Sei sulla pagina 1di 77

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 77

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

*
*
*
*
*
v.
*
*
*
NICHOLAS SKVARLA,
*
*
Defendant.
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Docket No. 09-CR-6147

Buffalo, New York


August 14, 2012
1:57 p.m.

10
11
12

TRANSCRIPT OF NON-JURY TRIAL CONTINUED


BEFORE THE HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

13
14
15
16

APPEARANCES:
For the Plaintiff:

MARISSA J. MILLER, ESQ. and


AARON J. MANGO, ESQ.

For the Defendant:

JOHN R. PARRINELLO, ESQ.

Court Reporter:

YVONNE M. GARRISON, RPR


Official Court Reporter
U.S.D.C., W.D.N.Y.
2 Niagara Square
Buffalo, New York 14202
716-861-7568

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 2 of 77


Proceedings

1
2

THE CLERK:

Criminal Action 2009-6147A, United States

Nicholas Skvarla, continuation of non-jury trial.

3
4

Counsel, please state your name and the party you


represent for the record.

MS. MILLER:

MR. PARRINELLO:

Marissa Miller for the government.


John Parrinello, representing the

defendant Nicholas Skvarla.

THE COURT:

Well, Mr. Parrinello, I guess you're up.

MR. PARRINELLO:

I'm up, yes, Your Honor.

And my

10

only problem is the witness I intend to call is apparently,

11

according to Ms. Miller, delayed.

12

MS. MILLER:

Your Honor, I spoke with him

13

approximately 20 minutes ago, and he said he'd gotten caught up

14

at the Williamsville tolls, but was past them and expected to

15

be here.

16

MR. PARRINELLO:

Your Honor, before we leave, can we

17

take up a scheduling matter --

18

THE COURT:

19

MR. PARRINELLO:

20

Obviously we're at the position of the beginning and

21

Sure.

presumably the end of the defense case today.

22

THE COURT:

23

MR. PARRINELLO:

24
25

-- perhaps?

Okay.
Which will be followed by a renewal

of the 29 motion and then ultimately a summation.


THE COURT:

Okay.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 3 of 77


Proceedings

MR. PARRINELLO:

And I've told Ms. Miller that I'm

prepared to do the witness today, I'm not prepared to do a

summation today.

4
5

THE COURT:

Okay.

MR. PARRINELLO:

THE COURT:

MR. PARRINELLO:

12

MR. PARRINELLO:

13

THE COURT:

Sure.
Can we -- can we do it Monday?

Let's see.

How long will your summations

be just so I have an idea?

15

MR. PARRINELLO:

16

MS. MILLER:

Forty-five minutes.

I imagine at the very most, 20 minutes,

Your Honor.

18

THE COURT:

19

MS. MILLER:

20

THE COURT:

21

I'd probably need a day or two just

to get prepared.
THE COURT:

17

Is the Court on

Yeah.

11

14

Today is the 14th.

trial?

10

When would you be available for

the summation?

6
7

2:00 on Monday.
The 20th.
All right.

Let me know when the witness

arrives.

22

(A recess was taken at 2:05 p.m.)

23

THE COURT:

24

MR. PARRINELLO:

25

THE COURT:

Mr. Parrinello, are we ready?

Okay.

Yes, Your Honor.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 4 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

1
2

MR. PARRINELLO:

The defense calls Deputy Kron as its

witness.

THE CLERK:

your last name for the record.

5
6

Please state your full name and spell

THE WITNESS:

My full name is David Kron, K-R-O-N.

Sworn.

DAVID KRON, SWORN,

THE COURT:

All right.
DIRECT EXAMINATION

10

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

11

Q.

Good afternoon, Deputy.

12

A.

Good afternoon, sir.

13

How are you?

14

Q.

I'm fine, thank you.

15

A.

Good.

16

Q.

Just to start out with, it's my understanding that you

17

work for the Monroe County Sheriff's Department for a number of

18

years; is that correct?

19

A.

Yes, sir, that's correct.

20

Q.

And then there was a period of time that you acted both as

21

a deputy for the Monroe County Sheriff's Department and as a

22

task force officer on loan to the FBI?

23

A.

Yes, sir, that's correct.

24

Q.

And I also understand that is -- you no longer are in a

25

TFO, task force officer, status with the FBI, are you?

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 5 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

A.

That is correct.

I am no longer in that status.

Q.

And as far as being a deputy with the Monroe County

Sheriff's Department, is -- are you retiring as of today?

A.

As of 5 p.m. today, yes.

Q.

So this is your last day?

A.

This will be my last day.

Q.

And it's my understanding that you are taking a position

abroad?

A.

That is -- yes, that's my intention.

10

Q.

Okay.

11

County Sheriff's office, how long -- well, when did you begin

12

serving as a Monroe County deputy?

13

A.

14

was in a part-time capacity.

15

1993.

16

Q.

17

today and informed her today that there came a time in 1997 --

18

at least she's made me aware of it and you made her aware of it

19

today -- that you were formally disciplined for giving an

20

incomplete answer to a superior officer; is that correct?

21

A.

22

that's correct.

23

Q.

24

taken against you in a capacity as a Monroe County sheriff?

25

A.

Now, with respect to your position with the Monroe

I began in 1990.

I believe it was October of 1990.

That

I was hired full-time early of

And I understand you had a conversation with Ms. Miller

It was '97 or '98.

Okay.

I don't know exactly which year, but

Any other disciplinary actions in your capacity --

None, none whatsoever.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 6 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

Q.

How about as a task force officer with the FBI?

A.

No.

Q.

Now, did there come a time in January of 2006, that you

had a -- an assignment with the Monroe County Sheriffs office

that you began monitoring the internet?

A.

Yes, that is correct.

Q.

Now, prior to that time, what, if any, training did you

have with respect to internet surveillance?

A.

Well, the position was entitled proactive online

10

investigations.

I was placed in that position January of 2006,

11

and I received training following my appointment, and that

12

would have been with the State Police Internet Crimes Against

13

Children Task Force.

14

Q.

15

training commence?

16

A.

17

of 2006, perhaps.

18

Q.

19

basically in two capacities, one of them was an enticement

20

investigator, correct?

21

A.

Yes.

22

Q.

And can you explain to the Judge what an enticement

23

investigator is?

24

A.

25

online investigations of enticement of children.

And when did -- was that training -- when did that

That was approximately -- I don't recall exactly -- March

And as far as your internet experience, you were assigned

That's not the title we use, but I was assigned to conduct


And

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 7 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

essentially what that boiled down to is I went online and I

would have the persona of a 14-year old child and simply

communicate with others online, and -- and open an

investigation if one of the individuals I communicated with

attempted to meet that child, my persona, for sexual purposes.

Q.

deputy for the purposes of inducing people to make contact with

you for sexual purposes, underage people?

A.

I don't understand the question.

10

Q.

Okay.

11

A.

Yes, sir.

12

Q.

You would get online and you would portray yourself as an

13

underage individual, correct?

14

A.

That is correct, yes.

15

Q.

Male or female, or both?

16

A.

More often than not female.

17

Q.

And of course what you were doing on the internet was not

18

true, right?

19

A.

20

asking.

21

Q.

Right.

22

A.

Yes, sir.

23

Q.

And you were also engaged in a peer-to-peer -- in a

24

peer-to-peer investigative role, correct?

25

A.

Okay.

So you were portraying yourself as other than a

As far as the enticement investigative portion?

I was not an underage female, if that's what you're

That came at a later point in that assignment, but yes.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 8 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

Q.

beginning of January, 2006, am I right?

A.

There weren't two assignments, sir, if I may clear it up.

Q.

Sure.

A.

I was assigned for the purpose exclusively of, as you put

it, portraying an underage child on the internet.

assignment involved two other forms of investigations, I would

say, approximately mid 2007, to include file sharing of

peer-to-peer investigations.

And but these two assignments took place after the

The

10

Q.

And that assignment was mid 2007?

11

A.

It was the same assignment, but the duties evolved to that

12

approximately mid 2007, yes.

13

Q.

14

investigations, that is investigating computer crimes by

15

proactive participation or investigation, is that -- is that

16

accurate?

17

A.

That is accurate, yes, sir.

18

Q.

And with respect to the peer-to-peer is it -- what -- is

19

it fair to say that you went online -- well, let me back up a

20

moment.

21

So safe to say that you were engaged in computer crime

Were you the only Monroe County Sheriff deputy assigned to

22

these tasks?

23

A.

Yes.

24

Q.

During that period of time, 2006 to, say, March 13th of

25

2008?

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 9 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

A.

investigations, yes, sir.

Q.

was your work schedule?

A.

10 p.m. at night.

Q.

How many days a week?

A.

Five days a week, Monday through Friday.

Q.

And so it's safe to say that Saturday and Sunday, as far

Yes, I was the only person assigned to online

And -- and how many -- during that period of time, what

Typically when I began it was 2 in the afternoon until

10

as the sheriffs department was concerned, that there was no

11

Monroe County Sheriff's deputy involved in computer crime

12

investigations, correct?

13

A.

14

weekends, that is correct.

15

Q.

16

investigations, you would go online and you would look for

17

people committing crimes using the internet; is that right?

18

A.

It's very broad, but yes.

19

Q.

And, sir, with respect to that portion of your duties, did

20

you understand what the internet was?

21

A.

Yes, yes, I did.

22

Q.

What was the internet?

23

A.

Again, that's a very broad question.

24
25

With a few exceptions where I would come in on the

Okay.

And with respect to your peer-to-peer

Specifically, what do you mean?


mean?

What are you referring to, sir?

What functionality do you

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 10 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

Well, what is the internet?

10

Q.

Can you tell the Judge what

the internet is?

A.

point that enables computers all over the world to communicate

through a number of protocols.

Q.

Does it have a source from which it emanates?

A.

There is no main source.

Q.

Okay.

source from which the internet operates?

The internet is a network, a worldwide network at this

When you say "no main source", is there a secondary

10

A.

11

function, internet service providers.

12

themselves are all over the world, privately owned, publicly

13

owned.

14

of assistance from internet service providers and other

15

networks.

16

Q.

Does any identifiable company operate the internet?

17

A.

As a whole, no, sir.

