vjksMk+ ] lat; ,oa HkV~Vkpk;Z] vuwi 2013A kku ihM+dksa ds
izkfrd 'k=q] dsohds&II] lhrkiqj] dfV;k] ihih 8A
lgxy] eqd's k] vjksMk+ ] lqfe=k] JhokLro] Mh- ,l-] ;kno]
vejh'k flag] lkSjHk] euh"k dqekj fc'ku] flag 'kSyUs nz dqekj]
vjksMk+ latho ,oa HkV~Vkpk;Z] vuwiA 2013A kku es lw=fe
izca ku] dsohds&II] lhrkiqj] dfV;k] ihih 8A
lgxy] eqd's k] pV~Vksik;k;] lh-] cksjk] chlh-] pV~Vksik;k;]
ch- ,u- Hkxorh] ch ,oa tSu] vkj- ds- 2014A vle esa tM+
foxyu lw=fe] esykMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk dh lQyrk xkFkkA
izlkj i=d ua- 31] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA 6 ihih'kekZ] ,- ,u-] xqIrk] th- ds-] oekZ] vkj- ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr]
,l-] vejlsu] ,u-] lSuh] ,e- vkj- pV~Vksik;k;] lh] lq'khy]
,l- ,u] vkljs] vkj-] diwj] ds- ,l-] lR;xksiky] ds- ,oa
t;kdqekj] ih- 2014A lks;kchu ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho
izca kuA jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn
rFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr] ihih 41'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] flag] eksfudk] dqekj] lquhy]
oSf..kyk] ,l- ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A ewx
a ,oa mM+n
esa yxus okys uk'khthoksa dh lfp= iqfLrdkA izlkj i=d
17 fgUnh] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA
'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] flag] eksfudk] oSf..kyk] ,l- ,oa
pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A pus esa LdysjksfVfu;k jksx ,oa
mldk izc/a kuA izlkj i=d 16 fgUnh] jklukizd-s ] ubZ
fnYyhA
'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] dqekj] lquhy] ,oa
pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A vjgj esa cka>iu jksx ,oa bldk
izc/a kuA izlkj i=d 19 fgUnh] jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA
'kekZ] vks- ih-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] Hkxr] ,l-] dqekjh] viZ.kk ,oa
pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A Qyh cs/kd dhV ,oa bldk
izc/a ku izlkj i=d 18 fgUnh] jklukizd-s ] ubZ fnYyhA
'kekZ] vks- ih-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] Hkxr] ,l-] dqekjh] viZ.kk]
dqekj] lquhy ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A vjgj esa yxus
okys uk'khthoksa dh lfp= if=dkA izlkj i=d 15 fgUnh]
jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyhA
'kekZ] vks- ih-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] Hkxr] ,l-] dqekjh] viZ.kk] dqekj]
lquhy ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A vjgj dh fpkhnkj
ikh Nsnd dk izc/a kuA izlkj i=d 14 fgUnh] jklukizd]s ubZ
fnYyhA
106
Sehgal, Mukesh, Arora , Sumitra, Srivastav, D. S.,

Yadav, Ambrish Singh, Sourabh, Manish Kumar
Bishen, Singh, Shailender Kumar, Arora, Sanjay and
Bhattacharya, Anoop. (2013). Dhan mein sutrkrimi
prabandhan, (Hindi), KVK-II, Sitapur, Katia, pp 8.
Sehgal, Mukesh, Arora, Sumitra, Srivastav, D. S., Yadav,
Ambrish Singh, Sourabh, Manish Kumar Bishen, Singh,
Shailender Kumar, Arora, Sanjay and Bhattacharya,
Anoop (2013). Dhan peedikon ke prakartik shatru,
(Hindi), KVK-II, Sitapur, Katia, pp 8
Sehgal, Mukesh, Chattopadhyay, C., Bora, B. C.,
Choudhay, B. N., Bhagwati, B and Jain, R. K. (2014).
Success story of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne
graminicola in Assam. Extension folder No.31.
NCIPM, New Delhi, pp 6.
Sharma, A. N., Gupta, G. K., Verma, R. K., Sharma,
O. P., Bhagat, S., Amaresan, N., Saini, M. R.,
Chattopadhyay, C., Sushil, S. N., Asre, R., Kapoor,
K. S., Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar, P. (2014).
Integrated pest management package for soybean.
Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Singh, Monika, Kumar, Sunil,
Vennila, S. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Moong evam
urad mein lagne vale nasheejeevon ki sachitr patrika.
Extension folder 17 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.
Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Singh, Monika, Vennila, S.
and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Chane mein sclerotinia
rog evam uska prabandhan. Extension folder 16 (Hindi).
NCIPM, New Delhi.
Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Vennila, Kumar, Sunil and
Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Arhar mein baanjhpan
masaic rog evm iska prabandhan. Extension folder 19
(Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.
Sharma, O. P., Vennila, S., Bhagat, S., Kumari, Arpana
and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Phali bedhak keet evam
iska prabandhan. Extension folder 18 (Hindi). NCIPM,
New Delhi.
Sharma, O. P., Vennila, S., Bhagat, S., Kumari, Arpana,
Kumar, Sunil and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Arhar
mein lagne vale nasheejeevon ki sachitr patrika.
Extension folder 15 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.
Sharma, O. P., Vennila, S., Bhagat, S., Kumari, Arpana,
Kumar, Sunil and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Arhar ki
chittidar patti chedak ka prabandhan. Extension folder
14 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.
flag] ljkst] fr:eyk;klSeh] ihih-] gjh'k] th-] nkk] jke]

lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] flUgk] ,- ds-] vkljs jke] diwj] ds- ,l-]
lR;xksiky] ds- t;dqekj] ih- fcjkg] vtark] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr]
lkse's oj] oekZ] ih- oh-] dqekj] lq'khy] pV~Vksik;k;] lh- ,oa
;kno] ,e- ,l- 2014A ewx
a Qyh ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho
izca kuA jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn
rFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr] ihih 49flag] ,l- ds-] oekZ] ih- oh-] dqekj] vkj-] ;kno] ,e- ,l-]
vgen] ,u-] jsMM
~ h] ,y-] osd
a Vs'ojyw] lh-] oseUuk] ds-] T;ksrluk]
,u- ds-] tkkks] ds- ,l- ,oa tljks] ih- 2014A ewx
a Qyh es
lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku] izlkj i=d la-a 23] jklukizd]s ubZ
fnYyhA
;kno] ,e- ,l- vgen] ,u-] ;kno] Mh- ds-] flag] ts- ,y] oekZ]
ih- oh-] esFkk] ,u- ,oa pV~Vksik;k;] lh- 2014A ljlksa esa
lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku] izlkj i=d la-a 25] jklukizd]s ubZ
fnYyhA
izLrqr isVsaV
Singh, Saroj, Thirumalaisamy, P. P., Harish, G., Datta,

Ram, Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre, Ram, Kapoor,
K. S., Satyagopal, K., Jeyakumar, P., Birah, Ajanta,
Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, Someshwar, Verma, P. V.,
Kumar, Sunil, Chattopadhyay, C. and Yadav, M. S.
(2014). Integrated pest management package for
groundnut. Published by NCIPM, New Delhi,
DPPQ&S, Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 49.
Singh, S. K., Verma, P. V., Kumar, R., Yadav, M. S.,
Ahmad, N., Reddy, L., Venketshwalru, C., Vemanna,
K., Jyotarana, N. K., Jadho, K. S. and Jasrotiya, P.
(2014). Mungphalee mein samekeet nasheejeev
prabandhan, Extension folder No.23, (Hindi), NCIPM,
New Delhi.
Yadav, M. S., Ahmad, N., Yadav, D. K., Singh, S. K.,
Yadav, J. L., Verma, P. V., Mehta, N. and
Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Sarson mein samekeet
nasheejeev prabandhan, Extension folder No.25
(Hindi), NCIPM, New Delhi.
'kekZ] lR;orh] uk;d] lR;ukjk;.k] feRry] vkfnR;] lkfcj]

uosn] 'kekZ] vfHk"ksd 2014 iflyksekblht fyyksflul ds
jksxmRiUu esa cVksRrjh ds fy;s cuk;s x;s ,oa mlds ok;
iz;ksxA Hkkjrh; rduhdh laLFkku] fnYyh 110016 Hkkjr- vkosnu
la[;k 3590@Mhb,y@2013flag] lqjUs nz dqekj vkSj cEckoys] dk;kZy; Kkiu 2012A
dhVksa ds izcaku ds fy, ykbV VSi varjjk"Vh; fo'o
ckSf)d&laink laxBu C;wjks] vkosnu la[;k ihlhVhA@vkbZch
2012@050168] ftls fnukad 13 tuojh] 2012 dks ihlhVh ds
fy, tek fd;k x;k Fkk] ftls orZeku o"kZ ds nkSjku varjjk"Vh;
Lrj ij Lohdkj dj fy;k x;kA
flag] lqjUs nz dqekj vkSj cEckokys] vks- ,e-] dk;kZy; Kkiu
2012A isVVas ds fy, igys ls vkosnu fd, x, vkfo"dkj
ijthO;kHk ykokZ dhV ds iztuu ds fy, QhYM fdV ds fy,
,QbZvkj dk mkj izkIr gks x;k gS] Hkkjrh; isVVas vkosnu
fnukad 29 ekpZ 2012 la- 170@MhbZ,y@2007] bls isVVas
dk;kZy;] ubZ fnYyh esa ekpZ] 2013 esa tek fd;k x;k FkkA
Patents filed
jsfM;ks okrkZ
Radio talk
ljnkuk] ,p- vkj- 2014 fnukad 24 ekpZ] 2014 dks vkWy

bafM;k jsfM;ks] vkdk'kok.kh] jksgrd] gfj;k.kk ij ^lfCt;ksa
dh Qlyksa esa lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku* 'kh"kZd ij ,d
jsfM;ks okrkZ izLrqr dhA
Sardana, H. R. (2014). Delivered a radio talk on topic

entitled `Sabjion ki faslon mein samekit Nashijiv
Prabandhan' on 24 Mar 2014 on All India Radio,
Akashvani, Rohtak, Haryana.
Sharma, Satyawati, Naik, Satyanarayan, Mittal, Aditya,

Sabir, Naved, Sharma, Abhishek (2014). A Composition
for Enhancement of Pathogenicity of Paecilomyces
lilacinus and uses thereof. Indian Institute Technology,
Delhi-110016 India. Application No. 3590/Del/2013.
Singh, Surender Kumar and Bambawale, O.M. (2012)
"Light trap for managing insects" International Bureau
of the World Intellectual Property Organization,
Application No.:PCT/IB2012/050168, which was filed
on 13 Jan 2012 for PCT, the same had qualified at the
International level during the current year.
Singh, Surender Kumar and Bambawale, O.M. (2012).
The "FER" was replied for the already patented
invention "Field kit for the multiplication of insect
larval parasitoid" Indian Patent Application number
170/Del/2007 dated 29 March, 2012, this was submitted
to the Patent office, New Delhi in March, 2013.
107
NCIPM
lsfeukj] laxks"Bh] izf'k{k.k

,oa iqjLdkj
Seminars, Conferences, Trainings
and Awards
?kVuke dk uke
Name of the event
vofk
LFkku
izfrHkkxh
Duration
Venue
Participants
lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku ij ,e,,l,p,oh }kjk izk;ksftr varjjk"Vh; 21 vizy

