Sei sulla pagina 1di 57

Introduction to 3GPP UMTS/LTE

389.168 Advanced Wireless Communications 1

stefan.schwarz@nt.tuwien.ac.at

Contents

1 Historical Development

2 Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

3 Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

4 Summary

Slide 2 / 48

Contents

Contents

1 Historical Development

2 Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

3 Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

4 Summary

Slide 3 / 48

Historical Development

History of UMTS/LTE
Creation of the 3GPP
2G (ETSI)
3G
GSM
1G (analog)
A, B, C Netz

4G

UMTS
GPRS

LTE
LTE advanced

HSPA
EDGE

1991 1997 1998

5G

HSPA+
1999 2004

2007 2009 2010

First generation (1G) cellular networks: analog telephony


Second generation (2G) era: digital networks
Global system for mobile communications (GSM): circuit-switched, time
division multiple access (TDMA), frequency division duplex (FDD)
General packet radio service (GPRS): packet-switched data traffic
Enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE): max. 472 kbit/s through
higher order modulation (8 PSK instead of GMSK)
200 kHz bandwidth
Standardized by the European telecommunications standard institute (ETSI)

Slide 4 / 48

Historical Development

History of UMTS/LTE (2)


Creation of the 3GPP
2G (ETSI)
3G
GSM
1G (analog)
A, B, C Netz

4G

UMTS
GPRS

LTE
LTE advanced

HSPA
EDGE

1991 1997 1998

5G

HSPA+
1999 2004

2007 2009 2010

Worldwide standardization: third generation partnership project (3GPP)


Universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS): release 99
Wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA)
First release: 384 kbit/s
5 MHz bandwidth
High speed packet access (HSPA) and HSPA+ (release 5 and 7)
Up to 4 4 multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)
Up to 20 MHz (carrier aggregation)
Adaptive modulation and coding (AMC)
330 Mbit/s (release 11)
Slide 5 / 48

Historical Development

History of UMTS/LTE (3)


Creation of the 3GPP
2G (ETSI)
3G
GSM
1G (analog)
A, B, C Netz

4G

UMTS
GPRS

LTE
LTE advanced

HSPA
EDGE

1991 1997 1998

5G

HSPA+
1999 2004

2007 2009 2010

UMTS long term evolution (LTE) release 8 (3.75G)


Orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)
Up to 4 4 MIMO
Up to 20 MHz
First release: 300 Mbit/s
LTE advanced release 10 (4G)
Up to 8 8 MIMO
Up to 100 MHz > 1 Gbit/s

Slide 6 / 48

Historical Development

Technology Utilization

10
9

Billion subcribers

8
7

Worldwide subcriptions (Source: Ericsson, June 2013)

LTE
WCDMA/HSPA
GSM/EDGE
CDMA
others

6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2010

2011

2012

2013

2014
Year

2015

2016

2017

2018

GSM still dominates the market


HSPA will become dominant around 2017
LTE still has to gain momentum

Slide 7 / 48

Historical Development

Contents

1 Historical Development

2 Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

3 Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

4 Summary

Slide 8 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE PHY Overview


Modulation and multiple-access
Downlink: orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation
Sharing of subcarriers between users
Advantages: flexibility, efficiency, complexity
Disadvantages: overhead, peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR)
Uplink: single-carrier frequency division multiple access (SCFDMA)
Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)-precoded OFDM
Sharing of consecutive subcarriers between users
Advantage: lower PAPR
Disadvantage: reduced efficiency (multi-user diversity)
7.5 kHz and 15 kHz subcarrier spacing (impact of Doppler spread)
Two cyclic prefix (CP) length (normal/extended 4.7 s/16.7 s @ 15 kHz)
Time division duplex (TDD) and frequency division duplex (FDD) support

Slide 9 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE PHY Overview


Modulation and multiple-access
Downlink: orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation
Sharing of subcarriers between users
Advantages: flexibility, efficiency, complexity
Disadvantages: overhead, peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR)
Uplink: single-carrier frequency division multiple access (SCFDMA)
Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)-precoded OFDM
Sharing of consecutive subcarriers between users
Advantage: lower PAPR
Disadvantage: reduced efficiency (multi-user diversity)
7.5 kHz and 15 kHz subcarrier spacing (impact of Doppler spread)
Two cyclic prefix (CP) length (normal/extended 4.7 s/16.7 s @ 15 kHz)
Time division duplex (TDD) and frequency division duplex (FDD) support

