Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Worldwide use of biomass in power generation and combined heat and power schemes
I. M. Arbon
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 2002 216: 41
DOI: 10.1243/095765002760024944
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://pia.sagepub.com/content/216/1/41
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and
Energy can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://pia.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://pia.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://pia.sagepub.com/content/216/1/41.refs.html
41
Abstract: Biomass is a truly renewable, sustainable source of energy; in its rewood form, at least, it has
always been humanitys primary fuel. Nevertheless, it is only in the very recent past that it has been regarded
as a viable substitute in power generation for the fossil fuels that have caused most of the worlds
environmental pollution problems. This paper distinguishes between truly renewable, sustainable sources
of fuel from agricultural sources, i.e. biomass, and the disposal of domestic, urban and hazardous waste in
energy-from-waste (EfW) plants; although these differences may appear to be marginal, and any EfW plant
is of value for power generation, there are particular reasons why the generation of power from genuine
biomass reaps environmental benets.
The bulk of the paper discusses the generation of electric power from a variety of different biomass
substances, some from purpose-grown energy crops but mostly from agricultural residues. While this is
predominantly through conventional combustion systems with steam turbines, more recent experience of both
gasication and pyrolysis, with power generation by other prime movers, such as gas turbines and
reciprocating engines is also covered. The concluding section of the paper looks briey at the relative benets
of combustion, gasication and pyrolysis and what the future is likely to hold for each of these technologies.
Keywords: biomass, renewable energy, gasication, pyrolysis, anaerobic digestion, liquefaction, combined
heat and power (CHP)
INTRODUCTION
Table 1
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
42
I M ARBON
Table 2
CV (MJ/kg)
Coal
Fuel oil
Natural gas
Plastic
MSW
Hospital and clinical waste
Chemical waste
Sewage sludge
Vehicle tyres
Wood
Straw
MBM
Poultry litter
23.032.0
40.045.0
50.055.0
27.034.0
8.511.0
17.522.5
18.523.0
7.013.0 (depending on dryness)
32.040.0
17.020.0
14.015.5
20.028.0 (depending on fat content)
13.014.0
2.1 Combustion
Despite recent advances made in developing the technology
for the other methods discussed below, combustion is still,
by far, the most common method of converting biomass to
usable power. Most of the biomass fuels shown in Table 1
can be used directly as fuel in conventional boiler systems.
Other than rewood, which is humanitys oldest known
fuel, and which is still used today in many parts of the world
as an inefcient fuel for space heating and cooking, sugar
cane waste (bagasse) was the earliest form of biomass to be
converted to usable power. In a cane sugar factory, even
today, bagasse is converted to steam through the conventional process of combustion.
Juice Extraction
Fig. 1
Diagram of main sections of a modern sugar mill. (Reproduced by permission of Fletcher Smith
Limited)
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
Fig. 2
Typical uidized-bed boiler for modern biomass combustion. (Reproduced by permission of Thermax)
43
Table 3
Biomass
Moisture (%)
Ash (%)
CV (MJ/kg)
Bagasse
Bagasse pith
Spent bagasse
Sawdust
Rice husk
Rice straw
De-oiled rice bran
Coffee husk
Peanut shells
Coconut shell
Coir pith
Bamboo dust
Tobacco dust
Cotton stalk
Soya straw
50
40
40
35
1015
6
16
1114
10
10
8
912
8
7
89
12
2
10
2
1520
16
16
25
23
1
15
7
30
3
56
9.2
7.58.4
12.5
11.3
12.613.8
14.7
11.3
15.017.5
16.75
18.8
16.75
7.514.7
11.7
18.4
15.515.9
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
44
I M ARBON
Fig. 3
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
2.3 Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis is the thermal degradation of organic waste in the
absence of oxygen to produce a carbonaceous char, oils and
combustible gases. Although pyrolysis is an age-old
technology (the common and traditional method of manufacturing charcoal, for example), its application to biomass
and waste materials is a relatively recent development
(Fig. 4). An alternative term for pyrolysis is thermolysis,
which is technically more accurate for biomass energy
processes because these systems are usually starved air
rather than the total absence of oxygen. Although all the
products of pyrolysis are useful, the main fuel for power
generation is the pyrolysis oil. Depending on the process,
this oil may be used as liquid fuel for burning in a boiler or as
a substitute for diesel fuel in reciprocating engines. Although
the future for pyrolysis is extremely promising, there is as yet
little direct operating experience with this method.