S & 14 ebZ] 2013 flukMdks vkbZ,u,u,Mhlhvks
vkj ,aM Mh ikB~;e
21 Apr -14 May 2013 izf'k{k.k dsUnz] oksYdkuh] csV Mkxu]
MASHAV Sponsored International R& D Course on Integrated
rsy voho] bt+jkbZy
,e- ,l- ;kno

eqds'k lgxy
M.S. Yadav
Mukesh Sehgal
Pest Management
CINNADCO's Training
Centre Volcani, Bet Dagan,
Tel Aviv, Israel.
^Qly vkkkfjr uk'khthoksa ,oa [kjirokjksa ds tSfod fu;a=.k ij 24&25 ebZ] 2013
vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor vuqla kku ifj;kstuk* dh okf"kZd lewg cSBd 24-25 May 2013
,uch,vkbZvkbZ] cSx
a yq#
vtark fcjkg
NBAII, Bangaluru
Ajanta Birah
ljnkj dq'khuxj nkarhokMk

d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;] ,l-ds-uxj
nkarhokMk
ulhe vgen
Annual Group Meeting of All India Co-ordinated Research

Project on Biological Control of Crop Pests and Weeds
Ckhloha vf[ky Hkkjrh; ljlksa vuql/a kku dkexkj lewg cSBd
5&7 tqykbZ] 2013
20th All India Group meeting on Rapeseed Musted Research
5-7 July 2013
Nasim Ahmad
Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada
Agricultural University, S.K.
Nagar, Dantiwada
f"k vuqla kku izca ku ij iqu'p;kZ ikB~;e
15&27 tqykbZ] 2013
ukeZ] gSnjkckn
vtark fcjkg
Refresher Course on Agricultural Research Management
15-27 Jul 2013
NAARM, Hyderabad
Ajanta Birah
lewg cSBd fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & pkoy
26 tqykbZ] 2013
jklukizd]s ubZ fnYyh
Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics-Rice)
26 Jul 2013
NCIPM, New Delhi
,l- osfuyk
vkj- ds- raoj
,l- ih- flag
fujatu flag
S. Vennila
R.K. Tanwar
S.P. Singh
Niranjan Singh
Qy eD[kh ij izfrHkk mUu;u dk;Ze ,oa dk;Z'kkyk
27 tqykbZ] 2013
,uch,vkbZvkbZ] cSx
a yq#
Mh- chvgwtk
Fruit Fly Brainstorming and Workshop
27 Jul 2013
NBAII, Bengaluru
D.B. Ahuja
izkS|ksfxdh dk okf.kT;hdj.k vkSj uoizorZu izca ku
29 tqykbZ &1 vxLr] 2013 vkbZ,lch] gSnjkckn
,l- ds- flag
Technology Commercialization and Innovation Management
29 Jul-1 Aug 2013
ISB, Hyderabad
S.K. Singh
lewg cSBd fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & vjgj
30 tqykbZ] 2013
Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics Pigeonpea)
30 Jul 2013
NCIPM, New Delhi
,l- osfuyk
vks- ih- kekZ
,l- Hkxr
108
lsfeukj] laxks"Bh] izf'k{k.k ,oa iqjLdkj | Seminars, Conferences, Trainings and Awards
?kVuke dk uke
Name of the event
vofk
LFkku
izfrHkkxh
Duration
Venue
Participants
fujatu flag
S.Vennila
O.P. Sharma
S. Bhagat
Niranjan Singh
uk'khtho ds [krjksa ds fo'ys"k.k ij varjjk"Vh; izf'k{k.k
2&6 flrEcj] 2013
,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn
International Training on Pest Risk Analysis
2-6 Sep 2013
NIPHM, Hyderabad
vtark fcjkg
,l- Hkxr
Ajanta Birah
S. Bhagat
oSf'od xSi ekud ij cMs+ iSekus ij O;olk; ds fy, bZ&yfuZx

dkslZ
10&12 flrEcj] 2013

10-12 Sep 2013
jk"Vh; mRikndrk ifj"kn]

ubZ fnYyh
uosn lkfcj
Naved Sabir
National Productivity Council,

New Delhi
e-Learning Course on GLOBAL GAP standard for great

marketing Access
eDdk gkbfczM ij jk"Vh; ijh{k.k dk;Ze
21 flrEcj] 2013
Programme on National Demonstration on Maize Hybrids
21 Sep 2013
eDdk vuqla kku funs'kky;]

ubZ fnYyh
vatrk fcjkg
Ajanta Birah
Directorate of Maize Research,

New Delhi
Hkk-d`-vuq-la-] ubZ fnYyh
,l- Hkxr
IARI, New Delhi
S. Bhagat
2 vxLr] 2013
2 Aug 2013
NCIPM, New Delhi
fuk ewx
a Qyh Vhe ds
lHkh ,lksfl;sV
Qly ds [krjukd jksxksa ds fy, gkWLa V&iSFkkstu ck;ks,tsVa baVjsD'ku

dh f;kfofk dks le>us ds fy, lh,,QVh dkV izf'k{k.k
24 flrEcj &
14 vDVwcj] 2013
CAFT Training on Understanding of Mechanism of HostPathogen-Bio-agent Interaction and Sustainable Management

Strategy for Threatening Crop Diseases
24 Sep -14 Oct 2013
lewg cSBd fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & ewx

a Qyh
Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics Groundnut)
All associates of
NICRA Groundnut
team
lewg cSBd fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & VekVj
6 vxLr] 2013
Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics Tomato)
6 Aug 2013
NCIPM, New Delhi
fuk VekVj Vhe ds

lHkh ,lksfl;sV
All associates of
NICRA Tomato
team
,lth,l Vsfuax ds }kjk [kk| lqj{kk ij vxz.kh vkfMVj dh ;ksX;rk

izkIr dh
21&25 vDrwcj
21-25 Oct
Qualified as Lead Auditor through SGS Training - Lead Auditor

for Food Safety Management System ISO22000
,lth,l Hkkjr izk- fyxqM+xkao
uosn lkfcj
Naved Sabir
SGS India Pvt Ltd,