Slide 9 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE PHY Overview


Modulation and multiple-access
Downlink: orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation
Sharing of subcarriers between users
Advantages: flexibility, efficiency, complexity
Disadvantages: overhead, peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR)
Uplink: single-carrier frequency division multiple access (SCFDMA)
Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)-precoded OFDM
Sharing of consecutive subcarriers between users
Advantage: lower PAPR
Disadvantage: reduced efficiency (multi-user diversity)
7.5 kHz and 15 kHz subcarrier spacing (impact of Doppler spread)
Two cyclic prefix (CP) length (normal/extended 4.7 s/16.7 s @ 15 kHz)
Time division duplex (TDD) and frequency division duplex (FDD) support

Slide 9 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE PHY Overview (2)


Channel coding and modulation-alphabets
Mother channel code: rate 1/3 Turbo code
Puncturing and repetition to obtain code rates between 0.08 and 0.93
Strong interleaving for robustness against error bursts
24 bit cyclic redundancy check (CRC) for error detection
Hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) with soft-combining
Quadratur amplitude modulation (QAM) symbol alphabets
4/16/64 QAM (256 is considered)
Bit-interleaved coded-modulation (BICM) architecture

channel
coding
data bits

Slide 10 / 48

bit
interleaving
coded bits

modulation
mapping

interleaved bits

modulated symbols

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE PHY Overview (3)


spatial multiplexing

diversity
error probability

beamforming
receive power

MIMO key data


Supported MIMO schemes
Transmit diversity
Beamforming
Spatial multiplexing
Antenna configurations
Up to eight base station antennas (LTE-A Rel. 10, before up to four)
Downlink: up to eight (four) spatial streams (layers)
Uplink: up to four (one) spatial streams
See [Dahlman et al., 2011, Rupp, 2012] for details on the PHY
Slide 11 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

OFDM Processing
(I)DFT... (inverse) discrete Fourier transform
CP... cyclic prefix

h[n,k]
OFDM-TX
x[n,k]

x[1,k]

OFDM-RX

IDFT + CP

x[N,k]

-CP + DFT
h[1,k]

subcarriers n

subcarriers n

h[N,k]

y[n,k]

y[1,k]

y[N,k]

subcarriers n

Transmit symbol on OFDM subcarrier n at OFDM symbol k : x[n, k ] C


Channel gain on subcarrier n at symbol k: h[n, k] C
Noisy input-output relationship
y[n, k] = h[n, k]x[n, k] + z[n, k]

(1)

Receiver noise z[n, k] C

Slide 12 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

OFDM Processing (2)

Implicit assumptions:
Perfect timing and frequency synchronization
synchronization signals: 0.2 % 3 % overhead in LTE
Sufficient CP length
normal/extended CP: 7 % 25 % overhead in LTE
Negligible temporal channel variation during OFDM symbols ( 72 s)

If one of these is violated:


Inter-carrier interference
Inter-symbol interference
(Can be considered in the noise)

For details, please visit 389.133 Wireless OFDM Systems

Slide 13 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

MIMO-OFDM
OFDM-TX

OFDM-RX
H[n,k]

IDFT + CP

-CP + DFT

x[n,k]

y[n,k]
IDFT + CP

-CP + DFT
Nt

Nr

Transmit symbol vector on subcarrier n at symbol k


h
iT
x[n, k] = x (1) [n, k], . . . , x (Nt ) [n, k]

(2)

Channel matrix: H[n, k] CNr Nt

h(1,1) [n, k]
h(2,1) [n, k]

H[n, k] =
..

.
h(Nr ,1) [n, k]

h(1,2) [n, k]
h(2,2) [n, k]
..
.
h(Nr ,2) [n, k]

...
...

...

h(1,Nt ) [n, k ]
h(2,Nt ) [n, k ]
..
.
h(Nr ,Nt ) [n, k ]

(3)

Noisy input-output relationship


y[n, k] = H[n, k]x[n, k] + z[n, k] CNr 1

Slide 14 / 48

(4)

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Frame Structure (FDD)


1 frame: 10 ms
1 subframe: 1ms
1

10

14 OFDM symbols
1

slot 1

slot 2

The subframe duration (1 ms) is the basic transmission time interval (TTI)
Each subframe is processed individually
e.g., the user-data within each subframe is jointly channel coded
The frame is used to organize the allocation of subframes to traffic channels
Physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH)
Physical broadcast channel (PBCH)
Physical multicast channel (PMCH)
...