18

Q.

Does -- is there any identifiable company which controls

19

what is carried on the internet?

20

A.

21

There are -- there are services that allow the internet to

It essentially is just on its own, with the exception

Again, that's very general.


You mean in this country or worldwide?

22

Q.

Anywhere.

23

A.

I imagine --

24
25

These computers

THE COURT REPORTER:


please?

Excuse me.

Can you repeat that,

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 11 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

THE WITNESS:

Can you repeat the question?

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

internet itself?

A.

There is not, not to my knowledge.

Q.

Do you know when the internet came into being?

A.

It originated, I believe, in the '50s for military

purposes.

Q.

And where did you learn that?

10

A.

Probably the internet.

11

Q.

You learned it came into existence -- the internet came

12

into existence in the '50s, and you learned that from the

13

internet?

14

A.

15

for military purposes, and I believe that was in the '50s.

16

That is my belief.

17

Q.

18

Yes, sir.

11

Is there any individual that controls the

The basic principles we had.

The technology into existence.

It was -- it was developed

And -- I'm sorry.


Did you take any -- by the way, how far did you go in

19

school?

20

A.

21

complete it.

22

credits.

23

Q.

24

Community College in Rochester, New York --

25

A.

I -- I went to Monroe Community College.

I did not

I was there at -- I have about 70 college

So you went through high school and then to Monroe

Yes, sir, that's correct.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 12 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

12

Q.

-- but didn't complete the curriculum, right?

A.

That is correct.

Q.

What curriculum were you in when you were in Monroe

Community College?

A.

Criminal justice.

Q.

Criminal justice?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And then any portion of that training or that course study

involve the internet?

10

A.

Not to my recollection, no.

11

Q.

Then after the Monroe Community College experience, did

12

you then become a Monroe County Sheriff's deputy?

13

A.

Yes, yes, sir.

14

Q.

And did -- you said that you went just for training

15

concerning the internet?

16

A.

I had been at training, yes.

17

Q.

Where was that?

18

A.

I had been in multiple locations.

19

Q.

Well, let me put it this way:

20

of, say, July of 2008 --

21

A.

Okay.

22

Q.

-- where did you attend any formal training regarding the

23

internet?

24

A.

25

Children Task Force that is a state police organization

Between 2006, and the end

I attended training through the Internet Crimes Against

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 13 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

13

specializing in exploitation of children.

Q.

How long did that course last?

A.

It was -- I believe there were a couple courses that

lasted a few days a piece.

Q.

A few days a piece?

A.

Yes.

Q.

So from January, 2006, until July, 2009, would you say

that your total experience regarding the internet was six days?

A.

I believe it was probably more than that.

I don't recall

10

exactly.

11

Q.

You don't recall?

12

A.

No, sir.

13

Q.

Okay.

14

investigating peer-to-peer -- doing a peer-to-peer

15

investigation?

16

A.

Yes, sir, I believe I was.

17

Q.

And a peer-to-peer investigation, the shorthand for it is

18

P-2-P, right?

19

A.

Yes, it's often referred to that way.

20

Q.

Pardon?

21

A.

Yes, sir.

22

Q.

Now, a P-2-P or peer-to-peer network, do you know what

23

that is?

24

A.

Yes, sir, I do.

25

Q.

And is that a -- where multiple users all over the world

Now, on March 13th, 2008, were you online that day

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 14 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

download a piece of software that enables them to share any

type of computer files?

A.

Yes, yes, I believe it is.

Q.

Now, there are certain programs associated with

peer-to-peer investigations, correct?

A.

There is several, yes.

Q.

Okay.

A.

A version of -- a version of LimeWire is available for

peer-to-peer investigations, yes.

14

And would I be correct -- is LimeWire one of them?

10

Q.

How about BearShare, B-E-A-R, Share?

11

A.

To my knowledge, nobody uses BearShare for investigations.

12

Q.

Well, is that a program associated with peer-to-peer

13

investigations?

14

A.

15

my knowledge, uses that software.

16

Q.

Did you use that software?

17

A.

BearShare, no, sir.

18

Q.

Okay.

19

A.

What is the question about Shareaza?

20

Q.

Is that a program associated with peer-to-peer

21

investigations?

22

A.

It's a program publically available.

No investigator, to

How about Shareaza?

It's a -- yes.

23

THE COURT:

What's that called?

24

MR. PARRINELLO:

25

THE COURT:

Okay.

Shareaza, S-H-E-R-E-A-Z-A (sic).

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 15 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

Am I pronouncing it correct?

A.

I always pronounce it Shareaza.

THE COURT:

THE WITNESS:

What does that word mean?


It's just a name given by the

developers to the software.

THE COURT:

THE WITNESS:

15

Okay.
I don't know that it has meaning, sir.

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

10

Q.

11

investigations from, say, 2007, to March 13th, 2008?

12

A.

13

Now, did you use Shareaza in your peer-to-peer

I'm a little confused on what you mean by used it.


Did I use it on my computer in my office; is that what

14

you're asking me?

15

Q.

To conduct peer-to-peer investigations.

16

A.

No, sir, never used Shareaza.

17

Q.

How about FrostWire?

18

A.

I have never used that on my computer for investigations.

19

Q.

But that is a program associated with peer-to-peer

20

investigations; isn't it?

21

A.

It can be, yes.

22

Q.

But you didn't use it?

23

A.

No, sir.

24

Q.

How about Morpheus?

25

associated with peer-to-peer investigations called Morpheus?

Did you use a software program

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 16 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

16

A.

I have not used Morpheus in these investigations.

Q.

Are there any others that I haven't mentioned, any other

software programs that are existing in that period of time from

2007, when you began the peer-to-peer investigations, to March,

13th, 2008?

A.

P-H-E-X; and I can't think of any others at this time.

Q.

conducted, what software did you use?

Yes.

There's Kazaa, K-A-Z-A-A; there's Phex, that's

And in your peer-to-peer investigations that you

10

A.

I used a version of LimeWire.

11

Q.

A version?

12

A.

That's correct.

13

Q.

How many versions of LimeWire were there in that period of

14

time for you to choose from?

15

A.

16

each software as it's upgraded, developed and approved becomes

17

a version, a new version.

18

Q.

All right.

19

A.

Not to be confused with the version I use.

20

was created for law enforcement purposes.

21

confuse the version with the average -- the common man

22

definition of version.

23

Q.

24

peer-to-peer computer investigations, you were using the

25

version that was specifically created for law enforcement

For me to choose from there was only -- well, by version

This version

So I don't want to

So when you said you used a version of LimeWire in your

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 17 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

purposes?

A.

Yes, sir, I was.

MR. PARRINELLO:

Excuse me.

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

network using search terms consistent with child pornography

images and videos?

A.

Yes, sir, I did.

Q.

And in other words, you were conducting searches on the

Now, on March 13th, 2008, did you log onto the Gnutella

10

Gnutella network, correct?

11

A.

That is correct, yes.

12

Q.

What is a Gnutella network?

13

A.

Gnutella network is the name given to a network commonly

14

used for peer-to-peer, also referred to as a protocol.

15

Q.

As what?

16

A.

As a protocol.

17

Q.

Protocol?

18

A.

Yes, sir.

19

Q.

And Gnutella is G-N-U-T-E-L-L-A.

20

Now, where did you learn to use the Gnutella network?

21

A.

22

or the software we were just discussing?

23

Q.

24

onto the Gnutella network.

25

17

Can you repeat or rephrase the question?

No.

Gnutella network

You said that on March 13th, 2008, that you logged

THE COURT:

How do you spell that?

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 18 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

MR. PARRINELLO:

18

G-N-U-T-E-L-L-A.

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

Correct?

A.

Yes, that's correct.

Q.

And how did you know to log onto that network?

A.

Well, that network is the only network available to the

LimeWire version I was using.

that network.

choice when using the software.

So it automatically logs onto

And I didn't -- I don't select a network by

10

Q.

And the Gnutella network is part of the internet?

11

A.

You know, it's -- it uses the internet for communication,

12

yes.

13

Q.

It does?

14

A.

Yes.

15

Q.

So this -- logging onto Gnutella was not your choice, but

16

it was because you were using a certain -- a version of

17

LimeWire which automatically connected you to the Gnutella

18

network; is that what you're saying?

19

A.

20

peer-to-peer software.

21

peer-to-peer software I was using, utilizes the Gnutella

22

network.

23

Correct.

Gnutella was a commonly used network for


The software I was using, the

So it was an unconscious decision that morning to use the

24

Gnutella network.

25

that.

It was simply the software I use utilizes

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 19 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

Q.

You said that morning.

A.

You know, I still get up in the morning, sir.

Q.

We all hopefully do, yes.

A.

Correct.

Q.

Now, my point is you said that morning.

you working -- did you log onto the Gnutella network using

LimeWire the morning of March 13th, 2008?

A.

that day -- I didn't get up that day and make a conscious

I thought you work from 2 to 10?

I don't recall the time.

Were you -- were

My point being I didn't wake up

10

decision to log onto the Gnutella network.

11

software available to me which so happens to utilize the

12

Gnutella network.

13

19

I simply used the

So I'm saying it wasn't -- I didn't have a choice of the

14

networks to chose from.

That network works with the software

15

that I use to firm my investigations.

16

Q.

And that was per the protocol, correct?

17

A.

The Gnutella network is a protocol.

18

Q.

Is a protocol?

19

A.

Yes.

20

Q.

Yes.

21

Gnutella, to introduce search terms which were consistent with

22

child pornography images and videos; is that correct?

23

A.

Yes, it is.

24

Q.

Can you tell the Judge how you do that?

25

physically -- in other words, you turning your computer on;

And so what you do is you used that network,

How did you

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 20 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

you're on LimeWire.

A.

click the LimeWire icon which would open the GUI or the user

interface for the software.

So how do you do it?

20

How do you --

Well, assuming my computer is already on, I would double

At that point I would tell the software to connect to the

Gnutella network.

At which point it would go out and connect

to ultrapeers.

Q.

connected with the Gnutella network what search term you

Ultrapeers handled the searches.

And do you remember on March 13th, 2008, when you

10

introduced that was consistent with child porn images and

11

video?