Gurgaon
ih,evkbZ,l ij izf'k{k.k dk;Ze
15&30 fnlEcj] 2013
vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh
Training Programme on PMIS
15-30 Dec 2013
IASRI, New Delhi
lHkh oSKkfud ,oa

izkklfud deZpkjh
All scientific and
administrative staff
eq[; Qlyksa esa mHkjrs jksxksa dh igpku djus ds fy, QyukRed

dk;Zuhfr;ksa ij jk"Vh; laxks"Bh
Hkk-d`-vuq-la-] ubZ fnYyh
13 Dec 2013
IARI, New Delhi
29 tuojh &
05 Qjojh] 2014
vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh
,l- osfuyk
IASRI, New Delhi
S. Vennila
M.S. Yadav
Nasim Ahmad
National Symposium Functional Strategies for Tracking

Emerging Diseases of Majors Crops
,l,,l dk iz;ksx djrs gq, MkVk fo'ys"k.k

Data Analysis Using SAS
,e- ,l- ;kno

ulhe vgen
13 fnlEcj] 2013
29 Jan-05 Feb 2014
109
NCIPM
?kVuke dk uke
Name of the event
21 oha lnh ds fy, usr`Ro % vjktdrk] la?k"kZ vkSj lkgl ij

varjkZ"Vh; f'k{k.k
vofk
LFkku
izfrHkkxh
Duration
Venue
Participants
02&07 Qjojh] 2014

02-07 Feb 2014
International Training on 'Leadership for the 21st Century:

Chaos, Conflict and Courage'
gkoZMZ dsuM
s h Ldwy] dSfEczt] la;q
jkT; vejhdk
lh- pV~Vksik;k;
C. Chattopadhyay
Harvard Kennedy School,

Cambridge, USA
f"k olar esyk
9&13 Qjojh] 2014
Krishi Vasant Mela
9 - 13 Feb 2014
dsUnzh; laLFkku dikl vuqla kku]

ukxiqj
Central Institute of Cotton
Research, Nagpur
Mh- chvgwtk

vks- ih- kekZ
vkj- ds- raoj
uosn lkfcj
,e- ,l- ;kno
,l- Hkxr
,l- ih- flag
D.B. Ahuja
O.P. Sharma
R. K. Tanwar
Naved Sabir
M.S. Yadav
S. Bhagat
S.P. Singh
varjkZ"Vh; lks;kchu vuqla kku lEesyu lks;dkWu & 2014
22&24 Qjojh] 2014
International Soybean Research Conference (SOYCON 2014)
22-24 Feb 2014
lks;kchu vuqla kku funs'kky;]

bUnkSj
fujatu flag
Niranjan Singh
Directorate of Soybean
Research, Indore
^baVjusV izkVs ksdkWy ot+Zu 6 vkbZihoh 6 ij lqxzkghdj.k dk;Z'kkyk
27 Qjojh] 2014
Sensitization Workshop on Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPV6)
27 Feb 2014
vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ,u,,llh
dkEIysDl] ubZ fnYyh
fujatu flag
Niranjan Singh
IASRI, NASC Complex,

New Delhi
iqjLdkj ,oa lEeku

vgwtk] Mh- ch- 2014- dhV&foKku vuqla kku la?k vkjlh,]
mn;iqj rFkk MkW- vkj- ih- JhokLro Le`fr QkmUMs'ku] mn;iqj]
jktLFkku }kjk fnukad 07 tuojh] 2014 dks o"kZ 2013 ds fy,
MkW- vkj- ih- JhokLro Le`fr jk"Vh; iqjLdkj iznku fd;k x;kA
Hkxr] lkse's oj 2013- Hkkjrh; ikni jksx foKku laLFkk] ikni
jksx foKku izHkkx] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] iwlk] ubZ fnYyh }kjk ,e- dsiVsy ;qok oSKkfud iqjLdkj 2013 iznku fd;k x;kA
MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k; 2014- dksydrk esa fnukad 21 Qjojh]
2014 dks varjjk"Vh; laxks"Bh esa ^fdlkuksa ds vkthfodk dh
lqj{kk ds fy, Qly LokLF; izca ku% Hkkjr esa orZeku fLFkfr
rFkk laHkkouk,a* ij Hkkjrh; ekbdksykWthdy lkslkbVh ds
izkQ
s l
s j ,l- ch- pV~Vksik;k; Le`fr O;k[;ku izLrqrhdj.k
fd;k x;kA
MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k; 2014- iatkc f"k fo'ofo|ky;] yqfk;kuk
esa vk;ksftr jk"Vh; czkfldk lEesyu ds nkSjku fnukad 15&16
Qjojh] 2014 dks rksfj;k&ljlksa vuqlakku lkslkbVh
,Q,lvkj,evkj dh QSyksf'ki iznku dh xbZA
110
Awards/Recognition
Ahuja, D. B. (2014). Dr. R.P. Srivastava Memorial
National Award conferred by Entomological Research
Association RCA , Udaipur, and Dr. R.P.Srivastava
Memorial Foundation Udaipur Rajasthan, for the year
2013, 7 Jan 2014.
Bhagat, Someshwar. (2013). Awarded M. K. Patel
Young Scientist Award 2013 by Indian
Phytopathological Society, Division of Plant
Pathology, IARI, Pusa, New Delhi.
Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Delivered the Prof. S.B.
Chattopadhyay Memorial Lecture 2014 of the Indian
Mycological Society on 'Crop Health Management for
Livelihood Security of Farmers: Current Status and
Prospects in India', at the International Symposium
2014 on 21 Feb 2014 at Kolkata.
Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Fellowship of the Society
of Rapeseed-Mustard Research (FSRMR) at the
National Brassica Conference during 15-16 Feb 2014
at PAU Ludhiana.
dkfeZd | Personnel
dkfeZd
Personnel
MkW- lh- pV~Vksik;k;
funs'kd
Dr. C. Chattopadhyay
oSKkfud
Director
deZpkjh@SCIENTIFIC STAFF
MkW- Mh- chvgwtk
izkku oSKkfud f"k dhV foKku
Dr. D. B. Ahuja
Principal Scientist (Agril. Entomology)
MkW- vks- ih- 'kekZ
izkku oSKkfud ikni jksx foKku
Dr. O. P. Sharma
Principal Scientist (Plant Pathology)
MkW- ,p- vkj- ljnkuk
Dr. H. R. Sardana
MkW- vkj- ds- raoj
Dr. R. K. Tanwar
MkW- eqd's k lgxy
izkku oSKkfud lw=fe foKku
Dr. Mukesh Sehgal
Principal Scientist (Nematology)
MkW- Jherh ,l- osfuyk
Dr. (Mrs) S. Vennila
MkW- ,e- ukjk;.k HkV~V
Dr. M. Narayana Bhat
MkW- uosn lkfcj
izkku oSKkfud lw=fe foKku
Dr. Naved Sabir
Principal Scientist (Nematology)
MkW- lqjUs nz dqekj flag
Dr. Surender Kumar Singh
MkW- Jherh lqfe=k vjksMk+
izkku oSKkfud tSo jlk;u
Dr. (Mrs) Sumitra Arora
Principal Scientist (Organic Chemistry)
MkW- egsUnz flag ;kno
Dr. Mahender Singh Yadav
MkW- vkjoh flag
ofj"B oSKkfud f"k foLrkj
Dr. R. V. Singh
Senior Scientist (Agril. Extension)
MkW- ih- t; dqekj
ofj"B oSKkfud f"k dhV foKku 27 twu] 2012 ls