2.4 Gasication
Gasication differs from pyrolysis in that oxygen in the
form of air, steam or pure oxygen is reacted at high
temperature with the available carbon in the waste to
produce a gas, ash or slag and a tar product. Although the
gasication method is very recent in its application to
biomass and waste materials (Fig. 5), the underlying technology, that of the gasication of coal, is now extremely well
proven. The major benet of gasication of biomass is that
the product gas can be used directly to fuel a gas turbine
Fig. 4
45
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
46
I M ARBON
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
A01701 # IMechE 2002
47
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
48
I M ARBON
Fig. 7
Multistage steam turbine supplied for Cuban sugar industry in 1968. (Reproduced by permission of
Peter Brotherhood Limited)
Fig. 8
A 20 MW steam turbinegenerator using sugar cane bagasse. (Reproduced by permission of Peter Brotherhood Limited)
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
Table 4
49
Ghana
(1988)
Fiji
(1986)
Finland
(1994)
Power (kW)
Inlet pressure (absolute) (bar)
Inlet temperature ( C)
Exhaust pressure (absolute) (bar)
Speed (r/min)
800
9.6
177
0.086
9250
2 6 1250
21.7
316
0.105
9250
3000
42.3
400
0.101
7035
3700
42.0
480
0.65
9000
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
Wisa Forest,
Pietarsaari, Finland
Burlington, Vermont, USA
Ahlstrom
ARBRE Energy,
Eggborough, UK
Mucuri, Bahia, Brazil
Cosenza, Italy
Jonquiere, Canada
Atmospheric indirect
heated FB, CCGT
Downdraught co-current
entrained bed
Atmospheric FB
Atmospheric FB
Atmospheric FB
Pressurized FB
Conversion of coal-red
atmospheric FB plant
Atmospheric CFB
Atmospheric CFB,
CCGT
SRC
SRC (willow)
Waste wood
General biomass
Wood waste
Wood chips
Agricultural waste
Bagasse
Demolition wood
Wood waste
Wood biomass
Waste wood,
woodchips
Wood waste
Biomass feedstock
Process type
CFB, circulating uidized bed; FB, uidized bed; RDF, refuse-derived fuel
TPS
Lurgi
Lurgi (25 million
including
Thermie Grant)
Pyrocycler by
Pyrovac International
Rossano Calabro
(7 million)
TPS
EPI
EPI
EPI
IGT Renugas
Lurgi
Switzerland
Varnarno, Sweden
Ahlstrom
Battelle FERCO
(USA DoE Grant)
DASAG
Site, country
Process company
Table 5
5.8
4.5
3.5
4.5
6.2
4.2
20.0
8.3
6.4
3.0
8.0
4.0
5.0
11.9
6.0
16.0
30.0
5.0
27.3
15.0
0.0
6.0
32.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34.0 (gas
for lime kilns)
40.0
9.0
50
I M ARBON
Fig. 9
51
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
52
I M ARBON
Table 6
Pilas
Coffee Mill
Naranjo
Coffee Mill
450
1.0
500
10001500
300
100
800
1.6
1500
30004500
1000
300
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
Fig. 10
A01701 # IMechE 2002
53
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
54
I M ARBON
Table 7
Plant name
Fibropower
Fibrogen
Fibrothetford
EPRL Elean
Location
County
Plant start-up
Throughput (t/yr)
Power output (MW)
Eye
Suffolk
1992
150 000
12.7
Glanford
Lincolnshire
1993
85 000 (now MBM)
13.5
Thetford
Norfolk
1998
450 000
38.5
Westeld
Scotland
2000
100 000
10.0
Fig. 11
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
Table 8
Resource
Population
Cattle
Pigs
Poultry
Total
12 200 000
7 900 000
124 000 000
55
5 700 000
800 000
1 000 000
8 600 000
6 200 000
900 000
1 100 000
9 400 000
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy
56
I M ARBON
Fiji Electricity Authority did not want to be fully dependent on a supply that may not be totally secure.
3. As far as the suitability of the equipment for the location
is concerned, Fiji is a long way from anywhere and 60 bar
steam requires a high level of water treatment not
currently available on the island and it was felt that a
reaction extraction machine was insufciently robust=
reliable for a sugar factory.
