Rubric for Evaluating Poster-Slogans

Group Name

Criteria

Evaluator

Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

The poster
includes all
required
elements as well
as additional
information.
The poster is
exceptionally
attractive in
terms of design,
layout, and
neatness.

All required
elements are
included on the
poster.

Only few
required
elements are
missing on the
poster.

Several
required
elements are
missing on
the poster.

The poster is
attractive in
terms of design,
layout and
neatness.

The poster is
acceptably
attractive
though it may
be a bit messy.

Slogan

The slogan has

the required
number of
words. It is
original and
catchy.

The slogan has

the required
number of
words. It is
original but not
catchy.

GraphicsRelevanvce

All graphics are

related to the
topic and make
it easier to
understand. All
borrowed
graphics have
note about their
source.

All graphics are

related to the
topic and most
make it easier
to understand.
Some graphics
have a note
about their
source.

The slogan
does not
follow the
required
number of
words.
However, it is
catchy but not
original.
All graphics
relate to the
topic. One or
two borrowed
graphics have
sources noted.

The poster is
distractingly
messy or
very poorly
designed. It
is not
attractive.
The slogan
does not
follow the
required
number of
words. It is
not original
and catchy.

Required
Elements

Attrativeness

Graphics do
not relate to
the topic or
several
borrowed
graphics do
not have a
source
citation.

Score

Label

All items of
importance on
the poster are
clearly labeled
and can be read
from at least 3 ft.
away.

Almost all
items of
importance on
the poster are
clearly labeled
and can be read
from at least 3
ft. away.
There are 1-2
grammatically/
spelling
mistakes on the
poster.

Mechanics

There are no
grammatical/
spelling
mistakes on the
poster.

Presentation

The presenter
has prepared and
rehearsed his/her
presentation.
He/She speaks
clearly and
smoothly in an
engaging way.

The presenter
has prepared
and rehearsed
his/her
presentation.
He/She speaks
clearly.

Teamwork

The result of the

task documents
division of
responsibilities
and describes
how the
individual
efforts
capitalized on
strengths of each
team member. It
shows evidence
of good

The result of
the task
documents how
members
divided tasks,
assigned roles
based on the
skills/ talents of
individual
members.
However, it
shows evidence
of poor

Many items of
importance on
the poster are
clearly labeled
and can be
read from at
least 3 ft.
away.
There are 3-4
grammatical/
spelling
mistakes on
the poster.

Labels are
too small to
view or no
important
items were
labeled.

There are
more than 4
grammatical/
spelling
mistakes on
the poster.
The presenter
The
is somewhat
presenter has
prepared, but
not prepared
he/she should
at all. He/she
have spent
has not
more time
rehearsed
rehearsing.
his/her
He/She
presentation.
delivers the
He/She often
presentation
forgets what
but he/she
he/she is
sometimes
doing and
forgets what
loses the
he/she is doing audiences
or loses the
attention.
audiences
attention
The result of
The result of
the task
the task
documents that documents
only few
that one
members are
student is
doing the
doing most
work. It shows of the work.
evidence of
It shows
poor
evidence of
communicatio poor
n, unresolved
communicati
conflict, or
on,
failure to
unresolved

communication,
resolved
conflict, or sense
of collaboration
on important
aspects of the
work.

communication,
unresolved
conflict, or
failure to
collaborate on
important
aspects of the
work.

collaborate on
important
aspects of the
work.

conflict, or
failure to
collaborate
on important
aspects of
the work.

TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------______/40

Comments and Suggestions