izfrfu;qfDr ij
Dr. P. Jeyakumar
Senior Scientist (Agril. Entomology) on deputation since

27 June 2012
MkW- vatrk fcjkg
ofj"B oSKkfud f"k dhV foKku
Dr. Ajanta Birah
Senior Scientist (Agril. Entomology)
MkW- lkse's oj Hkxr
ofj"B oSKkfud ikni jksx foKku
Dr. Someshwar Bhagat
Senior Scientist (Plant Pathology)
111
NCIPM
Jh fodkl daoj
oSKkfud f"k vkfFkZdh
Shri Vikas Kanwar
Scientist (Agril. Economics)
Jh fujatu flag
oSKkfud lax.kd vuqiz;ksx
Shri Niranjan Singh
Scientist (Computer Application)
Jh ,- ds- duksft;k
oSKkfud Hkwxksy v;;u gsrq NqV~Vh ij 07 tuojh 2013
Shri A. K. Kanojia
Scientist (Geography) on study leave w.e.f 07 Jan 2013
Jherh ehuk{kh efyd
oSKkfud f"k lkaf[;dh v;;u gsrq NqV~Vh ij 18

vDVwcj 2013
Mrs Meenakshi Malik
Scientist (Agril. Statistics) on study leave w.e.f 18 Oct 2013
Jh jkds'k dqekj
oSKkfud f"k dhV foKku
Shri Rakesh Kumar
Scientist (Agril. Entomology)
Jh ih- oh- oekZ
rduhdh deZpkjh@TECHNICAL STAFF

lgk;d eq[; rduhdh vf/kdkjh
Shri P. V. Verma
Asstt. Chief Technical Officer
Jh ,l- ih- flag
Shri S. P. Singh
MkW- ulhe vgen
Dr. Nasim Ahmad
Jherh uhye esgrk
rduhdh vfkdkjh
Mrs Neelam Mehta
Technical Officer
Jh lRksUnz
rduhdh lgk;d
Shri Satender
Technical Assistant
Jh fueZy dqekj
rduhdh lgk;d
Shri Nirmal Kumar
Technical Assistant
Jh v'kksd dqekj
rduhdh lgk;d
Shri Ashok Kumar
Technical Assistant
Jh lrh'k ckcw
rduhdh lgk;d
Shri Satish Babu
Technical Assistant
Jh ghjk yky ;kno
rduhdh lgk;d
Shri Hera Lal Yadav
Technical Assistant
Jh lqj's k iky
Okfj"B rduhf'k;u
Shri Suresh Pal
Sr. Technician
Jh ".k dqekj
iz'kklfud deZpkjh@ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF

ofj"B fok ,oa ys[kk vfkdkjh
Shri Krishan Kumar
Sr. Finance & Account Officer
Jh ,- ds- vxzoky
iz'kklfud vfkdkjh
Shri A. K. Agarwal
Administrative Officer
Jh ,e- vkj- 'kekZ
lgk;d iz'kklfud vfkdkjh
Shri M. R. Sharma
Asstt. Administrative Officer
Jh ,e- ds- eqykuh
lgk;d fok ,oa ys[kk vfkdkjh 24 vxLr 2013 ls
Shri M. K. Mulani
Asstt. Finance & Account Officer (w.e.f 24 Aug 2013)
Jh ch ckYehfd
lgk;d
Shri B. Balmiki
Assistant
112
dkfeZd | Personnel
Jh uonhi nkk
lgk;d
Shri Navdeep Datta
Assistant
Jh ch- ,l- rsofr;k
oS;fDrd lfpo
Shri B. S. Tewatia
Private Secretary
Jherh laxhrk eYgks=k
oS;fDrd lgk;d
Mrs Sangeeta Malhotra
Personal Assistant
Jherh vfuek yxqu