12

A.

I don't recall specifically which term I used.

13

Q.

Okay.

14

A.

That's one I frequently, use, yes.

15

Q.

And can you tell the Judge what that means?

16

A.

Yeah, that's an acronym for preteen hardcore.

17

Q.

Preteen hardcore?

18

A.

Yes, sir.

19

Q.

Would you use 12-year old?

20

A.

12 YO was something that I would use, yes.

21

Q.

Okay.

22

March 13th, 2008, what search term you used to conduct your

23

investigation, correct?

24

A.

I don't recall.

25

Q.

Okay.

One of the terms would be P-T-H-C, correct?

And just specifically, you just don't remember on

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 21 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

21

A.

I'm quite certain it's documented, but I don't have that

documentation in front of me.

Q.

I understand.

A.

In this case, the search terms that are already inputted.

I'm able to create a list of search terms that I frequently

use, and there is a button basically within the software that

automatically uses those search terms.

Q.

had previously created?

So you type in the search term, correct?

So it's a timesaver.

So they're predesignated search terms in LimeWire that you

10

A.

Designated by me, but, yes.

11

Q.

Designated by you?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

Okay.

14

A.

At that point I had -- I had received training from

15

individuals with the FBI in Buffalo, as well as some online

16

training on how to use.

17

investigations you learn --

18

Q.

Okay.

19

A.

-- you learn what terms are associated with the files of

20

interest per se.

21

Q.

22

retrieve results from the Gnutella network, correct?

23

A.

Yes, that's correct.

24

Q.

Now, the results of your introducing the search terms into

25

LimeWire onto the Gnutella network, the results, positive

And where did you learn how to use search terms?

And additionally as I conducted these

And the purpose of typing in the search terms is to

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 22 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

results, that is -- that is responses to these search terms,

could come to you from anywhere in the world, correct?

A.

Correct, yes.

Q.

Now, you couldn't tell specifically exactly where they

were coming from, could you?

A.

How specific are you referring?

Q.

Well, if you put -- let's try an example.

City?

22

State?

If you put 12 YO in and you got a hit?

A.

Okay.

10

Q.

Could you tell where it was coming from?

11

A.

I could tell at that point the city and state within

12

20 miles with 85 percent accuracy.

13

THE COURT:

14

THE WITNESS:

15

old.

16

investigations.

12 YO is an abbreviation for 12 years

It's a term commonly seen in child pornography

17

THE COURT:

18

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

19

Q.

20

What's 12 YO?

Okay.

Okay.

I just want to retreat to write it down.

You could tell the city and the state?

21

A.

Yes, sir.

22

Q.

Okay.

23

A.

If I recall correctly, it is within 20 miles of a city and

24

state.

25

it, with 85 percent accuracy.

Within what?

That being the -- the file or the result, as you put


Thus, giving me the ability to

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 23 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

approximate the location.

Q.

error, correct?

A.

At that point in the investigation, yes, sir.

Q.

Okay.

affect the state from which it was coming, correct, that

milage?

A.

referring to.

And you used 85 percent.

So there is 15 percent room for

And within 20 miles of a city and state, that could

It could traverse state lines, if that's what you're

10

Q.

Well, it could or it couldn't, correct?

11

A.

Correct.

12

Q.

Like Erie, Pennsylvania could really -- if 20 miles you

13

could be in New York State, right?

14

A.

Yes.

15

Q.

Okay.

16

when you were doing your P-2-P investigation, you had several

17

hits, correct?

18

23

And in what you did is -- is on March 13th, 2008,

Am I right -- is hits the right word?

19

A.

What are you referring to, responses based on the key

20

word?

21

Q.

Yeah.

22

A.

Yes, I nearly always get several hits or responses.

23

Q.

Okay.

24

of your search to locations near Rochester, New York, didn't

25

you?

And that day you specifically reviewed the results

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 24 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

24

A.

Yes, I would have.

Q.

In other words, what you were interested in would be among

the responses you got, and because you were a Monroe County

Sheriff's deputy in the State of New York, you were most

interested in the results of that search that were in or near

the City of Rochester, New York, correct?

A.

would be more accurate.

Q.

Okay.

10

A.

It was, and for operational reasons.

11

Q.

When you say "operational reasons", that means a follow-up

12

to the results so that you could potentially locate where the

13

hit had come from to get an IP address that would lead to a

14

search warrant that would lead to a search of the -- of the

15

location from which the hit came from, correct?

16

A.

17

further away it was the location we were looking at

18

geographically the more difficult, of course, it is for us to

19

investigate just due to the distance.

Well, correct, in or near the County of Monroe, I think

Okay.

And was that for jurisdictional reasons?

I'm not sure I understand all that.

20

THE COURT:

21

THE WITNESS:

However, you know,

Where it came from or where it went to?


Where we would be responding to to --

22

to investigate the suspicious -- the files of child pornography

23

or believed child pornography or videos, that sort of thing.

24
25

For example, we wouldn't investigate a case that came


out of Miami, Florida because my boss wouldn't approve us all

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 25 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

25

driving to Miami, Florida.

So the further away it is, the more

difficult it became for us.

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

How about Connecticut?

A.

In all likelihood, no.

Q.

How about Pennsylvania?

A.

We have done investigations in Northern Pennsylvania, yes.

Q.

In that time period -- so you would have to get -- in

terms of results that you got, using the methodology you

10

described, LimeWire, to Gnutella, using the search term in the

11

hits or results you got, you would sort them out in -- as far

12

as locations, correct?

13

A.

14

Monroe County.

15

Q.

Monroe County?

16

A.

Correct.

17

Q.

Okay.

18

is you could ID what they'd call an IP address of the person or

19

persons offering the file for copying purposes, correct?

20

A.

21

repeat that for me.

22

Q.

Okay.

23

A.

Yes, sir.

24

Q.

And let's limit it to Monroe County.

25

A.

Okay.

I was primarily interested in locations in and around

One of the things that you did is in this process,

I'm sorry.

You're going to -- you're going to have to

Sure.

Sure.

When you're getting the results --

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 26 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

26

Q.

Because that's what your concentration was about?

A.

Right.

Q.

The thing that you would get, you wouldn't get a name and

address, would you?

A.

No, sir.

Q.

What you would get as a result would be what they call an

IP address, correct?

A.

That is correct.

Q.

Okay.

And that IP address would be connected to a

10

location offering the file, correct?

11

A.

That is correct, yes.

12

Q.

And on March 13th, 2008, as you were conducting your

13

investigation, you identified files being shared by IP address

14

74.34.196.66, correct?

15

A.

16

is the correct IP.

17

Q.

18

where the -- where the address was that was offering the files

19

for coping?

20

A.

The physical address?

21

Q.

Yes.

22

A.

The numerical address, no, sir, we couldn't make that

23

point.

24

Q.

Or the name or persons that was associated with that IP?

25

A.

That's correct, we could not.

I can't say for sure without reviewing my report if that

Okay.

It sounds correct.

And with that information alone, you could not tell

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 27 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

Okay.

27

Q.

On that day and associated with that IP address,

there were numerous files that had search terms with -- I'm

sorry -- there were numerous files with search terms that were

consistent with child pornography, correct?

A.

Correct.

Q.

And did you download those files?

A.

I downloaded some of the files, as I recall.

Q.

And from viewing the downloaded -- or from viewing the

internet or the downloaded files, you made some determination

10

that some of the files that emanated from that IP address, that

11

74 IP address, were videos of children under 17 engaged in

12

sexual acts, correct?

13

A.

Correct.

14

Q.

Now, what standard did you use in making a determination

15

that what appeared on the downloaded files on March 13th, 2008,

16

from that IP address --

17

A.

Okay.

18

Q.

-- were indeed under the age of 17?

19

What did you use?

20

A.

Just by visually inspecting those files, watching the

21

videos, looking at the pictures, and seeing if they appeared,

22

to me, to be under 17 years of age, and engaged in sexual acts.

23

Q.

Was it clear that they were engaging in sexual acts?

24

A.

I don't recall the specific files on that date, but I

25

would not have continued my investigation had they not.

So

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 28 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

28

clearly there was something there that made me believe that,

yes.

Q.

the name of the term -- but you had no formal training with

respect to determining the age of somebody around the age of

17, did you?

A.

No, I had no formal training.

Q.

And with respect to these downloaded files on March 13th,

2008, did you -- did you share that information -- the

Okay.

But you had no formal training -- I don't even know

10

downloaded images, did you share that with anybody else asking

11

any professional opinion concerning the ages or age of the

12

children -- strike that -- age or ages of the individuals

13

engaging in sexual acts?

14

A.

15

that, no.

16

Q.

17

than determining that the images came from the -- the territory

18

area, area of Monroe County, could you tell whether or not any

19

of those images had crossed state lines?

20

A.

I don't understand the question.

21

Q.

Just by looking at the picture.

22

A.

At which point?

23

Q.

Yeah.

24

A.

Or at any point in time?

25

Q.

During your download.

No, I don't believe I would have.

Okay.

I would have not done

Now, at that stage before going any further, other

Could I tell if --

You mean during my download?

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 29 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

29

A.

No, and it's my belief that they would not have crossed

state lines.

Q.

The ones that you downloaded?

A.

The ones I downloaded, right.

Q.

And are you as certain as the statement you made it was

your belief that they did not cross state lines, that is the

images you downloaded?

A.

Okay.

Q.

Are you of the same firm belief that they had not crossed

10

international boundaries?

11

A.

During my download?

12

Q.

Yes.

13

A.

As they were downloaded from the IP address you just

14

mentioned to me, I have no reason to believe they crossed

15

international boundaries.

16

Q.

17

the images, through the process you've described, there is a

18

protocol or methodology to identify the actual address from

19

which those downloaded images came, correct?

20

A.

That is correct, yes, sir.

21

Q.

Okay.

22

IP address, you then put that IP address into ARIN or MaxMind,

23

correct?

24

A.

That's correct.

25

Q.

And ARIN is an acronym for American Registry for Internet

Now, once you -- on March 13th, 2008, once you downloaded

And correct me if I'm wrong, is once you have the

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 30 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

30

Numbers, correct?

A.

Yes, sir.

Q.