Slide 15 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Time-Frequency Grid

12 subcarriers
180 kHz (15 kHz subcarrier spacing)

......

subframe: 1ms
14 OFDM symbols

freq

......
slot (0.5ms)

......
e

tim

one resource block

one resource
element

Resource element (RE): one subcarrier during one OFDM symbol


Resource block (RB): 7 OFDM symbols in time, 12 subcarriers in frequency
Slot: 7 OFDM symbols over the full bandwidth
Subframe: two slots in time over the full bandwidth

Slide 16 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

resource block

fre
qu
en
c

Resource Allocation

space

spatial streams
or layers

time
UE 1

UE 2

UE 3

Based on (multiples of) RBs


Handled by the scheduler
Exploit multi-user diversity: double-logarithmic rate-growth with the number
of users for independent fading [Viswanath, 2006]
Fulfill quality of service (QoS) requirements (max. delay, min. rate)
Potentially varying over space, time and frequency

Slide 17 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Downlink Transmit Signal Processing Chain


Adaptive modulation and coding
channel
coding
interleaving
scrambling
user data bits

resource element
mapping

precoded signal

modulation
mapping

coded bits
up to 2 codewords

Transmit signal
composition

MIMO processing
layer
mapping
(+pilot insertion)

modulated symbols

precoding

spatial streams
up to 8 layers

precoded signal
Nt dimensional

other users signals


multi-user
multiplexing
+ pilot insertion

wireless
channel

IDFT/CP
+ RF

user transmit signal

transmit signal
Nt dimensional

AMC: 15 combinations of code rates and modulation alphabets are supported


(0.15 bit/symbol 5.55 bit/symbol)
Scrambling: inter-cell interference whitening
Pilot insertion for channel sounding and channel estimation
Channel state information (CSI) calculation for AMC and MIMO
Channel equalization and data detection

Slide 18 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Downlink Receive Signal Processing Chain

wireless
channel

user signal
and pilot
extraction

RF +
DFT/CP

receive signal
Nr dimensional

equalization

channel
estimation
+ feedback
calculation

data detection
+ symbol
demapping

descrambling
deinterleaving
decoding
HARQ combining

CRC check
ACK/NACK

spatial streams
up to 8 layers

estimated user
data bits

coded bits
up to 2 codewords

Channel estimation: estimate the channel matrices using pilot signals


Equalization: invert the distortions of the channel (per subcarrier)
Data detection: soft/hard symbol detection (log-likelihood ratios)
HARQ combining in case of retransmission

Slide 19 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Downlink Performance


100

SISO_1.4MHz_AWGN_TU

SISO_AWGN

8
Shannon capacity

Spectral efficiency [bit/s/Hz]

Block error ratio

10-1

10-2

BICM 64 capacity

5
BICM 16 capacity

4
3

BICM 4 capacity

LTE efficiency

2
1

MCS1
10-3
-10
-5

MCS15
0

5
10
SNR [dB]

15

20

25

-6 -4 -2

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
SNR [dB]

Transmission over single-input single-output (SISO) additive white Gaussian


noise (AWGN) channel
Performance of LTEs 15 modulation and coding schemes (MCSs)
No imperfections considered (channel estimation, synchronization)
Shannon capacity: log2 (1 + SNR)
BICM capacity [Caire et al., 1996]

Slide 20 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Downlink Reference Signals


antenna port 0
antenna port 1

antenna port 2
antenna port 3
four antennas
two antennas

time

frequency

frequency

frequency

one antenna

time

time

Two types of reference signals:


Non-precoded reference signals (cell-specific, sounding)
Precoded reference signals (UE-specific, demodulation)
Employed for channel sounding and estimation
Pilot-symbols are known to users
Pilots are non-overlapping in time/frequency
Channel distortions can be estimated

Slide 21 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Downlink Channel Estimation [Simko, 2013]

channel

0.5

pilot 2
0
10

pilot 3

data symbol
10
pilot 1

5
subcarrier index
0

5
OFDM symbol index

Least squares channel estimation plus linear interpolation (triangulation)