Mrs Anima Lugun
vk'kqfyfid xzM
s &III
Stenographer Grade III
Jh Hkwi's k pkSkjh
vij Js.kh fyfid
Shri Bhupesh Chaudhary
Upper Division Clerk
Jh iznhi dekj
vij Js.kh fyfid
Shri Pradeep Kumar
Upper Division Clerk
Jh lqj's k ;kno
vij Js.kh fyfid
Shri Suresh Yadav
Lower Division Clerk
dq'ky lgk;d deZpkjh@SKILLED SUPPORTING STAFF

Jherh f'kaxkjh nsoh
Jh jkt dqekj
Jh jktsUnz dqekj 'kkg
Jh mek 'kadj feJk
Jh lquhy dqekj
Jherh deyk
Jh egs'k dqekj
Jh n;ky pUn
Jherh lfjrk dqekjh
Mrs Shingari Devi

Shri Raj Kumar
Shri Rajendra Kumar Shah
Shri Uma Shankar Mishra
Shri Sunil Kumar
Mrs Kamla
Shri. Mahesh Kumar
Shri Dayal Chand
Mrs Sarita Kumari
inksUufr] fu;qfDr ,oa ifjorZu
Promotions, Recruitment and Fluxes
inksUufr
Promotions
MkW- ,e- ,l- ;kno] ofj"B oSKkfud ikni jksx foKku fnukad 01
tuojh] 2012 ls izkku oSKkfud ds in ij inksUur
Jh fujatu flag] oSKkfud lax.kd vuqi;
z ksx fnukad 31 vxLr]
2012 ls vkjthih ` 9000@& esa inksUur
Jh v'kksd dqekj] Vh&2 fnukad 17 tuojh] 2011 ls Vh&3 ds in
ij inksUur
Jh lrh'k ckcw] Vh&2 fnukad 30 tuojh] 2011 ls Vh&3 ds in ij
inksUur
Lo- Jh lat; pksiM+k] Vh&3 fnukad 05 Qjojh] 2011 ls Vh&4 ds
in ij inksUur
Joining
fu;qfDr
Jh jkds'k dqekj fnukad 11 vizSy] 2013 dks oSKkfud f"k dhV

foKku ds in ij fu;qDr fd, x,
Jh ghjk yky ;kno fnukad 13 twu] 2013 dks rduhdh lgk;d
Vh&3 ds in ij fu;qDr fd, x,
ifjorZu
MkW- Jherh ljkst flag] izkku oSKkfud ikni jksxfoKku fnukad

30 flrEcj] 2013 dks lsokfuo`k gqbA
Dr. M. S. Yadav, Sr. Scientist (Plant Pathology)

promoted to Principal Scientist w.e.f. 01 Jan 2012
Sh. Niranjan Singh, Scientist (Computer Application)
promoted RGP ` 9000/- w.e.f 31 Aug 2012
Sh. Ashok Kumar, T-2 promoted to T-3 w.e.f 17 Jan 2011
Sh. Satish Babu, T-2 promoted to T3 w.e.f 30 Jan 2011
Lt. Sanjay Chopra, T-3 promoted to T-4 w.e.f 05 Feb
2011
Sh. Rakesh Kumar joined as Scientist (Agril.

Entomology) on 11 Apr 2013
Shri Hera Lal Yadav joined as Technical Assistant
(T-3) on 13 June 2013.
Fluxes
Dr. (Mrs) Saroj Singh, Pr. Scientist (Plant Pathology)

superannuated on 30 Sep 2013
113
NCIPM
ctV
Budget
ctV
2013-14
Budget 2013-14
#- yk[k esa @ (` in lacs)
'kh"kZ
Lohr ctV
okLrfod O;;
Head
Sanctioned budget
Actual expenditure
xSj&;kstuk@Non-plan
548.00
526.00
;kstuk / Plan
131.50
131.26
dqy / Total
679.50
657.26
lalk/u l`tu
Resource generation
izkS|ksfxdh dh ykbZlfas lax
Licensing of technology
` 49.18
` 12.32
` 61.50
jktLo izkfIr;k
Revenue receipts
dqy
Total
114
y?kq:i | Abbreviations
y?kq:i
Abbreviations
,p,,uihoh
% gsyhdksoikZ vkfeZtsjk U;wfDy;j iksyh gsMjksfll