Now, and MaxMind ID'd the city and state of the IP

address, correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And by putting that IP -- by putting that IP address into

ARIN, did you do that on March 13th, 2008?

A.

sometimes use MaxMind.

I don't recall.

Okay.

I will -- I will sometimes use ARIN or


There are times that I would use both.

10

Q.

But on March 13th, 2008, it's safe to say you used

11

one or the other, or both, with respect to the IP address

12

74.34.196.66, correct?

13

A.

That's correct.

14

Q.

And the purpose of doing that -- am I correct, the purpose

15

of putting that IP address into one of the those web sites was

16

to find out which internet service provider was handling that

17

IP address, correct?

18

A.

19

owned that IP address.

20

Q.

21

that the internet service provider handling that IP address was

22

Frontier Communications, correct?

23

A.

24

giving me is what's reflected in my report.

25

Q.

Yes, which internet service provider essentially leased or

And when IP 74.34.196.66 was put into ARIN, you discovered

Correct.

Yes, sir.

And I'm assuming that the IP address you're

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 31 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

A.

Okay.

Q.

I can assure you I'm not misrepresenting you.

A.

Okay.

Q.

The address.

A.

Thank you.

Q.

Okay.

31

Then, yes, that's correct.

I appreciate that.
And I took that exactly from your report.

MS. MILLER:

Your Honor, just to clarify the record

here so that Mr. Parrinello is not testifying, perhaps we could

refresh the witness's recollection with his report.

10

MR. PARRINELLO:

Oh, sure.

Absolutely.

11

THE COURT:

12

(A recess was taken at 3:00 p.m.)

We'll take a five-minute recess.

13

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

14

Q.

15

did I put a 1 there?

16

A.

You did not.

17

Q.

I'm sorry.

18

Ms. Miller, in front of you.

19

is?

20

A.

21

that was completed during the course of this investigation.

22

Q.

23

the IP address that I've been using.

24

document, sir, and if you want I'll read off the IP address

25

I've been using, and read it to yourself, and then let us know

Still, Deputy Kron, I have marked as Defense Exhibit 1 --

Yes, sir.

Defense Exhibit 1, at the request of


Can you tell the Judge what that

This is a -- a copy of my original crime report

And one of the issues that's come up is the accuracy of


Would you look at that

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 32 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

whether or not that document refreshes your recollection that

the IP address that I have been using is accurate in terms of

the IP address that you obtained during your downloading

process on March 13th, 2008?

74.34.196.66.

refresh your recollection?

A.

Yes, that is the correct IP address.

Q.

Thank you.

32

The number I've been using is: IP

Would you look at the document?

Now, does that

You could just set that aside.

10

And I believe we're at the stage of by using ARIN or

11

MaxMind, and inputting the IP address that we've just referred

12

to, that you determined Frontier was the internet service

13

provider for that IP address, correct?

14

A.

Correct.

15

Q.

And the next process, and I'm talking about process, is

16

that you would obtain -- based upon your receipt of images from

17

that IP address, and knowing that Frontier was the service

18

provider, to obtain a subpoena that would be served on Frontier

19

in order to obtain the name and address of the subscriber to

20

that IP address, am I correct?

21

A.

You are correct, yes.

22

Q.

And the other thing, just in an abundance of caution,

23

which you did in this case, once you found out the name and

24

address of the person who was the subscriber to that IP

25

address, you would then double-check that with the DMV records,

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 33 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

33

correct?

A.

internet-related, so I'm trying to understand what the question

just was.

Q.

correct?

A.

Yes, we would -- we would --

Q.

Not we, sir; you?

A.

Well, yes.

Of the -- DMV records certainly don't reflect anything

Well, could confirm that that person's name and address is

When I say "we", I mean generally speaking.

10

But, yes, I would check DMV records, among other records, to

11

determine that the name of the subscriber corresponded with

12

other public records.

13

Q.

14

Missing and Exploited Children to run an Accurint, a data

15

manning company, correct?

16

A.

Accurint, yes.

17

Q.

A-C-C-U -- is it R or V?

18

A.

R-I-N-T.

19

Q.

R-I-N-T.

20

And the next step would be to use the National Center For

Okay.

And did you do that?

21

A.

Yes, I believe I did.

22

Q.

Okay.

23

based upon the information you had gathered, the name and

24

address, you would then apply, fill out an application for a

25

search warrant to search the premises that -- that Frontier had

And once that was done, then what you would do is,

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 34 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

34

supplied, right?

A.

Correct, yes.

Q.

Now, on March 13th, 2008, did you go through -- following

that date, did you go through all those steps which led you to

obtain a search warrant for the -- for Nick Skvarla, 165

Forgham, F-O-R-G-H-A-M, Road, Rochester, New York?

A.

Yes, yes, I did.

Q.

And that search warrant that you -- your application that

you made was September 10th, 2008; is that right?

10

A.

I believe so, yes, sir.

11

Q.

That's approximately six months after you had acquired the

12

images from Mr. Skvarla's computer on March 13th, 2008, wasn't

13

it?

14

A.

That is approximately six months, yes.

15

Q.

And you executed -- that search warrant was executed on

16

September 11th, 2008, wasn't it?

17

A.

Yes, it was.

18

Q.

And Mr. Skvarla was arrested on September 11th, 2008,

19

correct?

20

A.

Yes, sir.

21

Q.

What took so long?

22

MS. MILLER:

23

THE COURT:

24

THE WITNESS:

25

I believe it was September, 2008.

Objection, Your Honor.

Relevance.

Overruled.
A number of things.

I have other assignments.

I have caseload.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 35 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

35

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

What were your other assignments during that period?

A.

I don't recall, sir.

I don't recall specifically but I have one case at a time.

have other duties for starters.

This is four and a half years ago.


I

Additionally, as I recall, some of the paperwork that was

in the subpoena that was submitted was returned with erroneous

information and had to be resubmitted.

Q.

But that was in September, wasn't it?

10

A.

What was in September?

11

Q.

The erroneous address that you executed the initial search

12

warrant on was in September of 2008?

13

A.

14

recall.

15

Q.

Okay.

16

A.

Um-hum.

17

Q.

-- you did not expedite that process in order to identify

18

Mr. Skvarla's address and execute a search warrant and seize

19

his hardware, computer hard drive, DVDs; what you did is

20

instead of expediting that process because you were convinced

21

on March 13th, 2008, that -- that from Mr. Skvarla's address

22

that's where the images that you received on March 13th, 2008,

23

had come from, correct?

24

A.

25

knew they were in the City of Rochester within 20 miles with

I don't recall.

That was another case entirely.

I don't

But what you did is after March 13th, 2008 --

I didn't know where they came from on March 13th, 2008.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 36 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

36

85 percent accuracy.

Until I received a subpoena I had no idea

Mr. Skvarla or his address was involved.

Q.

And that took six months?

A.

A lot of things took six months.

recall, Mr. Skvarla was getting married and that posed some

problems because his family was coming into town.

was an issue.

I don't recall exactly.

Q.

And was that because you didn't want to embarrass him?

10

A.

No, because he had posted online where his family was

11

staying.

12

created -- it could have created quite a circus if the whole

13

family was in town for a wedding.

14

Q.

So I see.

15

A.

So we were trying to be considerate actually to the

16

timing.

17

Q.

18

continuing to download child pornography to his computer, were

19

you?

20

A.

21

addresses downloading child pornography.

22

precedence over the other.

23

earlier, I'm one guy doing it.

24

Q.

25

in terms of expediting this process regarding Mr. Skvarla,

I had a caseload.

As I

So that also

That actually stalled us perhaps a couple weeks.

They were coming into town.

And it would have

So you weren't worried about whether or not he was

At any given time I may have five to ten individuals IP

I see.

None takes the

I do the best I can.

As we said

So there was a lack of manpower that backed you up

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 37 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

right?

A.

expedite, sure.

Q.

Did you request it?

A.

Request more manpower?

Q.

Yeah.

A.

No, I didn't.

Q.

Okay.

you did on March 13th, 2008, correct?

37

Had there been more manpower, we may have been able to

Now, you did the same thing on April 4th, 2008, as

10

A.

Which same thing is that, sir?

11

Q.

That is to put the search word in, the search words and to

12

receive images in -- at that IP address.

13

A.

14

session on that day.

15

Q.

That was April 4th, 2008, right?

16

A.

I believe so.

17

Q.

You did another session on May 7th, 2008, correct?

18

A.

I believe so.

19

Q.

You did another session on July 8, 2008, correct?

20

A.

I believe so.

21

Q.

You did another session on July 10th, 2008, didn't you?

22

A.

How many does that make, sir?

Yes, I did another session, as we might call it, download

23

THE COURT:

What do you mean by session?

24

THE WITNESS:

25

Who are you asking, sir?

Session -- I'm sorry.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 38 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

THE COURT:

MR. PARRINELLO:

He's asked the question.


That is to, Your Honor, what I've

described so far is that the deputy would go online using a

version of LimeWire and log onto the Gnutella network using

search terms and -- with like 12 YO, 9 YO?

THE COURT:

MR. PARRINELLO:

THE COURT:

MR. PARRINELLO:

10

THE COURT:

PHTC (sic).

This would all be called a session.


He repeated that each time on these

Okay.

I understand that.

I just

didn't -- the word session.

13
14

Right.

various dates.

11
12

38

MR. PARRINELLO:

I misspoke.

It was -- he repeated

the same process.

15

THE COURT:

Okay.

16

MR. PARRINELLO:

17

THE COURT:

18

MR. PARRINELLO:

Session means process or whatever.


Yes, sir.

Okay.
That we've already covered.

19

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

20

Q.

21

2008; April 4th, the second time, 2008; third time was May 7th,

22

2008; the fourth time was July 8th, 2008; and the last time was

23

July 10th, 2008, correct?

24

A.

I believe so.

25

Q.

And so would it be safe to say as far as the IP address

Without going over it each day, but it was March 13th,

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 39 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

39

that we've been speaking of that you've confirmed, that you

were conducting an investigation for prosecution to be brought

in Monroe County, New York, from March 13th, 2008, through

July 10th, 2008, utilizing the process we've talked about; is

that a fair statement?

A.