LS [np , kp ] = y[np , kp ]
h
r [np , kp ]

(5)

r [np , kp ] reference symbol at pilot position [np , kp ]


Linear minimum squared error channel estimation

2 

LMMSE = ALMMSE h
LS
LMMSE
min E h h
, subject to h
2

(6)

Requires second-order channel and noise statistics


Slide 22 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTE Downlink Channel Estimation [Simko, 2013]

channel

0.5

pilot 2
0
10

pilot 3

data symbol
10
pilot 1

5
subcarrier index
0

5
OFDM symbol index

Least squares channel estimation plus linear interpolation (triangulation)


LS [np , kp ] = y[np , kp ]
h
r [np , kp ]

(5)

r [np , kp ] reference symbol at pilot position [np , kp ]


Linear minimum squared error channel estimation

2 

LMMSE = ALMMSE h
LS
LMMSE
min E h h
, subject to h
2

(6)

Requires second-order channel and noise statistics


Slide 22 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

Performance of Channel Estimation employing LTEs Reference


Signals [Simko, 2013]
Doppler frequency

Doppler frequency

100

100

1200 Hz

10-1

10-1

1000 Hz

600 Hz

10-2

MSE

MSE

800 Hz
1200 Hz

10-2

1000 Hz

400 Hz

800 Hz
600 Hz

200 Hz

10-3

0 Hz

10-3

400 Hz
200 Hz

10-4

10

15
SNR [dB]

20

25

Least squares channel estimator

30

10-4

10

15
SNR [dB]

20

25

0 Hz

30

Linear minimum mean-squared error channel estimator

Channel estimation for a noisy SISO channel


Performance degradation with increasing channel Doppler frequency fd due to
growing channel variation in time
Corresponding speed v at center frequency fc
v=

Slide 23 / 48

c
fd ,
fc

e.g. fc = 2 GHz, fd = 500 Hz v = 270 km/h

(7)

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTEs HARQ Protocol


original code block

} equal retransmissions
combined bits
punctured bits
reconstructed code block (chase combining)
original code block

different
versions

combined bits
reconstructed code block (incremental redundancy)

Fast PHY/MAC retransmission using ACK/NACK feedback


Higher layers not involved (transparent, reduced delay/latency)
Two possible types:
Chase combining (repetition gain)
Incremental redundancy (coding gain and repetition gain)
LTE employs incremental redundancy with soft combining
Slide 24 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTEs HARQ Protocol Performance [Colom-Ikuno, 2013]


10 0

10% BLER

.. . .

5.7 dB

BLER

10 1

HARQ
gain

2.5 dB
10 2

10 3
10

m=0
m=1
m=2
m=3
5

1.4 dB

0
5
SNR [dB]

10

15

Improvement of block error ratio (BLER) with retransmissions due to bit


repetitions and code rate reduction
Up to three retransmissions are supported in LTE

Slide 25 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

Simplified System Model


F1
precoding
s1
Fu
precoding

Hu

Gu

equalization

su

s^u

yu

FU
precoding
sU

Assume perfect operation of OFDM and consider a specific RE [n, k]


Omit channel coding and modulation mapping
Neglect channel estimation errors, synchronization errors, etc.

u = Gu Hu Fu su + Gu Hu
s

U
X

Fj sj + Gu zu ,

(8)

j=1,j6=u

Gu CLu Nr , Hu CNr Nt , Fu CNt Lu

(9)

The noise zu also contains interference from other base stations

Slide 26 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTEs Transmission Modes


PDP

IDFT
CDD

+ CP

+ CP

frequency response

Single antenna transmission (Nt = 1), single user U = 1, single stream Lu = 1

su = gH
u hu su + zu ,

gu , hu CNr 1

(10)

Transmit diversity (Nt > 1), U = 1, Lu = 1


Alamouti space-time (-frequency) coding [Alamouti, 1998]
Open-loop spatial multiplexing (Nt > 1), U = 1, Lu 1
Cyclic delay diversity (CDD) precoding
transforms spatial diversity to frequency diversity
Slide 27 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

LTEs Transmission Modes (2)


UE1

UE2

Antenna gain

6
4
2
0
0

45

90
135
Steering Angle []