An impulse back-pressure turbine with a separate dump
condenser was selected as this gave the necessary exibility
both to produce power for export and to concentrate on the
core business of sugar production. As a further consideration of exibility it was decided to design the machine for
maximum efciency at 80 per cent of the maximum
continuous rating (MCR) power.
PBL was selected to supply the steam turbo-generator for
the following reasons:
(a) excellent efciency, superior to that available from
competitors from Japan or Germany;
(b) proven track recorda number of similar frames had
been in operation in sugar factories in Australia and
Sudan for almost 25 years;
(c) familiarity with the cane sugar industrythe company
had supplied over 500 machines to sugar factories over a
40 year period.
The cautious approach adopted by FSC has proved to be
well founded as, since installing the two turbo-generator
sets, the Fiji sugar industry has suffered from both a drought
and an excess of rain and the 12 MW machine at Lautoka
has suffered from a major water carry-over causing considerable damage to the rst-stage blades.
At Drassa, not far from Lautoka on Viti Levu, Tropic
Wood produces wood chips and other wood products for
export from sustainable pine forests. The power requirement
of the sawmill is 3000 kW and on installing a condensing
steam turbine generator set, using steam raised by burning
the wood waste, the mill has become totally independent of
the local grid.
As well as being economically desirable the above
schemes are also neutral with regard to greenhouse gases
since the CO2 given off by burning both the bagasse and the
wood waste is absorbed in the growing of the sugar cane and
pine trees.
CONCLUSIONS
57
REFERENCES
1 Arbon, I. M. Power Generation from Biomass, 2001, Publication S764/002/01 (Professional Engineering Publications,
London).
2 Arbon, I. M. and Bowell, R. P. Experience with Power
Generation from Biomass, 2001, Publication S717/024=00
(Professional Engineering Publications, London).
3 New and Renewable EnergyProspects for the 21st Century,
1999 (Department of Trade and Industry, London).
4 McDougall, J., et al. 2020 VisionThe Engineering Challenges of Energy, 1998 (Professional Engineering Publications,
London).
5 Williams, P. T. Waste Treatment and Disposal, 1998 (John
Wiley, Chichester).
6 Mason, R. N. and Sheard, A. G. The Application of Steam
Turbine Plant in Modern Waste to Energy Facilities, 1997
(Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited, London).
7 Arbon, I. M. and Darley, P. C. Generating Electricity from Renewables and Waste, 1998 (Peter Brotherhood, Peterborough).
8 Bowell, R. P. Steam Turbines for the Cane Sugar Industry, 1987
(Peter Brotherhood, Peterborough).
9 Rea, T. Are the chips down for wood-fuelled power? 2000
Electr. Rev. 233(5).
10 Bridgwater, T. A guide to fast pyrolysis of biomass for fuels
and chemicals. PyNe newsletter, Aston University, Birmingham, 1999.
11 Pitcher, K. From willow to wattsthe ARBRE project. In
World Renewables Conference, Brussels, 1999 (Financial
Times Energy=Yorkshire Water).
12 Beis, S. H., Onay, O., Atabay, E., and Kockar, O. M. Pyrolysis
of walnut shell in a xed-bed reactor. In World Renewables
Energy Congress VI, Brighton, 2000 (Anadolu University,
Turkey).
13 Damminger, G. Utilization of Steam Turbines for Electric
Power GenerationIllustrated Through the Example of the
Palm Oil Industry, 1987 (Kuhnle, Kopp and Kausch, Frankenthal).
14 Fraser, J. Case studynancing poultry litter incineration
project. In World Renewables Conference, Brussels, 1999
(Financial Times Energy=Fibrowatt Limited).
15 Anaerobic Digestion of Farm and Food Processing Residues
Good Practice Guidelines, 1997 (Department of Trade and
Industry, London).
16 Arbon, I. M. The compression of fuel gas for turbines, engines
and boilers in co-generation plants. In COGEN 93, Bournemouth, 1993 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers).
17 Institute of Energy. Energy World.
18 Ferrero, G. L. Biomass Gasication, 2000 (Lior International,
Brussels).
19 Jones, J. (Ed), Renewable Energy World (James and James,
London).
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part A: J Power and Energy