fo"kk.kq
% fdlku fof/k
vkbZVh,l
% baVjuy Vkl
a kbcM Lislj
,vkbZlhvkjih
% vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor vuqla kku ifj;kstuk
,uthvks
% xSj ljdkjh laxBu
Hkkvuqi
% Hkkjrh; f"k vuqlakku ifj"kn
chih,p
% Hkqjk Qqndk
,l,;w
% jkT; f"k fo'ofo|ky;
,ulhvkj
% jkt/kkuh ds ikl ds {ks=
chlh
% ykHk&ykxr
MCy;qVhvks
% fo'o O;kikj laxBu
lhvkjvkjvkb
% dsna zh; pkoy vuql/a kku laLFkku
,u,vkj,l
% jk"Vh; d`f"k vuql/a kku iz.kkyh
,vkj,l
% f"k vuqla/kku LVs'ku
chlhdsoh
% fc/kku pUnz f"k fo'ofo|ky;
dsohds
% f"k foKku dsUnz
vkbZlhVh
% lwpuk ,oa lapkj midj.k
bZVh,y
% vkfFkZd gkfu lhek&js[kk Lrj
,eih;w,Vh
% Ekgkjk.kk izrki d`f"k ,oa izkS|ksfxdh fo'ofo|ky;
ohihds,,l
% foosdkuan ioZrh; f"k vuqla kku laLFkku
vkbZVh,l
% vkarfjd VkLa kbcM Lislj
ih,;w
% iatkc f"k fo'ofo|ky;
,ulhchvkbZ
% jk"Vh; tSo izkS|ksfxdh dsUnz
,3ih
% laofkZr nygu mRiknu dk;Ze
vkbZ,vkjvkbZ
% Hkkjrh; d`f"k vuql/a kku laLFkku
,l,eMCY;w
% ekud ekSle foKku lIrkg
lhlh,l,p,;w
% pkS/kjh pj.k flag gfj;k.kk d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;
,,u,u
% f=e U;wjy usVodZ
,ldsvkj,;w
% Lokeh ds'kokuan jktLFkku d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;
,QokbZ,e
% xkscj dh [kkn
vkbZMh,e
% ,dhd`r jksx izc/a ku
okbZ,lch
% ihyk ruk cskd
,Q,Q,l
% fdlku ikB'kkyk
;w,,l
% f"k foKku fo'ofo|ky;
lhihlhVh
% lajf{kr [ksrh izkS|ksfxdh dsUnz
Mh,Vh
% jksikbZ ds ckn fnu
ksilSi
% Qly dhV fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj ifj;kstuk
,,;w
% vle f"k fo'ofo|ky;
th,eMh,p
% MkVk gSaMfyax lewg fof/k
,uvkbZ,lih,e
% jk"Vh; lwpuk iz.kkyh ds rgr bZ&uk'khtho

fuxjkuh
MhMCy;qvkj
% xsgaw vuql/a kku funs'kky;
bljks
% Hkkjrh; varfj{k vuql/a kku laxBu
Mh,,l
% cqokbZ ds ckn fnu
Mhvks,
% d`f"k foHkkx
,u,Q,l,e
% jk"Vh; [kk| lqj{kk fe'ku
Mhth
% egk funs'kd
vkbZvkbZihvkj
% Hkkjrh; nygu vuqla kku laLFkku
,ds,e;w
% f"k Kku izcaku bdkbZ
ts,udsoh
% tokgjyky usg: f"k fo'ofo|ky;
vks;w,Vh
% vksfM'kk d`f"k ,oa izkS|ksfxdh fo'ofo|ky;
,e,;w
% ejkBokMk f"k fo'ofo|ky;
,pokbZih,e
% v)Z&okf"kZd ifj;kstuk fuxjkuh
,l,e,l
% y?kq lan's k lsok
lh,l,;w,Vh
,l,eMh
% LVfjfyVh ekstd
s jksx
% panz 'ks[kj vktkn d`f"k ,oa izkS|ksfxdh

fo'ofo|ky;
,ulhvkbZih,e
% jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku dsUnz
vkbZih,e
% lesfdr uk'khtho izca ku
,Qih
115
NCIPM
,uch,vkbvkb
% jk"Vh; d`f"k egRoiw.kZ dhV C;wjks
lhvkj;wvkjvkj,l % dsUh; o"kkaZ vkSj la;=

a jkbl fjlpZ LVs'ku
Ms;j
% d`f"k vuqla/kku ,oa f'k{kk foHkkx
Mh,lh
% f"k vkSj lgdkfjrk foHkkx
,,uthvkj,;w
% vkpk;Z ,u-th- jaxk f"k fo'ofo|ky;
Mhvksihch ,aMth
% IykaV czhfMax vkSj tsufs VDl foHkkx
,ih,p;w
% vka/kz ns'k ckxokuh fo'ofo|ky;
Mhvkjvkj
% pkoy vuql/a kku funs'kky;
,lvkjch
% f"k oSKkfud p;u cksMZ
thdsohds
% xka/kh f"k foKku dsU
ch,ldsohoh
% ckck lkgsc lkoar dksd

a .k f"k fo|kihB
vkbZ,,lvkjvkb
% Hkkjrh; f"k lkaf[;dh vuql/a kku laLFkku
lhvks,
% f"k dyst
vkbZthdsohoh
% bafnjk xka/kh f"k fo'ofo|ky;
lhvkjvkbZMh,
% 'kq"dHkwfe f"k ds fy, dsa h; vuql/a kku laLFkku
116
y?kq:i | Abbreviations
A3P
: Accelerated Pulse Production Programme
GKVK
AAU
: Assam Agricultural University
AICRP
: All India Coordinated Research Project
AKMU
: Agriculture Knowledge Management Unit
ANGRAU
Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra
GMDH
Group Method of Data Handling
HaNPV
Helicoverpa armigera Nuclear Poly hedrosis

Virus
: Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University
HYPM
Half Yearly Progress Monitoring
ANN
: Artificial Neural Network
IARI
Indian Agriculture Research Institute
APHU
: Andhra Pradesh Horticultural University
IASRI
AP
: Andhra Pradesh
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research

Institute
ARS
: Agricultural Research Station
ICAR
ASRB
: Agriculture Scientists Recruitment Board
BCR
: Benefit Cost Ratio
BCKV
: Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya
BPH
: Brown Plant Hopper
BSKVV
: Baba Saheb Sawant Konkan Krishi

Vidyapeeth
CABI
ICT
Indian Council of Agricultural Research

Information and communication tools
IDM
Integrated Disease Management
IGKVV
Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya
IIHR
Indian Institute of Horticulture Research
IIPR
Indian Institute of Pulse Research
IIVR
Indian Institute of Vegetable Research
: Centre for Agricultural Biosciences

International
IPM
Integrated Pest Management
IRC
Institute Research Committee
CCPI
: Co-operating Centre Principal Investigator
ISRO
Indian Space Research Organization
CCS HAU
: Chaudhary Charan Singh Hisar Agricultural