180

Closed-loop spatial multiplexing (Nt > 1), U = 1, Lu 1


Adaptive precoding utilizing CSI feedback
Adaptive transmission rank (layers) beamforming vs. multiplexing
Multi-user MIMO (Nt > 1), U = 2, Lu = 1
Based on predefined precoders (codebook)
Powerful receivers required to cancel residual inter-user interference
Details to come...
Slide 28 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

Performance Comparison of LTEs Single-User Transmission Modes

average user throughput [Mbit/s]

10

8
4x2 CLSM

2x2 OLSM

1x1 SISO
2x2 TxD

0
-10

10

SNR [dB]

20

30

40

Transmission over independent Rayleigh fading channels


Saturation at high signal to noise ratio (SNR) due to limitation to 64 QAM
(6 bit/symbol)
Different saturation values because of growing reference symbol overhead with
increasing number of transmit antennas

Slide 29 / 48

Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

Contents

1 Historical Development

2 Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

3 Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

4 Summary

Slide 30 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

Reasons for Further Enhancements

Global traffic [Exabytes/month]

15

12

Global traffic voice and data (Source: Ericsson, June 2013)

Data: mobile PCs, tablets, mobile routers


Data: smartphones
Voice

0
2010

2011

2012

2013

2014
Year

2015

2016

2017

2018

Estimated growth of mobile traffic (1 Exabyte = 1018 bytes); source: Ericsson traffic exploration tool, June 2013

Mobile data traffic in 2012 was twelve times the size of the Internet in 2000
Average smart phone usage grew 81 percent in 2012
Smart phones represented only 18 percent of total global handsets in use in
2012, but represented 92 percent of total global handset traffic
[Cisco Systems Inc., 2013, Ericsson, 2013]

Slide 31 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Enhanced MIMO


Higher-order single-user MIMO
Improved peak spectral efficiency: up to eight spatial streams
Gains in cell edge spectral efficiency: high signal to interference and noise ratio
(SINR) through beamforming
Support of uplink single-user MIMO (up to four streams)
Reduced reference signal overhead (UE-specific vs. cell-specific)

Improved multi-user MIMO


Non-codebook based precoding
Up to eight users in parallel
Improved CSI feedback using nested codebooks
e.g., given a valid rank 2 precoder F = [f1 , f2 ] CNt 2
f1 , f2 CNt 1 are valid rank 1 precoders

Slide 32 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Carrier Aggregation

frequency band 1 (800 MHz)

1.4 MHz 1.4 MHz

scenario A

frequency band 2 (2 GHz)

1.4 MHz

scenario B

5 MHz

scenario C

Enables up to 100 MHz bandwidth


Better utilization of fragmented spectrum
Contiguous/non-contiguous aggregation
Inter-/Intra-band aggregation

Slide 33 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Carrier Aggregation Scenarios

F1

F1

F2

F2

F1
F2

Base station
Remote radio unit
Low-latency high-bandwidth connection

Cover the same area peak capacity enhancement


Potentially different coverage area depending on carrier frequency
Cover each others cell-edge cell edge improvement
Hot-spot coverage using remote radio heads (RRHs)
Slide 34 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Relaying

coverage improvement
Base station

Relay node

User

cell-edge improvement

Provide coverage in dead zones and improve cell-edge performance


In-band versus out-band relays
Layer 1 relays: amplify and forward
Layer 2 relays: decode and forward
Layer 3 relays: appear to users as ordinary cells

Slide 35 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Coordinated Multipoint Transmission/Reception


Coordinated scheduling:
Time/frequency sharing
Dynamic point selection
Inter-cell interference coordination
ICIC (Rel. 8), eICIC (Rel. 10), FeICIC (Rel. 11)

Advantage: low overhead (control info)

Coordinated beamforming:
Spatial interference mitigation
Signal to leakage and noise ratio (SLNR)
[Sadek et al., 2007]
Advantage: good trade-off (CSI only)

Coordinated
scheduling

Joint transmission:
Exploitation of interference
Distributed antenna system
Advantage: potentially highest
performance
Disadvantage: overhead (CSI and data)

Slide 36 / 48

Base station

User

X2 interface or low-latency high-bandwidth dedicated connection

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Coordinated Multipoint Transmission/Reception


Coordinated scheduling:
Time/frequency sharing
Dynamic point selection
Inter-cell interference coordination
ICIC (Rel. 8), eICIC (Rel. 10), FeICIC (Rel. 11)

Advantage: low overhead (control info)