Yes, I would say that's a fair statement.

Q.

And you understood what I said that you were doing that,

conducting that investigation --

A.

Um-hum.

10

Q.

-- for a prosecution of Mr. Skvarla to be brought in

11

Monroe County, New York, correct?

12

A.

Correct.

13

Q.

Not by the federal government, but by the state

14

government, correct?

15

A.

That would be correct, yes.

16

THE COURT:

Were you aware what the federal

17

government was doing at the time?

18

THE WITNESS:

19

THE COURT:

20

23
24
25

Were you aware what the FBI was doing at

this point, as far as your investigation?

21
22

I'm sorry, sir?

THE WITNESS:

At the time I was not affiliated with

the FBI.
THE COURT:

Okay.

So you had no idea they were doing

the same thing you were doing -- well, similar -THE WITNESS:

Yeah.

Similar types of investigations

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 40 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

40

I was aware they were doing that, yes, sir.

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

when you turned over the results of the search to Special Agent

Meyers; isn't that right?

A.

that time.

Q.

In the Skvarla matter?

A.

That's correct.

The FBI never got into the Skvarla case until much later

I would say that's correct.

10

MS. MILLER:

They were not involved at

Objection, Your Honor.

Just to clarify

11

the federal agents that we're talking about here that became

12

involved.

13

MR. PARRINELLO:

14

THE COURT:

15

MR. PARRINELLO:

ICE.

I'm sorry.
ICE.

ICE.
We're getting to that, Your

16

Honor, in a moment.

17

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

18

Q.

19

from Skvarla computer, you went to the DA's office and informed

20

them you had a child pornography hit in the Rochester area,

21

correct?

On March 14th, the day after the first download reaction

22

MS. MILLER:

23

THE COURT:

24

THE WITNESS:

25

Objection, Your Honor.

Relevance.

Overruled.
I did go to the district attorney's

office and obtain a subpoena.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 41 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

41

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Q.

No, I'm not talking about that.

A.

Okay.

I'm not sure what you're asking me then.

Q.

Okay.

On March 14th, 2008 --

A.

Okay.

Q.

-- you went to the DA's office and you first informed them

that you had a child pornography hit in the Rochester area,

correct?

A.

I don't recall contacting the DA's office and informing

10

them of that.

11

Q.

Perhaps if you look at your report.

12

A.

That would be great.

13

number?

14

Q.

15

your report --

16

A.

Okay.

17

Q.

-- in terms of what you did.

18

A.

There is no reference here to March 14th, 2008.

19

Q.

Okay.

20

A.

I don't recall when the subpoena came back.

21

Q.

The subpoena came back in September, 2008, but you had the

22

address in July of 2008, correct?

23

A.

24

indicating the address.

25

occurred, but I can tell you I wouldn't have the address absent

Which page?

Do you have a page

No, I think they're the March 14th, 2008, as designated in

You got the Skvarla address in July, 2008, correct?

I would not have the address until the subpoena came back
I don't recall which date which

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 42 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

a subpoena.

Q.

Sir, the Defense Exhibit 1, that is your report?

A.

This is a copy of my report, yes, sir.

Q.

Okay.

7/10/08 --

A.

Okay.

Q.

-- did you -- did you fax subpoenas to the district

attorney's office to be served on Frontier for the dates

March 13th, April 4th, May 7th, July 8th, and July 10th, five

And on July 10th, on the third page under

10

subpoenas?

11

A.

12

issued to me by the district attorney's office; and yes, the

13

subpoenas did cover those five dates.

14

Q.

15

information as a result of those subpoenas that the address

16

came back, that IP address from the serve provider, as Nick

17

Skvarla, 165 Forgham Road, Rochester, New York?

18

A.

Correct.

19

Q.

Okay.

20

A.

Yes, sir.

21

Q.

Now, you waited until September of 2008, to apply for a

22

search warrant, correct?

23

A.

May I refer to this in my report?

24

Q.

Sure.

25

No, I faxed the subpoena directly to Frontier that were

Okay.

And subsequently the -- you got subscriber

And that was in July of 2008, right?

You can refresh your recollection.

On page 3, 9/10/2008.

42

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 43 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

43

A.

Yes, I --

Q.

Does that refresh your recollection?

A.

On 9/10/2008, I did obtain a search warrant, yes.

Q.

And so at least two months had passed before you even

attempted to get a search warrant after you had Skvarla's name

and address, correct?

A.

Correct.

Q.

And the very next day is when you and others from the

Monroe County Sheriff's Department executed the search warrant?

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

Were there any FBI agents involved in the search?

12

A.

No, none.

13

Q.

Any ICE agents?

14

A.

No, none.

15

Q.

Any federal agents at all?

16

A.

No, there weren't.

17

Q.

And when you arrested the -- Mr. Skvarla, you took him --

18

you didn't take him to federal court, did you?

19

A.

No, sir.

20

Q.

You took him to the Gates Town Court, and Gates Town Court

21

is in Gates, New York in Monroe County, New York, correct?

22

A.

I don't believe I took him anywhere.

23

Q.

Do you -- do you know that he was taken to Gates for

24

arraignment?

25

A.

I don't recall where he was taken.

If I -- if I recall

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 44 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

44

correctly, they were Town of Chili charges.

It's possible a

Gates judge did an arraignment because it is an adjoining town.

I was not with Mr. Skvarla at that time, so I don't know where

he was arraigned.

Q.

any federal court?

A.

No, not to my knowledge.

Q.

In September, right?

A.

That's correct.

10

Q.

And no federal authorities were involved with respect to

11

the investigation and identification and the search warrant --

12

subpoenas and the search warrant regarding Mr. Skvarla up to

13

September 11th, 2008, correct?

14

A.

Correct, no federal authorities were involved.

15

Q.

Okay.

16

Mr. Skvarla had been arrested?

17

A.

Okay.

18

Q.

Taken to a local town court, bail set, and he taken to

19

Monroe County Jail, correct?

20

A.

Correct.

21

Q.

Approximately four days later, there was a meeting at

22

about 2:30 in the afternoon on September 15th, 2008, where

23

members of the Monroe County Sheriff's Department, you

24

included, met with members of Monroe County District Attorney's

25

office and the United States Attorney's office, and also

And at least we have established that he was not taken to

And on September 15th of 2008, after he --

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 45 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

45

present was Special Agent Matt Meyer of ICE.

held at the Monroe County Sheriff's office, and it was decided

at that time that the case would be referred to ICE for further

investigation, correct?

MS. MILLER:

THE WITNESS:

MS. MILLER:

That meeting was

Objection.
I have no -At this point it feels as though counsel

is both leading and testifying while on direct.

agent could testify.

10

THE COURT:

Perhaps the

Overruled.

11

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

12

Q.

Do you remember such a meeting?

13

A.

I have no recollection of any such meeting, no, sir.

14

Q.

Do you --

15

THE COURT:

Have you reviewed your report?

16

THE WITNESS:

17

THE COURT:

I have, sir, yes.

Okay.

18

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

19

Q.

Would you look at page 6, please?

20

A.

Yes, sir.

21

Q.

And on page 6, if you read page 6 and the reference to

22

September 15th, 2008, read that to yourself, please.

23

A.

Okay.

24

Q.

And who's the reporting officer on that -- in -- of that

25

report?

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 46 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

46

A.

That would be myself.

Q.

And on September 15th, 2008, do you recall being in the

company of Special Agent Matt Meyer of ICE?

A.

I do.

Q.

At the Monroe County Sheriff's property clerk office?

A.

I do.

Q.

And at that time, sir, did you authorize that the --

Mr. Skvarla's computers, hard drives, CDs and DVDs that were

taken from his residence should be released to Special Agent

10

Meyer for forensic examination?

11

A.

Yes, I -- that is notated here.

12

Q.

Okay.

13

A.

And myself and --

14

Q.

I'm sorry.

15

A.

Would you like me to continue?

16

Q.

Yeah, sure.

17

A.

You described it as a meeting amongst many people.

18

with SA Matt Meyer at the property office to turn over

19

property.

20

describing.

21

Q.

I'm going to get to that right now.

22

A.

Okay.

23

Q.

Now, before turning that -- you were not, as a deputy,

24

authorized to turn those materials over to Special Agent Meyer

25

without some permission from your superior, correct?

You were --

I met

That's not quite the meaning I believe you were

Great.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 47 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

47

A.

No, that's not correct, sir.

Q.

Now, this state investigation of Mr. Skvarla, do you know

how it ended?

A.

I don't understand your question.

Q.

Did the state investigation of Mr. Skvarla continue on to

a trial?

A.

It did not, no.

Q.

Do you know how it ended?

A.

No, I don't know how it ended.

10

It ended when federal charges -- it was determined federal

11

charges would be lodged, if you will, against Mr. Skvarla.

12

Q.

13

Mr. Skvarla -- do you know -- do you know that federal charges

14

in the form of a criminal complaint were lodged against

15

Mr. Skvarla on March 25th, 2009, in the form of a criminal

16

complaint?

17

A.

18

Mr. Skvarla, no.

19

Q.

20

state prosecution never took place, right?

21

A.

22

you're referring to?

23

Q.

24

motions, hearings, ultimately a trial?

25

A.

Well, federal charges weren't lodged against

I don't know what day the federal government charged

Okay.

And you're saying that as far as you know, the

Describe prosecution.

You mean to trial?

Is that what

Well, going in front of the state superior court judge,

Yes.

To my knowledge, none of that took place with

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 48 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

48

Mr. Skvarla on the stateside, that's correct.

Q.

state charges that were brought against Mr. Skvarla, there were

two charges brought, and correct me if I'm wrong, one of them

was possessing a sexual performance by a child pursuant to New

York Penal Law Section 263.16; and the second charge was

promoting a sexual performance by a child pursuant to New York

Penal Law Section 263.15.

two charges lodged against Mr. Skvarla?

And by the way, with respect to the state charges, the

Do you recall that those were the

10

A.

I do, yes.

11

Q.

And did it -- was it ever called to your attention that

12

those charges were submitted to a Monroe County grand jury

13

which returned a no cause for action or otherwise termed a no

14

bill?

15

A.

No, I don't -- know such knowledge of that.