University
ITS
Internal Transcribed Spacer
JNKVV
Jawaharlal Nehru KrishiVishwaVidyalaya
CG
: Chhattisgarh
KA
Karnataka
COA
: College of Agriculture
KVK
Krishi Vigyan Kendra
CPCT
: Centre of Protected Cultivation Technology
MAU
Marathwada Agricultural University
CRIDA
: Central Research Institute for Dryland

Agriculture
MLP
Multi-Layer Perceptron
CROPSAP
: Crop Pest Surveillance and Advisory Project
MLR
Multiple Linear Regression
CRRI
: Centre for Rice Research Institute
MoA
Ministry of Agruculture
CRURRS
: Central Rainfed and Upland Rice Research

Station
MPKV
Mahatama Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth
MPUAT
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture

and Technology
MS
Maharashtra
NAARM
National Academy of Agricultural Research

Management
NARS
National Agricultural Research System
NASC
National Agricultural Science Centre
NBAII
National Bureau of Agriculturally Important

Insects
NCBI
National Centre for Biotechnology
NCIPM
National Centre for Integrated Pest

Management
NCR
Near Capital Region
NFSM
National Food Security Mission
NGO
Non-governmental Organization
NICRA
National Initiative on Climate Resilient

Agriculture
NIPHM
National Institute of Plant Health

Management
NISPM
National Information System for Pest

Management
CSAUA&T : Chandra Shekhar Azad University of

Agriculture and Technology
CYMMIT
: International Maize and Wheat Improvement

Centre
DAC
: Department of Agriculture and Cooperation
DAP
: Days After Planting
DARE
: Department of Agricultural Research and

Education
DAT
: Days After Transplanting
DG
: Director General
DOA
: Department of Agriculture
DOPB&G
: Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics
DRR
: Directorate of Rice Research
DWR
: Directorate of Wheat Research
ETL
: Economic Threshold Level
FFS
: Farmer Field Schools
FP
: Farmers practices
FYM
: Farm Yard manure
GJ
: Gujarat
117
NCIPM
NPRC
National Pulse Research Centre
SAD
OUAT
Odisha University of Agricultural and

Technology
SAU
State Agricultural University
SKRAU
Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural

University
Sterility Mosaic Disease
PAU
Punjab Agricultural University
PB
Phytophthora Blight
SMD
State Agriculture Department
PB
Punjab
SMS
Short Message Service
PBND
Peanut Bud Necrosis Disease
SMW
Standard Meteorological Week
PCI
Pest Control (India)
TN
Tamil Nadu
PDKV
Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth
TNAU
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University

Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute
PI
Principal Investigator
TRRI
PME
Priority Setting, Monitoring, and Evaluation
UAS
University of Agricultural Sciences
PNN
Polynomial Neural Networks
UP
Uttar Pradesh
PRA
Participatory Rural Appraisal
VPKAS
QRT
Quinquennial Review Team
Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan

Sansthan
RAC
Research Advisory Committee
WB
West Bengal
White Backed Plant Hopper
RARS
Regional Agriculture Research Station
WBPH
RBF
Radial Basis Function
WTO
World Trade Organization
Yellow Stem Borer
Zonal Agricultural Research Station
RCER
Regional Centre for Eastern Region
YSB
RRS
Regional Research Station
ZARS
118

Ar2013 14 PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Ar2013 14 PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

jk"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnz

Okkf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

Annual Report 2013-14

Mk- fpjaru pV~Vksik/;k;

nwjHkk"k@ Telephone No.

:ijs[kk ,oa eqnz.k

eSllZ jkW;y vkWQlsV fizUVlZ] ,&89@1 ujk;.kk b.MfLV;y ,fj;k] Qsl&1

Design & Printed at

M/s Royal Offset Printers, A-89/1 Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I

ANNUAL REPORT 20132014

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

take immense pleasure to present the Annual

okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

ecological health, sustainable agricultural growth.

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

"Vh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaku dsUnz jklukizds ds

ynthesis, validation and dissemination of IPM

Validation of integrated pest management (IPM)

greatly affected microbial population in soil and water

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

jassids> leaf reddening > whiteflies >thrips. Pest

pest status of any given sap feeder.

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

uxj xqtjkr esa ;qlfs j;e eqj>ku ikbZ xbZA o`)kpye

spot at Moinabad (AP) and Rahuri (MH) during kharif.

Site-specific IPM module comprising application

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

ANNUAL REPORT 20132014

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

lkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.k

vU; vuqla kkfud xfrfofk;ka

ekuo lalkku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.k

lqfokk,a vkSj ?kVuke

Facilities and Events

vuqla kkfud ifj;kstuk,a

lsfeukj] laxksBh] izf'k{k.k ,oa iqjLdkj

okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

ANNUAL REPORT 20132014

Qlyksa esa uk'khtho lef"V dks vkfFkZd gkfu Lrj bZVh,y

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a scientific

okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

control agents and botanicals. IPM practices also

"Let New India arise--out of the peasants'

ANNUAL REPORT 20132014

okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

ANNUAL REPORT 20132014

Bambawad (Uttar Pradesh)

okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

uk'khtho dk izdksi@izkfrd 'k=qk

and FP fields. Samples of grains at harvest were also

Pest incidence /Natural enemies

ANNUAL REPORT 20132014

dhVuk'kd vof'k"Vksa dk fo'ys"k.k

Pesticide residue analysis

fdlkuksa dh fofk ,Qih

dqy ykxr (`/gs-)@Total cost (`/ha.)

vkSlr mit fDo-@izfr gs-@Mean yield (q/ha)

'kq) ykHk (`/gs-)@Net returns (`/ha.)

ykxr%ykHk vuqikr@Benefit:Cost ratio

dhVuk'kd fNM+dko@Pesticide sprays (range)

pkoy dk ewY; `3800@& izfr fDoa- Rate of paddy ` 3800/- per q