Coordinated beamforming:
Spatial interference mitigation
Signal to leakage and noise ratio (SLNR)
[Sadek et al., 2007]
Advantage: good trade-off (CSI only)

Coordinated
scheduling
Coordinated
beamforming

Joint transmission:
Exploitation of interference
Distributed antenna system
Advantage: potentially highest
performance
Disadvantage: overhead (CSI and data)

Slide 36 / 48

Base station

User

X2 interface or low-latency high-bandwidth dedicated connection

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: Coordinated Multipoint Transmission/Reception


Coordinated scheduling:
Time/frequency sharing
Dynamic point selection
Inter-cell interference coordination
ICIC (Rel. 8), eICIC (Rel. 10), FeICIC (Rel. 11)

Joint
transmission

Advantage: low overhead (control info)

Coordinated beamforming:
Spatial interference mitigation
Signal to leakage and noise ratio (SLNR)
[Sadek et al., 2007]
Advantage: good trade-off (CSI only)

Coordinated
scheduling
Coordinated
beamforming

Joint transmission:
Exploitation of interference
Distributed antenna system
Advantage: potentially highest
performance
Disadvantage: overhead (CSI and data)

Slide 36 / 48

Base station

User

X2 interface or low-latency high-bandwidth dedicated connection

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: CoMP Scenarios

Base station

Remote radio unit

Access point

User

Low-latency high-bandwidth connection

Slide 37 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: CoMP Scenarios

Scenario 1: Intra-site CoMP

Base station

Remote radio unit

Access point

User

Low-latency high-bandwidth connection

Slide 37 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: CoMP Scenarios

Scenario 1: Intra-site CoMP


Scenario 2: Inter-site CoMP

Base station

Remote radio unit

Access point

User

Low-latency high-bandwidth connection

Slide 37 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: CoMP Scenarios

Scenario 1: Intra-site CoMP


Scenario 2: Inter-site CoMP
Scenario 3: HetNet CoMP 1 (different cell-IDs, small cells)

Base station

Remote radio unit

Access point

User

Low-latency high-bandwidth connection

Slide 37 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

LTE-A Enhancements: CoMP Scenarios

Scenario 1: Intra-site CoMP


Scenario 2: Inter-site CoMP
Scenario 3: HetNet CoMP 1 (different cell-IDs, small cells)
Scenario 4: HetNet CoMP 2 (same cell-IDs, RRHs and relays)

Base station

Remote radio unit

Access point

User

Low-latency high-bandwidth connection

Slide 37 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

Potential Future Technologies

Significant bandwidth expansions cannot be expected in the near future


Possible long-term solution Millimeter Waves
[Rappaport et al., 2013] (30 300 GHz 1 10 mm)
Increasing the network density
Heterogeneous networks [Andrews, 2013]
Inter-cell interference coordination
Potential PHY improvements with massive MIMO [Marzetta, 2010]
Hundreds to thousands of antennas per base station
Space division multiple access (SDMA)
Inter-cell interference mitigation/exploitation

More details in Prof. Rupps part

Slide 38 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

Potential Future Technologies: Full-Duplex Wireless


RX

TX

Control
Feedback

Attenuation
& Delay

RSSI

RF Reference

Balun

Balun Cancellation
RF

Baseband

Baseband

RF

DAC

ADC
Digital Interference Cancellation
-

Digital Interference
Reference
Channel
Estimate

Decoder
TX Signal Path

Encoder
RX Signal Path

[Jain et al., 2011]

Analog self-interference cancellation to avoid radio frequency (RF) amplifier and


analog to digital converter (ADC) overload
Digital cancellation of residual interference
Gain: factor 2
May help solving the CSI problematic
Slide 39 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

Potential Future Technologies: Filter Bank Multicarrier Modulation


10
0
-10

OFDM

FBMC

FBMC
IDFT

digital
filters

Power [dBW]

+ CP

OFDM
OFDM

FBMC

-20

IDFT

-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90

10

15

Frequency [MHz]
Source: ICT-PHYDYAS, FP7 project

Avoid cyclic prefix overhead of OFDM


Reduce the side-lobes of OFDM to shrink the required guard bands
improve spectral efficiency
Digital filter design based on Nyquist criterion to avoid inter-carrier interference
Higher complexity: inter-symbol interference, equalization

Slide 40 / 48

Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

Contents

1 Historical Development

2 Description of the LTE Downlink PHY

3 Enhancements of Legacy LTE LTE-Advanced

4 Summary

Slide 41 / 48

Summary

Summary
?