16

Q.

Now, you were the lead investigator on the Skvarla matter

17

for the State of New York, correct?

18

A.

Correct.

19

Q.

Did you ever appear in front of a Monroe County grand

20

jury?

21

A.

22

did.

23

I did or not.

24

Q.

25

jury?

I don't recall appearing in front -- I don't believe I


Again, four years ago.

I can't say with any certainty if

Have you ever appeared in front of a Monroe County grand

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 49 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

49

A.

Many times.

Q.

And what you're saying is you don't recall whether in this

case you appeared in front of a Monroe County grand jury

regarding the state prosecution of Mr. Skvarla; is that what

you're telling the judge?

A.

That's what I'm telling the Judge, yes.

Q.

Deputy Kron, did you download from Mr. Skvarla's computer

child pornography on September 11th, 2007?

A.

I don't believe I did.

I would have to refer to my

10

notes -- excuse me -- my report.

11

Q.

Go ahead.

12

A.

No, sir, I do not believe I downloaded anything from

13

Mr. Skvarla on September 11th.

14

Q.

2007?

15

A.

2007?

16

Q.

Yes, sir.

17

A.

No, not to my knowledge.

18

Q.

Okay.

19

Mr. Skvarla's computer on May 9th, 2008?

20

A.

Again, may I refer to these dates?

21

Q.

Absolutely.

22

A.

You say May 9th, 2008; is that correct?

23

Q.

Yes, sir.

24

A.

No, sir, I did not.

25

Q.

How about on April 2nd, 2006, did you download from

Yes.

And did you download child pornography from

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 50 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

50

Mr. Skvarla's computer child pornography?

A.

Not to my knowledge, no.

Q.

Do you know what real time is?

A.

In what context are you using?

Q.

In the context of monitoring somebody's computer to

determine the source from which that computer received child

pornography.

A.

No, sir, I don't believe I'm familiar with that.

Q.

Are you acquainted with eavesdropping warrants?

10

A.

No, no, I'm not.

11

Q.

Pardon me?

12

A.

I familiar they exist.

13

eavesdropping warrant, no.

14

Q.

15

warrant in order to watch in real time the source of

16

Mr. Skvarla's source of the child pornography on his computer,

17

did you?

18

A.

No, I have not.

19

Q.

Do you know what a Wyoming Toolkit is?

20

A.

Yes, I'm familiar with a Wyoming Toolkit, somewhat.

21

Q.

And did you utilize Wyoming Toolkit?

22

A.

I never utilized Wyoming Toolkit.

23

Q.

Do you -- when you say you're acquainted with it, have you

24

ever utilized it?

25

A.

I've never written an

So in this case, you never applied for an eavesdropping

I've never used the Wyoming Toolkit, no.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 51 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

51

Q.

Have you been trained with respect to use of a Wyoming

Toolkit?

A.

understand the concept.

to conduct peer-to-peer investigations.

know specifically how it operates or what -- what the -- what

software is used for the Wyoming Toolkit.

Q.

Wyoming Toolkit, do you know whether or not the use of such a

I don't know specifically what a Wyoming Toolkit is.

It's a -- it's a number of tools used


Beyond that, I don't

Do you know -- to the extent of your knowledge of the

10

kit can identify where an image is coming from?

11

A.

12

source from which it's downloaded.

13

Q.

14

you identified the source from which the images you downloaded

15

to be Mr. Skvarla's computer, correct?

16

A.

Well, an IP address and used by Mr. Skvarla, yes.

17

Q.

Okay.

18

investigation, was it one of your objectives to -- I'm sorry --

19

strike that.

20

It -- yes, it identifies the image as coming from the

And in this case, without the use of the Wyoming Toolkit,

In your -- in the process of the Skvarla

You said that this time lapse that occurred with

21

respect -- from March 13th, 2008, to the search and arrest on

22

September 11th, 2008, at that time that -- you explained that

23

as you being only one person involved and that you had a lot on

24

your plate, correct?

25

A.

I explained there were a number factors there that may

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 52 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

have caused that, but yes, that is one factor.

Q.

investigations that you were conducting in the Monroe County

area, along with the Skvarla investigation during that time

period; is that correct?

A.

Yes, that would have been.

Q.

And with respect to -- can you estimate for the Judge

between March 15th, 2008, and September 11th, 2008, how many

other investigations you were conducting concerning child

10

52

Now, with respect to that statement, there were other

pornography -- child pornography in Monroe County?

11

Can you give us an estimate?

12

A.

It's difficult to say.

13

frame.

14

Q.

15

30 investigations, one of which would have been the Skvarla

16

investigation, do you know, sir, how many of those resulted in

17

prosecutions?

18

A.

19

material.

20

Q.

21

during that time period, including Mr. Skvarla, how many were

22

referred to the federal government?

23

A.

I have no idea.

24

Q.

Were any, other than Mr. Skvarla?

25

A.

Prior to Mr. Skvarla, many of these cases were prosecuted

Yes.

Perhaps 20, 30 during that time

And do you know, sir, whether or not of those 20 or

I don't know.

I don't know without reviewing that

Can you tell the Judge of that 20 or 30 investigations

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 53 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

53

federally.

Q.

Not prior.

A.

Okay.

Q.

To September 11th, 2008?

A.

Okay.

Q.

How many of those other investigations, other than

Mr. Skvarla, did you refer to the federal government?

A.

know how many were prosecuted during that time frame.

From March 15th, 2008?

I didn't refer any to the federal government.

I don't
And when

10

you say "prosecuted", as we can see, the federal system takes a

11

long time sometimes.

12

So there could have been many that were taken by the

13

federal government prior to March that were still in the stages

14

of prosecution.

15

So your question is very confusing.

How many were --

16

Q.

If it's confusing then let me try to ask it in a less

17

confusing way.

18

A.

Right.

19

Q.

Of the 20 or 30 investigations that you were participating

20

in from March 15th, 2008 --

21

A.

Right.

22

Q.

-- to September 11th, 2008, can you tell the Judge how

23

many of those individuals you arrested?

24

A.

How many of those investigations ended in arrest?

25

Q.

Ended in arrest in that time period.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 54 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

A.

I don't know exactly.

one or two arrests a month, I believe, on the average.

Q.

One or two a month in that six months period, correct?

A.

I believe.

Q.

Okay.

approximately 12 arrests, right?

A.

it's hard to say.

month I made four arrests; in one month I made one arrest.

54

On the average, there were probably

I don't recall exactly.

That -- by multiplication that would be

But if you're using the two figure, yes.


It's hard to say.

If it was --

In some months -- in one

10

cannot average it out for you.

11

Q.

12

that time period --- did you -- were -- ended up being

13

prosecuted in the federal system; do you know?

14

A.

There's a lot of variables.

How many of those arrests that you did make -- this at

I don't know.

15

MS. MILLER:

16

THE COURT:

Objection, calls for speculation.


If he knows.

17

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

18

Q.

If you know.

19

A.

I don't know.

20

Q.

Okay.

21

federal grand jury?

22

A.

I don't recall.

23

Q.

In any of the other cases that you-- in that time period,

24

March 15th, 20 --

25

A.

I don't even --

Now, in the Skvarla case, did you testify in

I don't believe so.

In that time period, I don't know, sir.

During that six

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 55 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

months, I don't know what I went to the grand jury on.

Q.

When were you cross-designated?

A.

That would have been approximately May of 2009, if by

cross-designated you mean affiliated with the FBI.

Q.

Yes, sir.

A.

That would be May, 2009, roughly.

Q.

And you moved physically from the sheriffs department to

the federal building?

A.

For the most part, yes.

10

Q.

And were you involved in that period of time in child

11

pornography investigations?

12

A.

55

Yes.

13

MS. MILLER:

14

THE COURT:

Objection, relevance.
Overruled.

15

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

16

Q.

17

in Virginia giving them Mr. Skvarla's IP address and requesting

18

whether or not you could download known child porn images from

19

the defendant's computer?

20

A.

No, I know of no such thing.

21

Q.

Now, the images that you downloaded, using the system

22

we've talked about, from Mr. Skvarla's computer, do you, of

23

your own personal knowledge, know whether any of those images

24

crossed state lines?

25

A.

Now, did there come a time that you made contact with ICE

I believe based on the content some of those videos -- and

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 56 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

56

let me clarify:

You keep saying images, it was images and

videos, I think.

I don't remember which one, which date, but

just to clarify.

I believe there were videos that were clearly

foreign videos that I believe to have originated outside the

United States.

Q.

and videos on plaintiff's computer, were they -- where those

particular images came from, the location?

A.

The ones that actually resided on Mr. Skvarla's computer?

10

Q.

Yeah.

11

A.

Is that what you're asking me?

12

Q.

Yes, sir.

13

A.

I do not know where they came from.

14

Q.

Ever heard of the term "shortest path"?

15

A.

Perhaps.

16

not sure in what context you're referring to.

17

Q.

18

internet standard, isn't it true that while searching a

19

peer-to-peer network, the travel of images take the fastest and

20

closest source possible?

21

A.

I don't know that to be true, no.

22

Q.

Isn't it true that the images and videos are more likely

23

to come from -- from within the state than out of the state?

24

A.

25

has nothing to do with the path.

And do you know, sir, the location from which the images

I don't know.

I've heard the term used.

I'm

With respect to shortest path, as far as the -- an

No, no, not at all.

That depends on the availability.

It

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 57 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

Q.

September 11th, 2007; May 9th, 2008; April 2nd, 2006 in which

you said that you did not download those videos or images, do

you know where those images came from -- strike that.

And these -- and these dates that I read to you:

Do you know whether or not those images appeared on

Mr. Skvarla's hard drive?

A.

saying?

Q.

Yes, sir.

10

A.

You just established I did not.

11

Q.

You didn't download them?

12

A.

I didn't download them.

13

Q.

Do you know whether they appeared on his hard drive?

14

The images that I didn't download; is that what you're

MS. MILLER:

Objection, which images?

I think that

15

the deputy has testified that he didn't download on a

16

particular date.

So --

17

MR. PARRINELLO:

Those are Counts 1, 2 and 3 of the

18

superseding indictment, Your Honor.

19

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

20

Q.