Evolution TDMA WCDMA OFDMA FBMC


UMTS/LTE physical layer:
OFDMA modulation and multiple access
Channel coding based on rate 1/3 Turbo code
AMC utilizing BICM architecture
Fast HARQ retransmissions
MIMO beamforming/diversity/multiplexing
LTE-A enhancements:
Multi-user MIMO
Carrier aggregation
Relaying, CoMP
Potential enabling technologies for 5G cellular:
Millimeter wave
Network densification
Massive MIMO
Slide 42 / 48

Summary

Introduction to 3GPP UMTS/LTE


389.168 Advanced Wireless Communications 1

stefan.schwarz@nt.tuwien.ac.at

Abbreviations I
3GPP third generation partnership project
ADC analog to digital converter
AMC adaptive modulation and coding
AWGN additive white Gaussian noise
BICM bit-interleaved coded-modulation
BLER block error ratio
CDD cyclic delay diversity
CoMP coordinated multipoint transmission/reception
CP cyclic prefix
CRC cyclic redundancy check
CSI channel state information
DFT discrete Fourier transform
EDGE enhanced data rates for GSM evolution
ETSI European telecommunications standard institute
FBMC filter bank multicarrier modulation
FDD frequency division duplex
GPRS general packet radio service
GSM global system for mobile communications
Slide 44 / 48

Abbreviations

Abbreviations II
HARQ hybrid automatic repeat request
HSPA high speed packet access
LTE long term evolution
MAC medium access control
MCS modulation and coding scheme
MIMO multiple-input multiple-output
OFDM orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
OFDMA orthogonal frequency division multiple access
PAPR peak-to-average power ratio
PHY physical layer
QAM quadratur amplitude modulation
QoS quality of service
RB resource block
RE resource element
RF radio frequency
RRH remote radio head
SCFDMA single-carrier frequency division multiple access
SDMA space division multiple access
SINR signal to interference and noise ratio
Slide 45 / 48

Abbreviations

Abbreviations III

SISO single-input single-output


SNR signal to noise ratio
TDD time division duplex
TDMA time division multiple access
TTI transmission time interval
UMTS universal mobile telecommunications system
WCDMA wideband code division multiple access

Slide 46 / 48

Abbreviations

References I
Alamouti, S. (1998).
A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications.
IEEE journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16, issue 8.
Andrews, J. (2013).
Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift.
IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(3):136144.
Caire, G., Taricco, G., and Biglieri, E. (1996).
Capacity of bit-interleaved channels.
Electron. Lett., 32, issue 12:10601061.
Cisco Systems Inc. (2013).
Cisco visual networking index: forecast update, 2012-2017.
white paper.
Colom-Ikuno, J. (2013).
System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink.
PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology.
J. (2011).
Dahlman, E., Parkvall, S., and Skold,
4G LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband.
Elsevier Academic Press.
Ericsson (2013).
Ericsson mobility report.
white paper.

Slide 47 / 48

References

References II
Jain, M., Choi, J. I., Kim, T., Bharadia, D., Seth, S., Srinivasan, K., Levis, P., Katti, S., and Sinha, P. (2011).
Practical, real-time, full duplex wireless.
In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom
11, pages 301312, New York, USA. ACM.
Marzetta, T. (2010).
Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas.
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(11):35903600.
Rappaport, T., Sun, S., Mayzus, R., Zhao, H., Azar, Y., Wang, K., Wong, G., Schulz, J., Samimi, M., and
Gutierrez, F. (2013).
Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work!
IEEE Access, 1:335349.
Rupp, M. (2012).
Robust design of adaptive equalizers.
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(4):1612 1626.
Sadek, M., Tarighat, A., and Sayed, A. (2007).
A leakage-based precoding scheme for downlink multi-user MIMO channels.
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(5):17111721.
Simko, M. (2013).
Pilot Pattern Optimization for Doubly Selective MIMO OFDM Transmissions.
PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology.
Viswanath, P. (2006).
Opportunistic communication: a system view.
In Space-Time Wireless Systems, pages 426442. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge Books Online.

Slide 48 / 48

References

Potrebbero piacerti anche