21

seen -- have you seen the superseding indictment?

22

A.

I don't know if I have.

23

Q.

And with respect to the images referred to in the

24

superseding indictment, do you know where those images came

25

from to Mr. Skvarla's computer?

You didn't download the images referred to -- have you

57

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 58 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

58

A.

I don't know which images you're referring to.

Q.

Let me show you Defense Exhibit 2 marked for

identification.

superseding indictment that is being prosecuted in this court.

A.

Okay.

Q.

Do you see Counts 1, 2 and 3 on page 2?

A.

I do, yes, sir.

Q.

And do you recognize the dates that I read to you that I

asked you about previously that you said you didn't download?

Sir, I would represent to you that that is the

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

And, sir, do you know where any of those child pornography

12

images came from to get onto Mr. Skvarla's computer?

13

A.

These ones that I know nothing about?

14

Q.

Yes.

15

A.

I don't know how to answer that, sir.

16

about files that I know nothing about.

17

downloads.

18

Q.

19

and how they got onto Mr. Skvarla's computer; is that your

20

answer?

21

A.

22

yes, I do not how they got there.

23

Q.

Or where they came from?

24

A.

Having never seen them, of course not, no.

25

Q.

Okay.

You're asking me

These were not my

Is your answer that you don't know where they came from

Assuming there were downloads that day unbeknownst to me,

Have you ever received a pen register?

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 59 of 77


D. Kron - Direct

59

A.

No, sir, I haven't.

Q.

Do you know what a pen register trap and trace is?

A.

Somewhat, yes.

Q.

And at no time with respect to Frontier did you apply for

a pen register trap and trace to be placed on Mr. Skvarla's

computer, did you?

A.

No, that's correct, I did not.

8
9

MR. PARRINELLO:

Excuse me, Your Honor.

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

10

Q.

Deputy Kron, with respect to images and/or videos that you

11

did download on those five dates that we talked about, all you

12

know about is that they came from Mr. Skvarla's computer to

13

your computer, correct?

14

A.

His IP address to my computer, yes.

15

Q.

And as far as where they came from to get onto

16

Mr. Skvarla's computer, you don't know where they came from, do

17

you?

18

A.

That is correct, I don't.

19
20

MR. PARRINELLO:
more questions.

21

THE COURT:

22

MS. MILLER:

23

few issues.

24

present.

25

Your Honor, thank you very much.

How long are you going to be?


I don't know.

I'd like to clear up a

Certainly not the two hours that we've taken to

Perhaps 15 to 20 minutes.
MR. PARRINELLO:

I object to that reference to the

No

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 60 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

time I took, but I'll --

2
3

60

THE COURT:

All right.

Why don't we take a

five-minute break.

(A recess was taken at 3:56 p.m.)

THE COURT:

(Off the record discussion.)

THE COURT:

MS. MILLER:

Sorry for the delay here.

Ms. Miller, you're up.


Thank you, Your Honor.
CROSS EXAMINATION

10

BY MS. MILLER:

11

Q.

12

enforcement version of LimeWire?

13

A.

That is correct.

14

Q.

And that law enforcement version of LimeWire utilized the

15

Gnutella network --

16

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

-- is that correct?

18

Deputy Kron, you testified that you had used a law

Is it also correct that you testified about other

19

peer-to-peer file sharing programs including BearShare,

20

FrostWire, Shareaza, Kazaa; is that correct?

21

A.

Yes, that is correct.

22

Q.

And to your knowledge, do all of those file sharing

23

software programs also utilize the Gnutella network?

24

A.

They do, yes.

25

Q.

Is it possible then that you, as a member of law

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 61 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

61

enforcement, using a LimeWire program, are able to download

images from individuals using some of those other peer-to-peer

file sharing software program?

A.

network for protocol.

Q.

the law enforcement version, had you used that software program

prior to March of 2008?

A.

Yes, I have.

10

Q.

Was that software program, to your knowledge, used by

11

other members of law enforcement?

12

A.

Yes, they're compatible.

Okay.

They all use the same Gnutella

And the version of LimeWire that you were using,

Yes, it was.

13

MR. PARRINELLO:

14

THE COURT:

15

BY MS. MILLER:

16

Q.

17

accurate?

Objection.

Overruled.

Had you found that version of LimeWire to be previously

18

MR. PARRINELLO:

19

THE COURT:

20

Overruled.

21

THE WITNESS:

Objection, foundation.

Well, it's based on his experience.

It had been used by the law enforcement

22

for a while, and in my experience, it worked effectively.

23

BY MS. MILLER:

24

Q.

25

specifically on March 13th, of 2008, correct?

Okay.

You testified that you had downloaded images

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 62 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

A.

Correct.

Q.

And you had identified some of those images as what you

believed to be child pornography?

A.

Images and videos, yes.

Q.

Okay.

viewing images and videos of child pornography?

A.

Yes.

Q.

But up to and prior to March of 2008, approximately how

many images and videos of child pornography had you seen?

62

And those -- and you've previously had experience

10

A.

Prior to March of 2008, I've been doing these types of

11

investigations for approximately probably eight or nine months

12

at that point, in the thousands somewhere.

13

Q.

14

images were child pornography?

15

A.

Okay.

And were you comfortable in determining that those

Yes.

16

MR. PARRINELLO:

17

THE COURT:

Objection to the form.

Restate your question.

18

BY MS. MILLER:

19

Q.

20

containing child pornography that you downloaded on March 13th,

21

2008?

22

A.

Yes, I did.

23

Q.

Now, you testified that you had obtained some information

24

or some erroneous information from Frontier; is that correct?

25

A.

In your training and experience, did you identify files as

That's correct.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 63 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

63

Q.

What was that erroneous information?

A.

Basically it was served on Frontier for the IP address

that we've been discussing starting with 74.

response was received from Frontier identifying -- incorrectly

identifying the subscriber information.

Q.

information as being another individual living in Rochester,

New York, correct?

A.

Correct.

10

Q.

And you obtained a search warrant for that other address

11

in April of 2008, correct?

12

A.

Correct.

13

Q.

And it was at that time that you determined that that

14

information erroneous, correct?

15

A.

Yes, that's correct.

16

Q.

After that original search warrant was executed, did you

17

determine or did you observe IP address 74.34.196.66 offering

18

child pornography files after April of 2008?

19

A.

20

active on sharing files and pictures.

21

Q.

22

that you believed to be child pornography after April, 2008;

23

isn't that correct?

24

A.

That is correct.

25

Q.

And isn't it also correct that you downloaded on more than

A subpoena

And, in fact, Frontier identified the subscriber

Yes, after we served the warrant, the IP address was still

And, in fact, you downloaded additional images and videos

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 64 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

64

one date?

A.

address, yes.

Q.

And you testified that you sent new subpoenas to Frontier?

A.

I sent five new subpoenas, yes.

Q.

So, therefore, you -- is it correct that you sent one

subpoena for each download date?

A.

I misspoke.

Q.

Okay.

I believe it was a total of five dates from that IP

I sent multiple subpoenas for five dates.

And the response that came back for each of those

10

was Nicholas Skvarla?

11

A.

In all five cases, yes.

12

Q.

And what address was provided to you?

13

A.

165 Forgham Road.

14

Q.

In what town?

15

A.

Town of Greece.

16

Q.

Is that within Monroe County, New York?

17

A.

Yes, it is.

18

Q.

And you testified that, based upon that information, you

19

obtained a search warrant to search that premises, correct?

20

A.

That's correct, yes.

21

Q.

And you participated in that search?

22

A.

I did.

23

Q.

That search occurred at 165 Forgham Road in Rochester, New

24

York?

25

A.

It did, yes.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 65 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

65

Q.

September 11th, 2008?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And, again, you were present on that date?

A.

I was.

Q.

Did you encounter anyone at the house on that date?

A.

Initially we encountered Mr. Skvarla.

Q.

Do you see Mr. Skvarla in the courtroom today?

A.

Yes, I do.

10

Q.

Would you please identify him based on his clothing and

11

where he is located?

12

A.

13

Mr. Parrinello in the suit tie, shoulder length hair, mustache

14

and beard.

15

And the search of that premises occurred on

He is the gentlemen seated over there next to Parrin --

MS. MILLER:

Your Honor, I would request that the

16

record reflect that Deputy Kron has identified the defendant.

17

BY MS. MILLER:

18

Q.

19

didn't you?

20

Deputy Kron, on that date you spoke with Mr. Skvarla,

MR. PARRINELLO:

21

suppression hearing.

22

scope of direct.

23

MS. MILLER:

24

THE COURT:

25

MS. MILLER:

Objection.

This is not a

It's irrelevant and it's outside the

Your Honor, I think -Sustained.


-- there was some discussion about the

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 66 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

66

file sharing software programs that were used.

I'm simply

trying to establish that the software program that was used,

while not the same that Deputy Kron was used, follows in line

with the previous testimony that Mr. Parrinello elicited by the

peer-to-peer file sharing networks.

MR. PARRINELLO:

It still doesn't answer my

objection.

we have had a suppression hearing; and it is irrelevant with

respect to the direct examination.

10

First of all, it's outside the scope; and secondly,

THE COURT:

11

BY MS. MILLER:

12

Q.

13

let me rephrase that.

14

Sustained.

Deputy Kron, did you -- you seized items -- excuse me --

On September 11th, 2008, you seized items of digital media

15

from 165 Forgham Road, didn't you?

16

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

And isn't it correct that those items included a custom

18

built desktop computer with a Western Digital hard drive?

19

A.

I believe so, yes.

20

Q.

You didn't participate in any forensic review of those

21

items, did you?

22

A.

No, the forensic examination was not conducted by myself.

23

Q.

Okay.

24

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, correct?

25

A.

And that investigation was conducted by members of

I believe so, yes.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 67 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

MR. PARRINELLO:

Objection, move to strike, what he

believes; improper foundation.

THE COURT:

67

Just one second.

Well, just a yes or no

answer.

Overruled.

BY MS. MILLER:

Q.

that computer, correct?

A.

No, I don't.

10

Q.

And you don't know what files or other items, where those

11

files or items were located?

12

A.

That's correct.

13

Q.

Deputy Kron, you don't have any control over which of your

14

cases went federal or that were prosecuted on the stateside,

15

did you?

16

A.

No, I didn't and I don't.

17

Q.

And testifying today, you don't know why this case became

18

prosecuted federally?

19

A.

No, I don't know why.

20

Q.

Previous to this investigation had other of your cases

21

been prosecuted federally?

22

A.

Deputy Kron, you don't know today what others found on

Yes.

23

MR. PARRINELLO:

24

THE COURT:

25

MR. PARRINELLO:

Objection.

You opened the door on that.


Except, Your Honor, the basis of

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 68 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

68

them going federal could very well have been they had evidence

that the images had traveled in interstate commerce.

the difference.

That's

And if --

THE COURT:

Well, I'm going to overrule the

objection.

BY MS. MILLER:

Q.

and videos from the IP address that we've identified beginning

with the numbers 74, it was your testimony that they came to

Deputy Kron, on the five days that you downloaded images

10

85 percent certainty within Monroe County, correct?

11

A.

That is advertised by the company MaxMind, yes.

12

MR. PARRINELLO:

13

THE COURT:

Objection.

Overruled.

14

BY MS. MILLER:

15

Q.

16

videos, did you know where the user associated with IP address

17

beginning with the number 74 obtained those images and videos

18

from?

19

A.

No, at this time, I did not, no.

20

Q.

Based upon your training and experience, are you aware of

21

any software program that would allow you as an undercover

22

agent or officer to determine the source of an image or video

23

file during an undercover peer-to-peer file share software

24

program?

25

A.

At the time that you were downloading the images and

No, I know of no agency that's capable of doing that.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 69 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

69

Q.

Turning back to the discussion about peer-to-peer file

sharing programs, you testified that you were able to focus

users that were from Monroe County; is that correct?

A.

In and around Monroe County, yes.

Q.

Were you able to see where other users were located?

A.

Yes, all the results that were turned to me were

identified geographically.

Q.

these search terms, would you see and -- and users coming from

Okay.

In your training and experience, when you used

10

other locations?

11

A.

Yes, multiple.

12

Q.

And, in fact, you would see users from worldwide

13

locations?

14

A.

Yes, all over the world.

15

Q.

Based upon your training and experience then, is it

16

possible to receive these types of images from users around the

17

world?

18
19

MR. PARRINELLO:

Objection, irrelevant.

It's a

hypothetical question; calls for speculation.

20

THE COURT:

21

MS. MILLER:

Is it possible, sustained.
Allow me to rephrase then, Your Honor.

22

BY MS. MILLER:

23

Q.

24

PTHC, and in using the search term PTHC, did you see users

25

sharing files containing that name from locations around the

You testified on direct that you used the search term

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 70 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

70

world?

A.

Yes, I did.

Q.

Deputy Kron, is there any difference between the

functionality of the law enforcement version of LimeWire you

used and the version of LimeWire or similar peer-to-peer file

sharing programs that would be used by a civilian user?

A.

first is we can see -- we, as law enforcement, can see

immediately where the other -- where the IP addresses are

Yeah.

Primarily there's two functions that differ.

The

10

geographically; and secondly, when we conduct downloads those

11

are what we call single source downloads, meaning that that

12

file, picture, video, what have you, will come entirety from

13

the IP address of our choosing.

14

Q.

15

law enforcement?

16

A.

17

IP address of interest does, in fact, possess child

18

pornography, and has the entire picture or the entire video or

19

a portion that does depict child pornography.

20

Q.

21

file sharing software program, do they receive all of their

22

files from one source?

23

A.

No, generally, while it is possible, it's very unlikely.

24

Q.

Why not?

25

A.

Because the way the software's designed there's something

And why do you use single source downloads as a member of

To confirm that the -- during the investigation that the

Now, a user, a non-law enforcement user of a peer-to-peer

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 71 of 77


D. Kron - Cross

71

called swarming.

picture it will download segments of that video or picture from

multiple users at the same time.

software faster and more efficient.

What that does when you download a video or

What that does is makes the

So if you download a three-minute song or video, let's

say, to download a portion of that three-minute video from ten

different people at the same time would make the downloads much

quicker, more efficient.

Q.

Deputy Kron, in your experience using these programs, do

10

users receive portions of files from more than one other user

11

sharing a particular file?

12

MR. PARRINELLO:

13

MS. MILLER:

Objection, irrelevant.

Your Honor, on direct there were a

14

number of questions about the use of and the operation of

15

peer-to-peer file sharing programs.

16

issue to the source of those, and I'm asking about Deputy

17

Kron's experience.

18

MR. PARRINELLO:

I think this is a key

This question elicits a speculative

19

answer that has nothing to do with this case.

We're talking

20

about the images on Mr. Skvarla's computer.

21

about segmentation, we're not talking about the possibility of

22

parts coming from other places.

23

he knows where the images came from, that -- that were on

24

Mr. Skvarla's computer.

25

it's completely speculative, and it's not relevant, Your Honor.

We're not talking

The question is whether or not

So this is completely hypothetical,

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 72 of 77


D. Kron - Redirect

THE COURT:

72

Sustained.

BY MS. MILLER:

Q.

Nicholas Skvarla, or the IP address that we've identified that

is associated with Nicholas Skvarla, were you able to determine

the number of users from which he received his images and

videos?

A.

resided on his computer at that time?

Deputy Kron, at the time that you downloaded images from

The number of sources from which he received his that

10

Q.

That were being shared to you.

11

A.

No, I don't know what sources provided them to his

12

computer system.

13

MS. MILLER:

Your Honor, if I could just have one

14

moment.

15

BY MS. MILLER:

16

Q.

17

the child pornography on his computer?

Deputy Kron, did Nicholas Skvarla tell you how he obtained

18

MR. PARRINELLO:

19

THE WITNESS:

20

THE COURT:

21

It's outside the scope of the direct exam.

22

Sustained.

23

MS. MILLER:

24
25

Objection, outside the scope.

Yes.

Wait a minute.

No further question, Your Honor.


REDIRECT EXAMINATION

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 73 of 77


D. Kron - Redirect

Q.

you did not know why Nicholas Skvarla's case went federal,

correct?

A.

Yes, that's correct.

Q.

Did you supply any information to the federal government

that you had proof that the images on Mr. Skvarla's computer

had come from other states?

Deputy Kron, on cross examination I believe that you said

8
9
10

MS. MILLER:
examination.

Objection, outside the scope of cross

There was no testimony as to conversations with

the government.

11
12

73

MR. PARRINELLO:

I think she opened the door as to

why it went federal, and could have been --

13

THE COURT:

I'll allow it.

There's no jury here.

14

BY MR. PARRINELLO:

15

Q.

Did you?

16

A.

No, I did not.

17

Q.

Okay.

18

government leading to Mr. Skvarla's case going federal that any

19

of the images that were transmitted from Mr. Skvarla's computer

20

had traveled internationally?

21

A.

22

were discussing here today.

23

that, a determination that they were international, I can't

24

say.

25

Q.

And did you supply any information to the federal

Only in that I supplied the videos and pictures that we


Whether or not they made, based on

But you yourself did not supply any information that you

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 74 of 77


D. Kron - Redirect

74

had determined that they had come from an international source,

did you?

A.

No, that's correct.

Q.

Okay.

testimony about that users -- I'm supposing users were used in

the sense of those people using child pornography, users got

their information from worldwide locations.

saying that on cross?

A.

No, sir.

10

Q.

Well, as best as my handwriting can tell me, but --

11

A.

I don't -- I don't know what that's in reference to.

12

Q.

Well, let me ask you this:

13

images on Mr. Skvarla's computer came from worldwide locations?

14

A.

Directly to his computer?

15

Q.

Yes.

16

A.

No, I can't say that I did.

17

Q.

And I believe your last answer, sir, on -- to a question

18

that Ms. Miller posed to you is in -- with respect to

19

Mr. Skvarla, that you do not know the sources from which the

20

child pornography on Mr. Skvarla's computer where it came from.

21

Is that what -- am I correct in saying that?

22

A.

Yeah, again, just to clarify the direct sources --

23

Q.

Yes.

24

A.

-- that brought it to his computer, no, sir, I don't.

25

You -- on cross examination, I believe there was

Are you quoting me?

MR. PARRINELLO:

Do you remember

Is that what that is?

Do you know whether any of the

Thank you.

No further questions.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 75 of 77


D. Kron - Redirect

THE COURT:

All right.

(Witness excused.)

MR. PARRINELLO:

THE COURT:

MS. MILLER:

THE COURT:

MR. PARRINELLO:

75

Thank you, sir.

We rest, Your Honor.

Yeah.

Okay.

And the government rests.

Yes, Your Honor.


So I'll see you next Monday at 2:00.
Yes.

I've spoken to the Court

reporter and she's been gracious enough to indicate to me that

I would have the transcript before that because I'll need it in

10

the process of my summations.

11

THE COURT:

Okay.

12

MR. PARRINELLO:

And we also have a renewal of our

13

Rule 29 which I make verbally now.

14

written -- any written document or memoranda.

15

like to say as far as the renewal of the Rule 29, Your Honor,

16

is that there has been absolutely no proof in this case --

17
18

MS. MILLER:

I don't expect any

Are you making a Rule 29 motion right

now?

19

MR. PARRINELLO:

20

THE COURT:

21

MR. PARRINELLO:

22

THE COURT:

23

(Proceedings concluded at 4:39 p.m.)

24
25

And all I would

Yeah, I am.

Sorry.

Well, why don't we do it on Monday.


Your Honor, thank you.

Thank you.

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 76 of 77

INDEX
DIRECT
CROSS

REDIRECT

3
4
5

WITNESSES FOR THE


DEFENSE

David Kron

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

60

72

RECROSS

76

Case 6:09-cr-06147-RJA-JWF Document 80 Filed 08/20/12 Page 77 of 77

CERTIFICATION

2
3

I certify that the foregoing is a correct

transcription of the proceedings stenographically recorded by

me in this matter.

6
7
8

S/Yvonne M. Garrison, RPR

YVONNE M. GARRISON, RPR


Official Reporter
U.S.D.C., W.D.N.Y.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

77

Potrebbero piacerti anche